Fisheries of the Exclusive Economic Zone off Alaska; Application for an Exempted Fishing Permit, 29741-29743 [2014-12021]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 100 / Friday, May 23, 2014 / Notices
Comments submitted in response to
this notice will be summarized and/or
included in the request for OMB
approval of this information collection;
they also will become a matter of public
record.
Dated: May 20, 2014.
Gwellnar Banks,
Management Analyst, Office of the Chief
Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 2014–11990 Filed 5–22–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–HE–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
Proposed Information Collection;
Comment Request; Non-commercial
Permit and Reporting Requirements in
the Main Hawaiian Islands Bottomfish
Fishery
National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration,
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
I. Abstract
Regulations at 50 CFR 665, Subpart C,
require that all participants (including
vessel owners, operators, and crew) in
the boat-based non-commercial
bottomfish fishery in the Exclusive
Economic Zone around the main
Hawaiian Islands obtain a federal
bottomfish permit. This collection of
information is needed for permit
issuance, to identify actual or potential
participants in the fishery, determine
18:44 May 22, 2014
Jkt 232001
or other forms of information
technology.
Comments submitted in response to
this notice will be summarized and/or
included in the request for OMB
approval of this information collection;
they also will become a matter of public
record.
Dated: May 20, 2014
Gwellnar Banks,
Management Analyst, Office of the Chief
Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 2014–11997 Filed 5–22–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–12–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
RIN 0648–XD257
Fisheries of the Exclusive Economic
Zone off Alaska; Application for an
Exempted Fishing Permit
Documents may be submitted by mail
or online.
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice; public comment on an
application for exempted fishing permit.
III. Data
SUMMARY:
II. Method of Collection
The Department of
Commerce, as part of its continuing
effort to reduce paperwork and
respondent burden, invites the general
public and other Federal agencies to
take this opportunity to comment on
proposed and/or continuing information
collections, as required by the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DATES: Written comments must be
submitted on or before July 22, 2014.
ADDRESSES: Direct all written comments
to Jennifer Jessup, Departmental
Paperwork Clearance Officer,
Department of Commerce, Room 6616,
14th and Constitution Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20230 (or via the
Internet at JJessup@doc.gov).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Requests for additional information or
copies of the information collection
instrument and instructions should be
directed to Walter Ikehara, (808) 725–
5175, or Walter.Ikehara@noaa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
qualifications for permits, and to help
measure the impacts of management
controls on the participants in the
fishery. The permit program is also an
effective tool in the enforcement of
fishery regulations and serves as a link
between the National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS) and fishermen.
Regulations at 50 CFR 665 require that
all vessel owners or operators in this
fishery are required to submit a
completed logbook form at the
completion of each fishing trip. These
logbook reporting sheets document the
species and amount of species caught
during the trip. The reporting
requirements are crucial to ensure that
NMFS and the Western Pacific Fishery
Management Council (Council) will be
able to monitor the fishery and have
fishery-dependent information to
develop an Annual Catch Limit for the
fishery, evaluate the effectiveness of
management measures, determine
whether changes in fishery management
programs are necessary, and estimate
the impacts and implications of
alternative management measures.
29741
OMB Control Number: 0648–0577.
Form Number: None.
Type of Review: Regular submission
(extension of a current information
collection).
Affected Public: Individuals or small
businesses.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
100.
Estimated Time per Response: 10
minutes per permit application; 2 hours
per appeal of denied permit; 20 minutes
per trip report logsheet.
Estimated Total Annual Burden
Hours: 102.
Estimated Total Annual Cost to
Public: $4,330.
IV. Request for Comments
Comments are invited on: (a) Whether
the proposed collection of information
is necessary for the proper performance
of the functions of the agency, including
whether the information shall have
practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden
(including hours and cost) of the
proposed collection of information; (c)
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and (d) ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on respondents, including through the
use of automated collection techniques
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
AGENCY:
This notice announces receipt
of an application and the public
comment period for an exempted
fishing permit (EFP) from Mr. John
Gauvin of Gauvin and Associates, LLC.
If granted, this permit would allow the
applicant to continue the development
and testing of a salmon excluder device
for the Bering Sea pollock trawl fishery.
This activity is intended to promote the
objectives of the Fishery Management
Plan for Groundfish of the Bering Sea
and Aleutian Islands Management Area
(FMP) by reducing salmon bycatch in
the Bering Sea pollock trawl fishery.
DATES: Submit comments on or before
June 23, 2014. Interested persons may
comment on the EFP application and on
the environmental assessment (EA)
during the North Pacific Fishery
Management Council (Council) meeting
June 2 through June 10, 2014, in Nome,
AK.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
on this document, identified by FDMS
Docket Number NOAA–NMFS–2014–
0050, by any of the following methods:
• Electronic Submission: Submit all
electronic public comments via the
Federal e-Rulemaking Portal. Go to
www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=
NOAA-NMFS-2014-0050, click the
‘‘Comment Now!’’ icon, complete the
required fields, and enter or attach your
comments.
E:\FR\FM\23MYN1.SGM
23MYN1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
29742
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 100 / Friday, May 23, 2014 / Notices
• Mail: Submit written comments to
Glenn Merrill, Assistant Regional
Administrator, Sustainable Fisheries
Division, Alaska Region NMFS, Attn:
Ellen Sebastian. Mail comments to P.O.
Box 21668, Juneau, AK 99802–1668.
Instructions: Comments sent by any
other method, to any other address or
individual, or received after the end of
the comment period, may not be
considered by NMFS. All comments
received are a part of the public record
and will generally be posted for public
viewing on www.regulations.gov
without change. All personal identifying
information (e.g., name, address),
confidential business information, or
otherwise sensitive information
submitted voluntarily by the sender will
be publicly accessible. NMFS will
accept anonymous comments (enter
‘‘N/A’’ in the required fields if you wish
to remain anonymous). Attachments to
electronic comments will be accepted in
Microsoft Word, Excel, or Adobe PDF
file formats only.
Electronic copies of the Secretarial
Review Draft Environmental
Assessment For Issuing an Exempted
Fishing Permit for the Purpose of
Testing a Salmon Excluder Device in the
Eastern Bering Sea Pollock Fishery, May
2014, prepared for this action are
available from https://
www.regulations.gov or from the NMFS
Alaska Region Web site at https://
alaskafisheries.noaa.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeff
Hartman, 907–586–7442.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: NMFS
manages the domestic groundfish
fisheries in the Bering Sea and Aleutian
Islands Management Area (BSAI) under
the FMP. The Council prepared the FMP
under the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act.
Regulations governing the groundfish
fisheries of the BSAI appear at 50 CFR
parts 600 and 679. The FMP and the
implementing regulations at
§§ 600.745(b) and 679.6 authorize
issuance of EFPs to allow fishing that
would otherwise be prohibited.
Procedures for issuing EFPs are
contained in the implementing
regulations.
NMFS received an application for an
EFP from Mr. Gauvin in December 2013.
The purposes of the EFP project would
be to improve the performance of the
salmon excluder device developed
under EFP 11–01 from 2011 to 2012,
and to validate the performance of this
device for pollock trawl gear used in the
BSAI. The EFP project would focus on
testing a redesigned excluder device to
reduce chum salmon and Chinook
salmon bycatch and refine the device for
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:44 May 22, 2014
Jkt 232001
use on trawl vessels fishing for
groundfish. The goal is to develop a
device for pollock trawl gear that
reduces salmon bycatch without
significantly lowering pollock catch
rates. Salmon are prohibited species that
are incidentally caught in the pollock
fishery (§ 679.21(e) and (f)).
The EFP would allow for testing of
the salmon excluder device from
January 2015 through June 2016, for
several weeks in each pollock A and B
season. Testing in each season would
allow the device to be used under
salmon occurrence and pollock fishing
practices specific to each season.
Testing in the A season would catch
primarily Chinook salmon and roebearing pollock, while testing in the B
season would catch Chinook and chum
salmon and pollock that are not likely
to be roe-bearing. EFP fishing would be
conducted by one to two vessels in each
season.
To test the salmon excluder device,
exemptions would be necessary from
regulations for salmon bycatch
management, observer requirements,
closure areas, total allowable catch
amounts (TACs) for groundfish, and
prohibited species catch (PSC) limits for
the pollock fishery. Taking salmon
during the experiment is crucial for
determining the effectiveness of the
device. Salmon taken during the
experiment would not be counted
toward the Chinook and chum salmon
PSC limits under § 679.21(e)(1)(vii),
(e)(3)(i)(A)(3), and (f)(2). The amount of
chum salmon PSC taken by the pollock
trawl industry during the EFP period
could approach or exceed the chum
salmon PSC limits under
§ 679.21(e)(7)(vii). If the EFP salmon
were counted toward the salmon PSC
limits, the EFP salmon may create an
additional burden on the pollock trawl
fishermen not participating in an
intercooperative agreement for chum
salmon or incentive plan agreement for
Chinook salmon bycatch reduction by
causing earlier closures of the Chum
Salmon Savings Area or violating the
plan agreement for Chinook salmon.
More information regarding the
intercooperative agreement for salmon
bycatch reduction is at 72 FR 61070
(October 29, 2007). Information
regarding the incentive plan agreements
under Amendment 91 for Bering Sea
Chinook salmon bycatch management is
at 75 FR 53026 (August 30, 2010).
Approximately 2,500 chum salmon
and 250 Chinook salmon for the 2015 B
season and 500 chum salmon and 1,200
Chinook salmon for the 2015 and 2016
A seasons would be required to support
the project. In total, the applicant would
be limited to harvesting 3,000 chum
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
salmon and 1,450 Chinook salmon
during the EFP period. The
experimental design requires this
quantity of salmon to ensure statistically
valid results.
The applicant also has requested an
exemption from the Chum Salmon
Savings Area (§§ 679.21(e)(7)(vii) and
679.22(a)(10)), the Bering Sea Pollock
Restriction Area (§ 679.22(a)(7)(ii)), and
the Steller Sea Lion Conservation Area
(§ 679.22(a)(7)(vii)). These overlapping
areas occur in locations of salmon
concentration. The experiment must be
conducted in areas of salmon
concentration sufficient to ensure a
statistically adequate sample size. These
locations are ideal for conducting the
experiment and ensuring that the vessel
encounters sufficient concentrations of
salmon and pollock for meeting the
experimental design.
Groundfish taken under the EFP
would be exempt from the TACs
specified in the annual harvest
specifications (§ 679.20). A total of 2,500
metric tons (mt) of groundfish
(primarily pollock) would be taken
during each A season of 2015 and 2016,
and 2,500 mt of groundfish would be
taken in the B season of 2016 for a total
of 7,500 mt over the duration of the EFP.
Approximately 96 percent of the
groundfish harvested is expected to be
pollock. The experimental design
requires this quantity of pollock to
ensure a statistically adequate sample
size for measuring pollock escapement
through the salmon excluder device.
The EFP groundfish harvest would
not be included in the harvest applied
against the Bering Sea groundfish TACs.
The preliminary 2015 TAC for Bering
Sea pollock is equal to the acceptable
biological catch (ABC) at 1,258,000 mt,
but the TAC is likely to be adjusted
during the 2015/2016 harvest
specifications process and may result in
a TAC less than ABC (79 FR 12108,
March 4, 2014). TAC and ABC have not
been specified for the 2016 fishing year
at this time. The EFP fishing will be
permitted for this proposed action if the
ABC for Bering Sea pollock exceeds the
TAC by at least 5,000 mt in 2015 and
2,500 mt in 2016. Because of very little
groundfish incidental catch in the
pollock fishery, the harvest of other fish
species during the EFP fishing is
expected to be 50 mt to 80 mt per
season. The majority of these other
species harvested under the EFP likely
would be Pacific cod, skates, flatfish,
halibut, and jellyfish. The amount of
groundfish harvest under the EFP and
by the commercial groundfish fisheries
is not expected to cause ABCs for
groundfish species to be exceeded in
either 2015 or 2016 because other BSAI
E:\FR\FM\23MYN1.SGM
23MYN1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 100 / Friday, May 23, 2014 / Notices
groundfish TACs are set with a
sufficient difference between ABC and
TAC to accommodate EFP fishing catch
of groundfish species other than
pollock.
The EFP is expected to take
approximately 12 mt of halibut per
season for a total of 12 mt of halibut in
2015 and 24 mt of halibut in 2016. The
EFP would require an exemption from
halibut PSC limits under
§ 679.21(e)(3)(ii)(C). The halibut taken
under the EFP in combination with the
groundfish fisheries is not expected to
exceed the halibut PSC harvest
specifications in 2015 or 2016.
Using a catcher/processor for the EFP
study would require exemption from the
Catcher Vessel Operational Area
(CVOA) restriction (§ 679.22(a)(5))
because of the location of the Chinook
salmon concentration in the CVOA.
Catcher/processors are prohibited from
operating in the CVOA during the B
season. The EFP fishing may be done by
either a catcher vessel or a catcher/
processor. It may be necessary for the
EFP applicant to use a catcher/processor
to conduct tows in this area to ensure
encountering sufficient pollock and
salmon concentrations to meet the
experimental design.
The EFP would exempt vessels that
are EFP fishing from closures of the
Chum Salmon Savings Area. This is
necessary because the experimental
design for this EFP is based on testing
in areas with high incidental catch rates
of salmon that may occur in the Chum
Salmon Savings Area.
The EFP would include an exemption
from selected observer requirements at
§§ 679.50, 679.51, and 679.55.
Participating vessels would use ‘‘sea
samplers’’ who are NMFS-trained
observers. They would not be deployed
as NMFS observers, however, at the
time of the EFP fishing. The ‘‘sea
samplers’’ would conduct the EFP data
collection and perform other observer
duties that normally would be required
for vessels directed fishing for pollock.
EFP fishing trips also would be
exempted from observer requirements
for trip selection and fee collection.
The activities under the EFP are not
expected to have a significant impact on
the human environment as analyzed in
the EA for this action (see ADDRESSES).
The EFP would be subject to
modifications pending any new relevant
information regarding the 2015 and
2016 fishery, including the groundfish
harvest specifications.
In accordance with 50 CFR 679.6 and
600 CFR 745(b)(3)(ii), NMFS has
determined that the proposal warrants
further consideration and has forwarded
the application to the Council to initiate
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:44 May 22, 2014
Jkt 232001
consultation. The Council will consider
the EFP application during its meeting
June 2 through June 10, 2014, which
will be held at the Nome Mini
Convention Center, 409 River St., Nome,
AK. The applicant has been invited to
appear in support of the application.
Public Comments
Public comments are being solicited
on the application and the EA through
the end of the comment period stated in
this notice. To be considered, comments
must be received on or before the last
day of the comment period; that does
not mean postmarked or otherwise
transmitted by that date. Copies of the
application and EA are available for
review from NMFS (see ADDRESSES).
Interested persons also may comment
on the application and on the EA at the
June 2014 Council meeting during
public testimony.
Information regarding the meeting is
available at the Council’s Web site at
https://www.alaskafisheries.noaa.gov/
npfmc/.
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
Dated: May 20, 2014.
James P. Burgess,
Acting Director, Office of Sustainable
Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2014–12021 Filed 5–22–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
RIN 0648–XD266
Magnuson-Stevens Act Provisions;
General Provisions for Domestic
Fisheries; Application for Exempted
Fishing Permits
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice; request for comments.
AGENCY:
NOAA Fisheries has made a
preliminary determination that an
exempted fishing permit application
contains all of the required information
and warrants further consideration. This
request was submitted by the Gulf of
Maine Research Institute and would
allow commercial fishing vessels to
evaluate if whiting can be caught in
commercially viable quantities with
minimal bycatch in the Gulf of Maine
Grate Raised Footrope Trawl Exemption
Area using a small-mesh trawl that has
a standard cookie sweep, prior to the
start of the current season that begins
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
29743
July 1. The exempted fishing permit
would exempt the vessels from the
Northeast multispecies minimum mesh
size and seasonal restrictions at 50 CFR
648.80(a)(3) and 648.80 (a)(16).
Regulations under the MagnusonStevens Fishery Conservation and
Management Act require publication of
this notification to provide interested
parties the opportunity to comment on
applications for proposed exempted
fishing permits.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before June 9, 2014.
ADDRESSES: You may submit written
comments by any of the following
methods:
• Email: NMFS.GAR.EFP@noaa.gov.
Include in the subject line ‘‘Comments
on GMRI Whiting EFP.’’
• Mail: John K. Bullard, Regional
Administrator, NMFS, Greater Atlantic
Regional Fisheries Office, 55 Great
Republic Drive, Gloucester, MA 01930.
Mark the outside of the envelope
‘‘Comments on GMRI Whiting EFP.’’
• Fax: (978) 281–9135.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jason Berthiaume, Fishery Management
Specialist, 978–281–9177,
Jason.Berthiaume@noaa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Gulf
of Maine Research Institute (GMRI) has
submitted an application for an
exempted fishing permit (EFP) to
conduct commercial fishing activities
that the regulations would otherwise
restrict. The EFP would exempt three
federally permitted commercial fishing
vessels from the minimum mesh size
requirements for the purpose of testing
a small-mesh trawl fitted with an
excluder grate for harvesting silver hake.
The applicant states that there has been
poor performance of the raised footrope
trawl in this area due to the rocky
habitat, and that removing the raised
footrope could allow for increased catch
rates while maintaining low bycatch
rates. In addition, the applicant has
requested authorization to test the trawl
prior to the July 1–November 30 season
in the Gulf of Maine Grate Raised
Footrope Trawl Exemption Area.
The applicant would evaluate the
performance of a small-mesh trawl that
has a regulation compliant excluder
grate and is fitted with a cookie sweep.
The trawl would not have a raised
footrope as required by the Gulf of
Maine Grate Raised Footrope Trawl
regulations. Participating vessels would
complete up to 25 days of experimental
fishing with five 1-hour tows per day
with a target whiting catch of 5,000 lb
(2,268 kg) per day. A research
technician would accompany all trips
under the EFP, and sort and weigh all
E:\FR\FM\23MYN1.SGM
23MYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 100 (Friday, May 23, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 29741-29743]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-12021]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
RIN 0648-XD257
Fisheries of the Exclusive Economic Zone off Alaska; Application
for an Exempted Fishing Permit
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Notice; public comment on an application for exempted fishing
permit.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This notice announces receipt of an application and the public
comment period for an exempted fishing permit (EFP) from Mr. John
Gauvin of Gauvin and Associates, LLC. If granted, this permit would
allow the applicant to continue the development and testing of a salmon
excluder device for the Bering Sea pollock trawl fishery. This activity
is intended to promote the objectives of the Fishery Management Plan
for Groundfish of the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands Management Area
(FMP) by reducing salmon bycatch in the Bering Sea pollock trawl
fishery.
DATES: Submit comments on or before June 23, 2014. Interested persons
may comment on the EFP application and on the environmental assessment
(EA) during the North Pacific Fishery Management Council (Council)
meeting June 2 through June 10, 2014, in Nome, AK.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments on this document, identified by FDMS
Docket Number NOAA-NMFS-2014-0050, by any of the following methods:
Electronic Submission: Submit all electronic public
comments via the Federal e-Rulemaking Portal. Go to
www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D= NOAA-NMFS-2014-0050, click the
``Comment Now!'' icon, complete the required fields, and enter or
attach your comments.
[[Page 29742]]
Mail: Submit written comments to Glenn Merrill, Assistant
Regional Administrator, Sustainable Fisheries Division, Alaska Region
NMFS, Attn: Ellen Sebastian. Mail comments to P.O. Box 21668, Juneau,
AK 99802-1668.
Instructions: Comments sent by any other method, to any other
address or individual, or received after the end of the comment period,
may not be considered by NMFS. All comments received are a part of the
public record and will generally be posted for public viewing on
www.regulations.gov without change. All personal identifying
information (e.g., name, address), confidential business information,
or otherwise sensitive information submitted voluntarily by the sender
will be publicly accessible. NMFS will accept anonymous comments (enter
``N/A'' in the required fields if you wish to remain anonymous).
Attachments to electronic comments will be accepted in Microsoft Word,
Excel, or Adobe PDF file formats only.
Electronic copies of the Secretarial Review Draft Environmental
Assessment For Issuing an Exempted Fishing Permit for the Purpose of
Testing a Salmon Excluder Device in the Eastern Bering Sea Pollock
Fishery, May 2014, prepared for this action are available from https://www.regulations.gov or from the NMFS Alaska Region Web site at https://alaskafisheries.noaa.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeff Hartman, 907-586-7442.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: NMFS manages the domestic groundfish
fisheries in the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands Management Area (BSAI)
under the FMP. The Council prepared the FMP under the Magnuson-Stevens
Fishery Conservation and Management Act. Regulations governing the
groundfish fisheries of the BSAI appear at 50 CFR parts 600 and 679.
The FMP and the implementing regulations at Sec. Sec. 600.745(b) and
679.6 authorize issuance of EFPs to allow fishing that would otherwise
be prohibited. Procedures for issuing EFPs are contained in the
implementing regulations.
NMFS received an application for an EFP from Mr. Gauvin in December
2013. The purposes of the EFP project would be to improve the
performance of the salmon excluder device developed under EFP 11-01
from 2011 to 2012, and to validate the performance of this device for
pollock trawl gear used in the BSAI. The EFP project would focus on
testing a redesigned excluder device to reduce chum salmon and Chinook
salmon bycatch and refine the device for use on trawl vessels fishing
for groundfish. The goal is to develop a device for pollock trawl gear
that reduces salmon bycatch without significantly lowering pollock
catch rates. Salmon are prohibited species that are incidentally caught
in the pollock fishery (Sec. 679.21(e) and (f)).
The EFP would allow for testing of the salmon excluder device from
January 2015 through June 2016, for several weeks in each pollock A and
B season. Testing in each season would allow the device to be used
under salmon occurrence and pollock fishing practices specific to each
season. Testing in the A season would catch primarily Chinook salmon
and roe-bearing pollock, while testing in the B season would catch
Chinook and chum salmon and pollock that are not likely to be roe-
bearing. EFP fishing would be conducted by one to two vessels in each
season.
To test the salmon excluder device, exemptions would be necessary
from regulations for salmon bycatch management, observer requirements,
closure areas, total allowable catch amounts (TACs) for groundfish, and
prohibited species catch (PSC) limits for the pollock fishery. Taking
salmon during the experiment is crucial for determining the
effectiveness of the device. Salmon taken during the experiment would
not be counted toward the Chinook and chum salmon PSC limits under
Sec. 679.21(e)(1)(vii), (e)(3)(i)(A)(3), and (f)(2). The amount of
chum salmon PSC taken by the pollock trawl industry during the EFP
period could approach or exceed the chum salmon PSC limits under Sec.
679.21(e)(7)(vii). If the EFP salmon were counted toward the salmon PSC
limits, the EFP salmon may create an additional burden on the pollock
trawl fishermen not participating in an intercooperative agreement for
chum salmon or incentive plan agreement for Chinook salmon bycatch
reduction by causing earlier closures of the Chum Salmon Savings Area
or violating the plan agreement for Chinook salmon. More information
regarding the intercooperative agreement for salmon bycatch reduction
is at 72 FR 61070 (October 29, 2007). Information regarding the
incentive plan agreements under Amendment 91 for Bering Sea Chinook
salmon bycatch management is at 75 FR 53026 (August 30, 2010).
Approximately 2,500 chum salmon and 250 Chinook salmon for the 2015
B season and 500 chum salmon and 1,200 Chinook salmon for the 2015 and
2016 A seasons would be required to support the project. In total, the
applicant would be limited to harvesting 3,000 chum salmon and 1,450
Chinook salmon during the EFP period. The experimental design requires
this quantity of salmon to ensure statistically valid results.
The applicant also has requested an exemption from the Chum Salmon
Savings Area (Sec. Sec. 679.21(e)(7)(vii) and 679.22(a)(10)), the
Bering Sea Pollock Restriction Area (Sec. 679.22(a)(7)(ii)), and the
Steller Sea Lion Conservation Area (Sec. 679.22(a)(7)(vii)). These
overlapping areas occur in locations of salmon concentration. The
experiment must be conducted in areas of salmon concentration
sufficient to ensure a statistically adequate sample size. These
locations are ideal for conducting the experiment and ensuring that the
vessel encounters sufficient concentrations of salmon and pollock for
meeting the experimental design.
Groundfish taken under the EFP would be exempt from the TACs
specified in the annual harvest specifications (Sec. 679.20). A total
of 2,500 metric tons (mt) of groundfish (primarily pollock) would be
taken during each A season of 2015 and 2016, and 2,500 mt of groundfish
would be taken in the B season of 2016 for a total of 7,500 mt over the
duration of the EFP. Approximately 96 percent of the groundfish
harvested is expected to be pollock. The experimental design requires
this quantity of pollock to ensure a statistically adequate sample size
for measuring pollock escapement through the salmon excluder device.
The EFP groundfish harvest would not be included in the harvest
applied against the Bering Sea groundfish TACs. The preliminary 2015
TAC for Bering Sea pollock is equal to the acceptable biological catch
(ABC) at 1,258,000 mt, but the TAC is likely to be adjusted during the
2015/2016 harvest specifications process and may result in a TAC less
than ABC (79 FR 12108, March 4, 2014). TAC and ABC have not been
specified for the 2016 fishing year at this time. The EFP fishing will
be permitted for this proposed action if the ABC for Bering Sea pollock
exceeds the TAC by at least 5,000 mt in 2015 and 2,500 mt in 2016.
Because of very little groundfish incidental catch in the pollock
fishery, the harvest of other fish species during the EFP fishing is
expected to be 50 mt to 80 mt per season. The majority of these other
species harvested under the EFP likely would be Pacific cod, skates,
flatfish, halibut, and jellyfish. The amount of groundfish harvest
under the EFP and by the commercial groundfish fisheries is not
expected to cause ABCs for groundfish species to be exceeded in either
2015 or 2016 because other BSAI
[[Page 29743]]
groundfish TACs are set with a sufficient difference between ABC and
TAC to accommodate EFP fishing catch of groundfish species other than
pollock.
The EFP is expected to take approximately 12 mt of halibut per
season for a total of 12 mt of halibut in 2015 and 24 mt of halibut in
2016. The EFP would require an exemption from halibut PSC limits under
Sec. 679.21(e)(3)(ii)(C). The halibut taken under the EFP in
combination with the groundfish fisheries is not expected to exceed the
halibut PSC harvest specifications in 2015 or 2016.
Using a catcher/processor for the EFP study would require exemption
from the Catcher Vessel Operational Area (CVOA) restriction (Sec.
679.22(a)(5)) because of the location of the Chinook salmon
concentration in the CVOA. Catcher/processors are prohibited from
operating in the CVOA during the B season. The EFP fishing may be done
by either a catcher vessel or a catcher/processor. It may be necessary
for the EFP applicant to use a catcher/processor to conduct tows in
this area to ensure encountering sufficient pollock and salmon
concentrations to meet the experimental design.
The EFP would exempt vessels that are EFP fishing from closures of
the Chum Salmon Savings Area. This is necessary because the
experimental design for this EFP is based on testing in areas with high
incidental catch rates of salmon that may occur in the Chum Salmon
Savings Area.
The EFP would include an exemption from selected observer
requirements at Sec. Sec. 679.50, 679.51, and 679.55. Participating
vessels would use ``sea samplers'' who are NMFS-trained observers. They
would not be deployed as NMFS observers, however, at the time of the
EFP fishing. The ``sea samplers'' would conduct the EFP data collection
and perform other observer duties that normally would be required for
vessels directed fishing for pollock. EFP fishing trips also would be
exempted from observer requirements for trip selection and fee
collection.
The activities under the EFP are not expected to have a significant
impact on the human environment as analyzed in the EA for this action
(see ADDRESSES). The EFP would be subject to modifications pending any
new relevant information regarding the 2015 and 2016 fishery, including
the groundfish harvest specifications.
In accordance with 50 CFR 679.6 and 600 CFR 745(b)(3)(ii), NMFS has
determined that the proposal warrants further consideration and has
forwarded the application to the Council to initiate consultation. The
Council will consider the EFP application during its meeting June 2
through June 10, 2014, which will be held at the Nome Mini Convention
Center, 409 River St., Nome, AK. The applicant has been invited to
appear in support of the application.
Public Comments
Public comments are being solicited on the application and the EA
through the end of the comment period stated in this notice. To be
considered, comments must be received on or before the last day of the
comment period; that does not mean postmarked or otherwise transmitted
by that date. Copies of the application and EA are available for review
from NMFS (see ADDRESSES). Interested persons also may comment on the
application and on the EA at the June 2014 Council meeting during
public testimony.
Information regarding the meeting is available at the Council's Web
site at https://www.alaskafisheries.noaa.gov/npfmc/.
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
Dated: May 20, 2014.
James P. Burgess,
Acting Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2014-12021 Filed 5-22-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P