Proposed Information Collection; Comment Request; Competitive Enhancement Needs Assessment Survey Program, 29415-29416 [2014-11834]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 99 / Thursday, May 22, 2014 / Notices
The application to reorganize and
expand FTZ 235 under the ASF is
approved, subject to the FTZ Act and
the Board’s regulations, including
Section 400.13, to the Board’s standard
2,000-acre activation limit for the zone,
to a five-year ASF sunset provision for
magnet sites that would terminate
authority for Site 2 if not activated by
May 31, 2019, and to a three-year ASF
sunset provision for usage-driven sites
that would terminate authority for Sites
7 and 8 if no foreign-status merchandise
is admitted for a bona fide customs
purpose by May 31, 2017.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 9th day of
May 2014.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary of Commerce for
Enforcement and Compliance, Alternate
Chairman, Foreign-Trade Zones Board.
Attest:__________
Andrew McGilvray,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014–11891 Filed 5–21–14; 8:45 am]
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Bureau of Industry and Security
Proposed Information Collection;
Comment Request; Rated Orders
under the Defense Priorities and
Allocations System (DPAS)
Bureau of Industry and
Security, Commerce.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
The Department of
Commerce, as part of its continuing
effort to reduce paperwork and
respondent burden, invites the general
public and other Federal agencies to
take this opportunity to comment on
proposed and/or continuing information
collections, as required by the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DATES: Written comments must be
submitted on or before July 21, 2014.
ADDRESSES: Direct all written comments
to Jennifer Jessup, Departmental
Paperwork Clearance Officer,
Department of Commerce, Room 6616,
14th and Constitution Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20230 (or via the
Internet at JJessup@doc.gov).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Requests for additional information or
copies of the information collection
instrument and instructions should be
directed to Lawrence Hall, BIS Office of
Administration, 14th and Pennsylvania
Ave. NW., HCHB 6622, Washington, DC
20230; 703–675–9944; lohall.work@
comcast.net.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
19:36 May 21, 2014
I. Abstract
This collection involves the exchange
of rated order information between
customers and suppliers. Recordkeeping
is necessary for administration and
enforcement of delegated authority
under the Defense Production Act of
1950, as amended (50 U.S.C. App. 2061,
et seq.) and the Selective Service Act of
1948 (50 U.S.C. App. 468). Any person
(supplier) who receives a priority rated
order under DPAS regulation (15 CFR
700) must notify the customer of
acceptance or rejection of that order
within a specified period of time. Also,
if shipment against a priority rated order
will be delayed, the supplier must
immediately notify the customer.
II. Method of Collection
Rated order information may be
transmitted or stored electronically or
on paper.
III. Data
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Jkt 232001
OMB Control Number: 0694–0092.
Form Number(s): None.
Type of Review: Regular submission
(extension of a current information
collection).
Affected Public: Business or other forprofit organizations.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
1,434,650.
Estimated Time Per Response: 1 to 15
minutes.
Estimated Total Annual Burden
Hours: 45,290.
Estimated Total Annual Cost to
Public: $0.
IV. Request for Comments
Comments are invited on: (a) Whether
the proposed collection of information
is necessary for the proper performance
of the functions of the agency, including
whether the information shall have
practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden
(including hours and cost) of the
proposed collection of information; (c)
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and (d) ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on respondents, including through the
use of automated collection techniques
or other forms of information
technology.
Comments submitted in response to
this notice will be summarized and/or
included in the request for OMB
approval of this information collection;
they also will become a matter of public
record.
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
29415
Dated: May 16, 2014.
Gwellnar Banks,
Management Analyst, Office of the Chief
Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 2014–11833 Filed 5–21–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–33–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Bureau of Industry and Security
Proposed Information Collection;
Comment Request; Competitive
Enhancement Needs Assessment
Survey Program
Bureau of Industry and
Security, Commerce.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
The Department of
Commerce, as part of its continuing
effort to reduce paperwork and
respondent burden, invites the general
public and other Federal agencies to
take this opportunity to comment on
proposed and/or continuing information
collections, as required by the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DATES: Written comments must be
submitted on or before July 21, 2014.
ADDRESSES: Direct all written comments
to Jennifer Jessup, Departmental
Paperwork Clearance Officer,
Department of Commerce, Room 6616,
14th and Constitution Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20230 (or via the
Internet at JJessup@doc.gov).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Requests for additional information or
copies of the information collection
instrument and instructions should be
directed to Lawrence Hall, BIS Office of
Administration, 14th and Pennsylvania
Ave. NW., HCHB 6622, Washington, DC
20230, 703–675–9944,
lohall.work@comcast.net.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
I. Abstract
The Defense Production Act of 1950,
as amended, and Executive Order
12919, authorizes the Secretary of
Commerce to assess the capabilities of
the defense industrial base to support
the national defense. They also develop
policy alternatives to improve the
international competitiveness of specific
domestic industries and their abilities to
meet defense program needs. The
information collected from voluntary
surveys will be used to assist small- and
medium-sized firms in defense
transition and in gaining access to
advanced technologies and
manufacturing processes available from
Federal Laboratories. The goal is to
improve regions of the country
E:\FR\FM\22MYN1.SGM
22MYN1
29416
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 99 / Thursday, May 22, 2014 / Notices
adversely affected by cutbacks in
defense spending and military base
closures.
II. Method of Collection
Collected electronically or on paper.
III. Data
OMB Control Number: 0694–0083.
Form Number(s): None.
Type of Review: Regular submission
(extension of a current information
collection).
Affected Public: Business or other forprofit organizations.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
2,400.
Estimated Time Per Response: 1 hour.
Estimated Total Annual Burden
Hours: 2,400.
Estimated Total Annual Cost to
Public: $0.
IV. Request for Comments
Comments are invited on: (a) Whether
the proposed collection of information
is necessary for the proper performance
of the functions of the agency, including
whether the information shall have
practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden
(including hours and cost) of the
proposed collection of information; (c)
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and (d) ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on respondents, including through the
use of automated collection techniques
or other forms of information
technology.
Comments submitted in response to
this notice will be summarized and/or
included in the request for OMB
approval of this information collection;
they also will become a matter of public
record.
Dated: May 16, 2014.
Gwellnar Banks,
Management Analyst, Office of the Chief
Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 2014–11834 Filed 5–21–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–33–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
[A–570–832]
Pure Magnesium from the People’s
Republic of China: Final Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review; 2012–2013
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
DATES: Effective Date: May 22, 2014.
AGENCY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:36 May 21, 2014
Jkt 232001
On February 25, 2014, the
Department of Commerce (‘‘the
Department’’) published in the Federal
Register the preliminary results of the
administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on pure
magnesium from the People’s Republic
of China (‘‘PRC’’) covering the period
May 1, 2012 through April 30, 2013.1
This review covers one PRC company,
Tianjin Magnesium International, Co.,
Ltd. (‘‘TMI’’) and Tianjin Magnesium
Metal Co., Ltd. (‘‘TMM’’) (collectively
‘‘TMI/TMM’’).2 The Department gave
interested parties an opportunity to
comment on the Preliminary Results,
but we received no comments. Hence,
these final results are unchanged from
the Preliminary Results and we continue
to find that TMI/TMM did not have
reviewable entries during the period of
review (‘‘POR’’).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Laurel LaCivita or Brendan Quinn, AD/
CVD Operations, Office III, Enforcement
and Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230;
telephone: (202) 482–4243 or (202) 482–
5848, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
Background
On February 25, 2014, the Department
published the Preliminary Results of the
instant review.3 TMI and TMM each
submitted timely-filed certifications
indicating that it had no shipments of
subject merchandise to the United
States during the POR.4 In addition, in
response to the Department’s query,
1 See Pure Magnesium From the People’s
Republic of China: Preliminary Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2012–
2013, 79 FR 10473 (February 25, 2014)
(‘‘Preliminary Results’’).
2 The Department initiated the instant review on
both TMM and TMI. See Initiation of Antidumping
and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews
and Request for Revocation in Part, 78 FR 38924
(June 28, 2013) (‘‘Initiation Notice’’). In the interim,
for the prior 2011–2012 review of the order, the
Department determined TMM and TMI to be
collapsed and treated as a single entity for purposes
of the proceeding. See Pure Magnesium From the
People’s Republic of China: Final Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2011–
2012, 79 FR 94 (January 2, 2014) and accompanying
Issues and Decision Memorandum at Comment 5.
As this collapsing determination remains
unchallenged in this review, the instant review
covers the single TMM/TMI entity.
3 See Preliminary Results.
4 See letter from TMM, ‘‘Pure Magnesium from
the People’s Republic of China; A–570–832;
Certification of No Sales by Tianjin Magnesium
Metal, Co., Ltd.,’’ dated August 26, 2013, at 1; see
also letter from TMI, ‘‘Pure Magnesium from the
People’s Republic of China; A–570–832;
Certification of No Sales by Tianjin Magnesium
International, Co., Ltd.,’’ dated August 27, 2013,
at 1.
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
(‘‘CBP’’) did not provide any evidence
that contradicted TMI or TMM’s claim
of no shipments.5 The Department
received no comments from interested
parties concerning the results of the CBP
query. Therefore, based on TMI and
TMM’s certification and our analysis of
CBP information, we preliminarily
determined that the single TMI/TMM
entity did not have any reviewable
entries during the POR.6 We invited
interested parties to comment on the
Preliminary Results.7 We received no
comments from interested parties.
The Department conducted this
review in accordance with section
751(a)(1)(B) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (‘‘the Act’’).
Scope of the Order
Merchandise covered by the order is
pure magnesium regardless of
chemistry, form or size, unless expressly
excluded from the scope of the order.
Pure magnesium is a metal or alloy
containing by weight primarily the
element magnesium and produced by
decomposing raw materials into
magnesium metal. Pure primary
magnesium is used primarily as a
chemical in the aluminum alloying,
desulfurization, and chemical reduction
industries. In addition, pure magnesium
is used as an input in producing
magnesium alloy. Pure magnesium
encompasses products (including, but
not limited to, butt ends, stubs, crowns
and crystals) with the following primary
magnesium contents:
(1) Products that contain at least
99.95% primary magnesium, by weight
(generally referred to as ‘‘ultra pure’’
magnesium);
(2) Products that contain less than
99.95% but not less than 99.8% primary
magnesium, by weight (generally
referred to as ‘‘pure’’ magnesium); and
(3) Products that contain 50% or
greater, but less than 99.8% primary
magnesium, by weight, and that do not
conform to ASTM specifications for
alloy magnesium (generally referred to
as ‘‘off–specification pure’’ magnesium).
‘‘Off–specification pure’’ magnesium
is pure primary magnesium containing
magnesium scrap, secondary
magnesium, oxidized magnesium or
impurities (whether or not intentionally
added) that cause the primary
magnesium content to fall below 99.8%
by weight. It generally does not contain,
individually or in combination, 1.5% or
more, by weight, of the following
alloying elements: aluminum,
5 Preliminary
Results, 79 FR 10474.
6 Id.
7 Id.
E:\FR\FM\22MYN1.SGM
22MYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 99 (Thursday, May 22, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 29415-29416]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-11834]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Bureau of Industry and Security
Proposed Information Collection; Comment Request; Competitive
Enhancement Needs Assessment Survey Program
AGENCY: Bureau of Industry and Security, Commerce.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce, as part of its continuing effort
to reduce paperwork and respondent burden, invites the general public
and other Federal agencies to take this opportunity to comment on
proposed and/or continuing information collections, as required by the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DATES: Written comments must be submitted on or before July 21, 2014.
ADDRESSES: Direct all written comments to Jennifer Jessup, Departmental
Paperwork Clearance Officer, Department of Commerce, Room 6616, 14th
and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230 (or via the Internet
at JJessup@doc.gov).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Requests for additional information or
copies of the information collection instrument and instructions should
be directed to Lawrence Hall, BIS Office of Administration, 14th and
Pennsylvania Ave. NW., HCHB 6622, Washington, DC 20230, 703-675-9944,
lohall.work@comcast.net.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Abstract
The Defense Production Act of 1950, as amended, and Executive Order
12919, authorizes the Secretary of Commerce to assess the capabilities
of the defense industrial base to support the national defense. They
also develop policy alternatives to improve the international
competitiveness of specific domestic industries and their abilities to
meet defense program needs. The information collected from voluntary
surveys will be used to assist small- and medium-sized firms in defense
transition and in gaining access to advanced technologies and
manufacturing processes available from Federal Laboratories. The goal
is to improve regions of the country
[[Page 29416]]
adversely affected by cutbacks in defense spending and military base
closures.
II. Method of Collection
Collected electronically or on paper.
III. Data
OMB Control Number: 0694-0083.
Form Number(s): None.
Type of Review: Regular submission (extension of a current
information collection).
Affected Public: Business or other for-profit organizations.
Estimated Number of Respondents: 2,400.
Estimated Time Per Response: 1 hour.
Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 2,400.
Estimated Total Annual Cost to Public: $0.
IV. Request for Comments
Comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of
the agency, including whether the information shall have practical
utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden
(including hours and cost) of the proposed collection of information;
(c) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on respondents, including through the use of
automated collection techniques or other forms of information
technology.
Comments submitted in response to this notice will be summarized
and/or included in the request for OMB approval of this information
collection; they also will become a matter of public record.
Dated: May 16, 2014.
Gwellnar Banks,
Management Analyst, Office of the Chief Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 2014-11834 Filed 5-21-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-33-P