Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Idaho: Infrastructure Requirements for the 2008 Lead National Ambient Air Quality Standards, 29358-29359 [2014-11508]
Download as PDF
29358
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 99 / Thursday, May 22, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R10–OAR–2012–0183, FRL–9911–09–
Region–10]
Approval and Promulgation of
Implementation Plans; Idaho:
Infrastructure Requirements for the
2008 Lead National Ambient Air Quality
Standards
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The EPA is approving the
February 14, 2012, State
Implementation Plan (SIP) submittal
from Idaho demonstrating that the SIP
meets the infrastructure requirements of
the Clean Air Act (CAA) for the National
Ambient Air Quality Standards
(NAAQS) promulgated for lead (Pb) on
October 15, 2008. The CAA requires that
each state, after a new or revised
NAAQS is promulgated, review their
SIP to ensure that it meets the
infrastructure requirements necessary to
implement the new or revised NAAQS.
The EPA finds that the Idaho SIP meets
the CAA infrastructure requirements for
the 2008 Pb NAAQS.
DATES: This final rule is effective on
June 23, 2014.
ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket
Identification No. EPA–R10–OAR–
2012–0183. All documents in the docket
are listed on the https://
www.regulations.gov Web site. Although
listed in the index, some information
may not be publicly available, i.e.,
Confidential Business Information or
other information the disclosure of
which is restricted by statute. Certain
other material, such as copyrighted
material, is not placed on the Internet
and will be publicly available only in
hard copy form. Publicly available
docket materials are available either
electronically through https://
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at
EPA Region 10, Office of Air, Waste,
and Toxics, AWT–107, 1200 Sixth
Avenue, Seattle, Washington 98101. The
EPA requests that you contact the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
schedule your inspection. The Regional
Office’s official hours of business are
Monday through Friday, 8:30 to 4:30,
excluding Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kristin Hall at: (206) 553–6357,
hall.kristin@epa.gov, or the above EPA,
Region 10 address.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:57 May 21, 2014
Jkt 232001
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document wherever
‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, it is
intended to refer to the EPA.
Information is organized as follows:
Table of Contents
I. Background
II. Final Action
III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Background
Section 110 of the CAA specifies the
general requirements for states to submit
SIPs to attain and maintain the NAAQS
and the EPA’s actions regarding
approval of those SIPs. On February 14,
2012, Idaho submitted a SIP revision to
the EPA demonstrating that the SIP
meets the infrastructure requirements of
the CAA for the 2008 Pb NAAQS. On
March 26, 2014, we proposed approval
of Idaho’s February 14, 2012, submittal
(79 FR 16722). An explanation of the
CAA requirements and implementing
regulations that are met by this SIP
revision, a detailed explanation of the
revision, and the EPA’s reasons for the
proposed action were provided in the
notice of proposed rulemaking on
March 26, 2014, and will not be restated
here (79 FR 16722). The public
comment period for our proposed action
ended on April 25, 2014, and we
received no comments.
II. Final Action
The EPA is approving the February
14, 2012, submittal from Idaho
demonstrating that the SIP meets the
requirements of sections 110(a)(1) and
(2) of the CAA for the 2008 Pb NAAQS.
Specifically, we find that the Idaho SIP
meets the following CAA section
110(a)(2) infrastructure elements for the
2008 Pb NAAQS: (A), (B), (C), (D), (E),
(F), (G), (H), (J), (K), (L), and (M). This
action is being taken under section 110
of the CAA.
III. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is
required to approve a SIP submission
that complies with the provisions of the
CAA and applicable Federal regulations.
42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the
EPA’s role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the CAA. Accordingly, this action
merely approves state law as meeting
Federal requirements and does not
impose additional requirements beyond
those imposed by state law. For that
reason, this action:
• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ subject to review by the Office
of Management and Budget under
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993);
• does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
this action does not involve technical
standards; and does not provide the
EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate,
disproportionate human health or
environmental effects, using practicable
and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629,
February 16, 1994).
In addition, this rule does not have
tribal implications as specified by
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249,
November 9, 2000), because the SIP is
not approved to apply in Indian country
located in the State, and the EPA notes
that it will not impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt
tribal law.
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. The EPA will
submit a report containing this action
and other required information to the
U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller
General of the United States prior to
publication of the rule in the Federal
Register. A major rule cannot take effect
until 60 days after it is published in the
Federal Register. This action is not a
E:\FR\FM\22MYR1.SGM
22MYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 99 / Thursday, May 22, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA,
petitions for judicial review of this
action must be filed in the United States
Court of Appeals for the appropriate
circuit by July 21, 2014. Filing a petition
for reconsideration by the Administrator
of this final rule does not affect the
finality of this action for the purposes of
judicial review nor does it extend the
time within which a petition for judicial
review may be filed, and shall not
postpone the effectiveness of such rule
or action. This action may not be
challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section
307(b)(2)).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Lead, Particulate matter, and
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: May 1, 2014.
Michelle Pirzadeh,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 10.
40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart N—Idaho
2. In § 52.670, the table in paragraph
(e) is amended by adding an entry at the
end of the table for ‘‘Section 110(a)(2)
Infrastructure Requirements for the 2008
Pb NAAQS.’’
The addition reads as follows:
■
§ 52.670
*
PART 52—APPROVAL AND
PROMULGATION OF
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
29359
Identification of plan.
*
*
(e) * * *
*
*
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
EPA-APPROVED IDAHO NONREGULATORY PROVISIONS AND QUASI-REGULATORY MEASURES
Name of SIP provision
Applicable geographic
or nonattainment area
State
submittal date
EPA approval date
Comments
*
Section 110(a)(2) Infrastructure Requirements for the 2008 Pb
NAAQS.
*
*
State-wide ....................
2/14/2012
*
*
5/22/2014 [Insert page
number where the
document begins].
*
*
This action addresses the following CAA elements: 110(a)(2)(A), (B), (C), (D), (E), (F),
(G), (H), (J), (K), (L), and (M).
[FR Doc. 2014–11508 Filed 5–21–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R10–OAR–2014–0139 FRL–9911–23–
Region–10]
Approval and Promulgation of
Implementation Plans; State of
Oregon; Approval of Substitution for
Transportation Control Measures
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule; notice of
administrative change.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is making an
administrative change to update the
Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) to
reflect a change made to the Oregon
State Implementation Plan (SIP) on
December 11, 2013. The EPA has
concurred on a substitute transportation
control measure (TCM) for the Portland
Area Carbon Monoxide Maintenance
Plan portion of the Oregon SIP. On
January 14, 2014, the Oregon
Department of Environmental Quality
(ODEQ) submitted a revision to the
Oregon SIP requesting that the EPA
update its SIP to reflect a substitution of
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:57 May 21, 2014
Jkt 232001
a TCM. The substitution was made
pursuant to the TCM substitution
provisions contained in the Clean Air
Act (CAA). The EPA concurred with
this substitution on April 16, 2014. In
this administrative action, the EPA is
updating the non-regulatory provisions
of the Oregon SIP to reflect the
substitution. The substitution that the
EPA concurred with is an equivalent
method for assessing the transit service
increase TCM.
DATES: This action is effective May 22,
2014.
ADDRESSES: SIP materials which are
incorporated by reference into 40 CFR
part 52 are available for inspection at
the following location: US
Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 10, Office of Air, Waste, and
Toxics (OAWT–107), 1200 Sixth
Avenue, Seattle, Oregon 98101. Publicly
available docket materials are available
either electronically at
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy
during normal business hours at the
Office of Air, Waste and Toxics, EPA
Region 10, 1200 Sixth Avenue, Seattle,
Washington 98101.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Justin A. Spenillo, EPA Region 10, (206)
553–6125, spenillo.justin@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document, wherever
‘‘we’’, ‘‘us’’ or ‘‘our’’ are used, it is
intended to refer to the EPA.
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Table of Contents
I. This Action
II. Statutory and Executive Order Review
I. This Action
On April 16, 2014, the EPA concurred
with a determination by the ODEQ and
Metro, the metropolitan planning
organization for the Portland area, that
the replacement of a transit service
increase TCM with an equivalent
substitute transit service increase TCM
met the requirements of CAA section
176(c)(8). (See also EPA’s Guidance for
Implementing the CAA section 176(c)(8)
Transportation Control Measure
Substitution and Addition Provision
contained in the Safe, Accountable,
Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity
Act: A Legacy for Users which was
signed into law on August 10, 2005,
dated January 2009.) This action
provides notice of the EPA’s
concurrence with this substitution, and
codifies the substitute transportation
control measure in the Federally
approved Oregon SIP. The substitution
replaces the existing transit service
increase TCM with a TCM containing an
equivalent method for assessing the
transit service increase. The substituted
TCM is: ‘‘Transit Service Increase:
Regional transit service revenue hours
(weighted by capacity) shall be
increased 1.0% per year. The increase
shall be assessed on the basis of
E:\FR\FM\22MYR1.SGM
22MYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 99 (Thursday, May 22, 2014)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 29358-29359]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-11508]
[[Page 29358]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R10-OAR-2012-0183, FRL-9911-09-Region-10]
Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Idaho:
Infrastructure Requirements for the 2008 Lead National Ambient Air
Quality Standards
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The EPA is approving the February 14, 2012, State
Implementation Plan (SIP) submittal from Idaho demonstrating that the
SIP meets the infrastructure requirements of the Clean Air Act (CAA)
for the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) promulgated for
lead (Pb) on October 15, 2008. The CAA requires that each state, after
a new or revised NAAQS is promulgated, review their SIP to ensure that
it meets the infrastructure requirements necessary to implement the new
or revised NAAQS. The EPA finds that the Idaho SIP meets the CAA
infrastructure requirements for the 2008 Pb NAAQS.
DATES: This final rule is effective on June 23, 2014.
ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a docket for this action under
Docket Identification No. EPA-R10-OAR-2012-0183. All documents in the
docket are listed on the https://www.regulations.gov Web site. Although
listed in the index, some information may not be publicly available,
i.e., Confidential Business Information or other information the
disclosure of which is restricted by statute. Certain other material,
such as copyrighted material, is not placed on the Internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket
materials are available either electronically through https://www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at EPA Region 10, Office of Air,
Waste, and Toxics, AWT-107, 1200 Sixth Avenue, Seattle, Washington
98101. The EPA requests that you contact the person listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to schedule your inspection. The
Regional Office's official hours of business are Monday through Friday,
8:30 to 4:30, excluding Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kristin Hall at: (206) 553-6357,
hall.kristin@epa.gov, or the above EPA, Region 10 address.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document wherever ``we,''
``us'' or ``our'' is used, it is intended to refer to the EPA.
Information is organized as follows:
Table of Contents
I. Background
II. Final Action
III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Background
Section 110 of the CAA specifies the general requirements for
states to submit SIPs to attain and maintain the NAAQS and the EPA's
actions regarding approval of those SIPs. On February 14, 2012, Idaho
submitted a SIP revision to the EPA demonstrating that the SIP meets
the infrastructure requirements of the CAA for the 2008 Pb NAAQS. On
March 26, 2014, we proposed approval of Idaho's February 14, 2012,
submittal (79 FR 16722). An explanation of the CAA requirements and
implementing regulations that are met by this SIP revision, a detailed
explanation of the revision, and the EPA's reasons for the proposed
action were provided in the notice of proposed rulemaking on March 26,
2014, and will not be restated here (79 FR 16722). The public comment
period for our proposed action ended on April 25, 2014, and we received
no comments.
II. Final Action
The EPA is approving the February 14, 2012, submittal from Idaho
demonstrating that the SIP meets the requirements of sections 110(a)(1)
and (2) of the CAA for the 2008 Pb NAAQS. Specifically, we find that
the Idaho SIP meets the following CAA section 110(a)(2) infrastructure
elements for the 2008 Pb NAAQS: (A), (B), (C), (D), (E), (F), (G), (H),
(J), (K), (L), and (M). This action is being taken under section 110 of
the CAA.
III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the CAA and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this
action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and
does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state
law. For that reason, this action:
Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993);
does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because this action does not involve technical standards; and
does not provide the EPA with the discretionary authority to address,
as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental effects,
using practicable and legally permissible methods, under Executive
Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this rule does not have tribal implications as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000),
because the SIP is not approved to apply in Indian country located in
the State, and the EPA notes that it will not impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law.
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. The EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a
[[Page 29359]]
``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for
the appropriate circuit by July 21, 2014. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect
the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor
does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may
be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or
action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2)).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Lead, Particulate matter, and Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: May 1, 2014.
Michelle Pirzadeh,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 10.
40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:
PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart N--Idaho
0
2. In Sec. 52.670, the table in paragraph (e) is amended by adding an
entry at the end of the table for ``Section 110(a)(2) Infrastructure
Requirements for the 2008 Pb NAAQS.''
The addition reads as follows:
Sec. 52.670 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(e) * * *
EPA-Approved Idaho Nonregulatory Provisions and Quasi-Regulatory Measures
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Applicable
Name of SIP provision geographic or State submittal EPA approval date Comments
nonattainment area date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
Section 110(a)(2) State-wide........ 2/14/2012 5/22/2014 [Insert This action addresses
Infrastructure Requirements page number where the following CAA
for the 2008 Pb NAAQS. the document elements:
begins]. 110(a)(2)(A), (B),
(C), (D), (E), (F),
(G), (H), (J), (K),
(L), and (M).
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[FR Doc. 2014-11508 Filed 5-21-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P