Safety Zone: Santa Cruz Wharf 100th Anniversary Fireworks Display, 29139-29142 [2014-11791]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 98 / Wednesday, May 21, 2014 / Proposed Rules
All radials in the route descriptions
below are stated in True degrees.
VOR Federal airways are published in
paragraph 6010, and area navigation
routes are published in paragraph 6011,
respectively, of FAA Order 7400.9X
dated August 7, 2013, and effective
September 15, 2013, which is
incorporated by reference in 14 CFR
71.1. The VOR Federal airways and
RNAV route listed in this document
would be subsequently published in the
Order.
The FAA has determined that this
proposed regulation only involves an
established body of technical
regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to
keep them operationally current.
Therefore, this proposed regulation: (1)
Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not
a ‘‘significant rule’’ under Department of
Transportation (DOT) Regulatory
Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034;
February 26, 1979); and (3) does not
warrant preparation of a regulatory
evaluation as the anticipated impact is
so minimal. Since this is a routine
matter that will only affect air traffic
procedures and air navigation, it is
certified that this proposed rule, when
promulgated, will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities under the
criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
The FAA’s authority to issue rules
regarding aviation safety is found in
Title 49 of the United States Code.
Subtitle I, Section 106 describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator.
Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the
agency’s authority.
This rulemaking is promulgated
under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart I, Section
40103. Under that section, the FAA is
charged with prescribing regulations to
assign the use of the airspace necessary
to ensure the safety of aircraft and the
efficient use of airspace. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority as
it would amend the route structure as
required to preserve the safe and
efficient flow of air traffic within the
northeastern United States.
Environmental Review
This proposal will be subject to an
environmental analysis in accordance
with FAA Order 1050.1E,
‘‘Environmental Impacts: Policies and
Procedures’’ prior to any FAA final
regulatory action.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71
Airspace, Incorporation by reference,
Navigation (air).
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
[FR Doc. 2014–11777 Filed 5–20–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
2. The incorporation by reference in
14 CFR 71.1 of FAA Order 7400.9X,
Airspace Designations and Reporting
Points, dated August 7, 2013 and
effective September 15, 2013, is
amended as follows:
■
Paragraph 6010
airways.
V–93
Domestic VOR Federal
[Amended]
From Patuxent River, MD, INT Patuxent
013° and Baltimore, MD, 122° radials;
Baltimore; INT Baltimore 004° and Lancaster,
PA, 214° radials; Lancaster; Wilkes-Barre,
PA; to INT Wilkes-Barre 037° and Sparta, NJ
300° radials. From INT Sparta 018° and
Kingston, NY, 270° radials; Kingston;
Pawling, NY; Chester, MA, 12 miles 7 miles
wide (4 miles E and 3 miles W of centerline);
Keene, NH; Concord, NH; Kennebunk, ME;
INT Kennebunk 045° and Bangor, ME, 220°
radials; to Bangor.
PART 71—DESIGNATION OF CLASS A,
B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND
REPORTING POINTS
1. The authority citation for part 71
continues to read as follows:
■
ME (BGR) [Amended]
FIX
(Lat.
WP
(Lat.
VORTAC
(Lat.
VORTAC
(Lat.
FIX
(Lat.
FIX
(Lat.
FIX
(Lat.
VORTAC
(Lat.
VORTAC
(Lat.
VOR/DME
(Lat.
FIX
(Lat.
VORTAC
(Lat.
38°36′44″
39°19′51″
40°07′12″
41°16′22″
41°28′33″
42°02′46″
42°07′59″
42°47′39″
43°13′11″
43°25′32″
43°54′09″
44°50′30″
N.,
N.,
N.,
N.,
N.,
N.,
N.,
N.,
N.,
N.,
N.,
N.,
long.
long.
long.
long.
long.
long.
long.
long.
long.
long.
long.
long.
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
33 CFR Part 165
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Coast Guard, DHS.
Frm 00002
[Amended]
From Quebec, PQ, Canada, 99 miles 55
MSL, to Millinocket, ME, excluding the
airspace within Canada.
V–471
[Amended]
Paragraph 6011 United States area
navigation routes.
076°18′04″
076°24′41″
076°17′29″
075°41′22″
075°28′57″
074°19′10″
073°08′55″
072°17′30″
071°34′32″
070°36′49″
069°56′43″
068°52′26″
W.)
W.)
W.)
W.)
W.)
W.)
W.)
W.)
W.)
W.)
W.)
W.)
ACTION:
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
The Coast Guard is
establishing a temporary safety zone in
the navigable waters near Santa Cruz
Wharf in Santa Cruz, CA in support of
the Santa Cruz Wharf 100th Anniversary
Fireworks Display on October 4, 2014.
This safety zone is established to ensure
the safety of mariners and spectators
from the dangers associated with the
pyrotechnics. The safety zone will
temporarily restrict vessel movement
SUMMARY:
Coast Guard
[Docket No. USCG–2014–0054]
Jkt 232001
[Amended]
From Bangor, ME; Millinocket, ME;
Houlton, ME; INT Houlton 085° and the
United States/Canadian border.
Safety Zone: Santa Cruz Wharf 100th
Anniversary Fireworks Display
16:27 May 20, 2014
§ 71.1
V–314
RIN 1625–AA00
VerDate Mar<15>2010
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40113,
40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959–
1963 Comp., p. 389.
The Proposed Amendment
In consideration of the foregoing, the
Federal Aviation Administration
proposes to amend 14 CFR part 71 as
follows:
T–295 Louie, MD to Bangor,
LOUIE, MD
BAABS, MD
Lancaster, PA (LRP)
Wilkes-Barre, PA (LVZ)
LAAYK, PA
SAGES, NY
SASHA, MA
Keene, NH (EEN)
Concord, NH (CON)
Kennebunk, ME (ENE)
BRNNS, ME
Bangor, ME (BGR)
Issued in Washington, DC, on May 13,
2014.
Gary A. Norek,
Manager, Airspace Policy and Regulations
Group.
29139
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\21MYP1.SGM
21MYP1
29140
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 98 / Wednesday, May 21, 2014 / Proposed Rules
within the designated area on October 4,
2014 from 9 p.m. until 9:30 p.m.
DATES: Comments and related material
must be received by the Coast Guard on
or before June 20, 2014.
Requests for public meetings must be
received by the Coast Guard on or before
June 20, 2014.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by docket number USCG–
2014–0054 using any one of the
following methods:
(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov.
(2) Fax: 202–493–2251.
(3) Mail: Docket Management Facility
(M–30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590–
0001.
(4) Hand delivery: Same as mail
address above, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays. The telephone number
is 202–366–9329.
See the ‘‘Public Participation and
Request for Comments’’ portion of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
below for further instructions on
submitting comments. To avoid
duplication, please use only one of
these three methods.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this temporary
rule, call Lieutenant Junior Grade
Joshua V. Dykman at 415–399–3585, or
email D11–PF-MarineEvents@uscg.mil.
If you have questions on viewing or
submitting material to the docket,
contact the Program Manager, Docket
Operations, telephone 202–366–9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Acronyms
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
A. Public Participation and Request for
Comments
We encourage you to participate in
this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All
comments received will be posted
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov and will include
any personal information you have
provided.
If you submit a comment, please
include the docket number for this
rulemaking, indicate the specific section
of this document to which each
comment applies, and provide a reason
for each suggestion or recommendation.
You may submit your comments and
16:27 May 20, 2014
Jkt 232001
2. Viewing Comments and Documents
To view comments, as well as
documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to
https://www.regulations.gov, type the
docket number (USCG–2014–0054) in
the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click
‘‘SEARCH.’’ Click on Open Docket
Folder on the line associated with this
rulemaking. You may also visit the
Docket Management Facility in Room
W12–140 on the ground floor of the
Department of Transportation West
Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
3. Privacy Act
1. Submitting Comments
VerDate Mar<15>2010
material online at https://
www.regulations.gov, or by fax, mail, or
hand delivery, but please use only one
of these means. If you submit a
comment online, it will be considered
received by the Coast Guard when you
successfully transmit the comment. If
you fax, hand deliver, or mail your
comment, it will be considered as
having been received by the Coast
Guard when it is received at the Docket
Management Facility. We recommend
that you include your name and a
mailing address, an email address, or a
telephone number in the body of your
document so that we can contact you if
we have questions regarding your
submission.
To submit your comment online, go to
https://www.regulations.gov, type the
docket number (USCG–2014–0054) in
the ‘‘Search’’ box and click ‘‘Search.’’
Click on ‘‘Submit a Comment’’ on the
line associated with this rulemaking.
If you submit your comments by mail
or hand delivery, submit them in an
unbound format, no larger than 81⁄2 by
11 inches, suitable for copying and
electronic filing. If you submit
comments by mail and would like to
know that they reached the Facility,
please enclose a stamped, self-addressed
postcard or envelope. We will consider
all comments and material received
during the comment period and may
change the rule based on your
comments.
Anyone can search the electronic
form of comments received into any of
our dockets by the name of the
individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on
behalf of an association, business, labor
union, etc.). You may review a Privacy
Act notice regarding our public dockets
in the January 17, 2008, issue of the
Federal Register (73 FR 3316).
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
4. Public Meeting
We do not plan to hold public
meetings on this proposed rule. But you
may submit a request for one on or
before June 20, 2014, using one of the
methods specified under ADDRESSES.
Please explain why you believe a public
meeting would be beneficial. If we
determine that one would aid this
rulemaking, we will hold one at a time
and place announced by a later notice
in the Federal Register.
B. Regulatory History and Information
The Captain of the Port has the
authority to establish safety zones under
33 CFR 1.05(e) and 165.5. Because of the
dangers posed by the pyrotechnics used
in this fireworks display, the safety zone
is necessary to provide for the safety of
event participants, spectators, spectator
craft, and other vessels transiting the
event area. For the safety concerns
noted, it is in the public interest to have
these regulations in effect during the
event.
C. Basis and Purpose
The legal basis for the proposed rule
is 33 U.S.C 1231; 46 U.S.C Chapter 701,
3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR
1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, 160.5; Public
Law 107–295, 116 Stat. 2064;
Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1, which
collectively authorize the Coast Guard
to establish safety zones.
City of Santa Cruz Parks and
Recreation will sponsor the Santa Cruz
Wharf 100th Anniversary Fireworks
Display on October 4, 2014, off of Santa
Cruz Wharf in Santa Cruz, CA in
approximate position 36°57′50″ N,
122°00′48″ W (NAD 83) as depicted in
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration (NOAA) Chart 18685.
Upon the commencement of the
fireworks display, the safety zone will
encompass the navigable waters around
and under the launch site within a
radius of 420 feet. The fireworks display
is meant for entertainment purposes.
This restricted area around the launch
site is necessary to protect spectators,
vessels, and other property from the
hazards associated with the
pyrotechnics.
D. Discussion of the Proposed Rule
The proposed safety zone will
encompass the navigable waters around
the land based launch site off of Santa
Cruz Wharf in Santa Cruz, CA. Upon the
commencement of the fireworks
display, scheduled to take place from 9
p.m. to 9:30 p.m. on October 4, 2014,
the safety zone will encompass the
navigable waters around the fireworks
launch site within a radius 420 feet from
E:\FR\FM\21MYP1.SGM
21MYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 98 / Wednesday, May 21, 2014 / Proposed Rules
position 36°57′50″ N, 122°00′48″ W
(NAD 83) for the Santa Cruz Wharf
100th Anniversary Fireworks Display.
At the conclusion of the fireworks
display the safety zone shall terminate.
The effect of the temporary safety
zone will be to restrict navigation in the
vicinity of the launch site until the
conclusion of the scheduled display.
Except for persons or vessels authorized
by the Coast Guard Patrol Commander,
no person or vessel may enter or remain
in the restricted area. These regulations
are needed to keep spectators and
vessels away from the immediate
vicinity of the launch site to ensure the
safety of participants, spectators, and
transiting vessels.
E. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on these statutes and executive
orders.
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
1. Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant
regulatory action under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, as supplemented
by Executive Order 13563, Improving
Regulation and Regulatory Review, and
does not require an assessment of
potential costs and benefits under
section 6(a)(3) of Executive Order 12866
or under section 1 of Executive Order
13563. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under those
Orders.
We expect the economic impact of
this rule will not rise to the level of
necessitating a full Regulatory
Evaluation. The safety zone is limited in
duration, and is limited to a narrowly
tailored geographic area. In addition,
although this rule restricts access to the
waters encompassed by the safety zone,
the effect of this rule will not be
significant because the local waterway
users will be notified via public
Broadcast Notice to Mariners to ensure
the safety zone will result in minimum
impact. The entities most likely to be
affected are waterfront facilities,
commercial vessels, and pleasure craft
engaged in recreational activities.
2. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980
(RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended,
requires federal agencies to consider the
potential impact of regulations on small
entities during rulemaking. The term
‘‘small entities’’ comprises small
businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and
operated and are not dominant in their
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:27 May 20, 2014
Jkt 232001
fields, and governmental jurisdictions
with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C.
605(b) that this proposed rule will not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
This rule may affect owners and
operators of waterfront facilities,
commercial vessels, and pleasure craft
engaged in recreational activities and
sightseeing. This safety zone would not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities
for the following reasons. This safety
zone would be activated, and thus
subject to enforcement, for a limited
duration. When the safety zone is
activated, vessel traffic could pass safely
around the safety zone. The maritime
public will be advised in advance of this
safety zone via Broadcast Notice to
Mariners.
If you think that your business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity
and that this rule would have a
significant economic impact on it,
please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it
qualifies and how and to what degree
this rule would economically affect it.
3. Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this proposed rule. If the
rule would affect your small business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please contact the person
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT, above. The Coast Guard will
not retaliate against small entities that
question or complain about this
proposed rule or any policy or action of
the Coast Guard.
4. Collection of Information
This rule will not call for a new
collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520.).
5. Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. We have
analyzed this proposed rule under that
Order and determined that this rule
does not have implications for
federalism.
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
29141
6. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places or vessels.
7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this
proposed rule would not result in such
an expenditure, we do discuss the
effects of this rule elsewhere in this
preamble.
8. Taking of Private Property
This rule will not cause a taking of
private property or otherwise have
taking implications under Executive
Order 12630, Governmental Actions and
Interference with Constitutionally
Protected Property Rights.
9. Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards
in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to
minimize litigation, eliminate
ambiguity, and reduce burden.
10. Protection of Children
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This rule is not an economically
significant rule and would not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to
safety that might disproportionately
affect children.
11. Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
12. Energy Effects
This action is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under Executive Order
E:\FR\FM\21MYP1.SGM
21MYP1
29142
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 98 / Wednesday, May 21, 2014 / Proposed Rules
13211, Actions Concerning Regulations
That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use.
13. Technical Standards
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
14. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023–01 and
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guide the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA)(42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have determined that this action is one
of a category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This rule involves a safety
zone of limited size and duration. This
rule is categorically excluded from
further review under paragraph 34(g) of
Figure 2–1 of the Commandant
Instruction. An environmental analysis
checklist supporting this determination
and a Categorical Exclusion
Determination are available in the
docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or
information that may lead to the
discovery of a significant environmental
impact from this rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures, and
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to
amend 33 CFR Part 165 as follows:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR
1.05–1(g), 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5; Pub. L.
107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
around the fireworks launch site in
approximate position 36°57′50″ N,
122°00′48″ W (NAD 83) within a radius
of 420 feet.
(b) Enforcement period. The zone
described in paragraph (a) of this
section will be enforced from 9 p.m.
through 9:30 p.m. on October 4, 2014.
The Captain of the Port San Francisco
(COTP) will notify the maritime
community of periods during which this
zone will be enforced via Broadcast
Notice to Mariners in accordance with
33 CFR 165.7.
(c) Definitions. As used in this
section, ‘‘designated representative’’
means a Coast Guard Patrol
Commander, including a Coast Guard
coxswain, petty officer, or other officer
on a Coast Guard vessel or a Federal,
State, or local officer designated by or
assisting the COTP in the enforcement
of the safety zone.
(d) Regulations. (1) Under the general
regulations in 33 CFR Part 165, Subpart
C, entry into, transiting or anchoring
within this safety zone is prohibited
unless authorized by the COTP or a
designated representative.
(2) The safety zone is closed to all
vessel traffic, except as may be
permitted by the COTP or a designated
representative.
(3) Vessel operators desiring to enter
or operate within the safety zone must
contact the COTP or a designated
representative to obtain permission to
do so. Vessel operators given permission
to enter or operate in the safety zone
must comply with all directions given to
them by the COTP or a designated
representative. Persons and vessels may
request permission to enter the safety
zone on VHF–23A or through the 24hour Command Center at telephone
(415) 399–3547.
Dated: April 29, 2014.
Gregory G. Stump,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port San Francisco.
[FR Doc. 2014–11791 Filed 5–20–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
2. Add a new temporary § 165–T11–
0054 to read as follows:
§ 165–T11–0054 Safety Zone; Santa Cruz
Wharf 100th Anniversary Fireworks Display
(a) Location. This safety zone is
established in the navigable waters near
Santa Cruz Wharf in Santa Cruz, CA, as
depicted in National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)
Chart 18685. The temporary safety zone
will encompass the navigable waters
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:27 May 20, 2014
Jkt 232001
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R03–OAR–2013–0211, EPA–R03–
OAR–2013–0510]; FRL–9911–26–Region 3]
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans; Virginia;
Section 110(a)(2) Prevention of
Significant Deterioration Requirements
for the 2008 Ozone and 2010 Nitrogen
Dioxide National Ambient Air Quality
Standards
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve
revisions to the Virginia State
Implementation Plan (SIP) pursuant to
the Clean Air Act (CAA). Whenever new
or revised National Ambient Air Quality
Standards (NAAQS) are promulgated,
the CAA requires states to submit a plan
for the implementation, maintenance,
and enforcement of such NAAQS. The
plan is required to address basic
program elements, including, but not
limited to regulatory structure,
monitoring, modeling, legal authority,
and adequate resources necessary to
assure attainment and maintenance of
the standards. These elements are
referred to as infrastructure
requirements. The Commonwealth of
Virginia has made two separate
submittals addressing the infrastructure
requirements for the 2008 ozone and
2010 nitrogen dioxide (NO2) NAAQS.
This action proposes approval of the
prevention of significant deterioration
(PSD) portions of the infrastructure
requirements of the CAA for the
Commonwealth’s SIP submittals for the
2008 ozone and 2010 NO2 NAAQS.
DATES: Written comments must be
received on or before June 20, 2014.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID Number EPA–
R03–OAR–2013–0211 for the 2008
ozone docket and EPA–R03–OAR–
2013–0510 for the 2010 NO2 docket by
one of the following methods:
A. www.regulations.gov. Follow the
on-line instructions for submitting
comments.
B. Email: fernandez.cristina@epa.gov.
C. Mail: EPA–R03–OAR–2013–0211
and EPA–R03–OAR–2013–0510,
Cristina Fernandez, Associate Director,
Office of Air Program Planning, Air
Protection Division, Mailcode 3AP30,
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
Region III, 1650 Arch Street,
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\21MYP1.SGM
21MYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 98 (Wednesday, May 21, 2014)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 29139-29142]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-11791]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG-2014-0054]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zone: Santa Cruz Wharf 100th Anniversary Fireworks Display
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone in the
navigable waters near Santa Cruz Wharf in Santa Cruz, CA in support of
the Santa Cruz Wharf 100th Anniversary Fireworks Display on October 4,
2014. This safety zone is established to ensure the safety of mariners
and spectators from the dangers associated with the pyrotechnics. The
safety zone will temporarily restrict vessel movement
[[Page 29140]]
within the designated area on October 4, 2014 from 9 p.m. until 9:30
p.m.
DATES: Comments and related material must be received by the Coast
Guard on or before June 20, 2014.
Requests for public meetings must be received by the Coast Guard on
or before June 20, 2014.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-
2014-0054 using any one of the following methods:
(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
(2) Fax: 202-493-2251.
(3) Mail: Docket Management Facility (M-30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001.
(4) Hand delivery: Same as mail address above, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The telephone
number is 202-366-9329.
See the ``Public Participation and Request for Comments'' portion
of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section below for further instructions
on submitting comments. To avoid duplication, please use only one of
these three methods.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this
temporary rule, call Lieutenant Junior Grade Joshua V. Dykman at 415-
399-3585, or email D11-PF-MarineEvents@uscg.mil. If you have questions
on viewing or submitting material to the docket, contact the Program
Manager, Docket Operations, telephone 202-366-9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Acronyms
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
A. Public Participation and Request for Comments
We encourage you to participate in this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All comments received will be posted
without change to https://www.regulations.gov and will include any
personal information you have provided.
1. Submitting Comments
If you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
rulemaking, indicate the specific section of this document to which
each comment applies, and provide a reason for each suggestion or
recommendation. You may submit your comments and material online at
https://www.regulations.gov, or by fax, mail, or hand delivery, but
please use only one of these means. If you submit a comment online, it
will be considered received by the Coast Guard when you successfully
transmit the comment. If you fax, hand deliver, or mail your comment,
it will be considered as having been received by the Coast Guard when
it is received at the Docket Management Facility. We recommend that you
include your name and a mailing address, an email address, or a
telephone number in the body of your document so that we can contact
you if we have questions regarding your submission.
To submit your comment online, go to https://www.regulations.gov,
type the docket number (USCG-2014-0054) in the ``Search'' box and click
``Search.'' Click on ``Submit a Comment'' on the line associated with
this rulemaking.
If you submit your comments by mail or hand delivery, submit them
in an unbound format, no larger than 8\1/2\ by 11 inches, suitable for
copying and electronic filing. If you submit comments by mail and would
like to know that they reached the Facility, please enclose a stamped,
self-addressed postcard or envelope. We will consider all comments and
material received during the comment period and may change the rule
based on your comments.
2. Viewing Comments and Documents
To view comments, as well as documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov,
type the docket number (USCG-2014-0054) in the ``SEARCH'' box and click
``SEARCH.'' Click on Open Docket Folder on the line associated with
this rulemaking. You may also visit the Docket Management Facility in
Room W12-140 on the ground floor of the Department of Transportation
West Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590,
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.
3. Privacy Act
Anyone can search the electronic form of comments received into any
of our dockets by the name of the individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may review a Privacy Act notice
regarding our public dockets in the January 17, 2008, issue of the
Federal Register (73 FR 3316).
4. Public Meeting
We do not plan to hold public meetings on this proposed rule. But
you may submit a request for one on or before June 20, 2014, using one
of the methods specified under ADDRESSES. Please explain why you
believe a public meeting would be beneficial. If we determine that one
would aid this rulemaking, we will hold one at a time and place
announced by a later notice in the Federal Register.
B. Regulatory History and Information
The Captain of the Port has the authority to establish safety zones
under 33 CFR 1.05(e) and 165.5. Because of the dangers posed by the
pyrotechnics used in this fireworks display, the safety zone is
necessary to provide for the safety of event participants, spectators,
spectator craft, and other vessels transiting the event area. For the
safety concerns noted, it is in the public interest to have these
regulations in effect during the event.
C. Basis and Purpose
The legal basis for the proposed rule is 33 U.S.C 1231; 46 U.S.C
Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1,
6.04-6, 160.5; Public Law 107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1, which collectively authorize
the Coast Guard to establish safety zones.
City of Santa Cruz Parks and Recreation will sponsor the Santa Cruz
Wharf 100th Anniversary Fireworks Display on October 4, 2014, off of
Santa Cruz Wharf in Santa Cruz, CA in approximate position
36[deg]57'50'' N, 122[deg]00'48'' W (NAD 83) as depicted in National
Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Chart 18685. Upon the
commencement of the fireworks display, the safety zone will encompass
the navigable waters around and under the launch site within a radius
of 420 feet. The fireworks display is meant for entertainment purposes.
This restricted area around the launch site is necessary to protect
spectators, vessels, and other property from the hazards associated
with the pyrotechnics.
D. Discussion of the Proposed Rule
The proposed safety zone will encompass the navigable waters around
the land based launch site off of Santa Cruz Wharf in Santa Cruz, CA.
Upon the commencement of the fireworks display, scheduled to take place
from 9 p.m. to 9:30 p.m. on October 4, 2014, the safety zone will
encompass the navigable waters around the fireworks launch site within
a radius 420 feet from
[[Page 29141]]
position 36[deg]57'50'' N, 122[deg]00'48'' W (NAD 83) for the Santa
Cruz Wharf 100th Anniversary Fireworks Display. At the conclusion of
the fireworks display the safety zone shall terminate.
The effect of the temporary safety zone will be to restrict
navigation in the vicinity of the launch site until the conclusion of
the scheduled display. Except for persons or vessels authorized by the
Coast Guard Patrol Commander, no person or vessel may enter or remain
in the restricted area. These regulations are needed to keep spectators
and vessels away from the immediate vicinity of the launch site to
ensure the safety of participants, spectators, and transiting vessels.
E. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on these statutes and executive orders.
1. Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant regulatory action under section 3(f)
of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, as
supplemented by Executive Order 13563, Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review, and does not require an assessment of potential
costs and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of Executive Order 12866 or
under section 1 of Executive Order 13563. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under those Orders.
We expect the economic impact of this rule will not rise to the
level of necessitating a full Regulatory Evaluation. The safety zone is
limited in duration, and is limited to a narrowly tailored geographic
area. In addition, although this rule restricts access to the waters
encompassed by the safety zone, the effect of this rule will not be
significant because the local waterway users will be notified via
public Broadcast Notice to Mariners to ensure the safety zone will
result in minimum impact. The entities most likely to be affected are
waterfront facilities, commercial vessels, and pleasure craft engaged
in recreational activities.
2. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this
proposed rule will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
This rule may affect owners and operators of waterfront facilities,
commercial vessels, and pleasure craft engaged in recreational
activities and sightseeing. This safety zone would not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities
for the following reasons. This safety zone would be activated, and
thus subject to enforcement, for a limited duration. When the safety
zone is activated, vessel traffic could pass safely around the safety
zone. The maritime public will be advised in advance of this safety
zone via Broadcast Notice to Mariners.
If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have
a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what
degree this rule would economically affect it.
3. Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this proposed rule. If the rule would affect
your small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you
have questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance,
please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT, above. The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this proposed rule or any
policy or action of the Coast Guard.
4. Collection of Information
This rule will not call for a new collection of information under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520.).
5. Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this proposed rule under that Order and
determined that this rule does not have implications for federalism.
6. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places or vessels.
7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this proposed rule would not
result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
8. Taking of Private Property
This rule will not cause a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
9. Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
10. Protection of Children
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This rule is not an economically significant rule and would not
create an environmental risk to health or risk to safety that might
disproportionately affect children.
11. Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
12. Energy Effects
This action is not a ``significant energy action'' under Executive
Order
[[Page 29142]]
13211, Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy
Supply, Distribution, or Use.
13. Technical Standards
This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
14. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA)(42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have determined
that this action is one of a category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human
environment. This rule involves a safety zone of limited size and
duration. This rule is categorically excluded from further review under
paragraph 34(g) of Figure 2-1 of the Commandant Instruction. An
environmental analysis checklist supporting this determination and a
Categorical Exclusion Determination are available in the docket where
indicated under ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or information that may
lead to the discovery of a significant environmental impact from this
rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, and Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes
to amend 33 CFR Part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701; 50 U.S.C.
191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1(g), 6.04-1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; Pub. L. 107-
295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No.
0170.1.
2. Add a new temporary Sec. 165-T11-0054 to read as follows:
Sec. 165-T11-0054 Safety Zone; Santa Cruz Wharf 100th Anniversary
Fireworks Display
(a) Location. This safety zone is established in the navigable
waters near Santa Cruz Wharf in Santa Cruz, CA, as depicted in National
Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Chart 18685. The
temporary safety zone will encompass the navigable waters around the
fireworks launch site in approximate position 36[deg]57'50'' N,
122[deg]00'48'' W (NAD 83) within a radius of 420 feet.
(b) Enforcement period. The zone described in paragraph (a) of this
section will be enforced from 9 p.m. through 9:30 p.m. on October 4,
2014. The Captain of the Port San Francisco (COTP) will notify the
maritime community of periods during which this zone will be enforced
via Broadcast Notice to Mariners in accordance with 33 CFR 165.7.
(c) Definitions. As used in this section, ``designated
representative'' means a Coast Guard Patrol Commander, including a
Coast Guard coxswain, petty officer, or other officer on a Coast Guard
vessel or a Federal, State, or local officer designated by or assisting
the COTP in the enforcement of the safety zone.
(d) Regulations. (1) Under the general regulations in 33 CFR Part
165, Subpart C, entry into, transiting or anchoring within this safety
zone is prohibited unless authorized by the COTP or a designated
representative.
(2) The safety zone is closed to all vessel traffic, except as may
be permitted by the COTP or a designated representative.
(3) Vessel operators desiring to enter or operate within the safety
zone must contact the COTP or a designated representative to obtain
permission to do so. Vessel operators given permission to enter or
operate in the safety zone must comply with all directions given to
them by the COTP or a designated representative. Persons and vessels
may request permission to enter the safety zone on VHF-23A or through
the 24-hour Command Center at telephone (415) 399-3547.
Dated: April 29, 2014.
Gregory G. Stump,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port San Francisco.
[FR Doc. 2014-11791 Filed 5-20-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P