Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Notice of Availability of the Final Recovery Plan for Golden Sedge (Carex Lutea, 29200-29201 [2014-11730]
Download as PDF
29200
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 98 / Wednesday, May 21, 2014 / Notices
Institutes of Health, Center for Scientific
Review, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 5108,
MSC 7766, Bethesda, MD 20892,
301.326.9721, Lorangd@mail.nih.gov.
Name of Committee: Genes, Genomes, and
Genetics Integrated Review Group, Genetic
Variation and Evolution Study Section.
Date: June 20, 2014.
Time: 8:30 a.m. to 7:00 p.m.
Agenda: To review and evaluate grant
applications.
Place: Doubletree Guest Suites, 2515
Meridian Parkway, Research Triangle Park,
NC 27713.
Contact Person: Ronald Adkins, Ph.D.,
Scientific Review Officer, Center for
Scientific Review, National Institutes of
Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 2206,
MSC 7890, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301–435–
4511, ronald.adkins@nih.gov.
Name of Committee: Center for Scientific
Review Special Emphasis Panel, RFA Panel:
Molecular Probes.
Date: June 20, 2014.
Time: 10:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
Agenda: To review and evaluate grant
applications.
Place: Embassy Suites DC Convention
Center, 900 10th NW., Washington, DC
20001.
Contact Person: Mary Custer, Ph.D.,
Scientific Review Officer, Center for
Scientific Review, National Institutes of
Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 4148,
MSC 7850, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 435–
1164, custerm@csr.nih.gov.
(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance
Program Nos. 93.306, Comparative Medicine;
93.333, Clinical Research, 93.306, 93.333,
93.337, 93.393–93.396, 93.837–93.844,
93.846–93.878, 93.892, 93.893, National
Institutes of Health, HHS).
Dated: May 15, 2014.
Carolyn A. Baum,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory
Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2014–11649 Filed 5–20–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140–01–P
met in order to downlist this species to
threatened status or delist it under the
Endangered Species Act of 1973, as
amended (Act).
ADDRESSES: You may obtain a copy of
the recovery plan by contacting Dale
Suiter at the Raleigh Field Office, by
U.S. mail at U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service, Raleigh Field Office, 551–F
Pylon Drive, Raleigh, North Carolina
27606; or by telephone at (919) 856–
4520, extension 18; or by visiting our
recovery plan Web site at https://
www.fws.gov/endangered/species/
recovery-plans.html.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dale
Suiter, at the above address or by
telephone at (919) 856–4520, ext. 18.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Introduction
We listed golden sedge as an
endangered species under the Act (16
U.S.C. 1531 et seq.), on January 23, 2002
(67 FR 3120), and designated critical
habitat for the species on March 1, 2011
(76 FR 11086). This species is a rare
perennial member of the sedge family
(Cyperaceae) endemic to the coastal
plain of North Carolina. It is currently
known from only 21 occurrences
(specific locations or sites) located
within a 16 by 5 mile area in Pender and
Onslow Counties. All eight populations
of this plant occur in the Northeast Cape
Fear River watershed in North Carolina.
Factors contributing to its endangered
status are an extremely limited range
and loss of habitat. The primary threat
is the loss or alteration of habitat, from
fire suppression; residential,
commercial, or industrial development;
mining; livestock grazing; and woody or
invasive species encroachment.
Background
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS–R4–ES–2014–N05;
FXES111300400000C2–145–FF04E00000]
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife
and Plants; Notice of Availability of the
Final Recovery Plan for Golden Sedge
(Carex Lutea)
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
AGENCY:
We, the Fish and Wildlife
Service, announce the availability of the
final recovery plan for golden sedge
(Carex lutea), a species endemic to the
coastal plain in North Carolina. The
final recovery plan includes specific
recovery objectives and criteria to be
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:42 May 20, 2014
Jkt 232001
Restoring an endangered or
threatened animal or plant to the point
where it is again a secure, selfsustaining member of its ecosystem is a
primary goal of the endangered species
program. To help guide the recovery
effort, we are preparing recovery plans
for most listed species. Recovery plans
describe actions considered necessary
for conservation of the species, establish
criteria for downlisting or delisting, and
estimate time and cost for implementing
recovery measures.
The Act requires the development of
recovery plans for listed species, unless
such a plan would not promote the
conservation of a particular species.
Section 4(f) of the Act requires us to
provide a public notice and an
opportunity for public review and
comment during recovery plan
development.
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Recovery Plan Specifics
The objective of this plan is to
provide a framework for the recovery of
golden sedge so that protection under
the Act is no longer necessary. The draft
of this recovery plan was available for
public comment from June 18, 2013,
through August 19, 2013 (78 FR 36566).
We considered the information received
via public comments as well as from
peer reviewers in our preparation and
approval of this final recovery plan. We
also edited some sections of the draft
recovery plan to reflect these comments;
however, no substantial changes were
made to the draft recovery plan.
Criteria for Reclassification From
Endangered to Threatened
Golden sedge will be considered for
reclassification from endangered to
threatened status when all of the
following criteria are met:
1. There are 10 protected Carex lutea
sites in the wild that are distributed
across the range of the species. [Note:
Recovery sites will be considered
permanently protected when they are
placed under a conservation easement
or other binding land agreement and a
management agreement, and are ranked
as an A or B population by the North
Carolina Natural Heritage Program
(NCNHP).]
2. On each of the 10 Carex lutea sites,
for at least 5 years, any non-native plant
species that have the potential to
displace Carex lutea are maintained at
or below 10 percent of total number of
species and at or below 10 percent cover
(volume).
3. All 10 Carex lutea sites
demonstrate stable or increasing
population trends for 5 consecutive
years.
4. Habitat management plans are
actively being implemented for at least
seven of the protected sites.
5. A prescribed fire regime has been
developed and is being conducted at all
sites to mimic historical frequency and
timing (the frequency will be
determined through recovery actions in
this plan).
We define ‘‘protected’’ to mean the
site has been fee-simple acquired and
put into long-term conservation by a
local or State agency, or that a
conservation easement or other binding
land agreement has been placed on the
site by a landowner that shows a
commitment to its conservation in
perpetuity and Carex lutea from the site
is represented in a Center for Plant
Conservation (CPC)–approved seed
bank. In addition, each site should have
a management agreement/plan
developed. Prescribed fire should be
E:\FR\FM\21MYN1.SGM
21MYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 98 / Wednesday, May 21, 2014 / Notices
part of the agreement/plan and
implemented regularly. These plans
should include monitoring, according to
protocols developed collaboratively by
the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
(USFWS), North Carolina Department of
Agriculture and Consumer Services
(NCDACS), North Carolina Division of
Parks and Recreation (NCDPR), and The
Nature Conservancy (TNC) and other
interested parties; the monitoring
should occur annually at each protected
site. Each site should contain an A or B
ranked occurrence. For downlisting to
be considered, we would like to have at
least 7 of the 10 protected sites to be Aranked occurrences. The remaining
three sites can be either A or B ranked
occurrences.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Criteria for Delisting
Carex lutea will be considered for
removal from the List of Endangered
and Threatened Species (delisting)
when all of the following criteria are
met:
1. There are 15 protected sites in the
wild that are distributed across the
range of the species. [Note: Recovery
sites will be considered permanently
protected when they are placed under a
conservation easement or other binding
land agreement and a management
agreement, and are ranked as an A or B
population by the NCNHP.]
2. On each of the 15 Carex lutea sites,
for at least 5 years, any non-native plant
species that have the potential to
displace Carex lutea are maintained at
or below 10 percent of total number of
species and at or below 10 percent cover
(volume).
3. All 15 Carex lutea sites
demonstrate stable or increasing
population trends for 10 consecutive
years.
4. Habitat management plans are
actively being implemented for all
protected sites and are showing
evidence that actions are proving
effective for this plant.
5. A prescribed fire regime is being
conducted at all sites to mimic
historical frequency and timing (which
will be determined through recovery
actions in this plan). The definition of
‘‘protected’’ is the same as in the criteria
for downlisting. For delisting to be
considered, at least 10 of the 15
protected sites should be A ranked
occurrences. The remaining five sites
can be either A or B ranked occurrences.
Next Steps
As reclassification and recovery
criteria are met, the status of the species
will be reviewed, and it will be
considered for reclassification or
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:42 May 20, 2014
Jkt 232001
removal from the Federal List of
Endangered and Threatened Plants.
Authority
The authority for this action is section
4(f) of the Endangered Species Act, 16
U.S.C. 1533(f).
Dated: April 23, 2014.
Cynthia K. Dohner,
Regional Director, Southeast Region, U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service.
[FR Doc. 2014–11730 Filed 5–20–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–55–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Geological Survey
[GX14N05ESB0500]
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Request for Comments on
the Registry of Climate Change
Vulnerability Assessments
U.S. Geological Survey (USGS),
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of a new information
collection, Registry of Climate Change
Vulnerability Assessments.
AGENCY:
We (the U.S. Geological
Survey) are notifying the public that we
have submitted to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) the
information collection request (ICR)
described below. To comply with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA)
and as part of our continuing efforts to
reduce paperwork and respondent
burden, we invite the general public and
other Federal agencies to take this
opportunity to comment on this ICR.
DATES: To ensure that your comments
are considered, the OMB must receive
them on or before June 20, 2014.
ADDRESSES: Please submit your written
comments on this information
collection directly to the Office of
Management and Budget, Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs,
Attention: Desk Officer for the
Department of the Interior, at OIRA_
SUBMISSION@omb.eop.gov (email); or
(202) 395–5806 (fax). Please also
forward a copy of your comments to the
Information Collection Clearance
Officer, U.S. Geological Survey, 807
National Center, 12201 Sunrise Valley
Drive, Reston, VA 20192 (mail); 703–
648–7195 (fax); or gs-info_collections@
usgs.gov (email). Reference
‘‘Information Collection 1028–NEW:
Registry of Climate Change
Vulnerability Assessments’’ in all
correspondence.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Robin O’Malley, National Climate
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00045
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
29201
Change and Wildlife Science Center,
U.S. Geological Survey, 12201 Sunrise
Valley Drive, Mail Stop 400, Reston, VA
20192 (mail); 703–648–4086 (phone); or
romalley@usgs.gov (email). You may
also find information about this ICR at
www.reginfo.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Abstract
The USGS proposes to collect
information on existing assessments of
the vulnerability of various natural
resources and societal assets to climate
change (hereafter VA or ‘‘vulnerability
assessments’’). This information will
include the organization conducting the
study, study location, topical focus of
the assessment, methodology and
supporting data used, and point of
contact information. Because many
governmental and nongovernmental
parties are conducting such
assessments, and because their
conclusions, methodologies, and related
data assets may be of interest or utility
to others contemplating such
assessments, the USGS will make the
information collected available on the
Web in the form of a simple registrytype database. Users, including the
general public, scientists, resource
management agencies, and others will
be able to search the database by various
keywords of interest.
II. Data
OMB Control Number: 1028–NEW.
Title: Registry of Climate Change
Vulnerability Assessments.
Type of Request: Approval of new
information collection.
Respondent Obligation: None
(participation is voluntary).
Frequency of Collection: This
information will be collected initially
and reviewed at least annually. All
listed Registry projects will be contacted
and requested to update their
information; Federal agencies
participating in the Registry will
conduct ‘‘data calls’’ according to
agency practice to identify new agency
projects, and external partners will be
reminded via Web posting and
community-of-practice networking that
new projects may be added to the
Registry. Additional entries may be
added at any time, as information
becomes available.
Description of Respondents: Federal
agencies, state, tribal and
nongovernmental partners, individual
scientists, and others involved in the
conduct of climate change vulnerability
assessments.
Estimated Total Number of Annual
Responses: Approximately 1,360
responses (i.e., additions to the registry)
E:\FR\FM\21MYN1.SGM
21MYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 98 (Wednesday, May 21, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 29200-29201]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-11730]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS-R4-ES-2014-N05; FXES111300400000C2-145-FF04E00000]
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Notice of
Availability of the Final Recovery Plan for Golden Sedge (Carex Lutea)
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We, the Fish and Wildlife Service, announce the availability
of the final recovery plan for golden sedge (Carex lutea), a species
endemic to the coastal plain in North Carolina. The final recovery plan
includes specific recovery objectives and criteria to be met in order
to downlist this species to threatened status or delist it under the
Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (Act).
ADDRESSES: You may obtain a copy of the recovery plan by contacting
Dale Suiter at the Raleigh Field Office, by U.S. mail at U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service, Raleigh Field Office, 551-F Pylon Drive, Raleigh,
North Carolina 27606; or by telephone at (919) 856-4520, extension 18;
or by visiting our recovery plan Web site at https://www.fws.gov/endangered/species/recovery-plans.html.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dale Suiter, at the above address or
by telephone at (919) 856-4520, ext. 18.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Introduction
We listed golden sedge as an endangered species under the Act (16
U.S.C. 1531 et seq.), on January 23, 2002 (67 FR 3120), and designated
critical habitat for the species on March 1, 2011 (76 FR 11086). This
species is a rare perennial member of the sedge family (Cyperaceae)
endemic to the coastal plain of North Carolina. It is currently known
from only 21 occurrences (specific locations or sites) located within a
16 by 5 mile area in Pender and Onslow Counties. All eight populations
of this plant occur in the Northeast Cape Fear River watershed in North
Carolina.
Factors contributing to its endangered status are an extremely
limited range and loss of habitat. The primary threat is the loss or
alteration of habitat, from fire suppression; residential, commercial,
or industrial development; mining; livestock grazing; and woody or
invasive species encroachment.
Background
Restoring an endangered or threatened animal or plant to the point
where it is again a secure, self-sustaining member of its ecosystem is
a primary goal of the endangered species program. To help guide the
recovery effort, we are preparing recovery plans for most listed
species. Recovery plans describe actions considered necessary for
conservation of the species, establish criteria for downlisting or
delisting, and estimate time and cost for implementing recovery
measures.
The Act requires the development of recovery plans for listed
species, unless such a plan would not promote the conservation of a
particular species. Section 4(f) of the Act requires us to provide a
public notice and an opportunity for public review and comment during
recovery plan development.
Recovery Plan Specifics
The objective of this plan is to provide a framework for the
recovery of golden sedge so that protection under the Act is no longer
necessary. The draft of this recovery plan was available for public
comment from June 18, 2013, through August 19, 2013 (78 FR 36566). We
considered the information received via public comments as well as from
peer reviewers in our preparation and approval of this final recovery
plan. We also edited some sections of the draft recovery plan to
reflect these comments; however, no substantial changes were made to
the draft recovery plan.
Criteria for Reclassification From Endangered to Threatened
Golden sedge will be considered for reclassification from
endangered to threatened status when all of the following criteria are
met:
1. There are 10 protected Carex lutea sites in the wild that are
distributed across the range of the species. [Note: Recovery sites will
be considered permanently protected when they are placed under a
conservation easement or other binding land agreement and a management
agreement, and are ranked as an A or B population by the North Carolina
Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP).]
2. On each of the 10 Carex lutea sites, for at least 5 years, any
non-native plant species that have the potential to displace Carex
lutea are maintained at or below 10 percent of total number of species
and at or below 10 percent cover (volume).
3. All 10 Carex lutea sites demonstrate stable or increasing
population trends for 5 consecutive years.
4. Habitat management plans are actively being implemented for at
least seven of the protected sites.
5. A prescribed fire regime has been developed and is being
conducted at all sites to mimic historical frequency and timing (the
frequency will be determined through recovery actions in this plan).
We define ``protected'' to mean the site has been fee-simple
acquired and put into long-term conservation by a local or State
agency, or that a conservation easement or other binding land agreement
has been placed on the site by a landowner that shows a commitment to
its conservation in perpetuity and Carex lutea from the site is
represented in a Center for Plant Conservation (CPC)-approved seed
bank. In addition, each site should have a management agreement/plan
developed. Prescribed fire should be
[[Page 29201]]
part of the agreement/plan and implemented regularly. These plans
should include monitoring, according to protocols developed
collaboratively by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), North
Carolina Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services (NCDACS),
North Carolina Division of Parks and Recreation (NCDPR), and The Nature
Conservancy (TNC) and other interested parties; the monitoring should
occur annually at each protected site. Each site should contain an A or
B ranked occurrence. For downlisting to be considered, we would like to
have at least 7 of the 10 protected sites to be A-ranked occurrences.
The remaining three sites can be either A or B ranked occurrences.
Criteria for Delisting
Carex lutea will be considered for removal from the List of
Endangered and Threatened Species (delisting) when all of the following
criteria are met:
1. There are 15 protected sites in the wild that are distributed
across the range of the species. [Note: Recovery sites will be
considered permanently protected when they are placed under a
conservation easement or other binding land agreement and a management
agreement, and are ranked as an A or B population by the NCNHP.]
2. On each of the 15 Carex lutea sites, for at least 5 years, any
non-native plant species that have the potential to displace Carex
lutea are maintained at or below 10 percent of total number of species
and at or below 10 percent cover (volume).
3. All 15 Carex lutea sites demonstrate stable or increasing
population trends for 10 consecutive years.
4. Habitat management plans are actively being implemented for all
protected sites and are showing evidence that actions are proving
effective for this plant.
5. A prescribed fire regime is being conducted at all sites to
mimic historical frequency and timing (which will be determined through
recovery actions in this plan). The definition of ``protected'' is the
same as in the criteria for downlisting. For delisting to be
considered, at least 10 of the 15 protected sites should be A ranked
occurrences. The remaining five sites can be either A or B ranked
occurrences.
Next Steps
As reclassification and recovery criteria are met, the status of
the species will be reviewed, and it will be considered for
reclassification or removal from the Federal List of Endangered and
Threatened Plants.
Authority
The authority for this action is section 4(f) of the Endangered
Species Act, 16 U.S.C. 1533(f).
Dated: April 23, 2014.
Cynthia K. Dohner,
Regional Director, Southeast Region, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
[FR Doc. 2014-11730 Filed 5-20-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P