Determination of Regulatory Review Period for Purposes of Patent Extension; PERJETA, 28734-28735 [2014-11515]

Download as PDF mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES 28734 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 96 / Monday, May 19, 2014 / Notices of the length of a regulatory review period for a human drug product will include all of the testing phase and approval phase as specified in 35 U.S.C. 156(g)(1)(B). FDA has approved for marketing the human drug product ELELYSO (taliglucerase alfa). ELELYSO is indicated for long-term enzyme replacement therapy for adults with a confirmed diagnosis of Type 1 Gaucher disease. Subsequent to this approval, the Patent and Trademark Office received a patent term restoration application for ELELYSO (U.S. Patent No. 7,951,557) from Protalix Ltd., and the Patent and Trademark Office requested FDA’s assistance in determining this patent’s eligibility for patent term restoration. In a letter dated February 19, 2013, FDA advised the Patent and Trademark Office that this human drug product had undergone a regulatory review period and that the approval of ELELYSO represented the first permitted commercial marketing or use of the product. Thereafter, the Patent and Trademark Office requested that FDA determine the product’s regulatory review period. FDA has determined that the applicable regulatory review period for ELELYSO is 2,483 days. Of this time, 1,746 days occurred during the testing phase of the regulatory review period, while 737 days occurred during the approval phase. These periods of time were derived from the following dates: 1. The date an exemption under section 505(i) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the FD&C Act) (21 U.S.C. 355(i)) became effective: July 16, 2005. FDA has verified the applicant’s claim that the date the investigational new drug application became effective was on July 16, 2005. 2. The date the application was initially submitted with respect to the human drug product under section 505(b) of the FD&C Act: April 26, 2010. FDA has verified the applicant’s claim that the new drug application (NDA) for ELELYSO (NDA 22–458) was submitted on April 26, 2010. 3. The date the application was approved: May 1, 2012. FDA has verified the applicant’s claim that NDA 22–458 was approved on May 1, 2012. This determination of the regulatory review period establishes the maximum potential length of a patent extension. However, the Patent and Trademark Office applies several statutory limitations in its calculations of the actual period for patent extension. In its application for patent extension, this applicant seeks 336 days of patent term extension. VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:17 May 16, 2014 Jkt 232001 Anyone with knowledge that any of the dates as published are incorrect may submit to the Division of Dockets Management (see ADDRESSES) either electronic or written comments and ask for a redetermination by July 18, 2014. Furthermore, any interested person may petition FDA for a determination regarding whether the applicant for extension acted with due diligence during the regulatory review period by November 17, 2014. To meet its burden, the petition must contain sufficient facts to merit an FDA investigation. (See H. Rept. 857, part 1, 98th Cong., 2d sess., pp. 41–42, 1984.) Petitions should be in the format specified in 21 CFR 10.30. Interested persons may submit to the Division of Dockets Management (see ADDRESSES) electronic or written comments and written or electronic petitions. It is only necessary to send one set of comments. Identify comments with the docket number found in brackets in the heading of this document. If you submit a written petition, two copies are required. A petition submitted electronically must be submitted to https:// www.regulations.gov, Docket No. FDA– 2013–S–0610. Comments and petitions that have not been made publicly available on https://www.regulations.gov may be viewed in the Division of Dockets Management between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday. Dated: May 13, 2014. Leslie Kux, Assistant Commissioner for Policy. [FR Doc. 2014–11516 Filed 5–16–14; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4160–01–P DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Food and Drug Administration [Docket Nos. FDA–2012–E–1235; FDA– 2012–E–1236; FDA–2012–E–1237] Determination of Regulatory Review Period for Purposes of Patent Extension; PERJETA AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS. ACTION: Notice. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has determined the regulatory review period for PERJETA and is publishing this notice of that determination as required by law. FDA has made the determination because of the submission of applications to the Director of Patents and Trademarks, Department of Commerce, for the extension of a patent SUMMARY: PO 00000 Frm 00064 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 which claims that human biological product. ADDRESSES: Submit electronic comments to https:// www.regulations.gov. Submit written petitions (two copies are required) and written comments to the Division of Dockets Management (HFA–305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852. Submit petitions electronically to https://www.regulations.gov at Docket No. FDA–2013–S–0610. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Beverly Friedman, Office of Management, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 51, Rm. 6257, Silver Spring, MD 20993–0002, 301– 796–7900. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Drug Price Competition and Patent Term Restoration Act of 1984 (Pub. L. 98–417) and the Generic Animal Drug and Patent Term Restoration Act (Pub. L. 100–670) generally provide that a patent may be extended for a period of up to 5 years so long as the patented item (human drug product, animal drug product, medical device, food additive, or color additive) was subject to regulatory review by FDA before the item was marketed. Under these acts, a product’s regulatory review period forms the basis for determining the amount of extension an applicant may receive. A regulatory review period consists of two periods of time: A testing phase and an approval phase. For human biological products, the testing phase begins when the exemption to permit the clinical investigations of the biological becomes effective and runs until the approval phase begins. The approval phase starts with the initial submission of an application to market the human biological product and continues until FDA grants permission to market the biological product. Although only a portion of a regulatory review period may count toward the actual amount of extension that the Director of Patents and Trademarks may award (for example, half the testing phase must be subtracted as well as any time that may have occurred before the patent was issued), FDA’s determination of the length of a regulatory review period for a human biological product will include all of the testing phase and approval phase as specified in 35 U.S.C. 156(g)(1)(B). FDA has approved for marketing the human biologic product PERJETA (pertuzumab). PERJETA is indicated in combination with trastuzumab and docetaxel for treatment of patients with E:\FR\FM\19MYN1.SGM 19MYN1 mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 96 / Monday, May 19, 2014 / Notices HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer who have not received prior anti-HER2 therapy or chemotherapy for metastatic disease. Subsequent to this approval, the Patent and Trademark Office received a patent term restoration application for PERJETA (U.S. Patent Nos. 6,949,245; 7,560,111; 7,862,817) from Genentech, Inc., and the Patent and Trademark Office requested FDA’s assistance in determining these patents’ eligibility for patent term restoration. In a letter dated February 4, 2013, FDA advised the Patent and Trademark Office that this human biological product had undergone a regulatory review period and that the approval of PERJETA represented the first permitted commercial marketing or use of the product. Thereafter, the Patent and Trademark Office requested that FDA determine the product’s regulatory review period. FDA has determined that the applicable regulatory review period for PERJETA is 3,925 days. Of this time, 3,741 days occurred during the testing phase of the regulatory review period, while 184 days occurred during the approval phase. These periods of time were derived from the following dates: 1. The date an exemption under section 505(i) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 355(i)) became effective: September 11, 2001. FDA has verified the applicant’s claim that the date the investigational new drug application became effective was on September 11, 2001. 2. The date the application was initially submitted with respect to the human biological product under section 351 of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 262): December 8, 2011. The applicant claims December 6, 2011, as the date the biologics license application (BLA) for PERJETA (BLA 125409) was initially submitted. However, FDA records indicate that BLA 125409 was submitted on December 8, 2011. 3. The date the application was approved: June 8, 2012. FDA has verified the applicant’s claim that BLA 125409 was approved on June 8, 2012. This determination of the regulatory review period establishes the maximum potential length of a patent extension. However, the Patent and Trademark Office applies several statutory limitations in its calculations of the actual period for patent extension. In its applications for patent extension, this applicant seeks 1,317 or 624 or 354 days of patent term extension. Anyone with knowledge that any of the dates as published are incorrect may submit to the Division of Dockets Management (see ADDRESSES) either VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:17 May 16, 2014 Jkt 232001 electronic or written comments and ask for a redetermination by July 18, 2014. Furthermore, any interested person may petition FDA for a determination regarding whether the applicant for extension acted with due diligence during the regulatory review period by November 17, 2014. To meet its burden, the petition must contain sufficient facts to merit an FDA investigation. (See H. Rept. 857, part 1, 98th Cong., 2d sess., pp. 41–42, 1984.) Petitions should be in the format specified in 21 CFR 10.30. Interested persons may submit to the Division of Dockets Management (see ADDRESSES) electronic or written comments and written or electronic petitions. It is only necessary to send one set of comments. Identify comments with the docket number found in brackets in the heading of this document. If you submit a written petition, two copies are required. A petition submitted electronically must be submitted to https:// www.regulations.gov, Docket No. FDA– 2013–S–0610. Comments and petitions that have not been made publicly available on https://www.regulations.gov may be viewed in the Division of Dockets Management between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday. Comments and petitions that have not been made publicly available on https://www.regulations.gov may be viewed in the Division of Dockets Management between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday. Dated: May 13, 2014. Leslie Kux, Assistant Commissioner for Policy. [FR Doc. 2014–11515 Filed 5–16–14; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4160–01–P DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Food and Drug Administration [Docket No. FDA–2013–E–0056] Determination of Regulatory Review Period for Purposes of Patent Extension; ZIOPTAN AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS. ACTION: Notice. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has determined the regulatory review period for ZIOPTAN and is publishing this notice of that determination as required by law. FDA has made the determination because of the submission of an application to the Director of Patents and Trademarks, Department of SUMMARY: PO 00000 Frm 00065 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 28735 Commerce, for the extension of a patent which claims that human drug product. ADDRESSES: Submit electronic comments to https:// www.regulations.gov. Submit written petitions (two copies are required) and written comments to the Division of Dockets Management (HFA–305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852. Submit petitions electronically to https://www.regulations.gov at Docket No. FDA–2013–S–0610. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Beverly Friedman, Office of Management, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 51, Rm. 6257, Silver Spring, MD 20993–0002, 301– 796–7900. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Drug Price Competition and Patent Term Restoration Act of 1984 (Pub. L. 98–417) and the Generic Animal Drug and Patent Term Restoration Act (Pub. L. 100–670) generally provide that a patent may be extended for a period of up to 5 years so long as the patented item (human drug product, animal drug product, medical device, food additive, or color additive) was subject to regulatory review by FDA before the item was marketed. Under these acts, a product’s regulatory review period forms the basis for determining the amount of extension an applicant may receive. A regulatory review period consists of two periods of time: A testing phase and an approval phase. For human drug products, the testing phase begins when the exemption to permit the clinical investigations of the drug becomes effective and runs until the approval phase begins. The approval phase starts with the initial submission of an application to market the human drug product and continues until FDA grants permission to market the drug product. Although only a portion of a regulatory review period may count toward the actual amount of extension that the Director of Patents and Trademarks may award (for example, half the testing phase must be subtracted as well as any time that may have occurred before the patent was issued), FDA’s determination of the length of a regulatory review period for a human drug product will include all of the testing phase and approval phase as specified in 35 U.S.C. 156(g)(1)(B). FDA has approved for marketing the human drug product ZIOPTAN (tafluprost). ZIOPTAN is indicated for reducing elevated intraocular pressure in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension. Subsequent to this E:\FR\FM\19MYN1.SGM 19MYN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 96 (Monday, May 19, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 28734-28735]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-11515]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket Nos. FDA-2012-E-1235; FDA-2012-E-1236; FDA-2012-E-1237]


Determination of Regulatory Review Period for Purposes of Patent 
Extension; PERJETA

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has determined the 
regulatory review period for PERJETA and is publishing this notice of 
that determination as required by law. FDA has made the determination 
because of the submission of applications to the Director of Patents 
and Trademarks, Department of Commerce, for the extension of a patent 
which claims that human biological product.

ADDRESSES: Submit electronic comments to https://www.regulations.gov. 
Submit written petitions (two copies are required) and written comments 
to the Division of Dockets Management (HFA-305), Food and Drug 
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852. 
Submit petitions electronically to https://www.regulations.gov at Docket 
No. FDA-2013-S-0610.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Beverly Friedman, Office of 
Management, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug 
Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 51, Rm. 6257, Silver 
Spring, MD 20993-0002, 301-796-7900.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Drug Price Competition and Patent Term 
Restoration Act of 1984 (Pub. L. 98-417) and the Generic Animal Drug 
and Patent Term Restoration Act (Pub. L. 100-670) generally provide 
that a patent may be extended for a period of up to 5 years so long as 
the patented item (human drug product, animal drug product, medical 
device, food additive, or color additive) was subject to regulatory 
review by FDA before the item was marketed. Under these acts, a 
product's regulatory review period forms the basis for determining the 
amount of extension an applicant may receive.
    A regulatory review period consists of two periods of time: A 
testing phase and an approval phase. For human biological products, the 
testing phase begins when the exemption to permit the clinical 
investigations of the biological becomes effective and runs until the 
approval phase begins. The approval phase starts with the initial 
submission of an application to market the human biological product and 
continues until FDA grants permission to market the biological product. 
Although only a portion of a regulatory review period may count toward 
the actual amount of extension that the Director of Patents and 
Trademarks may award (for example, half the testing phase must be 
subtracted as well as any time that may have occurred before the patent 
was issued), FDA's determination of the length of a regulatory review 
period for a human biological product will include all of the testing 
phase and approval phase as specified in 35 U.S.C. 156(g)(1)(B).
    FDA has approved for marketing the human biologic product PERJETA 
(pertuzumab). PERJETA is indicated in combination with trastuzumab and 
docetaxel for treatment of patients with

[[Page 28735]]

HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer who have not received prior 
anti-HER2 therapy or chemotherapy for metastatic disease. Subsequent to 
this approval, the Patent and Trademark Office received a patent term 
restoration application for PERJETA (U.S. Patent Nos. 6,949,245; 
7,560,111; 7,862,817) from Genentech, Inc., and the Patent and 
Trademark Office requested FDA's assistance in determining these 
patents' eligibility for patent term restoration. In a letter dated 
February 4, 2013, FDA advised the Patent and Trademark Office that this 
human biological product had undergone a regulatory review period and 
that the approval of PERJETA represented the first permitted commercial 
marketing or use of the product. Thereafter, the Patent and Trademark 
Office requested that FDA determine the product's regulatory review 
period.
    FDA has determined that the applicable regulatory review period for 
PERJETA is 3,925 days. Of this time, 3,741 days occurred during the 
testing phase of the regulatory review period, while 184 days occurred 
during the approval phase. These periods of time were derived from the 
following dates:
    1. The date an exemption under section 505(i) of the Federal Food, 
Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 355(i)) became effective: September 
11, 2001. FDA has verified the applicant's claim that the date the 
investigational new drug application became effective was on September 
11, 2001.
    2. The date the application was initially submitted with respect to 
the human biological product under section 351 of the Public Health 
Service Act (42 U.S.C. 262): December 8, 2011. The applicant claims 
December 6, 2011, as the date the biologics license application (BLA) 
for PERJETA (BLA 125409) was initially submitted. However, FDA records 
indicate that BLA 125409 was submitted on December 8, 2011.
    3. The date the application was approved: June 8, 2012. FDA has 
verified the applicant's claim that BLA 125409 was approved on June 8, 
2012.
    This determination of the regulatory review period establishes the 
maximum potential length of a patent extension. However, the Patent and 
Trademark Office applies several statutory limitations in its 
calculations of the actual period for patent extension. In its 
applications for patent extension, this applicant seeks 1,317 or 624 or 
354 days of patent term extension.
    Anyone with knowledge that any of the dates as published are 
incorrect may submit to the Division of Dockets Management (see 
ADDRESSES) either electronic or written comments and ask for a 
redetermination by July 18, 2014. Furthermore, any interested person 
may petition FDA for a determination regarding whether the applicant 
for extension acted with due diligence during the regulatory review 
period by November 17, 2014. To meet its burden, the petition must 
contain sufficient facts to merit an FDA investigation. (See H. Rept. 
857, part 1, 98th Cong., 2d sess., pp. 41-42, 1984.) Petitions should 
be in the format specified in 21 CFR 10.30.
    Interested persons may submit to the Division of Dockets Management 
(see ADDRESSES) electronic or written comments and written or 
electronic petitions. It is only necessary to send one set of comments. 
Identify comments with the docket number found in brackets in the 
heading of this document. If you submit a written petition, two copies 
are required. A petition submitted electronically must be submitted to 
https://www.regulations.gov, Docket No. FDA-2013-S-0610. Comments and 
petitions that have not been made publicly available on https://www.regulations.gov may be viewed in the Division of Dockets Management 
between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday. Comments and 
petitions that have not been made publicly available on https://www.regulations.gov may be viewed in the Division of Dockets Management 
between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.

    Dated: May 13, 2014.
Leslie Kux,
Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2014-11515 Filed 5-16-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.