Petition for Waiver of Compliance, 28592-28593 [2014-11348]
Download as PDF
28592
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 95 / Friday, May 16, 2014 / Notices
expertise necessary to discharge its
responsibilities. See the RSAC Web site
for details on pending tasks at: https://
rsac.fra.dot.gov/. Please refer to the
notice published in the Federal Register
on March 11, 1996, 61 FR 9740, for
additional information about the RSAC.
Robert C. Lauby,
Associate Administrator for Railroad Safety,
Chief Safety Officer.
[FR Doc. 2014–11345 Filed 5–15–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–06–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Railroad Administration
[Docket Number FRA–2014–0043]
EMCDONALD on DSK67QTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Petition for Waiver of Compliance
In accordance with part 211 of Title
49 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR),
this document provides the public
notice that by a document dated April
22, 2014, the National Passenger
Railroad Corporation (Amtrak) is
requesting a waiver from the
requirements of 49 CFR 214.336, Ontrack safety procedures for certain
roadway work groups and adjacent
tracks. FRA assigned the petition Docket
Number FRA–2014–0043.
In its petition, Amtrak requests relief
from the portion of 49 CFR part 214
where roadway workers (herein referred
to as ‘‘workers’’) are able to occupy and
satisfy the requirements of a
predetermined place of safety (PPOS).
The waiver is sought for the express
purpose of providing workers with a
safe means of traversing to a PPOS when
working alongside Amtrak’s production
equipment, which does not allow access
between the rails of the occupied track,
and where an adjacent controlled track
is present on the same side as the
worker. When it is safe to do so, the
Roadway Worker-In-Charge (RWIC) will
identify the PPOS to be within the
vertical planes projected by the
occupied track’s running rails within
working limits, or clear of all tracks, per
49 CFR 214.336(b). When such a place
is not accessible or will require the
worker to directly expose themselves to
movement on one or more tracks while
traversing to occupy their PPOS, the
RWIC will identify the PPOS to be
within the perimeter of the equipment
so that no part of their person will break
the plane of the equipment’s perimeter.
The equipment will effectively protect
the worker from fouling the adjacent
controlled track.
Title 49 CFR 214.336(a)(1) defines the
procedure for on-track safety that is
required for each adjacent controlled
VerDate Mar<15>2010
20:00 May 15, 2014
Jkt 232001
track when a roadway work group with
at least one of the roadway workers on
the ground is engaged in a common task
with on-track, self-propelled equipment,
or coupled equipment on an occupied
track. Title 49 CFR 214.336(b)(1)
provides the requirements for affected
workers to cease all on-ground work and
equipment movement being performed,
and occupy a PPOS upon receiving
either a warning or notification of
equipment movement on the adjacent
controlled track. The average track
center spacing on the Northeast Corridor
(NEC) is less than 19 feet, and is
therefore regulated under the
requirements of 49 CFR 214.336.
Amtrak’s production equipment units
are typically work trains that consist of
many on-track, self-propelled, coupled
pieces of equipment, and the materials
required for continuous action track
renewal (rail, ballast, and/or tie
replacement), removal of track, and/or
track laying. The current practice for
workers engaged in a common task with
on-track, self-propelled equipment
prevents worker access to a PPOS
between the running rails of the
occupied track, and when the workers
must cross the tracks for which
movement is authorized. The safest
PPOS is identified within the perimeter
of the immobile production equipment
on the occupied track but not between
the running rails.
Title 49 CFR 214.336(e)(2) provides
exceptions for workers performing
maintenance or repairs either alongside
or within the perimeter of a roadway
maintenance machine, or coupled
equipment on the occupied track. The
exception to the requirement to cease
work does not apply to workers on the
ground engaged in a common task with
such equipment when a warning is
provided for movement on the adjacent
controlled track, when the equipment
prevents access between the rails of the
occupied track, when the only alternate
PPOS requires workers to cross tracks
for which movement is authorized at
maximum authorized speeds (the
highest authorized speed on the NEC is
150 mph, 220 feet per second).
An unfortunate consequence of the
procedures for adjacent controlled track
is that workers are frequently required
to engage in a common task alongside
Amtrak’s production equipment to cross
a convergent path with the projected
path of the movement for which a
warning was just received. A worker’s
exposure to the risk associated with an
adjacent controlled track is maximized
at that moment as a result of the
regulation designed to minimize this
particular risk. The normal frequency of
passing trains on the NEC can be as high
PO 00000
Frm 00120
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
as 30 trains per hour, which includes
instances of multiple trains authorized
to pass the work group simultaneously.
In the scenario of multiple authorized
movements, a worker’s view of adjacent
track movements could be obstructed by
an approaching movement requiring
them to blindly cross an unprotected
track.
Amtrak seeks regulatory relief so that
the RWIC may identify a PPOS in an
area of the stationary equipment, which
minimizes risk for the worker traversing
to occupy the identified PPOS, provided
that such PPOS is within the widest
perimeter dimension of the equipment
and no part of the worker’s person may
break the plane projected by the
equipment’s widest perimeter
dimension. The equipment would
effectively shelter the worker in a place
of safety. Equipment authorized to
operate on the NEC must meet the
dimensional specification, ‘‘Clearance
Limitations of Roadway Equipment;
Plate C’’, which is defined specifically
for the safe passage of multiple adjacent
movements at the most restrictive
spacing of track center locations (Figure
1). It is this specification that ensures
the worker a PPOS protected from
authorized movements.
Amtrak states in its petition that it is
dedicated to ensuring the safety of its
employees, and emphasizes that Amtrak
does not wish to seek a waiver from the
procedures for adjacent controlled track
movements when the RWIC feels it safe
for the workers to cross and occupy a
PPOS in accordance with the regulation.
The method of identifying a PPOS
within the widest perimeter dimension
of stationary equipment on an occupied
track is a common practice that has been
employed since Amtrak’s inception
without any records of serious injury or
fatality. In contrast, the procedure
provided in the regulation (crossing live
tracks to reach the PPOS) has resulted
in fatalities. The Fatality Analysis of
Maintenance-of-way Employees and
Signalmen committee’s most recent
publication on ‘‘Fatalities on Adjacent
Tracks’’ shows that 91 percent of the
Roadway Worker Protection fatalities
that are classified as adjacent track
fatalities occurred on adjacent tracks
with less than 19-foot spacing, where
roadway maintenance machines were
present and in use on the track where
work was being performed.
Amtrak believes that the waiver
requested will provide a level of safety
for workers engaged in a common task
with on-track, self-propelled equipment,
or coupled equipment on an occupied
track that exceeds the regulation’s
requirements. Therefore, Amtrak
believes that relief from the PPOS
E:\FR\FM\16MYN1.SGM
16MYN1
EMCDONALD on DSK67QTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 95 / Friday, May 16, 2014 / Notices
requirements for production tracklaying machines, as defined in the
regulation, is in the best interest of its
roadway workers and consistent with
railroad safety objectives.
Interested parties are invited to
participate in these proceedings by
submitting written views, data, or
comments. FRA does not anticipate
scheduling a public hearing in
connection with these proceedings since
the facts do not appear to warrant a
hearing. If any interested party desires
an opportunity for oral comment, they
should notify FRA, in writing, before
the end of the comment period and
specify the basis for their request.
All communications concerning these
proceedings should identify the
appropriate docket number and may be
submitted by any of the following
methods:
• Web site: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
• Mail: Docket Operations Facility,
U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., W12–140,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Room W12–140,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal Holidays.
Communications received by June 16,
2014 will be considered by FRA before
final action is taken. Comments received
after that date will be considered as far
as practicable.
All written communications
concerning these proceedings are
available for examination during regular
business hours (9 a.m.–5 p.m.) at the
above facility. All documents in the
public docket are also available for
inspection and copying on the Internet
at the docket facility’s Web site at
https://www.regulations.gov.
Anyone is able to search the
electronic form of any written
communications and comments
received into any of our dockets by the
name of the individual submitting the
comment (or signing the document, if
submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). See https://
www.regulations.gov/#!privacyNotice
for the privacy notice of regulations.gov
or interested parties may review the
U.S. Department of Transportation’s
complete Privacy Act Statement in the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
20:00 May 15, 2014
Jkt 232001
Federal Register published on April 11,
2000 (65 FR 19477).
Robert C. Lauby,
Associate Administrator for Railroad Safety,
Chief Safety Officer.
[FR Doc. 2014–11348 Filed 5–15–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–06–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Railroad Administration
[Docket Number FRA–2014–0010]
Petition for Waiver of Compliance
In accordance with Part 211 of Title
49 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR),
this document provides the public
notice that by a document dated January
9, 2014, Wabtec Railway Electronics
(Wabtec) has petitioned the Federal
Railroad Administration (FRA) for a
waiver of compliance from certain
provisions of the Federal railroad safety
regulations contained at Title 49 Code of
Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 229,
Railroad Locomotive Safety Standards,
and 49 CFR Part 232, Brake System
Safety Standards for Freight and Other
Non-Passenger Trains and Equipment;
End of Train Devices. FRA assigned the
petition Docket Number FRA–2014–
0010.
Specifically, Wabtec seeks relief from
49 CFR 229.29, Air brake system
calibration, maintenance, and testing,
and 49 CFR 232.205, Class I brake testinitial terminal inspection. These
sections list the required periods for the
calibration of the air flow method
(AFM) indicator and the process to be
used to calibrate the AFM. The present
requirement is for AFM calibration to
occur at intervals not to exceed 92 days.
Wabtec, in conjunction with Union
Pacific Railroad (UP), requests a 2-year
test waiver period to monitor and
analyze AFM readings taken after the
requested 368-day test interval for all
UP locomotives equipped with Wabtec
EPIC 3102D2, EPIC II, and FastBrake
electronic air brake systems. On April 9,
2012, FRA modified 49 CFR 229.27,
Annual tests, to allow that ‘‘[a]ll testing
under this section shall be performed at
intervals that do not exceed 368
calendar days’’ and ‘‘[e]ach device used
by the engineer to aid in the control or
braking of the train or locomotive that
provides an indication or air pressure
electronically shall be tested by
comparison with a test gauge or self-test
designed for this purpose.’’ Wabtec
seeks to gather and compare this data
with the 92-day readings it has
previously collected to confirm that
proper AFM calibration can be
PO 00000
Frm 00121
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
28593
maintained over a 368-day time period.
Positive conclusions realized from the
test may then be used to extend the
waiver beyond the initial 2-year period,
or as the basis for future regulatory
review of the 92-day requirement to
match the requirements of 49 CFR
229.27.
A copy of the petition, as well as any
written communications concerning the
petition, is available for review online at
www.regulations.gov and in person at
the U.S. Department of Transportation’s
(DOT) Docket Operations Facility, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., W12–140,
Washington, DC 20590. The Docket
Operations Facility is open from 9 a.m.
to 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal Holidays.
Interested parties are invited to
participate in these proceedings by
submitting written views, data, or
comments. FRA does not anticipate
scheduling a public hearing in
connection with these proceedings since
the facts do not appear to warrant a
hearing. If any interested party desires
an opportunity for oral comment, they
should notify FRA, in writing, before
the end of the comment period and
specify the basis for their request.
All communications concerning these
proceedings should identify the
appropriate docket number and may be
submitted by any of the following
methods:
• Web site: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
• Mail: Docket Operations Facility,
U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., W12–140,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Room W12–140,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal Holidays.
Communications received by June 30,
2014 will be considered by FRA before
final action is taken. Comments received
after that date will be considered as far
as practicable.
Anyone is able to search the
electronic form of any written
communications and comments
received into any of our dockets by the
name of the individual submitting the
comment (or signing the document, if
submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). See https://
www.regulations.gov/#!privacyNotice
for the privacy notice of regulations.gov
or interested parties may review DOT’s
complete Privacy Act Statement in the
Federal Register published on April 11,
2000 (65 FR 19477).
E:\FR\FM\16MYN1.SGM
16MYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 95 (Friday, May 16, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 28592-28593]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-11348]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Railroad Administration
[Docket Number FRA-2014-0043]
Petition for Waiver of Compliance
In accordance with part 211 of Title 49 Code of Federal Regulations
(CFR), this document provides the public notice that by a document
dated April 22, 2014, the National Passenger Railroad Corporation
(Amtrak) is requesting a waiver from the requirements of 49 CFR
214.336, On-track safety procedures for certain roadway work groups and
adjacent tracks. FRA assigned the petition Docket Number FRA-2014-0043.
In its petition, Amtrak requests relief from the portion of 49 CFR
part 214 where roadway workers (herein referred to as ``workers'') are
able to occupy and satisfy the requirements of a predetermined place of
safety (PPOS). The waiver is sought for the express purpose of
providing workers with a safe means of traversing to a PPOS when
working alongside Amtrak's production equipment, which does not allow
access between the rails of the occupied track, and where an adjacent
controlled track is present on the same side as the worker. When it is
safe to do so, the Roadway Worker-In-Charge (RWIC) will identify the
PPOS to be within the vertical planes projected by the occupied track's
running rails within working limits, or clear of all tracks, per 49 CFR
214.336(b). When such a place is not accessible or will require the
worker to directly expose themselves to movement on one or more tracks
while traversing to occupy their PPOS, the RWIC will identify the PPOS
to be within the perimeter of the equipment so that no part of their
person will break the plane of the equipment's perimeter. The equipment
will effectively protect the worker from fouling the adjacent
controlled track.
Title 49 CFR 214.336(a)(1) defines the procedure for on-track
safety that is required for each adjacent controlled track when a
roadway work group with at least one of the roadway workers on the
ground is engaged in a common task with on-track, self-propelled
equipment, or coupled equipment on an occupied track. Title 49 CFR
214.336(b)(1) provides the requirements for affected workers to cease
all on-ground work and equipment movement being performed, and occupy a
PPOS upon receiving either a warning or notification of equipment
movement on the adjacent controlled track. The average track center
spacing on the Northeast Corridor (NEC) is less than 19 feet, and is
therefore regulated under the requirements of 49 CFR 214.336. Amtrak's
production equipment units are typically work trains that consist of
many on-track, self-propelled, coupled pieces of equipment, and the
materials required for continuous action track renewal (rail, ballast,
and/or tie replacement), removal of track, and/or track laying. The
current practice for workers engaged in a common task with on-track,
self-propelled equipment prevents worker access to a PPOS between the
running rails of the occupied track, and when the workers must cross
the tracks for which movement is authorized. The safest PPOS is
identified within the perimeter of the immobile production equipment on
the occupied track but not between the running rails.
Title 49 CFR 214.336(e)(2) provides exceptions for workers
performing maintenance or repairs either alongside or within the
perimeter of a roadway maintenance machine, or coupled equipment on the
occupied track. The exception to the requirement to cease work does not
apply to workers on the ground engaged in a common task with such
equipment when a warning is provided for movement on the adjacent
controlled track, when the equipment prevents access between the rails
of the occupied track, when the only alternate PPOS requires workers to
cross tracks for which movement is authorized at maximum authorized
speeds (the highest authorized speed on the NEC is 150 mph, 220 feet
per second).
An unfortunate consequence of the procedures for adjacent
controlled track is that workers are frequently required to engage in a
common task alongside Amtrak's production equipment to cross a
convergent path with the projected path of the movement for which a
warning was just received. A worker's exposure to the risk associated
with an adjacent controlled track is maximized at that moment as a
result of the regulation designed to minimize this particular risk. The
normal frequency of passing trains on the NEC can be as high as 30
trains per hour, which includes instances of multiple trains authorized
to pass the work group simultaneously. In the scenario of multiple
authorized movements, a worker's view of adjacent track movements could
be obstructed by an approaching movement requiring them to blindly
cross an unprotected track.
Amtrak seeks regulatory relief so that the RWIC may identify a PPOS
in an area of the stationary equipment, which minimizes risk for the
worker traversing to occupy the identified PPOS, provided that such
PPOS is within the widest perimeter dimension of the equipment and no
part of the worker's person may break the plane projected by the
equipment's widest perimeter dimension. The equipment would effectively
shelter the worker in a place of safety. Equipment authorized to
operate on the NEC must meet the dimensional specification, ``Clearance
Limitations of Roadway Equipment; Plate C'', which is defined
specifically for the safe passage of multiple adjacent movements at the
most restrictive spacing of track center locations (Figure 1). It is
this specification that ensures the worker a PPOS protected from
authorized movements.
Amtrak states in its petition that it is dedicated to ensuring the
safety of its employees, and emphasizes that Amtrak does not wish to
seek a waiver from the procedures for adjacent controlled track
movements when the RWIC feels it safe for the workers to cross and
occupy a PPOS in accordance with the regulation. The method of
identifying a PPOS within the widest perimeter dimension of stationary
equipment on an occupied track is a common practice that has been
employed since Amtrak's inception without any records of serious injury
or fatality. In contrast, the procedure provided in the regulation
(crossing live tracks to reach the PPOS) has resulted in fatalities.
The Fatality Analysis of Maintenance-of-way Employees and Signalmen
committee's most recent publication on ``Fatalities on Adjacent
Tracks'' shows that 91 percent of the Roadway Worker Protection
fatalities that are classified as adjacent track fatalities occurred on
adjacent tracks with less than 19-foot spacing, where roadway
maintenance machines were present and in use on the track where work
was being performed.
Amtrak believes that the waiver requested will provide a level of
safety for workers engaged in a common task with on-track, self-
propelled equipment, or coupled equipment on an occupied track that
exceeds the regulation's requirements. Therefore, Amtrak believes that
relief from the PPOS
[[Page 28593]]
requirements for production track-laying machines, as defined in the
regulation, is in the best interest of its roadway workers and
consistent with railroad safety objectives.
Interested parties are invited to participate in these proceedings
by submitting written views, data, or comments. FRA does not anticipate
scheduling a public hearing in connection with these proceedings since
the facts do not appear to warrant a hearing. If any interested party
desires an opportunity for oral comment, they should notify FRA, in
writing, before the end of the comment period and specify the basis for
their request.
All communications concerning these proceedings should identify the
appropriate docket number and may be submitted by any of the following
methods:
Web site: https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
Fax: 202-493-2251.
Mail: Docket Operations Facility, U.S. Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., W12-140, Washington, DC
20590.
Hand Delivery: 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Room W12-140,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal Holidays.
Communications received by June 16, 2014 will be considered by FRA
before final action is taken. Comments received after that date will be
considered as far as practicable.
All written communications concerning these proceedings are
available for examination during regular business hours (9 a.m.-5 p.m.)
at the above facility. All documents in the public docket are also
available for inspection and copying on the Internet at the docket
facility's Web site at https://www.regulations.gov.
Anyone is able to search the electronic form of any written
communications and comments received into any of our dockets by the
name of the individual submitting the comment (or signing the document,
if submitted on behalf of an association, business, labor union, etc.).
See https://www.regulations.gov/#!privacyNotice for the privacy notice
of regulations.gov or interested parties may review the U.S. Department
of Transportation's complete Privacy Act Statement in the Federal
Register published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477).
Robert C. Lauby,
Associate Administrator for Railroad Safety, Chief Safety Officer.
[FR Doc. 2014-11348 Filed 5-15-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-06-P