Determination of Regulatory Review Period for Purposes of Patent Extension; KYPROLIS, 27877-27878 [2014-11175]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 94 / Thursday, May 15, 2014 / Notices 1. The current landscape of products used for emergency treatment of bleeding and the respective Centers, Divisions, and Branches within FDA involved in their review. 2. Definitions of bleeding severity and methods for validating bleeding severity scales used in the evaluation of hemostatic devices. 3. Pre-clinical studies, including animal studies, that can be used to collect data when clinical data are difficult to obtain. What value do these models provide (for the evaluation of hemostatic medical devices?) and what are their shortcomings? 4. What options exist for obtaining clinical data for products used for emergency treatment of bleeding in both Civilian and Military settings, and which devices should be supported by clinical data? 5. Products used for emergency treatment of bleeding are often used by a variety of end users and in a variety of high-stress situations; improper or unnecessary device use has the potential to cause serious harm. What human factors issues exist with use of these products and how should these issues be studied? 6. Discussion of protocols used to study the topics, such as validation of bleeding severity, bench-top, animal, and human studies, and assessment of hemostatic devices used for noncompressible hemorrhage. These topics will be presented by experts in the associated area, followed by more indepth discussions of the given topics in smaller breakout sessions. Dated: May 9, 2014. Leslie Kux, Assistant Commissioner for Policy. [FR Doc. 2014–11170 Filed 5–14–14; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4160–01–P DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Food and Drug Administration TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES [Docket Nos. FDA–2013–E–0431; FDA– 2013–E–0432; FDA–2013–E–0433; FDA– 2013–E–0436; FDA–2013–E–0437; FDA– 2013–E–0438; and FDA–2013–E–0439] Determination of Regulatory Review Period for Purposes of Patent Extension; KYPROLIS AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS. ACTION: Notice. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has determined the regulatory review period for SUMMARY: VerDate Mar<15>2010 18:18 May 14, 2014 Jkt 232001 KYPROLIS and is publishing this notice of that determination as required by law. FDA has made the determination because of the submission of applications to the Director of Patents and Trademarks, Department of Commerce, for the extension of a patent which claims that human drug product. ADDRESSES: Submit electronic comments to https:// www.regulations.gov. Submit written petitions (two copies are required) and written comments to the Division of Dockets Management (HFA–305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852. Submit petitions electronically to https://www.regulations.gov at Docket No. FDA–2013–S–0610. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Beverly Friedman, Office of Management, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 51, Rm. 6257, Silver Spring, MD 20993–0002, 301– 796–7900. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Drug Price Competition and Patent Term Restoration Act of 1984 (Pub. L. 98–417) and the Generic Animal Drug and Patent Term Restoration Act (Pub. L. 100–670) generally provide that a patent may be extended for a period of up to 5 years so long as the patented item (human drug product, animal drug product, medical device, food additive, or color additive) was subject to regulatory review by FDA before the item was marketed. Under these acts, a product’s regulatory review period forms the basis for determining the amount of extension an applicant may receive. A regulatory review period consists of two periods of time: A testing phase and an approval phase. For human drug products, the testing phase begins when the exemption to permit the clinical investigations of the drug becomes effective and runs until the approval phase begins. The approval phase starts with the initial submission of an application to market the human drug product and continues until FDA grants permission to market the drug product. Although only a portion of a regulatory review period may count toward the actual amount of extension that the Director of Patents and Trademarks may award (for example, half the testing phase must be subtracted as well as any time that may have occurred before the patent was issued), FDA’s determination of the length of a regulatory review period for a human drug product will include all of the testing phase and approval phase as specified in 35 U.S.C. 156(g)(1)(B). PO 00000 Frm 00041 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 27877 FDA has approved for marketing the human drug product KYPROLIS (carfilzomib). KYPROLIS is indicated for the treatment of patients with multiple myeloma who have received at least two prior therapies including bortezomib and an immunomodulatory agent and have demonstrated disease progression on or within 60 days of completion of the last therapy. Subsequent to this approval, the Patent and Trademark Office received patent term restoration applications for KYPROLIS (U.S. Patent Nos. 7,232,818; 7,417,042; 7,491,704; 8,207,125; 8,207,126; 8,207,127; and 8,207,297) from Onyx Therapeutics, Inc., and the Patent and Trademark Office requested FDA’s assistance in determining the patents’ eligibility for patent term restoration. In a letter dated July 10, 2013, FDA advised the Patent and Trademark Office that this human drug product had undergone a regulatory review period and that the approval of KYPROLIS represented the first permitted commercial marketing or use of the product. Thereafter, the Patent and Trademark Office requested that FDA determine the product’s regulatory review period. FDA has determined that the applicable regulatory review period for KYPROLIS is 2,565 days. Of this time, 2,267 days occurred during the testing phase of the regulatory review period, while 298 days occurred during the approval phase. These periods of time were derived from the following dates: 1. The date an exemption under section 505(i) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the FD&C Act) (21 U.S.C. 355(i)) became effective: July 14, 2005. FDA has verified the applicant’s claim that the date the investigational new drug application became effective was on July 14, 2005. 2. The date the application was initially submitted with respect to the human drug product under section 505(b) of the FD&C Act: September 27, 2011. FDA has verified the applicant’s claim that the new drug application (NDA) for KYPROLIS (NDA 202714) was submitted on September 27, 2011. 3. The date the application was approved: July 20, 2012. FDA has verified the applicant’s claim that NDA 202714 was approved on July 20, 2012. This determination of the regulatory review period establishes the maximum potential length of a patent extension. However, the Patent and Trademark Office applies several statutory limitations in its calculations of the actual period for patent extension. In its applications for patent extension, this applicant seeks 24 days; 43 days; or 462 days of patent term extension. E:\FR\FM\15MYN1.SGM 15MYN1 27878 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 94 / Thursday, May 15, 2014 / Notices Anyone with knowledge that any of the dates as published are incorrect may submit to the Division of Dockets Management (see ADDRESSES) either electronic or written comments and ask for a redetermination by July 14, 2014. Furthermore, any interested person may petition FDA for a determination regarding whether the applicant for extension acted with due diligence during the regulatory review period by November 12, 2014. To meet its burden, the petition must contain sufficient facts to merit an FDA investigation. (See H. Rept. 857, part 1, 98th Cong., 2d sess., pp. 41–42, 1984.) Petitions should be in the format specified in 21 CFR 10.30. Interested persons may submit to the Division of Dockets Management (see ADDRESSES) electronic or written comments and written or electronic petitions. It is only necessary to send one set of comments. Identify comments with the docket number found in brackets in the heading of this document. If you submit a written petition, two copies are required. A petition submitted electronically must be submitted to https:// www.regulations.gov, Docket No. FDA– 2013–S–0610. Comments and petitions that have not been made publicly available on https://www.regulations.gov may be viewed in the Division of Dockets Management between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday. Dated: May 9, 2014. Leslie Kux, Assistant Commissioner for Policy. [FR Doc. 2014–11175 Filed 5–14–14; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4160–01–P DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Food and Drug Administration [Docket Nos. FDA–2011–E–0711; FDA– 2011–E–0712; FDA–2011–E–0715] Determination of Regulatory Review Period for Purposes of Patent Extension; BENLYSTA AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS. ACTION: Notice. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has determined the regulatory review period for BENLYSTA and is publishing this notice of that determination as required by law. FDA has made the determination because of the submission of applications to the Director of Patents and Trademarks, Department of Commerce, for the TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES SUMMARY: VerDate Mar<15>2010 18:18 May 14, 2014 Jkt 232001 extension of a patent which claims that human biological product. ADDRESSES: Submit written petitions (two copies are required) and written comments to the Division of Dockets Management (HFA–305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852. Submit petitions electronically to https:// www.regulations.gov at Docket No. FDA–2013–S–0610. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Beverly Friedman, Office of Management, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 51, Rm. 6257, Silver Spring, MD 20993–0002, 301– 796–7900. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Drug Price Competition and Patent Term Restoration Act of 1984 (Pub. L. 98–417) and the Generic Animal Drug and Patent Term Restoration Act (Pub. L. 100–670) generally provide that a patent may be extended for a period of up to 5 years so long as the patented item (human drug product, animal drug product, medical device, food additive, or color additive) was subject to regulatory review by FDA before the item was marketed. Under these acts, a product’s regulatory review period forms the basis for determining the amount of extension an applicant may receive. A regulatory review period consists of two periods of time: A testing phase and an approval phase. For human biological products, the testing phase begins when the exemption to permit the clinical investigations of the biological becomes effective and runs until the approval phase begins. The approval phase starts with the initial submission of an application to market the human biological product and continues until FDA grants permission to market the biological product. Although only a portion of a regulatory review period may count toward the actual amount of extension that the Director of Patents and Trademarks may award (for example, half the testing phase must be subtracted as well as any time that may have occurred before the patent was issued), FDA’s determination of the length of a regulatory review period for a human biological product will include all of the testing phase and approval phase as specified in 35 U.S.C. 156(g)(1)(B). FDA has approved for marketing the human biologic product, BENLYSTA (belimumab). BENLYSTA is indicated for treatment of adult patients with active, autoantibody-positive, systemic lupus erythematosus who are receiving standard therapy. Subsequent to this PO 00000 Frm 00042 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 approval, the Patent and Trademark Office received patent term restoration applications for BENLYSTA (U.S. Patent Nos. 6,403,770; 7,138,501; and 7,879,328) from Human Genome Sciences Inc., and the Patent and Trademark Office requested FDA’s assistance in determining the patents’ eligibility for patent term restoration. In a letter dated July 2, 2012, FDA advised the Patent and Trademark Office that this human biological product had undergone a regulatory review period and that the approval of BENLYSTA represented the first permitted commercial marketing or use of the product. Thereafter, the Patent and Trademark Office requested that FDA determine the product’s regulatory review period. FDA has determined that the applicable regulatory review period for BENLYSTA is 3,426 days. Of this time, 3,152 days occurred during the testing phase of the regulatory review period, while 274 days occurred during the approval phase. These periods of time were derived from the following dates: 1. The date an exemption under section 505(i) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 355(i)) became effective: October 23, 2001. FDA has verified the applicant’s claim that the date the investigational new drug application became effective was on October 23, 2001. 2. The date the application was initially submitted with respect to the human biological product under section 351 of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 262): June 9, 2010. The applicant claims June 10, 2010, as the date the biologics license application (BLA) for BENLYSTA (BLA 125370/0) was initially submitted. However, FDA records indicate that BLA 125370/0 was submitted on June 9, 2010. 3. The date the application was approved: March 9, 2011. FDA has verified the applicant’s claim that BLA 125370/0 was approved on March 9, 2011. This determination of the regulatory review period establishes the maximum potential length of a patent extension. However, the Patent and Trademark Office applies several statutory limitations in its calculations of the actual period for patent extension. In its applications for patent extension, this applicant seeks 1,733 days or 610 days or 37 days of patent term extension. Anyone with knowledge that any of the dates as published are incorrect may submit to the Division of Dockets Management (see ADDRESSES) either electronic or written comments and ask for a redetermination by July 14, 2014. Furthermore, any interested person may E:\FR\FM\15MYN1.SGM 15MYN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 94 (Thursday, May 15, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 27877-27878]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-11175]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket Nos. FDA-2013-E-0431; FDA-2013-E-0432; FDA-2013-E-0433; FDA-
2013-E-0436; FDA-2013-E-0437; FDA-2013-E-0438; and FDA-2013-E-0439]


Determination of Regulatory Review Period for Purposes of Patent 
Extension; KYPROLIS

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has determined the 
regulatory review period for KYPROLIS and is publishing this notice of 
that determination as required by law. FDA has made the determination 
because of the submission of applications to the Director of Patents 
and Trademarks, Department of Commerce, for the extension of a patent 
which claims that human drug product.

ADDRESSES: Submit electronic comments to https://www.regulations.gov. 
Submit written petitions (two copies are required) and written comments 
to the Division of Dockets Management (HFA-305), Food and Drug 
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852. 
Submit petitions electronically to https://www.regulations.gov at Docket 
No. FDA-2013-S-0610.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Beverly Friedman, Office of 
Management, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug 
Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 51, Rm. 6257, Silver 
Spring, MD 20993-0002, 301-796-7900.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Drug Price Competition and Patent Term 
Restoration Act of 1984 (Pub. L. 98-417) and the Generic Animal Drug 
and Patent Term Restoration Act (Pub. L. 100-670) generally provide 
that a patent may be extended for a period of up to 5 years so long as 
the patented item (human drug product, animal drug product, medical 
device, food additive, or color additive) was subject to regulatory 
review by FDA before the item was marketed. Under these acts, a 
product's regulatory review period forms the basis for determining the 
amount of extension an applicant may receive.
    A regulatory review period consists of two periods of time: A 
testing phase and an approval phase. For human drug products, the 
testing phase begins when the exemption to permit the clinical 
investigations of the drug becomes effective and runs until the 
approval phase begins. The approval phase starts with the initial 
submission of an application to market the human drug product and 
continues until FDA grants permission to market the drug product. 
Although only a portion of a regulatory review period may count toward 
the actual amount of extension that the Director of Patents and 
Trademarks may award (for example, half the testing phase must be 
subtracted as well as any time that may have occurred before the patent 
was issued), FDA's determination of the length of a regulatory review 
period for a human drug product will include all of the testing phase 
and approval phase as specified in 35 U.S.C. 156(g)(1)(B).
    FDA has approved for marketing the human drug product KYPROLIS 
(carfilzomib). KYPROLIS is indicated for the treatment of patients with 
multiple myeloma who have received at least two prior therapies 
including bortezomib and an immunomodulatory agent and have 
demonstrated disease progression on or within 60 days of completion of 
the last therapy. Subsequent to this approval, the Patent and Trademark 
Office received patent term restoration applications for KYPROLIS (U.S. 
Patent Nos. 7,232,818; 7,417,042; 7,491,704; 8,207,125; 8,207,126; 
8,207,127; and 8,207,297) from Onyx Therapeutics, Inc., and the Patent 
and Trademark Office requested FDA's assistance in determining the 
patents' eligibility for patent term restoration. In a letter dated 
July 10, 2013, FDA advised the Patent and Trademark Office that this 
human drug product had undergone a regulatory review period and that 
the approval of KYPROLIS represented the first permitted commercial 
marketing or use of the product. Thereafter, the Patent and Trademark 
Office requested that FDA determine the product's regulatory review 
period.
    FDA has determined that the applicable regulatory review period for 
KYPROLIS is 2,565 days. Of this time, 2,267 days occurred during the 
testing phase of the regulatory review period, while 298 days occurred 
during the approval phase. These periods of time were derived from the 
following dates:
    1. The date an exemption under section 505(i) of the Federal Food, 
Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the FD&C Act) (21 U.S.C. 355(i)) became 
effective: July 14, 2005. FDA has verified the applicant's claim that 
the date the investigational new drug application became effective was 
on July 14, 2005.
    2. The date the application was initially submitted with respect to 
the human drug product under section 505(b) of the FD&C Act: September 
27, 2011. FDA has verified the applicant's claim that the new drug 
application (NDA) for KYPROLIS (NDA 202714) was submitted on September 
27, 2011.
    3. The date the application was approved: July 20, 2012. FDA has 
verified the applicant's claim that NDA 202714 was approved on July 20, 
2012.
    This determination of the regulatory review period establishes the 
maximum potential length of a patent extension. However, the Patent and 
Trademark Office applies several statutory limitations in its 
calculations of the actual period for patent extension. In its 
applications for patent extension, this applicant seeks 24 days; 43 
days; or 462 days of patent term extension.

[[Page 27878]]

    Anyone with knowledge that any of the dates as published are 
incorrect may submit to the Division of Dockets Management (see 
ADDRESSES) either electronic or written comments and ask for a 
redetermination by July 14, 2014. Furthermore, any interested person 
may petition FDA for a determination regarding whether the applicant 
for extension acted with due diligence during the regulatory review 
period by November 12, 2014. To meet its burden, the petition must 
contain sufficient facts to merit an FDA investigation. (See H. Rept. 
857, part 1, 98th Cong., 2d sess., pp. 41-42, 1984.) Petitions should 
be in the format specified in 21 CFR 10.30.
    Interested persons may submit to the Division of Dockets Management 
(see ADDRESSES) electronic or written comments and written or 
electronic petitions. It is only necessary to send one set of comments. 
Identify comments with the docket number found in brackets in the 
heading of this document. If you submit a written petition, two copies 
are required. A petition submitted electronically must be submitted to 
https://www.regulations.gov, Docket No. FDA-2013-S-0610. Comments and 
petitions that have not been made publicly available on https://www.regulations.gov may be viewed in the Division of Dockets Management 
between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.

    Dated: May 9, 2014.
Leslie Kux,
Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2014-11175 Filed 5-14-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.