Determination of Regulatory Review Period for Purposes of Patent Extension; PALLADIA, 27879-27880 [2014-11172]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 94 / Thursday, May 15, 2014 / Notices
petition FDA for a determination
regarding whether the applicant for
extension acted with due diligence
during the regulatory review period by
November 12, 2014. To meet its burden,
the petition must contain sufficient facts
to merit an FDA investigation. (See H.
Rept. 857, part 1, 98th Cong., 2d sess.,
pp. 41–42, 1984.) Petitions should be in
the format specified in 21 CFR 10.30.
Interested persons may submit to the
Division of Dockets Management (see
ADDRESSES) electronic or written
comments and written or electronic
petitions. It is only necessary to send
one set of comments. Identify comments
with the docket number found in
brackets in the heading of this
document. If you submit a written
petition, two copies are required. A
petition submitted electronically must
be submitted to https://
www.regulations.gov, Docket No. FDA–
2013–S–0610. Comments and petitions
that have not been made publicly
available on https://www.regulations.gov
may be viewed in the Division of
Dockets Management between 9 a.m.
and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.
Comments and petitions that have not
been made publicly available on
https://www.regulations.gov may be
viewed in the Division of Dockets
Management between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m.,
Monday through Friday.
Dated: May 9, 2014.
Leslie Kux,
Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2014–11176 Filed 5–14–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA–2010–E–0132]
Determination of Regulatory Review
Period for Purposes of Patent
Extension; PALLADIA
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Notice.
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) has determined
the regulatory review period for
PALLADIA and is publishing this notice
of that determination as required by
law. FDA has made the determination
because of the submission of an
application to the Director of Patents
and Trademarks, Department of
Commerce, for the extension of a patent
which claims that animal drug product.
ADDRESSES: Submit electronic
comments to https://
TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:18 May 14, 2014
Jkt 232001
www.regulations.gov. Submit written
petitions (two copies are required) and
written comments to the Division of
Dockets Management (HFA–305), Food
and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers
Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
Submit petitions electronically to https://
www.regulations.gov at Docket No.
FDA–2013–S–0610.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Beverly Friedman, Office of
Management, Center for Drug
Evaluation and Research, Food and
Drug Administration, 10903 New
Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 51, Rm. 6257,
Silver Spring, MD 20993–0002, 301–
796–7900.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Drug
Price Competition and Patent Term
Restoration Act of 1984 (Pub. L. 98–417)
and the Generic Animal Drug and Patent
Term Restoration Act (Pub. L. 100–670)
generally provide that a patent may be
extended for a period of up to 5 years
so long as the patented item (human
drug product, animal drug product,
medical device, food additive, or color
additive) was subject to regulatory
review by FDA before the item was
marketed. Under these acts, a product’s
regulatory review period forms the basis
for determining the amount of extension
an applicant may receive.
A regulatory review period consists of
two periods of time: A testing phase and
an approval phase. For animal drug
products, the testing phase begins on
the earlier date when either a major
environmental effects test was initiated
for the drug or when an exemption
under section 512(j) of the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the FD&C Act)
(21 U.S.C. 360b(j)) became effective and
runs until the approval phase begins.
The approval phase starts with the
initial submission of an application to
market the animal drug product and
continues until FDA grants permission
to market the drug product. Although
only a portion of a regulatory review
period may count toward the actual
amount of extension that the Director of
Patents and Trademarks may award (for
example, half the testing phase must be
subtracted as well as any time that may
have occurred before the patent was
issued), FDA’s determination of the
length of a regulatory review period for
an animal drug product will include all
of the testing phase and approval phase
as specified in 35 U.S.C. 156(g)(4)(B).
FDA has approved for marketing the
animal drug product PALLADIA
(toceranib phosphate). PALLADIA is
indicated for the treatment of Patnaik
grade II or III, recurrent, cutaneous mast
cell tumors with or without regional
lymph node involvement in dogs.
PO 00000
Frm 00043
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
27879
Subsequent to this approval, the Patent
and Trademark Office received a patent
term restoration application for
PALLADIA (U.S. Patent No. 6,573,293)
from Sugen, Inc., and Pharmacia &
Upjohn Company LLC, and the Patent
and Trademark Office requested FDA’s
assistance in determining this patent’s
eligibility for patent term restoration. In
a letter dated May 3, 2011, FDA advised
the Patent and Trademark Office that
this animal drug product had undergone
a regulatory review period and that the
approval of PALLADIA represented the
first permitted commercial marketing or
use of the product. Thereafter, the
Patent and Trademark Office requested
that the FDA determine the product’s
regulatory review period.
FDA has determined that the
applicable regulatory review period for
PALLADIA is 2,711 days. Of this time,
2,681 days occurred during the testing
phase of the regulatory review period,
while 30 days occurred during the
approval phase. These periods of time
were derived from the following dates:
1. The date an exemption under
section 505(i) of the Federal Food, Drug,
and Cosmetic Act (the FD&C Act) (21
U.S.C. 355(i)) became effective:
December 21, 2001. The applicant
claims November 23, 2001, as the date
the investigational new animal drug
application (INAD) became effective.
However, Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) records indicate
that the INAD effective date was
December 21, 2001, which was the
received date of the first submission that
includes a study with substantial data
(submission of a major health test) or
the first submission containing a Notice
of Claimed Investigational Exemption.
2. The date the application was
initially submitted with respect to the
animal drug product under section 512
of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 360b): April
23, 2009. The applicant claims April 22,
2009, as the date the new animal drug
application (NADA) for Palladia (NADA
141–295) was initially submitted.
However, FDA records indicate that
NADA 141–295 was submitted on April
23, 2009.
3. The date the application was
approved: May 22, 2009. FDA has
verified the applicant’s claim that
NADA 141–295 was approved on May
22, 2009.
This determination of the regulatory
review period establishes the maximum
potential length of a patent extension.
However, the Patent and Trademark
Office applies several statutory
limitations in its calculations of the
actual period for patent extension. In its
application for patent extension, this
E:\FR\FM\15MYN1.SGM
15MYN1
27880
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 94 / Thursday, May 15, 2014 / Notices
applicant seeks 827 days of patent term
extension.
Anyone with knowledge that any of
the dates as published are incorrect may
submit to the Division of Dockets
Management (see ADDRESSES) either
electronic or written comments and ask
for a redetermination by July 14, 2014.
Furthermore, any interested person may
petition FDA for a determination
regarding whether the applicant for
extension acted with due diligence
during the regulatory review period by
November 12, 2014. To meet its burden,
the petition must contain sufficient facts
to merit an FDA investigation. (See H.
Rept. 857, part 1, 98th Cong., 2d sess.,
pp. 41–42, 1984.) Petitions should be in
the format specified in 21 CFR 10.30.
Interested persons may submit to the
Division of Dockets Management (see
ADDRESSES) electronic or written
comments and written or electronic
petitions. It is only necessary to send
one set of comments. Identify comments
with the docket number found in
brackets in the heading of this
document. If you submit a written
petition, two copies are required. A
petition submitted electronically must
be submitted to https://
www.regulations.gov, Docket No. FDA–
2013–S–0610. Comments and petitions
that have not been made publicly
available on https://www.regulations.gov
may be viewed in the Division of
Dockets Management between 9 a.m.
and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.
Dated: May 9, 2014.
Leslie Kux,
Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2014–11172 Filed 5–14–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
National Institutes of Health
Government-Owned Inventions;
Availability for Licensing
AGENCY:
National Institutes of Health,
HHS.
ACTION:
Notice.
The inventions listed below
are owned by an agency of the U.S.
Government and are available for
licensing in the U.S. in accordance with
35 U.S.C. 209 and 37 CFR part 404 to
achieve expeditious commercialization
of results of federally-funded research
and development. Foreign patent
applications are filed on selected
inventions to extend market coverage
for companies and may also be available
for licensing.
TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:18 May 14, 2014
Jkt 232001
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Licensing information and copies of the
U.S. patent applications listed below
may be obtained by writing to the
indicated licensing contact at the Office
of Technology Transfer, National
Institutes of Health, 6011 Executive
Boulevard, Suite 325, Rockville,
Maryland 20852–3804; telephone: 301–
496–7057; fax: 301–402–0220. A signed
Confidential Disclosure Agreement will
be required to receive copies of the
patent applications.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Technology descriptions follow.
Real Time Medical Image Processing
Using Cloud Computing
Description of Technology: The
invention pertains to a system for
reconstructing images acquired from MR
and CT scanners in a robust Gadgetron
based cloud computing system. A
hardware interface connects clinical
imaging instruments (e.g., MR or CT
scanners) with a cloud computing
environment that includes image data
reconstruction and processing software
not limited by the computational
constraints typical of static hardware
with finite processor power. Raw
imaging data acquired from an MR or
CT instrument is evaluated and
categorized based on a pre-prioritized
dimensionality parameter (e.g., spatial
dimension parameter; three- or twodimensionality, a time parameter, a
flow/velocity parameter, an experiment
timing dimension parameter, a diffusion
encoding parameter, a functional/
physiological testing dimension
parameter, or a physiologic gating index
parameter) and transmitted to a
corresponding cloud computing
environment for processing and
reconstruction. The final processed
image is retransmitted to a user interface
that can be read by a radiologist or
technician.
Potential Commercial Applications:
• MRI imaging
• CT imaging
• Image processing
• Diagnostic radiology
Competitive Advantages:
• Eliminates the need for purchasing
expensive data processing equipment
that becomes obsolete
• Less equipment leads to lowers costs
and space efficiency
• Exponentially more robust computer
power, data acquisition and image
reconstruction
Development Stage:
• Early-stage
• In vitro data available
• In vivo data available (animal)
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
• In vivo data available (human)
• In situ data available (on-site)
• Prototype
Inventors: Michael Hansen, Peter
Kellman, Hui Xue (all of NHLBI)
Intellectual Property:
• HHS Reference No. E–074–2014/0—
U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/
934,987 filed 03 Feb 2014
• HHS Reference No. E–074–2014/1—
U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/
953,017 filed 14 Mar 2014
Licensing Contact: Michael
Shmilovich, Esq; 301–435–5019;
shmilovm@mail.nih.gov.
Collaborative Research Opportunity:
The National Heart Lung & Blood
Institute is seeking statements of
capability or interest from parties
interested in collaborative research to
further develop, evaluate or
commercialize Gadgetron mediated
clinical image processing. For
collaboration opportunities, please
contact Denise Crooks, Ph.D. at 301–
435–0103 or crooksd@nhlbi.nih.gov.
Personal Respirator Safety: Flushed
Seal for an Improved, More Protective,
Negative-Pressure Respirator
Description of Technology: This CDCdeveloped technology relates to
improved, full-face flushed-seal
personal respirators for lowering costs,
improving user mobility, and ensuring
occupational health and safety.
Currently, the most common type of
respirator in use, the negative pressure
respirator, seals to a user’s face so that
inhaled air is pulled through a purifying
filter by inhalation-generated negative
pressure; the weakest link in this type
of respirator is typically the seal at the
face-to-mask interface. When there is
face-seal leakage, toxic air will be drawn
into the facepiece of the respirator and
inhaled by the wearer, though designers
and engineers of respirators attempt to
minimize this face-seal leakage. Over
the last several decades, facepiece
design has been optimized by this
design approach so that the ambient
leakage of half-facepiece respirators and
full-facepiece respirators are 10% and
2%, respectively.
This technology incorporates an
additional element to reduce face-seal
leakage and therefore increases user
protection. In the respirator described
by this technology, a primary sealing
element is situated adjacent to the user’s
breathing space and a secondary sealing
element. Exhaled air (i.e., clean air
obtained by filter passage) is passed
from the breathing space into a flushing
channel formed between the primary
and secondary seals. If there is leakage
in the primary seal, air from this
E:\FR\FM\15MYN1.SGM
15MYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 94 (Thursday, May 15, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 27879-27880]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-11172]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA-2010-E-0132]
Determination of Regulatory Review Period for Purposes of Patent
Extension; PALLADIA
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has determined the
regulatory review period for PALLADIA and is publishing this notice of
that determination as required by law. FDA has made the determination
because of the submission of an application to the Director of Patents
and Trademarks, Department of Commerce, for the extension of a patent
which claims that animal drug product.
ADDRESSES: Submit electronic comments to https://www.regulations.gov.
Submit written petitions (two copies are required) and written comments
to the Division of Dockets Management (HFA-305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
Submit petitions electronically to https://www.regulations.gov at Docket
No. FDA-2013-S-0610.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Beverly Friedman, Office of
Management, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug
Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 51, Rm. 6257, Silver
Spring, MD 20993-0002, 301-796-7900.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Drug Price Competition and Patent Term
Restoration Act of 1984 (Pub. L. 98-417) and the Generic Animal Drug
and Patent Term Restoration Act (Pub. L. 100-670) generally provide
that a patent may be extended for a period of up to 5 years so long as
the patented item (human drug product, animal drug product, medical
device, food additive, or color additive) was subject to regulatory
review by FDA before the item was marketed. Under these acts, a
product's regulatory review period forms the basis for determining the
amount of extension an applicant may receive.
A regulatory review period consists of two periods of time: A
testing phase and an approval phase. For animal drug products, the
testing phase begins on the earlier date when either a major
environmental effects test was initiated for the drug or when an
exemption under section 512(j) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic
Act (the FD&C Act) (21 U.S.C. 360b(j)) became effective and runs until
the approval phase begins. The approval phase starts with the initial
submission of an application to market the animal drug product and
continues until FDA grants permission to market the drug product.
Although only a portion of a regulatory review period may count toward
the actual amount of extension that the Director of Patents and
Trademarks may award (for example, half the testing phase must be
subtracted as well as any time that may have occurred before the patent
was issued), FDA's determination of the length of a regulatory review
period for an animal drug product will include all of the testing phase
and approval phase as specified in 35 U.S.C. 156(g)(4)(B).
FDA has approved for marketing the animal drug product PALLADIA
(toceranib phosphate). PALLADIA is indicated for the treatment of
Patnaik grade II or III, recurrent, cutaneous mast cell tumors with or
without regional lymph node involvement in dogs. Subsequent to this
approval, the Patent and Trademark Office received a patent term
restoration application for PALLADIA (U.S. Patent No. 6,573,293) from
Sugen, Inc., and Pharmacia & Upjohn Company LLC, and the Patent and
Trademark Office requested FDA's assistance in determining this
patent's eligibility for patent term restoration. In a letter dated May
3, 2011, FDA advised the Patent and Trademark Office that this animal
drug product had undergone a regulatory review period and that the
approval of PALLADIA represented the first permitted commercial
marketing or use of the product. Thereafter, the Patent and Trademark
Office requested that the FDA determine the product's regulatory review
period.
FDA has determined that the applicable regulatory review period for
PALLADIA is 2,711 days. Of this time, 2,681 days occurred during the
testing phase of the regulatory review period, while 30 days occurred
during the approval phase. These periods of time were derived from the
following dates:
1. The date an exemption under section 505(i) of the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the FD&C Act) (21 U.S.C. 355(i)) became
effective: December 21, 2001. The applicant claims November 23, 2001,
as the date the investigational new animal drug application (INAD)
became effective. However, Food and Drug Administration (FDA) records
indicate that the INAD effective date was December 21, 2001, which was
the received date of the first submission that includes a study with
substantial data (submission of a major health test) or the first
submission containing a Notice of Claimed Investigational Exemption.
2. The date the application was initially submitted with respect to
the animal drug product under section 512 of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C.
360b): April 23, 2009. The applicant claims April 22, 2009, as the date
the new animal drug application (NADA) for Palladia (NADA 141-295) was
initially submitted. However, FDA records indicate that NADA 141-295
was submitted on April 23, 2009.
3. The date the application was approved: May 22, 2009. FDA has
verified the applicant's claim that NADA 141-295 was approved on May
22, 2009.
This determination of the regulatory review period establishes the
maximum potential length of a patent extension. However, the Patent and
Trademark Office applies several statutory limitations in its
calculations of the actual period for patent extension. In its
application for patent extension, this
[[Page 27880]]
applicant seeks 827 days of patent term extension.
Anyone with knowledge that any of the dates as published are
incorrect may submit to the Division of Dockets Management (see
ADDRESSES) either electronic or written comments and ask for a
redetermination by July 14, 2014. Furthermore, any interested person
may petition FDA for a determination regarding whether the applicant
for extension acted with due diligence during the regulatory review
period by November 12, 2014. To meet its burden, the petition must
contain sufficient facts to merit an FDA investigation. (See H. Rept.
857, part 1, 98th Cong., 2d sess., pp. 41-42, 1984.) Petitions should
be in the format specified in 21 CFR 10.30.
Interested persons may submit to the Division of Dockets Management
(see ADDRESSES) electronic or written comments and written or
electronic petitions. It is only necessary to send one set of comments.
Identify comments with the docket number found in brackets in the
heading of this document. If you submit a written petition, two copies
are required. A petition submitted electronically must be submitted to
https://www.regulations.gov, Docket No. FDA-2013-S-0610. Comments and
petitions that have not been made publicly available on https://www.regulations.gov may be viewed in the Division of Dockets Management
between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.
Dated: May 9, 2014.
Leslie Kux,
Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2014-11172 Filed 5-14-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-P