Revisions to the California State Implementation Plan; Ventura County Air Pollution Control District; Reasonably Available Control Technology for Ozone, 27761-27763 [2014-11087]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 94 / Thursday, May 15, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
(4) specified performance objectives; (5)
identified and assessed available
alternatives; (6) involved the public in
an open exchange of information and
perspectives among experts in relevant
disciplines, affected stakeholders in the
private sector and the public as a whole,
and provided on-line access to the
rulemaking docket; (7) attempted to
promote coordination, simplification,
and harmonization across government
agencies and identified goals designed
to promote innovation; (8) considered
approaches that reduce burdens and
maintain flexibility and freedom of
choice for the public; and (9) ensured
the objectivity of scientific and
technological information and
processes.
E. Executive Order 13132
(Federalism): This rulemaking does not
contain policies with federalism
implications sufficient to warrant
preparation of a Federalism Assessment
under Executive Order 13132 (Aug. 4,
1999).
F. Executive Order 13175 (Tribal
Consultation): This rulemaking will not:
(1) Have substantial direct effects on one
or more Indian tribes; (2) impose
substantial direct compliance costs on
Indian tribal governments; or (3)
preempt tribal law. Therefore, a tribal
summary impact statement is not
required under Executive Order 13175
(Nov. 6, 2000).
G. Executive Order 13211 (Energy
Effects): This rulemaking is not a
significant energy action under
Executive Order 13211 because this
rulemaking is not likely to have a
significant adverse effect on the supply,
distribution, or use of energy. Therefore,
a Statement of Energy Effects is not
required under Executive Order 13211
(May 18, 2001).
H. Executive Order 12988 (Civil
Justice Reform): This rulemaking meets
applicable standards to minimize
litigation, eliminate ambiguity, and
reduce burden as set forth in sections
3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive Order
12988 (Feb. 5, 1996).
I. Executive Order 13045 (Protection
of Children): This rulemaking does not
concern an environmental risk to health
or safety that may disproportionately
affect children under Executive Order
13045 (Apr. 21, 1997).
J. Executive Order 12630 (Taking of
Private Property): This rulemaking will
not effect a taking of private property or
otherwise have taking implications
under Executive Order 12630 (Mar. 15,
1988).
K. Congressional Review Act: Under
the Congressional Review Act
provisions of the Small Business
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:15 May 14, 2014
Jkt 232001
1996 (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.), the United
States Patent and Trademark Office will
submit a report containing this final rule
and other required information to the
United States Senate, the United States
House of Representatives, and the
Comptroller General of the Government
Accountability Office. The changes in
this rulemaking will not result in an
annual effect on the economy of 100
million dollars or more, a major increase
in costs or prices, or significant adverse
effects on competition, employment,
investment, productivity, innovation, or
the ability of United States-based
enterprises to compete with foreignbased enterprises in domestic and
export markets. Therefore, this
rulemaking is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as
defined in 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
L. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995: The changes set forth in this
rulemaking do not involve a Federal
intergovernmental mandate that will
result in the expenditure by State, local,
and tribal governments, in the aggregate,
of 100 million dollars (as adjusted) or
more in any one year, or a Federal
private sector mandate that will result
in the expenditure by the private sector
of 100 million dollars (as adjusted) or
more in any one year, and will not
significantly or uniquely affect small
governments. Therefore, no actions are
necessary under the provisions of the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995. See 2 U.S.C. 1501 et seq.
M. National Environmental Policy
Act: This rulemaking will not have any
effect on the quality of the environment
and is thus categorically excluded from
review under the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969. See
42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.
N. National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act: The requirements of
section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) are not
applicable because this rulemaking does
not contain provisions which involve
the use of technical standards.
O. Paperwork Reduction Act: The
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.) requires that the
Office consider the impact of paperwork
and other information collection
burdens imposed on the public. The
rules of practice pertaining to patent
term adjustment and extension have
been reviewed and approved by the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.)
under OMB control number 0651–0020.
The changes in this rulemaking: (1)
Revise the date from which the
fourteen-month period in 35 U.S.C.
154(b)(1)(A)(i) is measured in an
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
27761
international application for consistency
with the change to 35 U.S.C.
154(b)(1)(A)(i)(II); and (2) revise
(extend) the time period for seeking
reconsideration of the Office’s patent
term adjustment in view of the changes
in 35 U.S.C. 154(b)(3) and (b)(4). This
rulemaking does not add any additional
requirements (including information
collection requirements) or fees for
patent applicants or patentees.
Therefore, the Office is not resubmitting
information collection packages to OMB
for its review and approval because the
changes in this rulemaking do not affect
the information collection requirements
associated with the information
collections approved under OMB
control number 0651–0020 or any other
information collections.
Notwithstanding any other provision
of law, no person is required to respond
to nor shall any person be subject to a
penalty for failure to comply with a
collection of information subject to the
requirements of the Paperwork
Reduction Act unless that collection of
information displays a currently valid
OMB control number.
List of Subjects in 37 CFR Part 1
Administrative practice and
procedure, Courts, Freedom of
Information, Inventions and patents,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Small businesses.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, the interim rule amending 37
CFR part 1 which was published at 78
FR 19416 on April 1, 2013, is adopted
as a final rule without change.
■
Dated: May 9, 2014.
Michelle K. Lee,
Deputy Under Secretary of Commerce for
Intellectual Property and Deputy Director of
the United States Patent and Trademark
Office.
[FR Doc. 2014–11131 Filed 5–14–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–16–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R09–OAR–2014–0172; FRL–9910–85–
Region 9]
Revisions to the California State
Implementation Plan; Ventura County
Air Pollution Control District;
Reasonably Available Control
Technology for Ozone
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\15MYR1.SGM
15MYR1
27762
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 94 / Thursday, May 15, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is finalizing approval of
revisions to the Ventura County Air
Pollution Control District (VCAPCD)
portion of the California State
Implementation Plan (SIP). This action
was proposed in the Federal Register on
March 10, 2014 and concerns the
District’s reasonably available control
technology (RACT) requirements under
the 1997 8-hour ozone National
Ambient Air Quality Standards
(NAAQS). We are approving this
document under the Clean Air Act
(CAA or the Act).
SUMMARY:
This rule will be effective on
June 16, 2014.
DATES:
EPA has established docket
number EPA–R09–OAR–2014–0172 for
this action. Generally, documents in the
docket for this action are available
electronically at https://
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at
EPA Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street,
San Francisco, California 94105–3901.
While all documents in the docket are
listed at https://www.regulations.gov,
some information may be publicly
available only at the hard copy location
(e.g., copyrighted material, large maps,
multi-volume reports), and some may
not be available in either location (e.g.,
confidential business information
(CBI)). To inspect the hard copy
materials, please schedule an
appointment during normal business
ADDRESSES:
hours with the contact listed in the FOR
section.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Stanley Tong, EPA Region IX, (415)
947–4122, tong.stanley@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document, ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us’’
and ‘‘our’’ refer to EPA.
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
Table of Contents
I. Proposed Action
II. Public Comments and EPA Responses
III. EPA Action
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Proposed Action.
On March 10, 2014 (79 FR 13266),
EPA proposed to approve the following
document into the California SIP.
Local agency
Document
VCAPCD .......
Reasonably Available Control Technology State Implementation Plan Revision (2009 RACT
SIP Revision) as adopted September 15, 2009 (‘‘2009 RACT SIP’’).
VCAPCD’s submittal also included
the following negative declarations
which the District certified that it had
Adopted
9/15/09
Submitted
11/17/09
no sources subject to the control
techniques guidelines (CTG) documents.
CTG source category
CTG document title
Flat Wood Paneling Coatings ..................................
Large Appliance Coatings ........................................
Paper, Film and Foil Coatings .................................
Automobile and Light-Duty Truck Assembly Coatings.
Miscellaneous Industrial Adhesives .........................
Flexible Package Printing ........................................
Metal Furniture Coatings .........................................
Fiberglass Boat Manufacturing Materials ................
EPA–453/R06–004 Control Techniques Guidelines for Flat Wood Paneling Coatings.
EPA–453/R–07–004 Control Techniques Guidelines for Large Appliance Coatings.
EPA–453/R–07–003 Control Techniques Guidelines for Paper, Film, and Foil Coatings.
EPA–452/R–08–006 Control Techniques Guidelines for Automobile and Light-Duty Truck
Assembly Coatings.
EPA 453/R–08–005 Control Techniques Guidelines for Miscellaneous Industrial Adhesives.
EPA 453/R–06–003 Control Techniques Guidelines for Flexible Package Printing.
EPA 453/R–07–005 Control Techniques Guidelines for Metal Furniture Coatings.
EPA 453/R–08–004 Control Techniques Guidelines for Fiberglass Boat Manufacturing Materials.
We proposed to approve VCAPCD’s
2009 RACT SIP including the above
negative declarations because we
determined that it complied with the
relevant CAA requirements. Our
proposed action contains more
information on the submitted document
and our evaluation.
II. Public Comments and EPA
Responses
EPA’s proposed action provided a 30day public comment period. During this
period, we received no comments.
TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
III. EPA Action
No comments were submitted.
Therefore, as authorized in section
110(k)(3) of the Act, EPA is fully
approving this document, including the
negative declarations into the California
SIP.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:15 May 14, 2014
Jkt 232001
IV. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the Clean Air Act, the
Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the
provisions of the Act and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k);
40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP
submissions, EPA’s role is to approve
State choices, provided that they meet
the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
Accordingly, this action merely
approves State law as meeting Federal
requirements and does not impose
additional requirements beyond those
imposed by State law. For that reason,
this action:
• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ subject to review by the Office
of Management and Budget under
Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993);
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
E:\FR\FM\15MYR1.SGM
15MYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 94 / Thursday, May 15, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act;
and
• Does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address
disproportionate human health or
environmental effects with practical,
appropriate, and legally permissible
methods under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this rule does not have
tribal implications as specified by
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249,
November 9, 2000), because the SIP is
not approved to apply in Indian country
located in the State, and EPA notes that
it will not impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt
tribal law.
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. EPA will submit a
report containing this action and other
required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of the rule in
the Federal Register. A major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it
is published in the Federal Register.
This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as
defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean
Air Act, petitions for judicial review of
this action must be filed in the United
States Court of Appeals for the
appropriate circuit by July 14, 2014.
Filing a petition for reconsideration by
the Administrator of this final rule does
not affect the finality of this action for
the purposes of judicial review nor does
it extend the time within which a
petition for judicial review may be filed,
and shall not postpone the effectiveness
of such rule or action. This action may
not be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements (see section
307(b)(2)).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations,
Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Volatile
organic compounds.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:15 May 14, 2014
Jkt 232001
27763
Dated: April 25, 2014.
Jared Blumenfeld,
Regional Administrator, Region IX.
submitted on November 17, 2009 and
adopted on September 15, 2009.
*
*
*
*
*
Part 52, Chapter I, Title 40 of the Code
of Federal Regulations is amended as
follows:
[FR Doc. 2014–11087 Filed 5–14–14; 8:45 am]
PART 52—APPROVAL AND
PROMULGATION OF
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS.
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
1. The authority citation for Part 52
continues to read as follows:
[EPA–R07–OAR–2014–0165; FRL–9910–67–
Region–7]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
40 CFR Part 52
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart F—California
Approval and Promulgation of
Implementation Plans; State of Iowa
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
AGENCY:
2. Section 52.220 is amended by
adding paragraph (c)(437)to read as
follows:
■
§ 52.220
Identification of plan.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(437) New and amended regulations
for the following APCD was submitted
on November 17, 2009 by the
Governor’s designee.
(i) [Reserved]
(ii) Additional Material
(A) Ventura County Air Pollution
Control District.
(1) Reasonably Available Control
Technology State Implementation Plan
Revision (2009 RACT SIP Revision) as
adopted on September 15, 2009 (‘‘2009
RACT SIP’’).
■ 3. Section 52.222 is amended by
adding paragraph (a)(10)(i) to read as
follows:
§ 52.222
Negative declarations.
*
*
*
*
*
(a) * * *
(10) Ventura County Air Pollution
Control District.
(i) EPA–453/R06–004 Control
Techniques Guidelines for Flat Wood
Paneling Coatings; EPA–453/R–07–004
Control Techniques Guidelines for Large
Appliance Coatings; EPA–453/R–07–
003 Control Techniques Guidelines for
Paper, Film, and Foil Coatings; EPA–
452/R–08–006 Control Techniques
Guidelines for Automobile and LightDuty Truck Assembly Coatings; EPA
453/R–08–005 Control Techniques
Guidelines for Miscellaneous Industrial
Adhesives; EPA 453/R–06–003 Control
Techniques Guidelines for Flexible
Package Printing; EPA 453/R–07–005
Control Techniques Guidelines for
Metal Furniture Coatings; and EPA 453/
R–08–004 Control Techniques
Guidelines for Fiberglass Boat
Manufacturing Materials were
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is approving revisions to
the State Implementation Plan (SIP) for
the State of Iowa. This action will
amend the SIP to include revised
permitting regulations to allow facilities
to construct or modify existing sources
in areas that are not in attainment with
the National Ambient Air Quality
Standards. The rule revisions
incorporate Federal regulation by
reference. The provisions from previous
nonattainment permitting rules are
being retained and are now relocated to
Chapter 31 ‘‘Nonattainment Areas’’.
EPA is also acting to approve the SIP to
update the rule revisions for the
definition of excess emissions and
conformity of general actions rule.
DATES: This direct final rule will be
effective July 14, 2014, without further
notice, unless EPA receives adverse
comment by June 16, 2014. If EPA
receives adverse comment, we will
publish a timely withdrawal of the
direct final rule in the Federal Register
informing the public that the rule will
not take effect.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R07–
OAR–2014–0165, by one of the
following methods:
1. www.regulations.gov. Follow the
on-line instructions for submitting
comments.
2. Email: Algoe-eakin.amy@epa.gov.
3. Mail or Hand Delivery: Amy AlgoeEakin, Environmental Protection
Agency, Air Planning and Development
Branch, 11201 Renner Boulevard,
Lenexa, Kansas 66219.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
Docket ID No. EPA–R07–OAR–2014–
0165. EPA’s policy is that all comments
received will be included in the public
docket without change and may be
made available online at
www.regulations.gov, including any
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\15MYR1.SGM
15MYR1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 94 (Thursday, May 15, 2014)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 27761-27763]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-11087]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R09-OAR-2014-0172; FRL-9910-85-Region 9]
Revisions to the California State Implementation Plan; Ventura
County Air Pollution Control District; Reasonably Available Control
Technology for Ozone
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 27762]]
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is finalizing
approval of revisions to the Ventura County Air Pollution Control
District (VCAPCD) portion of the California State Implementation Plan
(SIP). This action was proposed in the Federal Register on March 10,
2014 and concerns the District's reasonably available control
technology (RACT) requirements under the 1997 8-hour ozone National
Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). We are approving this document
under the Clean Air Act (CAA or the Act).
DATES: This rule will be effective on June 16, 2014.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established docket number EPA-R09-OAR-2014-0172 for
this action. Generally, documents in the docket for this action are
available electronically at https://www.regulations.gov or in hard copy
at EPA Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, California 94105-
3901. While all documents in the docket are listed at https://www.regulations.gov, some information may be publicly available only at
the hard copy location (e.g., copyrighted material, large maps, multi-
volume reports), and some may not be available in either location
(e.g., confidential business information (CBI)). To inspect the hard
copy materials, please schedule an appointment during normal business
hours with the contact listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Stanley Tong, EPA Region IX, (415)
947-4122, tong.stanley@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, ``we,'' ``us'' and
``our'' refer to EPA.
Table of Contents
I. Proposed Action
II. Public Comments and EPA Responses
III. EPA Action
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Proposed Action.
On March 10, 2014 (79 FR 13266), EPA proposed to approve the
following document into the California SIP.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Local agency Document Adopted Submitted
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
VCAPCD..................... Reasonably Available Control Technology State 9/15/09 11/17/09
Implementation Plan Revision (2009 RACT SIP
Revision) as adopted September 15, 2009 (``2009
RACT SIP'').
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
VCAPCD's submittal also included the following negative
declarations which the District certified that it had no sources
subject to the control techniques guidelines (CTG) documents.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CTG source category CTG document title
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flat Wood Paneling Coatings.................... EPA-453/R06-004 Control Techniques Guidelines for Flat Wood
Paneling Coatings.
Large Appliance Coatings....................... EPA-453/R-07-004 Control Techniques Guidelines for Large
Appliance Coatings.
Paper, Film and Foil Coatings.................. EPA-453/R-07-003 Control Techniques Guidelines for Paper, Film,
and Foil Coatings.
Automobile and Light-Duty Truck Assembly EPA-452/R-08-006 Control Techniques Guidelines for Automobile
Coatings. and Light-Duty Truck Assembly Coatings.
Miscellaneous Industrial Adhesives............. EPA 453/R-08-005 Control Techniques Guidelines for
Miscellaneous Industrial Adhesives.
Flexible Package Printing...................... EPA 453/R-06-003 Control Techniques Guidelines for Flexible
Package Printing.
Metal Furniture Coatings....................... EPA 453/R-07-005 Control Techniques Guidelines for Metal
Furniture Coatings.
Fiberglass Boat Manufacturing Materials........ EPA 453/R-08-004 Control Techniques Guidelines for Fiberglass
Boat Manufacturing Materials.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
We proposed to approve VCAPCD's 2009 RACT SIP including the above
negative declarations because we determined that it complied with the
relevant CAA requirements. Our proposed action contains more
information on the submitted document and our evaluation.
II. Public Comments and EPA Responses
EPA's proposed action provided a 30-day public comment period.
During this period, we received no comments.
III. EPA Action
No comments were submitted. Therefore, as authorized in section
110(k)(3) of the Act, EPA is fully approving this document, including
the negative declarations into the California SIP.
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and
applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve State
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
Accordingly, this action merely approves State law as meeting Federal
requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those
imposed by State law. For that reason, this action:
Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993);
Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement
[[Page 27763]]
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because application of those
requirements would be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act; and
Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address disproportionate human health or environmental effects with
practical, appropriate, and legally permissible methods under Executive
Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this rule does not have tribal implications as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000),
because the SIP is not approved to apply in Indian country located in
the State, and EPA notes that it will not impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law.
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by July 14, 2014. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule
does not affect the finality of this action for the purposes of
judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for
judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness
of such rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in
proceedings to enforce its requirements (see section 307(b)(2)).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone,
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic compounds.
Dated: April 25, 2014.
Jared Blumenfeld,
Regional Administrator, Region IX.
Part 52, Chapter I, Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is
amended as follows:
PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS.
0
1. The authority citation for Part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart F--California
0
2. Section 52.220 is amended by adding paragraph (c)(437)to read as
follows:
Sec. 52.220 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(437) New and amended regulations for the following APCD was
submitted on November 17, 2009 by the Governor's designee.
(i) [Reserved]
(ii) Additional Material
(A) Ventura County Air Pollution Control District.
(1) Reasonably Available Control Technology State Implementation
Plan Revision (2009 RACT SIP Revision) as adopted on September 15, 2009
(``2009 RACT SIP'').
0
3. Section 52.222 is amended by adding paragraph (a)(10)(i) to read as
follows:
Sec. 52.222 Negative declarations.
* * * * *
(a) * * *
(10) Ventura County Air Pollution Control District.
(i) EPA-453/R06-004 Control Techniques Guidelines for Flat Wood
Paneling Coatings; EPA-453/R-07-004 Control Techniques Guidelines for
Large Appliance Coatings; EPA-453/R-07-003 Control Techniques
Guidelines for Paper, Film, and Foil Coatings; EPA-452/R-08-006 Control
Techniques Guidelines for Automobile and Light-Duty Truck Assembly
Coatings; EPA 453/R-08-005 Control Techniques Guidelines for
Miscellaneous Industrial Adhesives; EPA 453/R-06-003 Control Techniques
Guidelines for Flexible Package Printing; EPA 453/R-07-005 Control
Techniques Guidelines for Metal Furniture Coatings; and EPA 453/R-08-
004 Control Techniques Guidelines for Fiberglass Boat Manufacturing
Materials were submitted on November 17, 2009 and adopted on September
15, 2009.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2014-11087 Filed 5-14-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
