Fisheries of the Northeastern United States; Spiny Dogfish Fishery; Proposed 2014-2015 Spiny Dogfish Specifications, 27274-27276 [2014-11049]
Download as PDF
27274
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 92 / Tuesday, May 13, 2014 / Proposed Rules
vehicle to operate such vehicle in
violation of 49 CFR parts 356, 360, or
365–379.
(b) Complaint process. (1) A driver
who believes he or she was coerced to
violate a regulation described in
paragraph (a)(1) or (2) of this section
may file a written complaint under
§ 386.12(e) of this subchapter.
(2) A complaint under paragraph
(b)(1) of this section shall describe the
specific action that the driver claims
constitutes coercion and identify the
specific regulation the driver was
coerced to violate.
(3) A complaint under paragraph
(b)(1) of this section may include any
supporting evidence that will assist the
Division Administrator in determining
the merits of the complaint.
Issued under the authority of delegation in
49 CFR 1.87: May 5, 2014.
Anne S. Ferro,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2014–10722 Filed 5–12–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–EX–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 648
[Docket No. 140403312–4312–01]
RIN 0648–BE17
Fisheries of the Northeastern United
States; Spiny Dogfish Fishery;
Proposed 2014–2015 Spiny Dogfish
Specifications
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed specifications; request
for comments.
AGENCY:
This rule proposes catch
limits, commercial quotas, and
possession limits for the spiny dogfish
fishery for the 2014–2015 fishing years.
The proposed action was developed by
the Mid-Atlantic and New England
Fishery Management Councils pursuant
to the fishery specification requirements
of the Spiny Dogfish Fishery
Management Plan. These management
measures are supported by the best
available scientific information and
reflect recent increases in spiny dogfish
biomass, and are expected to result in
positive economic impacts for the spiny
dogfish fishery while maintaining the
conservation objectives of the Spiny
Dogfish Fishery Management Plan.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:25 May 12, 2014
Jkt 232001
Comments must be received on
or before June 12, 2014.
ADDRESSES: Copies of the amendment,
including the Environmental
Assessment and Initial Regulatory
Flexibility Analysis (EA/IRFA) and
other supporting documents for the
action are available from Dr.
Christopher M. Moore, Executive
Director, Mid-Atlantic Fishery
Management Council, Suite 201, 800 N.
State Street, Dover, DE 19901. The
amendment is also accessible via the
Internet at: https://www.nero.noaa.gov.
You may submit comments, identified
by NOAA–NMFS–2014–0053, by any
one of the following methods:
• Electronic Submissions: Submit all
electronic public comments via the
Federal e-Rulemaking portal. Go to
www.regulations.gov/
#!docketDetail;D=NOAA-NMFS-20140053, click the ‘‘Comment Now!’’ icon,
complete the required fields, and enter
or attach your comments.
• Mail: NMFS, Greater Atlantic
Regional Fisheries Office, 55 Great
Republic Drive, Gloucester, MA 01930.
Mark the outside of the envelope
‘‘Comments on Spiny Dogfish
Specifications.’’
Instructions: Comments must be
submitted by one of the above methods
to ensure that the comments are
received, documented, and considered
by NMFS. Comments sent by any other
method, to any other address or
individual, or received after the end of
the comment period, may not be
considered. All comments received are
a part of the public record and will
generally be posted for public viewing
on www.regulations.gov without change.
All personal identifying information
(e.g., name, address) submitted
voluntarily by the sender will be
publicly accessible. Do not submit
confidential business information, or
otherwise sensitive or protected
information. NMFS will accept
anonymous comments (enter ‘‘N/A’’ in
the required fields if you wish to remain
anonymous). Attachments to electronic
comments will be accepted in Microsoft
Word or Excel, WordPerfect, or Adobe
PDF formats only.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Tobey Curtis, Fishery Policy Analyst,
(978) 281–9273.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
DATES:
Background
The Atlantic spiny dogfish (Squalus
acanthias) fishery is jointly managed by
the New England and Mid-Atlantic
Fishery Management Councils. The
Atlantic States Marine Fisheries
Commission also manages the spiny
PO 00000
Frm 00063
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
dogfish fishery in state waters from
Maine to North Carolina through an
interstate fishery management plan
(FMP). The Federal Spiny Dogfish FMP
was implemented in 2000, when spiny
dogfish were determined to be
overfished. The spiny dogfish stock was
declared to be successfully rebuilt in
2010, and it continues to be above its
target biomass.
The regulations implementing the
FMP at 50 CFR part 648, subpart L,
outline the process for specifying an
annual catch limit (ACL), commercial
quota, possession limit, and other
management measures for a period of 1–
5 years. The Mid-Atlantic Council’s
Scientific and Statistical Committee
(SSC) reviews the best available
information on the status of the spiny
dogfish population and recommends
acceptable biological catch (ABC) levels.
This recommendation is then used as
the basis for catch limits and other
management measures developed by the
Council’s Spiny Dogfish Monitoring
Committee and Joint Spiny Dogfish
Committee (which includes members of
both Councils). The Councils then
review the recommendations of the
committees and make their specification
recommendations to NMFS. NMFS
reviews those recommendations, and
may modify them if necessary to ensure
that they are consistent with the FMP
and other applicable law. NMFS then
publishes proposed measures for public
comment.
NMFS implemented specifications for
the spiny dogfish fishery for the 2013–
2015 fishing years on May 1, 2013 (78
FR 25862). However, due to updated
scientific information on stock status
(see below), the Councils are
recommending revised specifications for
the 2014 and 2015 fishing years.
Spiny Dogfish Stock Status Update
In September 2013, the NMFS
Northeast Fisheries Science Center
updated the spiny dogfish stock status,
using the most recent catch and biomass
estimates from the 2013 spring trawl
survey. Updated estimates indicate that
the female spawning stock biomass
(SSB) for 2013 was 466 million lb
(211,374 mt), about 33 percent above the
target maximum sustainable yield
(MSY) biomass proxy (SSBMAX) of 351
million lb (159,288 mt). The 2012
fishing mortality rate (F) estimate for the
stock was 0.149, well below the
overfishing threshold (FMSY) of 0.2439.
Therefore, the spiny dogfish stock is not
currently overfished or experiencing
overfishing. While stock size and
recruitment have increased in recent
years, poor pup production from 1997–
2003 is projected to result in declines in
E:\FR\FM\13MYP1.SGM
13MYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 92 / Tuesday, May 13, 2014 / Proposed Rules
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
SSB from 2014–2020, when the pups
from the 1997–2003 years recruit to the
spawning stock.
The SSC reviewed this information
and recommended increasing the ABC
levels for spiny dogfish for the 2014–
2015 fishing years. The ABC
recommendations were based on an
overfishing level of median catch at the
FMSY proxy, and the Mid-Atlantic
Council’s risk policy for a Level 3
assessment (40-percent probability of
overfishing). The resulting new spiny
dogfish ABCs are 60.839 million lb
(27,596 mt) (increased from 55.455
million lb (25,154 mt)) for 2014, and
62.413 million lb (28,310 mt) (increased
from 55.241 million lb (25,057 mt)) for
2015.
Council Recommendations
The Councils’ Spiny Dogfish
Monitoring Committee and the
Commission’s Spiny Dogfish Technical
Committee met in September 2013 to
determine the resulting ACLs and
quotas following the FMP’s process. To
calculate the commercial quota for each
year, deductions were made from the
ABC to account for Canadian landings
(143,000 lb (65 mt)), U.S. discards
(11.605 million lb (5,264 mt)), and U.S.
recreational harvest (53,000 lb (24 mt)).
For 2014, the revised ACL would be
60.695 million lb (27,531 mt), and the
commercial quota would be 49.037
million lb (22,243 mt) (+20 percent from
2013), before potential deductions for
the Research Set-Aside (RSA) program
(pending the approval of Amendment 3
to the Spiny Dogfish FMP; 79 FR 19861;
April 10, 2014). A total of 250,000 lb
(113 mt) of spiny dogfish RSA has been
preliminarily approved for the 2014
fishing year. For 2015, the revised ACL
would be 62.270 million lb (28,245 mt),
and the commercial quota would be
50.612 million lb (22,957 mt) (+24
percent from 2013), before potential
RSA deductions.
The Councils recommended different
spiny dogfish trip limits for 2014 and
2015. The Mid-Atlantic Council
recommended the status quo trip limit
(4,000 lb (1,814 kg)), in
acknowledgment of recent market
demand and processing capacity issues,
and a desire to control the rate of
landings across the year. The spiny
dogfish fishery is projected to land only
about 40 percent of its 2013 commercial
quota due to these market constraints.
The New England Council
recommended no limits on the
possession of spiny dogfish, with the
objective of allowing the fishery to
harvest as much spiny dogfish as
possible under the increased quotas. We
do not know at this time what trip limits
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:25 May 12, 2014
Jkt 232001
the Commission may implement for
state waters.
Under the FMP, when the two
Councils recommend different
specification measures, NMFS has the
discretion to implement any measure
not specifically rejected by both
Councils. In this case, NMFS may
implement whatever trip limit is
deemed the most appropriate based
upon the advice of the Councils and
public comments. In this rule, NMFS is
proposing the New England Council’s
recommendation of unlimited
possession of spiny dogfish, but is
specifically requesting public input on
these alternatives to help determine
what trip limit is really preferred.
As currently specified in the FMP,
quota period 1 (May 1 through October
31) would be allocated 57.9 percent of
the commercial quota, and quota period
2 (November 1 through April 30) would
be allocated 42.1 percent of the
commercial quota. However, the
Councils have approved, and NMFS has
proposed to implement, Amendment 3
to the FMP, which would eliminate the
seasonal allocation of the commercial
quota (79 FR 19861; April 10, 2014).
Upon implementation of Amendment 3,
if approved, the Federal commercial
quota and trip limit would only be
specified on an annual, coastwide basis.
Classification
Pursuant to section 304(b)(1)(A) of the
Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act, the
NMFS Assistant Administrator has
made a preliminary determination that
this proposed rule is consistent with the
Spiny Dogfish FMP, other provisions of
the Magnuson-Stevens Act, and other
applicable law, subject to further
consideration after public comment.
This proposed rule has been
determined to be not significant for the
purpose of E.O. 12866.
The Councils prepared an IRFA, as
required by section 603 of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act. The IRFA
describes the economic impact this
proposed rule, if adopted, would have
on small entities. A description of the
action, why it is being considered, and
the legal basis for this action are
contained at the beginning of this
section of the preamble and in the
SUMMARY of this proposed rule. A
summary of the IRFA follows. A copy of
this analysis is available from the
Councils (see ADDRESSES).
This action does not introduce any
new reporting, recordkeeping, or other
compliance requirements. This
proposed rule does not duplicate,
overlap, or conflict with other Federal
rules.
PO 00000
Frm 00064
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
27275
Description and Estimate of Number of
Small Entities to Which the Rule Would
Apply
This rule would impact fishing
vessels, including commercial fishing
entities that hold spiny dogfish permits.
In 2012, 2,666 vessels held spiny
dogfish permits. However, not all of
those vessels are active participants in
the fishery; only 489 vessels landed
spiny dogfish in 2012. Additionally, if
two or more vessels have identical
owners, these vessels are considered to
be part of the same firm. When permit
ownership data is considered, in 2012,
1,976 fishing firms held at least one
spiny dogfish permit. According to the
Small Business Administration (SBA),
firms are classified as finfish or shellfish
firms based on the activity from which
they derive the most revenue. Using the
$5M cutoff for shellfish firms (NAICS
114112) and the $19M cutoff for finfish
firms (NAICS 114111), there are 1,953
directly regulated small entities and 23
directly regulated large entities. There
are 488 active fishing firms, of which
482 are small entities and 6 are large
entities. On average, for small entities,
spiny dogfish is responsible for a small
fraction of landings, and active
participants derive a small share of
gross receipts from the spiny dogfish
fishery. While all 1,953 directly
regulated small entities would be
affected by these specifications, many of
these small entities do not currently
participate in this fishery and would be
likely to experience only negligible
economic impacts, if any.
Economic Impacts of the Proposed
Action Compared to Significant NonSelected Alternatives
Three management alternatives were
analyzed for each year, 2014 and 2015.
As described in the EA for this action
(see ADDRESSES), Alternative 1
represents the Mid-Atlantic Council’s
recommended revised quotas and trip
limits, Alternative 2 represents the New
England Council’s recommended
revised quotas and trip limits, and
Alternative 3 represents the no action
quotas and trip limits for 2014 and
2015. While both Councils
recommended the same revised ACLs
and commercial quotas in Alternatives 1
and 2, as described above, the MidAtlantic Council recommended a 4,000lb (1,814-kg) trip limit and the New
England Council recommended an
unlimited trip limit. The no action
alternative (Alternative 3) includes
lower ACLs and commercial quotas than
the other two alternatives, and
maintains a 4,000-lb (1,814-kg) trip
limit, reflecting the final 2013–2015
E:\FR\FM\13MYP1.SGM
13MYP1
27276
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 92 / Tuesday, May 13, 2014 / Proposed Rules
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
spiny dogfish specifications
implemented by NMFS on May 1, 2013
(78 FR 25862). Alternative 2 (the New
England Council’s recommendation) is
the preferred alternative proposed in
this rule.
According to the analysis in the EA
(see ADDRESSES), all of the alternatives
under consideration in this action are
expected to result in positive economic
impacts. Alternatives 1 and 2 would
increase the maximum potential
landings for the spiny dogfish fishery
during 2014 and 2015, as compared to
Alternative 3. However, the commercial
quotas in all three alternatives are
higher than realized spiny dogfish
landings during recent fishing years. In
the 2013 fishing year, which ended on
April 30, 2014, the spiny dogfish fishery
landed only about 40 percent of its
40.842-million lb (18,526-mt) quota
(refer to landings data at
www.nero.noaa.gov), largely due to
market issues and declines in demand
in the primary export markets. Total
spiny dogfish revenue from the 2012
fishing year was reported as $5.3
million, reflecting an average price of
$0.20 per lb. The commercial quotas in
Alternatives 1 and 2, if fully utilized,
would correspond to approximately
$9.9 million in potential revenue,
whereas, the lower commercial quota in
Alternative 3 would correspond to
approximately $7.9 million in potential
revenue.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:25 May 12, 2014
Jkt 232001
Trip limits influence the rate of
landings across the fishing year, and are
not expected to result in direct positive
or negative economic impacts on the
fishery as a whole. While different trip
limit alternatives may affect trip-level
revenues, and have variable, short-term
effects on price, total spiny dogfish
revenues will still be largely influenced
by the quota. While the New England
Council’s recommendation for
unlimited possession may help the
fishery achieve more of its allowable
landings, continuing processing and
market demand constraints may limit
the ability of the fishery to accomplish
this. Furthermore, the Commission and
individual states may implement
various spiny dogfish trip limits in their
state waters (current trip limits range
from 4,000 lb (1,814 kg) to 10,000 lb
(4,536 kg) per trip), which would
effectively limit the allowable
possession of spiny dogfish by Federal
permit holders.
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 648
Fisheries, Fishing, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: May 6, 2014.
Samuel D. Rauch III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for
Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
PART 648—FISHERIES OF THE
NORTHEASTERN UNITED STATES
1. The authority citation for part 648
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
2. In § 648.235, revise the introductory
text to paragraphs (a) and (b), and revise
paragraphs (a)(1) and (b)(1) to read as
follows:
■
§ 648.235 Spiny dogfish possession and
landing restrictions.
(a) Quota period 1. From May 1
through October 31, vessels issued a
valid Federal spiny dogfish permit
specified under § 648.4(a)(11) may:
(1) Possess an unlimited amount of
spiny dogfish per trip; and
*
*
*
*
*
(b) Quota period 2. From November 1
through April 30, vessels issued a valid
Federal spiny dogfish permit specified
under § 648.4(a)(11) may:
(1) Possess an unlimited amount of
spiny dogfish per trip; and
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2014–11049 Filed 5–12–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
For the reasons set out in the
preamble, NMFS proposes to amend 50
CFR part 648 as follows:
PO 00000
Frm 00065
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 9990
E:\FR\FM\13MYP1.SGM
13MYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 92 (Tuesday, May 13, 2014)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 27274-27276]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-11049]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
50 CFR Part 648
[Docket No. 140403312-4312-01]
RIN 0648-BE17
Fisheries of the Northeastern United States; Spiny Dogfish
Fishery; Proposed 2014-2015 Spiny Dogfish Specifications
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed specifications; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This rule proposes catch limits, commercial quotas, and
possession limits for the spiny dogfish fishery for the 2014-2015
fishing years. The proposed action was developed by the Mid-Atlantic
and New England Fishery Management Councils pursuant to the fishery
specification requirements of the Spiny Dogfish Fishery Management
Plan. These management measures are supported by the best available
scientific information and reflect recent increases in spiny dogfish
biomass, and are expected to result in positive economic impacts for
the spiny dogfish fishery while maintaining the conservation objectives
of the Spiny Dogfish Fishery Management Plan.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before June 12, 2014.
ADDRESSES: Copies of the amendment, including the Environmental
Assessment and Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (EA/IRFA) and
other supporting documents for the action are available from Dr.
Christopher M. Moore, Executive Director, Mid-Atlantic Fishery
Management Council, Suite 201, 800 N. State Street, Dover, DE 19901.
The amendment is also accessible via the Internet at: https://www.nero.noaa.gov.
You may submit comments, identified by NOAA-NMFS-2014-0053, by any
one of the following methods:
Electronic Submissions: Submit all electronic public
comments via the Federal e-Rulemaking portal. Go to
www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=NOAA-NMFS-2014-0053, click the
``Comment Now!'' icon, complete the required fields, and enter or
attach your comments.
Mail: NMFS, Greater Atlantic Regional Fisheries Office, 55
Great Republic Drive, Gloucester, MA 01930. Mark the outside of the
envelope ``Comments on Spiny Dogfish Specifications.''
Instructions: Comments must be submitted by one of the above
methods to ensure that the comments are received, documented, and
considered by NMFS. Comments sent by any other method, to any other
address or individual, or received after the end of the comment period,
may not be considered. All comments received are a part of the public
record and will generally be posted for public viewing on
www.regulations.gov without change. All personal identifying
information (e.g., name, address) submitted voluntarily by the sender
will be publicly accessible. Do not submit confidential business
information, or otherwise sensitive or protected information. NMFS will
accept anonymous comments (enter ``N/A'' in the required fields if you
wish to remain anonymous). Attachments to electronic comments will be
accepted in Microsoft Word or Excel, WordPerfect, or Adobe PDF formats
only.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tobey Curtis, Fishery Policy Analyst,
(978) 281-9273.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The Atlantic spiny dogfish (Squalus acanthias) fishery is jointly
managed by the New England and Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management
Councils. The Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission also manages
the spiny dogfish fishery in state waters from Maine to North Carolina
through an interstate fishery management plan (FMP). The Federal Spiny
Dogfish FMP was implemented in 2000, when spiny dogfish were determined
to be overfished. The spiny dogfish stock was declared to be
successfully rebuilt in 2010, and it continues to be above its target
biomass.
The regulations implementing the FMP at 50 CFR part 648, subpart L,
outline the process for specifying an annual catch limit (ACL),
commercial quota, possession limit, and other management measures for a
period of 1-5 years. The Mid-Atlantic Council's Scientific and
Statistical Committee (SSC) reviews the best available information on
the status of the spiny dogfish population and recommends acceptable
biological catch (ABC) levels. This recommendation is then used as the
basis for catch limits and other management measures developed by the
Council's Spiny Dogfish Monitoring Committee and Joint Spiny Dogfish
Committee (which includes members of both Councils). The Councils then
review the recommendations of the committees and make their
specification recommendations to NMFS. NMFS reviews those
recommendations, and may modify them if necessary to ensure that they
are consistent with the FMP and other applicable law. NMFS then
publishes proposed measures for public comment.
NMFS implemented specifications for the spiny dogfish fishery for
the 2013-2015 fishing years on May 1, 2013 (78 FR 25862). However, due
to updated scientific information on stock status (see below), the
Councils are recommending revised specifications for the 2014 and 2015
fishing years.
Spiny Dogfish Stock Status Update
In September 2013, the NMFS Northeast Fisheries Science Center
updated the spiny dogfish stock status, using the most recent catch and
biomass estimates from the 2013 spring trawl survey. Updated estimates
indicate that the female spawning stock biomass (SSB) for 2013 was 466
million lb (211,374 mt), about 33 percent above the target maximum
sustainable yield (MSY) biomass proxy (SSBMAX) of 351
million lb (159,288 mt). The 2012 fishing mortality rate (F) estimate
for the stock was 0.149, well below the overfishing threshold
(FMSY) of 0.2439. Therefore, the spiny dogfish stock is not
currently overfished or experiencing overfishing. While stock size and
recruitment have increased in recent years, poor pup production from
1997-2003 is projected to result in declines in
[[Page 27275]]
SSB from 2014-2020, when the pups from the 1997-2003 years recruit to
the spawning stock.
The SSC reviewed this information and recommended increasing the
ABC levels for spiny dogfish for the 2014-2015 fishing years. The ABC
recommendations were based on an overfishing level of median catch at
the FMSY proxy, and the Mid-Atlantic Council's risk policy
for a Level 3 assessment (40-percent probability of overfishing). The
resulting new spiny dogfish ABCs are 60.839 million lb (27,596 mt)
(increased from 55.455 million lb (25,154 mt)) for 2014, and 62.413
million lb (28,310 mt) (increased from 55.241 million lb (25,057 mt))
for 2015.
Council Recommendations
The Councils' Spiny Dogfish Monitoring Committee and the
Commission's Spiny Dogfish Technical Committee met in September 2013 to
determine the resulting ACLs and quotas following the FMP's process. To
calculate the commercial quota for each year, deductions were made from
the ABC to account for Canadian landings (143,000 lb (65 mt)), U.S.
discards (11.605 million lb (5,264 mt)), and U.S. recreational harvest
(53,000 lb (24 mt)). For 2014, the revised ACL would be 60.695 million
lb (27,531 mt), and the commercial quota would be 49.037 million lb
(22,243 mt) (+20 percent from 2013), before potential deductions for
the Research Set-Aside (RSA) program (pending the approval of Amendment
3 to the Spiny Dogfish FMP; 79 FR 19861; April 10, 2014). A total of
250,000 lb (113 mt) of spiny dogfish RSA has been preliminarily
approved for the 2014 fishing year. For 2015, the revised ACL would be
62.270 million lb (28,245 mt), and the commercial quota would be 50.612
million lb (22,957 mt) (+24 percent from 2013), before potential RSA
deductions.
The Councils recommended different spiny dogfish trip limits for
2014 and 2015. The Mid-Atlantic Council recommended the status quo trip
limit (4,000 lb (1,814 kg)), in acknowledgment of recent market demand
and processing capacity issues, and a desire to control the rate of
landings across the year. The spiny dogfish fishery is projected to
land only about 40 percent of its 2013 commercial quota due to these
market constraints. The New England Council recommended no limits on
the possession of spiny dogfish, with the objective of allowing the
fishery to harvest as much spiny dogfish as possible under the
increased quotas. We do not know at this time what trip limits the
Commission may implement for state waters.
Under the FMP, when the two Councils recommend different
specification measures, NMFS has the discretion to implement any
measure not specifically rejected by both Councils. In this case, NMFS
may implement whatever trip limit is deemed the most appropriate based
upon the advice of the Councils and public comments. In this rule, NMFS
is proposing the New England Council's recommendation of unlimited
possession of spiny dogfish, but is specifically requesting public
input on these alternatives to help determine what trip limit is really
preferred.
As currently specified in the FMP, quota period 1 (May 1 through
October 31) would be allocated 57.9 percent of the commercial quota,
and quota period 2 (November 1 through April 30) would be allocated
42.1 percent of the commercial quota. However, the Councils have
approved, and NMFS has proposed to implement, Amendment 3 to the FMP,
which would eliminate the seasonal allocation of the commercial quota
(79 FR 19861; April 10, 2014). Upon implementation of Amendment 3, if
approved, the Federal commercial quota and trip limit would only be
specified on an annual, coastwide basis.
Classification
Pursuant to section 304(b)(1)(A) of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act, the NMFS Assistant Administrator has
made a preliminary determination that this proposed rule is consistent
with the Spiny Dogfish FMP, other provisions of the Magnuson-Stevens
Act, and other applicable law, subject to further consideration after
public comment.
This proposed rule has been determined to be not significant for
the purpose of E.O. 12866.
The Councils prepared an IRFA, as required by section 603 of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act. The IRFA describes the economic impact this
proposed rule, if adopted, would have on small entities. A description
of the action, why it is being considered, and the legal basis for this
action are contained at the beginning of this section of the preamble
and in the SUMMARY of this proposed rule. A summary of the IRFA
follows. A copy of this analysis is available from the Councils (see
ADDRESSES).
This action does not introduce any new reporting, recordkeeping, or
other compliance requirements. This proposed rule does not duplicate,
overlap, or conflict with other Federal rules.
Description and Estimate of Number of Small Entities to Which the Rule
Would Apply
This rule would impact fishing vessels, including commercial
fishing entities that hold spiny dogfish permits. In 2012, 2,666
vessels held spiny dogfish permits. However, not all of those vessels
are active participants in the fishery; only 489 vessels landed spiny
dogfish in 2012. Additionally, if two or more vessels have identical
owners, these vessels are considered to be part of the same firm. When
permit ownership data is considered, in 2012, 1,976 fishing firms held
at least one spiny dogfish permit. According to the Small Business
Administration (SBA), firms are classified as finfish or shellfish
firms based on the activity from which they derive the most revenue.
Using the $5M cutoff for shellfish firms (NAICS 114112) and the $19M
cutoff for finfish firms (NAICS 114111), there are 1,953 directly
regulated small entities and 23 directly regulated large entities.
There are 488 active fishing firms, of which 482 are small entities and
6 are large entities. On average, for small entities, spiny dogfish is
responsible for a small fraction of landings, and active participants
derive a small share of gross receipts from the spiny dogfish fishery.
While all 1,953 directly regulated small entities would be affected by
these specifications, many of these small entities do not currently
participate in this fishery and would be likely to experience only
negligible economic impacts, if any.
Economic Impacts of the Proposed Action Compared to Significant Non-
Selected Alternatives
Three management alternatives were analyzed for each year, 2014 and
2015. As described in the EA for this action (see ADDRESSES),
Alternative 1 represents the Mid-Atlantic Council's recommended revised
quotas and trip limits, Alternative 2 represents the New England
Council's recommended revised quotas and trip limits, and Alternative 3
represents the no action quotas and trip limits for 2014 and 2015.
While both Councils recommended the same revised ACLs and commercial
quotas in Alternatives 1 and 2, as described above, the Mid-Atlantic
Council recommended a 4,000-lb (1,814-kg) trip limit and the New
England Council recommended an unlimited trip limit. The no action
alternative (Alternative 3) includes lower ACLs and commercial quotas
than the other two alternatives, and maintains a 4,000-lb (1,814-kg)
trip limit, reflecting the final 2013-2015
[[Page 27276]]
spiny dogfish specifications implemented by NMFS on May 1, 2013 (78 FR
25862). Alternative 2 (the New England Council's recommendation) is the
preferred alternative proposed in this rule.
According to the analysis in the EA (see ADDRESSES), all of the
alternatives under consideration in this action are expected to result
in positive economic impacts. Alternatives 1 and 2 would increase the
maximum potential landings for the spiny dogfish fishery during 2014
and 2015, as compared to Alternative 3. However, the commercial quotas
in all three alternatives are higher than realized spiny dogfish
landings during recent fishing years. In the 2013 fishing year, which
ended on April 30, 2014, the spiny dogfish fishery landed only about 40
percent of its 40.842-million lb (18,526-mt) quota (refer to landings
data at www.nero.noaa.gov), largely due to market issues and declines
in demand in the primary export markets. Total spiny dogfish revenue
from the 2012 fishing year was reported as $5.3 million, reflecting an
average price of $0.20 per lb. The commercial quotas in Alternatives 1
and 2, if fully utilized, would correspond to approximately $9.9
million in potential revenue, whereas, the lower commercial quota in
Alternative 3 would correspond to approximately $7.9 million in
potential revenue.
Trip limits influence the rate of landings across the fishing year,
and are not expected to result in direct positive or negative economic
impacts on the fishery as a whole. While different trip limit
alternatives may affect trip-level revenues, and have variable, short-
term effects on price, total spiny dogfish revenues will still be
largely influenced by the quota. While the New England Council's
recommendation for unlimited possession may help the fishery achieve
more of its allowable landings, continuing processing and market demand
constraints may limit the ability of the fishery to accomplish this.
Furthermore, the Commission and individual states may implement various
spiny dogfish trip limits in their state waters (current trip limits
range from 4,000 lb (1,814 kg) to 10,000 lb (4,536 kg) per trip), which
would effectively limit the allowable possession of spiny dogfish by
Federal permit holders.
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 648
Fisheries, Fishing, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: May 6, 2014.
Samuel D. Rauch III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
For the reasons set out in the preamble, NMFS proposes to amend 50
CFR part 648 as follows:
PART 648--FISHERIES OF THE NORTHEASTERN UNITED STATES
0
1. The authority citation for part 648 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
0
2. In Sec. 648.235, revise the introductory text to paragraphs (a) and
(b), and revise paragraphs (a)(1) and (b)(1) to read as follows:
Sec. 648.235 Spiny dogfish possession and landing restrictions.
(a) Quota period 1. From May 1 through October 31, vessels issued a
valid Federal spiny dogfish permit specified under Sec. 648.4(a)(11)
may:
(1) Possess an unlimited amount of spiny dogfish per trip; and
* * * * *
(b) Quota period 2. From November 1 through April 30, vessels
issued a valid Federal spiny dogfish permit specified under Sec.
648.4(a)(11) may:
(1) Possess an unlimited amount of spiny dogfish per trip; and
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2014-11049 Filed 5-12-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P