Change of Address; Indian Child Welfare Act, 27189-27190 [2014-10934]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 92 / Tuesday, May 13, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
technology subject to the EAR (see
§ 123.21(b) of this subchapter).
*
*
*
*
*
PART 124—AGREEMENTS, OFFSHORE PROCUREMENT, AND OTHER
DEFENSE SERVICES
destination may also require that the
special export controls identified in
paragraphs (a)(1) and (a)(2) of this
section be applied in furtherance of the
security and foreign policy of the United
States.
*
*
*
*
*
■
5. The authority citation for part 124
is revised to read as follows:
Rose E. Gottemoeller,
Acting Under Secretary, Arms Control and
International Security, Department of State.
Authority: Secs. 2, 38, and 71, Pub. L. 90–
629, 90 Stat. 744 (22 U.S.C. 2752, 2778,
2797); 22 U.S.C. 2651a; 22 U.S.C. 2776;
Section 1514, Pub. L. 105–261; Pub. L. 111–
266; Section 1261, Pub. L. 112–239; E.O.
13637, 78 FR 16129.
[FR Doc. 2014–10806 Filed 5–12–14; 8:45 am]
6. Section 124.15 is amended by
revising paragraphs (a) introductory
text, (b) introductory text, (b)(2), and (c),
to read as follows:
Bureau of Indian Affairs
■
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
§ 124.15 Special Export Controls for
Defense Articles and Defense Services
Controlled Under Category XV: Space
Systems and Space Launches.
16:14 May 12, 2014
Jkt 232001
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
25 CFR Part 23
[134A2100DD/AAK3000000/
A0H501010.999900]
RIN 1076–AF21
(a) The export of a satellite or related
item controlled by Category XV of part
121 of this subchapter or any defense
service controlled by this subchapter
associated with the launch in, or by
nationals of, a country that is not a
member of the North Atlantic Treaty
Organization (NATO) or a major nonNATO ally of the United States always
requires special export controls, in
addition to other export controls
required by this subchapter, as follows:
*
*
*
*
*
(b) Mandatory licenses for launch
failure (crash) investigations or analyses
of any satellite controlled pursuant to
this subchapter or subject to the EAR: In
the event of a failure of a launch from
a foreign country (including a post
liftoff failure to reach proper orbit)—
*
*
*
*
*
(2) Officials of the Department of
Defense must monitor all activities
associated with the investigation or
analyses to insure against unauthorized
transfer of technical data or services and
U.S. persons must follow the procedures
set forth in paragraphs (a)(1) and (a)(2)
of this section.
(c) Although Public Law 105–261
does not require the application of
special export controls for the launch of
U.S.-origin satellites and components
from or by nationals of countries that
are members of NATO or major nonNATO allies, such export controls may
nonetheless be applied, in addition to
any other export controls required
under this subchapter, as appropriate in
furtherance of the security and foreign
policy of the United States. Further, the
export of any article or defense service
controlled under this subchapter to any
VerDate Mar<15>2010
BILLING CODE 4710–25–P
Change of Address; Indian Child
Welfare Act
Bureau of Indian Affairs,
Interior.
ACTION: Final rule; technical
amendment.
AGENCY:
The Bureau of Indian Affairs
(BIA) is amending its regulations to
reflect a change of address for filing
copies of Indian Child Welfare Act
(ICWA) notices to the Eastern Regional
Director and to update the titles of
‘‘Area Directors’’ to ‘‘Regional
Directors.’’ This technical amendment is
a nomenclature change that updates and
corrects BIA officials’ titles and the
address for filing ICWA notices to the
Eastern Regional Director.
DATES: Effective May 13, 2014.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Elizabeth Appel, Director, Office of
Regulatory Affairs & Collaborative
Action, (202) 273–4680;
elizabeth.appel@bia.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This rule
updates the address for the Eastern
Regional Office, which was printed in
error. BIA employees have ensured that
notices sent to the printed address have
been forwarded to the BIA authorities,
but this rule will make the forwarding
unnecessary. This rule also updates all
references to ‘‘Area Director’’ in 25 CFR
part 23 to be ‘‘Regional Director’’ in
accordance with the nomenclature
currently in use.
SUMMARY:
Procedural Requirements
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
(E.O. 12866 and 13563)
Executive Order (E.O.) 12866 provides
that the Office of Information and
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
27189
Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) at the Office
of Management and Budget (OMB) will
review all significant rules. OIRA has
determined that this rule is not
significant. E.O. 13563 reaffirms the
principles of E.O. 12866 while calling
for improvements in the nation’s
regulatory system to promote
predictability, to reduce uncertainty,
and to use the best, most innovative,
and least burdensome tools for
achieving regulatory ends. The E.O.
directs agencies to consider regulatory
approaches that reduce burdens and
maintain flexibility and freedom of
choice for the public where these
approaches are relevant, feasible, and
consistent with regulatory objectives.
E.O. 13563 emphasizes further that
regulations must be based on the best
available science and that the
rulemaking process must allow for
public participation and an open
exchange of ideas. We have developed
this rule in a manner consistent with
these requirements. This rule is also
part of the Department’s commitment
under the Executive Order to reduce the
number and burden of regulations and
provide greater notice and clarity to the
public.
B. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Department of the Interior
certifies that this rule will not have a
significant economic effect on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.).
C. Small Business Regulatory
Enforcement Fairness Act
This rule is not a major rule under 5
U.S.C. 804(2), the Small Business
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act. It
will not result in the expenditure by
State, local, or tribal governments, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100 million or more in any one year.
The rule’s requirements will not result
in a major increase in costs or prices for
consumers, individual industries,
Federal, State, or local government
agencies, or geographic regions. Nor will
this rule have significant adverse effects
on competition, employment,
investment, productivity, innovation, or
the ability of the U.S.-based enterprises
to compete with foreign-based
enterprises.
D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
This rule does not impose an
unfunded mandate on State, local, or
tribal governments or the private sector
of more than $100 million per year. The
rule does not have a significant or
unique effect on State, local, or tribal
governments or the private sector. A
E:\FR\FM\13MYR1.SGM
13MYR1
27190
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 92 / Tuesday, May 13, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
statement containing the information
required by the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act (2 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) is not
required.
E. Takings (E.O. 12630)
Under the criteria in Executive Order
12630, this rule does not affect
individual property rights protected by
the Fifth Amendment nor does it
involve a compensable ‘‘taking.’’ A
takings implication assessment is
therefore not required.
F. Federalism (E.O. 13132)
Under the criteria in Executive Order
13132, this rule has no substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. This rule
ensures notification to State and local
governments of a BIA official’s decision
to take land into trust and the right to
administratively appeal such decision.
This rule also ensures notification to
State and local governments of an AS–
IA official’s decision through
publication in the Federal Register.
G. Civil Justice Reform (E.O. 12988)
This rule complies with the
requirements of Executive Order 12988.
Specifically, this rule has been reviewed
to eliminate errors and ambiguity and
written to minimize litigation; and is
written in clear language and contains
clear legal standards.
H. Consultation With Indian Tribes
(E.O. 13175)
In accordance with the President’s
memorandum of April 29, 1994,
‘‘Government-to-Government Relations
with Native American Tribal
Governments,’’ Executive Order 13175
(59 FR 22951, November 6, 2000), and
512 DM 2, we have determined there are
no potential effects on federally
recognized Indian tribes and Indian
trust assets.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
I. Paperwork Reduction Act
This rule does not contain any
information collections requiring
approval under the Paperwork
Reduction Act (PRA), 44 U.S.C. 3501 et
seq.
J. National Environmental Policy Act
This rule does not constitute a major
Federal action significantly affecting the
quality of the human environment
because it is of an administrative,
technical, and procedural nature.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:14 May 12, 2014
Jkt 232001
K. Effects on the Energy Supply (E.O.
13211)
This rule is not a significant energy
action under the definition in Executive
Order 13211. A Statement of Energy
Effects is not required.
L. Determination To Issue Final Rule
Without the Opportunity for Public
Comment and With Immediate Effective
Date
BIA is taking this action under its
authority, at 5 U.S.C. 552, to publish
regulations in the Federal Register.
Under the Administrative Procedure
Act, statutory procedures for agency
rulemaking do not apply ‘‘when the
agency for good cause finds . . . that
notice and public procedure thereon are
impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary
to the public interest.’’ 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(3)(B). BIA finds that the notice
and comment procedure are
impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary
to the public interest, because: (1) These
amendments are non-substantive; and
(2) the public benefits for timely
notification of a change in the official
agency address, and further delay is
unnecessary and contrary to the public
interest. Similarly because this final rule
makes no substantive changes and
merely reflects a change of address and
updates to titles in the existing
regulations, this final rule is not subject
to the effective date limitation of 5
U.S.C. 553(d).
List of Subjects in 25 CFR Part 23
Administrative practice and
procedures, Child welfare, Grant
programs—Indians, Grant programs—
social programs, Indians, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
For the reasons stated in the
preamble, the Department of the
Interior, Bureau of Indian Affairs,
amends part 23 in Title 25 of the Code
of Federal Regulations as follows:
PART 23—INDIAN CHILD WELFARE
ACT
1. The authority citation for part 23
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 25 U.S.C. 2, 9,
1901–1952.
2. Throughout part 23, remove the
word ‘‘Area Director’’ and ‘‘Area
Directors’’ and add in their place the
words ‘‘Regional Director’’ and
‘‘Regional Directors’’ respectively,
wherever they appear.
■ 3. In § 23.11, revise paragraph (c)(1) to
read as follows:
■
§ 23.11
*
PO 00000
*
Notice.
*
Frm 00032
*
Fmt 4700
*
Sfmt 4700
(c)(1) For proceedings in Alabama,
Connecticut, Delaware, District of
Columbia, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky,
Louisiana, Maine, Maryland,
Massachusetts, Mississippi, New
Hampshire, New Jersey, New York,
North Carolina, Pennsylvania, Rhode
Island, South Carolina, Tennessee,
Vermont, Virginia, West Virginia, or any
territory or possession of the United
States, notices shall be sent to the
following address: Eastern Regional
Director, Bureau of Indian Affairs, 545
Marriott Drive, Suite 700, Nashville,
Tennessee 37214.
*
*
*
*
*
Dated: May 1, 2014.
Kevin K. Washburn,
Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs.
[FR Doc. 2014–10934 Filed 5–12–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–W7–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R08–OAR–2012–0168; FRL–9756–5]
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans; Utah;
Revisions to UAC Rule 401—Permit:
New and Modified Sources
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is taking final action to
approve State Implementation Plan
revisions submitted by the State of Utah
on April 17, 2008 and partially approve
SIP revisions submitted by the State of
Utah on September 15, 2006. The
revisions contain new rules in Utah’s
Title 307 Rule 401 (Permit: New and
Modified Sources). The intended effect
of this action is to propose to approve
the rules that are consistent with the
Clean Air Act. This action is being taken
under sections 110 and 112 of the Clean
Air Act.
DATES: This final rule is effective June
12, 2014.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA–R08–OAR–2012–0168. All
documents in the docket are listed in
the www.regulations.gov Web site.
Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available,
e.g., CBI or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, will be publicly
available only in hard copy. Publicly
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\13MYR1.SGM
13MYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 92 (Tuesday, May 13, 2014)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 27189-27190]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-10934]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Indian Affairs
25 CFR Part 23
[134A2100DD/AAK3000000/A0H501010.999900]
RIN 1076-AF21
Change of Address; Indian Child Welfare Act
AGENCY: Bureau of Indian Affairs, Interior.
ACTION: Final rule; technical amendment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) is amending its regulations
to reflect a change of address for filing copies of Indian Child
Welfare Act (ICWA) notices to the Eastern Regional Director and to
update the titles of ``Area Directors'' to ``Regional Directors.'' This
technical amendment is a nomenclature change that updates and corrects
BIA officials' titles and the address for filing ICWA notices to the
Eastern Regional Director.
DATES: Effective May 13, 2014.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elizabeth Appel, Director, Office of
Regulatory Affairs & Collaborative Action, (202) 273-4680;
elizabeth.appel@bia.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This rule updates the address for the
Eastern Regional Office, which was printed in error. BIA employees have
ensured that notices sent to the printed address have been forwarded to
the BIA authorities, but this rule will make the forwarding
unnecessary. This rule also updates all references to ``Area Director''
in 25 CFR part 23 to be ``Regional Director'' in accordance with the
nomenclature currently in use.
Procedural Requirements
A. Regulatory Planning and Review (E.O. 12866 and 13563)
Executive Order (E.O.) 12866 provides that the Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) at the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) will review all significant rules. OIRA has determined
that this rule is not significant. E.O. 13563 reaffirms the principles
of E.O. 12866 while calling for improvements in the nation's regulatory
system to promote predictability, to reduce uncertainty, and to use the
best, most innovative, and least burdensome tools for achieving
regulatory ends. The E.O. directs agencies to consider regulatory
approaches that reduce burdens and maintain flexibility and freedom of
choice for the public where these approaches are relevant, feasible,
and consistent with regulatory objectives. E.O. 13563 emphasizes
further that regulations must be based on the best available science
and that the rulemaking process must allow for public participation and
an open exchange of ideas. We have developed this rule in a manner
consistent with these requirements. This rule is also part of the
Department's commitment under the Executive Order to reduce the number
and burden of regulations and provide greater notice and clarity to the
public.
B. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Department of the Interior certifies that this rule will not
have a significant economic effect on a substantial number of small
entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.).
C. Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act
This rule is not a major rule under 5 U.S.C. 804(2), the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act. It will not result in the
expenditure by State, local, or tribal governments, in the aggregate,
or by the private sector of $100 million or more in any one year. The
rule's requirements will not result in a major increase in costs or
prices for consumers, individual industries, Federal, State, or local
government agencies, or geographic regions. Nor will this rule have
significant adverse effects on competition, employment, investment,
productivity, innovation, or the ability of the U.S.-based enterprises
to compete with foreign-based enterprises.
D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
This rule does not impose an unfunded mandate on State, local, or
tribal governments or the private sector of more than $100 million per
year. The rule does not have a significant or unique effect on State,
local, or tribal governments or the private sector. A
[[Page 27190]]
statement containing the information required by the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act (2 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) is not required.
E. Takings (E.O. 12630)
Under the criteria in Executive Order 12630, this rule does not
affect individual property rights protected by the Fifth Amendment nor
does it involve a compensable ``taking.'' A takings implication
assessment is therefore not required.
F. Federalism (E.O. 13132)
Under the criteria in Executive Order 13132, this rule has no
substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between
the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government. This rule
ensures notification to State and local governments of a BIA official's
decision to take land into trust and the right to administratively
appeal such decision. This rule also ensures notification to State and
local governments of an AS-IA official's decision through publication
in the Federal Register.
G. Civil Justice Reform (E.O. 12988)
This rule complies with the requirements of Executive Order 12988.
Specifically, this rule has been reviewed to eliminate errors and
ambiguity and written to minimize litigation; and is written in clear
language and contains clear legal standards.
H. Consultation With Indian Tribes (E.O. 13175)
In accordance with the President's memorandum of April 29, 1994,
``Government-to-Government Relations with Native American Tribal
Governments,'' Executive Order 13175 (59 FR 22951, November 6, 2000),
and 512 DM 2, we have determined there are no potential effects on
federally recognized Indian tribes and Indian trust assets.
I. Paperwork Reduction Act
This rule does not contain any information collections requiring
approval under the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA), 44 U.S.C. 3501 et
seq.
J. National Environmental Policy Act
This rule does not constitute a major Federal action significantly
affecting the quality of the human environment because it is of an
administrative, technical, and procedural nature.
K. Effects on the Energy Supply (E.O. 13211)
This rule is not a significant energy action under the definition
in Executive Order 13211. A Statement of Energy Effects is not
required.
L. Determination To Issue Final Rule Without the Opportunity for Public
Comment and With Immediate Effective Date
BIA is taking this action under its authority, at 5 U.S.C. 552, to
publish regulations in the Federal Register. Under the Administrative
Procedure Act, statutory procedures for agency rulemaking do not apply
``when the agency for good cause finds . . . that notice and public
procedure thereon are impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the
public interest.'' 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(3)(B). BIA finds that the notice and
comment procedure are impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the
public interest, because: (1) These amendments are non-substantive; and
(2) the public benefits for timely notification of a change in the
official agency address, and further delay is unnecessary and contrary
to the public interest. Similarly because this final rule makes no
substantive changes and merely reflects a change of address and updates
to titles in the existing regulations, this final rule is not subject
to the effective date limitation of 5 U.S.C. 553(d).
List of Subjects in 25 CFR Part 23
Administrative practice and procedures, Child welfare, Grant
programs--Indians, Grant programs--social programs, Indians, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements.
For the reasons stated in the preamble, the Department of the
Interior, Bureau of Indian Affairs, amends part 23 in Title 25 of the
Code of Federal Regulations as follows:
PART 23--INDIAN CHILD WELFARE ACT
0
1. The authority citation for part 23 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 25 U.S.C. 2, 9, 1901-1952.
0
2. Throughout part 23, remove the word ``Area Director'' and ``Area
Directors'' and add in their place the words ``Regional Director'' and
``Regional Directors'' respectively, wherever they appear.
0
3. In Sec. 23.11, revise paragraph (c)(1) to read as follows:
Sec. 23.11 Notice.
* * * * *
(c)(1) For proceedings in Alabama, Connecticut, Delaware, District
of Columbia, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland,
Massachusetts, Mississippi, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, North
Carolina, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Tennessee,
Vermont, Virginia, West Virginia, or any territory or possession of the
United States, notices shall be sent to the following address: Eastern
Regional Director, Bureau of Indian Affairs, 545 Marriott Drive, Suite
700, Nashville, Tennessee 37214.
* * * * *
Dated: May 1, 2014.
Kevin K. Washburn,
Assistant Secretary--Indian Affairs.
[FR Doc. 2014-10934 Filed 5-12-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-W7-P