Commission Information Collection Activities (FERC-725D); Comment Request, 27292-27293 [2014-10880]
Download as PDF
27292
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 92 / Tuesday, May 13, 2014 / Notices
orderly conduct of business. Public
comment will follow the 10-minute
rule.
Minutes: The minutes of the meeting
will be available for public review and
copying within 45 days at the BERAC
Web site: https://science.energy.gov/ber/
berac/meetings/berac-minutes/.
Issued at Washington, DC on May 7, 2014.
LaTanya R. Butler,
Deputy Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2014–11024 Filed 5–12–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission
[Docket No. IC14–5–000]
Commission Information Collection
Activities (FERC–725D); Comment
Request
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission, DOE.
ACTION: Comment request.
AGENCY:
In compliance with the
requirements of the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, 44 U.S.C.
3507(a)(1)(D), the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission (Commission or
FERC) is submitting its information
collection FERC–725D (Facilities
Design, Connections and Maintenance
Reliability Standards) to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for
review of the information collection
requirements. Any interested person
may file comments directly with OMB
and should address a copy of those
comments to the Commission as
explained below. The Commission
previously issued a Notice in the
Federal Register (79 FR 11773,
3/3/2014) requesting public comments.
The Commission received no comments
on the FERC–725D and is making this
notation in its submittal to OMB.
DATES: Comments on the collection of
information are due by June 12, 2014.
ADDRESSES: Comments filed with OMB,
identified by the OMB Control No.
1902–0247, should be sent via email to
the Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs: oira_submission@omb.gov.
Attention: Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission Desk Officer. The Desk
Officer may also be reached via
telephone at 202–395–4718.
A copy of the comments should also
be sent to the Commission, in Docket
No. IC14–5–000, by either of the
following methods:
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:27 May 12, 2014
Jkt 232001
• eFiling at Commission’s Web site:
https://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/
efiling.asp.
• Mail/Hand Delivery/Courier:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,
Secretary of the Commission, 888 First
Street NE., Washington, DC 20426.
Instructions: All submissions must be
formatted and filed in accordance with
submission guidelines at: https://
www.ferc.gov/help/submissionguide.asp. For user assistance contact
FERC Online Support by email at
ferconlinesupport@ferc.gov, or by phone
at: (866) 208–3676 (toll-free), or (202)
502–8659 for TTY.
Docket: Users interested in receiving
automatic notification of activity in this
docket or in viewing/downloading
comments and issuances in this docket
may do so at https://www.ferc.gov/docsfiling/docs-filing.asp.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Ellen Brown may be reached by email
at DataClearance@FERC.gov, by
telephone at (202) 502–8663, and by fax
at (202) 273–0873.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Title: Facilities Design, Connections
and Maintenance Reliability Standards.
OMB Control No.: 1902–0247.
Type of Request: Three-year extension
of the FERC–725D information
collection requirements with no changes
to the reporting requirements.
Abstract: The Commission requires
the FERC–725D information collection
to implement the statutory provisions of
Section 215 of the Federal Power Act
(FPA).1 On August 8, 2005, the
Electricity Modernization Act of 2005 of
the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (EPAct
2005), was enacted into law.2 EPAct
2005 added a new Section 215 to the
FPA, which required a Commissioncertified Electric Reliability
Organization (ERO) to develop
mandatory and enforceable reliability
standards which are subject to
Commission review and approval. Once
approved, the reliability standards may
be enforced by the ERO subject to
Commission oversight or the
Commission can independently enforce
reliability standards.3
On February 3, 2006, the Commission
issued Order No. 672, implementing
Section 215 of the FPA. Pursuant to
Order No. 672, the Commission certified
one organization [North American
Electric Reliability Council (NERC)] as
the ERO. The reliability standards
developed by the ERO and approved by
1 16
U.S.C. 842o.
Policy Act of 2005, Public Law 109–58,
Title XII, Subtitle A, 119 Stat. 594, 941 (2005), 16
U.S.C. 824o.
3 16 U.S.C. 824o(e)(3).
2 Energy
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
the Commission apply to users, owners,
and operators of the Bulk-Power System
(BPS) as set forth in each reliability
standard.
On November 15, 2006, NERC filed 20
revised reliability standards and three
new reliability standards for
Commission approval. The Commission
addressed revisions to the 20 Reliability
Standards in Order No. 693. The
Commission approved the three new
reliability standards on 12/27/2007 in
Order No. 705 and NERC designated
them as follows:
• FAC–010–1 (System Operating Limits
Methodology for the Planning
Horizon)
• FAC–011–1 (System Operating Limits
Methodology for the Operations
Horizon)
• FAC–014–1 (Establish and
Communicate System Operating
Limits).
Subsequently, NERC modified these
standards in April of 2008 and
submitted to the Commission for
approval. On 3/20/2009 the Commission
approved NERC’s modifications to the
FAC standards in Order No. 722 and
NERC now designates these standards as
FAC–010–2, FAC–011–2, and FAC–
014–2. These three approved FAC
reliability standards require planning
authorities and reliability coordinators
to establish methodologies to determine
system operating limits (SOLs) for the
bulk-power system in the planning and
operation horizons.
The three reliability standards do not
require responsible entities to file
information with the Commission. Nor,
with the exception of a three year selfcertification of compliance, do the
Reliability Standards require
responsible entities to file information
with the ERO or Regional Entities.
However, the Reliability Standards do
require responsible entities to develop
and maintain certain information for a
specified period of time, subject to
inspection by the ERO or Regional
Entities.
Reliability standard FAC–010–2
requires the planning authority to have
a documented methodology for use in
developing SOLs and must retain
evidence that it issued its SOL
methodology to relevant reliability
coordinators, transmission operators
and adjacent planning authorities.
Further, each planning authority must
self-certify its compliance to the
compliance monitor once every three
years. Reliability standard FAC–011–2
requires similar documentation by the
reliability coordinator. Reliability
standard FAC–014–2 requires the
reliability coordinator, planning
E:\FR\FM\13MYN1.SGM
13MYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 92 / Tuesday, May 13, 2014 / Notices
transmission planners, and transmission
operators.
Estimate of Annual Burden: 4 The
Commission estimates the annual public
reporting burden for the information
collection as:
provided SOLs to entities identified in
Requirement 5 of the reliability
standard. Further, the planning
authority must maintain a list of
multiple contingencies and their
associated stability limits.
Type of Respondents: Planning
authorities, reliability coordinators,
authority, transmission operator, and
transmission planner to verify
compliance through self-certification
submitted to the compliance monitor
annually. These entities must also
document that they have developed
SOLs consistent with the applicable
SOL methodology and that they have
27293
FERC–725D: (MANDATORY RELIABILITY STANDARDS: FAC (FACILITIES, DESIGN, CONNECTIONS, AND MAINTENANCE)
Number of
respondents
Annual number
of responses
per respondent
Total number
of responses
Average burden
hours & cost per
response 5
Total annual
burden hours &
total
annual cost 6
Average
annual cost
per respondent
(1)
(2)
(1)*(2)=(3)
(4)
(3)*(4)=(5)
(5)÷(1)
Annual Reporting
470
1
Comments: Comments are invited on:
(1) Whether the collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
Commission, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
(2) the accuracy of the agency’s estimate
of the burden and cost of the collection
of information, including the validity of
the methodology and assumptions used;
(3) ways to enhance the quality, utility
and clarity of the information collection;
and (4) ways to minimize the burden of
the collection of information on those
who are to respond, including the use
of automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
Dated: May 6, 2014.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014–10880 Filed 5–12–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission
Combined Notice of Filings #1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Take notice that the Commission
received the following electric corporate
filings:
Docket Numbers: EC14–83–000.
Applicants: Nevada Power Company,
Nevada Sun-Peak Limited Partnership.
4 The Commission defines burden as the total
time, effort, or financial resources expended by
persons to generate, maintain, retain, or disclose or
provide information to or for a Federal agency. For
further explanation of what is included in the
information collection burden, reference 5 Code of
Federal Regulations 1320.3.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:27 May 12, 2014
Jkt 232001
470
295.7
$20,992
138,980
$9,866,240
$20,992
Description: Nevada Power Company
and Nevada Sun-Peak Limited
Partnership Section 203 Application.
Filed Date: 5/2/14.
Accession Number: 20140502–5246.
Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 5/23/14.
Docket Numbers: EC14–84–000.
Applicants: Nevada Power Company,
Las Vegas Cogeneration LP, Las Vegas
Cogeneration II, LLC.
Description: Nevada Power Company,
Las Vegas Cogeneration Limited
Partnership, et al Section 203
Application.
Filed Date: 5/2/14.
Accession Number: 20140502–5253.
Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 5/23/14.
Take notice that the Commission
received the following electric rate
filings:
Docket Numbers: ER10–1569–009;
ER10–2361–002; ER10–2575–002;
ER10–2381–002; ER10–2947–008;
ER10–2369–002; ER10–2360–002;
ER10–2359–002; ER11–2857–013;
ER10–2358–002; ER13–2050–004;
ER13–2020–004; ER13–2107–004;
ER10–2357–002; ER10–2356–002;
ER11–2856–013; ER10–2382–002;
ER10–1580–011; ER10–3143–011;
ER12–21–014; ER10–2783–008; ER10–
2784–008; ER11–2855–013; ER10–2791–
009; ER10–2333–002; ER14–1865–001;
ER10–2792–009; ER14–1818–001;
ER12–1238–00; ER10–1564–009; ER10–
1565–009; ER10–2337–003; ER10–2795–
008; ER10–2798–008; ER10–1575–007;
ER10–2339–003; ER10–2338–003;
ER10–2340–003; ER12–1239–002;
ER10–2336–002; ER10–2335–002;
ER10–2799–008; ER10–2801–008;
ER10–2385–002; ER11–3727–009;
ER10–1566–009; ER12–2413–007;
ER11–2062–010; ER10–2346–002;
ER10–2812–007; ER10–1291–011;
ER10–2843–006; ER11–2508–009;
ER11–2683–001; ER11–2805–009;
ER11–4308–010; ER11–4351–003;
ER10–2969–008; ER13–1965–004;
ER10–2931–009; ER11–3459–008;
ER11–4307–010; ER10–2347–002;
ER10–2348–002; ER12–1711–009;
ER10–2350–002; ER10–2846–008;
ER12–261–009; ER10–2871–006; ER10–
2351–002; ER10–2875–008; ER12–2398–
008; ER10–1582–008; ER12–2019–008;
ER12–1525–009; ER10–2915–008;
ER10–2916–008; ER13–1802–003;
ER13–1801–003; ER13–1799–003;
ER10–2368–002; ER10–2352–002;
ER10–1568–009; ER10–1581–011;
ER10–2353–002; ER10–2876–009;
ER10–2878–008; ER10–2354–003;
ER10–2355–003; ER10–2914–010;
ER13–1746–006; ER13–1791–003;
ER10–2913–008; ER10–2896–008;
ER13–1790–005; ER13–1789–003;
ER10–2879–008; ER10–2384–003;
ER10–2383–003; ER10–2880–008.
Applicants: NRG Power Marketing
LLC, Agua Caliente Solar, LLC, Arthur
Kill Power LLC, Astoria Gas Turbine
Power LLC, Avenal Park LLC, Bayou
Cove Peaking Power, LLC, Bendwind,
LLC, BETM Solutions LLC, Big Cajun I
Peaking Power LLC, Boston Energy
Trading and Marketing LLC, Broken
Bow Wind, LLC, Cabrillo Power I LLC,
Cabrillo Power II LLC, CL Power Sales
Eight, L.L.C., Conemaugh Power LLC,
5 The estimate for cost per response is derived
using the following formula: Total Annual Cost
(Column 5) ÷ Total Number of Responses (Column
3) = Average Cost per Response.
6 The total annual cost is derived from salary
figures from the Bureau of Labor Statistics for two
positions involved in the reporting and recordkeeping associated with this collection. These
figures include salary (https://bls.gov/oes/current/
naics2_22.htm) and other associated benefits
(https://www.bls.gov/news.release/ecec.nr0.htm):
• Manager: $82.36/hour
• Engineer: $59.62/hour
This results in an average hourly wage of $70.99.
138,980 hours (total annual burden) * $70.99/hour
= $9,866,240.
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\13MYN1.SGM
13MYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 92 (Tuesday, May 13, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 27292-27293]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-10880]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. IC14-5-000]
Commission Information Collection Activities (FERC-725D); Comment
Request
AGENCY: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, DOE.
ACTION: Comment request.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In compliance with the requirements of the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995, 44 U.S.C. 3507(a)(1)(D), the Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission (Commission or FERC) is submitting its information
collection FERC-725D (Facilities Design, Connections and Maintenance
Reliability Standards) to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for
review of the information collection requirements. Any interested
person may file comments directly with OMB and should address a copy of
those comments to the Commission as explained below. The Commission
previously issued a Notice in the Federal Register (79 FR 11773, 3/3/
2014) requesting public comments. The Commission received no comments
on the FERC-725D and is making this notation in its submittal to OMB.
DATES: Comments on the collection of information are due by June 12,
2014.
ADDRESSES: Comments filed with OMB, identified by the OMB Control No.
1902-0247, should be sent via email to the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs: oira_submission@omb.gov. Attention: Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission Desk Officer. The Desk Officer may also be
reached via telephone at 202-395-4718.
A copy of the comments should also be sent to the Commission, in
Docket No. IC14-5-000, by either of the following methods:
eFiling at Commission's Web site: https://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling.asp.
Mail/Hand Delivery/Courier: Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission, Secretary of the Commission, 888 First Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20426.
Instructions: All submissions must be formatted and filed in
accordance with submission guidelines at: https://www.ferc.gov/help/submission-guide.asp. For user assistance contact FERC Online Support
by email at ferconlinesupport@ferc.gov, or by phone at: (866) 208-3676
(toll-free), or (202) 502-8659 for TTY.
Docket: Users interested in receiving automatic notification of
activity in this docket or in viewing/downloading comments and
issuances in this docket may do so at https://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/docs-filing.asp.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ellen Brown may be reached by email at
DataClearance@FERC.gov, by telephone at (202) 502-8663, and by fax at
(202) 273-0873.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Title: Facilities Design, Connections and Maintenance Reliability
Standards.
OMB Control No.: 1902-0247.
Type of Request: Three-year extension of the FERC-725D information
collection requirements with no changes to the reporting requirements.
Abstract: The Commission requires the FERC-725D information
collection to implement the statutory provisions of Section 215 of the
Federal Power Act (FPA).\1\ On August 8, 2005, the Electricity
Modernization Act of 2005 of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (EPAct
2005), was enacted into law.\2\ EPAct 2005 added a new Section 215 to
the FPA, which required a Commission-certified Electric Reliability
Organization (ERO) to develop mandatory and enforceable reliability
standards which are subject to Commission review and approval. Once
approved, the reliability standards may be enforced by the ERO subject
to Commission oversight or the Commission can independently enforce
reliability standards.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 16 U.S.C. 842o.
\2\ Energy Policy Act of 2005, Public Law 109-58, Title XII,
Subtitle A, 119 Stat. 594, 941 (2005), 16 U.S.C. 824o.
\3\ 16 U.S.C. 824o(e)(3).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On February 3, 2006, the Commission issued Order No. 672,
implementing Section 215 of the FPA. Pursuant to Order No. 672, the
Commission certified one organization [North American Electric
Reliability Council (NERC)] as the ERO. The reliability standards
developed by the ERO and approved by the Commission apply to users,
owners, and operators of the Bulk-Power System (BPS) as set forth in
each reliability standard.
On November 15, 2006, NERC filed 20 revised reliability standards
and three new reliability standards for Commission approval. The
Commission addressed revisions to the 20 Reliability Standards in Order
No. 693. The Commission approved the three new reliability standards on
12/27/2007 in Order No. 705 and NERC designated them as follows:
FAC-010-1 (System Operating Limits Methodology for the
Planning Horizon)
FAC-011-1 (System Operating Limits Methodology for the
Operations Horizon)
FAC-014-1 (Establish and Communicate System Operating Limits).
Subsequently, NERC modified these standards in April of 2008 and
submitted to the Commission for approval. On 3/20/2009 the Commission
approved NERC's modifications to the FAC standards in Order No. 722 and
NERC now designates these standards as FAC-010-2, FAC-011-2, and FAC-
014-2. These three approved FAC reliability standards require planning
authorities and reliability coordinators to establish methodologies to
determine system operating limits (SOLs) for the bulk-power system in
the planning and operation horizons.
The three reliability standards do not require responsible entities
to file information with the Commission. Nor, with the exception of a
three year self-certification of compliance, do the Reliability
Standards require responsible entities to file information with the ERO
or Regional Entities. However, the Reliability Standards do require
responsible entities to develop and maintain certain information for a
specified period of time, subject to inspection by the ERO or Regional
Entities.
Reliability standard FAC-010-2 requires the planning authority to
have a documented methodology for use in developing SOLs and must
retain evidence that it issued its SOL methodology to relevant
reliability coordinators, transmission operators and adjacent planning
authorities. Further, each planning authority must self-certify its
compliance to the compliance monitor once every three years.
Reliability standard FAC-011-2 requires similar documentation by the
reliability coordinator. Reliability standard FAC-014-2 requires the
reliability coordinator, planning
[[Page 27293]]
authority, transmission operator, and transmission planner to verify
compliance through self-certification submitted to the compliance
monitor annually. These entities must also document that they have
developed SOLs consistent with the applicable SOL methodology and that
they have provided SOLs to entities identified in Requirement 5 of the
reliability standard. Further, the planning authority must maintain a
list of multiple contingencies and their associated stability limits.
Type of Respondents: Planning authorities, reliability
coordinators, transmission planners, and transmission operators.
Estimate of Annual Burden: \4\ The Commission estimates the annual
public reporting burden for the information collection as:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ The Commission defines burden as the total time, effort, or
financial resources expended by persons to generate, maintain,
retain, or disclose or provide information to or for a Federal
agency. For further explanation of what is included in the
information collection burden, reference 5 Code of Federal
Regulations 1320.3.
FERC-725D: (Mandatory Reliability Standards: FAC (Facilities, Design, Connections, and Maintenance)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total annual
Number of Annual number of Total number of Average burden burden hours & Average annual
respondents responses per responses hours & cost per total annual cost cost per
respondent response 5 6 respondent
(1) (2) (1)*(2)=(3) (4) (3)*(4)=(5) (5)/(1)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Annual Reporting...................... 470 1 470 295.7 138,980 $20,992
$20,992 $9,866,240
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ The estimate for cost per response is derived using the
following formula: Total Annual Cost (Column 5) / Total Number of
Responses (Column 3) = Average Cost per Response.
\6\ The total annual cost is derived from salary figures from
the Bureau of Labor Statistics for two positions involved in the
reporting and record-keeping associated with this collection. These
figures include salary (https://bls.gov/oes/current/naics2_22.htm)
and other associated benefits (https://www.bls.gov/news.release/ecec.nr0.htm):
Manager: $82.36/hour
Engineer: $59.62/hour
This results in an average hourly wage of $70.99. 138,980 hours
(total annual burden) * $70.99/hour = $9,866,240.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Comments: Comments are invited on: (1) Whether the collection of
information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of
the Commission, including whether the information will have practical
utility; (2) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden and
cost of the collection of information, including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used; (3) ways to enhance the quality,
utility and clarity of the information collection; and (4) ways to
minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are
to respond, including the use of automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
Dated: May 6, 2014.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-10880 Filed 5-12-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P