Medicare Program; Request for an Exception to the Prohibition on Expansion of Facility Capacity Under the Hospital Ownership and Rural Provider Exceptions to the Physician Self-Referral Prohibition, 26969-26971 [2014-10872]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 91 / Monday, May 12, 2014 / Notices
Comments erroneously mailed to the
addresses indicated as appropriate for
hand or courier delivery may be delayed
and received after the comment period.
For information on viewing public
comments, see the beginning of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Patricia Taft, (410) 786–4561.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Inspection
of Public Comments: All comments
received before the close of the
comment period are available for
viewing by the public, including any
personally identifiable or confidential
business information that is included in
a comment. We post all comments
received before the close of the
comment period on the following Web
site as soon as possible after they have
been received: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the search
instructions on that Web site to view
public comments.
Comments received timely will also
be available for public inspection as
they are received, generally beginning
approximately 3 weeks after publication
of a document, at the headquarters of
the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Services, 7500 Security Boulevard,
Baltimore, Maryland 21244, Monday
through Friday of each week from 8:30
a.m. to 4 p.m. To schedule an
appointment to view public comments,
phone 1–800–743–3951.
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with NOTICES
I. Background
Organ Procurement Organizations
(OPOs) are not-for-profit organizations
that are responsible for the
procurement, preservation, and
transport of organs to transplant centers
throughout the country. Qualified OPOs
are designated by the Centers for
Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) to
recover or procure organs in CMSdefined exclusive geographic service
areas, pursuant to section 371(b)(1) of
the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C.
273(b)(1)) and our regulations at 42 CFR
486.306. Once an OPO has been
designated for an area, hospitals in that
area that participate in Medicare and
Medicaid are required to work with that
OPO in providing organs for transplant,
pursuant to section 1138(a)(1)(C) of the
Social Security Act (the Act) and our
regulations at 42 CFR 482.45.
Section 1138(a)(1)(A)(iii) of the Act
provides that a hospital must notify the
designated OPO (for the service area in
which it is located) of potential organ
donors. Under section 1138(a)(1)(C) of
the Act, every participating hospital
must have an agreement only with its
designated OPO to identify potential
donors.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:00 May 09, 2014
Jkt 232001
However, section 1138(a)(2)(A) of the
Act provides that a hospital may obtain
a waiver of the above requirements from
the Secretary of the Department of
Health and Human Services (the
Secretary) under certain specified
conditions. A waiver allows the hospital
to have an agreement with an OPO other
than the one initially designated by
CMS, if the hospital meets certain
conditions specified in section
1138(a)(2)(A) of the Act. In addition, the
Secretary may review additional criteria
described in section 1138(a)(2)(B) of the
Act to evaluate the hospital’s request for
a waiver.
Section 1138(a)(2)(A) of the Act states
that in granting a waiver, the Secretary
must determine that the waiver—(1) is
expected to increase organ donations;
and (2) will ensure equitable treatment
of patients referred for transplants
within the service area served by the
designated OPO and within the service
area served by the OPO with which the
hospital seeks to enter into an
agreement under the waiver. In making
a waiver determination, section
1138(a)(2)(B) of the Act provides that
the Secretary may consider, among
other factors: (1) Cost-effectiveness; (2)
improvements in quality; (3) whether
there has been any change in a
hospital’s designated OPO due to the
changes made in definitions for
metropolitan statistical areas; and (4)
the length and continuity of a hospital’s
relationship with an OPO other than the
hospital’s designated OPO. Under
section 1138(a)(2)(D) of the Act, the
Secretary is required to publish a notice
of any waiver application received from
a hospital within 30 days of receiving
the application, and to offer interested
parties an opportunity to submit
comments during the 60-day comment
period beginning on the publication
date in the Federal Register.
The criteria that the Secretary uses to
evaluate the waiver in these cases are
the same as those described above under
sections 1138(a)(2)(A) and (B) of the Act
and have been incorporated into the
regulations at § 486.308(e) and (f).
II. Waiver Request Procedures
In October 1995, we issued a Program
Memorandum (Transmittal No. A–95–
11) detailing the waiver process and
discussing the information hospitals
must provide in requesting a waiver. We
indicated that upon receipt of a waiver
request, we would publish a Federal
Register notice to solicit public
comments, as required by section
1138(a)(2)(D) of the Act.
According to these requirements, we
will review the comments received.
During the review process, we may
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
26969
consult on an as-needed basis with the
Health Resources and Services
Administration’s Division of
Transplantation, the United Network for
Organ Sharing, and our regional offices.
If necessary, we may request additional
clarifying information from the applying
hospital or others. We will then make a
final determination on the waiver
request and notify the hospital and the
designated and requested OPOs.
III. Hospital Waiver Request
As permitted by § 486.308(e), the
following hospital has requested a
waiver to enter into an agreement with
a designated OPO other than the OPO
designated for the service area in which
the hospital is located:
Banner Churchill Community
Hospital, Fallon, Nevada, is requesting a
waiver to work with: California
Transplant Donor Network, 1000
Broadway, Suite 600, Oakland,
California 94607–4099.
The Hospital’s Designated OPO is:
Nevada Donor Network, 2061 E Sahara
Ave., Las Vegas, Nevada 89104.
IV. Collection of Information
Requirements
This document does not impose
information collection and
recordkeeping requirements.
Consequently, it need not be reviewed
by the Office of Management and
Budget under the authority of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 35).
V. Response to Public Comments
We will consider all comments we
receive by the date and time specified
in the DATES section of this preamble.
Dated: May 2, 2014.
Marilyn Tavenner,
Administrator, Centers for Medicare &
Medicaid Services.
[FR Doc. 2014–10638 Filed 5–9–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4120–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Services
[CMS–1615–NC]
Medicare Program; Request for an
Exception to the Prohibition on
Expansion of Facility Capacity Under
the Hospital Ownership and Rural
Provider Exceptions to the Physician
Self-Referral Prohibition
Centers for Medicare &
Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS.
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\12MYN1.SGM
12MYN1
26970
ACTION:
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 91 / Monday, May 12, 2014 / Notices
Notice with comment period.
Under section 1877(i) of the
Social Security Act (the Act), a
physician-owned hospital is effectively
prohibited from expanding facility
capacity, unless the Secretary grants the
hospital’s request for an exception to
that prohibition after considering input
on the hospital’s request from
individuals and entities in the
community where the hospital is
located. The Centers for Medicare &
Medicaid Services (CMS) has received a
request from a physician-owned
hospital for an exception to the
prohibition against expansion of facility
capacity. This notice solicits comments
on the request from individuals and
entities in the community in which the
physician-owned hospital is located.
Community input may inform our
determination regarding whether the
requesting hospital qualifies for an
exception to the prohibition against
expansion of facility capacity.
DATES: Comment Date: To be assured
consideration, comments must be
received at one of the addresses
provided below, no later than 5 p.m. on
June 11, 2014.
ADDRESSES: In commenting, please refer
to file code CMS–1615–NC. Because of
staff and resource limitations, we cannot
accept comments by facsimile (FAX)
transmission.
You may submit comments in one of
three ways (please choose only one of
the ways listed):
1. Electronically. You may submit
electronic comments on this exception
request to https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions under the ‘‘More
Search Options’’ tab.
2. By regular mail. You may mail
written comments to the following
address ONLY: Centers for Medicare &
Medicaid Services, Department of
Health and Human Services, Attention:
CMS–1615–NC, P.O. Box 8010,
Baltimore, MD 21244–1850.
Please allow sufficient time for mailed
comments to be received before the
close of the comment period.
3. By express or overnight mail. You
may send written comments to the
following address ONLY: Department of
Health and Human Services, Attention:
CMS–1615–NC, Mail Stop C4–26–05,
7500 Security Boulevard, Baltimore, MD
21244–1850.
For information on viewing public
comments, see the beginning of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Patricia Taft, (410) 786–4561 or Teresa
Walden, (410) 786–3755.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:00 May 09, 2014
Jkt 232001
Inspection of Public Comments:
All comments received before the
close of the comment period are
available for viewing by the public,
including any personally identifiable or
confidential business information that is
included in a comment. We post all
comments received before the close of
the comment period on the following
Web site as soon as possible after they
have been received: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the search
instructions on that Web site to view
public comments.
We will allow stakeholders 30 days
from the date of this notice to submit
written comments. Comments received
timely will be available for public
inspection as they are received,
generally beginning approximately 3
weeks after publication of this notice, at
the headquarters of the Centers for
Medicare & Medicaid Services, 7500
Security Boulevard, Baltimore,
Maryland 21244, Monday through
Friday of each week from 8:30 a.m. to
4 p.m. To schedule an appointment to
view public comments, please phone 1–
800–743–3951.
I. Background
Section 1877 of the Social Security
Act (the Act), also known as the
physician self-referral law—(1) prohibits
a physician from making referrals for
certain ‘‘designated health services’’
(DHS) payable by Medicare to an entity
with which he or she (or an immediate
family member) has a financial
relationship (ownership or
compensation), unless an exception
applies; and (2) prohibits the entity from
filing claims with Medicare (or billing
another individual, entity, or third party
payer) for those DHS furnished as a
result of a prohibited referral.
Section 1877(d)(3) of the Act provides
an exception, known as the ‘‘whole
hospital exception,’’ for physician
ownership or investment interests held
in a hospital located outside of Puerto
Rico, provided that the referring
physician is authorized to perform
services at the hospital and the
ownership or investment interest is in
the hospital itself (and not merely in a
subdivision of the hospital).
Section 1877(d)(2) of the Act provides
an exception for physician ownership or
investment interests in rural providers
(the ‘‘rural provider exception’’). In
order for an entity to qualify for the
rural provider exception, the DHS must
be furnished in a rural area (as defined
in section 1886(d)(2) of the Act) and
substantially all the DHS furnished by
the entity must be furnished to
individuals residing in a rural area.
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Section 6001(a)(3) of the Patient
Protection and Affordable Care Act
(Pub. L. 111–148) as amended by the
Health Care and Education
Reconciliation Act of 2010 (Pub. L. 111–
152) (hereafter referred to together as
‘‘the Affordable Care Act’’) amended the
whole hospital and rural provider
exceptions to the physician self-referral
prohibition to impose additional
restrictions on physician ownership and
investment in hospitals and rural
providers. Since March 23, 2010, a
physician-owned hospital that seeks to
avail itself of either exception is
prohibited from expanding facility
capacity unless it qualifies as an
‘‘applicable hospital’’ or ‘‘high Medicaid
facility’’ (as defined in sections
1877(i)(3)(E), (F) of the Act and 42 CFR
411.362(c)(2), (3) of our regulations) and
has been granted an exception to the
prohibition by the Secretary. Section
1877(i)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act provides that
individuals and entities in the
community in which the provider
requesting the exception is located must
have an opportunity to provide input
with respect to the provider’s
application for the exception. For
further information, visit our Web site
at: https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/
Fraud-and-Abuse/PhysicianSelf
Referral/Physician_Owned_
Hospitals.html.
II. Exception Request Process
On November 30, 2011, we published
a final rule in the Federal Register (76
FR 74122, 74517 through 74525) that,
among other things, finalized
§ 411.362(c), which specified the
process for submitting, commenting on,
and reviewing a request for an exception
to the prohibition on expansion of
facility capacity. We specified that prior
to our review of the request, we will
solicit community input on the request
for an exception by publishing a notice
of the request in the Federal Register
(see § 411.362(c)(5)). We also stated that
individuals and entities in the hospital’s
community have 30 days to submit
comments on the request. Community
input must take the form of written
comments and may include
documentation demonstrating that the
physician-owned hospital requesting
the exception does or does not qualify
as an ‘‘applicable hospital’’ or ‘‘high
Medicaid facility,’’ as such terms are
defined in § 411.362(c)(2) and (3).
Although we gave examples of
community input, such as
documentation demonstrating that the
hospital does not satisfy one or more of
the data criteria or that the hospital
discriminates against beneficiaries of
Federal health programs, we noted that
E:\FR\FM\12MYN1.SGM
12MYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 91 / Monday, May 12, 2014 / Notices
care programs and does not permit
physicians practicing at the hospital to
discriminate against such beneficiaries;
and
• With respect to each of the 3 most
recent fiscal years for which data are
available as of the date the hospital
submits its request, the hospital has an
annual percent of total inpatient
admissions under Medicaid that is
estimated to be greater than such
percent with respect to such admissions
for any other hospital located in the
county in which the hospital is located.
We note that our regulations require
the requesting hospital to use filed
hospital cost report discharge data to
estimate its annual percentage of total
inpatient admissions under Medicaid
and the annual percentages of total
inpatient admissions under Medicaid
for every other hospital located in the
county in which the hospital is located.
Individuals and entities wishing to
submit comments on the hospital’s
request should review the DATES and
ADDRESSES sections above and state
whether or not they are in the
community in which the hospital is
located.
III. Hospital Exception Request
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with NOTICES
these were examples only and that we
will not restrict the type of community
input that may be submitted (76 FR
74522). If we receive timely comments
from the community, we will notify the
hospital, and the hospital has 30 days
after such notice to submit a rebuttal
statement (§ 411.362(c)(5)(ii)).
A request for an exception to the
facility expansion prohibition is
considered complete and ready for CMS
review if no comments from the
community are received by the close of
the 30-day comment period. If we
receive timely comments from the
community, we consider the request to
be complete 30 days after the hospital
is notified of the comments. If we grant
the request for an exception to the
prohibition on expansion of facility
capacity, the expansion may occur only
in facilities on the hospital’s main
campus and may not result in the
number of operating rooms, procedure
rooms, and beds for which the hospital
is licensed exceeding 200 percent of the
hospital’s baseline number of operating
rooms, procedure rooms, and beds
(§ 411.362(c)(6)). Our decision to grant
or deny a hospital’s request for an
exception to the prohibition on
expansion of facility capacity will be
published in the Federal Register in
accordance with our regulations at
§ 411.362(c)(7).
This document does not impose
information collection and
recordkeeping requirements.
Consequently, it need not be reviewed
by the Office of Management and
Budget under the authority of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 35).
As permitted by section 1877(i)(3) of
the Act and our regulations at
§ 411.362(c), the following physicianowned hospital has requested an
exception to the prohibition on
expansion of facility capacity:
Name of Facility: Lake Pointe Medical
Center
Location: 6800 Scenic Drive, Rowlett,
Texas 75088–4552 (Rockwall County)
Basis for Exception Request: High
Medicaid Facility
We seek comments on this request
from individuals and entities in the
community in which the hospital is
located. We encourage interested parties
to review the hospital’s request, which
is posted on the CMS Web site at:
https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Fraudand-Abuse/PhysicianSelfReferral/
Physician_Owned_Hospitals.html. We
especially welcome comments regarding
whether the hospital qualifies as a ‘‘high
Medicaid facility.’’ Under
§ 411.362(c)(3), a ‘‘high Medicaid
facility’’ is a hospital that satisfies all of
the following criteria:
• The hospital is not the sole hospital
in the county in which it is located;
• The hospital does not discriminate
against beneficiaries of Federal health
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:00 May 09, 2014
Jkt 232001
IV. Collection of Information
Requirements
V. Response to Public Comments
We will consider all comments we
receive by the date and time specified
in the DATES section of this preamble,
and, when we proceed with a
subsequent document, we will respond
to the comments in the preamble to that
document.
Dated: May 6, 2014.
Marilyn Tavenner,
Administrator, Centers for Medicare &
Medicaid Services.
[FR Doc. 2014–10872 Filed 5–9–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
26971
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Administration for Children and
Families
Proposed Information Collection
Activity; Comment Request Proposed
Projects:
Title: Multistate Financial Institution
Data Match with Federally Assisted
State Transmitted Levy (FIDM/FAST
Levy)
OMB No.: 0970–0196.
Description: State child support
enforcement agencies are required to
attach and seize an obligor’s assets in
financial institutions to satisfy any
current support obligation and arrearage
when the obligor owes past-due
support. To locate an obligor’s account,
state child support enforcement
agencies are required to enter into data
matching agreements with financial
institutions doing business in their
state. State child support enforcement
agencies use the results of data matches
to secure information leading to the
enforcement of the support obligation.
The federal Office of Child Support
Enforcement (OCSE) assists states to
fulfill the data matching requirements
with multistate financial institutions by
facilitating matching through the
Federal Parent Locator Service’s
Multistate Financial Institution Data
Match (MSFIDM) program.
To further assist states to meet this
statutory requirement, the OCSE
enhanced the Federal Parent Locator
Service by developing the Federally
Assisted State Transmitted (FAST) Levy
application that provides a secure and
automated method of collecting and
disseminating electronic levy notices
between state child support
enforcement agencies and multistate
financial institutions. This increases
states’ efficiency to secure financial
assets.
The FIDM/FAST Levy information
collection activities are authorized by:
42 U.S.C. 652(l) which authorizes OCSE,
through the Federal Parent Locator
Service, to aid state child support
agencies and financial institutions doing
business in two or more states in
reaching agreements regarding the
receipt from financial institutions, and
the transfer to the state child support
agencies, of information pertaining to
the location of accounts held by obligors
who owe past-due support; 42 U.S.C.
666 (a)(2) and (c)(1)(G)(ii) which require
state child support agencies in cases in
which there is an arrearage to establish
procedures to secure assets to satisfy
any current support obligation and the
E:\FR\FM\12MYN1.SGM
12MYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 91 (Monday, May 12, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 26969-26971]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-10872]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
[CMS-1615-NC]
Medicare Program; Request for an Exception to the Prohibition on
Expansion of Facility Capacity Under the Hospital Ownership and Rural
Provider Exceptions to the Physician Self-Referral Prohibition
AGENCY: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS.
[[Page 26970]]
ACTION: Notice with comment period.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Under section 1877(i) of the Social Security Act (the Act), a
physician-owned hospital is effectively prohibited from expanding
facility capacity, unless the Secretary grants the hospital's request
for an exception to that prohibition after considering input on the
hospital's request from individuals and entities in the community where
the hospital is located. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
(CMS) has received a request from a physician-owned hospital for an
exception to the prohibition against expansion of facility capacity.
This notice solicits comments on the request from individuals and
entities in the community in which the physician-owned hospital is
located. Community input may inform our determination regarding whether
the requesting hospital qualifies for an exception to the prohibition
against expansion of facility capacity.
DATES: Comment Date: To be assured consideration, comments must be
received at one of the addresses provided below, no later than 5 p.m.
on June 11, 2014.
ADDRESSES: In commenting, please refer to file code CMS-1615-NC.
Because of staff and resource limitations, we cannot accept comments by
facsimile (FAX) transmission.
You may submit comments in one of three ways (please choose only
one of the ways listed):
1. Electronically. You may submit electronic comments on this
exception request to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions under the ``More Search Options'' tab.
2. By regular mail. You may mail written comments to the following
address ONLY: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Department of
Health and Human Services, Attention: CMS-1615-NC, P.O. Box 8010,
Baltimore, MD 21244-1850.
Please allow sufficient time for mailed comments to be received
before the close of the comment period.
3. By express or overnight mail. You may send written comments to
the following address ONLY: Department of Health and Human Services,
Attention: CMS-1615-NC, Mail Stop C4-26-05, 7500 Security Boulevard,
Baltimore, MD 21244-1850.
For information on viewing public comments, see the beginning of
the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Patricia Taft, (410) 786-4561 or
Teresa Walden, (410) 786-3755.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Inspection of Public Comments:
All comments received before the close of the comment period are
available for viewing by the public, including any personally
identifiable or confidential business information that is included in a
comment. We post all comments received before the close of the comment
period on the following Web site as soon as possible after they have
been received: https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the search
instructions on that Web site to view public comments.
We will allow stakeholders 30 days from the date of this notice to
submit written comments. Comments received timely will be available for
public inspection as they are received, generally beginning
approximately 3 weeks after publication of this notice, at the
headquarters of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, 7500
Security Boulevard, Baltimore, Maryland 21244, Monday through Friday of
each week from 8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m. To schedule an appointment to view
public comments, please phone 1-800-743-3951.
I. Background
Section 1877 of the Social Security Act (the Act), also known as
the physician self-referral law--(1) prohibits a physician from making
referrals for certain ``designated health services'' (DHS) payable by
Medicare to an entity with which he or she (or an immediate family
member) has a financial relationship (ownership or compensation),
unless an exception applies; and (2) prohibits the entity from filing
claims with Medicare (or billing another individual, entity, or third
party payer) for those DHS furnished as a result of a prohibited
referral.
Section 1877(d)(3) of the Act provides an exception, known as the
``whole hospital exception,'' for physician ownership or investment
interests held in a hospital located outside of Puerto Rico, provided
that the referring physician is authorized to perform services at the
hospital and the ownership or investment interest is in the hospital
itself (and not merely in a subdivision of the hospital).
Section 1877(d)(2) of the Act provides an exception for physician
ownership or investment interests in rural providers (the ``rural
provider exception''). In order for an entity to qualify for the rural
provider exception, the DHS must be furnished in a rural area (as
defined in section 1886(d)(2) of the Act) and substantially all the DHS
furnished by the entity must be furnished to individuals residing in a
rural area.
Section 6001(a)(3) of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care
Act (Pub. L. 111-148) as amended by the Health Care and Education
Reconciliation Act of 2010 (Pub. L. 111-152) (hereafter referred to
together as ``the Affordable Care Act'') amended the whole hospital and
rural provider exceptions to the physician self-referral prohibition to
impose additional restrictions on physician ownership and investment in
hospitals and rural providers. Since March 23, 2010, a physician-owned
hospital that seeks to avail itself of either exception is prohibited
from expanding facility capacity unless it qualifies as an ``applicable
hospital'' or ``high Medicaid facility'' (as defined in sections
1877(i)(3)(E), (F) of the Act and 42 CFR 411.362(c)(2), (3) of our
regulations) and has been granted an exception to the prohibition by
the Secretary. Section 1877(i)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act provides that
individuals and entities in the community in which the provider
requesting the exception is located must have an opportunity to provide
input with respect to the provider's application for the exception. For
further information, visit our Web site at: https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Fraud-and-Abuse/PhysicianSelfReferral/Physician_Owned_Hospitals.html.
II. Exception Request Process
On November 30, 2011, we published a final rule in the Federal
Register (76 FR 74122, 74517 through 74525) that, among other things,
finalized Sec. 411.362(c), which specified the process for submitting,
commenting on, and reviewing a request for an exception to the
prohibition on expansion of facility capacity. We specified that prior
to our review of the request, we will solicit community input on the
request for an exception by publishing a notice of the request in the
Federal Register (see Sec. 411.362(c)(5)). We also stated that
individuals and entities in the hospital's community have 30 days to
submit comments on the request. Community input must take the form of
written comments and may include documentation demonstrating that the
physician-owned hospital requesting the exception does or does not
qualify as an ``applicable hospital'' or ``high Medicaid facility,'' as
such terms are defined in Sec. 411.362(c)(2) and (3). Although we gave
examples of community input, such as documentation demonstrating that
the hospital does not satisfy one or more of the data criteria or that
the hospital discriminates against beneficiaries of Federal health
programs, we noted that
[[Page 26971]]
these were examples only and that we will not restrict the type of
community input that may be submitted (76 FR 74522). If we receive
timely comments from the community, we will notify the hospital, and
the hospital has 30 days after such notice to submit a rebuttal
statement (Sec. 411.362(c)(5)(ii)).
A request for an exception to the facility expansion prohibition is
considered complete and ready for CMS review if no comments from the
community are received by the close of the 30-day comment period. If we
receive timely comments from the community, we consider the request to
be complete 30 days after the hospital is notified of the comments. If
we grant the request for an exception to the prohibition on expansion
of facility capacity, the expansion may occur only in facilities on the
hospital's main campus and may not result in the number of operating
rooms, procedure rooms, and beds for which the hospital is licensed
exceeding 200 percent of the hospital's baseline number of operating
rooms, procedure rooms, and beds (Sec. 411.362(c)(6)). Our decision to
grant or deny a hospital's request for an exception to the prohibition
on expansion of facility capacity will be published in the Federal
Register in accordance with our regulations at Sec. 411.362(c)(7).
III. Hospital Exception Request
As permitted by section 1877(i)(3) of the Act and our regulations
at Sec. 411.362(c), the following physician-owned hospital has
requested an exception to the prohibition on expansion of facility
capacity:
Name of Facility: Lake Pointe Medical Center
Location: 6800 Scenic Drive, Rowlett, Texas 75088-4552 (Rockwall
County)
Basis for Exception Request: High Medicaid Facility
We seek comments on this request from individuals and entities in
the community in which the hospital is located. We encourage interested
parties to review the hospital's request, which is posted on the CMS
Web site at: https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Fraud-and-Abuse/PhysicianSelfReferral/Physician_Owned_Hospitals.html. We especially
welcome comments regarding whether the hospital qualifies as a ``high
Medicaid facility.'' Under Sec. 411.362(c)(3), a ``high Medicaid
facility'' is a hospital that satisfies all of the following criteria:
The hospital is not the sole hospital in the county in
which it is located;
The hospital does not discriminate against beneficiaries
of Federal health care programs and does not permit physicians
practicing at the hospital to discriminate against such beneficiaries;
and
With respect to each of the 3 most recent fiscal years for
which data are available as of the date the hospital submits its
request, the hospital has an annual percent of total inpatient
admissions under Medicaid that is estimated to be greater than such
percent with respect to such admissions for any other hospital located
in the county in which the hospital is located.
We note that our regulations require the requesting hospital to use
filed hospital cost report discharge data to estimate its annual
percentage of total inpatient admissions under Medicaid and the annual
percentages of total inpatient admissions under Medicaid for every
other hospital located in the county in which the hospital is located.
Individuals and entities wishing to submit comments on the
hospital's request should review the DATES and ADDRESSES sections above
and state whether or not they are in the community in which the
hospital is located.
IV. Collection of Information Requirements
This document does not impose information collection and
recordkeeping requirements. Consequently, it need not be reviewed by
the Office of Management and Budget under the authority of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 35).
V. Response to Public Comments
We will consider all comments we receive by the date and time
specified in the DATES section of this preamble, and, when we proceed
with a subsequent document, we will respond to the comments in the
preamble to that document.
Dated: May 6, 2014.
Marilyn Tavenner,
Administrator, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services.
[FR Doc. 2014-10872 Filed 5-9-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P