Airworthiness Directives; Honeywell International Inc. Turboprop Engines, 26906-26909 [2014-10783]
Download as PDF
26906
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 91 / Monday, May 12, 2014 / Proposed Rules
comply with this proposed AD. The
average labor rate is $85 per hour.
Required parts cost about $750 per
engine. Based on these figures, we
estimate the cost of this proposed AD on
U.S. operators to be $1,360.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. ‘‘Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs,’’ describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in ‘‘Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701:
General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
Regulatory Findings
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
We determined that this proposed AD
would not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This
proposed AD would not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on
the relationship between the national
Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify this proposed regulation:
(1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866,
(2) Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under
the DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26,
1979),
(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation
in Alaska to the extent that it justifies
making a regulatory distinction, and
(4) Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:57 May 09, 2014
Jkt 232001
the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part
39 as follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):
■
Turbomeca S.A.: Docket No. FAA–2014–
0219; Directorate Identifier 2014–NE–
04–AD.
(a) Comments Due Date
We must receive comments by July 11,
2014.
(b) Affected ADs
None.
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to Turbomeca S.A. Makila
2A and Makila 2A1 turboshaft engines with
a high-pressure (HP) fuel pump, part number
(P/N) 0 298 91 806 0 or P/N 0 298 91 805
0, installed, that have not incorporated
Turbomeca modification TU 59.
(d) Reason
This AD was prompted by failure of two
HP fuel pumps that resulted in engine inflight shutdowns. We are proposing this AD
to prevent failure of the HP fuel pump, which
could lead to an in-flight shutdown, damage
to the engine, and forced landing or accident.
(e) Actions and Compliance
Comply with this AD within the
compliance times specified, unless already
done.
(1) Within 25 flight hours (FH) or 6 months
after the effective date of this AD, whichever
occurs earlier, clean and visually inspect the
splines of the HP fuel pump/metering valve
and the module M01 drive gear for wear,
corrosion, scaling, pitting, and chafing.
(2) Thereafter, reinspect every 100 FH
since-last-inspection.
(3) If the HP fuel pump/metering valve or
the module M01 drive gear fail the inspection
required by this AD, replace it with a part
eligible for installation before further flight.
(4) After the effective date of this AD, do
not install any HP fuel pump, HP fuel pump
drive shaft, module 01 drive gear, or module
M01 77-tooth gear onto any engine, or install
any engine onto any helicopter, unless the
HP fuel pump/metering valve and the
module M01 drive gear passed the inspection
required by paragraph (e) of this AD.
(f) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
The Manager, Engine Certification Office,
FAA, may approve AMOCs to this AD. Use
the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19 to
make your request.
(g) Related Information
(1) For more information about this AD,
contact James E. Gray, Aerospace Engineer,
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Engine Certification Office, FAA, Engine &
Propeller Directorate, 12 New England
Executive Park, Burlington, MA 01803;
phone: (781) 238–7742; fax: (781) 238–7199;
email: James.E.Gray@faa.gov.
(2) Refer to MCAI European Aviation
Safety Agency AD 2014–0059, dated March
10, 2014, for more information. You may
examine the MCAI in the AD docket on the
Internet at https://www.regulations.gov by
searching for and locating it in Docket No.
FAA–2014–0219.
(3) Turbomeca S.A. Mandatory Service
Bulletin No. 298 73 2818, Version F, dated
March 5, 2014, pertains to the subject of this
AD and can be obtained from Turbomeca
S.A., using the contact information in
paragraph (g)(4) of this AD.
(4) For service information identified in
this AD, contact Turbomeca, S.A., 40220
Tarnos, France; phone: 33 (0)5 59 74 40 00;
telex: 570 042; fax: 33 (0)5 59 74 45 15.
(5) You may view this service information
at the FAA, Engine & Propeller Directorate,
12 New England Executive Park, Burlington,
MA. For information on the availability of
this material at the FAA, call 781–238–7125.
Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on
May 6, 2014.
Colleen M. D’Alessandro,
Assistant Directorate Manager, Engine &
Propeller Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2014–10782 Filed 5–9–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2012–0913; Directorate
Identifier 2012–NE–23–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Honeywell
International Inc. Turboprop Engines
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
We propose to adopt a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
Honeywell International Inc. TPE331–5,
–5A, –5AB, –5B, –10, –10R, –10U,
–10UF, –10UG, –10UGR, and –10UR
model turboprop engines. This
proposed AD was prompted by engine
propeller shaft coupling failures,
leading to unexpected propeller pitch
changes resulting in high aerodynamic
and asymmetric drag on the airplanes
using these engines. This proposed AD
would require removing certain part
number (P/N) propeller shaft couplings
from service. This proposed AD would
also require inserting a copy of
Honeywell International Inc. Operating
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\12MYP1.SGM
12MYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 91 / Monday, May 12, 2014 / Proposed Rules
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Information Letter OI331–26, dated
March 2, 2010, into the applicable
Airplane Flight Manuals. We are
proposing this AD to prevent loss of
airplane control, leading to an accident.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by July 11, 2014.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments,
using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail
address above between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
For service information identified in
this proposed AD, contact Honeywell
International Inc., 111 S. 34th Street,
Phoenix, AZ 85034–2802; phone: 800–
601–3099; Web site: https://
portal.honeywell.com. You may view
this service information at the FAA,
Engine & Propeller Directorate, 12 New
England Executive Park, Burlington,
MA. For information on the availability
of this material at the FAA, call 781–
238–7125.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2012–
0913; or in person at the Docket
Management Facility between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this proposed AD, the
regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The
street address for the Docket Office
(phone: 800–647–5527) is in the
ADDRESSES section. Comments will be
available in the AD docket shortly after
receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Joseph Costa, Aerospace Engineer, Los
Angeles Aircraft Certification Office,
FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate,
3960 Paramount Blvd., Lakewood, CA
90712–4137; phone: 562–627–5246; fax:
562–627–5210; email: joseph.costa@
faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written
relevant data, views, or arguments about
this proposal. Send your comments to
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:57 May 09, 2014
Jkt 232001
an address listed under the ADDRESSES
section. Include ‘‘Docket No. FAA–
2012–0913; Directorate Identifier 2012–
NE–23–AD’’ at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite
comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy
aspects of this proposed AD. We will
consider all comments received by the
closing date and may amend this
proposed AD because of those
comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact we receive
about this proposed AD.
Discussion
We have received numerous reports of
propeller shaft couplings, P/Ns
3107065–1 and 865888–3, failing. These
propeller shaft couplings experience
fatigue cracks at the corners of the
lubrication slots that may result in
separation and fragmentation of the
propeller shaft coupling. That
separation causes a sudden loss of drive
torque from the engine’s power section
to the propeller shaft (called drivetrain
uncoupling). After a drivetrain
uncoupling, the engine’s fuel pump
continues to provide fuel to the power
section, and with no propeller load and
no engine control changes by the pilot,
the engine power section will accelerate
to the fuel control’s overspeed governor
set point. Even though the propeller
drive is uncoupled, the propeller blade
pitch is still controlled by the propeller
governor. During this overspeed
condition, the propeller governor is
designed to move the propeller blades
toward higher pitch until full feather is
reached with the propeller not rotating
or rotating very slowly. Under certain
conditions the power section will
remain at about 104% RPM with the
propeller blades in feather position and
the propeller not rotating or rotating
very slowly, until the engine is shut
down by the pilot.
Potential Unsafe Failure Scenarios
After a propeller shaft drivetrain
uncoupling, the speed of the engine’s
power section may be reduced: (1) From
full power, by the pilot retarding the
power lever to flight idle, which reduces
fuel to the power section; (2) at flight
idle, because the fuel control reduces
the fuel supply to the power section
and/or; (3) by fragmentation of the
propeller shaft coupling and secondary
damage to the gears in the gearbox. If
the resulting speed of the power section
falls below the propeller governor set
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
26907
point (set by the pilot-controlled
condition lever), the propeller governor
will move the propeller out of feather to
a low-pitch, high-drag position.
Also, after a propeller shaft drivetrain
uncoupling, a pilot reacting to the
overspeed of the power section may
inadvertently retard the power lever to
flight idle. Doing so will cause the
propeller governor to move the
feathered propeller to a low-pitch, highdrag condition.
Several reports during maintenance
test flights and in-service operations of
twin-engine airplanes have shown that
inadvertent movement of the propeller
blade pitch to a low blade angle create
a high aerodynamic and asymmetric
drag with resultant uncommanded yaw
and roll response on the airplane.
Following this unexpected yaw and roll
response, stabilization and control of
the airplane may range from unusually
difficult to catastrophic, and pilots may
lack sufficient time to properly assess
the engine problem, initiate an engine
emergency shutdown, and activate the
feather valve.
The drivetrain uncoupling events
described previously lead to loss of
thrust, cause the propeller blade pitch to
go to a low-blade angle, and create a
high aerodynamic and asymmetric drag
on the airplane. The low-blade angle
may result in loss of airplane control,
leading to an accident. After a review of
about 40 years of National
Transportation Safety Board fatal
accident reports of multi-engine
airplanes with TPE331 engines, we
determined that certain airplanes are
more at risk by engine-failure events
than others. Therefore, we are proposing
compliance times in this AD that
address the risk by airplane after a
propeller shaft coupling failure.
Relevant Service Information
Allied-Signal Aerospace Company,
Garrett Engine Division Service Bulletin
No. TPE331–72–0873, Revision 1, dated
May 20, 1993, describes procedures for
replacing the affected P/Ns of propeller
shaft couplings with a defined
redesigned propeller shaft coupling.
Honeywell International Inc.
Operating Information Letter OI331–26,
dated March 2, 2010, describes
emergency procedures for aircrew if a
propeller shaft coupling fails.
FAA’s Determination
We are proposing this AD because we
evaluated all the relevant information
and determined the unsafe condition
described previously is likely to exist or
develop in other products of the same
type design.
E:\FR\FM\12MYP1.SGM
12MYP1
26908
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 91 / Monday, May 12, 2014 / Proposed Rules
Proposed AD Requirements
This proposed AD would require
removing propeller shaft couplings, P/
Ns 3107065–1, 865888–3, 865888–6,
and 865888–8, from service.
This proposed AD would also require
inserting a copy of Honeywell
International Inc. Operating Information
Letter OI331–26, dated March 2, 2010,
into the applicable Airplane Flight
Manual, Pilot Operating Handbook, or
Manufacturer’s Operating Manual.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this proposed AD
would affect 485 engines installed on
airplanes of U.S. registry. We also
estimate that it would take about one
hour per engine to perform the actions
required by this proposed AD, if done
at next turbine hot section scheduled
inspection, and 40 hours per engine if
done at an unscheduled access of the
propeller shaft coupling. We also
estimate that 400 engines would have
the replacement actions done at a
scheduled time of next turbine hot
section inspection, and 85 engines
would have the replacement actions
done at an unscheduled access of the
propeller shaft coupling. We also
estimate that the average labor rate is
$85 per hour. Required parts would cost
about $12,000 per engine. Based on
these figures, we estimate the total cost
of the proposed AD to U.S. operators to
be $6,143,000.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs, describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701:
‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD
would not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This
proposed AD would not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:57 May 09, 2014
Jkt 232001
the relationship between the national
Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify this proposed regulation:
(1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866,
(2) Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under
the DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26,
1979),
(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation
in Alaska to the extent that it justifies
making a regulatory distinction, and
(4) Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part
39 as follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):
■
Honeywell International Inc. (Type
Certificate Previously Held by
AlliedSignal Inc., Garrett Engine
Division; Garrett Turbine Engine
Company; and AiResearch
Manufacturing Company of Arizona):
Docket No. FAA–2012–0913; Directorate
Identifier 2012–NE–23–AD.
(a) Comments Due Date
We must receive comments by July 11,
2014.
(b) Affected ADs
None.
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to Honeywell
International Inc. TPE331–5, –5A, –5AB,
–5B, –10, –10R, –10U, –10UF, –10UG,
–10UGR, and –10UR model turboprop
engines, with a propeller shaft coupling, part
number (P/N) 3107065–1, 865888–3, 865888–
6, or 865888–8, installed.
(d) Unsafe Condition
This AD was prompted by engine propeller
shaft coupling failures leading to unexpected
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
propeller pitch changes resulting in high
aerodynamic and asymmetric drag on the
airplanes using these engines. We are issuing
this AD to prevent loss of airplane control,
leading to an accident.
(e) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the
compliance times specified, unless already
done.
(1) Engines Installed In Mitsubishi MU–2B
Series (MU–2 Series) Airplanes: Remove from
service the affected propeller shaft coupling
at the earliest of the following:
(i) Next piece-part exposure; or
(ii) Next turbine (hot) section inspection
(HSI); or
(iii) Before accumulating an additional
1,200 cycles after the effective date of this
AD.
(2) Engines Installed In Construcciones
Aeronauticas, S.A. (CASA) C–212 Series, and
Twin Commander 690 and 695 Series
(Jetprop Commander) Airplanes: Remove
from service the affected propeller shaft
coupling at the earliest of the following:
(i) Next piece-part exposure; or
(ii) Next turbine HSI; or
(iii) Before accumulating an additional
2,400 cycles after the effective date of this
AD.
(3) Engines Installed In British Aerospace
Jetstream 3101 Series, Dornier Luftfahrt
Dornier 228 Series, and M7 (formerly
Fairchild, Swearingen) SA226 and SA227
Series Airplanes, and All Other Airplanes
Not Listed in this AD Using Affected Engines:
Remove from service the affected propeller
shaft coupling at the earliest of the following:
(i) Next piece-part exposure; or
(ii) Next turbine HSI; or
(iii) Before accumulating an additional
3,600 cycles after the effective date of this
AD.
(4) Inserting a Copy of Honeywell
International Inc. Operating Information
Letter into the FAA-Approved Flight Manual:
Within 60 days after the effective date of
this AD, for airplanes with engine propeller
shaft coupling, P/N 3107065–1, 865888–3,
865888–6, or 865888–8, installed, insert a
copy of Honeywell International Inc.
Operating Information Letter OI331–26,
dated March 2, 2010, into the Emergency
Procedures Section of the applicable
Airplane Flight Manual, Pilot Operating
Handbook, or Manufacturer’s Operating
Manual.
(f) Definition
For the purpose of this AD, next piece-part
exposure is when the nose cone assembly is
removed from the engine.
(g) Installation Prohibition
After the effective date of this AD, do not
install any propeller shaft coupling, P/N
3107065–1, 865888–3, 865888–6, or 865888–
8, into any engine.
(h) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
The Manager, Los Angeles Aircraft
Certification Office, FAA, may approve
AMOCs for this AD. Use the procedures
found in 14 CFR 39.19 to make your request.
E:\FR\FM\12MYP1.SGM
12MYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 91 / Monday, May 12, 2014 / Proposed Rules
(i) Related Information
(1) For more information about this AD,
contact Joseph Costa, Aerospace Engineer,
Los Angeles Aircraft Certification Office,
FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 3960
Paramount Blvd., Lakewood, CA 90712–
4137; phone: 562–627–5246; fax: 562–627–
5210; email: joseph.costa@faa.gov.
(2) Allied-Signal Aerospace Company
Service Bulletin No. TPE331–72–0873,
Revision 1, dated May 20, 1993, addresses
acceptable replacement parts, and other
information pertaining to the subject of this
AD.
(3) For service information identified in
this AD, contact Honeywell International
Inc., 111 S. 34th Street, Phoenix, AZ 85034–
2802; phone: 800–601–3099; Web site:
https://portal.honeywell.com.
(4) You may view this service information
at the FAA, Engine & Propeller Directorate,
12 New England Executive Park, Burlington,
MA. For information on the availability of
this material at the FAA, call 781–238–7125.
Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on
May 6, 2014.
Colleen M. D’Alessandro,
Assistant Directorate Manager, Engine &
Propeller Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2014–10783 Filed 5–9–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R06–OAR–2014–0214; FRL–9910–77–
Region 6]
Approval and Promulgation of
Implementation Plans; New Mexico;
Regional Haze and Interstate Transport
Affecting Visibility State
Implementation Plan Revisions;
Withdrawal of Federal Implementation
Plan for the San Juan Generating
Station
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve
revisions to the New Mexico Regional
Haze State Implementation Plan that
address the Best Available Retrofit
Technology (BART) requirement for
oxides of nitrogen (NOX) for the Public
Service of New Mexico (PNM) San Juan
Generating Station (SJGS) in San Juan
County, New Mexico and the New
Mexico Visibility Transport SIP that
address impacts of emissions from the
SJGS, as required by the Federal Clean
Air Act (CAA) mandate to ensure that
emissions from sources in New Mexico
do not interfere with programs in other
states to protect visibility. In
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:57 May 09, 2014
Jkt 232001
conjunction with these proposed
approvals, we propose to withdraw the
federal implementation plan (FIP) that
addresses the NOX BART and visibility
transport requirements for the SJGS. The
EPA is taking this action under the
CAA.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before June 11, 2014.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R06–
OAR–2014–0214 by one of the following
methods:
• Federal e-Rulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
online instructions.
• Email: feldman.michael@epa.gov.
• Mail or delivery: Mr. Guy
Donaldson, Chief, Air Planning Section
(6PD–L), Environmental Protection
Agency, 1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 1200,
Dallas, Texas 75202–2733.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
Docket No. EPA–R06–OAR–2014–0214.
Our policy is that all comments received
will be included in the public docket
without change and may be made
available online at www.regulations.gov,
including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes
information claimed to be Confidential
Business Information (CBI) or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. The
www.regulations.gov Web site is an
‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which
means we will not know your identity
or contact information unless you
provide it in the body of your comment.
If you send an email comment directly
to us without going through
www.regulations.gov your email address
will be automatically captured and
included as part of the comment that is
placed in the public docket and made
available on the Internet. If you submit
an electronic comment, we recommend
that you include your name and other
contact information in the body of your
comment and with any disk or CD–ROM
you submit. If we cannot read your
comment due to technical difficulties
and cannot contact you for clarification,
we may not be able to consider your
comment. Electronic files should avoid
the use of special characters, any form
of encryption, and be free of any defects
or viruses.
Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise
protected through www.regulations.gov
or email. Clearly mark the part or all of
the information that you claim as CBI.
For CBI information in a disk or CD
ROM that you mail to EPA, mark the
outside of the disk or CD ROM as CBI
and identify electronically within the
disk or CD ROM the specific
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
26909
information that is claimed as CBI. In
addition to one complete version of the
comment that includes information
claimed as CBI, you must submit a copy
of the comment that does not contain
the information claimed as CBI for
inclusion in the public docket. We will
not disclose information so marked
except in accordance with procedures
set forth in 40 CFR part 2.
Docket: The index to the docket for
this action is available electronically at
www.regulations.gov and in hard copy
at EPA Region 6, 1445 Ross Avenue,
Suite 700, Dallas, Texas. While all
documents in the docket are listed in
the index, some information may be
publicly available only at the hard copy
location (e.g., copyrighted material), and
some may not be publicly available at
either location (e.g., CBI). To inspect the
hard copy materials, please schedule an
appointment with the person listed in
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
paragraph below or Mr. Bill Deese at
214–665–7253.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Michael Feldman, 214–665–9793;
feldman.michael@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Definitions
For the purpose of this document, we
are giving meaning to certain words or
initials as follows:
i. The words or initials Act or CAA
mean or refer to the Clean Air Act,
unless the context indicates otherwise.
ii. The words EPA, we, us or our mean
or refer to the United States
Environmental Protection Agency.
iii. The initials SIP mean or refer to
State Implementation Plan.
iv. The initials FIP mean or refer to
Federal Implementation Plan.
v. The initials RH and RHR mean or
refer to Regional Haze and the Regional
Haze Rule.
vi. The initials NMED mean the New
Mexico Environmental Department.
vii. The initials BART mean or refer
to Best Available Retrofit Technology.
viii. The initials EGUs mean or refer
to Electric Generating Units.
ix. The initials NOX mean or refer to
nitrogen oxides.
x. The initials SO2 mean or refer to
sulfur dioxide.
xi. The initials H2SO4 mean or refer to
sulfuric acid.
xii. The initials PM2.5 mean or refer to
particulate matter with an aerodynamic
of less than 2.5 micrometers.
xiii. The initials NAAQS mean or
refer to the National Ambient Air
Quality Standards.
xiv. The initials RPOs mean or refer
to regional planning organizations.
E:\FR\FM\12MYP1.SGM
12MYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 91 (Monday, May 12, 2014)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 26906-26909]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-10783]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2012-0913; Directorate Identifier 2012-NE-23-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Honeywell International Inc. Turboprop
Engines
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for
certain Honeywell International Inc. TPE331-5, -5A, -5AB, -5B, -10, -
10R, -10U, -10UF, -10UG, -10UGR, and -10UR model turboprop engines.
This proposed AD was prompted by engine propeller shaft coupling
failures, leading to unexpected propeller pitch changes resulting in
high aerodynamic and asymmetric drag on the airplanes using these
engines. This proposed AD would require removing certain part number
(P/N) propeller shaft couplings from service. This proposed AD would
also require inserting a copy of Honeywell International Inc. Operating
[[Page 26907]]
Information Letter OI331-26, dated March 2, 2010, into the applicable
Airplane Flight Manuals. We are proposing this AD to prevent loss of
airplane control, leading to an accident.
DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by July 11, 2014.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments, using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Fax: 202-493-2251.
Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail address above between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
For service information identified in this proposed AD, contact
Honeywell International Inc., 111 S. 34th Street, Phoenix, AZ 85034-
2802; phone: 800-601-3099; Web site: https://portal.honeywell.com. You
may view this service information at the FAA, Engine & Propeller
Directorate, 12 New England Executive Park, Burlington, MA. For
information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call 781-
238-7125.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2012-
0913; or in person at the Docket Management Facility between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this proposed AD, the regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The street address for the Docket
Office (phone: 800-647-5527) is in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will
be available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joseph Costa, Aerospace Engineer, Los
Angeles Aircraft Certification Office, FAA, Transport Airplane
Directorate, 3960 Paramount Blvd., Lakewood, CA 90712-4137; phone: 562-
627-5246; fax: 562-627-5210; email: joseph.costa@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposal. Send your comments to an address listed
under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2012-0913;
Directorate Identifier 2012-NE-23-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposed AD because of those comments.
We will post all comments we receive, without change, to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.
Discussion
We have received numerous reports of propeller shaft couplings, P/
Ns 3107065-1 and 865888-3, failing. These propeller shaft couplings
experience fatigue cracks at the corners of the lubrication slots that
may result in separation and fragmentation of the propeller shaft
coupling. That separation causes a sudden loss of drive torque from the
engine's power section to the propeller shaft (called drivetrain
uncoupling). After a drivetrain uncoupling, the engine's fuel pump
continues to provide fuel to the power section, and with no propeller
load and no engine control changes by the pilot, the engine power
section will accelerate to the fuel control's overspeed governor set
point. Even though the propeller drive is uncoupled, the propeller
blade pitch is still controlled by the propeller governor. During this
overspeed condition, the propeller governor is designed to move the
propeller blades toward higher pitch until full feather is reached with
the propeller not rotating or rotating very slowly. Under certain
conditions the power section will remain at about 104% RPM with the
propeller blades in feather position and the propeller not rotating or
rotating very slowly, until the engine is shut down by the pilot.
Potential Unsafe Failure Scenarios
After a propeller shaft drivetrain uncoupling, the speed of the
engine's power section may be reduced: (1) From full power, by the
pilot retarding the power lever to flight idle, which reduces fuel to
the power section; (2) at flight idle, because the fuel control reduces
the fuel supply to the power section and/or; (3) by fragmentation of
the propeller shaft coupling and secondary damage to the gears in the
gearbox. If the resulting speed of the power section falls below the
propeller governor set point (set by the pilot-controlled condition
lever), the propeller governor will move the propeller out of feather
to a low-pitch, high-drag position.
Also, after a propeller shaft drivetrain uncoupling, a pilot
reacting to the overspeed of the power section may inadvertently retard
the power lever to flight idle. Doing so will cause the propeller
governor to move the feathered propeller to a low-pitch, high-drag
condition.
Several reports during maintenance test flights and in-service
operations of twin-engine airplanes have shown that inadvertent
movement of the propeller blade pitch to a low blade angle create a
high aerodynamic and asymmetric drag with resultant uncommanded yaw and
roll response on the airplane. Following this unexpected yaw and roll
response, stabilization and control of the airplane may range from
unusually difficult to catastrophic, and pilots may lack sufficient
time to properly assess the engine problem, initiate an engine
emergency shutdown, and activate the feather valve.
The drivetrain uncoupling events described previously lead to loss
of thrust, cause the propeller blade pitch to go to a low-blade angle,
and create a high aerodynamic and asymmetric drag on the airplane. The
low-blade angle may result in loss of airplane control, leading to an
accident. After a review of about 40 years of National Transportation
Safety Board fatal accident reports of multi-engine airplanes with
TPE331 engines, we determined that certain airplanes are more at risk
by engine-failure events than others. Therefore, we are proposing
compliance times in this AD that address the risk by airplane after a
propeller shaft coupling failure.
Relevant Service Information
Allied-Signal Aerospace Company, Garrett Engine Division Service
Bulletin No. TPE331-72-0873, Revision 1, dated May 20, 1993, describes
procedures for replacing the affected P/Ns of propeller shaft couplings
with a defined redesigned propeller shaft coupling.
Honeywell International Inc. Operating Information Letter OI331-26,
dated March 2, 2010, describes emergency procedures for aircrew if a
propeller shaft coupling fails.
FAA's Determination
We are proposing this AD because we evaluated all the relevant
information and determined the unsafe condition described previously is
likely to exist or develop in other products of the same type design.
[[Page 26908]]
Proposed AD Requirements
This proposed AD would require removing propeller shaft couplings,
P/Ns 3107065-1, 865888-3, 865888-6, and 865888-8, from service.
This proposed AD would also require inserting a copy of Honeywell
International Inc. Operating Information Letter OI331-26, dated March
2, 2010, into the applicable Airplane Flight Manual, Pilot Operating
Handbook, or Manufacturer's Operating Manual.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this proposed AD would affect 485 engines
installed on airplanes of U.S. registry. We also estimate that it would
take about one hour per engine to perform the actions required by this
proposed AD, if done at next turbine hot section scheduled inspection,
and 40 hours per engine if done at an unscheduled access of the
propeller shaft coupling. We also estimate that 400 engines would have
the replacement actions done at a scheduled time of next turbine hot
section inspection, and 85 engines would have the replacement actions
done at an unscheduled access of the propeller shaft coupling. We also
estimate that the average labor rate is $85 per hour. Required parts
would cost about $12,000 per engine. Based on these figures, we
estimate the total cost of the proposed AD to U.S. operators to be
$6,143,000.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
(1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
(2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska to the extent
that it justifies making a regulatory distinction, and
(4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):
Honeywell International Inc. (Type Certificate Previously Held by
AlliedSignal Inc., Garrett Engine Division; Garrett Turbine Engine
Company; and AiResearch Manufacturing Company of Arizona): Docket
No. FAA-2012-0913; Directorate Identifier 2012-NE-23-AD.
(a) Comments Due Date
We must receive comments by July 11, 2014.
(b) Affected ADs
None.
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to Honeywell International Inc. TPE331-5, -5A, -
5AB, -5B, -10, -10R, -10U, -10UF, -10UG, -10UGR, and -10UR model
turboprop engines, with a propeller shaft coupling, part number (P/
N) 3107065-1, 865888-3, 865888-6, or 865888-8, installed.
(d) Unsafe Condition
This AD was prompted by engine propeller shaft coupling failures
leading to unexpected propeller pitch changes resulting in high
aerodynamic and asymmetric drag on the airplanes using these
engines. We are issuing this AD to prevent loss of airplane control,
leading to an accident.
(e) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.
(1) Engines Installed In Mitsubishi MU-2B Series (MU-2 Series)
Airplanes: Remove from service the affected propeller shaft coupling
at the earliest of the following:
(i) Next piece-part exposure; or
(ii) Next turbine (hot) section inspection (HSI); or
(iii) Before accumulating an additional 1,200 cycles after the
effective date of this AD.
(2) Engines Installed In Construcciones Aeronauticas, S.A.
(CASA) C-212 Series, and Twin Commander 690 and 695 Series (Jetprop
Commander) Airplanes: Remove from service the affected propeller
shaft coupling at the earliest of the following:
(i) Next piece-part exposure; or
(ii) Next turbine HSI; or
(iii) Before accumulating an additional 2,400 cycles after the
effective date of this AD.
(3) Engines Installed In British Aerospace Jetstream 3101
Series, Dornier Luftfahrt Dornier 228 Series, and M7 (formerly
Fairchild, Swearingen) SA226 and SA227 Series Airplanes, and All
Other Airplanes Not Listed in this AD Using Affected Engines: Remove
from service the affected propeller shaft coupling at the earliest
of the following:
(i) Next piece-part exposure; or
(ii) Next turbine HSI; or
(iii) Before accumulating an additional 3,600 cycles after the
effective date of this AD.
(4) Inserting a Copy of Honeywell International Inc. Operating
Information Letter into the FAA-Approved Flight Manual:
Within 60 days after the effective date of this AD, for
airplanes with engine propeller shaft coupling, P/N 3107065-1,
865888-3, 865888-6, or 865888-8, installed, insert a copy of
Honeywell International Inc. Operating Information Letter OI331-26,
dated March 2, 2010, into the Emergency Procedures Section of the
applicable Airplane Flight Manual, Pilot Operating Handbook, or
Manufacturer's Operating Manual.
(f) Definition
For the purpose of this AD, next piece-part exposure is when the
nose cone assembly is removed from the engine.
(g) Installation Prohibition
After the effective date of this AD, do not install any
propeller shaft coupling, P/N 3107065-1, 865888-3, 865888-6, or
865888-8, into any engine.
(h) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
The Manager, Los Angeles Aircraft Certification Office, FAA, may
approve AMOCs for this AD. Use the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19
to make your request.
[[Page 26909]]
(i) Related Information
(1) For more information about this AD, contact Joseph Costa,
Aerospace Engineer, Los Angeles Aircraft Certification Office, FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 3960 Paramount Blvd., Lakewood, CA
90712-4137; phone: 562-627-5246; fax: 562-627-5210; email:
joseph.costa@faa.gov.
(2) Allied-Signal Aerospace Company Service Bulletin No. TPE331-
72-0873, Revision 1, dated May 20, 1993, addresses acceptable
replacement parts, and other information pertaining to the subject
of this AD.
(3) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Honeywell International Inc., 111 S. 34th Street, Phoenix, AZ 85034-
2802; phone: 800-601-3099; Web site: https://portal.honeywell.com.
(4) You may view this service information at the FAA, Engine &
Propeller Directorate, 12 New England Executive Park, Burlington,
MA. For information on the availability of this material at the FAA,
call 781-238-7125.
Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on May 6, 2014.
Colleen M. D'Alessandro,
Assistant Directorate Manager, Engine & Propeller Directorate, Aircraft
Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2014-10783 Filed 5-9-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P