Announcement of Requirements and Registration for the “Public Sector Program Management-a Vision for the Future” Ideation Challenge, 26249-26252 [2014-10514]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 88 / Wednesday, May 7, 2014 / Notices
of Management and Budget (OMB)
control number.
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
Written PRA comments should
be submitted on or before July 7, 2014.
If you anticipate that you will be
submitting comments, but find it
difficult to do so within the period of
time allowed by this notice, you should
advise the contact listed below as soon
as possible.
DATES:
Direct all PRA comments to
Cathy Williams, FCC, via email
PRA@fcc.gov and
to Cathy.Williams@fcc.gov
.
ADDRESSES:
For
additional information about the
information collection, contact Cathy
Williams at (202) 418–2918.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
OMB Control No.: 3060–0508.
Title: Parts 1 and 22 Reporting and
Recordkeeping Requirements.
Form Nos.: Not applicable.
Type of Review: Extension of a
currently approved collection.
Respondents: Business or other for
profit entities, Individuals or
households and State, local or Tribal
Government.
Number of Respondents and
Responses: 16,013 respondents and
16,013 responses.
Estimated Time per Response: 15
minutes–10 hours.
Frequency of Response:
Recordkeeping requirement; On
occasion, quarterly and semi-annually
reporting requirements.
Total Annual Burden: 5,794 hours.
Total Annual Cost: $19,816,500.
Privacy Act Impact Assessment: Yes.
Needs and Uses: Part 22 contains the
technical and legal requirements for
radio stations operating in the Public
Mobile Services. The information
collected is used to determine on a caseby-case basis, whether or not to grant
licenses authorizing construction and
operation of wireless
telecommunications facilities to
common carriers. Further, this
information is used to develop statistics
about the demand for various wireless
licenses and/or the licensing process
itself, and occasionally for rule
enforcement purposes.
GENERAL SERVICES
ADMINISTRATION
Federal Advisory Committee Act
[Notice–MX–2014–01; Docket No. 2014–
0002; Sequence 18]
Federal Communications
Commission.
Announcement of Requirements and
Registration for the ‘‘Public Sector
Program Management—a Vision for
the Future’’ Ideation Challenge
AGENCY:
ACTION:
Notice.
In accordance with the
Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub.
L. 92–463), the Federal Communications
Commission (FCC) announces that the
charter for the Advisory Committee for
the 2015 World Radiocommunication
Conference (WRC–15 Advisory
Committee) has been renewed by the
General Services Administration (GSA)
for a two-year period. The WRC–15
Advisory Committee is a federal
advisory committee under the Federal
Advisory Committee Act.
SUMMARY:
DATES:
Renewed through April 25, 2016.
Federal Communications
Commission, 445 12th Street SW., Room
TW–C305, Washington, DC 20554.
ADDRESSES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Alexander Roytblat, Designated Federal
Official, WRC–15 Advisory Committee,
FCC International Bureau, Strategic
Analysis and Negotiations Division, at
(202) 418–7501. Email:
Alexander.Roytblat@fcc.gov.
In
accordance with the Federal Advisory
Committee Act, Public Law 92–463, as
amended, this notice advises interested
persons that the GSA has renewed the
charter of the WRC–15 Advisory
Committee through April 25, 2016. Its
scope of activities is to address issues
contained in the agenda for the 2015
World Radiocommunication Conference
(WRC–15). The WRC–15 Advisory
Committee will continue to provide to
the FCC advice, data, and technical
analyses, and will formulate
recommendations relating to the
preparation of U.S. proposals and
positions for WRC–15.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Federal Communications Commission.
Mindel De La Torre,
Chief, International Bureau.
[FR Doc. 2014–10368 Filed 5–6–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712–01–P
Federal Communications Commission.
Marlene H. Dortch,
Secretary, Office of the Secretary, Office of
Managing Director.
[FR Doc. 2014–10396 Filed 5–6–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712–01–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:25 May 06, 2014
Jkt 232001
26249
PO 00000
Frm 00051
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Performance Improvement
Council (PIC), General Services
Administration (GSA).
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
The Performance
Improvement Council (PIC) located in
the General Services Administration
(GSA) announces the ‘‘Public Sector
Program Management—A Vision for the
Future’’ ideation challenge. GSA is
interested in initiating a public dialog
on the future of program management in
the government context. The contest
challenges the public to look ahead 25
years and imagine how advances in
technology and the skill set of a new
generation will drive the development
of public sector program management.
DATES: The challenge begins May 13,
2014 and ends May 27, 2014 (1:59 p.m.
Eastern Daylight Time). Contestants
must register and submit all entries by
the contest end date. Public voting for
a ‘‘Most Popular’’ entry begins May 13,
2014 and extends through June 03, 2014
(1:59 p.m. Eastern Daylight Time). GSA
expects to announce winners in June,
2014. GSA reserves the right to extend
the registration and submission period,
and delay the award announcement, for
any reason. The challenge can be
viewed at https://www.challenge.gov/.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Bethany Blakey, Performance
Improvement Council, General Services
Administration at 202–694–2981 and/or
via email: bethany.blakey@gsa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
1. Subject of the Competition: GSA
designed this challenge to generate a
discussion about the coming state of
program management in the public
sector. Planning, project management,
financial management, employee
engagement, and reporting are among
the key responsibilities of today’s public
sector program managers. The approach
to each of these and so many others is
defined, in part, by the state of existing
technology, access to data, and the
ability of a skilled workforce to take full
advantage of those resources. Today’s
tools and resources both enable and
limit program managers’ ability to
deliver the best service to the public,
efficiently and within budget, while
adjusting to changes in political
direction and mission focus.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\07MYN1.SGM
07MYN1
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
26250
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 88 / Wednesday, May 7, 2014 / Notices
This contest challenges contestants to
look beyond the current state to imagine
how new or emerging trends will
transform the government workplace
and the practice of program
management. Contestants should
describe where they think the field of
public sector program management will
be in 25 years. Contestants may choose
to illustrate their visions with scenarios
that reach ahead to the year 2039 or they
may describe their visions in more
general terms. The challenge
instructions encourage contestants to
use their foresight and be creative.
Contestants need not address any
particular management issue or
question. Instead, the rules give
contestants the latitude to develop and
present their own visions.
The challenge instructions contain
brief profiles of four government
program managers and some of the
challenges they faced in 2014. These
profiles appear at the bottom of this
notice. They are an entirely optional
resource for the contestants’ benefit.
Contestants are encouraged to use them
if they find them helpful in focusing
their thoughts. However, entries need
not refer to any of the themes discussed
in the profiles.
2. Contestant Eligibility: The
challenge is open to U.S. citizens and
permanent legal residents age 18 and
older at the time of registration, and
private entities such as corporations and
nonprofit organizations that are
incorporated in and maintain a primary
place of business in the United States.
Individuals entering as teams, and
individuals submitting entries on behalf
of corporations or other organizations,
must meet the eligibility requirements
of individual contestants. All eligible
individuals, teams, or other entities that
submit entries that adhere to the
contest’s rules are referred to as
‘‘contestants’’ below. The following
individuals and entities are not eligible
to participate:
i. GSA employees and contractors,
and members of their immediate
families (spouses, children, siblings,
and parents).
ii. Other Federal Government
employees, acting within the scope of
their employment.
iii. Entities involved with the
production or execution of the
challenge, employees of such entities,
and members of their immediate
families.
iv. Contest judges and individuals
with a familial or financial relationship
with a contest judge.
v. Entities in which a contest judge is
an employee, officer, director, or agent.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:11 May 06, 2014
Jkt 232001
vi. Other entities in which a contest
judge has a personal or financial
interest.
Final determination of contestant
eligibility rests with GSA.
3. Contestant Registration and
Submission of Entries: Contestants must
register and submit their entries through
the contest site’s ‘‘Submit Solution’’ tab
(accessible from https://
www.challenge.gov/) between May 13,
2014 and May 27, 2014 (1:59 p.m.
Eastern Daylight Time). Contestants will
be prompted for the following
registration information when they
submit their entries:
i. Contestant’s name (or the team’s
name for team entries);
ii. Contestant’s email address (teams
must enter the team leader’s email
address);
iii. The title of contestant’s entry;
iv. External link to contestant’s
YouTube video entry, if applicable; and
v. The text of contestant’s submission.
If entering as a team, contestants must
submit their team leader’s name in an
attached text file titled ‘‘Team
Information’’ (or something similar)
using the contest site’s ‘‘Additional
Files’’ option. Registered contestants
and team leaders will receive contest
updates by email.
Contestants must accept the following
terms and conditions to submit an entry:
i. Contestants warrant that they are
the sole authors and copyright holders
of their entries, and that their entries do
not infringe the property or other rights
of any other individual or entity as
protected by U.S. law.
ii. Contestants grant GSA the nonexclusive right to use, publish, and
reproduce their names and entries for
educational and/or promotional
purposes, as well as the right to permit
the same use by any other agency of the
Federal Government.
iii. Contestants must take care to
avoid the suggestion or the appearance
of Government endorsement of their
participation in this contest, or of the
content of their entries.
iv. GSA will discard entries and
remove comments that violate U.S. law.
v. At its sole discretion, GSA will
discard entries and remove comments
that it finds indecent, in bad taste, or off
topic, or embrace or promote
discrimination, hatred, or harm against
any individual or group.
vi. Once an entry is accepted by GSA
and posted to the contest Web site it
may not be withdrawn by the
contestant. Contestants may, however,
submit more than one entry.
vii. Registered contestants agree to
assume any and all risks and waive
claims against the Federal Government
PO 00000
Frm 00052
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
and its related entities (as defined in 15
U.S.C. 3719), except in the case of
willful misconduct, for any injury,
death, damage, or loss of property,
revenue, or profits, whether direct,
indirect, or consequential, arising from
their participation in this challenge,
whether the injury, death, damage, or
loss arises through negligence or
otherwise. In addition, contestants agree
to indemnify the Federal Government
against third party claims for damages
arising from or related to competition
activities.
viii. Registered contestants are not
required to obtain liability insurance or
demonstrate financial responsibility in
order to participate.
ix. Contest disputes arising from
matters not addressed in these rules
shall be resolved by GSA.
Contestants may submit their entries
as text, a combination of text and
graphics, or video. Entries must satisfy
the following maximum and minimum
length requirements. GSA will discard
entries that fall outside of these bounds:
i. Text-only entries. 500–1,500 words,
inclusive of title, footnotes, endnotes,
citations, and other references.
ii. Text entries with graphics. 500–
1,500 words, inclusive of text contained
in graphics, titles, footnotes, endnotes,
citations, and references. Text entries
containing graphics must be printable at
full size on no more than four singlesided 81⁄2 x 11 inch sheets of paper with
one inch margins.
iii. Video entries. 21⁄2–71⁄2 minutes of
video posted to YouTube. Video entries
must be supplemented with a separate
document of introductory text, not to
exceed 100 words, and a full written
transcript. The introductory text will
accompany the video’s YouTube link on
the challenge Web site.
To be eligible for recognition as a
contest winner, contestants must submit
their entries in English on the challenge
site’s ‘‘Submit Solution’’ tab.
Contestants may submit multiple
entries.
For text-only entries: Contestants are
strongly encouraged to upload their
entries as attachments using the site’s
‘‘Additional Files’’ option; however,
contestants may type or paste their
entries in the ‘‘Submission Text’’ box.
For video entries: Contestants are
strongly encouraged to upload their
videos’ introductory text and transcripts
using the site’s ‘‘Additional Files’’
option; however, contestants may type
or paste their introductory text and/or
transcripts in the ‘‘Submission Text’’
box.
For text entries with graphics:
Contestants must submit text entries
with embedded graphics as attached
E:\FR\FM\07MYN1.SGM
07MYN1
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 88 / Wednesday, May 7, 2014 / Notices
files using the site’s ‘‘Additional Files’’
option.
4. Selection of Winners: Entries will
be evaluated by GSA’s Performance
Improvement Council staff and the
panel of judges named on the contest
Web site. GSA is solely responsible for
the selection of judges. Judging will take
place in two rounds:
1. GSA’s Performance Improvement
Council staff will review all entries and
award points according to the Judging
Criteria, listed below. The ten entries
with the most points will be selected as
Round 1 finalists.
2. The panel of judges named on the
contest site will select the winning
entries, based on the Judging Criteria,
from Round 1 finalists.
GSA will recognize up to four entries
as winners based on the points awarded
by the contest’s judges. In addition, one
entry will be selected for recognition
based on the votes cast by visitors to the
contest Web site.
i. ‘‘Best Overall’’ entry—Judges will
select a best overall entry according to
the criteria outlined under Judging
Criteria.
ii. ‘‘Most Popular’’ entry—The entry
that receives the highest average rating
from among the five entries with the
greatest number of votes received from
visitors to the contest Web site will be
recognized as the Most Popular.
iii. ‘‘Most Original Vision’’—Judges
may select an entry not recognized in
another category as the most original
based on the criteria for ‘‘originality’’
outlined under Judging Criteria.
iv. ‘‘Honorable Mention’’—Judges
may select up to two entries not
recognized in another category for
honorable mention based on the same
criteria used to select the best overall
entry.
Winning entries will be recognized on
the contest and GSA Web sites. GSA
will invite contest winners to
participate in a moderated event about
the future of program management, and
may feature winning entries in a followup contest. The contest will award no
cash prizes.
Contestants conditionally selected for
awards will be notified by email using
the contact information provided at
registration. Final determination of
contest winners is subject to verification
of contestants’ eligibility and
compliance with all contest rules.
GSA reserves the right to cancel the
contest before announcing winners.
5. Judging Criteria: The entry awarded
the most points by contest judges in the
following categories will be named the
‘‘Best Overall’’ entry.
i. Originality: Judges will award up to
35 points for originality. An original
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:11 May 06, 2014
Jkt 232001
vision will see beyond or around the
path defined by a linear extension of
current trends in technology, the scope
and nature of program managers’
responsibilities, the workplace
environment, or the professional
competencies of program managers. An
original vision will identify new or
emerging trends that have the potential
to transform the field.
ii. Clarity: Judges will award up to 35
points to entries that offer a clear and
coherent vision of the future. Where
originality demands imagination, clarity
calls for focus and structure. Contestants
will be awarded points for clarity to the
extent that they offer a coherent view of
the future and a convincing argument
for how we’ll get there.
iii. Presentation: Judges will award up
to 30 points to entries for readability
and style. Because GSA hopes to feature
winning entries on its Web site and in
other forums, judges will award the
most points in this category to wellwritten and engaging entries that are
likely to capture and hold the attention
of a general audience.
6. Public Comment and Voting: GSA
encourages visitors to the contest Web
site to review entries, offer comments,
and vote for their favorites. The
comment and voting process offers the
public an opportunity to contribute to
the dialog.
i. Entries received from eligible
contestants will be posted to the contest
Web site after GSA determines that they
comply with the contest’s Terms and
Conditions. Once an entry is posted to
the contest Web site, Web site visitors
will be able to view, comment on, and
vote for that entry.
ii. The voting period will extend one
week beyond the deadline for
submission of entries in order to give
visitors an opportunity to view,
comment, and vote on all posted entries.
iii. Visitors may cast up to one vote
for each entry, including their own.
iv. Visitors will vote by awarding up
to 5 stars, with each star representing
one point.
7. Post-Challenge Activity: The
General Services Administration (GSA)
and the Performance Improvement
Council expect this challenge to kick off
an ongoing dialog about current trends
and challenges in public sector program
management, what tomorrow promises,
and how today’s managers can position
themselves and their organizations for
future success. GSA will feature
winning entries on both the challenge
homepage and on the GSA Web site.
GSA will also invite contest winners to
participate in a moderated and recorded
Google Hangout conversation, and may
PO 00000
Frm 00053
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
26251
highlight ideas from one or more
winning entries in a follow-up contest.
8. Optional Contestant Resource:
‘‘Profiles of Public Sector Program
Managers—ca. 2014.’’
Program managers in the public sector
are a diverse group. They confront an
extraordinary range of challenges in
mission areas as diverse as regulatory
compliance, basic research, service
delivery, law enforcement, and military
preparedness, to name just a few. While
many are unique to a particular program
mission, some challenges tend to be
shared by all program managers.
The following profiles offer a
snapshot of the immediate challenges
faced by four government program
managers. These challenges are defined
in part by the tools and resources
available to address them. They are
defined, as well, by current expectations
of what government can and should do.
As expectations change, and as
technology and workplace skills evolve,
the nature of these challenges will
change as well.
Profile 1—Regulatory Compliance
Trina is a program manager with a
Federal Government regulatory agency.
She leads an office that writes policy,
processes industry applications for
licenses, and tracks routine industry
reporting in support of the agency’s
industry compliance efforts. The office
also conducts inspections to ensure
industry compliance with laws and
policy. In the 20 years that Trina has
spent with the Government, the work of
her office has been transformed by
historic advances in online and data
processing technologies. Although the
agency’s compliance efforts are more
effective than at any point in the past,
Trina recognizes the need to develop
more sophisticated approaches to keep
up with a rapidly evolving industry and
an increasingly complicated regulatory
environment.
Profile 2—Service Delivery
Henry manages a program that
benefits low income households.
Removing barriers to participation by
eligible households is central to the
program’s purpose. At the same time the
program is committed to eliminating
payments to ineligible recipients. Henry
believes that facilitating access to
benefits and strengthening program
integrity need not compete against each
other; greater understanding of the
factors that lead to improper
certification for program benefits might
be useful in developing strategies to
reach the unserved eligible population.
Henry has challenged his staff and
program partners to draw on their
E:\FR\FM\07MYN1.SGM
07MYN1
26252
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 88 / Wednesday, May 7, 2014 / Notices
diversity of skills and perspectives to
come up with ideas that advance both
goals simultaneously so that 25 years
from now the present tension between
the two is replaced with a relationship
of positive and mutual reinforcement.
Welcome to the team!
Profile 3—Grants Management
Ty oversees an office that awards and
administers grants to community-based
social service organizations. As part of
an ongoing effort to maximize the
agency’s return on investment, Ty’s
office is awarding more grants to
organizations that promise innovative
approaches to service delivery. Many of
those organizations are first-time
recipients of government grants.
Although Ty and his staff are
encouraged by early signs of success,
they recognize the need for careful
oversight and evaluation. They also
recognize that new models of service
delivery may call for changes in the way
that the office collects and analyzes
program data. Responding to these
challenges is critical to ensuring that
management of the grant-making
process does not stand in the way of
grantee-led program innovation.
Profile 4—Law Enforcement
Sami was recently hired by her city’s
chief of police to review the
organization’s case prioritization
approach. She is faced with the
dilemma of meeting higher expectations
for successful criminal prosecution/
crime reduction/agility in response to
emerging threats without any increase
in enforcement and civilian staff. She is
expected to do so in a more transparent
manner and to further complicate
things, the budget is shrinking. Sami is
reaching out to other law enforcement
agencies to learn what they are doing
that she may be able to replicate but she
also believes that new, innovative
approaches are necessary to meet
expectations in the long run. She is
actually more concerned about internal
resistance to trying new approaches
than she is about anything else.
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Administration for Community Living
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Proposed Collection;
Comment Request; Developmental
Disabilities Protection and Advocacy
Program Performance Report
ACTION:
Notice.
The Adminstration for
Community Living (ACL) is announcing
that the proposed collection of
information listed below has been
submitted to the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) for review and
clearance under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995.
SUMMARY:
Submit written or electronic
comments on the collection of
information by June 6, 2014.
DATES:
Authority: America COMPETES
Reauthorization Act of 2010, Section 105 (15
U.S.C. 3719).
ADDRESSES:
Dated: April 24, 2014.
Kevin Donahue,
Executive Director, Performance
Improvement Council, General Services
Administration.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
[FR Doc. 2014–10514 Filed 5–6–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820–BR–P
Submit written comments
on the collection of information by fax
202.395.5806 or by email to
OIRA_submission@omb.eop.gov, Attn:
OMB Desk Officer for ACL.
Shawn Callaway at 202–690–5781 or
email: Shawn.Callaway@acl.gov.
ANNUAL BURDEN ESTIMATES
Instrument
Number of
respondents
Number of
responses per
respondent
Average
burden hours
per response
Total burden
hours
State Developmental Disabilities Protection and Advocacy Program Performance Report ..........................................................................................
57
1
44
2,508
Estimated Total Annual Burden
Hours: 2,508.
This
information collection is required by
federal statute. Each State Protection
and Advocacy System must prepare and
submit a Program Performance Report
for the preceding fiscal year of activities
and accomplishments and of conditions
in the State. The information in the
Annual Report will be aggregated into a
national profile of Protection and
Advocacy Systems. It will also provide
the Administration on Intellectual and
Developmental Disabilities (AIDD) with
an overview of program trends and
achievements and will enable AIDD to
respond to administration and
congressional requests for specific
information on program activities. This
information will also be used to submit
a Biennial Report to Congress as well as
to comply with requirements in the
Government Performance and Results
Act of 1993.
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:11 May 06, 2014
Jkt 232001
Dated: May 2, 2014.
Kathy Greenlee,
Administrator and Assistant Secretary for
Aging.
[FR Doc. 2014–10468 Filed 5–6–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4154–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA–2014–N–0539]
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Proposed Collection;
Comment Request; Prescription Drug
Labeling Improvement and
Enhancement Initiative
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Notice.
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) is announcing an
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00054
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
opportunity for public comment on the
proposed collection of certain
information by the Agency. Under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (the
PRA), Federal Agencies are required to
publish notice in the Federal Register
concerning each proposed collection of
information and to allow 60 days for
public comment in response to the
notice. This notice solicits comments on
information collection for the
Prescription Drug Labeling
Improvement and Enhancement
Initiative (the initiative); specifically,
information collection associated with
the use of Government contractorassisted labeling conversion resources
and services for certain older drug and
biological products (approved before
June 30, 2001). The intent of the
initiative is to enhance the safe and
effective use of prescription drugs by
facilitating optimal communication
through labeling.
E:\FR\FM\07MYN1.SGM
07MYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 88 (Wednesday, May 7, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 26249-26252]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-10514]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION
[Notice-MX-2014-01; Docket No. 2014-0002; Sequence 18]
Announcement of Requirements and Registration for the ``Public
Sector Program Management--a Vision for the Future'' Ideation Challenge
AGENCY: Performance Improvement Council (PIC), General Services
Administration (GSA).
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Performance Improvement Council (PIC) located in the
General Services Administration (GSA) announces the ``Public Sector
Program Management--A Vision for the Future'' ideation challenge. GSA
is interested in initiating a public dialog on the future of program
management in the government context. The contest challenges the public
to look ahead 25 years and imagine how advances in technology and the
skill set of a new generation will drive the development of public
sector program management.
DATES: The challenge begins May 13, 2014 and ends May 27, 2014 (1:59
p.m. Eastern Daylight Time). Contestants must register and submit all
entries by the contest end date. Public voting for a ``Most Popular''
entry begins May 13, 2014 and extends through June 03, 2014 (1:59 p.m.
Eastern Daylight Time). GSA expects to announce winners in June, 2014.
GSA reserves the right to extend the registration and submission
period, and delay the award announcement, for any reason. The challenge
can be viewed at https://www.challenge.gov/.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bethany Blakey, Performance
Improvement Council, General Services Administration at 202-694-2981
and/or via email: bethany.blakey@gsa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
1. Subject of the Competition: GSA designed this challenge to
generate a discussion about the coming state of program management in
the public sector. Planning, project management, financial management,
employee engagement, and reporting are among the key responsibilities
of today's public sector program managers. The approach to each of
these and so many others is defined, in part, by the state of existing
technology, access to data, and the ability of a skilled workforce to
take full advantage of those resources. Today's tools and resources
both enable and limit program managers' ability to deliver the best
service to the public, efficiently and within budget, while adjusting
to changes in political direction and mission focus.
[[Page 26250]]
This contest challenges contestants to look beyond the current
state to imagine how new or emerging trends will transform the
government workplace and the practice of program management.
Contestants should describe where they think the field of public sector
program management will be in 25 years. Contestants may choose to
illustrate their visions with scenarios that reach ahead to the year
2039 or they may describe their visions in more general terms. The
challenge instructions encourage contestants to use their foresight and
be creative. Contestants need not address any particular management
issue or question. Instead, the rules give contestants the latitude to
develop and present their own visions.
The challenge instructions contain brief profiles of four
government program managers and some of the challenges they faced in
2014. These profiles appear at the bottom of this notice. They are an
entirely optional resource for the contestants' benefit. Contestants
are encouraged to use them if they find them helpful in focusing their
thoughts. However, entries need not refer to any of the themes
discussed in the profiles.
2. Contestant Eligibility: The challenge is open to U.S. citizens
and permanent legal residents age 18 and older at the time of
registration, and private entities such as corporations and nonprofit
organizations that are incorporated in and maintain a primary place of
business in the United States. Individuals entering as teams, and
individuals submitting entries on behalf of corporations or other
organizations, must meet the eligibility requirements of individual
contestants. All eligible individuals, teams, or other entities that
submit entries that adhere to the contest's rules are referred to as
``contestants'' below. The following individuals and entities are not
eligible to participate:
i. GSA employees and contractors, and members of their immediate
families (spouses, children, siblings, and parents).
ii. Other Federal Government employees, acting within the scope of
their employment.
iii. Entities involved with the production or execution of the
challenge, employees of such entities, and members of their immediate
families.
iv. Contest judges and individuals with a familial or financial
relationship with a contest judge.
v. Entities in which a contest judge is an employee, officer,
director, or agent.
vi. Other entities in which a contest judge has a personal or
financial interest.
Final determination of contestant eligibility rests with GSA.
3. Contestant Registration and Submission of Entries: Contestants
must register and submit their entries through the contest site's
``Submit Solution'' tab (accessible from https://www.challenge.gov/)
between May 13, 2014 and May 27, 2014 (1:59 p.m. Eastern Daylight
Time). Contestants will be prompted for the following registration
information when they submit their entries:
i. Contestant's name (or the team's name for team entries);
ii. Contestant's email address (teams must enter the team leader's
email address);
iii. The title of contestant's entry;
iv. External link to contestant's YouTube video entry, if
applicable; and
v. The text of contestant's submission.
If entering as a team, contestants must submit their team leader's
name in an attached text file titled ``Team Information'' (or something
similar) using the contest site's ``Additional Files'' option.
Registered contestants and team leaders will receive contest updates by
email.
Contestants must accept the following terms and conditions to
submit an entry:
i. Contestants warrant that they are the sole authors and copyright
holders of their entries, and that their entries do not infringe the
property or other rights of any other individual or entity as protected
by U.S. law.
ii. Contestants grant GSA the non-exclusive right to use, publish,
and reproduce their names and entries for educational and/or
promotional purposes, as well as the right to permit the same use by
any other agency of the Federal Government.
iii. Contestants must take care to avoid the suggestion or the
appearance of Government endorsement of their participation in this
contest, or of the content of their entries.
iv. GSA will discard entries and remove comments that violate U.S.
law.
v. At its sole discretion, GSA will discard entries and remove
comments that it finds indecent, in bad taste, or off topic, or embrace
or promote discrimination, hatred, or harm against any individual or
group.
vi. Once an entry is accepted by GSA and posted to the contest Web
site it may not be withdrawn by the contestant. Contestants may,
however, submit more than one entry.
vii. Registered contestants agree to assume any and all risks and
waive claims against the Federal Government and its related entities
(as defined in 15 U.S.C. 3719), except in the case of willful
misconduct, for any injury, death, damage, or loss of property,
revenue, or profits, whether direct, indirect, or consequential,
arising from their participation in this challenge, whether the injury,
death, damage, or loss arises through negligence or otherwise. In
addition, contestants agree to indemnify the Federal Government against
third party claims for damages arising from or related to competition
activities.
viii. Registered contestants are not required to obtain liability
insurance or demonstrate financial responsibility in order to
participate.
ix. Contest disputes arising from matters not addressed in these
rules shall be resolved by GSA.
Contestants may submit their entries as text, a combination of text
and graphics, or video. Entries must satisfy the following maximum and
minimum length requirements. GSA will discard entries that fall outside
of these bounds:
i. Text-only entries. 500-1,500 words, inclusive of title,
footnotes, endnotes, citations, and other references.
ii. Text entries with graphics. 500-1,500 words, inclusive of text
contained in graphics, titles, footnotes, endnotes, citations, and
references. Text entries containing graphics must be printable at full
size on no more than four single-sided 8\1/2\ x 11 inch sheets of paper
with one inch margins.
iii. Video entries. 2\1/2\-7\1/2\ minutes of video posted to
YouTube. Video entries must be supplemented with a separate document of
introductory text, not to exceed 100 words, and a full written
transcript. The introductory text will accompany the video's YouTube
link on the challenge Web site.
To be eligible for recognition as a contest winner, contestants
must submit their entries in English on the challenge site's ``Submit
Solution'' tab. Contestants may submit multiple entries.
For text-only entries: Contestants are strongly encouraged to
upload their entries as attachments using the site's ``Additional
Files'' option; however, contestants may type or paste their entries in
the ``Submission Text'' box.
For video entries: Contestants are strongly encouraged to upload
their videos' introductory text and transcripts using the site's
``Additional Files'' option; however, contestants may type or paste
their introductory text and/or transcripts in the ``Submission Text''
box.
For text entries with graphics: Contestants must submit text
entries with embedded graphics as attached
[[Page 26251]]
files using the site's ``Additional Files'' option.
4. Selection of Winners: Entries will be evaluated by GSA's
Performance Improvement Council staff and the panel of judges named on
the contest Web site. GSA is solely responsible for the selection of
judges. Judging will take place in two rounds:
1. GSA's Performance Improvement Council staff will review all
entries and award points according to the Judging Criteria, listed
below. The ten entries with the most points will be selected as Round 1
finalists.
2. The panel of judges named on the contest site will select the
winning entries, based on the Judging Criteria, from Round 1 finalists.
GSA will recognize up to four entries as winners based on the
points awarded by the contest's judges. In addition, one entry will be
selected for recognition based on the votes cast by visitors to the
contest Web site.
i. ``Best Overall'' entry--Judges will select a best overall entry
according to the criteria outlined under Judging Criteria.
ii. ``Most Popular'' entry--The entry that receives the highest
average rating from among the five entries with the greatest number of
votes received from visitors to the contest Web site will be recognized
as the Most Popular.
iii. ``Most Original Vision''--Judges may select an entry not
recognized in another category as the most original based on the
criteria for ``originality'' outlined under Judging Criteria.
iv. ``Honorable Mention''--Judges may select up to two entries not
recognized in another category for honorable mention based on the same
criteria used to select the best overall entry.
Winning entries will be recognized on the contest and GSA Web
sites. GSA will invite contest winners to participate in a moderated
event about the future of program management, and may feature winning
entries in a follow-up contest. The contest will award no cash prizes.
Contestants conditionally selected for awards will be notified by
email using the contact information provided at registration. Final
determination of contest winners is subject to verification of
contestants' eligibility and compliance with all contest rules.
GSA reserves the right to cancel the contest before announcing winners.
5. Judging Criteria: The entry awarded the most points by contest
judges in the following categories will be named the ``Best Overall''
entry.
i. Originality: Judges will award up to 35 points for originality.
An original vision will see beyond or around the path defined by a
linear extension of current trends in technology, the scope and nature
of program managers' responsibilities, the workplace environment, or
the professional competencies of program managers. An original vision
will identify new or emerging trends that have the potential to
transform the field.
ii. Clarity: Judges will award up to 35 points to entries that
offer a clear and coherent vision of the future. Where originality
demands imagination, clarity calls for focus and structure. Contestants
will be awarded points for clarity to the extent that they offer a
coherent view of the future and a convincing argument for how we'll get
there.
iii. Presentation: Judges will award up to 30 points to entries for
readability and style. Because GSA hopes to feature winning entries on
its Web site and in other forums, judges will award the most points in
this category to well-written and engaging entries that are likely to
capture and hold the attention of a general audience.
6. Public Comment and Voting: GSA encourages visitors to the
contest Web site to review entries, offer comments, and vote for their
favorites. The comment and voting process offers the public an
opportunity to contribute to the dialog.
i. Entries received from eligible contestants will be posted to the
contest Web site after GSA determines that they comply with the
contest's Terms and Conditions. Once an entry is posted to the contest
Web site, Web site visitors will be able to view, comment on, and vote
for that entry.
ii. The voting period will extend one week beyond the deadline for
submission of entries in order to give visitors an opportunity to view,
comment, and vote on all posted entries.
iii. Visitors may cast up to one vote for each entry, including
their own.
iv. Visitors will vote by awarding up to 5 stars, with each star
representing one point.
7. Post-Challenge Activity: The General Services Administration
(GSA) and the Performance Improvement Council expect this challenge to
kick off an ongoing dialog about current trends and challenges in
public sector program management, what tomorrow promises, and how
today's managers can position themselves and their organizations for
future success. GSA will feature winning entries on both the challenge
homepage and on the GSA Web site. GSA will also invite contest winners
to participate in a moderated and recorded Google Hangout conversation,
and may highlight ideas from one or more winning entries in a follow-up
contest.
8. Optional Contestant Resource: ``Profiles of Public Sector
Program Managers--ca. 2014.''
Program managers in the public sector are a diverse group. They
confront an extraordinary range of challenges in mission areas as
diverse as regulatory compliance, basic research, service delivery, law
enforcement, and military preparedness, to name just a few. While many
are unique to a particular program mission, some challenges tend to be
shared by all program managers.
The following profiles offer a snapshot of the immediate challenges
faced by four government program managers. These challenges are defined
in part by the tools and resources available to address them. They are
defined, as well, by current expectations of what government can and
should do. As expectations change, and as technology and workplace
skills evolve, the nature of these challenges will change as well.
Profile 1--Regulatory Compliance
Trina is a program manager with a Federal Government regulatory
agency. She leads an office that writes policy, processes industry
applications for licenses, and tracks routine industry reporting in
support of the agency's industry compliance efforts. The office also
conducts inspections to ensure industry compliance with laws and
policy. In the 20 years that Trina has spent with the Government, the
work of her office has been transformed by historic advances in online
and data processing technologies. Although the agency's compliance
efforts are more effective than at any point in the past, Trina
recognizes the need to develop more sophisticated approaches to keep up
with a rapidly evolving industry and an increasingly complicated
regulatory environment.
Profile 2--Service Delivery
Henry manages a program that benefits low income households.
Removing barriers to participation by eligible households is central to
the program's purpose. At the same time the program is committed to
eliminating payments to ineligible recipients. Henry believes that
facilitating access to benefits and strengthening program integrity
need not compete against each other; greater understanding of the
factors that lead to improper certification for program benefits might
be useful in developing strategies to reach the unserved eligible
population. Henry has challenged his staff and program partners to draw
on their
[[Page 26252]]
diversity of skills and perspectives to come up with ideas that advance
both goals simultaneously so that 25 years from now the present tension
between the two is replaced with a relationship of positive and mutual
reinforcement. Welcome to the team!
Profile 3--Grants Management
Ty oversees an office that awards and administers grants to
community-based social service organizations. As part of an ongoing
effort to maximize the agency's return on investment, Ty's office is
awarding more grants to organizations that promise innovative
approaches to service delivery. Many of those organizations are first-
time recipients of government grants. Although Ty and his staff are
encouraged by early signs of success, they recognize the need for
careful oversight and evaluation. They also recognize that new models
of service delivery may call for changes in the way that the office
collects and analyzes program data. Responding to these challenges is
critical to ensuring that management of the grant-making process does
not stand in the way of grantee-led program innovation.
Profile 4--Law Enforcement
Sami was recently hired by her city's chief of police to review the
organization's case prioritization approach. She is faced with the
dilemma of meeting higher expectations for successful criminal
prosecution/crime reduction/agility in response to emerging threats
without any increase in enforcement and civilian staff. She is expected
to do so in a more transparent manner and to further complicate things,
the budget is shrinking. Sami is reaching out to other law enforcement
agencies to learn what they are doing that she may be able to replicate
but she also believes that new, innovative approaches are necessary to
meet expectations in the long run. She is actually more concerned about
internal resistance to trying new approaches than she is about anything
else.
Authority: America COMPETES Reauthorization Act of 2010, Section
105 (15 U.S.C. 3719).
Dated: April 24, 2014.
Kevin Donahue,
Executive Director, Performance Improvement Council, General Services
Administration.
[FR Doc. 2014-10514 Filed 5-6-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-BR-P