United States Standards for Grades of Maple Sirup, 26200-26202 [2014-10372]
Download as PDF
26200
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 88 / Wednesday, May 7, 2014 / Notices
submission(s) may be obtained by
calling (202) 720–8681.
An agency may not conduct or
sponsor a collection of information
unless the collection of information
displays a currently valid OMB control
number and the agency informs
potential persons who are to respond to
the collection of information that such
persons are not required to respond to
the collection of information unless it
displays a currently valid OMB control
number.
Total Burden Hours: 26,169.
Charlene Parker,
Departmental Information Collection
Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 2014–10479 Filed 5–6–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–XV–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
[Document Number AMS–FV–14–0040; FV–
14–328]
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Rural Housing Service
Title: 7 CFR Part 1902–A, Supervised
Bank Accounts.
OMB Control Number: 0575–0158.
Summary of Collection: 7 CFR Part
1902–A, Supervised Bank Accounts
(SBA), prescribes the policies and
procedures for disbursing loan and grant
funds, establishing and closing
supervised accounts, and placing MultiFamily housing reserve accounts in
supervised accounts. The Rural
Business Service extends financial
assistance to applicants that do not
qualify for loans under commercial rates
and terms. The Rural Housing Service
(RHS) is the credit agency for
agriculture and rural development in
USDA. RHS is the lender of last resort,
providing financial support for housing
in rural America. Supervised accounts
are accounts with a financial institution
in the names of a borrower and the
United States Government, represented
by Rural Housing Service, Rural
Business-Cooperative Service, Rural
Utilities Service (Agency). Section 339
of the Consolidated Farm and Rural
Development Act, 7 U.S.C. 1989 and
Section 510 of the Housing Act of 1949,
as amended, (42 U.S.C. 1480) is the
legislative authorities requiring the use
of supervised accounts.
Need and Use of the Information: The
agency’s state and field offices will
collect information from borrowers and
financial institutions. The Agency use
SBA’s as a mechanism to (1) ensure
correct disbursement and expenditure of
all funds designated for a project; (2)
help a borrower properly manage its
financial affairs; (3) ensure that the
Government’s security is protected
adequately from fraud, waste and abuse.
The consequence to Federal program
and policy activities if the collection of
information was not conducted would
be detrimental to both the Government
and to borrowers.
Description of Respondents: Business
or other for-profit.
Number of Respondents: 15,192.
Frequency of Responses: Reporting:
On occasion.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:11 May 06, 2014
Jkt 232001
United States Standards for Grades of
Maple Sirup
Agricultural Marketing Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Notice and request for
comments.
AGENCY:
The Agricultural Marketing
Service (AMS) of the Department of
Agriculture (USDA) is soliciting public
comments on a proposed revision to the
United States Standards for Grades of
Maple Sirup (Syrup). AMS received a
petition from the International Maple
Syrup Institute (IMSI) requesting a
revision of the U.S. grade standards.
IMSI stated it is interested in developing
harmonized grade standards for maple
syrup producers in the United States
and Canada, and asked AMS to replace
the current grade classification
requirements with new color and flavor
descriptors, and revise Grade A
requirements to be free from damage.
AMS is also proposing to change the
spelling from ‘‘sirup’’ to the more
commonly used term ‘‘syrup.’’ The
proposed grade standards would revise
the existing federal grade standards for
maple sirup (syrup). The purpose of
these proposed revisions would be to
foster or assist in the development of
new or expanded markets, and improve
the marketing of maple syrup in the U.S.
and internationally.
DATES: Comments must be submitted on
or before July 7, 2014.
ADDRESSES: Written comments may be
submitted via the Internet: https://
www.regulations.gov; or email
richard.peterson@ams.usda.gov; or by
mail to Richard E. Peterson,
Standardization Branch, Specialty Crops
Inspection Division, Fruit and Vegetable
Program, Agricultural Marketing
Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture,
1400 Independence Avenue SW., Room
0709, South Building; STOP 0247,
Washington, DC 20250; fax (202) 690–
1527. All comments should reference
the document number, date, and page
number of this issue of the Federal
Register. All comments will be posted
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
without change, including any personal
information provided. All comments
submitted in response to this notice will
be included in the public record and
will be made available to the public on
the Internet via https://
www.regulations.gov. Comments will be
made available for public inspection at
the above address during regular
business hours or can be viewed at:
https://www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION: Contact
Richard E. Peterson, Agricultural
Marketing Specialist, Specialty Crops
Inspection Division, Fruit and Vegetable
Program, Agricultural Marketing
Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture,
1400 Independence Avenue SW., Room
0709, South Building; STOP 0247,
Washington, DC 20250; telephone (202)
720–5021; fax (202) 690–1527; or, email
richard.peterson@ams.usda.gov. Copies
of the proposed revised grade standards
are on the Internet at https://
www.ams.usda.gov/scihome or https://
www.regulations.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: AMS is
proposing to revise the U.S. Standards
for Grades of Maple Sirup using the
procedures that appear in Title 7 part 36
of the Code of Federal Regulations (7
CFR part 36). Section 203(c) of the
Agricultural Marketing Act of 1946 (Act)
(7 U.S.C. 1621–1627), as amended,
directs and authorizes the Secretary of
Agriculture ‘‘to develop and improve
standards of quality, condition,
quantity, grade and packaging, and
recommend and demonstrate such
standards in order to encourage
uniformity and consistency in
commercial practices.’’ AMS is
committed to carrying out this authority
in a manner that facilitates the
marketing of agricultural commodities
and makes copies of official standards
available upon request. The United
States Standards for Grades of Fruits
and Vegetables not connected with
Federal Marketing Orders or U.S. Import
Requirements, no longer appear in the
Code of Federal Regulations, but are
maintained by USDA, AMS, Fruit and
Vegetable Program, and are available on
the Internet at https://
www.ams.usda.gov/scihome.
Background
Maple syrup is the liquid food
derived by concentration and heat
treatment of the sap of the maple tree
(Acer). Maple syrup contains an
abundant amount of naturally occurring
minerals such as calcium, manganese,
potassium and magnesium. Maple syrup
is a natural source of beneficial
antioxidants. The North American
maple syrup industry sells an estimated
E:\FR\FM\07MYN1.SGM
07MYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 88 / Wednesday, May 7, 2014 / Notices
$400 million of product annually, but
the maple crop can vary significantly
from year to year depending on weather
and other factors. An example of this is
reflected in the 2013 National
Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS)
report for 2013, the report states:
Nationally, maple syrup production in
2013 totaled 3.25 million gallons, up 70
percent from 2012. In 2012, prevailing
high temperatures limited sap flow. The
number of taps is estimated at 10.6
million, 8 percent above the 2012 total
of 9.77 million. Yield per tap is
estimated to be 0.308 gallons, up 58
percent from the previous season’s
revised yield. All States showed an
increase in production from the
previous year. Cool temperatures in the
early spring months delayed budding of
maple trees which contributed to a
longer season of sap flow than last year.
The earliest sap flow reported was
January 1 in New York. The latest sap
flow reported to open the season was
February 15 in Wisconsin. On average,
the season lasted 37 days, compared
with 24 days in 2012. The 2012 U.S.
average price per gallon was $39.10, up
$1.20 from the 2011 price of $37.90. The
U.S. value of production, at $74.6
million for 2012, was down 30 percent
from the previous season.
In 2002, IMSI, which represents
maple producers, state governments,
vendors, maple equipment
manufacturers, organizations, and
others in both Canada and the United
States, established a committee to
review existing regulations for pure
maple syrup in Canada and the United
States. The committee recommended
establishing harmonized and standard
definitions, grades, and nomenclature
for pure maple syrup in the United
States and Canada for the benefit of the
maple industry. IMSI is seeking to
eliminate inconsistent grade names and
nomenclature, which vary from
jurisdiction to jurisdiction, and
emphasize the taste of the syrup by
including flavor descriptors as well as
new color descriptors on the labels for
the different classes of syrup.
26201
In September 2011, AMS received a
petition to revise the U.S. Standards for
Grades of Maple Sirup from IMSI.
Petitioner IMSI stated that consumers
currently face a patchwork of grading
systems in the United States that are
confusing, and fail to define the grades
of maple syrup in meaningful terms.
The petitioner stated its overall goal as
providing uniform definitions of maple
syrup in North America and the world
marketplace. In addition to proposing
modifications to the standards, as
proposed by IMSI, AMS is proposing to
change the spelling from ‘‘sirup’’ to the
more commonly used term ‘‘syrup.’’
The table below illustrates the
variation of grade standards
requirements among the maple
producing states and Canada in 2013
and the proposed revision. The current
U.S. grade standardsdo not recognize
percent light transmittance (%Tc) as a
means of ascertaining color, but at the
state level, some states use this method
to determine the color of maple syrup.
COMPARISON OF 2013 USDA, STATE STANDARDS, AND PROPOSED MAPLE SYRUP GRADES AND NOMENCLATURE
Current U.S.
standard 1
U.S Grade A Light
Amber.
Vermont 2 and
Ohio 1
New Hampshire 1
New York 1
Vermont Fancy
≥75.0% Tc Ohio
Light.
Grade A Medium
Amber 60.5–
74.9% Tc.
Grade A Dark
Amber 44.0–
60.4% Tc.
Grade B 27.0–
43.9% Tc.
Grade A Light
Amber.
Grade A Light
Amber.
Grade A Medium
Amber.
Grade A Medium
Amber.
Grade A Dark
Amber.
Grade A Dark
Amber.
Grade B ...............
U.S. Grade B For
Reprocessing.
Commercial
Grade <27.0%
Tc.
Grade B ...............
Substandard 3 .........
Substandard 3 ......
Substandard 3 ......
Extra Dark for
Cooking or
Grade B for Reprocessing.
Extra Dark for
Cooking or
Grade B for Reprocessing.
Substandard 3 ......
U.S. Grade A Medium Amber.
U.S. Grade A Dark
Amber.
U.S. Grade B For
Reprocessing.
Canada all
provinces 2
Maine 2
Grade A Light
Amber ≥75.0%
Tc.
Grade A Medium
Amber 60.5–
74.9% Tc.
Grade A Dark
Amber 44.0–
60.4% Tc.
Grade A Extra
Dark Amber
27.0–43.9% Tc.
Commercial
Grade <27.0%
Tc.
Substandard 3 ......
Proposed option 2
Canada No. 1
Extra Light
≥75.0% Tc.
Canada No. 1
Light 60.5–
74.9% Tc.
Canada No. 1
Medium 44.0–
60.4% Tc.
Canada No. 2
Amber 27.0–
43.9% Tc.
Grade A Golden
Delicate Taste
≥75.0% Tc.
Grade A Amber
Rich Taste 50–
74.9% Tc.
Grade A Dark Robust Taste 25–
49.9% Tc.
Grade A Very
Dark Strong
Taste <25.0%
Tc.
Canada No. 3
Processing Grade
Dark <27.0% Tc.
any Color
Class, any offflavored syrup.
N/A ...................... N/A.
1 Color
determined using USDA Color Standards for Maple Syrup.
light transmission measured with a spectrophotometer using matched square optical cells having a 10mm light path at a wavelength
of 560 nm, with the color values expressed in percent of light transmission as compared to analytical reagent glycerol fixed at one hundred percent transmission. Percent transmission determined in this way is symbolized ‘‘%Tc’’.
3 Fails Other Grade Requirements.
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
2 Percent
Currently, there are both Federal
standards and separate state standards
for maple syrup. The existing Federal
standards and 2013 state standards are
referenced in the above table. Vermont
and New York have moved forward
with new regulations for labeling maple
syrup with full implementation on
January 1, 2015.
The U.S. Standards for Grades of
Maple Sirup, effective date January 14,
1980, are voluntary U.S. grade standards
issued under the authority of the Act
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:11 May 06, 2014
Jkt 232001
which provides for the development of
official U.S. grades to designate different
levels of quality. These grade standards
are available for use by producers,
suppliers, buyers and consumers. The
standards serve as a basis for the
inspection and grading of commodities
by the Federal inspection service as
provided under the Act. As in the case
of other standards for grades of fresh
and processed fruits, vegetables, and
specialty crops, these standards are
designed to facilitate marketing by
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
providing a convenient basis for buying
and selling maple syrup, and
identification of product value.
While the petitioner’s overall goal is
to provide universal definitions, and
standardized grading and labeling
requirements for maple syrup in the
North American and world marketplace,
the revisions proposed in this action
apply only to the voluntary U.S.
standards for maple syrup authorized
under the Act.
E:\FR\FM\07MYN1.SGM
07MYN1
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
26202
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 88 / Wednesday, May 7, 2014 / Notices
Under current U.S. standards,
producers include a grade statement and
color descriptor on labels of maple
syrup. Syrup with a rich bold flavor is
currently labeled as Grade B syrup,
which is not intended for retail sale.
However, consumers are increasingly
seeking the darkest color class of maple
syrup for cooking and table use. The
proposed revisions to the U.S. standards
would categorize Grade B syrup
(containing no damage or off flavors/
odors) as Grade A to allow the darker
syrup to be sold at the retail level.
According to the petitioner, a basic
description of taste intensity on the
product label would help consumers
and ingredient users more consistently
purchase syrup in accordance with their
taste preferences and needs.
The proposed revision to the Grade A
classification includes four color and
flavor classes of maple syrup
determined: (1) Using a
spectrophotometer, which provides a
measure of percent of light transmission
through the syrup expressed as percent
of light transmission and symbolized by
%Tc values; or (2) by any method that
provides equivalent results. The new
grade classifications would be: U.S.
Grade A Golden (delicate taste,
≥75.0%Tc), U.S. Grade A Amber (rich
taste, 50.0–74.9%Tc), U.S. Grade A Dark
(robust taste, 25.0–49.9%Tc), and U.S.
Grade A Very Dark (strong taste,
<25.0%Tc). The proposed grade
standards would remove references to
the USDA permanent glass color
standards for maple sirup (syrup).
The petitioner also requested a limit
to the brix range of 66 percent minimum
to 68.9 percent maximum soluble solids.
After submitting the petition, IMSI
additionally requested that the
standards include definitions for mold
and yeast. AMS did not include separate
definitions for mold and yeast, but the
terms were incorporated within the
definition of fermentation. The
proposed revision to the Grade A
classification includes, free from off
flavors, odors, and fermentation, and is
free from turbidity or sediment.
Fermentation is caused by the presence
of mold and yeast. Off flavor and odor
can also indicate the presence of mold
and yeast. Fermentation, off flavor and
odor are classified as damage and are
not permitted in Grade A. AMS retained
the Substandard grade which was not
included in the petition. The
Substandard Grade allows a category of
products that are not fit for human
consumption or do not meet the
requirements for ‘‘Processing Grade.’’
Additional requests by the petitioner
was establishing a maximum solids
level at 68.9%, and using the term
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:11 May 06, 2014
Jkt 232001
‘‘Pure’’ maple syrup in the product
description. AMS did not include this
in the product definition, because it
would not be consistent with the
current Food and Drug Administration
(FDA) standard of identity for maple
syrup (21 CFR 168.140). However, the
Brix limit is included in the Grade A
classification.
AMS is also proposing to change the
spelling of ‘‘sirup’’ to the more current
commonly used term ‘‘syrup’’ to align it
with the FDA standard of identity for
Maple Syrup 21 CFR 168.140 (c) and
commercial practices.
IMSI also requested that the standards
include the flavor and color descriptors
to be placed on the label. AMS is not
moving forward with such requirements
for flavor and color descriptors because
such requirements would not be
appropriate for inclusion in the U.S.
grade standards.
The proposed revision would include
a ‘‘Processing Grade,’’ a grade that does
not meet the ‘‘U.S. Grade A’’
requirements as far as quality, may
contain off flavors, may not be for retail
sales, and may be used for reprocessing.
Off flavors/odors may be defined as any
specific and identifiable flavor or smell
defect not normally found in good
quality maple syrup. These off flavors
may be related to natural factors such
as, woody, buddy, or fermented flavors
or due to production, handling, or
storage, e.g., burnt, chemical, or mold.
The ‘‘Processing Grade’’ in other
respects, may have fairly good
characteristic maple taste, be fairly free
of damage, turbidity or cloudiness, and
be fairly free from foreign material, such
as pieces of bark, soot, dust, and dirt.
Under the proposed revision the grade
of a sample unit of maple syrup would
be ascertained considering the factors of
color, flavor, odor, damage, and
turbidity or cloudiness.
USDA grades for maple syrup are not
mandatory, but producers, processors
and handlers/packers labeling maple
syrup as a particular U.S. grade are
responsible for the accuracy of that U.S.
grade statement indicated, that the
maple syrup meets the current Federal
standards for that grade. Under the
existing regulations governing the
inspection and grading of processed
fruits, vegetables, and miscellaneous
products, 7 CFR 52.53 provides for the
use of approved identification marks
and paragraph (h) describes or lists
prohibited uses of approved
identification. Section 52.53(h) provides
that, except for officially inspected or
otherwise approved products (namely
maple syrup and honey) no label or
advertising material used upon, or in
conjunction with, a processed product
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
shall bear a brand name, trademark,
product name, company name, or any
other descriptive material as it relates or
alludes to any official U.S. Department
of Agriculture certificate of quality or
loading, grade mark, grade statement
(except honey and maple syrup which
may bear such grade mark or statement),
continuous inspection mark, continuous
inspection statement, sampling mark or
sampling statement or combinations of
one or more of the above. Therefore,
honey and maple syrup may bear
official USDA grade marks without
official inspection.
Commodities covered by U.S. grade
standards must comply with all
applicable Federal, state and local laws.
The official grade of a lot of maple
syrup covered by these standards would
be determined by the procedures set
forth in the Regulations Governing
Inspection and Certification of
Processed Products, Thereof, and
Certain Other Processed Food Products
(7 CFR 52.1 to 52.83).
AMS is soliciting comment on the
proposed United States Standards for
Grades of Maple Sirup.
AMS is publishing this notice with a
60-day comment period.
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 1621–1627.
Dated: May 1, 2014.
Rex A. Barnes,
Associate Administrator, Agricultural
Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. 2014–10372 Filed 5–6–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Olympic Peninsula Resource Advisory
Committee
Forest Service, USDA.
Notice of meeting.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Olympic Peninsula
Resource Advisory Committee (RAC)
will meet in Olympia, Washington. The
committee is authorized under the
Secure Rural Schools and Community
Self-Determination Act (Pub. L. 110–
343) (the Act) and operates in
compliance with the Federal Advisory
Committee Act. The purpose of the
committee is to improve collaborative
relationships and to provide advice and
recommendations to the Forest Service
concerning projects and funding
consistent with Title II of the Act. The
meeting is open to the public. The
purpose of the meeting is to review
project proposals and make
recommendations for 2014 Title II
funds.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\07MYN1.SGM
07MYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 88 (Wednesday, May 7, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 26200-26202]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-10372]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
[Document Number AMS-FV-14-0040; FV-14-328]
United States Standards for Grades of Maple Sirup
AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.
ACTION: Notice and request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) of the Department of
Agriculture (USDA) is soliciting public comments on a proposed revision
to the United States Standards for Grades of Maple Sirup (Syrup). AMS
received a petition from the International Maple Syrup Institute (IMSI)
requesting a revision of the U.S. grade standards. IMSI stated it is
interested in developing harmonized grade standards for maple syrup
producers in the United States and Canada, and asked AMS to replace the
current grade classification requirements with new color and flavor
descriptors, and revise Grade A requirements to be free from damage.
AMS is also proposing to change the spelling from ``sirup'' to the more
commonly used term ``syrup.'' The proposed grade standards would revise
the existing federal grade standards for maple sirup (syrup). The
purpose of these proposed revisions would be to foster or assist in the
development of new or expanded markets, and improve the marketing of
maple syrup in the U.S. and internationally.
DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before July 7, 2014.
ADDRESSES: Written comments may be submitted via the Internet: https://www.regulations.gov; or email richard.peterson@ams.usda.gov; or by mail
to Richard E. Peterson, Standardization Branch, Specialty Crops
Inspection Division, Fruit and Vegetable Program, Agricultural
Marketing Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, 1400 Independence
Avenue SW., Room 0709, South Building; STOP 0247, Washington, DC 20250;
fax (202) 690-1527. All comments should reference the document number,
date, and page number of this issue of the Federal Register. All
comments will be posted without change, including any personal
information provided. All comments submitted in response to this notice
will be included in the public record and will be made available to the
public on the Internet via https://www.regulations.gov. Comments will be
made available for public inspection at the above address during
regular business hours or can be viewed at: https://www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION: Contact Richard E. Peterson, Agricultural
Marketing Specialist, Specialty Crops Inspection Division, Fruit and
Vegetable Program, Agricultural Marketing Service, U.S. Department of
Agriculture, 1400 Independence Avenue SW., Room 0709, South Building;
STOP 0247, Washington, DC 20250; telephone (202) 720-5021; fax (202)
690-1527; or, email richard.peterson@ams.usda.gov. Copies of the
proposed revised grade standards are on the Internet at https://www.ams.usda.gov/scihome or https://www.regulations.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: AMS is proposing to revise the U.S.
Standards for Grades of Maple Sirup using the procedures that appear in
Title 7 part 36 of the Code of Federal Regulations (7 CFR part 36).
Section 203(c) of the Agricultural Marketing Act of 1946 (Act) (7
U.S.C. 1621-1627), as amended, directs and authorizes the Secretary of
Agriculture ``to develop and improve standards of quality, condition,
quantity, grade and packaging, and recommend and demonstrate such
standards in order to encourage uniformity and consistency in
commercial practices.'' AMS is committed to carrying out this authority
in a manner that facilitates the marketing of agricultural commodities
and makes copies of official standards available upon request. The
United States Standards for Grades of Fruits and Vegetables not
connected with Federal Marketing Orders or U.S. Import Requirements, no
longer appear in the Code of Federal Regulations, but are maintained by
USDA, AMS, Fruit and Vegetable Program, and are available on the
Internet at https://www.ams.usda.gov/scihome.
Background
Maple syrup is the liquid food derived by concentration and heat
treatment of the sap of the maple tree (Acer). Maple syrup contains an
abundant amount of naturally occurring minerals such as calcium,
manganese, potassium and magnesium. Maple syrup is a natural source of
beneficial antioxidants. The North American maple syrup industry sells
an estimated
[[Page 26201]]
$400 million of product annually, but the maple crop can vary
significantly from year to year depending on weather and other factors.
An example of this is reflected in the 2013 National Agricultural
Statistics Service (NASS) report for 2013, the report states:
Nationally, maple syrup production in 2013 totaled 3.25 million
gallons, up 70 percent from 2012. In 2012, prevailing high temperatures
limited sap flow. The number of taps is estimated at 10.6 million, 8
percent above the 2012 total of 9.77 million. Yield per tap is
estimated to be 0.308 gallons, up 58 percent from the previous season's
revised yield. All States showed an increase in production from the
previous year. Cool temperatures in the early spring months delayed
budding of maple trees which contributed to a longer season of sap flow
than last year. The earliest sap flow reported was January 1 in New
York. The latest sap flow reported to open the season was February 15
in Wisconsin. On average, the season lasted 37 days, compared with 24
days in 2012. The 2012 U.S. average price per gallon was $39.10, up
$1.20 from the 2011 price of $37.90. The U.S. value of production, at
$74.6 million for 2012, was down 30 percent from the previous season.
In 2002, IMSI, which represents maple producers, state governments,
vendors, maple equipment manufacturers, organizations, and others in
both Canada and the United States, established a committee to review
existing regulations for pure maple syrup in Canada and the United
States. The committee recommended establishing harmonized and standard
definitions, grades, and nomenclature for pure maple syrup in the
United States and Canada for the benefit of the maple industry. IMSI is
seeking to eliminate inconsistent grade names and nomenclature, which
vary from jurisdiction to jurisdiction, and emphasize the taste of the
syrup by including flavor descriptors as well as new color descriptors
on the labels for the different classes of syrup.
In September 2011, AMS received a petition to revise the U.S.
Standards for Grades of Maple Sirup from IMSI. Petitioner IMSI stated
that consumers currently face a patchwork of grading systems in the
United States that are confusing, and fail to define the grades of
maple syrup in meaningful terms. The petitioner stated its overall goal
as providing uniform definitions of maple syrup in North America and
the world marketplace. In addition to proposing modifications to the
standards, as proposed by IMSI, AMS is proposing to change the spelling
from ``sirup'' to the more commonly used term ``syrup.''
The table below illustrates the variation of grade standards
requirements among the maple producing states and Canada in 2013 and
the proposed revision. The current U.S. grade standardsdo not recognize
percent light transmittance (%Tc) as a means of ascertaining color, but
at the state level, some states use this method to determine the color
of maple syrup.
Comparison of 2013 USDA, State Standards, and Proposed Maple Syrup Grades and Nomenclature
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Vermont [sup2] and New Hampshire Canada all Proposed option
Current U.S. standard [sup1] Ohio [sup1] [sup1] New York [sup1] Maine [sup2] provinces [sup2] [sup2]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
U.S Grade A Light Amber......... Vermont Fancy Grade A Light Grade A Light Grade A Light Canada No. 1 Extra Grade A Golden
>=75.0% Tc Ohio Amber. Amber. Amber >=75.0% Tc. Light >=75.0% Tc. Delicate Taste
Light. >=75.0% Tc.
U.S. Grade A Medium Amber....... Grade A Medium Grade A Medium Grade A Medium Grade A Medium Canada No. 1 Light Grade A Amber Rich
Amber 60.5-74.9% Amber. Amber. Amber 60.5-74.9% 60.5-74.9% Tc. Taste 50-74.9%
Tc. Tc. Tc.
U.S. Grade A Dark Amber......... Grade A Dark Amber Grade A Dark Amber Grade A Dark Amber Grade A Dark Amber Canada No. 1 Grade A Dark
44.0-60.4% Tc. 44.0-60.4% Tc. Medium 44.0-60.4% Robust Taste 25-
Tc. 49.9% Tc.
U.S. Grade B For Reprocessing... Grade B 27.0-43.9% Grade B........... Extra Dark for Grade A Extra Dark Canada No. 2 Amber Grade A Very Dark
Tc. Cooking or Grade Amber 27.0-43.9% 27.0-43.9% Tc. Strong Taste
B for Tc. <25.0% Tc.
Reprocessing.
U.S. Grade B For Reprocessing... Commercial Grade Grade B........... Extra Dark for Commercial Grade Canada No. 3 Dark Processing Grade
<27.0% Tc. Cooking or Grade <27.0% Tc. <27.0% Tc. any Color Class,
B for any off-flavored
Reprocessing. syrup.
Substandard [sup3].............. Substandard [sup3] Substandard [sup3] Substandard [sup3] Substandard [sup3] N/A............... N/A.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Color determined using USDA Color Standards for Maple Syrup.
\2\ Percent light transmission measured with a spectrophotometer using matched square optical cells having a 10mm light path at a wavelength of 560 nm,
with the color values expressed in percent of light transmission as compared to analytical reagent glycerol fixed at one hundred percent transmission.
Percent transmission determined in this way is symbolized ``%Tc''.
\3\ Fails Other Grade Requirements.
Currently, there are both Federal standards and separate state
standards for maple syrup. The existing Federal standards and 2013
state standards are referenced in the above table. Vermont and New York
have moved forward with new regulations for labeling maple syrup with
full implementation on January 1, 2015.
The U.S. Standards for Grades of Maple Sirup, effective date
January 14, 1980, are voluntary U.S. grade standards issued under the
authority of the Act which provides for the development of official
U.S. grades to designate different levels of quality. These grade
standards are available for use by producers, suppliers, buyers and
consumers. The standards serve as a basis for the inspection and
grading of commodities by the Federal inspection service as provided
under the Act. As in the case of other standards for grades of fresh
and processed fruits, vegetables, and specialty crops, these standards
are designed to facilitate marketing by providing a convenient basis
for buying and selling maple syrup, and identification of product
value.
While the petitioner's overall goal is to provide universal
definitions, and standardized grading and labeling requirements for
maple syrup in the North American and world marketplace, the revisions
proposed in this action apply only to the voluntary U.S. standards for
maple syrup authorized under the Act.
[[Page 26202]]
Under current U.S. standards, producers include a grade statement
and color descriptor on labels of maple syrup. Syrup with a rich bold
flavor is currently labeled as Grade B syrup, which is not intended for
retail sale. However, consumers are increasingly seeking the darkest
color class of maple syrup for cooking and table use. The proposed
revisions to the U.S. standards would categorize Grade B syrup
(containing no damage or off flavors/odors) as Grade A to allow the
darker syrup to be sold at the retail level. According to the
petitioner, a basic description of taste intensity on the product label
would help consumers and ingredient users more consistently purchase
syrup in accordance with their taste preferences and needs.
The proposed revision to the Grade A classification includes four
color and flavor classes of maple syrup determined: (1) Using a
spectrophotometer, which provides a measure of percent of light
transmission through the syrup expressed as percent of light
transmission and symbolized by %Tc values; or (2) by any method that
provides equivalent results. The new grade classifications would be:
U.S. Grade A Golden (delicate taste, >=75.0%Tc), U.S. Grade A Amber
(rich taste, 50.0-74.9%Tc), U.S. Grade A Dark (robust taste, 25.0-
49.9%Tc), and U.S. Grade A Very Dark (strong taste, <25.0%Tc). The
proposed grade standards would remove references to the USDA permanent
glass color standards for maple sirup (syrup).
The petitioner also requested a limit to the brix range of 66
percent minimum to 68.9 percent maximum soluble solids. After
submitting the petition, IMSI additionally requested that the standards
include definitions for mold and yeast. AMS did not include separate
definitions for mold and yeast, but the terms were incorporated within
the definition of fermentation. The proposed revision to the Grade A
classification includes, free from off flavors, odors, and
fermentation, and is free from turbidity or sediment. Fermentation is
caused by the presence of mold and yeast. Off flavor and odor can also
indicate the presence of mold and yeast. Fermentation, off flavor and
odor are classified as damage and are not permitted in Grade A. AMS
retained the Substandard grade which was not included in the petition.
The Substandard Grade allows a category of products that are not fit
for human consumption or do not meet the requirements for ``Processing
Grade.'' Additional requests by the petitioner was establishing a
maximum solids level at 68.9%, and using the term ``Pure'' maple syrup
in the product description. AMS did not include this in the product
definition, because it would not be consistent with the current Food
and Drug Administration (FDA) standard of identity for maple syrup (21
CFR 168.140). However, the Brix limit is included in the Grade A
classification.
AMS is also proposing to change the spelling of ``sirup'' to the
more current commonly used term ``syrup'' to align it with the FDA
standard of identity for Maple Syrup 21 CFR 168.140 (c) and commercial
practices.
IMSI also requested that the standards include the flavor and color
descriptors to be placed on the label. AMS is not moving forward with
such requirements for flavor and color descriptors because such
requirements would not be appropriate for inclusion in the U.S. grade
standards.
The proposed revision would include a ``Processing Grade,'' a grade
that does not meet the ``U.S. Grade A'' requirements as far as quality,
may contain off flavors, may not be for retail sales, and may be used
for reprocessing. Off flavors/odors may be defined as any specific and
identifiable flavor or smell defect not normally found in good quality
maple syrup. These off flavors may be related to natural factors such
as, woody, buddy, or fermented flavors or due to production, handling,
or storage, e.g., burnt, chemical, or mold. The ``Processing Grade'' in
other respects, may have fairly good characteristic maple taste, be
fairly free of damage, turbidity or cloudiness, and be fairly free from
foreign material, such as pieces of bark, soot, dust, and dirt. Under
the proposed revision the grade of a sample unit of maple syrup would
be ascertained considering the factors of color, flavor, odor, damage,
and turbidity or cloudiness.
USDA grades for maple syrup are not mandatory, but producers,
processors and handlers/packers labeling maple syrup as a particular
U.S. grade are responsible for the accuracy of that U.S. grade
statement indicated, that the maple syrup meets the current Federal
standards for that grade. Under the existing regulations governing the
inspection and grading of processed fruits, vegetables, and
miscellaneous products, 7 CFR 52.53 provides for the use of approved
identification marks and paragraph (h) describes or lists prohibited
uses of approved identification. Section 52.53(h) provides that, except
for officially inspected or otherwise approved products (namely maple
syrup and honey) no label or advertising material used upon, or in
conjunction with, a processed product shall bear a brand name,
trademark, product name, company name, or any other descriptive
material as it relates or alludes to any official U.S. Department of
Agriculture certificate of quality or loading, grade mark, grade
statement (except honey and maple syrup which may bear such grade mark
or statement), continuous inspection mark, continuous inspection
statement, sampling mark or sampling statement or combinations of one
or more of the above. Therefore, honey and maple syrup may bear
official USDA grade marks without official inspection.
Commodities covered by U.S. grade standards must comply with all
applicable Federal, state and local laws.
The official grade of a lot of maple syrup covered by these
standards would be determined by the procedures set forth in the
Regulations Governing Inspection and Certification of Processed
Products, Thereof, and Certain Other Processed Food Products (7 CFR
52.1 to 52.83).
AMS is soliciting comment on the proposed United States Standards
for Grades of Maple Sirup.
AMS is publishing this notice with a 60-day comment period.
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 1621-1627.
Dated: May 1, 2014.
Rex A. Barnes,
Associate Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. 2014-10372 Filed 5-6-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-02-P