Privacy Act of 1974; Implementation, 25505-25506 [2014-10190]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 86 / Monday, May 5, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
¯
And x is the sample mean; s is the
sample standard deviation; n is the
number of samples; and t0.95 is the t
statistic for a 95% one-tailed confidence
interval with n¥1 degrees of freedom
(from Appendix A to subpart B of part
429).
(2) Alternative efficiency
determination methods. In lieu of
testing, a represented value of efficiency
or consumption for a basic model of
commercial packaged boiler must be
determined through the application of
an AEDM pursuant to the requirements
of § 429.70 and the provisions of this
section, where:
(i) Any represented value of energy
consumption or other measure of energy
use of a basic model for which
consumers would favor lower values
shall be greater than or equal to the
output of the AEDM and less than or
equal to the Federal standard for that
basic model; and
(ii) Any represented value of energy
efficiency or other measure of energy
consumption of a basic model for which
consumers would favor higher values
shall be less than or equal to the output
of the AEDM and greater than or equal
to the Federal standard for that basic
model.
(b) Certification reports. (1) The
requirements of § 429.12 are applicable
to commercial packaged boilers; and
(2) Pursuant to § 429.12(b)(13), a
certification report must include the
following public equipment-specific
information: The combustion efficiency
in percent (%) or the thermal efficiency
in percent (%), as required in § 431.87
of this chapter; and the maximum rated
input capacity in British thermal units
per hour (Btu/h).
(3) Pursuant to § 429.12(b)(13), a
certification report must include the
following additional equipment-specific
information:
(i) Whether the basic model is
engineered-to-order; and
(ii) For any basic model rated with an
AEDM, whether the manufacturer elects
the witness test option for verification
testing. (See § 429.70(c)(5)(iii) for
options). However, the manufacturer
may not select more than 10% of
AEDM-rated basic models to be eligible
for witness testing.
(4) Pursuant to § 429.12(b)(13), a
certification report may include
supplemental testing instructions in
PDF format. A manufacturer may also
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:36 May 02, 2014
Jkt 232001
include with a certification report other
supplementary items in PDF format
(e.g., manuals) for DOE consideration in
performing testing under subpart C of
this part.
(c) Alternative methods for
determining efficiency or energy use for
commercial packaged boilers can be
found in § 429.70.
■ 10. Section 429.70 is amended by
revising the section heading and the
heading of paragraph (c) to read as
follows:
ACTION:
This rule is being published as a
direct final rule as the Department of
Defense does not expect to receive any
adverse comments, and so a proposed
rule is unnecessary.
DATES: This rule will be effective on July
14, 2014 unless adverse comment is
received by July 7, 2014. If adverse
comment is received, the Department of
Defense will publish a timely
withdrawal of the rule in the Federal
Register.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by docket number and title,
by any of the following methods:
* Federal Rulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
* Mail: Federal Docket Management
System Office, 4800 Mark Center Drive,
East Tower, 2nd Floor, Suite 02G09,
Alexandria, VA 22350–3100.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the agency name and
docket number for this Federal Register
document. The general policy for
comments and other submissions from
members of the public is to make these
submissions available for public
viewing on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov as they are
received without change, including any
personal identifiers or contact
information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mark Dorgan, DoD IG FOIA/Privacy
Office, Department of Defense, Inspector
General, 4800 Mark Center Drive,
Alexandria, VA 22350–1500 or
telephone: (703) 699–5680.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
The Office of Inspector
General is exempting a new system of
records, CIG–29, entitled, ‘‘Privacy and
Civil Liberties Complaint Reporting
System’’ from subsections (c)(3); (d)(1),
(2), (3), (4); (e)(1) and (e)(4); (G), (H), (I);
and (f) of the Privacy Act, pursuant to
5 U.S.C. 552a.
This direct final rule makes no
substantive changes to the Office of
Inspector General Privacy Program
rules.
These changes will allow the
Department to add an exemption rule to
the Office of Inspector General Privacy
Program rules that will exempt
applicable Department records and/or
material from certain portions of the
Privacy Act. This will improve the
efficiency and effectiveness of DoD’s
program by preserving the exempt status
of the applicable records and/or
material when the purposes underlying
the exemption(s) are valid and
necessary.
Direct Final Rule and Significant
Adverse Comments
DoD has determined this rulemaking
meets the criteria for a direct final rule
because it involves nonsubstantive
changes dealing with DoD’s
management of its Privacy Programs.
DoD expects no opposition to the
changes and no significant adverse
comments. However, if DoD receives a
significant adverse comment, the
Department will withdraw this direct
final rule by publishing a notice in the
Federal Register. A significant adverse
comment is one that explains: (1) Why
the direct final rule is inappropriate,
including challenges to the rule’s
underlying premise or approach; or (2)
why the direct final rule will be
ineffective or unacceptable without a
change. In determining whether a
comment necessitates withdrawal of
this direct final rule, DoD will consider
whether it warrants a substantive
response in a notice and comment
process.
§ 429.70 Alternative methods for
determining energy efficiency and energy
use.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) Alternative efficiency
determination method (AEDM) for
commercial HVAC (includes
commercial warm air furnaces and
commercial packaged boilers), WH, and
refrigeration equipment—(1) * * *
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2014–10085 Filed 5–2–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Office of the Secretary
32 CFR Part 312
[Docket ID: DoD–2014–OS–0060]
Privacy Act of 1974; Implementation
AGENCY:
Office of Inspector General,
DoD.
Direct final rule with request for
comments.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\05MYR1.SGM
05MYR1
ER05MY14.007
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
(2) The lower 95 percent confidence
limit (LCL) of the true mean divided by
0.95, where:
25505
25506
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 86 / Monday, May 5, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
Executive Order 12866, ‘‘Regulatory
Planning and Review’’ and Executive
Order 13563, ‘‘Improving Regulation
and Regulatory Review’’
PART 312—OFFICE OF THE
INSPECTOR GENERAL (OIG) PRIVACY
PROGRAM
It has been determined that this rule
is not a significant rule. This rule does
not (1) Have an annual effect on the
economy of $100 million or more or
adversely affect in a material way the
economy; a sector of the economy;
productivity; competition; jobs; the
environment; public health or safety; or
State, local, or tribal governments or
communities; (2) Create a serious
inconsistency or otherwise interfere
with an action taken or planned by
another Agency; (3) Materially alter the
budgetary impact of entitlements,
grants, user fees, or loan programs, or
the rights and obligations of recipients
thereof; or (4) Raise novel legal or policy
issues arising out of legal mandates, the
President’s priorities, or the principles
set forth in these Executive orders.
Public Law 96–354, ‘‘Regulatory
Flexibility Act’’ (5 U.S.C. Chapter 6)
This rule will not have significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities because it is
concerned only with the administration
of Privacy Act systems of records within
the Department of Defense. A
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis is not
required.
Public Law 96–511, ‘‘Paperwork
Reduction Act’’ (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35)
This rule does not contain any
information collection requirements
subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
Section 202, Public Law 104–4,
‘‘Unfunded Mandates Reform Act’’
These amendments do not involve a
Federal mandate that may result in the
expenditure by State, local and tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $100 million or more
and that such rulemaking will not
significantly or uniquely affect small
governments.
1. The authority citation for 32 CFR
part 312 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: Pub. L. 93–579, 88 Stat. 1896
(5 U.S.C. 552a).
2. Section 312.12 is amended by
adding paragraph (k) to read as follows:
■
§ 312.12
Exemptions.
*
*
*
*
*
(k) System identifier: CIG–29.
(1) System Name: Privacy and Civil
Liberties Complaint Reporting System.
(2) Exemptions: Any portion of this
record system which falls within the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552a (j)(2),
(k)(2)and (k)(5) may be exempt from the
following subsections of 5 U.S.C. 552a:
(c)(3), (d), (e)(1), (e)(4)(G), (e)(4)(H),
(e)(4)(I).
(3) Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552a(j)(2),
(k)(2), and (k)(5).
(4) Reasons: To ensure the integrity of
the privacy and civil liberties process.
The execution requires that information
be provided in a free and open manner
without fear of retribution or
harassment in order to facilitate a just,
thorough, and timely resolution of the
complaint or inquiry. Disclosures from
this system can enable individuals to
conceal their wrongdoing or mislead the
course of the investigation by
concealing, destroying, or fabricating
evidence or documents. In addition,
disclosures can subject sources and
witnesses to harassment or intimidation
which may cause individuals not to
seek redress for wrongs through privacy
and civil liberties channels for fear of
retribution or harassment. There is a
clear need to protect national security
information from inadvertent
disclosure.
Dated: April 30, 2014.
Aaron Siegel,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison
Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 2014–10190 Filed 5–2–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001–06–P
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
Executive Order 13132, ‘‘Federalism’’
These amendments do not have
substantial direct effects on the States,
on the relationship between the
National Government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. Therefore, no
Federalism assessment is required.
List of Subjects in 32 CFR Part 312
Privacy.
Accordingly, 32 CFR part 312 is
amended as follows:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:36 May 02, 2014
Jkt 232001
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R03–OAR–2014–0005; FRL–9910–33–
Region 3]
Approval and Promulgation of
Implementation Plans; Delaware;
Regional Haze Five-Year Progress
Report State Implementation Plan
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
ACTION:
Final rule.
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is approving a State
Implementation Plan (SIP) revision
submitted by the State of Delaware
through the Delaware Department of
Natural Resources and Environmental
Control (DNREC). Delaware’s SIP
revision addresses requirements of the
Clean Air Act (CAA) and EPA’s rules
that require states to submit periodic
reports describing progress towards
reasonable progress goals (RPGs)
established for regional haze and a
determination of the adequacy of the
state’s existing implementation plan
addressing regional haze (regional haze
SIP). EPA is approving Delaware’s SIP
revision on the basis that it addresses
the progress report and adequacy
determination requirements for the first
implementation period for regional
haze.
DATES: This final rule is effective on
June 4, 2014.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket ID
Number EPA–R03–OAR–2014–0005. All
documents in the docket are listed in
the www.regulations.gov Web site.
Although listed in the electronic docket,
some information is not publicly
available, i.e., confidential business
information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the Internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available either electronically through
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy for
public inspection during normal
business hours at the Air Protection
Division, U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, Region III, 1650 Arch Street,
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103.
Copies of the State submittal are
available at the Delaware Department of
Natural Resources and Environmental
Control, 89 Kings Highway, P.O. Box
1401, Dover, Delaware 19903.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Irene Shandruk, (215) 814–2166, or by
email at shandruk.irene@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
I. Background
On February 25, 2014 (79 FR 10442),
EPA published a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPR) for the State of
Delaware. In the NPR, EPA proposed
approval of Delaware’s progress report
SIP, a report on progress made in the
first implementation period towards
RPGs for the Class I area outside the
State that is affected by emissions from
E:\FR\FM\05MYR1.SGM
05MYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 86 (Monday, May 5, 2014)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 25505-25506]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-10190]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Office of the Secretary
32 CFR Part 312
[Docket ID: DoD-2014-OS-0060]
Privacy Act of 1974; Implementation
AGENCY: Office of Inspector General, DoD.
ACTION: Direct final rule with request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Office of Inspector General is exempting a new system of
records, CIG-29, entitled, ``Privacy and Civil Liberties Complaint
Reporting System'' from subsections (c)(3); (d)(1), (2), (3), (4);
(e)(1) and (e)(4); (G), (H), (I); and (f) of the Privacy Act, pursuant
to 5 U.S.C. 552a.
This direct final rule makes no substantive changes to the Office
of Inspector General Privacy Program rules.
These changes will allow the Department to add an exemption rule to
the Office of Inspector General Privacy Program rules that will exempt
applicable Department records and/or material from certain portions of
the Privacy Act. This will improve the efficiency and effectiveness of
DoD's program by preserving the exempt status of the applicable records
and/or material when the purposes underlying the exemption(s) are valid
and necessary.
This rule is being published as a direct final rule as the
Department of Defense does not expect to receive any adverse comments,
and so a proposed rule is unnecessary.
DATES: This rule will be effective on July 14, 2014 unless adverse
comment is received by July 7, 2014. If adverse comment is received,
the Department of Defense will publish a timely withdrawal of the rule
in the Federal Register.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by docket number and
title, by any of the following methods:
* Federal Rulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
* Mail: Federal Docket Management System Office, 4800 Mark Center
Drive, East Tower, 2nd Floor, Suite 02G09, Alexandria, VA 22350-3100.
Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name
and docket number for this Federal Register document. The general
policy for comments and other submissions from members of the public is
to make these submissions available for public viewing on the Internet
at https://www.regulations.gov as they are received without change,
including any personal identifiers or contact information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mark Dorgan, DoD IG FOIA/Privacy
Office, Department of Defense, Inspector General, 4800 Mark Center
Drive, Alexandria, VA 22350-1500 or telephone: (703) 699-5680.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Direct Final Rule and Significant Adverse Comments
DoD has determined this rulemaking meets the criteria for a direct
final rule because it involves nonsubstantive changes dealing with
DoD's management of its Privacy Programs. DoD expects no opposition to
the changes and no significant adverse comments. However, if DoD
receives a significant adverse comment, the Department will withdraw
this direct final rule by publishing a notice in the Federal Register.
A significant adverse comment is one that explains: (1) Why the direct
final rule is inappropriate, including challenges to the rule's
underlying premise or approach; or (2) why the direct final rule will
be ineffective or unacceptable without a change. In determining whether
a comment necessitates withdrawal of this direct final rule, DoD will
consider whether it warrants a substantive response in a notice and
comment process.
[[Page 25506]]
Executive Order 12866, ``Regulatory Planning and Review'' and Executive
Order 13563, ``Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review''
It has been determined that this rule is not a significant rule.
This rule does not (1) Have an annual effect on the economy of $100
million or more or adversely affect in a material way the economy; a
sector of the economy; productivity; competition; jobs; the
environment; public health or safety; or State, local, or tribal
governments or communities; (2) Create a serious inconsistency or
otherwise interfere with an action taken or planned by another Agency;
(3) Materially alter the budgetary impact of entitlements, grants, user
fees, or loan programs, or the rights and obligations of recipients
thereof; or (4) Raise novel legal or policy issues arising out of legal
mandates, the President's priorities, or the principles set forth in
these Executive orders.
Public Law 96-354, ``Regulatory Flexibility Act'' (5 U.S.C. Chapter 6)
This rule will not have significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities because it is concerned only with
the administration of Privacy Act systems of records within the
Department of Defense. A Regulatory Flexibility Analysis is not
required.
Public Law 96-511, ``Paperwork Reduction Act'' (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35)
This rule does not contain any information collection requirements
subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et
seq.).
Section 202, Public Law 104-4, ``Unfunded Mandates Reform Act''
These amendments do not involve a Federal mandate that may result
in the expenditure by State, local and tribal governments, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector, of $100 million or more and that
such rulemaking will not significantly or uniquely affect small
governments.
Executive Order 13132, ``Federalism''
These amendments do not have substantial direct effects on the
States, on the relationship between the National Government and the
States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. Therefore, no Federalism assessment is
required.
List of Subjects in 32 CFR Part 312
Privacy.
Accordingly, 32 CFR part 312 is amended as follows:
PART 312--OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL (OIG) PRIVACY PROGRAM
0
1. The authority citation for 32 CFR part 312 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: Pub. L. 93-579, 88 Stat. 1896 (5 U.S.C. 552a).
0
2. Section 312.12 is amended by adding paragraph (k) to read as
follows:
Sec. 312.12 Exemptions.
* * * * *
(k) System identifier: CIG-29.
(1) System Name: Privacy and Civil Liberties Complaint Reporting
System.
(2) Exemptions: Any portion of this record system which falls
within the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552a (j)(2), (k)(2)and (k)(5) may be
exempt from the following subsections of 5 U.S.C. 552a: (c)(3), (d),
(e)(1), (e)(4)(G), (e)(4)(H), (e)(4)(I).
(3) Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552a(j)(2), (k)(2), and (k)(5).
(4) Reasons: To ensure the integrity of the privacy and civil
liberties process. The execution requires that information be provided
in a free and open manner without fear of retribution or harassment in
order to facilitate a just, thorough, and timely resolution of the
complaint or inquiry. Disclosures from this system can enable
individuals to conceal their wrongdoing or mislead the course of the
investigation by concealing, destroying, or fabricating evidence or
documents. In addition, disclosures can subject sources and witnesses
to harassment or intimidation which may cause individuals not to seek
redress for wrongs through privacy and civil liberties channels for
fear of retribution or harassment. There is a clear need to protect
national security information from inadvertent disclosure.
Dated: April 30, 2014.
Aaron Siegel,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 2014-10190 Filed 5-2-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P