Unlicensed National Information Infrastructure (U-NII) Devices in the 5 GHz Band, 24569-24580 [2014-09279]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 84 / Thursday, May 1, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this rule
will not result in such an expenditure,
we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
7. Taking of Private Property
This rule will not cause a taking of
private property or otherwise have
taking implications under Executive
Order 12630, Governmental Actions and
Interference with Constitutionally
Protected Property Rights.
8. Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards
in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to
minimize litigation, eliminate
ambiguity, and reduce burden.
9. Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13045, Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not
an economically significant rule and
does not create an environmental risk to
health or risk to safety that might
disproportionately affect children.
10. Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
11. Energy Effects
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This rule involves the
drawbridge operation for the First Street
Bridge which has been converted to a
fixed bridge. This rule is categorically
excluded, under figure 2–1, paragraph
(32) (e), of the Instruction.
Under figure 2–1, paragraph (32) (e),
of the Instruction, an environmental
analysis checklist and a categorical
exclusion determination are not
required for this rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 117
Bridges.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 117 as follows:
PART 117—DRAWBRIDGE
OPERATION REGULATIONS
1. The authority citation for part 117
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 499; 33 CFR 1.05–1;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.
§ 117.718
2. Remove § 117.718(b) and
redesignate § 117.718(c) as § 117.718(b)
respectively.
■
Dated: April 17, 2014.
V.B. Gifford, Jr.,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Acting
Commander, First Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 2014–09999 Filed 4–30–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
47 CFR Parts 2 and 15
This action is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under Executive Order
13211, Actions Concerning Regulations
That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use.
[ET Docket No. 13–49; FCC 14–30]
Unlicensed National Information
Infrastructure (U–NII) Devices in the 5
GHz Band
12. Technical Standards
AGENCY:
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
SUMMARY:
13. Environment
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
[Amended]
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023–01 and
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guides the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have concluded that this action is one
of a category of actions that do not
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:24 Apr 30, 2014
Jkt 232001
Federal Communications
Commission.
ACTION: Final rule.
This document amends the
Commission rules governing the
operation of unlicensed National
Information Infrastructure (U–NII)
devices in the 5 GHz band to make
broadband technologies more widely
available for consumers and businesses
by increasing power and permitting
outdoor use in the U–NII–1 band and by
adding 25 megahertz to the U–NII–3
band; it also takes steps to reduce the
potential for harmful interference to
incumbent operations. The proceeding
PO 00000
Frm 00043
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
24569
satisfies the requirements of the
Spectrum Act, by which Congress
required that the Commission begin a
proceeding regarding U–NII devices in
the 5 GHz band within a year if it
determined, after consultation with
NTIA, that incumbents will be protected
and their missions will not be
compromised.
DATES: Effective June 2, 2014 except for
§ 15.407(j), which contains information
collection requirements that have not
been approved by OMB. The
Commission will publish a document in
the Federal Register announcing the
effective date.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Aole
Wilkins, Office of Engineering and
Technology, 202–418–2406,
Aole.Wilkins@fcc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a
summary of the Commission’s First
Report and Order, ET Docket No. 13–49,
FCC 14–30 adopted March 31, 2014, and
released April 1, 2014. The full text of
this document is available for
inspection and copying during normal
business hours in the FCC Reference
Center (Room CY–A257), 445 12th
Street SW., Washington, DC 20554. The
complete text of this document also may
be purchased from the Commission’s
copy contractor, Best Copy and Printing,
Inc., 445 12th Street SW., Room CY–
B402, Washington, DC 20554. The full
text may also be downloaded at:
www.fcc.gov. People with Disabilities:
To request materials in accessible
formats for people with disabilities
(braille, large print, electronic files,
audio format), send an email to fcc504@
fcc.gov or call the Consumer &
Governmental Affairs Bureau at 202–
418–0530 (voice), 202–418–0432 (tty).
Summary of First Report and Order
1. In 2013, the Commission issued the
Notice of Proposed Rule Making, 78 FR
21320, April 10, 2013, that initiated this
proceeding, with the goal of supporting
the growing needs of businesses and
consumers for fixed and mobile
broadband communications using
Unlicensed National Information
Infrastructure (U–NII) devices in the
5.15–5.35 GHz and 5.47–5.85 GHz
bands. At the same time, it recognized
the need to modify its rules to better
ensure that these devices do not cause
harmful interference to authorized
Federal and non-Federal users in these
bands. U–NII devices are unlicensed
intentional radiators, which use
wideband digital modulation techniques
to provide a wide array of high-data-rate
mobile and fixed communications used
by individuals, businesses, and
institutions, particularly for wireless
E:\FR\FM\01MYR1.SGM
01MYR1
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
24570
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 84 / Thursday, May 1, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
local area networking—including WiFi—and broadband access.
2. U–NII devices already play an
important role in meeting public
demand for wireless broadband service,
particularly wireless local area
networking and broadband access. This
foundation, coupled with increasing
demand for wireless broadband
applications and new Wi-Fi technology,
signals a bright future for unlicensed
operations in the 5 GHz band. To meet
continuing demand, in this First R&O
the Commission takes a number of
actions to increase the utility of the 550
megahertz of the 5 GHz band already
available for U–NII operations, while
protecting incumbent users from
harmful interference.
3. In this First R&O, the Commission
modified the Part 15 rules for the U–
NII–1 band by removing the indoor-only
restriction and increasing the permitted
power level. These changes provide
more flexibility for providing broadband
service, whether indoors or outdoors,
and take advantage of the new 802.11ac
standard to achieve higher data rate
transmissions across multiple U–NII
segments of the 5 GHz band. To protect
Mobile Satellite Service in the U–NII–1
band from harmful interference, the
Commission also created certain
technical rules for U–NII–1 devices,
principally requiring directionality in
the antennas to limit emissions in the
upward direction and requiring
operators with more than 1000 outdoor
access points to register information
regarding their systems with the
Commission.
4. The Commission described
circumstances which would facilitate
waivers under its rules for converting
existing U–NII–3 devices to incorporate
the U–NII–1 band without having to
comply with the new antenna rules.
5. The Commission also modified its
rules to require manufacturers to secure
the software in all U–NII devices to
prevent modifications that would allow
the device to operate in a manner
inconsistent with the equipment
certification. This change will reduce
the likelihood of harmful interference
not only to Terminal Doppler Weather
Radar (TDWR) systems, but to all
authorized services in the 5 GHz bands.
6. The Commission consolidated the
provisions in § 15.247 of the rules
(applicable to digitally modulated
devices for this band) with the rules in
§ 15.407 (applicable to U–NII devices)
so that all the digitally modulated
devices operating in the 5 GHz band
will operate under the combined rules
and be subject to the new device
security requirement. This change
addresses a major cause of harmful
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:24 Apr 30, 2014
Jkt 232001
interference to the TDWR: in which
users have illegally modified devices
certified to operate under § 15.247 to
operate in the 5.47–5.725 GHz band
without implementing Dynamic
Frequency Selection (DFS). This rule
consolidation also will reduce
complexity and costs in authorizing
technically similar devices under
different rules.
Increasing the Utility of the U–NII–1
Band
7. The majority of commenters
support allowing outdoor operations in
the U–NII–1 band, and some level of
harmonization across the U–NII bands.
The Commission concluded that it is in
the public interest to permit outdoor
operation of U–NII devices in the U–
NII–1 band, and that it can do so while
appropriately protecting MSS services
from harmful interference. Specifically,
the Commission revised its rules to
permit transmitter power levels up to 1
W, as permitted in the U–NII–3 band,
with safeguards to minimize the
likelihood of harmful interference to
Globalstar’s MSS system.
8. The Commission observed that
NCTA’s and Globalstar’s initial analyses
of the likelihood of harmful interference
to Globalstar’s system were based on
fundamentally different assumptions
about future factors such as the extent
of deployments, the technical
characteristics of the equipment, and
the extent of the communications traffic,
and that these assumptions are
inherently uncertain. The Commission
determined that it can minimize the
significance of these assumptions with a
technical resolution which restricts a
device’s emissions when operating
above a certain elevation angle, coupled
with a reporting requirement directed at
large scale deployments, which will
facilitate corrective measures should
they become necessary.
9. Since the noise floor increase seen
by the satellite will be a function of the
aggregated energy from U–NII–1
emissions at elevation angles above 30
degrees, the Commission addressed the
likelihood of interference to the satellite
by restricting upward emissions to
sharply reduce the energy that will be
received by the satellite from each
individual access point. As a result, it
is far less likely that harmful
interference will occur, even for
proliferation of access points greater
than that presumed in either party’s
earlier analysis, making moot to a large
degree the disagreements as to the
number of access points that might be
deployed.
10. The Commission has concluded
that generally allowing fixed access
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
point outdoor operations at a conducted
power level of up to 1 W (30 dBm), and
a PSD of 17 dBm/MHz with an
allowance for a 6 dBi antenna gain (i.e.,
a total 36 dBm EIRP), and limiting the
maximum EIRP above 30 degrees
elevation to 125 mW (21 dBm) EIRP,
provides reasonable protection from
harmful interference to Globalstar’s
system. Both NCTA and Globalstar agree
that this protocol would provide
interference protection to Globalstar,
while permitting access to the spectrum
for U–NII users. The Commission
believes that expressing a limit in terms
of EIRP will provide U–NII
manufacturers and operators with
flexibility regarding how to design their
equipment, while still achieving the
required levels of protection.
Manufacturers will be able to
demonstrate compliance with the EIRP
limit by reducing antenna gain in the
upward direction, or by limiting the
transmitter power, or a combination of
the two, as best suits their particular
purpose.
11. In conjunction with this
requirement, the Commission will
continue to monitor developments in
this band. Globalstar has expressed
strong concerns in this proceeding that
proposed unchecked, widespread
deployments of outdoor access points
may disrupt licensed services in the
band. To provide a safeguard and
require accountability for such large
deployments, the Commission adopted
the following filing requirement. Before
deploying an aggregate total of more
than one thousand outdoor access
points within the U–NII–1 band,
companies must submit a letter to the
Commission acknowledging that,
should harmful interference to licensed
services in this band occur, they will be
required to take corrective action.
12. The Commission will permit
current UN–II–3 devices to operate
under the new U–NII–1 rules under two
potential scenarios, but in both cases,
the equipment must comply with the
software security requirements that it
adopted to prevent unauthorized device
modifications. First, at any time
manufacturers or equipment operators
may file a request for a permissive
change to their current equipment
authorizations demonstrating
compliance with the rules adopted. If
manufacturers of the previously
deployed equipment are able to
demonstrate compliance with the EIRP
requirement described, the Commission
will allow a permissive change with up
to 1 W of conducted power.
13. Second, for outdoor U–NII–3 band
systems installed prior to the effective
date of the rules adopted are not able to
E:\FR\FM\01MYR1.SGM
01MYR1
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 84 / Thursday, May 1, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
comply with the new EIRP
requirement,, the Commission suggested
the kind of information that could be
submitted to expedite consideration and
grant of a waiver of the new antenna
rules for existing devices. The
Commission determined that providing
the following about the waiver
petitioner’s existing deployments will
be important to its ability to assess
waiver requests: the number of devices
installed, general location of each
deployment, ability to reprogram the
devices, and ability to adjust operating
power from a central network
management system. The Commission
concluded that waiver requests meeting
these parameters and made within 30
days of the effective date of its rules are
likely to serve the public interest
because granting them is highly unlikely
to create any risk of harmful
interference, given the small numbers
involved and the limited departure from
the new technical requirements for the
U–NII–1 band. Moreover, having such
waiver petitioners provide information
about the numbers of installed devices
that would be covered by the grant, as
well as their general location, will help
the Commission monitor the accuracy of
its predictions in these regards and
allow the Commission to alter course or
take effective corrective action if
necessary. The Commission has
specifically delegated to the Office of
Engineering and Technology the
authority to grant waivers under these
favorable conditions. Following the 30day window, operators and
manufacturers may continue to file
petitions for waiver, but the
Commission will decide such petitions
without the assurances of good cause
provided by the described approach.
14. All parties receiving a waiver
must then demonstrate compliance with
the technical requirements through the
equipment certification process by filing
a permissive change request including
the approved waiver. There is no
deadline for filing for such a permissive
change.
15. The Commission will permit fixed
point-to-point devices operating in the
U–NII–1 band to employ transmitting
antennas with directional gain up to 23
dBi without any corresponding
reduction in the transmitter maximum
output power or maximum power
spectral density, and with no reduction
of power in the vertical direction. It will
not require these devices to reduce the
antenna gain in the vertical direction.
Such point-to-point operations are
typically highly directional and aim
their signals along the earth, and
therefore are less likely to contribute
significant energy to that received by the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:24 Apr 30, 2014
Jkt 232001
satellite. They are also relatively few in
numbers as compared to the widespread
distribution of access points examined
by Globalstar and NCTA.
16. The Commission will permit
indoor access points operating in the U–
NII–1 band at 1 W of conducted power
with a 6 dBi antenna gain and no
reduction in vertical antenna gain
coupled with a requirement for a 1 dB
reduction in conducted power for every
1 dB that the antenna gain exceeds 6
dBi. These types of consumer-oriented
devices should not contribute to
interference concerns, as the building
materials used in indoor environments
should sufficiently attenuate energy
transmitted from indoor devices to
prevent any significant contribution to
any noise rise seen by Globalstar’s
satellite.
17. The Commission will permit any
client device which operates under
control of an access point in the U–NII–
1 band to operate at conducted power
levels up to 250 mW and a PSD of 11
dBm/MHz with a 6 dBi gain antenna
without distinction to whether devices
are located indoor or outdoor; power
must be reduced by 1 dB for every dB
that the antenna gain exceeds 6 dBi.
These devices will not cause
interference to Globalstar’s MSS because
of their nature of operation. A client
device operates with an access point in
a very asymmetric nature, in that very
little data is transmitted in the uplink
direction (i.e. transmitted from the
client device) as compared to data
transmitted in the downlink direction
(i.e. transmitted from the access point).
Client devices are typically mobile or
portable, such as handsets or laptops
and tablets. These devices are not
typically installed in permanent outdoor
locations, and due to their mobile
nature the antenna gain in any
particular direction cannot be
guaranteed. Because client devices will
most often be used in indoor locations
with very low antenna heights any
emissions will be shielded to some
extent by buildings, foliage or other
obstructions. While many such devices
are able to operate in either a client
mode, hotspot mode or a peer-peer
mode, the Commission does not believe
that such peer-to-peer modes will be
used frequently or deployed as part of
an outdoor network; and thus, it will
permit mobile or portable client devices
to operate in either mode without
changing maximum power levels.
Finally, many client devices incorporate
power control features that cause the
device to use as little power necessary
to provide necessary communications.
These factors compound each other and
point to a very low impact from client
PO 00000
Frm 00045
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
24571
devices and the Commission does not
find a need to impose the antenna
requirements described for access
points.
18. The Commission notes that
Globalstar has the capability to monitor
increases in noise levels at its satellites,
and anticipates that Globalstar will
report any significant changes in the
noise levels and provide specific details
as to how it is affecting its operations.
The Commission also encourages all
interested parties to continue to
communicate regularly among each
other and with Commission staff
regarding developments in this band.
Security Features for All U–NII Bands
19. Because the current and future use
of the 5 GHz U–NII bands is heavily
reliant on the successful
implementation of the Commission’s
technical rules, the Commission
proposed to require that manufacturers
implement security features in any
digitally modulated device capable of
operating in any of the U–NII bands, so
that third parties are not able to
reprogram the device to operate outside
the parameters for which the device was
certified.
20. Because 5 GHz U–NII devices are
able to operate across such a wide swath
of spectrum, any device could
potentially be reprogrammed to operate
outside of its certified frequency range.
Accordingly, the Commission adopted
its proposal in the NPRM that
manufacturers must take steps to
prevent unauthorized software changes
to their equipment in all of the U–NII
bands. It leaves the precise methods of
ensuring the integrity of the software in
a radio to the manufacturer, but requires
the manufacturer to document those
methods in its application for
equipment authorization and declines to
set specific security protocol or
authentication requirements at this
time, so as not to hinder the
development of the technology used to
provide such security, or to be unduly
burdensome on manufacturers.
21. The Commission acknowledges
that it may have to specify more
detailed security requirements at a later
date as software driven radio technology
develops. The Commission directed
OET to provide guidance, through the
Knowledge Data Base (KDB) on what
types of security measures work
effectively, and what types do not, as
well as on the level of detail the FCC
will typically need to evaluate the
authorization request.
22. The Commission reiterated its
observation in the NPRM that some
radios are designed so that they can
communicate directly with each other,
E:\FR\FM\01MYR1.SGM
01MYR1
24572
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 84 / Thursday, May 1, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
rather than through a control point, and
thus they could function as either a
‘‘master’’ that initiates a network or as
a ‘‘client’’ device within the network.
The Commission also believes that it is
important to ensure that client devices
cannot be unlawfully reprogrammed to
perform the functions of an access
point. Thus, the Commission concludes
that all devices that operate under the
U–NII rules must be subject to the
device security requirements.
23. The Commission believes the
enhanced security measures will be
effective, and conclude that there is no
need for a reactive scheme such as
disabling devices that are modified or
tampered with, as urged by some
commenters. The Commission intends
to enforce its security protocol
requirement carefully and vigorously.
24. Transmitter ID. The Commission
declines to require U–NII devices to
transmit identifying information. While
the Commission’s experience in the
field has indicated that a transmitter ID
requirement would help to more quickly
identify and locate devices that cause
harmful interference, the Commission is
not persuaded that the benefits accrued
from such a requirement would
outweigh the costs to implement it at
this time. One of its primary goals
throughout this proceeding is to
prioritize eliminating the occurrence of
harmful interference in the first
instance. The Commission’s adoption of
enhanced security requirements,
directly addresses this priority, whereas
a transmitter identification requirement
does not. However, if harmful
interference continues to be a problem
the Commission will reevaluate the
costs and benefits associated with a
transmitter ID requirement, recognizing
that it may be necessary to implement
more costly solutions to eliminate the
harmful interference if devices
operating in the band continue to cause
harmful interference.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
U–NII–2 Bands
25. In addition to the security
requirements applicable to all U–NII
devices operating in the 5 GHz band
described, the Commission revised the
technical rules for operation in the U–
NII–2A and U–NII–2C bands to further
mitigate potential harmful interference
to TDWR and other radar systems that
operate in those bands. It also modified
the rules and updated its U–NII
compliance measurement procedures to
improve testing for radar detection and
eliminate certain outdated performance
tests.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:24 Apr 30, 2014
Jkt 232001
Interference Mitigation Techniques
26. To be certified for operation in the
U–NII–2A and U–NII–2C bands, devices
must include a DFS radar detection
function. In its field investigations, the
Commission’s Enforcement Bureau
found that certain models of devices
certified for use in these bands were
designed in a way that users were able
to disable the DFS mechanism. With the
DFS mechanism inactive, the device
could transmit on an active radar
channel and cause harmful interference.
In the NPRM the Commission therefore
proposed that manufacturers prevent
the DFS mechanism from being disabled
in devices certified to operate in the U–
NII–2A and U–NII–2C bands. It also
proposed that U–NII devices certified to
operate in these bands must be operated
with the DFS function on. The
Commission also noted in the NPRM
that the NTIA Third Technical Report
and its own discussions with NTIA,
FAA and industry representatives have
identified additional techniques that
could mitigate in-band and adjacent
band interference to incumbents. These
include increasing the sensing
frequency range (e.g., detection
bandwidth) of U–NII devices operating
in the U–NII–2A and U–NII–2C bands;
using a database registration process
combined with geo-location technology
to determine whether there is any
potential harmful interference to radar
systems such as the TDWR; and limiting
the unwanted emission levels of the U–
NII devices.
27. DFS Functionality. No
commenters opposed the Commission’s
proposal that DFS must be active for any
devices operating in the U–NII–2A and
U–NII–2C bands. The technical rules for
equipment authorized to operate in the
U–NII–2A and U–NII–2C bands already
require the implementation of DFS. The
requirement to preclude software
changes that would allow devices to
operate outside of their authorized
parameters includes the DFS
functionality. That is, the devices must
be designed to prohibit software
changes that would disable the DFS
functionality. The Commission also
modified its rules to explicitly prohibit
operators from using equipment without
operational DFS in the U–NII–2 bands,
and to require the DFS function to be
turned on when operating in these
bands. This explicit requirement will
help the Commission’s Enforcement
Bureau eliminate harmful interference
should they encounter modified
equipment in the field.
28. DFS Sensing Bandwidth. The
Commission modified its rules to
require U–NII devices to sense for radar
PO 00000
Frm 00046
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
signals at 100 percent of their emissions
bandwidth in U–NII–2A and U–NII–2C
bands, as proposed in the NPRM. The
current rule for sensing bandwidth
ensures co-channel interference
protection only when the radar signal
falls within 80 percent of the U–NII
device’s occupied bandwidth, and it is
thus possible for the U–NII device to
transmit on the same frequency as the
radar when the radar signal falls within
the 20 percent of occupied bandwidth
that does not require sensing. This
could result in transmissions from the
U–NII devices that fall within the
TDWR receiver bandwidth, which
would increase the potential for harmful
interference. Expanding the sensing
requirement to the entire occupied
bandwidth will prevent any and all cochannel operations between U–NII–2A,
U–NII–2C band devices and radars.
29. Geolocation/Database. The
Commission declines to adopt a geolocation database requirement that I
proposed in the NPRM for several
reasons. First, it is taking several actions
in this First R&O that would have
prevented most of the harmful
interference cases that it has observed to
date, and which will prevent future
interference cases. Second, the
Commission is making several changes
to its part 15 rules and compliance
measurement procedures to improve the
DFS functionality, thus further reducing
the harmful interference risk to TDWR
and other radar systems, e.g. increasing
the sensing bandwidth, modifying the
sensing threshold, and testing DFS
functions against a new radar waveform.
These changes will be sufficient for U–
NII devices to avoid radar systems
operating in these bands. Given these
considerations, the Commission agrees
with commenters that the incremental
benefit provided by implementing a geolocation/database approach as a
supplement to DFS is not sufficient to
justify the expense of doing so.
Additionally, permitting a geo-location/
database approach as an alternative to
requiring DFS functionality would also
present some practical concerns in
overall management of the interference
environment, since two different types
of devices would be operating under
different authorization procedures and
operating rules.
30. The Commission notes that
although it is not adopting a database
requirement, WISPA maintains a
database accessible to the public which
contains TDWR system locations and
the Commission actions in this First
R&O will not prevent the use of any
voluntary databases such as the one
implemented by WISPA.
E:\FR\FM\01MYR1.SGM
01MYR1
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 84 / Thursday, May 1, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
31. Out-of-Band Emissions in the U–
NII–2 Bands. In the NPRM, the
Commission noted that emissions
outside of the U–NII device’s occupied
bandwidth may have the potential to
cause harmful interference to TDWRs.
Aside from increasing frequency
separation or distance separation, U–NII
devices may avoid causing harmful
interference by lowering the emissions
on the radar’s fundamental frequency.
This equates to lowering all emissions
from U–NII devices at the frequencies
outside of the device’s operating
bandwidth. The Commission sought
comment on whether requiring lower
unwanted emission limits for U–NII
devices operating in the U–NII–2A and
UNII–2C bands was appropriate, and
whether it should modify the emission
limits based on findings in NTIA Third
Technical Report.
32. The Commission also sought
comment on modifying its rules to
adopt out-of-channel limits for indoor
versus outdoor U–NII devices, including
how it should define the terms ‘‘indoor’’
and ‘‘outdoor,’’ and how different
operating requirements for indoor
versus outdoor operations can be
accommodated through its equipment
authorization and enforcement
procedures.
33. The Commission declined to
adopt the proposals in the NPRM that
would have required reductions in outof-band emissions below the levels
currently allowed under § 15.407. In the
harmful interference cases that it has
investigated, it has not seen evidence
that problems are being caused by
unwanted emissions from properly
certified and properly functioning
equipment. Instead, the majority of
cases have been caused by devices that
have been modified to operate in
frequency bands in which they are not
certified to operate, or by devices in
which DFS had been disabled.
Consolidating the technical rules in the
U–NII–3 band, along with enhancing the
software security requirements of all U–
NII devices, would have prevented most
of the harmful interference cases that
has been observed to date. Accordingly,
the Commission agrees with
commenters that a reduction in
unwanted emissions from properly
certified and properly functioning
equipment would be overly restrictive
and would not provide any long-term
interference mitigation and that the
benefits of applying reduced emission
limits would be speculative, while the
costs imposed on manufacturers and
users are real and would result in
decreased equipment capabilities.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:24 Apr 30, 2014
Jkt 232001
Other U–NII–2 Rules and Measurement
Procedures
34. Sensing Threshold. The current
rules require that the DFS mechanism
continuously monitor the device’s
environment for the presence of radar,
both prior to and during operation,
using two detection thresholds to
ascertain whether radar signals were
present. The required threshold levels
are: (a) ¥62 dBm for lower power
devices with a maximum EIRP less than
200 mW (23 dBm), and (b) ¥64 dBm for
higher power devices with a maximum
EIRP between 200 mW (23 dBm) and 1
W (30 dBm), averaged over 1 ms. The
difference is due to the lesser range at
which the lower power devices can
potentially cause harmful interference.
In order to ensure that the potential for
harmful interference does not increase
with the use of the relaxed sensing
threshold, the Commission proposed in
the NPRM to apply a reduction in EIRP
spectral density for devices that use the
¥62 dBm sensing threshold.
35. The Commission adopted the
proposal it advanced in the NPRM to
revise the DFS sensing rules by
introducing a Power Spectral Density
(PSD) limit for devices that meet the
requirements for this relaxed sensing
threshold. It modified the rules to
require that devices operate with both
an EIRP of less than 200 mW (23 dBm),
and an EIRP spectral density of less than
10 dBm/MHz (10 mW/MHz), in order to
use the relaxed sensing detection
threshold of ¥62 dBm. Devices that do
not meet the proposed EIRP and EIRP
spectral density requirements must use
the ¥64 dBm sensing threshold. The
Commission also noted that a reduction
in the EIRP spectral density limit would
be consistent with recent actions taken
by European Telecommunications
Standards Institute (ETSI). Specifically,
ETSI chose to restrict a device’s use of
the relaxed sensing threshold by
reducing both the EIRP and the EIRP
spectral density to 23 dBm (200 mW)
and 10 dBm/MHz (10 mW/MHz),
respectively. This change will further
enhance protection for radars from cochannel interference by reducing both
the range and the in-band spectral
density of the U–NII devices that use the
relaxed sensing threshold.
36. Bin 1 Waveforms. U–NII devices
that operate in the U–NII–2A and the U–
NII–2C bands are certified using a
testing regime that considers how the
U–NII equipment responds to sample
waveforms that simulate typical
parameters that are used by radars that
operate in these bands. The radar
parameters are divided up into several
‘‘bins,’’ each representing a different
PO 00000
Frm 00047
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
24573
category of radar system. The
Commission is adopting its proposals
from the NPRM, to use an updated set
of ‘‘Bin-1’’ radar waveforms to be used
in certifying U–NII equipment. The new
waveforms are expected to account for
current and, to the extent possible,
future TDWR characteristics, and the
modifications in the Bin-1 radar
simulating waveform used in its
measurement procedures will reduce
the potential for co-channel interference
to the TDWR and other radar systems.
The Commission believes that these
changes will reduce the potential for cochannel interference to the TDWR and
other radar systems, and directed OET
to modify the Bin-1 radar simulating
waveform used in the 2006 DFS
Compliance Measurement Procedures.
Based on the reported co-channel
interference to TDWR, and its
investigations into complaints, the
Commission believes the modifications
to the test waveforms in the
measurement procedures are required.
The test waveforms proposed in the
NPRM were created by NTIA with input
from a number of agencies and with the
industry stakeholders after a long
evaluation period. The tests are a
generalized procedure and are not
intended to cover every radar device
exactly. In fact, all the test waveforms
were created by ‘‘mixing’’ a number of
radar types. Thus, they are not exact
representations, but a generalized view
of pulse types to be detected. In
practice, a U–NII device is expected to
detect any radar types and not just the
parameters used for test purposes and
thus, the Commission does not need to
include the specific parameters
requested by Baron Services.
37. Channel Spreading. With the
support of all commenters addressing
the issue, the Commission modified its
rules, as proposed in the NPRM, to
eliminate the last portion of
§ 15.407(h)(2) that requires that the DFS
process provide a uniform spreading of
the loading over all of the available
channels, and directed OET to update
the 2006 DFS Compliance Measurement
Procedures to remove the channel
spreading requirement. The Uniform
Channel Spreading requirement on DFS
is outdated and does not reflect the
current state and trajectory of wireless
technology, which is turning toward U–
NII devices which operate with ever
wider bandwidths such as contained in
the new 802.11ac standard. Operation
over wider bandwidths causes U–NII
energy to be spread throughout the
frequency band in which the device is
operating, rather than concentrated in a
narrow bandwidth, reducing the utility
E:\FR\FM\01MYR1.SGM
01MYR1
24574
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 84 / Thursday, May 1, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
of uniform channel-spreading
requirement. This rule modification will
give U–NII equipment manufacturers
significant flexibility to design and
develop radar avoidance methods, while
increasing effective use of the spectrum.
38. Channel Loading. With the
support of all parties that commented
on channel loading, the Commission
determined to remove the requirement
for using the MPEG test file (streaming
full motion video at 30 frames per
second) for testing of channel loading.
Given that there are a number of
affected devices that are not designed
for video use and therefore cannot be
effectively tested with a video-based
process, the Commission concluded that
a more flexible approach is warranted,
which permits channel-loading testing
to be performed using means
appropriate to the data types that are
used by the unlicensed device at issue.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
U–NII–3 Band Features
39. The Commission’s rules permit
the certification of devices that operate
in 5.725–5.85 GHz band under two
different rule sections. Section 15.247
was originally adopted in 1985 to
govern spread spectrum operations. The
U–NII rules were adopted in 1997 and
were designed to accommodate new
digital modulation technologies. In
2002, the Commission modified the
original spread spectrum rules to allow
digitally-modulated devices under
§ 15.247, but were not fully aligned with
the U–NII rules. The differences in these
rules has persisted and led to the
situation where devices were authorized
under the frequencies permitted under
§ 15.247 and then illegally modified to
operate on frequencies permitted only
for U–NII devices without complying
with the rules designed to prevent
interference to other radio services,
resulting in harmful interference to
TDWRs.
40. To provide for simplicity and
clarity in the rules and to eliminate the
scheme whereby unlicensed devices
authorized under the unlicensed rules
rather than the U–NII rules could then
be (illegally) modified to operate on U–
NII bands without U–NII compliance
and protection protocols, the
Commission adopted the NRPM
proposals for the U–NII–3 band with
one exception, it did not adopt an
antenna gain limit for point-to-point
devices. It adopted a single set of rules
for all devices in the U–NII–3 band, it
adopted the provisions from each
respective rule regimen which provides
for the most effective and efficient use
of spectrum while protecting
incumbents.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:24 Apr 30, 2014
Jkt 232001
41. First, the Commission extended
the upper edge of the U–NII–3 band
from 5.825 GHz to 5.85 GHz to match
the amount of spectrum available for
digitally-modulated devices under
§ 15.247. Second, it consolidated
§ 15.247 technical rules for digitallymodulated devices in the 5.725–5.85
GHz band with § 15.407 U–NII rules,
while maintaining many of the technical
rules that currently make equipment
authorization under § 15.247 more
attractive for equipment manufacturers.
It removed the 5.725–5.85 GHz band for
digital modulation devices from
§ 15.247 to ensure that all digitally
modulated equipment that are
technically similar operate under a
single set of technical rules in this band.
42. The Commission also adjusted the
rules for technical parameters such as
the frequency band of operation, the
power and power spectral density
limits, emission bandwidth, antenna
gain, unwanted emission limits, and the
peak to average ratio permitted in its
rules. It adopted a modified version of
its proposed rule for antenna gain to
retain the provisions for high-gain
point-to-point operations.
43. The Commission adopted its
proposal to consolidate the provisions
for operation in the 5.725–5.85 GHz
band into the U–NII rules under
§ 15.407. It expects this rule change to
decrease unnecessary complexity in the
equipment authorization process and
eliminate the incentives for gaming the
rules. More importantly, this change,
combined with the software security
changes the Commission adopted,
should help eliminate potential harmful
interference from unlicensed devices to
other spectrum users.
Power
44. Section 15.247 allows 1 Watt of
total peak conducted power whereas
§ 15.407 limits maximum conducted
output power to the lesser of 1 Watt or
17 dBm + 10 log B (where B is
bandwidth in MHz). In addition to the
1 Watt power limit, there are different
PSD limits in §§ 15.247 and 15.407 such
that 1 Watt of total power is available
only when the 6-dB bandwidth is 500
kilohertz or more under § 15.247 and
when the 26-dB bandwidth is 20
megahertz or more under § 15.407.
Because the Commission is trying to
accommodate digitally modulated
devices that are currently permitted
under both rules, it proposed in the
NPRM to remove the bandwidth
dependent term (i.e., remove 17 + 10 log
B) from § 15.407, so that the power limit
would be 1 Watt.
45. The Commission modified its
rules to remove the bandwidth-
PO 00000
Frm 00048
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
dependent term from § 15.407(a)(3) of
its rules, as proposed. As the
Commission initially suggested and the
majority of commenters agreed, utilizing
the 1 Watt power limit will not increase
the potential for harmful interference
because unlicensed devices are already
allowed to operate without the
bandwidth-dependent term under
§ 15.247.
Power Spectral Density
46. Section 15.247(e) permits a
maximum PSD of 8 dBm/3 kHz (33
dBm/MHz), whereas § 15.407(a)(3)
permits a maximum PSD of 17 dBm/
MHz. The difference between these two
PSD limits is the bandwidth at which
the device reaches the 1-Watt total
power limit. Specifically, § 15.247(e)
allows a higher PSD when the device
emission bandwidth is between 0.5 and
20 megahertz. Whenever devices use an
emission bandwidth above 20
megahertz, the 1 Watt power limit
becomes the limiting parameter, and the
effective PSD at which the device
operates is the same under both § 15.247
and 15.407. A PSD of 8dBm/3kHz
(33dBm/MHz) is equivalent to a PSD
that is higher than a total power limit of
1 Watt (30dBm).
47. The Commission did not adopt the
proposed PSD limit of 33dBm/MHz
because it would exceed the conducted
power limit of 1 Watt specified in
§ 15.247(b)(3), which it is incorporating
into the consolidated rule; the
Commission instead calculates a PSD
limit that can be practically measured
and would not be higher than the
conducted power limit of 30 dBm. The
Commission adjusts the 33 dBm/MHz
proposed in the NPRM by simply
converting the PSD into a smaller
bandwidth such that the power allowed
in that bandwidth does not exceed 30
dBm. The Commission modifies the
PSD limit by decreasing the power by 3
dB, and at the same time reduces the
bandwidth by half, making the PSD that
it adopted 30 dBm/500 kHz. Assuming
that emission levels are evenly
distributed throughout the bandwidth,
this is equivalent to the 8 dBm/3 kHz
(33 dBm/MHz) that was proposed in the
NPRM.
48. The Commission continues to
believe that the 3 kilohertz
measurement bandwidth is
unnecessary, as it creates an
exceedingly long time for labs to
complete the measurements for devices
that use 20 megahertz or even wider
channels. With the introduction of 80
and 160 megahertz channels with the
IEEE 802.11 ac standard, the time to
complete a single measure would
increase significantly. Because the
E:\FR\FM\01MYR1.SGM
01MYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 84 / Thursday, May 1, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
Commission adopted a PSD limit in a
500 kHz bandwidth, it modified the
measurement procedures to
correspondingly be performed using a
500 kHz reference bandwidth. Likewise,
the Commission modified § 15.407(a)(5)
to specify a 500 kHz reference
bandwidth for the U–NII–3 band. This
will allow measurements of unlicensed
devices being certified for operation in
the U–NII–3 band to be performed in a
timely manner, resulting in efficiencies
and cost savings for manufacturers, test
facilities, and ultimately to consumers.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
Emission Bandwidth
49. Section 15.247(a)(2) requires a
minimum 6 dB bandwidth of 500
kilohertz. Section 15.407 has no
minimum or maximum bandwidth, but
the emission bandwidth is defined and
measured at the 26 dB down points of
the U–NII signal and is used to
determine the total power allowed
under that rule.
50. The Commission concludes that
using a minimum 6 dB bandwidth of
500 kilohertz will continue to provide
sufficient flexibility to foster
development, frequency sharing and
frequency reuse in the band, and it
modified § 15.407 to include that
minimum-bandwidth requirement, in
order to help ensure that the band does
not become congested with narrowbandwidth applications for which other
spectrum could be available.
Antenna Gain
51. Under the antenna gain
requirements in § 15.247, a 1 dB
reduction in power is required for every
1 dB that the antenna gain exceeds 6
dBi, except for fixed point-to-point
systems, for which no power reduction
is required. Under § 15.407, a 1 dB
reduction in power is similarly required
for every 1 dB that the antenna gain
exceeds 6 dBi, but for fixed point-topoint systems, a 1 dB reduction in
power is required for every 1 dB that the
antenna gain exceeds 23 dBi.
52. The Commission declined to
adopt its initial proposal to conform to
the provisions of § 15.407 which restrict
require reduced power for high-gain
antennas, and instead will conform the
rules for U–NII–3 devices to those
presently in § 15.247 to continue to
permit the use of unlicensed high-gain
point-to-point antennas. This will allow
service providers to deploy costeffective wireless links in what would
otherwise be considered high cost areas,
and allow for the quick setup and
transitioning of unlicensed and licensed
microwave links.
53. The Commission finds that
Fastback’s proposal to permit higher
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:24 Apr 30, 2014
Jkt 232001
24575
antenna gain for point-to-multipoint
systems would be an expansion of usage
in the U–NII–3 band, and is beyond the
scope of the rulemaking.
Unwanted Emissions
54. Section 15.247(d) requires 20 dB
of attenuation (30 dB if the alternate
measurement procedure detailed in
§ 15.247(b)(3) is used) for unwanted
emissions. In restricted bands,
emissions must meet the § 15.209
general emission limits. Section 15.407
requires unwanted emissions to be
below ¥17 dBm/MHz within 10
megahertz of the band edge, and below
¥27 dBm/MHz beyond 10 megahertz of
the band edge. Also, all emissions below
1 GHz must comply with the § 15.209
general emission limits. These
unwanted emission limits are somewhat
more restrictive than those in § 15.247.
55. The Commission adopted the
more restrictive unwanted emissions
limits in § 15.407 for the combined new
rule, rather than the more lenient
unwanted emissions limit currently in
§ 15.247 for several reasons. The more
stringent unwanted emissions
requirement will ensure that there is no
increase in the potential for harmful
interference from unlicensed devices
operating under the new combined rule
parts. Additionally, this decision is
consistent with the determination to
apply the § 15.407 out-of-band emission
levels in the U–NII–2 bands, and having
a single limit for devices that operate in
any U–NII band will provide clarity and
simplicity. The record shows broad
support for adopting the tighter
unwanted-emissions limits of § 15.407
limits. The Commission recognizes that
high gain point-to-point system certified
under § 15.247 may have to be modified
to comply with the lower out-of-band
emissions limit from § 15.407.
Manufacturers have the flexibility to
determine how they should meet the
lower out-of-band emissions limit.
portion of hybrid devices in the 5725–
5850 MHz band. The digitally
modulated portion of hybrid devices
will have to meet the modified U–NII
rules for this band.
Adoption of Miscellaneous Rule
Modifications
58. The NPRM proposed several rule
modifications to simplify and clarify
various Part 15 rules. The Commission
determines that several sections of the
rules referenced procedures or
provisions that are no longer in use and
therefore, are no longer necessary and
others with inconsistent terminology. In
§ 15.403(m) the Commission replaced
‘‘Peak Power Spectral Density’’ with
‘‘Maximum Power Spectral Density.’’ In
addition, the Commission deleted ‘‘peak
or’’ from § 15.403(o) for clarity. It also
deleted ‘‘peak or’’ from § 15.403(o) for
clarity. The Commission also deleted
§ 15.247(b)(4)(i) through (b)(4)(ii) to
eliminate repetitive language that was
found in § 15.247(c)(1)(i) through
(c)(1)(iii).
59. In § 15.407 the Commission
deleted the second sentence in
paragraph (a)(4) because it contains
language that is no longer relevant. It
also corrected the wording in
paragraphs (a)(2) and (a)(5) by replacing
‘‘peak’’ with ‘‘maximum.’’ The
Commission also corrected the wording
in paragraph (b)(8) by replacing ‘‘block
edges’’ with ‘‘band edges.’’ The
Commission also clarified rule
§ 15.215(c) to allow the operation of a
U–NII device over multiple channels/
bands. U–NII Band straddling in the 5
GHz region of U–NII spectrum is
allowed and applies to 802.11ac bonded
80 megahertz and 160 megahertz
channels. It also modified § 15.407(h)(2)
to clarify the language for DFS
requirements once the emission
bandwidth of a U–NII device is
straddled across multiple U–NII bands.
Peak-to-Average Power Ratio
56. Section 15.407 contains a
requirement to maintain a peak-toaverage power ratio of no more than 13
dB across any 1 megahertz band,
whereas § 15.247 contain no peak-toaverage ratio requirement. The
Commission did not adopt the proposal
in the NPRM to keep the peak-to-average
ratio requirement, agreeing with
commenters that this measurement is no
longer necessary.
Hybrid Devices
57. The Commission will continue to
authorize under § 15.247 frequency
hopping spread spectrum devices and
the frequency hopping spread spectrum
PO 00000
Frm 00049
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Transition Periods
60. The Commission adopted its
proposal to require that 12 months after
the effective date of this First R&O,
applications for certification of devices
must meet the new and modified rules
adopted. The manufacture, marketing,
sale and importation into the United
States of devices that do not meet the
new or modified rules adopted must
cease two years after the effective date
of this First R&O. While the
Commission is sympathetic to the
arguments that the more restrictive
unwanted emission limits for digital
modulation devices may present design
challenges for some manufacturers, the
Commission finds that it is in the public
interest to implement the changes as
E:\FR\FM\01MYR1.SGM
01MYR1
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
24576
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 84 / Thursday, May 1, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
soon as possible to eliminate the
potential of harmful interference to
incumbents.
61. Grandfathered devices must
continue to employ DFS as required in
§ 15.407(h)(2). Devices operating in the
U–NII–2A or U–NII–2C bands that do
not have DFS or that have DFS turned
off are not compliant with the part 15
rules, and any operators who use such
devices may be subject to a f forfeiture.
Large numbers of 5 GHz U–NII devices
are already in the marketplace and pose
no threat of harmful interference unless
they are modified in violation of the
Commission’s rules. However, should
these devices be modified and cause
harmful interference to TDWR or any
other incumbent systems, the FCC
Enforcement Bureau will continue its
aggressive approach to ensuring
compliance with the Commission’s
rules.
62. Since 2010, the Commission has
been certifying U–NII–2C devices under
interim procedures which require that
the 5.6–5.65 GHz band be notched out,
and that certain devices within 35 km
of a TDWR location be separated by at
least 30 MHz (center-to-center) from the
TDWR operating frequency. The
Commission will permit U–NII–2C, i.e.,
devices operating in the 5470–5725
MHz band, to be certified either under
these interim procedures or the new
rules adopted herein for 12 months after
the effective date of this First R&O. After
12 months, all U–NII–2C devices must
meet the new rules in order to be
certified.
63. The Commission adopted its
proposal to no longer allow Class II
permissive changes for devices certified
under either the old rules, or the U–NII–
2C interim procedures, after two years
unless they meet the new rules adopted
here. Devices may continue to apply for
Class II permissive changes that
demonstrate compliance with the old
rules for only up to two years after the
effective date of the new rules.
However, the Commission feels that it is
in the public interest to continue to
allow indefinitely Class II permissive
changes to devices certified under the
old rules in some instances. The
Commission will therefore allow
devices certified under the old rules, or
U–NII–2C interim procedures, prior to
the 12-month effective date of the new
rules, to demonstrate compliance with
the new or modified rules through Class
II permissive changes.
64. The Commission will continue to
allow digital modulation equipment and
the digital modulation portion of hybrid
devices, i.e., those that can function as
either spread spectrum or digitally
modulated systems, operating in the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:24 Apr 30, 2014
Jkt 232001
5.725–5.85 GHz band to be certified to
meet the § 15.247 requirements for 12
months after the effective date of the
new rules. After 12 months, digital
modulation devices and the digital
modulation portion of hybrid devices
must meet the new § 15.407 U–NII–3
rules in order to be FCC certified. The
frequency hopping spread spectrum
portion of hybrid devices will continue
to be certified under the § 15.247 spread
spectrum rules. The manufacture,
marketing, sale and importation into the
United States of digitally modulated and
hybrid devices certified under § 15.247
operating in the 5.725–5.85 GHz band
must cease two years after the effective
date of this 1st R&O. Additionally, for
up to two years after the effective date
of these new rules they may apply for
Class II permissive changes to
demonstrate compliance with the old
rules. After two years, these devices
must be certified to meet the new rules
and Class II permissive changes may
only be made if these devices meet the
new rules as well.
Procedural Matters
65. Paperwork Reduction Analysis.
This document contains modified
information collection requirements
subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995 (PRA), Public Law 104–13. It
will be submitted to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for
review under section 3507(d) of the
PRA. OMB, the general public, and
other Federal agencies are invited to
comment on the new or modified
information collection requirements
contained in this proceeding. This
collection of information will be
covered under (OMB 3060–0057
Equipment Authorization).
Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
66. As required by the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (RFA),1 an Initial
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (IRFA)
was incorporated in the Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) in ET
Docket No. 13–49.2 The Commission
sought written public comment on the
proposals in the NPRM, including
comment on the IRFA. This present
Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
(FRFA) conforms to the RFA.
1 See 5 U.S.C. 603. The RFA, see 5 U.S.C. 60–612,
has been amended by the Small Business
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1966
(SBREFA), Public Law 104–121, Title II, 110 Stat.
857 (1996), and the Small Business Jobs Act of
2010, Public Law 111–240, 124 Stat. 2504 (2010).
2 See Revision of part 15 of the Commission’s
rules to Permit Unlicensed National Information
Infrastructure (U–NII) Devices in the 5 GHz Band
in ET Docket No. 13–49, Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking, 28 FCC Rcd. 1769 (2013) (NPRM).
PO 00000
Frm 00050
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
A. Need for, and Objectives of, the
Report and Order
67. The First Report and Order
amends the regulations for Information
Unlicensed National Information
Infrastructure (U–NII) devices which
operate in the 5 GHz band.3 U–NII
devices are unlicensed intentional
radiators which use wideband digital
modulation techniques to provide a
wide array of high data rate mobile and
fixed communications used by
individuals, businesses, and
institutions.4 As discussed, the
Commission modified certain technical
requirements in its rules for all U–NII
devices to ensure that these devices do
not cause harmful interference to
Terminal Doppler Weather Radar
(TDWR) systems and other radar
systems that operate in the 5 GHz band.
It is also extending the upper edge of the
5.725–5.825 GHz U–NII band from 5.825
GHz to 5.85 GHz and consolidating the
provisions formerly applicable to
digitally modulated devices under
§ 15.247 of the rules for this band with
the U–NII rules in § 15.407. This change
will eliminate a loophole in the former
rules that allowed devices to be certified
under the § 15.247 rules and then
modified to operate as U–NII devices
without complying with all of the
technical requirements of the U–NII
rules—a practice that was shown to be
a major source of harmful interference
to TDWRs. Finally, the Commission is
removing the indoor only restriction
and increasing the permitted power for
U–NII devices in the 5.15–5.25 GHz
band thus increasing the amount of
spectrum available for next generation
Wi-Fi services by 100 megahertz.
B. Significant Issues Raised by Public
Comments in Response to the IRFA
68. There were no public comments
filed that specifically addressed the
rules and policies proposed in the IRFA.
C. Response to Comments by the Chief
Counsel for Advocacy of the Small
Business Administration
69. Pursuant to the Small Business
Jobs Act of 2010, the Commission is
required to respond to any comments
filed by the Chief Counsel for Advocacy
of the Small Business Administration,
and to provide a detailed statement of
any change made to the proposed rules
as a result of those comments. The Chief
Counsel did not file any comments in
response to the proposed rules in this
proceeding.
3 See 47 CFR part 15 Subpart E—Unlicensed
National Information Infrastructure Devices.
4 See 47 CFR 15.403(s).
E:\FR\FM\01MYR1.SGM
01MYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 84 / Thursday, May 1, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
D. Description and Estimate of the
Number of Small Entities to Which the
Rules Will Apply
70. The RFA directs agencies to
provide a description of, and, where
feasible, an estimate of the number of
small entities that may be affected by
the proposed rules, if adopted.5 The
RFA defines the term ‘‘small entity’’ as
having the same meaning as the terms
‘‘small business,’’ ‘‘small organization,’’
and ‘‘small business concern’’ under
section 3 of the Small Business Act.6
Under the Small Business Act, a ‘‘small
business concern’’ is one that: (1) is
independently owned and operated; (2)
is not dominant in its field of
operations; and (3) meets may
additional criteria established by the
Small Business Administration (SBA).7
E. Small Businesses, Small
Organizations, and Small Governmental
Jurisdictions
71. The Commission’s action may,
over time, affect small entities that are
not easily categorized at present. It
therefore describes here, at the outset,
three comprehensive, statutory small
entity size standards that encompass
entities that could be directly affected
by the proposals under consideration.8
As of 2009, small businesses
represented 99.9% of the 27.5 million
businesses in the United States,
according to the SBA.9 Additionally, a
‘‘small organization’’ is generally ‘‘any
not-for-profit enterprise which is
independently owned and operated and
is not dominant in its field.’’ 10
Nationwide, as of 2007, there were
approximately 1,621,315 small
organizations.11 Finally, the term ‘‘small
governmental jurisdiction’’ is defined
generally as ‘‘governments of cities,
counties, towns, townships, villages,
school districts, or special districts, with
a population of less than fifty
thousand.’’ 12 Census Bureau data for
2007 indicate that there were 89,527
governmental jurisdictions in the
United States.13 The Commission
estimates that, of this total, as many as
88,761 entities may qualify as ‘‘small
5 See
5 U.S.C. 603(b)(3).
601(3).
7 Id. 632.
8 See 5 U.S.C. 601(3)–(6).
9 See SBA, Office of Advocacy, ‘‘Frequently
Asked Questions,’’ available at https://web.sba.gov/
faqs/faqindex.cfm?areaID=24 (last visited Aug. 31,
2012).
10 5 U.S.C. 601(4).
11 Independent Sector, The New Nonprofit
Almanac & Desk Reference (2010).
12 5 U.S.C. 601(5).
13 U.S. CENSUS BUREAU, STATISTICAL
ABSTRACT OF THE UNITED STATES: 2011, Table
427 (2007).
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
6 Id.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
19:07 Apr 30, 2014
Jkt 232001
governmental jurisdictions.’’ 14 Thus,
the Commission estimates that most
governmental jurisdictions are small.
72. The adopted rules pertain to
manufacturers of unlicensed
communications devices. The
appropriate small business size standard
is that which the SBA has established
for radio and television broadcasting
and wireless communications
equipment manufacturing. The Census
Bureau defines this category as follows:
‘‘This industry comprises
establishments primarily engaged in
manufacturing radio and television
broadcast and wireless communications
equipment. Examples of products made
by these establishments are:
transmitting and receiving antennas,
cable television equipment, GPS
equipment, pagers, cellular phones,
mobile communications equipment, and
radio and television studio and
broadcasting equipment.’’ 15 The SBA
has developed a small business size
standard for firms in this category,
which is: all such firms having 750 or
fewer employees.16 According to Census
Bureau data for 2007, there were a total
of 939 establishments in this category
that operated for part or all of the entire
year. Of this total, 784 had less than 500
employees and 155 had more than 100
employees.17 Thus, under this size
14 The 2007 U.S Census data for small
governmental organizations are not presented based
on the size of the population in each such
organization. There were 89,476 local governmental
organizations in 2007. If the Commission assumes
that county, municipal, township, and school
district organizations are more likely than larger
governmental organizations to have populations of
50,000 or less, the total of these organizations is
52,095. If the Commission makes the same
population assumption about special districts,
specifically that they are likely to have a population
of 50,000 or less, and also assume that special
districts are different from county, municipal,
township, and school districts, in 2007 there were
37,381 such special districts. Therefore, there are a
total of 89,476 local government organizations. As
a basis of estimating how many of these 89,476
local government organizations were small, in 2011,
the Commission notes that there were a total of 715
cities and towns (incorporated places and minor
civil divisions) with populations over 50,000. CITY
AND TOWNS TOTALS: VINTAGE 2011—U.S.
Census Bureau, available at https://www.census.gov/
popest/data/cities/totals/2011/. If the
Commission subtracts the 715 cities and towns that
meet or exceed the 50,000 population threshold, the
Commission concludes that approximately 88,761
are small. U.S. CENSUS BUREAU, STATISTICAL
ABSTRACT OF THE UNITED STATES 2011, Tables
427, 426 (Data cited therein are from 2007).
15 U.S. Census Bureau, 2007 NAICS Definitions,
‘‘334220 Radio and Television Broadcasting and
Wireless Communications Equipment
Manufacturing’’; https://www.census.gov/naics/
2007/def/ND334220.HTM#N334220.
16 13 CFR 121.201, NAICS code 334220.
17 https://factfinder.census.gov/servlet/
IBQTable?_bm=y&-fds_name=EC0700A1&-geo_
id=&-_skip=300&-ds_name=EC0731SG2&-_lang=en.
PO 00000
Frm 00051
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
24577
standard, the majority of firms can be
considered small.
F. Description of Projected Reporting,
Record keeping and Other Compliance
Requirements
73. The Report and Order contains a
non-substantial modification to the
information collection requirements.
The rules adopted in this First Report
and Order will apply to small
businesses that choose to use,
manufacture, design, import, or sell part
15 U–NII devices. There is no
requirement, however, for any entity to
use, market, or produce these types of
products. Small businesses are already
subject to the existing rules with regard
to reporting, record keeping and other
compliance requirements related to U–
NII devices. The rules adopted in this
First Report and Order do not add
substantial additional compliance
burden on small businesses.
G. Steps Taken To Minimize Significant
Economic Impact on Small Entities and
Significant Alternatives Considered
74. The RFA requires an agency to
describe any significant alternatives that
it has considered in reaching its
proposed approach, which may include
the following four alternatives (among
others): (1) The establishment of
differing compliance or reporting
requirements or timetables that take into
account the resources available to small
entities; (2) the clarification,
consolidation, or simplification of
compliance or reporting requirements
under the rule for small entities; (3) the
use of performance, rather than design,
standards; and (4) an exemption from
coverage of the rule, or any part thereof,
for small entities.18
75. In this First Report and Order, the
Commission modified its rules for
Unlicensed National Information
Infrastructure (U–NII) devices which
operate in the 5 GHz band.19 U–NII
devices are unlicensed intentional
radiators which use wideband digital
modulation techniques to provide a
wide array of high data rate mobile and
fixed communications used by
individuals, businesses, and
institutions.20 As discussed, the
Commission is modifying certain
technical requirements in its rules for
all U–NII devices to ensure that these
devices do not cause harmful
interference to Terminal Doppler
Weather Radar (TDWR) systems and
other radar systems that operate in the
18 5
U.S.C. 603(c).
47 CFR part 15 Subpart E—Unlicensed
National Information Infrastructure Devices.
20 See 47 CFR 15.403(s).
19 See
E:\FR\FM\01MYR1.SGM
01MYR1
24578
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 84 / Thursday, May 1, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
5 GHz band. The Commission also
extends the upper edge of the 5.725–
5.825 GHz U–NII band from 5.825 GHz
to 5.85 GHz and consolidates the
provisions formerly applicable to
digitally modulated devices under
§ 15.247 of the rules for this band with
the U–NII rules in § 15.407. This change
will eliminate a loophole in the former
rules that allowed devices to be certified
under the § 15.247 rules and then
modified to operate as U–NII devices
without complying with all of the
technical requirements of the U–NII
rules—a practice that was shown to be
a major source of harmful interference
to TDWRs. Finally, the Commission is
removing the indoor only restriction
and increasing the permitted power for
U–NII devices in the 5.15–5.25 GHz
band thus increasing the amount of
spectrum available for next generation
Wi-Fi services by 100 megahertz.
79. The Office of Engineering and
Technology is delegated authority to
grant waivers of the antenna
requirements adopted herein consistent
with the terms of this Order.
80. The Commission’s Consumer and
Governmental Affairs Bureau, Reference
Information Center, shall send a copy of
this First Report and Order, including
the Final Regulatory Flexibility
Analysis, to the Chief Counsel for
Advocacy of the Small Business
Administration.
81. The Office of Engineering and
Technology shall publish, consistent
with the terms of this Report and Order,
measurement procedures that will be
used for certifying equipment that will
operate in the 5.15–5.35 GHz and 5.47–
5.85 GHz bands.
List of Subjects in 47 CFR Parts 2 and
15
Communications equipment, Radio.
Report to Congress
76. The Commission will send a copy
of the Report and Order, including this
FRFA, in a report to be sent to Congress
pursuant to the Congressional Review
Act.21 In addition, the Commission will
send a copy of the Report and Order,
including this FRFA, to the Chief
Counsel for Advocacy of the SBA. A
copy of the Report and Order and FRFA
(or summaries thereof) will also be
published in the Federal Register.22
Congressional Review Act
77. The Commission will send a copy
of this Report and Order to Congress
and the Government Accountability
Office pursuant to the Congressional
Review Act, see 5 U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A).
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
Ordering Clauses
22 See
16:24 Apr 30, 2014
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, the Federal Communications
Commission amends 47 CFR parts 2 and
15 of the Code of Federal Regulations to
read as follows:
PART 2—FREQUENCY ALLOCATIONS
AND RADIO TREATY MATTERS;
GENERAL RULES AND REGULATIONS
1. The authority citation for part 2
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154, 302a, 303, and
336, unless otherwise noted.
2. Section 2.1033 is amended by
adding paragraph (b)(13) to read as
follows:
§ 2.1033
Application for certification.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * * * *
(13) Applications for certification of
U–NII devices in the 5.15–5.35 GHz and
the 5.47–5.85 GHz bands must include
a high level operational description of
the security procedures that control the
radio frequency operating parameters
and ensure that unauthorized
modifications cannot be made.
*
*
*
*
*
PART 15—RADIO FREQUENCY
DEVICES
3. The authority citation for part 15
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154, 302a, 303, 304,
307, 336, 544a, and 549.
5 U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A).
5 U.S.C. 604(b).
VerDate Mar<15>2010
Final Rules
■
78. Pursuant to sections 4(i), 301, 302,
303(e), 303(f), 303(g), and 303(r) of the
Communications Act of 1934, as
amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 301, 302a,
303(e), 303(f), 303(g), and 303(r), this
First Report and Order is hereby
adopted and parts 2 and 15 of the
Commission’s rules are amended as set
forth in Final rules, effective June 2,
2014, except for § 15.407(j), which
contains information collection
requirements subject to the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104–
13, that are not effective until approved
by the Office of Management and
Budget. The Federal Communications
Commission will publish a document in
the Federal Register announcing OMB
approval and the effective date of this
rule.
21 See
Federal Communications Commission.
Sheryl D. Todd,
Deputy Secretary.
Jkt 232001
PO 00000
Frm 00052
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
4. Section 15.37 is amended by adding
new paragraph (h) to read as follows:
■
§ 15.37 Transition provisions for
compliance with the rules.
*
*
*
*
*
(h) Effective June 2, 2015 devices
using digital modulation techniques in
the 5725–5850 MHz bands will no
longer be certified under the provisions
of § 15.247. The technical requirements
for obtaining certification after this date
for digitally modulated devices and the
digitally modulated portion of hybrid
devices are found in subpart E of this
part. The provisions for the frequency
hopping spread spectrum portion of
hybrid devices will remain in § 15.247.
Effective June 2, 2016 systems using
digital modulation techniques in the
5725–5850 MHz band certified under
the provisions of § 15.247 may no longer
be imported or marketed within the
United States.
5. Section 15.215 is amended by
revising paragraph (c) to read as follows:
■
§ 15.215 Additional provisions to the
general radiated emission limitations.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) Intentional radiators operating
under the alternative provisions to the
general emission limits, as contained in
§§ 15.217 through 15.257 and in subpart
E of this part, must be designed to
ensure that the 20 dB bandwidth of the
emission, or whatever bandwidth may
otherwise be specified in the specific
rule section under which the equipment
operates, is contained within the
frequency band designated in the rule
section under which the equipment is
operated. In the case of intentional
radiators operating under the provisions
of subpart E, the emission bandwidth
may span across multiple contiguous
frequency bands identified in that
subpart. The requirement to contain the
designated bandwidth of the emission
within the specified frequency band
includes the effects from frequency
sweeping, frequency hopping and other
modulation techniques that may be
employed as well as the frequency
stability of the transmitter over expected
variations in temperature and supply
voltage. If a frequency stability is not
specified in the regulations, it is
recommended that the fundamental
emission be kept within at least the
central 80% of the permitted band in
order to minimize the possibility of outof-band operation.
6. Section 15.247 is amended by
removing paragraphs (b)(4)(i), (ii) and
(iii), and by revising paragraph (f) to
read as follows:
■
E:\FR\FM\01MYR1.SGM
01MYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 84 / Thursday, May 1, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
§ 15.247 Operation within the bands 902–
928 MHz, 2400–2483.5 MHz, and 5725–5850
MHz.
*
*
*
*
*
(f) For the purposes of this section,
hybrid systems are those that employ a
combination of both frequency hopping
and digital modulation techniques. The
frequency hopping operation of the
hybrid system, with the direct sequence
or digital modulation operation turnedoff, shall have an average time of
occupancy on any frequency not to
exceed 0.4 seconds within a time period
in seconds equal to the number of
hopping frequencies employed
multiplied by 0.4. The power spectral
density conducted from the intentional
radiator to the antenna due to the digital
modulation operation of the hybrid
system, with the frequency hopping
operation turned off, shall not be greater
than 8 dBm in any 3 kHz band during
any time interval of continuous
transmission.
Note to paragraph (f): The transition
provisions found in § 15.37(h) will apply to
hybrid devices beginning June 2, 2015.
*
*
*
*
*
7. Section 15.401 is revised to read as
follows:
■
§ 15.401
Scope.
This subpart sets out the regulations
for unlicensed National Information
Infrastructure (U–NII) devices operating
in the 5.15–5.35 GHz, 5.47–5.725 GHz
and 5.725–5.85 GHz bands.
■ 8. Section 15.403 is amended by
revising paragraphs (m), (o) and (s) to
read as follows:
§ 15.403
Definitions.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
*
*
*
*
*
(m) Maximum Power Spectral
Density. The maximum power spectral
density is the maximum power spectral
density, within the specified
measurement bandwidth, within the U–
NII device operating band.
*
*
*
*
*
(o) Power Spectral Density. The power
spectral density is the total energy
output per unit bandwidth from a pulse
or sequence of pulses for which the
transmit power is at its maximum level,
divided by the total duration of the
pulses. This total time does not include
the time between pulses during which
the transmit power is off or below its
maximum level.
*
*
*
*
*
(s) U–NII devices. Intentional
radiators operating in the frequency
bands 5.15–5.35 GHz and 5.470–5.85
GHz that use wideband digital
modulation techniques and provide a
wide array of high data rate mobile and
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:24 Apr 30, 2014
Jkt 232001
fixed communications for individuals,
businesses, and institutions.
■ 9. Section 15.407 is amended by
revising paragraphs (a)(1) through (a)(5),
(b) introductory text, (b)(1) through
(b)(4), (b)(8), (e), and (h)(2), and
removing paragraph (a)(6) and by
adding new paragraph (i) and (j) to read
as follows:
§ 15.407
General technical requirements.
(a) * * *
(1) For the band 5.15–5.25 GHz.
(i) For an outdoor access point
operating in the band 5.15–5.25 GHz,
the maximum conducted output power
over the frequency band of operation
shall not exceed 1 W provided the
maximum antenna gain does not exceed
6 dBi. In addition, the maximum power
spectral density shall not exceed 17
dBm in any 1 megahertz band. If
transmitting antennas of directional gain
greater than 6 dBi are used, both the
maximum conducted output power and
the maximum power spectral density
shall be reduced by the amount in dB
that the directional gain of the antenna
exceeds 6 dBi. The maximum e.i.r.p. at
any elevation angle above 30 degrees as
measured from the horizon must not
exceed 125 mW (21 dBm).
(ii) For an indoor access point
operating in the band 5.15–5.25 GHz,
the maximum conducted output power
over the frequency band of operation
shall not exceed 1 W provided the
maximum antenna gain does not exceed
6 dBi. In addition, the maximum power
spectral density shall not exceed 17
dBm in any 1 megahertz band. If
transmitting antennas of directional gain
greater than 6 dBi are used, both the
maximum conducted output power and
the maximum power spectral density
shall be reduced by the amount in dB
that the directional gain of the antenna
exceeds 6 dBi.
(iii) For fixed point-to-point access
points operating in the band 5.15–5.25
GHz, the maximum conducted output
power over the frequency band of
operation shall not exceed 1 W. Fixed
point-to-point U–NII devices may
employ antennas with directional gain
up to 23 dBi without any corresponding
reduction in the maximum conducted
output power or maximum power
spectral density. For fixed point-topoint transmitters that employ a
directional antenna gain greater than 23
dBi, a 1 dB reduction in maximum
conducted output power and maximum
power spectral density is required for
each 1 dB of antenna gain in excess of
23 dBi. Fixed, point-to-point operations
exclude the use of point-to-multipoint
systems, omnidirectional applications,
and multiple collocated transmitters
PO 00000
Frm 00053
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
24579
transmitting the same information. The
operator of the U–NII device, or if the
equipment is professionally installed,
the installer, is responsible for ensuring
that systems employing high gain
directional antennas are used
exclusively for fixed, point-to-point
operations.
(iv) For mobile and portable client
devices in the 5.15–5.25 GHz band, the
maximum conducted output power over
the frequency band of operation shall
not exceed 250 mW provided the
maximum antenna gain does not exceed
6 dBi. In addition, the maximum power
spectral density shall not exceed 11
dBm in any 1 megahertz band. If
transmitting antennas of directional gain
greater than 6 dBi are used, both the
maximum conducted output power and
the maximum power spectral density
shall be reduced by the amount in dB
that the directional gain of the antenna
exceeds 6 dBi.
(2) For the 5.25–5.35 GHz and 5.47–
5.725 GHz bands, the maximum
conducted output power over the
frequency bands of operation shall not
exceed the lesser of 250 mW or 11 dBm
10 log B, where B is the 26 dB emission
bandwidth in megahertz. In addition,
the maximum power spectral density
shall not exceed 11 dBm in any 1
megahertz band. If transmitting
antennas of directional gain greater than
6 dBi are used, both the maximum
conducted output power and the
maximum power spectral density shall
be reduced by the amount in dB that the
directional gain of the antenna exceeds
6 dBi.
(3) For the band 5.725–5.85 GHz, the
maximum conducted output power over
the frequency band of operation shall
not exceed 1 W. In addition, the
maximum power spectral density shall
not exceed 30 dBm in any 500-kHz
band. If transmitting antennas of
directional gain greater than 6 dBi are
used, both the maximum conducted
output power and the maximum power
spectral density shall be reduced by the
amount in dB that the directional gain
of the antenna exceeds 6 dBi. However,
fixed point-to-point U–NII devices
operating in this band may employ
transmitting antennas with directional
gain greater than 6 dBi without any
corresponding reduction in transmitter
conducted power. Fixed, point-to-point
operations exclude the use of point-tomultipoint systems, omnidirectional
applications, and multiple collocated
transmitters transmitting the same
information. The operator of the U–NII
device, or if the equipment is
professionally installed, the installer, is
responsible for ensuring that systems
employing high gain directional
E:\FR\FM\01MYR1.SGM
01MYR1
24580
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 84 / Thursday, May 1, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
antennas are used exclusively for fixed,
point-to-point operations.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
Note to paragraph (a)(3): The Commission
strongly recommends that parties employing
U–NII devices to provide critical
communications services should determine if
there are any nearby Government radar
systems that could affect their operation.
(4) The maximum conducted output
power must be measured over any
interval of continuous transmission
using instrumentation calibrated in
terms of an rms-equivalent voltage.
(5) The maximum power spectral
density is measured as a conducted
emission by direct connection of a
calibrated test instrument to the
equipment under test. If the device
cannot be connected directly,
alternative techniques acceptable to the
Commission may be used.
Measurements in the 5.725–5.85 GHz
band are made over a reference
bandwidth of 500 kHz or the 26 dB
emission bandwidth of the device,
whichever is less. Measurements in the
5.15–5.25 GHz, 5.25–5.35 GHz, and the
5.47–5.725 GHz bands are made over a
bandwidth of 1 MHz or the 26 dB
emission bandwidth of the device,
whichever is less. A narrower resolution
bandwidth can be used, provided that
the measured power is integrated over
the full reference bandwidth.
(b) Undesirable emission limits.
Except as shown in paragraph (b)(7) of
this section, the maximum emissions
outside of the frequency bands of
operation shall be attenuated in
accordance with the following limits:
(1) For transmitters operating in the
5.15–5.25 GHz band: All emissions
outside of the 5.15–5.35 GHz band shall
not exceed an e.i.r.p. of ¥27 dBm/MHz.
(2) For transmitters operating in the
5.25–5.35 GHz band: All emissions
outside of the 5.15–5.35 GHz band shall
not exceed an e.i.r.p. of ¥27 dBm/MHz.
(3) For transmitters operating in the
5.47–5.725 GHz band: All emissions
outside of the 5.47–5.725 GHz band
shall not exceed an e.i.r.p. of ¥27 dBm/
MHz.
(4) For transmitters operating in the
5.725–5.85 GHz band: All emissions
within the frequency range from the
band edge to 10 MHz above or below the
band edge shall not exceed an e.i.r.p. of
¥17 dBm/MHz; for frequencies 10 MHz
or greater above or below the band edge,
emissions shall not exceed an e.i.r.p. of
¥27 dBm/MHz.
*
*
*
*
*
(8) When measuring the emission
limits, the nominal carrier frequency
shall be adjusted as close to the upper
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:24 Apr 30, 2014
Jkt 232001
and lower frequency band edges as the
design of the equipment permits.
*
*
*
*
*
(e) Within the 5.725–5.85 GHz band,
the minimum 6 dB bandwidth of U–NII
devices shall be at least 500 kHz.
*
*
*
*
*
(h) * * *
(2) Radar Detection Function of
Dynamic Frequency Selection (DFS). U–
NII devices operating with any part of
its 26 dB emission bandwidth in the
5.25–5.35 GHz and 5.47–5.725 GHz
bands shall employ a DFS radar
detection mechanism to detect the
presence of radar systems and to avoid
co-channel operation with radar
systems. Operators shall only use
equipment with a DFS mechanism that
is turned on when operating in these
bands. The device must sense for radar
signals at 100 percent of its emission
bandwidth. The minimum DFS
detection threshold for devices with a
maximum e.i.r.p. of 200 mW to 1 W is
¥64 dBm. For devices that operate with
less than 200 mW e.i.r.p. and a Power
Spectral Density of less than 10 dBm in
a 1 MHz band, the minimum detection
threshold is ¥62 dBm. The detection
threshold is the received power
averaged over 1 microsecond referenced
to a 0 dBi antenna. For the initial
channel setting, the manufacturers shall
be permitted to provide for either
random channel selection or manual
channel selection.
*
*
*
*
*
(i) Device Security. All U–NII devices
must contain security features to protect
against modification of software by
unauthorized parties.
(1) Manufacturers must implement
security features in any digitally
modulated devices capable of operating
in any of the U–NII bands, so that third
parties are not able to reprogram the
device to operate outside the parameters
for which the device was certified. The
software must prevent the user from
operating the transmitter with operating
frequencies, output power, modulation
types or other radio frequency
parameters outside those that were
approved for the device. Manufacturers
may use means including, but not
limited to the use of a private network
that allows only authenticated users to
download software, electronic
signatures in software or coding in
hardware that is decoded by software to
verify that new software can be legally
loaded into a device to meet these
requirements and must describe the
methods in their application for
equipment authorization.
(2) Manufacturers must take steps to
ensure that DFS functionality cannot be
PO 00000
Frm 00054
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
disabled by the operator of the U–NII
device.
(j) Operator Filing Requirement:
Before deploying an aggregate total of
more than one thousand outdoor access
points within the 5.15–5.25 GHz band,
parties must submit a letter to the
Commission acknowledging that,
should harmful interference to licensed
services in this band occur, they will be
required to take corrective action.
Corrective actions may include reducing
power, turning off devices, changing
frequency bands, and/or further
reducing power radiated in the vertical
direction. This material shall be
submitted to Laboratory Division, Office
of Engineering and Technology, Federal
Communications Commission, 7435
Oakland Mills Road, Columbia, MD
21046. Attn: U–NII Coordination, or via
Web site at https://www.fcc.gov/labhelp
with the SUBJECT LINE: ‘‘U–NII–1
Filing’’.
[FR Doc. 2014–09279 Filed 4–30–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 660
[Docket No. 140107014–4014–01]
RIN 0648–XD072
Fisheries Off West Coast States; West
Coast Salmon Fisheries; 2014
Management Measures
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Final rule; notice of availability
of an environmental assessment.
AGENCY:
Through this final rule NMFS
establishes fishery management
measures for the 2014 ocean salmon
fisheries off Washington, Oregon, and
California and the 2015 salmon seasons
opening earlier than May 1, 2015.
Specific fishery management measures
vary by fishery and by area. The
measures establish fishing areas,
seasons, quotas, legal gear, recreational
fishing days and catch limits,
possession and landing restrictions, and
minimum lengths for salmon taken in
the U.S. exclusive economic zone (EEZ)
(3–200 NM) off Washington, Oregon,
and California. The management
measures are intended to prevent
overfishing and to apportion the ocean
harvest equitably among treaty Indian,
non-treaty commercial, and recreational
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\01MYR1.SGM
01MYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 84 (Thursday, May 1, 2014)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 24569-24580]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-09279]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
47 CFR Parts 2 and 15
[ET Docket No. 13-49; FCC 14-30]
Unlicensed National Information Infrastructure (U-NII) Devices in
the 5 GHz Band
AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document amends the Commission rules governing the
operation of unlicensed National Information Infrastructure (U-NII)
devices in the 5 GHz band to make broadband technologies more widely
available for consumers and businesses by increasing power and
permitting outdoor use in the U-NII-1 band and by adding 25 megahertz
to the U-NII-3 band; it also takes steps to reduce the potential for
harmful interference to incumbent operations. The proceeding satisfies
the requirements of the Spectrum Act, by which Congress required that
the Commission begin a proceeding regarding U-NII devices in the 5 GHz
band within a year if it determined, after consultation with NTIA, that
incumbents will be protected and their missions will not be
compromised.
DATES: Effective June 2, 2014 except for Sec. 15.407(j), which
contains information collection requirements that have not been
approved by OMB. The Commission will publish a document in the Federal
Register announcing the effective date.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Aole Wilkins, Office of Engineering
and Technology, 202-418-2406, Aole.Wilkins@fcc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a summary of the Commission's First
Report and Order, ET Docket No. 13-49, FCC 14-30 adopted March 31,
2014, and released April 1, 2014. The full text of this document is
available for inspection and copying during normal business hours in
the FCC Reference Center (Room CY-A257), 445 12th Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20554. The complete text of this document also may be
purchased from the Commission's copy contractor, Best Copy and
Printing, Inc., 445 12th Street SW., Room CY-B402, Washington, DC
20554. The full text may also be downloaded at: www.fcc.gov. People
with Disabilities: To request materials in accessible formats for
people with disabilities (braille, large print, electronic files, audio
format), send an email to fcc504@fcc.gov or call the Consumer &
Governmental Affairs Bureau at 202-418-0530 (voice), 202-418-0432
(tty).
Summary of First Report and Order
1. In 2013, the Commission issued the Notice of Proposed Rule
Making, 78 FR 21320, April 10, 2013, that initiated this proceeding,
with the goal of supporting the growing needs of businesses and
consumers for fixed and mobile broadband communications using
Unlicensed National Information Infrastructure (U-NII) devices in the
5.15-5.35 GHz and 5.47-5.85 GHz bands. At the same time, it recognized
the need to modify its rules to better ensure that these devices do not
cause harmful interference to authorized Federal and non-Federal users
in these bands. U-NII devices are unlicensed intentional radiators,
which use wideband digital modulation techniques to provide a wide
array of high-data-rate mobile and fixed communications used by
individuals, businesses, and institutions, particularly for wireless
[[Page 24570]]
local area networking--including Wi-Fi--and broadband access.
2. U-NII devices already play an important role in meeting public
demand for wireless broadband service, particularly wireless local area
networking and broadband access. This foundation, coupled with
increasing demand for wireless broadband applications and new Wi-Fi
technology, signals a bright future for unlicensed operations in the 5
GHz band. To meet continuing demand, in this First R&O the Commission
takes a number of actions to increase the utility of the 550 megahertz
of the 5 GHz band already available for U-NII operations, while
protecting incumbent users from harmful interference.
3. In this First R&O, the Commission modified the Part 15 rules for
the U-NII-1 band by removing the indoor-only restriction and increasing
the permitted power level. These changes provide more flexibility for
providing broadband service, whether indoors or outdoors, and take
advantage of the new 802.11ac standard to achieve higher data rate
transmissions across multiple U-NII segments of the 5 GHz band. To
protect Mobile Satellite Service in the U-NII-1 band from harmful
interference, the Commission also created certain technical rules for
U-NII-1 devices, principally requiring directionality in the antennas
to limit emissions in the upward direction and requiring operators with
more than 1000 outdoor access points to register information regarding
their systems with the Commission.
4. The Commission described circumstances which would facilitate
waivers under its rules for converting existing U-NII-3 devices to
incorporate the U-NII-1 band without having to comply with the new
antenna rules.
5. The Commission also modified its rules to require manufacturers
to secure the software in all U-NII devices to prevent modifications
that would allow the device to operate in a manner inconsistent with
the equipment certification. This change will reduce the likelihood of
harmful interference not only to Terminal Doppler Weather Radar (TDWR)
systems, but to all authorized services in the 5 GHz bands.
6. The Commission consolidated the provisions in Sec. 15.247 of
the rules (applicable to digitally modulated devices for this band)
with the rules in Sec. 15.407 (applicable to U-NII devices) so that
all the digitally modulated devices operating in the 5 GHz band will
operate under the combined rules and be subject to the new device
security requirement. This change addresses a major cause of harmful
interference to the TDWR: in which users have illegally modified
devices certified to operate under Sec. 15.247 to operate in the 5.47-
5.725 GHz band without implementing Dynamic Frequency Selection (DFS).
This rule consolidation also will reduce complexity and costs in
authorizing technically similar devices under different rules.
Increasing the Utility of the U-NII-1 Band
7. The majority of commenters support allowing outdoor operations
in the U-NII-1 band, and some level of harmonization across the U-NII
bands. The Commission concluded that it is in the public interest to
permit outdoor operation of U-NII devices in the U-NII-1 band, and that
it can do so while appropriately protecting MSS services from harmful
interference. Specifically, the Commission revised its rules to permit
transmitter power levels up to 1 W, as permitted in the U-NII-3 band,
with safeguards to minimize the likelihood of harmful interference to
Globalstar's MSS system.
8. The Commission observed that NCTA's and Globalstar's initial
analyses of the likelihood of harmful interference to Globalstar's
system were based on fundamentally different assumptions about future
factors such as the extent of deployments, the technical
characteristics of the equipment, and the extent of the communications
traffic, and that these assumptions are inherently uncertain. The
Commission determined that it can minimize the significance of these
assumptions with a technical resolution which restricts a device's
emissions when operating above a certain elevation angle, coupled with
a reporting requirement directed at large scale deployments, which will
facilitate corrective measures should they become necessary.
9. Since the noise floor increase seen by the satellite will be a
function of the aggregated energy from U-NII-1 emissions at elevation
angles above 30 degrees, the Commission addressed the likelihood of
interference to the satellite by restricting upward emissions to
sharply reduce the energy that will be received by the satellite from
each individual access point. As a result, it is far less likely that
harmful interference will occur, even for proliferation of access
points greater than that presumed in either party's earlier analysis,
making moot to a large degree the disagreements as to the number of
access points that might be deployed.
10. The Commission has concluded that generally allowing fixed
access point outdoor operations at a conducted power level of up to 1 W
(30 dBm), and a PSD of 17 dBm/MHz with an allowance for a 6 dBi antenna
gain (i.e., a total 36 dBm EIRP), and limiting the maximum EIRP above
30 degrees elevation to 125 mW (21 dBm) EIRP, provides reasonable
protection from harmful interference to Globalstar's system. Both NCTA
and Globalstar agree that this protocol would provide interference
protection to Globalstar, while permitting access to the spectrum for
U-NII users. The Commission believes that expressing a limit in terms
of EIRP will provide U-NII manufacturers and operators with flexibility
regarding how to design their equipment, while still achieving the
required levels of protection. Manufacturers will be able to
demonstrate compliance with the EIRP limit by reducing antenna gain in
the upward direction, or by limiting the transmitter power, or a
combination of the two, as best suits their particular purpose.
11. In conjunction with this requirement, the Commission will
continue to monitor developments in this band. Globalstar has expressed
strong concerns in this proceeding that proposed unchecked, widespread
deployments of outdoor access points may disrupt licensed services in
the band. To provide a safeguard and require accountability for such
large deployments, the Commission adopted the following filing
requirement. Before deploying an aggregate total of more than one
thousand outdoor access points within the U-NII-1 band, companies must
submit a letter to the Commission acknowledging that, should harmful
interference to licensed services in this band occur, they will be
required to take corrective action.
12. The Commission will permit current UN-II-3 devices to operate
under the new U-NII-1 rules under two potential scenarios, but in both
cases, the equipment must comply with the software security
requirements that it adopted to prevent unauthorized device
modifications. First, at any time manufacturers or equipment operators
may file a request for a permissive change to their current equipment
authorizations demonstrating compliance with the rules adopted. If
manufacturers of the previously deployed equipment are able to
demonstrate compliance with the EIRP requirement described, the
Commission will allow a permissive change with up to 1 W of conducted
power.
13. Second, for outdoor U-NII-3 band systems installed prior to the
effective date of the rules adopted are not able to
[[Page 24571]]
comply with the new EIRP requirement,, the Commission suggested the
kind of information that could be submitted to expedite consideration
and grant of a waiver of the new antenna rules for existing devices.
The Commission determined that providing the following about the waiver
petitioner's existing deployments will be important to its ability to
assess waiver requests: the number of devices installed, general
location of each deployment, ability to reprogram the devices, and
ability to adjust operating power from a central network management
system. The Commission concluded that waiver requests meeting these
parameters and made within 30 days of the effective date of its rules
are likely to serve the public interest because granting them is highly
unlikely to create any risk of harmful interference, given the small
numbers involved and the limited departure from the new technical
requirements for the U-NII-1 band. Moreover, having such waiver
petitioners provide information about the numbers of installed devices
that would be covered by the grant, as well as their general location,
will help the Commission monitor the accuracy of its predictions in
these regards and allow the Commission to alter course or take
effective corrective action if necessary. The Commission has
specifically delegated to the Office of Engineering and Technology the
authority to grant waivers under these favorable conditions. Following
the 30-day window, operators and manufacturers may continue to file
petitions for waiver, but the Commission will decide such petitions
without the assurances of good cause provided by the described
approach.
14. All parties receiving a waiver must then demonstrate compliance
with the technical requirements through the equipment certification
process by filing a permissive change request including the approved
waiver. There is no deadline for filing for such a permissive change.
15. The Commission will permit fixed point-to-point devices
operating in the U-NII-1 band to employ transmitting antennas with
directional gain up to 23 dBi without any corresponding reduction in
the transmitter maximum output power or maximum power spectral density,
and with no reduction of power in the vertical direction. It will not
require these devices to reduce the antenna gain in the vertical
direction. Such point-to-point operations are typically highly
directional and aim their signals along the earth, and therefore are
less likely to contribute significant energy to that received by the
satellite. They are also relatively few in numbers as compared to the
widespread distribution of access points examined by Globalstar and
NCTA.
16. The Commission will permit indoor access points operating in
the U-NII-1 band at 1 W of conducted power with a 6 dBi antenna gain
and no reduction in vertical antenna gain coupled with a requirement
for a 1 dB reduction in conducted power for every 1 dB that the antenna
gain exceeds 6 dBi. These types of consumer-oriented devices should not
contribute to interference concerns, as the building materials used in
indoor environments should sufficiently attenuate energy transmitted
from indoor devices to prevent any significant contribution to any
noise rise seen by Globalstar's satellite.
17. The Commission will permit any client device which operates
under control of an access point in the U-NII-1 band to operate at
conducted power levels up to 250 mW and a PSD of 11 dBm/MHz with a 6
dBi gain antenna without distinction to whether devices are located
indoor or outdoor; power must be reduced by 1 dB for every dB that the
antenna gain exceeds 6 dBi. These devices will not cause interference
to Globalstar's MSS because of their nature of operation. A client
device operates with an access point in a very asymmetric nature, in
that very little data is transmitted in the uplink direction (i.e.
transmitted from the client device) as compared to data transmitted in
the downlink direction (i.e. transmitted from the access point). Client
devices are typically mobile or portable, such as handsets or laptops
and tablets. These devices are not typically installed in permanent
outdoor locations, and due to their mobile nature the antenna gain in
any particular direction cannot be guaranteed. Because client devices
will most often be used in indoor locations with very low antenna
heights any emissions will be shielded to some extent by buildings,
foliage or other obstructions. While many such devices are able to
operate in either a client mode, hotspot mode or a peer-peer mode, the
Commission does not believe that such peer-to-peer modes will be used
frequently or deployed as part of an outdoor network; and thus, it will
permit mobile or portable client devices to operate in either mode
without changing maximum power levels. Finally, many client devices
incorporate power control features that cause the device to use as
little power necessary to provide necessary communications. These
factors compound each other and point to a very low impact from client
devices and the Commission does not find a need to impose the antenna
requirements described for access points.
18. The Commission notes that Globalstar has the capability to
monitor increases in noise levels at its satellites, and anticipates
that Globalstar will report any significant changes in the noise levels
and provide specific details as to how it is affecting its operations.
The Commission also encourages all interested parties to continue to
communicate regularly among each other and with Commission staff
regarding developments in this band.
Security Features for All U-NII Bands
19. Because the current and future use of the 5 GHz U-NII bands is
heavily reliant on the successful implementation of the Commission's
technical rules, the Commission proposed to require that manufacturers
implement security features in any digitally modulated device capable
of operating in any of the U-NII bands, so that third parties are not
able to reprogram the device to operate outside the parameters for
which the device was certified.
20. Because 5 GHz U-NII devices are able to operate across such a
wide swath of spectrum, any device could potentially be reprogrammed to
operate outside of its certified frequency range. Accordingly, the
Commission adopted its proposal in the NPRM that manufacturers must
take steps to prevent unauthorized software changes to their equipment
in all of the U-NII bands. It leaves the precise methods of ensuring
the integrity of the software in a radio to the manufacturer, but
requires the manufacturer to document those methods in its application
for equipment authorization and declines to set specific security
protocol or authentication requirements at this time, so as not to
hinder the development of the technology used to provide such security,
or to be unduly burdensome on manufacturers.
21. The Commission acknowledges that it may have to specify more
detailed security requirements at a later date as software driven radio
technology develops. The Commission directed OET to provide guidance,
through the Knowledge Data Base (KDB) on what types of security
measures work effectively, and what types do not, as well as on the
level of detail the FCC will typically need to evaluate the
authorization request.
22. The Commission reiterated its observation in the NPRM that some
radios are designed so that they can communicate directly with each
other,
[[Page 24572]]
rather than through a control point, and thus they could function as
either a ``master'' that initiates a network or as a ``client'' device
within the network. The Commission also believes that it is important
to ensure that client devices cannot be unlawfully reprogrammed to
perform the functions of an access point. Thus, the Commission
concludes that all devices that operate under the U-NII rules must be
subject to the device security requirements.
23. The Commission believes the enhanced security measures will be
effective, and conclude that there is no need for a reactive scheme
such as disabling devices that are modified or tampered with, as urged
by some commenters. The Commission intends to enforce its security
protocol requirement carefully and vigorously.
24. Transmitter ID. The Commission declines to require U-NII
devices to transmit identifying information. While the Commission's
experience in the field has indicated that a transmitter ID requirement
would help to more quickly identify and locate devices that cause
harmful interference, the Commission is not persuaded that the benefits
accrued from such a requirement would outweigh the costs to implement
it at this time. One of its primary goals throughout this proceeding is
to prioritize eliminating the occurrence of harmful interference in the
first instance. The Commission's adoption of enhanced security
requirements, directly addresses this priority, whereas a transmitter
identification requirement does not. However, if harmful interference
continues to be a problem the Commission will reevaluate the costs and
benefits associated with a transmitter ID requirement, recognizing that
it may be necessary to implement more costly solutions to eliminate the
harmful interference if devices operating in the band continue to cause
harmful interference.
U-NII-2 Bands
25. In addition to the security requirements applicable to all U-
NII devices operating in the 5 GHz band described, the Commission
revised the technical rules for operation in the U-NII-2A and U-NII-2C
bands to further mitigate potential harmful interference to TDWR and
other radar systems that operate in those bands. It also modified the
rules and updated its U-NII compliance measurement procedures to
improve testing for radar detection and eliminate certain outdated
performance tests.
Interference Mitigation Techniques
26. To be certified for operation in the U-NII-2A and U-NII-2C
bands, devices must include a DFS radar detection function. In its
field investigations, the Commission's Enforcement Bureau found that
certain models of devices certified for use in these bands were
designed in a way that users were able to disable the DFS mechanism.
With the DFS mechanism inactive, the device could transmit on an active
radar channel and cause harmful interference. In the NPRM the
Commission therefore proposed that manufacturers prevent the DFS
mechanism from being disabled in devices certified to operate in the U-
NII-2A and U-NII-2C bands. It also proposed that U-NII devices
certified to operate in these bands must be operated with the DFS
function on. The Commission also noted in the NPRM that the NTIA Third
Technical Report and its own discussions with NTIA, FAA and industry
representatives have identified additional techniques that could
mitigate in-band and adjacent band interference to incumbents. These
include increasing the sensing frequency range (e.g., detection
bandwidth) of U-NII devices operating in the U-NII-2A and U-NII-2C
bands; using a database registration process combined with geo-location
technology to determine whether there is any potential harmful
interference to radar systems such as the TDWR; and limiting the
unwanted emission levels of the U-NII devices.
27. DFS Functionality. No commenters opposed the Commission's
proposal that DFS must be active for any devices operating in the U-
NII-2A and U-NII-2C bands. The technical rules for equipment authorized
to operate in the U-NII-2A and U-NII-2C bands already require the
implementation of DFS. The requirement to preclude software changes
that would allow devices to operate outside of their authorized
parameters includes the DFS functionality. That is, the devices must be
designed to prohibit software changes that would disable the DFS
functionality. The Commission also modified its rules to explicitly
prohibit operators from using equipment without operational DFS in the
U-NII-2 bands, and to require the DFS function to be turned on when
operating in these bands. This explicit requirement will help the
Commission's Enforcement Bureau eliminate harmful interference should
they encounter modified equipment in the field.
28. DFS Sensing Bandwidth. The Commission modified its rules to
require U-NII devices to sense for radar signals at 100 percent of
their emissions bandwidth in U-NII-2A and U-NII-2C bands, as proposed
in the NPRM. The current rule for sensing bandwidth ensures co-channel
interference protection only when the radar signal falls within 80
percent of the U-NII device's occupied bandwidth, and it is thus
possible for the U-NII device to transmit on the same frequency as the
radar when the radar signal falls within the 20 percent of occupied
bandwidth that does not require sensing. This could result in
transmissions from the U-NII devices that fall within the TDWR receiver
bandwidth, which would increase the potential for harmful interference.
Expanding the sensing requirement to the entire occupied bandwidth will
prevent any and all co-channel operations between U-NII-2A, U-NII-2C
band devices and radars.
29. Geolocation/Database. The Commission declines to adopt a geo-
location database requirement that I proposed in the NPRM for several
reasons. First, it is taking several actions in this First R&O that
would have prevented most of the harmful interference cases that it has
observed to date, and which will prevent future interference cases.
Second, the Commission is making several changes to its part 15 rules
and compliance measurement procedures to improve the DFS functionality,
thus further reducing the harmful interference risk to TDWR and other
radar systems, e.g. increasing the sensing bandwidth, modifying the
sensing threshold, and testing DFS functions against a new radar
waveform. These changes will be sufficient for U-NII devices to avoid
radar systems operating in these bands. Given these considerations, the
Commission agrees with commenters that the incremental benefit provided
by implementing a geo-location/database approach as a supplement to DFS
is not sufficient to justify the expense of doing so. Additionally,
permitting a geo-location/database approach as an alternative to
requiring DFS functionality would also present some practical concerns
in overall management of the interference environment, since two
different types of devices would be operating under different
authorization procedures and operating rules.
30. The Commission notes that although it is not adopting a
database requirement, WISPA maintains a database accessible to the
public which contains TDWR system locations and the Commission actions
in this First R&O will not prevent the use of any voluntary databases
such as the one implemented by WISPA.
[[Page 24573]]
31. Out-of-Band Emissions in the U-NII-2 Bands. In the NPRM, the
Commission noted that emissions outside of the U-NII device's occupied
bandwidth may have the potential to cause harmful interference to
TDWRs. Aside from increasing frequency separation or distance
separation, U-NII devices may avoid causing harmful interference by
lowering the emissions on the radar's fundamental frequency. This
equates to lowering all emissions from U-NII devices at the frequencies
outside of the device's operating bandwidth. The Commission sought
comment on whether requiring lower unwanted emission limits for U-NII
devices operating in the U-NII-2A and UNII-2C bands was appropriate,
and whether it should modify the emission limits based on findings in
NTIA Third Technical Report.
32. The Commission also sought comment on modifying its rules to
adopt out-of-channel limits for indoor versus outdoor U-NII devices,
including how it should define the terms ``indoor'' and ``outdoor,''
and how different operating requirements for indoor versus outdoor
operations can be accommodated through its equipment authorization and
enforcement procedures.
33. The Commission declined to adopt the proposals in the NPRM that
would have required reductions in out-of-band emissions below the
levels currently allowed under Sec. 15.407. In the harmful
interference cases that it has investigated, it has not seen evidence
that problems are being caused by unwanted emissions from properly
certified and properly functioning equipment. Instead, the majority of
cases have been caused by devices that have been modified to operate in
frequency bands in which they are not certified to operate, or by
devices in which DFS had been disabled. Consolidating the technical
rules in the U-NII-3 band, along with enhancing the software security
requirements of all U-NII devices, would have prevented most of the
harmful interference cases that has been observed to date. Accordingly,
the Commission agrees with commenters that a reduction in unwanted
emissions from properly certified and properly functioning equipment
would be overly restrictive and would not provide any long-term
interference mitigation and that the benefits of applying reduced
emission limits would be speculative, while the costs imposed on
manufacturers and users are real and would result in decreased
equipment capabilities.
Other U-NII-2 Rules and Measurement Procedures
34. Sensing Threshold. The current rules require that the DFS
mechanism continuously monitor the device's environment for the
presence of radar, both prior to and during operation, using two
detection thresholds to ascertain whether radar signals were present.
The required threshold levels are: (a) -62 dBm for lower power devices
with a maximum EIRP less than 200 mW (23 dBm), and (b) -64 dBm for
higher power devices with a maximum EIRP between 200 mW (23 dBm) and 1
W (30 dBm), averaged over 1 [mu]s. The difference is due to the lesser
range at which the lower power devices can potentially cause harmful
interference. In order to ensure that the potential for harmful
interference does not increase with the use of the relaxed sensing
threshold, the Commission proposed in the NPRM to apply a reduction in
EIRP spectral density for devices that use the -62 dBm sensing
threshold.
35. The Commission adopted the proposal it advanced in the NPRM to
revise the DFS sensing rules by introducing a Power Spectral Density
(PSD) limit for devices that meet the requirements for this relaxed
sensing threshold. It modified the rules to require that devices
operate with both an EIRP of less than 200 mW (23 dBm), and an EIRP
spectral density of less than 10 dBm/MHz (10 mW/MHz), in order to use
the relaxed sensing detection threshold of -62 dBm. Devices that do not
meet the proposed EIRP and EIRP spectral density requirements must use
the -64 dBm sensing threshold. The Commission also noted that a
reduction in the EIRP spectral density limit would be consistent with
recent actions taken by European Telecommunications Standards Institute
(ETSI). Specifically, ETSI chose to restrict a device's use of the
relaxed sensing threshold by reducing both the EIRP and the EIRP
spectral density to 23 dBm (200 mW) and 10 dBm/MHz (10 mW/MHz),
respectively. This change will further enhance protection for radars
from co-channel interference by reducing both the range and the in-band
spectral density of the U-NII devices that use the relaxed sensing
threshold.
36. Bin 1 Waveforms. U-NII devices that operate in the U-NII-2A and
the U-NII-2C bands are certified using a testing regime that considers
how the U-NII equipment responds to sample waveforms that simulate
typical parameters that are used by radars that operate in these bands.
The radar parameters are divided up into several ``bins,'' each
representing a different category of radar system. The Commission is
adopting its proposals from the NPRM, to use an updated set of ``Bin-
1'' radar waveforms to be used in certifying U-NII equipment. The new
waveforms are expected to account for current and, to the extent
possible, future TDWR characteristics, and the modifications in the
Bin-1 radar simulating waveform used in its measurement procedures will
reduce the potential for co-channel interference to the TDWR and other
radar systems. The Commission believes that these changes will reduce
the potential for co-channel interference to the TDWR and other radar
systems, and directed OET to modify the Bin-1 radar simulating waveform
used in the 2006 DFS Compliance Measurement Procedures. Based on the
reported co-channel interference to TDWR, and its investigations into
complaints, the Commission believes the modifications to the test
waveforms in the measurement procedures are required. The test
waveforms proposed in the NPRM were created by NTIA with input from a
number of agencies and with the industry stakeholders after a long
evaluation period. The tests are a generalized procedure and are not
intended to cover every radar device exactly. In fact, all the test
waveforms were created by ``mixing'' a number of radar types. Thus,
they are not exact representations, but a generalized view of pulse
types to be detected. In practice, a U-NII device is expected to detect
any radar types and not just the parameters used for test purposes and
thus, the Commission does not need to include the specific parameters
requested by Baron Services.
37. Channel Spreading. With the support of all commenters
addressing the issue, the Commission modified its rules, as proposed in
the NPRM, to eliminate the last portion of Sec. 15.407(h)(2) that
requires that the DFS process provide a uniform spreading of the
loading over all of the available channels, and directed OET to update
the 2006 DFS Compliance Measurement Procedures to remove the channel
spreading requirement. The Uniform Channel Spreading requirement on DFS
is outdated and does not reflect the current state and trajectory of
wireless technology, which is turning toward U-NII devices which
operate with ever wider bandwidths such as contained in the new
802.11ac standard. Operation over wider bandwidths causes U-NII energy
to be spread throughout the frequency band in which the device is
operating, rather than concentrated in a narrow bandwidth, reducing the
utility
[[Page 24574]]
of uniform channel-spreading requirement. This rule modification will
give U-NII equipment manufacturers significant flexibility to design
and develop radar avoidance methods, while increasing effective use of
the spectrum.
38. Channel Loading. With the support of all parties that commented
on channel loading, the Commission determined to remove the requirement
for using the MPEG test file (streaming full motion video at 30 frames
per second) for testing of channel loading. Given that there are a
number of affected devices that are not designed for video use and
therefore cannot be effectively tested with a video-based process, the
Commission concluded that a more flexible approach is warranted, which
permits channel-loading testing to be performed using means appropriate
to the data types that are used by the unlicensed device at issue.
U-NII-3 Band Features
39. The Commission's rules permit the certification of devices that
operate in 5.725-5.85 GHz band under two different rule sections.
Section 15.247 was originally adopted in 1985 to govern spread spectrum
operations. The U-NII rules were adopted in 1997 and were designed to
accommodate new digital modulation technologies. In 2002, the
Commission modified the original spread spectrum rules to allow
digitally-modulated devices under Sec. 15.247, but were not fully
aligned with the U-NII rules. The differences in these rules has
persisted and led to the situation where devices were authorized under
the frequencies permitted under Sec. 15.247 and then illegally
modified to operate on frequencies permitted only for U-NII devices
without complying with the rules designed to prevent interference to
other radio services, resulting in harmful interference to TDWRs.
40. To provide for simplicity and clarity in the rules and to
eliminate the scheme whereby unlicensed devices authorized under the
unlicensed rules rather than the U-NII rules could then be (illegally)
modified to operate on U-NII bands without U-NII compliance and
protection protocols, the Commission adopted the NRPM proposals for the
U-NII-3 band with one exception, it did not adopt an antenna gain limit
for point-to-point devices. It adopted a single set of rules for all
devices in the U-NII-3 band, it adopted the provisions from each
respective rule regimen which provides for the most effective and
efficient use of spectrum while protecting incumbents.
41. First, the Commission extended the upper edge of the U-NII-3
band from 5.825 GHz to 5.85 GHz to match the amount of spectrum
available for digitally-modulated devices under Sec. 15.247. Second,
it consolidated Sec. 15.247 technical rules for digitally-modulated
devices in the 5.725-5.85 GHz band with Sec. 15.407 U-NII rules, while
maintaining many of the technical rules that currently make equipment
authorization under Sec. 15.247 more attractive for equipment
manufacturers. It removed the 5.725-5.85 GHz band for digital
modulation devices from Sec. 15.247 to ensure that all digitally
modulated equipment that are technically similar operate under a single
set of technical rules in this band.
42. The Commission also adjusted the rules for technical parameters
such as the frequency band of operation, the power and power spectral
density limits, emission bandwidth, antenna gain, unwanted emission
limits, and the peak to average ratio permitted in its rules. It
adopted a modified version of its proposed rule for antenna gain to
retain the provisions for high-gain point-to-point operations.
43. The Commission adopted its proposal to consolidate the
provisions for operation in the 5.725-5.85 GHz band into the U-NII
rules under Sec. 15.407. It expects this rule change to decrease
unnecessary complexity in the equipment authorization process and
eliminate the incentives for gaming the rules. More importantly, this
change, combined with the software security changes the Commission
adopted, should help eliminate potential harmful interference from
unlicensed devices to other spectrum users.
Power
44. Section 15.247 allows 1 Watt of total peak conducted power
whereas Sec. 15.407 limits maximum conducted output power to the
lesser of 1 Watt or 17 dBm + 10 log B (where B is bandwidth in MHz). In
addition to the 1 Watt power limit, there are different PSD limits in
Sec. Sec. 15.247 and 15.407 such that 1 Watt of total power is
available only when the 6-dB bandwidth is 500 kilohertz or more under
Sec. 15.247 and when the 26-dB bandwidth is 20 megahertz or more under
Sec. 15.407. Because the Commission is trying to accommodate digitally
modulated devices that are currently permitted under both rules, it
proposed in the NPRM to remove the bandwidth dependent term (i.e.,
remove 17 + 10 log B) from Sec. 15.407, so that the power limit would
be 1 Watt.
45. The Commission modified its rules to remove the bandwidth-
dependent term from Sec. 15.407(a)(3) of its rules, as proposed. As
the Commission initially suggested and the majority of commenters
agreed, utilizing the 1 Watt power limit will not increase the
potential for harmful interference because unlicensed devices are
already allowed to operate without the bandwidth-dependent term under
Sec. 15.247.
Power Spectral Density
46. Section 15.247(e) permits a maximum PSD of 8 dBm/3 kHz (33 dBm/
MHz), whereas Sec. 15.407(a)(3) permits a maximum PSD of 17 dBm/MHz.
The difference between these two PSD limits is the bandwidth at which
the device reaches the 1-Watt total power limit. Specifically, Sec.
15.247(e) allows a higher PSD when the device emission bandwidth is
between 0.5 and 20 megahertz. Whenever devices use an emission
bandwidth above 20 megahertz, the 1 Watt power limit becomes the
limiting parameter, and the effective PSD at which the device operates
is the same under both Sec. 15.247 and 15.407. A PSD of 8dBm/3kHz
(33dBm/MHz) is equivalent to a PSD that is higher than a total power
limit of 1 Watt (30dBm).
47. The Commission did not adopt the proposed PSD limit of 33dBm/
MHz because it would exceed the conducted power limit of 1 Watt
specified in Sec. 15.247(b)(3), which it is incorporating into the
consolidated rule; the Commission instead calculates a PSD limit that
can be practically measured and would not be higher than the conducted
power limit of 30 dBm. The Commission adjusts the 33 dBm/MHz proposed
in the NPRM by simply converting the PSD into a smaller bandwidth such
that the power allowed in that bandwidth does not exceed 30 dBm. The
Commission modifies the PSD limit by decreasing the power by 3 dB, and
at the same time reduces the bandwidth by half, making the PSD that it
adopted 30 dBm/500 kHz. Assuming that emission levels are evenly
distributed throughout the bandwidth, this is equivalent to the 8 dBm/3
kHz (33 dBm/MHz) that was proposed in the NPRM.
48. The Commission continues to believe that the 3 kilohertz
measurement bandwidth is unnecessary, as it creates an exceedingly long
time for labs to complete the measurements for devices that use 20
megahertz or even wider channels. With the introduction of 80 and 160
megahertz channels with the IEEE 802.11 ac standard, the time to
complete a single measure would increase significantly. Because the
[[Page 24575]]
Commission adopted a PSD limit in a 500 kHz bandwidth, it modified the
measurement procedures to correspondingly be performed using a 500 kHz
reference bandwidth. Likewise, the Commission modified Sec.
15.407(a)(5) to specify a 500 kHz reference bandwidth for the U-NII-3
band. This will allow measurements of unlicensed devices being
certified for operation in the U-NII-3 band to be performed in a timely
manner, resulting in efficiencies and cost savings for manufacturers,
test facilities, and ultimately to consumers.
Emission Bandwidth
49. Section 15.247(a)(2) requires a minimum 6 dB bandwidth of 500
kilohertz. Section 15.407 has no minimum or maximum bandwidth, but the
emission bandwidth is defined and measured at the 26 dB down points of
the U-NII signal and is used to determine the total power allowed under
that rule.
50. The Commission concludes that using a minimum 6 dB bandwidth of
500 kilohertz will continue to provide sufficient flexibility to foster
development, frequency sharing and frequency reuse in the band, and it
modified Sec. 15.407 to include that minimum-bandwidth requirement, in
order to help ensure that the band does not become congested with
narrow-bandwidth applications for which other spectrum could be
available.
Antenna Gain
51. Under the antenna gain requirements in Sec. 15.247, a 1 dB
reduction in power is required for every 1 dB that the antenna gain
exceeds 6 dBi, except for fixed point-to-point systems, for which no
power reduction is required. Under Sec. 15.407, a 1 dB reduction in
power is similarly required for every 1 dB that the antenna gain
exceeds 6 dBi, but for fixed point-to-point systems, a 1 dB reduction
in power is required for every 1 dB that the antenna gain exceeds 23
dBi.
52. The Commission declined to adopt its initial proposal to
conform to the provisions of Sec. 15.407 which restrict require
reduced power for high-gain antennas, and instead will conform the
rules for U-NII-3 devices to those presently in Sec. 15.247 to
continue to permit the use of unlicensed high-gain point-to-point
antennas. This will allow service providers to deploy cost-effective
wireless links in what would otherwise be considered high cost areas,
and allow for the quick setup and transitioning of unlicensed and
licensed microwave links.
53. The Commission finds that Fastback's proposal to permit higher
antenna gain for point-to-multipoint systems would be an expansion of
usage in the U-NII-3 band, and is beyond the scope of the rulemaking.
Unwanted Emissions
54. Section 15.247(d) requires 20 dB of attenuation (30 dB if the
alternate measurement procedure detailed in Sec. 15.247(b)(3) is used)
for unwanted emissions. In restricted bands, emissions must meet the
Sec. 15.209 general emission limits. Section 15.407 requires unwanted
emissions to be below -17 dBm/MHz within 10 megahertz of the band edge,
and below -27 dBm/MHz beyond 10 megahertz of the band edge. Also, all
emissions below 1 GHz must comply with the Sec. 15.209 general
emission limits. These unwanted emission limits are somewhat more
restrictive than those in Sec. 15.247.
55. The Commission adopted the more restrictive unwanted emissions
limits in Sec. 15.407 for the combined new rule, rather than the more
lenient unwanted emissions limit currently in Sec. 15.247 for several
reasons. The more stringent unwanted emissions requirement will ensure
that there is no increase in the potential for harmful interference
from unlicensed devices operating under the new combined rule parts.
Additionally, this decision is consistent with the determination to
apply the Sec. 15.407 out-of-band emission levels in the U-NII-2
bands, and having a single limit for devices that operate in any U-NII
band will provide clarity and simplicity. The record shows broad
support for adopting the tighter unwanted-emissions limits of Sec.
15.407 limits. The Commission recognizes that high gain point-to-point
system certified under Sec. 15.247 may have to be modified to comply
with the lower out-of-band emissions limit from Sec. 15.407.
Manufacturers have the flexibility to determine how they should meet
the lower out-of-band emissions limit.
Peak-to-Average Power Ratio
56. Section 15.407 contains a requirement to maintain a peak-to-
average power ratio of no more than 13 dB across any 1 megahertz band,
whereas Sec. 15.247 contain no peak-to-average ratio requirement. The
Commission did not adopt the proposal in the NPRM to keep the peak-to-
average ratio requirement, agreeing with commenters that this
measurement is no longer necessary.
Hybrid Devices
57. The Commission will continue to authorize under Sec. 15.247
frequency hopping spread spectrum devices and the frequency hopping
spread spectrum portion of hybrid devices in the 5725-5850 MHz band.
The digitally modulated portion of hybrid devices will have to meet the
modified U-NII rules for this band.
Adoption of Miscellaneous Rule Modifications
58. The NPRM proposed several rule modifications to simplify and
clarify various Part 15 rules. The Commission determines that several
sections of the rules referenced procedures or provisions that are no
longer in use and therefore, are no longer necessary and others with
inconsistent terminology. In Sec. 15.403(m) the Commission replaced
``Peak Power Spectral Density'' with ``Maximum Power Spectral
Density.'' In addition, the Commission deleted ``peak or'' from Sec.
15.403(o) for clarity. It also deleted ``peak or'' from Sec. 15.403(o)
for clarity. The Commission also deleted Sec. 15.247(b)(4)(i) through
(b)(4)(ii) to eliminate repetitive language that was found in Sec.
15.247(c)(1)(i) through (c)(1)(iii).
59. In Sec. 15.407 the Commission deleted the second sentence in
paragraph (a)(4) because it contains language that is no longer
relevant. It also corrected the wording in paragraphs (a)(2) and (a)(5)
by replacing ``peak'' with ``maximum.'' The Commission also corrected
the wording in paragraph (b)(8) by replacing ``block edges'' with
``band edges.'' The Commission also clarified rule Sec. 15.215(c) to
allow the operation of a U-NII device over multiple channels/bands. U-
NII Band straddling in the 5 GHz region of U-NII spectrum is allowed
and applies to 802.11ac bonded 80 megahertz and 160 megahertz channels.
It also modified Sec. 15.407(h)(2) to clarify the language for DFS
requirements once the emission bandwidth of a U-NII device is straddled
across multiple U-NII bands.
Transition Periods
60. The Commission adopted its proposal to require that 12 months
after the effective date of this First R&O, applications for
certification of devices must meet the new and modified rules adopted.
The manufacture, marketing, sale and importation into the United States
of devices that do not meet the new or modified rules adopted must
cease two years after the effective date of this First R&O. While the
Commission is sympathetic to the arguments that the more restrictive
unwanted emission limits for digital modulation devices may present
design challenges for some manufacturers, the Commission finds that it
is in the public interest to implement the changes as
[[Page 24576]]
soon as possible to eliminate the potential of harmful interference to
incumbents.
61. Grandfathered devices must continue to employ DFS as required
in Sec. 15.407(h)(2). Devices operating in the U-NII-2A or U-NII-2C
bands that do not have DFS or that have DFS turned off are not
compliant with the part 15 rules, and any operators who use such
devices may be subject to a f forfeiture. Large numbers of 5 GHz U-NII
devices are already in the marketplace and pose no threat of harmful
interference unless they are modified in violation of the Commission's
rules. However, should these devices be modified and cause harmful
interference to TDWR or any other incumbent systems, the FCC
Enforcement Bureau will continue its aggressive approach to ensuring
compliance with the Commission's rules.
62. Since 2010, the Commission has been certifying U-NII-2C devices
under interim procedures which require that the 5.6-5.65 GHz band be
notched out, and that certain devices within 35 km of a TDWR location
be separated by at least 30 MHz (center-to-center) from the TDWR
operating frequency. The Commission will permit U-NII-2C, i.e., devices
operating in the 5470-5725 MHz band, to be certified either under these
interim procedures or the new rules adopted herein for 12 months after
the effective date of this First R&O. After 12 months, all U-NII-2C
devices must meet the new rules in order to be certified.
63. The Commission adopted its proposal to no longer allow Class II
permissive changes for devices certified under either the old rules, or
the U-NII-2C interim procedures, after two years unless they meet the
new rules adopted here. Devices may continue to apply for Class II
permissive changes that demonstrate compliance with the old rules for
only up to two years after the effective date of the new rules.
However, the Commission feels that it is in the public interest to
continue to allow indefinitely Class II permissive changes to devices
certified under the old rules in some instances. The Commission will
therefore allow devices certified under the old rules, or U-NII-2C
interim procedures, prior to the 12-month effective date of the new
rules, to demonstrate compliance with the new or modified rules through
Class II permissive changes.
64. The Commission will continue to allow digital modulation
equipment and the digital modulation portion of hybrid devices, i.e.,
those that can function as either spread spectrum or digitally
modulated systems, operating in the 5.725-5.85 GHz band to be certified
to meet the Sec. 15.247 requirements for 12 months after the effective
date of the new rules. After 12 months, digital modulation devices and
the digital modulation portion of hybrid devices must meet the new
Sec. 15.407 U-NII-3 rules in order to be FCC certified. The frequency
hopping spread spectrum portion of hybrid devices will continue to be
certified under the Sec. 15.247 spread spectrum rules. The
manufacture, marketing, sale and importation into the United States of
digitally modulated and hybrid devices certified under Sec. 15.247
operating in the 5.725-5.85 GHz band must cease two years after the
effective date of this 1st R&O. Additionally, for up to two years after
the effective date of these new rules they may apply for Class II
permissive changes to demonstrate compliance with the old rules. After
two years, these devices must be certified to meet the new rules and
Class II permissive changes may only be made if these devices meet the
new rules as well.
Procedural Matters
65. Paperwork Reduction Analysis. This document contains modified
information collection requirements subject to the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (PRA), Public Law 104-13. It will be submitted to the
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review under section 3507(d)
of the PRA. OMB, the general public, and other Federal agencies are
invited to comment on the new or modified information collection
requirements contained in this proceeding. This collection of
information will be covered under (OMB 3060-0057 Equipment
Authorization).
Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
66. As required by the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA),\1\ an
Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (IRFA) was incorporated in the
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) in ET Docket No. 13-49.\2\ The
Commission sought written public comment on the proposals in the NPRM,
including comment on the IRFA. This present Final Regulatory
Flexibility Analysis (FRFA) conforms to the RFA.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See 5 U.S.C. 603. The RFA, see 5 U.S.C. 60-612, has been
amended by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of
1966 (SBREFA), Public Law 104-121, Title II, 110 Stat. 857 (1996),
and the Small Business Jobs Act of 2010, Public Law 111-240, 124
Stat. 2504 (2010).
\2\ See Revision of part 15 of the Commission's rules to Permit
Unlicensed National Information Infrastructure (U-NII) Devices in
the 5 GHz Band in ET Docket No. 13-49, Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking, 28 FCC Rcd. 1769 (2013) (NPRM).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
A. Need for, and Objectives of, the Report and Order
67. The First Report and Order amends the regulations for
Information Unlicensed National Information Infrastructure (U-NII)
devices which operate in the 5 GHz band.\3\ U-NII devices are
unlicensed intentional radiators which use wideband digital modulation
techniques to provide a wide array of high data rate mobile and fixed
communications used by individuals, businesses, and institutions.\4\ As
discussed, the Commission modified certain technical requirements in
its rules for all U-NII devices to ensure that these devices do not
cause harmful interference to Terminal Doppler Weather Radar (TDWR)
systems and other radar systems that operate in the 5 GHz band. It is
also extending the upper edge of the 5.725-5.825 GHz U-NII band from
5.825 GHz to 5.85 GHz and consolidating the provisions formerly
applicable to digitally modulated devices under Sec. 15.247 of the
rules for this band with the U-NII rules in Sec. 15.407. This change
will eliminate a loophole in the former rules that allowed devices to
be certified under the Sec. 15.247 rules and then modified to operate
as U-NII devices without complying with all of the technical
requirements of the U-NII rules--a practice that was shown to be a
major source of harmful interference to TDWRs. Finally, the Commission
is removing the indoor only restriction and increasing the permitted
power for U-NII devices in the 5.15-5.25 GHz band thus increasing the
amount of spectrum available for next generation Wi-Fi services by 100
megahertz.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ See 47 CFR part 15 Subpart E--Unlicensed National
Information Infrastructure Devices.
\4\ See 47 CFR 15.403(s).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Significant Issues Raised by Public Comments in Response to the IRFA
68. There were no public comments filed that specifically addressed
the rules and policies proposed in the IRFA.
C. Response to Comments by the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small
Business Administration
69. Pursuant to the Small Business Jobs Act of 2010, the Commission
is required to respond to any comments filed by the Chief Counsel for
Advocacy of the Small Business Administration, and to provide a
detailed statement of any change made to the proposed rules as a result
of those comments. The Chief Counsel did not file any comments in
response to the proposed rules in this proceeding.
[[Page 24577]]
D. Description and Estimate of the Number of Small Entities to Which
the Rules Will Apply
70. The RFA directs agencies to provide a description of, and,
where feasible, an estimate of the number of small entities that may be
affected by the proposed rules, if adopted.\5\ The RFA defines the term
``small entity'' as having the same meaning as the terms ``small
business,'' ``small organization,'' and ``small business concern''
under section 3 of the Small Business Act.\6\ Under the Small Business
Act, a ``small business concern'' is one that: (1) is independently
owned and operated; (2) is not dominant in its field of operations; and
(3) meets may additional criteria established by the Small Business
Administration (SBA).\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ See 5 U.S.C. 603(b)(3).
\6\ Id. 601(3).
\7\ Id. 632.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
E. Small Businesses, Small Organizations, and Small Governmental
Jurisdictions
71. The Commission's action may, over time, affect small entities
that are not easily categorized at present. It therefore describes
here, at the outset, three comprehensive, statutory small entity size
standards that encompass entities that could be directly affected by
the proposals under consideration.\8\ As of 2009, small businesses
represented 99.9% of the 27.5 million businesses in the United States,
according to the SBA.\9\ Additionally, a ``small organization'' is
generally ``any not-for-profit enterprise which is independently owned
and operated and is not dominant in its field.'' \10\ Nationwide, as of
2007, there were approximately 1,621,315 small organizations.\11\
Finally, the term ``small governmental jurisdiction'' is defined
generally as ``governments of cities, counties, towns, townships,
villages, school districts, or special districts, with a population of
less than fifty thousand.'' \12\ Census Bureau data for 2007 indicate
that there were 89,527 governmental jurisdictions in the United
States.\13\ The Commission estimates that, of this total, as many as
88,761 entities may qualify as ``small governmental jurisdictions.''
\14\ Thus, the Commission estimates that most governmental
jurisdictions are small.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ See 5 U.S.C. 601(3)-(6).
\9\ See SBA, Office of Advocacy, ``Frequently Asked Questions,''
available at https://web.sba.gov/faqs/faqindex.cfm?areaID=24 (last
visited Aug. 31, 2012).
\10\ 5 U.S.C. 601(4).
\11\ Independent Sector, The New Nonprofit Almanac & Desk
Reference (2010).
\12\ 5 U.S.C. 601(5).
\13\ U.S. CENSUS BUREAU, STATISTICAL ABSTRACT OF THE UNITED
STATES: 2011, Table 427 (2007).
\14\ The 2007 U.S Census data for small governmental
organizations are not presented based on the size of the population
in each such organization. There were 89,476 local governmental
organizations in 2007. If the Commission assumes that county,
municipal, township, and school district organizations are more
likely than larger governmental organizations to have populations of
50,000 or less, the total of these organizations is 52,095. If the
Commission makes the same population assumption about special
districts, specifically that they are likely to have a population of
50,000 or less, and also assume that special districts are different
from county, municipal, township, and school districts, in 2007
there were 37,381 such special districts. Therefore, there are a
total of 89,476 local government organizations. As a basis of
estimating how many of these 89,476 local government organizations
were small, in 2011, the Commission notes that there were a total of
715 cities and towns (incorporated places and minor civil divisions)
with populations over 50,000. CITY AND TOWNS TOTALS: VINTAGE 2011--
U.S. Census Bureau, available at https://www.census.gov/popest/data/cities/totals/2011/. If the Commission subtracts the 715
cities and towns that meet or exceed the 50,000 population
threshold, the Commission concludes that approximately 88,761 are
small. U.S. CENSUS BUREAU, STATISTICAL ABSTRACT OF THE UNITED STATES
2011, Tables 427, 426 (Data cited therein are from 2007).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
72. The adopted rules pertain to manufacturers of unlicensed
communications devices. The appropriate small business size standard is
that which the SBA has established for radio and television
broadcasting and wireless communications equipment manufacturing. The
Census Bureau defines this category as follows: ``This industry
comprises establishments primarily engaged in manufacturing radio and
television broadcast and wireless communications equipment. Examples of
products made by these establishments are: transmitting and receiving
antennas, cable television equipment, GPS equipment, pagers, cellular
phones, mobile communications equipment, and radio and television
studio and broadcasting equipment.'' \15\ The SBA has developed a small
business size standard for firms in this category, which is: all such
firms having 750 or fewer employees.\16\ According to Census Bureau
data for 2007, there were a total of 939 establishments in this
category that operated for part or all of the entire year. Of this
total, 784 had less than 500 employees and 155 had more than 100
employees.\17\ Thus, under this size standard, the majority of firms
can be considered small.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ U.S. Census Bureau, 2007 NAICS Definitions, ``334220 Radio
and Television Broadcasting and Wireless Communications Equipment
Manufacturing''; https://www.census.gov/naics/2007/def/ND334220.HTM#N334220.
\16\ 13 CFR 121.201, NAICS code 334220.
\17\ https://factfinder.census.gov/servlet/IBQTable?_bm=y&-fds_name=EC0700A1&-geo_id=&-_skip=300&-ds_name=EC0731SG2&-_lang=en.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
F. Description of Projected Reporting, Record keeping and Other
Compliance Requirements
73. The Report and Order contains a non-substantial modification to
the information collection requirements. The rules adopted in this
First Report and Order will apply to small businesses that choose to
use, manufacture, design, import, or sell part 15 U-NII devices. There
is no requirement, however, for any entity to use, market, or produce
these types of products. Small businesses are already subject to the
existing rules with regard to reporting, record keeping and other
compliance requirements related to U-NII devices. The rules adopted in
this First Report and Order do not add substantial additional
compliance burden on small businesses.
G. Steps Taken To Minimize Significant Economic Impact on Small
Entities and Significant Alternatives Considered
74. The RFA requires an agency to describe any significant
alternatives that it has considered in reaching its proposed approach,
which may include the following four alternatives (among others): (1)
The establishment of differing compliance or reporting requirements or
timetables that take into account the resources available to small
entities; (2) the clarification, consolidation, or simplification of
compliance or reporting requirements under the rule for small entities;
(3) the use of performance, rather than design, standards; and (4) an
exemption from coverage of the rule, or any part thereof, for small
entities.\18\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\18\ 5 U.S.C. 603(c).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
75. In this First Report and Order, the Commission modified its
rules for Unlicensed National Information Infrastructure (U-NII)
devices which operate in the 5 GHz band.\19\ U-NII devices are
unlicensed intentional radiators which use wideband digital modulation
techniques to provide a wide array of high data rate mobile and fixed
communications used by individuals, businesses, and institutions.\20\
As discussed, the Commission is modifying certain technical
requirements in its rules for all U-NII devices to ensure that these
devices do not cause harmful interference to Terminal Doppler Weather
Radar (TDWR) systems and other radar systems that operate in the
[[Page 24578]]
5 GHz band. The Commission also extends the upper edge of the 5.725-
5.825 GHz U-NII band from 5.825 GHz to 5.85 GHz and consolidates the
provisions formerly applicable to digitally modulated devices under
Sec. 15.247 of the rules for this band with the U-NII rules in Sec.
15.407. This change will eliminate a loophole in the former rules that
allowed devices to be certified under the Sec. 15.247 rules and then
modified to operate as U-NII devices without complying with all of the
technical requirements of the U-NII rules--a practice that was shown to
be a major source of harmful interference to TDWRs. Finally, the
Commission is removing the indoor only restriction and increasing the
permitted power for U-NII devices in the 5.15-5.25 GHz band thus
increasing the amount of spectrum available for next generation Wi-Fi
services by 100 megahertz.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\19\ See 47 CFR part 15 Subpart E--Unlicensed National
Information Infrastructure Devices.
\20\ See 47 CFR 15.403(s).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Report to Congress
76. The Commission will send a copy of the Report and Order,
including this FRFA, in a report to be sent to Congress pursuant to the
Congressional Review Act.\21\ In addition, the Commission will send a
copy of the Report and Order, including this FRFA, to the Chief Counsel
for Advocacy of the SBA. A copy of the Report and Order and FRFA (or
summaries thereof) will also be published in the Federal Register.\22\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\21\ See 5 U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A).
\22\ See 5 U.S.C. 604(b).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Congressional Review Act
77. The Commission will send a copy of this Report and Order to
Congress and the Government Accountability Office pursuant to the
Congressional Review Act, see 5 U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A).
Ordering Clauses
78. Pursuant to sections 4(i), 301, 302, 303(e), 303(f), 303(g),
and 303(r) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C.
154(i), 301, 302a, 303(e), 303(f), 303(g), and 303(r), this First
Report and Order is hereby adopted and parts 2 and 15 of the
Commission's rules are amended as set forth in Final rules, effective
June 2, 2014, except for Sec. 15.407(j), which contains information
collection requirements subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995,
Public Law 104-13, that are not effective until approved by the Office
of Management and Budget. The Federal Communications Commission will
publish a document in the Federal Register announcing OMB approval and
the effective date of this rule.
79. The Office of Engineering and Technology is delegated authority
to grant waivers of the antenna requirements adopted herein consistent
with the terms of this Order.
80. The Commission's Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau,
Reference Information Center, shall send a copy of this First Report
and Order, including the Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis, to the
Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business Administration.
81. The Office of Engineering and Technology shall publish,
consistent with the terms of this Report and Order, measurement
procedures that will be used for certifying equipment that will operate
in the 5.15-5.35 GHz and 5.47-5.85 GHz bands.
List of Subjects in 47 CFR Parts 2 and 15
Communications equipment, Radio.
Federal Communications Commission.
Sheryl D. Todd,
Deputy Secretary.
Final Rules
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, the Federal
Communications Commission amends 47 CFR parts 2 and 15 of the Code of
Federal Regulations to read as follows:
PART 2--FREQUENCY ALLOCATIONS AND RADIO TREATY MATTERS; GENERAL
RULES AND REGULATIONS
0
1. The authority citation for part 2 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154, 302a, 303, and 336, unless otherwise
noted.
0
2. Section 2.1033 is amended by adding paragraph (b)(13) to read as
follows:
Sec. 2.1033 Application for certification.
* * * * *
(b) * * * * *
(13) Applications for certification of U-NII devices in the 5.15-
5.35 GHz and the 5.47-5.85 GHz bands must include a high level
operational description of the security procedures that control the
radio frequency operating parameters and ensure that unauthorized
modifications cannot be made.
* * * * *
PART 15--RADIO FREQUENCY DEVICES
0
3. The authority citation for part 15 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154, 302a, 303, 304, 307, 336, 544a, and
549.
0
4. Section 15.37 is amended by adding new paragraph (h) to read as
follows:
Sec. 15.37 Transition provisions for compliance with the rules.
* * * * *
(h) Effective June 2, 2015 devices using digital modulation
techniques in the 5725-5850 MHz bands will no longer be certified under
the provisions of Sec. 15.247. The technical requirements for
obtaining certification after this date for digitally modulated devices
and the digitally modulated portion of hybrid devices are found in
subpart E of this part. The provisions for the frequency hopping spread
spectrum portion of hybrid devices will remain in Sec. 15.247.
Effective June 2, 2016 systems using digital modulation techniques in
the 5725-5850 MHz band certified under the provisions of Sec. 15.247
may no longer be imported or marketed within the United States.
0
5. Section 15.215 is amended by revising paragraph (c) to read as
follows:
Sec. 15.215 Additional provisions to the general radiated emission
limitations.
* * * * *
(c) Intentional radiators operating under the alternative
provisions to the general emission limits, as contained in Sec. Sec.
15.217 through 15.257 and in subpart E of this part, must be designed
to ensure that the 20 dB bandwidth of the emission, or whatever
bandwidth may otherwise be specified in the specific rule section under
which the equipment operates, is contained within the frequency band
designated in the rule section under which the equipment is operated.
In the case of intentional radiators operating under the provisions of
subpart E, the emission bandwidth may span across multiple contiguous
frequency bands identified in that subpart. The requirement to contain
the designated bandwidth of the emission within the specified frequency
band includes the effects from frequency sweeping, frequency hopping
and other modulation techniques that may be employed as well as the
frequency stability of the transmitter over expected variations in
temperature and supply voltage. If a frequency stability is not
specified in the regulations, it is recommended that the fundamental
emission be kept within at least the central 80% of the permitted band
in order to minimize the possibility of out-of-band operation.
0
6. Section 15.247 is amended by removing paragraphs (b)(4)(i), (ii) and
(iii), and by revising paragraph (f) to read as follows:
[[Page 24579]]
Sec. 15.247 Operation within the bands 902-928 MHz, 2400-2483.5 MHz,
and 5725-5850 MHz.
* * * * *
(f) For the purposes of this section, hybrid systems are those that
employ a combination of both frequency hopping and digital modulation
techniques. The frequency hopping operation of the hybrid system, with
the direct sequence or digital modulation operation turned-off, shall
have an average time of occupancy on any frequency not to exceed 0.4
seconds within a time period in seconds equal to the number of hopping
frequencies employed multiplied by 0.4. The power spectral density
conducted from the intentional radiator to the antenna due to the
digital modulation operation of the hybrid system, with the frequency
hopping operation turned off, shall not be greater than 8 dBm in any 3
kHz band during any time interval of continuous transmission.
Note to paragraph (f): The transition provisions found in Sec.
15.37(h) will apply to hybrid devices beginning June 2, 2015.
* * * * *
0
7. Section 15.401 is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 15.401 Scope.
This subpart sets out the regulations for unlicensed National
Information Infrastructure (U-NII) devices operating in the 5.15-5.35
GHz, 5.47-5.725 GHz and 5.725-5.85 GHz bands.
0
8. Section 15.403 is amended by revising paragraphs (m), (o) and (s) to
read as follows:
Sec. 15.403 Definitions.
* * * * *
(m) Maximum Power Spectral Density. The maximum power spectral
density is the maximum power spectral density, within the specified
measurement bandwidth, within the U-NII device operating band.
* * * * *
(o) Power Spectral Density. The power spectral density is the total
energy output per unit bandwidth from a pulse or sequence of pulses for
which the transmit power is at its maximum level, divided by the total
duration of the pulses. This total time does not include the time
between pulses during which the transmit power is off or below its
maximum level.
* * * * *
(s) U-NII devices. Intentional radiators operating in the frequency
bands 5.15-5.35 GHz and 5.470-5.85 GHz that use wideband digital
modulation techniques and provide a wide array of high data rate mobile
and fixed communications for individuals, businesses, and institutions.
0
9. Section 15.407 is amended by revising paragraphs (a)(1) through
(a)(5), (b) introductory text, (b)(1) through (b)(4), (b)(8), (e), and
(h)(2), and removing paragraph (a)(6) and by adding new paragraph (i)
and (j) to read as follows:
Sec. 15.407 General technical requirements.
(a) * * *
(1) For the band 5.15-5.25 GHz.
(i) For an outdoor access point operating in the band 5.15-5.25
GHz, the maximum conducted output power over the frequency band of
operation shall not exceed 1 W provided the maximum antenna gain does
not exceed 6 dBi. In addition, the maximum power spectral density shall
not exceed 17 dBm in any 1 megahertz band. If transmitting antennas of
directional gain greater than 6 dBi are used, both the maximum
conducted output power and the maximum power spectral density shall be
reduced by the amount in dB that the directional gain of the antenna
exceeds 6 dBi. The maximum e.i.r.p. at any elevation angle above 30
degrees as measured from the horizon must not exceed 125 mW (21 dBm).
(ii) For an indoor access point operating in the band 5.15-5.25
GHz, the maximum conducted output power over the frequency band of
operation shall not exceed 1 W provided the maximum antenna gain does
not exceed 6 dBi. In addition, the maximum power spectral density shall
not exceed 17 dBm in any 1 megahertz band. If transmitting antennas of
directional gain greater than 6 dBi are used, both the maximum
conducted output power and the maximum power spectral density shall be
reduced by the amount in dB that the directional gain of the antenna
exceeds 6 dBi.
(iii) For fixed point-to-point access points operating in the band
5.15-5.25 GHz, the maximum conducted output power over the frequency
band of operation shall not exceed 1 W. Fixed point-to-point U-NII
devices may employ antennas with directional gain up to 23 dBi without
any corresponding reduction in the maximum conducted output power or
maximum power spectral density. For fixed point-to-point transmitters
that employ a directional antenna gain greater than 23 dBi, a 1 dB
reduction in maximum conducted output power and maximum power spectral
density is required for each 1 dB of antenna gain in excess of 23 dBi.
Fixed, point-to-point operations exclude the use of point-to-multipoint
systems, omnidirectional applications, and multiple collocated
transmitters transmitting the same information. The operator of the U-
NII device, or if the equipment is professionally installed, the
installer, is responsible for ensuring that systems employing high gain
directional antennas are used exclusively for fixed, point-to-point
operations.
(iv) For mobile and portable client devices in the 5.15-5.25 GHz
band, the maximum conducted output power over the frequency band of
operation shall not exceed 250 mW provided the maximum antenna gain
does not exceed 6 dBi. In addition, the maximum power spectral density
shall not exceed 11 dBm in any 1 megahertz band. If transmitting
antennas of directional gain greater than 6 dBi are used, both the
maximum conducted output power and the maximum power spectral density
shall be reduced by the amount in dB that the directional gain of the
antenna exceeds 6 dBi.
(2) For the 5.25-5.35 GHz and 5.47-5.725 GHz bands, the maximum
conducted output power over the frequency bands of operation shall not
exceed the lesser of 250 mW or 11 dBm 10 log B, where B is the 26 dB
emission bandwidth in megahertz. In addition, the maximum power
spectral density shall not exceed 11 dBm in any 1 megahertz band. If
transmitting antennas of directional gain greater than 6 dBi are used,
both the maximum conducted output power and the maximum power spectral
density shall be reduced by the amount in dB that the directional gain
of the antenna exceeds 6 dBi.
(3) For the band 5.725-5.85 GHz, the maximum conducted output power
over the frequency band of operation shall not exceed 1 W. In addition,
the maximum power spectral density shall not exceed 30 dBm in any 500-
kHz band. If transmitting antennas of directional gain greater than 6
dBi are used, both the maximum conducted output power and the maximum
power spectral density shall be reduced by the amount in dB that the
directional gain of the antenna exceeds 6 dBi. However, fixed point-to-
point U-NII devices operating in this band may employ transmitting
antennas with directional gain greater than 6 dBi without any
corresponding reduction in transmitter conducted power. Fixed, point-
to-point operations exclude the use of point-to-multipoint systems,
omnidirectional applications, and multiple collocated transmitters
transmitting the same information. The operator of the U-NII device, or
if the equipment is professionally installed, the installer, is
responsible for ensuring that systems employing high gain directional
[[Page 24580]]
antennas are used exclusively for fixed, point-to-point operations.
Note to paragraph (a)(3): The Commission strongly recommends
that parties employing U-NII devices to provide critical
communications services should determine if there are any nearby
Government radar systems that could affect their operation.
(4) The maximum conducted output power must be measured over any
interval of continuous transmission using instrumentation calibrated in
terms of an rms-equivalent voltage.
(5) The maximum power spectral density is measured as a conducted
emission by direct connection of a calibrated test instrument to the
equipment under test. If the device cannot be connected directly,
alternative techniques acceptable to the Commission may be used.
Measurements in the 5.725-5.85 GHz band are made over a reference
bandwidth of 500 kHz or the 26 dB emission bandwidth of the device,
whichever is less. Measurements in the 5.15-5.25 GHz, 5.25-5.35 GHz,
and the 5.47-5.725 GHz bands are made over a bandwidth of 1 MHz or the
26 dB emission bandwidth of the device, whichever is less. A narrower
resolution bandwidth can be used, provided that the measured power is
integrated over the full reference bandwidth.
(b) Undesirable emission limits. Except as shown in paragraph
(b)(7) of this section, the maximum emissions outside of the frequency
bands of operation shall be attenuated in accordance with the following
limits:
(1) For transmitters operating in the 5.15-5.25 GHz band: All
emissions outside of the 5.15-5.35 GHz band shall not exceed an
e.i.r.p. of -27 dBm/MHz.
(2) For transmitters operating in the 5.25-5.35 GHz band: All
emissions outside of the 5.15-5.35 GHz band shall not exceed an
e.i.r.p. of -27 dBm/MHz.
(3) For transmitters operating in the 5.47-5.725 GHz band: All
emissions outside of the 5.47-5.725 GHz band shall not exceed an
e.i.r.p. of -27 dBm/MHz.
(4) For transmitters operating in the 5.725-5.85 GHz band: All
emissions within the frequency range from the band edge to 10 MHz above
or below the band edge shall not exceed an e.i.r.p. of -17 dBm/MHz; for
frequencies 10 MHz or greater above or below the band edge, emissions
shall not exceed an e.i.r.p. of -27 dBm/MHz.
* * * * *
(8) When measuring the emission limits, the nominal carrier
frequency shall be adjusted as close to the upper and lower frequency
band edges as the design of the equipment permits.
* * * * *
(e) Within the 5.725-5.85 GHz band, the minimum 6 dB bandwidth of
U-NII devices shall be at least 500 kHz.
* * * * *
(h) * * *
(2) Radar Detection Function of Dynamic Frequency Selection (DFS).
U-NII devices operating with any part of its 26 dB emission bandwidth
in the 5.25-5.35 GHz and 5.47-5.725 GHz bands shall employ a DFS radar
detection mechanism to detect the presence of radar systems and to
avoid co-channel operation with radar systems. Operators shall only use
equipment with a DFS mechanism that is turned on when operating in
these bands. The device must sense for radar signals at 100 percent of
its emission bandwidth. The minimum DFS detection threshold for devices
with a maximum e.i.r.p. of 200 mW to 1 W is -64 dBm. For devices that
operate with less than 200 mW e.i.r.p. and a Power Spectral Density of
less than 10 dBm in a 1 MHz band, the minimum detection threshold is -
62 dBm. The detection threshold is the received power averaged over 1
microsecond referenced to a 0 dBi antenna. For the initial channel
setting, the manufacturers shall be permitted to provide for either
random channel selection or manual channel selection.
* * * * *
(i) Device Security. All U-NII devices must contain security
features to protect against modification of software by unauthorized
parties.
(1) Manufacturers must implement security features in any digitally
modulated devices capable of operating in any of the U-NII bands, so
that third parties are not able to reprogram the device to operate
outside the parameters for which the device was certified. The software
must prevent the user from operating the transmitter with operating
frequencies, output power, modulation types or other radio frequency
parameters outside those that were approved for the device.
Manufacturers may use means including, but not limited to the use of a
private network that allows only authenticated users to download
software, electronic signatures in software or coding in hardware that
is decoded by software to verify that new software can be legally
loaded into a device to meet these requirements and must describe the
methods in their application for equipment authorization.
(2) Manufacturers must take steps to ensure that DFS functionality
cannot be disabled by the operator of the U-NII device.
(j) Operator Filing Requirement: Before deploying an aggregate
total of more than one thousand outdoor access points within the 5.15-
5.25 GHz band, parties must submit a letter to the Commission
acknowledging that, should harmful interference to licensed services in
this band occur, they will be required to take corrective action.
Corrective actions may include reducing power, turning off devices,
changing frequency bands, and/or further reducing power radiated in the
vertical direction. This material shall be submitted to Laboratory
Division, Office of Engineering and Technology, Federal Communications
Commission, 7435 Oakland Mills Road, Columbia, MD 21046. Attn: U-NII
Coordination, or via Web site at https://www.fcc.gov/labhelp with the
SUBJECT LINE: ``U-NII-1 Filing''.
[FR Doc. 2014-09279 Filed 4-30-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P