Adequacy Status of the Submitted Maintenance Plan for the District of Columbia Portion of the Metropolitan Washington, DC, (DC-MD-VA) 1997 Fine Particulate National Ambient Air Quality Standard Nonattainment Area for Transportation Conformity Purposes, 23972-23973 [2014-09719]
Download as PDF
23972
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 82 / Tuesday, April 29, 2014 / Notices
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Docket No. ER14–591, Southwest Power
Pool, Inc.
Docket No. ER14–781, Southwest Power
Pool, Inc.
Docket No. ER14–1174, Southwest
Power Pool, Inc.
Docket No. ER14–1194, Southwestern
Public Service Company
Docket No. ER14–1196, Southwestern
Public Service Company
Docket No. ER14–1197, Southwestern
Public Service Company
Docket No. ER14–1198, Southwestern
Public Service Company
Docket No. ER14–1200, Southwestern
Public Service Company
Docket No. ER14–1201, Southwestern
Public Service Company
Docket No. ER14–1406, Midcontinent
Independent System Operator, Inc.
Docket No. ER14–1407, Southwest
Power Pool, Inc.
Docket No. ER14–1415, Southwest
Power Pool, Inc.
Docket No. ER14–1416, Southwest
Power Pool, Inc.
Docket No. ER14–1423, Southwest
Power Pool, Inc.
Docket No. ER14–1430, Southwest
Power Pool, Inc.
Docket No. ER14–1530, Southwest
Power Pool, Inc.
Docket No. ER14–1534, Southwest
Power Pool, Inc.
Docket No. ER14–1535, Southwest
Power Pool, Inc.
Docket No. ER14–1580, Southwest
Power Pool, Inc.
Docket No. ER14–1587, Southwest
Power Pool, Inc.
Docket No. ER14–1592, Southwest
Power Pool, Inc.
Docket No. ER14–1628, Southwest
Power Pool, Inc.
Docket No. ER14–1700, Southwest
Power Pool, Inc.
Docket No. ER14–1713, Midcontinent
Independent System Operator, Inc.
These meetings are open to the
public.
For more information, contact Patrick
Clarey, Office of Energy Market
Regulation, Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission at (317) 249–5937 or
patrick.clarey@ferc.gov.
Dated: April 22, 2014.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014–09666 Filed 4–28–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717–01–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:56 Apr 28, 2014
Jkt 232001
Dated: April 22, 2014.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission
[FR Doc. 2014–09663 Filed 4–28–14; 8:45 am]
[Docket No. EL14–40–000]
BILLING CODE 6717–01–P
Morongo Transmission LLC; Notice of
Petition For Declaratory Order
Take notice that on April 17, 2014,
Morongo Transmission LLC (Morongo
Transmission), pursuant to section
207(a)(2) of the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission’s (Commission)
Rules of Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR
385.207(a)(2), filed a petition for
declaratory order requesting that the
Commission approve a rate
methodology for Morongo Transmission
in connection with its participation in
the West of Devers Upgrade Project
being developed by South California
Edison Company (SCE), as more fully
described in the petition.
Any person desiring to intervene or to
protest this filing must file in
accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of
the Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214).
Protests will be considered by the
Commission in determining the
appropriate action to be taken, but will
not serve to make protestants parties to
the proceeding. Any person wishing to
become a party must file a notice of
intervention or motion to intervene, as
appropriate. Such notices, motions, or
protests must be filed on or before the
comment date. On or before the
comment date, it is not necessary to
serve motions to intervene or protests
on persons other than the Applicant.
The Commission encourages
electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper using the
‘‘eFiling’’ link at https://www.ferc.gov.
Persons unable to file electronically
should submit an original and 5 copies
of the protest or intervention to the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,
888 First Street NE., Washington, DC
20426.
This filing is accessible on-line at
https://www.ferc.gov, using the
‘‘eLibrary’’ link and is available for
review in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room in Washington, DC.
There is an ‘‘eSubscription’’ link on the
Web site that enables subscribers to
receive email notification when a
document is added to a subscribed
docket(s).
For assistance with any FERC Online
service, please email
FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov, or call
(866) 208–3676 (toll free). For TTY, call
(202) 502–8659.
Comment Date: 5:00 p.m. Eastern
Time on May 19, 2014.
PO 00000
Frm 00045
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[FRL–9910–10–Region 3]
Adequacy Status of the Submitted
Maintenance Plan for the District of
Columbia Portion of the Metropolitan
Washington, DC, (DC–MD–VA) 1997
Fine Particulate National Ambient Air
Quality Standard Nonattainment Area
for Transportation Conformity
Purposes
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice of adequacy.
AGENCY:
In this notice, the
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
is notifying the public that EPA has
found that the motor vehicle emissions
budgets (MVEBs) in the District of
Columbia portion of the Metropolitan
Washington, DC, (DC–MD–VA) 1997
Fine Particulate (PM2.5) National
Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS)
Nonattainment Area (hereafter, the
Washington Area) Maintenance Plan,
submitted as a State Implementation
Plan (SIP) revision by District of
Columbia Department of the
Environment (DDOE), are adequate for
transportation conformity purposes.
DATES: This finding is effective on May
14, 2014.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Gregory Becoat, Physical Scientist,
Office of Air Program Planning (3AP30),
United States Environmental Protection
Agency, Region III, 1650 Arch Street,
Philadelphia, PA 19103, (215) 814–
2036; becoat.gregory@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Today’s
notice is simply an announcement of a
finding that EPA has already made. EPA
Region III sent a letter to DDOE on
March 25, 2014, stating that EPA has
found that the MVEBs in the
Washington Area’s Maintenance Plan
for budget years 2017 and 2025,
submitted on June 3, 2013 by DDOE, are
adequate for transportation conformity
purposes. As a result of EPA’s finding,
the District of Columbia must use the
2017 and 2025 Tier 1 MVEBs shown in
Table 1 from the Washington Area’s
Maintenance Plan for future conformity
determinations for the 1997 PM2.5
NAAQS. The Tier 2 MVEBS shown in
Table 2 adds a twenty percent (20%)
transportation buffer to the mobile
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\29APN1.SGM
29APN1
23973
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 82 / Tuesday, April 29, 2014 / Notices
emissions inventory projections for
PM2.5 and nitrogen oxides (NOX) in 2017
and 2025. The Tier 2 MVEBs will
become effective if it is determined that
technical uncertainties primarily due to
model changes and to vehicle fleet
turnover, which may affect future motor
vehicle emissions inventories, lead to
motor vehicle emissions estimates above
the Tier 1 MVEBs. The determination
will be made through the interagency
consultation process and fully
documented within the first conformity
analysis that uses the Tier 2 MVEBs.
Receipt of the submittal was announced
on EPA’s transportation conformity Web
site. No comments were received. The
findings letter is available at EPA’s
conformity Web site: https://
www.epa.gov/otaq/stateresources/
transconf/adequacy.htm. The adequate
direct particulate matter (PM) and NOX
MVEBs for Tier 1 and Tier 2 are
provided in Table 1 and Table 2.
TABLE 1—TIER 1 ON-ROAD MVEBS CONTAINED IN THE WASHINGTON AREA MAINTENANCE PLAN FOR THE 1997 PM2.5
NAAQS
Motor vehicle emissions
budget for PM2.5 on-road
emissions
(tons per year)
Year
2017 .....................................................................................................................
2025 .....................................................................................................................
Mobile vehicle emissions
budget for NOX on-road
emissions
(tons per year)
1,787
1,350
41,709
27,400
TABLE 2—TIER 2 ON-ROAD MVEBS CONTAINED IN THE WASHINGTON AREA MAINTENANCE PLAN FOR THE 1997 PM2.5
NAAQS
Motor vehicle emissions
budget for PM2.5 on-road
emissions
(tons per year)
Year
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
2017 .....................................................................................................................
2025 .....................................................................................................................
Transportation conformity is required
by section 176(c) of the Clean Air Act
(CAA). EPA’s conformity rule requires
that transportation plans, transportation
improvement programs, and projects
conform to SIPs and establishes the
criteria and procedures for determining
whether or not they do. Conformity to
a SIP means that transportation
activities will not produce new air
quality violations, worsen existing
violations, or delay timely attainment of
the national ambient air quality
standards.
The criteria by which we determine
whether a SIP’s MVEBs are adequate for
conformity purposes are outlined in 40
CFR 93.118(e)(4). EPA described the
process for determining the adequacy of
submitted SIP budgets in a July 1, 2004
preamble starting at 69 FR 40038 and
used the information in these resources
in making this adequacy determination.
The District of Columbia did not
provide emission budgets for sulfur
dioxide (SO2), volatile organic
compounds (VOCs), or ammonia for the
Washington Area’s Maintenance Plan
because it concluded that emissions of
these precursors from motor vehicles are
not significant contributors to the area’s
PM2.5 air quality problem. The
transportation conformity rule provision
at 40 CFR 93.102(b)(2)(v) indicates that
conformity does not apply for these
precursors, due to the lack of motor
vehicle emissions budgets for these
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:56 Apr 28, 2014
Jkt 232001
2,144
1,586
precursors and state’s conclusion that
motor vehicle emissions of SO2, VOCs,
and ammonia do not contribute
significantly to the area’s PM2.5
nonattainment problem. This provision
of the transportation conformity rule
predates and was not disturbed by the
January 4, 2013 decision in the litigation
on the PM2.5 implementation rule.
EPA has preliminarily concluded that
the District’s decision to not include
budgets for SO2, VOCs, and ammonia is
consistent with the requirements of the
transportation conformity rule. That
decision does not affect EPA’s adequacy
finding for the submitted direct PM and
NOX MVEBs for the Washington Area’s
Maintenance Plan.
Please note that an adequacy review
is separate from EPA’s completeness
review, and should not be used to
prejudge EPA’s ultimate approval action
for the SIP. Even if EPA finds the
budgets for the Washington Area’s
Maintenance Plan adequate, the SIP
could later be disapproved. The finding
and the response to comments are
available at EPA’s conformity Web site:
https://www.epa.gov/otaq/
stateresources/transconf/adequacy.htm.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401–7671q.
Dated: April 11, 2014.
W. C. Early, Acting
Regional Administrator, Region III.
[FR Doc. 2014–09719 Filed 4–28–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
PO 00000
Frm 00046
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Mobile vehicle emissions
budget for NOX on-road
emissions
(tons per year)
50,051
32,880
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[EPA–R04–OW–2013–0728]
Public Water System Supervision
Program Revision for the State of
North Carolina
U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice of tentative approval.
AGENCY:
Notice is hereby given that
the State of North Carolina is revising its
approved Public Water System
Supervision Program. North Carolina
has adopted the following rules: Long
Term 1 Enhanced Surface Water
Treatment Rule, Long Term 2 Enhanced
Surface Water Treatment Rule, Stage 2
Disinfectants and Disinfection
Byproducts Rule, Lead and Copper Rule
Short-Term Regulatory Revisions and
Clarifications, and Ground Water Rule.
The EPA has determined that North
Carolina’s rules are no less stringent
than the corresponding federal
regulations. Therefore, the EPA is
tentatively approving this revision to
the State of North Carolina’s Public
Water System Supervision Program.
DATES: Any interested person may
request a public hearing. A request for
a public hearing must be submitted by
May 29, 2014, to the Regional
Administrator at the EPA Region 4
address shown below. The Regional
Administrator may deny frivolous or
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\29APN1.SGM
29APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 82 (Tuesday, April 29, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 23972-23973]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-09719]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
[FRL-9910-10-Region 3]
Adequacy Status of the Submitted Maintenance Plan for the
District of Columbia Portion of the Metropolitan Washington, DC, (DC-
MD-VA) 1997 Fine Particulate National Ambient Air Quality Standard
Nonattainment Area for Transportation Conformity Purposes
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice of adequacy.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In this notice, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is
notifying the public that EPA has found that the motor vehicle
emissions budgets (MVEBs) in the District of Columbia portion of the
Metropolitan Washington, DC, (DC-MD-VA) 1997 Fine Particulate
(PM2.5) National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS)
Nonattainment Area (hereafter, the Washington Area) Maintenance Plan,
submitted as a State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision by District of
Columbia Department of the Environment (DDOE), are adequate for
transportation conformity purposes.
DATES: This finding is effective on May 14, 2014.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gregory Becoat, Physical Scientist,
Office of Air Program Planning (3AP30), United States Environmental
Protection Agency, Region III, 1650 Arch Street, Philadelphia, PA
19103, (215) 814-2036; becoat.gregory@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Today's notice is simply an announcement of
a finding that EPA has already made. EPA Region III sent a letter to
DDOE on March 25, 2014, stating that EPA has found that the MVEBs in
the Washington Area's Maintenance Plan for budget years 2017 and 2025,
submitted on June 3, 2013 by DDOE, are adequate for transportation
conformity purposes. As a result of EPA's finding, the District of
Columbia must use the 2017 and 2025 Tier 1 MVEBs shown in Table 1 from
the Washington Area's Maintenance Plan for future conformity
determinations for the 1997 PM2.5 NAAQS. The Tier 2 MVEBS
shown in Table 2 adds a twenty percent (20%) transportation buffer to
the mobile
[[Page 23973]]
emissions inventory projections for PM2.5 and nitrogen
oxides (NOX) in 2017 and 2025. The Tier 2 MVEBs will become
effective if it is determined that technical uncertainties primarily
due to model changes and to vehicle fleet turnover, which may affect
future motor vehicle emissions inventories, lead to motor vehicle
emissions estimates above the Tier 1 MVEBs. The determination will be
made through the interagency consultation process and fully documented
within the first conformity analysis that uses the Tier 2 MVEBs.
Receipt of the submittal was announced on EPA's transportation
conformity Web site. No comments were received. The findings letter is
available at EPA's conformity Web site: https://www.epa.gov/otaq/stateresources/transconf/adequacy.htm. The adequate direct particulate
matter (PM) and NOX MVEBs for Tier 1 and Tier 2 are provided
in Table 1 and Table 2.
Table 1--Tier 1 On-Road MVEBs Contained in the Washington Area Maintenance Plan for the 1997 PM2.5 NAAQS
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Motor vehicle emissions Mobile vehicle emissions
Year budget for PM2.5 on-road budget for NOX on-road
emissions (tons per year) emissions (tons per year)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2017................................................ 1,787 41,709
2025................................................ 1,350 27,400
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table 2--Tier 2 On-Road MVEBs Contained in the Washington Area Maintenance Plan for the 1997 PM2.5 NAAQS
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Motor vehicle emissions Mobile vehicle emissions
Year budget for PM2.5 on-road budget for NOX on-road
emissions (tons per year) emissions (tons per year)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2017................................................ 2,144 50,051
2025................................................ 1,586 32,880
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Transportation conformity is required by section 176(c) of the
Clean Air Act (CAA). EPA's conformity rule requires that transportation
plans, transportation improvement programs, and projects conform to
SIPs and establishes the criteria and procedures for determining
whether or not they do. Conformity to a SIP means that transportation
activities will not produce new air quality violations, worsen existing
violations, or delay timely attainment of the national ambient air
quality standards.
The criteria by which we determine whether a SIP's MVEBs are
adequate for conformity purposes are outlined in 40 CFR 93.118(e)(4).
EPA described the process for determining the adequacy of submitted SIP
budgets in a July 1, 2004 preamble starting at 69 FR 40038 and used the
information in these resources in making this adequacy determination.
The District of Columbia did not provide emission budgets for sulfur
dioxide (SO2), volatile organic compounds (VOCs), or ammonia
for the Washington Area's Maintenance Plan because it concluded that
emissions of these precursors from motor vehicles are not significant
contributors to the area's PM2.5 air quality problem. The
transportation conformity rule provision at 40 CFR 93.102(b)(2)(v)
indicates that conformity does not apply for these precursors, due to
the lack of motor vehicle emissions budgets for these precursors and
state's conclusion that motor vehicle emissions of SO2,
VOCs, and ammonia do not contribute significantly to the area's
PM2.5 nonattainment problem. This provision of the
transportation conformity rule predates and was not disturbed by the
January 4, 2013 decision in the litigation on the PM2.5
implementation rule.
EPA has preliminarily concluded that the District's decision to not
include budgets for SO2, VOCs, and ammonia is consistent
with the requirements of the transportation conformity rule. That
decision does not affect EPA's adequacy finding for the submitted
direct PM and NOX MVEBs for the Washington Area's
Maintenance Plan.
Please note that an adequacy review is separate from EPA's
completeness review, and should not be used to prejudge EPA's ultimate
approval action for the SIP. Even if EPA finds the budgets for the
Washington Area's Maintenance Plan adequate, the SIP could later be
disapproved. The finding and the response to comments are available at
EPA's conformity Web site: https://www.epa.gov/otaq/stateresources/transconf/adequacy.htm.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401-7671q.
Dated: April 11, 2014.
W. C. Early, Acting
Regional Administrator, Region III.
[FR Doc. 2014-09719 Filed 4-28-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P