Waste Mine Methane Capture, Use, Sale, or Destruction, 23923-23926 [2014-09688]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 82 / Tuesday, April 29, 2014 / Proposed Rules
captured and included as part of the
comment that is placed in the public
docket and made available on the
Internet. If you submit an electronic
comment, EPA recommends that you
include your name and other contact
information in the body of your
comment and with any disk or CD–ROM
you submit. If EPA cannot read your
comment due to technical difficulties
and cannot contact you for clarification,
EPA may not be able to consider your
comment. Electronic files should avoid
the use of special characters, any form
of encryption, and be free of any defects
or viruses.
Docket: All documents in the
electronic docket are listed in the
www.regulations.gov index. Although
listed in the index, some information is
not publicly available, i.e., CBI or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material,
is not placed on the Internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy
form. Publicly available docket
materials are available either
electronically in www.regulations.gov or
in hard copy during normal business
hours at the Air Protection Division,
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
Region III, 1650 Arch Street,
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103.
Copies of the State submittal are
available at the Virginia Department of
Environmental Quality, 629 East Main
Street, Richmond, Virginia 23219.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Irene Shandruk, (215) 814–2166, or by
email at shandruk.irene@epa.gov.
For
further information, please see the
information provided in the direct final
action, entitled Control of Volatile
Organic Compound Emissions from
¯
Mondelez Global LLC, Inc.—Richmond
Bakery located in Henrico County,
Virginia, that is located in the ‘‘Rules
and Regulations’’ section of this Federal
Register publication.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Dated: April 11, 2014.
W.C. Early,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region III.
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
[FR Doc. 2014–09657 Filed 4–28–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Land Management
43 CFR Parts 3100, 3400, and 3500
[LLWO320000.L13200000.PP0000]
RIN 1004–AE23
Waste Mine Methane Capture, Use,
Sale, or Destruction
Bureau of Land Management,
Interior.
ACTION: Advance notice of proposed
rulemaking.
AGENCY:
The Bureau of Land
Management (BLM) requests comments
and suggestions that might assist the
agency in the establishment of a
program to capture, use, or destroy
waste mine methane that is released
into the mine environment and the
atmosphere as a direct consequence of
underground mining operations on
Federal leases for coal and other
minerals.
SUMMARY:
We will accept comments and
suggestions on the Advance Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking (ANPR) until June
30, 2014.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
and suggestions by any of the following
methods:
Mail: U.S. Department of the Interior,
Bureau of Land Management, 1849 C
Street NW., Room 2134LM, Attention:
WO–630, Washington, DC 20240–0001.
Personal or messenger delivery: U.S.
Department of the Interior, Bureau of
Land Management, 20 M Street SE.,
Room 2134LM, Attention: WO–630,
Washington, DC 20003.
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov.
Please include ‘‘Attn: 1004–AE23’’ in
your comments, regardless of the form
in which they are submitted.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
information on the substance of this
Advance Notice, please contact William
Radden-Lesage at (202) 912–7116. For
information on procedural matters,
please contact Jean Sonneman at (202)
912–7405. Persons who use a
telecommunications device for the deaf
(TDD) may call the Federal Information
Relay Service (FIRS) at 1–800–877–8339
to contact the above individuals during
business hours. FIRS is available 24
hours a day, 7 days a week.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
DATES:
I. Public Comment Procedures
Written comments or suggestions
should be specific, explain the
reasoning behind your comments and
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:01 Apr 28, 2014
Jkt 232001
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
23923
suggestions, and address the issues
outlined in this Advance Notice. For
comments and suggestions to be the
most useful and most likely to influence
decisions on the content of the proposed
rule, they should be substantive, and
facilitate the development and
implementation of an environmentally
responsible capture or destruction
system for methane released in the
development of federally owned
mineral resources.
The BLM is particularly interested in
receiving comments and suggestions
about the topics listed in Section III of
this Advance Notice. All
communication on these topics should
refer to RIN 1004–AE23 and may be
submitted by any one of several
methods listed under the ADDRESSES
section of this Advance Notice.
Comments and suggestions received
after the close of the comment period
(see DATES) will not necessarily be
considered or included in the
Administrative Record for any future
proposed rule. Likewise, comments and
suggestions delivered to an address
other than those listed above (see
ADDRESSES) need not be considered or
included in the Administrative Record
for the proposed rule.
Comments, including names and
street addresses of respondents, will be
available for public review at the
address listed under ADDRESSES for
‘‘Personal or messenger delivery’’
during regular business hours (7:45 a.m.
to 4:15 p.m.), Monday through Friday,
except holidays. Before including your
address, phone number, email address,
or other personal identifying
information in your comment, you
should be aware that your entire
comment—including your personal
identifying information—may be made
publicly available at any time. While
you can ask us in your comment to
withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
II. Background
Coal, and some other leasable
minerals, may naturally contain various
concentrations of methane. Methane can
be recovered from the coal or other
mineralized seams without mining
operations. The recovery of methane
from coal seams without mining
operations is known as coalbed methane
recovery and is common in the United
States (https://www.epa.gov/cmop/
accomplishments.html and https://
www.eia.gov/dnav/ng/hist/rngr52nus_
1a.htm). For Federal lands, recovery of
coalbed methane is authorized through
an oil and gas lease under the Mineral
E:\FR\FM\29APP1.SGM
29APP1
23924
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 82 / Tuesday, April 29, 2014 / Proposed Rules
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Leasing Act. However, in some cases
coalbed methane development and
extraction have not preceded mining, or
not all of the methane was recovered,
and through the process of mining,
methane can be released from the coal
or other mineralized seam into the mine
environment and atmosphere. Methane
in the mine environment can be a
significant safety issue for underground
miners in mining operations where the
mine methane may concentrate in
underground workings to explosive
levels. It may also make the air deadly
for miners to breathe. The Mine Safety
and Health Administration (MSHA) is
charged with regulating mine safety,
including ventilation of underground
mines for control of methane
concentrations in the mine
environment. (See 30 CFR part 75 for
coal mines and 30 CFR part 57 for other
types of mines.) The methane that is
liberated into the mine environment as
a direct result of mining operations is
known as waste mine methane (WMM).
The BLM is considering establishing a
system for the capture, use, sale, or
destruction of WMM liberated from
federally leased lands by active
underground mines. The purposes of
this Advance Notice are to summarize
the general issues, and to ask you to
inform us as we consider how to
proceed.
A. Statutory Authority and Federal
Policy
The provisions of the Mineral Leasing
Act, 30 U.S.C. 181 et seq., provide legal
authority for the agency to address the
capture, use, or destruction of waste
mine methane.
Section 30 of the MLA, 30 U.S.C. 187,
provides that: ‘‘Each lease shall contain
provisions for the purpose of insuring
the exercise of reasonable diligence,
skill, and care in the operation of said
property; a provision that such rules for
the safety and welfare of the miners and
for the prevention of undue waste as
may be prescribed by said Secretary
shall be observed. . .’’
Section 32 of the Mineral Leasing Act
(MLA), 30 U.S.C. 189, states that the
Secretary ‘‘is authorized to prescribe
necessary and proper rules and
regulations and to do any and all things
necessary to carry out and accomplish
the purposes of’’ the provisions of the
Mineral Leasing Act governing coal
leasing and other minerals specified
under that Act. Further, Section 7(a) of
the MLA, 30 U.S.C. 207, states that coal
leases, in addition to including lease
terms about the length of the primary
term, annual rentals and royalties,
‘‘shall include such other terms and
conditions as the Secretary shall
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:01 Apr 28, 2014
Jkt 232001
determine.’’ Section 24 of the MLA, 30
U.S.C. 262, provides similar discretion
to the Secretary with regard to sodium
leases.
This statutory authority applies to
federally owned minerals, including
coal and methane, on approximately
700 million acres of Federal mineral
estate.
These provisions provide the
Secretary with broad authority to
include terms and conditions in coal
and other solid mineral leases that are
designed to diminish the amount of
WMM that is vented into the air from
underground mining operations.
Section 7(a) of the MLA, 30 U.S.C.
207(a), also makes terms and conditions
of the lease subject to readjustment at
the end of a coal lease’s primary term
of 20 years and at the end of each 10year period thereafter. Based on the
readjustment authority, the BLM may
readjust lease terms to both authorize
and require lessees to capture otherwise
vented WMM to use or sell. The BLM
also has authority under the same
section of the MLA to include such
terms and conditions in new coal leases.
In addition, reducing WMM venting
would reduce emissions of a potent
greenhouse gas, consistent with the
President’s Climate Action Plan—
Strategy to Reduce Methane Emissions
(March 2014) and Secretarial Order
3289, Amendment No. 1 (‘‘Addressing
the Impacts of Climate Change on
America’s Water, Land, and other
Natural and Cultural Resources,’’ dated
February 22, 2010).
B. Current Practice
At present, the following methods are
used to remove WMM from active
underground mines:
1. Methane drainage before mining.
Vertical or horizontal wells are used to
drain methane from the mineral deposit
in advance of the mining. Traditional
methane drainage before mining is
similar to coalbed methane
development, with vertical drilling from
the earth’s surface to intersect the
methane producing seam and that
functions independent of any
underground mining operations.
Coalbed methane development, and
similarly methane drainage in advance
of mining, is authorized for federally
owned minerals through an oil and gas
lease. While used less frequently,
methane recovery can also be developed
in advance of mining by horizontal
drilling within the seam being
developed from within an established
underground mine. Because this type of
methane recovery is induced by drilling
and functions independently of the
mining operation, recovery from Federal
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
lands would require a Federal oil and
gas lease and would not be considered
waste mine methane. Under these
circumstances, the anticipated
concentrations of methane would be
greater than 80 percent. A number of
documents related to drainage and
degasification techniques can be found
at https://www.epa.gov/cmop/resources/
drain_degas.html; or https://
www.rpsea.org/media/files/project/
6cb39f9a/07122_27_ts_overview_
current_coalbedf_methane_extraction_
technologies_12_01_08_p.pdf;
2. Methane drainage during mining.
Vertical wells are used to drain gob
(rubble) gas from closed and mined-out
areas. As underground mining
progresses, pressure build-up in the
unmined supporting pillars and in
surrounding rock will liberate methane
entrapped in the rock which in turn
needs to be vented for safety purposes.
The majority of this methane is
ventilated through a series of vertical
ventilation wells that are drilled in
advance of the mine. As a result of
venting the methane, the mine
environment is improved and kept safe
for the miners. Methane that is vented
by vertical ventilation wells for miner
safety can be released to the atmosphere
(currently the most common approach),
destroyed by combustion in a flare, or
captured for beneficial use or
competitive sale. All of these methods
must be done in a manner that preserves
the safety of the miners. Anticipated
methane concentrations from
ventilation wells are expected to be less
than 80 percent. This technology is
described at the EPA–CMOP Web site
(https://www.epa.gov/cmop/docs/
ggasrecpv.pdf) or https://www.unece.org/
fileadmin/DAM/energy/se/pdfs/cmm/
pub/BestPractGuide_MethDrain_
es31.pdf); or
3. Treatment of ventilation air
methane (VAM). Methane released into
the mine environment is diluted with
large quantities of fresh air, and fans are
used to exhaust the air from
underground mines to the earth’s
surface. Methane can be released into
the mine atmosphere from the seam
being mined as well as from rock above
and below the mine. Because methane
in the mine environment can create an
explosion hazard and reduce air quality
for underground miners, dilution of the
methane with large quantities of fresh
air is necessary in order to mitigate the
explosion risk and make the work place
safe. Concentrations of methane are
regularly monitored and must be
maintained in accordance with MSHA
standards. Because the VAM methane
concentrations are typically less than
one percent methane, it probably is not
E:\FR\FM\29APP1.SGM
29APP1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 82 / Tuesday, April 29, 2014 / Proposed Rules
worthwhile to collect VAM as an energy
source. However, methane within the
VAM can be oxidized by passing the air
through a high-temperature grid known
as a regenerative thermal or catalytic
oxidizer, which will oxidize, or burn,
low concentrations of methane. The
greenhouse gas potential of the VAM is
reduced by this oxidation process. The
regenerative thermal or catalytic
oxidizer technology is described at the
EPA–CMOP Web site https://
www.epa.gov/cmop/docs/2012-VAMupdate.pdf.
Methane is emitted not only from
underground coal mines, but also from
active surface coal mines and postmining operations, as well as
abandoned or closed underground coal
mines. In 2003, BLM established a
policy to alleviate conflicts between
coalbed methane development by
federal oil and gas lessees and active
surface coal mining by federal coal
lessees. That policy has led to a
reduction of methane emissions from
some surface coal mines. Policy and
Guidance on Conflicts between Coalbed
Natural Gas (CBNG) and Surface Coal
Mine Development in the Powder River
Basin, BLM–WO–IM–2003–253 (Aug.
21, 2003). More background on mine
methane can be found at the
Environmental Protection Agency
Coalbed Methane Outreach Program
Web site at https://www.epa.gov/cmop/.
III. Description of Information
Requested
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
General Questions
As an aid to establishing a safe and
effective system for capture, use, sale, or
disposal of WMM from Federal lands,
we encourage members of the public to
provide comments and suggestions on
the following key components:
(1) Technologies and methods for
capture, processing, use, transport of
methane gas (by pipeline, railroad, or
truck), or transmission of methanegenerated electricity;
(2) Methane destruction as an
alternative to productive use or release;
(3) Economics of capture, use, and
destruction;
(4) Possible incentives that BLM
could offer to encourage methane
destruction, capture, or use; and
(5) Destruction of ventilation air
methane.
The BLM is particularly interested in
receiving comments on the following
questions relating to policy or
regulations it may develop concerning
WMM capture, use, or destruction:
1. What steps might the Bureau take
to reduce WMM emissions from mining
on Federal lands?
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:01 Apr 28, 2014
Jkt 232001
2. What technologies and methods
exist for the capture and use or
destruction of high, medium, and low
quality mine methane? What are the
design, economic, and specific
operational considerations of each
technology or method?
3. What are the acquisition and
operation costs for equipment and
facilities that can be used for the
capture, use, or destruction of WMM?
Please also qualify your response with
the size or capacity of the respective
equipment you suggest.
4. What are the possible financial
impacts of incentives for the capture,
use, or destruction of WMM?
5. Would cooperative ventures or
partnerships encourage methane capture
and use, and how could the BLM assist
with their formation?
6. What are the barriers to WMM
capture on Federal land and how might
the BLM reduce these barriers to
facilitate methane capture and use:
a. From drainage wells?
b. From gob gas?
c. From ventilation air (ventilation air
methane or VAM)?
7. Should WMM capture be mandated
wherever technically and economically
feasible and consistent with safe
operating practices, or should BLM
consider the use of incentives to
encourage mine operators to invest
capital for the acquisition of equipment
and infrastructure required for the
capture and use or destruction of WMM
collected from Federal lands? To the
extent the BLM may consider using
incentives, including but not limited to
royalty rate reductions, for methane gas
or source minerals, or both, what
incentive(s) would be most effective in
achieving WMM capture objectives
while balancing this objective with the
need for transparency and a fair return
to taxpayers from Federal mineral
production?
8. What kinds of surface disturbances
and environmental impacts might be
caused by methane capture activities,
including the installation of collection
pipes, pumps, or other equipment?
9. Is there a reason to believe
incentives for mine methane recovery
from drainage wells would affect, either
positively or negatively, mine safety or
coal production and royalty revenues?
10. How should Best Practices for
methane management on Federal lands
be defined and in what ways should the
BLM encourage Best Practices for
methane management on Federal lands?
Feasibility
Other important considerations in
developing a program for the capture of
WMM are the economic impacts on
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
23925
prospective projects, impacts on the
return to taxpayers from Federal leases,
and potential offsetting effects on net
methane emissions. Any shift in mining
activities away from Federal lands and
toward lands with fewer operating
requirements could reduce the net
emissions benefit of requiring WMM
capture on Federal leases. There is also
the potential for Federal royalty
revenues and bonuses to be reduced.
However, if operators could sell (or use
on-site) the captured WMM, requiring
capture may increase Federal royalty
revenues. The BLM is interested in your
thoughts and comments about these
issues.
The BLM is also interested in your
views on the technological and
economic feasibility of various methods
of reducing WMM emissions, including
the following:
1. Abatement by Conversion to
Carbon Dioxide or By Other Means. If
there are no cost-effective end-uses for
WMM (either on-site or off-site sales),
methane destruction using a flare or
oxidizer is preferred to releasing the
WMM to the atmosphere. Conversion of
methane into carbon dioxide and water
through combustion or oxidation
reduces the greenhouse potential of this
waste gas. Carbon dioxide, also a
greenhouse gas, is produced in the
combustion of methane (whether
through flaring or in a combined-cycle
engine). However, based on the Global
Warming Potential (GWP) (a measure of
the climate impact of different gases that
combines lifetime with radiative
efficiency in the atmosphere), methane
is many times more potent per pound
than carbon dioxide.1 In addition, the
greenhouse potential of methane is 21
times that of carbon dioxide with a 12year life in the atmosphere. https://
www.epa.gov/climatechange/
ghgemissions/gases/ch4.html. Also
important to note is that most methane
released into the atmosphere is
eventually oxidized to carbon dioxide in
any case.2 Therefore, combustion of
methane through flaring or other means
has an order of magnitude lower impact
1 Forster, P. et al. (2007) Changes in Atmospheric
Constituents and in Radiative Forcing, In: Climate
Change 2007. The Physical Science Basis.
Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth
Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel
on Climate Change [Solomon, S., D. Qin, M.
Manning, Z. Chen, M. Marquis, K.B. Averyt, M.
Tignor and H.L. Miller (eds.)]. Cambridge
University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and
New York, NY, USA.
2 O. Boucher, P. Friedlingstein, B. Collins, K.P.
Shine, The indirect global warming potential and
global temperature change potential due to methane
oxidation, Environ. Res. Lett. 4, 044007 (2009).
E:\FR\FM\29APP1.SGM
29APP1
23926
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 82 / Tuesday, April 29, 2014 / Proposed Rules
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646–4064,
or (email)
Luis.Rodriguez3@fema.dhs.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Luis
Rodriguez, Chief, Engineering
Management Branch, Federal Insurance
and Mitigation Administration, Federal
Emergency Management Agency, 500 C
Street SW., Washington, DC 20472,
(202) 646–4064, or (email)
Luis.Rodriguez3@fema.dhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On
November 24, 2008, FEMA published a
proposed rulemaking at 73 FR 70948,
proposing flood elevation
determinations along one or more
flooding sources in Dona Ana County,
New Mexico. Because FEMA has or will
be issuing a Revised Preliminary Flood
Insurance Rate Map, and if necessary a
Flood Insurance Study report, featuring
updated flood hazard information, the
proposed rulemaking is being
withdrawn. A Notice of Proposed Flood
Hazard Determinations will be
published in the Federal Register and in
the affected community’s local
newspaper.
1068, to Luis Rodriguez, Chief,
Engineering Management Branch,
Federal Insurance and Mitigation
Administration, Federal Emergency
Management Agency, 500 C Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646–4064,
or (email)
Luis.Rodriguez3@fema.dhs.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Luis
Rodriguez, Chief, Engineering
Management Branch, Federal Insurance
and Mitigation Administration, Federal
Emergency Management Agency, 500 C
Street SW., Washington, DC 20472,
(202) 646–4064, or (email)
Luis.Rodriguez3@fema.dhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On
September 15, 2009, FEMA published a
proposed rulemaking at 74 FR 47182,
proposing flood elevation
determinations along one or more
flooding sources in Natchitoches Parish,
Louisiana. FEMA is withdrawing the
proposed rulemaking and is no longer
proposing flood elevation determination
changes along the flooding sources
identified in the above-referenced
rulemaking publication.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 4104; 44 CFR 67.4.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 4104; 44 CFR 67.4.
BILLING CODE 4310–84–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Dated: April 14, 2014.
Roy E. Wright,
Deputy Associate Administrator for
Mitigation, Department of Homeland
Security, Federal Emergency Management
Agency.
Dated: April 14, 2014.
Roy E. Wright,
Deputy Associate Administrator for
Mitigation, Department of Homeland
Security, Federal Emergency Management
Agency.
[FR Doc. 2014–09746 Filed 4–28–14; 8:45 am]
[FR Doc. 2014–09736 Filed 4–28–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–12–P
BILLING CODE 9110–12–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
[Docket ID FEMA–2014–0002; Internal
Agency Docket No. FEMA–B–1021]
Federal Emergency Management
Agency
Federal Emergency Management
Agency
Proposed Flood Elevation
Determinations for Dona Ana County,
New Mexico and Incorporated Areas
44 CFR Part 67
44 CFR Part 67
[Docket ID FEMA–2014–0002; Internal
Agency Docket No. FEMA–B–1068]
[Docket ID FEMA–2014–0002; Internal
Agency Docket No. FEMA–B–7756]
Proposed Flood Elevation
Determinations for Natchitoches
Parish, Louisiana, and Incorporated
Areas
Proposed Flood Elevation
Determinations
on climate than release of that methane
unburned.
2. Processing for Pipeline Quality
Gas—Methane is the principal
component of natural gas, which is used
for heating and industrial purposes.
WMM may be contaminated with air (or
other materials) to various degrees when
it is released and collected.
Contaminants may need to be removed
from the methane before it can be sold
as natural gas. A general reference
concerning the upgrade of WMM to
pipeline-quality gas is available from
the EPA at https://www.epa.gov/cmop/
docs/red24.pdf.
3. Other Mine Methane End Uses—
New technologies and innovative use of
existing technologies are always
evolving. The BLM is also interested in
receiving comments regarding other
potential WMM reduction methods or
technologies that could be applicable to
its mineral leasing programs.
Please send or deliver comments to
one of the addresses listed under
ADDRESSES. Please refer to RIN 1004–
AE23 in your correspondence.
Tommy P. Beaudreau,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Land
and Minerals Management.
[FR Doc. 2014–09688 Filed 4–24–14; 11:15 am]
Federal Emergency Management
Agency
44 CFR Part 67
Federal Emergency
Management Agency, DHS.
ACTION: Proposed rule; withdrawal.
AGENCY:
The Federal Emergency
Management Agency (FEMA) is
withdrawing its proposed rule
concerning proposed flood elevation
determinations for Dona Ana County,
New Mexico and Incorporated Areas.
DATES: This withdrawal is effective on
April 29, 2014.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by Docket No. FEMA–B–
1021, to Luis Rodriguez, Chief,
Engineering Management Branch,
Federal Insurance and Mitigation
Administration, Federal Emergency
Management Agency, 500 C Street SW.,
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:01 Apr 28, 2014
Jkt 232001
Federal Emergency
Management Agency, DHS.
ACTION: Proposed rule; withdrawal.
AGENCY:
The Federal Emergency
Management Agency (FEMA) is
withdrawing its proposed rule
concerning proposed flood elevation
determinations for Natchitoches Parish,
Louisiana, and Incorporated Areas.
DATES: This withdrawal is effective
April 29, 2014.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by Docket No. FEMA–B–
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Federal Emergency
Management Agency, DHS.
ACTION: Proposed rule; correction.
AGENCY:
On January 16, 2008, the
Federal Emergency Management Agency
(FEMA) published in the Federal
Register a proposed rule that included
modified Base (1% annual-chance)
Flood Elevations (BFEs) for the
locations at the intersection with IH 440
and at the confluence with Palarm Creek
along the Arkansas River in Pulaski
County, Arkansas. FEMA is no longer
proposing these flood elevation
determination changes along the
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\29APP1.SGM
29APP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 82 (Tuesday, April 29, 2014)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 23923-23926]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-09688]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Land Management
43 CFR Parts 3100, 3400, and 3500
[LLWO320000.L13200000.PP0000]
RIN 1004-AE23
Waste Mine Methane Capture, Use, Sale, or Destruction
AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.
ACTION: Advance notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) requests comments and
suggestions that might assist the agency in the establishment of a
program to capture, use, or destroy waste mine methane that is released
into the mine environment and the atmosphere as a direct consequence of
underground mining operations on Federal leases for coal and other
minerals.
DATES: We will accept comments and suggestions on the Advance Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking (ANPR) until June 30, 2014.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments and suggestions by any of the
following methods:
Mail: U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management,
1849 C Street NW., Room 2134LM, Attention: WO-630, Washington, DC
20240-0001.
Personal or messenger delivery: U.S. Department of the Interior,
Bureau of Land Management, 20 M Street SE., Room 2134LM, Attention: WO-
630, Washington, DC 20003.
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Please include ``Attn: 1004-AE23'' in your comments, regardless of the
form in which they are submitted.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For information on the substance of
this Advance Notice, please contact William Radden-Lesage at (202) 912-
7116. For information on procedural matters, please contact Jean
Sonneman at (202) 912-7405. Persons who use a telecommunications device
for the deaf (TDD) may call the Federal Information Relay Service
(FIRS) at 1-800-877-8339 to contact the above individuals during
business hours. FIRS is available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Public Comment Procedures
Written comments or suggestions should be specific, explain the
reasoning behind your comments and suggestions, and address the issues
outlined in this Advance Notice. For comments and suggestions to be the
most useful and most likely to influence decisions on the content of
the proposed rule, they should be substantive, and facilitate the
development and implementation of an environmentally responsible
capture or destruction system for methane released in the development
of federally owned mineral resources.
The BLM is particularly interested in receiving comments and
suggestions about the topics listed in Section III of this Advance
Notice. All communication on these topics should refer to RIN 1004-AE23
and may be submitted by any one of several methods listed under the
ADDRESSES section of this Advance Notice.
Comments and suggestions received after the close of the comment
period (see DATES) will not necessarily be considered or included in
the Administrative Record for any future proposed rule. Likewise,
comments and suggestions delivered to an address other than those
listed above (see ADDRESSES) need not be considered or included in the
Administrative Record for the proposed rule.
Comments, including names and street addresses of respondents, will
be available for public review at the address listed under ADDRESSES
for ``Personal or messenger delivery'' during regular business hours
(7:45 a.m. to 4:15 p.m.), Monday through Friday, except holidays.
Before including your address, phone number, email address, or other
personal identifying information in your comment, you should be aware
that your entire comment--including your personal identifying
information--may be made publicly available at any time. While you can
ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be
able to do so.
II. Background
Coal, and some other leasable minerals, may naturally contain
various concentrations of methane. Methane can be recovered from the
coal or other mineralized seams without mining operations. The recovery
of methane from coal seams without mining operations is known as
coalbed methane recovery and is common in the United States (https://www.epa.gov/cmop/accomplishments.html and https://www.eia.gov/dnav/ng/hist/rngr52nus_1a.htm). For Federal lands, recovery of coalbed methane
is authorized through an oil and gas lease under the Mineral
[[Page 23924]]
Leasing Act. However, in some cases coalbed methane development and
extraction have not preceded mining, or not all of the methane was
recovered, and through the process of mining, methane can be released
from the coal or other mineralized seam into the mine environment and
atmosphere. Methane in the mine environment can be a significant safety
issue for underground miners in mining operations where the mine
methane may concentrate in underground workings to explosive levels. It
may also make the air deadly for miners to breathe. The Mine Safety and
Health Administration (MSHA) is charged with regulating mine safety,
including ventilation of underground mines for control of methane
concentrations in the mine environment. (See 30 CFR part 75 for coal
mines and 30 CFR part 57 for other types of mines.) The methane that is
liberated into the mine environment as a direct result of mining
operations is known as waste mine methane (WMM).
The BLM is considering establishing a system for the capture, use,
sale, or destruction of WMM liberated from federally leased lands by
active underground mines. The purposes of this Advance Notice are to
summarize the general issues, and to ask you to inform us as we
consider how to proceed.
A. Statutory Authority and Federal Policy
The provisions of the Mineral Leasing Act, 30 U.S.C. 181 et seq.,
provide legal authority for the agency to address the capture, use, or
destruction of waste mine methane.
Section 30 of the MLA, 30 U.S.C. 187, provides that: ``Each lease
shall contain provisions for the purpose of insuring the exercise of
reasonable diligence, skill, and care in the operation of said
property; a provision that such rules for the safety and welfare of the
miners and for the prevention of undue waste as may be prescribed by
said Secretary shall be observed. . .''
Section 32 of the Mineral Leasing Act (MLA), 30 U.S.C. 189, states
that the Secretary ``is authorized to prescribe necessary and proper
rules and regulations and to do any and all things necessary to carry
out and accomplish the purposes of'' the provisions of the Mineral
Leasing Act governing coal leasing and other minerals specified under
that Act. Further, Section 7(a) of the MLA, 30 U.S.C. 207, states that
coal leases, in addition to including lease terms about the length of
the primary term, annual rentals and royalties, ``shall include such
other terms and conditions as the Secretary shall determine.'' Section
24 of the MLA, 30 U.S.C. 262, provides similar discretion to the
Secretary with regard to sodium leases.
This statutory authority applies to federally owned minerals,
including coal and methane, on approximately 700 million acres of
Federal mineral estate.
These provisions provide the Secretary with broad authority to
include terms and conditions in coal and other solid mineral leases
that are designed to diminish the amount of WMM that is vented into the
air from underground mining operations.
Section 7(a) of the MLA, 30 U.S.C. 207(a), also makes terms and
conditions of the lease subject to readjustment at the end of a coal
lease's primary term of 20 years and at the end of each 10-year period
thereafter. Based on the readjustment authority, the BLM may readjust
lease terms to both authorize and require lessees to capture otherwise
vented WMM to use or sell. The BLM also has authority under the same
section of the MLA to include such terms and conditions in new coal
leases.
In addition, reducing WMM venting would reduce emissions of a
potent greenhouse gas, consistent with the President's Climate Action
Plan--Strategy to Reduce Methane Emissions (March 2014) and Secretarial
Order 3289, Amendment No. 1 (``Addressing the Impacts of Climate Change
on America's Water, Land, and other Natural and Cultural Resources,''
dated February 22, 2010).
B. Current Practice
At present, the following methods are used to remove WMM from
active underground mines:
1. Methane drainage before mining. Vertical or horizontal wells are
used to drain methane from the mineral deposit in advance of the
mining. Traditional methane drainage before mining is similar to
coalbed methane development, with vertical drilling from the earth's
surface to intersect the methane producing seam and that functions
independent of any underground mining operations. Coalbed methane
development, and similarly methane drainage in advance of mining, is
authorized for federally owned minerals through an oil and gas lease.
While used less frequently, methane recovery can also be developed in
advance of mining by horizontal drilling within the seam being
developed from within an established underground mine. Because this
type of methane recovery is induced by drilling and functions
independently of the mining operation, recovery from Federal lands
would require a Federal oil and gas lease and would not be considered
waste mine methane. Under these circumstances, the anticipated
concentrations of methane would be greater than 80 percent. A number of
documents related to drainage and degasification techniques can be
found at https://www.epa.gov/cmop/resources/drain_degas.html; or https://www.rpsea.org/media/files/project/6cb39f9a/07122_27_ts_overview_current_coalbedf_methane_extraction_technologies_12_01_08_p.pdf;
2. Methane drainage during mining. Vertical wells are used to drain
gob (rubble) gas from closed and mined-out areas. As underground mining
progresses, pressure build-up in the unmined supporting pillars and in
surrounding rock will liberate methane entrapped in the rock which in
turn needs to be vented for safety purposes. The majority of this
methane is ventilated through a series of vertical ventilation wells
that are drilled in advance of the mine. As a result of venting the
methane, the mine environment is improved and kept safe for the miners.
Methane that is vented by vertical ventilation wells for miner safety
can be released to the atmosphere (currently the most common approach),
destroyed by combustion in a flare, or captured for beneficial use or
competitive sale. All of these methods must be done in a manner that
preserves the safety of the miners. Anticipated methane concentrations
from ventilation wells are expected to be less than 80 percent. This
technology is described at the EPA-CMOP Web site (https://www.epa.gov/cmop/docs/ggasrecpv.pdf) or https://www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/energy/se/pdfs/cmm/pub/BestPractGuide_MethDrain_es31.pdf); or
3. Treatment of ventilation air methane (VAM). Methane released
into the mine environment is diluted with large quantities of fresh
air, and fans are used to exhaust the air from underground mines to the
earth's surface. Methane can be released into the mine atmosphere from
the seam being mined as well as from rock above and below the mine.
Because methane in the mine environment can create an explosion hazard
and reduce air quality for underground miners, dilution of the methane
with large quantities of fresh air is necessary in order to mitigate
the explosion risk and make the work place safe. Concentrations of
methane are regularly monitored and must be maintained in accordance
with MSHA standards. Because the VAM methane concentrations are
typically less than one percent methane, it probably is not
[[Page 23925]]
worthwhile to collect VAM as an energy source. However, methane within
the VAM can be oxidized by passing the air through a high-temperature
grid known as a regenerative thermal or catalytic oxidizer, which will
oxidize, or burn, low concentrations of methane. The greenhouse gas
potential of the VAM is reduced by this oxidation process. The
regenerative thermal or catalytic oxidizer technology is described at
the EPA-CMOP Web site https://www.epa.gov/cmop/docs/2012-VAM-update.pdf.
Methane is emitted not only from underground coal mines, but also
from active surface coal mines and post-mining operations, as well as
abandoned or closed underground coal mines. In 2003, BLM established a
policy to alleviate conflicts between coalbed methane development by
federal oil and gas lessees and active surface coal mining by federal
coal lessees. That policy has led to a reduction of methane emissions
from some surface coal mines. Policy and Guidance on Conflicts between
Coalbed Natural Gas (CBNG) and Surface Coal Mine Development in the
Powder River Basin, BLM-WO-IM-2003-253 (Aug. 21, 2003). More background
on mine methane can be found at the Environmental Protection Agency
Coalbed Methane Outreach Program Web site at https://www.epa.gov/cmop/.
III. Description of Information Requested
General Questions
As an aid to establishing a safe and effective system for capture,
use, sale, or disposal of WMM from Federal lands, we encourage members
of the public to provide comments and suggestions on the following key
components:
(1) Technologies and methods for capture, processing, use,
transport of methane gas (by pipeline, railroad, or truck), or
transmission of methane-generated electricity;
(2) Methane destruction as an alternative to productive use or
release;
(3) Economics of capture, use, and destruction;
(4) Possible incentives that BLM could offer to encourage methane
destruction, capture, or use; and
(5) Destruction of ventilation air methane.
The BLM is particularly interested in receiving comments on the
following questions relating to policy or regulations it may develop
concerning WMM capture, use, or destruction:
1. What steps might the Bureau take to reduce WMM emissions from
mining on Federal lands?
2. What technologies and methods exist for the capture and use or
destruction of high, medium, and low quality mine methane? What are the
design, economic, and specific operational considerations of each
technology or method?
3. What are the acquisition and operation costs for equipment and
facilities that can be used for the capture, use, or destruction of
WMM? Please also qualify your response with the size or capacity of the
respective equipment you suggest.
4. What are the possible financial impacts of incentives for the
capture, use, or destruction of WMM?
5. Would cooperative ventures or partnerships encourage methane
capture and use, and how could the BLM assist with their formation?
6. What are the barriers to WMM capture on Federal land and how
might the BLM reduce these barriers to facilitate methane capture and
use:
a. From drainage wells?
b. From gob gas?
c. From ventilation air (ventilation air methane or VAM)?
7. Should WMM capture be mandated wherever technically and
economically feasible and consistent with safe operating practices, or
should BLM consider the use of incentives to encourage mine operators
to invest capital for the acquisition of equipment and infrastructure
required for the capture and use or destruction of WMM collected from
Federal lands? To the extent the BLM may consider using incentives,
including but not limited to royalty rate reductions, for methane gas
or source minerals, or both, what incentive(s) would be most effective
in achieving WMM capture objectives while balancing this objective with
the need for transparency and a fair return to taxpayers from Federal
mineral production?
8. What kinds of surface disturbances and environmental impacts
might be caused by methane capture activities, including the
installation of collection pipes, pumps, or other equipment?
9. Is there a reason to believe incentives for mine methane
recovery from drainage wells would affect, either positively or
negatively, mine safety or coal production and royalty revenues?
10. How should Best Practices for methane management on Federal
lands be defined and in what ways should the BLM encourage Best
Practices for methane management on Federal lands?
Feasibility
Other important considerations in developing a program for the
capture of WMM are the economic impacts on prospective projects,
impacts on the return to taxpayers from Federal leases, and potential
offsetting effects on net methane emissions. Any shift in mining
activities away from Federal lands and toward lands with fewer
operating requirements could reduce the net emissions benefit of
requiring WMM capture on Federal leases. There is also the potential
for Federal royalty revenues and bonuses to be reduced. However, if
operators could sell (or use on-site) the captured WMM, requiring
capture may increase Federal royalty revenues. The BLM is interested in
your thoughts and comments about these issues.
The BLM is also interested in your views on the technological and
economic feasibility of various methods of reducing WMM emissions,
including the following:
1. Abatement by Conversion to Carbon Dioxide or By Other Means. If
there are no cost-effective end-uses for WMM (either on-site or off-
site sales), methane destruction using a flare or oxidizer is preferred
to releasing the WMM to the atmosphere. Conversion of methane into
carbon dioxide and water through combustion or oxidation reduces the
greenhouse potential of this waste gas. Carbon dioxide, also a
greenhouse gas, is produced in the combustion of methane (whether
through flaring or in a combined-cycle engine). However, based on the
Global Warming Potential (GWP) (a measure of the climate impact of
different gases that combines lifetime with radiative efficiency in the
atmosphere), methane is many times more potent per pound than carbon
dioxide.\1\ In addition, the greenhouse potential of methane is 21
times that of carbon dioxide with a 12-year life in the atmosphere.
https://www.epa.gov/climatechange/ghgemissions/gases/ch4.html. Also
important to note is that most methane released into the atmosphere is
eventually oxidized to carbon dioxide in any case.\2\ Therefore,
combustion of methane through flaring or other means has an order of
magnitude lower impact
[[Page 23926]]
on climate than release of that methane unburned.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Forster, P. et al. (2007) Changes in Atmospheric
Constituents and in Radiative Forcing, In: Climate Change 2007. The
Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the
Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate
Change [Solomon, S., D. Qin, M. Manning, Z. Chen, M. Marquis, K.B.
Averyt, M. Tignor and H.L. Miller (eds.)]. Cambridge University
Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA.
\2\ O. Boucher, P. Friedlingstein, B. Collins, K.P. Shine, The
indirect global warming potential and global temperature change
potential due to methane oxidation, Environ. Res. Lett. 4, 044007
(2009).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Processing for Pipeline Quality Gas--Methane is the principal
component of natural gas, which is used for heating and industrial
purposes. WMM may be contaminated with air (or other materials) to
various degrees when it is released and collected. Contaminants may
need to be removed from the methane before it can be sold as natural
gas. A general reference concerning the upgrade of WMM to pipeline-
quality gas is available from the EPA at https://www.epa.gov/cmop/docs/red24.pdf.
3. Other Mine Methane End Uses--New technologies and innovative use
of existing technologies are always evolving. The BLM is also
interested in receiving comments regarding other potential WMM
reduction methods or technologies that could be applicable to its
mineral leasing programs.
Please send or deliver comments to one of the addresses listed
under ADDRESSES. Please refer to RIN 1004-AE23 in your correspondence.
Tommy P. Beaudreau,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Land and Minerals Management.
[FR Doc. 2014-09688 Filed 4-24-14; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-84-P