Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Saugus River, Revere and Lynn, MA, 22911-22913 [2014-09384]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 80 / Friday, April 25, 2014 / Proposed Rules
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Coast Guard
2. Viewing Comments and Documents
Tables of Acronyms
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
We encourage you to participate in
this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All
comments received will be posted,
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov and will include
any personal information you have
provided.
To view comments, as well as
documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to
https://www.regulations.gov, type the
docket number (USCG–2014–0272) in
the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click
‘‘SEARCH.’’ Click on Open Docket
Folder on the line associated with this
rulemaking. You may also visit either
the Docket Management Facility in
Room W12–140 on the ground floor of
the Department of Transportation West
Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. We have an
agreement with the Department of
Transportation to use the Docket
Management Facility.
1. Submitting Comments
3. Privacy Act
If you submit a comment, please
include the docket number for this
rulemaking (USCG–2014–0272),
indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment
applies, and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation. You
may submit your comments and
material online (https://
www.regulations.gov), or by fax, mail or
hand delivery, but please use only one
of these means. If you submit a
comment online via https://
www.regulations.gov, it will be
considered received by the Coast Guard
when you successfully transmit the
comment. If you fax, hand delivery, or
mail your comment, it will be
considered as having been received by
the Coast Guard when it is received at
the Docket Management Facility. We
recommend that you include your name
and a mailing address, an email address,
or a phone number in the body of your
document so that we can contact you if
we have questions regarding your
submission.
To submit your comment online, go to
https://www.regulations.gov, type the
docket number USCG–2014–0272 in the
‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click ‘‘SEARCH.’’
Click on ‘‘Submit a Comment’’ on the
line associated with this rulemaking. If
you submit your comments by mail or
hand delivery, submit them in an
unbound format, no larger than 81⁄2 by
11 inches, suitable for copying and
electronic filing. If you submit them by
mail and would like to know that they
reached the Facility, please enclose a
stamped, self-addressed postcard or
envelope. We will consider all
comments and material received during
the comment period and may change
the rule based on your comments.
Anyone can search the electronic
form of comments received into any of
our dockets by the name of the
individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on
behalf of an association, business, labor
union, etc.). You may review a Privacy
Act notice regarding our public dockets
in the January 17, 2008, issue of the
Federal Register (73 FR 3316).
RIN 1625–AA09
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
§ Section Symbol
U.S.C. United States Code
Drawbridge Operation Regulation;
Saugus River, Revere and Lynn, MA
A. Public Participation and Request for
Comments
33 CFR Part 117
[Docket No. USCG–2014–0272]
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard proposes to
modify the operating schedule that
governs the General Edwards SR1A
Bridge across the Saugus River at mile
1.7, between Revere and Lynn,
Massachusetts. The bridge owner,
Massachusetts Department of
Transportation, submitted a request to
require a two-hour advance notice for
bridge openings at all times based upon
infrequent requests to open the draw
during past years. It is expected that this
change to the regulation will create
efficiency in drawbridge operations
while continuing to meet the reasonable
needs of navigation.
DATES: Comments and related material
must be received by the Coast Guard on
or before June 24, 2014.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by docket number USCG–
2014–0272 using any one of the
following methods:
(1) Federal Rulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov.
(2) Fax: 202–493–2251.
(3) Mail or Delivery: Docket
Management Facility (M–30), U.S.
Department of Transportation, West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590–0001. Deliveries
accepted between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except federal
holidays. The telephone number is 202–
366–9329.
See the ‘‘Public Participation and
Request for Comments’’ portion of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
below for instructions on submitting
comments. To avoid duplication, please
use only one of these four methods.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this proposed
rule, call or email Mr. John W.
McDonald, Project Officer, First Coast
Guard District Bridge Program,
telephone 617–223–8364, email
john.w.mcdonald@uscg.mil. If you have
questions on viewing or submitting
material to the docket, call Cheryl
Collins, Program Manager, Docket
Operations, telephone 202–366–9826.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:16 Apr 24, 2014
Jkt 232001
22911
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
4. Public Meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public
meeting. But you may submit a request
for one using one of the four methods
specified under ADDRESSES. Please
explain why one would be beneficial. If
we determine that one would aid this
rulemaking, we will hold one at a time
and place announced by a later notice
in the Federal Register.
B. Basis and Purpose
The General Edwards SR1A Bridge
across the Saugus River at mile 1.7,
between Revere and Lynn,
Massachusetts, has a vertical clearance
of 27 feet at mean high water and 36 feet
at mean low water. The drawbridge
operation regulations are listed at 33
CFR 117.618(b).
The waterway users are commercial
lobster boats and seasonal recreational
vessels of various size.
The owner of the bridge,
Massachusetts Department of
Transportation, submitted a request to
the Coast Guard to change the
drawbridge operating regulations that
presently require the bridge to open on
signal; except that, from April 1 through
November 30, from midnight through 8
a.m. at least an eight hour advance
notice is required for bridge openings,
and at all times from December 1
through March 31, at least an eight hour
E:\FR\FM\25APP1.SGM
25APP1
22912
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 80 / Friday, April 25, 2014 / Proposed Rules
advance notice is required for bridge
openings.
Under this proposed rule the bridge
would open on signal at all times if at
least a two-hour advance notice is given
by calling the number posted at the
bridge.
C. Discussion of Proposed Rule
The Coast Guard proposes to change
the drawbridge operation regulations at
33 CFR 117.618(b) that would allow the
General Edwards SR1A Bridge to open
on signal at all times if at least a twohour advance notice is given by calling
the number posted at the bridge.
As a result of the vertical clearance
under the bridge, 27 feet at mean high
water and 36 feet at mean low water, the
bridge has received few requests to open
during past years. There were no
requests to open the bridge in 2013,
because the bridge was closed due to a
major rehabilitation. There were 20
requests to open in 2012, 14 requests to
open in 2011, 55 requests to open in
2010, and 141 openings in 2009, 59 of
which were test openings.
Based on the above information, the
Coast Guard believes it is reasonable to
allow the General Edwards SR1A Bridge
to open on signal at all times if at least
a two-hour advance notice is given. This
decision was based on the number
requests to open the bridge during the
past years and the relatively high
vertical clearance under the bridge.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
D. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after
considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on these statutes or executive
orders.
1. Regulatory Planning and Review
This proposed rule is not a
‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866,
Regulatory Planning and Review, as
supplemented by Executive Order
13563, Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review, and does not require
an assessment of potential costs and
benefits under section 6(a)(3) of Order
12866, or under section 1 of Executive
Order 13563. The Office of Management
and Budget has not reviewed it under
those Orders. We believe that this rule
is not a significant regulatory action
because the bridge will still open for all
vessel traffic at all times provided the
two-hour advance notice is given.
2. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980
(RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended,
requires federal agencies to consider the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:16 Apr 24, 2014
Jkt 232001
potential impact of regulations on small
entities during rulemaking. The term
‘‘small entities’’ comprises small
businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and
operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions
with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed rule
would not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
This proposed rule would affect the
following entities, some of which might
be small entities: The owners or
operators of vessels needing to transit
through the bridge.
This action will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities for the
following reasons: The General Edwards
SR1A Bridge will open on signal at all
times provided at least a two hour
advance notice is given.
If you think that your business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity
and that this rule would have a
significant economic impact on it,
please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it
qualifies and how and to what degree
this rule would economically affect it.
3. Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this proposed rule. If the
rule would affect your small business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please contact the person
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT, above.
The Coast Guard will not retaliate
against small entities that question or
complain about this proposed rule or
any policy or action of the Coast Guard.
4. Collection of Information
This proposed rule would call for no
new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520.).
5. Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. We have
analyzed this proposed rule under that
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Order and have determined that it does
not have implications for federalism.
6. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places or vessels.
7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this
proposed rule will not result in such an
expenditure, we do discuss the effects of
this rule elsewhere in this preamble.
8. Taking of Private Property
This proposed rule would not cause a
taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under
Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with
Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
9. Civil Justice Reform
This proposed rule meets applicable
standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce
burden.
10. Protection of Children
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This rule is not an economically
significant rule and would not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to
safety that might disproportionately
affect children.
11. Indian Tribal Governments
This proposed rule does not have
tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have
a substantial direct effect on one or
more Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes.
E:\FR\FM\25APP1.SGM
25APP1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 80 / Friday, April 25, 2014 / Proposed Rules
22913
12. Energy Effects
This proposed rule is not a
‘‘significant energy action’’ under
Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use.
Dated: April 15, 2014.
V.B. Gifford, Jr.,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Acting
Commander, First Coast Guard District.
section
below for instructions on submitting
comments.
[FR Doc. 2014–09384 Filed 4–24–14; 8:45 am]
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
13. Technical Standards
This proposed rule does not use
technical standards. Therefore, we did
not consider the use of voluntary
consensus standards.
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
14. Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023–01,
and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD which guides the Coast
Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have made a preliminary determination
that this action is one of a category of
actions which do not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on
the human environment. This proposed
rule simply promulgates the operating
regulations or procedures for
drawbridges. This rule is categorically
excluded, under figure 2–1, paragraph
(32)(e), of the Instruction.
Under figure 2–1, paragraph (32)(e), of
the Instruction, an environmental
analysis checklist and a categorical
exclusion determination are not
required for this rule. We seek any
comments or information that may lead
to the discovery of significant
environmental impact from the
proposed rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 117
Bridges.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to
amend 33 CFR part 117 as follows:
PART 117—DRAWBRIDGE
OPERATION REGULATIONS
1. The authority citation for part 117
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 499; 33 CFR 1.05–1;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.
2. Revise § 117.618, paragraph (b), to
read as follows:
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
■
§ 117.618
Taunton River.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) The draw of the General Edwards
SR1A Bridge, mile 1.7, between Revere
and Lynn, shall open on signal at all
times if at least a two-hour advance
notice is given by calling the number
posted at the bridge.
*
*
*
*
*
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:16 Apr 24, 2014
Jkt 232001
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG–2014–0082]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone; Cleveland Dragon Boat
Festival and Head of the Cuyahoga,
Cuyahoga River, Cleveland, OH
Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
The Coast Guard proposes to
establish regulations for annual,
combined marine events that require the
establishment of a temporary safety
zone within the Captain of the Port
Zone Buffalo on the Cuyahoga River,
Cleveland, OH. This proposed safety
zone regulation is necessary to protect
the surrounding public, spectators,
participants, and vessels from the
hazards associated with the rowing
regatta in the narrow waterway of the
Cuyahoga River. This proposed rule is
intended to restrict vessels annually
from a portion of the Cuyahoga River for
up to 10 hours during the combined
Dragon Boat Festival and the Head of
the Cuyahoga Regatta.
DATES: Comments and related materials
must be received by the Coast Guard on
or before May 27, 2014. Requests for
public meetings must be received May
15, 2014.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by docket number USCG–
2014–0082 using any one of the
following methods:
(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov.
(2) Fax: 202–493–2251.
(3) Mail: Docket Management Facility
(M–30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590–
0001.
(4) Delivery: at the same as mail
address above, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
federal holidays. The telephone number
is 202–366–9329.
To avoid duplication, please use only
one of these four methods. See the
‘‘Public Participation and Request for
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Comments’’ portion of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
If
you have questions on this rule, call or
email LT Christopher Mercurio, Chief of
Waterways Management, U.S. Coast
Guard Sector Buffalo; telephone 716–
843–9573, email
SectorBuffaloMarineSafety@uscg.mil or
LT Hillary Allegretti, Marine Safety Unit
Cleveland at Hillary.a.allegretti@
uscg.mil. If you have questions on
viewing or submitting material to the
docket, call Cheryl Collins, Program
Manager, Docket Operations, telephone
202–366–9826 or 1–800–647–5527.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Acronyms
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
MM Mile Marker
A. Public Participation and Request for
Comments
We encourage you to participate in
this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All
comments received will be posted
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov and will include
any personal information you have
provided.
1. Submitting Comments
If you submit a comment, please
include the docket number for this
rulemaking (USCG–2014–0082),
indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment
applies, and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation. You
may submit your comments and
material online at https://
www.regulations.gov or by fax, mail, or
hand delivery, but please use only one
of these means. If you submit a
comment online, it will be considered
received by the Coast Guard when the
comment is successfully transmitted. If
you fax, hand deliver, or mail your
comment, it will be considered received
by the Coast Guard when the comment
is received at the Docket Management
Facility. We recommend that you
include your name and a mailing
address, an email address, or a
telephone number in the body of your
document so that we can contact you if
we have questions regarding your
submission.
To submit your comment online, go to
https://www.regulations.gov, type the
docket number [USCG–2014–0082] in
the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click
‘‘SEARCH.’’ Click on ‘‘Submit a
E:\FR\FM\25APP1.SGM
25APP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 80 (Friday, April 25, 2014)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 22911-22913]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-09384]
[[Page 22911]]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 117
[Docket No. USCG-2014-0272]
RIN 1625-AA09
Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Saugus River, Revere and Lynn,
MA
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to modify the operating schedule that
governs the General Edwards SR1A Bridge across the Saugus River at mile
1.7, between Revere and Lynn, Massachusetts. The bridge owner,
Massachusetts Department of Transportation, submitted a request to
require a two-hour advance notice for bridge openings at all times
based upon infrequent requests to open the draw during past years. It
is expected that this change to the regulation will create efficiency
in drawbridge operations while continuing to meet the reasonable needs
of navigation.
DATES: Comments and related material must be received by the Coast
Guard on or before June 24, 2014.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-
2014-0272 using any one of the following methods:
(1) Federal Rulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
(2) Fax: 202-493-2251.
(3) Mail or Delivery: Docket Management Facility (M-30), U.S.
Department of Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001. Deliveries
accepted between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
federal holidays. The telephone number is 202-366-9329.
See the ``Public Participation and Request for Comments'' portion
of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section below for instructions on
submitting comments. To avoid duplication, please use only one of these
four methods.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this proposed
rule, call or email Mr. John W. McDonald, Project Officer, First Coast
Guard District Bridge Program, telephone 617-223-8364, email
john.w.mcdonald@uscg.mil. If you have questions on viewing or
submitting material to the docket, call Cheryl Collins, Program
Manager, Docket Operations, telephone 202-366-9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Tables of Acronyms
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
Sec. Section Symbol
U.S.C. United States Code
A. Public Participation and Request for Comments
We encourage you to participate in this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All comments received will be posted,
without change to https://www.regulations.gov and will include any
personal information you have provided.
1. Submitting Comments
If you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
rulemaking (USCG-2014-0272), indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment applies, and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation. You may submit your comments and material
online (https://www.regulations.gov), or by fax, mail or hand delivery,
but please use only one of these means. If you submit a comment online
via https://www.regulations.gov, it will be considered received by the
Coast Guard when you successfully transmit the comment. If you fax,
hand delivery, or mail your comment, it will be considered as having
been received by the Coast Guard when it is received at the Docket
Management Facility. We recommend that you include your name and a
mailing address, an email address, or a phone number in the body of
your document so that we can contact you if we have questions regarding
your submission.
To submit your comment online, go to https://www.regulations.gov,
type the docket number USCG-2014-0272 in the ``SEARCH'' box and click
``SEARCH.'' Click on ``Submit a Comment'' on the line associated with
this rulemaking. If you submit your comments by mail or hand delivery,
submit them in an unbound format, no larger than 8\1/2\ by 11 inches,
suitable for copying and electronic filing. If you submit them by mail
and would like to know that they reached the Facility, please enclose a
stamped, self-addressed postcard or envelope. We will consider all
comments and material received during the comment period and may change
the rule based on your comments.
2. Viewing Comments and Documents
To view comments, as well as documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov,
type the docket number (USCG-2014-0272) in the ``SEARCH'' box and click
``SEARCH.'' Click on Open Docket Folder on the line associated with
this rulemaking. You may also visit either the Docket Management
Facility in Room W12-140 on the ground floor of the Department of
Transportation West Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington,
DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays. We have an agreement with the Department of
Transportation to use the Docket Management Facility.
3. Privacy Act
Anyone can search the electronic form of comments received into any
of our dockets by the name of the individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may review a Privacy Act notice
regarding our public dockets in the January 17, 2008, issue of the
Federal Register (73 FR 3316).
4. Public Meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public meeting. But you may submit a
request for one using one of the four methods specified under
ADDRESSES. Please explain why one would be beneficial. If we determine
that one would aid this rulemaking, we will hold one at a time and
place announced by a later notice in the Federal Register.
B. Basis and Purpose
The General Edwards SR1A Bridge across the Saugus River at mile
1.7, between Revere and Lynn, Massachusetts, has a vertical clearance
of 27 feet at mean high water and 36 feet at mean low water. The
drawbridge operation regulations are listed at 33 CFR 117.618(b).
The waterway users are commercial lobster boats and seasonal
recreational vessels of various size.
The owner of the bridge, Massachusetts Department of
Transportation, submitted a request to the Coast Guard to change the
drawbridge operating regulations that presently require the bridge to
open on signal; except that, from April 1 through November 30, from
midnight through 8 a.m. at least an eight hour advance notice is
required for bridge openings, and at all times from December 1 through
March 31, at least an eight hour
[[Page 22912]]
advance notice is required for bridge openings.
Under this proposed rule the bridge would open on signal at all
times if at least a two-hour advance notice is given by calling the
number posted at the bridge.
C. Discussion of Proposed Rule
The Coast Guard proposes to change the drawbridge operation
regulations at 33 CFR 117.618(b) that would allow the General Edwards
SR1A Bridge to open on signal at all times if at least a two-hour
advance notice is given by calling the number posted at the bridge.
As a result of the vertical clearance under the bridge, 27 feet at
mean high water and 36 feet at mean low water, the bridge has received
few requests to open during past years. There were no requests to open
the bridge in 2013, because the bridge was closed due to a major
rehabilitation. There were 20 requests to open in 2012, 14 requests to
open in 2011, 55 requests to open in 2010, and 141 openings in 2009, 59
of which were test openings.
Based on the above information, the Coast Guard believes it is
reasonable to allow the General Edwards SR1A Bridge to open on signal
at all times if at least a two-hour advance notice is given. This
decision was based on the number requests to open the bridge during the
past years and the relatively high vertical clearance under the bridge.
D. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes
and executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our
analyses based on these statutes or executive orders.
1. Regulatory Planning and Review
This proposed rule is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review,
as supplemented by Executive Order 13563, Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review, and does not require an assessment of potential
costs and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of Order 12866, or under
section 1 of Executive Order 13563. The Office of Management and Budget
has not reviewed it under those Orders. We believe that this rule is
not a significant regulatory action because the bridge will still open
for all vessel traffic at all times provided the two-hour advance
notice is given.
2. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed
rule would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities.
This proposed rule would affect the following entities, some of
which might be small entities: The owners or operators of vessels
needing to transit through the bridge.
This action will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities for the following reasons: The
General Edwards SR1A Bridge will open on signal at all times provided
at least a two hour advance notice is given.
If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have
a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what
degree this rule would economically affect it.
3. Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this proposed rule. If the rule would affect
your small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you
have questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance,
please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT, above.
The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small entities that
question or complain about this proposed rule or any policy or action
of the Coast Guard.
4. Collection of Information
This proposed rule would call for no new collection of information
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520.).
5. Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this proposed rule under that Order and
have determined that it does not have implications for federalism.
6. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places or vessels.
7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this proposed rule will not
result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
8. Taking of Private Property
This proposed rule would not cause a taking of private property or
otherwise have taking implications under Executive Order 12630,
Governmental Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected
Property Rights.
9. Civil Justice Reform
This proposed rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and
3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize
litigation, eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
10. Protection of Children
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This rule is not an economically significant rule and would not
create an environmental risk to health or risk to safety that might
disproportionately affect children.
11. Indian Tribal Governments
This proposed rule does not have tribal implications under
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
[[Page 22913]]
12. Energy Effects
This proposed rule is not a ``significant energy action'' under
Executive Order 13211, Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use.
13. Technical Standards
This proposed rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we
did not consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
14. Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023-01, and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD which guides the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and
have made a preliminary determination that this action is one of a
category of actions which do not individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human environment. This proposed rule simply
promulgates the operating regulations or procedures for drawbridges.
This rule is categorically excluded, under figure 2-1, paragraph
(32)(e), of the Instruction.
Under figure 2-1, paragraph (32)(e), of the Instruction, an
environmental analysis checklist and a categorical exclusion
determination are not required for this rule. We seek any comments or
information that may lead to the discovery of significant environmental
impact from the proposed rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 117
Bridges.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes
to amend 33 CFR part 117 as follows:
PART 117--DRAWBRIDGE OPERATION REGULATIONS
0
1. The authority citation for part 117 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 499; 33 CFR 1.05-1; Department of Homeland
Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
0
2. Revise Sec. 117.618, paragraph (b), to read as follows:
Sec. 117.618 Taunton River.
* * * * *
(b) The draw of the General Edwards SR1A Bridge, mile 1.7, between
Revere and Lynn, shall open on signal at all times if at least a two-
hour advance notice is given by calling the number posted at the
bridge.
* * * * *
Dated: April 15, 2014.
V.B. Gifford, Jr.,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Acting Commander, First Coast Guard
District.
[FR Doc. 2014-09384 Filed 4-24-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P