Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Wisconsin; Redesignation of the Milwaukee-Racine 2006 24-Hour Fine Particle Nonattainment Area to Attainment, 22415-22418 [2014-08613]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 77 / Tuesday, April 22, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
(c) Regulations. (1) All persons and
vessels are prohibited from entering,
transiting through, anchoring in, or
remaining within the regulated area
unless authorized by the Captain of the
Port Charleston or a designated
representative.
(2) Persons and vessels desiring to
enter, transit through, anchor in, or
remain within the regulated area may
contact the Captain of the Port
Charleston by telephone at 843–740–
7050, or a designated representative via
VHF radio on channel 16, to request
authorization. If authorization to enter,
transit through, anchor in, or remain
within the regulated area is granted by
the Captain of the Port Charleston or a
designated representative, all persons
and vessels receiving such authorization
must comply with the instructions of
the Captain of the Port Charleston or a
designated representative.
(3) The Coast Guard will provide
notice of the regulated area by Local
Notice to Mariners, Broadcast Notice to
Mariners, and on-scene designated
representatives.
(d) Effective date. This rule is
effective on May 4, 2014. This rule will
be enforced from 7:30 a.m. until 8:15
a.m. on Sunday, May 4, 2014.
Dated: April 4, 2014.
R.R. Rodriguez,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port Charleston.
[FR Doc. 2014–09060 Filed 4–21–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG–2013–0320]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone, Chicago Harbor, Navy
Pier Southeast, Chicago, IL
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of enforcement of
regulation.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard will enforce
the Navy Pier Southeast Safety Zone
within the Chicago Harbor during
specified periods from May 24, 2014,
through January 1, 2015. This action is
necessary and intended to ensure safety
of life on the navigable waters of the
United States immediately prior to,
during, and immediately after various
firework events. During the enforcement
periods listed below, no person or
vessel may enter the safety zone without
ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:06 Apr 21, 2014
Jkt 232001
permission of the Captain of the Port,
Lake Michigan.
DATES: The regulations in 33 CFR
165.931 will be enforced at specified
times between 10 p.m. on May 24, 2014,
through 12:30 a.m. on January 1, 2015.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this notice, call
or email MST1 John Ng, Waterways
Management Division, Marine Safety
Unit Chicago, telephone 630–986–2122,
email address john.h.ng@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Coast
Guard will enforce the Safety Zone;
Chicago Harbor, Navy Pier Southeast,
Chicago, IL listed in 33 CFR 165.931, on
each Saturday from 10 p.m. until 10:30
p.m. and each Wednesday from 9:15
p.m. until 9:45 p.m. during the period
starting May 24, 2014, through August
30, 2014. Additionally, on the dates
below during this period, this safety
zone will be enforced with the following
adjustments in times:
• Friday, July 4, 2014, from 9:15 p.m.
until 10 p.m.;
• Saturday, August 9, 2014, from 9:15
p.m. until 9:45 p.m.;
• Saturday, October 25, 2014, from 9
p.m. until 10:30 p.m.; and
• Wednesday, December 31, 2014,
from 11:45 p.m. until 12:30 a.m. on
Thursday, January 1, 2015.
This safety zone encompasses the
waters of Lake Michigan within Chicago
Harbor bounded by coordinates
beginning at 41°53′26.5″ N, 087°35′26.5″
W; then south to 41°53′7.6″ N,
087°35′26.3″ W; then west to 41°53′7.6″
N, 087°36′23.2″ W; then north to
41°53′26.5″ N, 087°36′24.6″ W; then east
back to the point of origin (NAD 83). All
vessels must obtain permission from the
Captain of the Port, Lake Michigan, or
his on-scene representative to enter,
move within or exit the safety zone.
Vessels and persons granted permission
to enter the safety zone shall obey all
lawful orders or directions of the
Captain of the Port, Lake Michigan, or
his on-scene representative.
This notice is issued under authority
of 33 CFR 165.931 and 5 U.S.C. 552(a).
In addition to this notice in the Federal
Register, the Coast Guard will provide
the maritime community with advance
notification of these enforcement
periods via broadcast Notice to Mariners
or Local Notice to Mariners. If the
Captain of the Port, Lake Michigan,
determines that the safety zone need not
be enforced for the full duration stated
in this notice, he may use a Broadcast
Notice to Mariners to grant general
permission to enter the safety zone. The
Captain of the Port, Lake Michigan, or
his on-scene representative may be
contacted via VHF Channel 16.
PO 00000
Frm 00059
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
22415
Dated: April 10, 2014.
K.M. Moser,
Commander, U.S. Coast Guard, Acting
Captain of the Port, Lake Michigan.
[FR Doc. 2014–09058 Filed 4–21–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Parts 52 and 81
[EPA–R05–OAR–2012–0464; FRL–9909–50–
Region–5]
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans;
Wisconsin; Redesignation of the
Milwaukee-Racine 2006 24-Hour Fine
Particle Nonattainment Area to
Attainment
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is approving Wisconsin’s
request to redesignate the MilwaukeeRacine, Wisconsin nonattainment area
(Milwaukee, Racine and Waukesha
Counties) to attainment for the 2006 24hour National Ambient Air Quality
Standard (NAAQS or standard) for fine
particulate matter (PM2.5) because the
request meets the statutory requirements
for redesignation under the Clean Air
Act (CAA). The Wisconsin Department
of Natural Resources (WDNR) submitted
this request to EPA on June 8, 2012, and
supplemented it on May 30, 2013. EPA’s
approval involves several related
actions. EPA is making a determination
that the Milwaukee-Racine area has
attained the 2006 24-hour PM2.5
standard. EPA is approving, as a
revision to the Wisconsin state
implementation plan (SIP), the state’s
plan for maintaining the 2006 24-hour
PM2.5 NAAQS through 2025 in the area.
EPA is also approving the
comprehensive emissions inventories
submitted by WDNR for Nitrogen
Oxides (NOX), Sulfur Dioxide (SO2),
primary PM2.5, Volatile Organic
Compounds (VOC), and ammonia as
meeting the requirements of the CAA.
Finally, EPA finds adequate and is
approving Wisconsin’s direct PM2.5,
SO2, NOX and VOC Motor Vehicle
Emission Budgets (MVEBs) for 2020 and
2025 for the Milwaukee-Racine area.
DATES: This final rule is effective on
April 22, 2014.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA–R05–OAR–2012–0464. All
documents in the docket are listed on
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\22APR1.SGM
22APR1
22416
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 77 / Tuesday, April 22, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
the www.regulations.gov Web site.
Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available,
i.e., Confidential Business Information
(CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the Internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available either electronically through
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at
the Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 5, Air and Radiation Division, 77
West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago,
Illinois 60604. This facility is open from
8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through
Friday, excluding Federal holidays. We
recommend that you telephone Gilberto
Alvarez, Environmental Scientist, at
(312 886–6143 before visiting the
Region 5 office.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Gilberto Alvarez, Environmental
Scientist, Attainment Planning and
Maintenance Section, Air Programs
Branch (AR–18J), Environmental
Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West
Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois
60604, (312) 886–6143,
alvarez.gilberto@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document whenever
‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean
EPA. This supplementary information
section is arranged as follows:
ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES
I. What is the background for the actions?
II. What actions is EPA taking?
III. What is EPA’s response to comments?
IV. Why is EPA taking these actions?
V. Final Action
VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. What is the background for the
actions?
On June 8, 2012, WDNR submitted its
request to redesignate the MilwaukeeRacine, Wisconsin nonattainment area
(Milwaukee, Racine and Waukesha
Counties) to attainment for the 2006 24hour PM2.5 NAAQS, and for EPA
approval of the SIP revision containing
an emissions inventory and a
maintenance plan for the area. WDNR
supplemented its submission on May
30, 2013. On February 18, 2014, EPA
published a proposed rule (79 FR 9134)
making a determination that the
Milwaukee-Racine area is attaining the
2006 24-hour PM2.5 standard and that
the area has met the requirements for
redesignation under section 107(d)(3)(E)
of the CAA.
II. What actions is EPA taking?
EPA has determined that the
Milwaukee-Racine area has attained and
continues to attain the 2006 24-hour
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:06 Apr 21, 2014
Jkt 232001
PM2.5 standard, that the area has
attained this standard by the applicable
attainment date, and that the area meets
the requirements for redesignation
under section 107(d)(3)(E) of the CAA.
EPA proposed this determination based
on monitoring data showing attainment
of the standard for the 2008–2010,
2009–2011, 2010–2012 and 2013 time
periods. Monitoring data for 2013 show
that the area continues to attain the
standard. Because the area continues to
attain the standard and meets all other
requirements for redesignation under
CAA section 107(d)(3)(E), EPA is
approving the request from Wisconsin
to change the legal designation of the
Milwaukee-Racine area from
nonattainment to attainment for the
2006 24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS.
EPA is taking several actions related
to Wisconsin’s PM2.5 redesignation
request, as discussed below.
EPA is approving, pursuant to CAA
section 175A, Wisconsin’s 2006 24-hour
PM2.5 maintenance plan for the
Milwaukee-Racine area as a revision to
the Wisconsin SIP (such approval being
one of the CAA criteria for redesignation
to attainment status). The maintenance
plan is designed to keep the MilwaukeeRacine area in attainment of the 2006
24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS through 2025.
EPA is approving, pursuant to CAA
section 172(c)(3), both the 2006
emission inventories for primary PM2.5,1
NOX, VOC and SO2,2 and the 2007
emission inventory for ammonia. These
emission inventories satisfy the
requirement in section 172(c)(3) of the
CAA for a comprehensive, current
emission inventory.
Finally, for transportation conformity
purposes EPA finds adequate and is
approving Wisconsin’s direct PM2.5,
SO2, NOX and VOC MVEBs for 2020 and
2025 for the Milwaukee-Racine area.
III. What is EPA’s response to
comments?
EPA received no adverse comments
on the February 18, 2014, proposal. EPA
received four comments in support of
the February 18, 2014, proposal from:
(1) Harold Pederson, a private citizen,
(2) the WDNR, (3) Eric Bott, with the
Wisconsin Manufacturers & Commerce
organization and (4) five members of the
United States Congressional delegation
from Wisconsin.
In addition, EPA would like to correct
two of the 98th Percentile values within
1 Fine particulates directly emitted by sources
and not formed in a secondary manner through
chemical reactions or other processes in the
atmosphere.
2 NO and SO are precursors for fine particulates
X
2
through chemical reactions and other related
processes in the atmosphere.
PO 00000
Frm 00060
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Table 1 on page 9136 of the proposed
rule (79 FR 9134). The value (in
micrograms per cubic meter) for 2013
for monitor number 550790026 which is
currently listed as 19.0 should be
changed to 21.2. The value for 2013 for
monitor number 550790099 which is
currently 19.7 should be changed to
20.5. The original values were entered
incorrectly due to a calculation error.
EPA notes that both of these corrected
values are still below the NAAQS and
do not impact the overall outcome of the
redesignation.
IV. Why is EPA taking these actions?
EPA has determined that the
Milwaukee-Racine area has attained and
continues to attain the 2006 24-hour
PM2.5 NAAQS and that the area has
attained this standard by its applicable
attainment date. EPA has also
determined that all other criteria have
been met for the redesignation of the
Milwaukee-Racine area from
nonattainment to attainment of the 2006
24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS and for approval
of Wisconsin’s maintenance plan for the
area. See CAA sections 107(d)(3)(E) and
175A. The detailed rationale for EPA’s
findings and actions is set forth in the
proposed rulemaking of February 18,
2014 (79 FR 9134), and in this final
rulemaking.
V. Final Action
EPA is making a determination that
the Milwaukee-Racine area has attained
the 2006 24-hour PM2.5 standard by its
attainment date and that the area
continues to attain the standard. EPA
has determined that the area has met the
requirements for redesignation under
section 107(d)(3)(E) and 175A of the
CAA. EPA is thus approving the request
from Wisconsin to change the legal
designation of the Milwaukee-Racine
area from nonattainment to attainment
for the 2006 24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS.
EPA is also approving Wisconsin’s
PM2.5 maintenance plan for the
Milwaukee-Racine area as a revision to
the Wisconsin SIP, because the plan
meets the requirements of section 175A
of the CAA. EPA is approving the
comprehensive emissions inventories
submitted by WDNR for NOX, SO2,
primary PM2.5, VOC, and ammonia as
meeting the requirements of the CAA.
Finally, EPA finds adequate and is
approving Wisconsin’s direct PM2.5,
SO2, NOX and VOC MVEBs for 2020 and
2025 for the Milwaukee-Racine area.
In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 553(d),
EPA finds there is good cause for these
actions to become effective immediately
upon publication. This is because a
delayed effective date is unnecessary
due to the nature of a redesignation to
E:\FR\FM\22APR1.SGM
22APR1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 77 / Tuesday, April 22, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES
attainment, which relieves the area from
certain CAA requirements that would
otherwise apply to it. The immediate
effective date for this action is
authorized under both 5 U.S.C.
553(d)(1), which provides that
rulemaking actions may become
effective less than 30 days after
publication if the rule ‘‘grants or
recognizes an exemption or relieves a
restriction,’’ and section 553(d)(3)
which allows an effective date less than
30 days after publication ‘‘as otherwise
provided by the agency for good cause
found and published with the rule.’’
The purpose of the 30-day waiting
period prescribed in section 553(d) is to
give affected parties a reasonable time to
adjust their behavior and prepare before
the final rule takes effect. Today’s rule,
however, does not create any new
regulatory requirements such that
affected parties would need time to
prepare before the rule takes effect.
Rather, today’s rule relieves the state of
planning requirements for the
Milwaukee-Racine 24-hour PM2.5
nonattainment area. For these reasons,
EPA finds good cause under 5 U.S.C.
553(d)(3) for these actions to become
effective on the date of publication of
these actions.
VI. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the CAA, redesignation of an
area to attainment and the
accompanying approval of a
maintenance plan under section
107(d)(3)(E) are actions that affect the
status of a geographical area and do not
impose any additional regulatory
requirements on sources beyond those
imposed by state law. A redesignation to
attainment does not in and of itself
create any new requirements, but rather
results in the applicability of
requirements contained in the CAA for
areas that have been redesignated to
attainment. Moreover, the Administrator
is required to approve a SIP submission
that complies with the provisions of the
CAA and applicable Federal regulations.
42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions,
EPA’s role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the CAA. Accordingly, these actions
merely do not impose additional
requirements beyond those imposed by
state law and the CAA. For that reason,
these actions:
• Are not ‘‘significant regulatory
actions’’ subject to review by the Office
of Management and Budget under
Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993);
• do not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:57 Apr 21, 2014
Jkt 232001
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• are certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• do not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• do not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• are not economically significant
regulatory actions based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• are not significant regulatory
actions subject to Executive Order
13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
• are not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the CAA; and
• do not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this rule does not have
tribal implications as specified by
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249,
November 9, 2000), because a
determination of attainment is an action
that affects the status of a geographical
area and does not impose any new
regulatory requirements on tribes,
impact any existing sources of air
pollution on tribal lands, nor impair the
maintenance of particulate matter
national ambient air quality standards
in tribal lands.
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. EPA will submit a
report containing this action and other
required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of the rule in
the Federal Register. A major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it
is published in the Federal Register.
These actions are not ‘‘major rules’’ as
defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
PO 00000
Frm 00061
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
22417
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA,
petitions for judicial review of this
action must be filed in the United States
Court of Appeals for the appropriate
circuit by June 23, 2014. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the
Administrator of this final rule does not
affect the finality of these actions for the
purposes of judicial review nor does it
extend the time within which a petition
for judicial review may be filed, and
shall not postpone the effectiveness of
such rule or action. These actions may
not be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce their requirements. (See section
307(b)(2))
List of Subjects
40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations,
Particulate matter.
40 CFR Part 81
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, National parks,
Wilderness areas.
Dated: April 4, 2014.
Susan Hedman,
Regional Administrator, Region 5.
40 CFR parts 52 and 81 are amended
as follows:
PART 52—APPROVAL AND
PROMULGATION OF
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
2. Section 52.2584 is amended by
adding paragraphs (d) and (e) to read as
follows:
■
§ 52.2584
matter.
Control strategy; Particulate
*
*
*
*
*
(d) Approval—On April 22, 2014,
EPA approved the 2006 24-Hour PM2.5
maintenance plan for the MilwaukeeRacine nonattainment area (Milwaukee,
Racine and Waukesha Counties), as
submitted on June 8, 2012. The
maintenance plan establishes 2020
motor vehicle emissions budgets for the
Milwaukee-Racine area of 2.33 tons per
winter day 1 (tpwd) and 2.16 tpwd
direct PM2.5 and 32.62 tpwd and 28.69
tpwd NOX for the years 2020 and 2025,
respectively.
(e) Approval—On April 22, 2014, EPA
approved the 2006 24-hour PM2.5
comprehensive emissions inventories
for the Milwaukee-Racine area
(Milwaukee, Racine and Waukesha
Counties). Wisconsin’s 2006 NOX,
E:\FR\FM\22APR1.SGM
22APR1
22418
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 77 / Tuesday, April 22, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
directly emitted PM2.5, SO2, VOC, as
well as the 2007 supplemental ammonia
emissions inventory satisfies the
emission inventory requirements of
section 172(c)(3) of the Clean Air Act for
the Milwaukee-Racine area.
4. Section 81.350 is amended by
revising the entry for MilwaukeeRacine, WI in the table entitled
‘‘Wisconsin—PM2.5 [24-Hour NAAQS]’’
to read as follows:
■
PART 81—DESIGNATION OF AREAS
FOR AIR QUALITY PLANNING
PURPOSES
3. The authority citation for part 81
continues to read as follows:
■
§ 81.350
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401, et seq.
*
*
Wisconsin.
*
*
*
WISCONSIN—PM2.5
[24-Hour NAAQS]
Designation for the 1997 NAAQS a
Designation for the 2006 NAAQS a
Designated area
Date 1
Milwaukee-Racine, WI:
Milwaukee County .......................................................
Racine County
Waukesha County
*
*
Type
Date 2
....................
Unclassifiable/Attainment
April 22, 2014
*
*
*
Type
*
Attainment.
*
a Includes
1 This
2 This
*
Indian Country located in each county or area, except as otherwise specified.
date is 90 days after January 5, 2005, unless otherwise noted.
date is 30 days after November 13, 2009, unless otherwise noted.
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2014–08613 Filed 4–21–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 180
[EPA–HQ–OPP–2012–0791; FRL–9908–83]
Linuron; Pesticide Tolerances;
Technical Correction
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule; technical correction.
AGENCY:
EPA issued a final rule in the
Federal Register of February 12, 2014,
concerning the establishment of
tolerances for residues of linuron in or
on multiple commodities and the
removal of a tolerance with regional
registrations in or on parsley leaves.
This document corrects an error in the
listing of the registrant associated with
this action.
DATES: This final rule correction is
effective April 22, 2014.
ADDRESSES: The docket for this action,
identified by docket identification (ID)
number EPA–HQ–OPP–2012–0791, is
available at https://www.regulations.gov
or at the Office of Pesticide Programs
Regulatory Public Docket (OPP Docket)
in the Environmental Protection Agency
Docket Center (EPA/DC), West William
Jefferson Clinton Bldg., Rm. 3334, 1301
Constitution Ave., NW., Washington,
DC 20460–0001. The Public Reading
Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30
p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding
ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:06 Apr 21, 2014
Jkt 232001
legal holidays. The telephone number
for the Public Reading Room is (202)
566–1744, and the telephone number for
the OPP Docket is (703) 305–5805.
Please review the visitor instructions
and additional information about the
docket available at https://www.epa.gov/
dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lois
Rossi, Registration Division (7505P),
Office of Pesticide Programs,
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington,
DC 20460–0001; telephone number:
(703) 305–7090; email address:
RDFRNotices@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Does this action apply to me?
The Agency included in the final rule
published in the Federal Register of
February 12, 2014 (79 FR 8301) (FRL–
9905–22) a list of those who may be
potentially affected by this action.
II. What does this technical correction
do?
EPA issued a final rule in the Federal
Register of February 12, 2014, that
established tolerances for residues of
linuron in or on multiple commodities
and removed a tolerance with regional
registrations in or on parsley leaves.
EPA inadvertently listed the incorrect
registrant associated with this action as
Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC, in Unit
II. Summary of Petitioned-for Tolerance.
The correct registrant associated with
this action is Tessenderlo Kerley, Inc.
The same incorrect registrant’s name
appears in the notice of receipt
associated with this regulatory action,
which published in the Federal Register
PO 00000
Frm 00062
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
of November 7, 2012 (77 FR 66832)
(FRL–9523–9).
The preamble for FR Doc. 2014–
03077, published in the Federal
Register of February 12, 2014 (79 FR
8301) is corrected as follows:
On page 8302, under the heading ‘‘II.
Summary of Petitioned-for Tolerance,’’
second column, first full paragraph, line
22, correct ‘‘Syngenta Crop Protection,
LLC’’ to read ‘‘Tessenderlo Kerley, Inc.’’.
III. Why is this correction issued as a
final rule?
Section 553 of the Administrative
Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C.
553(b)(3)(B)) provides that, when an
agency for good cause finds that notice
and public procedure are impracticable,
unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest, the agency may issue a final
rule without providing notice and an
opportunity for public comment. EPA
has determined that there is good cause
for making this technical correction
final without prior proposal and
opportunity for comment, because the
technical amendment serves only to
correct the registrant that is listed as
having prepared a summary of the
petition associated with the final rule.
EPA finds that this constitutes good
cause under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(3)(B).
IV. Do any of the statutory and
Executive Order reviews apply to this
action?
No. For a detailed discussion
concerning the statutory and executive
order review, refer to ‘‘Unit VII.
Statutory and Executive Order Reviews’’
of the February 12, 2014 final rule.
E:\FR\FM\22APR1.SGM
22APR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 77 (Tuesday, April 22, 2014)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 22415-22418]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-08613]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Parts 52 and 81
[EPA-R05-OAR-2012-0464; FRL-9909-50-Region-5]
Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans;
Wisconsin; Redesignation of the Milwaukee-Racine 2006 24-Hour Fine
Particle Nonattainment Area to Attainment
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is approving
Wisconsin's request to redesignate the Milwaukee-Racine, Wisconsin
nonattainment area (Milwaukee, Racine and Waukesha Counties) to
attainment for the 2006 24-hour National Ambient Air Quality Standard
(NAAQS or standard) for fine particulate matter (PM2.5)
because the request meets the statutory requirements for redesignation
under the Clean Air Act (CAA). The Wisconsin Department of Natural
Resources (WDNR) submitted this request to EPA on June 8, 2012, and
supplemented it on May 30, 2013. EPA's approval involves several
related actions. EPA is making a determination that the Milwaukee-
Racine area has attained the 2006 24-hour PM2.5 standard.
EPA is approving, as a revision to the Wisconsin state implementation
plan (SIP), the state's plan for maintaining the 2006 24-hour
PM2.5 NAAQS through 2025 in the area. EPA is also approving
the comprehensive emissions inventories submitted by WDNR for Nitrogen
Oxides (NOX), Sulfur Dioxide (SO2), primary
PM2.5, Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC), and ammonia as
meeting the requirements of the CAA. Finally, EPA finds adequate and is
approving Wisconsin's direct PM2.5, SO2,
NOX and VOC Motor Vehicle Emission Budgets (MVEBs) for 2020
and 2025 for the Milwaukee-Racine area.
DATES: This final rule is effective on April 22, 2014.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA-R05-OAR-2012-0464. All documents in the docket are listed on
[[Page 22416]]
the www.regulations.gov Web site. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available, i.e., Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted
by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, is
not placed on the Internet and will be publicly available only in hard
copy form. Publicly available docket materials are available either
electronically through www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the
Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, Air and Radiation Division,
77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604. This facility is
open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding
Federal holidays. We recommend that you telephone Gilberto Alvarez,
Environmental Scientist, at (312 886-6143 before visiting the Region 5
office.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gilberto Alvarez, Environmental
Scientist, Attainment Planning and Maintenance Section, Air Programs
Branch (AR-18J), Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West
Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604, (312) 886-6143,
alvarez.gilberto@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document whenever ``we,''
``us,'' or ``our'' is used, we mean EPA. This supplementary information
section is arranged as follows:
I. What is the background for the actions?
II. What actions is EPA taking?
III. What is EPA's response to comments?
IV. Why is EPA taking these actions?
V. Final Action
VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. What is the background for the actions?
On June 8, 2012, WDNR submitted its request to redesignate the
Milwaukee-Racine, Wisconsin nonattainment area (Milwaukee, Racine and
Waukesha Counties) to attainment for the 2006 24-hour PM2.5
NAAQS, and for EPA approval of the SIP revision containing an emissions
inventory and a maintenance plan for the area. WDNR supplemented its
submission on May 30, 2013. On February 18, 2014, EPA published a
proposed rule (79 FR 9134) making a determination that the Milwaukee-
Racine area is attaining the 2006 24-hour PM2.5 standard and
that the area has met the requirements for redesignation under section
107(d)(3)(E) of the CAA.
II. What actions is EPA taking?
EPA has determined that the Milwaukee-Racine area has attained and
continues to attain the 2006 24-hour PM2.5 standard, that
the area has attained this standard by the applicable attainment date,
and that the area meets the requirements for redesignation under
section 107(d)(3)(E) of the CAA. EPA proposed this determination based
on monitoring data showing attainment of the standard for the 2008-
2010, 2009-2011, 2010-2012 and 2013 time periods. Monitoring data for
2013 show that the area continues to attain the standard. Because the
area continues to attain the standard and meets all other requirements
for redesignation under CAA section 107(d)(3)(E), EPA is approving the
request from Wisconsin to change the legal designation of the
Milwaukee-Racine area from nonattainment to attainment for the 2006 24-
hour PM2.5 NAAQS.
EPA is taking several actions related to Wisconsin's
PM2.5 redesignation request, as discussed below.
EPA is approving, pursuant to CAA section 175A, Wisconsin's 2006
24-hour PM2.5 maintenance plan for the Milwaukee-Racine area
as a revision to the Wisconsin SIP (such approval being one of the CAA
criteria for redesignation to attainment status). The maintenance plan
is designed to keep the Milwaukee-Racine area in attainment of the 2006
24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS through 2025.
EPA is approving, pursuant to CAA section 172(c)(3), both the 2006
emission inventories for primary PM2.5,\1\ NOX,
VOC and SO2,\2\ and the 2007 emission inventory for ammonia.
These emission inventories satisfy the requirement in section 172(c)(3)
of the CAA for a comprehensive, current emission inventory.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Fine particulates directly emitted by sources and not formed
in a secondary manner through chemical reactions or other processes
in the atmosphere.
\2\ NOX and SO2 are precursors for fine
particulates through chemical reactions and other related processes
in the atmosphere.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Finally, for transportation conformity purposes EPA finds adequate
and is approving Wisconsin's direct PM2.5, SO2,
NOX and VOC MVEBs for 2020 and 2025 for the Milwaukee-Racine
area.
III. What is EPA's response to comments?
EPA received no adverse comments on the February 18, 2014,
proposal. EPA received four comments in support of the February 18,
2014, proposal from: (1) Harold Pederson, a private citizen, (2) the
WDNR, (3) Eric Bott, with the Wisconsin Manufacturers & Commerce
organization and (4) five members of the United States Congressional
delegation from Wisconsin.
In addition, EPA would like to correct two of the 98th Percentile
values within Table 1 on page 9136 of the proposed rule (79 FR 9134).
The value (in micrograms per cubic meter) for 2013 for monitor number
550790026 which is currently listed as 19.0 should be changed to 21.2.
The value for 2013 for monitor number 550790099 which is currently 19.7
should be changed to 20.5. The original values were entered incorrectly
due to a calculation error. EPA notes that both of these corrected
values are still below the NAAQS and do not impact the overall outcome
of the redesignation.
IV. Why is EPA taking these actions?
EPA has determined that the Milwaukee-Racine area has attained and
continues to attain the 2006 24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS and that
the area has attained this standard by its applicable attainment date.
EPA has also determined that all other criteria have been met for the
redesignation of the Milwaukee-Racine area from nonattainment to
attainment of the 2006 24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS and for approval
of Wisconsin's maintenance plan for the area. See CAA sections
107(d)(3)(E) and 175A. The detailed rationale for EPA's findings and
actions is set forth in the proposed rulemaking of February 18, 2014
(79 FR 9134), and in this final rulemaking.
V. Final Action
EPA is making a determination that the Milwaukee-Racine area has
attained the 2006 24-hour PM2.5 standard by its attainment
date and that the area continues to attain the standard. EPA has
determined that the area has met the requirements for redesignation
under section 107(d)(3)(E) and 175A of the CAA. EPA is thus approving
the request from Wisconsin to change the legal designation of the
Milwaukee-Racine area from nonattainment to attainment for the 2006 24-
hour PM2.5 NAAQS. EPA is also approving Wisconsin's
PM2.5 maintenance plan for the Milwaukee-Racine area as a
revision to the Wisconsin SIP, because the plan meets the requirements
of section 175A of the CAA. EPA is approving the comprehensive
emissions inventories submitted by WDNR for NOX,
SO2, primary PM2.5, VOC, and ammonia as meeting
the requirements of the CAA. Finally, EPA finds adequate and is
approving Wisconsin's direct PM2.5, SO2,
NOX and VOC MVEBs for 2020 and 2025 for the Milwaukee-Racine
area.
In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 553(d), EPA finds there is good cause
for these actions to become effective immediately upon publication.
This is because a delayed effective date is unnecessary due to the
nature of a redesignation to
[[Page 22417]]
attainment, which relieves the area from certain CAA requirements that
would otherwise apply to it. The immediate effective date for this
action is authorized under both 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(1), which provides that
rulemaking actions may become effective less than 30 days after
publication if the rule ``grants or recognizes an exemption or relieves
a restriction,'' and section 553(d)(3) which allows an effective date
less than 30 days after publication ``as otherwise provided by the
agency for good cause found and published with the rule.'' The purpose
of the 30-day waiting period prescribed in section 553(d) is to give
affected parties a reasonable time to adjust their behavior and prepare
before the final rule takes effect. Today's rule, however, does not
create any new regulatory requirements such that affected parties would
need time to prepare before the rule takes effect. Rather, today's rule
relieves the state of planning requirements for the Milwaukee-Racine
24-hour PM2.5 nonattainment area. For these reasons, EPA
finds good cause under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3) for these actions to become
effective on the date of publication of these actions.
VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the CAA, redesignation of an area to attainment and the
accompanying approval of a maintenance plan under section 107(d)(3)(E)
are actions that affect the status of a geographical area and do not
impose any additional regulatory requirements on sources beyond those
imposed by state law. A redesignation to attainment does not in and of
itself create any new requirements, but rather results in the
applicability of requirements contained in the CAA for areas that have
been redesignated to attainment. Moreover, the Administrator is
required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions
of the CAA and applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40
CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to
approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA.
Accordingly, these actions merely do not impose additional requirements
beyond those imposed by state law and the CAA. For that reason, these
actions:
Are not ``significant regulatory actions'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993);
do not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
are certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
do not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
do not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
are not economically significant regulatory actions based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
are not significant regulatory actions subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
are not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the CAA; and
do not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this rule does not have tribal implications as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000),
because a determination of attainment is an action that affects the
status of a geographical area and does not impose any new regulatory
requirements on tribes, impact any existing sources of air pollution on
tribal lands, nor impair the maintenance of particulate matter national
ambient air quality standards in tribal lands.
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. These actions are not ``major rules'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for
the appropriate circuit by June 23, 2014. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect
the finality of these actions for the purposes of judicial review nor
does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may
be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or
action. These actions may not be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce their requirements. (See section 307(b)(2))
List of Subjects
40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Particulate matter.
40 CFR Part 81
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, National parks,
Wilderness areas.
Dated: April 4, 2014.
Susan Hedman,
Regional Administrator, Region 5.
40 CFR parts 52 and 81 are amended as follows:
PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
0
2. Section 52.2584 is amended by adding paragraphs (d) and (e) to read
as follows:
Sec. 52.2584 Control strategy; Particulate matter.
* * * * *
(d) Approval--On April 22, 2014, EPA approved the 2006 24-Hour
PM2.5 maintenance plan for the Milwaukee-Racine
nonattainment area (Milwaukee, Racine and Waukesha Counties), as
submitted on June 8, 2012. The maintenance plan establishes 2020 motor
vehicle emissions budgets for the Milwaukee-Racine area of 2.33 tons
per winter day 1 (tpwd) and 2.16 tpwd direct PM2.5 and 32.62
tpwd and 28.69 tpwd NOX for the years 2020 and 2025,
respectively.
(e) Approval--On April 22, 2014, EPA approved the 2006 24-hour
PM2.5 comprehensive emissions inventories for the Milwaukee-
Racine area (Milwaukee, Racine and Waukesha Counties). Wisconsin's 2006
NOX,
[[Page 22418]]
directly emitted PM2.5, SO2, VOC, as well as the
2007 supplemental ammonia emissions inventory satisfies the emission
inventory requirements of section 172(c)(3) of the Clean Air Act for
the Milwaukee-Racine area.
PART 81--DESIGNATION OF AREAS FOR AIR QUALITY PLANNING PURPOSES
0
3. The authority citation for part 81 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401, et seq.
0
4. Section 81.350 is amended by revising the entry for Milwaukee-
Racine, WI in the table entitled ``Wisconsin--PM2.5 [24-Hour
NAAQS]'' to read as follows:
Sec. 81.350 Wisconsin.
* * * * *
Wisconsin--PM2.5
[24-Hour NAAQS]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Designation for the 1997 NAAQS a Designation for the 2006 NAAQS a
Designated area --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date 1 Type Date 2 Type
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Milwaukee-Racine, WI:
Milwaukee County............... ........... Unclassifiable/Attainment............ April 22, 2014........... Attainment.
Racine County..................
Waukesha County................
* * * * * * *
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\a\ Includes Indian Country located in each county or area, except as otherwise specified.
\1\ This date is 90 days after January 5, 2005, unless otherwise noted.
\2\ This date is 30 days after November 13, 2009, unless otherwise noted.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2014-08613 Filed 4-21-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P