Rules of Practice in Proceedings Under Section 5 of the Debt Collection Act, 22025-22028 [2014-08963]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 76 / Monday, April 21, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or
information that may lead to the
discovery of a significant environmental
impact from this rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security Measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
(5) The Coast Guard may be assisted
by other federal, state, or local agencies.
Dated: March 20, 2014.
S.M. Mahoney,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port San Diego.
[FR Doc. 2014–08933 Filed 4–18–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
POSTAL SERVICE
39 CFR Part 961
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
Rules of Practice in Proceedings
Under Section 5 of the Debt Collection
Act
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
AGENCY:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
Pub. L. 107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department
of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1
2. Add § 165.T11–626 to read as
follows:
■
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
§ 165.T11–626 Safety zone; BWRC West
Coast Nationals, Parker, AZ.
(a) Location. The limits of the safety
zone will include all the navigable
waters of the Colorado River on
Moovalya Lake between Headgate Dam
and 0.5 miles north of the Blue Water
Marina in Parker, Arizona.
(b) Enforcement Period. This section
will be enforced on May 3 and May 4,
2014. It will be enforced from 6 a.m. to
6 p.m.
(c) Definitions. The following
definition applies to this section:
designated representative, means any
commissioned, warrant, or petty officer
of the Coast Guard on board Coast
Guard, Coast Guard Auxiliary, or local,
state, and federal law enforcement
vessels who have been authorized to act
on the behalf of the Captain of the Port.
(d) Regulations. (1) In accordance
with general regulations in 33 CFR part
165, subpart C, entry into, transit
through or anchoring within this safety
zone is prohibited unless authorized by
the Captain of the Port of San Diego or
his designated representative.
(2) Mariners requesting permission to
transit through the safety zone may
request authorization to do so from the
Captain of the Port designated
representative or event sponsor.
(3) All persons and vessels shall
comply with the instructions of the
Coast Guard Captain of the Port or his
designated representative.
(4) Upon being hailed by U.S. Coast
Guard or designated patrol personnel by
siren, radio, flashing light or other
means, the operator of a vessel shall
proceed as directed.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:49 Apr 18, 2014
Jkt 232001
ACTION:
Postal Service.
Final rule.
This document contains the
final revisions to the rules of practice
before the Judicial Officer in
proceedings under section 5 of the Debt
Collection Act. These rules of procedure
completely replace and supersede the
prior rules.
DATES: Effective Date: June 2, 2014.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Associate Judicial Officer Gary E.
Shapiro, (703) 812–1910.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On
February 18, 2014, the Judicial Officer
Department published for comment
proposed revisions to the rules
governing practice in proceedings under
section 5 of the Debt Collection Act of
1982 (79 FR 9120–21). Following the
receipt of comments, the Judicial Officer
has made further revisions to the
original proposed rules, as discussed
below, and has determined that it is
appropriate to adopt the rules of
practice, as revised. The Judicial Officer
Department also has determined that it
is appropriate to make these rules of
practice effective on June 2, 2014, in the
interest of orderly public
administration.
SUMMARY:
A. Executive Summary
Part 961 of title 39, Code of Federal
Regulations, contains the rules of
practice in proceedings under section 5
of the Debt Collection Act of 1982, as
amended, 5 U.S.C. 5514, in which the
Judicial Officer or an assigned Hearing
Official provides the final agency
adjudication for debt collection
assessments by administrative salary
offset issued by the Postal Service
seeking to collect a debt owed it by a
current employee. This authority is
delegated by the Postmaster General.
Although these rules provide a complete
replacement for the former rules, the
changes are not considered to affect the
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
22025
rights of the parties in a substantive
way. Rather, the rules are revised to
conform to current practices and to
clarify the procedures.
B. Background
The Judicial Officer Department
published for comments proposed
revisions to the rules governing
proceedings under section 5 of the Debt
Collection Act of 1982 in the Federal
Register on February 18, 2014 (79 FR
9120–21). This notice announces the
intention to promulgate final rules of
procedure, following our review and
consideration of all comments. The
period for comments closed on March
20, 2014. We considered all comments
received, revised the proposed rules as
explained below, and promulgate our
final rules of procedure.
C. Summary of Comments and Changes
The Judicial Officer Department
received comments from one source: a
labor union representing many Postal
Service employees who are parties to
Debt Collection Act litigation before the
Judicial Officer Department. We
carefully considered each comment and
adopted some of the suggestions made.
All comments are discussed below:
Section 961.4 Employee Petition for a
Hearing
A comment noted that the proposed
rule provided the Hearing Official with
discretion to resolve a dispute where the
Postal Service has not initiated
involuntary administrative salary offsets
by issuing a Notice as required by the
Debt Collection Act. This rule change
reflects our experience that the Postal
Service sometimes collects alleged debts
by administrative salary offset without
having issued the proper Notice. In such
circumstances, our practice has been to
order a refund of the improperly
collected offset, and to offer the
employee the choice whether to proceed
to an adjudication on the merits without
additional procedural requirements, or
to dismiss the case without prejudice (or
sometimes suspend the case) while
requiring the Postal Service to issue the
Notice. Retaining the case ensures that
the employee remains protected against
collection activity without undue delay
of the adjudication. As explained
however, at the option of the employee,
we will dismiss the case as premature,
or suspend it, and require that the
Notice be issued. In either event, we
will not permit collection activity to
commence until our adjudication is
final or the Postal Service has complied
with the statute. As we believe that the
revision is consistent with the statute,
protects the rights of the employee/
E:\FR\FM\21APR1.SGM
21APR1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
22026
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 76 / Monday, April 21, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
debtor, and conforms the rule to existing
practice, we have declined to make a
change in response to the comment.
Another comment expressed concern
about the proposed elimination of
former paragraphs (b)(4) and (5) from
§ 961.4. Deleted paragraph (b)(4)
provided for an employee to include in
his or her petition whether an oral
hearing is requested, or alternatively, a
hearing based solely on written
submissions. Deleted paragraph (b)(5)
provided for an employee requesting an
oral hearing to include a statement of
the evidence he or she will produce
which makes an oral hearing necessary,
including a list of witnesses, with their
addresses, whom the employee expects
to call; the proposed city for the hearing
site, with justification for holding the
hearing in that city; and recommended
alternative dates for the hearing; which
should be within 40 days from filing the
Petition. These deletions are part of
several former requirements for
inclusion in an employee petition. Our
objective was to simplify petition
requirements and defer obtaining
certain information from an employee
until a later stage of the proceeding
when the case is developed further. The
requirements cited in the comment were
deleted because at the petition stage, it
often is premature to include such
information resulting in incomplete
petitions which unnecessarily delays
the process. Both parties are given
opportunities to express their
preferences concerning the type of
hearing requested which the Hearing
Official will consider in deciding the
most appropriate form for a hearing. We
agree with the comment that the
employee should be permitted to
present arguments in support of his or
her position regarding whether an oral
or written hearing should occur. While
that reflects our existing process, we
have modified the language of the rules
to make it explicit, and have done so in
the most appropriate paragraph—
§ 961.8(d), which has been changed to
require the Hearing Official to consider
the positions of the parties before
determining whether an oral hearing (or
alternatively, a hearing solely on written
submissions) shall be conducted, and
setting the place, date, and time for such
a hearing. Where a hearing on written
submissions is ordered, the Hearing
Official explains the process thoroughly
to both parties. Therefore, an additional
change in that regard is not necessary.
Section 961.8 Hearing Official
Authority and Responsibilities
A comment expressed concern about
the proposed elimination of the
following sentence from § 961.8: ‘‘The
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:49 Apr 18, 2014
Jkt 232001
proceedings must be expedited to
ensure issuance of the final decision no
later than 60 days after the filing of the
employee’s hearing Petition.’’ Our case
law precedent establishes that the sixtyday timeframe referenced in the prior
regulations and in the Debt Collection
Act is not a statutory deadline or
requirement that can be enforced by a
party. See Celeste Guice, P.S. Docket No.
DCA 12–19 (May 11, 2012).
Additionally, our experience has been
that both parties commonly request
extensions or do not comply with
deadlines in these cases making
decisions within sixty days impossible.
While the Judicial Officer Department’s
policy is to issue decisions in a timely
manner after the record closes, a
specific hard deadline is not practical.
Furthermore, employees who have filed
timely petitions remain protected
against involuntary administrative
salary offsets until the case is decided.
Therefore, we do not believe that reinsertion of a sixty-day time period is
necessary, nor does it reflect our case
law or actual practice. However, to
address the concern reflected in this
comment, we have added language to
§ 961.8(i) to require the Hearing Official
to issue the decision as soon as
practicable after the close of the record,
and to stay collection activity until the
decision has issued.
D. Effective Date
These revised rules will govern
proceedings under part 961 docketed on
or after June 2, 2014.
List of Subjects in 39 CFR Part 961
Claims, Government employees,
Wages.
For the reasons stated in the
preamble, the Postal Service hereby
revises 39 CFR part 961 as set forth
below:
PART 961—RULES OF PRACTICE IN
PROCEEDINGS UNDER SECTION 5 OF
THE DEBT COLLECTION ACT
Sec.
961.1 Authority for rules.
961.2 Scope of rules.
961.3 Definitions.
961.4 Employee petition for a hearing.
961.5 Effect of filing a petition.
961.6 Filing, docketing, and serving
documents; computation of time;
representation of parties.
961.7 Answer to petition.
961.8 Hearing Official authority and
responsibilities.
961.9 Opportunity for oral hearing.
961.10 Effect of Hearing Official’s decision;
motion for reconsideration.
961.11 Consequences for failure to comply
with rules.
961.12 Ex parte communications.
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Authority: 39 U.S.C. 204, 401; 5 U.S.C.
5514.
§ 961.1
Authority for rules.
These rules are issued by the Judicial
Officer pursuant to authority delegated
by the Postmaster General.
§ 961.2
Scope of rules.
The rules in this part apply to the
hearing provided by section 5 of the
Debt Collection Act of 1982, as
amended, 5 U.S.C. 5514, challenging the
Postal Service’s determination of the
existence or amount of an employee
debt to the Postal Service, or of the
terms of the employee’s debt repayment
schedule. In addition, these rules apply
to a hearing under section 5 of the Debt
Collection Act when an Administrative
Law Judge or an Administrative Judge in
the Judicial Officer Department is
designated as the Hearing Official for a
creditor Federal agency other than the
Postal Service pursuant to an agreement
between the Postal Service and that
agency. In such cases, all references to
Postal Service within these rules shall
be construed to refer to the creditor
Federal agency involved.
§ 961.3
Definitions.
As used in this part:
(a) Employee refers to a current
employee of the Postal Service who is
alleged to be indebted to the Postal
Service; or to an employee of another
Federal agency who is alleged to be
indebted to that other creditor Federal
agency and whose hearing under section
5 of the Debt Collection Act is being
conducted under these rules.
(b) General Counsel refers to the
General Counsel of the Postal Service,
and includes a designated
representative.
(c) Hearing Official refers to an
Administrative Law Judge qualified to
hear cases under the Administrative
Procedure Act, an Administrative Judge
appointed under the Contract Disputes
Act of 1978, or other qualified person
not under the control or supervision of
the Postmaster General, who is
designated by the Judicial Officer to
conduct the hearing under section 5 of
the Debt Collection Act of 1982, as
amended, 5 U.S.C. 5514.
(d) Judicial Officer refers to the
Judicial Officer, Associate Judicial
Officer, or Acting Judicial Officer of the
United States Postal Service.
(e) Notice of Involuntary
Administrative Salary Offsets Under the
Debt Collection Act refers to the formal
written notice required by section 5 of
the Debt Collection Act, including the
provision of notice of the procedures
under this Part, before involuntary
E:\FR\FM\21APR1.SGM
21APR1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 76 / Monday, April 21, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
collection deductions can be taken from
an employee’s salary.
(f) Postmaster/Installation Head refers
to the Postal Service official who is
authorized under the Postal Service
Employee and Labor Relations Manual
to make the initial determination of
employee indebtedness and to issue the
‘‘Notice of Involuntary Administrative
Salary Offsets Under the Debt Collection
Act.’’
(g) Recorder refers to the Recorder,
Judicial Officer Department, U.S. Postal
Service, located at 2101 Wilson
Boulevard, Suite 600, Arlington, VA
22201–3078. The Recorder’s telephone
number is (703) 812–1900, and the fax
number is (703) 812–1901.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
§ 961.4
Employee petition for a hearing.
(a) If an employee desires a hearing,
prescribed by section 5 of the Debt
Collection Act, to challenge the Postal
Service’s determination of the existence
or amount of a debt, or to challenge the
involuntary repayment terms proposed
by the Postal Service, the employee
must file a written, signed petition with
the Recorder, on or before the fifteenth
(15th) calendar day following the
employee’s receipt of the Postal
Service’s ‘‘Notice of Involuntary
Administrative Salary Offsets Under the
Debt Collection Act.’’ The Hearing
Official, in his or her discretion may
waive this deadline upon a
demonstration of good cause. In the
event that the Postal Service initiated
involuntary administrative salary offsets
without having issued a Notice as
required by the Debt Collection Act, the
Hearing Official, in his or her discretion,
may retain authority to resolve the debt
assessment as if a Notice had been
issued, and may order the Postal Service
to return any improperly offset money.
(b) The hearing petition shall include
the following:
(1) The words, ‘‘Petition for Hearing
under the Debt Collection Act,’’
prominently captioned at the top of the
first page;
(2) The name of the employee, the
employee’s work address, home
address, work telephone number, home
telephone number, and email address, if
any, or other address and telephone
number at which the employee may be
contacted during business hours;
(3) A statement of the date on which
the employee received the ‘‘Notice of
Involuntary Administrative Salary
Offsets Under the Debt Collection Act,’’
and a copy of the Notice;
(4) A statement indicating whether
the employee challenges:
(i) The existence of the debt identified
in the Notice of Involuntary
Administrative Salary Offsets;
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:49 Apr 18, 2014
Jkt 232001
(ii) the amount of the debt identified
in the Notice; and/or
(iii) the involuntary repayment terms
identified by the Postal Service in the
Notice. For each challenge, the
employee’s petition shall indicate the
basis of the employee’s disagreement.
The employee should identify and
explain the facts, evidence, and legal
arguments which support his or her
position;
(5) Copies of all records in the
employee’s possession which relate to
the debt; and
(6) If an employee contends that the
Postal Service’s proposed offset
schedule would result in a severe
financial hardship on the employee, his
or her spouse, and dependents, the
employee shall identify an alternative
offset schedule. As directed by the
Hearing Official, the employee shall
provide a statement and supporting
documents indicating the employee’s
financial status. This statement should
address total income from all sources;
assets; liabilities; number of
dependents; and expenses for food,
housing, clothing, transportation,
medical care, and exceptional expenses,
if any.
(c) The employee shall file with the
Recorder, any additional information
directed by the Hearing Official.
§ 961.5
Effect of filing a petition.
Upon receipt and docketing of the
employee’s petition for a hearing,
further collection activity by the Postal
Service must cease, as required by
section 5 of the Debt Collection Act
until the petition is resolved by the
Hearing Official.
§ 961.6 Filing, docketing and serving
documents; computation of time;
representation of parties.
(a) Filing. All documents relating to
the Debt Collection Act hearing
proceedings must be filed by the
employee or the General Counsel’s
designee with the Recorder. (Normal
Recorder office business hours are
between 8:45 a.m. and 4:45 p.m.,
Eastern Time.) Unless otherwise
directed by the Hearing Official, the
party filing a document shall send a
copy thereof to the opposing party.
(b) Docketing. The Recorder will
maintain a record of Debt Collection Act
proceedings and will assign a docket
number to each such case. After
notification of the docket number, the
employee and the Postal Service’s
representative should refer to it on any
further filings regarding the petition.
(c) Time computation. A filing period
under the rules in this Part excludes the
day the period begins, and includes the
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
22027
last day of the period unless the last day
is a Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday,
in which event the period runs until the
close of business on the next business
day. Requests for extensions of time
shall be made in writing prior to the
date on which the submission is due,
state the reason for the extension
request, represent that the moving party
has contacted the opposing party about
the request, or made reasonable efforts
to do so, and indicate whether the
opposing party consents to the
extension. Requests for extensions of
time submitted after the date on which
the submission was due shall explain
why the moving party was unable to
request an extension prior to the
deadline.
(d) Representation of parties. The
representative of the Postal Service, as
designated by the General Counsel, shall
file a notice of appearance as soon as
practicable, but no later than the date
for filing the answer. If an employee has
a representative, he or she also shall file
a notice of appearance as soon as
practicable, and further transmissions of
documents and other communications
by and with the employee shall be made
through his or her representative.
§ 961.7
Answer to petition.
Within 15 days from the date of
receiving the petition, the Postal
Service’s representative shall file an
answer to the petition, and attach all
available relevant records and
documents in support of the Postal
Service’s debt claim, and/or the
administrative salary offset schedule
proposed by the Postal Service for
collecting any such claim. The answer
shall provide a clear and thorough
description of the basis for the Postal
Service’s determination of the alleged
debt, its calculation of the amount of the
alleged debt, and/or its proposed offset
schedule.
§ 961.8 Hearing Official authority and
responsibilities.
The Hearing Official’s authority
includes, but is not limited to, the
following:
(a) Ruling on all motions or requests
by the parties.
(b) Issuing notices, orders or
memoranda to the parties concerning
the hearing proceedings.
(c) Conducting telephone conferences
with the parties to expedite the
proceedings. The Hearing Official will
prepare a Memorandum of Telephone
Conference, which shall be transmitted
to both parties and which serves as the
official record of that conference.
(d) After considering the positions of
the parties, determining whether an oral
E:\FR\FM\21APR1.SGM
21APR1
22028
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 76 / Monday, April 21, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
hearing (or alternatively, a hearing
solely on written submissions) shall be
conducted, and setting the place, date,
and time for such a hearing.
(e) Administering oaths or
affirmations to witnesses.
(f) Conducting the hearing in a
manner to maintain discipline and
decorum while assuring that relevant,
reliable and probative evidence is
elicited on the issues in dispute, but
irrelevant, immaterial or repetitious
evidence is excluded. The Hearing
Official in his or her discretion may
examine witnesses to ensure that a
satisfactory record is developed.
(g) Establishing the record in the case.
The weight to be attached to any
evidence of record will rest within the
discretion of the Hearing Official.
Except as the Hearing Official may
otherwise order, no proof shall be
received in evidence after completion of
an oral hearing or, in cases submitted on
the written record, after notification by
the Hearing Official that the record is
closed. The Hearing Official may require
either party, with appropriate notice to
the other party, to submit additional
evidence on any relevant matter.
(h) Granting reasonable time
extensions or other relief for good cause
shown in the Hearing Official’s sole
discretion.
(i) Issuing the final decision. The
decision must include the
determination of the amount and
validity of the alleged debt and, where
applicable, the repayment schedule. The
Hearing Official will issue the decision
as soon as practicable after the close of
the record. Collection activity remains
stayed until the decision has issued.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
§ 961.9
Opportunity for oral hearing.
An oral hearing shall be conducted in
the sole discretion of the Hearing
Official. An oral hearing may be
conducted in-person, by telephone, by
video conference, or other appropriate
means as directed by the Hearing
Official. When the Hearing Official
determines that an oral hearing shall not
be conducted, the decision shall be
based solely on the written submissions.
The Hearing Official shall arrange for
the recording and transcription of an
oral hearing, which shall serve as the
official record of the hearing. In the
event of an unexcused absence, the
hearing may proceed without the
participation of the absent party.
§ 961.10 Effect of Hearing Official’s
decision; motion for reconsideration.
(a) After the receipt of written
submissions or after the conclusion of
the hearing and the receipt of posthearing briefs, if any, the Hearing
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:49 Apr 18, 2014
Jkt 232001
Official shall issue a written decision,
which shall include the findings of fact
and conclusions of law, relied upon.
(b) The Hearing Official shall send
each party a copy of the decision. The
Hearing Official’s decision shall be the
final administrative determination on
the employee’s debt or repayment
schedule. No reconsideration of the
decision will be allowed unless a
motion for reconsideration is filed
within 10 days from receipt of the
decision and shows good cause for
reconsideration. Reconsideration will be
allowed only in the discretion of the
Hearing Official. A motion for
reconsideration by the employee will
not operate to stay a collection action
authorized by the Hearing Official’s
decision.
§ 961.11 Consequences for failure to
comply with rules.
(a) The Hearing Official may
determine that the employee has
abandoned the right to a hearing, and
that administrative offset may be
initiated if the employee files his or her
petition late without good cause; or files
a withdrawal of the employee’s petition
for a hearing.
(b) The Hearing Official may
determine that the administrative offset
may not be initiated if the Postal Service
fails to file the answer or files the
answer late without good cause; or files
a withdrawal of the debt determination
at issue.
(c) If a party fails to comply with
these Rules or the Hearing Official’s
orders, the Hearing Official may take
such action as he or she deems
reasonable and proper under the
circumstances, including dismissing or
granting the petition as appropriate.
§ 961.12
Ex parte communications.
Ex parte communications are not
allowed between a party and the
Hearing Official or the Official’s staff. Ex
parte communication means an oral or
written communication, not on the
public record, with one party only with
respect to which reasonable prior notice
to all parties is not given, but it shall not
include requests for status reports or
procedural matters. A memorandum of
any communication between the
Hearing Official and a party will be
transmitted to both parties.
Stanley F. Mires,
Attorney, Legal Policy & Legislative Advice.
[FR Doc. 2014–08963 Filed 4–18–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710–12–P
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–HQ–OAR–2010–0943; FRL–9909–19–
OAR]
RIN 2060–AQ55
Amendments to Delegation of
Authority Provisions in the Prevention
of Significant Deterioration Program
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is promulgating
amendments to the New Source Review
(NSR) Prevention of Significant
Deterioration (PSD) program that amend
certain outdated language that limited
the EPA’s ability to delegate the federal
PSD program to interested Indian tribes.
This final action provides consistency
with the current federal PSD regulatory
requirements by allowing the EPA to
delegate the PSD program to interested
tribes for their attainment areas. The
EPA regulations already provide for the
administrative delegation of the PSD
program to state and local governments
for their attainment areas and
administrative delegation of the
nonattainment NSR program to states,
tribes and local governments. This final
rule deletes a restriction on tribes’
ability to take delegation of the PSD
program and includes tribes, along with
state and local governments, to make it
clear that tribes, as well as states and
local governments, may voluntarily
request and assume direct delegation of
the NSR program in areas that are
currently attaining the national ambient
air quality standards (NAAQS). This
final rule does not create any new
requirements.
DATES: This final rule is effective April
21, 2014.
ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA–HQ–OAR–2010–0943. All
documents in the docket are listed on
the www.regulations.gov Web site.
Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available,
e.g., CBI or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the Internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available either electronically through
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at
the EPA’s Docket Center, Public Reading
Room, EPA West, Room 3334, 1301
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\21APR1.SGM
21APR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 76 (Monday, April 21, 2014)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 22025-22028]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-08963]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
POSTAL SERVICE
39 CFR Part 961
Rules of Practice in Proceedings Under Section 5 of the Debt
Collection Act
AGENCY: Postal Service.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document contains the final revisions to the rules of
practice before the Judicial Officer in proceedings under section 5 of
the Debt Collection Act. These rules of procedure completely replace
and supersede the prior rules.
DATES: Effective Date: June 2, 2014.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Associate Judicial Officer Gary E.
Shapiro, (703) 812-1910.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On February 18, 2014, the Judicial Officer
Department published for comment proposed revisions to the rules
governing practice in proceedings under section 5 of the Debt
Collection Act of 1982 (79 FR 9120-21). Following the receipt of
comments, the Judicial Officer has made further revisions to the
original proposed rules, as discussed below, and has determined that it
is appropriate to adopt the rules of practice, as revised. The Judicial
Officer Department also has determined that it is appropriate to make
these rules of practice effective on June 2, 2014, in the interest of
orderly public administration.
A. Executive Summary
Part 961 of title 39, Code of Federal Regulations, contains the
rules of practice in proceedings under section 5 of the Debt Collection
Act of 1982, as amended, 5 U.S.C. 5514, in which the Judicial Officer
or an assigned Hearing Official provides the final agency adjudication
for debt collection assessments by administrative salary offset issued
by the Postal Service seeking to collect a debt owed it by a current
employee. This authority is delegated by the Postmaster General.
Although these rules provide a complete replacement for the former
rules, the changes are not considered to affect the rights of the
parties in a substantive way. Rather, the rules are revised to conform
to current practices and to clarify the procedures.
B. Background
The Judicial Officer Department published for comments proposed
revisions to the rules governing proceedings under section 5 of the
Debt Collection Act of 1982 in the Federal Register on February 18,
2014 (79 FR 9120-21). This notice announces the intention to promulgate
final rules of procedure, following our review and consideration of all
comments. The period for comments closed on March 20, 2014. We
considered all comments received, revised the proposed rules as
explained below, and promulgate our final rules of procedure.
C. Summary of Comments and Changes
The Judicial Officer Department received comments from one source:
a labor union representing many Postal Service employees who are
parties to Debt Collection Act litigation before the Judicial Officer
Department. We carefully considered each comment and adopted some of
the suggestions made. All comments are discussed below:
Section 961.4 Employee Petition for a Hearing
A comment noted that the proposed rule provided the Hearing
Official with discretion to resolve a dispute where the Postal Service
has not initiated involuntary administrative salary offsets by issuing
a Notice as required by the Debt Collection Act. This rule change
reflects our experience that the Postal Service sometimes collects
alleged debts by administrative salary offset without having issued the
proper Notice. In such circumstances, our practice has been to order a
refund of the improperly collected offset, and to offer the employee
the choice whether to proceed to an adjudication on the merits without
additional procedural requirements, or to dismiss the case without
prejudice (or sometimes suspend the case) while requiring the Postal
Service to issue the Notice. Retaining the case ensures that the
employee remains protected against collection activity without undue
delay of the adjudication. As explained however, at the option of the
employee, we will dismiss the case as premature, or suspend it, and
require that the Notice be issued. In either event, we will not permit
collection activity to commence until our adjudication is final or the
Postal Service has complied with the statute. As we believe that the
revision is consistent with the statute, protects the rights of the
employee/
[[Page 22026]]
debtor, and conforms the rule to existing practice, we have declined to
make a change in response to the comment.
Another comment expressed concern about the proposed elimination of
former paragraphs (b)(4) and (5) from Sec. 961.4. Deleted paragraph
(b)(4) provided for an employee to include in his or her petition
whether an oral hearing is requested, or alternatively, a hearing based
solely on written submissions. Deleted paragraph (b)(5) provided for an
employee requesting an oral hearing to include a statement of the
evidence he or she will produce which makes an oral hearing necessary,
including a list of witnesses, with their addresses, whom the employee
expects to call; the proposed city for the hearing site, with
justification for holding the hearing in that city; and recommended
alternative dates for the hearing; which should be within 40 days from
filing the Petition. These deletions are part of several former
requirements for inclusion in an employee petition. Our objective was
to simplify petition requirements and defer obtaining certain
information from an employee until a later stage of the proceeding when
the case is developed further. The requirements cited in the comment
were deleted because at the petition stage, it often is premature to
include such information resulting in incomplete petitions which
unnecessarily delays the process. Both parties are given opportunities
to express their preferences concerning the type of hearing requested
which the Hearing Official will consider in deciding the most
appropriate form for a hearing. We agree with the comment that the
employee should be permitted to present arguments in support of his or
her position regarding whether an oral or written hearing should occur.
While that reflects our existing process, we have modified the language
of the rules to make it explicit, and have done so in the most
appropriate paragraph--Sec. 961.8(d), which has been changed to
require the Hearing Official to consider the positions of the parties
before determining whether an oral hearing (or alternatively, a hearing
solely on written submissions) shall be conducted, and setting the
place, date, and time for such a hearing. Where a hearing on written
submissions is ordered, the Hearing Official explains the process
thoroughly to both parties. Therefore, an additional change in that
regard is not necessary.
Section 961.8 Hearing Official Authority and Responsibilities
A comment expressed concern about the proposed elimination of the
following sentence from Sec. 961.8: ``The proceedings must be
expedited to ensure issuance of the final decision no later than 60
days after the filing of the employee's hearing Petition.'' Our case
law precedent establishes that the sixty-day timeframe referenced in
the prior regulations and in the Debt Collection Act is not a statutory
deadline or requirement that can be enforced by a party. See Celeste
Guice, P.S. Docket No. DCA 12-19 (May 11, 2012). Additionally, our
experience has been that both parties commonly request extensions or do
not comply with deadlines in these cases making decisions within sixty
days impossible. While the Judicial Officer Department's policy is to
issue decisions in a timely manner after the record closes, a specific
hard deadline is not practical. Furthermore, employees who have filed
timely petitions remain protected against involuntary administrative
salary offsets until the case is decided. Therefore, we do not believe
that re-insertion of a sixty-day time period is necessary, nor does it
reflect our case law or actual practice. However, to address the
concern reflected in this comment, we have added language to Sec.
961.8(i) to require the Hearing Official to issue the decision as soon
as practicable after the close of the record, and to stay collection
activity until the decision has issued.
D. Effective Date
These revised rules will govern proceedings under part 961 docketed
on or after June 2, 2014.
List of Subjects in 39 CFR Part 961
Claims, Government employees, Wages.
For the reasons stated in the preamble, the Postal Service hereby
revises 39 CFR part 961 as set forth below:
PART 961--RULES OF PRACTICE IN PROCEEDINGS UNDER SECTION 5 OF THE
DEBT COLLECTION ACT
Sec.
961.1 Authority for rules.
961.2 Scope of rules.
961.3 Definitions.
961.4 Employee petition for a hearing.
961.5 Effect of filing a petition.
961.6 Filing, docketing, and serving documents; computation of time;
representation of parties.
961.7 Answer to petition.
961.8 Hearing Official authority and responsibilities.
961.9 Opportunity for oral hearing.
961.10 Effect of Hearing Official's decision; motion for
reconsideration.
961.11 Consequences for failure to comply with rules.
961.12 Ex parte communications.
Authority: 39 U.S.C. 204, 401; 5 U.S.C. 5514.
Sec. 961.1 Authority for rules.
These rules are issued by the Judicial Officer pursuant to
authority delegated by the Postmaster General.
Sec. 961.2 Scope of rules.
The rules in this part apply to the hearing provided by section 5
of the Debt Collection Act of 1982, as amended, 5 U.S.C. 5514,
challenging the Postal Service's determination of the existence or
amount of an employee debt to the Postal Service, or of the terms of
the employee's debt repayment schedule. In addition, these rules apply
to a hearing under section 5 of the Debt Collection Act when an
Administrative Law Judge or an Administrative Judge in the Judicial
Officer Department is designated as the Hearing Official for a creditor
Federal agency other than the Postal Service pursuant to an agreement
between the Postal Service and that agency. In such cases, all
references to Postal Service within these rules shall be construed to
refer to the creditor Federal agency involved.
Sec. 961.3 Definitions.
As used in this part:
(a) Employee refers to a current employee of the Postal Service who
is alleged to be indebted to the Postal Service; or to an employee of
another Federal agency who is alleged to be indebted to that other
creditor Federal agency and whose hearing under section 5 of the Debt
Collection Act is being conducted under these rules.
(b) General Counsel refers to the General Counsel of the Postal
Service, and includes a designated representative.
(c) Hearing Official refers to an Administrative Law Judge
qualified to hear cases under the Administrative Procedure Act, an
Administrative Judge appointed under the Contract Disputes Act of 1978,
or other qualified person not under the control or supervision of the
Postmaster General, who is designated by the Judicial Officer to
conduct the hearing under section 5 of the Debt Collection Act of 1982,
as amended, 5 U.S.C. 5514.
(d) Judicial Officer refers to the Judicial Officer, Associate
Judicial Officer, or Acting Judicial Officer of the United States
Postal Service.
(e) Notice of Involuntary Administrative Salary Offsets Under the
Debt Collection Act refers to the formal written notice required by
section 5 of the Debt Collection Act, including the provision of notice
of the procedures under this Part, before involuntary
[[Page 22027]]
collection deductions can be taken from an employee's salary.
(f) Postmaster/Installation Head refers to the Postal Service
official who is authorized under the Postal Service Employee and Labor
Relations Manual to make the initial determination of employee
indebtedness and to issue the ``Notice of Involuntary Administrative
Salary Offsets Under the Debt Collection Act.''
(g) Recorder refers to the Recorder, Judicial Officer Department,
U.S. Postal Service, located at 2101 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 600,
Arlington, VA 22201-3078. The Recorder's telephone number is (703) 812-
1900, and the fax number is (703) 812-1901.
Sec. 961.4 Employee petition for a hearing.
(a) If an employee desires a hearing, prescribed by section 5 of
the Debt Collection Act, to challenge the Postal Service's
determination of the existence or amount of a debt, or to challenge the
involuntary repayment terms proposed by the Postal Service, the
employee must file a written, signed petition with the Recorder, on or
before the fifteenth (15th) calendar day following the employee's
receipt of the Postal Service's ``Notice of Involuntary Administrative
Salary Offsets Under the Debt Collection Act.'' The Hearing Official,
in his or her discretion may waive this deadline upon a demonstration
of good cause. In the event that the Postal Service initiated
involuntary administrative salary offsets without having issued a
Notice as required by the Debt Collection Act, the Hearing Official, in
his or her discretion, may retain authority to resolve the debt
assessment as if a Notice had been issued, and may order the Postal
Service to return any improperly offset money.
(b) The hearing petition shall include the following:
(1) The words, ``Petition for Hearing under the Debt Collection
Act,'' prominently captioned at the top of the first page;
(2) The name of the employee, the employee's work address, home
address, work telephone number, home telephone number, and email
address, if any, or other address and telephone number at which the
employee may be contacted during business hours;
(3) A statement of the date on which the employee received the
``Notice of Involuntary Administrative Salary Offsets Under the Debt
Collection Act,'' and a copy of the Notice;
(4) A statement indicating whether the employee challenges:
(i) The existence of the debt identified in the Notice of
Involuntary Administrative Salary Offsets;
(ii) the amount of the debt identified in the Notice; and/or
(iii) the involuntary repayment terms identified by the Postal
Service in the Notice. For each challenge, the employee's petition
shall indicate the basis of the employee's disagreement. The employee
should identify and explain the facts, evidence, and legal arguments
which support his or her position;
(5) Copies of all records in the employee's possession which relate
to the debt; and
(6) If an employee contends that the Postal Service's proposed
offset schedule would result in a severe financial hardship on the
employee, his or her spouse, and dependents, the employee shall
identify an alternative offset schedule. As directed by the Hearing
Official, the employee shall provide a statement and supporting
documents indicating the employee's financial status. This statement
should address total income from all sources; assets; liabilities;
number of dependents; and expenses for food, housing, clothing,
transportation, medical care, and exceptional expenses, if any.
(c) The employee shall file with the Recorder, any additional
information directed by the Hearing Official.
Sec. 961.5 Effect of filing a petition.
Upon receipt and docketing of the employee's petition for a
hearing, further collection activity by the Postal Service must cease,
as required by section 5 of the Debt Collection Act until the petition
is resolved by the Hearing Official.
Sec. 961.6 Filing, docketing and serving documents; computation of
time; representation of parties.
(a) Filing. All documents relating to the Debt Collection Act
hearing proceedings must be filed by the employee or the General
Counsel's designee with the Recorder. (Normal Recorder office business
hours are between 8:45 a.m. and 4:45 p.m., Eastern Time.) Unless
otherwise directed by the Hearing Official, the party filing a document
shall send a copy thereof to the opposing party.
(b) Docketing. The Recorder will maintain a record of Debt
Collection Act proceedings and will assign a docket number to each such
case. After notification of the docket number, the employee and the
Postal Service's representative should refer to it on any further
filings regarding the petition.
(c) Time computation. A filing period under the rules in this Part
excludes the day the period begins, and includes the last day of the
period unless the last day is a Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday, in
which event the period runs until the close of business on the next
business day. Requests for extensions of time shall be made in writing
prior to the date on which the submission is due, state the reason for
the extension request, represent that the moving party has contacted
the opposing party about the request, or made reasonable efforts to do
so, and indicate whether the opposing party consents to the extension.
Requests for extensions of time submitted after the date on which the
submission was due shall explain why the moving party was unable to
request an extension prior to the deadline.
(d) Representation of parties. The representative of the Postal
Service, as designated by the General Counsel, shall file a notice of
appearance as soon as practicable, but no later than the date for
filing the answer. If an employee has a representative, he or she also
shall file a notice of appearance as soon as practicable, and further
transmissions of documents and other communications by and with the
employee shall be made through his or her representative.
Sec. 961.7 Answer to petition.
Within 15 days from the date of receiving the petition, the Postal
Service's representative shall file an answer to the petition, and
attach all available relevant records and documents in support of the
Postal Service's debt claim, and/or the administrative salary offset
schedule proposed by the Postal Service for collecting any such claim.
The answer shall provide a clear and thorough description of the basis
for the Postal Service's determination of the alleged debt, its
calculation of the amount of the alleged debt, and/or its proposed
offset schedule.
Sec. 961.8 Hearing Official authority and responsibilities.
The Hearing Official's authority includes, but is not limited to,
the following:
(a) Ruling on all motions or requests by the parties.
(b) Issuing notices, orders or memoranda to the parties concerning
the hearing proceedings.
(c) Conducting telephone conferences with the parties to expedite
the proceedings. The Hearing Official will prepare a Memorandum of
Telephone Conference, which shall be transmitted to both parties and
which serves as the official record of that conference.
(d) After considering the positions of the parties, determining
whether an oral
[[Page 22028]]
hearing (or alternatively, a hearing solely on written submissions)
shall be conducted, and setting the place, date, and time for such a
hearing.
(e) Administering oaths or affirmations to witnesses.
(f) Conducting the hearing in a manner to maintain discipline and
decorum while assuring that relevant, reliable and probative evidence
is elicited on the issues in dispute, but irrelevant, immaterial or
repetitious evidence is excluded. The Hearing Official in his or her
discretion may examine witnesses to ensure that a satisfactory record
is developed.
(g) Establishing the record in the case. The weight to be attached
to any evidence of record will rest within the discretion of the
Hearing Official. Except as the Hearing Official may otherwise order,
no proof shall be received in evidence after completion of an oral
hearing or, in cases submitted on the written record, after
notification by the Hearing Official that the record is closed. The
Hearing Official may require either party, with appropriate notice to
the other party, to submit additional evidence on any relevant matter.
(h) Granting reasonable time extensions or other relief for good
cause shown in the Hearing Official's sole discretion.
(i) Issuing the final decision. The decision must include the
determination of the amount and validity of the alleged debt and, where
applicable, the repayment schedule. The Hearing Official will issue the
decision as soon as practicable after the close of the record.
Collection activity remains stayed until the decision has issued.
Sec. 961.9 Opportunity for oral hearing.
An oral hearing shall be conducted in the sole discretion of the
Hearing Official. An oral hearing may be conducted in-person, by
telephone, by video conference, or other appropriate means as directed
by the Hearing Official. When the Hearing Official determines that an
oral hearing shall not be conducted, the decision shall be based solely
on the written submissions. The Hearing Official shall arrange for the
recording and transcription of an oral hearing, which shall serve as
the official record of the hearing. In the event of an unexcused
absence, the hearing may proceed without the participation of the
absent party.
Sec. 961.10 Effect of Hearing Official's decision; motion for
reconsideration.
(a) After the receipt of written submissions or after the
conclusion of the hearing and the receipt of post-hearing briefs, if
any, the Hearing Official shall issue a written decision, which shall
include the findings of fact and conclusions of law, relied upon.
(b) The Hearing Official shall send each party a copy of the
decision. The Hearing Official's decision shall be the final
administrative determination on the employee's debt or repayment
schedule. No reconsideration of the decision will be allowed unless a
motion for reconsideration is filed within 10 days from receipt of the
decision and shows good cause for reconsideration. Reconsideration will
be allowed only in the discretion of the Hearing Official. A motion for
reconsideration by the employee will not operate to stay a collection
action authorized by the Hearing Official's decision.
Sec. 961.11 Consequences for failure to comply with rules.
(a) The Hearing Official may determine that the employee has
abandoned the right to a hearing, and that administrative offset may be
initiated if the employee files his or her petition late without good
cause; or files a withdrawal of the employee's petition for a hearing.
(b) The Hearing Official may determine that the administrative
offset may not be initiated if the Postal Service fails to file the
answer or files the answer late without good cause; or files a
withdrawal of the debt determination at issue.
(c) If a party fails to comply with these Rules or the Hearing
Official's orders, the Hearing Official may take such action as he or
she deems reasonable and proper under the circumstances, including
dismissing or granting the petition as appropriate.
Sec. 961.12 Ex parte communications.
Ex parte communications are not allowed between a party and the
Hearing Official or the Official's staff. Ex parte communication means
an oral or written communication, not on the public record, with one
party only with respect to which reasonable prior notice to all parties
is not given, but it shall not include requests for status reports or
procedural matters. A memorandum of any communication between the
Hearing Official and a party will be transmitted to both parties.
Stanley F. Mires,
Attorney, Legal Policy & Legislative Advice.
[FR Doc. 2014-08963 Filed 4-18-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P