Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands; Prevention of Significant Deterioration; Special Exemptions From Requirements of the Clean Air Act, 22032-22036 [2014-08611]
Download as PDF
22032
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 76 / Monday, April 21, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
G. Executive Order 13045: Protection of
Children From Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks
The EPA interprets Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1977) as
applying only to those regulatory
actions that concern health or safety
risks, such that the analysis required
under section 5–501 of the E.O. has the
potential to influence the regulation.
This action is not subject to E.O. 13045
because it does not establish an
environmental standard intended to
mitigate health or safety risks.
H. Executive Order 13211: Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use
This action is not subject to Executive
Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22,
2001), because it is not a significant
regulatory action under E.O. 12866.
I. National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (‘‘NTTAA’’), Public Law No.
104–113, 12(d) (15 U.S.C. 272 note)
directs the EPA to use voluntary
consensus standards in its regulatory
activities unless to do so would be
inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary
consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., materials specifications,
test methods, sampling procedures, and
business practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies. NTTAA directs the
EPA to provide Congress, through OMB,
explanations when the Agency decides
not to use available and applicable
voluntary consensus standards.
This action does not involve technical
standards. Therefore, the EPA did not
consider the use of any voluntary
consensus standards.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
J. Executive Order 12898: Federal
Actions To Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and
Low-Income Populations
17:49 Apr 18, 2014
Jkt 232001
K. Congressional Review Act
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801, et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. The EPA will
submit a report containing this final rule
and other required information to the
United States Senate, the United States
House of Representatives and the
Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of the rule in
the Federal Register. A major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it
is published in the Federal Register.
This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as
defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). This rule
will be effective upon publication in the
Federal Register.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Indians, Indians-law,
and Indians-tribal government;
Incorporation by reference.
Dated: April 11, 2014.
Gina McCarthy,
Administrator.
For the reasons stated in the
preamble, 40 CFR part 52 is amended as
follows:
PART 52—APPROVAL AND
PROMULGATION OF
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629,
Feb. 16, 1994) establishes federal
executive policy on environmental
justice. Its main provision directs
federal agencies, to the greatest extent
practicable and permitted by law, to
make environmental justice part of their
mission by identifying and addressing,
as appropriate, disproportionately high
and adverse human health or
environmental effects of their programs,
policies, and activities on minority
populations and low-income
populations in the United States.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
The EPA has determined that this
final rule will not have
disproportionately high and adverse
human health or environmental effects
on minority or low-income populations
because it does not affect the level of
protection provided to human health or
the environment. This final rule
imposes no new requirements but does
allow interested tribes to accept
delegation of the existing federal
program.
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401, et seq.
2. Amend § 52.21 by revising
paragraphs (u)(1) and (u)(2)(i) and by
removing paragraph (u)(3) and
redesignating paragraph (u)(4) as
paragraph (u)(3) to read as follows:
■
§ 52.21 Prevention of significant
deterioration of air quality.
*
*
*
*
*
(u) Delegation of authority. (1) The
Administrator shall have the authority
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
to delegate his responsibility for
conducting source review pursuant to
this section, in accordance with
paragraph (u)(2) of this section.
(2) * * *
(i) Where the delegate agency is not
an air pollution control agency, it shall
consult with the appropriate state, tribe,
and local air pollution control agency
prior to making any determination
under this section. Similarly, where the
delegate agency does not have
continuing responsibility for managing
land use, it shall consult with the
appropriate state, tribe, and local agency
primarily responsible for managing land
use prior to making any determination
under this section.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2014–08919 Filed 4–18–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Parts 52 and 69
[EPA–R09–OAR–2013–0697; FRL–9909–18–
Region 9]
Approval and Promulgation of
Implementation Plans; Commonwealth
of the Northern Mariana Islands;
Prevention of Significant Deterioration;
Special Exemptions From
Requirements of the Clean Air Act
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
Under the Clean Air Act, the
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
is taking final action to disapprove the
state implementation plan (SIP) for the
Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana
Islands (CNMI) with respect to
prevention of significant deterioration
(PSD), and to incorporate by reference
the Federal PSD regulations into the
applicable CNMI plan. EPA is also
taking final action to grant a petition by
CNMI for an exemption of the
applicable PSD major source baseline
date, and to establish an alternate date,
January 13, 1997, as the major source
baseline date and trigger date in CNMI.
EPA is also making certain corrections
to errors that were made in previous
rulemakings related to the CNMI SIP.
This action establishes the Federal PSD
regulations as a basic element of the
applicable CNMI plan and, through the
exemption, establishes January 13, 1997
as the major source baseline date (and
trigger date) under the PSD program in
CNMI for sulfur dioxide, PM10 and
nitrogen dioxide.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\21APR1.SGM
21APR1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 76 / Monday, April 21, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
Effective Date: This rule is
effective on May 21, 2014.
DATES:
EPA has established docket
number EPA–R09–OAR–2013–0697 for
this action. The index to the docket is
available electronically at https://
www.regulations.gov and in hard copy
at EPA Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street,
San Francisco, California. While all
documents in the docket are listed in
the index, some information may be
publicly available only at the hard copy
location (e.g., copyrighted material), and
some may not be publicly available in
either location (e.g., Confidential
Business Information). To inspect the
hard copy materials, please schedule an
appointment during normal business
hours with the contact listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: La
Weeda Ward, (213) 244–1812 or
ward.laweeda@epa.gov.
ADDRESSES:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document, ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us’’
and ‘‘our’’ refer to EPA.
Table of Contents
I. Proposed Action
II. Public Comments and EPA Responses
III. Final Action
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Proposed Action
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
On November 25, 2013 (78 FR 70248),
under section 110(k) of the Clean Air
Act (CAA or ‘‘Act’’), EPA proposed to
disapprove the state implementation
plan (SIP) for the Commonwealth of the
Northern Mariana Islands (CNMI) with
respect to prevention of significant
deterioration (PSD), and to incorporate
by reference the Federal PSD regulations
into the applicable CNMI plan.1 EPA
also proposed to grant, under section
325(a)(1) of the Act, a petition by CNMI
for an exemption of the applicable PSD
major source baseline date under
Federal PSD regulations, and to
establish an alternate date, January 13,
1997, as the major source baseline date
and trigger date for certain pollutants in
CNMI. Lastly, under section 110(k)(6) of
the Act, EPA proposed to make certain
corrections to errors that were made in
1 CNMI is an insular territory of the United States.
CNMI consists of 15 islands of volcanic origin
which are located approximately 145° to 146° east
and from 14° to 20° north of the equator. The
islands extend in a general north-south direction for
approximately 420 nautical miles from the Island of
Farallon de Pajaros in the north to the island of Rota
in the south. CNMI lies in the western part of the
Pacific Ocean and is located approximately 1,250
miles south of Tokyo, 1,440 miles east of Manila,
and 110 miles north of Guam. Based on Bureau of
Census 2010 population counts, the total
population of CNMI is approximately 54,000 with
the majority of the population residing on Saipan.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:49 Apr 18, 2014
Jkt 232001
22033
previous rulemakings involving the
CNMI SIP.
As explained in our November 25,
2013 proposed rule, the action would
establish the Federal PSD regulations as
a basic element of the applicable CNMI
plan and, through the exemption, would
establish January 13, 1997 as the major
source baseline date (and trigger date)
under the PSD program in CNMI for
sulfur dioxide, PM10 and nitrogen
dioxide.
Our November 25, 2013 proposed rule
provides detailed background
information related to PSD requirements
under part C of title I of the CAA (and
EPA’s PSD SIP requirements in 40 CFR
51.166) and petitions by governors of
certain territories under CAA section
325(a) for exemptions from certain CAA
requirements; the rationale for our
conclusion that the CNMI SIP does not
meet the requirements for PSD under
part C of title I of the CAA and 40 CFR
51.166; the rationale for granting
CNMI’s petition for an alternate major
source baseline date and the
establishment of January 13, 1997 as the
PSD major source baseline date and
trigger date (with respect to sulfur
dioxide, PM10, and nitrogen dioxide);
and a description of the specific
corrections to previous SIP actions that
are needed to better identify and clarify
the contents of the CNMI SIP as set forth
in 40 CFR part 52. The reader is directed
to the proposed rule for the details,
which are not repeated here.
addition to making conforming
amendments to 40 CFR part 52, subparts
A and FFF and to 40 CFR part 69,
subpart C, EPA is also making certain
corrections to certain errors in 40 CFR
part 52 that were made in previous
rulemakings involving the CNMI SIP.
This action establishes EPA’s PSD
regulations as a basic element of the
applicable CNMI plan, and, through the
exemption, establishes a major source
baseline date and trigger date for sulfur
dioxide, PM10, and nitrogen dioxide on
CNMI of January 13, 1997.
II. Public Comments and EPA
Responses
Our November 25, 2013 proposed rule
provided a 30-day comment period and
an opportunity to request a public
hearing. During this period, we received
no comments on our proposed action
and no request for a public hearing.
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
generally requires an agency to conduct
a regulatory flexibility analysis of any
rule subject to notice and comment
rulemaking requirements unless the
agency certifies that the rule will not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
Small entities include small businesses,
small not-for-profit enterprises, and
small governmental jurisdictions.
This rule will not have a significant
impact on a substantial number of small
entities because, while the disapproval
of the CNMI SIP with respect to PSD
will lead to the application of the
Federal PSD regulations to CNMI, the
basic PSD statutory requirements for
major emitting facilities to obtain a PSD
permit already apply within CNMI, and
the incremental impact associated with
application of the specific requirements
under the Federal PSD regulations will
be offset by EPA’s grant of CNMI’s
petition for an exemption from the
original PSD major source baseline
dates. Therefore, I certify that this action
will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
III. Final Action
Under section 110(k) of the CAA, EPA
is taking final action to disapprove the
CNMI SIP with respect to PSD, and
incorporate by reference the Federal
PSD regulations into the applicable
CNMI plan.2 EPA is also taking final
action to grant a petition by CNMI for
an exemption of the PSD major source
baseline date, and to establish an
alternate date, January 13, 1997, as the
major source baseline date and trigger
date for sulfur dioxide, PM10, and
nitrogen dioxide in CNMI. Lastly, in
2 While EPA is taking final action to disapprove
the CNMI SIP with respect to PSD, such
disapproval does not affect the validity of
previously approved rules in the CNMI SIP. Such
SIP rules continue to be part of the applicable CNMI
plan unless and until EPA approves their
revocation or revision.
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
IV. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
A. Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review and Executive
Order 13563: Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review
This action is not a ‘‘significant
regulatory action’’ under the terms of
Executive Order (E.O.) 12866 (58 FR
51735, October 4, 1993) and is therefore
not subject to review by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) under
E.O. 12866 and E.O. 13563 (76 FR 3821,
January 21, 2011).
B. Paperwork Reduction Act
This action does not impose an
information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction
Act, 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq. Burden is
defined at 5 CFR 1320.3(b).
C. Regulatory Reduction Act
E:\FR\FM\21APR1.SGM
21APR1
22034
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 76 / Monday, April 21, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
Under section 202 of the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995
(‘‘Unfunded Mandates Act’’), signed
into law on March 22, 1995, EPA must
prepare a budgetary impact statement to
accompany any proposed or final rule
that includes a Federal mandate that
may result in estimated costs to State,
local, or tribal governments in the
aggregate; or to the private sector, of
$100 million or more. Under section
205, EPA must select the most costeffective and least burdensome
alternative that achieves the objectives
of the rule and is consistent with
statutory requirements. Section 203
requires EPA to establish a plan for
informing and advising any small
governments that may be significantly
or uniquely impacted by the rule.
EPA has determined that the
disapproval of the CNMI SIP with
respect to PSD, considered together with
the incorporation of the Federal PSD
regulations, and grant of an exemption
request with respect to the PSD major
source baseline date, does not include a
Federal mandate that may result in
estimated costs of $100 million or more
to either State, local, or tribal
governments in the aggregate, or to the
private sector. While the disapproval of
the CNMI SIP with respect to PSD will
lead to the application of the Federal
PSD regulations to CNMI, the basic PSD
statutory requirements for major
emitting facilities to obtain a PSD
permit already apply within CNMI, and
the incremental impact associated with
application of the specific requirements
under the Federal PSD regulations will
be offset by EPA’s grant of CNMI’s
petition for an exemption from the
original PSD major source baseline
dates. Accordingly, the additional costs
to State, local, or tribal governments, or
to the private sector, will not be
significant for the purposes of section
202 of the Unfunded Mandates Act.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
E. Executive Order 13132, Federalism
Federalism (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999) revokes and replaces Executive
Orders 12612 (Federalism) and 12875
(Enhancing the Intergovernmental
Partnership). Executive Order 13132
requires EPA to develop an accountable
process to ensure ‘‘meaningful and
timely input by State and local officials
in the development of regulatory
policies that have federalism
implications.’’ ‘‘Policies that have
federalism implications’’ is defined in
the Executive Order to include
regulations that have ‘‘substantial direct
effects on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:49 Apr 18, 2014
Jkt 232001
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government.’’ Under
Executive Order 13132, EPA may not
issue a regulation that has federalism
implications, that imposes substantial
direct compliance costs, and that is not
required by statute, unless the Federal
government provides the funds
necessary to pay the direct compliance
costs incurred by State and local
governments, or EPA consults with
State and local officials early in the
process of developing the proposed
regulation. EPA also may not issue a
regulation that has federalism
implications and that preempts State
law unless the Agency consults with
State and local officials early in the
process of developing the proposed
regulation.
This rule will not have substantial
direct effects on the States, on the
relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government, as specified in
Executive Order 13132, because it
merely disapproves the CNMI SIP with
respect to PSD, incorporates the Federal
PSD regulations, and grants an
exemption request with respect to the
PSD major source baseline date, and
does not alter the relationship or the
distribution of power and
responsibilities established in the Clean
Air Act. Thus, the requirements of
section 6 of the Executive Order do not
apply to this rule.
F. Executive Order 13175, Coordination
With Indian Tribal Governments
Executive Order 13175, entitled
‘‘Consultation and Coordination with
Indian Tribal Governments’’ (65 FR
67249, November 9, 2000), requires EPA
to develop an accountable process to
ensure ‘‘meaningful and timely input by
tribal officials in the development of
regulatory policies that have tribal
implications.’’ This rule does not have
tribal implications, as specified in
Executive Order 13175. It will not have
substantial direct effects on tribal
governments, on the relationship
between the Federal government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal government and Indian tribes.
Thus, Executive Order 13175 does not
apply to this rule.
G. Executive Order 13045, Protection of
Children From Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks
EPA interprets Executive Order 13045
(62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997) as
applying only to those regulatory
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
actions that concern health or safety
risks, such that the analysis required
under section 5–501 of the Executive
Order has the potential to influence the
regulation. This rule is not subject to
Executive Order 13045, because it
disapproves the CNMI SIP with respect
to PSD, incorporates the Federal PSD
regulations, and grants an exemption
request with respect to the PSD major
source baseline date.
H. Executive Order 13211, Actions That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use
This rule is not subject to Executive
Order 13211, ‘‘Actions Concerning
Regulations That Significantly Affect
Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use’’ (66
FR 28355, May 22, 2001) because it is
not a significant regulatory action under
Executive Order 12866.
I. National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act
Section 12 of the National Technology
Transfer and Advancement Act
(NTTAA) of 1995 requires Federal
agencies to evaluate existing technical
standards when developing a new
regulation. To comply with NTTAA,
EPA must consider and use ‘‘voluntary
consensus standards’’ (VCS) if available
and applicable when developing
programs and policies unless doing so
would be inconsistent with applicable
law or otherwise impractical.
EPA believes that VCS are
inapplicable to this action. Today’s
action does not require the public to
perform activities conducive to the use
of VCS.
J. Executive Order 12898: Federal
Actions To Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and
Low-Income Population
Executive Order (E.O.) 12898 (59 FR
7629 (Feb. 16, 1994)) establishes federal
executive policy on environmental
justice. Its main provision directs
federal agencies, to the greatest extent
practicable and permitted by law, to
make environmental justice part of their
mission by identifying and addressing,
as appropriate, disproportionately high
and adverse human health or
environmental effects of their programs,
policies, and activities on minority
populations and low-income
populations in the United States.
This rulemaking includes a review of
the CNMI SIP relative to PSD
requirements, incorporation of EPA’s
PSD regulation into the applicable
CNMI plan, and a grant of an exemption
to CNMI to the original PSD major
source baseline dates. With respect to
EPA’s review of the CNMI SIP, EPA’s
E:\FR\FM\21APR1.SGM
21APR1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 76 / Monday, April 21, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
role is to approve or disapprove state
choices, based on the criteria of the
Clean Air Act, and incorporation of
EPA’s PSD regulation is the established
remedy for disapproval of the CNMI SIP
with respect to PSD. Thus, the EPA
lacks the discretionary authority to
address environmental justice in those
two aspects of this rulemaking.
EPA does have discretionary authority
to address environment justice with
respect to EPA’s consideration of the
exemption request from CNMI and has
determined that this action will not
have disproportionately high and
adverse human health or environmental
effects on minority or low-income
populations. This is because, due to the
lack of documentation of major source
emissions changes from the original
PSD baseline dates, application of the
original major source baseline dates
could lead to speculative and uncertain
estimates of PSD increment
consumption and correspondingly
speculative and uncertain levels of
environmental protection. In contrast,
EPA’s grant of CNMI’s exemption
request sets the stage for consistent and
uniform PSD increment tracking and
protection within CNMI.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
K. Congressional Review Act
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. EPA will submit a
report containing this rule and other
required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of the rule in
the Federal Register. A major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it
is published in the Federal Register.
This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as
defined by 5 U.S.C. section 804(2).
L. Petitions for Judicial Review
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA,
petitions for judicial review of this
action must be filed in the United States
Court of Appeals for the appropriate
circuit by June 20, 2014. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the
Administrator of this final rule does not
affect the finality of this rule for the
purposes of judicial review nor does it
extend the time within which a petition
for judicial review may be filed, and
shall not postpone the effectiveness of
such rule or action. This action may not
be challenged later in proceedings to
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:49 Apr 18, 2014
Jkt 232001
enforce its requirements (See section
307(b)(2)).
List of Subjects
40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
40 CFR Part 69
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control.
Dated: April 8, 2014.
Gina McCarthy,
Administrator.
For the reasons stated in the
preamble, Title 40, Chapter I of the Code
of Federal Regulations is amended as
follows:
PART 52—APPROVAL AND
PROMULGATION OF
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart A—General Provisions
§ 52.02
[Amended]
2. Section 52.02 is amended by:
■ a. Adding ‘‘and FFF’’ after ‘‘DDD’’ in
paragraph (d) introductory text; and
■ b. Adding ‘‘Commonwealth of the
Northern Mariana Islands,’’ after
‘‘American Samoa,’’ in paragraph
(d)(2)(ix).
■
§ 52.2921
22035
[Amended]
6. Amend § 52.2921 in paragraph
(c)(1)(i)(A) by removing ‘‘of lead’’ after
‘‘major sources’’.
■ 7. Section 52.2922 is added to read as
follows:
■
§ 52.2922
quality.
Significant deterioration of air
(a) The requirements of sections 160
through 165 of the Clean Air Act are not
met, since the plan does not include
approvable procedures for preventing
the significant deterioration of air
quality.
(b) Regulations for preventing
significant deterioration of air quality.
The provisions of § 52.21 except
paragraphs (a)(1), (b)(14)(i)(a) and (b),
(b)(14)(ii)(a) and (b), (i)(5)(i)(c), and
(k)(2) are hereby incorporated and made
a part of the applicable plan for the
Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana
Islands.
(c) For the purposes of applying the
requirements of § 52.21 within the
Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana
Islands, the terms ‘‘major source
baseline date’’ and ‘‘trigger date’’ mean
January 13, 1997 in the case of sulfur
dioxide, PM10, and nitrogen dioxide.
PART 69—SPECIAL EXEMPTIONS
FROM REQUIREMENTS OF THE
CLEAN AIR ACT
8. The authority citation for part 69
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7545(c), (g) and (i),
and 7625–1.
Subpart C—Commonwealth of the
Northern Mariana Islands
9. Section 69.31 is added to read as
follows:
■
§ 52.16
[Amended]
3. Amend § 52.16 in paragraph (b)(9)
by adding ‘‘Commonwealth of the
Northern Mariana Islands,’’ after
‘‘American Samoa,’’.
■
§ 52.21
[Amended]
4. Amend § 52.21 in paragraph (a)(1)
by adding ‘‘and FFF’’ after ‘‘DDD’’ two
times.
■
Subpart FFF—Commonwealth of the
Northern Mariana Islands
§ 52.2920
[Amended]
5. In § 52.2920, amend the table in
paragraph (c), by removing the entry for
‘‘Part VIII,’’ and under ‘‘Part VIII,’’ by
removing the entries for ‘‘Paragraph A,’’
‘‘Paragraph B,’’ ‘‘Paragraph C,’’
‘‘Paragraph D,’’ ‘‘Paragraph E,’’
‘‘Paragraph F,’’ ‘‘Table VIII–1,’’
‘‘Paragraph G,’’ and ‘‘Paragraph H.’’
■
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
§ 69.31
New Exemptions.
(a) Change to Major Source Baseline
Date and Trigger Date. Pursuant to
section 325(a) of the Clean Air Act and
a petition submitted by the Governor of
the Commonwealth of the Northern
Mariana Islands, EPA grants an
exemption to the major source baseline
dates and trigger dates for sulfur
dioxide, PM10, and nitrogen dioxide
under 40 CFR 52.21, and establishes
January 13, 1997 as the major source
baseline date and trigger date for these
pollutants in the Commonwealth of the
Northern Mariana Islands. This
exemption applies solely to the PSD
major source baseline date and trigger
date in the Commonwealth of the
Northern Mariana Islands. Owners and
operators of air pollutant sources are
required to comply with all other
applicable requirements of the Clean Air
E:\FR\FM\21APR1.SGM
21APR1
22036
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 76 / Monday, April 21, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
Act. For purposes of complying with
any applicable requirement that is
triggered by, implemented or calculated
from the PSD major source baseline
date, such requirement, increment, or
calculation shall, for sources located
within the Commonwealth of the
Northern Mariana Islands, use January
13, 1997 as the PSD major source
baseline date and trigger date for sulfur
dioxide, PM10, and nitrogen dioxide.
(b) [Reserved]
[FR Doc. 2014–08611 Filed 4–18–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Defense Acquisition Regulations
System
III. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
48 CFR Part 201
RIN 0750–AI21
Defense Federal Acquisition
Regulation Supplement: Contracting
Officer’s Representative (DFARS Case
2013–D023)
Defense Acquisition
Regulations System, Department of
Defense (DoD).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
DoD is issuing a final rule
amending the Defense Federal
Acquisition Regulation Supplement
(DFARS) to remove coverage concerning
contracting officer’s representative
responsibilities that is procedural in
nature.
DATES: Effective April 21, 2014.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Janetta Brewer, telephone 571–372–
6104.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
I. Discussion
DoD is revising DFARS 201.602–2 to
remove guidance that is internal to DoD
concerning contracting officer’s
representative (COR) responsibilities.
COR responsibilities, addressed at
DFARS Procedures, Guidance, and
Information (PGI) 201.602–2, are also
being revised in conjunction with this
DFARS change. Included in the PGI
update is a link to the DoD COR
Handbook, dated March 22, 2012, which
provides detailed guidance on COR
appointments and duties.
II. Publication of This Final Rule for
Public Comment Is Not Required by
Statute
Publication of proposed regulations,
41 U.S.C. 1707, is the statute which
applies to the publication of the Federal
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:49 Apr 18, 2014
Jkt 232001
Acquisition Regulation. Paragraph (a)(1)
of the statute requires that a
procurement policy, regulation,
procedure or form (including an
amendment or modification thereof)
must be published for public comment
if it relates to the expenditure of
appropriated funds, and has either a
significant effect beyond the internal
operating procedures of the agency
issuing the policy, regulation, procedure
or form, or has a significant cost or
administrative impact on contractors or
offerors. This final rule is not required
to be published for public comment,
because the change is not substantive
and only modifies the internal operating
procedures of DoD.
Executive Orders (E.O.s) 12866 and
13563 direct agencies to assess all costs
and benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, distributive impacts, and
equity). E.O. 13563 emphasizes the
importance of quantifying both costs
and benefits, of reducing costs, of
harmonizing rules, and of promoting
flexibility. This is not a significant
regulatory action and, therefore, was not
subject to review under section 6(b) of
E.O. 12866, Regulatory Planning and
Review, dated September 30, 1993. This
rule is not a major rule under 5 U.S.C.
804.
IV. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act does
not apply to this rule because this final
rule does not constitute a significant
DFARS revision within the meaning of
FAR 1.501–1, and 41 U.S.C. 1707 does
not require publication for public
comment.
V. Paperwork Reduction Act
The rule does not contain any
information collection requirements that
require the approval of the Office of
Management and Budget under the
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
chapter 35).
List of Subjects in 48 CFR Part 201
Government procurement.
Therefore, 48 CFR part 201 is
amended as follows:
Frm 00028
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
1. The authority citation for 48 CFR
201 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 41 U.S.C. 1303 and 48 CFR
chapter 1.
2. Section 201.602–2 is revised to read
as follows:
■
201.602–2
Responsibilities.
(d) Follow the procedures at PGI
201.602–2 regarding designation,
assignment, and responsibilities of a
contracting officer’s representative
(COR).
(1) A COR shall be an employee,
military or civilian, of the U.S.
Government, a foreign government, or a
North Atlantic Treaty Organization/
coalition partner. In no case shall
contractor personnel serve as CORs.
[FR Doc. 2014–08858 Filed 4–18–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001–06–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Defense Acquisition Regulations
System
48 CFR Parts 212, 216, 247, and 252
RIN 0750–AH90
Defense Federal Acquisition
Regulation Supplement: Clauses With
Alternates—Transportation (DFARS
Case 2012–D057)
Defense Acquisition
Regulations System, Department of
Defense (DoD).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
DoD is issuing a final rule
amending the Defense Federal
Acquisition Regulation Supplement
(DFARS) to revise and update
transportation-related clauses and their
prescriptions to create basic and
alternate clauses structured in a manner
to facilitate use of automated contract
writing systems. The rule also includes
the full text of each alternate, rather
than only showing the paragraphs that
differ from the basic clause.
DATES: Effective April 21, 2014.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Annette Gray, telephone 571–372–6093.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
I. Background
Manuel Quinones,
Editor, Defense Acquisition Regulations
System.
PO 00000
PART 201—FEDERAL ACQUISITION
REGULATIONS SYSTEM
DoD published a proposed rule in the
Federal Register at 78 FR 48397 on
August 8, 2013, to revise the
presentation of DFARS part 247 clauses
with alternates and their prescriptions
in the DFARS. One respondent
E:\FR\FM\21APR1.SGM
21APR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 76 (Monday, April 21, 2014)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 22032-22036]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-08611]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Parts 52 and 69
[EPA-R09-OAR-2013-0697; FRL-9909-18-Region 9]
Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Commonwealth
of the Northern Mariana Islands; Prevention of Significant
Deterioration; Special Exemptions From Requirements of the Clean Air
Act
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Under the Clean Air Act, the Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA) is taking final action to disapprove the state implementation
plan (SIP) for the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands (CNMI)
with respect to prevention of significant deterioration (PSD), and to
incorporate by reference the Federal PSD regulations into the
applicable CNMI plan. EPA is also taking final action to grant a
petition by CNMI for an exemption of the applicable PSD major source
baseline date, and to establish an alternate date, January 13, 1997, as
the major source baseline date and trigger date in CNMI. EPA is also
making certain corrections to errors that were made in previous
rulemakings related to the CNMI SIP. This action establishes the
Federal PSD regulations as a basic element of the applicable CNMI plan
and, through the exemption, establishes January 13, 1997 as the major
source baseline date (and trigger date) under the PSD program in CNMI
for sulfur dioxide, PM10 and nitrogen dioxide.
[[Page 22033]]
DATES: Effective Date: This rule is effective on May 21, 2014.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established docket number EPA-R09-OAR-2013-0697 for
this action. The index to the docket is available electronically at
https://www.regulations.gov and in hard copy at EPA Region IX, 75
Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, California. While all documents in the
docket are listed in the index, some information may be publicly
available only at the hard copy location (e.g., copyrighted material),
and some may not be publicly available in either location (e.g.,
Confidential Business Information). To inspect the hard copy materials,
please schedule an appointment during normal business hours with the
contact listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: La Weeda Ward, (213) 244-1812 or
ward.laweeda@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, ``we,'' ``us'' and
``our'' refer to EPA.
Table of Contents
I. Proposed Action
II. Public Comments and EPA Responses
III. Final Action
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Proposed Action
On November 25, 2013 (78 FR 70248), under section 110(k) of the
Clean Air Act (CAA or ``Act''), EPA proposed to disapprove the state
implementation plan (SIP) for the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana
Islands (CNMI) with respect to prevention of significant deterioration
(PSD), and to incorporate by reference the Federal PSD regulations into
the applicable CNMI plan.\1\ EPA also proposed to grant, under section
325(a)(1) of the Act, a petition by CNMI for an exemption of the
applicable PSD major source baseline date under Federal PSD
regulations, and to establish an alternate date, January 13, 1997, as
the major source baseline date and trigger date for certain pollutants
in CNMI. Lastly, under section 110(k)(6) of the Act, EPA proposed to
make certain corrections to errors that were made in previous
rulemakings involving the CNMI SIP.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ CNMI is an insular territory of the United States. CNMI
consists of 15 islands of volcanic origin which are located
approximately 145[deg] to 146[deg] east and from 14[deg] to 20[deg]
north of the equator. The islands extend in a general north-south
direction for approximately 420 nautical miles from the Island of
Farallon de Pajaros in the north to the island of Rota in the south.
CNMI lies in the western part of the Pacific Ocean and is located
approximately 1,250 miles south of Tokyo, 1,440 miles east of
Manila, and 110 miles north of Guam. Based on Bureau of Census 2010
population counts, the total population of CNMI is approximately
54,000 with the majority of the population residing on Saipan.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
As explained in our November 25, 2013 proposed rule, the action
would establish the Federal PSD regulations as a basic element of the
applicable CNMI plan and, through the exemption, would establish
January 13, 1997 as the major source baseline date (and trigger date)
under the PSD program in CNMI for sulfur dioxide, PM10 and
nitrogen dioxide.
Our November 25, 2013 proposed rule provides detailed background
information related to PSD requirements under part C of title I of the
CAA (and EPA's PSD SIP requirements in 40 CFR 51.166) and petitions by
governors of certain territories under CAA section 325(a) for
exemptions from certain CAA requirements; the rationale for our
conclusion that the CNMI SIP does not meet the requirements for PSD
under part C of title I of the CAA and 40 CFR 51.166; the rationale for
granting CNMI's petition for an alternate major source baseline date
and the establishment of January 13, 1997 as the PSD major source
baseline date and trigger date (with respect to sulfur dioxide,
PM10, and nitrogen dioxide); and a description of the
specific corrections to previous SIP actions that are needed to better
identify and clarify the contents of the CNMI SIP as set forth in 40
CFR part 52. The reader is directed to the proposed rule for the
details, which are not repeated here.
II. Public Comments and EPA Responses
Our November 25, 2013 proposed rule provided a 30-day comment
period and an opportunity to request a public hearing. During this
period, we received no comments on our proposed action and no request
for a public hearing.
III. Final Action
Under section 110(k) of the CAA, EPA is taking final action to
disapprove the CNMI SIP with respect to PSD, and incorporate by
reference the Federal PSD regulations into the applicable CNMI plan.\2\
EPA is also taking final action to grant a petition by CNMI for an
exemption of the PSD major source baseline date, and to establish an
alternate date, January 13, 1997, as the major source baseline date and
trigger date for sulfur dioxide, PM10, and nitrogen dioxide
in CNMI. Lastly, in addition to making conforming amendments to 40 CFR
part 52, subparts A and FFF and to 40 CFR part 69, subpart C, EPA is
also making certain corrections to certain errors in 40 CFR part 52
that were made in previous rulemakings involving the CNMI SIP.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ While EPA is taking final action to disapprove the CNMI SIP
with respect to PSD, such disapproval does not affect the validity
of previously approved rules in the CNMI SIP. Such SIP rules
continue to be part of the applicable CNMI plan unless and until EPA
approves their revocation or revision.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
This action establishes EPA's PSD regulations as a basic element of
the applicable CNMI plan, and, through the exemption, establishes a
major source baseline date and trigger date for sulfur dioxide,
PM10, and nitrogen dioxide on CNMI of January 13, 1997.
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
A. Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review and Executive
Order 13563: Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review
This action is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under the
terms of Executive Order (E.O.) 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993)
and is therefore not subject to review by the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) under E.O. 12866 and E.O. 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21,
2011).
B. Paperwork Reduction Act
This action does not impose an information collection burden under
the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.
Burden is defined at 5 CFR 1320.3(b).
C. Regulatory Reduction Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) generally requires an agency
to conduct a regulatory flexibility analysis of any rule subject to
notice and comment rulemaking requirements unless the agency certifies
that the rule will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities. Small entities include small
businesses, small not-for-profit enterprises, and small governmental
jurisdictions.
This rule will not have a significant impact on a substantial
number of small entities because, while the disapproval of the CNMI SIP
with respect to PSD will lead to the application of the Federal PSD
regulations to CNMI, the basic PSD statutory requirements for major
emitting facilities to obtain a PSD permit already apply within CNMI,
and the incremental impact associated with application of the specific
requirements under the Federal PSD regulations will be offset by EPA's
grant of CNMI's petition for an exemption from the original PSD major
source baseline dates. Therefore, I certify that this action will not
have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
[[Page 22034]]
D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
Under section 202 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
(``Unfunded Mandates Act''), signed into law on March 22, 1995, EPA
must prepare a budgetary impact statement to accompany any proposed or
final rule that includes a Federal mandate that may result in estimated
costs to State, local, or tribal governments in the aggregate; or to
the private sector, of $100 million or more. Under section 205, EPA
must select the most cost-effective and least burdensome alternative
that achieves the objectives of the rule and is consistent with
statutory requirements. Section 203 requires EPA to establish a plan
for informing and advising any small governments that may be
significantly or uniquely impacted by the rule.
EPA has determined that the disapproval of the CNMI SIP with
respect to PSD, considered together with the incorporation of the
Federal PSD regulations, and grant of an exemption request with respect
to the PSD major source baseline date, does not include a Federal
mandate that may result in estimated costs of $100 million or more to
either State, local, or tribal governments in the aggregate, or to the
private sector. While the disapproval of the CNMI SIP with respect to
PSD will lead to the application of the Federal PSD regulations to
CNMI, the basic PSD statutory requirements for major emitting
facilities to obtain a PSD permit already apply within CNMI, and the
incremental impact associated with application of the specific
requirements under the Federal PSD regulations will be offset by EPA's
grant of CNMI's petition for an exemption from the original PSD major
source baseline dates. Accordingly, the additional costs to State,
local, or tribal governments, or to the private sector, will not be
significant for the purposes of section 202 of the Unfunded Mandates
Act.
E. Executive Order 13132, Federalism
Federalism (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999) revokes and replaces
Executive Orders 12612 (Federalism) and 12875 (Enhancing the
Intergovernmental Partnership). Executive Order 13132 requires EPA to
develop an accountable process to ensure ``meaningful and timely input
by State and local officials in the development of regulatory policies
that have federalism implications.'' ``Policies that have federalism
implications'' is defined in the Executive Order to include regulations
that have ``substantial direct effects on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government.'' Under Executive Order 13132, EPA may not issue a
regulation that has federalism implications, that imposes substantial
direct compliance costs, and that is not required by statute, unless
the Federal government provides the funds necessary to pay the direct
compliance costs incurred by State and local governments, or EPA
consults with State and local officials early in the process of
developing the proposed regulation. EPA also may not issue a regulation
that has federalism implications and that preempts State law unless the
Agency consults with State and local officials early in the process of
developing the proposed regulation.
This rule will not have substantial direct effects on the States,
on the relationship between the national government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various
levels of government, as specified in Executive Order 13132, because it
merely disapproves the CNMI SIP with respect to PSD, incorporates the
Federal PSD regulations, and grants an exemption request with respect
to the PSD major source baseline date, and does not alter the
relationship or the distribution of power and responsibilities
established in the Clean Air Act. Thus, the requirements of section 6
of the Executive Order do not apply to this rule.
F. Executive Order 13175, Coordination With Indian Tribal Governments
Executive Order 13175, entitled ``Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments'' (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000),
requires EPA to develop an accountable process to ensure ``meaningful
and timely input by tribal officials in the development of regulatory
policies that have tribal implications.'' This rule does not have
tribal implications, as specified in Executive Order 13175. It will not
have substantial direct effects on tribal governments, on the
relationship between the Federal government and Indian tribes, or on
the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal
government and Indian tribes. Thus, Executive Order 13175 does not
apply to this rule.
G. Executive Order 13045, Protection of Children From Environmental
Health Risks and Safety Risks
EPA interprets Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997)
as applying only to those regulatory actions that concern health or
safety risks, such that the analysis required under section 5-501 of
the Executive Order has the potential to influence the regulation. This
rule is not subject to Executive Order 13045, because it disapproves
the CNMI SIP with respect to PSD, incorporates the Federal PSD
regulations, and grants an exemption request with respect to the PSD
major source baseline date.
H. Executive Order 13211, Actions That Significantly Affect Energy
Supply, Distribution, or Use
This rule is not subject to Executive Order 13211, ``Actions
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use'' (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001) because it is not a
significant regulatory action under Executive Order 12866.
I. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act
Section 12 of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act
(NTTAA) of 1995 requires Federal agencies to evaluate existing
technical standards when developing a new regulation. To comply with
NTTAA, EPA must consider and use ``voluntary consensus standards''
(VCS) if available and applicable when developing programs and policies
unless doing so would be inconsistent with applicable law or otherwise
impractical.
EPA believes that VCS are inapplicable to this action. Today's
action does not require the public to perform activities conducive to
the use of VCS.
J. Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions To Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Population
Executive Order (E.O.) 12898 (59 FR 7629 (Feb. 16, 1994))
establishes federal executive policy on environmental justice. Its main
provision directs federal agencies, to the greatest extent practicable
and permitted by law, to make environmental justice part of their
mission by identifying and addressing, as appropriate,
disproportionately high and adverse human health or environmental
effects of their programs, policies, and activities on minority
populations and low-income populations in the United States.
This rulemaking includes a review of the CNMI SIP relative to PSD
requirements, incorporation of EPA's PSD regulation into the applicable
CNMI plan, and a grant of an exemption to CNMI to the original PSD
major source baseline dates. With respect to EPA's review of the CNMI
SIP, EPA's
[[Page 22035]]
role is to approve or disapprove state choices, based on the criteria
of the Clean Air Act, and incorporation of EPA's PSD regulation is the
established remedy for disapproval of the CNMI SIP with respect to PSD.
Thus, the EPA lacks the discretionary authority to address
environmental justice in those two aspects of this rulemaking.
EPA does have discretionary authority to address environment
justice with respect to EPA's consideration of the exemption request
from CNMI and has determined that this action will not have
disproportionately high and adverse human health or environmental
effects on minority or low-income populations. This is because, due to
the lack of documentation of major source emissions changes from the
original PSD baseline dates, application of the original major source
baseline dates could lead to speculative and uncertain estimates of PSD
increment consumption and correspondingly speculative and uncertain
levels of environmental protection. In contrast, EPA's grant of CNMI's
exemption request sets the stage for consistent and uniform PSD
increment tracking and protection within CNMI.
K. Congressional Review Act
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other
required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
section 804(2).
L. Petitions for Judicial Review
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for
the appropriate circuit by June 20, 2014. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect
the finality of this rule for the purposes of judicial review nor does
it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may be
filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or action.
This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to enforce its
requirements (See section 307(b)(2)).
List of Subjects
40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
40 CFR Part 69
Environmental protection, Air pollution control.
Dated: April 8, 2014.
Gina McCarthy,
Administrator.
For the reasons stated in the preamble, Title 40, Chapter I of the
Code of Federal Regulations is amended as follows:
PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart A--General Provisions
Sec. 52.02 [Amended]
0
2. Section 52.02 is amended by:
0
a. Adding ``and FFF'' after ``DDD'' in paragraph (d) introductory text;
and
0
b. Adding ``Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands,'' after
``American Samoa,'' in paragraph (d)(2)(ix).
Sec. 52.16 [Amended]
0
3. Amend Sec. 52.16 in paragraph (b)(9) by adding ``Commonwealth of
the Northern Mariana Islands,'' after ``American Samoa,''.
Sec. 52.21 [Amended]
0
4. Amend Sec. 52.21 in paragraph (a)(1) by adding ``and FFF'' after
``DDD'' two times.
Subpart FFF--Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands
Sec. 52.2920 [Amended]
0
5. In Sec. 52.2920, amend the table in paragraph (c), by removing the
entry for ``Part VIII,'' and under ``Part VIII,'' by removing the
entries for ``Paragraph A,'' ``Paragraph B,'' ``Paragraph C,''
``Paragraph D,'' ``Paragraph E,'' ``Paragraph F,'' ``Table VIII-1,''
``Paragraph G,'' and ``Paragraph H.''
Sec. 52.2921 [Amended]
0
6. Amend Sec. 52.2921 in paragraph (c)(1)(i)(A) by removing ``of
lead'' after ``major sources''.
0
7. Section 52.2922 is added to read as follows:
Sec. 52.2922 Significant deterioration of air quality.
(a) The requirements of sections 160 through 165 of the Clean Air
Act are not met, since the plan does not include approvable procedures
for preventing the significant deterioration of air quality.
(b) Regulations for preventing significant deterioration of air
quality. The provisions of Sec. 52.21 except paragraphs (a)(1),
(b)(14)(i)(a) and (b), (b)(14)(ii)(a) and (b), (i)(5)(i)(c), and (k)(2)
are hereby incorporated and made a part of the applicable plan for the
Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands.
(c) For the purposes of applying the requirements of Sec. 52.21
within the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, the terms
``major source baseline date'' and ``trigger date'' mean January 13,
1997 in the case of sulfur dioxide, PM10, and nitrogen
dioxide.
PART 69--SPECIAL EXEMPTIONS FROM REQUIREMENTS OF THE CLEAN AIR ACT
0
8. The authority citation for part 69 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7545(c), (g) and (i), and 7625-1.
Subpart C--Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands
0
9. Section 69.31 is added to read as follows:
Sec. 69.31 New Exemptions.
(a) Change to Major Source Baseline Date and Trigger Date. Pursuant
to section 325(a) of the Clean Air Act and a petition submitted by the
Governor of the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, EPA
grants an exemption to the major source baseline dates and trigger
dates for sulfur dioxide, PM10, and nitrogen dioxide under
40 CFR 52.21, and establishes January 13, 1997 as the major source
baseline date and trigger date for these pollutants in the Commonwealth
of the Northern Mariana Islands. This exemption applies solely to the
PSD major source baseline date and trigger date in the Commonwealth of
the Northern Mariana Islands. Owners and operators of air pollutant
sources are required to comply with all other applicable requirements
of the Clean Air
[[Page 22036]]
Act. For purposes of complying with any applicable requirement that is
triggered by, implemented or calculated from the PSD major source
baseline date, such requirement, increment, or calculation shall, for
sources located within the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana
Islands, use January 13, 1997 as the PSD major source baseline date and
trigger date for sulfur dioxide, PM10, and nitrogen dioxide.
(b) [Reserved]
[FR Doc. 2014-08611 Filed 4-18-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P