Stakeholder Input; Experts Forum on Public Health Impacts of Blending at Publicly Owned Treatment Plants, 21918-21919 [2014-08925]
Download as PDF
21918
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 75 / Friday, April 18, 2014 / Notices
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
forum of public health experts in June
2014 to discuss the public health
implications of discharges of ‘blended’
effluent from publicly owned treatment
works (POTWs) served by separate
sanitary sewers into waterways. The
discussion will include public health
implications of such discharges.
Today’s notice asks for
recommendations of public health
experts who would be interested and
qualified to participate in the forum. In
addition, today’s notice seeks
recommendations of wastewater
treatment plant design and operation
experts to serve as advisors to the public
health forum participants. Today’s
notice also provides the public with an
opportunity to submit data regarding the
performance of municipal wastewater
treatment plants during wet weather
conditions.
Blending is a practice used by some
POTWs to manage wastewater when
flows to the plant exceed the capacity of
the secondary treatment units, which
happens most often during wet weather
conditions. POTWs engaged in the
practice of blending divert excess flow
around secondary treatment units and
subsequently blend the diverted flows
to the portion of flow that received
secondary treatment. In some cases the
diverted flows receive some additional
treatment before blending. The Agency
is interested in evaluating the public
health implications of different blending
scenarios, including scenarios where the
diverted flow is subject to supplemental
physical/chemical treatment prior to
blending and where the diverted flows
do not receive any additional treatment
prior to blending.
The Agency is undertaking this
outreach to help advance the Clean
Water Act (CWA) objective to restore
and maintain the chemical, physical
and biological integrity of the nation’s
waters (CWA, Section 101(a)).
DATES: Suggestions on experts should be
made on or before May 4, 2014. Other
technical information requested in this
notice should be provided on or before
May 19, 2014. We expect to hold the
public health forum during June of
2014.
[FRL–9909–75–OW]
ADDRESSES:
EIS No. 20140118, Draft Supplement,
USN, GU, Guam and Commonwealth
of the Northern Mariana Islands
Military Relocation (2012 Roadmap
Adjustments), Comment Period Ends:
06/16/2014, Contact: CDR Curtis
Duncan 703–602–3825.
EIS No. 20140119, Final EIS, USCG, FL,
Proposed New Bridge across the
Manatee River, Review Period Ends:
05/19/2014, Contact: Randall Overton
305–415–6736.
EIS No. 20140120, Draft EIS, USACE,
CA, Delta Islands and Levees
Feasibility Study, Comment Period
Ends: 06/02/2014, Contact: Brad
Johnson 916–557–7812.
EIS No. 20140121, Draft EIS, DOE, HI,
PROGRAMMATIC—Hawaii Clean
Energy, Comment Period Ends: 07/17/
2014, Contact: Dr. Jane Summerson
505–845–4091.
EIS No. 20140122, Draft EIS, USFS, MT,
Greater Red Lodge Area Vegetation
and Habitat Management Project,
Comment Period Ends: 06/02/2014,
Contact: Amy Waring 406–255–1451.
EIS No. 20140123, Final EIS, BIA, CA,
Los Coyotes Band of Cahuilla and
Cupeno Indians Fee-To-Trust and
Casino-Hotel Project, Review Period
Ends: 05/19/2014, Contact: John
Rydzik 916–978–6051.
EIS No. 20140124, Final EIS, USACE,
CA, Westbrook Project, Review Period
Ends: 05/19/2014, Contact: Kathy
Norton 916–557–5260.
Amended Notices
EIS No. 20140069, Draft EIS, USFS, MT,
Divide Travel Plan, Helena National
Forest, Comment Period Ends: 06/12/
2014, Contact: Heather DeGeest 406–
449–5201.
Revision to the FR Notice Published
03/14/2014; Extending Comment Period
from 04/28/2014 to 06/12/2014.
Dated: April 15, 2014.
Cliff Rader,
Director, NEPA Compliance Division, Office
of Federal Activities.
[FR Doc. 2014–08890 Filed 4–17–14; 8:45 am]
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
Stakeholder Input; Experts Forum on
Public Health Impacts of Blending at
Publicly Owned Treatment Plants
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency is announcing plans to hold a
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:54 Apr 17, 2014
Jkt 232001
Submit your
recommendations for experts or other
input by one of the following methods:
• Email to weiss.kevin@epa.gov.
• Mail: Kevin Weiss, Water Permits
Division, U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, Room 7421J EPA East, 1200
Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington,
DC 20460.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: EPA
will post the date and location of the
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
public health experts’ forum at:
www.epa.gov/npdes/peakflowsforum.
For further information about this
notice, contact Kevin Weiss, EPA
Headquarters, Office of Water, Office of
Wastewater Management at tel.: 202–
564–0742 or email: weiss.kevin@
epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
Wastewater collection systems collect
wastewater from homes and other
buildings and convey it to wastewater
treatment plants for proper treatment
and disposal. The collection and proper
treatment of municipal wastewater is
vital to the public health in our cities
and towns and to the viability of our
receiving waters.
During and immediately after wet
weather events, flows to wastewater
collection systems and to treatment
facilities typically increase. Significant
flow increases in a wastewater
collection system can cause overflows of
untreated wastewater and sewage
backups into buildings. For some
municipalities, an important component
of their strategy to reduce collection
system overflows and backups into
buildings is to increase the conveyance
of wet weather flows to a treatment
plant. Significant increases in flow at
the treatment facility can cause
operational challenges, especially for
biological-based secondary treatment
units. Activated sludge systems are
particularly vulnerable to high volume
peak flows. Peak flows that approach or
exceed design capacity of an activated
sludge unit can shift the solids
inventory from the aeration basin to the
clarifier(s), and can result in excessive
solids losses from the clarifier(s). If a
clarifier experiences excessive loss of
solids, treatment efficiencies can be
lowered for weeks or months until the
biological mass in the aeration basins is
reestablished. In addition to these
hydraulic concerns, wastewater
associated with peak flows may have
low concentrations of oxygendemanding pollutants, which can also
decrease treatment efficiencies.
Biological nutrient removal processes
typically have an increased sensitivity
to the hydraulic and loading
fluctuations associated with wet
weather flows.
Design and operational options that
are routinely employed to maintain the
effective capacity of biological-based
secondary treatment units include:
• Providing alternative feed patterns
in the aeration basin(s);
• Increasing the returned activated
sludge rate relative to those needed for
steady flow;
E:\FR\FM\18APN1.SGM
18APN1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 75 / Friday, April 18, 2014 / Notices
• Increasing the size of secondary
clarifiers; and
• Damping peak flows to biologicalbased secondary units by providing flow
equalization (i.e. storage) prior to the
biological-based secondary unit either at
the plant or before flows get to the plant.
These options may temporarily
decrease treatment efficiencies for the
biological-based secondary treatment
units and may have limited
applicability to biological nutrient
removal processes. As a result, there are
limitations on the variation in flow
volumes and influent strength that
biological-based secondary treatment
units can accommodate.
Many POTW treatment plants have
been designed with primary treatment
capacity that is significantly greater than
the biological-based secondary
treatment capacity. These plants
typically provide screening and primary
clarification of all flows entering the
plant. In order to protect biologicalbased secondary treatment units during
wet weather events, flows that exceed
the capacity of the biological-based
secondary treatment units are diverted
around the biological-based secondary
treatment units after they receive
primary treatment. At some treatment
facilities diverted flows are disinfected
and discharged directly to a surface
water from a separate outfall. Other
facilities blend the diverted flows with
flows that receive biological-based
secondary treatment and discharge the
combined flow after it has been
disinfected. Some facilities provide
some additional treatment of the
diverted flows while other facilities
provide no additional treatment, other
than disinfection.
Operators of treatment facilities have
several design and operational options
that can be used to increase pollutant
removals during high flow conditions,
including:
• Adding chemicals to the primary
treatment process that increase solids
removals;
• Providing additional primary
treatment capacity, thereby lowering
overflow rates in the facility’s primary
treatment units;
• Providing structural changes to
primary treatment units, such as the
installation of lamella settlers;
• Providing supplemental side stream
physical/chemical treatment units, such
as high rate clarification systems or fine
screen systems, to provide supplemental
treatment to flows that are diverted
around biological-based secondary
treatment units.
EPA is particularly interested in the
relative risks associated with pathogens,
sediments, nutrients, pharmaceuticals,
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:54 Apr 17, 2014
Jkt 232001
toxics and other contaminants that may
be discharged under blending scenarios.
EPA is seeking nominations of public
health experts to participate at a forum
to discuss these issues. The experts
should be nationally recognized in the
fields of evaluating the risks associated
with various levels of water quality and/
or of effluent from wastewater treatment
plants. EPA, in consultation with key
stakeholders, will identify wastewater
treatment plant design and operation
experts to serve as advisors to the public
health forum participants. EPA is
soliciting nominations for these experts
as part of this Federal Register notice.
After EPA selects the participants it
will provide the participants with more
detailed information to read prior to the
forum and will provide specific
questions on which participants will be
asked to provide input.
II. Purpose of Public Health Experts’
Forum
The purpose of this forum is to enlist
public health experts from federal
agencies, local health departments and
academia in an effort to ensure that EPA
has appropriate health-based
information associated with different
engineering options available to address
wet weather blending at POTWs served
by separate sanitary sewers. EPA does
not intend that this meeting be a forum
for debating the application of the
Agency’s bypass regulation at 40 CFR
122.41(m) going forward. Rather, this
forum is solely concerned with the
potential public health impacts of
blended discharges from POTWs.
Further, it is not EPA’s objective
during the forum to establish consensus
among the parties or to obtain a
collective set of recommendations.
Rather, it is EPA’s intention to obtain
individual input from knowledgeable
experts so that the Agency can better
understand the differences and
commonalities among the individual
recommendations. In this regard, EPA
has determined that this workshop is
not subject to the requirements of the
Federal Advisory Committee Act. 5
U.S.C. Appendix 2.
III. Additional Information on the
Forum
EPA plans to schedule the forum in
June, 2014. Information regarding the
date and location of the forum, along
with other logistics information, when
available, will be posted at
www.epa.gov/npdes/peakflowsforum.
Members of the public are invited to
participate as observers in the forum as
capacity allows. Additional details
concerning the participation of
observers will be posted on this Web
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
21919
page when the location and time of the
forum is set.
Authority: Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1251
et seq.
Dated: April 9, 2014.
Andrew D. Sawyers,
Director, Office of Wastewater Management.
[FR Doc. 2014–08925 Filed 4–17–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[EPA–HQ–OPP–2014–0009; FRL–9908–54]
Pesticide Products; Registration
Applications for New Active
Ingredients
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
EPA has received several
applications to register pesticide
products containing active ingredients
not included in any currently registered
pesticide products. Pursuant to the
Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and
Rodenticide Act (FIFRA), EPA is hereby
providing notice of receipt and
opportunity to comment on these
applications.
SUMMARY:
Comments must be received on
or before May 19, 2014.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by docket identification (ID)
number and the EPA File Symbol of
interest as shown in the body of this
document, by one of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
Do not submit electronically any
information you consider to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute.
• Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental
Protection Agency Docket Center
(EPA/DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania
Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460–0001.
• Hand Delivery: To make special
arrangements for hand delivery or
delivery of boxed information, please
follow the instructions at https://
www.epa.gov/dockets/contacts.html.
Additional instructions on
commenting or visiting the docket,
along with more information about
dockets generally, is available at
https://www.epa.gov/dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Robert McNally, Biopesticides and
Pollution Prevention Division (BPPD)
(7511P), email address:
DATES:
E:\FR\FM\18APN1.SGM
18APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 75 (Friday, April 18, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 21918-21919]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-08925]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
[FRL-9909-75-OW]
Stakeholder Input; Experts Forum on Public Health Impacts of
Blending at Publicly Owned Treatment Plants
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency is announcing plans to
hold a forum of public health experts in June 2014 to discuss the
public health implications of discharges of `blended' effluent from
publicly owned treatment works (POTWs) served by separate sanitary
sewers into waterways. The discussion will include public health
implications of such discharges.
Today's notice asks for recommendations of public health experts
who would be interested and qualified to participate in the forum. In
addition, today's notice seeks recommendations of wastewater treatment
plant design and operation experts to serve as advisors to the public
health forum participants. Today's notice also provides the public with
an opportunity to submit data regarding the performance of municipal
wastewater treatment plants during wet weather conditions.
Blending is a practice used by some POTWs to manage wastewater when
flows to the plant exceed the capacity of the secondary treatment
units, which happens most often during wet weather conditions. POTWs
engaged in the practice of blending divert excess flow around secondary
treatment units and subsequently blend the diverted flows to the
portion of flow that received secondary treatment. In some cases the
diverted flows receive some additional treatment before blending. The
Agency is interested in evaluating the public health implications of
different blending scenarios, including scenarios where the diverted
flow is subject to supplemental physical/chemical treatment prior to
blending and where the diverted flows do not receive any additional
treatment prior to blending.
The Agency is undertaking this outreach to help advance the Clean
Water Act (CWA) objective to restore and maintain the chemical,
physical and biological integrity of the nation's waters (CWA, Section
101(a)).
DATES: Suggestions on experts should be made on or before May 4, 2014.
Other technical information requested in this notice should be provided
on or before May 19, 2014. We expect to hold the public health forum
during June of 2014.
ADDRESSES: Submit your recommendations for experts or other input by
one of the following methods:
Email to weiss.kevin@epa.gov.
Mail: Kevin Weiss, Water Permits Division, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, Room 7421J EPA East, 1200 Pennsylvania
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20460.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: EPA will post the date and location of
the public health experts' forum at: www.epa.gov/npdes/peakflowsforum.
For further information about this notice, contact Kevin Weiss, EPA
Headquarters, Office of Water, Office of Wastewater Management at tel.:
202-564-0742 or email: weiss.kevin@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
Wastewater collection systems collect wastewater from homes and
other buildings and convey it to wastewater treatment plants for proper
treatment and disposal. The collection and proper treatment of
municipal wastewater is vital to the public health in our cities and
towns and to the viability of our receiving waters.
During and immediately after wet weather events, flows to
wastewater collection systems and to treatment facilities typically
increase. Significant flow increases in a wastewater collection system
can cause overflows of untreated wastewater and sewage backups into
buildings. For some municipalities, an important component of their
strategy to reduce collection system overflows and backups into
buildings is to increase the conveyance of wet weather flows to a
treatment plant. Significant increases in flow at the treatment
facility can cause operational challenges, especially for biological-
based secondary treatment units. Activated sludge systems are
particularly vulnerable to high volume peak flows. Peak flows that
approach or exceed design capacity of an activated sludge unit can
shift the solids inventory from the aeration basin to the clarifier(s),
and can result in excessive solids losses from the clarifier(s). If a
clarifier experiences excessive loss of solids, treatment efficiencies
can be lowered for weeks or months until the biological mass in the
aeration basins is reestablished. In addition to these hydraulic
concerns, wastewater associated with peak flows may have low
concentrations of oxygen-demanding pollutants, which can also decrease
treatment efficiencies. Biological nutrient removal processes typically
have an increased sensitivity to the hydraulic and loading fluctuations
associated with wet weather flows.
Design and operational options that are routinely employed to
maintain the effective capacity of biological-based secondary treatment
units include:
Providing alternative feed patterns in the aeration
basin(s);
Increasing the returned activated sludge rate relative to
those needed for steady flow;
[[Page 21919]]
Increasing the size of secondary clarifiers; and
Damping peak flows to biological-based secondary units by
providing flow equalization (i.e. storage) prior to the biological-
based secondary unit either at the plant or before flows get to the
plant.
These options may temporarily decrease treatment efficiencies for
the biological-based secondary treatment units and may have limited
applicability to biological nutrient removal processes. As a result,
there are limitations on the variation in flow volumes and influent
strength that biological-based secondary treatment units can
accommodate.
Many POTW treatment plants have been designed with primary
treatment capacity that is significantly greater than the biological-
based secondary treatment capacity. These plants typically provide
screening and primary clarification of all flows entering the plant. In
order to protect biological-based secondary treatment units during wet
weather events, flows that exceed the capacity of the biological-based
secondary treatment units are diverted around the biological-based
secondary treatment units after they receive primary treatment. At some
treatment facilities diverted flows are disinfected and discharged
directly to a surface water from a separate outfall. Other facilities
blend the diverted flows with flows that receive biological-based
secondary treatment and discharge the combined flow after it has been
disinfected. Some facilities provide some additional treatment of the
diverted flows while other facilities provide no additional treatment,
other than disinfection.
Operators of treatment facilities have several design and
operational options that can be used to increase pollutant removals
during high flow conditions, including:
Adding chemicals to the primary treatment process that
increase solids removals;
Providing additional primary treatment capacity, thereby
lowering overflow rates in the facility's primary treatment units;
Providing structural changes to primary treatment units,
such as the installation of lamella settlers;
Providing supplemental side stream physical/chemical
treatment units, such as high rate clarification systems or fine screen
systems, to provide supplemental treatment to flows that are diverted
around biological-based secondary treatment units.
EPA is particularly interested in the relative risks associated
with pathogens, sediments, nutrients, pharmaceuticals, toxics and other
contaminants that may be discharged under blending scenarios.
EPA is seeking nominations of public health experts to participate
at a forum to discuss these issues. The experts should be nationally
recognized in the fields of evaluating the risks associated with
various levels of water quality and/or of effluent from wastewater
treatment plants. EPA, in consultation with key stakeholders, will
identify wastewater treatment plant design and operation experts to
serve as advisors to the public health forum participants. EPA is
soliciting nominations for these experts as part of this Federal
Register notice.
After EPA selects the participants it will provide the participants
with more detailed information to read prior to the forum and will
provide specific questions on which participants will be asked to
provide input.
II. Purpose of Public Health Experts' Forum
The purpose of this forum is to enlist public health experts from
federal agencies, local health departments and academia in an effort to
ensure that EPA has appropriate health-based information associated
with different engineering options available to address wet weather
blending at POTWs served by separate sanitary sewers. EPA does not
intend that this meeting be a forum for debating the application of the
Agency's bypass regulation at 40 CFR 122.41(m) going forward. Rather,
this forum is solely concerned with the potential public health impacts
of blended discharges from POTWs.
Further, it is not EPA's objective during the forum to establish
consensus among the parties or to obtain a collective set of
recommendations. Rather, it is EPA's intention to obtain individual
input from knowledgeable experts so that the Agency can better
understand the differences and commonalities among the individual
recommendations. In this regard, EPA has determined that this workshop
is not subject to the requirements of the Federal Advisory Committee
Act. 5 U.S.C. Appendix 2.
III. Additional Information on the Forum
EPA plans to schedule the forum in June, 2014. Information
regarding the date and location of the forum, along with other
logistics information, when available, will be posted at www.epa.gov/npdes/peakflowsforum.
Members of the public are invited to participate as observers in
the forum as capacity allows. Additional details concerning the
participation of observers will be posted on this Web page when the
location and time of the forum is set.
Authority: Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.
Dated: April 9, 2014.
Andrew D. Sawyers,
Director, Office of Wastewater Management.
[FR Doc. 2014-08925 Filed 4-17-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P