Amendment of Class E Airspace; Paragould, AR, 21846-21847 [2014-08771]
Download as PDF
21846
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 75 / Friday, April 18, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this AD will affect
about 232 engines installed on aircraft
of U.S. registry. We also estimate that it
will take about 24 hours per engine to
comply with this AD. The average labor
rate is $85 per hour. Required parts will
cost about $9,268 per engine. Based on
these figures, we estimate the cost of
this AD on U.S. operators to be
$2,623,456.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. ‘‘Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs,’’ describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in ‘‘Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701:
General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this AD will not
have federalism implications under
Executive Order 13132. This AD will
not have a substantial direct effect on
the States, on the relationship between
the national government and the States,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify this AD:
(1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866,
(2) Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under
the DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26,
1979),
(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation
in Alaska to the extent that it justifies
making a regulatory distinction, and
(4) Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation
of the estimated costs to comply with
this AD and placed it in the AD docket.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:13 Apr 17, 2014
Jkt 232001
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as
follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):
■
2014–08–05 Rolls-Royce Deutschland Ltd &
Co KG (Type Certificate previously held
by Rolls-Royce Deutschland GmbH and
BMW Rolls-Royce GmbH): Amendment
39–17829; Docket No. FAA–2013–0884;
Directorate Identifier 2013–NE–31–AD.
(a) Effective Date
This AD becomes effective May 23, 2014.
(b) Affected ADs
None.
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to all Rolls-Royce
Deutschland Ltd & Co KG (RRD) BR700–
715A1–30, BR700–715B1–30, and BR700–
715C1–30 turbofan engines.
(d) Reason
This AD was prompted by a report of a
partial de-bonding of the low-pressure
compressor (LPC) case ice impact panels
during an engine shop visit. We are issuing
this AD to prevent failure of the LPC case ice
impact panels, which could result in damage
to the engine and loss of control of the
airplane.
(e) Actions and Compliance
Unless already done, after the effective
date of this AD, at the next engine shop visit
or within 12,500 engine flight cycles since
the last shop visit, whichever occurs first,
replace the four LPC ice impact panels with
panels eligible for installation.
(f) Definitions
(1) For the purposes of this AD, an ‘‘engine
shop visit’’ is the induction of an engine into
the shop for maintenance involving the
separation of pairs of major mating engine
flanges. The separation of engine flanges
solely for the purpose of transportation
without subsequent engine maintenance does
not constitute an engine shop visit.
(2) For the purposes of this AD, a panel
that is ‘‘eligible for installation’’ is a new LPC
impact panel or one that has been repaired
using RRD Alert Non-Modification Service
Bulletin (NMSB) No. ALERT SB–BR700–72–
A900281, dated July 1, 2013.
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
(g) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
The Manager, Engine Certification Office,
FAA, may approve AMOCs to this AD. Use
the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19 to
make your request.
(h) Related Information
(1) For more information about this AD,
contact Rose Len, Aerospace Engineer,
Engine Certification Office, FAA, Engine &
Propeller Directorate, 12 New England
Executive Park, Burlington, MA 01803;
phone: 781–238–7772; fax: 781–238–7199;
email: rose.len@faa.gov.
(2) Refer to MCAI European Aviation
Safety Agency AD 2013–0231, dated
September 24, 2013, for more information.
You may examine the MCAI in the AD
docket on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov/
#!documentDetail;D=FAA-2013-0884-0002.
(3) RRD Alert NMSB No. ALERT SB–
BR700–72–A900281, dated July 1, 2013,
which is not incorporated by reference in this
AD, can be obtained from RRD using the
contact information in paragraph (h)(4) of
this AD.
(4) For service information identified in
this AD, contact Rolls-Royce Deutschland Ltd
& Co KG, Eschenweg 11, Dahlewitz, 15827
Blankenfelde-Mahlow, Germany; phone: 49
33–7086–1944; fax: 49 33–7086–3276.
(5) You may view this service information
at the FAA, Engine & Propeller Directorate,
12 New England Executive Park, Burlington,
MA. For information on the availability of
this material at the FAA, call 781–238–7125.
(i) Material Incorporated by Reference
None.
Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on
April 8, 2014.
Ann C. Mollica,
Acting Assistant Directorate Manager, Engine
& Propeller Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2014–08733 Filed 4–17–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 71
[Docket No. FAA–2013–0588; Airspace
Docket No. 13–ASW–12]
Amendment of Class E Airspace;
Paragould, AR
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
This action amends Class E
airspace at Paragould, AR.
Decommissioning of the Paragould nondirectional radio beacon (NDB) at Kirk
Field Airport has made reconfiguration
necessary for standard instrument
approach procedures and for the safety
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\18APR1.SGM
18APR1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 75 / Friday, April 18, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
and management of Instrument Flight
Rule (IFR) operations at the airport.
Geographic coordinates are also
updated.
DATES: Effective date: 0901 UTC, July
24, 2014. The Director of the Federal
Register approves this incorporation by
reference action under 1 CFR Part 51,
subject to the annual revision of FAA
Order 7400.9 and publication of
conforming amendments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Scott Enander, Central Service Center,
Operations Support Group, Federal
Aviation Administration, Southwest
Region, 2601 Meacham Blvd., Fort
Worth, TX 76137; telephone 817–321–
7716.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with RULES
History
On January 8, 2014, the FAA
published in the Federal Register a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
to amend Class E airspace for the
Paragould, AR, area, modifying
controlled airspace at Kirk Field Airport
(79 FR 1344) Docket No. FAA–2013–
0588. Interested parties were invited to
participate in this rulemaking effort by
submitting written comments on the
proposal to the FAA. No comments
were received. Class E airspace
designations are published in paragraph
6005 of FAA Order 7400.9X dated
August 7, 2013, and effective September
15, 2013, which is incorporated by
reference in 14 CFR 71.1. The Class E
airspace designations listed in this
document will be published
subsequently in the Order.
The Rule
This action amends Title 14 Code of
Federal Regulations (14 CFR) Part 71 by
amending Class E airspace extending
upward from 700 feet above the surface
for standard instrument approach
procedures at Kirk Field Airport,
Paragould, AR. Airspace reconfiguration
is necessary due to the
decommissioning of the Paragould NDB
and the cancellation of the NDB
approach. The segment northeast of the
airport is now within 2.5 miles each
side of the 062° bearing from the airport.
Controlled airspace is necessary for the
safety and management of IFR
operations at the airport. Geographic
coordinates are also adjusted to coincide
with the FAA’s aeronautical database.
The FAA has determined that this
regulation only involves an established
body of technical regulations for which
frequent and routine amendments are
necessary to keep them operationally
current. Therefore, this regulation: (1) Is
not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:13 Apr 17, 2014
Jkt 232001
21847
under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not
a ‘‘significant rule’’ under DOT
Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44
FR 11034; February 26, 1979); and (3)
does not warrant preparation of a
regulatory evaluation as the anticipated
impact is so minimal. Since this is a
routine matter that only affects air traffic
procedures and air navigation, it is
certified that this rule, when
promulgated, does not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities under the
criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
The FAA’s authority to issue rules
regarding aviation safety is found in
Title 49 of the U.S. Code. Subtitle 1,
Section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more
detail the scope of the agency’s
authority. This rulemaking is
promulgated under the authority
described in Subtitle VII, Part A,
Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that
section, the FAA is charged with
prescribing regulations to assign the use
of airspace necessary to ensure the
safety of aircraft and the efficient use of
airspace. This regulation is within the
scope of that authority as it amends
controlled airspace at Kirk Field,
Paragould, AR.
§ 71.1
Environmental Review
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
The FAA has determined that this
action qualifies for categorical exclusion
under the National Environmental
Policy Act in accordance with FAA
Order 1050.1E, ‘‘Environmental
Impacts: Policies and Procedures,’’
paragraph 311a. This airspace action is
not expected to cause any potentially
significant environmental impacts, and
no extraordinary circumstances exist
that warrant preparation of an
environmental assessment.
Federal Aviation Administration
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71
SUMMARY:
Airspace, Incorporation by reference,
Navigation (air).
Adoption of the Amendment
In consideration of the foregoing, the
Federal Aviation Administration
amends 14 CFR part 71 as follows:
PART 71—DESIGNATION OF CLASS A,
B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND
REPORTING POINTS
1. The authority citation for 14 CFR
part 71 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40113,
40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959–
1963 Comp., p. 389.
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
[Amended]
2. The incorporation by reference in
14 CFR 71.1 of the Federal Aviation
Administration Order 7400.9X, Airspace
Designations and Reporting Points,
dated August 7, 2013, and effective
September 15, 2013, is amended as
follows:
■
Paragraph 6005 Class E airspace areas
extending upward from 700 feet or more
above the surface.
*
*
*
*
*
ASW AR E5 Paragould, AR [Amended]
Paragould, Kirk Field, AR
(Lat. 36°03′50″ N., long. 90°30′33″ W.)
That airspace extending upward from 700
feet above the surface within a 6.4-mile
radius of Kirk Field, and within 2.5 miles
each side of the 218° bearing from the airport
extending from the 6.4-mile radius to 9.5
miles southwest of the airport, and within 2.5
miles each side of the 062° bearing from the
airport extending from the 6.4-mile radius to
7.5 miles northeast of the airport.
Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on April 2,
2014.
Kent M. Wheeler,
Manager, Operations Support Group, ATO
Central Service Center.
[FR Doc. 2014–08771 Filed 4–17–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
14 CFR Part 71
[Docket No. FAA–2013–0587; Airspace
Docket No. 13–ACE–8]
Amendment of Class E Airspace;
Jefferson City, MO
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
This action amends Class E
airspace at Jefferson City, MO.
Decommissioning of the Noah nondirectional radio beacon (NDB) at
Jefferson City Memorial Airport has
made reconfiguration necessary for
standard instrument approach
procedures and for the safety and
management of Instrument Flight Rule
(IFR) operations at the airport.
DATES: Effective date: 0901 UTC, July
24, 2014. The Director of the Federal
Register approves this incorporation by
reference action under 1 CFR Part 51,
subject to the annual revision of FAA
Order 7400.9 and publication of
conforming amendments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Scott Enander, Central Service Center,
Operations Support Group, Federal
E:\FR\FM\18APR1.SGM
18APR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 75 (Friday, April 18, 2014)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 21846-21847]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-08771]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 71
[Docket No. FAA-2013-0588; Airspace Docket No. 13-ASW-12]
Amendment of Class E Airspace; Paragould, AR
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This action amends Class E airspace at Paragould, AR.
Decommissioning of the Paragould non-directional radio beacon (NDB) at
Kirk Field Airport has made reconfiguration necessary for standard
instrument approach procedures and for the safety
[[Page 21847]]
and management of Instrument Flight Rule (IFR) operations at the
airport. Geographic coordinates are also updated.
DATES: Effective date: 0901 UTC, July 24, 2014. The Director of the
Federal Register approves this incorporation by reference action under
1 CFR Part 51, subject to the annual revision of FAA Order 7400.9 and
publication of conforming amendments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Scott Enander, Central Service Center,
Operations Support Group, Federal Aviation Administration, Southwest
Region, 2601 Meacham Blvd., Fort Worth, TX 76137; telephone 817-321-
7716.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
History
On January 8, 2014, the FAA published in the Federal Register a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend Class E airspace for the
Paragould, AR, area, modifying controlled airspace at Kirk Field
Airport (79 FR 1344) Docket No. FAA-2013-0588. Interested parties were
invited to participate in this rulemaking effort by submitting written
comments on the proposal to the FAA. No comments were received. Class E
airspace designations are published in paragraph 6005 of FAA Order
7400.9X dated August 7, 2013, and effective September 15, 2013, which
is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 71.1. The Class E airspace
designations listed in this document will be published subsequently in
the Order.
The Rule
This action amends Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR)
Part 71 by amending Class E airspace extending upward from 700 feet
above the surface for standard instrument approach procedures at Kirk
Field Airport, Paragould, AR. Airspace reconfiguration is necessary due
to the decommissioning of the Paragould NDB and the cancellation of the
NDB approach. The segment northeast of the airport is now within 2.5
miles each side of the 062[deg] bearing from the airport. Controlled
airspace is necessary for the safety and management of IFR operations
at the airport. Geographic coordinates are also adjusted to coincide
with the FAA's aeronautical database.
The FAA has determined that this regulation only involves an
established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current.
Therefore, this regulation: (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory
action'' under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule''
under DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26,
1979); and (3) does not warrant preparation of a regulatory evaluation
as the anticipated impact is so minimal. Since this is a routine matter
that only affects air traffic procedures and air navigation, it is
certified that this rule, when promulgated, does not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the
criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
The FAA's authority to issue rules regarding aviation safety is
found in Title 49 of the U.S. Code. Subtitle 1, Section 106, describes
the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation
Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the agency's authority.
This rulemaking is promulgated under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that section, the
FAA is charged with prescribing regulations to assign the use of
airspace necessary to ensure the safety of aircraft and the efficient
use of airspace. This regulation is within the scope of that authority
as it amends controlled airspace at Kirk Field, Paragould, AR.
Environmental Review
The FAA has determined that this action qualifies for categorical
exclusion under the National Environmental Policy Act in accordance
with FAA Order 1050.1E, ``Environmental Impacts: Policies and
Procedures,'' paragraph 311a. This airspace action is not expected to
cause any potentially significant environmental impacts, and no
extraordinary circumstances exist that warrant preparation of an
environmental assessment.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71
Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (air).
Adoption of the Amendment
In consideration of the foregoing, the Federal Aviation
Administration amends 14 CFR part 71 as follows:
PART 71--DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND REPORTING POINTS
0
1. The authority citation for 14 CFR part 71 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O. 10854,
24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.
Sec. 71.1 [Amended]
0
2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of the Federal
Aviation Administration Order 7400.9X, Airspace Designations and
Reporting Points, dated August 7, 2013, and effective September 15,
2013, is amended as follows:
Paragraph 6005 Class E airspace areas extending upward from 700 feet
or more above the surface.
* * * * *
ASW AR E5 Paragould, AR [Amended]
Paragould, Kirk Field, AR
(Lat. 36[deg]03'50'' N., long. 90[deg]30'33'' W.)
That airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface
within a 6.4-mile radius of Kirk Field, and within 2.5 miles each
side of the 218[deg] bearing from the airport extending from the
6.4-mile radius to 9.5 miles southwest of the airport, and within
2.5 miles each side of the 062[deg] bearing from the airport
extending from the 6.4-mile radius to 7.5 miles northeast of the
airport.
Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on April 2, 2014.
Kent M. Wheeler,
Manager, Operations Support Group, ATO Central Service Center.
[FR Doc. 2014-08771 Filed 4-17-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P