Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Virginia; Revision for GP Big Island, LLC, 21855-21857 [2014-08658]
Download as PDF
21855
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 75 / Friday, April 18, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
State citation
State
effective
date
Title/subject
EPA approval date and citation 1
Explanations
74:36:09 Prevention of Significant Deterioration
*
74:36:09:02 .....................
*
*
*
Prevention of significant deterioration .....
*
*
6/28/2010
*
*
*
*
4/18/2014 [Insert Federal Register page
number where the document begins.].
*
*
*
*
1 In
order to determine the EPA effective date for a specific provision listed in this table, consult the Federal Register notice cited in this column for the particular provision.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2014–08615 Filed 4–17–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R03–OAR–2013–0191; FRL–9909–60–
Region–3]
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans; Virginia;
Revision for GP Big Island, LLC
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is taking direct final
action to approve a revision to the
Virginia State Implementation Plan
(SIP). The SIP revision consists of a
revision to the operating permit for the
control of visibility-impairing emissions
from GP Big Island, LLC on a shutdown
of an individual unit. EPA is approving
this revision in accordance with the
requirements of the Clean Air Act
(CAA).
DATES: This rule is effective on June 17,
2014 without further notice, unless EPA
receives adverse written comment by
May 19, 2014. If EPA receives such
comments, it will publish a timely
withdrawal of the direct final rule in the
Federal Register and inform the public
that the rule will not take effect.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID Number EPA–
R03–OAR–2013–0191 by one of the
following methods:
A. www.regulations.gov. Follow the
on-line instructions for submitting
comments.
B. Email: fernandez.cristina@epa.gov.
C. Mail: EPA–R03–OAR–2013–0191,
Cristina Fernandez, Associate Director,
Office of Air Program Planning,
Mailcode 3AP30, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Region III, 1650
Arch Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
19103.
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:11 Apr 17, 2014
Jkt 232001
D. Hand Delivery: At the previouslylisted EPA Region III address. Such
deliveries are only accepted during the
Docket’s normal hours of operation, and
special arrangements should be made
for deliveries of boxed information.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
Docket ID No. EPA–R03–OAR–2013–
0191. EPA’s policy is that all comments
received will be included in the public
docket without change, and may be
made available online at
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided, unless
the comment includes information
claimed to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise
protected through www.regulations.gov
or email. The www.regulations.gov Web
site is an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system,
which means EPA will not know your
identity or contact information unless
you provide it in the body of your
comment. If you send an email
comment directly to EPA without going
through www.regulations.gov, your
email address will be automatically
captured and included as part of the
comment that is placed in the public
docket and made available on the
Internet. If you submit an electronic
comment, EPA recommends that you
include your name and other contact
information in the body of your
comment and with any disk or CD–ROM
you submit. If EPA cannot read your
comment due to technical difficulties
and cannot contact you for clarification,
EPA may not be able to consider your
comment. Electronic files should avoid
the use of special characters, any form
of encryption, and be free of any defects
or viruses.
Docket: All documents in the
electronic docket are listed in the
www.regulations.gov index. Although
listed in the index, some information is
not publicly available, i.e., CBI or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material,
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
is not placed on the Internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy
form. Publicly available docket
materials are available either
electronically in www.regulations.gov or
in hard copy during normal business
hours at the Air Protection Division,
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
Region III, 1650 Arch Street,
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103.
Copies of the State submittal are
available at the Virginia Department of
Environmental Quality, 629 East Main
Street, Richmond, Virginia 23219.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rose
Quinto, (215) 814–2182, or by email at
quinto.rose@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
On July 17, 2008, the Commonwealth
of Virginia submitted a state operating
permit for the control of visibilityimpairing emissions from GP Big Island
LLC located in Bedford County,
Virginia. This permit consists of two
power boilers (numbers 4 and 5). This
permit was issued pursuant to Article
52 (9 VAC–5–40–7550 et seq.) of 9 VAC
5–40 (Existing Stationary Sources), and
Article 5 (VAC 5–80–800 et seq.) of 9
VAC 5–80 (Permits for Stationary
Sources) of the Commonwealth of
Virginia Regulations for the Control and
Abatement of Air Pollution.
II. Summary of SIP Revision
On December 21, 2012, the
Commonwealth of Virginia submitted a
SIP revision that consists of an
amendment of the state operating permit
for GP Big Island, LLC. The
Commonwealth of Virginia and GP Big
Island, LLC entered into a mutual
determination of permanent shutdown
of an individual unit consisting of the
number 4 power boiler, in accordance
with 9 VAC5–20–220 of Virginia’s
Regulations for the Control and
Abatement of Air Pollution, regarding
the shutdown of a stationary source.
This SIP revision amends the state
operating permit reflecting control of
visibility-impairing pollutants in order
E:\FR\FM\18APR1.SGM
18APR1
21856
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 75 / Friday, April 18, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with RULES
to reflect the unit shutdown. This
permit action is for the purpose of the
shutdown agreement only, and no
alterations are made to limits for power
boiler number 5.
III. General Information Pertaining to
SIP Submittals From the
Commonwealth of Virginia
In 1995, Virginia adopted legislation
that provides, subject to certain
conditions, for an environmental
assessment (audit) ‘‘privilege’’ for
voluntary compliance evaluations
performed by a regulated entity. The
legislation further addresses the relative
burden of proof for parties either
asserting the privilege or seeking
disclosure of documents for which the
privilege is claimed. Virginia’s
legislation also provides, subject to
certain conditions, for a penalty waiver
for violations of environmental laws
when a regulated entity discovers such
violations pursuant to a voluntary
compliance evaluation and voluntarily
discloses such violations to the
Commonwealth and takes prompt and
appropriate measures to remedy the
violations. Virginia’s Voluntary
Environmental Assessment Privilege
Law, Va. Code Sec. 10.1–1198, provides
a privilege that protects from disclosure
documents and information about the
content of those documents that are the
product of a voluntary environmental
assessment. The Privilege Law does not
extend to documents or information
that: (1) Are generated or developed
before the commencement of a
voluntary environmental assessment; (2)
are prepared independently of the
assessment process; (3) demonstrate a
clear, imminent and substantial danger
to the public health or environment; or
(4) are required by law.
On January 12, 1998, the
Commonwealth of Virginia Office of the
Attorney General provided a legal
opinion that states that the Privilege
Law, Va. Code Sec. 10.1–1198,
precludes granting a privilege to
documents and information ‘‘required
by law,’’ including documents and
information ‘‘required by Federal law to
maintain program delegation,
authorization or approval,’’ since
Virginia must ‘‘enforce Federally
authorized environmental programs in a
manner that is no less stringent than
their Federal counterparts. . . .’’ The
opinion concludes that ‘‘[r]egarding
§ 10.1–1198, therefore, documents or
other information needed for civil or
criminal enforcement under one of these
programs could not be privileged
because such documents and
information are essential to pursuing
enforcement in a manner required by
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:13 Apr 17, 2014
Jkt 232001
Federal law to maintain program
delegation, authorization or approval.’’
Virginia’s Immunity law, Va. Code Sec.
10.1–1199, provides that ‘‘[t]o the extent
consistent with requirements imposed
by Federal law,’’ any person making a
voluntary disclosure of information to a
state agency regarding a violation of an
environmental statute, regulation,
permit, or administrative order is
granted immunity from administrative
or civil penalty. The Attorney General’s
January 12, 1998 opinion states that the
quoted language renders this statute
inapplicable to enforcement of any
Federally authorized programs, since
‘‘no immunity could be afforded from
administrative, civil, or criminal
penalties because granting such
immunity would not be consistent with
Federal law, which is one of the criteria
for immunity.’’
Therefore, EPA has determined that
Virginia’s Privilege and Immunity
statutes will not preclude the
Commonwealth from enforcing its
program consistent with the Federal
requirements. In any event, because
EPA has also determined that a state
audit privilege and immunity law can
affect only state enforcement and cannot
have any impact on Federal
enforcement authorities, EPA may at
any time invoke its authority under the
CAA, including, for example, sections
113, 167, 205, 211 or 213, to enforce the
requirements or prohibitions of the state
plan, independently of any state
enforcement effort. In addition, citizen
enforcement under section 304 of the
CAA is likewise unaffected by this, or
any, state audit privilege or immunity
law.
IV. Final Action
EPA is approving Virginia’s SIP
revision that consists of the amended
permit for GP Big Island, LLC reflecting
the unit shutdown. Because the unit is
shutdown permanently and the state
operating permit has been revised
accordingly, EPA is approving the
amended permit as a SIP revision. EPA
is publishing this rule without prior
proposal because EPA views this as a
noncontroversial amendment and
anticipates no adverse comment.
However, in the ‘‘Proposed Rules’’
section of today’s Federal Register, EPA
is publishing a separate document that
will serve as the proposal to approve the
SIP revision if adverse comments are
filed. This rule will be effective on June
17, 2014 without further notice unless
EPA receives adverse comment by May
19, 2014. If EPA receives adverse
comment, EPA will publish a timely
withdrawal in the Federal Register
informing the public that the rule will
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
not take effect. EPA will address all
public comments in a subsequent final
rule based on the proposed rule. EPA
will not institute a second comment
period on this action. Any parties
interested in commenting must do so at
this time.
V. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
A. General Requirements
Under the CAA, the Administrator is
required to approve a SIP submission
that complies with the provisions of the
CAA and applicable Federal regulations.
42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions,
EPA’s role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the CAA. Accordingly, this action
merely approves state law as meeting
Federal requirements and does not
impose additional requirements beyond
those imposed by state law. For that
reason, this action:
• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ subject to review by the Office
of Management and Budget under
Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993);
• does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the CAA; and
• does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
E:\FR\FM\18APR1.SGM
18APR1
21857
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 75 / Friday, April 18, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
In addition, this rule does not have
tribal implications as specified by
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249,
November 9, 2000), because the SIP is
not approved to apply in Indian country
located in the state, and EPA notes that
it will not impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt
tribal law.
B. Submission to Congress and the
Comptroller General
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. EPA will submit a
report containing this action and other
required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of the rule in
the Federal Register. A major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it
is published in the Federal Register.
This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as
defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
enforce its requirements. (See section
307(b)(2).)
C. Petitions for Judicial Review
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA,
petitions for judicial review of this
action must be filed in the United States
Court of Appeals for the appropriate
circuit by June 17, 2014. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the
Administrator of this final rule does not
affect the finality of this action for the
purposes of judicial review nor does it
extend the time within which a petition
for judicial review may be filed, and
shall not postpone the effectiveness of
such rule or action. Parties with
objections to this direct final rule are
encouraged to file a comment in
response to the parallel notice of
proposed rulemaking for this action
published in the proposed rules section
of today’s Federal Register, rather than
file an immediate petition for judicial
review of this direct final rule, so that
EPA can withdraw this direct final rule
and address the comment in the
proposed rulemaking. This action
pertaining to the Virginia SIP revision
for GP Big Island, LLC, may not be
challenged later in proceedings to
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference.
Dated: April 4, 2014.
W.C. Early,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region III.
40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:
PART 52—APPROVAL AND
PROMULGATION OF
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart VV—Virginia
2. In § 52.2420, the table in paragraph
(d) is amended by revising the entry for
George Pacific Corporation. The revised
text reads as follows:
■
§ 52.2420
*
Identification of plan.
*
*
(d) * * *
*
*
EPA-APPROVED SOURCE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS
Permit/order or
registration No.
Source name
State effective
date
*
GP Big Island, LLC
*
Registration No.
30389.
*
*
*
40 CFR Part 52 citation
*
*
4/18/14 [Insert page number where the
document begins].
*
*
52.2420(d); BART permit revised to reflect the unit shutdown; replaces permit dated 6/12/08.
*
*
*
*
*
10/5/12
*
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Parts 52 and 81
[Docket No. EPA–R02–OAR–2013–0592;
FRL–9909–65–Region 2]
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans; New
York State; Redesignation of Areas for
1997 Annual and 2006 24-Hour Fine
Particulate Matter and Approval of the
Associated Maintenance Plan
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
AGENCY:
ACTION:
Final rule.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:13 Apr 17, 2014
*
*
On June 27, 2013 the New
York State Department of
Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC)
submitted a request for the
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
to approve the redesignation of the New
York portion of the New York-N.New
Jersey-Long Island, NY-NJ-CT
nonattainment area for the 1997 annual
and the 2006 24-hour Fine Particle
(PM2.5) National Ambient Air Quality
Standards (NAAQS). In conjunction
with its redesignation request, New
York submitted a State Implementation
Plan (SIP) revision containing a
maintenance plan for the area that
provides for continued maintenance of
the 1997 annual and 2006 24-hour PM2.5
NAAQS. The submittals included the
2007 ammonia (NH3), volatile organic
compounds (VOC), nitrogen oxides
(NOX), PM10, direct PM2.5 and sulfur
dioxide (SO2) emissions inventories
SUMMARY:
[FR Doc. 2014–08658 Filed 4–17–14; 8:45 am]
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with RULES
EPA Approval date
Jkt 232001
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
*
*
submitted to meet the comprehensive
emissions inventory requirements of
section 172(c)(3) of the Clean Air Act
(CAA), and accompanying motor
vehicle emissions budgets. EPA is
taking final action to approve the
requested SIP revisions and to
redesignate the New York portion of the
New York-N.New Jersey-Long Island,
NY-NJ-CT nonattainment area to
attainment for the 1997 annual and the
2006 24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS.
DATES:
This rule is effective on April 18,
2014.
EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket ID
Number EPA–R02–OAR–2013–0592. All
documents in the docket are listed in
the https://www.regulations.gov Web
site. Although listed in the electronic
docket, some information is not publicly
available, i.e., confidential business
information (CBI) or other information
ADDRESSES:
E:\FR\FM\18APR1.SGM
18APR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 75 (Friday, April 18, 2014)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 21855-21857]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-08658]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R03-OAR-2013-0191; FRL-9909-60-Region-3]
Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans;
Virginia; Revision for GP Big Island, LLC
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is taking direct
final action to approve a revision to the Virginia State Implementation
Plan (SIP). The SIP revision consists of a revision to the operating
permit for the control of visibility-impairing emissions from GP Big
Island, LLC on a shutdown of an individual unit. EPA is approving this
revision in accordance with the requirements of the Clean Air Act
(CAA).
DATES: This rule is effective on June 17, 2014 without further notice,
unless EPA receives adverse written comment by May 19, 2014. If EPA
receives such comments, it will publish a timely withdrawal of the
direct final rule in the Federal Register and inform the public that
the rule will not take effect.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID Number EPA-
R03-OAR-2013-0191 by one of the following methods:
A. www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line instructions for
submitting comments.
B. Email: fernandez.cristina@epa.gov.
C. Mail: EPA-R03-OAR-2013-0191, Cristina Fernandez, Associate
Director, Office of Air Program Planning, Mailcode 3AP30, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, Region III, 1650 Arch Street,
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103.
D. Hand Delivery: At the previously-listed EPA Region III address.
Such deliveries are only accepted during the Docket's normal hours of
operation, and special arrangements should be made for deliveries of
boxed information.
Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID No. EPA-R03-OAR-
2013-0191. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included
in the public docket without change, and may be made available online
at www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided,
unless the comment includes information claimed to be Confidential
Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you consider to
be CBI or otherwise protected through www.regulations.gov or email. The
www.regulations.gov Web site is an ``anonymous access'' system, which
means EPA will not know your identity or contact information unless you
provide it in the body of your comment. If you send an email comment
directly to EPA without going through www.regulations.gov, your email
address will be automatically captured and included as part of the
comment that is placed in the public docket and made available on the
Internet. If you submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you
include your name and other contact information in the body of your
comment and with any disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your
comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for
clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic
files should avoid the use of special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or viruses.
Docket: All documents in the electronic docket are listed in the
www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available, i.e., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such
as copyrighted material, is not placed on the Internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket
materials are available either electronically in www.regulations.gov or
in hard copy during normal business hours at the Air Protection
Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region III, 1650 Arch
Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103. Copies of the State submittal
are available at the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality, 629
East Main Street, Richmond, Virginia 23219.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rose Quinto, (215) 814-2182, or by
email at quinto.rose@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
On July 17, 2008, the Commonwealth of Virginia submitted a state
operating permit for the control of visibility-impairing emissions from
GP Big Island LLC located in Bedford County, Virginia. This permit
consists of two power boilers (numbers 4 and 5). This permit was issued
pursuant to Article 52 (9 VAC-5-40-7550 et seq.) of 9 VAC 5-40
(Existing Stationary Sources), and Article 5 (VAC 5-80-800 et seq.) of
9 VAC 5-80 (Permits for Stationary Sources) of the Commonwealth of
Virginia Regulations for the Control and Abatement of Air Pollution.
II. Summary of SIP Revision
On December 21, 2012, the Commonwealth of Virginia submitted a SIP
revision that consists of an amendment of the state operating permit
for GP Big Island, LLC. The Commonwealth of Virginia and GP Big Island,
LLC entered into a mutual determination of permanent shutdown of an
individual unit consisting of the number 4 power boiler, in accordance
with 9 VAC5-20-220 of Virginia's Regulations for the Control and
Abatement of Air Pollution, regarding the shutdown of a stationary
source. This SIP revision amends the state operating permit reflecting
control of visibility-impairing pollutants in order
[[Page 21856]]
to reflect the unit shutdown. This permit action is for the purpose of
the shutdown agreement only, and no alterations are made to limits for
power boiler number 5.
III. General Information Pertaining to SIP Submittals From the
Commonwealth of Virginia
In 1995, Virginia adopted legislation that provides, subject to
certain conditions, for an environmental assessment (audit)
``privilege'' for voluntary compliance evaluations performed by a
regulated entity. The legislation further addresses the relative burden
of proof for parties either asserting the privilege or seeking
disclosure of documents for which the privilege is claimed. Virginia's
legislation also provides, subject to certain conditions, for a penalty
waiver for violations of environmental laws when a regulated entity
discovers such violations pursuant to a voluntary compliance evaluation
and voluntarily discloses such violations to the Commonwealth and takes
prompt and appropriate measures to remedy the violations. Virginia's
Voluntary Environmental Assessment Privilege Law, Va. Code Sec. 10.1-
1198, provides a privilege that protects from disclosure documents and
information about the content of those documents that are the product
of a voluntary environmental assessment. The Privilege Law does not
extend to documents or information that: (1) Are generated or developed
before the commencement of a voluntary environmental assessment; (2)
are prepared independently of the assessment process; (3) demonstrate a
clear, imminent and substantial danger to the public health or
environment; or (4) are required by law.
On January 12, 1998, the Commonwealth of Virginia Office of the
Attorney General provided a legal opinion that states that the
Privilege Law, Va. Code Sec. 10.1-1198, precludes granting a privilege
to documents and information ``required by law,'' including documents
and information ``required by Federal law to maintain program
delegation, authorization or approval,'' since Virginia must ``enforce
Federally authorized environmental programs in a manner that is no less
stringent than their Federal counterparts. . . .'' The opinion
concludes that ``[r]egarding Sec. 10.1-1198, therefore, documents or
other information needed for civil or criminal enforcement under one of
these programs could not be privileged because such documents and
information are essential to pursuing enforcement in a manner required
by Federal law to maintain program delegation, authorization or
approval.'' Virginia's Immunity law, Va. Code Sec. 10.1-1199, provides
that ``[t]o the extent consistent with requirements imposed by Federal
law,'' any person making a voluntary disclosure of information to a
state agency regarding a violation of an environmental statute,
regulation, permit, or administrative order is granted immunity from
administrative or civil penalty. The Attorney General's January 12,
1998 opinion states that the quoted language renders this statute
inapplicable to enforcement of any Federally authorized programs, since
``no immunity could be afforded from administrative, civil, or criminal
penalties because granting such immunity would not be consistent with
Federal law, which is one of the criteria for immunity.''
Therefore, EPA has determined that Virginia's Privilege and
Immunity statutes will not preclude the Commonwealth from enforcing its
program consistent with the Federal requirements. In any event, because
EPA has also determined that a state audit privilege and immunity law
can affect only state enforcement and cannot have any impact on Federal
enforcement authorities, EPA may at any time invoke its authority under
the CAA, including, for example, sections 113, 167, 205, 211 or 213, to
enforce the requirements or prohibitions of the state plan,
independently of any state enforcement effort. In addition, citizen
enforcement under section 304 of the CAA is likewise unaffected by
this, or any, state audit privilege or immunity law.
IV. Final Action
EPA is approving Virginia's SIP revision that consists of the
amended permit for GP Big Island, LLC reflecting the unit shutdown.
Because the unit is shutdown permanently and the state operating permit
has been revised accordingly, EPA is approving the amended permit as a
SIP revision. EPA is publishing this rule without prior proposal
because EPA views this as a noncontroversial amendment and anticipates
no adverse comment. However, in the ``Proposed Rules'' section of
today's Federal Register, EPA is publishing a separate document that
will serve as the proposal to approve the SIP revision if adverse
comments are filed. This rule will be effective on June 17, 2014
without further notice unless EPA receives adverse comment by May 19,
2014. If EPA receives adverse comment, EPA will publish a timely
withdrawal in the Federal Register informing the public that the rule
will not take effect. EPA will address all public comments in a
subsequent final rule based on the proposed rule. EPA will not
institute a second comment period on this action. Any parties
interested in commenting must do so at this time.
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
A. General Requirements
Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the CAA and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this
action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and
does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state
law. For that reason, this action:
Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993);
does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the CAA; and
does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
[[Page 21857]]
In addition, this rule does not have tribal implications as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000),
because the SIP is not approved to apply in Indian country located in
the state, and EPA notes that it will not impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law.
B. Submission to Congress and the Comptroller General
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
C. Petitions for Judicial Review
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for
the appropriate circuit by June 17, 2014. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect
the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor
does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may
be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or
action. Parties with objections to this direct final rule are
encouraged to file a comment in response to the parallel notice of
proposed rulemaking for this action published in the proposed rules
section of today's Federal Register, rather than file an immediate
petition for judicial review of this direct final rule, so that EPA can
withdraw this direct final rule and address the comment in the proposed
rulemaking. This action pertaining to the Virginia SIP revision for GP
Big Island, LLC, may not be challenged later in proceedings to enforce
its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference.
Dated: April 4, 2014.
W.C. Early,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region III.
40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:
PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart VV--Virginia
0
2. In Sec. 52.2420, the table in paragraph (d) is amended by revising
the entry for George Pacific Corporation. The revised text reads as
follows:
Sec. 52.2420 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(d) * * *
EPA-Approved Source Specific Requirements
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Permit/order or State 40 CFR Part 52
Source name registration No. effective date EPA Approval date citation
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
GP Big Island, LLC............ Registration No. 10/5/12 4/18/14 [Insert page 52.2420(d); BART
30389. number where the permit revised to
document begins]. reflect the unit
shutdown; replaces
permit dated 6/12/
08.
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2014-08658 Filed 4-17-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P