CoreLogic, Inc.; Analysis of Agreement Containing Consent Order To Aid Public Comment, 21461-21464 [2014-08635]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 73 / Wednesday, April 16, 2014 / Notices
Privacy Act Appeals Officer. Requests
may be mailed to the Privacy Act
Appeals Officer, Federal Housing
Finance Agency, 400 Seventh Street
SW., Washington, DC 20024, or can be
submitted electronically at https://
www.fhfa.gov/Default.aspx?Page=236 in
accordance with the procedures set
forth in 12 CFR part 1204.
RECORD SOURCE CATEGORIES:
The information is obtained from
individuals who respond to the National
Survey of Mortgage Borrowers, credit
repository files, other FHFA systems of
records, other Federal government
systems of records, commercial data
aggregators, or other commercial
entities.
EXEMPTIONS CLAIMED FOR THE SYSTEM:
None.
Dated: April 7, 2014.
Melvin L. Watt,
Director, Federal Housing Finance Agency.
[FR Doc. 2014–08566 Filed 4–15–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8070–01–P
FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Notice of Agreements Filed
The Commission hereby gives notice
of the filing of the following agreements
under the Shipping Act of 1984.
Interested parties may submit comments
on the agreements to the Secretary,
Federal Maritime Commission,
Washington, DC 20573, within twelve
days of the date this notice appears in
the Federal Register. Copies of the
agreements are available through the
Commission’s Web site (www.fmc.gov)
or by contacting the Office of
Agreements at 202/523–5793 or
tradeanalysis@fmc.gov.
Agreement No.: 012032–010.
Title: CMA CGM/MSC/Maersk Line
North and Central China-U.S. Pacific
Coast Three-Loop Space Charter, Sailing
and Cooperative Working Agreement.
Parties: A.P. Moller-Maersk A/S, CMA
CGM S.A., and MSC Mediterranean
Shipping Company SA.
Filing Party: Wayne R. Rohde, Esq.;
Cozen O’Connor; 1627 I Street NW.,
Suite 1100; Washington, DC 20006.
Synopsis: The amendment extends
the duration of the agreement.
Agreement No.: 012073–003.
Title: MSC/CSAV Group Vessel
Sharing Agreement.
Parties: MSC Mediterranean Shipping
ˇ
Company SA; Compania Sud Americana
de Vapores S.A.; Companhia Libra de
Navegacao; and Compania Libra de
Navegacion Uruguay S.A..
Filing Party: Wayne R. Rohde, Esq.;
Cozen O’Connor; 1627 I Street NW.,
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:20 Apr 15, 2014
Jkt 232001
Suite 1100; Washington, DC 20006–
4007.
Synopsis: The amendment would
decrease CSAV Group’s space allocation
and make the corresponding changes to
MSC’s space allocation.
Agreement No.: 012199–001.
Title: NYK/Hyundai Americas NorthSouth Service Slot Charter Agreement.
Parties: Nippon Yusen Kaisha and
Hyundai Merchant Marine Co., Ltd.
Filing Party: Robert Shababb; NYK
Line (North America) Inc.; 300 Lighting
Way, 5th Floor; Secaucus, NJ 07094.
Synopsis: The agreement deletes
Hanjin from the agreement and updates
the slot charter amounts.
Agreement No.: 012260.
Title: MSC/Maersk Line USEC–WCSA
Space Charter Agreement.
Parties: MSC Mediterranean Shipping
Company SA. and A.P. Moller-Maersk
A/S.
Filing Party: Wayne R. Rohde, Esq.;
Cozen O’Connor; 1627 I Street NW.,
Suite 1100; Washington, DC 20006.
Synopsis: The agreement authorizes
MSC to charter space to Maersk Line in
the trade between the U.S. East Coast,
on the one hand, and ports in the
Bahamas, Panama, Colombia (Pacific
Coast only), Ecuador, Peru, and Chile,
on the other hand.
Agreement No.: 012261.
Title: Eukor Car Carriers, Inc./Liberty
Global Logistics LLC Space Charter
Agreement.
Parties: Eukor Car Carriers, Inc. and
Liberty Global Logistics LLC.
Filing Party: Brooke F. Shapiro;
Winston & Strawn LLP; 200 Park
Avenue; New York, NY 10166.
Synopsis: The agreement authorizes
Eukor and Liberty Global Logistics to
charter space to each other on an ad hoc
basis in the trade between the U.S. East
and Gulf Coasts, on the one hand, and
ports along the Arabian Sea, Red Sea,
Persian Gulf and Middle East, India and
Pakistan, on the other hand.
Agreement No.: 012262.
Title: The G6/Hanjin Vessel Sharing
Agreement.
Parties: American President Lines,
Ltd. and APL Co. Pte, Ltd. (operating as
one party); Hapag-Lloyd AG; Hyundai
Merchant Marine Co., Ltd.; Mitsui
O.S.K. Lines, Ltd.; Nippon Yusen
Kaisha; Orient Overseas Container Line,
Limited (all acting as a single party);
and Hanjin Shipping Co., Ltd.
Filing Party: David F. Smith, Esq.;
Cozen O’Connor; 1627 I Street NW.,
Suite 1100; Washington, DC 20006.
Synopsis: The agreement would
authorize the parties to share vessels in
the trade between the U.S. West Coast
and Asia.
By Order of the Federal Maritime
Commission.
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
21461
Dated: April 11, 2014.
Rachel E. Dickon,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014–08655 Filed 4–15–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
[File No. 131 0199]
CoreLogic, Inc.; Analysis of Agreement
Containing Consent Order To Aid
Public Comment
Federal Trade Commission.
Proposed Consent Agreement.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The consent agreement in this
matter settles alleged violations of
federal law prohibiting unfair methods
of competition. The attached Analysis of
Agreement Containing Consent Order to
Aid Public Comment describes both the
allegations in the draft complaint and
the terms of the consent orders—
embodied in the consent agreement—
that would settle these allegations.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before April 23, 2014.
ADDRESSES: Interested parties may file
comments at https://
ftcpublic.commentworks.com/ftc/
corelogicconsent online or on paper, by
following the instructions in the
Request for Comments part of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
below. Write ‘‘CoreLogic, Inc., Consent
Agreement; File No. 131–0199’’ on your
comment and file your comment online
at https://ftcpublic.commentworks.com/
ftc/corelogicconsenthttps://
ftcpublic.commentworks.com/ftc/
fidelitynationalconsent by following the
instructions on the web-based form. If
you prefer to file your comment on
paper, mail or deliver your comments to
the following address: Federal Trade
Commission, Office of the Secretary,
Room H–113 (Annex D), 600
Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington,
DC 20580.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Cathlin Tully, Bureau of Competition,
(202–326–3644), 600 Pennsylvania
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20580.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant
to Section 6(f) of the Federal Trade
Commission Act, 15 U.S.C. 46(f), and
FTC Rule 2.34, 16 CFR 2.34, notice is
hereby given that the above-captioned
consent agreement containing consent
order to cease and desist, having been
filed with and accepted, subject to final
approval, by the Commission, having
been placed on the public record for a
period of thirty (30) days. The following
Analysis to Aid Public Comment
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\16APN1.SGM
16APN1
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
21462
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 73 / Wednesday, April 16, 2014 / Notices
describes the terms of the consent
agreement, and the allegations in the
complaint. An electronic copy of the
full text of the consent agreement
package can be obtained from the FTC
Home Page (for March 24, 2014), on the
World Wide Web, at https://www.ftc.gov/
os/actions.shtm. A paper copy can be
obtained from the FTC Public Reference
Room, Room 130–H, 600 Pennsylvania
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20580,
either in person or by calling (202) 326–
2222.
You can file a comment online or on
paper. For the Commission to consider
your comment, we must receive it on or
before April 23, 2014. Write ‘‘CoreLogic,
Inc., Consent Agreement; File No. 131–
0199’’ on your comment. Your
comment—including your name and
your state—will be placed on the public
record of this proceeding, including, to
the extent practicable, on the public
Commission Web site, at https://
www.ftc.gov/os/publiccomments.shtm.
As a matter of discretion, the
Commission tries to remove individuals’
home contact information from
comments before placing them on the
Commission Web site.
Because your comment will be made
public, you are solely responsible for
making sure that your comment does
not include any sensitive personal
information, like anyone’s Social
Security number, date of birth, driver’s
license number or other state
identification number or foreign country
equivalent, passport number, financial
account number, or credit or debit card
number. You are also solely responsible
for making sure that your comment does
not include any sensitive health
information, like medical records or
other individually identifiable health
information. In addition, do not include
any ‘‘[t]rade secret or any commercial or
financial information which . . . is
privileged or confidential,’’ as discussed
in Section 6(f) of the FTC Act, 15 U.S.C.
46(f), and FTC Rule 4.10(a)(2), 16 CFR
4.10(a)(2). In particular, do not include
competitively sensitive information
such as costs, sales statistics,
inventories, formulas, patterns, devices,
manufacturing processes, or customer
names.
If you want the Commission to give
your comment confidential treatment,
you must file it in paper form, with a
request for confidential treatment, and
you have to follow the procedure
explained in FTC Rule 4.9(c), 16 CFR
4.9(c).1 Your comment will be kept
1 In particular, the written request for confidential
treatment that accompanies the comment must
include the factual and legal basis for the request,
and must identify the specific portions of the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:20 Apr 15, 2014
Jkt 232001
confidential only if the FTC General
Counsel, in his or her sole discretion,
grants your request in accordance with
the law and the public interest.
Postal mail addressed to the
Commission is subject to delay due to
heightened security screening. As a
result, we encourage you to submit your
comment online. To make sure that the
Commission considers your online
comment, you must file it at https://
ftcpublic.commentworks.com/ftc/
corelogicconsent by following the
instructions on the web-based forms. If
this Notice appears at https://
www.regulations.gov/#!home, you also
may file a comment through that Web
site.
If you file your comment on paper,
write ‘‘CoreLogic, Inc., Consent
Agreement; File No. 131–0199’’ on your
comment and on the envelope, and mail
or deliver it to the following address:
Federal Trade Commission, Office of the
Secretary, Room H–113 (Annex D), 600
Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington,
DC 20580. If possible, submit your
paper comment to the Commission by
courier or overnight service.
Visit the Commission Web site at
https://www.ftc.gov to read this Notice
and the news release describing it. The
FTC Act and other laws that the
Commission administers permit the
collection of public comments to
consider and use in this proceeding as
appropriate. The Commission will
consider all timely and responsive
public comments that it receives on or
before April 23, 2014. You can find
more information, including routine
uses permitted by the Privacy Act, in
the Commission’s privacy policy, at
https://www.ftc.gov/ftc/privacy.htm.
Analysis of Agreement Containing
Consent Order To Aid Public Comment
Introduction
The Federal Trade Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) has accepted from
CoreLogic, Inc. (‘‘CoreLogic’’), subject to
final approval, an Agreement
Containing Consent Order (‘‘Consent
Agreement’’) designed to remedy the
anticompetitive effects resulting from
CoreLogic’s proposed acquisition of
certain assets and other interests from
TPG VI Ontario 1 AIV L.P. (‘‘TPG’’).
Under the terms of the Decision and
Order (‘‘Order’’) contained in the
Consent Agreement, CoreLogic must
grant Renwood RealtyTrac LLC
(‘‘RealtyTrac’’) a license for national
assessor and recorder bulk data that will
restore to the market a third competitor
comment to be withheld from the public record. See
FTC Rule 4.9(c), 16 CFR 4.9(c).
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
that will act independently of
CoreLogic.
The Consent Agreement has been
placed on the public record for 30 days
to solicit comments from interested
persons. Comments received during this
period will become part of the public
record. After 30 days, the Commission
will again review the Consent
Agreement and the comments received,
and will decide whether it should
withdraw from the Consent Agreement,
modify it, or make the Order final.
Pursuant to a Purchase and Sale
Agreement dated June 30, 2013,
CoreLogic proposes to acquire certain
assets and other interests from TPG,
including its DataQuick Information
Systems, Inc. (‘‘DataQuick’’) national
real property public records bulk data
business, for $661 million (the
‘‘acquisition’’). The Commission’s
Complaint alleges that the acquisition, if
consummated, would violate Section 7
of the Clayton Act, as amended, 15
U.S.C. 18, and Section 5 of the Federal
Trade Commission Act, as amended, 15
U.S.C. 45, by substantially lessening
competition in the market for national
assessor and recorder bulk data.
The Parties
CoreLogic, a publicly-traded company
headquartered in Irvine, California,
provides real property information,
analytics, and services through a host of
products tailored to the needs of
customers in the lending, investment,
and real estate industries. As part of its
Data and Analytics segment, CoreLogic
collects, maintains, and offers licenses
for national assessor and recorder bulk
data.
Among its various assets and
interests, TPG wholly owns Decision
Insight Information Group, which owns
DataQuick. DataQuick provides real
property information, analytics, and
services to the real estate, mortgage
lending, and secondary investor markets
in the United States. As part of its
business, DataQuick offers licenses for
national assessor and recorder bulk
data.
The Relevant Market
The relevant product market in which
to analyze the effects of the acquisition
is the market for national assessor and
recorder bulk data. National assessor
and recorder bulk data consist of
aggregated current and historical
assessor and recorder data in bulk
format for the vast majority of properties
across the United States. National
assessor and recorder bulk data offer
data for all properties in covered
jurisdictions in a standardized form.
E:\FR\FM\16APN1.SGM
16APN1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 73 / Wednesday, April 16, 2014 / Notices
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Assessor and recorder data provide
information regarding ownership,
status, and value of properties. Assessor
data consist of public record
information concerning characteristics
of individual real property parcels,
including, but not limited to, square
footage, number of bedrooms and
bathrooms, sales information, history,
and assessed value. Assessor data are
often referred to as tax assessor or tax
roll data. Recorder data consist of public
record information abstracted from
transactions related to real property,
including, but not limited to, deeds,
mortgages, liens, assignments, and
foreclosures, the parties to the
transaction, transfer tax, and purchase
price. Assessor and recorder data and
information are available from local
(county or county-equivalent)
government offices.
Customers integrate national assessor
and recorder bulk data into proprietary
programs and systems for internal
analyses or to create value-added
products using the data, such as risk
and fraud management tools, valuation
models, and consumer-oriented
property Web sites. National assessor
and recorder bulk data customers
cannot use regional assessor and
recorder bulk data to create reliable
internal analyses or value-added
products. Regional bulk data providers
offer data for certain limited geographic
areas in the United States. National bulk
data customers could not combine the
data offered by regional firms to meet
their needs because it would not
provide the required geographic scope.
The relevant geographic market in
which to assess the competitive effects
of the acquisition is the world. The
relevant product is provided through
electronic file transfer technology and
can be supplied from anywhere in the
world, notwithstanding the more
limited geographic scope of the product
itself.
The Structure of the Market
The acquisition would significantly
increase concentration in an already
highly concentrated market for national
assessor and recorder bulk data.
CoreLogic and DataQuick are two of the
three firms that offer national assessor
and recorder bulk data. Black Knight
Financial Services, Inc. (formerly
Lender Processing Services, Inc.)
(‘‘Black Knight’’) is the only other
competitor. DataQuick obtained
historical data through a prior
acquisition and since 2004 has obtained
on-going national assessor and recorder
bulk data primarily through a license
with CoreLogic. The license allows
DataQuick to re-license the data in bulk
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:20 Apr 15, 2014
Jkt 232001
and act independently of CoreLogic.
DataQuick aggressively competes headto-head against CoreLogic and Black
Knight to furnish national assessor and
recorder bulk data to customers, offering
lower prices and less restrictive license
terms than its competitors.
Entry Conditions
Without the Consent Agreement,
entry or expansion into the market for
national assessor and recorder bulk data
would not occur in a timely, likely, or
sufficient manner to deter or negate the
anticompetitive effects of the
acquisition. In order to compete
effectively in the market for national
assessor and recorder bulk data, a firm
typically must have several years of
national historical data and an ability to
provide go-forward national data. It
would be cost-prohibitive for a potential
entrant to collect the necessary
historical and go-forward data.
Firms currently offering assessor and
recorder bulk data on a regional basis
would not expand their historical and
on-going offerings in a timely manner to
provide national assessor and recorder
bulk data. Regional firms could not
combine their offerings to provide
national assessor and recorder bulk data
customers with the necessary
geographic scope of data they require,
nor is it likely that a firm combining the
offerings of all of the regional firms
could expand to offer national coverage
in a timely enough manner to constrain
any exercise of market power.
Finally, a potential entrant without its
own historical data would not be able to
enter the market for national assessor
and recorder bulk data by obtaining a
license from CoreLogic or Black Knight.
Neither CoreLogic nor Black Knight has
any incentive to offer such a license to
a potential entrant that will compete
against them. DataQuick has been able
to obtain a license because it is unlike
any other potential licensee; it owns
historical data and could credibly
threaten to enter the market for national
assessor and recorder bulk data without
a license.
Effects of the Acquisition
The acquisition may substantially
lessen competition in the markt for
national assessor and recorder bulk
data. The acquisition will eliminate
actual, direct, and substantial
competition between CoreLogic and
DataQuick. Further, the acquisition may
increase the likelihood and degree of
coordination between CoreLogic and the
only other remaining competitor, Black
Knight, and the likelihood that
CoreLogic will exercise market power
unilaterally post-acquisition.
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
21463
The Decision and Order
The Order resolves the competitive
concerns raised by the acquisition by
restoring to the market a third
competitor. The Order requires
CoreLogic to grant RealtyTrac a license
that allows it to replicate DataQuick’s
data offerings and competitive position.
The Order does this by requiring
CoreLogic to provide RealtyTrac with
the data, information, support, and
access to customers it needs to enter
successfully and compete in the market
for national assessor and recorder bulk
data. RealtyTrac has the relevant
industry experience, reputation, and
resources to enter the relevant market
successfully under the terms of the
Order. RealtyTrac operates an online
marketplace of foreclosure real property
listings and provides national
foreclosure data and services to real
estate consumers, investors, and
professionals. As part of its business,
RealtyTrac collects, maintains, and
offers licenses for foreclosure data for
properties throughout the United States.
The license required by the Order
allows RealtyTrac to step into the shoes
of DataQuick as CoreLogic’s licensee.
The Order requires that CoreLogic grant
a license to RealtyTrac for national
assessor and recorder bulk data of the
‘‘same scope and quality’’ as DataQuick
provides its customers today. The Order
requires that the license include both
current and historical data and several
ancillary derived data sets that
DataQuick provides. The Order requires
that CoreLogic offer the license to
RealtyTrac for no less than 5 years, and
provides that a Monitor appointed by
the Commission may, if needed, extend
the license for two additional one-year
terms. The Commission must either
approve, or waive its right to approve,
any proposed modification to the
license.
The license terms and posttermination rights are substantially
similar to those in DataQuick’s license
with CoreLogic, putting RealtyTrac in
the same competitive position relative
to CoreLogic as DataQuick is today. The
license allows RealtyTrac to offer
customers not only the data, but also the
services, that CoreLogic and DataQuick
offer to customers. Further, the license
permits RealtyTrac to re-license the data
in bulk and positions RealtyTrac to
remain in the relevant market following
the license’s termination.
The Order includes additional
provisions that provide RealtyTrac with
the information and support it needs to
begin offering bulk data licenses to
customers as seamlessly and quickly as
possible following Commission
E:\FR\FM\16APN1.SGM
16APN1
pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
21464
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 73 / Wednesday, April 16, 2014 / Notices
approval. The Order requires CoreLogic
to provide RealtyTrac with access to
information regarding customers and
data management, including the
information necessary to provide data to
customers in the same manner as
DataQuick. Moreover, the Order
requires that CoreLogic provide
RealtyTrac with access to technical
support for 18 months to assist its
management and provision of the data.
Lastly, the Order helps RealtyTrac, at its
option, hire and retain former
DataQuick employees by requiring
CoreLogic to waive certain non-compete
and non-disclosure agreements during
the first year and prohibiting CoreLogic
from attempting to hire DataQuick
employees away from RealtyTrac for
two years.
The Order also requires CoreLogic to
provide certain DataQuick customers
with the opportunity to terminate their
contracts early and switch to
RealtyTrac. These early termination
provisions will give RealtyTrac more
customers to compete for and will
ensure that all DataQuick customers
will be able to take advantage of
RealtyTrac’s entry during the first three
years RealtyTrac is in the market.
CoreLogic is required to permit these
customers to terminate their agreements
only in order to switch to RealtyTrac.
Further, CoreLogic can require the
customers to provide 180-days’ notice of
termination, although the Order requires
CoreLogic to allow a customer to revoke
or postpone the effective date of its
termination notice at any time.
CoreLogic must provide written notice
to each customer who can terminate an
existing contract under the Order and is
prohibited from imposing penalties on
or retaliating against customers that
exercise their early termination rights.
There are three groups of customers
that CoreLogic must allow to terminate
their license agreements with 180-days’
notice in order to switch to RealtyTrac.
The first are DataQuick customers who
renewed a DataQuick contract or
switched to CoreLogic between July 1,
2013, and the acquisition date. The
second are DataQuick customers who
enter into or renew their licenses during
the first nine months following the
acquisition. The final group of
DataQuick customers includes those
who, prior to the acquisition, executed
licenses with DataQuick that expire on
or after March 31, 2017. The Order
permits these customers to switch to
RealtyTrac on or after March 31, 2016.
To ensure CoreLogic’s compliance
with the Order, the Order provides for
the appointment of a Monitor as well as
a Divestiture Trustee and imposes
certain compliance requirements on
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:20 Apr 15, 2014
Jkt 232001
CoreLogic. The Order appoints Mitchell
S. Pettit as Monitor to oversee
CoreLogic’s ongoing compliance with
their obligations and responsibilities
under the Order. The Order also allows
the Commission to appoint a Divestiture
Trustee to assign, grant, license, divest,
transfer, deliver, or otherwise convey
the relevant data and information.
Further, CoreLogic must submit
periodic compliance reports and give
the Commission prior notice of certain
events that might affect its compliance
obligations arising from the Order.
Lastly, the Order terminates after 10
years.
The purpose of this analysis is to
facilitate public comment on the
Consent Agreement, and it is not
intended to constitute an official
interpretation of the Order or to modify
its terms in any way.
By direction of the Commission.
Donald S. Clark,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014–08635 Filed 4–15–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6750–01–P
GENERAL SERVICES
ADMINISTRATION
[Notice–PBS–2013–02; Docket No: 2013–
0002; Sequence 12]
Federal Management Regulation;
Delegations of Lease Acquisition
Authority—Notification, Usage, and
Reporting Requirements for General
Purpose, Categorical, and Special
Purpose Space Delegations
Public Buildings Service (PBS),
General Services Administration (GSA).
ACTION: Notice of FMR Bulletin C–2
Delegations of Lease Acquisition
Authority.
AGENCY:
The U.S. General Services
Administration (GSA) recently
completed a review of agencies’ lease
files for space acquired using a
delegation of leasing authority from
GSA in accordance with Federal
Management Regulation (FMR) Bulletin
2008–B1 (Bulletin 2008–B1). FMR
Bulletin C–2 clarifies the conditions,
restrictions and reporting requirements
specified in the delegation of authority
and updates weblinks, the Simplified
Lease Threshold and regulation
references specified in FMR Bulletin
2008–B1. This bulletin is in keeping
with the spirit of Executive Order
13327, ‘‘Federal Real Property Asset
Management,’’ to maximize the
increased governmentwide emphasis on
real property inventory management.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
A notice announcing FMR Bulletin C–
2 appeared in the Federal Register on
March 13, 2014 (79 FR 144251) which
stated the bulletin would be posted only
on the FMR Web site. However, that
decision was reconsidered and for the
convenience of the reader, FMR Bulletin
C–2 appears in full in today’s Federal
Register following this notice. FMR
Bulletin C–2 and all FMR bulletins may
be accessed at https://www.gsa.gov/
fmrbulletins.
DATES: Effective: April 16, 2014.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Contact Ms. Mary Pesina, Director,
Center for Lease Delegations, Office of
Leasing, Public Buildings Service, at
202–236–1686, or mary.pesina@gsa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Federal
Property Management Regulation
(FPMR) Bulletin D–239, published in
the Federal Register on October 16,
1996 (61 FR 53924), announced a new
GSA leasing program called ‘‘Can’t Beat
GSA Leasing’’ and the delegation of
lease acquisition authority issued by the
Administrator of General Services to the
heads of all Federal agencies in his
letter of September 25, 1996. GSA
Bulletin FPMR D–239, Supplement 1,
published in the Federal Register on
December 18, 1996 (61 FR 66668),
issued supporting information for the
delegation. GSA Bulletin FMR 2005–B1,
published in the Federal Register on
May 25, 2005 (70 FR 30115), revised
and re-emphasized certain procedures
associated with the delegation of
General Purpose leasing authority.
On August 24, 2007, the Government
Accountability Office and the GSA
Office of Inspector General issued a
report recommending that GSA provide
centralized management and oversight
of all lease delegation activities to
ensure that all federal agencies
procuring leased space under delegated
authority follow the conditions,
restrictions and reporting requirements
specified in the delegation of authority.
In response to the audit
recommendations, GSA centralized its
management and oversight of all GSAauthorized lease delegations and, on
November 19, 2007, published FMR
Bulletin 2008–B1 in the Federal
Register (72 FR 65026), which limited
General Purpose delegations of lease
authority to no more than 19,999
rentable square feet of space and
implemented management controls
commensurate with the risks at that
threshold. In addition, FMR Bulletin
2008–B1 established new requirements
for agencies requesting authorization to
use the General Purpose and Special
Purpose delegation authority and
established revised reporting
E:\FR\FM\16APN1.SGM
16APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 73 (Wednesday, April 16, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 21461-21464]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-08635]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
[File No. 131 0199]
CoreLogic, Inc.; Analysis of Agreement Containing Consent Order
To Aid Public Comment
AGENCY: Federal Trade Commission.
ACTION: Proposed Consent Agreement.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The consent agreement in this matter settles alleged
violations of federal law prohibiting unfair methods of competition.
The attached Analysis of Agreement Containing Consent Order to Aid
Public Comment describes both the allegations in the draft complaint
and the terms of the consent orders--embodied in the consent
agreement--that would settle these allegations.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before April 23, 2014.
ADDRESSES: Interested parties may file comments at https://ftcpublic.commentworks.com/ftc/corelogicconsent online or on paper, by
following the instructions in the Request for Comments part of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section below. Write ``CoreLogic, Inc.,
Consent Agreement; File No. 131-0199'' on your comment and file your
comment online at https://ftcpublic.commentworks.com/ftc/corelogicconsenthttps://ftcpublic.commentworks.com/ftc/fidelitynationalconsent by following the instructions on the web-based
form. If you prefer to file your comment on paper, mail or deliver your
comments to the following address: Federal Trade Commission, Office of
the Secretary, Room H-113 (Annex D), 600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20580.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Cathlin Tully, Bureau of Competition,
(202-326-3644), 600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20580.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to Section 6(f) of the Federal
Trade Commission Act, 15 U.S.C. 46(f), and FTC Rule 2.34, 16 CFR 2.34,
notice is hereby given that the above-captioned consent agreement
containing consent order to cease and desist, having been filed with
and accepted, subject to final approval, by the Commission, having been
placed on the public record for a period of thirty (30) days. The
following Analysis to Aid Public Comment
[[Page 21462]]
describes the terms of the consent agreement, and the allegations in
the complaint. An electronic copy of the full text of the consent
agreement package can be obtained from the FTC Home Page (for March 24,
2014), on the World Wide Web, at https://www.ftc.gov/os/actions.shtm. A
paper copy can be obtained from the FTC Public Reference Room, Room
130-H, 600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20580, either in
person or by calling (202) 326-2222.
You can file a comment online or on paper. For the Commission to
consider your comment, we must receive it on or before April 23, 2014.
Write ``CoreLogic, Inc., Consent Agreement; File No. 131-0199'' on your
comment. Your comment--including your name and your state--will be
placed on the public record of this proceeding, including, to the
extent practicable, on the public Commission Web site, at https://www.ftc.gov/os/publiccomments.shtm. As a matter of discretion, the
Commission tries to remove individuals' home contact information from
comments before placing them on the Commission Web site.
Because your comment will be made public, you are solely
responsible for making sure that your comment does not include any
sensitive personal information, like anyone's Social Security number,
date of birth, driver's license number or other state identification
number or foreign country equivalent, passport number, financial
account number, or credit or debit card number. You are also solely
responsible for making sure that your comment does not include any
sensitive health information, like medical records or other
individually identifiable health information. In addition, do not
include any ``[t]rade secret or any commercial or financial information
which . . . is privileged or confidential,'' as discussed in Section
6(f) of the FTC Act, 15 U.S.C. 46(f), and FTC Rule 4.10(a)(2), 16 CFR
4.10(a)(2). In particular, do not include competitively sensitive
information such as costs, sales statistics, inventories, formulas,
patterns, devices, manufacturing processes, or customer names.
If you want the Commission to give your comment confidential
treatment, you must file it in paper form, with a request for
confidential treatment, and you have to follow the procedure explained
in FTC Rule 4.9(c), 16 CFR 4.9(c).\1\ Your comment will be kept
confidential only if the FTC General Counsel, in his or her sole
discretion, grants your request in accordance with the law and the
public interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ In particular, the written request for confidential
treatment that accompanies the comment must include the factual and
legal basis for the request, and must identify the specific portions
of the comment to be withheld from the public record. See FTC Rule
4.9(c), 16 CFR 4.9(c).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Postal mail addressed to the Commission is subject to delay due to
heightened security screening. As a result, we encourage you to submit
your comment online. To make sure that the Commission considers your
online comment, you must file it at https://ftcpublic.commentworks.com/ftc/corelogicconsent by following the instructions on the web-based
forms. If this Notice appears at https://www.regulations.gov/#!home, you
also may file a comment through that Web site.
If you file your comment on paper, write ``CoreLogic, Inc., Consent
Agreement; File No. 131-0199'' on your comment and on the envelope, and
mail or deliver it to the following address: Federal Trade Commission,
Office of the Secretary, Room H-113 (Annex D), 600 Pennsylvania Avenue
NW., Washington, DC 20580. If possible, submit your paper comment to
the Commission by courier or overnight service.
Visit the Commission Web site at https://www.ftc.gov to read this
Notice and the news release describing it. The FTC Act and other laws
that the Commission administers permit the collection of public
comments to consider and use in this proceeding as appropriate. The
Commission will consider all timely and responsive public comments that
it receives on or before April 23, 2014. You can find more information,
including routine uses permitted by the Privacy Act, in the
Commission's privacy policy, at https://www.ftc.gov/ftc/privacy.htm.
Analysis of Agreement Containing Consent Order To Aid Public Comment
Introduction
The Federal Trade Commission (``Commission'') has accepted from
CoreLogic, Inc. (``CoreLogic''), subject to final approval, an
Agreement Containing Consent Order (``Consent Agreement'') designed to
remedy the anticompetitive effects resulting from CoreLogic's proposed
acquisition of certain assets and other interests from TPG VI Ontario 1
AIV L.P. (``TPG''). Under the terms of the Decision and Order
(``Order'') contained in the Consent Agreement, CoreLogic must grant
Renwood RealtyTrac LLC (``RealtyTrac'') a license for national assessor
and recorder bulk data that will restore to the market a third
competitor that will act independently of CoreLogic.
The Consent Agreement has been placed on the public record for 30
days to solicit comments from interested persons. Comments received
during this period will become part of the public record. After 30
days, the Commission will again review the Consent Agreement and the
comments received, and will decide whether it should withdraw from the
Consent Agreement, modify it, or make the Order final.
Pursuant to a Purchase and Sale Agreement dated June 30, 2013,
CoreLogic proposes to acquire certain assets and other interests from
TPG, including its DataQuick Information Systems, Inc. (``DataQuick'')
national real property public records bulk data business, for $661
million (the ``acquisition''). The Commission's Complaint alleges that
the acquisition, if consummated, would violate Section 7 of the Clayton
Act, as amended, 15 U.S.C. 18, and Section 5 of the Federal Trade
Commission Act, as amended, 15 U.S.C. 45, by substantially lessening
competition in the market for national assessor and recorder bulk data.
The Parties
CoreLogic, a publicly-traded company headquartered in Irvine,
California, provides real property information, analytics, and services
through a host of products tailored to the needs of customers in the
lending, investment, and real estate industries. As part of its Data
and Analytics segment, CoreLogic collects, maintains, and offers
licenses for national assessor and recorder bulk data.
Among its various assets and interests, TPG wholly owns Decision
Insight Information Group, which owns DataQuick. DataQuick provides
real property information, analytics, and services to the real estate,
mortgage lending, and secondary investor markets in the United States.
As part of its business, DataQuick offers licenses for national
assessor and recorder bulk data.
The Relevant Market
The relevant product market in which to analyze the effects of the
acquisition is the market for national assessor and recorder bulk data.
National assessor and recorder bulk data consist of aggregated current
and historical assessor and recorder data in bulk format for the vast
majority of properties across the United States. National assessor and
recorder bulk data offer data for all properties in covered
jurisdictions in a standardized form.
[[Page 21463]]
Assessor and recorder data provide information regarding ownership,
status, and value of properties. Assessor data consist of public record
information concerning characteristics of individual real property
parcels, including, but not limited to, square footage, number of
bedrooms and bathrooms, sales information, history, and assessed value.
Assessor data are often referred to as tax assessor or tax roll data.
Recorder data consist of public record information abstracted from
transactions related to real property, including, but not limited to,
deeds, mortgages, liens, assignments, and foreclosures, the parties to
the transaction, transfer tax, and purchase price. Assessor and
recorder data and information are available from local (county or
county-equivalent) government offices.
Customers integrate national assessor and recorder bulk data into
proprietary programs and systems for internal analyses or to create
value-added products using the data, such as risk and fraud management
tools, valuation models, and consumer-oriented property Web sites.
National assessor and recorder bulk data customers cannot use regional
assessor and recorder bulk data to create reliable internal analyses or
value-added products. Regional bulk data providers offer data for
certain limited geographic areas in the United States. National bulk
data customers could not combine the data offered by regional firms to
meet their needs because it would not provide the required geographic
scope.
The relevant geographic market in which to assess the competitive
effects of the acquisition is the world. The relevant product is
provided through electronic file transfer technology and can be
supplied from anywhere in the world, notwithstanding the more limited
geographic scope of the product itself.
The Structure of the Market
The acquisition would significantly increase concentration in an
already highly concentrated market for national assessor and recorder
bulk data. CoreLogic and DataQuick are two of the three firms that
offer national assessor and recorder bulk data. Black Knight Financial
Services, Inc. (formerly Lender Processing Services, Inc.) (``Black
Knight'') is the only other competitor. DataQuick obtained historical
data through a prior acquisition and since 2004 has obtained on-going
national assessor and recorder bulk data primarily through a license
with CoreLogic. The license allows DataQuick to re-license the data in
bulk and act independently of CoreLogic. DataQuick aggressively
competes head-to-head against CoreLogic and Black Knight to furnish
national assessor and recorder bulk data to customers, offering lower
prices and less restrictive license terms than its competitors.
Entry Conditions
Without the Consent Agreement, entry or expansion into the market
for national assessor and recorder bulk data would not occur in a
timely, likely, or sufficient manner to deter or negate the
anticompetitive effects of the acquisition. In order to compete
effectively in the market for national assessor and recorder bulk data,
a firm typically must have several years of national historical data
and an ability to provide go-forward national data. It would be cost-
prohibitive for a potential entrant to collect the necessary historical
and go-forward data.
Firms currently offering assessor and recorder bulk data on a
regional basis would not expand their historical and on-going offerings
in a timely manner to provide national assessor and recorder bulk data.
Regional firms could not combine their offerings to provide national
assessor and recorder bulk data customers with the necessary geographic
scope of data they require, nor is it likely that a firm combining the
offerings of all of the regional firms could expand to offer national
coverage in a timely enough manner to constrain any exercise of market
power.
Finally, a potential entrant without its own historical data would
not be able to enter the market for national assessor and recorder bulk
data by obtaining a license from CoreLogic or Black Knight. Neither
CoreLogic nor Black Knight has any incentive to offer such a license to
a potential entrant that will compete against them. DataQuick has been
able to obtain a license because it is unlike any other potential
licensee; it owns historical data and could credibly threaten to enter
the market for national assessor and recorder bulk data without a
license.
Effects of the Acquisition
The acquisition may substantially lessen competition in the markt
for national assessor and recorder bulk data. The acquisition will
eliminate actual, direct, and substantial competition between CoreLogic
and DataQuick. Further, the acquisition may increase the likelihood and
degree of coordination between CoreLogic and the only other remaining
competitor, Black Knight, and the likelihood that CoreLogic will
exercise market power unilaterally post-acquisition.
The Decision and Order
The Order resolves the competitive concerns raised by the
acquisition by restoring to the market a third competitor. The Order
requires CoreLogic to grant RealtyTrac a license that allows it to
replicate DataQuick's data offerings and competitive position. The
Order does this by requiring CoreLogic to provide RealtyTrac with the
data, information, support, and access to customers it needs to enter
successfully and compete in the market for national assessor and
recorder bulk data. RealtyTrac has the relevant industry experience,
reputation, and resources to enter the relevant market successfully
under the terms of the Order. RealtyTrac operates an online marketplace
of foreclosure real property listings and provides national foreclosure
data and services to real estate consumers, investors, and
professionals. As part of its business, RealtyTrac collects, maintains,
and offers licenses for foreclosure data for properties throughout the
United States.
The license required by the Order allows RealtyTrac to step into
the shoes of DataQuick as CoreLogic's licensee. The Order requires that
CoreLogic grant a license to RealtyTrac for national assessor and
recorder bulk data of the ``same scope and quality'' as DataQuick
provides its customers today. The Order requires that the license
include both current and historical data and several ancillary derived
data sets that DataQuick provides. The Order requires that CoreLogic
offer the license to RealtyTrac for no less than 5 years, and provides
that a Monitor appointed by the Commission may, if needed, extend the
license for two additional one-year terms. The Commission must either
approve, or waive its right to approve, any proposed modification to
the license.
The license terms and post-termination rights are substantially
similar to those in DataQuick's license with CoreLogic, putting
RealtyTrac in the same competitive position relative to CoreLogic as
DataQuick is today. The license allows RealtyTrac to offer customers
not only the data, but also the services, that CoreLogic and DataQuick
offer to customers. Further, the license permits RealtyTrac to re-
license the data in bulk and positions RealtyTrac to remain in the
relevant market following the license's termination.
The Order includes additional provisions that provide RealtyTrac
with the information and support it needs to begin offering bulk data
licenses to customers as seamlessly and quickly as possible following
Commission
[[Page 21464]]
approval. The Order requires CoreLogic to provide RealtyTrac with
access to information regarding customers and data management,
including the information necessary to provide data to customers in the
same manner as DataQuick. Moreover, the Order requires that CoreLogic
provide RealtyTrac with access to technical support for 18 months to
assist its management and provision of the data. Lastly, the Order
helps RealtyTrac, at its option, hire and retain former DataQuick
employees by requiring CoreLogic to waive certain non-compete and non-
disclosure agreements during the first year and prohibiting CoreLogic
from attempting to hire DataQuick employees away from RealtyTrac for
two years.
The Order also requires CoreLogic to provide certain DataQuick
customers with the opportunity to terminate their contracts early and
switch to RealtyTrac. These early termination provisions will give
RealtyTrac more customers to compete for and will ensure that all
DataQuick customers will be able to take advantage of RealtyTrac's
entry during the first three years RealtyTrac is in the market.
CoreLogic is required to permit these customers to terminate their
agreements only in order to switch to RealtyTrac. Further, CoreLogic
can require the customers to provide 180-days' notice of termination,
although the Order requires CoreLogic to allow a customer to revoke or
postpone the effective date of its termination notice at any time.
CoreLogic must provide written notice to each customer who can
terminate an existing contract under the Order and is prohibited from
imposing penalties on or retaliating against customers that exercise
their early termination rights.
There are three groups of customers that CoreLogic must allow to
terminate their license agreements with 180-days' notice in order to
switch to RealtyTrac. The first are DataQuick customers who renewed a
DataQuick contract or switched to CoreLogic between July 1, 2013, and
the acquisition date. The second are DataQuick customers who enter into
or renew their licenses during the first nine months following the
acquisition. The final group of DataQuick customers includes those who,
prior to the acquisition, executed licenses with DataQuick that expire
on or after March 31, 2017. The Order permits these customers to switch
to RealtyTrac on or after March 31, 2016.
To ensure CoreLogic's compliance with the Order, the Order provides
for the appointment of a Monitor as well as a Divestiture Trustee and
imposes certain compliance requirements on CoreLogic. The Order
appoints Mitchell S. Pettit as Monitor to oversee CoreLogic's ongoing
compliance with their obligations and responsibilities under the Order.
The Order also allows the Commission to appoint a Divestiture Trustee
to assign, grant, license, divest, transfer, deliver, or otherwise
convey the relevant data and information. Further, CoreLogic must
submit periodic compliance reports and give the Commission prior notice
of certain events that might affect its compliance obligations arising
from the Order. Lastly, the Order terminates after 10 years.
The purpose of this analysis is to facilitate public comment on the
Consent Agreement, and it is not intended to constitute an official
interpretation of the Order or to modify its terms in any way.
By direction of the Commission.
Donald S. Clark,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-08635 Filed 4-15-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6750-01-P