Medicare and Medicaid Programs; Fire Safety Requirements for Certain Health Care Facilities, 21551-21576 [2014-08602]
Download as PDF
Vol. 79
Wednesday,
No. 73
April 16, 2014
Part III
Department of Health and Human Services
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS2
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
42 CFR Parts 403, 416, 418, et al.
Medicare and Medicaid Programs; Fire Safety Requirements for Certain
Health Care Facilities; Proposed Rule
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:04 Apr 15, 2014
Jkt 232001
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4717
Sfmt 4717
E:\FR\FM\16APP2.SGM
16APP2
21552
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 73 / Wednesday, April 16, 2014 / Proposed Rules
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Services
42 CFR Parts 403, 416, 418, 460, 482,
483, and 485
[CMS–3277–P]
RIN 0938–AR72
Medicare and Medicaid Programs; Fire
Safety Requirements for Certain Health
Care Facilities
Centers for Medicare &
Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
This proposed rule would
amend the fire safety standards for
Medicare and Medicaid participating
hospitals, critical access hospitals
(CAHs), long-term care facilities,
intermediate care facilities for
individuals with intellectual disabilities
(ICF–IID), ambulatory surgery centers
(ASCs), hospices which provide
inpatient services, religious nonmedical health care institutions
(RNHCIs), and programs of all-inclusive
care for the elderly (PACE) facilities.
Further, this proposed rule would adopt
the 2012 edition of the Life Safety Code
(LSC) and eliminate references in our
regulations to all earlier editions. It
would also adopt the 2012 edition of the
Health Care Facilities Code, with some
exceptions. We are providing the LSC
citation, a description of the 2012
requirement, and an explanation of its
benefits for health care facilities,
patients, staff, and visitors over the 2000
version in each occupancy section.
DATES: To be assured consideration,
comments must be received at one of
the addresses provided below, no later
than 5 p.m. on June 16, 2014.
ADDRESSES: In commenting, please refer
to file code CMS–3277–P. Because of
staff and resource limitations, we cannot
accept comments by facsimile (FAX)
transmission.
You may submit comments in one of
four ways (please choose only one of the
ways listed):
1. Electronically. You may submit
electronic comments on this regulation
to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow
the ‘‘Submit a comment’’ instructions.
2. By regular mail. You may mail
written comments to the following
address only: Centers for Medicare &
Medicaid Services, Department of
Health and Human Services, Attention:
CMS–3277–P, P.O. Box 8010, Baltimore,
MD 21244–8010.
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS2
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:04 Apr 15, 2014
Jkt 232001
Please allow sufficient time for mailed
comments to be received before the
close of the comment period.
3. By express or overnight mail. You
may send written comments to the
following address only: Centers for
Medicare & Medicaid Services,
Department of Health and Human
Services, Attention: CMS–3277–P, Mail
Stop C4–26–05, 7500 Security
Boulevard, Baltimore, MD 21244–1850.
4. By hand or courier. Alternatively,
you may deliver (by hand or courier)
your written comments only to the
following addresses prior to the close of
the comment period:
a. For delivery in Washington, DC—
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Services, Department of Health and
Human Services, Room 445–G, Hubert
H. Humphrey Building, 200
Independence Avenue SW.,
Washington, DC 20201.
(Because access to the interior of the
Hubert H. Humphrey Building is not
readily available to persons without
Federal government identification,
commenters are encouraged to leave
their comments in the CMS drop slots
located in the main lobby of the
building. A stamp-in clock is available
for persons wishing to retain a proof of
filing by stamping in and retaining an
extra copy of the comments being filed.)
b. For delivery in Baltimore, MD—
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Services, Department of Health and
Human Services, 7500 Security
Boulevard, Baltimore, MD 21244–1850.
If you intend to deliver your
comments to the Baltimore address, call
telephone number (410) 786–9994 in
advance to schedule your arrival with
one of our staff members.
Comments erroneously mailed to the
addresses indicated as appropriate for
hand or courier delivery may be delayed
and received after the comment period.
For information on viewing public
comments, see the beginning of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kristin Shifflett, (410) 786–4133.
Danielle Shearer, (410) 786–6617.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Inspection
of Public Comments: All comments
received before the close of the
comment period are available for
viewing by the public, including any
personally identifiable or confidential
business information that is included in
a comment. We post all comments
received before the close of the
comment period on the following Web
site as soon as possible after they have
been received: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the search
instructions on that Web site to view
public comments.
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
Comments received timely will also
be available for public inspection as
they are received, generally beginning
approximately 3 weeks after publication
of a document, at the headquarters of
the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Services, 7500 Security Boulevard,
Baltimore, Maryland 21244, Monday
through Friday of each week from 8:30
a.m. to 4 p.m. To schedule an
appointment to view public comments,
phone 1–800–743–3951.
I. Background
A. Overview of the Life Safety Code and
the Health Care Facilities Code
The Life Safety Code (LSC) is a
compilation of fire safety requirements
for new and existing buildings, and is
updated and published every 3 years by
the National Fire Protection Association
(NFPA), a private, nonprofit
organization dedicated to reducing loss
of life due to fire. The LSC regulations
adopted by Centers for Medicare &
Medicaid Services (CMS) apply to
hospitals, long-term care facilities
(LTC), critical access hospitals (CAHs),
ambulatory surgical centers (ASC),
intermediate care facilities for
individuals with intellectual disabilities
(ICF–IIDs), hospice inpatient care
facilities, programs for all inclusive care
for the elderly (PACE), and religious
non-medical health care institutions
(RNHCIs). The Medicare and Medicaid
regulations have historically
incorporated by reference these
requirements, along with Secretarial
waiver authority. The statutory basis for
incorporating NFPA’s LSC for our
providers and suppliers is the
Secretary’s authority to stipulate health
and safety regulations for each type of
Medicare and (if applicable) Medicaidparticipating facilities, as well as the
Secretary’s general rulemaking authority
set out at sections 1102 and 1871 of the
Social Security Act (the Act).
In our regulations, issued pursuant to
the Act, we have stated that we believe
CMS has the authority to grant waivers
of some provisions of the LSC when
necessary; for instance, to hospitals
under section 1861(e)(9) of the Act, and
to LTC facilities at sections
1819(d)(2)(B) and 1919(d)(2)(B) of the
Act. Currently, the Secretary may waive
specific provisions of the LSC for any
type of facility, if application of the rule
would result in unreasonable hardship
for the facility, and if the health and
safety of its patients would not be
compromised.
We do not consider it always
necessary for a facility to be cited for a
deficiency before it can apply for or
receive a waiver. This is particularly the
E:\FR\FM\16APP2.SGM
16APP2
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS2
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 73 / Wednesday, April 16, 2014 / Proposed Rules
case when we have evaluated specific
provisions of the LSC, determined that
a waiver would arguably apply to all
similarly-situated facilities with respect
to the LSC requirement in question, and
issued a public communication
describing the specifics of such a
categorical waiver, including any
particular requirements that must be
met in order for the waiver to apply to
a facility. Waiver approval in these
instances would be subject to a review
of documentation maintained by the
facility, verification of the applicability
of the waiver, and confirmation that the
terms and requirements of the waiver
have been implemented by the facility.
In most cases such verification occurs
when an onsite survey of the facility is
conducted. We plan to continue this
approach, but would like to clarify that
in those cases where we have issued a
prior public communication providing
for a categorical waiver, an advance
recommendation from a state survey
agency or accrediting organization (as
applicable), is not required in order for
a waiver to be granted. We have issued
categorical waivers of LSC requirements
when newer editions of the LSC
provided equally effective means of
ensuring life safety compared to
requirements of earlier LSC editions.
When CMS has evaluated the alternative
(such as examining the new fire safety
research and technology), and
concluded that the specific alternative
would improve or maintain the safety of
the residents or patients of the facility,
CMS may defer to newer editions of the
LSC. CMS requires that providers
comply with applicable provisions of
the version of the LSC referenced in the
categorical waiver.
In addition, the Secretary may accept
a state’s fire and safety code instead of
the LSC if CMS determines that the
protections of the state’s fire and safety
code are equivalent to the protections
offered by the LSC. Further, the NFPA’s
Fire Safety Evaluation System (FSES),
an equivalency system, provides
alternatives to meeting various
provisions of the LSC, thereby achieving
the same level of fire protection as the
LSC. These flexibilities mitigate the
potential burdens of applying the
requirements of the LSC to all affected
health care facilities.
On January 10, 2003, we published a
final rule in the Federal Register (68 FR
1374) adopting the 2000 edition of the
LSC. In this final rule, we required that
all affected providers and suppliers
meet the provisions of the 2000 edition
of the LSC, with certain exceptions. One
of the exceptions to the 2000 edition of
the LSC is the code’s use of roller
latches on corridor doors in buildings
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:04 Apr 15, 2014
Jkt 232001
that are fully protected by a sprinkler
system. We believe that roller latches
are a safety hazard under all
circumstances and prohibit their use in
all Medicare and applicable Medicaid
facilities. We also removed references to
all previous editions of the LSC.
In 2002, the Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention (CDC) published
an initial set of hand hygiene guidelines
for health care settings on its Web site
(https://www.cdc.gov/handhygiene/
Guidelines.html). The guidelines
recommended the use of alcohol-based
hand rub (ABHR) dispensers. On
September 22, 2006 we published a
final rule (71 FR 55326), to allow certain
health care facilities to place ABHR
dispensers in exit corridors under
specified conditions. To accommodate
the placement of ABHR dispensers in
health care facilities, the NFPA
retroactively amended the 2000 edition
of the code. When CMS adopts an
edition of the LSC, it adopts that edition
as it existed on the day of publication
of the final rule. Since the changes to
the 2000 edition of the LSC occurred
after publication of the January 2003
final rule that adopted the 2000 edition
of the LSC, CMS was required to use the
notice and comment rulemaking process
to adopt the amendment that the NFPA
made to the code.
The September 2006 final rule also
required that LTC facilities, at a
minimum, install battery-powered
single station smoke alarms in resident
rooms and common areas if their
buildings were not fully sprinklered, or
if the building did not have systembased smoke detectors. A Government
Accountability Office (GAO) report
entitled ‘‘Nursing Home Fire Safety:
Recent Fires Highlight Weaknesses in
Federal Standards and Oversights’’
GAO–04–660, July 16, 2004, (https://
www.gao.gov/products/GAO-04-660)
examined two LTC facility fires
(Hartford and Nashville) in 2003, that
resulted in 31 total resident deaths. The
report examined Federal fire safety
standards and enforcement procedures,
as well as results from the fire
investigations of these two incidents. It
specifically cited requiring smoke
detectors in these facilities as one way
to strengthen the requirements. We
agreed with the GAO findings and
added this smoke alarm requirement in
response to the GAO report.
On August 13, 2008, we published a
final rule (73 FR 47075), to require all
LTC facilities to install automatic
sprinkler systems throughout their
buildings in accordance with the
technical provisions of the 1999 edition
of NFPA 13—Standard for the
Installation of Sprinkler Systems, and to
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
21553
test, inspect, and maintain sprinkler
systems in accordance with the
technical requirements of the 1998
edition of NFPA 25—Standard for the
Inspection, Testing and Maintenance of
Water-Based Fire Protection Systems.
The August 2008 final rule required all
LTC facilities to be equipped with
sprinkler systems by August 13, 2013.
This rule was also in response to the
July 2004 GAO report on nursing home
fire safety. In addition to its findings
related to smoke alarms, the GAO
recommended that fire safety standards
for unsprinklered LTC facilities be
strengthened, and cited sprinklers as the
single most effective fire protection
feature for LTC facilities.
On October 24, 2011, we published a
proposed rule (76 FR 65891), to reform
hospital and critical access hospital
conditions of participation. Many of the
public comments received during the
comment period strongly encouraged
CMS to adopt the 2012 edition of the
LSC. The commenters stated that the
newest edition of the LSC would clarify
several issues and would be beneficial
to facilities.
B. 2012 Edition of the Life Safety Code
The 2012 edition of the LSC includes
new provisions that we believe are vital
to the health and safety of all patients
and staff. Our intention is to ensure that
patients and staff continue to experience
the highest degree of fire safety possible.
The term ‘‘Patient(s)’’ will be globally
used throughout this document, and
refers to patient, clients, residents and
all other terms used to describe the type
of individuals cared for in each provider
type. The use of earlier editions of the
code can become problematic due to
advances in safety and technology, and
changes made to each edition of the
code. Newer buildings are typically
built to comply with the newer versions
of the LSC because state and local
jurisdictions, as well as non-CMSapproved accreditation programs, often
adopt and enforce newer versions of the
code as they become available.
Therefore, a health care facility that is
constructed or renovated in 2013 would
likely be required by its state and local
authorities to comply with a more
recent edition of the LSC, while also
being required to comply with the 2000
edition of the LSC to meet the Medicare
and applicable Medicaid regulatory
requirements. Requiring compliance
with two different editions of the LSC
at the same time can create unnecessary
conflicts, duplications, and
inconsistencies that increase
construction and compliance costs
without any fire safety or patient care
benefits. For example, the 2000 edition
E:\FR\FM\16APP2.SGM
16APP2
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS2
21554
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 73 / Wednesday, April 16, 2014 / Proposed Rules
of the LSC limits ABHRs to gel form,
whereas the 2012 edition of the LSC
expands to allow aerosol and gel
ABHRs. Limiting the choice of ABHRs
creates barriers to improve hand
hygiene, which has been shown to
reduce the number of health care
associated infections. We believe that
adopting the 2012 LSC would simplify
and modernize the construction and
renovation process for affected health
care providers and suppliers, reduce
compliance-related burdens, and
allowing for more resources to be used
for patient care.
The 2012 edition of the LSC contains
several significant changes from the
2000 edition. First, the format of the
LSC has been altered. The LSC has
eliminated the use of ‘‘exceptions’’
throughout the entire code to provide
more consistency and easier reading.
There was also a change in
measurement systems, from centimeters
to millimeters. Using a smaller unit of
measurement allows for more precision
and consistency throughout the LSC.
The 2000 LSC requires minor
renovation projects to meet the same
stringent requirements as those applied
to completely new construction.
However, the 2012 edition of the LSC
contains a new chapter entitled,
‘‘Chapter 43—Building Rehabilitation.’’
This new chapter replaces the
requirements that all modernizations/
renovations meet the requirements for
new construction. The degree to which
requirements for new construction must
be met now varies with the
rehabilitation work category. This
chapter sets out different types of
building rehabilitation work (that is,
repair, renovation, modification,
reconstruction, change of use, change of
occupancy and addition) to which
different standards apply. We believe
that this clarification will assist health
care facilities by reducing costs for
minor construction projects.
Buildings that have not received all
pre-construction governmental
approvals required by the jurisdiction(s)
in which the building is to be built
before the rule’s effective date, or those
buildings that begin construction after
the effective date of this regulation,
would be required to meet the New
Occupancy chapters of the 2012 edition
of the LSC. Buildings constructed before
the effective date of this regulation
would be required to meet the Existing
Occupancy chapters of the 2012 edition
of the LSC. Changes made to buildings
would be required to comply with
Chapter 43—Building Rehabilitation,
which could require compliance with
the New Occupancy chapters,
depending on the changes being made.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:04 Apr 15, 2014
Jkt 232001
In instances where mandatory LSC
references do not include existing
chapters, existing occupancies must
ensure buildings and equipment are in
compliance with provisions previously
adopted by CMS at the time they were
constructed or installed.
Health Care Occupancies
The following are provisions that
appear in the 2012 edition of the LSC,
but that did not exist in the 2000 edition
of the LSC, for Chapter 18, ‘‘New Health
Care Occupancies,’’ and Chapter 19,
‘‘Existing Health Care Occupancies.’’
We are providing the LSC citation, a
description of the 2012 requirement,
and an explanation of its benefits for
health care facilities, patients, staff, and
visitors over the 2000 version.
Both the 2000 and 2012 editions of
the LSC classify a ‘‘Health Care
Occupancy’’ as a facility having 4 or
more patients on an inpatient basis.
However, CMS does not apply this LSC
standard with respect to patient census
numbers. Unless specifically noted, the
requirements, conditions of
participation, and conditions for
coverage for all Medicare and Medicaidparticipating health care providers and
suppliers subject to these rules would
apply on a facility basis, regardless of
the size of the facility or the facility’s
patient census. These basic
requirements are established to assure a
core level of safety and quality for all
patients, regardless of where they
receive health care services. We believe
that patients in small facilities should
be assured the same level of fire safety
as those in larger facilities. Therefore,
the LSC exception for health care
occupancy facilities with fewer than
four occupants/patients would be
inapplicable to the Medicare and
Medicaid facilities affected by this
proposed rule. All health care
occupancies that provide care to one or
more patients would be required to
comply with the relevant requirements
of the 2012 edition of the LSC.
Sections 18.2.3.4 (2) and 19.2.3.4(2)—
Corridor Projections
This provision requires
noncontinuous projections to be no
more than 6 inches from the corridor
wall. In addition to following the
requirements of the LSC, health care
facilities are also required to follow the
requirements of the Americans with
Disabilities Act (ADA). Section 307 of
the ‘‘ADA Accessibility Guidelines for
Buildings and Facilities’’ (https://
www.ada.gov/regs2010/
2010ADAStandards/
2010ADAstandards.htm#c4) requires
that projections be no more than 4
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
inches from the corridor wall.
Therefore, while the LSC allows
facilities to have 6 inch projections, so
long as the ADA standard is 4 inches
then facilities should only have 4 inch
projections to comply with the more
stringent requirement set forth by the
ADA.
Sections 18.2.5.7 and 19.2.5.7—Suites
This new provision has enlarged the
size of permissible sleeping suites for
patients to potentially allow ‘more
comfort and space for patients’ if the
facilities choose to use the larger size
patient rooms. The provision requires
that new construction sleeping suites
cannot exceed 7500 square feet.
Previously sleeping suites could not
exceed 5000 square feet. Sleeping suites
greater than 7500 square feet, and not
exceeding 10,000 square feet, may be
permitted where there is direct visual
supervision and a complete smoke
detection system. This change allows
health care facilities to have more
patients in a single area, reducing the
number of staff that are necessary to
visually monitor patients and allowing
facilities to accommodate additional
pieces of medical equipment or visitor
space. This could improve facility
staffing flexibility and reduce costs by
allowing this increase in size thereby
reducing the number of suites to treat
the same number of patients.
Sections 18.7.5.7.2 and 19.7.5.7.2—
Recycling
This new provision requires that
containers used solely for recycling
clean waste be limited to a maximum
capacity of 96 gallons. If the recycling
containers are located in a protected
hazardous area, container size will not
be limited. In the 2000 edition of the
LSC, the container size was limited to
32 gallons. The larger containers
allowed in the 2012 edition of the LSC
require less frequent emptying, which
could reduce housekeeping costs.
Sections 18.3.6.3.9.1 and 19.3.6.3.5—
Roller Latches
A roller latch is a type of door
latching mechanism to keep a door
closed. The 2012 edition of the LSC
requires corridor doors to be provided
with a means for keeping the door
closed that is acceptable to the authority
having jurisdiction. The LSC permits
roller latches capable of keeping the
door fully closed if a force of 5 pounds
is applied at the latch edge or roller
latches in fully sprinklered buildings.
However, we would not adopt these
standards from the 2012 LSC. Through
fire investigations, roller latches have
proven to be an unreliable door latching
E:\FR\FM\16APP2.SGM
16APP2
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 73 / Wednesday, April 16, 2014 / Proposed Rules
mechanism requiring extensive
maintenance to operate properly. Many
roller latches in fire situations failed to
provide adequate protection to residents
in their rooms during an emergency.
Therefore, roller latches would be
prohibited in existing and new Health
Care Occupancies, and corridor doors
would be required to have positive
latching devices.
Sections 18.4.2 and 19.4.2—Sprinklers
in High-Rise Buildings
This is a new provision for existing
health care occupancies. This provision
requires buildings over 75′ (generally
greater than 7 or 8 stories) in height to
have automatic sprinkler systems
installed throughout the building. The
2012 LSC allows 12-years from when
the authority having jurisdiction (which
in this case is CMS) officially adopts the
2012 edition of the LSC for existing
facilities to comply with the sprinkler
system installation requirement.
Therefore, those facilities that are not
already required to do so would have 12
years following publication of the final
rule adopting the 2012 LSC to install
sprinklers. We propose to adopt this
new provision because high-rise
buildings require more time to evacuate,
and sprinklers would very likely allow
additional time to safely evacuate a
facility.
We believe that this provision would
mainly affect hospitals. However, we are
specifically soliciting public comment
to determine if other provider types are,
or may be, located in a high-rise
building. We would also like to solicit
public comments regarding the phase-in
period of 12 years, including if 12-years
is enough time for the installation of
sprinklers in high-rise buildings.
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS2
Sections 18.2.2.2.5.2 and 19.2.2.2.5.2—
Door Locking
This new provision requires that,
where the special needs of patients
require specialized protective measures
for their safety, door-locking
arrangements are permitted. This
provision allows interior doors to be
locked to reduce the risk of infant
abductions and individuals who may
wander, subject to the following
requirements: (1) All staff must have
keys; (2) smoke detection systems must
be in place; and (3) the facility must be
fully sprinklered; (4) the locks are
electrical locks that will release upon
loss of power to the device and (5) the
locks release by independent activation
of the smoke detection system and the
water flow in the automatic sprinkler
system. This provision would improve
the security of health care facilities with
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:04 Apr 15, 2014
Jkt 232001
specialized needs and improve patient
safety.
Sections 18.3.2.6 and 19.3.2.6—Alcohol
Based Hand Rubs (ABHRs)
This provision now explicitly allows
aerosol dispensers, in addition to gel
hand rub dispensers. The aerosol
dispensers are subject to limitations on
size, quantity, and location, just as gel
dispensers are limited. Automatic
dispensers are also now permitted in
health care facilities, provided that the
following requirements are met: (1)
They do not release contents unless they
are activated; (2) the activation occurs
only when an object is within 4 inches
of the sensing device; (3) any object
placed in the activation zone and left in
place must not cause more than one
activation; (4) the dispenser must not
dispense more than the amount required
for hand hygiene consistent with the
label instructions; (5) the dispenser is
designed, constructed and operated in a
way to minimize accidental or
malicious dispensing; and (6) all
dispensers are tested in accordance with
the manufacturer’s care and use
instructions each time a new refill is
installed. The provision further defines
prior language regarding ‘‘above or
adjacent to an ignition source’’ as being
‘‘within 1 inch’’ of the ignition source.
These new provisions would allow for
more hand hygiene dispenser options
for all facilities.
Sections 18.3.5 and 19.3.5—
Extinguishment Requirements
This provision is related to sprinkler
system requirements and cross
references section 9.7 of the LSC,
‘‘Automatic sprinklers and other
extinguishing equipment.’’ Section 9.7
further cross references the 2011 edition
of NFPA 25, Standard for the
Inspection, Testing and Maintenance of
Water-based Fire Protection Systems.
Section 9.7.5 of the LSC states ‘‘All
automatic sprinkler and standpipe
systems required by this Code shall be
inspected, tested and maintained in
accordance with NFPA 25. . . .’’
Section 15.5.2, of the 2011 edition of
NFPA 25, which is cross-referenced by
the 2012 edition of the LSC, requires the
evacuation of a building or the
instituting of an approved fire watch
when a sprinkler system is out of
service for more than 10 hours in a 24hour period until the system has been
returned to service. However the 1998
edition of NFPA 25, which is crossreferenced by the 2000 edition of the
LSC, has the same requirement when a
sprinkler system is out of service for
only 4 hours. Because of the increased
reliance upon a facility sprinkler
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
21555
protection system in the 2012 edition of
the LSC, and to ensure a facility is
adequately monitored when a sprinkler
system is out of service, we propose to
retain the requirement for evacuation or
a fire watch when a sprinkler system is
out of service for more than 4 hours.
This provision is set out in the
applicable sections of this proposed
rule.
Section 18.3.2.3 and 19.3.2.3—
Anesthetizing Locations
This provision requires that
anesthetizing locations be protected in
accordance with the 2012 edition of
NFPA 99, Health Care Facilities Code.
The 2012 edition of NFPA 99 eliminated
an important requirement that was in
the 1999 edition of NFPA 99. The 1999
edition of NFPA 99, which is crossreferenced in the 2000 LSC, requires a
smoke control ventilation system in
anesthetizing locations (for example,
Operating Rooms). The 1999 edition of
NFPA 99 requires that supply and
exhaust systems for windowless
anesthetizing locations must be
arranged to automatically vent smoke
and products of combustion to prevent
the circulation of smoke originating
from within and outside the operating
room(s). The smoke control is intended
to protect the anesthetizing location
until surgical procedures can be
completed and patients can be safely
evacuated from the operating rooms. As
fires in operating rooms continue to
occur, we propose to retain the
requirement for smoke control in
anesthetizing locations, notwithstanding
the lower standard in the 2012 LSC.
https://www.fda.gov/ForConsumers/
ConsumerUpdates/ucm282810.htm.
Sections 18.2.3.4 and 19.2.3.4—
Corridors
This new provision allows for storage
of medical equipment in the corridors.
Any equipment that is in use, including
medical emergency equipment, and
patient lift and transportation
equipment is permitted to be stored in
the corridors for more timely patient
care. This provision also allows
facilities to place fixed furniture in the
corridors. This creates resting points in
the corridors for patients and families in
facilities and makes for a more homelike setting.
Sections 18.3.2.5.3 and 19.3.2.5.3—
Cooking Facilities
This provision is a new section,
which further supports a more homelike setting in health care facilities.
Cooking facilities are allowed in a
smoke compartment where food is
prepared for 30 individuals or fewer (by
E:\FR\FM\16APP2.SGM
16APP2
21556
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 73 / Wednesday, April 16, 2014 / Proposed Rules
bed count). The cooking facility is
permitted to be open to the corridor,
provided that the following conditions
are met:
• The area being served is limited to
30 beds or less;
• The area is separated from other
portions of the facility by a smoke
barrier;
• The range hood and stovetop meet
certain standards—
++ A switch must be located in the
area that is used to deactivate the cook
top or range whenever the kitchen is not
under staff supervision
++ The switch also has a timer, not
exceeding 120-minute capacity that
automatically shuts off after time runs
out
• Two smoke detectors must be
located no closer than 20 feet and not
further than 25 feet from the cooktop or
range.
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS2
Sections 18.7.5.1 and 19.7.5.1—
Furnishings & Decorations
This provision has been revised to
allow combustible decor in any health
care occupancy as long as they are
flame-retardant or treated with
approved fire-retardant coating that is
listed and labeled, and meet fire test
´
standards. The decor (such as
photographs, paintings and other art)
may be attached directly to the walls,
ceilings, and non fire-rated doors as
long as it does not interfere with the
operation of the doors. Additionally,
decor may not exceed—(1) 20 percent of
the wall, ceiling and doors, in any room
that is not protected by an approved
automatic sprinkler system; (2) 30
percent of the wall, ceiling and doors,
in any room that is not protected by an
approved, supervised automatic
sprinkler system; and (3) 50 percent of
the wall, ceiling and doors, in any room
with a capacity of 4 people (the actual
number of occupants in the room may
be less than its capacity) that is not
protected by an approved, supervised
automatic sprinkler system. These
changes would allow individuals to
bring in their own furnishings and
decor, which helps to provide a more
home-like setting.
Sections 18.5.2.3 and 19.5.2.3—
Fireplaces
This provision has been revised to
allow direct-vent gas fireplaces in
smoke compartments without the 1 hour
fire wall rating. Fireplaces must not be
located inside of any patient sleeping
room. Solid fuel-burning fireplaces are
permitted and can be used only in areas
other than patient sleeping rooms, and
must be separated from sleeping rooms
by construction of no less than a 1 hour
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:04 Apr 15, 2014
Jkt 232001
fire resistance wall rating. This
provision allows for more options for
the location of fireplaces in health care
facilities, which makes the facilities feel
more home-like.
Outside Window or Door Requirements
The 2000 edition of the LSC required
that every health care occupancy patient
sleeping room shall have an outside
window or outside door, with new
health care occupancies having an
allowable sill height not to exceed 36
inches above the floor with certain
exceptions. This requirement no longer
exists in the 2012 edition of the LSC;
however, as outside windows and doors
may be used for smoke control, building
entry, patient and resident evacuation,
and other emergency forces operations
during an emergency situation, we
propose to retain this requirement. We
propose the following exceptions to the
outside window or door requirement, as
included in the 2000 edition of the LSC:
• Newborn nurseries and rooms
intended for occupancy for less than 24
hours have no sill height requirements.
• Windows in atrium walls shall be
considered outside windows for the
purposes of this requirement.
• The window sill height in special
nursing care areas shall not exceed 60
inches above the floor.
Ambulatory Health Care Occupancies
The following are new provisions in
the 2012 edition of the LSC from
Chapter 20, ‘‘New Ambulatory Health
Care Occupancies’’ and Chapter 21,
‘‘Existing Ambulatory Health Care
Occupancies.’’ We are providing the
LSC citation, a description of the
requirement, and an explanation of its
benefits for health care facilities,
patients, staff, and visitors.
Both the 2000 and 2012 edition of the
LSC define an ‘‘Ambulatory Health Care
Occupancy’’ as a facility capable of
treating 4 or more patients
simultaneously on an outpatient basis.
CMS regulations at 42 CFR § 416.44
require that all ASCs meet the
provisions applicable to Ambulatory
Health Care Occupancy, regardless of
the number of patients served. We
believe that hospital outpatient surgical
departments are comparable to ASCs
and thus should also be required to
meet the provisions applicable to
Ambulatory Health Care Occupancy
Chapters, regardless of the number of
patients served.
Sections 20.1.6.4 and 21.1.6.5—Interior
Nonbearing Walls
This new provision allows all interior
nonbearing walls that are required to
have a minimum 2 hour fire resistance
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
rating to be constructed of fire-retardant
treated wood enclosed within
noncombustible or limited combustible
materials, provided that these walls are
not used as shaft enclosures. The use of
fire-retardant treated wood allows for
more flexibility during construction and
could reduce the cost of construction.
Sections 20.3.2.1 and 21.3.2.1—Doors
This new provision requires all doors
to hazardous areas to be self-closing or
close automatically. This provision was
added to provide an extra level of
protection for all patients. Adding this
provision aligns the requirements for
both ASCs and Health care occupancies
to assure the same basic level of
protection for all patients.
Sections 20.3.2.6 and 21.3.2.6—ABHRs
This provision now explicitly allows
aerosol dispensers, in addition to gel
hand rub dispensers. The aerosol
dispensers are subject to limitations on
size, quantity, and location, just as gel
dispensers are. Automatic dispensers
are also now permitted in health care
facilities, provided, among other things,
that—(1) they do not release contents
unless they are activated; (2) the
activation occurs only when an object is
within 4 inches of the sensing device;
(3) any object placed in the activation
zone and left in place must not cause
more than one activation; (4) the
dispenser must not dispense more than
the amount required for hand hygiene
consistent with the label instructions;
(5) the dispenser is designed,
constructed and operated in a way to
minimize accidental or malicious
dispensing; (6) all dispensers are tested
in accordance with the manufacturer’s
care and use instructions each time a
new refill is installed. The provision
further defines prior language regarding
‘‘above or adjacent to an ignition
source’’ as being ‘‘within 1 inch’’ of the
ignition source. These new provisions
allow for more hand hygiene dispenser
options for all facilities.
Sections 20.3.5 and 21.3.5—
Extinguishment Requirements
This provision is related to sprinkler
system requirements and cross
references section 9.7 of the LSC,
‘‘Automatic sprinklers and other
extinguishing equipment.’’ Section 9.7
also cross references the 2011 edition of
NFPA 25, ‘‘Standard for the Inspection,
Testing and Maintenance of Waterbased Fire Protection Systems.’’ Section
9.7.5 of the LSC states, ‘‘All automatic
sprinkler and standpipe systems
required by this Code shall be
inspected, tested and maintained in
accordance with NFPA 25. . . .’’
E:\FR\FM\16APP2.SGM
16APP2
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 73 / Wednesday, April 16, 2014 / Proposed Rules
Section 15.5.2, of the 2011 edition of
NFPA 25, which is cross-referenced by
the 2012 edition of the LSC, requires the
evacuation of a building or the
instituting of an approved fire watch
when a sprinkler system is out of
service for more than 10 hours in a 24hour period until the system has been
returned to service. The 1998 edition of
NFPA 25, which is cross-referenced by
the 2000 edition of the LSC, has the
same requirement when a sprinkler
system is out of service for only 4 hours.
With the increased reliance upon a
facility sprinkler protection system in
the 2012 edition of the LSC, and to
ensure a facility is adequately
monitored when a sprinkler system is
out of service, we propose to retain the
requirement for evacuation or a fire
watch when a sprinkler system is out of
service for more than 4 hours.
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS2
Section 20.3.2.3 and 21.3.2.3—
Anesthetizing Locations
This provision requires that
anesthetizing locations be protected in
accordance with the 2012 edition of
NFPA 99, Health Care Facilities Code.
The 2012 edition of NFPA 99 eliminated
an important requirement that was in
the 1999 edition of NFPA 99. The 1999
edition of NFPA 99, which is crossreferenced by to the 2000 LSC, requires
a smoke control ventilation system in
anesthetizing locations (for example,
Operating Rooms). The 1999 edition of
NFPA 99 requires that supply and
exhaust systems for windowless
anesthetizing locations must be
arranged to automatically vent smoke
and products of combustion to prevent
the circulation of smoke originating
from within and outside the operating
room. The smoke control is intended to
protect the anesthetizing location until
surgical procedures can be completed
and patients can be safely evacuated
from the operating rooms. As fires in
operating rooms continue to occur, we
propose to retain the requirement for
smoke control in anesthetizing
locations.
Residential Board and Care Occupancies
The LSC requirements for residential
care facilities are differentiated based on
the evacuation capability of the facility
in question. The term ‘‘evacuation
capability’’ refers to the ability of
occupants, residents, and staff as a
group either to evacuate a building, or
to relocate from one point of occupancy
to a point of safety. An ‘‘impractical
evacuation capability’’ means that a
group is unable to reliably move to a
point of safety in a timely manner. A
‘‘prompt evacuation capability’’ means
that a group is able to move reliably to
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:04 Apr 15, 2014
Jkt 232001
a point of safety in a timely manner that
is equivalent to the capacity of a
household in the general population. A
‘‘slow evacuation capability’’ means that
a group is able to move reliably to a
point of safety in a timely manner, but
not as rapidly as members of a
household in the general population.
The LSC requirements for a facility that
has a prompt evacuation capability may
be different from those for a facility that
has an impractical evacuation
capability. Those differences are
reflected in the following provisions.
Both the 2000 and 2012 editions of
the LSC classify ‘‘board and care’’ as a
facility ‘‘used for lodging or boarding of
4 or more patients not related by blood
or marriage to the owners or operators,
for the purpose of providing personal
care services.’’ However, for CMS
regulatory purposes, unless specifically
noted, the conditions of participation
and conditions for coverage for all
affected health care providers and
suppliers apply to all patients in a
facility, regardless of the number of
patients served. These basic
requirements are established to assure a
core level of safety and quality for all
patients, regardless of where they
receive health care services. We
continue to believe that patients in very
small facilities should be assured the
same level of fire safety as those
residing in very large facilities.
Therefore, the LSC ‘‘4 or more’’ criteria
would not apply to any Medicare and
applicable Medicaid certified facilities.
All residential board and care
occupancies that provide care to one or
more patients would be required to
comply with the relevant requirements
of the 2012 edition of the LSC.
The following are provisions that
appear in the 2012 edition of the LSC,
but that did not exist in the 2000 edition
of the LSC, for Chapter 32, ‘‘New
Residential Board and Care
Occupancies’’ and Chapter 33, ‘‘Existing
Residential Board and Care
Occupancies.’’ We are providing the
LSC citation, a description of the
requirement, and an explanation of its
benefits for health care facilities,
patients, staff, and visitors.
Section 32.2.3.5.3.2—Sprinklers
This revised provision has been
expanded to require that sprinkler
systems be installed in all habitable
areas, closets, roofed porches, balconies
and decks of new facilities. Although
this section of the LSC does not apply
to existing facilities, we strongly
encourage all existing facilities be
sprinklered in all habitable areas in the
same manner that newly constructed
facilities are required to be sprinklered.
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
21557
Sections 32.2.3.5.7 and 33.2.3.5.7—
Attics
This new provision requires attics of
new and existing facilities to be
sprinklered. The attics of new board and
care facilities are required to be
protected in accordance with sections
32.2.3.5.7.1 or 32.2.3.5.7.2 of the LSC.
The attics of existing board and care
facilities are required to be protected in
accordance with sections 33.2.3.5.7.1 or
33.2.3.5.7.2 of the LSC. For both new
and existing board and care facilities, if
the attic is used for living purposes,
storage, or housing of fuel fired
equipment, it must be protected with an
automatic approved sprinkler system. If
the attic is used for other purposes or is
not used, then it must meet one of the
following requirements: (1) Have a heat
detection system that activates the
building fire alarm system; (2) have
automatic sprinklers; (3) be of
noncombustible or limited-combustible
construction; or (4) be constructed of
fire-retardant-treated-wood. We are
requesting public comment on the
length of time needed to install
sprinklers in attics. This provision was
added after fire investigations
demonstrated that fires in attics pose a
high hazard in this type of occupancy.
For example, one well-known case
would be the fire in a board and care
facility in Wells, New York on March
21, 2009. The fire started on the
screened porch and spread to the
unsprinklered attic where it quickly
engulfed the facility. Despite the prompt
evacuation by staff, 4 of the 9 clients
perished in the fire. (https://
www.prevention1st.org/documents/
Wells_Fire_GrandJuryReport.pdf.)
Sections 32.2.2 and 33.2.2—Means of
Escape
This new provision requires
designated means of escape to be
continuously maintained free of all
obstructions or impediments to full
instant use in the case of a fire or
emergency. This provision was added
because there were no provisions within
the occupancy chapter to prohibit an
obstructed means of escape, and to
emphasize that all means of escape are
required to be free of obstructions to
allow use without delay.
Section 32.3.3.4.7—Smoke Alarms
This new provision would only affect
newly constructed facilities. Approved
smoke alarms are required to be
installed in accordance with 9.6.2.10 of
the LSC inside every sleeping room,
outside every sleeping area, in the
immediate vicinity of the bedrooms, and
on all levels within a resident unit. This
E:\FR\FM\16APP2.SGM
16APP2
21558
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 73 / Wednesday, April 16, 2014 / Proposed Rules
requirement is located in Chapter 32,
which only applies to newly
constructed facilities. We are soliciting
public comments about whether or not
CMS should also require existing
facilities to have smoke alarms that meet
the requirements of this section.
Sections 32.7.6 and 33.7.6—Staff
This new provision for both newly
constructed and existing facilities
requires staff to be on duty and in the
facility at all times when residents
requiring evacuation assistance are
present. This provision was added
because staff assistance during
evacuation is a necessity in this
occupancy. This would increase safety
for patients that are unable to
independently exit the building in an
emergency situation.
Sections 32.3.2.2.2 and 33.3.2.2.2—
Access-Controlled Egress Doors
New and existing facilities must be
permitted to have access-controlled
egress doors that are in accordance with
7.2.1.6.2 of the LSC. When using the
term ‘‘egress,’’ we are describing, for
example, hallways or corridors, interior
and exterior stairways, entrance ways or
lobbies, and escalators. Section 7.2.1.6.2
of the LSC permits means of egress to
be equipped with electrical lock
hardware to prevent egress. This
provision was added to improve safety
while allowing for more flexibility.
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS2
Section 33.3.3.2.3—Hazardous Areas
This new provision is for existing
facilities with impractical evacuation
capabilities. All hazardous areas must
be separated from other parts of the
building by smoke partitions, and also
in accordance with section 8.4 of the
LSC. Section 8.4 of the LSC addresses
the continuity of smoke partitions and
requires that they be placed
appropriately. We are requesting public
comment on the length of time needed
to install smoke partitions in hazardous
areas. This new provision provides a
higher level of safety for facilities with
impractical evacuation capabilities, and
allows more time for individuals using
facilities with slower evacuation
capabilities to exit the building.
Section 33.3.3.4.6.2—Emergency Forces
Notification
This new provision is only for
existing facilities. Where a new fire
alarm system is installed, or the existing
fire alarm system is replaced,
notification of emergency forces must be
handled in accordance with section
9.6.4 of the LSC, which states that,
where required by another section of
this code, notification of emergency
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:04 Apr 15, 2014
Jkt 232001
forces should alert the municipal fire
department and fire brigade (if
provided) of fire or other emergency.
This new provision would increase
safety for residents and staff by assuring
that the appropriate emergency force is
quickly notified of an emergency
situation, enabling the emergency force
to arrive in the fastest time possible to
aid residents and staff.
proposing to adopt in this rule. The
state must submit the request to the
appropriate CMS Regional Office, and
the Regional Office would forward the
request to CMS central office for final
determination. We would retain our
authority to apply the Fire Safety
Evaluation System (FSES) as an
alternative approach to meeting the
requirements of the LSC.
Waiver Authority
We are proposing to retain our
existing authority to waive provisions of
the LSC under certain circumstances,
further reducing the exposure to
additional cost and burden for facilities
with unique situations. A waiver may be
granted for a specific LSC requirement
if we determine that—(1) The waiver
would not adversely affect patient/staff
health and safety; and (2) it would
impose an unreasonable hardship on the
facility to meet a specific LSC
requirement. We do not consider it
always necessary for a facility to be
cited for a deficiency before it can apply
for or receive a waiver, and we have
periodically issued communications
regarding specific provisions of the LSC
that we evaluated and for which we
have determined that a waiver would
generally apply, subject to
documentation maintained by the
facility and verification of the
applicability of the waiver when a
survey of the facility is conducted. We
plan to continue this approach.
In cases where a provider or supplier
has been cited for a LSC deficiency, the
provider or supplier may request a
waiver from its State Survey Agency or
Accrediting Organization (AO) with a
CMS-approved Medicare and applicable
Medicaid accreditation program. The
State Survey Agency or AO reviews the
request and makes a recommendation to
the appropriate CMS Regional Office.
The CMS Regional Office would review
the waiver request and the
recommendation and make a final
decision. A waiver cannot be granted if
patient health and safety is
compromised.
The LSC recognizes alternative
systems, methods, or devices approved
as equivalent by the authority having
jurisdiction as being in compliance with
the LSC. CMS, as the authority having
jurisdiction for certification, will
determine equivalency through the
waiver approval process.
C. 2012 Edition of the Health Care
Facilities Code
The 2012 edition of the NFPA 99,
‘‘Health Care Facilities Code’’, addresses
requirements for both health care
occupancies and ambulatory care
occupancies, and serves as a resource
for those who are responsible for
protecting health care facilities from fire
and associated hazards. The purpose of
this Code is to provide minimum
requirements for the installation,
inspection, testing, maintenance,
performance, and safe practices for
health care facility materials, equipment
and appliances. This Code is a
compilation of documents that have
been developed over a 40-year period by
NFPA, and is intended to be used by
those persons involved in the design,
construction, inspection, and operation
of health care facilities, and in the
design, manufacture, and testing of
appliances and equipment used in
patient care areas of health care
facilities. It provides information on
subjects such as medical gas and
vacuum systems, electrical systems,
electrical equipment, and gas
equipment.
The NFPA 99, which is a crossreferenced document in the LSC, has
undergone some significant changes.
The NFPA 99 has been upgraded from
a standard to a code. A code, as used by
the NFPA describes what to do, whereas
a standard describes how to comply
with the code. In addition to the
upgrade, the format of the code has
changed from specific provisions that
are directed by different chapters in the
NFPA 99 to provisions that apply to all
health care facilities. The applicability
of any specific provision is determined
in accordance with the results of a risk
based methodology. Previous editions
utilized occupancy chapters to
determine which systems were required
in a health care facility. Requirements
were applied based upon the facility
type (that is, Hospital, Nursing Home,
Limited Care Facility, Other Health Care
Facilities). In the 2012 edition,
requirements are based upon the
possible risks to patients and residents,
regardless of the type of facility.
Although NFPA 99 is a reference
document of the 2012 edition of the
State Fire Codes
In addition to the proposed waiver
option, a state may request that its state
fire safety requirements, imposed by
state law, be used in lieu of the 2012
edition of the LSC, which we are
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\16APP2.SGM
16APP2
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 73 / Wednesday, April 16, 2014 / Proposed Rules
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS2
LSC, the health care occupancy chapters
of the LSC do not reference NFPA 99
requirements for all areas within a
health care facility. In order to ensure
the minimum level of protection
afforded by NFPA 99 is applicable to all
patient and resident care areas within a
health care facility, CMS is proposing
the adoption of the 2012 edition of
NFPA 99, with the exception of chapters
7, 8, 12, and 13. In the following
section, we describe the key provisions
within the NFPA 99.
The first three chapters of the NFPA
99 address the administration of the
NFPA 99, the referenced publications
and also definitions.
Chapter 4—Fundamentals
Chapter 4 is new to the 2012 edition
and provides guidance on how to apply
NFPA 99 requirements to health care
facilities based upon ‘‘categories’’
determined when using a risk-based
methodology. A risk-based approach
allows for the application of
requirements based upon the types of
treatment and services being provided
to patients or residents rather than the
type of facility in which they are being
performed. This approach will ensure
that patients and residents in all types
of health care facilities are provided
with a minimum level of protection. In
addition, the risk-based approach will
allow a facility to determine the
appropriate level of protection required
in individual areas throughout a facility
based upon each area’s risk to patients
or residents, and would no longer
require the facility to implement
requirements in discriminately
throughout an entire facility. Based
upon a risk assessment conducted by
qualified facility personnel,
implementation of less stringent
requirements may be appropriate for
areas presenting a lower risk to patients
or residents, while implementation of
more stringent requirements is reserved
for areas presenting a higher risk. This
will allow health care facilities to apply
the most appropriate level of protection
in an efficient and economical manner.
There are four categories utilized in
the risk assessment methodology,
depending on the types of treatment and
services being provided to patients or
residents. Section 4.1.1 of NFPA 99
describes Category 1 as, ‘‘Facility
systems in which failure of such
equipment or system is likely to cause
major injury or death of patients or
caregivers . . . .’’ Section A.4.1.1
provides examples of what a major
injury could include, such as
amputation or a burn to the eye. Section
4.1.2 describes Category 2 as, ‘‘Facility
systems in which failure of such
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:04 Apr 15, 2014
Jkt 232001
equipment is likely to cause minor
injury to patients or caregivers . . . .’’
Section A.4.1.2 describes a minor injury
as one that is not serious or involving
risk of life. Section 4.1.3 describes
Category 3 as, ‘‘Facility systems in
which failure of such equipment is not
likely to cause injury to patients or
caregivers, but can cause patient
discomfort . . . .’’ Section 4.1.4
describes Category 4 as, ‘‘Facility
systems in which failure of such
equipment would have no impact on
patient care . . . .’’
Section 4.2 would require that each
facility that is a health care or
ambulatory occupancy define its risk
assessment methodology, implement the
methodology and document the results.
We do not propose to require the use of
any particular risk assessment
procedure. Section A.4.2 provides
examples of appropriate risk assessment
procedures, such as ISO/IEC31010, Risk
management—Risk Assessment, or
NFPA 551, Guide for the Evaluation of
Fire Risk Assessments.
Chapter 5—Gas and Vacuum Systems
The hazards addressed in Chapter 5
include the ability of oxygen and
nitrous oxide to exacerbate fires, safety
concerns from the storage and use of
pressurized gas, and the reliance upon
medical gas and vacuum systems for
patient care. Adopting Chapter 5 would
ensure a minimal level of the
performance, maintenance, installation,
and testing of piped medical gas and
vacuum systems in all patient and
resident care areas (for example,
operating rooms, intensive care units,
critical care units, procedure rooms, and
sleeping rooms). Chapter 5 would not
mandate the installation of any systems;
rather, if they are installed or are
required to be installed, the systems
would be required to comply with
NFPA 99.
Chapter 5 covers the performance,
maintenance, installation, and testing of
the following:
• Nonflammable medical gas systems
with operating pressure below a gauge
pressure of 300 psi;
• Vacuum systems in health care
facilities;
• Waste anesthetic gas disposal
systems (WAGD); and
• Manufactured assemblies that are
intended for connection to the medical
gas, vacuum, or WAGD systems.
The NFPA 99 defines key terms that
are used frequently throughout this
chapter as follows:
Section 3.3.108—Medical Gas Systems
Medical gas systems are an assembly
of equipment and piping for the
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
21559
distribution of nonflammable medical
gases such as oxygen, nitrous oxide,
compressed air, carbon dioxide, and
helium.
Section 3.3.110—Medical-surgical
Vacuum
Medical-surgical vacuum systems are
used to provide a source of drainage,
aspiration, and suction in order to
remove body fluids from patients.
Section 3.3.183—Waste Anesthetic Gas
Disposal Systems (WAGD)
A WAGD system is the process of
capturing and carrying gases vented
from the patient breathing circuit during
the normal operation of gas anesthesia
or analgesia equipment.
Section 3.3.111—Medical-Surgical
Vacuum System
A medical-surgical vacuum system is
an assembly of central vacuumproducing equipment and a network of
piping for patient suction in medical,
surgical, and WAGD applications.
Section 3.3.102—Manufactured
Assembly
A manufactured assembly is a factoryassembled product that contains
medical gas or vacuum outlets, piping,
or other devices related to medical gas.
Chapter 5 is organized by category as
described in Chapter 4. The NFPA
Technical Committee on Medical Gas
did not find there was a need for
Category 4 requirements, as Category 4
facilities would not ordinarily have
piped medical gas or vacuums. Chapter
5 includes several sections, described
below, which are significant to
managing the hazards associated with
gas and vacuum systems.
Section 5.1.3—Category 1 Sources
This section includes information on
the management of the sources for the
medical gas, vacuum, WAGD, and
instrument supply systems. It requires
facilities to identify and label storage
containers and other system
components. It also contains
requirements related to areas used to
store gas and equipment, and how to
handle gas cylinders and containers.
Facilities would be required to design
and construct systems and storage
locations in accordance with the
requirements for this section. This
section also regulates the requirements
for construction materials and
placement of system components, and
requirements for emergency power and
quality assurance.
E:\FR\FM\16APP2.SGM
16APP2
21560
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 73 / Wednesday, April 16, 2014 / Proposed Rules
Chapter 6—Electrical Systems
Section 5.1.9—Category 1 Warning
Systems
This section includes information on
the requirements for warning systems
that monitor piped gas and vacuum
systems. Warning systems monitor and
alert the facility if a condition exists that
could have a negative effect on the
health and safety of patients, staff, and
visitors. This section regulates the
functions, capabilities, placement,
labeling, emergency power, wiring,
computer systems, initiating devices,
and monitoring requirements for master,
area, and local alarm systems.
Section 5.1.10—Category 1 Distribution
This section includes information on
the requirements for the piping system
for medical gas, vacuum, and WAGD
systems. It regulates piping system
installation, location, assembly,
cleaning, and materials of construction,
inspection, and installer qualifications.
Section 5.1.14—Category 1 Operation
and Management
This section includes information on
the operation and maintenance of
medical gas, vacuum, WAGD and
support gas systems. Issues addressed in
this section include system limitations,
maintenance programs, inspection and
testing, management of flexible
connections, piping and valve labeling,
and recordkeeping. This section allows
facilities flexibility in meeting the
maintenance program requirements by
focusing on the basic goals, timing, and
qualifications for performing the work.
NFPA 99 would not require a specific
schedule, allowing a facility to
determine the frequency of maintenance
based on the original quality, age and
longevity, and known characteristics of
the equipment.
Section 5.2 Category—2 Piped Gas and
Vacuum Systems and 5.3 Category 3
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS2
Piped Gas and Vacuum Systems
Category 2 requirements apply to
facilities treating patients who might
require the gases occasionally, but
ordinarily would not require them.
When the use of gas is required for
patient care, the need is short term. The
provisions for Category 2 are virtually
the same as for Category 1, except some
equipment is permitted to be simplex
rather than duplex. Category 3 applies
to office-based care, where gases are
used in such a manner that the life of
the patient is never at issue in the event
of failure of gas. Many requirements in
the Category 3 section are similar to the
requirements in Category 1 and Category
2.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:04 Apr 15, 2014
Jkt 232001
The hazards addressed in Chapter 6
are related to the electrical power
distribution systems in health care
facilities, and address issues such as
electrical shock, power continuity, fire,
electrocution, and explosions that might
be caused by faults in the electrical
system. Although these threats are
present in any facility, the
vulnerabilities of patients or residents in
health care facilities, coupled with the
complexity of the systems involved,
create a need for distinct considerations.
Chapter 6 covers the performance,
maintenance, and testing of both the
normal and essential electrical systems
(EES) in health care facilities. The
normal electrical system is comprised of
a normal power supply, typically
provided by a public utility, connected
to the facility electrical distribution
system and ancillary equipment. The
normal electrical system supplies power
to the health care facility under normal
operating conditions. An EES is
comprised of an alternate source of
power, typically a generator, connected
to the facility’s separate essential
electric distribution systems and
ancillary equipment. An EES is
designed to ensure continuity of
electrical power to designated areas and
functions of a health care facility during
a disruption of the normal power
sources, and also to minimize
disruptions with the internal wiring
system (3.3.48).
Certain provisions in Chapter 6
related to the normal power system are
defined by category as described in
Chapter 4; however, all EES provisions
are organized by ‘‘Type.’’ Category 1
systems are the most reliable and
complex, because patients being served
by these systems are the most
dependent on this system to function
properly and will be at the greatest risk
if the system fails. Category 2 systems
are a step down from Category 1
systems, and Category 3 systems are
another step down. Critical care rooms
(Category 1) would be required to be
served by a Type 1 EES, general care
rooms would be required to be served
by a Type 1 or Type 2 EES, and basic
care rooms and non-patient care rooms
are not required to be served by any
EES.
Chapter 6 includes several sections,
which are significant to managing the
hazards associated with the normal
electrical system. Subject areas include:
Section 6.3.1—Sources
This section requires each linepowered electrical appliance in a health
care facility to be supported by sources
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
and distribution systems that provide
power adequate for each service.
Section 6.3.2—Distribution
This section includes information on
the electrical distribution systems
within a health care facility. Some of the
issues addressed include:
• Electrical system installation;
• Specific requirements for patient
care rooms (circuits, overcurrent
protection, receptacles, wet locations);
• Ground-fault protection; and
• Isolated power systems.
Section 6.3.3—Performance Criteria and
Testing
This section includes information on
electrical system performance criteria.
Electrical systems that support patient
rooms would be required to be tested in
order to ensure that they are safe and
reliable. Some of the issues addressed
include:
• Grounding system testing;
• Voltage measurements;
• Impedance measurements;
• Testing equipment;
• Receptacle testing;
• Isolated power systems testing; and
• Ground-fault protection testing.
Section 6.3.4—Administration of
Electric System
This section includes information on
the frequency of electrical system
component testing and record keeping
requirements. Where hospital-grade
receptacles are required at patient bed
locations and in locations where deep
sedation or general anesthesia is
administered, testing must be performed
after initial installation, replacement, or
servicing of the device. Receptacles not
listed as hospital-grade must be tested
in intervals not exceeding 12 months.
The minimum acceptable
documentation would identify what was
tested, when it was tested, and whether
it performed successfully.
Chapter 6 also includes several
sections related to managing the hazards
associated with the EES, including but
not limited to:
Section 6.4.1—Sources (Type 1 EES)
This section includes specific
information for on-site generators used
as an alternate source of power.
Generator requirements focus on design
considerations, generator types,
allowable uses, generator placement and
protection, capacity, rating, heating,
cooling, ventilating, battery
maintenance, fuel supply, and generator
monitoring. In addition, this section
addresses batteries used as alternate
sources of power, as permitted.
E:\FR\FM\16APP2.SGM
16APP2
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 73 / Wednesday, April 16, 2014 / Proposed Rules
Section 6.4.2—Distribution (Type 1
EES)
This section includes information on
the EES distribution systems and
ancillary equipment in a health care
facility. It covers topics such as transfer
switches; division of distribution system
into three branches—life safety, critical,
and equipment; and wiring
requirements.
Section 6.4.3—Performance Criteria and
Testing (Type 1 EES)
This section includes information on
EES performance criteria to assure that
the EES is safe and reliable. It includes
a requirement that all functions of the
life safety branch and critical branches
must be automatically restored to
operation within 10 seconds after
interruption of the normal power
source. It also includes specific transfer
switch requirements related to
placement, voltage drop, load transfer,
and normal power restoration.
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS2
Section 6.4.4—Administration (Type 1
EES)
This section includes general
information on the maintenance,
inspection and testing of the EES
alternate power source, including
generator testing criteria, test
conditions, and testing personnel
qualifications. Specific maintenance,
inspection and testing requirements are
also required through reference to NFPA
110, Standard for Emergency and
Standby Power Systems. In addition,
this section addresses the maintenance
and testing of EES circuitry and record
keeping requirements.
Section 6.5—Essential Electrical System
Requirements—Type 2
Section 6.5 addresses Type 2 EES
requirements, which share many of the
Type 1 EES requirements related to
maintenance, inspection, and testing.
The major difference between a Type 1
and Type 2 EES is that a Type 2 EES
only requires two separate branches—a
Life Safety branch and an Equipment
branch. A Type 2 EES does not require
a branch to supply a limited amount of
lighting and power service that is
considered essential for life safety and
effective operation to critical care areas
during the time the normal electrical
service is interrupted.
Section 6.6—Essential Electrical System
Requirements—Type 3
Section 6.6 addresses Type 3 EES
requirements, which share many of the
Type 1 EES requirements related to
maintenance, inspection, and testing.
The major difference between a Type 1
or Type 2 EES and a Type 3 EES system
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:04 Apr 15, 2014
Jkt 232001
21561
is that a Type 3 EES system comprises
only one electrical branch to supply a
limited amount of lighting and power
service that is considered essential for
life safety and orderly cessation of
procedures during the time normal
electrical service is interrupted. Type 3
EES systems are not permitted in areas
where surgery is performed. In addition,
the alternative power for a Type 3
system can be a generator, battery
system, or self-contained battery integral
with the equipment.
ventilation systems in order to assure an
environment that is comfortable and
clean, and that minimizes odors in
health care facilities. These
requirements also apply to patient care
areas and other related support areas
within a health care facility. This
section considers chemical, physical
and biological contaminants that can
affect the delivery of medical care to
patients, the recovery of patients, and
the safety of patients, health care
workers, and visitors.
Chapter 9—Heating, Ventilation, and
Air Conditioning (HVAC)
Chapter 9 is a newly added chapter to
the 2012 edition of the NFPA 99 and
requires HVAC systems serving spaces
or providing health care functions to be
in accordance with the American
Society of Heating, Refrigeration and
Air-Conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE)
Standard 170—Ventilation of Health
Care Facilities (2008 edition) (https://
www.ashrae.org). The purpose of a
HVAC system is to create acceptable
indoor air quality. Heating is the process
of bringing heat to different spaces using
a variety of sources. Ventilating is the
process of removing or changing air in
a space to create a different temperature
or to reduce or remove moisture, odors,
smoke, dust, gases and microbes within
a space. Air conditioning is the removal
of heat from a space.
Chapter 9 does not apply to existing
HVAC systems, but would apply to the
construction of new health care
facilities, and the altered, renovated, or
modernized portions of existing systems
or individual components. Chapter 9
would ensure minimum levels of
heating, ventilation and air conditioning
performance in patient and resident care
areas. Some of the issues discussed in
Chapter 9 are:
• HVAC system energy conservation;
• Commissioning;
• Piping;
• Ductwork;
• Acoustics;
• Requirements for the ventilation of
medical gas storage and trans-filling
areas;
• Waste anesthetic gases;
• Plumes from medical procedures;
• Emergency power system rooms;
and
• Ventilation during construction.
Chapter 9 includes several sections,
which are of significant importance to
managing the hazards associated with
HVAC systems, including but not
limited to:
Section 9.3.3—Commissioning
Section 9.3.1—Heating, Cooling,
Ventilating, and Process Systems
The purpose of this section is to
define design requirements for
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
This section requires HVAC system
commissioning to follow ASHRAE
Guideline 0, The Commissioning
Process, and ASHRAE Guideline 1.1,
HVAC & R Technical Requirements for
the commissioning process, or other
publically viewed documents
acceptable to the authority having
jurisdiction. Commissioning is a
quality-oriented process for verifying
new HVAC systems and assemblies
meet performance objectives and
criteria. For purposes of this rule, we
would consider ASHRAE Guideline 0
and ASHRAE Guideline 1.1 as the only
acceptable documents guiding the
commissioning process.
Section 9.3.5—Ductwork
This section requires health care
facilities to use ductwork systems that
comply with NFPA 90, Standard for the
Installation of Air-Conditioning and
Ventilation Systems or other mechanical
codes. NFPA 90 covers the construction,
installation, operation, and maintenance
of HVAC systems to protect life and
property from fire, smoke, and gases
resulting from a fire. NFPA 90A is also
cross-referenced in the 2012 edition of
the LSC.
Section 9.3.7—Medical Gas Storage or
Transfilling
This section addresses the ventilation
requirements for both medical gas
storage and transfilling areas.
Transfilling is the process of transferring
a medical gas in gaseous or liquid state
from one container or cylinder to
another container or cylinder (3.3.176).
Some of the requirements included in
this section are for natural and
mechanical ventilation.
Section 9.3.8—Waste Gas
This section requires the removal of
gases vented from the patient breathing
circuit during the normal operation of
gas anesthesia or analgesia equipment
by a WAGD system, as described in
chapter 5, or by an active or passive
scavenging ventilation system.
E:\FR\FM\16APP2.SGM
16APP2
21562
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 73 / Wednesday, April 16, 2014 / Proposed Rules
Section 9.3.10—Emergency Power
System Room
This section requires operation of the
emergency power supply to be in
accordance with NFPA 110, Standard
for Emergency and Standby Power
Systems. NFPA 110 addresses
ventilation requirements including,
maintaining room temperature,
adequate supply of air for generator
combustion and cooling, air supply
quality, and generator radiator and
exhaust discharge. NFPA 110, in its
entirety, is also cross-referenced in the
2012 edition of the LSC.
Chapter 10—Electrical Equipment
Chapter 10 covers the performance,
maintenance, and testing of electrical
equipment in health care facilities.
Much of this chapter applies to
requirements for portable electrical
equipment in health care facilities, but
there are also requirements for fixedequipment and information on
administrative issues. There has been an
increased need for electrical equipment
safety requirements due to the increase
in the use of electrical circuits and
multiple appliances that are located
close to the patient’s body, including
situations where they enter the patient’s
body (such as internal defibrillators, and
neurostimulators). Chapter 10 includes
several sections, which may reduce the
instances of patient injuries and death
due to electrical appliances and
equipment, including, but not limited
to:
Section 10.2—Performance Criteria and
Testing for Patient Care—Related
Electrical Appliances and Equipment
This section includes information on
the connection of equipment, grounding
of equipment, power cords, and the
proper use of electrical plug adapters
and extension cords. This section also
discusses the proper materials to use to
ensure electrical safety.
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS2
Section 10.3—Testing Requirements—
Fixed and Portable
This section discusses the proper
testing procedure for patient care
electrical equipment, both visually and
physically, to ensure that leakage
currents, which may cause electrical
shocks, are minimized or eliminated.
Section 10.4—Nonpatient Electrical
Appliances and Equipment
This section discusses the proper
testing procedure of equipment that may
not be patient care related, but may be
in the vicinity of the patient and could
pose an electrical hazard to the patient,
if not properly inspected. Nonpatient
electrical appliances may include:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:04 Apr 15, 2014
Jkt 232001
Entertainment devices, computers,
displays and such.
Section 10.5—Administration
This section requires facilities to
ensure that there are policies in place
for the testing and maintenance of
equipment, for the proper use of
electrical equipment in the
administration of oxygen therapy, and
for the proper use of electrical
equipment in an oxygen enriched
environment. This section also includes
requirements for the use, inspection,
and maintenance of equipment found in
laboratories. Section 10.5.6 requires that
a facility would keep records related to
the performance testing and repairs of
patient care equipment. Section 10.5.8
would require that equipment be used
and maintained by qualified and trained
personnel.
Chapter 11—Gas Equipment
The hazards addressed in Chapter 11
relate to general fire, explosions, and
mechanical issues associated with gas
equipment, including compressed gas
cylinders. Fire and explosions may be
caused by incidents involving oxygen,
frequently used in health care facilities,
or nitrous oxide, frequently used as an
inhalation anesthetic. Many materials
commonly used in health care facilities
are not flammable in room air, but
become flammable or extremely
flammable when the concentration of
oxygen is raised in a room. Mechanical
hazards are often associated with
compressed gas cylinders, which are
generally under high pressures and are
very heavy in weight. The cylinders can
cause injury, if not property secured or
mishandled. If there is physical damage
to regulators or valves, such damage
may cause escaping gas to propel the
cylinder. Use of Chapter 11 would
ensure a minimal level of performance,
maintenance, testing, storage, and
management of gas equipment in all
patient and resident care areas.
Chapter 11 includes several sections,
which may reduce the instances of
patient injuries and death due to gas
equipment. The following are important
provisions of this section:
Section 11.1—Applicability
This section includes information on
the types of medical gases included in
this chapter such as nonflammable
medical gases, and vapors and aerosols.
Section 11.2—Cylinder and Container
Source
This section includes information on
the proper connection of regulators and
gauges to various types of gas sources to
prevent cross connections and leakage.
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
Section 11.3—Cylinder and Container
Storage Requirements
This section includes information on
the proper storage of cylinders and
containers, including cryogenic liquid
containers. It discusses the types of
enclosures required for storage and
signage that facility must display.
Section 11.4—Performance Criteria and
Testing
This section includes information on
the proper testing of portable patient
care gas equipment that is found in
health care facilities, proper handling of
gas containers for respiratory therapy,
and non-patient gas equipment safety
procedures. The section also addresses
special requirements regarding the
proper handling of gas equipment in
laboratories.
Section 11.5—Administration
This section includes requirements
for the elimination of potential sources
of ignition, as well as the servicing and
maintenance of equipment. There are
also special handling requirements in
this section for gases in cylinders,
liquefied gases in containers, and
transfilling of cylinders, including the
transfilling of liquid oxygen.
Section 11.6—Operation and
Maintenance of Cylinders
This section includes requirements
for the proper procedures for safe
handling of cylinders and containers.
This section also requires special
precautions for handling oxygen
cylinders and manifolds, and making
cylinder and container connections.
Section 11.7—Liquid Oxygen
Equipment
This section includes information on
the safe storage and handling of liquid
oxygen portable containers and base
reservoir containers.
Chapter 14—Hyperbaric Facilities
Hyperbaric facilities house hyperbaric
chambers and auxiliary equipment.
Hyperbaric medicine is the medical use
of oxygen at a level higher than
atmospheric pressure. The hyperbaric
chamber is necessary to adjust the
ambient pressure required for
hyperbaric oxygen therapy. Chapter 14
addresses the hazards associated with
hyperbaric facilities in health care
facilities, including electrical, explosive,
implosive, as well as fire hazards.
Chapter 14 sets forth minimum
safeguards for the protection of patients
and personnel administering hyperbaric
therapy and procedures.
Chapter 14 contains requirements for
hyperbaric chamber manufacturers,
E:\FR\FM\16APP2.SGM
16APP2
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 73 / Wednesday, April 16, 2014 / Proposed Rules
hyperbaric facility designers, and
personnel operating hyperbaric
facilities. It also contains requirements
related to construction of the hyperbaric
chamber itself and the equipment used
for supporting the hyperbaric chamber,
as well as administration and
maintenance. Many requirements in this
chapter are applicable only to new
construction and new facilities.
However, there are some requirements,
ones that are generally operational in
nature, that are applicable to existing
facilities. The 2000 edition of the LSC
required that all occupancies containing
hyperbaric facilities must comply with
NFPA 99; therefore, Chapter 14 is not
expected to impose a significant burden
upon existing health care facilities.
Hyperbaric chambers are classified
according to the number of human
occupants in order to establish
appropriate minimum safeguards in
construction and operation. Class A
chambers have multiple occupants,
Class B chambers are single occupancy,
and Class C chambers are for animals
only (no human occupancy ever).
Chapter 14 includes several sections,
which are important to managing the
hazards associated with hyperbaric
facilities, including, but not limited to:
Section 14.2—Construction and
Equipment
This section includes information on
the construction and management of
hyperbaric facilities and hyperbaric
chambers, including topics such as:
• Fabrication of the hyperbaric
chamber;
• Illumination;
• Ventilation;
• Fire protection;
• Electrical wiring;
• Electrical equipment;
• Communication systems;
• Gas detection and monitoring; and
• Chamber equipment and fixtures.
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS2
Section 14.3—Administration and
Maintenance
This section includes information on
the administration and maintenance of
hyperbaric facilities and hyperbaric
chambers, including topics such as:
• Recognition of hazards associated
with hyperbaric facilities;
• Establishing programs and
assigning responsibilities to ensure
safety;
• Restrictions on ignition sources;
• Limitations on flammables;
• Antistatic procedures and
grounding;
• Limitations on combustibles;
• Restrictions and compatibility of
equipment;
• Proper handling of gases;
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:04 Apr 15, 2014
Jkt 232001
• Installation, inspection, and
maintenance of chamber equipment;
and
• Electrical and electrostatic
safeguards.
The hazards involved in the use of
hyperbaric facilities can be mitigated
successfully only when all of the areas
of hazard are fully recognized by all
personnel and when the physical
protection provided is complete and is
augmented by attention to detail by all
personnel of administration and
maintenance having any responsibility
for the functioning of the hyperbaric
equipment. This section addresses the
administration and maintenance of the
hyperbaric chamber with requirements
such as the having a Safety Director,
developing management policies and
emergency procedures, and fire training
of personnel involved with the use of
the chamber. This section also includes
policies describing what types of
medical devices or equipment can be
used in the chamber, along with the safe
use of medical gases, electrical
equipment, and fire protection
equipment used within the chamber
itself.
Chapter 15—Features of Fire Protection
Chapter 15 covers the performance,
maintenance, and testing of fire
protection equipment in health care
facilities. Issues addressed in this
chapter range from the use of flammable
liquids in an operating room to special
sprinkler protection. These fire
protection requirements are
independent of the risk-based approach,
as they are applicable to all patient care
areas in both new and existing facilities.
Chapter 15 has several sections taken
directly from the NFPA 101, including
requirements for the following:
• Construction and
compartmentalization of health care
facilities;
• Laboratories;
• Utilities;
• Heating, ventilation and air
conditioning systems;
• Elevators;
• Escalators;
• Conveyors;
• Rubbish Chutes;
• Incinerators;
• Laundry Chutes;
• Fire detection, alarm and
communication systems;
• Automatic sprinklers and other
extinguishing equipment;
• Compact storage including mobile
storage and maintenance; and
• Testing of water based fire
protection systems.
These sections have requirements for
inspection, testing and maintenance
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
21563
which would apply to all facilities, as
well as specific requirements for
existing systems and equipment that
would also apply to all facilities.
Section 15.13 addresses fire loss
prevention in operating rooms. This
section includes requirements for a
hazard assessment, fire prevention
procedures, procedures for handling
flammable germicides and antiseptics,
emergency procedures, and orientation
and training. This section sets out
requirements that may reduce the risk of
surgical fires, as described below:
Section 15.13.1—Hazard Assessment
This section includes information on
the assessment of hazards that a facility
could encounter during a surgical
procedure, and the periodic review of
surgical operations and procedures.
Section 15.13.2—Fire Prevention
Procedures
This section requires that fire
prevention procedures be established in
facilities, but does not prescribe any
particular procedures. The exact
procedures to be used are left to the
discretion of each facility based on its
unique circumstances, features, and
needs, and applicable State licensure
laws and local ordinances
Section 15.13.3—Germicides and
Antiseptics
This section includes information on
the procedures for the safe handling of
flammable materials in operating rooms.
This section also outlines operational
procedures to address the fire hazards of
these flammable materials, including
packaging and material handling,
removing solution-soaked materials,
preventing pooling of material,
preoperative ‘‘time-out’’ period to allow
for drying before patient draping, and
establishing policies and procedures to
outline safety precautions.
Section 15.13.3.9—Emergency
Procedures
This section requires emergency
procedures to be in place in case of fire,
or chemical spills in the operating room,
as well as the procedures for alarm
activation, evacuation and equipment
shutdown.
Section 15.13.3.10—Orientation and
Training
This section includes requirements
for the orientation and training of new
operating room/surgical suite staff for
issues such as:
• Safe practices related to the area
and equipment;
• Continuing education;
• Incident reviews;
E:\FR\FM\16APP2.SGM
16APP2
21564
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 73 / Wednesday, April 16, 2014 / Proposed Rules
• Procedure updates; and
• Fire drills.
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS2
II. Proposed Requirements for Health
Care Facilities
This section details the specific
regulatory changes for each affected
provider and supplier. Due to the
similar content and structure of the
regulations for the various providers
and suppliers, most of the information
presented repeats for each provider.
1. Religious Nonmedical Health Care
Institutions: Condition of Participation:
Life Safety From Fire (§ 403.744)
We propose to maintain most of the
current provisions for Religious
Nonmedical Health Care Institutions
(RNHCI) published in the Federal
Register on January 10, 2003 (68 FR
1374), except if it conflicts with the
2012 LSC and the requirements are not
within the provisions detailed in
Section I of this preamble regardless of
the number of patients the facility
serves.
Specifically, we propose to retain the
requirements at § 403.744(a)(1)(ii)
related to the prohibition of roller
latches in health care facilities. We
propose to update the LSC chapter
reference from ‘‘19.3.6.3.2 exception
number 2’’ to ‘‘19.3.6.3.5 numbers 1 and
2 and 19.3.6.3.6 number 2’’.
We propose to modify the
requirements specific to ABHRs since
most of the requirements in our
regulation are now included in the 2012
edition of the LSC. Therefore, we
propose to remove the requirements at
§ 403.744(a)(4)(i), (ii), (iv) and (v). We
propose to retain the requirements at
§ 403.744(a)(4)(iii) related to protection
against inappropriate access, and would
redesignate it at § 403.744(a)(4).
We propose to add a new requirement
at § 403.744(a)(5) that would require a
facility with a sprinkler system that is
out of service for more than 4 hours in
a 24-hour period to evacuate the
building or portion of the building
affected by the system outage, or
establish a fire watch until the system
is back in service, notwithstanding the
lower standard of the LSC.
We also propose to add a new
requirement at § 403.744(a)(6) that
would retain the 36 inch window sill
requirement that was in the 2000
edition of the LSC.
In addition, we propose to retain the
requirement at § 403.744(b) related to
the Secretary’s waiver authority and
state imposed codes. We do not propose
to make any changes to this section.
Furthermore, we propose to remove
the requirements at § 403.744(c) related
to the phase-in period for compliance
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:04 Apr 15, 2014
Jkt 232001
with emergency lighting. In the 2003
final rule, we allowed facilities until
March 13, 2006, to upgrade their
emergency lighting equipment. This
phase-in period has now expired and all
facilities should be in compliance.
Therefore, this phase-in provision is no
longer a necessary regulatory
requirement.
We are proposing to add a new
Condition of Participation at § 403.745
that would require RNHCIs to comply
with the 2012 edition of the NFPA 99.
We propose that chapters 7, 8, 12, and
13 would not apply to RNHCIs. We also
propose to allow for waivers of these
provisions under the same conditions
and procedures that we currently use for
waivers of applicable provisions of the
LSC.
2. Ambulatory Surgery Centers:
Condition for Coverage: Environment
(§ 416.44)
We propose that all ASCs meet the
provisions applicable to Ambulatory
Health Care Centers in the 2012 edition
of the LSC, except as detailed in section
I of this preamble, regardless of the
number of patients the facility serves.
We believe the protection provided in
the Ambulatory Health Care Centers
chapter is necessary to protect the
health and safety of patients who are
incapable of caring for themselves at
any point in time. However, we do not
believe that the Business Occupancy
chapter of the LSC (applied by some
authorities having jurisdiction to ASCs
treating fewer than 4 patients at a time)
affords an adequate level of protection
to patients in an ASC.
Specifically, we propose to retain the
provision at § 416.44(b)(2) and (3)
related to the Secretary’s waiver
authority and state imposed codes. We
do not propose to make any changes to
this section.
We propose to remove the
requirements at § 416.44(b)(4) related to
the phase-in period for compliance with
emergency lighting. In the 2003 final
rule, we allowed facilities until March
13, 2006, to upgrade their emergency
lighting equipment. This phase-in
period has now expired and all facilities
should be in compliance. Therefore, this
phase-in provision is no longer a
necessary regulatory requirement.
We propose to modify the
requirements specific to ABHRs since
most of the requirements are now
included in the 2012 edition of the LSC.
Specifically, we propose to remove the
requirements at § 416.44(b)(5)(i), (ii),
(iv), (A) through (G), and (v). We also
propose to retain the requirements at
§ 416.44(b)(5)(iii) related to protection
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
against inappropriate access, and would
redesignate it at § 416.44(b)(4).
We propose to add a new requirement
at § 416.44(b)(5) that would require a
facility with a sprinkler system that is
out of service for more than 4 hours in
a 24-hour period to evacuate the
building or portion of the building
affected by the system outage, or
establish a fire watch until the system
is back in service, notwithstanding the
lower standard of the 2012 LSC.
We propose to add a new requirement
at § 416.44(b)(6) that would require
facilities with windowless anesthetizing
locations to have a supply and exhaust
system that automatically vents smoke
and products of combustion, prevents
recirculation of smoke originating
within the operating room, and prevents
the circulation of smoke entering the
system intake.
We are proposing to add a new
paragraph at § 416.44(c) that would
require ASCs to comply with the 2012
edition of the NFPA 99. We propose that
chapters 7, 8, 12, and 13 would not
apply to ASCs. We also propose to allow
for waivers of these provisions under
the same conditions and procedures that
we currently use for waivers of
applicable provisions of the LSC.
3. Hospice Care: Condition of
Participation: Hospices That Provide
Inpatient Care Directly (§ 418.110)
We propose that all inpatient hospice
facilities meet the provisions applicable
to health care occupancies in the 2012
edition of the LSC, with the exceptions
discussed in section I of this preamble,
regardless of the number of patients
they serve. We note that this is not a
change in requirements, but merely a
clarification that, for LSC purposes, an
inpatient hospice facility is considered
a health care occupancy. The LSC does
not apply to hospice care that is
provided in a patient’s home.
We propose to retain the requirements
at § 418.110(d)(1)(ii) related to the
prohibition of roller latches in health
care facilities. We are proposing to
update the LSC chapter reference from
‘‘19.3.6.3.2 exception number 2’’ to
‘‘19.3.6.3.5 numbers 1 and 2 and
19.3.6.3.6 number 2.’’ In addition, we
propose to retain the provision at
§ 418.110(d)(2) and (3) related to the
Secretary’s waiver authority and state
imposed codes. We do not propose to
make any changes to this section.
We also propose to modify the
requirements specific to ABHRs because
most of the requirements are now
included in the 2012 edition of the LSC.
Specifically, we propose to remove the
requirements at § 418.110(d)(4)(i), (ii)
and (iv). We also propose to retain the
E:\FR\FM\16APP2.SGM
16APP2
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 73 / Wednesday, April 16, 2014 / Proposed Rules
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS2
requirements at § 418.110(d)(4)(iii)
related to protection against
inappropriate access, and would
redesignate this requirement at
§ 418.110(d)(4).
We propose to add a new requirement
at § 418.110(d)(5) that would require a
facility with a sprinkler system that is
out of service for more than 4 hours in
a 24-hour period to evacuate the
building or portion of the building
affected by the system outage, or
establish a fire watch until the system
is back in service, notwithstanding the
lower standard of the 2012 LSC.
We also propose to add a new
requirement at § 418.110(d)(6) that
would retain the 36 inch window sill
requirement that was in the 2000
edition of the LSC.
We are proposing to add a new
paragraph at § 418.110(e) that would
require hospices to comply with the
2012 edition of the NFPA 99. We
propose that chapters 7, 8, 12, and 13
would not apply to hospices. We also
propose to allow for waivers of these
provisions under the same conditions
and procedures that we currently use for
waivers of applicable provisions of the
LSC.
4. Programs of All-Inclusive Care for the
Elderly (PACE): Condition of
Participation: Physical Environment
(§ 460.72)
We propose to retain most of the
provisions of the existing final
regulation for Programs of All-Inclusive
Care for the Elderly (PACE) published in
the Federal Register on January 10,
2003 (68 FR 1374), regardless of the
number of patients the PACE facility
serves. PACE providers would continue
to be required to meet LSC
specifications for the type of facilities in
which the programs are located (that is,
hospitals, and office buildings).
Specifically, we propose to retain the
requirements at § 460.72(b)(1)(ii) related
to the prohibition of roller latches in
health care facilities. We are proposing
to update the LSC chapter reference
from ‘‘19.3.6.3.2 exception number 2’’ to
‘‘19.3.6.3.5 numbers 1 and 2 and
19.3.6.3.6 number 2.’’
We propose to retain the provision at
§ 460.72(b)(2)(i) and (ii) related to the
Secretary’s waiver authority and state
imposed codes. We do not propose to
make any changes to this section.
We propose to remove the
requirement at § 460.72(b)(3) related to
the phase-in period for compliance with
emergency lighting. In the 2003 final
rule, we allowed facilities until March
13, 2006, to upgrade their emergency
lighting equipment. This phase-in
period has now expired and all facilities
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:04 Apr 15, 2014
Jkt 232001
should be in compliance. Therefore, this
phase-in provision is no longer a
necessary regulatory requirement.
We also propose to remove the
requirements at § 460.72(b)(4) related to
the prohibition of roller latches in
health care facilities. In the 2003 final
rule, we allowed facilities until March
13, 2006, to replace their existing roller
latches. This phase-in period has now
ended, and all facilities should be in
compliance. Therefore, this phase-in
provision is no longer a necessary
regulatory requirement.
We propose to modify the
requirements specific to ABHRs because
most of the requirements are now
located in the 2012 edition of the LSC.
Specifically, we proposed to remove the
requirements at § 460.72(b)(5)(i), (ii), (iv)
and (v). In addition, we propose to
retain the requirements at
§ 460.72(b)(5)(iii) related to protection
against inappropriate access, and would
redesignate it at § 460.72(b)(3).
We propose to add a new requirement
at § 460.72(b)(4) that would require a
facility with a sprinkler system that is
out of service for more than 4 hours in
a 24-hour period to evacuate the
building or portion of the building
affected by the system outage, or
establish a fire watch until the system
is back in service, notwithstanding the
lower standard of the 2012 LSC.
We are proposing to add a new
paragraph at § 460.72(d) that would
require PACE centers to comply with
the 2012 edition of the NFPA 99. We
propose that chapters 7, 8, 12, and 13
would not apply to PACEs. We also
propose to allow for waivers of these
provisions under the same conditions
and procedures that we currently use for
waivers of applicable provisions of the
LSC.
5. Hospitals: Condition of Participation:
Physical Environment (§ 482.41)
We propose that the hospital must
meet the health care occupancy
provisions of the 2012 edition of the
LSC, regardless of the number of
patients the hospital serves. There can
be multiple occupancy classifications
within a single hospital. Therefore,
multiple chapters of the code may be
applied to a single hospital in
accordance with the Multiple
Occupancies provisions in 18.1.3 and
19.1.3. In addition, we believe that
hospital outpatient surgical departments
are comparable to ASCs and thus should
be required to meet the provisions
applicable to Ambulatory Health Care
Occupancy chapters, regardless of the
number of patients served.
We propose to retain most of the
provisions from the existing final
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
21565
regulation for hospitals published in the
Federal Register on January 10, 2003
(68 FR 1374). Specifically, we propose
to retain the requirements at
§ 482.41(b)(1)(ii) related to the
prohibition of roller latches in health
care facilities. We are proposing to
update the LSC chapter reference from
‘‘19.3.6.3.2 exception number 2’’ to
‘‘19.3.6.3.5 numbers 1 and 2 and
19.3.6.3.6 number 2.’’
We propose to retain the provision at
§ 482.41(b)(2) and (3) related to the
Secretary’s waiver authority and state
imposed codes. We do not propose to
make any changes to this section.
We propose to remove the
requirements at § 482.41(b)(4) related to
the phase-in period for compliance with
emergency lighting. In the 2003 final
rule, we allowed facilities until March
13, 2006, to upgrade their emergency
lighting equipment. This phase-in
period has now ended, and all facilities
should be in compliance. Therefore, this
phase-in provision is no longer a
necessary regulatory requirement.
We propose to remove the
requirements at § 482.41(b)(5) related to
phase-in period of the prohibition on
roller latches in health care facilities.
This provision allowed hospitals a 3
year period to replace all existing roller
latches. This phase-in period has now
expired and all facilities should be in
compliance. Therefore, this phase-in
provision is no longer a necessary
regulatory requirement.
We propose to retain the requirements
at § 482.41(b)(7) through (b)(8), and
would redesignate them at § 482.41(b)(4)
through (b)(6), without changes.
In addition, we propose to modify the
requirements specific to ABHRs since
most of the requirements are now
located in the 2012 edition of the LSC.
We proposed to remove the
requirements at § 482.41(b)(9)(i), (ii), (iv)
and (v). We propose to retain the
requirement at § 482.41(b)(9)(iii) related
to protection against inappropriate
access, and would redesignate it at
§ 482.41(b)(7).
We are proposing to add a new
requirement at § 482.41(b)(8) that would
require a facility with a sprinkler system
that is out of service for more than 4
hours in a 24-hour period to evacuate
the building or portion of the building
affected by the system outage, or
establish a fire watch until the system
is back in service, notwithstanding the
lower standard of the 2012 LSC.
We are also proposing to add a new
requirement at § 482.41(b)(9) that would
require facilities with windowless
anesthetizing locations to have a supply
and exhaust system that automatically
vents smoke and products of
E:\FR\FM\16APP2.SGM
16APP2
21566
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 73 / Wednesday, April 16, 2014 / Proposed Rules
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS2
combustion, prevents recirculation of
smoke originating within the surgical
suite, and prevents the circulation of
smoke entering the system intake.
We also propose to add a new
requirement at § 482.41(b)(10) that
would retain the majority of the 36 inch
window sill requirement that was in the
2000 edition of the LSC. Newborn
nurseries and rooms intended for
occupancy for less than 24 hours, such
as those housing obstetrical labor beds,
and recovery beds would be exempt
from the window sill height
requirement. The 2000 edition of the
LSC allowed for observation beds in the
emergency department to be exempt
from the 36 inch window sill
requirement. However, we do not
propose to incorporate an exemption for
observation beds, because they are
frequently occupied for greater than 24
hours. Therefore, observation beds
would be required to meet the 36 inch
window sill requirement. Window sills
in special nursing care areas, such as
those housing an intensive care unit,
critical care unit, hemodialysis, and
neonatal patients, would not exceed 60
inches.
We are proposing to add a new
paragraph at § 482.41(c) that would
require hospitals to comply with the
2012 edition of the NFPA 99. We
propose that chapters 7, 8, 12, and 13
would not apply to hospitals. We also
propose to allow for waivers of these
provisions under the same conditions
and procedures that we currently use for
waivers of applicable provisions of the
LSC.
6. Long-Term Care Facilities: Condition
of Participation: Physical Environment
(§ 483.70)
We propose to retain most of the
provisions of the existing final
regulation for long-term care facilities
published in the Federal Register on
January 10, 2003 (68 FR 1374) regardless
of the number of residents the facility
serves. We propose to retain the
requirements at § 483.70(a)(1)(ii) related
to the prohibition of roller latches in
health care facilities. We are proposing
to update the LSC chapter reference
from ‘‘19.3.6.3.2 exception number 2’’ to
‘‘19.3.6.3.5 numbers 1 and 2 and
19.3.6.3.6 number 2.’’
We propose to retain the provision at
§ 483.70(a)(2) and (3) related to the
Secretary’s waiver authority and state
imposed codes. We do not propose to
make any changes to this section.
We propose to remove the
requirements at § 483.70(a)(4) related to
the phase-in period for compliance with
emergency lighting. In the 2003 final
rule, we allowed facilities until March
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:04 Apr 15, 2014
Jkt 232001
13, 2006, to upgrade their emergency
lighting equipment. This phase-in
period has now expired and all facilities
should be in compliance. Therefore, this
phase-in provision is no longer a
necessary regulatory requirement.
We also propose to remove the
requirements at § 483.70(a)(5) related to
the phase-in period for the prohibition
of roller latches in health care facilities.
In the 2003 final rule, we allowed
facilities until March 13, 2006, to
upgrade their door latching equipment.
This phase-in period has now ended
and all facilities should be in
compliance. Therefore, this phase-in
provision is no longer a necessary
regulatory requirement.
We propose to modify the
requirements specific to ABHRs since
most of the requirements are now
included in the 2012 edition of the LSC.
Specifically, we propose to remove the
requirements at § 483.70(a)(6)(i), (ii), (iv)
and (v). We propose to retain the
requirement at § 483.70(a)(6)(iii) related
to protection against inappropriate
access, and would redesignate it at
§ 483.70(a)(4).
We propose to retain the requirements
at § 483.70(a)(7)(i), (ii), (iii), (A) and (B)
related to installation, inspection,
testing and maintenance of battery
operated single station smoke alarms,
without changes. We are proposing to
redesignate these requirements at
§ 483.70(a)(5) (i), (ii), (iii) (A) and (B).
In addition, we propose to retain the
requirements at § 483.70(a)(8)(i) and (ii)
related to the installation of supervised
automatic sprinklers and the testing,
inspection and maintenance of the
sprinkler system. We propose to
redesignate these requirements as
§ 483.70(a)(6)(i) and (ii), without
changes.
We also propose to add a new
requirement at § 483.70(a)(7) that would
retain the 36 inch window sill
requirement that was in the 2000
edition of the LSC.
We are proposing to add a new
paragraph at § 483.70(b) that would
require LTCs to comply with the 2012
edition of the NFPA 99. We propose that
chapters 7, 8, 12, and 13 would not
apply to LTCs. We also propose to allow
for waivers of these provisions under
the same conditions and procedures that
we currently use for waivers of
applicable provisions of the LSC.
7. Intermediate Care Facilities for
Individuals With Intellectual
Disabilities: Condition of Participation:
Physical Environment (§ 483.470)
We propose to retain most of the
provisions of the existing regulation for
ICFs/IID. ICFs/IID would continue to be
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
permitted to meet either the Residential
Board and Care Occupancies chapter or
the Health Care Occupancy chapter of
the LSC, as appropriate, regardless of
the number of patients the facility
serves.
However, we propose not to adopt the
provisions at Chapters 32.3.2.11.2 and
33.3.2.11.2, related to ‘‘lockups.’’ This is
a new provision that has not been
addressed in this chapter in prior
editions of the LSC. Lock-ups are
incidental use areas where occupants
are secluded or restrained, and;
therefore, incapable of self-preservation
in any emergency situation because of
security measures and other
circumstances no longer under the
person’s control. We do not believe that
lock-ups as described in the LSC are
appropriate under any circumstances for
board and care facilities.
In addition, we propose to retain the
requirements at § 483.470(j)(1)(ii)
related to the prohibition of roller
latches in health care facilities. We are
proposing to update the LSC chapter
reference from ‘‘19.3.6.3.2 exception
number 2’’ to ‘‘19.3.6.3.5 numbers 1 and
2 and 19.3.6.3.6 number 2.’’
We propose to retain the requirements
at § 483.470(j)(2), (3), and (4). We do not
propose any changes to the content of
these sections.
We propose to remove the
requirements at § 483.470(j)(5) related to
the phase-in period for compliance with
emergency lighting. In the 2003 final
rule, we allowed facilities until March
13, 2006, to upgrade their emergency
lighting equipment. This phase-in
period has expired and all facilities
should be in compliance. Therefore, this
phase-in provision is no longer a
necessary regulatory requirement.
We propose to remove § 483.470(j)(6)
related to the phase-in period for the
prohibition of roller latches in health
care facilities. In the 2003 final rule, we
allowed facilities until March 13, 2006,
to upgrade their door latching
equipment. This phase-in period has
now ended and all facilities should be
in compliance. Therefore, this phase-in
provision is no longer a necessary
regulatory requirement.
We also propose to retain the
provision at § 483.470(j)(7)(A) and (B)
related to the Secretary’s waiver
authority and state imposed codes. We
propose to redesignate these provisions
at § 483.470(j)(5)(A) and (B) without
change.
In addition, we propose to modify the
requirements specific to ABHRs since
most of the requirements are now
included in the 2012 edition of the LSC.
Specifically, we proposed to remove the
requirements at § 483.470(j)(7)(ii)(A),
E:\FR\FM\16APP2.SGM
16APP2
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 73 / Wednesday, April 16, 2014 / Proposed Rules
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS2
(B), (D) and (E). We propose to retain the
requirements at § 483.470(j)(7)(ii)(C)
related to protection against
inappropriate access, and would
redesignate it at § 483.470(j)(5)(ii).
We propose to add a new requirement
at § 483.470(j)(5)(iii) that would require
a facility with a sprinkler system that is
out of service for more than 4 hours in
a 24-hour period to evacuate the
building or portion of the building
affected by the system outage, or
establish a fire watch until the system
is back in service, notwithstanding the
lower standard of the 2012 LSC.
We are proposing to add a new
paragraph at § 483.470(j)(5)(iv) that
would require ICF–IIDs to comply with
the 2012 edition of the NFPA 99. We
propose that chapters 7, 8, 12, and 13
would not apply to ICF–IIDs. We also
propose to allow for waivers of these
provisions under the same conditions
and procedures that we currently use for
waivers of applicable provisions of the
LSC.
8. Critical Access Hospitals: Condition
of Participation: Physical Plant and
Environment (§ 485.623)
We propose to retain most of the
provisions of the existing final
regulation for Critical Access Hospitals
(CAHs) published in the Federal
Register on January 10, 2003 (68 FR
1374), regardless of the number of
patients the facility serves. Specifically,
we propose to retain the requirements at
§ 485.623(d)(1)(ii) related to the
prohibition of roller latches in health
care facilities. We are proposing to
update the LSC chapter reference from
‘‘19.3.6.3.2 exception number 2’’ to
‘‘19.3.6.3.5 numbers 1 and 2 and
19.3.6.3.6 number 2.’’
We propose to retain the requirements
at § 485.623(d)(2) through (d)(4). We do
not propose to make any changes to
these sections.
We propose to remove the
requirement at § 485.623(d)(5) related to
the phase-in period for compliance with
emergency lighting. In the 2003 final
rule, we allowed facilities until March
13, 2006, to upgrade their emergency
lighting equipment. This phase-in
period has now expired and all facilities
should be in compliance. Therefore, this
phase-in provision is no longer a
necessary regulatory requirement.
We propose to remove the
requirement at § 485.623(d)(6) related to
the phase-in period of the prohibition
on roller latches in health care facilities.
This provision allowed CAHs a 3 year
period to replace all existing roller
latches. This phase-in period has also
expired and all facilities should be in
compliance. Therefore, this phase-in
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:04 Apr 15, 2014
Jkt 232001
provision is no longer a necessary
regulatory requirement.
In addition, we propose to modify the
requirements specific to ABHRs since
most of the requirements are now
incorporated in the 2012 edition of the
LSC. Specifically, we proposed to
remove the requirements at
§ 485.623(d)(7)(i), (ii), (iv) and (v). We
propose to retain the requirement at
§ 485.623(d)(7)(iii) related to protection
against inappropriate access, and would
redesignate it at § 485.623(d)(5).
We are proposing to add a new
requirement at § 485.623(d)(6) that
would require a facility with a sprinkler
system that is out of service for more
than 4 hours in a 24-hour period to
evacuate the building or portion of the
building affected by the system outage,
or establish a fire watch until the system
is back in service, notwithstanding the
lower standard of the 2012 LSC.
We are proposing to add a new
requirement at § 485.623(d)(7) that
would require facilities with
windowless anesthetizing locations to
have a supply and exhaust system that
automatically vents smoke and products
of combustion, prevents recirculation of
smoke originating within the surgical
suite, and prevents the circulation of
smoke entering the system intake.
We also propose to add a new
requirement at § 485.623(d)(8) that
would retain the 36 inch window sill
requirement that was in the 2000
edition of the LSC. With the exception
of newborn nurseries and rooms
intended for occupancy for less than 24
hours, every sleeping room must have
an outside window or outside door, and
the sill height must not exceed 36
inches above the floor. Special nursing
care areas shall not exceed 60 inches.
Windows in atrium walls are considered
outside windows for the purposes of
this requirement.
We are proposing to add a new
paragraph at § 485.623(e) that would
require CAHs to comply with the 2012
edition of the NFPA 99. We propose that
chapters 7, 8, 12, and 13 would not
apply to CAHs. We also propose to
allow for waivers of these provisions
under the same conditions and
procedures that we currently use for
waivers of applicable provisions of the
LSC.
III. Collection of Information
Requirements
This proposed rule does not impose
any new reporting, recordkeeping or
third-party disclosure requirements.
However, this proposed rule does
reference the NFPA 99 that has several
recordkeeping requirements for medical
gas and vacuum systems, and electrical
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
21567
equipment. We believe that
documenting maintenance and testing is
a usual and customary business practice
in accordance with 5 CFR 1320.3(b)(2),
and would not impose any additional
information collection burden beyond
that associated with the normal course
of business. Consequently, it need not
be reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget under the
authority of the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995.
IV. Response to Comments
Because of the large number of public
comments we normally receive on
Federal Register documents, we are not
able to acknowledge or respond to them
individually. We will consider all
comments we receive by the date and
time specified in the DATES section of
this preamble, and, when we proceed
with a subsequent document, we will
respond to the comments in the
preamble to that document.
V. Regulatory Impact Statement
In accordance with the provisions of
Executive Order 12866, this regulation
was reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget.
A. Overall Impact
We have examined the impacts of this
rule as required by Executive Order
12866 on Regulatory Planning and
Review (September 30, 1993), Executive
Order 13563 on Improving Regulation
and Regulatory Review (January 18,
2011), the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(RFA) (September 19, 1980, Pub. L. 96–
354), section 1102(b) of the Social
Security Act, section 202 of the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
(March 22, 1995; Pub. L. 104–4),
Executive Order 13132 on Federalism
(August 4, 1999) and the Congressional
Review Act (5 U.S.C. 804(2).
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess all costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, distributive impacts, and
equity). Executive Order 13563
emphasizes the importance of
quantifying both costs and benefits, of
reducing costs, of harmonizing rules,
and of promoting flexibility. A
regulatory impact analysis (RIA) must
be prepared for major rules with
economically significant effects ($100
million or more in any 1 year). The
overall economic impact for this rule is
estimated to be $41,437,279 in the first
year of implementation and $7,109,914
E:\FR\FM\16APP2.SGM
16APP2
21568
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 73 / Wednesday, April 16, 2014 / Proposed Rules
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS2
after the first year of implementation,
and annually thereafter for an 11 year
period. Therefore, this is not an
economically significant or major rule.
B. Alternatives Considered
We could have chosen not to update
our fire safety provisions. We believe
that this is not an acceptable alternative
because many health care facilities
complete unnecessary work and incur
unnecessary expense without any gain
in fire safety by continuing to comply
with the 2000 edition of the Life Safety
Code. Many states have adopted
subsequent editions of the Life Safety
Code. This has caused confusion for,
and imposed additional burdens on,
health care facilities, that must request
waivers or modify designs to meet the
requirements of both the state- and
federally-adopted editions of the LSC.
Updating the LSC would not only
relieve the regulatory burden on health
care providers, but also assist in
ensuring the health and safety of
patients and staff.
We considered proposing an
alternative phase-in period for the
requirement to install sprinklers in high
rise health care occupancies. The LSC
allows for a 12-year phase-in period,
which would begin on the day a final
rule is published. We considered
shortening this period in order to
accelerate compliance. However, based
on our recent experience with requiring
long term care facilities to install
sprinklers within 5 years, and the
difficulties that several facilities have
faced in meeting this deadline, we have
learned that a shorter phase-in period is
not always feasible for facilities. We also
considered proposing a longer phase-in
period, but believe that extending
beyond 12 years set out in the LSC may
not sufficiently convey the importance
of this requirement to improving patient
and staff safety in these buildings.
Therefore, we have proposed to
maintain the phase-in length that is
already part of the LSC, and we are
specifically requesting public comment
on the appropriateness of this
timeframe.
We considered not proposing separate
requirements for anesthetizing
locations, out-of-service sprinkler
systems, and window sill heights.
Although the NFPA has removed these
requirements from the LSC, we felt that
these were important issues that still
needed to be required for the safety of
patients, visitors, and staff. We believe
that smoke detection systems in
anesthetizing locations are important
because there continue to be operating
room fires and this requirement will
maintain the safety in operating rooms
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:04 Apr 15, 2014
Jkt 232001
for staff and patients. CMS believes that
allowing a sprinkler system to be out of
service for 12 hours before evacuating
patients or establishing a fire watch is
too long. Therefore, CMS will continue
to require the shorter 4 hour timeframe
that was in the 2000 edition of the LSC.
Lastly, window sill height requirements
were eliminated from the 2012 edition
of the LSC. We believe that this
requirement is essential to allow easier
access for emergency personnel in the
event of a fire or other emergency
situation.
We considered not proposing the
adoption of the NFPA 99 Health care
Facilities code. However, many
requirements of the LSC already cross
reference the NFPA 99, therefore we
decided to propose adopting the NFPA
99 because it addresses additional
building safety topics that are related to
important fire safety issues.
We also considered proposing
adoption of chapters 7, 8, 12, and 13 of
the NFPA 99, related to information
technology, plumbing, emergency
management, and security management.
We believe that information technology,
plumbing and security management are
not within the scope of the conditions
of participation and conditions for
coverage. In addition, emergency
management topics are addressed in our
December 27, 2013 proposed rule,
‘‘Medicare and Medicaid Programs:
Emergency Preparedness Requirements
for Medicare and Medicaid Participating
Providers and Suppliers’’ (78 FR 79081).
C. Anticipated Effects
1. Hospitals
Section 19.4.2 of the LSC requires that
all existing high-rise buildings
containing health care occupancies be
protected throughout by an approved,
supervised automatic sprinkler system.
This provision was added to the LSC in
2012 and we anticipate that there would
be a cost associated with installing the
sprinklers. Since this is a new provision
for the 2012 edition of the LSC, only 3
states have adopted this requirement,
accounting for 21 high-rise facilities.
To develop the most accurate estimate
possible for this provision, we requested
data from all 50 states regarding the
sprinkler status of high-rise buildings
containing health care occupancies, and
the average square footage needing to be
sprinklered. Of the 50 states, we
received some data from 30 states.1 We
1 The following states submitted data regarding
the sprinkler status of high-rise buildings
containing health care facilities—Arizona,
Arkansas, California, Colorado, Delaware, Hawaii,
Idaho, Iowa, Kansas, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland,
Massachusetts, Minnesota, Missouri, Montana,
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
calculated the average number of highrise hospitals for all of the states that
responded. Overall, 15.64 percent of
hospitals were located in high-rise
buildings. We also used the data
submitted to determine the average
number of fully, partially and nonsprinklered high-rise buildings in each
state for which we have data. First, we
calculated the percentages of fully,
partially, and non-sprinklered hospitals
for each state. We then averaged the
percentage of fully, partially and nonsprinklered buildings across all states
for which there was data, with a result
of 84.66 percent of hospitals in high-rise
buildings being fully sprinklered, 14.6
percent being partially sprinklered and
0.74 percent being non-sprinklered.
Next, we applied these percentages to
the states that did not respond to our
data request or that provided a limited
amount of data. For example, Alabama
has a total of 125 hospitals. Based on the
data from states that submitted
information, we know that, on average,
15.64 percent of hospitals have high-rise
buildings, for an estimated 20 high-rise
hospitals in Alabama. We used this
same methodology to estimate the
average number of high-rise hospitals in
all of the states that did not respond to
our data request or that provided only
a limited amount of data, for a total of
386 high-rise hospitals. Of the 386
estimated high-rise hospitals in states
that did not respond, we estimate there
are 339 fully sprinklered, 56 partially
sprinklered, and 3 non-sprinklered. We
note that these numbers do not directly
match because there was limited actual
data available for the state of
Massachusetts. The number of high rise
hospitals in Massachusetts is included
in the count of states for which we have
reported data. However, because we did
not receive a breakdown of those highrise hospitals by their current sprinkler
status, we used the methodology
described above to estimate the
distribution of fully sprinklered,
partially sprinklered, and nonsprinklered high-rise hospitals in that
state.
We combined this information with
the information from the states that
submitted data to develop an estimate of
858 high-rise facilities with health care
occupancies throughout all 50 states
(472 high-rise facilities in states that
submitted data + 386 estimated highrise facilities in states that did not
submit data). We estimate that 682 of
those high-rise facilities are fully
Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Mexico,
North Dakota, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Rhode
Island, South Dakota, Texas, Utah, Virginia,
Washington, and Wyoming.
E:\FR\FM\16APP2.SGM
16APP2
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS2
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 73 / Wednesday, April 16, 2014 / Proposed Rules
sprinklered, 169 are partially
sprinklered, and 7 are not sprinklered.
We also requested that the 50 states
submit information regarding the area
(measured in square feet) per partially
sprinklered and non-sprinklered facility
that does not currently have sprinklers.
Only 8 states supplied data regarding
the area to be sprinklered in partially
sprinklered facilities.2 In addition, 3
states supplied data regarding the area
to be sprinklered in non-sprinklered
facilities.3 We did not specify size and
age data. Of the states that responded
with square footage data, we estimate
that an average partially sprinklered
facility would need to install sprinklers
to protect 37,173 square feet, and an
average non-sprinklered facility would
need to install sprinklers to protect
127,667 square feet. Regardless of the
square footage, any facility in a high-rise
building 75’ and over is required to be
sprinklered. We recognize that these
averages are based on very limited data
submitted by the states, and we
welcome public comment and/or
additional data submission that would
help us improve the accuracy of these
estimates.
We applied all of the data submitted
and averages calculated to figure out the
total average area that will need to be
sprinklered in all partially sprinklered
facilities and non-sprinklered facilities,
and the cost associated with that
installation. Based on the information
provided by the public in comments
received on the hospital conditions of
participation (76 FR 65891), the cost per
square foot to install sprinklers is
approximately $11. We estimated that
there are 169 partially sprinklered
facilities that would install sprinklers to
cover an average of 37,173 square feet
per facility, for a total of 6,282,237
square feet. At an estimated cost of $11
per square foot to install sprinklers, we
estimate a total cost of $69,104,607 for
all partially sprinklered facilities
(6,282,937 square feet × $11 per square
foot). We estimate that an average
partially sprinklered facility would
spend $408,903 to complete the
sprinkler installation (37,173 square feet
per facility × $11 per square foot).
We estimated that there are 7 nonsprinklered facilities nationwide, and
that an average non-sprinklered facility
would install sprinklers for, 127,667
2 The following states provided data regarding the
average square footage for partially sprinklered
high-rise facilities containing health care facilities—
California, Hawaii, Iowa, Kansas, Nebraska,
Pennsylvania, Virginia, and Washington.
3 The following states provided data regarding the
average square footage for non-sprinklered high-rise
facilities containing health care facilitiesCalifornia, Hawaii, and Iowa.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:04 Apr 15, 2014
Jkt 232001
square feet, for a total of 893,669 square
feet (7 facilities × 127,667 square feet
per facility). At an estimated cost of $11
per square foot to install sprinklers, we
estimate that it would cost $9,830,359
for all non-sprinklered facilities to
install sprinklers in their facilities. We
estimate that an average non-sprinklered
facility would spend $1,404,337 per
facility (127,667 square feet × $11 per
square foot).
We estimate the total cost associated
with the installation of sprinklers in
partially sprinklered and nonsprinklered facilities to be $78,934,966
($69,104,607 for all partially sprinklered
facilities + $9,830,359 for all nonsprinklered facilities). This cost would
be distributed over a phase-in period of
12 years, per the phase-in period
established within the LSC, or an
average yearly cost of $6.6 million.
2. Ambulatory Surgical Centers
Sections 20.3.2.1 and 21.3.2.1 of the
LSC requires all doors to hazardous
areas to be self-closing or automatic
closing. This provision was added to the
LSC in 2003, and we anticipate that
there would be a cost associated with
installing the self-closing or automatic
closing doors. Since 2003, 35 states have
adopted this requirement, accounting
for 4,149 ASCs. As of December 2012,
there were 5,444 total Medicare and
applicable Medicaid participating ASCs.
The 1,295 remaining facilities would be
required to upgrade their door closing
mechanisms to meet this requirement.
The estimated cost per door is $349, and
we would assume the average facility
has 3 hazardous areas that would
require a replacement door closing
mechanism for a total cost of $1,047 per
facility. The anticipated cost is
$1,355,865.
3. Intermediate Care Facilities for
Individuals With Intellectual
Disabilities
Sections 32.2.3.5.7 and 33.2.3.5.7 of
the LSC requires attics of new and
existing facilities to be sprinklered if the
attic space is used for living purposes,
including storage and fuel fired
equipment. Facilities that do not use
their attics for living purposes may
choose to install a heat detection system
in place of the sprinklers. This
provision was added to the LSC in 2012.
Since this is a new provision for the
2012 edition of the LSC, only 3 states
have adopted this requirement,
accounting for 78 ICF–IIDs. We are not
including those 78 facilities in our
analysis. For purposes of this analysis
only, we assume that about 10 percent
(639) of facilities will install a heat
detection system because they do not
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
21569
use the attic for living purposes. As of
December 2012, there were 6,460 total
Medicare participating ICF–IIDs. After
excluding those facilities located in
states that have already adopted this
requirement and those that would
install a heat detection system instead of
sprinklers, the 5,743 remaining facilities
would be required to install sprinklers
in their attics to meet this requirement.
Installing sprinklers into an unfinished
attic is less complicated than installing
sprinklers in a finished hospital,
therefore the cost per square foot would
be less to install in attics than hospitals.
The estimated cost per square foot to
install sprinklers in an attic is $3.00,
and the average estimated square
footage per attic per facility is 1500
square feet, for a total of $4,500 per ICF–
IID. We estimate that all ICF–IIDs would
spend $25,843,500 to install sprinklers
in their attic spaces.
Facilities that do not use their attics
for living purposes may choose to install
a heat detection system in the attic
instead of sprinklers. We assume that
639 facilities will install a heat
detection system. We estimate the cost
to install a heat detection system to be
$1,000 per facility. The anticipated cost
would be $639,000 for all affected
facilities to install heat detection
systems.
Section 33.3.3.2.3 of the LSC requires
all hazardous areas in existing facilities
with impractical evacuation capabilities
to be separated from other parts of the
building by a smoke partition. This
provision was added to the LSC in 2012
and we anticipate there being a cost
associated with installing the smoke
partition. Since this is a new provision
for 2012, only 3 states have adopted this
requirement, accounting for 78 ICF–
IIDs. As of December 2012, there were
6,460 total Medicare and applicable
Medicaid participating ICF–IIDs. We do
not collect data regarding the evacuation
capability of each ICF–IID. Therefore,
for purposes of this analysis only, we
assume that the 6,382 remaining
facilities will need to install a smoke
partition around all hazardous areas to
meet this requirement. The estimated
cost per smoke partition is $500, and we
assume that an average ICF–IID would
need to install 2 smoke partitions for a
total of $1,000 per facility. The
anticipated cost is $6,382,000.
Section 33.3.3.4.6.2 of the LSC
requires that, when an existing facility
installs a new fire alarm system, or the
existing fire alarm system is replaced,
notification of emergency forces should
be handled in accordance with section
9.6.4, which states that notification of
emergency forces should alert the
municipal fire department and fire
E:\FR\FM\16APP2.SGM
16APP2
21570
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 73 / Wednesday, April 16, 2014 / Proposed Rules
brigade (if provided) of fire or other
emergency. This provision was added to
the LSC in 2012 and we anticipate there
being a cost associated with upgrading
a new or existing fire alarm system.
Since this is a new provision for 2012,
only 3 states have adopted this
requirement, accounting for 78 ICF–
analysis only, we assume that about 8.3
percent (532) of facilities will do this in
any given year, for an annual cost of
$532,000 over a 12 year period.
IIDs. As of December 2012, there were
6,460 total Medicare participating ICF–
IIDs. The 6,382 remaining facilities
would be required to add emergency
notifications capabilities when they
choose to update or install a new fire
alarm system. The estimated cost per
upgrade is $1000. For purposes of this
($1,000 per upgraded alarm system ×
532 facilities in any given year =
532,000)
TABLE 1—TOTAL COST FOR IMPLEMENTATION IN YEAR 1
Cost per
affected
provider
Requirement
Provider type affected
High-rise sprinkler installation * ....................................
High-rise sprinkler installation * ....................................
Self-closing or automatic closing doors on hazardous
areas.
Sprinklers in Attics (used for living purposes, storage
or fuel fired equipment).
Heat detection systems in attics (not used for living
purposes).
Hazardous areas separated by smoke partitions ........
Hospitals, partially sprinklered ......................................
Hospitals, non-sprinklered ............................................
Ambulatory surgical centers .........................................
Upgrade existing or install new fire alarm system with
emergency forces notification capabilities*.
Total .......................................................................
Cost for all
providers
$34,075
117,028
1,047
$5,758,717
819,197
1,355,865
care for individuals with intellectual dis-
4,500
25,843,500
care for individuals with intellectual dis-
1,000
639,000
care for individuals with intellectual dis-
1,000
6,382,000
care for individuals with intellectual dis-
1,000
532,000
.......................................................................................
........................
41,437,279
Intermediate
abilities.
Intermediate
abilities.
Intermediate
abilities.
Intermediate
abilities.
* Data presented for a single year of the 12 year phase-in period.
TABLE 2—TOTAL COST OF IMPLEMENTATION FOR YEARS 2–12
Requirement
Provider type
affected
High-rise sprinkler installation ......................................................................................................
Hospitals,
partially
sprinklered
Hospitals, nonsprinklered
Cost per
affected
provider
Cost for all
providers
$34,075
$5,758,717
117,028
819,197
Intermediate
care for
individuals
with
intellectual
disabilities
1,000
532,000
TOTAL ANNUALLY ..............................................................................................................
........................
........................
7,109,914
OVERALL TOTAL YEARS 2–12 ...................................................................................
........................
........................
78,209,054
High-rise sprinkler installation ......................................................................................................
Upgrade existing or install new fire alarm system with emergency forces notification capabilities ............................................................................................................................................
willingness to pay for reductions in the
risk of premature death equivalent to
saving one life in expectation is
Year 1 of implementation .....
$41,437,279 typically over $9 million (https://
www.dot.gov/sites/dot.dev/files/docs/
Years 2–12 of implementation ....................................
78,209,054 VSL%20Guidance%202013.pdf).
Although we are not quantifying the
TOTAL ...........................
119,646,333 number of lives that would be saved
upon implementation of this proposed
4. Benefits to Patients/Residents
rule due to the lack of data that could
As a result of this rule, we believe that provide a reliable point estimate, we
believe that there is potential for such
there would be a decreased risk of
a result.
premature death. A decreased risk of
premature death is valuable to people
The RFA requires agencies to analyze
and that value is symbolized by their
options for regulatory relief of small
willingness to pay for such benefits. The entities, if a rule has a significant impact
Department of Transportation found in
on a substantial number of small
a recent literature review that
entities. For purposes of the RFA, small
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS2
TABLE 3—TOTAL COST OF
IMPLEMENTATION FOR ALL YEARS
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:04 Apr 15, 2014
Jkt 232001
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
entities include small businesses,
nonprofit organizations, and
government agencies. Individuals and
states are not included in the definition
of a small entity. For purposes of the
RFA, most of the providers and
suppliers that would be affected by this
rule (hospitals, ASCs, and ICF–IIDs) are
considered to be small entities, either by
virtue of their nonprofit or government
status or by having yearly revenues
below industry threshold established by
the Small Business Administration (for
details, see the Small Business
Administration’s Web site at https://
www.sba.gov/content/small-businesssize-standards.
E:\FR\FM\16APP2.SGM
16APP2
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS2
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 73 / Wednesday, April 16, 2014 / Proposed Rules
We estimate that implementation of
the high-rise sprinkler requirements of
this rule will cost all affected hospitals
approximately $6.6 million total in any
1 year. That’s a total of $408,903 per
individual facility that is partially
sprinklered or $34,075 per year over the
12 year phase-in period and/$1.4
million per individual facility that is
non-sprinklered or $117,028 per year
over the 12 year phase-in period. We
estimate the implementation of this rule
will cost affected ASCs approximately
$1.4 million in the first year of
implementation, or $1,047 per ASC. We
estimate that implementation of this
rule will cost affected ICF–IIDs
approximately $32.9 million in the first
year of implementation, or $6,500 per
affected ICF–IID. The Department of
Health and Human Services uses as its
measure of significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities
a change in revenues of more than 3 to
5 percent. Therefore, the Secretary
proposes to certify that this rule will not
have a significant impact on a
substantial number of small entities,
since the impact will be less than 3
percent of the revenue.
In addition, section 1102(b) of the Act
requires us to prepare a regulatory
impact analysis if a rule may have a
significant impact on the operations of
a substantial number of small rural
hospitals. This analysis must conform to
the provisions of section 603 of the
RFA. For purposes of section 1102(b) of
the Act, we define a small rural hospital
as a hospital that is located outside of
a metropolitan statistical area and has
fewer than 100 beds. We believe that
this rule will not have a significant
impact on the operations of a substantial
number of small rural hospitals.
Section 202 of the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA)
also requires that agencies assess
anticipated costs and benefits before
issuing any rule whose mandates
require spending in any 1 year of $100
million in 1995 dollars, updated
annually for inflation. In 2013, that
threshold is approximately $141
million. This rule will not have an
impact on the expenditures of state,
local, or tribal governments in the
aggregate, or on the private sector of
$141 million.
Executive Order 13132 establishes
certain requirements that an agency
must meet when it promulgates a
proposed rule (and subsequent final
rule) that imposes substantial direct
requirement costs on state and local
governments, preempts state law, or
otherwise has Federalism implications.
This rule has no Federalism
implications.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:04 Apr 15, 2014
Jkt 232001
List of Subjects
The revisions and additions read as
follows:
42 CFR Part 403
Health insurance, Hospitals,
Intergovernmental relations,
Incorporation by reference, Medicare,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
42 CFR Part 416
Health facilities, Kidney diseases,
Incorporation by reference, Medicare,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
42 CFR Part 418
Health facilities, Hospice care,
Medicare, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
42 CFR Part 460
Aged, Health, Incorporation by
reference, Medicare, Medicaid,
Reporting and record keeping
requirements.
42 CFR Part 482
Grant programs-health, Hospitals,
Incorporation by reference, Medicaid,
Medicare, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
42 CFR Part 483
Grant programs-health, Health
facilities, Health professions, Health
records, Incorporation by reference,
Medicaid, Medicare, Nursing homes,
Nutrition, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Safety.
42 CFR Part 485
Grant programs—health, Health
facilities, Incorporation by reference,
Medicaid, Medicare, Reporting and
record keeping requirements.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, the Centers for Medicare &
Medicaid Services proposes to amend
42 CFR chapter IV as set forth below:
PART 403—SPECIAL PROGRAMS AND
PROJECTS
1. The authority citation for part 403
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: Secs. 1102 and 1871 of the
Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1302 and
1395hh).
2. Amend § 403.744 by—
A. Revising paragraph (a)(1)(i).
B. Amending paragraph (a)(1)(ii) by
removing the reference to ‘‘Chapter
19.3.6.3.2, exception number 2’’ and
adding in its place ‘‘Chapter 19.3.6.3.5
numbers 1 and 2 and Chapter 19.3.6.3.6
number 2’’.
■ C. Revising paragraph (a)(4).
■ D. Adding paragraphs (a)(5) and (6).
■ E. Removing paragraph (c).
■
■
■
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4701
21571
Sfmt 4702
§ 403.744 Condition of participation: Life
safety from fire.
(a)(1) * * *
(i) Except as otherwise provided in
this section, the RNHCI must meet the
applicable provisions of the 2012
edition of the Life Safety Code of the
National Fire Protection Association,
regardless of the number of individuals
served. The Director of the Office of the
Federal Register has approved the NFPA
101® 2012 edition of the Life Safety
Code, issued August 11, 2011, for
incorporation by reference in
accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1
CFR part 51. A copy of the Code is
available for inspection at the CMS
Information Resource Center, 7500
Security Boulevard, Baltimore, MD or at
the National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For
information on the availability of this
material at NARA, call 202–741–6030,
or go to: https://www.archives.gov/
federal_register/code_of_federal_
regulations/ibr_locations.html. Copies
may be obtained from the National Fire
Protection Association, 1 Batterymarch
Park, Quincy, MA 02269. If any changes
in this edition of the Code are
incorporated by reference, CMS will
publish notice in the Federal Register to
announce the changes.
*
*
*
*
*
(4) The RNHCI may place alcoholbased hand rub dispensers in its facility
if the dispensers are installed in a
manner that adequately protects against
inappropriate access.
(5) When a sprinkler system is out of
service for more than 4 hours in a 24hour period, the RHNCI must—
(i) Evacuate the building or portion of
the building affected by the system
outage until the system is back in
service, or
(ii) Establish a fire watch until the
system is back in service.
(6) Every sleeping room must have an
outside window or outside door, and
the sill height must not exceed 36
inches above the floor. Windows in
atrium walls are considered outside
windows for the purposes of this
requirement.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 3. Add § 403.745 to read as follow:
§ 403.745 Condition of participation:
Building Safety.
(a) Standard: building safety. Except
as otherwise provided in this section,
the RNHCI must meet the applicable
provisions of the 2012 edition of the
Health Care Facilities Code of the
National Fire Protection Association,
E:\FR\FM\16APP2.SGM
16APP2
21572
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 73 / Wednesday, April 16, 2014 / Proposed Rules
regardless of the number of patients
served. The Director of the Office of the
Federal Register has approved the NFPA
99® 2012 edition of the Health Care
Facilities Code, issued August 11, 2011,
for incorporation by reference in
accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1
CFR part 51. A copy of the Code is
available for inspection at the CMS
Information Resource Center, 7500
Security Boulevard, Baltimore, MD or at
the National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For
information on the availability of this
material at NARA, call 202–741–6030,
or go to: https://www.archives.gov/
federal_register/code_of_federal_
regulations/ibr_locations.html. Copies
may be obtained from the National Fire
Protection Association, 1 Batterymarch
Park, Quincy, MA 02269. If any changes
in this edition of the Code are
incorporated by reference, CMS will
publish notice in the Federal Register to
announce the changes.
(b) Standard: exceptions. Chapters 7,
8, 12, and 13 of the adopted Health Care
Facilities Code do not apply to an
RNHCI.
(c) Waiver. If application of the Health
Care Facilities Code required under
paragraph (a) of this section would
result in unreasonable hardship upon
the RNHCI, CMS may waive specific
provisions of the Health Care Facilities
Code, but only if the waiver does not
adversely affect the health and safety of
individuals.
PART 416—AMBULATORY SURGICAL
SERVICES
4. The authority citation for part 416
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: Secs. 1102 and 1871 of the
Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1302 and
1395hh).
5. Amend § 416.44 by—
A. Revising paragraph (b)(1).
B. Removing paragraph (b)(4).
C. Redesignating paragraph (b)(5) as
paragraph (b)(4).
■ D. Revising newly redesignated
paragraph (b)(4).
■ E. Adding new paragraphs (b)(5) and
(6)
■ F. Redesignating paragraphs (c) and
(d) as (d) and (e).
■ G. Adding new paragraph (c).
The revisions and additions read as
follows:
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS2
■
■
■
■
§ 416.44 Condition for coverage—
Environment.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(1) Except as otherwise provided in
this section, the ASC must meet the
provisions applicable to Ambulatory
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:04 Apr 15, 2014
Jkt 232001
Health Care Centers of the 2012 edition
of the Life Safety Code of the National
Fire Protection Association, regardless
of the number of patients served. The
Director of the Office of the Federal
Register has approved the NFPA 101®
2012 edition of the Life Safety Code,
issued August 11, 2011, for
incorporation by reference in
accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1
CFR part 51. A copy of the Code is
available for inspection at the CMS
Information Resource Center, 7500
Security Boulevard, Baltimore, MD and
at the National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For
information on the availability of this
material at NARA, call 202–741–6030,
or go to: https://www.archives.gov/
federal_register/code_of_federal_
regulations/ibr_locations.html. Copies
may be obtained from the National Fire
Protection Association, 1 Batterymarch
Park, Quincy, MA 02269. If any changes
in this edition of the Code are
incorporated by reference, CMS will
publish notice in the Federal Register to
announce the changes.
* * *
(4) An ASC may place alcohol-based
hand rub dispensers in its facility if the
dispensers are installed in a manner that
adequately protects against
inappropriate access.
(5) When a sprinkler system is out of
service for more than 4 hours in a 24hour period, the ASC must—
(i) Evacuate the building or portion of
the building affected by the system
outage until the system is back in
service, or
(ii) Establish a fire watch until the
system is back in service.
(6) In windowless anesthetizing
locations, the ASC must have a supply
and exhaust system that—
(i) Automatically vents smoke and
products of combustion,
(ii) Prevents recirculation of smoke
originating within the surgical suite,
and
(iii) Prevents the circulation of smoke
entering the system intake.
(c) Standard: building safety. Except
as otherwise provided in this section,
the ASC must meet the applicable
provisions of the 2012 edition of the
Health Care Facilities Code of the
National Fire Protection Association,
regardless of the number of patients
served. The Director of the Office of the
Federal Register has approved the NFPA
99® 2012 edition of the Health Care
Facilities Code, issued August 11, 2011,
for incorporation by reference in
accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1
CFR part 51. A copy of the Code is
available for inspection at the CMS
Information Resource Center, 7500
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
Security Boulevard, Baltimore, MD or at
the National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For
information on the availability of this
material at NARA, call 202–741–6030,
or go to: https://www.archives.gov/
federal_register/code_of_federal_
regulations/ibr_locations.html. Copies
may be obtained from the National Fire
Protection Association, 1 Batterymarch
Park, Quincy, MA 02269. If any changes
in this edition of the Code are
incorporated by reference, CMS will
publish notice in the Federal Register to
announce the changes.
(1) Chapters 7, 8, 12, and 13 of the
adopted Health Care Facilities Code do
not apply to an ASC.
(2) If application of the Health Care
Facilities Code required under
paragraph (c) of this section would
result in unreasonable hardship upon
the ASC, CMS may waive specific
provisions of the Health Care Facilities
Code, but only if the waiver does not
adversely affect the health and safety of
patients.
*
*
*
*
*
PART 418—HOSPICE CARE
6. The authority citation for part 418
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: Secs. 1102 and 1871 of the
Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1302 and
1395hh).
§ 418.108
[Amended]
7. Amend § 418.108 by—
A. Amending paragraph (a)(2) by
removing the reference ‘‘§ 418.110(b)
and (e)’’ and by adding in its place the
reference ‘‘§ 418.110(b) and (f)’’.
■ B. Amending paragraph (b)(1)(ii) by
removing the reference ‘‘§ 418.110(e)’’
and by adding in its place the reference
‘‘§ 418.110(f)’’.
■ 8. Amend § 418.110 by—
■ A. Revising paragraph (d)(1)(i).
■ B. Amending paragraph (d)(1)(ii) by
removing the reference to ‘‘Chapter
19.3.6.3.2, exception number 2’’ and
adding in its place ‘‘Chapter 19.3.6.3.5
numbers 1 and 2 and Chapter 19.3.6.3.6
number 2’’.
■ C. Revising paragraph (d)(4).
■ D. Adding paragraphs (d)(5) and (6).
■ E. Redesignating paragraphs (e)
through (o) as (f) through (p).
■ F. Adding new paragraph (e).
The revisions and additions read as
follows:
■
■
§ 418.110 Condition of participation:
Hospices that provide inpatient care
directly.
*
*
*
*
*
(d)(1) * * *
(i) Except as otherwise provided in
this section, the hospice must meet the
E:\FR\FM\16APP2.SGM
16APP2
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS2
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 73 / Wednesday, April 16, 2014 / Proposed Rules
provisions applicable to health care
occupancies of the 2012 edition of the
Life Safety Code of the National Fire
Protection Association, regardless of the
number of patients served. The Director
of the Office of the Federal Register has
approved the NFPA 101® 2012 edition
of the Life Safety Code, issued August
11, 2011, for incorporation by reference
in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and
1 CFR part 51. A copy of the code is
available for inspection at the CMS
Information Resource Center, 7500
Security Boulevard, Baltimore, MD or at
the National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For
information on the availability of this
material at NARA, call 202–741–6030,
or go to: https://www.archives.gov/
federalregister/
codeoffederalregulations/
ibrlocations.html. Copies may be
obtained from the National Fire
Protection Association, 1 Batterymarch
Park, Quincy, MA 02269. If any changes
in the edition of the Code are
incorporated by reference, CMS will
publish a notice in the Federal Register
to announce the changes.
*
*
*
*
*
(4) A hospice may place alcohol-based
hand rub dispensers in its facility if the
dispensers are installed in a manner that
adequately protects against access by
vulnerable populations.
(5) When a sprinkler system is out of
service for more than 4 hours in a 24hour period, the hospice must—
(i) Evacuate the building or portion of
the building affected by the system
outage until the system is back in
service, or
(ii) Establish a fire watch until the
system is back in service.
(6) Every sleeping room must have an
outside window or outside door, and
the sill height must not exceed 36
inches above the floor. Windows in
atrium walls are considered outside
windows for the purposes of this
requirement.
(e) Standard: Building Safety. Except
as otherwise provided in this section,
the hospice must meet the applicable
provisions of the 2012 edition of the
Health Care Facilities Code of the
National Fire Protection Association,
regardless of the number of patients
served. The Director of the Office of the
Federal Register has approved the NFPA
99® 2012 edition of the Health Care
Facilities Code, issued August 11, 2011,
for incorporation by reference in
accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1
CFR part 51. A copy of the Code is
available for inspection at the CMS
Information Resource Center, 7500
Security Boulevard, Baltimore, MD or at
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:04 Apr 15, 2014
Jkt 232001
the National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For
information on the availability of this
material at NARA, call 202–741–6030,
or go to: https://www.archives.gov/
federal_register/code_of_federal_
regulations/ibr_locations.html. Copies
may be obtained from the National Fire
Protection Association, 1 Batterymarch
Park, Quincy, MA 02269. If any changes
in this edition of the Code are
incorporated by reference, CMS will
publish notice in the Federal Register to
announce the changes.
(1) Chapters 7, 8, 12, and 13 of the
adopted Health Care Facilities Code do
not apply to a hospice.
(2) If application of the Health Care
Facilities Code required under
paragraph (e) of this section would
result in unreasonable hardship upon
the hospice, CMS may waive specific
provisions of the Health Care Facilities
Code, but only if the waiver does not
adversely affect the health and safety of
patients.
*
*
*
*
*
PART 460—PROGRAMS OF ALL
INCLUSIVE CARE FOR THE ELDERLY
(PACE)
9. The authority citation for part 460
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: Secs. 1102, 1871, 1894(f), and
1934(f) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C.
1302 and 1395, 1395eee(f), and 1396u–4(f)).
10. Amend § 460.72 by—
A. Revising paragraph (b)(1)(i).
B. Amending paragraph (b)(1)(ii) by
removing the reference to ‘‘Chapter
19.3.6.3.2, exception number 2’’ and
adding in its place ‘‘Chapter 19.3.6.3.5
numbers 1 and 2 and Chapter 19.3.6.3.6
number 2’’.
■ C. Removing paragraphs (b)(3) and (4).
■ D. Redesignating paragraph (b)(5) as
paragraph (b)(3).
■ E. Revising newly redesignated
paragraph (b)(3).
■ F. Adding new paragraph (b)(4) and
paragraph (d).
The revisions and addition read as
follows:
■
■
■
§ 460.72
Physical environment.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(1) * * *
(i) Except as otherwise provided in
this section, a PACE center must meet
the applicable provisions of the 2012
edition of the Life Safety Code (LSC) of
the National Fire Protection Association
that apply to the type of setting in
which the center is located, regardless
of the number of PACE enrollees served.
The Director of the Office of the Federal
Register has approved the NFPA 101®
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
21573
2012 edition of the Life Safety Code,
issued August 11, 2011, for
incorporation by reference in
accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1
CFR part 51. A copy of the Code is
available for inspection at the CMS
Information Resource Center, 7500
Security Boulevard, Baltimore, MD or at
the National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For
information on the availability of this
material at NARA, call 202–741–6030,
or go to: https://www.archives.gov/
federal_register/code_of_federal_
regulations/ibr_locations.html. Copies
may be obtained from the National Fire
Protection Association, 1 Batterymarch
Park, Quincy, MA 02269. If any changes
in this edition of the Code are
incorporated by reference, CMS will
publish notice in the Federal Register to
announce the changes.
*
*
*
*
*
(3) A PACE center may install
alcohol-based hand rub dispensers in its
facility if the dispensers are installed in
a manner that adequately protects
against inappropriate access.
(4) When a sprinkler system is out of
service for more than 4 hours in a 24hour period, the PACE center must—
(i) Evacuate the building or portion of
the building affected by the system
outage until the system is back in
service, or
(ii) Establish a fire watch until the
system is back in service.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) Standard: Building Safety. Except
as otherwise provided in this section, a
PACE center must meet the applicable
provisions of the 2012 edition of the
Health Care Facilities Code of the
National Fire Protection Association,
regardless of the number of patients
served. The Director of the Office of the
Federal Register has approved the NFPA
99® 2012 edition of the Health Care
Facilities Code, issued August 11, 2011,
for incorporation by reference in
accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1
CFR part 51. A copy of the Code is
available for inspection at the CMS
Information Resource Center, 7500
Security Boulevard, Baltimore, MD or at
the National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For
information on the availability of this
material at NARA, call 202–741–6030,
or go to: https://www.archives.gov/
federal_register/code_of_federal_
regulations/ibr_locations.html. Copies
may be obtained from the National Fire
Protection Association, 1 Batterymarch
Park, Quincy, MA 02269. If any changes
in this edition of the Code are
incorporated by reference, CMS will
E:\FR\FM\16APP2.SGM
16APP2
21574
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 73 / Wednesday, April 16, 2014 / Proposed Rules
publish notice in the Federal Register to
announce the changes.
(1) Chapters 7, 8, 12, and 13 of the
adopted Health Care Facilities Code do
not apply to a PACE center.
(2) If application of the Health Care
Facilities Code required under
paragraph (d) of this section would
result in unreasonable hardship upon
the PACE center, CMS may waive
specific provisions of the Health Care
Facilities Code, but only if the waiver
does not adversely affect the health and
safety of patients.
*
*
*
*
*
PART 482—CONDITIONS OF
PARTICIPATION FOR HOSPITALS
11. The authority citation for part 482
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: Secs. 1102, 1871, and 1881 of
the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1302,
1395hh, and 1395rr), unless otherwise noted.
12. Amend § 482.41 by—
A. Revising paragraph (b)(1)(i).
B. Amending paragraph (b)(1)(ii) by
removing the reference to ‘‘Chapter
19.3.6.3.2, exception number 2’’ and
adding in its place ‘‘Chapter 19.3.6.3.5
numbers 1 and 2 and Chapter 19.3.6.3.6
number 2’’.
■ C. Removing paragraphs (b)(4) and (5).
■ D. Redesignating paragraphs (b)(6)
through (9) as paragraphs (b)(4) through
(7), respectively.
■ E. Revising newly redesignated
paragraph (b)(7).
■ F. Adding new paragraphs (b)(8), (9),
and (10).
■ G. Redesignating paragraph (c) as
paragraph (d).
■ H. Adding new paragraph (c).
The revisions and additions read as
follows:
■
■
■
§ 482.41 Condition of participation:
Physical environment.
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS2
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(1) * * *
(i) Except as otherwise provided in
this section, the hospital must meet the
applicable provisions of the 2012
edition of the Life Safety Code of the
National Fire Protection Association,
regardless of the number of patients
served. The Director of the Office of the
Federal Register has approved the NFPA
101® 2012 edition of the Life Safety
Code, issued August 11, 2011, for
incorporation by reference in
accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1
CFR part 51. A copy of the Code is
available for inspection at the CMS
Information Resource Center, 7500
Security Boulevard, Baltimore, MD or at
the National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:04 Apr 15, 2014
Jkt 232001
information on the availability of this
material at NARA, call 202–741–6030,
or go to: https://www.archives.gov/
federal_register/code_of_federal_
regulations/ibr_locations.html. Copies
may be obtained from the National Fire
Protection Association, 1 Batterymarch
Park, Quincy, MA 02269. If any changes
in this edition of the Code are
incorporated by reference, CMS will
publish notice in the Federal Register to
announce the changes.
*
*
*
*
*
(7) A hospital may install alcoholbased hand rub dispensers in its facility
if the dispensers are installed in a
manner that adequately protects against
inappropriate access;
(8) When a sprinkler system is out of
service for more than 4 hours in a 24hour period, the hospital must—
(i) Evacuate the building or portion of
the building affected by the system
outage until the system is back in
service, or
(ii) Establish a fire watch until the
system is back in service.
(9) In windowless anesthetizing
locations, the hospital must have a
supply and exhaust system that—
(i) Automatically vents smoke and
products of combustion.
(ii) Prevents recirculation of smoke
originating within the surgical suite.
(iii) Prevents the circulation of smoke
entering the system intake.
(10) Except for, newborn nurseries
and rooms intended for occupancy for
less than 24 hours, every sleeping room
must have an outside window or
outside door, and the sill height must
not exceed 36 inches above the floor.
Special nursing care areas shall not
exceed 60 inches. Windows in atrium
walls are considered outside windows
for the purposes of this requirement.
(c) Standard: building safety. Except
as otherwise provided in this section,
the hospital must meet the applicable
provisions of the 2012 edition of the
Health Care Facilities Code of the
National Fire Protection Association,
regardless of the number of patients
served. The Director of the Office of the
Federal Register has approved the NFPA
99® 2012 edition of the Health Care
Facilities Code, issued August 11, 2011,
for incorporation by reference in
accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1
CFR part 51. A copy of the Code is
available for inspection at the CMS
Information Resource Center, 7500
Security Boulevard, Baltimore, MD or at
the National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For
information on the availability of this
material at NARA, call 202–741–6030,
or go to: https://www.archives.gov/
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
federal_register/code_of_federal_
regulations/ibr_locations.html. Copies
may be obtained from the National Fire
Protection Association, 1 Batterymarch
Park, Quincy, MA 02269. If any changes
in this edition of the Code are
incorporated by reference, CMS will
publish notice in the Federal Register to
announce the changes.
(1) Chapters 7, 8, 12, and 13 of the
adopted Health Care Facilities Code do
not apply to a hospital.
(2) If application of the Health Care
Facilities Code required under
paragraph (c) of this section would
result in unreasonable hardship upon
the hospital, CMS may waive specific
provisions of the Health Care Facilities
Code, but only if the waiver does not
adversely affect the health and safety of
patients.
*
*
*
*
*
PART 483—REQUIREMENTS FOR
STATES AND LONG TERM CARE
FACILITIES
13. The authority citation for part 483
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: Secs. 1102, 1128l and 1871 of
the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1302 and
1395hh).
§ 483.15
[Amended]
14. In § 483.15, amend paragraph
(h)(4) by removing the reference
‘‘§ 483.70(d)(2)(iv)’’ and by adding in its
place the reference ‘‘§ 483.70(e)(2)(iv)’’.
■ 15. Amend § 483.70 by—
■ A. Revising paragraph (a)(1)(i).
■ B. Amending paragraph (a)(1)(ii) by
removing the reference to ‘‘Chapter
19.3.6.3.2, exception number 2’’ and
adding in its place ‘‘Chapter 19.3.6.3.5
numbers 1 and 2 and Chapter 19.3.6.3.6
number 2’’.
■ C. Removing paragraphs (a)(4) and (5).
■ D. Redesignating paragraphs (a)(6)
through (8) as paragraphs (a)(4) through
(6), respectively.
■ E. Revising newly redesignated
paragraphs (a)(4).
■ F. Adding new paragraph (a)(7).
■ G. Redesignating paragraphs (b)
through (h) as paragraphs (c) through (i).
■ H. Adding new paragraph (b).
The revisions read as follows:
■
§ 483.70
Physical environment.
*
*
*
*
*
(a)(1) * * *
(i) Except as otherwise provided in
this section, the long term care facility
must meet the applicable provisions of
the 2012 edition of the Life Safety Code
of the National Fire Protection
Association, regardless of the number of
residents served. The Director of the
Office of the Federal Register has
E:\FR\FM\16APP2.SGM
16APP2
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS2
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 73 / Wednesday, April 16, 2014 / Proposed Rules
approved the NFPA 101® 2012 edition
of the Life Safety Code, issued August
11, 2011, for incorporation by reference
in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and
1 CFR part 51. A copy of the Code is
available for inspection at the CMS
Information Resource Center, 7500
Security Boulevard, Baltimore, MD or at
the National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For
information on the availability of this
material at NARA, call 202–741–6030,
or go to: https://www.archives.gov/
federal_register/code_of_federal_
regulations/ibr_locations.html. Copies
may be obtained from the National Fire
Protection Association, 1 Batterymarch
Park, Quincy, MA 02269. If any changes
in this edition of the Code are
incorporated by reference, CMS will
publish notice in the Federal Register to
announce the changes.
*
*
*
*
*
(4) A long-term care facility may
install alcohol-based hand rub
dispensers in its facility if the
dispensers are installed in a manner that
adequately protects against
inappropriate access.
*
*
*
*
*
(7) Every sleeping room must have an
outside window or outside door, and
the sill height must not exceed 36
inches above the floor. Windows in
atrium walls are considered outside
windows for the purposes of this
requirement.
(b) Standard: building safety. Except
as otherwise provided in this section,
the long term care facility must meet the
applicable provisions of the 2012
edition of the Health Care Facilities
Code of the National Fire Protection
Association, regardless of the number of
residents served. The Director of the
Office of the Federal Register has
approved the NFPA 99® 2012 edition of
the Health Care Facilities Code, issued
August 11, 2011, for incorporation by
reference in accordance with 5 U.S.C.
552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. A copy of the
Code is available for inspection at the
CMS Information Resource Center, 7500
Security Boulevard, Baltimore, MD or at
the National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For
information on the availability of this
material at NARA, call 202–741–6030,
or go to: https://www.archives.gov/
federal_register/code_of_federal_
regulations/ibr_locations.html. Copies
may be obtained from the National Fire
Protection Association, 1 Batterymarch
Park, Quincy, MA 02269. If any changes
in this edition of the code are
incorporated by reference, CMS will
publish notice in the Federal Register to
announce the changes.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:04 Apr 15, 2014
Jkt 232001
(1) Chapters 7, 8, 12, and 13 of the
adopted Health Care Facilities Code do
not apply to a long term care facility.
(2) If application of the Health Care
Facilities Code required under
paragraph (b) of this section would
result in unreasonable hardship upon
the long term care facility, CMS may
waive specific provisions of the Health
Care Facilities Code, but only if the
waiver does not adversely affect the
health and safety of residents.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 16. Amend § 483.470 by—
■ A. Revising paragraph (j)(1)(i).
■ B. Amending paragraph (j)(1)(ii) by
removing the reference to ‘‘Chapter
19.3.6.3.2, exception number 2’’ and
adding in its place ‘‘Chapter 19.3.6.3.5
numbers 1 and 2 and Chapter 19.3.6.3.6
number 2’’.
■ C. Adding a new paragraph (j)(1)(iii).
■ D. Removing paragraphs (j)(5) and (6).
■ E. Redesignating paragraph (j)(7) as
paragraph (j)(5).
■ F. Revising newly redesignated
paragraph (j)(5).
The revisions and additions read as
follows:
§ 483.470 Condition of participation:
Physical environment.
*
*
*
*
*
(j) * * *
(1) * * *
(i) Except as otherwise provided in
this section, the facility must meet the
applicable provisions of either the
Health Care Occupancies Chapters or
the Residential Board and Care
Occupancies Chapter of the 2012
edition of the Life Safety Code of the
National Fire Protection Association,
regardless of the number of clients
served. The Director of the Office of the
Federal Register has approved the NFPA
101® 2012 edition of the Life Safety
Code, issued August 11, 2011, for
incorporation by reference in
accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1
CFR part 51. A copy of the Code is
available for inspection at the CMS
Information Resource Center, 7500
Security Boulevard, Baltimore, MD or at
the National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For
information on the availability of this
material at NARA, call 202–741–6030,
or go to: https://www.archives.gov/
federal_register/code_of_federal_
regulations/ibr_locations.html. Copies
may be obtained from the National Fire
Protection Association, 1 Batterymarch
Park, Quincy, MA 02269. If any changes
in this edition of the Code are
incorporated by reference, CMS will
publish notice in the Federal Register to
announce the changes.
*
*
*
*
*
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
21575
(iii) Chapters 32.3.2.11.2 and
33.3.2.11.2 of the adopted 2012 LSC do
not apply to a facility.
*
*
*
*
*
(5) Facilities that meet the LSC
definition of a health care occupancy.
(i) After consideration of State survey
agency recommendations, CMS may
waive, for appropriate periods, specific
provisions of the Life Safety Code if the
following requirements are met:
(A) The waiver would not adversely
affect the health and safety of the
clients.
(B) Rigid application of specific
provisions would result in an
unreasonable hardship for the facility.
(ii) A facility may install alcoholbased hand rub dispensers if the
dispensers are installed in a manner that
adequately protects against
inappropriate access.
(iii) When a sprinkler system is out of
service for more than 4 hours in a 24hour period, the facility must—
(A) Evacuate the building or portion
of the building affected by the system
outage until the system is back in
service, or
(B) Establish a fire watch until the
system is back in service.
(iv) Except as otherwise provided in
this section, ICF–IIDs must meet the
applicable provisions of the 2012
edition of the Health Care Facilities
Code of the National Fire Protection
Association, regardless of the number of
clients served. The Director of the Office
of the Federal Register has approved the
NFPA 99® 2012 edition of the Health
Care Facilities Code, issued August 11,
2011, for incorporation by reference in
accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1
CFR part 51. A copy of the Code is
available for inspection at the CMS
Information Resource Center, 7500
Security Boulevard, Baltimore, MD or at
the National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For
information on the availability of this
material at NARA, call 202–741–6030,
or go to: https://www.archives.gov/
federal_register/code_of_federal_
regulations/ibr_locations.html. Copies
may be obtained from the National Fire
Protection Association, 1 Batterymarch
Park, Quincy, MA 02269. If any changes
in this edition of the Code are
incorporated by reference, CMS will
publish notice in the Federal Register to
announce the changes.
(A) Chapter 7,8,12 and 13 of the
adopted Health Care Facilities Code
does not apply to an ICF–IID.
(B) If application of the Health Care
Facilities Code required under
paragraph (iv) of this section would
result in unreasonable hardship upon
E:\FR\FM\16APP2.SGM
16APP2
21576
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 73 / Wednesday, April 16, 2014 / Proposed Rules
the ICF–IID, CMS may waive specific
provisions of the Health Care Facilities
Code, but only if the waiver does not
adversely affect the health and safety of
clients.
*
*
*
*
*
PART 485—CONDITIONS OF
PARTICIPATION: SPECIALIZED
PROVIDERS
17. The authority citation for part 485
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: Secs. 1102 and 1871 of the
Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1302 and
1395(hh)).
18. Amend § 485.623 by—
A. Revising paragraph (d)(1)(i).
B. Amending paragraph (d)(1)(ii) by
removing the reference to ‘‘Chapter
19.3.6.3.2, exception number 2’’ and
adding in its place ‘‘Chapter 19.3.6.3.5
numbers 1 and 2 and Chapter 19.3.6.3.6
number 2’’.
■ C. Removing paragraphs (d)(5) and (6).
■ D. Redesignating paragraph (d)(7) as
paragraph (d)(5).
■ E. Revising newly redesignated
paragraph (d)(5).
■ F. Adding paragraphs (d)(6), (7), and
(8) and (e)
The revisions and additions read as
follows:
■
■
■
§ 485.623 Condition of participation:
Physical plant and environment.
*
*
*
*
(d) * * *
(1) * * *
(i) Except as otherwise provided in
this section, the CAH must meet the
applicable provisions of the 2012
edition of the Life Safety Code of the
National Fire Protection Association,
regardless of the number of patients
served. The Director of the Office of the
Federal Register has approved the NFPA
101® 2012 edition of the Life Safety
Code, issued August 11, 2011, for
incorporation by reference in
accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1
CFR part 51. A copy of the Code is
available for inspection at the CMS
Information Resource Center, 7500
emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS2
*
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:04 Apr 15, 2014
Jkt 232001
Security Boulevard, Baltimore, MD or at
the National Archives and records
Administration (NARA). For
information on the availability of this
material at NARA, call 202–741–6030,
or go to: https://www.archives.gov/
federal_register/code_of_federal_
regulations/ibr_locations.html. Copies
may be obtained from the National Fire
Protection Association, 1 Batterymarch
Park, Quincy, MA 02269. If any changes
in this edition of the Code are
incorporated by reference, CMS will
publish notice in the Federal Register to
announce the changes.
*
*
*
*
*
(5) A CAH may install alcohol-based
hand rub dispensers in its facility if the
dispensers are installed in a manner that
adequately protects against
inappropriate access.
(6) When a sprinkler system is out of
service for more than 4 hours in a 24hour period, the CAH must—
(i) Evacuate the building or portion of
the building affected by the system
outage until the system is back in
service, or
(ii) Establish a fire watch until the
system is back in service.
(7) In windowless anesthetizing
locations, the CAH must have a supply
and exhaust system that—
(i) Automatically vents smoke and
products of combustion,
(ii) Prevents recirculation of smoke
originating within the surgical suite,
and
(iii) Prevents the circulation of smoke
entering the system intake.
(8) Except for, newborn nurseries and
rooms intended for occupancy for less
than 24 hours, every sleeping room
must have an outside window or
outside door, and the sill height must
not exceed 36 inches above the floor.
Special nursing care areas shall not
exceed 60 inches. Windows in atrium
walls are considered outside windows
for the purposes of this requirement.
(e) Standard: building safety. Except
as otherwise provided in this section,
the CAH must meet the applicable
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 9990
provisions of the 2012 edition of the
Health Care Facilities Code of the
National Fire Protection Association,
regardless of the number of patients
served. The Director of the Office of the
Federal Register has approved the NFPA
99® 2012 edition of the Health Care
Facilities Code, issued August 11, 2011,
for incorporation by reference in
accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1
CFR part 51. A copy of the Code is
available for inspection at the CMS
Information Resource Center, 7500
Security Boulevard, Baltimore, MD or at
the National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For
information on the availability of this
material at NARA, call 202–741–6030,
or go to: https://www.archives.gov/
federal_register/code_of_federal_
regulations/ibr_locations.html. Copies
may be obtained from the National Fire
Protection Association, 1 Batterymarch
Park, Quincy, MA 02269. If any changes
in this edition of the Code are
incorporated by reference, CMS will
publish notice in the Federal Register to
announce the changes.
(1) Chapters 7, 8, 12, and 13 of the
adopted Health Care Facilities Code do
not apply to a CAH.
(2) If application of the Health Care
Facilities Code required under
paragraph (e) of this section would
result in unreasonable hardship upon
the CAH, CMS may waive specific
provisions of the Health Care Facilities
Code, but only if the waiver does not
adversely affect the health and safety of
patients.
*
*
*
*
*
Dated: August 22, 2013.
Marilyn Tavenner,
Administrator, Centers for Medicare &
Medicaid Services.
Approved: March 7, 2014.
Kathleen Sebelius,
Secretary, Department of Health and Human
Services.
[FR Doc. 2014–08602 Filed 4–14–14; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 4120–01–P
E:\FR\FM\16APP2.SGM
16APP2
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 73 (Wednesday, April 16, 2014)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 21551-21576]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-08602]
[[Page 21551]]
Vol. 79
Wednesday,
No. 73
April 16, 2014
Part III
Department of Health and Human Services
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
42 CFR Parts 403, 416, 418, et al.
Medicare and Medicaid Programs; Fire Safety Requirements for Certain
Health Care Facilities; Proposed Rule
Federal Register / Vol. 79 , No. 73 / Wednesday, April 16, 2014 /
Proposed Rules
[[Page 21552]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
42 CFR Parts 403, 416, 418, 460, 482, 483, and 485
[CMS-3277-P]
RIN 0938-AR72
Medicare and Medicaid Programs; Fire Safety Requirements for
Certain Health Care Facilities
AGENCY: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This proposed rule would amend the fire safety standards for
Medicare and Medicaid participating hospitals, critical access
hospitals (CAHs), long-term care facilities, intermediate care
facilities for individuals with intellectual disabilities (ICF-IID),
ambulatory surgery centers (ASCs), hospices which provide inpatient
services, religious non-medical health care institutions (RNHCIs), and
programs of all-inclusive care for the elderly (PACE) facilities.
Further, this proposed rule would adopt the 2012 edition of the Life
Safety Code (LSC) and eliminate references in our regulations to all
earlier editions. It would also adopt the 2012 edition of the Health
Care Facilities Code, with some exceptions. We are providing the LSC
citation, a description of the 2012 requirement, and an explanation of
its benefits for health care facilities, patients, staff, and visitors
over the 2000 version in each occupancy section.
DATES: To be assured consideration, comments must be received at one of
the addresses provided below, no later than 5 p.m. on June 16, 2014.
ADDRESSES: In commenting, please refer to file code CMS-3277-P. Because
of staff and resource limitations, we cannot accept comments by
facsimile (FAX) transmission.
You may submit comments in one of four ways (please choose only one
of the ways listed):
1. Electronically. You may submit electronic comments on this
regulation to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the ``Submit a
comment'' instructions.
2. By regular mail. You may mail written comments to the following
address only: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Department of
Health and Human Services, Attention: CMS-3277-P, P.O. Box 8010,
Baltimore, MD 21244-8010.
Please allow sufficient time for mailed comments to be received
before the close of the comment period.
3. By express or overnight mail. You may send written comments to
the following address only: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services,
Department of Health and Human Services, Attention: CMS-3277-P, Mail
Stop C4-26-05, 7500 Security Boulevard, Baltimore, MD 21244-1850.
4. By hand or courier. Alternatively, you may deliver (by hand or
courier) your written comments only to the following addresses prior to
the close of the comment period:
a. For delivery in Washington, DC-- Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Services, Department of Health and Human Services, Room 445-G, Hubert
H. Humphrey Building, 200 Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC
20201.
(Because access to the interior of the Hubert H. Humphrey Building
is not readily available to persons without Federal government
identification, commenters are encouraged to leave their comments in
the CMS drop slots located in the main lobby of the building. A stamp-
in clock is available for persons wishing to retain a proof of filing
by stamping in and retaining an extra copy of the comments being
filed.)
b. For delivery in Baltimore, MD-- Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Services, Department of Health and Human Services, 7500 Security
Boulevard, Baltimore, MD 21244-1850.
If you intend to deliver your comments to the Baltimore address,
call telephone number (410) 786-9994 in advance to schedule your
arrival with one of our staff members.
Comments erroneously mailed to the addresses indicated as
appropriate for hand or courier delivery may be delayed and received
after the comment period.
For information on viewing public comments, see the beginning of
the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kristin Shifflett, (410) 786-4133.
Danielle Shearer, (410) 786-6617.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Inspection of Public Comments: All comments
received before the close of the comment period are available for
viewing by the public, including any personally identifiable or
confidential business information that is included in a comment. We
post all comments received before the close of the comment period on
the following Web site as soon as possible after they have been
received: https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the search instructions on
that Web site to view public comments.
Comments received timely will also be available for public
inspection as they are received, generally beginning approximately 3
weeks after publication of a document, at the headquarters of the
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, 7500 Security Boulevard,
Baltimore, Maryland 21244, Monday through Friday of each week from 8:30
a.m. to 4 p.m. To schedule an appointment to view public comments,
phone 1-800-743-3951.
I. Background
A. Overview of the Life Safety Code and the Health Care Facilities Code
The Life Safety Code (LSC) is a compilation of fire safety
requirements for new and existing buildings, and is updated and
published every 3 years by the National Fire Protection Association
(NFPA), a private, nonprofit organization dedicated to reducing loss of
life due to fire. The LSC regulations adopted by Centers for Medicare &
Medicaid Services (CMS) apply to hospitals, long-term care facilities
(LTC), critical access hospitals (CAHs), ambulatory surgical centers
(ASC), intermediate care facilities for individuals with intellectual
disabilities (ICF-IIDs), hospice inpatient care facilities, programs
for all inclusive care for the elderly (PACE), and religious non-
medical health care institutions (RNHCIs). The Medicare and Medicaid
regulations have historically incorporated by reference these
requirements, along with Secretarial waiver authority. The statutory
basis for incorporating NFPA's LSC for our providers and suppliers is
the Secretary's authority to stipulate health and safety regulations
for each type of Medicare and (if applicable) Medicaid-participating
facilities, as well as the Secretary's general rulemaking authority set
out at sections 1102 and 1871 of the Social Security Act (the Act).
In our regulations, issued pursuant to the Act, we have stated that
we believe CMS has the authority to grant waivers of some provisions of
the LSC when necessary; for instance, to hospitals under section
1861(e)(9) of the Act, and to LTC facilities at sections 1819(d)(2)(B)
and 1919(d)(2)(B) of the Act. Currently, the Secretary may waive
specific provisions of the LSC for any type of facility, if application
of the rule would result in unreasonable hardship for the facility, and
if the health and safety of its patients would not be compromised.
We do not consider it always necessary for a facility to be cited
for a deficiency before it can apply for or receive a waiver. This is
particularly the
[[Page 21553]]
case when we have evaluated specific provisions of the LSC, determined
that a waiver would arguably apply to all similarly-situated facilities
with respect to the LSC requirement in question, and issued a public
communication describing the specifics of such a categorical waiver,
including any particular requirements that must be met in order for the
waiver to apply to a facility. Waiver approval in these instances would
be subject to a review of documentation maintained by the facility,
verification of the applicability of the waiver, and confirmation that
the terms and requirements of the waiver have been implemented by the
facility. In most cases such verification occurs when an onsite survey
of the facility is conducted. We plan to continue this approach, but
would like to clarify that in those cases where we have issued a prior
public communication providing for a categorical waiver, an advance
recommendation from a state survey agency or accrediting organization
(as applicable), is not required in order for a waiver to be granted.
We have issued categorical waivers of LSC requirements when newer
editions of the LSC provided equally effective means of ensuring life
safety compared to requirements of earlier LSC editions. When CMS has
evaluated the alternative (such as examining the new fire safety
research and technology), and concluded that the specific alternative
would improve or maintain the safety of the residents or patients of
the facility, CMS may defer to newer editions of the LSC. CMS requires
that providers comply with applicable provisions of the version of the
LSC referenced in the categorical waiver.
In addition, the Secretary may accept a state's fire and safety
code instead of the LSC if CMS determines that the protections of the
state's fire and safety code are equivalent to the protections offered
by the LSC. Further, the NFPA's Fire Safety Evaluation System (FSES),
an equivalency system, provides alternatives to meeting various
provisions of the LSC, thereby achieving the same level of fire
protection as the LSC. These flexibilities mitigate the potential
burdens of applying the requirements of the LSC to all affected health
care facilities.
On January 10, 2003, we published a final rule in the Federal
Register (68 FR 1374) adopting the 2000 edition of the LSC. In this
final rule, we required that all affected providers and suppliers meet
the provisions of the 2000 edition of the LSC, with certain exceptions.
One of the exceptions to the 2000 edition of the LSC is the code's use
of roller latches on corridor doors in buildings that are fully
protected by a sprinkler system. We believe that roller latches are a
safety hazard under all circumstances and prohibit their use in all
Medicare and applicable Medicaid facilities. We also removed references
to all previous editions of the LSC.
In 2002, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
published an initial set of hand hygiene guidelines for health care
settings on its Web site (https://www.cdc.gov/handhygiene/Guidelines.html). The guidelines recommended the use of alcohol-based
hand rub (ABHR) dispensers. On September 22, 2006 we published a final
rule (71 FR 55326), to allow certain health care facilities to place
ABHR dispensers in exit corridors under specified conditions. To
accommodate the placement of ABHR dispensers in health care facilities,
the NFPA retroactively amended the 2000 edition of the code. When CMS
adopts an edition of the LSC, it adopts that edition as it existed on
the day of publication of the final rule. Since the changes to the 2000
edition of the LSC occurred after publication of the January 2003 final
rule that adopted the 2000 edition of the LSC, CMS was required to use
the notice and comment rulemaking process to adopt the amendment that
the NFPA made to the code.
The September 2006 final rule also required that LTC facilities, at
a minimum, install battery-powered single station smoke alarms in
resident rooms and common areas if their buildings were not fully
sprinklered, or if the building did not have system-based smoke
detectors. A Government Accountability Office (GAO) report entitled
``Nursing Home Fire Safety: Recent Fires Highlight Weaknesses in
Federal Standards and Oversights'' GAO-04-660, July 16, 2004, (https://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-04-660) examined two LTC facility fires
(Hartford and Nashville) in 2003, that resulted in 31 total resident
deaths. The report examined Federal fire safety standards and
enforcement procedures, as well as results from the fire investigations
of these two incidents. It specifically cited requiring smoke detectors
in these facilities as one way to strengthen the requirements. We
agreed with the GAO findings and added this smoke alarm requirement in
response to the GAO report.
On August 13, 2008, we published a final rule (73 FR 47075), to
require all LTC facilities to install automatic sprinkler systems
throughout their buildings in accordance with the technical provisions
of the 1999 edition of NFPA 13--Standard for the Installation of
Sprinkler Systems, and to test, inspect, and maintain sprinkler systems
in accordance with the technical requirements of the 1998 edition of
NFPA 25--Standard for the Inspection, Testing and Maintenance of Water-
Based Fire Protection Systems. The August 2008 final rule required all
LTC facilities to be equipped with sprinkler systems by August 13,
2013. This rule was also in response to the July 2004 GAO report on
nursing home fire safety. In addition to its findings related to smoke
alarms, the GAO recommended that fire safety standards for
unsprinklered LTC facilities be strengthened, and cited sprinklers as
the single most effective fire protection feature for LTC facilities.
On October 24, 2011, we published a proposed rule (76 FR 65891), to
reform hospital and critical access hospital conditions of
participation. Many of the public comments received during the comment
period strongly encouraged CMS to adopt the 2012 edition of the LSC.
The commenters stated that the newest edition of the LSC would clarify
several issues and would be beneficial to facilities.
B. 2012 Edition of the Life Safety Code
The 2012 edition of the LSC includes new provisions that we believe
are vital to the health and safety of all patients and staff. Our
intention is to ensure that patients and staff continue to experience
the highest degree of fire safety possible. The term ``Patient(s)''
will be globally used throughout this document, and refers to patient,
clients, residents and all other terms used to describe the type of
individuals cared for in each provider type. The use of earlier
editions of the code can become problematic due to advances in safety
and technology, and changes made to each edition of the code. Newer
buildings are typically built to comply with the newer versions of the
LSC because state and local jurisdictions, as well as non-CMS-approved
accreditation programs, often adopt and enforce newer versions of the
code as they become available. Therefore, a health care facility that
is constructed or renovated in 2013 would likely be required by its
state and local authorities to comply with a more recent edition of the
LSC, while also being required to comply with the 2000 edition of the
LSC to meet the Medicare and applicable Medicaid regulatory
requirements. Requiring compliance with two different editions of the
LSC at the same time can create unnecessary conflicts, duplications,
and inconsistencies that increase construction and compliance costs
without any fire safety or patient care benefits. For example, the 2000
edition
[[Page 21554]]
of the LSC limits ABHRs to gel form, whereas the 2012 edition of the
LSC expands to allow aerosol and gel ABHRs. Limiting the choice of
ABHRs creates barriers to improve hand hygiene, which has been shown to
reduce the number of health care associated infections. We believe that
adopting the 2012 LSC would simplify and modernize the construction and
renovation process for affected health care providers and suppliers,
reduce compliance-related burdens, and allowing for more resources to
be used for patient care.
The 2012 edition of the LSC contains several significant changes
from the 2000 edition. First, the format of the LSC has been altered.
The LSC has eliminated the use of ``exceptions'' throughout the entire
code to provide more consistency and easier reading. There was also a
change in measurement systems, from centimeters to millimeters. Using a
smaller unit of measurement allows for more precision and consistency
throughout the LSC.
The 2000 LSC requires minor renovation projects to meet the same
stringent requirements as those applied to completely new construction.
However, the 2012 edition of the LSC contains a new chapter entitled,
``Chapter 43--Building Rehabilitation.'' This new chapter replaces the
requirements that all modernizations/renovations meet the requirements
for new construction. The degree to which requirements for new
construction must be met now varies with the rehabilitation work
category. This chapter sets out different types of building
rehabilitation work (that is, repair, renovation, modification,
reconstruction, change of use, change of occupancy and addition) to
which different standards apply. We believe that this clarification
will assist health care facilities by reducing costs for minor
construction projects.
Buildings that have not received all pre-construction governmental
approvals required by the jurisdiction(s) in which the building is to
be built before the rule's effective date, or those buildings that
begin construction after the effective date of this regulation, would
be required to meet the New Occupancy chapters of the 2012 edition of
the LSC. Buildings constructed before the effective date of this
regulation would be required to meet the Existing Occupancy chapters of
the 2012 edition of the LSC. Changes made to buildings would be
required to comply with Chapter 43--Building Rehabilitation, which
could require compliance with the New Occupancy chapters, depending on
the changes being made. In instances where mandatory LSC references do
not include existing chapters, existing occupancies must ensure
buildings and equipment are in compliance with provisions previously
adopted by CMS at the time they were constructed or installed.
Health Care Occupancies
The following are provisions that appear in the 2012 edition of the
LSC, but that did not exist in the 2000 edition of the LSC, for Chapter
18, ``New Health Care Occupancies,'' and Chapter 19, ``Existing Health
Care Occupancies.'' We are providing the LSC citation, a description of
the 2012 requirement, and an explanation of its benefits for health
care facilities, patients, staff, and visitors over the 2000 version.
Both the 2000 and 2012 editions of the LSC classify a ``Health Care
Occupancy'' as a facility having 4 or more patients on an inpatient
basis. However, CMS does not apply this LSC standard with respect to
patient census numbers. Unless specifically noted, the requirements,
conditions of participation, and conditions for coverage for all
Medicare and Medicaid-participating health care providers and suppliers
subject to these rules would apply on a facility basis, regardless of
the size of the facility or the facility's patient census. These basic
requirements are established to assure a core level of safety and
quality for all patients, regardless of where they receive health care
services. We believe that patients in small facilities should be
assured the same level of fire safety as those in larger facilities.
Therefore, the LSC exception for health care occupancy facilities with
fewer than four occupants/patients would be inapplicable to the
Medicare and Medicaid facilities affected by this proposed rule. All
health care occupancies that provide care to one or more patients would
be required to comply with the relevant requirements of the 2012
edition of the LSC.
Sections 18.2.3.4 (2) and 19.2.3.4(2)--Corridor Projections
This provision requires noncontinuous projections to be no more
than 6 inches from the corridor wall. In addition to following the
requirements of the LSC, health care facilities are also required to
follow the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).
Section 307 of the ``ADA Accessibility Guidelines for Buildings and
Facilities'' (https://www.ada.gov/regs2010/2010ADAStandards/2010ADAstandards.htm#c4) requires that projections be no more than 4
inches from the corridor wall. Therefore, while the LSC allows
facilities to have 6 inch projections, so long as the ADA standard is 4
inches then facilities should only have 4 inch projections to comply
with the more stringent requirement set forth by the ADA.
Sections 18.2.5.7 and 19.2.5.7--Suites
This new provision has enlarged the size of permissible sleeping
suites for patients to potentially allow `more comfort and space for
patients' if the facilities choose to use the larger size patient
rooms. The provision requires that new construction sleeping suites
cannot exceed 7500 square feet. Previously sleeping suites could not
exceed 5000 square feet. Sleeping suites greater than 7500 square feet,
and not exceeding 10,000 square feet, may be permitted where there is
direct visual supervision and a complete smoke detection system. This
change allows health care facilities to have more patients in a single
area, reducing the number of staff that are necessary to visually
monitor patients and allowing facilities to accommodate additional
pieces of medical equipment or visitor space. This could improve
facility staffing flexibility and reduce costs by allowing this
increase in size thereby reducing the number of suites to treat the
same number of patients.
Sections 18.7.5.7.2 and 19.7.5.7.2--Recycling
This new provision requires that containers used solely for
recycling clean waste be limited to a maximum capacity of 96 gallons.
If the recycling containers are located in a protected hazardous area,
container size will not be limited. In the 2000 edition of the LSC, the
container size was limited to 32 gallons. The larger containers allowed
in the 2012 edition of the LSC require less frequent emptying, which
could reduce housekeeping costs.
Sections 18.3.6.3.9.1 and 19.3.6.3.5--Roller Latches
A roller latch is a type of door latching mechanism to keep a door
closed. The 2012 edition of the LSC requires corridor doors to be
provided with a means for keeping the door closed that is acceptable to
the authority having jurisdiction. The LSC permits roller latches
capable of keeping the door fully closed if a force of 5 pounds is
applied at the latch edge or roller latches in fully sprinklered
buildings. However, we would not adopt these standards from the 2012
LSC. Through fire investigations, roller latches have proven to be an
unreliable door latching
[[Page 21555]]
mechanism requiring extensive maintenance to operate properly. Many
roller latches in fire situations failed to provide adequate protection
to residents in their rooms during an emergency. Therefore, roller
latches would be prohibited in existing and new Health Care
Occupancies, and corridor doors would be required to have positive
latching devices.
Sections 18.4.2 and 19.4.2--Sprinklers in High-Rise Buildings
This is a new provision for existing health care occupancies. This
provision requires buildings over 75' (generally greater than 7 or 8
stories) in height to have automatic sprinkler systems installed
throughout the building. The 2012 LSC allows 12-years from when the
authority having jurisdiction (which in this case is CMS) officially
adopts the 2012 edition of the LSC for existing facilities to comply
with the sprinkler system installation requirement. Therefore, those
facilities that are not already required to do so would have 12 years
following publication of the final rule adopting the 2012 LSC to
install sprinklers. We propose to adopt this new provision because
high-rise buildings require more time to evacuate, and sprinklers would
very likely allow additional time to safely evacuate a facility.
We believe that this provision would mainly affect hospitals.
However, we are specifically soliciting public comment to determine if
other provider types are, or may be, located in a high-rise building.
We would also like to solicit public comments regarding the phase-in
period of 12 years, including if 12-years is enough time for the
installation of sprinklers in high-rise buildings.
Sections 18.2.2.2.5.2 and 19.2.2.2.5.2--Door Locking
This new provision requires that, where the special needs of
patients require specialized protective measures for their safety,
door-locking arrangements are permitted. This provision allows interior
doors to be locked to reduce the risk of infant abductions and
individuals who may wander, subject to the following requirements: (1)
All staff must have keys; (2) smoke detection systems must be in place;
and (3) the facility must be fully sprinklered; (4) the locks are
electrical locks that will release upon loss of power to the device and
(5) the locks release by independent activation of the smoke detection
system and the water flow in the automatic sprinkler system. This
provision would improve the security of health care facilities with
specialized needs and improve patient safety.
Sections 18.3.2.6 and 19.3.2.6--Alcohol Based Hand Rubs (ABHRs)
This provision now explicitly allows aerosol dispensers, in
addition to gel hand rub dispensers. The aerosol dispensers are subject
to limitations on size, quantity, and location, just as gel dispensers
are limited. Automatic dispensers are also now permitted in health care
facilities, provided that the following requirements are met: (1) They
do not release contents unless they are activated; (2) the activation
occurs only when an object is within 4 inches of the sensing device;
(3) any object placed in the activation zone and left in place must not
cause more than one activation; (4) the dispenser must not dispense
more than the amount required for hand hygiene consistent with the
label instructions; (5) the dispenser is designed, constructed and
operated in a way to minimize accidental or malicious dispensing; and
(6) all dispensers are tested in accordance with the manufacturer's
care and use instructions each time a new refill is installed. The
provision further defines prior language regarding ``above or adjacent
to an ignition source'' as being ``within 1 inch'' of the ignition
source. These new provisions would allow for more hand hygiene
dispenser options for all facilities.
Sections 18.3.5 and 19.3.5--Extinguishment Requirements
This provision is related to sprinkler system requirements and
cross references section 9.7 of the LSC, ``Automatic sprinklers and
other extinguishing equipment.'' Section 9.7 further cross references
the 2011 edition of NFPA 25, Standard for the Inspection, Testing and
Maintenance of Water-based Fire Protection Systems. Section 9.7.5 of
the LSC states ``All automatic sprinkler and standpipe systems required
by this Code shall be inspected, tested and maintained in accordance
with NFPA 25. . . .'' Section 15.5.2, of the 2011 edition of NFPA 25,
which is cross-referenced by the 2012 edition of the LSC, requires the
evacuation of a building or the instituting of an approved fire watch
when a sprinkler system is out of service for more than 10 hours in a
24-hour period until the system has been returned to service. However
the 1998 edition of NFPA 25, which is cross-referenced by the 2000
edition of the LSC, has the same requirement when a sprinkler system is
out of service for only 4 hours. Because of the increased reliance upon
a facility sprinkler protection system in the 2012 edition of the LSC,
and to ensure a facility is adequately monitored when a sprinkler
system is out of service, we propose to retain the requirement for
evacuation or a fire watch when a sprinkler system is out of service
for more than 4 hours. This provision is set out in the applicable
sections of this proposed rule.
Section 18.3.2.3 and 19.3.2.3--Anesthetizing Locations
This provision requires that anesthetizing locations be protected
in accordance with the 2012 edition of NFPA 99, Health Care Facilities
Code. The 2012 edition of NFPA 99 eliminated an important requirement
that was in the 1999 edition of NFPA 99. The 1999 edition of NFPA 99,
which is cross-referenced in the 2000 LSC, requires a smoke control
ventilation system in anesthetizing locations (for example, Operating
Rooms). The 1999 edition of NFPA 99 requires that supply and exhaust
systems for windowless anesthetizing locations must be arranged to
automatically vent smoke and products of combustion to prevent the
circulation of smoke originating from within and outside the operating
room(s). The smoke control is intended to protect the anesthetizing
location until surgical procedures can be completed and patients can be
safely evacuated from the operating rooms. As fires in operating rooms
continue to occur, we propose to retain the requirement for smoke
control in anesthetizing locations, notwithstanding the lower standard
in the 2012 LSC. https://www.fda.gov/ForConsumers/ConsumerUpdates/ucm282810.htm.
Sections 18.2.3.4 and 19.2.3.4--Corridors
This new provision allows for storage of medical equipment in the
corridors. Any equipment that is in use, including medical emergency
equipment, and patient lift and transportation equipment is permitted
to be stored in the corridors for more timely patient care. This
provision also allows facilities to place fixed furniture in the
corridors. This creates resting points in the corridors for patients
and families in facilities and makes for a more home-like setting.
Sections 18.3.2.5.3 and 19.3.2.5.3--Cooking Facilities
This provision is a new section, which further supports a more
home-like setting in health care facilities. Cooking facilities are
allowed in a smoke compartment where food is prepared for 30
individuals or fewer (by
[[Page 21556]]
bed count). The cooking facility is permitted to be open to the
corridor, provided that the following conditions are met:
The area being served is limited to 30 beds or less;
The area is separated from other portions of the facility
by a smoke barrier;
The range hood and stovetop meet certain standards--
++ A switch must be located in the area that is used to deactivate
the cook top or range whenever the kitchen is not under staff
supervision
++ The switch also has a timer, not exceeding 120-minute capacity
that automatically shuts off after time runs out
Two smoke detectors must be located no closer than 20 feet
and not further than 25 feet from the cooktop or range.
Sections 18.7.5.1 and 19.7.5.1--Furnishings & Decorations
This provision has been revised to allow combustible decor in any
health care occupancy as long as they are flame-retardant or treated
with approved fire-retardant coating that is listed and labeled, and
meet fire test standards. The d[eacute]cor (such as photographs,
paintings and other art) may be attached directly to the walls,
ceilings, and non fire-rated doors as long as it does not interfere
with the operation of the doors. Additionally, decor may not exceed--
(1) 20 percent of the wall, ceiling and doors, in any room that is not
protected by an approved automatic sprinkler system; (2) 30 percent of
the wall, ceiling and doors, in any room that is not protected by an
approved, supervised automatic sprinkler system; and (3) 50 percent of
the wall, ceiling and doors, in any room with a capacity of 4 people
(the actual number of occupants in the room may be less than its
capacity) that is not protected by an approved, supervised automatic
sprinkler system. These changes would allow individuals to bring in
their own furnishings and decor, which helps to provide a more home-
like setting.
Sections 18.5.2.3 and 19.5.2.3--Fireplaces
This provision has been revised to allow direct-vent gas fireplaces
in smoke compartments without the 1 hour fire wall rating. Fireplaces
must not be located inside of any patient sleeping room. Solid fuel-
burning fireplaces are permitted and can be used only in areas other
than patient sleeping rooms, and must be separated from sleeping rooms
by construction of no less than a 1 hour fire resistance wall rating.
This provision allows for more options for the location of fireplaces
in health care facilities, which makes the facilities feel more home-
like.
Outside Window or Door Requirements
The 2000 edition of the LSC required that every health care
occupancy patient sleeping room shall have an outside window or outside
door, with new health care occupancies having an allowable sill height
not to exceed 36 inches above the floor with certain exceptions. This
requirement no longer exists in the 2012 edition of the LSC; however,
as outside windows and doors may be used for smoke control, building
entry, patient and resident evacuation, and other emergency forces
operations during an emergency situation, we propose to retain this
requirement. We propose the following exceptions to the outside window
or door requirement, as included in the 2000 edition of the LSC:
Newborn nurseries and rooms intended for occupancy for
less than 24 hours have no sill height requirements.
Windows in atrium walls shall be considered outside
windows for the purposes of this requirement.
The window sill height in special nursing care areas shall
not exceed 60 inches above the floor.
Ambulatory Health Care Occupancies
The following are new provisions in the 2012 edition of the LSC
from Chapter 20, ``New Ambulatory Health Care Occupancies'' and Chapter
21, ``Existing Ambulatory Health Care Occupancies.'' We are providing
the LSC citation, a description of the requirement, and an explanation
of its benefits for health care facilities, patients, staff, and
visitors.
Both the 2000 and 2012 edition of the LSC define an ``Ambulatory
Health Care Occupancy'' as a facility capable of treating 4 or more
patients simultaneously on an outpatient basis. CMS regulations at 42
CFR Sec. 416.44 require that all ASCs meet the provisions applicable
to Ambulatory Health Care Occupancy, regardless of the number of
patients served. We believe that hospital outpatient surgical
departments are comparable to ASCs and thus should also be required to
meet the provisions applicable to Ambulatory Health Care Occupancy
Chapters, regardless of the number of patients served.
Sections 20.1.6.4 and 21.1.6.5--Interior Nonbearing Walls
This new provision allows all interior nonbearing walls that are
required to have a minimum 2 hour fire resistance rating to be
constructed of fire-retardant treated wood enclosed within
noncombustible or limited combustible materials, provided that these
walls are not used as shaft enclosures. The use of fire-retardant
treated wood allows for more flexibility during construction and could
reduce the cost of construction.
Sections 20.3.2.1 and 21.3.2.1--Doors
This new provision requires all doors to hazardous areas to be
self-closing or close automatically. This provision was added to
provide an extra level of protection for all patients. Adding this
provision aligns the requirements for both ASCs and Health care
occupancies to assure the same basic level of protection for all
patients.
Sections 20.3.2.6 and 21.3.2.6--ABHRs
This provision now explicitly allows aerosol dispensers, in
addition to gel hand rub dispensers. The aerosol dispensers are subject
to limitations on size, quantity, and location, just as gel dispensers
are. Automatic dispensers are also now permitted in health care
facilities, provided, among other things, that--(1) they do not release
contents unless they are activated; (2) the activation occurs only when
an object is within 4 inches of the sensing device; (3) any object
placed in the activation zone and left in place must not cause more
than one activation; (4) the dispenser must not dispense more than the
amount required for hand hygiene consistent with the label
instructions; (5) the dispenser is designed, constructed and operated
in a way to minimize accidental or malicious dispensing; (6) all
dispensers are tested in accordance with the manufacturer's care and
use instructions each time a new refill is installed. The provision
further defines prior language regarding ``above or adjacent to an
ignition source'' as being ``within 1 inch'' of the ignition source.
These new provisions allow for more hand hygiene dispenser options for
all facilities.
Sections 20.3.5 and 21.3.5--Extinguishment Requirements
This provision is related to sprinkler system requirements and
cross references section 9.7 of the LSC, ``Automatic sprinklers and
other extinguishing equipment.'' Section 9.7 also cross references the
2011 edition of NFPA 25, ``Standard for the Inspection, Testing and
Maintenance of Water-based Fire Protection Systems.'' Section 9.7.5 of
the LSC states, ``All automatic sprinkler and standpipe systems
required by this Code shall be inspected, tested and maintained in
accordance with NFPA 25. . . .''
[[Page 21557]]
Section 15.5.2, of the 2011 edition of NFPA 25, which is cross-
referenced by the 2012 edition of the LSC, requires the evacuation of a
building or the instituting of an approved fire watch when a sprinkler
system is out of service for more than 10 hours in a 24-hour period
until the system has been returned to service. The 1998 edition of NFPA
25, which is cross-referenced by the 2000 edition of the LSC, has the
same requirement when a sprinkler system is out of service for only 4
hours. With the increased reliance upon a facility sprinkler protection
system in the 2012 edition of the LSC, and to ensure a facility is
adequately monitored when a sprinkler system is out of service, we
propose to retain the requirement for evacuation or a fire watch when a
sprinkler system is out of service for more than 4 hours.
Section 20.3.2.3 and 21.3.2.3--Anesthetizing Locations
This provision requires that anesthetizing locations be protected
in accordance with the 2012 edition of NFPA 99, Health Care Facilities
Code. The 2012 edition of NFPA 99 eliminated an important requirement
that was in the 1999 edition of NFPA 99. The 1999 edition of NFPA 99,
which is cross-referenced by to the 2000 LSC, requires a smoke control
ventilation system in anesthetizing locations (for example, Operating
Rooms). The 1999 edition of NFPA 99 requires that supply and exhaust
systems for windowless anesthetizing locations must be arranged to
automatically vent smoke and products of combustion to prevent the
circulation of smoke originating from within and outside the operating
room. The smoke control is intended to protect the anesthetizing
location until surgical procedures can be completed and patients can be
safely evacuated from the operating rooms. As fires in operating rooms
continue to occur, we propose to retain the requirement for smoke
control in anesthetizing locations.
Residential Board and Care Occupancies
The LSC requirements for residential care facilities are
differentiated based on the evacuation capability of the facility in
question. The term ``evacuation capability'' refers to the ability of
occupants, residents, and staff as a group either to evacuate a
building, or to relocate from one point of occupancy to a point of
safety. An ``impractical evacuation capability'' means that a group is
unable to reliably move to a point of safety in a timely manner. A
``prompt evacuation capability'' means that a group is able to move
reliably to a point of safety in a timely manner that is equivalent to
the capacity of a household in the general population. A ``slow
evacuation capability'' means that a group is able to move reliably to
a point of safety in a timely manner, but not as rapidly as members of
a household in the general population. The LSC requirements for a
facility that has a prompt evacuation capability may be different from
those for a facility that has an impractical evacuation capability.
Those differences are reflected in the following provisions.
Both the 2000 and 2012 editions of the LSC classify ``board and
care'' as a facility ``used for lodging or boarding of 4 or more
patients not related by blood or marriage to the owners or operators,
for the purpose of providing personal care services.'' However, for CMS
regulatory purposes, unless specifically noted, the conditions of
participation and conditions for coverage for all affected health care
providers and suppliers apply to all patients in a facility, regardless
of the number of patients served. These basic requirements are
established to assure a core level of safety and quality for all
patients, regardless of where they receive health care services. We
continue to believe that patients in very small facilities should be
assured the same level of fire safety as those residing in very large
facilities. Therefore, the LSC ``4 or more'' criteria would not apply
to any Medicare and applicable Medicaid certified facilities. All
residential board and care occupancies that provide care to one or more
patients would be required to comply with the relevant requirements of
the 2012 edition of the LSC.
The following are provisions that appear in the 2012 edition of the
LSC, but that did not exist in the 2000 edition of the LSC, for Chapter
32, ``New Residential Board and Care Occupancies'' and Chapter 33,
``Existing Residential Board and Care Occupancies.'' We are providing
the LSC citation, a description of the requirement, and an explanation
of its benefits for health care facilities, patients, staff, and
visitors.
Section 32.2.3.5.3.2--Sprinklers
This revised provision has been expanded to require that sprinkler
systems be installed in all habitable areas, closets, roofed porches,
balconies and decks of new facilities. Although this section of the LSC
does not apply to existing facilities, we strongly encourage all
existing facilities be sprinklered in all habitable areas in the same
manner that newly constructed facilities are required to be
sprinklered.
Sections 32.2.3.5.7 and 33.2.3.5.7--Attics
This new provision requires attics of new and existing facilities
to be sprinklered. The attics of new board and care facilities are
required to be protected in accordance with sections 32.2.3.5.7.1 or
32.2.3.5.7.2 of the LSC. The attics of existing board and care
facilities are required to be protected in accordance with sections
33.2.3.5.7.1 or 33.2.3.5.7.2 of the LSC. For both new and existing
board and care facilities, if the attic is used for living purposes,
storage, or housing of fuel fired equipment, it must be protected with
an automatic approved sprinkler system. If the attic is used for other
purposes or is not used, then it must meet one of the following
requirements: (1) Have a heat detection system that activates the
building fire alarm system; (2) have automatic sprinklers; (3) be of
noncombustible or limited-combustible construction; or (4) be
constructed of fire-retardant-treated-wood. We are requesting public
comment on the length of time needed to install sprinklers in attics.
This provision was added after fire investigations demonstrated that
fires in attics pose a high hazard in this type of occupancy. For
example, one well-known case would be the fire in a board and care
facility in Wells, New York on March 21, 2009. The fire started on the
screened porch and spread to the unsprinklered attic where it quickly
engulfed the facility. Despite the prompt evacuation by staff, 4 of the
9 clients perished in the fire. (https://www.prevention1st.org/documents/Wells_Fire_GrandJuryReport.pdf.)
Sections 32.2.2 and 33.2.2--Means of Escape
This new provision requires designated means of escape to be
continuously maintained free of all obstructions or impediments to full
instant use in the case of a fire or emergency. This provision was
added because there were no provisions within the occupancy chapter to
prohibit an obstructed means of escape, and to emphasize that all means
of escape are required to be free of obstructions to allow use without
delay.
Section 32.3.3.4.7--Smoke Alarms
This new provision would only affect newly constructed facilities.
Approved smoke alarms are required to be installed in accordance with
9.6.2.10 of the LSC inside every sleeping room, outside every sleeping
area, in the immediate vicinity of the bedrooms, and on all levels
within a resident unit. This
[[Page 21558]]
requirement is located in Chapter 32, which only applies to newly
constructed facilities. We are soliciting public comments about whether
or not CMS should also require existing facilities to have smoke alarms
that meet the requirements of this section.
Sections 32.7.6 and 33.7.6--Staff
This new provision for both newly constructed and existing
facilities requires staff to be on duty and in the facility at all
times when residents requiring evacuation assistance are present. This
provision was added because staff assistance during evacuation is a
necessity in this occupancy. This would increase safety for patients
that are unable to independently exit the building in an emergency
situation.
Sections 32.3.2.2.2 and 33.3.2.2.2--Access-Controlled Egress Doors
New and existing facilities must be permitted to have access-
controlled egress doors that are in accordance with 7.2.1.6.2 of the
LSC. When using the term ``egress,'' we are describing, for example,
hallways or corridors, interior and exterior stairways, entrance ways
or lobbies, and escalators. Section 7.2.1.6.2 of the LSC permits means
of egress to be equipped with electrical lock hardware to prevent
egress. This provision was added to improve safety while allowing for
more flexibility.
Section 33.3.3.2.3--Hazardous Areas
This new provision is for existing facilities with impractical
evacuation capabilities. All hazardous areas must be separated from
other parts of the building by smoke partitions, and also in accordance
with section 8.4 of the LSC. Section 8.4 of the LSC addresses the
continuity of smoke partitions and requires that they be placed
appropriately. We are requesting public comment on the length of time
needed to install smoke partitions in hazardous areas. This new
provision provides a higher level of safety for facilities with
impractical evacuation capabilities, and allows more time for
individuals using facilities with slower evacuation capabilities to
exit the building.
Section 33.3.3.4.6.2--Emergency Forces Notification
This new provision is only for existing facilities. Where a new
fire alarm system is installed, or the existing fire alarm system is
replaced, notification of emergency forces must be handled in
accordance with section 9.6.4 of the LSC, which states that, where
required by another section of this code, notification of emergency
forces should alert the municipal fire department and fire brigade (if
provided) of fire or other emergency. This new provision would increase
safety for residents and staff by assuring that the appropriate
emergency force is quickly notified of an emergency situation, enabling
the emergency force to arrive in the fastest time possible to aid
residents and staff.
Waiver Authority
We are proposing to retain our existing authority to waive
provisions of the LSC under certain circumstances, further reducing the
exposure to additional cost and burden for facilities with unique
situations. A waiver may be granted for a specific LSC requirement if
we determine that--(1) The waiver would not adversely affect patient/
staff health and safety; and (2) it would impose an unreasonable
hardship on the facility to meet a specific LSC requirement. We do not
consider it always necessary for a facility to be cited for a
deficiency before it can apply for or receive a waiver, and we have
periodically issued communications regarding specific provisions of the
LSC that we evaluated and for which we have determined that a waiver
would generally apply, subject to documentation maintained by the
facility and verification of the applicability of the waiver when a
survey of the facility is conducted. We plan to continue this approach.
In cases where a provider or supplier has been cited for a LSC
deficiency, the provider or supplier may request a waiver from its
State Survey Agency or Accrediting Organization (AO) with a CMS-
approved Medicare and applicable Medicaid accreditation program. The
State Survey Agency or AO reviews the request and makes a
recommendation to the appropriate CMS Regional Office. The CMS Regional
Office would review the waiver request and the recommendation and make
a final decision. A waiver cannot be granted if patient health and
safety is compromised.
The LSC recognizes alternative systems, methods, or devices
approved as equivalent by the authority having jurisdiction as being in
compliance with the LSC. CMS, as the authority having jurisdiction for
certification, will determine equivalency through the waiver approval
process.
State Fire Codes
In addition to the proposed waiver option, a state may request that
its state fire safety requirements, imposed by state law, be used in
lieu of the 2012 edition of the LSC, which we are proposing to adopt in
this rule. The state must submit the request to the appropriate CMS
Regional Office, and the Regional Office would forward the request to
CMS central office for final determination. We would retain our
authority to apply the Fire Safety Evaluation System (FSES) as an
alternative approach to meeting the requirements of the LSC.
C. 2012 Edition of the Health Care Facilities Code
The 2012 edition of the NFPA 99, ``Health Care Facilities Code'',
addresses requirements for both health care occupancies and ambulatory
care occupancies, and serves as a resource for those who are
responsible for protecting health care facilities from fire and
associated hazards. The purpose of this Code is to provide minimum
requirements for the installation, inspection, testing, maintenance,
performance, and safe practices for health care facility materials,
equipment and appliances. This Code is a compilation of documents that
have been developed over a 40-year period by NFPA, and is intended to
be used by those persons involved in the design, construction,
inspection, and operation of health care facilities, and in the design,
manufacture, and testing of appliances and equipment used in patient
care areas of health care facilities. It provides information on
subjects such as medical gas and vacuum systems, electrical systems,
electrical equipment, and gas equipment.
The NFPA 99, which is a cross-referenced document in the LSC, has
undergone some significant changes. The NFPA 99 has been upgraded from
a standard to a code. A code, as used by the NFPA describes what to do,
whereas a standard describes how to comply with the code. In addition
to the upgrade, the format of the code has changed from specific
provisions that are directed by different chapters in the NFPA 99 to
provisions that apply to all health care facilities. The applicability
of any specific provision is determined in accordance with the results
of a risk based methodology. Previous editions utilized occupancy
chapters to determine which systems were required in a health care
facility. Requirements were applied based upon the facility type (that
is, Hospital, Nursing Home, Limited Care Facility, Other Health Care
Facilities). In the 2012 edition, requirements are based upon the
possible risks to patients and residents, regardless of the type of
facility.
Although NFPA 99 is a reference document of the 2012 edition of the
[[Page 21559]]
LSC, the health care occupancy chapters of the LSC do not reference
NFPA 99 requirements for all areas within a health care facility. In
order to ensure the minimum level of protection afforded by NFPA 99 is
applicable to all patient and resident care areas within a health care
facility, CMS is proposing the adoption of the 2012 edition of NFPA 99,
with the exception of chapters 7, 8, 12, and 13. In the following
section, we describe the key provisions within the NFPA 99.
The first three chapters of the NFPA 99 address the administration
of the NFPA 99, the referenced publications and also definitions.
Chapter 4--Fundamentals
Chapter 4 is new to the 2012 edition and provides guidance on how
to apply NFPA 99 requirements to health care facilities based upon
``categories'' determined when using a risk-based methodology. A risk-
based approach allows for the application of requirements based upon
the types of treatment and services being provided to patients or
residents rather than the type of facility in which they are being
performed. This approach will ensure that patients and residents in all
types of health care facilities are provided with a minimum level of
protection. In addition, the risk-based approach will allow a facility
to determine the appropriate level of protection required in individual
areas throughout a facility based upon each area's risk to patients or
residents, and would no longer require the facility to implement
requirements in discriminately throughout an entire facility. Based
upon a risk assessment conducted by qualified facility personnel,
implementation of less stringent requirements may be appropriate for
areas presenting a lower risk to patients or residents, while
implementation of more stringent requirements is reserved for areas
presenting a higher risk. This will allow health care facilities to
apply the most appropriate level of protection in an efficient and
economical manner.
There are four categories utilized in the risk assessment
methodology, depending on the types of treatment and services being
provided to patients or residents. Section 4.1.1 of NFPA 99 describes
Category 1 as, ``Facility systems in which failure of such equipment or
system is likely to cause major injury or death of patients or
caregivers . . . .'' Section A.4.1.1 provides examples of what a major
injury could include, such as amputation or a burn to the eye. Section
4.1.2 describes Category 2 as, ``Facility systems in which failure of
such equipment is likely to cause minor injury to patients or
caregivers . . . .'' Section A.4.1.2 describes a minor injury as one
that is not serious or involving risk of life. Section 4.1.3 describes
Category 3 as, ``Facility systems in which failure of such equipment is
not likely to cause injury to patients or caregivers, but can cause
patient discomfort . . . .'' Section 4.1.4 describes Category 4 as,
``Facility systems in which failure of such equipment would have no
impact on patient care . . . .''
Section 4.2 would require that each facility that is a health care
or ambulatory occupancy define its risk assessment methodology,
implement the methodology and document the results. We do not propose
to require the use of any particular risk assessment procedure. Section
A.4.2 provides examples of appropriate risk assessment procedures, such
as ISO/IEC31010, Risk management--Risk Assessment, or NFPA 551, Guide
for the Evaluation of Fire Risk Assessments.
Chapter 5--Gas and Vacuum Systems
The hazards addressed in Chapter 5 include the ability of oxygen
and nitrous oxide to exacerbate fires, safety concerns from the storage
and use of pressurized gas, and the reliance upon medical gas and
vacuum systems for patient care. Adopting Chapter 5 would ensure a
minimal level of the performance, maintenance, installation, and
testing of piped medical gas and vacuum systems in all patient and
resident care areas (for example, operating rooms, intensive care
units, critical care units, procedure rooms, and sleeping rooms).
Chapter 5 would not mandate the installation of any systems; rather, if
they are installed or are required to be installed, the systems would
be required to comply with NFPA 99.
Chapter 5 covers the performance, maintenance, installation, and
testing of the following:
Nonflammable medical gas systems with operating pressure
below a gauge pressure of 300 psi;
Vacuum systems in health care facilities;
Waste anesthetic gas disposal systems (WAGD); and
Manufactured assemblies that are intended for connection
to the medical gas, vacuum, or WAGD systems.
The NFPA 99 defines key terms that are used frequently throughout
this chapter as follows:
Section 3.3.108--Medical Gas Systems
Medical gas systems are an assembly of equipment and piping for the
distribution of nonflammable medical gases such as oxygen, nitrous
oxide, compressed air, carbon dioxide, and helium.
Section 3.3.110--Medical-surgical Vacuum
Medical-surgical vacuum systems are used to provide a source of
drainage, aspiration, and suction in order to remove body fluids from
patients.
Section 3.3.183--Waste Anesthetic Gas Disposal Systems (WAGD)
A WAGD system is the process of capturing and carrying gases vented
from the patient breathing circuit during the normal operation of gas
anesthesia or analgesia equipment.
Section 3.3.111--Medical-Surgical Vacuum System
A medical-surgical vacuum system is an assembly of central vacuum-
producing equipment and a network of piping for patient suction in
medical, surgical, and WAGD applications.
Section 3.3.102--Manufactured Assembly
A manufactured assembly is a factory-assembled product that
contains medical gas or vacuum outlets, piping, or other devices
related to medical gas.
Chapter 5 is organized by category as described in Chapter 4. The
NFPA Technical Committee on Medical Gas did not find there was a need
for Category 4 requirements, as Category 4 facilities would not
ordinarily have piped medical gas or vacuums. Chapter 5 includes
several sections, described below, which are significant to managing
the hazards associated with gas and vacuum systems.
Section 5.1.3--Category 1 Sources
This section includes information on the management of the sources
for the medical gas, vacuum, WAGD, and instrument supply systems. It
requires facilities to identify and label storage containers and other
system components. It also contains requirements related to areas used
to store gas and equipment, and how to handle gas cylinders and
containers. Facilities would be required to design and construct
systems and storage locations in accordance with the requirements for
this section. This section also regulates the requirements for
construction materials and placement of system components, and
requirements for emergency power and quality assurance.
[[Page 21560]]
Section 5.1.9--Category 1 Warning Systems
This section includes information on the requirements for warning
systems that monitor piped gas and vacuum systems. Warning systems
monitor and alert the facility if a condition exists that could have a
negative effect on the health and safety of patients, staff, and
visitors. This section regulates the functions, capabilities,
placement, labeling, emergency power, wiring, computer systems,
initiating devices, and monitoring requirements for master, area, and
local alarm systems.
Section 5.1.10--Category 1 Distribution
This section includes information on the requirements for the
piping system for medical gas, vacuum, and WAGD systems. It regulates
piping system installation, location, assembly, cleaning, and materials
of construction, inspection, and installer qualifications.
Section 5.1.14--Category 1 Operation and Management
This section includes information on the operation and maintenance
of medical gas, vacuum, WAGD and support gas systems. Issues addressed
in this section include system limitations, maintenance programs,
inspection and testing, management of flexible connections, piping and
valve labeling, and recordkeeping. This section allows facilities
flexibility in meeting the maintenance program requirements by focusing
on the basic goals, timing, and qualifications for performing the work.
NFPA 99 would not require a specific schedule, allowing a facility to
determine the frequency of maintenance based on the original quality,
age and longevity, and known characteristics of the equipment.
Section 5.2 Category--2 Piped Gas and Vacuum Systems and 5.3 Category 3
Piped Gas and Vacuum Systems
Category 2 requirements apply to facilities treating patients who
might require the gases occasionally, but ordinarily would not require
them. When the use of gas is required for patient care, the need is
short term. The provisions for Category 2 are virtually the same as for
Category 1, except some equipment is permitted to be simplex rather
than duplex. Category 3 applies to office-based care, where gases are
used in such a manner that the life of the patient is never at issue in
the event of failure of gas. Many requirements in the Category 3
section are similar to the requirements in Category 1 and Category 2.
Chapter 6--Electrical Systems
The hazards addressed in Chapter 6 are related to the electrical
power distribution systems in health care facilities, and address
issues such as electrical shock, power continuity, fire, electrocution,
and explosions that might be caused by faults in the electrical system.
Although these threats are present in any facility, the vulnerabilities
of patients or residents in health care facilities, coupled with the
complexity of the systems involved, create a need for distinct
considerations.
Chapter 6 covers the performance, maintenance, and testing of both
the normal and essential electrical systems (EES) in health care
facilities. The normal electrical system is comprised of a normal power
supply, typically provided by a public utility, connected to the
facility electrical distribution system and ancillary equipment. The
normal electrical system supplies power to the health care facility
under normal operating conditions. An EES is comprised of an alternate
source of power, typically a generator, connected to the facility's
separate essential electric distribution systems and ancillary
equipment. An EES is designed to ensure continuity of electrical power
to designated areas and functions of a health care facility during a
disruption of the normal power sources, and also to minimize
disruptions with the internal wiring system (3.3.48).
Certain provisions in Chapter 6 related to the normal power system
are defined by category as described in Chapter 4; however, all EES
provisions are organized by ``Type.'' Category 1 systems are the most
reliable and complex, because patients being served by these systems
are the most dependent on this system to function properly and will be
at the greatest risk if the system fails. Category 2 systems are a step
down from Category 1 systems, and Category 3 systems are another step
down. Critical care rooms (Category 1) would be required to be served
by a Type 1 EES, general care rooms would be required to be served by a
Type 1 or Type 2 EES, and basic care rooms and non-patient care rooms
are not required to be served by any EES.
Chapter 6 includes several sections, which are significant to
managing the hazards associated with the normal electrical system.
Subject areas include:
Section 6.3.1--Sources
This section requires each line-powered electrical appliance in a
health care facility to be supported by sources and distribution
systems that provide power adequate for each service.
Section 6.3.2--Distribution
This section includes information on the electrical distribution
systems within a health care facility. Some of the issues addressed
include:
Electrical system installation;
Specific requirements for patient care rooms (circuits,
overcurrent protection, receptacles, wet locations);
Ground-fault protection; and
Isolated power systems.
Section 6.3.3--Performance Criteria and Testing
This section includes information on electrical system performance
criteria. Electrical systems that support patient rooms would be
required to be tested in order to ensure that they are safe and
reliable. Some of the issues addressed include:
Grounding system testing;
Voltage measurements;
Impedance measurements;
Testing equipment;
Receptacle testing;
Isolated power systems testing; and
Ground-fault protection testing.
Section 6.3.4--Administration of Electric System
This section includes information on the frequency of electrical
system component testing and record keeping requirements. Where
hospital-grade receptacles are required at patient bed locations and in
locations where deep sedation or general anesthesia is administered,
testing must be performed after initial installation, replacement, or
servicing of the device. Receptacles not listed as hospital-grade must
be tested in intervals not exceeding 12 months. The minimum acceptable
documentation would identify what was tested, when it was tested, and
whether it performed successfully.
Chapter 6 also includes several sections related to managing the
hazards associated with the EES, including but not limited to:
Section 6.4.1--Sources (Type 1 EES)
This section includes specific information for on-site generators
used as an alternate source of power. Generator requirements focus on
design considerations, generator types, allowable uses, generator
placement and protection, capacity, rating, heating, cooling,
ventilating, battery maintenance, fuel supply, and generator
monitoring. In addition, this section addresses batteries used as
alternate sources of power, as permitted.
[[Page 21561]]
Section 6.4.2--Distribution (Type 1 EES)
This section includes information on the EES distribution systems
and ancillary equipment in a health care facility. It covers topics
such as transfer switches; division of distribution system into three
branches--life safety, critical, and equipment; and wiring
requirements.
Section 6.4.3--Performance Criteria and Testing (Type 1 EES)
This section includes information on EES performance criteria to
assure that the EES is safe and reliable. It includes a requirement
that all functions of the life safety branch and critical branches must
be automatically restored to operation within 10 seconds after
interruption of the normal power source. It also includes specific
transfer switch requirements related to placement, voltage drop, load
transfer, and normal power restoration.
Section 6.4.4--Administration (Type 1 EES)
This section includes general information on the maintenance,
inspection and testing of the EES alternate power source, including
generator testing criteria, test conditions, and testing personnel
qualifications. Specific maintenance, inspection and testing
requirements are also required through reference to NFPA 110, Standard
for Emergency and Standby Power Systems. In addition, this section
addresses the maintenance and testing of EES circuitry and record
keeping requirements.
Section 6.5--Essential Electrical System Requirements--Type 2
Section 6.5 addresses Type 2 EES requirements, which share many of
the Type 1 EES requirements related to maintenance, inspection, and
testing. The major difference between a Type 1 and Type 2 EES is that a
Type 2 EES only requires two separate branches--a Life Safety branch
and an Equipment branch. A Type 2 EES does not require a branch to
supply a limited amount of lighting and power service that is
considered essential for life safety and effective operation to
critical care areas during the time the normal electrical service is
interrupted.
Section 6.6--Essential Electrical System Requirements--Type 3
Section 6.6 addresses Type 3 EES requirements, which share many of
the Type 1 EES requirements related to maintenance, inspection, and
testing. The major difference between a Type 1 or Type 2 EES and a Type
3 EES system is that a Type 3 EES system comprises only one electrical
branch to supply a limited amount of lighting and power service that is
considered essential for life safety and orderly cessation of
procedures during the time normal electrical service is interrupted.
Type 3 EES systems are not permitted in areas where surgery is
performed. In addition, the alternative power for a Type 3 system can
be a generator, battery system, or self-contained battery integral with
the equipment.
Chapter 9--Heating, Ventilation, and Air Conditioning (HVAC)
Chapter 9 is a newly added chapter to the 2012 edition of the NFPA
99 and requires HVAC systems serving spaces or providing health care
functions to be in accordance with the American Society of Heating,
Refrigeration and Air-Conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE) Standard 170--
Ventilation of Health Care Facilities (2008 edition) (https://www.ashrae.org). The purpose of a HVAC system is to create acceptable
indoor air quality. Heating is the process of bringing heat to
different spaces using a variety of sources. Ventilating is the process
of removing or changing air in a space to create a different
temperature or to reduce or remove moisture, odors, smoke, dust, gases
and microbes within a space. Air conditioning is the removal of heat
from a space.
Chapter 9 does not apply to existing HVAC systems, but would apply
to the construction of new health care facilities, and the altered,
renovated, or modernized portions of existing systems or individual
components. Chapter 9 would ensure minimum levels of heating,
ventilation and air conditioning performance in patient and resident
care areas. Some of the issues discussed in Chapter 9 are:
HVAC system energy conservation;
Commissioning;
Piping;
Ductwork;
Acoustics;
Requirements for the ventilation of medical gas storage
and trans-filling areas;
Waste anesthetic gases;
Plumes from medical procedures;
Emergency power system rooms; and
Ventilation during construction.
Chapter 9 includes several sections, which are of significant
importance to managing the hazards associated with HVAC systems,
including but not limited to:
Section 9.3.1--Heating, Cooling, Ventilating, and Process Systems
The purpose of this section is to define design requirements for
ventilation systems in order to assure an environment that is
comfortable and clean, and that minimizes odors in health care
facilities. These requirements also apply to patient care areas and
other related support areas within a health care facility. This section
considers chemical, physical and biological contaminants that can
affect the delivery of medical care to patients, the recovery of
patients, and the safety of patients, health care workers, and
visitors.
Section 9.3.3--Commissioning
This section requires HVAC system commissioning to follow ASHRAE
Guideline 0, The Commissioning Process, and ASHRAE Guideline 1.1, HVAC
& R Technical Requirements for the commissioning process, or other
publically viewed documents acceptable to the authority having
jurisdiction. Commissioning is a quality-oriented process for verifying
new HVAC systems and assemblies meet performance objectives and
criteria. For purposes of this rule, we would consider ASHRAE Guideline
0 and ASHRAE Guideline 1.1 as the only acceptable documents guiding the
commissioning process.
Section 9.3.5--Ductwork
This section requires health care facilities to use ductwork
systems that comply with NFPA 90, Standard for the Installation of Air-
Conditioning and Ventilation Systems or other mechanical codes. NFPA 90
covers the construction, installation, operation, and maintenance of
HVAC systems to protect life and property from fire, smoke, and gases
resulting from a fire. NFPA 90A is also cross-referenced in the 2012
edition of the LSC.
Section 9.3.7--Medical Gas Storage or Transfilling
This section addresses the ventilation requirements for both
medical gas storage and transfilling areas. Transfilling is the process
of transferring a medical gas in gaseous or liquid state from one
container or cylinder to another container or cylinder (3.3.176). Some
of the requirements included in this section are for natural and
mechanical ventilation.
Section 9.3.8--Waste Gas
This section requires the removal of gases vented from the patient
breathing circuit during the normal operation of gas anesthesia or
analgesia equipment by a WAGD system, as described in chapter 5, or by
an active or passive scavenging ventilation system.
[[Page 21562]]
Section 9.3.10--Emergency Power System Room
This section requires operation of the emergency power supply to be
in accordance with NFPA 110, Standard for Emergency and Standby Power
Systems. NFPA 110 addresses ventilation requirements including,
maintaining room temperature, adequate supply of air for generator
combustion and cooling, air supply quality, and generator radiator and
exhaust discharge. NFPA 110, in its entirety, is also cross-referenced
in the 2012 edition of the LSC.
Chapter 10--Electrical Equipment
Chapter 10 covers the performance, maintenance, and testing of
electrical equipment in health care facilities. Much of this chapter
applies to requirements for portable electrical equipment in health
care facilities, but there are also requirements for fixed-equipment
and information on administrative issues. There has been an increased
need for electrical equipment safety requirements due to the increase
in the use of electrical circuits and multiple appliances that are
located close to the patient's body, including situations where they
enter the patient's body (such as internal defibrillators, and
neurostimulators). Chapter 10 includes several sections, which may
reduce the instances of patient injuries and death due to electrical
appliances and equipment, including, but not limited to:
Section 10.2--Performance Criteria and Testing for Patient Care--
Related Electrical Appliances and Equipment
This section includes information on the connection of equipment,
grounding of equipment, power cords, and the proper use of electrical
plug adapters and extension cords. This section also discusses the
proper materials to use to ensure electrical safety.
Section 10.3--Testing Requirements--Fixed and Portable
This section discusses the proper testing procedure for patient
care electrical equipment, both visually and physically, to ensure that
leakage currents, which may cause electrical shocks, are minimized or
eliminated.
Section 10.4--Nonpatient Electrical Appliances and Equipment
This section discusses the proper testing procedure of equipment
that may not be patient care related, but may be in the vicinity of the
patient and could pose an electrical hazard to the patient, if not
properly inspected. Nonpatient electrical appliances may include:
Entertainment devices, computers, displays and such.
Section 10.5--Administration
This section requires facilities to ensure that there are policies
in place for the testing and maintenance of equipment, for the proper
use of electrical equipment in the administration of oxygen therapy,
and for the proper use of electrical equipment in an oxygen enriched
environment. This section also includes requirements for the use,
inspection, and maintenance of equipment found in laboratories. Section
10.5.6 requires that a facility would keep records related to the
performance testing and repairs of patient care equipment. Section
10.5.8 would require that equipment be used and maintained by qualified
and trained personnel.
Chapter 11--Gas Equipment
The hazards addressed in Chapter 11 relate to general fire,
explosions, and mechanical issues associated with gas equipment,
including compressed gas cylinders. Fire and explosions may be caused
by incidents involving oxygen, frequently used in health care
facilities, or nitrous oxide, frequently used as an inhalation
anesthetic. Many materials commonly used in health care facilities are
not flammable in room air, but become flammable or extremely flammable
when the concentration of oxygen is raised in a room. Mechanical
hazards are often associated with compressed gas cylinders, which are
generally under high pressures and are very heavy in weight. The
cylinders can cause injury, if not property secured or mishandled. If
there is physical damage to regulators or valves, such damage may cause
escaping gas to propel the cylinder. Use of Chapter 11 would ensure a
minimal level of performance, maintenance, testing, storage, and
management of gas equipment in all patient and resident care areas.
Chapter 11 includes several sections, which may reduce the
instances of patient injuries and death due to gas equipment. The
following are important provisions of this section:
Section 11.1--Applicability
This section includes information on the types of medical gases
included in this chapter such as nonflammable medical gases, and vapors
and aerosols.
Section 11.2--Cylinder and Container Source
This section includes information on the proper connection of
regulators and gauges to various types of gas sources to prevent cross
connections and leakage.
Section 11.3--Cylinder and Container Storage Requirements
This section includes information on the proper storage of
cylinders and containers, including cryogenic liquid containers. It
discusses the types of enclosures required for storage and signage that
facility must display.
Section 11.4--Performance Criteria and Testing
This section includes information on the proper testing of portable
patient care gas equipment that is found in health care facilities,
proper handling of gas containers for respiratory therapy, and non-
patient gas equipment safety procedures. The section also addresses
special requirements regarding the proper handling of gas equipment in
laboratories.
Section 11.5--Administration
This section includes requirements for the elimination of potential
sources of ignition, as well as the servicing and maintenance of
equipment. There are also special handling requirements in this section
for gases in cylinders, liquefied gases in containers, and transfilling
of cylinders, including the transfilling of liquid oxygen.
Section 11.6--Operation and Maintenance of Cylinders
This section includes requirements for the proper procedures for
safe handling of cylinders and containers. This section also requires
special precautions for handling oxygen cylinders and manifolds, and
making cylinder and container connections.
Section 11.7--Liquid Oxygen Equipment
This section includes information on the safe storage and handling
of liquid oxygen portable containers and base reservoir containers.
Chapter 14--Hyperbaric Facilities
Hyperbaric facilities house hyperbaric chambers and auxiliary
equipment. Hyperbaric medicine is the medical use of oxygen at a level
higher than atmospheric pressure. The hyperbaric chamber is necessary
to adjust the ambient pressure required for hyperbaric oxygen therapy.
Chapter 14 addresses the hazards associated with hyperbaric facilities
in health care facilities, including electrical, explosive, implosive,
as well as fire hazards. Chapter 14 sets forth minimum safeguards for
the protection of patients and personnel administering hyperbaric
therapy and procedures.
Chapter 14 contains requirements for hyperbaric chamber
manufacturers,
[[Page 21563]]
hyperbaric facility designers, and personnel operating hyperbaric
facilities. It also contains requirements related to construction of
the hyperbaric chamber itself and the equipment used for supporting the
hyperbaric chamber, as well as administration and maintenance. Many
requirements in this chapter are applicable only to new construction
and new facilities. However, there are some requirements, ones that are
generally operational in nature, that are applicable to existing
facilities. The 2000 edition of the LSC required that all occupancies
containing hyperbaric facilities must comply with NFPA 99; therefore,
Chapter 14 is not expected to impose a significant burden upon existing
health care facilities.
Hyperbaric chambers are classified according to the number of human
occupants in order to establish appropriate minimum safeguards in
construction and operation. Class A chambers have multiple occupants,
Class B chambers are single occupancy, and Class C chambers are for
animals only (no human occupancy ever).
Chapter 14 includes several sections, which are important to
managing the hazards associated with hyperbaric facilities, including,
but not limited to:
Section 14.2--Construction and Equipment
This section includes information on the construction and
management of hyperbaric facilities and hyperbaric chambers, including
topics such as:
Fabrication of the hyperbaric chamber;
Illumination;
Ventilation;
Fire protection;
Electrical wiring;
Electrical equipment;
Communication systems;
Gas detection and monitoring; and
Chamber equipment and fixtures.
Section 14.3--Administration and Maintenance
This section includes information on the administration and
maintenance of hyperbaric facilities and hyperbaric chambers, including
topics such as:
Recognition of hazards associated with hyperbaric
facilities;
Establishing programs and assigning responsibilities to
ensure safety;
Restrictions on ignition sources;
Limitations on flammables;
Antistatic procedures and grounding;
Limitations on combustibles;
Restrictions and compatibility of equipment;
Proper handling of gases;
Installation, inspection, and maintenance of chamber
equipment; and
Electrical and electrostatic safeguards.
The hazards involved in the use of hyperbaric facilities can be
mitigated successfully only when all of the areas of hazard are fully
recognized by all personnel and when the physical protection provided
is complete and is augmented by attention to detail by all personnel of
administration and maintenance having any responsibility for the
functioning of the hyperbaric equipment. This section addresses the
administration and maintenance of the hyperbaric chamber with
requirements such as the having a Safety Director, developing
management policies and emergency procedures, and fire training of
personnel involved with the use of the chamber. This section also
includes policies describing what types of medical devices or equipment
can be used in the chamber, along with the safe use of medical gases,
electrical equipment, and fire protection equipment used within the
chamber itself.
Chapter 15--Features of Fire Protection
Chapter 15 covers the performance, maintenance, and testing of fire
protection equipment in health care facilities. Issues addressed in
this chapter range from the use of flammable liquids in an operating
room to special sprinkler protection. These fire protection
requirements are independent of the risk-based approach, as they are
applicable to all patient care areas in both new and existing
facilities.
Chapter 15 has several sections taken directly from the NFPA 101,
including requirements for the following:
Construction and compartmentalization of health care
facilities;
Laboratories;
Utilities;
Heating, ventilation and air conditioning systems;
Elevators;
Escalators;
Conveyors;
Rubbish Chutes;
Incinerators;
Laundry Chutes;
Fire detection, alarm and communication systems;
Automatic sprinklers and other extinguishing equipment;
Compact storage including mobile storage and maintenance;
and
Testing of water based fire protection systems.
These sections have requirements for inspection, testing and
maintenance which would apply to all facilities, as well as specific
requirements for existing systems and equipment that would also apply
to all facilities.
Section 15.13 addresses fire loss prevention in operating rooms.
This section includes requirements for a hazard assessment, fire
prevention procedures, procedures for handling flammable germicides and
antiseptics, emergency procedures, and orientation and training. This
section sets out requirements that may reduce the risk of surgical
fires, as described below:
Section 15.13.1--Hazard Assessment
This section includes information on the assessment of hazards that
a facility could encounter during a surgical procedure, and the
periodic review of surgical operations and procedures.
Section 15.13.2--Fire Prevention Procedures
This section requires that fire prevention procedures be
established in facilities, but does not prescribe any particular
procedures. The exact procedures to be used are left to the discretion
of each facility based on its unique circumstances, features, and
needs, and applicable State licensure laws and local ordinances
Section 15.13.3--Germicides and Antiseptics
This section includes information on the procedures for the safe
handling of flammable materials in operating rooms. This section also
outlines operational procedures to address the fire hazards of these
flammable materials, including packaging and material handling,
removing solution-soaked materials, preventing pooling of material,
preoperative ``time-out'' period to allow for drying before patient
draping, and establishing policies and procedures to outline safety
precautions.
Section 15.13.3.9--Emergency Procedures
This section requires emergency procedures to be in place in case
of fire, or chemical spills in the operating room, as well as the
procedures for alarm activation, evacuation and equipment shutdown.
Section 15.13.3.10--Orientation and Training
This section includes requirements for the orientation and training
of new operating room/surgical suite staff for issues such as:
Safe practices related to the area and equipment;
Continuing education;
Incident reviews;
[[Page 21564]]
Procedure updates; and
Fire drills.
II. Proposed Requirements for Health Care Facilities
This section details the specific regulatory changes for each
affected provider and supplier. Due to the similar content and
structure of the regulations for the various providers and suppliers,
most of the information presented repeats for each provider.
1. Religious Nonmedical Health Care Institutions: Condition of
Participation: Life Safety From Fire (Sec. 403.744)
We propose to maintain most of the current provisions for Religious
Nonmedical Health Care Institutions (RNHCI) published in the Federal
Register on January 10, 2003 (68 FR 1374), except if it conflicts with
the 2012 LSC and the requirements are not within the provisions
detailed in Section I of this preamble regardless of the number of
patients the facility serves.
Specifically, we propose to retain the requirements at Sec.
403.744(a)(1)(ii) related to the prohibition of roller latches in
health care facilities. We propose to update the LSC chapter reference
from ``19.3.6.3.2 exception number 2'' to ``19.3.6.3.5 numbers 1 and 2
and 19.3.6.3.6 number 2''.
We propose to modify the requirements specific to ABHRs since most
of the requirements in our regulation are now included in the 2012
edition of the LSC. Therefore, we propose to remove the requirements at
Sec. 403.744(a)(4)(i), (ii), (iv) and (v). We propose to retain the
requirements at Sec. 403.744(a)(4)(iii) related to protection against
inappropriate access, and would redesignate it at Sec. 403.744(a)(4).
We propose to add a new requirement at Sec. 403.744(a)(5) that
would require a facility with a sprinkler system that is out of service
for more than 4 hours in a 24-hour period to evacuate the building or
portion of the building affected by the system outage, or establish a
fire watch until the system is back in service, notwithstanding the
lower standard of the LSC.
We also propose to add a new requirement at Sec. 403.744(a)(6)
that would retain the 36 inch window sill requirement that was in the
2000 edition of the LSC.
In addition, we propose to retain the requirement at Sec.
403.744(b) related to the Secretary's waiver authority and state
imposed codes. We do not propose to make any changes to this section.
Furthermore, we propose to remove the requirements at Sec.
403.744(c) related to the phase-in period for compliance with emergency
lighting. In the 2003 final rule, we allowed facilities until March 13,
2006, to upgrade their emergency lighting equipment. This phase-in
period has now expired and all facilities should be in compliance.
Therefore, this phase-in provision is no longer a necessary regulatory
requirement.
We are proposing to add a new Condition of Participation at Sec.
403.745 that would require RNHCIs to comply with the 2012 edition of
the NFPA 99. We propose that chapters 7, 8, 12, and 13 would not apply
to RNHCIs. We also propose to allow for waivers of these provisions
under the same conditions and procedures that we currently use for
waivers of applicable provisions of the LSC.
2. Ambulatory Surgery Centers: Condition for Coverage: Environment
(Sec. 416.44)
We propose that all ASCs meet the provisions applicable to
Ambulatory Health Care Centers in the 2012 edition of the LSC, except
as detailed in section I of this preamble, regardless of the number of
patients the facility serves. We believe the protection provided in the
Ambulatory Health Care Centers chapter is necessary to protect the
health and safety of patients who are incapable of caring for
themselves at any point in time. However, we do not believe that the
Business Occupancy chapter of the LSC (applied by some authorities
having jurisdiction to ASCs treating fewer than 4 patients at a time)
affords an adequate level of protection to patients in an ASC.
Specifically, we propose to retain the provision at Sec.
416.44(b)(2) and (3) related to the Secretary's waiver authority and
state imposed codes. We do not propose to make any changes to this
section.
We propose to remove the requirements at Sec. 416.44(b)(4) related
to the phase-in period for compliance with emergency lighting. In the
2003 final rule, we allowed facilities until March 13, 2006, to upgrade
their emergency lighting equipment. This phase-in period has now
expired and all facilities should be in compliance. Therefore, this
phase-in provision is no longer a necessary regulatory requirement.
We propose to modify the requirements specific to ABHRs since most
of the requirements are now included in the 2012 edition of the LSC.
Specifically, we propose to remove the requirements at Sec.
416.44(b)(5)(i), (ii), (iv), (A) through (G), and (v). We also propose
to retain the requirements at Sec. 416.44(b)(5)(iii) related to
protection against inappropriate access, and would redesignate it at
Sec. 416.44(b)(4).
We propose to add a new requirement at Sec. 416.44(b)(5) that
would require a facility with a sprinkler system that is out of service
for more than 4 hours in a 24-hour period to evacuate the building or
portion of the building affected by the system outage, or establish a
fire watch until the system is back in service, notwithstanding the
lower standard of the 2012 LSC.
We propose to add a new requirement at Sec. 416.44(b)(6) that
would require facilities with windowless anesthetizing locations to
have a supply and exhaust system that automatically vents smoke and
products of combustion, prevents recirculation of smoke originating
within the operating room, and prevents the circulation of smoke
entering the system intake.
We are proposing to add a new paragraph at Sec. 416.44(c) that
would require ASCs to comply with the 2012 edition of the NFPA 99. We
propose that chapters 7, 8, 12, and 13 would not apply to ASCs. We also
propose to allow for waivers of these provisions under the same
conditions and procedures that we currently use for waivers of
applicable provisions of the LSC.
3. Hospice Care: Condition of Participation: Hospices That Provide
Inpatient Care Directly (Sec. 418.110)
We propose that all inpatient hospice facilities meet the
provisions applicable to health care occupancies in the 2012 edition of
the LSC, with the exceptions discussed in section I of this preamble,
regardless of the number of patients they serve. We note that this is
not a change in requirements, but merely a clarification that, for LSC
purposes, an inpatient hospice facility is considered a health care
occupancy. The LSC does not apply to hospice care that is provided in a
patient's home.
We propose to retain the requirements at Sec. 418.110(d)(1)(ii)
related to the prohibition of roller latches in health care facilities.
We are proposing to update the LSC chapter reference from ``19.3.6.3.2
exception number 2'' to ``19.3.6.3.5 numbers 1 and 2 and 19.3.6.3.6
number 2.'' In addition, we propose to retain the provision at Sec.
418.110(d)(2) and (3) related to the Secretary's waiver authority and
state imposed codes. We do not propose to make any changes to this
section.
We also propose to modify the requirements specific to ABHRs
because most of the requirements are now included in the 2012 edition
of the LSC. Specifically, we propose to remove the requirements at
Sec. 418.110(d)(4)(i), (ii) and (iv). We also propose to retain the
[[Page 21565]]
requirements at Sec. 418.110(d)(4)(iii) related to protection against
inappropriate access, and would redesignate this requirement at Sec.
418.110(d)(4).
We propose to add a new requirement at Sec. 418.110(d)(5) that
would require a facility with a sprinkler system that is out of service
for more than 4 hours in a 24-hour period to evacuate the building or
portion of the building affected by the system outage, or establish a
fire watch until the system is back in service, notwithstanding the
lower standard of the 2012 LSC.
We also propose to add a new requirement at Sec. 418.110(d)(6)
that would retain the 36 inch window sill requirement that was in the
2000 edition of the LSC.
We are proposing to add a new paragraph at Sec. 418.110(e) that
would require hospices to comply with the 2012 edition of the NFPA 99.
We propose that chapters 7, 8, 12, and 13 would not apply to hospices.
We also propose to allow for waivers of these provisions under the same
conditions and procedures that we currently use for waivers of
applicable provisions of the LSC.
4. Programs of All-Inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE): Condition of
Participation: Physical Environment (Sec. 460.72)
We propose to retain most of the provisions of the existing final
regulation for Programs of All-Inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE)
published in the Federal Register on January 10, 2003 (68 FR 1374),
regardless of the number of patients the PACE facility serves. PACE
providers would continue to be required to meet LSC specifications for
the type of facilities in which the programs are located (that is,
hospitals, and office buildings).
Specifically, we propose to retain the requirements at Sec.
460.72(b)(1)(ii) related to the prohibition of roller latches in health
care facilities. We are proposing to update the LSC chapter reference
from ``19.3.6.3.2 exception number 2'' to ``19.3.6.3.5 numbers 1 and 2
and 19.3.6.3.6 number 2.''
We propose to retain the provision at Sec. 460.72(b)(2)(i) and
(ii) related to the Secretary's waiver authority and state imposed
codes. We do not propose to make any changes to this section.
We propose to remove the requirement at Sec. 460.72(b)(3) related
to the phase-in period for compliance with emergency lighting. In the
2003 final rule, we allowed facilities until March 13, 2006, to upgrade
their emergency lighting equipment. This phase-in period has now
expired and all facilities should be in compliance. Therefore, this
phase-in provision is no longer a necessary regulatory requirement.
We also propose to remove the requirements at Sec. 460.72(b)(4)
related to the prohibition of roller latches in health care facilities.
In the 2003 final rule, we allowed facilities until March 13, 2006, to
replace their existing roller latches. This phase-in period has now
ended, and all facilities should be in compliance. Therefore, this
phase-in provision is no longer a necessary regulatory requirement.
We propose to modify the requirements specific to ABHRs because
most of the requirements are now located in the 2012 edition of the
LSC. Specifically, we proposed to remove the requirements at Sec.
460.72(b)(5)(i), (ii), (iv) and (v). In addition, we propose to retain
the requirements at Sec. 460.72(b)(5)(iii) related to protection
against inappropriate access, and would redesignate it at Sec.
460.72(b)(3).
We propose to add a new requirement at Sec. 460.72(b)(4) that
would require a facility with a sprinkler system that is out of service
for more than 4 hours in a 24-hour period to evacuate the building or
portion of the building affected by the system outage, or establish a
fire watch until the system is back in service, notwithstanding the
lower standard of the 2012 LSC.
We are proposing to add a new paragraph at Sec. 460.72(d) that
would require PACE centers to comply with the 2012 edition of the NFPA
99. We propose that chapters 7, 8, 12, and 13 would not apply to PACEs.
We also propose to allow for waivers of these provisions under the same
conditions and procedures that we currently use for waivers of
applicable provisions of the LSC.
5. Hospitals: Condition of Participation: Physical Environment (Sec.
482.41)
We propose that the hospital must meet the health care occupancy
provisions of the 2012 edition of the LSC, regardless of the number of
patients the hospital serves. There can be multiple occupancy
classifications within a single hospital. Therefore, multiple chapters
of the code may be applied to a single hospital in accordance with the
Multiple Occupancies provisions in 18.1.3 and 19.1.3. In addition, we
believe that hospital outpatient surgical departments are comparable to
ASCs and thus should be required to meet the provisions applicable to
Ambulatory Health Care Occupancy chapters, regardless of the number of
patients served.
We propose to retain most of the provisions from the existing final
regulation for hospitals published in the Federal Register on January
10, 2003 (68 FR 1374). Specifically, we propose to retain the
requirements at Sec. 482.41(b)(1)(ii) related to the prohibition of
roller latches in health care facilities. We are proposing to update
the LSC chapter reference from ``19.3.6.3.2 exception number 2'' to
``19.3.6.3.5 numbers 1 and 2 and 19.3.6.3.6 number 2.''
We propose to retain the provision at Sec. 482.41(b)(2) and (3)
related to the Secretary's waiver authority and state imposed codes. We
do not propose to make any changes to this section.
We propose to remove the requirements at Sec. 482.41(b)(4) related
to the phase-in period for compliance with emergency lighting. In the
2003 final rule, we allowed facilities until March 13, 2006, to upgrade
their emergency lighting equipment. This phase-in period has now ended,
and all facilities should be in compliance. Therefore, this phase-in
provision is no longer a necessary regulatory requirement.
We propose to remove the requirements at Sec. 482.41(b)(5) related
to phase-in period of the prohibition on roller latches in health care
facilities. This provision allowed hospitals a 3 year period to replace
all existing roller latches. This phase-in period has now expired and
all facilities should be in compliance. Therefore, this phase-in
provision is no longer a necessary regulatory requirement.
We propose to retain the requirements at Sec. 482.41(b)(7) through
(b)(8), and would redesignate them at Sec. 482.41(b)(4) through
(b)(6), without changes.
In addition, we propose to modify the requirements specific to
ABHRs since most of the requirements are now located in the 2012
edition of the LSC. We proposed to remove the requirements at Sec.
482.41(b)(9)(i), (ii), (iv) and (v). We propose to retain the
requirement at Sec. 482.41(b)(9)(iii) related to protection against
inappropriate access, and would redesignate it at Sec. 482.41(b)(7).
We are proposing to add a new requirement at Sec. 482.41(b)(8)
that would require a facility with a sprinkler system that is out of
service for more than 4 hours in a 24-hour period to evacuate the
building or portion of the building affected by the system outage, or
establish a fire watch until the system is back in service,
notwithstanding the lower standard of the 2012 LSC.
We are also proposing to add a new requirement at Sec.
482.41(b)(9) that would require facilities with windowless
anesthetizing locations to have a supply and exhaust system that
automatically vents smoke and products of
[[Page 21566]]
combustion, prevents recirculation of smoke originating within the
surgical suite, and prevents the circulation of smoke entering the
system intake.
We also propose to add a new requirement at Sec. 482.41(b)(10)
that would retain the majority of the 36 inch window sill requirement
that was in the 2000 edition of the LSC. Newborn nurseries and rooms
intended for occupancy for less than 24 hours, such as those housing
obstetrical labor beds, and recovery beds would be exempt from the
window sill height requirement. The 2000 edition of the LSC allowed for
observation beds in the emergency department to be exempt from the 36
inch window sill requirement. However, we do not propose to incorporate
an exemption for observation beds, because they are frequently occupied
for greater than 24 hours. Therefore, observation beds would be
required to meet the 36 inch window sill requirement. Window sills in
special nursing care areas, such as those housing an intensive care
unit, critical care unit, hemodialysis, and neonatal patients, would
not exceed 60 inches.
We are proposing to add a new paragraph at Sec. 482.41(c) that
would require hospitals to comply with the 2012 edition of the NFPA 99.
We propose that chapters 7, 8, 12, and 13 would not apply to hospitals.
We also propose to allow for waivers of these provisions under the same
conditions and procedures that we currently use for waivers of
applicable provisions of the LSC.
6. Long-Term Care Facilities: Condition of Participation: Physical
Environment (Sec. 483.70)
We propose to retain most of the provisions of the existing final
regulation for long-term care facilities published in the Federal
Register on January 10, 2003 (68 FR 1374) regardless of the number of
residents the facility serves. We propose to retain the requirements at
Sec. 483.70(a)(1)(ii) related to the prohibition of roller latches in
health care facilities. We are proposing to update the LSC chapter
reference from ``19.3.6.3.2 exception number 2'' to ``19.3.6.3.5
numbers 1 and 2 and 19.3.6.3.6 number 2.''
We propose to retain the provision at Sec. 483.70(a)(2) and (3)
related to the Secretary's waiver authority and state imposed codes. We
do not propose to make any changes to this section.
We propose to remove the requirements at Sec. 483.70(a)(4) related
to the phase-in period for compliance with emergency lighting. In the
2003 final rule, we allowed facilities until March 13, 2006, to upgrade
their emergency lighting equipment. This phase-in period has now
expired and all facilities should be in compliance. Therefore, this
phase-in provision is no longer a necessary regulatory requirement.
We also propose to remove the requirements at Sec. 483.70(a)(5)
related to the phase-in period for the prohibition of roller latches in
health care facilities. In the 2003 final rule, we allowed facilities
until March 13, 2006, to upgrade their door latching equipment. This
phase-in period has now ended and all facilities should be in
compliance. Therefore, this phase-in provision is no longer a necessary
regulatory requirement.
We propose to modify the requirements specific to ABHRs since most
of the requirements are now included in the 2012 edition of the LSC.
Specifically, we propose to remove the requirements at Sec.
483.70(a)(6)(i), (ii), (iv) and (v). We propose to retain the
requirement at Sec. 483.70(a)(6)(iii) related to protection against
inappropriate access, and would redesignate it at Sec. 483.70(a)(4).
We propose to retain the requirements at Sec. 483.70(a)(7)(i),
(ii), (iii), (A) and (B) related to installation, inspection, testing
and maintenance of battery operated single station smoke alarms,
without changes. We are proposing to redesignate these requirements at
Sec. 483.70(a)(5) (i), (ii), (iii) (A) and (B).
In addition, we propose to retain the requirements at Sec.
483.70(a)(8)(i) and (ii) related to the installation of supervised
automatic sprinklers and the testing, inspection and maintenance of the
sprinkler system. We propose to redesignate these requirements as Sec.
483.70(a)(6)(i) and (ii), without changes.
We also propose to add a new requirement at Sec. 483.70(a)(7) that
would retain the 36 inch window sill requirement that was in the 2000
edition of the LSC.
We are proposing to add a new paragraph at Sec. 483.70(b) that
would require LTCs to comply with the 2012 edition of the NFPA 99. We
propose that chapters 7, 8, 12, and 13 would not apply to LTCs. We also
propose to allow for waivers of these provisions under the same
conditions and procedures that we currently use for waivers of
applicable provisions of the LSC.
7. Intermediate Care Facilities for Individuals With Intellectual
Disabilities: Condition of Participation: Physical Environment (Sec.
483.470)
We propose to retain most of the provisions of the existing
regulation for ICFs/IID. ICFs/IID would continue to be permitted to
meet either the Residential Board and Care Occupancies chapter or the
Health Care Occupancy chapter of the LSC, as appropriate, regardless of
the number of patients the facility serves.
However, we propose not to adopt the provisions at Chapters
32.3.2.11.2 and 33.3.2.11.2, related to ``lockups.'' This is a new
provision that has not been addressed in this chapter in prior editions
of the LSC. Lock-ups are incidental use areas where occupants are
secluded or restrained, and; therefore, incapable of self-preservation
in any emergency situation because of security measures and other
circumstances no longer under the person's control. We do not believe
that lock-ups as described in the LSC are appropriate under any
circumstances for board and care facilities.
In addition, we propose to retain the requirements at Sec.
483.470(j)(1)(ii) related to the prohibition of roller latches in
health care facilities. We are proposing to update the LSC chapter
reference from ``19.3.6.3.2 exception number 2'' to ``19.3.6.3.5
numbers 1 and 2 and 19.3.6.3.6 number 2.''
We propose to retain the requirements at Sec. 483.470(j)(2), (3),
and (4). We do not propose any changes to the content of these
sections.
We propose to remove the requirements at Sec. 483.470(j)(5)
related to the phase-in period for compliance with emergency lighting.
In the 2003 final rule, we allowed facilities until March 13, 2006, to
upgrade their emergency lighting equipment. This phase-in period has
expired and all facilities should be in compliance. Therefore, this
phase-in provision is no longer a necessary regulatory requirement.
We propose to remove Sec. 483.470(j)(6) related to the phase-in
period for the prohibition of roller latches in health care facilities.
In the 2003 final rule, we allowed facilities until March 13, 2006, to
upgrade their door latching equipment. This phase-in period has now
ended and all facilities should be in compliance. Therefore, this
phase-in provision is no longer a necessary regulatory requirement.
We also propose to retain the provision at Sec. 483.470(j)(7)(A)
and (B) related to the Secretary's waiver authority and state imposed
codes. We propose to redesignate these provisions at Sec.
483.470(j)(5)(A) and (B) without change.
In addition, we propose to modify the requirements specific to
ABHRs since most of the requirements are now included in the 2012
edition of the LSC. Specifically, we proposed to remove the
requirements at Sec. 483.470(j)(7)(ii)(A),
[[Page 21567]]
(B), (D) and (E). We propose to retain the requirements at Sec.
483.470(j)(7)(ii)(C) related to protection against inappropriate
access, and would redesignate it at Sec. 483.470(j)(5)(ii).
We propose to add a new requirement at Sec. 483.470(j)(5)(iii)
that would require a facility with a sprinkler system that is out of
service for more than 4 hours in a 24-hour period to evacuate the
building or portion of the building affected by the system outage, or
establish a fire watch until the system is back in service,
notwithstanding the lower standard of the 2012 LSC.
We are proposing to add a new paragraph at Sec. 483.470(j)(5)(iv)
that would require ICF-IIDs to comply with the 2012 edition of the NFPA
99. We propose that chapters 7, 8, 12, and 13 would not apply to ICF-
IIDs. We also propose to allow for waivers of these provisions under
the same conditions and procedures that we currently use for waivers of
applicable provisions of the LSC.
8. Critical Access Hospitals: Condition of Participation: Physical
Plant and Environment (Sec. 485.623)
We propose to retain most of the provisions of the existing final
regulation for Critical Access Hospitals (CAHs) published in the
Federal Register on January 10, 2003 (68 FR 1374), regardless of the
number of patients the facility serves. Specifically, we propose to
retain the requirements at Sec. 485.623(d)(1)(ii) related to the
prohibition of roller latches in health care facilities. We are
proposing to update the LSC chapter reference from ``19.3.6.3.2
exception number 2'' to ``19.3.6.3.5 numbers 1 and 2 and 19.3.6.3.6
number 2.''
We propose to retain the requirements at Sec. 485.623(d)(2)
through (d)(4). We do not propose to make any changes to these
sections.
We propose to remove the requirement at Sec. 485.623(d)(5) related
to the phase-in period for compliance with emergency lighting. In the
2003 final rule, we allowed facilities until March 13, 2006, to upgrade
their emergency lighting equipment. This phase-in period has now
expired and all facilities should be in compliance. Therefore, this
phase-in provision is no longer a necessary regulatory requirement.
We propose to remove the requirement at Sec. 485.623(d)(6) related
to the phase-in period of the prohibition on roller latches in health
care facilities. This provision allowed CAHs a 3 year period to replace
all existing roller latches. This phase-in period has also expired and
all facilities should be in compliance. Therefore, this phase-in
provision is no longer a necessary regulatory requirement.
In addition, we propose to modify the requirements specific to
ABHRs since most of the requirements are now incorporated in the 2012
edition of the LSC. Specifically, we proposed to remove the
requirements at Sec. 485.623(d)(7)(i), (ii), (iv) and (v). We propose
to retain the requirement at Sec. 485.623(d)(7)(iii) related to
protection against inappropriate access, and would redesignate it at
Sec. 485.623(d)(5).
We are proposing to add a new requirement at Sec. 485.623(d)(6)
that would require a facility with a sprinkler system that is out of
service for more than 4 hours in a 24-hour period to evacuate the
building or portion of the building affected by the system outage, or
establish a fire watch until the system is back in service,
notwithstanding the lower standard of the 2012 LSC.
We are proposing to add a new requirement at Sec. 485.623(d)(7)
that would require facilities with windowless anesthetizing locations
to have a supply and exhaust system that automatically vents smoke and
products of combustion, prevents recirculation of smoke originating
within the surgical suite, and prevents the circulation of smoke
entering the system intake.
We also propose to add a new requirement at Sec. 485.623(d)(8)
that would retain the 36 inch window sill requirement that was in the
2000 edition of the LSC. With the exception of newborn nurseries and
rooms intended for occupancy for less than 24 hours, every sleeping
room must have an outside window or outside door, and the sill height
must not exceed 36 inches above the floor. Special nursing care areas
shall not exceed 60 inches. Windows in atrium walls are considered
outside windows for the purposes of this requirement.
We are proposing to add a new paragraph at Sec. 485.623(e) that
would require CAHs to comply with the 2012 edition of the NFPA 99. We
propose that chapters 7, 8, 12, and 13 would not apply to CAHs. We also
propose to allow for waivers of these provisions under the same
conditions and procedures that we currently use for waivers of
applicable provisions of the LSC.
III. Collection of Information Requirements
This proposed rule does not impose any new reporting, recordkeeping
or third-party disclosure requirements. However, this proposed rule
does reference the NFPA 99 that has several recordkeeping requirements
for medical gas and vacuum systems, and electrical equipment. We
believe that documenting maintenance and testing is a usual and
customary business practice in accordance with 5 CFR 1320.3(b)(2), and
would not impose any additional information collection burden beyond
that associated with the normal course of business. Consequently, it
need not be reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget under the
authority of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
IV. Response to Comments
Because of the large number of public comments we normally receive
on Federal Register documents, we are not able to acknowledge or
respond to them individually. We will consider all comments we receive
by the date and time specified in the DATES section of this preamble,
and, when we proceed with a subsequent document, we will respond to the
comments in the preamble to that document.
V. Regulatory Impact Statement
In accordance with the provisions of Executive Order 12866, this
regulation was reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget.
A. Overall Impact
We have examined the impacts of this rule as required by Executive
Order 12866 on Regulatory Planning and Review (September 30, 1993),
Executive Order 13563 on Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review
(January 18, 2011), the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (September 19,
1980, Pub. L. 96-354), section 1102(b) of the Social Security Act,
section 202 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (March 22,
1995; Pub. L. 104-4), Executive Order 13132 on Federalism (August 4,
1999) and the Congressional Review Act (5 U.S.C. 804(2).
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess all
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public
health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity). Executive
Order 13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and
benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting
flexibility. A regulatory impact analysis (RIA) must be prepared for
major rules with economically significant effects ($100 million or more
in any 1 year). The overall economic impact for this rule is estimated
to be $41,437,279 in the first year of implementation and $7,109,914
[[Page 21568]]
after the first year of implementation, and annually thereafter for an
11 year period. Therefore, this is not an economically significant or
major rule.
B. Alternatives Considered
We could have chosen not to update our fire safety provisions. We
believe that this is not an acceptable alternative because many health
care facilities complete unnecessary work and incur unnecessary expense
without any gain in fire safety by continuing to comply with the 2000
edition of the Life Safety Code. Many states have adopted subsequent
editions of the Life Safety Code. This has caused confusion for, and
imposed additional burdens on, health care facilities, that must
request waivers or modify designs to meet the requirements of both the
state- and federally-adopted editions of the LSC. Updating the LSC
would not only relieve the regulatory burden on health care providers,
but also assist in ensuring the health and safety of patients and
staff.
We considered proposing an alternative phase-in period for the
requirement to install sprinklers in high rise health care occupancies.
The LSC allows for a 12-year phase-in period, which would begin on the
day a final rule is published. We considered shortening this period in
order to accelerate compliance. However, based on our recent experience
with requiring long term care facilities to install sprinklers within 5
years, and the difficulties that several facilities have faced in
meeting this deadline, we have learned that a shorter phase-in period
is not always feasible for facilities. We also considered proposing a
longer phase-in period, but believe that extending beyond 12 years set
out in the LSC may not sufficiently convey the importance of this
requirement to improving patient and staff safety in these buildings.
Therefore, we have proposed to maintain the phase-in length that is
already part of the LSC, and we are specifically requesting public
comment on the appropriateness of this timeframe.
We considered not proposing separate requirements for anesthetizing
locations, out-of-service sprinkler systems, and window sill heights.
Although the NFPA has removed these requirements from the LSC, we felt
that these were important issues that still needed to be required for
the safety of patients, visitors, and staff. We believe that smoke
detection systems in anesthetizing locations are important because
there continue to be operating room fires and this requirement will
maintain the safety in operating rooms for staff and patients. CMS
believes that allowing a sprinkler system to be out of service for 12
hours before evacuating patients or establishing a fire watch is too
long. Therefore, CMS will continue to require the shorter 4 hour
timeframe that was in the 2000 edition of the LSC. Lastly, window sill
height requirements were eliminated from the 2012 edition of the LSC.
We believe that this requirement is essential to allow easier access
for emergency personnel in the event of a fire or other emergency
situation.
We considered not proposing the adoption of the NFPA 99 Health care
Facilities code. However, many requirements of the LSC already cross
reference the NFPA 99, therefore we decided to propose adopting the
NFPA 99 because it addresses additional building safety topics that are
related to important fire safety issues.
We also considered proposing adoption of chapters 7, 8, 12, and 13
of the NFPA 99, related to information technology, plumbing, emergency
management, and security management. We believe that information
technology, plumbing and security management are not within the scope
of the conditions of participation and conditions for coverage. In
addition, emergency management topics are addressed in our December 27,
2013 proposed rule, ``Medicare and Medicaid Programs: Emergency
Preparedness Requirements for Medicare and Medicaid Participating
Providers and Suppliers'' (78 FR 79081).
C. Anticipated Effects
1. Hospitals
Section 19.4.2 of the LSC requires that all existing high-rise
buildings containing health care occupancies be protected throughout by
an approved, supervised automatic sprinkler system. This provision was
added to the LSC in 2012 and we anticipate that there would be a cost
associated with installing the sprinklers. Since this is a new
provision for the 2012 edition of the LSC, only 3 states have adopted
this requirement, accounting for 21 high-rise facilities.
To develop the most accurate estimate possible for this provision,
we requested data from all 50 states regarding the sprinkler status of
high-rise buildings containing health care occupancies, and the average
square footage needing to be sprinklered. Of the 50 states, we received
some data from 30 states.\1\ We calculated the average number of high-
rise hospitals for all of the states that responded. Overall, 15.64
percent of hospitals were located in high-rise buildings. We also used
the data submitted to determine the average number of fully, partially
and non-sprinklered high-rise buildings in each state for which we have
data. First, we calculated the percentages of fully, partially, and
non-sprinklered hospitals for each state. We then averaged the
percentage of fully, partially and non-sprinklered buildings across all
states for which there was data, with a result of 84.66 percent of
hospitals in high-rise buildings being fully sprinklered, 14.6 percent
being partially sprinklered and 0.74 percent being non-sprinklered.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The following states submitted data regarding the sprinkler
status of high-rise buildings containing health care facilities--
Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Delaware, Hawaii, Idaho,
Iowa, Kansas, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota,
Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Mexico,
North Dakota, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Dakota,
Texas, Utah, Virginia, Washington, and Wyoming.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Next, we applied these percentages to the states that did not
respond to our data request or that provided a limited amount of data.
For example, Alabama has a total of 125 hospitals. Based on the data
from states that submitted information, we know that, on average, 15.64
percent of hospitals have high-rise buildings, for an estimated 20
high-rise hospitals in Alabama. We used this same methodology to
estimate the average number of high-rise hospitals in all of the states
that did not respond to our data request or that provided only a
limited amount of data, for a total of 386 high-rise hospitals. Of the
386 estimated high-rise hospitals in states that did not respond, we
estimate there are 339 fully sprinklered, 56 partially sprinklered, and
3 non-sprinklered. We note that these numbers do not directly match
because there was limited actual data available for the state of
Massachusetts. The number of high rise hospitals in Massachusetts is
included in the count of states for which we have reported data.
However, because we did not receive a breakdown of those high-rise
hospitals by their current sprinkler status, we used the methodology
described above to estimate the distribution of fully sprinklered,
partially sprinklered, and non-sprinklered high-rise hospitals in that
state.
We combined this information with the information from the states
that submitted data to develop an estimate of 858 high-rise facilities
with health care occupancies throughout all 50 states (472 high-rise
facilities in states that submitted data + 386 estimated high-rise
facilities in states that did not submit data). We estimate that 682 of
those high-rise facilities are fully
[[Page 21569]]
sprinklered, 169 are partially sprinklered, and 7 are not sprinklered.
We also requested that the 50 states submit information regarding
the area (measured in square feet) per partially sprinklered and non-
sprinklered facility that does not currently have sprinklers. Only 8
states supplied data regarding the area to be sprinklered in partially
sprinklered facilities.\2\ In addition, 3 states supplied data
regarding the area to be sprinklered in non-sprinklered facilities.\3\
We did not specify size and age data. Of the states that responded with
square footage data, we estimate that an average partially sprinklered
facility would need to install sprinklers to protect 37,173 square
feet, and an average non-sprinklered facility would need to install
sprinklers to protect 127,667 square feet. Regardless of the square
footage, any facility in a high-rise building 75' and over is required
to be sprinklered. We recognize that these averages are based on very
limited data submitted by the states, and we welcome public comment
and/or additional data submission that would help us improve the
accuracy of these estimates.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ The following states provided data regarding the average
square footage for partially sprinklered high-rise facilities
containing health care facilities--California, Hawaii, Iowa, Kansas,
Nebraska, Pennsylvania, Virginia, and Washington.
\3\ The following states provided data regarding the average
square footage for non-sprinklered high-rise facilities containing
health care facilities- California, Hawaii, and Iowa.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
We applied all of the data submitted and averages calculated to
figure out the total average area that will need to be sprinklered in
all partially sprinklered facilities and non-sprinklered facilities,
and the cost associated with that installation. Based on the
information provided by the public in comments received on the hospital
conditions of participation (76 FR 65891), the cost per square foot to
install sprinklers is approximately $11. We estimated that there are
169 partially sprinklered facilities that would install sprinklers to
cover an average of 37,173 square feet per facility, for a total of
6,282,237 square feet. At an estimated cost of $11 per square foot to
install sprinklers, we estimate a total cost of $69,104,607 for all
partially sprinklered facilities (6,282,937 square feet x $11 per
square foot). We estimate that an average partially sprinklered
facility would spend $408,903 to complete the sprinkler installation
(37,173 square feet per facility x $11 per square foot).
We estimated that there are 7 non-sprinklered facilities
nationwide, and that an average non-sprinklered facility would install
sprinklers for, 127,667 square feet, for a total of 893,669 square feet
(7 facilities x 127,667 square feet per facility). At an estimated cost
of $11 per square foot to install sprinklers, we estimate that it would
cost $9,830,359 for all non-sprinklered facilities to install
sprinklers in their facilities. We estimate that an average non-
sprinklered facility would spend $1,404,337 per facility (127,667
square feet x $11 per square foot).
We estimate the total cost associated with the installation of
sprinklers in partially sprinklered and non-sprinklered facilities to
be $78,934,966 ($69,104,607 for all partially sprinklered facilities +
$9,830,359 for all non-sprinklered facilities). This cost would be
distributed over a phase-in period of 12 years, per the phase-in period
established within the LSC, or an average yearly cost of $6.6 million.
2. Ambulatory Surgical Centers
Sections 20.3.2.1 and 21.3.2.1 of the LSC requires all doors to
hazardous areas to be self-closing or automatic closing. This provision
was added to the LSC in 2003, and we anticipate that there would be a
cost associated with installing the self-closing or automatic closing
doors. Since 2003, 35 states have adopted this requirement, accounting
for 4,149 ASCs. As of December 2012, there were 5,444 total Medicare
and applicable Medicaid participating ASCs. The 1,295 remaining
facilities would be required to upgrade their door closing mechanisms
to meet this requirement. The estimated cost per door is $349, and we
would assume the average facility has 3 hazardous areas that would
require a replacement door closing mechanism for a total cost of $1,047
per facility. The anticipated cost is $1,355,865.
3. Intermediate Care Facilities for Individuals With Intellectual
Disabilities
Sections 32.2.3.5.7 and 33.2.3.5.7 of the LSC requires attics of
new and existing facilities to be sprinklered if the attic space is
used for living purposes, including storage and fuel fired equipment.
Facilities that do not use their attics for living purposes may choose
to install a heat detection system in place of the sprinklers. This
provision was added to the LSC in 2012. Since this is a new provision
for the 2012 edition of the LSC, only 3 states have adopted this
requirement, accounting for 78 ICF-IIDs. We are not including those 78
facilities in our analysis. For purposes of this analysis only, we
assume that about 10 percent (639) of facilities will install a heat
detection system because they do not use the attic for living purposes.
As of December 2012, there were 6,460 total Medicare participating ICF-
IIDs. After excluding those facilities located in states that have
already adopted this requirement and those that would install a heat
detection system instead of sprinklers, the 5,743 remaining facilities
would be required to install sprinklers in their attics to meet this
requirement. Installing sprinklers into an unfinished attic is less
complicated than installing sprinklers in a finished hospital,
therefore the cost per square foot would be less to install in attics
than hospitals. The estimated cost per square foot to install
sprinklers in an attic is $3.00, and the average estimated square
footage per attic per facility is 1500 square feet, for a total of
$4,500 per ICF-IID. We estimate that all ICF-IIDs would spend
$25,843,500 to install sprinklers in their attic spaces.
Facilities that do not use their attics for living purposes may
choose to install a heat detection system in the attic instead of
sprinklers. We assume that 639 facilities will install a heat detection
system. We estimate the cost to install a heat detection system to be
$1,000 per facility. The anticipated cost would be $639,000 for all
affected facilities to install heat detection systems.
Section 33.3.3.2.3 of the LSC requires all hazardous areas in
existing facilities with impractical evacuation capabilities to be
separated from other parts of the building by a smoke partition. This
provision was added to the LSC in 2012 and we anticipate there being a
cost associated with installing the smoke partition. Since this is a
new provision for 2012, only 3 states have adopted this requirement,
accounting for 78 ICF-IIDs. As of December 2012, there were 6,460 total
Medicare and applicable Medicaid participating ICF-IIDs. We do not
collect data regarding the evacuation capability of each ICF-IID.
Therefore, for purposes of this analysis only, we assume that the 6,382
remaining facilities will need to install a smoke partition around all
hazardous areas to meet this requirement. The estimated cost per smoke
partition is $500, and we assume that an average ICF-IID would need to
install 2 smoke partitions for a total of $1,000 per facility. The
anticipated cost is $6,382,000.
Section 33.3.3.4.6.2 of the LSC requires that, when an existing
facility installs a new fire alarm system, or the existing fire alarm
system is replaced, notification of emergency forces should be handled
in accordance with section 9.6.4, which states that notification of
emergency forces should alert the municipal fire department and fire
[[Page 21570]]
brigade (if provided) of fire or other emergency. This provision was
added to the LSC in 2012 and we anticipate there being a cost
associated with upgrading a new or existing fire alarm system. Since
this is a new provision for 2012, only 3 states have adopted this
requirement, accounting for 78 ICF-IIDs. As of December 2012, there
were 6,460 total Medicare participating ICF-IIDs. The 6,382 remaining
facilities would be required to add emergency notifications
capabilities when they choose to update or install a new fire alarm
system. The estimated cost per upgrade is $1000. For purposes of this
analysis only, we assume that about 8.3 percent (532) of facilities
will do this in any given year, for an annual cost of $532,000 over a
12 year period.
($1,000 per upgraded alarm system x 532 facilities in any given year =
532,000)
Table 1--Total Cost for Implementation in Year 1
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cost per
Requirement Provider type affected affected Cost for all
provider providers
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
High-rise sprinkler installation *............ Hospitals, partially sprinklered $34,075 $5,758,717
High-rise sprinkler installation *............ Hospitals, non-sprinklered...... 117,028 819,197
Self-closing or automatic closing doors on Ambulatory surgical centers..... 1,047 1,355,865
hazardous areas.
Sprinklers in Attics (used for living Intermediate care for 4,500 25,843,500
purposes, storage or fuel fired equipment). individuals with intellectual
disabilities.
Heat detection systems in attics (not used for Intermediate care for 1,000 639,000
living purposes). individuals with intellectual
disabilities.
Hazardous areas separated by smoke partitions. Intermediate care for 1,000 6,382,000
individuals with intellectual
disabilities.
Upgrade existing or install new fire alarm Intermediate care for 1,000 532,000
system with emergency forces notification individuals with intellectual
capabilities*. disabilities.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Total..................................... ................................ .............. 41,437,279
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* Data presented for a single year of the 12 year phase-in period.
Table 2--Total Cost of Implementation for Years 2-12
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cost per
Requirement Provider type affected Cost for all
affected provider providers
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
High-rise sprinkler installation................................ Hospitals, $34,075 $5,758,717
partially
sprinklered
High-rise sprinkler installation................................ Hospitals, non- 117,028 819,197
sprinklered
Upgrade existing or install new fire alarm system with emergency Intermediate 1,000 532,000
forces notification capabilities............................... care for
individuals
with
intellectual
disabilities
-----------------------------------------------
TOTAL ANNUALLY.............................................. .............. .............. 7,109,914
-----------------------------------------------
OVERALL TOTAL YEARS 2-12................................ .............. .............. 78,209,054
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table 3--Total Cost of Implementation for All Years
------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Year 1 of implementation................................ $41,437,279
Years 2-12 of implementation............................ 78,209,054
---------------
TOTAL............................................... 119,646,333
------------------------------------------------------------------------
4. Benefits to Patients/Residents
As a result of this rule, we believe that there would be a
decreased risk of premature death. A decreased risk of premature death
is valuable to people and that value is symbolized by their willingness
to pay for such benefits. The Department of Transportation found in a
recent literature review that willingness to pay for reductions in the
risk of premature death equivalent to saving one life in expectation is
typically over $9 million (https://www.dot.gov/sites/dot.dev/files/docs/VSL%20Guidance%202013.pdf). Although we are not quantifying the number
of lives that would be saved upon implementation of this proposed rule
due to the lack of data that could provide a reliable point estimate,
we believe that there is potential for such a result.
The RFA requires agencies to analyze options for regulatory relief
of small entities, if a rule has a significant impact on a substantial
number of small entities. For purposes of the RFA, small entities
include small businesses, nonprofit organizations, and government
agencies. Individuals and states are not included in the definition of
a small entity. For purposes of the RFA, most of the providers and
suppliers that would be affected by this rule (hospitals, ASCs, and
ICF-IIDs) are considered to be small entities, either by virtue of
their nonprofit or government status or by having yearly revenues below
industry threshold established by the Small Business Administration
(for details, see the Small Business Administration's Web site at
https://www.sba.gov/content/small-business-size-standards.
[[Page 21571]]
We estimate that implementation of the high-rise sprinkler
requirements of this rule will cost all affected hospitals
approximately $6.6 million total in any 1 year. That's a total of
$408,903 per individual facility that is partially sprinklered or
$34,075 per year over the 12 year phase-in period and/$1.4 million per
individual facility that is non-sprinklered or $117,028 per year over
the 12 year phase-in period. We estimate the implementation of this
rule will cost affected ASCs approximately $1.4 million in the first
year of implementation, or $1,047 per ASC. We estimate that
implementation of this rule will cost affected ICF-IIDs approximately
$32.9 million in the first year of implementation, or $6,500 per
affected ICF-IID. The Department of Health and Human Services uses as
its measure of significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities a change in revenues of more than 3 to 5 percent.
Therefore, the Secretary proposes to certify that this rule will not
have a significant impact on a substantial number of small entities,
since the impact will be less than 3 percent of the revenue.
In addition, section 1102(b) of the Act requires us to prepare a
regulatory impact analysis if a rule may have a significant impact on
the operations of a substantial number of small rural hospitals. This
analysis must conform to the provisions of section 603 of the RFA. For
purposes of section 1102(b) of the Act, we define a small rural
hospital as a hospital that is located outside of a metropolitan
statistical area and has fewer than 100 beds. We believe that this rule
will not have a significant impact on the operations of a substantial
number of small rural hospitals.
Section 202 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA) also
requires that agencies assess anticipated costs and benefits before
issuing any rule whose mandates require spending in any 1 year of $100
million in 1995 dollars, updated annually for inflation. In 2013, that
threshold is approximately $141 million. This rule will not have an
impact on the expenditures of state, local, or tribal governments in
the aggregate, or on the private sector of $141 million.
Executive Order 13132 establishes certain requirements that an
agency must meet when it promulgates a proposed rule (and subsequent
final rule) that imposes substantial direct requirement costs on state
and local governments, preempts state law, or otherwise has Federalism
implications. This rule has no Federalism implications.
List of Subjects
42 CFR Part 403
Health insurance, Hospitals, Intergovernmental relations,
Incorporation by reference, Medicare, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
42 CFR Part 416
Health facilities, Kidney diseases, Incorporation by reference,
Medicare, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
42 CFR Part 418
Health facilities, Hospice care, Medicare, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
42 CFR Part 460
Aged, Health, Incorporation by reference, Medicare, Medicaid,
Reporting and record keeping requirements.
42 CFR Part 482
Grant programs-health, Hospitals, Incorporation by reference,
Medicaid, Medicare, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
42 CFR Part 483
Grant programs-health, Health facilities, Health professions,
Health records, Incorporation by reference, Medicaid, Medicare, Nursing
homes, Nutrition, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Safety.
42 CFR Part 485
Grant programs--health, Health facilities, Incorporation by
reference, Medicaid, Medicare, Reporting and record keeping
requirements.
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, the Centers for Medicare
& Medicaid Services proposes to amend 42 CFR chapter IV as set forth
below:
PART 403--SPECIAL PROGRAMS AND PROJECTS
0
1. The authority citation for part 403 continues to read as follows:
Authority: Secs. 1102 and 1871 of the Social Security Act (42
U.S.C. 1302 and 1395hh).
0
2. Amend Sec. 403.744 by--
0
A. Revising paragraph (a)(1)(i).
0
B. Amending paragraph (a)(1)(ii) by removing the reference to ``Chapter
19.3.6.3.2, exception number 2'' and adding in its place ``Chapter
19.3.6.3.5 numbers 1 and 2 and Chapter 19.3.6.3.6 number 2''.
0
C. Revising paragraph (a)(4).
0
D. Adding paragraphs (a)(5) and (6).
0
E. Removing paragraph (c).
The revisions and additions read as follows:
Sec. 403.744 Condition of participation: Life safety from fire.
(a)(1) * * *
(i) Except as otherwise provided in this section, the RNHCI must
meet the applicable provisions of the 2012 edition of the Life Safety
Code of the National Fire Protection Association, regardless of the
number of individuals served. The Director of the Office of the Federal
Register has approved the NFPA 101[supreg] 2012 edition of the Life
Safety Code, issued August 11, 2011, for incorporation by reference in
accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. A copy of the Code
is available for inspection at the CMS Information Resource Center,
7500 Security Boulevard, Baltimore, MD or at the National Archives and
Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of
this material at NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: https://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html. Copies may be obtained from the National Fire
Protection Association, 1 Batterymarch Park, Quincy, MA 02269. If any
changes in this edition of the Code are incorporated by reference, CMS
will publish notice in the Federal Register to announce the changes.
* * * * *
(4) The RNHCI may place alcohol-based hand rub dispensers in its
facility if the dispensers are installed in a manner that adequately
protects against inappropriate access.
(5) When a sprinkler system is out of service for more than 4 hours
in a 24-hour period, the RHNCI must--
(i) Evacuate the building or portion of the building affected by
the system outage until the system is back in service, or
(ii) Establish a fire watch until the system is back in service.
(6) Every sleeping room must have an outside window or outside
door, and the sill height must not exceed 36 inches above the floor.
Windows in atrium walls are considered outside windows for the purposes
of this requirement.
* * * * *
0
3. Add Sec. 403.745 to read as follow:
Sec. 403.745 Condition of participation: Building Safety.
(a) Standard: building safety. Except as otherwise provided in this
section, the RNHCI must meet the applicable provisions of the 2012
edition of the Health Care Facilities Code of the National Fire
Protection Association,
[[Page 21572]]
regardless of the number of patients served. The Director of the Office
of the Federal Register has approved the NFPA 99[supreg] 2012 edition
of the Health Care Facilities Code, issued August 11, 2011, for
incorporation by reference in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR
part 51. A copy of the Code is available for inspection at the CMS
Information Resource Center, 7500 Security Boulevard, Baltimore, MD or
at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For
information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202-741-
6030, or go to: https://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html. Copies may be obtained from
the National Fire Protection Association, 1 Batterymarch Park, Quincy,
MA 02269. If any changes in this edition of the Code are incorporated
by reference, CMS will publish notice in the Federal Register to
announce the changes.
(b) Standard: exceptions. Chapters 7, 8, 12, and 13 of the adopted
Health Care Facilities Code do not apply to an RNHCI.
(c) Waiver. If application of the Health Care Facilities Code
required under paragraph (a) of this section would result in
unreasonable hardship upon the RNHCI, CMS may waive specific provisions
of the Health Care Facilities Code, but only if the waiver does not
adversely affect the health and safety of individuals.
PART 416--AMBULATORY SURGICAL SERVICES
0
4. The authority citation for part 416 continues to read as follows:
Authority: Secs. 1102 and 1871 of the Social Security Act (42
U.S.C. 1302 and 1395hh).
0
5. Amend Sec. 416.44 by--
0
A. Revising paragraph (b)(1).
0
B. Removing paragraph (b)(4).
0
C. Redesignating paragraph (b)(5) as paragraph (b)(4).
0
D. Revising newly redesignated paragraph (b)(4).
0
E. Adding new paragraphs (b)(5) and (6)
0
F. Redesignating paragraphs (c) and (d) as (d) and (e).
0
G. Adding new paragraph (c).
The revisions and additions read as follows:
Sec. 416.44 Condition for coverage--Environment.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(1) Except as otherwise provided in this section, the ASC must meet
the provisions applicable to Ambulatory Health Care Centers of the 2012
edition of the Life Safety Code of the National Fire Protection
Association, regardless of the number of patients served. The Director
of the Office of the Federal Register has approved the NFPA 101[supreg]
2012 edition of the Life Safety Code, issued August 11, 2011, for
incorporation by reference in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR
part 51. A copy of the Code is available for inspection at the CMS
Information Resource Center, 7500 Security Boulevard, Baltimore, MD and
at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For
information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202-741-
6030, or go to: https://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html. Copies may be obtained from
the National Fire Protection Association, 1 Batterymarch Park, Quincy,
MA 02269. If any changes in this edition of the Code are incorporated
by reference, CMS will publish notice in the Federal Register to
announce the changes.
* * *
(4) An ASC may place alcohol-based hand rub dispensers in its
facility if the dispensers are installed in a manner that adequately
protects against inappropriate access.
(5) When a sprinkler system is out of service for more than 4 hours
in a 24-hour period, the ASC must--
(i) Evacuate the building or portion of the building affected by
the system outage until the system is back in service, or
(ii) Establish a fire watch until the system is back in service.
(6) In windowless anesthetizing locations, the ASC must have a
supply and exhaust system that--
(i) Automatically vents smoke and products of combustion,
(ii) Prevents recirculation of smoke originating within the
surgical suite, and
(iii) Prevents the circulation of smoke entering the system intake.
(c) Standard: building safety. Except as otherwise provided in this
section, the ASC must meet the applicable provisions of the 2012
edition of the Health Care Facilities Code of the National Fire
Protection Association, regardless of the number of patients served.
The Director of the Office of the Federal Register has approved the
NFPA 99[supreg] 2012 edition of the Health Care Facilities Code, issued
August 11, 2011, for incorporation by reference in accordance with 5
U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. A copy of the Code is available for
inspection at the CMS Information Resource Center, 7500 Security
Boulevard, Baltimore, MD or at the National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this
material at NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: https://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html.
Copies may be obtained from the National Fire Protection Association, 1
Batterymarch Park, Quincy, MA 02269. If any changes in this edition of
the Code are incorporated by reference, CMS will publish notice in the
Federal Register to announce the changes.
(1) Chapters 7, 8, 12, and 13 of the adopted Health Care Facilities
Code do not apply to an ASC.
(2) If application of the Health Care Facilities Code required
under paragraph (c) of this section would result in unreasonable
hardship upon the ASC, CMS may waive specific provisions of the Health
Care Facilities Code, but only if the waiver does not adversely affect
the health and safety of patients.
* * * * *
PART 418--HOSPICE CARE
0
6. The authority citation for part 418 continues to read as follows:
Authority: Secs. 1102 and 1871 of the Social Security Act (42
U.S.C. 1302 and 1395hh).
Sec. 418.108 [Amended]
0
7. Amend Sec. 418.108 by--
0
A. Amending paragraph (a)(2) by removing the reference ``Sec.
418.110(b) and (e)'' and by adding in its place the reference ``Sec.
418.110(b) and (f)''.
0
B. Amending paragraph (b)(1)(ii) by removing the reference ``Sec.
418.110(e)'' and by adding in its place the reference ``Sec.
418.110(f)''.
0
8. Amend Sec. 418.110 by--
0
A. Revising paragraph (d)(1)(i).
0
B. Amending paragraph (d)(1)(ii) by removing the reference to ``Chapter
19.3.6.3.2, exception number 2'' and adding in its place ``Chapter
19.3.6.3.5 numbers 1 and 2 and Chapter 19.3.6.3.6 number 2''.
0
C. Revising paragraph (d)(4).
0
D. Adding paragraphs (d)(5) and (6).
0
E. Redesignating paragraphs (e) through (o) as (f) through (p).
0
F. Adding new paragraph (e).
The revisions and additions read as follows:
Sec. 418.110 Condition of participation: Hospices that provide
inpatient care directly.
* * * * *
(d)(1) * * *
(i) Except as otherwise provided in this section, the hospice must
meet the
[[Page 21573]]
provisions applicable to health care occupancies of the 2012 edition of
the Life Safety Code of the National Fire Protection Association,
regardless of the number of patients served. The Director of the Office
of the Federal Register has approved the NFPA 101[supreg] 2012 edition
of the Life Safety Code, issued August 11, 2011, for incorporation by
reference in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. A copy
of the code is available for inspection at the CMS Information Resource
Center, 7500 Security Boulevard, Baltimore, MD or at the National
Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the
availability of this material at NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to:
https://www.archives.gov/federalregister/codeoffederalregulations/ibrlocations.html. Copies may be obtained from the National Fire
Protection Association, 1 Batterymarch Park, Quincy, MA 02269. If any
changes in the edition of the Code are incorporated by reference, CMS
will publish a notice in the Federal Register to announce the changes.
* * * * *
(4) A hospice may place alcohol-based hand rub dispensers in its
facility if the dispensers are installed in a manner that adequately
protects against access by vulnerable populations.
(5) When a sprinkler system is out of service for more than 4 hours
in a 24-hour period, the hospice must--
(i) Evacuate the building or portion of the building affected by
the system outage until the system is back in service, or
(ii) Establish a fire watch until the system is back in service.
(6) Every sleeping room must have an outside window or outside
door, and the sill height must not exceed 36 inches above the floor.
Windows in atrium walls are considered outside windows for the purposes
of this requirement.
(e) Standard: Building Safety. Except as otherwise provided in this
section, the hospice must meet the applicable provisions of the 2012
edition of the Health Care Facilities Code of the National Fire
Protection Association, regardless of the number of patients served.
The Director of the Office of the Federal Register has approved the
NFPA 99[supreg] 2012 edition of the Health Care Facilities Code, issued
August 11, 2011, for incorporation by reference in accordance with 5
U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. A copy of the Code is available for
inspection at the CMS Information Resource Center, 7500 Security
Boulevard, Baltimore, MD or at the National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this
material at NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: https://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html.
Copies may be obtained from the National Fire Protection Association, 1
Batterymarch Park, Quincy, MA 02269. If any changes in this edition of
the Code are incorporated by reference, CMS will publish notice in the
Federal Register to announce the changes.
(1) Chapters 7, 8, 12, and 13 of the adopted Health Care Facilities
Code do not apply to a hospice.
(2) If application of the Health Care Facilities Code required
under paragraph (e) of this section would result in unreasonable
hardship upon the hospice, CMS may waive specific provisions of the
Health Care Facilities Code, but only if the waiver does not adversely
affect the health and safety of patients.
* * * * *
PART 460--PROGRAMS OF ALL INCLUSIVE CARE FOR THE ELDERLY (PACE)
0
9. The authority citation for part 460 continues to read as follows:
Authority: Secs. 1102, 1871, 1894(f), and 1934(f) of the Social
Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1302 and 1395, 1395eee(f), and 1396u-4(f)).
0
10. Amend Sec. 460.72 by--
0
A. Revising paragraph (b)(1)(i).
0
B. Amending paragraph (b)(1)(ii) by removing the reference to ``Chapter
19.3.6.3.2, exception number 2'' and adding in its place ``Chapter
19.3.6.3.5 numbers 1 and 2 and Chapter 19.3.6.3.6 number 2''.
0
C. Removing paragraphs (b)(3) and (4).
0
D. Redesignating paragraph (b)(5) as paragraph (b)(3).
0
E. Revising newly redesignated paragraph (b)(3).
0
F. Adding new paragraph (b)(4) and paragraph (d).
The revisions and addition read as follows:
Sec. 460.72 Physical environment.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(1) * * *
(i) Except as otherwise provided in this section, a PACE center
must meet the applicable provisions of the 2012 edition of the Life
Safety Code (LSC) of the National Fire Protection Association that
apply to the type of setting in which the center is located, regardless
of the number of PACE enrollees served. The Director of the Office of
the Federal Register has approved the NFPA 101[supreg] 2012 edition of
the Life Safety Code, issued August 11, 2011, for incorporation by
reference in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. A copy
of the Code is available for inspection at the CMS Information Resource
Center, 7500 Security Boulevard, Baltimore, MD or at the National
Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the
availability of this material at NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to:
https://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html. Copies may be obtained from the
National Fire Protection Association, 1 Batterymarch Park, Quincy, MA
02269. If any changes in this edition of the Code are incorporated by
reference, CMS will publish notice in the Federal Register to announce
the changes.
* * * * *
(3) A PACE center may install alcohol-based hand rub dispensers in
its facility if the dispensers are installed in a manner that
adequately protects against inappropriate access.
(4) When a sprinkler system is out of service for more than 4 hours
in a 24-hour period, the PACE center must--
(i) Evacuate the building or portion of the building affected by
the system outage until the system is back in service, or
(ii) Establish a fire watch until the system is back in service.
* * * * *
(d) Standard: Building Safety. Except as otherwise provided in this
section, a PACE center must meet the applicable provisions of the 2012
edition of the Health Care Facilities Code of the National Fire
Protection Association, regardless of the number of patients served.
The Director of the Office of the Federal Register has approved the
NFPA 99[supreg] 2012 edition of the Health Care Facilities Code, issued
August 11, 2011, for incorporation by reference in accordance with 5
U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. A copy of the Code is available for
inspection at the CMS Information Resource Center, 7500 Security
Boulevard, Baltimore, MD or at the National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this
material at NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: https://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html.
Copies may be obtained from the National Fire Protection Association, 1
Batterymarch Park, Quincy, MA 02269. If any changes in this edition of
the Code are incorporated by reference, CMS will
[[Page 21574]]
publish notice in the Federal Register to announce the changes.
(1) Chapters 7, 8, 12, and 13 of the adopted Health Care Facilities
Code do not apply to a PACE center.
(2) If application of the Health Care Facilities Code required
under paragraph (d) of this section would result in unreasonable
hardship upon the PACE center, CMS may waive specific provisions of the
Health Care Facilities Code, but only if the waiver does not adversely
affect the health and safety of patients.
* * * * *
PART 482--CONDITIONS OF PARTICIPATION FOR HOSPITALS
0
11. The authority citation for part 482 continues to read as follows:
Authority: Secs. 1102, 1871, and 1881 of the Social Security
Act (42 U.S.C. 1302, 1395hh, and 1395rr), unless otherwise noted.
0
12. Amend Sec. 482.41 by--
0
A. Revising paragraph (b)(1)(i).
0
B. Amending paragraph (b)(1)(ii) by removing the reference to ``Chapter
19.3.6.3.2, exception number 2'' and adding in its place ``Chapter
19.3.6.3.5 numbers 1 and 2 and Chapter 19.3.6.3.6 number 2''.
0
C. Removing paragraphs (b)(4) and (5).
0
D. Redesignating paragraphs (b)(6) through (9) as paragraphs (b)(4)
through (7), respectively.
0
E. Revising newly redesignated paragraph (b)(7).
0
F. Adding new paragraphs (b)(8), (9), and (10).
0
G. Redesignating paragraph (c) as paragraph (d).
0
H. Adding new paragraph (c).
The revisions and additions read as follows:
Sec. 482.41 Condition of participation: Physical environment.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(1) * * *
(i) Except as otherwise provided in this section, the hospital must
meet the applicable provisions of the 2012 edition of the Life Safety
Code of the National Fire Protection Association, regardless of the
number of patients served. The Director of the Office of the Federal
Register has approved the NFPA 101[supreg] 2012 edition of the Life
Safety Code, issued August 11, 2011, for incorporation by reference in
accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. A copy of the Code
is available for inspection at the CMS Information Resource Center,
7500 Security Boulevard, Baltimore, MD or at the National Archives and
Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of
this material at NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: https://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html. Copies may be obtained from the National Fire
Protection Association, 1 Batterymarch Park, Quincy, MA 02269. If any
changes in this edition of the Code are incorporated by reference, CMS
will publish notice in the Federal Register to announce the changes.
* * * * *
(7) A hospital may install alcohol-based hand rub dispensers in its
facility if the dispensers are installed in a manner that adequately
protects against inappropriate access;
(8) When a sprinkler system is out of service for more than 4 hours
in a 24-hour period, the hospital must--
(i) Evacuate the building or portion of the building affected by
the system outage until the system is back in service, or
(ii) Establish a fire watch until the system is back in service.
(9) In windowless anesthetizing locations, the hospital must have a
supply and exhaust system that--
(i) Automatically vents smoke and products of combustion.
(ii) Prevents recirculation of smoke originating within the
surgical suite.
(iii) Prevents the circulation of smoke entering the system intake.
(10) Except for, newborn nurseries and rooms intended for occupancy
for less than 24 hours, every sleeping room must have an outside window
or outside door, and the sill height must not exceed 36 inches above
the floor. Special nursing care areas shall not exceed 60 inches.
Windows in atrium walls are considered outside windows for the purposes
of this requirement.
(c) Standard: building safety. Except as otherwise provided in this
section, the hospital must meet the applicable provisions of the 2012
edition of the Health Care Facilities Code of the National Fire
Protection Association, regardless of the number of patients served.
The Director of the Office of the Federal Register has approved the
NFPA 99[supreg] 2012 edition of the Health Care Facilities Code, issued
August 11, 2011, for incorporation by reference in accordance with 5
U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. A copy of the Code is available for
inspection at the CMS Information Resource Center, 7500 Security
Boulevard, Baltimore, MD or at the National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this
material at NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: https://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html.
Copies may be obtained from the National Fire Protection Association, 1
Batterymarch Park, Quincy, MA 02269. If any changes in this edition of
the Code are incorporated by reference, CMS will publish notice in the
Federal Register to announce the changes.
(1) Chapters 7, 8, 12, and 13 of the adopted Health Care Facilities
Code do not apply to a hospital.
(2) If application of the Health Care Facilities Code required
under paragraph (c) of this section would result in unreasonable
hardship upon the hospital, CMS may waive specific provisions of the
Health Care Facilities Code, but only if the waiver does not adversely
affect the health and safety of patients.
* * * * *
PART 483--REQUIREMENTS FOR STATES AND LONG TERM CARE FACILITIES
0
13. The authority citation for part 483 continues to read as follows:
Authority: Secs. 1102, 1128l and 1871 of the Social Security
Act (42 U.S.C. 1302 and 1395hh).
Sec. 483.15 [Amended]
0
14. In Sec. 483.15, amend paragraph (h)(4) by removing the reference
``Sec. 483.70(d)(2)(iv)'' and by adding in its place the reference
``Sec. 483.70(e)(2)(iv)''.
0
15. Amend Sec. 483.70 by--
0
A. Revising paragraph (a)(1)(i).
0
B. Amending paragraph (a)(1)(ii) by removing the reference to ``Chapter
19.3.6.3.2, exception number 2'' and adding in its place ``Chapter
19.3.6.3.5 numbers 1 and 2 and Chapter 19.3.6.3.6 number 2''.
0
C. Removing paragraphs (a)(4) and (5).
0
D. Redesignating paragraphs (a)(6) through (8) as paragraphs (a)(4)
through (6), respectively.
0
E. Revising newly redesignated paragraphs (a)(4).
0
F. Adding new paragraph (a)(7).
0
G. Redesignating paragraphs (b) through (h) as paragraphs (c) through
(i).
0
H. Adding new paragraph (b).
The revisions read as follows:
Sec. 483.70 Physical environment.
* * * * *
(a)(1) * * *
(i) Except as otherwise provided in this section, the long term
care facility must meet the applicable provisions of the 2012 edition
of the Life Safety Code of the National Fire Protection Association,
regardless of the number of residents served. The Director of the
Office of the Federal Register has
[[Page 21575]]
approved the NFPA 101[supreg] 2012 edition of the Life Safety Code,
issued August 11, 2011, for incorporation by reference in accordance
with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. A copy of the Code is available
for inspection at the CMS Information Resource Center, 7500 Security
Boulevard, Baltimore, MD or at the National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this
material at NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: https://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html.
Copies may be obtained from the National Fire Protection Association, 1
Batterymarch Park, Quincy, MA 02269. If any changes in this edition of
the Code are incorporated by reference, CMS will publish notice in the
Federal Register to announce the changes.
* * * * *
(4) A long-term care facility may install alcohol-based hand rub
dispensers in its facility if the dispensers are installed in a manner
that adequately protects against inappropriate access.
* * * * *
(7) Every sleeping room must have an outside window or outside
door, and the sill height must not exceed 36 inches above the floor.
Windows in atrium walls are considered outside windows for the purposes
of this requirement.
(b) Standard: building safety. Except as otherwise provided in this
section, the long term care facility must meet the applicable
provisions of the 2012 edition of the Health Care Facilities Code of
the National Fire Protection Association, regardless of the number of
residents served. The Director of the Office of the Federal Register
has approved the NFPA 99[supreg] 2012 edition of the Health Care
Facilities Code, issued August 11, 2011, for incorporation by reference
in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. A copy of the
Code is available for inspection at the CMS Information Resource
Center, 7500 Security Boulevard, Baltimore, MD or at the National
Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the
availability of this material at NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to:
https://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html. Copies may be obtained from the
National Fire Protection Association, 1 Batterymarch Park, Quincy, MA
02269. If any changes in this edition of the code are incorporated by
reference, CMS will publish notice in the Federal Register to announce
the changes.
(1) Chapters 7, 8, 12, and 13 of the adopted Health Care Facilities
Code do not apply to a long term care facility.
(2) If application of the Health Care Facilities Code required
under paragraph (b) of this section would result in unreasonable
hardship upon the long term care facility, CMS may waive specific
provisions of the Health Care Facilities Code, but only if the waiver
does not adversely affect the health and safety of residents.
* * * * *
0
16. Amend Sec. 483.470 by--
0
A. Revising paragraph (j)(1)(i).
0
B. Amending paragraph (j)(1)(ii) by removing the reference to ``Chapter
19.3.6.3.2, exception number 2'' and adding in its place ``Chapter
19.3.6.3.5 numbers 1 and 2 and Chapter 19.3.6.3.6 number 2''.
0
C. Adding a new paragraph (j)(1)(iii).
0
D. Removing paragraphs (j)(5) and (6).
0
E. Redesignating paragraph (j)(7) as paragraph (j)(5).
0
F. Revising newly redesignated paragraph (j)(5).
The revisions and additions read as follows:
Sec. 483.470 Condition of participation: Physical environment.
* * * * *
(j) * * *
(1) * * *
(i) Except as otherwise provided in this section, the facility must
meet the applicable provisions of either the Health Care Occupancies
Chapters or the Residential Board and Care Occupancies Chapter of the
2012 edition of the Life Safety Code of the National Fire Protection
Association, regardless of the number of clients served. The Director
of the Office of the Federal Register has approved the NFPA 101[supreg]
2012 edition of the Life Safety Code, issued August 11, 2011, for
incorporation by reference in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR
part 51. A copy of the Code is available for inspection at the CMS
Information Resource Center, 7500 Security Boulevard, Baltimore, MD or
at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For
information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202-741-
6030, or go to: https://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html. Copies may be obtained from
the National Fire Protection Association, 1 Batterymarch Park, Quincy,
MA 02269. If any changes in this edition of the Code are incorporated
by reference, CMS will publish notice in the Federal Register to
announce the changes.
* * * * *
(iii) Chapters 32.3.2.11.2 and 33.3.2.11.2 of the adopted 2012 LSC
do not apply to a facility.
* * * * *
(5) Facilities that meet the LSC definition of a health care
occupancy. (i) After consideration of State survey agency
recommendations, CMS may waive, for appropriate periods, specific
provisions of the Life Safety Code if the following requirements are
met:
(A) The waiver would not adversely affect the health and safety of
the clients.
(B) Rigid application of specific provisions would result in an
unreasonable hardship for the facility.
(ii) A facility may install alcohol-based hand rub dispensers if
the dispensers are installed in a manner that adequately protects
against inappropriate access.
(iii) When a sprinkler system is out of service for more than 4
hours in a 24-hour period, the facility must--
(A) Evacuate the building or portion of the building affected by
the system outage until the system is back in service, or
(B) Establish a fire watch until the system is back in service.
(iv) Except as otherwise provided in this section, ICF-IIDs must
meet the applicable provisions of the 2012 edition of the Health Care
Facilities Code of the National Fire Protection Association, regardless
of the number of clients served. The Director of the Office of the
Federal Register has approved the NFPA 99[supreg] 2012 edition of the
Health Care Facilities Code, issued August 11, 2011, for incorporation
by reference in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. A
copy of the Code is available for inspection at the CMS Information
Resource Center, 7500 Security Boulevard, Baltimore, MD or at the
National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on
the availability of this material at NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to:
https://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html. Copies may be obtained from the
National Fire Protection Association, 1 Batterymarch Park, Quincy, MA
02269. If any changes in this edition of the Code are incorporated by
reference, CMS will publish notice in the Federal Register to announce
the changes.
(A) Chapter 7,8,12 and 13 of the adopted Health Care Facilities
Code does not apply to an ICF-IID.
(B) If application of the Health Care Facilities Code required
under paragraph (iv) of this section would result in unreasonable
hardship upon
[[Page 21576]]
the ICF-IID, CMS may waive specific provisions of the Health Care
Facilities Code, but only if the waiver does not adversely affect the
health and safety of clients.
* * * * *
PART 485--CONDITIONS OF PARTICIPATION: SPECIALIZED PROVIDERS
0
17. The authority citation for part 485 continues to read as follows:
Authority: Secs. 1102 and 1871 of the Social Security Act (42
U.S.C. 1302 and 1395(hh)).
0
18. Amend Sec. 485.623 by--
0
A. Revising paragraph (d)(1)(i).
0
B. Amending paragraph (d)(1)(ii) by removing the reference to ``Chapter
19.3.6.3.2, exception number 2'' and adding in its place ``Chapter
19.3.6.3.5 numbers 1 and 2 and Chapter 19.3.6.3.6 number 2''.
0
C. Removing paragraphs (d)(5) and (6).
0
D. Redesignating paragraph (d)(7) as paragraph (d)(5).
0
E. Revising newly redesignated paragraph (d)(5).
0
F. Adding paragraphs (d)(6), (7), and (8) and (e)
The revisions and additions read as follows:
Sec. 485.623 Condition of participation: Physical plant and
environment.
* * * * *
(d) * * *
(1) * * *
(i) Except as otherwise provided in this section, the CAH must meet
the applicable provisions of the 2012 edition of the Life Safety Code
of the National Fire Protection Association, regardless of the number
of patients served. The Director of the Office of the Federal Register
has approved the NFPA 101[supreg] 2012 edition of the Life Safety Code,
issued August 11, 2011, for incorporation by reference in accordance
with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. A copy of the Code is available
for inspection at the CMS Information Resource Center, 7500 Security
Boulevard, Baltimore, MD or at the National Archives and records
Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this
material at NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: https://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html.
Copies may be obtained from the National Fire Protection Association, 1
Batterymarch Park, Quincy, MA 02269. If any changes in this edition of
the Code are incorporated by reference, CMS will publish notice in the
Federal Register to announce the changes.
* * * * *
(5) A CAH may install alcohol-based hand rub dispensers in its
facility if the dispensers are installed in a manner that adequately
protects against inappropriate access.
(6) When a sprinkler system is out of service for more than 4 hours
in a 24-hour period, the CAH must--
(i) Evacuate the building or portion of the building affected by
the system outage until the system is back in service, or
(ii) Establish a fire watch until the system is back in service.
(7) In windowless anesthetizing locations, the CAH must have a
supply and exhaust system that--
(i) Automatically vents smoke and products of combustion,
(ii) Prevents recirculation of smoke originating within the
surgical suite, and
(iii) Prevents the circulation of smoke entering the system intake.
(8) Except for, newborn nurseries and rooms intended for occupancy
for less than 24 hours, every sleeping room must have an outside window
or outside door, and the sill height must not exceed 36 inches above
the floor. Special nursing care areas shall not exceed 60 inches.
Windows in atrium walls are considered outside windows for the purposes
of this requirement.
(e) Standard: building safety. Except as otherwise provided in this
section, the CAH must meet the applicable provisions of the 2012
edition of the Health Care Facilities Code of the National Fire
Protection Association, regardless of the number of patients served.
The Director of the Office of the Federal Register has approved the
NFPA 99[supreg] 2012 edition of the Health Care Facilities Code, issued
August 11, 2011, for incorporation by reference in accordance with 5
U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. A copy of the Code is available for
inspection at the CMS Information Resource Center, 7500 Security
Boulevard, Baltimore, MD or at the National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this
material at NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: https://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html.
Copies may be obtained from the National Fire Protection Association, 1
Batterymarch Park, Quincy, MA 02269. If any changes in this edition of
the Code are incorporated by reference, CMS will publish notice in the
Federal Register to announce the changes.
(1) Chapters 7, 8, 12, and 13 of the adopted Health Care Facilities
Code do not apply to a CAH.
(2) If application of the Health Care Facilities Code required
under paragraph (e) of this section would result in unreasonable
hardship upon the CAH, CMS may waive specific provisions of the Health
Care Facilities Code, but only if the waiver does not adversely affect
the health and safety of patients.
* * * * *
Dated: August 22, 2013.
Marilyn Tavenner,
Administrator, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services.
Approved: March 7, 2014.
Kathleen Sebelius,
Secretary, Department of Health and Human Services.
[FR Doc. 2014-08602 Filed 4-14-14; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 4120-01-P