Low-Effect Habitat Conservation Plan for the Endangered Mount Hermon June Beetle, Bonny Doon, Santa Cruz County, California, 21275-21277 [2014-08464]
Download as PDF
21275
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 72 / Tuesday, April 15, 2014 / Notices
APPENDIX 4—ESTIMATED COSTS AND BENEFITS PER DWELLING UNIT FROM ADOPTION OF ASHRAE 90.1–2007 50—
Continued
Incremental
Cost/Unit
($)
State
CO ................................................................................................................................................
HI .................................................................................................................................................
KS ................................................................................................................................................
ME ................................................................................................................................................
MN ...............................................................................................................................................
MO ...............................................................................................................................................
NY ................................................................................................................................................
OK ................................................................................................................................................
SD ................................................................................................................................................
TN ................................................................................................................................................
WY ...............................................................................................................................................
354
476
338
373
413
366
441
309
317
318
319
Energy cost
savings/unit
($/year) *
32.01
8.11
59.26
42.27
33.65
26.55
45.07
21.73
35.32
25.57
32.95
simple payback/unit
(years)
11.1
58.8
5.7
8.8
12.3
13.8
9.8
14.3
9.0
12.5
9.7
* Note on Energy Cost Savings: This table uses PNNL methodology of national average cost of electricity of .0939/kWh and $1.2201/therm for
natural gas.
APPENDIX 5—ESTIMATED TOTAL
COSTS AND BENEFITS FROM ADOPTION OF 2009 IECC OVER EXISTING
STATE CODE
State
Total incremental cost
per state
($)
APPENDIX 6—ESTIMATED TOTAL
COSTS AND BENEFITS FROM ADOPTION OF ASHRAE 90.1–2007—
Continued
Total energy
cost savings
per state
($ per year)
AK .............
AR .............
AZ .............
CO ............
HI ..............
KS .............
KY .............
LA .............
ME ............
MN ............
MO ............
MS ............
OK .............
SD .............
TN .............
UT .............
WI .............
WY ............
282,940
1,330,890
4,649,876
1,909,534
622,050
424,050
781,392
2,849,237
291,200
1,840,895
1,158,043
1,263,525
1,892,952
258,962
1,313,649
1,579,900
865,761
306,210
107,457
211,233
824,978
283,678
125,367
135,696
218,094
342,085
97,600
432,425
302,568
174,416
295,728
58,408
292,149
218,624
201,477
53,630
Total ......
23,621,066
4,375,613
State
Total .....
Total incremental cost/
state
($)
Total energy
cost savings/
state
($/year)
1,872,015
177,837
[FR Doc. 2014–08562 Filed 4–14–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210–67–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS–R8–ES–2014–N060;
FXES11120800000–145–FF08EVEN00]
Low-Effect Habitat Conservation Plan
for the Endangered Mount Hermon
June Beetle, Bonny Doon, Santa Cruz
County, California
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability; request
for comment.
AGENCY:
APPENDIX 6—ESTIMATED TOTAL
COSTS AND BENEFITS FROM ADOPTION OF ASHRAE 90.1–2007
We, the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service, have received an
application from Steven C. Sohl for a 5year incidental take permit under the
Endangered Species Act of 1973, as
3,069 amended (Act). The application
46,521 addresses the potential for ‘‘take’’ of the
57,618 federally endangered Mount Hermon
0 June beetle likely to occur incidental to
SUMMARY:
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
State
AK ............
AZ ............
CO ...........
HI 51 .........
KS ............
ME 52 .......
MN ...........
MO ...........
OK ...........
SD ............
TN ............
WY ...........
VerDate Mar<15>2010
Total incremental cost/
state
($)
25,945
292,192
638,730
0
11,860
0
107,396
247,930
402,972
44,159
74,960
25,871
18:06 Apr 14, 2014
Total energy
cost savings/
state
($/year)
2,074
0
8,749
17,948
28,271
4,909
6,009
2,669
Jkt 232001
51 Hawaii has been excluded from this notice due
to insufficient cost savings and a resulting long
simple payback projected from the adoption of
ASHRAE 90.1–2007. These costs and savings are
therefore excluded from this table.
52 No units were produced under affected
programs in Maine in FY 2011: therefore, no costs
or savings are shown.
PO 00000
Frm 00073
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
the construction of a single-family
residence, garage, and associated
landscaping/infrastructure on an
existing legal parcel in Bonny Doon,
Santa Cruz County, California. We
invite comments from the public on the
application package includes the Sohl
Low-Effect Habitat Conservation Plan
for the Endangered Mount Hermon June
Beetle.
DATES: To ensure consideration, please
send your written comments by May 15,
2014.
ADDRESSES: You may download a copy
of the Habitat Conservation Plan, draft
Environmental Action Statement and
Low-Effect Screening Form, and related
documents on the Internet at https://
www.fws.gov/ventura/, or you may
request copies of the documents by U.S.
mail or phone (see below). Please
address written comments to Stephen P.
Henry, Acting Field Supervisor, Ventura
Fish and Wildlife Office, U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service, 2493 Portola Road,
Suite B, Ventura, CA 93003. You may
alternatively send comments by
facsimile to (805) 644–3958.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Chad Mitcham, Fish and Wildlife
Biologist, by U.S. mail at the above
address, or by telephone (805) 644–
1766.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: We have
received an application from Steven C.
Sohl for a 5-year incidental take permit
under the Endangered Species Act of
1973, as amended. The application
addresses the potential for ‘‘take’’ of the
federally endangered Mount Hermon
June beetle (Polyphylla barbata) likely
to occur incidental to the construction
of a single-family residence, garage, and
associated landscaping/infrastructure on
an existing legal parcel in Bonny Doon,
Santa Cruz County, California. The
applicant would implement a
conservation program to minimize and
E:\FR\FM\15APN1.SGM
15APN1
21276
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 72 / Tuesday, April 15, 2014 / Notices
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
mitigate project activities that are likely
to result in take of the Mount Hermon
June beetle as described in the plan. We
invite comments from the public on the
application package, which includes the
Sohl Low-Effect Habitat Conservation
Plan for the Endangered Mount Hermon
June Beetle. This proposed action has
been determined to be eligible for a
Categorical Exclusion under the
National Environmental Policy Act of
1969, as amended.
Background
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
(Service) listed the Mount Hermon June
beetle as endangered on January 24,
1997 (62 FR 3616). Section 9 of the Act
(16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) and its
implementing regulations prohibit the
take of fish or wildlife species listed as
endangered or threatened. ‘‘Take’’ is
defined under the Act to include the
following activities: ‘‘to harass, harm,
pursue, hunt, shoot, wound, kill, trap,
capture, or collect, or to attempt to
engage in any such conduct’’ (16 U.S.C.
1532); however, under section
10(a)(1)(B) of the Act, we may issue
permits to authorize incidental take of
listed species. The Act defines
‘‘Incidental Take’’ as take that is not the
purpose of carrying out of an otherwise
lawful activity. Regulations governing
incidental take permits for threatened
and endangered species are provided at
50 CFR 17.32 and 17.22, respectively.
Issuance of an incidental take permit
must not jeopardize the existence of
federally listed fish, wildlife, or plant
species.
Take of listed plants is not prohibited
under the Act unless such take would
violate State law. As such, take of plants
cannot be authorized under an
incidental take permit. Plant species
may be included on a permit in
recognition of the conservation benefits
provided them under a habitat
conservation plan. All species,
including plants, covered by the
incidental take permit receive
assurances under our ‘‘No Surprises’’
regulations (50 CFR 17.22(b)(55) and
17.32(b)(5)). In addition to meeting
other specific criteria, actions
undertaken through implementation of
the Habitat Conservation Plan (HCP)
must not jeopardize the continued
existence of federally listed animal or
plant species.
Applicant’s Proposal
Steven C. Sohl (hereafter, the
applicant) has submitted a Low-Effect
HCP in support of his application for an
incidental take permit (ITP) to address
take of Mount Hermon June beetle that
is likely to occur as the result of direct
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:06 Apr 14, 2014
Jkt 232001
impacts to up to 0.0625 acres (ac) (2,720
square feet (sf)) of degraded sandhills
habitat occupied by the species. Take
would be associated with the
construction of a single-family residence
on an existing parcel legally described
as Assessor Parcel Number 063–061–28.
This parcel lacks an assigned street
address, but is located next to 1055
Martin Road in Ben Lomond, Santa Cruz
County, California. The applicant is
requesting a permit for take of Mount
Hermon June beetle that would result
from ‘‘covered activities’’ that are
related to the construction of a singlefamily residence and associated
landscaping/infrastructure.
The applicant proposes to avoid,
minimize, and mitigate take of Mount
Hermon June beetle associated with the
covered activities by fully implementing
the HCP. The following measures will
be implemented: (1) Siting of the
residence in an area of the property
where habitat is considered degraded
and less suitable for the species; (2)
avoiding construction during the flight
season (considered to be between May
and October, annually), if possible; (3)
covering of exposed soils with erosion
control fabric to prevent the Mount
Hermon June beetles from burrowing
into exposed soil at the construction site
if soil disturbing activities must occur
between May and October; (4)
employment of a Service-approved
entomologist to capture and relocate
into suitable habitat out of harm’s way
any Mount Hermon June beetle larvae
unearthed during construction
activities; (5) outdoor night lighting that
will use light bulbs certified not to
attract nocturnally active insects, in
order to minimize disruption of Mount
Hermon June beetle breeding behavior
during the adult flight season, and (6)
secure off-site mitigation at a ratio of 1:1
to mitigate for temporary and permanent
habitat impacts through the acquisition
of 0.0625 ac (2,720 sf) of conservation
credits in the Zayante Sandhills
Conservation Bank. The applicant will
fund up to $31,100 to ensure
implementation of all minimization
measures, monitoring, and reporting
requirements identified in the HCP.
In the proposed HCP, the applicant
considers two alternatives to the
proposed action: ‘‘No Action’’ and
‘‘Project Design.’’ Under the ‘‘No
Action’’ alternative, an ITP for the Sohl
single-family residence would not be
issued. The Sohl single-family residence
would not be built, and the purchase of
conservation credits would not be
provided to effect recovery actions for
Mount Hermon June beetle.
Additionally, since the property is
privately owned, there are ongoing
PO 00000
Frm 00074
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
economic considerations associated
with continued ownership without use,
which include payment of associated
taxes. The sale of this property for
purposes other than the identified
activity is not considered economically
feasible. Because of economic
considerations and because the
proposed action results in a net benefit
for the covered species, the No Action
Alternative has been rejected. Under the
‘‘Project Redesign’’ alternative, the
project would be redesigned to avoid or
further reduce take of Mount Hermon
June beetle. The proposed project has
already been designed to minimize
impacts to the species by locating the
residence, garage, and associated
landscaping/infrastructure in degraded
habitat and constructing the residence
vertically (two stories) instead of
horizontally. A redesigned project does
not realize a reduction in take and is not
practical. As such, the ‘‘Project
Redesign’’ alternative has also been
rejected.
Our Preliminary Determination
We are requesting comments on our
preliminary determination that the
applicant’s proposal will have a minor
or negligible effect on the Mount
Hermon June beetle and that the plan
qualifies as a low-effect HCP as defined
by our Habitat Conservation Planning
Handbook (November 1996). We base
our determinations on three criteria: (1)
Implementation of the proposed project
as described in the HCP would result in
minor or negligible effects on federally
listed, proposed, and/or candidate
species and their habitats; (2)
implementation of the HCP would result
in minor negligible effects on other
environmental values or resources; and
(3) HCP impacts, considered together
with those of other past, present, and
reasonably foreseeable future projects,
would not result in cumulatively
significant effects. In our analysis of
these criteria, we have made a
preliminary determination that the
approval of the HCP and issuance of an
ITP qualify for categorical exclusion
under the National Environmental
Policy Act (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321 et
seq.), as provided by the Department of
Interior Manual (516 DM 2 Appendix 2
and 516 DM 8); however, based upon
our review of public comments that we
receive in response to this notice, this
preliminary determination may be
revised.
Next Steps
We will evaluate the permit
application, including the plan and
comments we receive, to determine
whether the application meets the
E:\FR\FM\15APN1.SGM
15APN1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 72 / Tuesday, April 15, 2014 / Notices
requirements of Section 10(a)(1)(B) of
the Act. We will also evaluate whether
issuance of the ITP would comply with
Section 7(a)(2) of the Act by conducting
an intra-Service Section 7 consultation.
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Public Review
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Request for Comments
We provide this notice under section
10(c) of the Act and the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969, as
amended (NEPA), NEPA’s public
involvement regulations (40 CFR
1500.1(b), 1500.2(d), and 1506.6). We
are requesting comments on our
determination that the applicants’
proposal will have a minor or neglible
effect on the Mount Hermon June beetle
and that the plan qualifies as a loweffect HCP as defined by our 1996
Habitat Conservation Planning
Handbook. We will evaluate the permit
application, including the plan and
comments, we receive, to determine
whether the application meets the
requirements of section 10(a)(1)(B) of
the Act. We will use the results of our
internal Service consultation, in
combination with the above findings, in
our final analysis to determine whether
to issue the permits. If the requirements
are met, we will issue an ITP to the
applicant for the incidental take of
Mount Hermon June beetle. We will
make the final permit decision no
sooner than 30 days after the date of this
notice.
Public Comments
If you wish to comment on the permit
applications, plans, and associated
documents, you may submit comments
by any one of the methods in
ADDRESSES.
Public Availability of Comments
Before including your address, phone
number, email address, or other
personal identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
your entire comment—including your
personal identifying information—may
be made publicly available at any time.
While you can ask us in your comment
to withhold your personal identifying
information from public view, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Authority
We provide this notice under section
10 of the Act (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.)
and NEPA regulations (40 CFR 1506.6).
Dated: April 8, 2014.
Stephen P. Henry,
Acting Field Supervisor, Ventura Fish and
Wildlife Office, Ventura, California.
[FR Doc. 2014–08464 Filed 4–14–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–55–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:06 Apr 14, 2014
Jkt 232001
U.S. Geological Survey
[GX14LR000F60100]
U.S. Geological Survey (USGS),
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of an extension of a
currently approved information
collection (1028–0070).
AGENCY:
We (the U.S. Geological
Survey) will ask the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) to
approve the information collection (IC)
described below. This collection
consists of one form, ‘9–4117–MA,
Consolidated Consumers’ Report’. As
required by the Paperwork Reduction
Act (PRA) of 1995, and as part of our
continuing efforts to reduce paperwork
and respondent burden, we invite the
general public and other Federal
agencies to take this opportunity to
comment on this IC. This collection is
scheduled to expire on April 30, 2014.
DATES: To ensure that your comments
are considered, OMB must receive them
on or before May 15, 2014.
ADDRESSES: Please submit your written
comments on this information
collection directly to the Office of
Management and Budget, Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs,
Attention: Desk Officer for the
Department of the Interior, at OIRA_
SUBMISSION@omb.eop.gov (email); or
(202) 395–5806 (fax). Please also
forward a copy of your comments to the
Information Collection Clearance
Officer, U.S. Geological Survey, 807
National Center, 12201 Sunrise Valley
Drive, Reston, VA 20192 (mail); 703–
648–7195 (fax); or gs-info_collections@
usgs.gov (email). Reference
‘‘Information Collection 1028–0070,
Consolidated Consumers’ Report’’ in all
correspondence.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Michael J. Magyar at 703–648–4910
(telephone); mmagyar@usgs.gov (email);
or by mail at U.S. Geological Survey,
988 National Center, 12201 Sunrise
Valley Drive, Reston, VA 20192. You
may also find information about this
ICR at www.reginfo.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
I. Abstract
Respondents to this form supply the
USGS with domestic consumption data
for 12 metals and ferroalloys, some of
which are considered strategic and
critical to assist in determining
stockpile goals. These data and derived
PO 00000
Frm 00075
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
21277
information will be published as
chapters in Minerals Yearbooks,
monthly Mineral Industry Surveys,
annual Mineral Commodity Summaries,
and special publications, for use by
Government agencies, industry
education programs, and the general
public.
II. Data
OMB Control Number: 1028–0070.
Form Number: 9–4117–MA.
Title: Consolidated Consumers’
Report.
Type of Request: Extension of a
currently approved collection.
Affected Public: Business or OtherFor-Profit Institutions: U.S. nonfuel
minerals consumers of ferrous and
related metals.
Respondent Obligation: None.
Participation is voluntary.
Frequency of Collection: Monthly and
Annually.
Estimated Number of Annual
Responses: 1,904.
Annual Burden Hours: 1,428 hours,
based on an estimated average of 45
minutes per response.
Estimated Reporting and
Recordkeeping ‘‘Non-Hour Cost’’
Burden: There are no ‘‘non-hour cost’’
burdens associated with this collection
of information.
Public Disclosure Statement: The PRA
(44 U.S.C. 3501, et seq.) provides that an
agency may not conduct or sponsor a
collection of information unless it
displays a currently valid OMB control
number and current expiration date.
III. Request for Comments
On December 24, 2013, a 60-day
Federal Register notice (78 FR 77704)
was published announcing this
information collection. Public
comments were solicited for 60 days
ending February 24, 2014. We did not
receive any public comments in
response to that notice. We again invite
comments as to: (a) Whether the
proposed collection of information is
necessary for the agency to perform its
duties, including whether the
information is useful; (b) the accuracy of
the agency’s estimate of the burden time
to the proposed collection of
information; (c) how to enhance the
quality, usefulness, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and (d) how
to minimize the burden on the
respondents, including the use of
automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
Please note that the comments
submitted in response to this notice are
a matter of public record. Before
including your personal mailing
address, phone number, email address,
E:\FR\FM\15APN1.SGM
15APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 72 (Tuesday, April 15, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 21275-21277]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-08464]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS-R8-ES-2014-N060; FXES11120800000-145-FF08EVEN00]
Low-Effect Habitat Conservation Plan for the Endangered Mount
Hermon June Beetle, Bonny Doon, Santa Cruz County, California
AGENCY: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability; request for comment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, have received an
application from Steven C. Sohl for a 5-year incidental take permit
under the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (Act). The
application addresses the potential for ``take'' of the federally
endangered Mount Hermon June beetle likely to occur incidental to the
construction of a single-family residence, garage, and associated
landscaping/infrastructure on an existing legal parcel in Bonny Doon,
Santa Cruz County, California. We invite comments from the public on
the application package includes the Sohl Low-Effect Habitat
Conservation Plan for the Endangered Mount Hermon June Beetle.
DATES: To ensure consideration, please send your written comments by
May 15, 2014.
ADDRESSES: You may download a copy of the Habitat Conservation Plan,
draft Environmental Action Statement and Low-Effect Screening Form, and
related documents on the Internet at https://www.fws.gov/ventura/, or
you may request copies of the documents by U.S. mail or phone (see
below). Please address written comments to Stephen P. Henry, Acting
Field Supervisor, Ventura Fish and Wildlife Office, U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service, 2493 Portola Road, Suite B, Ventura, CA 93003. You
may alternatively send comments by facsimile to (805) 644-3958.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Chad Mitcham, Fish and Wildlife
Biologist, by U.S. mail at the above address, or by telephone (805)
644-1766.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: We have received an application from Steven
C. Sohl for a 5-year incidental take permit under the Endangered
Species Act of 1973, as amended. The application addresses the
potential for ``take'' of the federally endangered Mount Hermon June
beetle (Polyphylla barbata) likely to occur incidental to the
construction of a single-family residence, garage, and associated
landscaping/infrastructure on an existing legal parcel in Bonny Doon,
Santa Cruz County, California. The applicant would implement a
conservation program to minimize and
[[Page 21276]]
mitigate project activities that are likely to result in take of the
Mount Hermon June beetle as described in the plan. We invite comments
from the public on the application package, which includes the Sohl
Low-Effect Habitat Conservation Plan for the Endangered Mount Hermon
June Beetle. This proposed action has been determined to be eligible
for a Categorical Exclusion under the National Environmental Policy Act
of 1969, as amended.
Background
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) listed the Mount
Hermon June beetle as endangered on January 24, 1997 (62 FR 3616).
Section 9 of the Act (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) and its implementing
regulations prohibit the take of fish or wildlife species listed as
endangered or threatened. ``Take'' is defined under the Act to include
the following activities: ``to harass, harm, pursue, hunt, shoot,
wound, kill, trap, capture, or collect, or to attempt to engage in any
such conduct'' (16 U.S.C. 1532); however, under section 10(a)(1)(B) of
the Act, we may issue permits to authorize incidental take of listed
species. The Act defines ``Incidental Take'' as take that is not the
purpose of carrying out of an otherwise lawful activity. Regulations
governing incidental take permits for threatened and endangered species
are provided at 50 CFR 17.32 and 17.22, respectively. Issuance of an
incidental take permit must not jeopardize the existence of federally
listed fish, wildlife, or plant species.
Take of listed plants is not prohibited under the Act unless such
take would violate State law. As such, take of plants cannot be
authorized under an incidental take permit. Plant species may be
included on a permit in recognition of the conservation benefits
provided them under a habitat conservation plan. All species, including
plants, covered by the incidental take permit receive assurances under
our ``No Surprises'' regulations (50 CFR 17.22(b)(55) and 17.32(b)(5)).
In addition to meeting other specific criteria, actions undertaken
through implementation of the Habitat Conservation Plan (HCP) must not
jeopardize the continued existence of federally listed animal or plant
species.
Applicant's Proposal
Steven C. Sohl (hereafter, the applicant) has submitted a Low-
Effect HCP in support of his application for an incidental take permit
(ITP) to address take of Mount Hermon June beetle that is likely to
occur as the result of direct impacts to up to 0.0625 acres (ac) (2,720
square feet (sf)) of degraded sandhills habitat occupied by the
species. Take would be associated with the construction of a single-
family residence on an existing parcel legally described as Assessor
Parcel Number 063-061-28. This parcel lacks an assigned street address,
but is located next to 1055 Martin Road in Ben Lomond, Santa Cruz
County, California. The applicant is requesting a permit for take of
Mount Hermon June beetle that would result from ``covered activities''
that are related to the construction of a single-family residence and
associated landscaping/infrastructure.
The applicant proposes to avoid, minimize, and mitigate take of
Mount Hermon June beetle associated with the covered activities by
fully implementing the HCP. The following measures will be implemented:
(1) Siting of the residence in an area of the property where habitat is
considered degraded and less suitable for the species; (2) avoiding
construction during the flight season (considered to be between May and
October, annually), if possible; (3) covering of exposed soils with
erosion control fabric to prevent the Mount Hermon June beetles from
burrowing into exposed soil at the construction site if soil disturbing
activities must occur between May and October; (4) employment of a
Service-approved entomologist to capture and relocate into suitable
habitat out of harm's way any Mount Hermon June beetle larvae unearthed
during construction activities; (5) outdoor night lighting that will
use light bulbs certified not to attract nocturnally active insects, in
order to minimize disruption of Mount Hermon June beetle breeding
behavior during the adult flight season, and (6) secure off-site
mitigation at a ratio of 1:1 to mitigate for temporary and permanent
habitat impacts through the acquisition of 0.0625 ac (2,720 sf) of
conservation credits in the Zayante Sandhills Conservation Bank. The
applicant will fund up to $31,100 to ensure implementation of all
minimization measures, monitoring, and reporting requirements
identified in the HCP.
In the proposed HCP, the applicant considers two alternatives to
the proposed action: ``No Action'' and ``Project Design.'' Under the
``No Action'' alternative, an ITP for the Sohl single-family residence
would not be issued. The Sohl single-family residence would not be
built, and the purchase of conservation credits would not be provided
to effect recovery actions for Mount Hermon June beetle. Additionally,
since the property is privately owned, there are ongoing economic
considerations associated with continued ownership without use, which
include payment of associated taxes. The sale of this property for
purposes other than the identified activity is not considered
economically feasible. Because of economic considerations and because
the proposed action results in a net benefit for the covered species,
the No Action Alternative has been rejected. Under the ``Project
Redesign'' alternative, the project would be redesigned to avoid or
further reduce take of Mount Hermon June beetle. The proposed project
has already been designed to minimize impacts to the species by
locating the residence, garage, and associated landscaping/
infrastructure in degraded habitat and constructing the residence
vertically (two stories) instead of horizontally. A redesigned project
does not realize a reduction in take and is not practical. As such, the
``Project Redesign'' alternative has also been rejected.
Our Preliminary Determination
We are requesting comments on our preliminary determination that
the applicant's proposal will have a minor or negligible effect on the
Mount Hermon June beetle and that the plan qualifies as a low-effect
HCP as defined by our Habitat Conservation Planning Handbook (November
1996). We base our determinations on three criteria: (1) Implementation
of the proposed project as described in the HCP would result in minor
or negligible effects on federally listed, proposed, and/or candidate
species and their habitats; (2) implementation of the HCP would result
in minor negligible effects on other environmental values or resources;
and (3) HCP impacts, considered together with those of other past,
present, and reasonably foreseeable future projects, would not result
in cumulatively significant effects. In our analysis of these criteria,
we have made a preliminary determination that the approval of the HCP
and issuance of an ITP qualify for categorical exclusion under the
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.), as
provided by the Department of Interior Manual (516 DM 2 Appendix 2 and
516 DM 8); however, based upon our review of public comments that we
receive in response to this notice, this preliminary determination may
be revised.
Next Steps
We will evaluate the permit application, including the plan and
comments we receive, to determine whether the application meets the
[[Page 21277]]
requirements of Section 10(a)(1)(B) of the Act. We will also evaluate
whether issuance of the ITP would comply with Section 7(a)(2) of the
Act by conducting an intra-Service Section 7 consultation.
Public Review
We provide this notice under section 10(c) of the Act and the
National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, as amended (NEPA), NEPA's
public involvement regulations (40 CFR 1500.1(b), 1500.2(d), and
1506.6). We are requesting comments on our determination that the
applicants' proposal will have a minor or neglible effect on the Mount
Hermon June beetle and that the plan qualifies as a low-effect HCP as
defined by our 1996 Habitat Conservation Planning Handbook. We will
evaluate the permit application, including the plan and comments, we
receive, to determine whether the application meets the requirements of
section 10(a)(1)(B) of the Act. We will use the results of our internal
Service consultation, in combination with the above findings, in our
final analysis to determine whether to issue the permits. If the
requirements are met, we will issue an ITP to the applicant for the
incidental take of Mount Hermon June beetle. We will make the final
permit decision no sooner than 30 days after the date of this notice.
Public Comments
If you wish to comment on the permit applications, plans, and
associated documents, you may submit comments by any one of the methods
in ADDRESSES.
Public Availability of Comments
Before including your address, phone number, email address, or
other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be
aware that your entire comment--including your personal identifying
information--may be made publicly available at any time. While you can
ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying
information from public view, we cannot guarantee that we will be able
to do so.
Authority
We provide this notice under section 10 of the Act (16 U.S.C. 1531
et seq.) and NEPA regulations (40 CFR 1506.6).
Dated: April 8, 2014.
Stephen P. Henry,
Acting Field Supervisor, Ventura Fish and Wildlife Office, Ventura,
California.
[FR Doc. 2014-08464 Filed 4-14-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P