Approval and Promulgation of State Plans for Designated Facilities and Pollutants; Air Emissions From Existing Municipal Solid Waste Landfills; State of Missouri, 21146-21148 [2014-08340]
Download as PDF
21146
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 72 / Tuesday, April 15, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
• is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• is not subject to requirements of
section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act;
• does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994); and
• this rule does not have tribal
implications as specified by Executive
Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9,
2000), because the SIP is not approved
to apply in Indian country located in the
state, and EPA notes that it will not
impose substantial direct costs on tribal
governments or preempt tribal law.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
PART 52—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart SS—Texas
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Hydrocarbons,
Incorporation by reference,
Intergovernmental relations, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements,
Volatile organic compounds.
Dated: April 1, 2014.
Samuel Coleman,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 6.
2. In Section 52.2270, the second table
in paragraph (e) entitled ‘‘EPAApproved Nonregulatory Provisions and
Quasi-Regulatory Measures in the Texas
SIP’’ is amended by adding two entries
at the end to read as follows:
■
§ 52.2270
*
Part 52, chapter I, title 40 of the Code
of Federal Regulations is amended as
follows:
Identification of plan.
*
*
(e) * * *
*
*
EPA-APPROVED NONREGULATORY PROVISIONS AND QUASI-REGULATORY MEASURES IN THE TEXAS SIP
Applicable geographic or
nonattainment area
Name of SIP provision
*
VOC RACT negative declaration for Fiberglass
Boat Manufacturing Materials, Leather Tanning
and Finishing, Surface
Coating for Flat Wood
Paneling, Letterpress
Printing, Automobile and
Light-Duty Truck Assembly Coating, Rubber Tire
Manufacturing, and Vegetable Oil Manufacturing
Operations.
VOC RACT finding for the
1997 8-hour ozone
NAAQS, except for the
2006–2010 EPA-issued
CTG series.
*
*
*
Brazoria, Chambers, Fort
April 6, 2010.
Bend, Galveston, Harris,
Liberty, Montgomery
and Waller Counties, TX.
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 62
ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES
[EPA–R07–OAR–2013–0692; FRL–9909–45–
Region 7]
Approval and Promulgation of State
Plans for Designated Facilities and
Pollutants; Air Emissions From
Existing Municipal Solid Waste
Landfills; State of Missouri
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
AGENCY:
14:48 Apr 14, 2014
Jkt 232001
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Comments
*
*
April 15, 2014 [Insert FR
page number where
document begins].
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is taking direct final
action to approve a revision to the state
section 111 plan for Municipal Solid
Waste (MSW) Landfills submitted by the
State of Missouri Department of Natural
Resources. This plan contains state rules
‘‘Municipal Solid Waste Landfills’’ and
‘‘Restriction of Emissions from
Municipal Solid Waste Landfills’’ that
were updated as a result of amendments
to the Federal Emission Guidelines (EG)
published April 10, 2000; October 17,
2000; and September 21, 2006. The plan
also corrects typographical and
administrative changes in the Missouri
Rules. This approval means that EPA
finds the State Plan meets applicable
Clean Air Act (CAA) requirements.
SUMMARY:
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
EPA Approval date
*
Brazoria, Chambers, Fort
April 6, 2010 .....................
Bend, Galveston, Harris,
Liberty, Montgomery
and Waller Counties, TX.
[FR Doc. 2014–08331 Filed 4–14–14; 8:45 am]
VerDate Mar<15>2010
State submittal/effective
date
This direct final rule will be
effective June 16, 2014, without further
notice, unless EPA receives adverse
comments by May 15, 2014. If EPA
receives adverse comments, we will
publish a timely withdrawal of the
direct final rule in the Federal Register
informing the public that the rule will
not take effect.
DATES:
Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R07–
OAR–2013–0692, by one of the
following methods:
1. www.regulations.gov. Follow the
on-line instructions for submitting
comments.
2. Email: Bernstein.craig@epa.gov.
3. Mail or Hand Delivery: Craig
Bernstein, Environmental Protection
Agency, Air Planning and Development
ADDRESSES:
E:\FR\FM\15APR1.SGM
15APR1
ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 72 / Tuesday, April 15, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
Branch, 11201 Renner Boulevard,
Lenexa, Kansas 66219.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
Docket ID No. EPA–R07–OAR–2013–
0692. EPA’s policy is that all comments
received will be included in the public
docket without change and may be
made available online at
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided, unless
the comment includes information
claimed to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Do not submit through
www.regulations.gov or email
information that you consider to be CBI
or otherwise protected. The
www.regulations.gov Web site is an
‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which
means EPA will not know your identity
or contact information unless you
provide it in the body of your comment.
If you send an email comment directly
to EPA without going through
www.regulations.gov, your email
address will be automatically captured
and included as part of the comment
that is placed in the public docket and
made available on the Internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA
recommends that you include your
name and other contact information in
the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA
cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact
you for clarification, EPA may not be
able to consider your comment.
Electronic files should avoid the use of
special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or
viruses.
Docket: All documents in the docket
are listed in the www.regulations.gov
index. Although listed in the index,
some information is not publicly
available, i.e., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available either electronically in
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at
the Environmental Protection Agency,
Air Planning and Development Branch,
11201 Renner Boulevard, Lenexa,
Kansas 66219. The Regional Office’s
official hours of business are Monday
through Friday, 8:00 to 4:30 excluding
Federal holidays. The interested persons
wanting to examine these documents
should make an appointment with the
office at least 24 hours in advance.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Craig Bernstein, Environmental
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:48 Apr 14, 2014
Jkt 232001
Protection Agency, Air Planning and
Development Branch, 11201 Renner
Boulevard, Lenexa, Kansas 66219 at
913–551–7688, or by email at
Bernstein.craig@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’
or ‘‘our’’ refer to EPA. This section
provides additional information by
addressing the following:
I. Background
II. Have the requirements for approval of a
section 111(d) plan revision been met?
III. What action is EPA taking?
I. Background
Standards and guidelines for new and
existing MSW landfills are promulgated
under the authority of section 111 of the
CAA. These standards can be found at
40 CFR part 60, subpart WWW, new
source performance standards (NSPS)
for new MSW landfills, and subpart Cc,
emission guidelines (EG) for existing
MSW landfills. The final NSPS and EG
were published in the Federal Register
on March 12, 1996 (49 FR 9905). We
first approved Missouri’s section 111(d)
plan for MSW landfills on April 24,
1998 (63 FR 20320). The state’s plan
consists primarily of two state rules
which adopt the Federal landfill
requirements. These rules are 10 CSR
10–6.310 ‘‘Restriction of Emissions from
Municipal Solid Waste Landfills’’
(which covers all areas of Missouri
except St. Louis) and 10 CSR 10–5.490
‘‘Municipal Solid Waste Landfills’’
(which covers the St. Louis area).
Since Missouri last amended both of
these state rules, EPA has published in
the Federal Register three final rules
that update the requirements for
municipal solid waste landfills. The
dates and Federal Register citations are:
April 10, 2000 (65 FR 18906); October
17, 2000 (65 FR 61744), and September
21, 2006 (71 FR 55127). Missouri
updated rules 10 CSR 10–5.490
‘‘Municipal Solid Waste Landfills’’ and
10 CSR 10–6.310 ‘‘Restriction of
Emissions from Municipal Solid Waste
Landfills’’ to incorporate EPA’s recent
amendments, to correct typographical
errors, to include formatting changes,
and to correct inconsistencies.
Missouri’s request to move definitions
from 10 CSR 10–5.490 and 10 CSR 10–
6.310 to rule 10 CSR 10–6.020
‘‘Definitions and Common Reference
Tables’’ has been addressed in a
separate rulemaking action. In a
separate action being published in
today’s Federal Register, EPA is taking
action to approve rule 10 CSR 10–5.490
‘‘Municipal Solid Waste Landfills’’ into
Missouri’s SIP as well.
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
21147
II. Have the requirements for approval
of a section 111(d) plan revision been
met?
The Missouri Air Conservation
Commission adopted rule amendments
to 10 CSR 10–5.490 and 10 CSR 10–
6.310 on February 2, 2012, after
considering comments received at a
public hearing. The Missouri Air
Conservation Commission has full legal
authority to develop rules pursuant to
section 643.050 of the Missouri Air
Conservation Law. The State followed
all applicable administrative procedures
in proposing and adopting the rule
actions. After publication by the
Missouri Secretary of State in the Code
of State Regulations, the amendments
became effective May 30, 2012. The
State of Missouri has incorporated these
rule amendments into its revised section
111(d) plan and submitted the plan and
rules to us for approval pursuant to
section 111(d). We have evaluated the
state plan revision against criteria in the
EG and against the plan approval
criteria at 40 CFR 60.23 through 40 CFR
60.26, subpart B ‘‘Adoption and
Submittal of State Plans for Designated
Facilities.’’ The state plan meets all of
the applicable requirements of 40 CFR
part 60, subpart B and subpart Cc.
III. What action is EPA taking?
EPA is approving the revisions to the
Missouri section 111(d) plan submitted
by the State of Missouri for MSW
landfills, which incorporates the recent
EPA updated rules. We are publishing
this rule without a prior proposed rule
because we view this as a
noncontroversial action and anticipate
no adverse comment because the
revisions are administrative and
consistent with Federal regulations.
However, in the ‘‘Proposed Rules’’
section of today’s Federal Register, we
are publishing a separate document that
will serve as the proposed rule to
approve the section 111(d) revision. If
EPA receives adverse comments on this
direct final rule, we will publish a
timely withdrawal in the Federal
Register informing the public that this
direct final rule will not take effect. We
would address all public comments in
any subsequent final rule based on the
proposed rule.
Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
A. General Requirements
Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR
51735, October 4, 1993), this action is
not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ and
therefore is not subject to review by the
Office of Management and Budget. For
this reason, this action is also not
subject to Executive Order 13211,
E:\FR\FM\15APR1.SGM
15APR1
ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES
21148
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 72 / Tuesday, April 15, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
‘‘Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use’’ (66 FR 28355, May
22, 2001). This action merely approves
state law as meeting Federal
requirements and imposes no additional
requirements beyond those imposed by
state law. Accordingly, the
Administrator certifies that this rule
will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities under the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because this
rule approves pre-existing requirements
under state law and does not impose
any additional enforceable duty beyond
that required by state law, it does not
contain any unfunded mandate or
significantly or uniquely affect small
governments, as described in the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
(Pub. L. 104–4). This rule also does not
have tribal implications because it will
not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the
relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000). This
action also does not have Federalism
implications because it does not have
substantial direct effects on the States,
on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government, as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255,
August 10, 1999). This action merely
approves a state rule implementing a
Federal requirement, and does not alter
the relationship or the distribution of
power and responsibilities established
in the Act. This rule also is not subject
to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885,
April 23, 1997), because it approves a
state rule implementing a Federal
standard.
In reviewing section 111(d) plan
submissions, EPA’s role is to approve
State choices, provided that they meet
the criteria of the Act. In this context,
in the absence of a prior existing
requirement for the State to use
voluntary consensus standards (VCS),
EPA has no authority to disapprove a
section 111(d) plan submission for
failure to use VCS. It would thus be
inconsistent with applicable law for
EPA, when it reviews a section 111(d)
plan submission, to use VCS in place of
a section 111(d) plan submission that
otherwise satisfies the provisions of the
Act. Thus, the requirements of section
12(d) of the National Technology
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:48 Apr 14, 2014
Jkt 232001
Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995
(15 U.S.C. 272 note) do not apply. This
rule does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
PART 62—APPROVAL AND
PROMULGATION OF STATE PLANS
FOR DESIGNATED FACILITIES AND
POLLUTANTS
1. The authority citation for part 62
continues to read as follows:
■
B. Submission to Congress and the
Comptroller General
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. EPA will submit a
report containing this rule and other
required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of the rule in
the Federal Register. This rule is not a
‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart AA—Missouri
2. Section 62.6357 is amended by
adding paragraph (e) to read as follows:
■
§ 62.6357
Identification of plan.
*
*
*
*
*
(e) Amended plan for the control of
air emissions from Municipal Solid
Waste Landfills submitted by the
Missouri Department of Natural
Resources on February 9, 2012. The
effective date of the amended plan is
May 30, 2012.
[FR Doc. 2014–08340 Filed 4–14–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
LEGAL SERVICES CORPORATION
C. Petitions for Judicial Review
45 CFR Part 1613
Under Section 307(b)(1) of the Act,
petitions for judicial review of this
action must be filed in the United States
Court of Appeals for the appropriate
circuit by August 12, 2013. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the
Administrator of this final rule does not
affect the finality of this rule for the
purposes of judicial review nor does it
extend the time within which a petition
for judicial review may be filed, and
shall not postpone the effectiveness of
such rule or action. This action
approving Missouri’s section 111(d)
plan revision for SSI sources may not be
challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section
307(b)(2).)
Restrictions on Legal Assistance With
Respect to Criminal Proceedings
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 62
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Hydrocarbons, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations,
Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur
oxides.
Dated: April 3, 2014.
Karl Brooks,
Regional Administrator, Region 7.
Chapter I, title 40 of the Code of
Federal Regulations is amended as
follows:
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Legal Services Corporation.
Final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
This final rule updates the
Legal Services Corporation (LSC or
Corporation) regulation on legal
assistance with respect to criminal
proceedings. The Tribal Law and Order
Act of 2010 (TLOA) amended the LSC
Act to authorize LSC funds to be used
for representation of persons charged
with any criminal offense in tribal
courts. This proposed rule will bring the
regulations into alignment with the
amended provisions of the LSC Act. The
proposed rule will also revise the
conditions under which LSC recipients
can accept or decline court
appointments to represent defendants in
criminal proceedings.
DATES: The effective date of this rule is
May 15, 2014.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Stefanie K. Davis, Assistant General
Counsel, Legal Services Corporation,
3333 K Street NW., Washington, DC
20007, (202) 295–1563 (phone), (202)
337–6519 (fax), sdavis@lsc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
I. General Authorities and Impetus for
Rulemaking
The Corporation first issued 45 CFR
part 1613 in 1976 to implement a
statutory prohibition on the use of LSC
E:\FR\FM\15APR1.SGM
15APR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 72 (Tuesday, April 15, 2014)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 21146-21148]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-08340]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 62
[EPA-R07-OAR-2013-0692; FRL-9909-45-Region 7]
Approval and Promulgation of State Plans for Designated
Facilities and Pollutants; Air Emissions From Existing Municipal Solid
Waste Landfills; State of Missouri
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is taking direct
final action to approve a revision to the state section 111 plan for
Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) Landfills submitted by the State of
Missouri Department of Natural Resources. This plan contains state
rules ``Municipal Solid Waste Landfills'' and ``Restriction of
Emissions from Municipal Solid Waste Landfills'' that were updated as a
result of amendments to the Federal Emission Guidelines (EG) published
April 10, 2000; October 17, 2000; and September 21, 2006. The plan also
corrects typographical and administrative changes in the Missouri
Rules. This approval means that EPA finds the State Plan meets
applicable Clean Air Act (CAA) requirements.
DATES: This direct final rule will be effective June 16, 2014, without
further notice, unless EPA receives adverse comments by May 15, 2014.
If EPA receives adverse comments, we will publish a timely withdrawal
of the direct final rule in the Federal Register informing the public
that the rule will not take effect.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R07-
OAR-2013-0692, by one of the following methods:
1. www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line instructions for
submitting comments.
2. Email: Bernstein.craig@epa.gov.
3. Mail or Hand Delivery: Craig Bernstein, Environmental Protection
Agency, Air Planning and Development
[[Page 21147]]
Branch, 11201 Renner Boulevard, Lenexa, Kansas 66219.
Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID No. EPA-R07-OAR-
2013-0692. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included
in the public docket without change and may be made available online at
www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided,
unless the comment includes information claimed to be Confidential
Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Do not submit through www.regulations.gov or
email information that you consider to be CBI or otherwise protected.
The www.regulations.gov Web site is an ``anonymous access'' system,
which means EPA will not know your identity or contact information
unless you provide it in the body of your comment. If you send an email
comment directly to EPA without going through www.regulations.gov, your
email address will be automatically captured and included as part of
the comment that is placed in the public docket and made available on
the Internet. If you submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that
you include your name and other contact information in the body of your
comment and with any disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your
comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for
clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic
files should avoid the use of special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or viruses.
Docket: All documents in the docket are listed in the
www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available, i.e., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such
as copyrighted material, is not placed on the internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket
materials are available either electronically in www.regulations.gov or
in hard copy at the Environmental Protection Agency, Air Planning and
Development Branch, 11201 Renner Boulevard, Lenexa, Kansas 66219. The
Regional Office's official hours of business are Monday through Friday,
8:00 to 4:30 excluding Federal holidays. The interested persons wanting
to examine these documents should make an appointment with the office
at least 24 hours in advance.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Craig Bernstein, Environmental
Protection Agency, Air Planning and Development Branch, 11201 Renner
Boulevard, Lenexa, Kansas 66219 at 913-551-7688, or by email at
Bernstein.craig@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document ``we,'' ``us,'' or
``our'' refer to EPA. This section provides additional information by
addressing the following:
I. Background
II. Have the requirements for approval of a section 111(d) plan
revision been met?
III. What action is EPA taking?
I. Background
Standards and guidelines for new and existing MSW landfills are
promulgated under the authority of section 111 of the CAA. These
standards can be found at 40 CFR part 60, subpart WWW, new source
performance standards (NSPS) for new MSW landfills, and subpart Cc,
emission guidelines (EG) for existing MSW landfills. The final NSPS and
EG were published in the Federal Register on March 12, 1996 (49 FR
9905). We first approved Missouri's section 111(d) plan for MSW
landfills on April 24, 1998 (63 FR 20320). The state's plan consists
primarily of two state rules which adopt the Federal landfill
requirements. These rules are 10 CSR 10-6.310 ``Restriction of
Emissions from Municipal Solid Waste Landfills'' (which covers all
areas of Missouri except St. Louis) and 10 CSR 10-5.490 ``Municipal
Solid Waste Landfills'' (which covers the St. Louis area).
Since Missouri last amended both of these state rules, EPA has
published in the Federal Register three final rules that update the
requirements for municipal solid waste landfills. The dates and Federal
Register citations are: April 10, 2000 (65 FR 18906); October 17, 2000
(65 FR 61744), and September 21, 2006 (71 FR 55127). Missouri updated
rules 10 CSR 10-5.490 ``Municipal Solid Waste Landfills'' and 10 CSR
10-6.310 ``Restriction of Emissions from Municipal Solid Waste
Landfills'' to incorporate EPA's recent amendments, to correct
typographical errors, to include formatting changes, and to correct
inconsistencies. Missouri's request to move definitions from 10 CSR 10-
5.490 and 10 CSR 10-6.310 to rule 10 CSR 10-6.020 ``Definitions and
Common Reference Tables'' has been addressed in a separate rulemaking
action. In a separate action being published in today's Federal
Register, EPA is taking action to approve rule 10 CSR 10-5.490
``Municipal Solid Waste Landfills'' into Missouri's SIP as well.
II. Have the requirements for approval of a section 111(d) plan
revision been met?
The Missouri Air Conservation Commission adopted rule amendments to
10 CSR 10-5.490 and 10 CSR 10-6.310 on February 2, 2012, after
considering comments received at a public hearing. The Missouri Air
Conservation Commission has full legal authority to develop rules
pursuant to section 643.050 of the Missouri Air Conservation Law. The
State followed all applicable administrative procedures in proposing
and adopting the rule actions. After publication by the Missouri
Secretary of State in the Code of State Regulations, the amendments
became effective May 30, 2012. The State of Missouri has incorporated
these rule amendments into its revised section 111(d) plan and
submitted the plan and rules to us for approval pursuant to section
111(d). We have evaluated the state plan revision against criteria in
the EG and against the plan approval criteria at 40 CFR 60.23 through
40 CFR 60.26, subpart B ``Adoption and Submittal of State Plans for
Designated Facilities.'' The state plan meets all of the applicable
requirements of 40 CFR part 60, subpart B and subpart Cc.
III. What action is EPA taking?
EPA is approving the revisions to the Missouri section 111(d) plan
submitted by the State of Missouri for MSW landfills, which
incorporates the recent EPA updated rules. We are publishing this rule
without a prior proposed rule because we view this as a
noncontroversial action and anticipate no adverse comment because the
revisions are administrative and consistent with Federal regulations.
However, in the ``Proposed Rules'' section of today's Federal Register,
we are publishing a separate document that will serve as the proposed
rule to approve the section 111(d) revision. If EPA receives adverse
comments on this direct final rule, we will publish a timely withdrawal
in the Federal Register informing the public that this direct final
rule will not take effect. We would address all public comments in any
subsequent final rule based on the proposed rule.
Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
A. General Requirements
Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), this
action is not a ``significant regulatory action'' and therefore is not
subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget. For this
reason, this action is also not subject to Executive Order 13211,
[[Page 21148]]
``Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy
Supply, Distribution, or Use'' (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001). This action
merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and imposes
no additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law.
Accordingly, the Administrator certifies that this rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because
this rule approves pre-existing requirements under state law and does
not impose any additional enforceable duty beyond that required by
state law, it does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4). This rule also does not
have tribal implications because it will not have a substantial direct
effect on one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes,
as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
This action also does not have Federalism implications because it does
not have substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government,
as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999).
This action merely approves a state rule implementing a Federal
requirement, and does not alter the relationship or the distribution of
power and responsibilities established in the Act. This rule also is
not subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997),
because it approves a state rule implementing a Federal standard.
In reviewing section 111(d) plan submissions, EPA's role is to
approve State choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Act.
In this context, in the absence of a prior existing requirement for the
State to use voluntary consensus standards (VCS), EPA has no authority
to disapprove a section 111(d) plan submission for failure to use VCS.
It would thus be inconsistent with applicable law for EPA, when it
reviews a section 111(d) plan submission, to use VCS in place of a
section 111(d) plan submission that otherwise satisfies the provisions
of the Act. Thus, the requirements of section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) do
not apply. This rule does not impose an information collection burden
under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C.
3501 et seq.).
B. Submission to Congress and the Comptroller General
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other
required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. This rule is not a
``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
C. Petitions for Judicial Review
Under Section 307(b)(1) of the Act, petitions for judicial review
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for
the appropriate circuit by August 12, 2013. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect
the finality of this rule for the purposes of judicial review nor does
it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may be
filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or action.
This action approving Missouri's section 111(d) plan revision for SSI
sources may not be challenged later in proceedings to enforce its
requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 62
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Hydrocarbons, Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations,
Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements,
Sulfur oxides.
Dated: April 3, 2014.
Karl Brooks,
Regional Administrator, Region 7.
Chapter I, title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended
as follows:
PART 62--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF STATE PLANS FOR DESIGNATED
FACILITIES AND POLLUTANTS
0
1. The authority citation for part 62 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart AA--Missouri
0
2. Section 62.6357 is amended by adding paragraph (e) to read as
follows:
Sec. 62.6357 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(e) Amended plan for the control of air emissions from Municipal
Solid Waste Landfills submitted by the Missouri Department of Natural
Resources on February 9, 2012. The effective date of the amended plan
is May 30, 2012.
[FR Doc. 2014-08340 Filed 4-14-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P