Special Conditions: Embraer S.A., Model EMB-550 Airplanes; Flight Envelope Protection: Normal Load Factor (g) Limiting, 20768-20769 [2014-08275]
Download as PDF
20768
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 71 / Monday, April 14, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 25
[Docket No. FAA–2013–0772; Special
Conditions No. 25–520–SC]
Special Conditions: Embraer S.A.,
Model EMB–550 Airplanes; Flight
Envelope Protection: Normal Load
Factor (g) Limiting
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final special conditions.
AGENCY:
These special conditions are
issued for the Embraer S.A. Model
EMB–550 airplane. This airplane will
have a novel or unusual design feature
associated with an electronic flight
control system that prevents the pilot
from inadvertently or intentionally
exceeding the positive or negative
airplane limit load factor. The
applicable airworthiness regulations do
not contain adequate or appropriate
safety standards for this design feature.
These special conditions contain the
additional safety standards that the
Administrator considers necessary to
establish a level of safety equivalent to
that established by the existing
airworthiness standards.
DATES: Effective Date: May 14, 2014.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joe
Jacobsen, FAA, Airplane and Flight
Crew Interface Branch, Transport
Airplane Directorate, Aircraft
Certification Service, 1601 Lind Avenue
SW., Renton, Washington 98057–3356;
telephone 425–227–2011; facsimile
425–227–1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Background
On May 14, 2009, Embraer S.A.
applied for a type certificate for its new
Model EMB–550 airplane. The Model
EMB–550 airplane is the first of a new
family of jet airplanes designed for
corporate flight, fractional, charter, and
private owner operations. The airplane
has a conventional configuration with
low wing and T-tail empennage. The
primary structure is metal with
composite empennage and control
surfaces. The Model EMB–550 airplane
is designed for 8 passengers, with a
maximum of 12 passengers. It is
equipped with two Honeywell
HTF7500–E medium bypass ratio
turbofan engines mounted on aft
fuselage pylons. Each engine produces
approximately 6,540 pounds of thrust
for normal takeoff. The primary flight
controls consist of hydraulically
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:13 Apr 11, 2014
Jkt 232001
powered fly-by-wire elevators, ailerons,
and rudders controlled by the pilot or
copilot sidestick.
The design of the electronic flight
control system for the Model EMB–550
airplane incorporates normal load factor
limiting on a full time basis that
prevents the flight crew from
inadvertently or intentionally exceeding
the positive or negative airplane limit
load factor. This feature is considered
novel and unusual in that the current
regulations do not provide standards for
maneuverability and controllability
evaluations for such systems.
Type Certification Basis
Under the provisions of Title 14,
Federal Code of Regulations (14 CFR)
21.17, Embraer S.A. must show that the
Model EMB–550 airplane meets the
applicable provisions of part 25, as
amended by Amendments 25–1 through
25–127 thereto.
If the Administrator finds that the
applicable airworthiness regulations
(i.e., 14 CFR part 25) do not contain
adequate or appropriate safety standards
for the Model EMB–550 airplane
because of a novel or unusual design
feature, special conditions are
prescribed under the provisions of
§ 21.16.
Special conditions are initially
applicable to the model for which they
are issued. Should the type certificate
for that model be amended later to
include any other model that
incorporates the same or similar novel
or unusual design feature, the special
conditions would also apply to the other
model under § 21.101.
In addition to the applicable
airworthiness regulations and special
conditions, the Model EMB–550
airplane must comply with the fuel vent
and exhaust emission requirements of
14 CFR part 34 and the noise
certification requirements of 14 CFR
part 36, and the FAA must issue a
finding of regulatory adequacy under
§ 611 of Public Law 92–574, the ‘‘Noise
Control Act of 1972.’’
The FAA issues special conditions, as
defined in 14 CFR 11.19, in accordance
with § 11.38, and they become part of
the type-certification basis under
§ 21.17(a)(2).
Novel or Unusual Design Features
The Model EMB–550 airplane will
incorporate the following novel or
unusual design features: The design of
the electronic flight control system
incorporates normal load factor limiting
on a full-time basis that will prevent the
flight crew from inadvertently or
intentionally exceeding the positive or
negative airplane limit load factor. This
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
feature is considered novel because the
current regulations do not provide
standards for maneuverability and
controllability evaluations for such
systems. Therefore, special conditions
are needed to ensure adequate
maneuverability and controllability
when using this design feature.
Discussion
Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations,
part 25 sections do not specify
requirements or policy for
demonstrating maneuver control that
impose any handling qualities
requirements beyond the design limit
structural loads. Nevertheless, some
pilots have become accustomed to the
availability of this excess maneuver
capacity in case of extreme emergency
such as upset recoveries or collision
avoidance.
As with previous fly-by-wire
airplanes, the FAA has no regulatory or
safety reason to prohibit a design for an
electronic flight control system with
load factor limiting. It is possible that
pilots accustomed to this feature feel
more freedom in commanding full-stick
displacement maneuvers because of the
following:
• Knowledge that the limit system
will protect the structure,
• Low stick force/displacement
gradients,
• Smooth transition from pilot
elevator control to limit control.
These special conditions will ensure
adequate maneuverability and
controllability when using this design
feature.
Discussion of Comments
Notice of proposed special conditions
No. 25–13–05–SC for Embraer S.A.
Model EMB–550 airplanes was
published in the Federal Register on
October 25, 2013 (78 FR 63902). No
comments were received, and the
special conditions are adopted as
proposed.
Applicability
As discussed above, these special
conditions are applicable to the Model
EMB–550 airplane. Should Embraer
S.A. apply at a later date for a change
to the type certificate to include another
model incorporating the same novel or
unusual design feature, the special
conditions would apply to that model as
well.
Conclusion
This action affects only certain novel
or unusual design features on one model
of airplanes. It is not a rule of general
applicability.
E:\FR\FM\14APR1.SGM
14APR1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 71 / Monday, April 14, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 25
Aircraft, Aviation safety, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements.
■ The authority citation for these
special conditions is as follows:
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701,
44702, 44704.
The Special Conditions
Accordingly, pursuant to the
authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the following special
conditions are issued as part of the type
certification basis for Embraer S.A.
Model EMB–550 airplanes.
1. Flight Envelope Protection: Normal
Load Factor (g) Limiting.
To meet the intent of adequate
maneuverability and controllability
required by § 25.143(a), and in addition
to the requirements of § 25.143(a) and in
the absence of other limiting factors, the
following special conditions are issued
based on § 25.333(b):
(a) The positive limiting load factor
must not be less than:
(1) 2.5g for the normal state of the
electronic flight control system with the
high lift devices retracted.
(2) 2.0g for the normal state of the
electronic flight control system with the
high lift devices extended.
(b) The negative limiting load factor
must be equal to or more negative than:
(1) Minus 1.0g for the normal state of
the electronic flight control system with
the high lift devices retracted.
(2) 0.0g for the normal state of the
electronic flight control system with
high lift devices extended.
(c) Maximum reachable positive load
factor wings level may be limited by the
characteristics of the electronic flight
control system or flight envelope
protections (other than load factor
protection) provided that:
(1) The required values are readily
achievable in turns, and
(2) That wings level pitch up is
satisfactory.
(d) Maximum achievable negative
load factor may be limited by the
characteristics of the electronic flight
control system or flight envelope
protections (other than load factor
protection) provided that:
(1) Pitch down responsiveness is
satisfactory, and
(2) From level flight, 0g is readily
achievable, or alternatively, a
satisfactory trajectory change is readily
achievable at operational speeds. For
the FAA to consider a trajectory change
as satisfactory, the applicant should
propose and justify a pitch rate that
provides sufficient maneuvering
capability in the most critical scenarios.
(e) Compliance demonstration with
the above requirements may be
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:13 Apr 11, 2014
Jkt 232001
performed without ice accretion on the
airframe.
(f) These special conditions do not
impose an upper bound for the normal
load factor limit, nor does it require that
the limiter exist. If the limit is set at a
value beyond the structural design limit
maneuvering load factor n of
§§ 25.333(b), 25.337(b), 25.337(c), there
should be a very obvious positive tactile
feel built into the controller so that it
serves as a deterrent to inadvertently
exceeding the structural limit.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on April 8,
2014.
John P. Piccola,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
20769
March 4, 2014, make the following
correction:
On page 12040, in the second column
heading, correct the amendment number
from ‘‘36–29’’ to ‘‘36–30’’.
Issued in Washington, DC, on April 4,
2014.
Lirio Liu,
Director, Office of Rulemaking.
[FR Doc. 2014–07941 Filed 4–11–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 71
[FR Doc. 2014–08275 Filed 4–11–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
[Docket No. FAA–2013–0951; Airspace
Docket No. 13–ASW–22]
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 36
[Docket No. FAA–2012–0948; Amdt. No. 36–
30]
RIN 2120–AJ96
Stage 3 Helicopter Noise Certification
Standards; Correction
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule; correction.
AGENCY:
The Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA) published in the
Federal Register of March 4, 2014 a
document adopting more stringent noise
certification standards for helicopters
that are certificated in the United States
(U.S.). Inadvertently the incorrect
amendment number was assigned. This
document corrects the amendment
number cited in the heading of the final
rule.
DATES: This correction is effective April
14, 2014.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Katherine Haley, Office of Rulemaking,
ARM–203, Federal Aviation
Administration, 800 Independence
Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20591;
telephone (202) 267–5708; fax (202)
267–5075; email ralen.gao@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA
published a document in the Federal
Register of March 4, 2014 (79 FR 12040)
as Amendment Number 36–29. In FR
Doc. 2014–04479, Amdt. No. 36–29 is
incorrect. This document corrects the
amendment number published on
March 4, 2014.
In FR Doc. 2014–04479, beginning on
page 12040 in the Federal Register of
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
RIN 2120–AA66
Modification of Area Navigation
(RNAV) Route Q–20, TX
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
This action modifies RNAV
route Q–20 by relocating the FUSCO
waypoint (WP) southwest to match the
intersection of Jet routes J–15 and J–183.
This action enhances the safe and
efficient management of aircraft within
the National Airspace System.
DATES: Effective Date: 0901 UTC, July
24, 2014. The Director of the Federal
Register approves this incorporation by
reference action under 1 CFR part 51,
subject to the annual revision of FAA
Order 7400.9 and publication of
conforming amendments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Colby Abbott, Airspace Policy and
Regulations Group, Office of Airspace
Services, Federal Aviation
Administration, 800 Independence
Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20591;
telephone: (202) 267–8783.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
History
The FAA published in the Federal
Register a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) to amend Q–20 by
moving the FUSCO WP to match the
intersection of Jet Routes J–15 and J–
183, and re-designate the WP as a fix (78
FR 70900, November 27, 2013).
Interested parties were invited to
participate in this rulemaking effort by
submitting written comments on the
proposal to the FAA. No comments
were received.
E:\FR\FM\14APR1.SGM
14APR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 71 (Monday, April 14, 2014)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 20768-20769]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-08275]
[[Page 20768]]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 25
[Docket No. FAA-2013-0772; Special Conditions No. 25-520-SC]
Special Conditions: Embraer S.A., Model EMB-550 Airplanes; Flight
Envelope Protection: Normal Load Factor (g) Limiting
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final special conditions.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: These special conditions are issued for the Embraer S.A. Model
EMB-550 airplane. This airplane will have a novel or unusual design
feature associated with an electronic flight control system that
prevents the pilot from inadvertently or intentionally exceeding the
positive or negative airplane limit load factor. The applicable
airworthiness regulations do not contain adequate or appropriate safety
standards for this design feature. These special conditions contain the
additional safety standards that the Administrator considers necessary
to establish a level of safety equivalent to that established by the
existing airworthiness standards.
DATES: Effective Date: May 14, 2014.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joe Jacobsen, FAA, Airplane and Flight
Crew Interface Branch, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft
Certification Service, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, Washington 98057-
3356; telephone 425-227-2011; facsimile 425-227-1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On May 14, 2009, Embraer S.A. applied for a type certificate for
its new Model EMB-550 airplane. The Model EMB-550 airplane is the first
of a new family of jet airplanes designed for corporate flight,
fractional, charter, and private owner operations. The airplane has a
conventional configuration with low wing and T-tail empennage. The
primary structure is metal with composite empennage and control
surfaces. The Model EMB-550 airplane is designed for 8 passengers, with
a maximum of 12 passengers. It is equipped with two Honeywell HTF7500-E
medium bypass ratio turbofan engines mounted on aft fuselage pylons.
Each engine produces approximately 6,540 pounds of thrust for normal
takeoff. The primary flight controls consist of hydraulically powered
fly-by-wire elevators, ailerons, and rudders controlled by the pilot or
copilot sidestick.
The design of the electronic flight control system for the Model
EMB-550 airplane incorporates normal load factor limiting on a full
time basis that prevents the flight crew from inadvertently or
intentionally exceeding the positive or negative airplane limit load
factor. This feature is considered novel and unusual in that the
current regulations do not provide standards for maneuverability and
controllability evaluations for such systems.
Type Certification Basis
Under the provisions of Title 14, Federal Code of Regulations (14
CFR) 21.17, Embraer S.A. must show that the Model EMB-550 airplane
meets the applicable provisions of part 25, as amended by Amendments
25-1 through 25-127 thereto.
If the Administrator finds that the applicable airworthiness
regulations (i.e., 14 CFR part 25) do not contain adequate or
appropriate safety standards for the Model EMB-550 airplane because of
a novel or unusual design feature, special conditions are prescribed
under the provisions of Sec. 21.16.
Special conditions are initially applicable to the model for which
they are issued. Should the type certificate for that model be amended
later to include any other model that incorporates the same or similar
novel or unusual design feature, the special conditions would also
apply to the other model under Sec. 21.101.
In addition to the applicable airworthiness regulations and special
conditions, the Model EMB-550 airplane must comply with the fuel vent
and exhaust emission requirements of 14 CFR part 34 and the noise
certification requirements of 14 CFR part 36, and the FAA must issue a
finding of regulatory adequacy under Sec. 611 of Public Law 92-574,
the ``Noise Control Act of 1972.''
The FAA issues special conditions, as defined in 14 CFR 11.19, in
accordance with Sec. 11.38, and they become part of the type-
certification basis under Sec. 21.17(a)(2).
Novel or Unusual Design Features
The Model EMB-550 airplane will incorporate the following novel or
unusual design features: The design of the electronic flight control
system incorporates normal load factor limiting on a full-time basis
that will prevent the flight crew from inadvertently or intentionally
exceeding the positive or negative airplane limit load factor. This
feature is considered novel because the current regulations do not
provide standards for maneuverability and controllability evaluations
for such systems. Therefore, special conditions are needed to ensure
adequate maneuverability and controllability when using this design
feature.
Discussion
Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations, part 25 sections do not
specify requirements or policy for demonstrating maneuver control that
impose any handling qualities requirements beyond the design limit
structural loads. Nevertheless, some pilots have become accustomed to
the availability of this excess maneuver capacity in case of extreme
emergency such as upset recoveries or collision avoidance.
As with previous fly-by-wire airplanes, the FAA has no regulatory
or safety reason to prohibit a design for an electronic flight control
system with load factor limiting. It is possible that pilots accustomed
to this feature feel more freedom in commanding full-stick displacement
maneuvers because of the following:
Knowledge that the limit system will protect the
structure,
Low stick force/displacement gradients,
Smooth transition from pilot elevator control to limit
control.
These special conditions will ensure adequate maneuverability and
controllability when using this design feature.
Discussion of Comments
Notice of proposed special conditions No. 25-13-05-SC for Embraer
S.A. Model EMB-550 airplanes was published in the Federal Register on
October 25, 2013 (78 FR 63902). No comments were received, and the
special conditions are adopted as proposed.
Applicability
As discussed above, these special conditions are applicable to the
Model EMB-550 airplane. Should Embraer S.A. apply at a later date for a
change to the type certificate to include another model incorporating
the same novel or unusual design feature, the special conditions would
apply to that model as well.
Conclusion
This action affects only certain novel or unusual design features
on one model of airplanes. It is not a rule of general applicability.
[[Page 20769]]
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 25
Aircraft, Aviation safety, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
0
The authority citation for these special conditions is as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701, 44702, 44704.
The Special Conditions
Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the following special conditions are issued as part of
the type certification basis for Embraer S.A. Model EMB-550 airplanes.
1. Flight Envelope Protection: Normal Load Factor (g) Limiting.
To meet the intent of adequate maneuverability and controllability
required by Sec. 25.143(a), and in addition to the requirements of
Sec. 25.143(a) and in the absence of other limiting factors, the
following special conditions are issued based on Sec. 25.333(b):
(a) The positive limiting load factor must not be less than:
(1) 2.5g for the normal state of the electronic flight control
system with the high lift devices retracted.
(2) 2.0g for the normal state of the electronic flight control
system with the high lift devices extended.
(b) The negative limiting load factor must be equal to or more
negative than:
(1) Minus 1.0g for the normal state of the electronic flight
control system with the high lift devices retracted.
(2) 0.0g for the normal state of the electronic flight control
system with high lift devices extended.
(c) Maximum reachable positive load factor wings level may be
limited by the characteristics of the electronic flight control system
or flight envelope protections (other than load factor protection)
provided that:
(1) The required values are readily achievable in turns, and
(2) That wings level pitch up is satisfactory.
(d) Maximum achievable negative load factor may be limited by the
characteristics of the electronic flight control system or flight
envelope protections (other than load factor protection) provided that:
(1) Pitch down responsiveness is satisfactory, and
(2) From level flight, 0g is readily achievable, or alternatively,
a satisfactory trajectory change is readily achievable at operational
speeds. For the FAA to consider a trajectory change as satisfactory,
the applicant should propose and justify a pitch rate that provides
sufficient maneuvering capability in the most critical scenarios.
(e) Compliance demonstration with the above requirements may be
performed without ice accretion on the airframe.
(f) These special conditions do not impose an upper bound for the
normal load factor limit, nor does it require that the limiter exist.
If the limit is set at a value beyond the structural design limit
maneuvering load factor n of Sec. Sec. 25.333(b), 25.337(b),
25.337(c), there should be a very obvious positive tactile feel built
into the controller so that it serves as a deterrent to inadvertently
exceeding the structural limit.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on April 8, 2014.
John P. Piccola,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2014-08275 Filed 4-11-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P