Notice of Availability of a Final Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement for Hawaiian Monk Seal Recovery Actions, 20172-20174 [2014-08207]
Download as PDF
20172
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 70 / Friday, April 11, 2014 / Notices
that date will be distributed to the
members but may not be considered at
the meeting.
Copies of Council meeting minutes
will be available within 90 days of the
meeting.
Dated: April 8, 2014.
Ingrid Mitchem,
Director, Industry Trade Advisory Center.
[FR Doc. 2014–08189 Filed 4–10–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DR–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Institute of Standards and
Technology
II. Method of Collection
Proposed Information Collection;
Comment Request; Manufacturing
Extension Partnership Program
Management Information Reporting
System for the Business and Talent
Management Self-Diagnostic
The information will be collected
from the NIST-hosted web application
via the MEP Web site at
www.smartalent.gov using a passwordprotected interface.
National Institute of Standards
and Technology, Commerce.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
The Department of
Commerce, as part of its continuing
effort to reduce paperwork and
respondent burden, invites the general
public and other Federal agencies to
take this opportunity to comment on
proposed and/or continuing information
collections, as required by the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DATES: Written comments must be
submitted on or before June 10, 2014.
ADDRESSES: Direct all written comments
to Jennifer Jessup, Departmental
Paperwork Clearance Officer,
Department of Commerce, Room 6616,
14th and Constitution Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20230 (or via the
Internet at jjessup@doc.gov).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Requests for additional information or
copies of the information collection
instrument and instructions should be
directed to Stacey Wagner,
Stacey.wagner@nist.gov, 301–975–4850.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
I. Abstract
The Manufacturing Extension
Partnership (MEP), sponsored by the
National Institute of Standards and
Technology (NIST), is a national
network of locally-based manufacturing
extension centers working with small
manufacturers to assist them improve
productivity, improve profitability, and
enhance their economic
competitiveness. In order for small and
medium-sized manufacturers to
understand the systemic alignment
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:55 Apr 10, 2014
Jkt 232001
between their business goals and
workforce investments, they will need
to compare their internal business goals/
targets and their talent management
efforts. By comparing their own internal
data that reflects all of their business
strategies, small and medium-sized
manufacturers will understand how
aligned their workforce skills are with
their business investments and
execution. This self-diagnostic service
will be offered by MEP centers to their
manufacturing clients. The results of the
service information will enable the
NIST MEP to provide systematic
business analysis assistance to their
clients.
III. Data
OMB Control Number: None.
Form Number: None.
Type of Review: Regular submission
(new information collection).
Affected Public: Business or other forprofit organizations.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
600.
Estimated Time per Response: 30
minutes.
Estimated Total Annual Burden
Hours: 300.
Estimated Total Annual Cost to
Public: $0.
IV. Request for Comments
Comments are invited on: (a) Whether
the proposed collection of information
is necessary for the proper performance
of the functions of the agency, including
whether the information shall have
practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden
(including hours and cost) of the
proposed collection of information; (c)
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and (d) ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on respondents, including through the
use of automated collection techniques
or other forms of information
technology.
Comments submitted in response to
this notice will be summarized and/or
included in the request for OMB
approval of this information collection;
they also will become a matter of public
record.
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Dated: April 8, 2014.
Gwellnar Banks,
Management Analyst, Office of the Chief
Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 2014–08196 Filed 4–10–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
RIN 0648–XZ21
Notice of Availability of a Final
Programmatic Environmental Impact
Statement for Hawaiian Monk Seal
Recovery Actions
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of Availability of a Final
Programmatic Environmental Impact
Statement; Request for Comments.
AGENCY:
NMFS announces the
availability of the ‘‘Final Programmatic
Environmental Impact Statement (PEIS)
for Hawaiian monk seal Recovery
Actions.’’ Publication of this notice
begins the official public comment
period for the Final PEIS. The purpose
of the Final PEIS is to evaluate, in
compliance with the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), the
potential direct, indirect, and
cumulative impacts on the human
environment from implementing the
alternative approaches for funding,
undertaking, and permitting research
and enhancement activities on
Hawaiian monk seals (Monachus
schauinslandi).
SUMMARY:
Written comments must be
received on or before May 12, 2014.
While NMFS is not required to respond
to comments received on the Final PEIS,
we will review and consider them prior
to issuing a Record of Decision. The
Record of Decision will include
information on the alternatives
considered, the preferred alternative
and why we chose it, and required
mitigation and monitoring.
ADDRESSES: Comments on the Final
PEIS for this action may be submitted
by:
• Email: monkseal@noaa.gov.
• Fax: 301–713–0376.
• Mail: NOAA, NMFS, 1315 EastWest Highway, SSMC3, F/PR1, Room
13715, Silver Spring, MD 20910 (ATTN:
Monk Seal PEIS).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Amy Sloan (301–427–8401, monkseal@
noaa.gov).
DATES:
E:\FR\FM\11APN1.SGM
11APN1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 70 / Friday, April 11, 2014 / Notices
NMFS is
the Federal agency responsible for
management, recovery and conservation
of Hawaiian monk seals under the
Endangered Species Act (ESA; 16
United States Code [U.S.C.] 1531 et seq.)
and the Marine Mammal Protection Act
(MMPA; 16 U.S.C. 1361 et seq.). As part
of their responsibilities, NMFS funds,
permits, and conducts research and
enhancement activities on endangered
Hawaiian monk seals in the
Northwestern Hawaiian Islands (NWHI),
main Hawaiian Islands (MHI), and at
Johnston Atoll. NMFS proposes to
implement research and enhancement
actions identified in the 2007 Hawaiian
Monk Seal Recovery Plan, with the goal
of conserving and recovering the
species. This Final PEIS provides
decision-makers and the public with an
evaluation of the environmental, social,
and economic effects of the proposed
recovery actions and alternatives.
The agency’s recommended Preferred
Alternative is Alternative 3 (Limited
Translocation). Alternative 3
encompasses a broad scope of research
and enhancement activities that would
yield greater recovery benefits to the
species over the next several years than
would be expected under the other
alternatives. It is important to note that
while Alternative 4 (Enhanced
Implementation) was Preferred in the
Draft PEIS, Alternative 3 has been
selected as the Preferred Alternative in
the Final PEIS. The only distinction
between these two Alternatives is that
Alternative 3 (Preferred) does not
include any translocation option that
would involve taking seals born in the
NWHI and releasing them in the MHI.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The Hawaiian monk seal is a critically
endangered species found only in the
U.S., within the Hawaiian Archipelago
and at Johnston Atoll. The population is
estimated to have around 1,200
individuals and is declining by roughly
4% each year. Since the 1980’s, NMFS
has conducted research to understand,
and enhancement activities to mitigate,
threats to the survival of monk seals.
Most of this work has been in the NWHI
where the majority of seals live and
breed. More recently, a natural increase
in the number of seals in the MHI has
prompted researchers and managers to
begin studying and aiding seals in the
MHI.
Despite measures taken to save the
monk seal, the species is not showing
signs of recovery. In the NWHI, young
seals are continuing to starve to death,
nursing and newly weaned pups are
being killed by sharks, seals are getting
entangled in marine debris, and sea
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:55 Apr 10, 2014
Jkt 232001
level rise threatens terrestrial habitats.
Low juvenile survival over the past two
decades is the primary cause of the
population’s decline. There is
insufficient recruitment into the
breeding population, and the population
decline will likely continue without
additional intervention.
On October 1, 2010, NMFS provided
public notice (75 FR 60721) that it
would prepare a PEIS to assess the
impacts of implementing specific
management actions and administering
a research and enhancement program to
improve survival of Hawaiian monk
seals. The 45-day public scoping period
was extended 15 days (75 FR 69398)
and ended November 30, 2010. As part
of scoping, NMFS hosted public
meetings to introduce the project
proposal, describe the PEIS process, and
solicit input on the issues and
alternatives to be evaluated. Public
scoping meetings were held in October
2010 on the islands of O‘ahu, Hawai‘i,
Maui, Moloka‘i, and Kaua‘i. During the
scoping comment period, 139 public
comments were received. The Scoping
Report is available on the project Web
site: https://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/
permits/eis/hawaiianmonkseal.htm.
On August 19, 2011, NMFS provided
public notice (76 FR 51945) that the
Draft PEIS for Hawaiian Monk Seal
Recovery Actions was available for
public comment, and the Draft PEIS was
released for public review on the project
Web site listed above. The public
comment period ended on October 17,
2011. A total of 341 comment
submissions were received from
agencies and the public on the Draft
PEIS. These submissions generated
1,180 substantive comments. Comments
received during the scoping process and
public comment period on the Draft
PEIS raised issues that have been
addressed or incorporated in the Final
PEIS. A Comment Analysis Report is
included in Appendix C to the Final
PEIS and is available on the project Web
site listed above. This report includes
public comments received, NMFS’
responses, and where in the PEIS the
comments are addressed or revisions are
made.
Alternatives
NMFS has evaluated a preferred
alternative (Alternative 3) and three
others in the Final PEIS. These are
summarized as follows:
Alternative 1: Status Quo Alternative:
Under the Status Quo Alternative,
research and enhancement activities
would be carried out as currently
permitted under the MMPA and ESA.
New permits could be issued in the
future to maintain the current levels of
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
20173
research and enhancement activities.
Some elements of this alternative
include:
• Monitoring via ground, vessel, and
aerial surveys;
• Marking and photo ID;
• Health screening and
instrumentation;
• De-worming research;
• Specimen collection and import/
export of specimens;
• Disentanglement and dehooking;
• Adult male removal for
enhancement; and
• Translocation for enhancement
including:
Æ Translocating abandoned nursing
pups to a prospective foster mother or
their natural mother within their birth
island or atoll;
Æ Translocating weaned pups from a
high risk area (e.g., known shark
predation) to a low risk area within the
same island or atoll in the NWHI or
Johnston Atoll; translocations in the
MHI may be to a different location on
the same island or to a different island
in the MHI;
Æ Translocating weaned pups in
subpopulations where juvenile survival
is low to subpopulations with higher
rates of juvenile survival; seals may only
be translocated among subpopulations
within the NWHI.
No new activities or expanded scope of
existing activities would occur under
the Status Quo Alternative.
Alternative 2: No Action: Under this
alternative, the above-mentioned
permitted research and enhancement
activities would stop in June 2014 when
the current permit expires. At that time,
all research and enhancement activities
that require a permit would cease except
for those activities covered by the NMFS
Marine Mammal Health and Stranding
Response Program, such as responding
to stranded, injured, or entangled seals
in need of intervention.
Alternative 3: Limited Translocation
(Preferred Alternative): Alternative 3
includes activities described in the
Status Quo as well as new and
expanded activities. The new and
expanded activities include, but are not
limited to:
• Vaccination studies and potential
implementation of a vaccination
program to prevent or mitigate
infectious disease.
• Potential implementation of deworming as an enhancement tool to
improve juvenile Hawaiian monk seal
survival.
• Expanded scope and number of seal
translocations in addition to those in the
status quo, including:
E:\FR\FM\11APN1.SGM
11APN1
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
20174
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 70 / Friday, April 11, 2014 / Notices
• Taking seals with unmanageable
human interactions from the MHI to
NWHI.
• Taking juvenile and older seals
from the MHI to NWHI to examine their
subsequent survival.
• Implementing a two-stage
translocation program whereby weaned
pups are taken from areas of lower
survival to areas of higher survival
(within the NWHI, within the MHI, or
from the MHI to NWHI, but not from the
NWHI to MHI), with the option of
returning them to their natal location or
nearest appropriate site at age 2 years
and older. Note that seals originally
born in the MHI and translocated to the
NWHI may be returned to the MHI.
• Supplemental feeding of monk seals
in NWHI locations where seals are
released after being cared for in
captivity (post-rehabilitation).
• Research to develop tools for
modifying undesirable Hawaiian monk
seal behavior related to interactions
with humans and fishing gear in the
MHI. If proven effective by research,
these tools would be implemented.
• Chemical alteration of aggressive
male monk seal behavior using a drug
to reduce testosterone.
Alternative 4: Enhanced
Implementation: The only difference
between Alternative 4 and Alternative 3
(Preferred) is that Alternative 4 would
also allow for two-stage translocation of
weaned pups from the NWHI to the MHI
and their subsequent return at age 2 or
3 years to the NWHI. The ability under
Alternative 4 to conduct two-stage
translocation from the NWHI to the MHI
would allow for maximal flexibility to
take advantage of the potential benefits
of two-stage translocation, because
weaned pups could be moved to
wherever their survival chances are
best. However, implementing two-stage
translocations from the NWHI to the
MHI would be infeasible at this time.
NWHI pups, once brought to the MHI,
could become involved in fishery and
other human interactions, just as has
occurred among some seals born in the
MHI. Capacity and techniques for
monitoring translocated seals, and
intervening to prevent and mitigate such
interactions, must be further developed
before this action can be conducted
without risking failure as measured both
in terms of seal survival and public
attitudes toward monk seal
conservation. Thus, while Alternative 4
was the preferred alternative in the Draft
PEIS, it is not the preferred alternative
in the Final PEIS.
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1361 et seq. and 16
U.S.C. 1531 et seq.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:55 Apr 10, 2014
Jkt 232001
Dated: April 4, 2014.
Samuel D. Rauch III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for
Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2014–08207 Filed 4–10–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
RIN 0648–XD219
Fisheries of the South Atlantic; South
Atlantic Fishery Management Council
(Council); Public Meeting
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Department of Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of public meetings.
AGENCY:
5. Elect a new Chairperson and ViceChair for the AP.
6. Discuss the principles of effective
science communication as well as the
creation of effective science
communication products.
Deepwater Shrimp AP Agenda,
Tuesday May 6, 2014, 1 p.m. Through
12 Noon Wednesday, May 7, 2014
1. Receive a status update on Coral
Amendment 8, pertaining to Coral
Habitat Areas of Particular Concern
(HAPCs) and transit through the
Oculina Bank HAPC.
2. Review the draft Oculina
Evaluation Team Report.
3. Provide input on potential changes
to HAPCs (Coral Amendment 9).
Coral AP Agenda, Wednesday, May 7,
2014, 1 p.m. Through 4:30 p.m.
Thursday, May 8, 2014
The South Atlantic Fishery
Management Council (SAFMC) will
hold meetings of its Information &
Education Advisory Panel (AP) Meeting
and Science Communication Workshop;
Deepwater Shrimp AP; and Coral AP, in
North Charleston, SC.
DATES: The meetings will be held from
8 a.m. on Monday, May 5, 2014 until
4:30 p.m. on Thursday, May 8, 2014.
ADDRESSES: The meetings will be held at
the Crowne Plaza Hotel, 4831 Tanger
Outlet Blvd., North Charleston, SC
29418; telephone: (877) 227–6963 or
(843) 744–4422; fax: (843) 744–4472.
Council address: South Atlantic
Fishery Management Council, 4055
Faber Place Drive, Suite 201, N.
Charleston, SC 29405.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kim
Iverson, Public Information Officer,
SAFMC; telephone: (843) 571–4366 or
toll free: (866) SAFMC–10; fax: (843)
769–4520; email: kim.iverson@
safmc.net.
The items
of discussion in the individual meeting
agendas are as follows:
1. Receive a status update on Coral
Amendment 8.
2. Receive a status update of the
SAFMC’s Cooperative Agreement
proposal with NOAA’s Coral Reef
Conservation Program.
3. Review the draft Oculina
Evaluation Team Report.
4. Provide input for potential changes
to HAPCs (Coral Amendment 9).
Although non-emergency issues not
contained in this agenda may come
before this group for discussion, those
issues may not be the subject of formal
action during these meetings. Action
will be restricted to those issues
specifically identified in this notice and
any issues arising after publication of
this notice that require emergency
action under section 305(c) of the
Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act,
provided the public has been notified of
the Council’s intent to take final action
to address the emergency.
Special Accommodations
SUMMARY:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Information & Education AP Agenda &
Science Communication Workshop,
Monday, May 5, 2014, 8 a.m. Until 5
p.m. Tuesday, May 6, 2014
1. Receive an update on SAFMC
outreach activities 2013–14.
2. Receive an overview and update on
the Council’s Snapper Grouper
Visioning Project and port meetings.
3. Review the draft Oculina
Evaluation Team Report.
4. Receive an update on the Marine
Resources Education Program (MREP)
for the Southeast region.
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 9990
These meetings are physically
accessible to people with disabilities.
Requests for auxiliary aids should be
directed to the council office (see
ADDRESSES) 3 days prior to the meeting.
Note: The times and sequence specified in
this agenda are subject to change.
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
Dated: April 8, 2014.
Tracey L. Thompson,
Acting Deputy Director, Office of Sustainable
Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2014–08147 Filed 4–10–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
E:\FR\FM\11APN1.SGM
11APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 70 (Friday, April 11, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 20172-20174]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-08207]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
RIN 0648-XZ21
Notice of Availability of a Final Programmatic Environmental
Impact Statement for Hawaiian Monk Seal Recovery Actions
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of Availability of a Final Programmatic Environmental
Impact Statement; Request for Comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: NMFS announces the availability of the ``Final Programmatic
Environmental Impact Statement (PEIS) for Hawaiian monk seal Recovery
Actions.'' Publication of this notice begins the official public
comment period for the Final PEIS. The purpose of the Final PEIS is to
evaluate, in compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA), the potential direct, indirect, and cumulative impacts on the
human environment from implementing the alternative approaches for
funding, undertaking, and permitting research and enhancement
activities on Hawaiian monk seals (Monachus schauinslandi).
DATES: Written comments must be received on or before May 12, 2014.
While NMFS is not required to respond to comments received on the Final
PEIS, we will review and consider them prior to issuing a Record of
Decision. The Record of Decision will include information on the
alternatives considered, the preferred alternative and why we chose it,
and required mitigation and monitoring.
ADDRESSES: Comments on the Final PEIS for this action may be submitted
by:
Email: monkseal@noaa.gov.
Fax: 301-713-0376.
Mail: NOAA, NMFS, 1315 East-West Highway, SSMC3, F/PR1,
Room 13715, Silver Spring, MD 20910 (ATTN: Monk Seal PEIS).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Amy Sloan (301-427-8401,
monkseal@noaa.gov).
[[Page 20173]]
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: NMFS is the Federal agency responsible for
management, recovery and conservation of Hawaiian monk seals under the
Endangered Species Act (ESA; 16 United States Code [U.S.C.] 1531 et
seq.) and the Marine Mammal Protection Act (MMPA; 16 U.S.C. 1361 et
seq.). As part of their responsibilities, NMFS funds, permits, and
conducts research and enhancement activities on endangered Hawaiian
monk seals in the Northwestern Hawaiian Islands (NWHI), main Hawaiian
Islands (MHI), and at Johnston Atoll. NMFS proposes to implement
research and enhancement actions identified in the 2007 Hawaiian Monk
Seal Recovery Plan, with the goal of conserving and recovering the
species. This Final PEIS provides decision-makers and the public with
an evaluation of the environmental, social, and economic effects of the
proposed recovery actions and alternatives.
The agency's recommended Preferred Alternative is Alternative 3
(Limited Translocation). Alternative 3 encompasses a broad scope of
research and enhancement activities that would yield greater recovery
benefits to the species over the next several years than would be
expected under the other alternatives. It is important to note that
while Alternative 4 (Enhanced Implementation) was Preferred in the
Draft PEIS, Alternative 3 has been selected as the Preferred
Alternative in the Final PEIS. The only distinction between these two
Alternatives is that Alternative 3 (Preferred) does not include any
translocation option that would involve taking seals born in the NWHI
and releasing them in the MHI.
Background
The Hawaiian monk seal is a critically endangered species found
only in the U.S., within the Hawaiian Archipelago and at Johnston
Atoll. The population is estimated to have around 1,200 individuals and
is declining by roughly 4% each year. Since the 1980's, NMFS has
conducted research to understand, and enhancement activities to
mitigate, threats to the survival of monk seals. Most of this work has
been in the NWHI where the majority of seals live and breed. More
recently, a natural increase in the number of seals in the MHI has
prompted researchers and managers to begin studying and aiding seals in
the MHI.
Despite measures taken to save the monk seal, the species is not
showing signs of recovery. In the NWHI, young seals are continuing to
starve to death, nursing and newly weaned pups are being killed by
sharks, seals are getting entangled in marine debris, and sea level
rise threatens terrestrial habitats. Low juvenile survival over the
past two decades is the primary cause of the population's decline.
There is insufficient recruitment into the breeding population, and the
population decline will likely continue without additional
intervention.
On October 1, 2010, NMFS provided public notice (75 FR 60721) that
it would prepare a PEIS to assess the impacts of implementing specific
management actions and administering a research and enhancement program
to improve survival of Hawaiian monk seals. The 45-day public scoping
period was extended 15 days (75 FR 69398) and ended November 30, 2010.
As part of scoping, NMFS hosted public meetings to introduce the
project proposal, describe the PEIS process, and solicit input on the
issues and alternatives to be evaluated. Public scoping meetings were
held in October 2010 on the islands of O`ahu, Hawai`i, Maui, Moloka`i,
and Kaua`i. During the scoping comment period, 139 public comments were
received. The Scoping Report is available on the project Web site:
https://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/permits/eis/hawaiianmonkseal.htm.
On August 19, 2011, NMFS provided public notice (76 FR 51945) that
the Draft PEIS for Hawaiian Monk Seal Recovery Actions was available
for public comment, and the Draft PEIS was released for public review
on the project Web site listed above. The public comment period ended
on October 17, 2011. A total of 341 comment submissions were received
from agencies and the public on the Draft PEIS. These submissions
generated 1,180 substantive comments. Comments received during the
scoping process and public comment period on the Draft PEIS raised
issues that have been addressed or incorporated in the Final PEIS. A
Comment Analysis Report is included in Appendix C to the Final PEIS and
is available on the project Web site listed above. This report includes
public comments received, NMFS' responses, and where in the PEIS the
comments are addressed or revisions are made.
Alternatives
NMFS has evaluated a preferred alternative (Alternative 3) and
three others in the Final PEIS. These are summarized as follows:
Alternative 1: Status Quo Alternative: Under the Status Quo
Alternative, research and enhancement activities would be carried out
as currently permitted under the MMPA and ESA. New permits could be
issued in the future to maintain the current levels of research and
enhancement activities. Some elements of this alternative include:
Monitoring via ground, vessel, and aerial surveys;
Marking and photo ID;
Health screening and instrumentation;
De-worming research;
Specimen collection and import/export of specimens;
Disentanglement and dehooking;
Adult male removal for enhancement; and
Translocation for enhancement including:
[cir] Translocating abandoned nursing pups to a prospective foster
mother or their natural mother within their birth island or atoll;
[cir] Translocating weaned pups from a high risk area (e.g., known
shark predation) to a low risk area within the same island or atoll in
the NWHI or Johnston Atoll; translocations in the MHI may be to a
different location on the same island or to a different island in the
MHI;
[cir] Translocating weaned pups in subpopulations where juvenile
survival is low to subpopulations with higher rates of juvenile
survival; seals may only be translocated among subpopulations within
the NWHI.
No new activities or expanded scope of existing activities would occur
under the Status Quo Alternative.
Alternative 2: No Action: Under this alternative, the above-
mentioned permitted research and enhancement activities would stop in
June 2014 when the current permit expires. At that time, all research
and enhancement activities that require a permit would cease except for
those activities covered by the NMFS Marine Mammal Health and Stranding
Response Program, such as responding to stranded, injured, or entangled
seals in need of intervention.
Alternative 3: Limited Translocation (Preferred Alternative):
Alternative 3 includes activities described in the Status Quo as well
as new and expanded activities. The new and expanded activities
include, but are not limited to:
Vaccination studies and potential implementation of a
vaccination program to prevent or mitigate infectious disease.
Potential implementation of de-worming as an enhancement
tool to improve juvenile Hawaiian monk seal survival.
Expanded scope and number of seal translocations in
addition to those in the status quo, including:
[[Page 20174]]
Taking seals with unmanageable human interactions from the
MHI to NWHI.
Taking juvenile and older seals from the MHI to NWHI to
examine their subsequent survival.
Implementing a two-stage translocation program whereby
weaned pups are taken from areas of lower survival to areas of higher
survival (within the NWHI, within the MHI, or from the MHI to NWHI, but
not from the NWHI to MHI), with the option of returning them to their
natal location or nearest appropriate site at age 2 years and older.
Note that seals originally born in the MHI and translocated to the NWHI
may be returned to the MHI.
Supplemental feeding of monk seals in NWHI locations where
seals are released after being cared for in captivity (post-
rehabilitation).
Research to develop tools for modifying undesirable
Hawaiian monk seal behavior related to interactions with humans and
fishing gear in the MHI. If proven effective by research, these tools
would be implemented.
Chemical alteration of aggressive male monk seal behavior
using a drug to reduce testosterone.
Alternative 4: Enhanced Implementation: The only difference between
Alternative 4 and Alternative 3 (Preferred) is that Alternative 4 would
also allow for two-stage translocation of weaned pups from the NWHI to
the MHI and their subsequent return at age 2 or 3 years to the NWHI.
The ability under Alternative 4 to conduct two-stage translocation from
the NWHI to the MHI would allow for maximal flexibility to take
advantage of the potential benefits of two-stage translocation, because
weaned pups could be moved to wherever their survival chances are best.
However, implementing two-stage translocations from the NWHI to the MHI
would be infeasible at this time. NWHI pups, once brought to the MHI,
could become involved in fishery and other human interactions, just as
has occurred among some seals born in the MHI. Capacity and techniques
for monitoring translocated seals, and intervening to prevent and
mitigate such interactions, must be further developed before this
action can be conducted without risking failure as measured both in
terms of seal survival and public attitudes toward monk seal
conservation. Thus, while Alternative 4 was the preferred alternative
in the Draft PEIS, it is not the preferred alternative in the Final
PEIS.
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1361 et seq. and 16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.
Dated: April 4, 2014.
Samuel D. Rauch III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2014-08207 Filed 4-10-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P