Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed eCollection eComments Requested; New Collection; 2014 Census of Adult Probation Supervising Agencies, 20230-20232 [2014-08175]

Download as PDF tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES 20230 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 70 / Friday, April 11, 2014 / Notices to submit proposed remedial orders for the Commission’s consideration. Complainant is also requested to state the date on which the ’561 patent expires and the HTSUS subheadings under which the accused products are imported. Written submissions must be filed no later than close of business on April 23, 2014. Reply submissions must be filed no later than the close of business on April 30, 2014. Such submissions should address the ALJ’s recommended determinations on remedy and bonding which were made in Order No. 28. No further submissions on any of these issues will be permitted unless otherwise ordered by the Commission. Persons filing written submissions must file the original document electronically on or before the deadlines stated above and submit eight true paper copies to the Office of the Secretary by noon the next day pursuant to section 210.4(f) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 210.4(f)). Submissions should refer to the investigation number (‘‘Inv. No. 337–TA–861/867’’) in a prominent place on the cover page and/or the first page. (See Handbook for Electronic Filing Procedures, https://www.usitc.gov/ secretary/fed_reg_notices/rules/ handbook_on_electronic_filing.pdf). Persons with questions regarding filing should contact the Secretary (202–205– 2000). Any person desiring to submit a document to the Commission in confidence must request confidential treatment. All such requests should be directed to the Secretary to the Commission and must include a full statement of the reasons why the Commission should grant such treatment. See 19 CFR 201.6. Documents for which confidential treatment by the Commission is properly sought will be treated accordingly. A redacted nonconfidential version of the document must also be filed simultaneously with the any confidential filing. All nonconfidential written submissions will be available for public inspection at the Office of the Secretary and on EDIS. The authority for the Commission’s determination is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in Part 210 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR Part 210). By order of the Commission. Issued: April 8, 2014. Lisa R. Barton, Acting Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2014–08164 Filed 4–10–14; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P VerDate Mar<15>2010 18:55 Apr 10, 2014 Jkt 232001 INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE [Investigation Nos. 731–TA–1140–1142 (Review)] Uncovered Innerspring Units from China, South Africa, and Vietnam Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed eCollection eComments Requested; New Collection; 2014 Census of Adult Probation Supervising Agencies Determinations AGENCY: [OMB Number 1121–NEW] On the basis of the record 1 developed in the subject five-year reviews, the United States International Trade Commission (Commission) determines,2 pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)), that revocation of the antidumping duty orders on uncovered innerspring units from China, South Africa, and Vietnam would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the United States within a reasonably foreseeable time. Background The Commission instituted these reviews on November 1, 2013 (78 FR 65711) and determined on February 4, 2014 that it would conduct expedited reviews (79 FR 11466, February 28, 2014). The Commission completed and filed its determinations in these reviews on April 7, 2014.3 The views of the Commission are contained in USITC Publication 4459 (April 2014), entitled Uncovered Innerspring Units from China, South Africa, and Vietnam: Investigation Nos. 731–TA–1140–1142 (Review). By order of the Commission. Issued: April 8, 2014. Lisa R. Barton, Acting Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2014–08161 Filed 4–10–14; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 1 The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 207.2(f)). 2 Commissioner Shara L. Aranoff did not participate in these reviews. 3 The Commission has the authority to toll statutory deadlines during a period when the government is closed. Because the Commission was closed on December 10, 2013, January 21, 2014, February 13, 2014, March 10, 2014, and March 17, 2014 due to inclement weather in Washington, DC, the statutory deadlines reflect the tolling of deadlines by five days. PO 00000 Frm 00066 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Bureau of Justice Statistics, Department of Justice. ACTION: 30-day notice. The Department of Justice (DOJ), Office of Justice Programs, will be submitting the following information collection to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and approval in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. The proposed information collection was previously published in the Federal Register Volume 79, Number 27, pages 7701–7702, on February 10, 2014, allowing a 60-day comment period. DATES: Comments are encouraged and will be accepted for ‘‘thirty days’’ until May 12, 2014. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Written comments and/or suggestions regarding the items contained in this notice, especially the estimated public burden or associated response time, should be directed to the Office of Management and Budget, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Attention Department of Justice Desk Officer, Washington, DC 20503 or send to OIRA_submission@omb.eop.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This process is conducted in accordance with 5 CFR 1320.10. Request written comments and suggestions from the public and affected agencies concerning the proposed collection of information are encouraged. Your comments should address one or more of the following four points: —Evaluate whether the collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information will have practical utility; —Evaluate the accuracy of the agency’s estimate of the burden of the collection of information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used; —Enhance the quality, utility and clarity of the information to be collected; and —Minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g. SUMMARY: E:\FR\FM\11APN1.SGM 11APN1 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 70 / Friday, April 11, 2014 / Notices tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES permitting electronic submission of responses. Overview of This Information Collection: (1) Type of Information Collection: New Collection. While the Bureau of Justice Statistics conducted a census of probation and parole agencies in 1991, the 2014 Census of Adult Probation Supervising Agencies is now a standalone collection. This collection’s scope is narrower and only includes adult probation agencies. The scope of the 1991 census was broader and included both adult probation and parole agencies. (2) Title of the Form/Collection: 2014 Census of Adult Probation Supervising Agencies. (3) Agency form number: CAPSA–AIF is the Agency Information Form (AIF) for public agencies, CAPSA–CIF is the Company Information Form (CIF) for private probation companies, CAPSA– 1A is the questionnaire for public probation agencies, and CAPSA–1B is the questionnaire for private probation companies. (4) Affected public who will be asked to respond, as well as a brief abstract: Primary: State or local government. Other: Federal government or private companies. The primary goals of the work under this clearance are to: (1) Enhance and validate a national roster of probation agencies that supervise adults on probation for a felony (or those that supervise felons and misdemeanants) and private companies that directly supervise adult probationers; and (2) collect information from those agencies to report national and state-level statistics that provide a clear understanding of how adult probation in the United States is currently organized, the supervision policies and practices agencies have established to administer adult probation, the various types of functions adult probation agencies perform, and the different types of individuals supervised by adult probation agencies. The Bureau of Justice Statistics will use this information in published reports and for the U.S. Congress, Executive Office of the President, practitioners, researchers, students, the media, and others interested in community corrections statistics. All agencies and companies that are believed to supervise adult probationers are on a preliminary roster that BJS, Westat, and the American Probation and Parole Association (APPA) developed by reviewing and compiling data and information from various available resources. (Westat and APPA are the data collection agents for the 2014 VerDate Mar<15>2010 18:55 Apr 10, 2014 Jkt 232001 CAPSA) The CAPSA–AIF or CAPSA– CIF will be mailed to the head of each agency/company on the preliminary roster and the head of the agency/ company will be asked to confirm the contact information for the agency/ company and designate a respondent to complete the CAPSA questionnaire. Agency/company heads will be asked to fax, email, or mail the AIF or CIF to Westat. Designated respondents from public probation agencies will receive the CAPSA–1A questionnaire and will be asked to report via the Internet through a web survey with telephone reporting as a secondary mode. Designated respondents from private probation companies will receive the CAPSA–1B questionnaire and will be asked to return the paper questionnaire by fax, email, or mail. Telephone will also serve as a secondary mode of data collection for private probation companies. The CAPSA–1A will collect information from public probation agencies about their branch and level of government, the various functions they perform, the policies and practices they have in place to administer adult probation related to both adult probationers and the community corrections officers that supervise them, the extent to which agencies have supervision authority, the various populations they serve, the size of their adult probation population, the use of and number of adult probationers held in community-based correctional facilities, and funding sources for adult probation. In an effort to validate the roster of probation agencies and companies, respondents will also be asked to review a list of public probation agencies in their state to identify any that may be missing from the list. They will also be asked to report any private probation companies that supervise adult probationers in their state. The CAPSA–1B will collect information from private probation companies about the various functions they perform, the number of states for which they supervise adult probationers, the branches and levels of government from which they receive adult probationers to supervise, the extent to which any governmental entity conducts oversight of their supervision activities, the various populations they serve, the size of their adult probation population, and the practices and methods they use to administer adult probation. Both the CAPSA–1A and CAPSA–1B questionnaires will include questions to confirm that the agencies/companies supervise adult probationers and are PO 00000 Frm 00067 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 20231 therefore correctly included on the roster and fall within the scope of the CAPSA. In addition, because the organization of adult probation varies drastically not only by state but within particular states, as part of the work under this clearance to enhance and validate the roster of adult probation agencies and companies, one informant in each state, the District of Columbia, and the Federal system will be asked to complete a telephone interview. These contacts are necessary to assist in: (1) Identifying any agencies that may be missing or should be removed from the roster (e.g., agencies that are no longer in operation); (2) updating information contained in the resources that have been used to develop the preliminary roster since some of the source material was only available from publications that were published 5 to 10 years ago; and (3) resolving questions about how probation is organized in the jurisdiction that stem from differences in the way probation in particular jurisdictions has been described in some of the materials used to develop the preliminary roster. (5) An estimate of the total number of respondents and the amount of time needed for an average respondent to respond: (a) CAPSA–AIF form: Approximately 1,760 respondents, each taking an average of 5 minutes to respond with 2 minutes of follow-up. (b) CAPSA–CIF form: Approximately 204 respondents, each taking an average of 5 minutes to respond with 2 minutes of follow-up. (c) CAPSA–1A form: Approximately 1,760 respondents, each taking an average of 65 minutes to respond with 10 minutes of follow-up. (d) CAPSA–1B form: Approximately 204 respondents, each taking an average of 30 minutes to respond with 5 minutes of follow-up. (e) 52 telephone calls to informants in each jurisdiction, each taking an average of 30 minutes with 5 minutes of followup. (6) An estimate of the total public burden (in hours) associated with the collection: 2,578 total burden hours. If additional information is required contact: Jerri Murray, Department Clearance Officer, United States Department of Justice, Justice Management Division, Policy and Planning Staff, Two Constitution Avenue, 145 N Street NE., Room 3E.405B, Washington, DC 20530. E:\FR\FM\11APN1.SGM 11APN1 20232 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 70 / Friday, April 11, 2014 / Notices Dated: April 8, 2014. Jerri Murray, Department Clearance Officer for PRA, U.S. Department of Justice. [FR Doc. 2014–08175 Filed 4–10–14; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410–18–P DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE [OMB Number 1110–0021] Proposed eCollection, eComments Requested; Approval for a Revised Collection; FBI National Academy Post-Graduate Questionnaires, FBI National Academy Post-Graduate Questionnaire for Graduates, FBI National Academy Post-Graduate Questionnaire for Supervisors of Graduates Training Division, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Department of Justice. ACTION: 30-day notice. AGENCY: The Department of Justice (DOJ), Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), Training Division’s Curriculum Management Section (CMS) will be submitting the following information collection request to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and approval in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. The proposed information collection is published to obtain comments from the public and affected agencies. This proposed information collection was previously published in the Federal Register Volume, Number 23, page 6628, on February 4, 2014. allowing for a 60 day comment period. DATES: Comments are encouraged and will be accepted for 30 days until May 12, 2014. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have comments (especially on the estimated public burden or associated response time), suggestions, or need a copy of the proposed information collection instrument with instructions or additional information, please contact Keith Shirley, Unit Chief, Evaluation and Accreditation Unit, Training Division, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Quantico, Virginia 22135. Written comments and/or suggestions can also be directed to the Office of Management and Budget, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Attention Department of Justice Desk Officer, Washington, DC 20503 or send to OIRA_submission@omb.eop.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This process is conducted in accordance with 5 CFR 1320.10. Written comments and suggestions from the public and affected tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES SUMMARY: VerDate Mar<15>2010 18:55 Apr 10, 2014 Jkt 232001 agencies concerning the proposed collection of information are encouraged. Your comments should address one or more of the following three points: (1) Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency/component, including whether the information will have practical utility; (2) Evaluate the accuracy of the agency’s/component’s estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of the information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used; (3) Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (4) Minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond, including the use of appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic submission of responses. Overview of This Information 1. Type of Information Collection: Approval of a Revised Collection. 2. Title of the Forms: FBI National Academy Post-Graduate Questionnaire for Graduates. FBI National Academy Post-Graduate Questionnaire for Supervisors of Graduates. 3. Agency Form Number, if any, and the applicable component of the department sponsoring the collection: Form Number: 1110–0021. Sponsor: Training Division of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), Department of Justice (DOJ). 4. Affected Public who will be asked or required to respond, as well as a brief abstract: Primary: FBI National Academy graduates and their identified supervisors represents state and local police departments, sheriffs’ departments, military police organizations, and federal law enforcement agencies from the United States and over 150 foreign nations. Brief Abstract: This collection is requested by FBI National Academy. These questionnaires have been designed to collect feedback from FBI National Academy students regarding their courses and instructors. The results are used to help determine if the FBI National Academy program is functioning as intended and meeting its goals and objectives. We will utilize the students’ comments to improve the current curriculum. 5. An estimate of the total number of respondents and the amount of time PO 00000 Frm 00068 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 9990 estimated for an average respondent to respond: Approximately 1,000 FBI National Academy graduates per year will respond to the FBI National Academy Post-Graduate Questionnaire for Graduates. It is predicted that we will receive a 50% response rate. The average response time for reading the questionnaire directions for the FBI National Academy Post-Graduate Questionnaire for Graduates is estimated to be two (2) minutes; time to complete the questionnaire is estimated to be 30 minutes. Thus the total time to complete the Post-Graduate Questionnaire for Graduates is 32 minutes. There are approximately 1,000 FBI National Academy graduates who have identified their supervisors that will respond to the FBI National Academy Post-Graduates Questionnaire for Supervisors of Graduates. It is predicted that we will receive a 50% response rate. The average response time for reading the directions for the FBI National Academy Post-Graduate Questionnaire for Supervisors of Graduates is estimated to be 2 minutes; time to complete the questionnaire is estimated to be 30 minutes. Thus the total time to complete the Post-Graduate Questionnaire for Supervisors for Graduates is 32 minutes. The total estimated time to complete each questionnaire per respondent for each group is 32 minutes. 6. An estimate of the total public burden (in hours) associated with the collection: Given that approximately 50% of those surveyed (or 500 from each group) will respond, the total public burden for completing questionnaires is 533 hours. For additional information, contact: Jerri Murray, Department Clearance Officer, United States Department of Justice, Policy and Planning Staff, Justice Management Division, Two Constitution Square, 145 N Street NE., Room 3E–405B, Washington, DC 20530. Dated: April 8, 2014. Jerri Murray, Department Clearance Officer for PRA, United States Department of Justice. [FR Doc. 2014–08173 Filed 4–10–14; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410–02–P E:\FR\FM\11APN1.SGM 11APN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 70 (Friday, April 11, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 20230-20232]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-08175]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

[OMB Number 1121-NEW]


Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed eCollection 
eComments Requested; New Collection; 2014 Census of Adult Probation 
Supervising Agencies

AGENCY: Bureau of Justice Statistics, Department of Justice.

ACTION: 30-day notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Justice (DOJ), Office of Justice Programs, 
will be submitting the following information collection to the Office 
of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and approval in accordance 
with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. The proposed information 
collection was previously published in the Federal Register Volume 79, 
Number 27, pages 7701-7702, on February 10, 2014, allowing a 60-day 
comment period.

DATES: Comments are encouraged and will be accepted for ``thirty days'' 
until May 12, 2014.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Written comments and/or suggestions 
regarding the items contained in this notice, especially the estimated 
public burden or associated response time, should be directed to the 
Office of Management and Budget, Office of Information and Regulatory 
Affairs, Attention Department of Justice Desk Officer, Washington, DC 
20503 or send to OIRA_submission@omb.eop.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This process is conducted in accordance with 
5 CFR 1320.10. Request written comments and suggestions from the public 
and affected agencies concerning the proposed collection of information 
are encouraged. Your comments should address one or more of the 
following four points:

--Evaluate whether the collection of information is necessary for the 
proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether 
the information will have practical utility;
--Evaluate the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the 
collection of information, including the validity of the methodology 
and assumptions used;
--Enhance the quality, utility and clarity of the information to be 
collected; and
--Minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are 
to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated, 
electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or 
other forms of information technology, e.g.

[[Page 20231]]

permitting electronic submission of responses.

Overview of This Information Collection:

    (1) Type of Information Collection: New Collection. While the 
Bureau of Justice Statistics conducted a census of probation and parole 
agencies in 1991, the 2014 Census of Adult Probation Supervising 
Agencies is now a standalone collection. This collection's scope is 
narrower and only includes adult probation agencies. The scope of the 
1991 census was broader and included both adult probation and parole 
agencies.
    (2) Title of the Form/Collection: 2014 Census of Adult Probation 
Supervising Agencies.
    (3) Agency form number: CAPSA-AIF is the Agency Information Form 
(AIF) for public agencies, CAPSA-CIF is the Company Information Form 
(CIF) for private probation companies, CAPSA-1A is the questionnaire 
for public probation agencies, and CAPSA-1B is the questionnaire for 
private probation companies.
    (4) Affected public who will be asked to respond, as well as a 
brief abstract: Primary: State or local government. Other: Federal 
government or private companies. The primary goals of the work under 
this clearance are to: (1) Enhance and validate a national roster of 
probation agencies that supervise adults on probation for a felony (or 
those that supervise felons and misdemeanants) and private companies 
that directly supervise adult probationers; and (2) collect information 
from those agencies to report national and state-level statistics that 
provide a clear understanding of how adult probation in the United 
States is currently organized, the supervision policies and practices 
agencies have established to administer adult probation, the various 
types of functions adult probation agencies perform, and the different 
types of individuals supervised by adult probation agencies. The Bureau 
of Justice Statistics will use this information in published reports 
and for the U.S. Congress, Executive Office of the President, 
practitioners, researchers, students, the media, and others interested 
in community corrections statistics.
    All agencies and companies that are believed to supervise adult 
probationers are on a preliminary roster that BJS, Westat, and the 
American Probation and Parole Association (APPA) developed by reviewing 
and compiling data and information from various available resources. 
(Westat and APPA are the data collection agents for the 2014 CAPSA) The 
CAPSA-AIF or CAPSA-CIF will be mailed to the head of each agency/
company on the preliminary roster and the head of the agency/company 
will be asked to confirm the contact information for the agency/company 
and designate a respondent to complete the CAPSA questionnaire. Agency/
company heads will be asked to fax, email, or mail the AIF or CIF to 
Westat. Designated respondents from public probation agencies will 
receive the CAPSA-1A questionnaire and will be asked to report via the 
Internet through a web survey with telephone reporting as a secondary 
mode. Designated respondents from private probation companies will 
receive the CAPSA-1B questionnaire and will be asked to return the 
paper questionnaire by fax, email, or mail. Telephone will also serve 
as a secondary mode of data collection for private probation companies.
    The CAPSA-1A will collect information from public probation 
agencies about their branch and level of government, the various 
functions they perform, the policies and practices they have in place 
to administer adult probation related to both adult probationers and 
the community corrections officers that supervise them, the extent to 
which agencies have supervision authority, the various populations they 
serve, the size of their adult probation population, the use of and 
number of adult probationers held in community-based correctional 
facilities, and funding sources for adult probation. In an effort to 
validate the roster of probation agencies and companies, respondents 
will also be asked to review a list of public probation agencies in 
their state to identify any that may be missing from the list. They 
will also be asked to report any private probation companies that 
supervise adult probationers in their state.
    The CAPSA-1B will collect information from private probation 
companies about the various functions they perform, the number of 
states for which they supervise adult probationers, the branches and 
levels of government from which they receive adult probationers to 
supervise, the extent to which any governmental entity conducts 
oversight of their supervision activities, the various populations they 
serve, the size of their adult probation population, and the practices 
and methods they use to administer adult probation.
    Both the CAPSA-1A and CAPSA-1B questionnaires will include 
questions to confirm that the agencies/companies supervise adult 
probationers and are therefore correctly included on the roster and 
fall within the scope of the CAPSA. In addition, because the 
organization of adult probation varies drastically not only by state 
but within particular states, as part of the work under this clearance 
to enhance and validate the roster of adult probation agencies and 
companies, one informant in each state, the District of Columbia, and 
the Federal system will be asked to complete a telephone interview. 
These contacts are necessary to assist in: (1) Identifying any agencies 
that may be missing or should be removed from the roster (e.g., 
agencies that are no longer in operation); (2) updating information 
contained in the resources that have been used to develop the 
preliminary roster since some of the source material was only available 
from publications that were published 5 to 10 years ago; and (3) 
resolving questions about how probation is organized in the 
jurisdiction that stem from differences in the way probation in 
particular jurisdictions has been described in some of the materials 
used to develop the preliminary roster.
    (5) An estimate of the total number of respondents and the amount 
of time needed for an average respondent to respond:
    (a) CAPSA-AIF form: Approximately 1,760 respondents, each taking an 
average of 5 minutes to respond with 2 minutes of follow-up.
    (b) CAPSA-CIF form: Approximately 204 respondents, each taking an 
average of 5 minutes to respond with 2 minutes of follow-up.
    (c) CAPSA-1A form: Approximately 1,760 respondents, each taking an 
average of 65 minutes to respond with 10 minutes of follow-up.
    (d) CAPSA-1B form: Approximately 204 respondents, each taking an 
average of 30 minutes to respond with 5 minutes of follow-up.
    (e) 52 telephone calls to informants in each jurisdiction, each 
taking an average of 30 minutes with 5 minutes of follow-up.
    (6) An estimate of the total public burden (in hours) associated 
with the collection: 2,578 total burden hours.
    If additional information is required contact: Jerri Murray, 
Department Clearance Officer, United States Department of Justice, 
Justice Management Division, Policy and Planning Staff, Two 
Constitution Avenue, 145 N Street NE., Room 3E.405B, Washington, DC 
20530.


[[Page 20232]]


    Dated: April 8, 2014.
Jerri Murray,
Department Clearance Officer for PRA, U.S. Department of Justice.
[FR Doc. 2014-08175 Filed 4-10-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-18-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.