Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed eCollection eComments Requested; New Collection; 2014 Census of Adult Probation Supervising Agencies, 20230-20232 [2014-08175]
Download as PDF
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
20230
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 70 / Friday, April 11, 2014 / Notices
to submit proposed remedial orders for
the Commission’s consideration.
Complainant is also requested to state
the date on which the ’561 patent
expires and the HTSUS subheadings
under which the accused products are
imported.
Written submissions must be filed no
later than close of business on April 23,
2014. Reply submissions must be filed
no later than the close of business on
April 30, 2014. Such submissions
should address the ALJ’s recommended
determinations on remedy and bonding
which were made in Order No. 28. No
further submissions on any of these
issues will be permitted unless
otherwise ordered by the Commission.
Persons filing written submissions
must file the original document
electronically on or before the deadlines
stated above and submit eight true paper
copies to the Office of the Secretary by
noon the next day pursuant to section
210.4(f) of the Commission’s Rules of
Practice and Procedure (19 CFR
210.4(f)). Submissions should refer to
the investigation number (‘‘Inv. No.
337–TA–861/867’’) in a prominent place
on the cover page and/or the first page.
(See Handbook for Electronic Filing
Procedures, https://www.usitc.gov/
secretary/fed_reg_notices/rules/
handbook_on_electronic_filing.pdf).
Persons with questions regarding filing
should contact the Secretary (202–205–
2000).
Any person desiring to submit a
document to the Commission in
confidence must request confidential
treatment. All such requests should be
directed to the Secretary to the
Commission and must include a full
statement of the reasons why the
Commission should grant such
treatment. See 19 CFR 201.6. Documents
for which confidential treatment by the
Commission is properly sought will be
treated accordingly. A redacted nonconfidential version of the document
must also be filed simultaneously with
the any confidential filing. All nonconfidential written submissions will be
available for public inspection at the
Office of the Secretary and on EDIS.
The authority for the Commission’s
determination is contained in section
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in Part
210 of the Commission’s Rules of
Practice and Procedure (19 CFR Part
210).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: April 8, 2014.
Lisa R. Barton,
Acting Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2014–08164 Filed 4–10–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:55 Apr 10, 2014
Jkt 232001
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
[Investigation Nos. 731–TA–1140–1142
(Review)]
Uncovered Innerspring Units from
China, South Africa, and Vietnam
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Proposed eCollection
eComments Requested; New
Collection; 2014 Census of Adult
Probation Supervising Agencies
Determinations
AGENCY:
[OMB Number 1121–NEW]
On the basis of the record 1 developed
in the subject five-year reviews, the
United States International Trade
Commission (Commission) determines,2
pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff
Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)), that
revocation of the antidumping duty
orders on uncovered innerspring units
from China, South Africa, and Vietnam
would be likely to lead to continuation
or recurrence of material injury to an
industry in the United States within a
reasonably foreseeable time.
Background
The Commission instituted these
reviews on November 1, 2013 (78 FR
65711) and determined on February 4,
2014 that it would conduct expedited
reviews (79 FR 11466, February 28,
2014).
The Commission completed and filed
its determinations in these reviews on
April 7, 2014.3 The views of the
Commission are contained in USITC
Publication 4459 (April 2014), entitled
Uncovered Innerspring Units from
China, South Africa, and Vietnam:
Investigation Nos. 731–TA–1140–1142
(Review).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: April 8, 2014.
Lisa R. Barton,
Acting Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2014–08161 Filed 4–10–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
1 The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19
CFR 207.2(f)).
2 Commissioner Shara L. Aranoff did not
participate in these reviews.
3 The Commission has the authority to toll
statutory deadlines during a period when the
government is closed. Because the Commission was
closed on December 10, 2013, January 21, 2014,
February 13, 2014, March 10, 2014, and March 17,
2014 due to inclement weather in Washington, DC,
the statutory deadlines reflect the tolling of
deadlines by five days.
PO 00000
Frm 00066
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Bureau of Justice Statistics,
Department of Justice.
ACTION: 30-day notice.
The Department of Justice
(DOJ), Office of Justice Programs, will be
submitting the following information
collection to the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) for review and
approval in accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. The
proposed information collection was
previously published in the Federal
Register Volume 79, Number 27, pages
7701–7702, on February 10, 2014,
allowing a 60-day comment period.
DATES: Comments are encouraged and
will be accepted for ‘‘thirty days’’ until
May 12, 2014.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Written comments and/or suggestions
regarding the items contained in this
notice, especially the estimated public
burden or associated response time,
should be directed to the Office of
Management and Budget, Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs,
Attention Department of Justice Desk
Officer, Washington, DC 20503 or send
to OIRA_submission@omb.eop.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
process is conducted in accordance with
5 CFR 1320.10. Request written
comments and suggestions from the
public and affected agencies concerning
the proposed collection of information
are encouraged. Your comments should
address one or more of the following
four points:
—Evaluate whether the collection of
information is necessary for the
proper performance of the functions
of the agency, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
—Evaluate the accuracy of the agency’s
estimate of the burden of the
collection of information, including
the validity of the methodology and
assumptions used;
—Enhance the quality, utility and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and
—Minimize the burden of the collection
of information on those who are to
respond, including through the use of
appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other technological
collection techniques or other forms
of information technology, e.g.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\11APN1.SGM
11APN1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 70 / Friday, April 11, 2014 / Notices
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
permitting electronic submission of
responses.
Overview of This Information
Collection:
(1) Type of Information Collection:
New Collection. While the Bureau of
Justice Statistics conducted a census of
probation and parole agencies in 1991,
the 2014 Census of Adult Probation
Supervising Agencies is now a
standalone collection. This collection’s
scope is narrower and only includes
adult probation agencies. The scope of
the 1991 census was broader and
included both adult probation and
parole agencies.
(2) Title of the Form/Collection: 2014
Census of Adult Probation Supervising
Agencies.
(3) Agency form number: CAPSA–AIF
is the Agency Information Form (AIF)
for public agencies, CAPSA–CIF is the
Company Information Form (CIF) for
private probation companies, CAPSA–
1A is the questionnaire for public
probation agencies, and CAPSA–1B is
the questionnaire for private probation
companies.
(4) Affected public who will be asked
to respond, as well as a brief abstract:
Primary: State or local government.
Other: Federal government or private
companies. The primary goals of the
work under this clearance are to: (1)
Enhance and validate a national roster
of probation agencies that supervise
adults on probation for a felony (or
those that supervise felons and
misdemeanants) and private companies
that directly supervise adult
probationers; and (2) collect information
from those agencies to report national
and state-level statistics that provide a
clear understanding of how adult
probation in the United States is
currently organized, the supervision
policies and practices agencies have
established to administer adult
probation, the various types of functions
adult probation agencies perform, and
the different types of individuals
supervised by adult probation agencies.
The Bureau of Justice Statistics will use
this information in published reports
and for the U.S. Congress, Executive
Office of the President, practitioners,
researchers, students, the media, and
others interested in community
corrections statistics.
All agencies and companies that are
believed to supervise adult probationers
are on a preliminary roster that BJS,
Westat, and the American Probation and
Parole Association (APPA) developed
by reviewing and compiling data and
information from various available
resources. (Westat and APPA are the
data collection agents for the 2014
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:55 Apr 10, 2014
Jkt 232001
CAPSA) The CAPSA–AIF or CAPSA–
CIF will be mailed to the head of each
agency/company on the preliminary
roster and the head of the agency/
company will be asked to confirm the
contact information for the agency/
company and designate a respondent to
complete the CAPSA questionnaire.
Agency/company heads will be asked to
fax, email, or mail the AIF or CIF to
Westat. Designated respondents from
public probation agencies will receive
the CAPSA–1A questionnaire and will
be asked to report via the Internet
through a web survey with telephone
reporting as a secondary mode.
Designated respondents from private
probation companies will receive the
CAPSA–1B questionnaire and will be
asked to return the paper questionnaire
by fax, email, or mail. Telephone will
also serve as a secondary mode of data
collection for private probation
companies.
The CAPSA–1A will collect
information from public probation
agencies about their branch and level of
government, the various functions they
perform, the policies and practices they
have in place to administer adult
probation related to both adult
probationers and the community
corrections officers that supervise them,
the extent to which agencies have
supervision authority, the various
populations they serve, the size of their
adult probation population, the use of
and number of adult probationers held
in community-based correctional
facilities, and funding sources for adult
probation. In an effort to validate the
roster of probation agencies and
companies, respondents will also be
asked to review a list of public
probation agencies in their state to
identify any that may be missing from
the list. They will also be asked to
report any private probation companies
that supervise adult probationers in
their state.
The CAPSA–1B will collect
information from private probation
companies about the various functions
they perform, the number of states for
which they supervise adult
probationers, the branches and levels of
government from which they receive
adult probationers to supervise, the
extent to which any governmental entity
conducts oversight of their supervision
activities, the various populations they
serve, the size of their adult probation
population, and the practices and
methods they use to administer adult
probation.
Both the CAPSA–1A and CAPSA–1B
questionnaires will include questions to
confirm that the agencies/companies
supervise adult probationers and are
PO 00000
Frm 00067
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
20231
therefore correctly included on the
roster and fall within the scope of the
CAPSA. In addition, because the
organization of adult probation varies
drastically not only by state but within
particular states, as part of the work
under this clearance to enhance and
validate the roster of adult probation
agencies and companies, one informant
in each state, the District of Columbia,
and the Federal system will be asked to
complete a telephone interview. These
contacts are necessary to assist in: (1)
Identifying any agencies that may be
missing or should be removed from the
roster (e.g., agencies that are no longer
in operation); (2) updating information
contained in the resources that have
been used to develop the preliminary
roster since some of the source material
was only available from publications
that were published 5 to 10 years ago;
and (3) resolving questions about how
probation is organized in the
jurisdiction that stem from differences
in the way probation in particular
jurisdictions has been described in some
of the materials used to develop the
preliminary roster.
(5) An estimate of the total number of
respondents and the amount of time
needed for an average respondent to
respond:
(a) CAPSA–AIF form: Approximately
1,760 respondents, each taking an
average of 5 minutes to respond with 2
minutes of follow-up.
(b) CAPSA–CIF form: Approximately
204 respondents, each taking an average
of 5 minutes to respond with 2 minutes
of follow-up.
(c) CAPSA–1A form: Approximately
1,760 respondents, each taking an
average of 65 minutes to respond with
10 minutes of follow-up.
(d) CAPSA–1B form: Approximately
204 respondents, each taking an average
of 30 minutes to respond with 5 minutes
of follow-up.
(e) 52 telephone calls to informants in
each jurisdiction, each taking an average
of 30 minutes with 5 minutes of followup.
(6) An estimate of the total public
burden (in hours) associated with the
collection: 2,578 total burden hours.
If additional information is required
contact: Jerri Murray, Department
Clearance Officer, United States
Department of Justice, Justice
Management Division, Policy and
Planning Staff, Two Constitution
Avenue, 145 N Street NE., Room
3E.405B, Washington, DC 20530.
E:\FR\FM\11APN1.SGM
11APN1
20232
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 70 / Friday, April 11, 2014 / Notices
Dated: April 8, 2014.
Jerri Murray,
Department Clearance Officer for PRA, U.S.
Department of Justice.
[FR Doc. 2014–08175 Filed 4–10–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–18–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
[OMB Number 1110–0021]
Proposed eCollection, eComments
Requested; Approval for a Revised
Collection; FBI National Academy
Post-Graduate Questionnaires, FBI
National Academy Post-Graduate
Questionnaire for Graduates, FBI
National Academy Post-Graduate
Questionnaire for Supervisors of
Graduates
Training Division, Federal
Bureau of Investigation, Department of
Justice.
ACTION: 30-day notice.
AGENCY:
The Department of Justice
(DOJ), Federal Bureau of Investigation
(FBI), Training Division’s Curriculum
Management Section (CMS) will be
submitting the following information
collection request to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for
review and approval in accordance with
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
The proposed information collection is
published to obtain comments from the
public and affected agencies. This
proposed information collection was
previously published in the Federal
Register Volume, Number 23, page
6628, on February 4, 2014. allowing for
a 60 day comment period.
DATES: Comments are encouraged and
will be accepted for 30 days until May
12, 2014.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have comments (especially on the
estimated public burden or associated
response time), suggestions, or need a
copy of the proposed information
collection instrument with instructions
or additional information, please
contact Keith Shirley, Unit Chief,
Evaluation and Accreditation Unit,
Training Division, Federal Bureau of
Investigation, Quantico, Virginia 22135.
Written comments and/or suggestions
can also be directed to the Office of
Management and Budget, Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs,
Attention Department of Justice Desk
Officer, Washington, DC 20503 or send
to OIRA_submission@omb.eop.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
process is conducted in accordance with
5 CFR 1320.10. Written comments and
suggestions from the public and affected
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:55 Apr 10, 2014
Jkt 232001
agencies concerning the proposed
collection of information are
encouraged. Your comments should
address one or more of the following
three points:
(1) Evaluate whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the agency/component,
including whether the information will
have practical utility;
(2) Evaluate the accuracy of the
agency’s/component’s estimate of the
burden of the proposed collection of the
information, including the validity of
the methodology and assumptions used;
(3) Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and
(4) Minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who
are to respond, including the use of
appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other technological
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology, e.g., permitting
electronic submission of responses.
Overview of This Information
1. Type of Information Collection:
Approval of a Revised Collection.
2. Title of the Forms:
FBI National Academy Post-Graduate
Questionnaire for Graduates.
FBI National Academy Post-Graduate
Questionnaire for Supervisors of
Graduates.
3. Agency Form Number, if any, and
the applicable component of the
department sponsoring the collection:
Form Number: 1110–0021.
Sponsor: Training Division of the
Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI),
Department of Justice (DOJ).
4. Affected Public who will be asked
or required to respond, as well as a brief
abstract:
Primary: FBI National Academy
graduates and their identified
supervisors represents state and local
police departments, sheriffs’
departments, military police
organizations, and federal law
enforcement agencies from the United
States and over 150 foreign nations.
Brief Abstract: This collection is
requested by FBI National Academy.
These questionnaires have been
designed to collect feedback from FBI
National Academy students regarding
their courses and instructors. The
results are used to help determine if the
FBI National Academy program is
functioning as intended and meeting its
goals and objectives. We will utilize the
students’ comments to improve the
current curriculum.
5. An estimate of the total number of
respondents and the amount of time
PO 00000
Frm 00068
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 9990
estimated for an average respondent to
respond:
Approximately 1,000 FBI National
Academy graduates per year will
respond to the FBI National Academy
Post-Graduate Questionnaire for
Graduates. It is predicted that we will
receive a 50% response rate. The
average response time for reading the
questionnaire directions for the FBI
National Academy Post-Graduate
Questionnaire for Graduates is
estimated to be two (2) minutes; time to
complete the questionnaire is estimated
to be 30 minutes. Thus the total time to
complete the Post-Graduate
Questionnaire for Graduates is 32
minutes.
There are approximately 1,000 FBI
National Academy graduates who have
identified their supervisors that will
respond to the FBI National Academy
Post-Graduates Questionnaire for
Supervisors of Graduates. It is predicted
that we will receive a 50% response
rate. The average response time for
reading the directions for the FBI
National Academy Post-Graduate
Questionnaire for Supervisors of
Graduates is estimated to be 2 minutes;
time to complete the questionnaire is
estimated to be 30 minutes. Thus the
total time to complete the Post-Graduate
Questionnaire for Supervisors for
Graduates is 32 minutes.
The total estimated time to complete
each questionnaire per respondent for
each group is 32 minutes.
6. An estimate of the total public
burden (in hours) associated with the
collection:
Given that approximately 50% of
those surveyed (or 500 from each group)
will respond, the total public burden for
completing questionnaires is 533 hours.
For additional information, contact:
Jerri Murray, Department Clearance
Officer, United States Department of
Justice, Policy and Planning Staff,
Justice Management Division, Two
Constitution Square, 145 N Street NE.,
Room 3E–405B, Washington, DC 20530.
Dated: April 8, 2014.
Jerri Murray,
Department Clearance Officer for PRA,
United States Department of Justice.
[FR Doc. 2014–08173 Filed 4–10–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–02–P
E:\FR\FM\11APN1.SGM
11APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 70 (Friday, April 11, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 20230-20232]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-08175]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
[OMB Number 1121-NEW]
Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed eCollection
eComments Requested; New Collection; 2014 Census of Adult Probation
Supervising Agencies
AGENCY: Bureau of Justice Statistics, Department of Justice.
ACTION: 30-day notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Justice (DOJ), Office of Justice Programs,
will be submitting the following information collection to the Office
of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and approval in accordance
with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. The proposed information
collection was previously published in the Federal Register Volume 79,
Number 27, pages 7701-7702, on February 10, 2014, allowing a 60-day
comment period.
DATES: Comments are encouraged and will be accepted for ``thirty days''
until May 12, 2014.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Written comments and/or suggestions
regarding the items contained in this notice, especially the estimated
public burden or associated response time, should be directed to the
Office of Management and Budget, Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs, Attention Department of Justice Desk Officer, Washington, DC
20503 or send to OIRA_submission@omb.eop.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This process is conducted in accordance with
5 CFR 1320.10. Request written comments and suggestions from the public
and affected agencies concerning the proposed collection of information
are encouraged. Your comments should address one or more of the
following four points:
--Evaluate whether the collection of information is necessary for the
proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether
the information will have practical utility;
--Evaluate the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the
collection of information, including the validity of the methodology
and assumptions used;
--Enhance the quality, utility and clarity of the information to be
collected; and
--Minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are
to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology, e.g.
[[Page 20231]]
permitting electronic submission of responses.
Overview of This Information Collection:
(1) Type of Information Collection: New Collection. While the
Bureau of Justice Statistics conducted a census of probation and parole
agencies in 1991, the 2014 Census of Adult Probation Supervising
Agencies is now a standalone collection. This collection's scope is
narrower and only includes adult probation agencies. The scope of the
1991 census was broader and included both adult probation and parole
agencies.
(2) Title of the Form/Collection: 2014 Census of Adult Probation
Supervising Agencies.
(3) Agency form number: CAPSA-AIF is the Agency Information Form
(AIF) for public agencies, CAPSA-CIF is the Company Information Form
(CIF) for private probation companies, CAPSA-1A is the questionnaire
for public probation agencies, and CAPSA-1B is the questionnaire for
private probation companies.
(4) Affected public who will be asked to respond, as well as a
brief abstract: Primary: State or local government. Other: Federal
government or private companies. The primary goals of the work under
this clearance are to: (1) Enhance and validate a national roster of
probation agencies that supervise adults on probation for a felony (or
those that supervise felons and misdemeanants) and private companies
that directly supervise adult probationers; and (2) collect information
from those agencies to report national and state-level statistics that
provide a clear understanding of how adult probation in the United
States is currently organized, the supervision policies and practices
agencies have established to administer adult probation, the various
types of functions adult probation agencies perform, and the different
types of individuals supervised by adult probation agencies. The Bureau
of Justice Statistics will use this information in published reports
and for the U.S. Congress, Executive Office of the President,
practitioners, researchers, students, the media, and others interested
in community corrections statistics.
All agencies and companies that are believed to supervise adult
probationers are on a preliminary roster that BJS, Westat, and the
American Probation and Parole Association (APPA) developed by reviewing
and compiling data and information from various available resources.
(Westat and APPA are the data collection agents for the 2014 CAPSA) The
CAPSA-AIF or CAPSA-CIF will be mailed to the head of each agency/
company on the preliminary roster and the head of the agency/company
will be asked to confirm the contact information for the agency/company
and designate a respondent to complete the CAPSA questionnaire. Agency/
company heads will be asked to fax, email, or mail the AIF or CIF to
Westat. Designated respondents from public probation agencies will
receive the CAPSA-1A questionnaire and will be asked to report via the
Internet through a web survey with telephone reporting as a secondary
mode. Designated respondents from private probation companies will
receive the CAPSA-1B questionnaire and will be asked to return the
paper questionnaire by fax, email, or mail. Telephone will also serve
as a secondary mode of data collection for private probation companies.
The CAPSA-1A will collect information from public probation
agencies about their branch and level of government, the various
functions they perform, the policies and practices they have in place
to administer adult probation related to both adult probationers and
the community corrections officers that supervise them, the extent to
which agencies have supervision authority, the various populations they
serve, the size of their adult probation population, the use of and
number of adult probationers held in community-based correctional
facilities, and funding sources for adult probation. In an effort to
validate the roster of probation agencies and companies, respondents
will also be asked to review a list of public probation agencies in
their state to identify any that may be missing from the list. They
will also be asked to report any private probation companies that
supervise adult probationers in their state.
The CAPSA-1B will collect information from private probation
companies about the various functions they perform, the number of
states for which they supervise adult probationers, the branches and
levels of government from which they receive adult probationers to
supervise, the extent to which any governmental entity conducts
oversight of their supervision activities, the various populations they
serve, the size of their adult probation population, and the practices
and methods they use to administer adult probation.
Both the CAPSA-1A and CAPSA-1B questionnaires will include
questions to confirm that the agencies/companies supervise adult
probationers and are therefore correctly included on the roster and
fall within the scope of the CAPSA. In addition, because the
organization of adult probation varies drastically not only by state
but within particular states, as part of the work under this clearance
to enhance and validate the roster of adult probation agencies and
companies, one informant in each state, the District of Columbia, and
the Federal system will be asked to complete a telephone interview.
These contacts are necessary to assist in: (1) Identifying any agencies
that may be missing or should be removed from the roster (e.g.,
agencies that are no longer in operation); (2) updating information
contained in the resources that have been used to develop the
preliminary roster since some of the source material was only available
from publications that were published 5 to 10 years ago; and (3)
resolving questions about how probation is organized in the
jurisdiction that stem from differences in the way probation in
particular jurisdictions has been described in some of the materials
used to develop the preliminary roster.
(5) An estimate of the total number of respondents and the amount
of time needed for an average respondent to respond:
(a) CAPSA-AIF form: Approximately 1,760 respondents, each taking an
average of 5 minutes to respond with 2 minutes of follow-up.
(b) CAPSA-CIF form: Approximately 204 respondents, each taking an
average of 5 minutes to respond with 2 minutes of follow-up.
(c) CAPSA-1A form: Approximately 1,760 respondents, each taking an
average of 65 minutes to respond with 10 minutes of follow-up.
(d) CAPSA-1B form: Approximately 204 respondents, each taking an
average of 30 minutes to respond with 5 minutes of follow-up.
(e) 52 telephone calls to informants in each jurisdiction, each
taking an average of 30 minutes with 5 minutes of follow-up.
(6) An estimate of the total public burden (in hours) associated
with the collection: 2,578 total burden hours.
If additional information is required contact: Jerri Murray,
Department Clearance Officer, United States Department of Justice,
Justice Management Division, Policy and Planning Staff, Two
Constitution Avenue, 145 N Street NE., Room 3E.405B, Washington, DC
20530.
[[Page 20232]]
Dated: April 8, 2014.
Jerri Murray,
Department Clearance Officer for PRA, U.S. Department of Justice.
[FR Doc. 2014-08175 Filed 4-10-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-18-P