Aviation Rulemaking Advisory Committee-Transport Airplane Performance and Handling Characteristics-Continuing a Task, 20295-20297 [2014-08139]
Download as PDF
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 70 / Friday, April 11, 2014 / Notices
SBA may then identify a specific item
within a PSC and NAICS code to which
a class waiver would apply. ‘‘Available
to participate’’ in the context of the
Federal market means that contractors
exist that have been awarded or have
performed a contract to supply a
specific class of products to the Federal
Government within 24 months from the
date of the request for waiver, either
directly or through a dealer, or that have
submitted an offer on a solicitation for
that class of products within that time
frame. 13 CFR 121.1202(c).
On November 2, 2004, SBA granted a
class waiver of the Nonmanufacturer
Rule for Miscellaneous Electrical
Equipment and Component
Manufacturing, classified under NAICS
code 335999 (All Other Miscellaneous
Electrical Equipment and Component
Manufacturing), PSC 5999
(Miscellaneous Electrical and Electronic
Components). 69 FR 61429. On January
28, 2008, SBA granted a class waiver for
Fluorescent Lamps, Incandescent
Lamps, etc., classified under NAICS
code 335999, PSC 6240 (Electric
Lamps). 73 FR 4940. The same day, SBA
granted a class waiver for Electric Lamp
Starters and Lamp Holders, etc.,
classified under NAICS code 335999,
PSC 6250 (Ballasts, Lampholders, and
Starters). 73 FR 4941. On March 21,
2008, SBA granted a class waiver for
Indoor and Outdoor Electric Lighting
Fixtures, classified under NAICS code
335999, PSC 6210 (Indoor and Outdoor
Electrical Lighting Fixtures). 73 FR
15251.
In 2013, SBA received a request from
a small business manufacturer to
rescind the class waiver of the
Nonmanufacturer Rule for
Miscellaneous Electrical Equipment and
Component Manufacturing (classified
under NAICS code 335999, PSC 5999).
According to the request, there was at
least one small business manufacturer
that had conducted business with the
Federal Government within the
previous 24 months and provided at
least one of the various supplies listed
under the class waiver applicable to
Miscellaneous Electrical Equipment and
Component Manufacturing. SBA’s
independent research resulted in the
discovery of other small business
manufacturers of various items listed
under the descriptors applicable to
Miscellaneous Electrical Equipment and
Component Manufacturing.
On July 17, 2013, SBA published a
notice in the Federal Register stating
that SBA intended to rescind the class
waiver for NAICS code 335999. 78 FR
42817. The public comment period for
this notice closed on August 1, 2013.
Soon after it closed, a small business
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:55 Apr 10, 2014
Jkt 232001
manufacturer requested that the public
comment period be reopened to allow
submission of additional data. SBA
reopened the comment period from
August 20, 2013 to September 19, 2013.
78 FR 51263. During the comment
periods, five respondents submitted
eight comments.
Two commenters strongly supported
rescinding the class waiver for NAICS
code 335999, PSC 5999. These
commenters also stated that the three
other previously granted class waivers
under NAICS code 335999 were
misclassified and recommended that
SBA reclassify them under different
NAICS codes. Another respondent, a
small business manufacturer of
electrical equipment, fully supported
the rescission of the class waiver for
NAICS code 335999, PSC 5999. A fourth
commenter opposed the rescission but
insisted that SBA adopt the above
revisions and reclassifications of the
class waivers under NAICS code
335999. A fifth respondent, a small
distributor of lighting, electrical and
voice and data products, opposed
rescinding the waiver and commented
that the rescission of this waiver would
negatively impact his business.
However, the commenter did not
provide an explanation or evidence as to
how rescission of this wavier would
negatively impact his business. That
same commenter also recommended
that the class waivers for PSCs 6210,
6240, and 6250 be reclassified under
different NAICS codes. A small business
distributor of electrical supplies
supported the rescission of the class
waiver for NAICS code 335999, PSC
5999 on the grounds that contracting
officers are justifying their refusal to set
aside contracts for the procurement of
miscellaneous electrical equipment
based on this wavier being in place.
Another respondent, a small business
lighting products distributor, supported
rescission of all of the class waivers
classified under NAICS code 335999.
This respondent commented that a class
waiver should never have been granted
for PSC 5999 and that the waivers for
PSCs 6210, 6240, and 6250 are
misclassified under NAICS code
335999, resulting in contracting officials
refusing to set aside these procurements
for small business and instead choosing
to procure through unrestricted
procedures. One commenter’s request
was not relevant to the purpose of this
class waiver and therefore is not
addressed here.
Based on the public comments
received, SBA’s analysis of data
submitted, and independent market
research performed by SBA, it has been
determined that several small business
PO 00000
Frm 00131
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
20295
manufacturers of miscellaneous
electrical equipment are currently
available to participate in the Federal
marketplace. In addition, SBA’s
research validated the commenters’
assertions regarding the improper
NAICS code classification of the class
waivers for PSCs 6210, 6240, and 6250.
Therefore, SBA has decided to take the
following actions: (1) Rescind the class
waiver for Miscellaneous Electrical
Equipment and Component
Manufacturing, classified under NAICS
code 335999, PSC 5999 (see 69 FR
61429); (2) rescind the class waiver for
Indoor and Outdoor Electric Lighting
Fixtures, classified under NAICS code
335999, PSC 6210 (see 73 FR 15251),
and replace it by granting a class waiver
for Indoor and Outdoor Electrical
Lighting Fixtures, under NAICS code
335122 (Commercial, Industrial, and
Institutional Electric Lighting Fixture
Manufacturing), PSC 6210 (Indoor and
Outdoor Electrical Lighting Fixtures);
(3) rescind the class waiver for
Fluorescent Lamps, Incandescent
Lamps, etc., classified under NAICS
code 335999, PSC 6240 (see 73 FR 4940)
and replace it by granting a class waiver
for Electric Lamps, under NAICS code
335110 (Electric Lamp Bulb and Part
Manufacturing), PSC 6240 (Electric
Lamps); and (4) rescind the class waiver
for Electric Lamp Starters and Lamp
Holders, etc., classified under NAICS
code 335999, PSC 6250 (see 73 FR 4941)
and replace it by granting a class waiver
for Ballasts, Lampholders, and Starters,
under NAICS code 335311 (Power,
Distribution, and Specialty Transformer
Manufacturing), PSC 6250 (Ballasts,
Lampholders, and Starters).
Dated: March 31, 2014.
Judith A. Roussel,
Director, Office of Government Contracting.
[FR Doc. 2014–08088 Filed 4–10–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
Aviation Rulemaking Advisory
Committee—Transport Airplane
Performance and Handling
Characteristics—Continuing a Task
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of phase 2 task
assignment for the Aviation Rulemaking
Advisory Committee (ARAC).
AGENCY:
The FAA assigned the
Aviation Rulemaking Advisory
Committee (ARAC) a new phase 2 task
to provide recommendations regarding
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\11APN1.SGM
11APN1
20296
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 70 / Friday, April 11, 2014 / Notices
new or updated standards in the highest
priority topic areas for airplane
performance and handling
characteristics. This task addresses the
Flight Test Harmonization Working
Group’s recent recommendations. This
notice informs the public of phase 2
ARAC activity and does not solicit
membership for the existing Flight Test
Harmonization Working Group
(FTHWG).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joe
Jacobsen, Airplane & Flight Crew
Interface Branch, ANM–111, Transport
Airplane Directorate, Federal Aviation
Administration, 1601 Lind Avenue SW.,
Renton, Washington 98057–3356;
telephone 425–227–2011, facsimile
425–227–1149; email joe.jacobsen@
faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
ARAC Acceptance of Task
As a result of the March 20, 2014,
ARAC meeting, the FAA has assigned
and ARAC has accepted this task and
will use the existing FTHWG. The
FTHWG will serve as staff to ARAC and
provide advice and recommendations
on the assigned task. ARAC will review
and approve the recommendation report
that will be sent to the FAA.
Background
The FAA established ARAC to
provide advice and recommendations to
the FAA Administrator, through the
Associate Administrator of Aviation
Safety, on the FAA’s rulemaking
activities. ARAC’s objectives are to
improve the development of the FAA’s
regulations by providing information,
advice, and recommendations related to
aviation issues.
The FTHWG will provide advice and
recommendations to ARAC on new and
updated standards for the highest
priority topic areas for airplane
performance and handling
characteristics.
In March 2013, the FAA tasked ARAC
to provide advice and recommendations
in prioritizing potential topic areas for
the development of new or revised
standards for airplane performance and
handling characteristics in new
transport category airplanes. The output
of that task is now complete and is the
basis for this new task. The highest
priority topic areas were determined to
be new or updated standards for fly-bywire (FBW) flight controls, wet runway
stopping performance, runway
excursion hazard classification, stall
speed in ground effect, steep approach,
flight test methods used to determine
maximum tailwind and crosswind
capability, susceptibility to pilot-
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:55 Apr 10, 2014
Jkt 232001
induced oscillations/airplane-pilot
coupling (PIO/APC), and guidance
material for assessing handling
qualities. This task will be to develop
these high priority topic areas.
The Task
The working group should develop
recommended standards in the
following topic areas. If there are
disagreements within the working
group, these should be documented,
including the reasons for the
disagreement and rationale from each
party. The following subject areas
should be worked upon within this task:
1. Fly-by-wire Flight Controls.
Regulatory requirements and associated
guidance material for airworthiness
certification of airplane designs using
fly-by-wire technology to remove the
need for longstanding, repetitively-used
fly-by-wire special conditions. Specific
areas include:
a. Applicability/adaptation of
Amendment 25–121 airplane
performance and handling
characteristics in icing conditions
requirements,
b. Lateral/directional/longitudinal
stability,
c. Out of trim requirements,
d. Side stick controls, and
e. Flight envelope protection.
2. Takeoff and Landing Performance.
Regulatory requirements and associated
guidance material for airworthiness
certification in the following areas listed
below. (Note: This topic area excludes
items addressed by the Takeoff and
Landing Performance Assessment
Aviation Rulemaking Committee.)
a. Flight test methods used to
determine maximum tailwind and
crosswind capability. For crosswind
testing, better define intended
operational use of demonstrated
maximum steady and gusting crosswind
performance.
b. Wet runway stopping performance.
Recent landing overruns on wet
runways have raised questions
regarding current wet runway stopping
performance requirements and methods.
Analyses indicate that the braking
coefficient of friction in each case was
significantly lower than expected for a
wet runway (i.e., lower than the level
specified in FAA regulations).
Consideration should also be given to
the scheduling of landing performance
on wet porous friction course and
grooved runway surfaces.
Recommendations may include the
need for additional data gathering,
analysis, and possible rulemaking.
c. Steep approach landing
performance. Current airplane
certification standards are not
PO 00000
Frm 00132
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
harmonized among the U.S., Canadian,
Brazilian, and European airworthiness
authorities.
d. Guidance material addressing the
adverse effects on stall speed in ground
effect.
e. Runway excursion hazard
classification. Current safety
assessments are not harmonized among
the U.S., Canadian, Brazilian, and
European airworthiness authorities.
3. Handling Characteristics. Guidance
material for airworthiness certification
in the following areas:
a. Guidance material for assessing
handling qualities. Current Advisory
Circular 25–7, ‘‘Flight Test Guide for
Certification of Transport Category
Airplanes,’’ provides an FAA Handling
Quality Rating Method that is intended
to provide a systematic way of
determining appropriate minimum
handling qualities requirements and
evaluating those handling qualities forconditions affecting an airplane’s flying
qualities. The FAA handling quality
rating system is not universally
accepted within industry, nor is it
accepted by EASA.
b. Guidance for assessing
susceptibility to pilot-induced
oscillations/airplane-pilot coupling
(PIO/APC). Guidance provided in
Advisory Circular 25–7C for evaluating
PIO/APC is also not well accepted by
airplane manufacturers, is not
harmonized with EASA, and has been
superseded to some extent in recent
certification programs. Modified
guidance is needed to both simplify and
standardize the methods for evaluating
an airplane’s susceptibility to PIO/APC.
Schedule
The recommendation report must be
submitted to the FAA for review and
acceptance no later than 3 years from
the publication date of this tasking. The
FAA expects to publish additional
ARAC taskings for follow-on phases to
develop other topic areas which were
lower in priority.
Working Group Activity
The FTHWG must comply with the
procedures adopted by ARAC. As part
of the procedures, the working group
must:
1. Conduct a review and analysis of
the assigned task and any other related
materials or documents.
2. Draft and submit a work plan for
completion of the task, including the
rationale supporting such a plan, for
consideration by the Transport Airplane
and Engine (TAE) Subcommittee.
3. Provide a status report at each TAE
Subcommittee meeting.
E:\FR\FM\11APN1.SGM
11APN1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 70 / Friday, April 11, 2014 / Notices
4. Draft and submit the
recommendation report based on the
review and analysis of the assigned
tasks.
5. Present the recommendation report
at the TAE Subcommittee meeting.
Issued in Washington, DC, on April 8,
2014.
Lirio Liu,
Designated Federal Officer, Aviation
Rulemaking Advisory Committee.
[FR Doc. 2014–08139 Filed 4–10–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Participation in the Working Group
The existing FTHGW is comprised of
technical experts having an interest in
the assigned task. A working group
member need not be a representative or
a member of the full committee. In
accordance with the June 18, 2010,
memorandum entitled ‘‘Lobbyists on
Agency Boards and Commissions,’’
members are not federally registered
lobbyists, who are subject to the
registration and reporting requirements
of the Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995
(LDA) as amended, 2 U.S.C. 1603, 1604,
and 1605, at the time of appointment or
reappointment to an advisory
committee, and has not served in such
a role for three consecutive quarters
prior to appointment. (For further
information see the Office of
Management and Budget final guidance
on appointment of lobbyists to federal
boards and commissions (76 FR 61756,
October 5, 2011).
All existing FTHWG members who
wish to participate in this task must
actively participate by attending all
meetings, and providing written
comments when requested to do so.
Each member must devote the resources
necessary to support the working group
in meeting any assigned deadlines. Each
member must keep their management
chain, and those they may represent,
advised of working group activities and
decisions to ensure the proposed
technical solutions do not conflict with
their sponsoring organization’s position
when the subject is presented to ARAC
for approval. Once the FTHWG has
begun deliberations, members will not
be added or substituted without the
approval of the FAA and the Working
Group Chair.
The Secretary of Transportation
determined the formation and use of
ARAC is necessary and in the public
interest in connection with the
performance of duties imposed on the
FAA by law.
ARAC meetings are open to the
public. However, meetings of the
FTHWG are not open to the public,
except to the extent individuals with an
interest and expertise are selected to
participate. The FAA will make no
public announcement of FTHWG
meetings.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:55 Apr 10, 2014
Jkt 232001
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
Approval of Noise Compatibility
Program; Southwest Florida
International Airport, Fort Myers, FL
Federal Aviation
Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
The Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA) announces its
findings on the Noise Compatibility
Program submitted by the Lee County
Port Authority under the provisions of
49 U.S.C. (the Aviation Safety and Noise
Abatement Act, hereinafter referred to
as ‘‘the Act’’) and 14 CFR part 150.
These findings are made in recognition
of the description of Federal and
nonfederal responsibilities in Senate
Report No. 96–52 (1980). On January 30,
2013, the FAA determined that the
noise exposure maps submitted by the
Lee County Port Authority under Part
150 were in compliance with applicable
requirements. On April 4, 2014, the
FAA approved the Southwest Florida
International Airport Noise
Compatibility Program. Some of the
recommendations of the Program were
approved by FAA.
DATES: Effective Date: The effective date
of the FAA’s approval of the Southwest
Florida International Airport Noise
Compatibility Program is April 4, 2014.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Allan Nagy, Federal Aviation
Administration, Orlando Airports
District Office, 5950 Hazeltine National
Drive, Suite 400, Orlando, FL 32822,
phone number: (407) 812–6331.
Documents reflecting this FAA action
may be reviewed at this same location.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
notice announces that the FAA has
given its overall approval to the Noise
Compatibility Program for Southwest
Florida International Airport, effective
April 4, 2014.
Under Section 47504 of the Act, an
airport operator who has previously
submitted a Noise Exposure Map may
submit to the FAA a Noise
Compatibility Program which sets forth
the measures taken or proposed by the
airport operator for the reduction of
existing non-compatible land uses and
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00133
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
20297
prevention of additional non-compatible
land uses within the area covered by the
Noise Exposure Maps. The Act requires
such programs to be developed in
consultation with interested and
affected parties including local
communities, government agencies,
airport users, and FAA personnel.
Each airport Noise Compatibility
Program developed in accordance with
Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations
(CFR) Part 150 is a local program, not
a Federal Program. The FAA does not
substitute its judgment for that of the
airport operator with respect to which
measure should be recommended for
action. The FAA’s approval or
disapproval of 14 CFR Part 150 Program
recommendations is measured
according to the standards expressed in
14 CFR Part 150 and the Act, and is
limited to the following determinations:
a. The Noise Compatibility Program
was developed in accordance with the
provisions and procedures of 14 CFR
Part 150;
b. Program measures are reasonably
consistent with achieving the goals of
reducing existing non-compatible land
uses around the airport and preventing
the introduction of additional noncompatible land uses;
c. Program measures would not create
an undue burden on interstate or foreign
commerce, unjustly discriminate against
types or classes of aeronautical uses,
violate the terms of airport grant
agreements, or intrude into areas
preempted by the Federal government;
and
d. Program measures relating to the
use of flight procedures can be
implemented within the period covered
by the program without derogating
safety, adversely affecting the efficient
use and management of the navigable
airspace and air traffic control systems,
or adversely affecting other powers and
responsibilities of the Administrator
prescribed by law.
Specific limitations with respect to
FAA’s approval of an airport Noise
Compatibility Program are delineated in
14 CFR Part 150, Section 150.5.
Approval is not a determination
concerning the acceptability of land
uses under Federal, state, or local law.
Approval does not by itself constitute an
FAA implementing action. A request for
Federal action or approval to implement
specific noise compatibility measures
may be required, and an FAA decision
on the request may require an
environmental assessment of the
proposed action. Approval does not
constitute a commitment by the FAA to
financially assist in the implementation
of the Program nor a determination that
all measures covered by the Program are
E:\FR\FM\11APN1.SGM
11APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 70 (Friday, April 11, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 20295-20297]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-08139]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
Aviation Rulemaking Advisory Committee--Transport Airplane
Performance and Handling Characteristics--Continuing a Task
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of phase 2 task assignment for the Aviation Rulemaking
Advisory Committee (ARAC).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The FAA assigned the Aviation Rulemaking Advisory Committee
(ARAC) a new phase 2 task to provide recommendations regarding
[[Page 20296]]
new or updated standards in the highest priority topic areas for
airplane performance and handling characteristics. This task addresses
the Flight Test Harmonization Working Group's recent recommendations.
This notice informs the public of phase 2 ARAC activity and does not
solicit membership for the existing Flight Test Harmonization Working
Group (FTHWG).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joe Jacobsen, Airplane & Flight Crew
Interface Branch, ANM-111, Transport Airplane Directorate, Federal
Aviation Administration, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, Washington
98057-3356; telephone 425-227-2011, facsimile 425-227-1149; email
joe.jacobsen@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
ARAC Acceptance of Task
As a result of the March 20, 2014, ARAC meeting, the FAA has
assigned and ARAC has accepted this task and will use the existing
FTHWG. The FTHWG will serve as staff to ARAC and provide advice and
recommendations on the assigned task. ARAC will review and approve the
recommendation report that will be sent to the FAA.
Background
The FAA established ARAC to provide advice and recommendations to
the FAA Administrator, through the Associate Administrator of Aviation
Safety, on the FAA's rulemaking activities. ARAC's objectives are to
improve the development of the FAA's regulations by providing
information, advice, and recommendations related to aviation issues.
The FTHWG will provide advice and recommendations to ARAC on new
and updated standards for the highest priority topic areas for airplane
performance and handling characteristics.
In March 2013, the FAA tasked ARAC to provide advice and
recommendations in prioritizing potential topic areas for the
development of new or revised standards for airplane performance and
handling characteristics in new transport category airplanes. The
output of that task is now complete and is the basis for this new task.
The highest priority topic areas were determined to be new or updated
standards for fly-by-wire (FBW) flight controls, wet runway stopping
performance, runway excursion hazard classification, stall speed in
ground effect, steep approach, flight test methods used to determine
maximum tailwind and crosswind capability, susceptibility to pilot-
induced oscillations/airplane-pilot coupling (PIO/APC), and guidance
material for assessing handling qualities. This task will be to develop
these high priority topic areas.
The Task
The working group should develop recommended standards in the
following topic areas. If there are disagreements within the working
group, these should be documented, including the reasons for the
disagreement and rationale from each party. The following subject areas
should be worked upon within this task:
1. Fly-by-wire Flight Controls. Regulatory requirements and
associated guidance material for airworthiness certification of
airplane designs using fly-by-wire technology to remove the need for
longstanding, repetitively-used fly-by-wire special conditions.
Specific areas include:
a. Applicability/adaptation of Amendment 25-121 airplane
performance and handling characteristics in icing conditions
requirements,
b. Lateral/directional/longitudinal stability,
c. Out of trim requirements,
d. Side stick controls, and
e. Flight envelope protection.
2. Takeoff and Landing Performance. Regulatory requirements and
associated guidance material for airworthiness certification in the
following areas listed below. (Note: This topic area excludes items
addressed by the Takeoff and Landing Performance Assessment Aviation
Rulemaking Committee.)
a. Flight test methods used to determine maximum tailwind and
crosswind capability. For crosswind testing, better define intended
operational use of demonstrated maximum steady and gusting crosswind
performance.
b. Wet runway stopping performance. Recent landing overruns on wet
runways have raised questions regarding current wet runway stopping
performance requirements and methods. Analyses indicate that the
braking coefficient of friction in each case was significantly lower
than expected for a wet runway (i.e., lower than the level specified in
FAA regulations). Consideration should also be given to the scheduling
of landing performance on wet porous friction course and grooved runway
surfaces. Recommendations may include the need for additional data
gathering, analysis, and possible rulemaking.
c. Steep approach landing performance. Current airplane
certification standards are not harmonized among the U.S., Canadian,
Brazilian, and European airworthiness authorities.
d. Guidance material addressing the adverse effects on stall speed
in ground effect.
e. Runway excursion hazard classification. Current safety
assessments are not harmonized among the U.S., Canadian, Brazilian, and
European airworthiness authorities.
3. Handling Characteristics. Guidance material for airworthiness
certification in the following areas:
a. Guidance material for assessing handling qualities. Current
Advisory Circular 25-7, ``Flight Test Guide for Certification of
Transport Category Airplanes,'' provides an FAA Handling Quality Rating
Method that is intended to provide a systematic way of determining
appropriate minimum handling qualities requirements and evaluating
those handling qualities for-conditions affecting an airplane's flying
qualities. The FAA handling quality rating system is not universally
accepted within industry, nor is it accepted by EASA.
b. Guidance for assessing susceptibility to pilot-induced
oscillations/airplane-pilot coupling (PIO/APC). Guidance provided in
Advisory Circular 25-7C for evaluating PIO/APC is also not well
accepted by airplane manufacturers, is not harmonized with EASA, and
has been superseded to some extent in recent certification programs.
Modified guidance is needed to both simplify and standardize the
methods for evaluating an airplane's susceptibility to PIO/APC.
Schedule
The recommendation report must be submitted to the FAA for review
and acceptance no later than 3 years from the publication date of this
tasking. The FAA expects to publish additional ARAC taskings for
follow-on phases to develop other topic areas which were lower in
priority.
Working Group Activity
The FTHWG must comply with the procedures adopted by ARAC. As part
of the procedures, the working group must:
1. Conduct a review and analysis of the assigned task and any other
related materials or documents.
2. Draft and submit a work plan for completion of the task,
including the rationale supporting such a plan, for consideration by
the Transport Airplane and Engine (TAE) Subcommittee.
3. Provide a status report at each TAE Subcommittee meeting.
[[Page 20297]]
4. Draft and submit the recommendation report based on the review
and analysis of the assigned tasks.
5. Present the recommendation report at the TAE Subcommittee
meeting.
Participation in the Working Group
The existing FTHGW is comprised of technical experts having an
interest in the assigned task. A working group member need not be a
representative or a member of the full committee. In accordance with
the June 18, 2010, memorandum entitled ``Lobbyists on Agency Boards and
Commissions,'' members are not federally registered lobbyists, who are
subject to the registration and reporting requirements of the Lobbying
Disclosure Act of 1995 (LDA) as amended, 2 U.S.C. 1603, 1604, and 1605,
at the time of appointment or reappointment to an advisory committee,
and has not served in such a role for three consecutive quarters prior
to appointment. (For further information see the Office of Management
and Budget final guidance on appointment of lobbyists to federal boards
and commissions (76 FR 61756, October 5, 2011).
All existing FTHWG members who wish to participate in this task
must actively participate by attending all meetings, and providing
written comments when requested to do so. Each member must devote the
resources necessary to support the working group in meeting any
assigned deadlines. Each member must keep their management chain, and
those they may represent, advised of working group activities and
decisions to ensure the proposed technical solutions do not conflict
with their sponsoring organization's position when the subject is
presented to ARAC for approval. Once the FTHWG has begun deliberations,
members will not be added or substituted without the approval of the
FAA and the Working Group Chair.
The Secretary of Transportation determined the formation and use of
ARAC is necessary and in the public interest in connection with the
performance of duties imposed on the FAA by law.
ARAC meetings are open to the public. However, meetings of the
FTHWG are not open to the public, except to the extent individuals with
an interest and expertise are selected to participate. The FAA will
make no public announcement of FTHWG meetings.
Issued in Washington, DC, on April 8, 2014.
Lirio Liu,
Designated Federal Officer, Aviation Rulemaking Advisory Committee.
[FR Doc. 2014-08139 Filed 4-10-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P