Occupational Safety and Health Investigations of Places of Employment, 19848-19849 [2014-07987]

Download as PDF 19848 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 69 / Thursday, April 10, 2014 / Proposed Rules PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES 1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows: ■ Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. § 39.13 [Amended] 2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness directive (AD): ■ Airbus: Docket No. FAA–2014–0193; Directorate Identifier 2013–NM–234–AD. (a) Comments Due Date We must receive comments by May 27, 2014. (b) Affected ADs None. (c) Applicability This AD applies to Airbus Model A318– 111, –112, –121, and –122 airplanes; Model A319–111, –112, –113, –114, –115, –131, –132, and –133 airplanes; Model A320–111, –211, –212, –214, –231, –232, and –233 airplanes; and Model A321–111, –112, –131, –211, –212, –213, –231, and –232 airplanes; certificated in any category; all manufacturer serial numbers on which Airbus modification 21202 has been embodied in production, except those on which modification 152569 has been embodied in production. (d) Subject Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 53, Fuselage. (e) Reason This AD was prompted by a report of a crack found in the side box beam flange of the fuselage at the frame (FR) 43 level during a fatigue test campaign. We are issuing this AD to prevent cracking in the side box beam flange of the fuselage, which could affect the structural integrity of the airplane. ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS-1 (f) Compliance Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified, unless already done. (g) Inspection At the time specified in paragraph (g)(1) or (g)(2) of this AD, whichever occurs later: Do a rototest inspection for cracking of the beam flange of the stiffener 15 side box on the leftand right-hand sides in the FR43 area, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus Service Bulletin A320– 53–1258, dated October 18, 2012. Repeat the inspection thereafter at intervals not to exceed 7,500 flight cycles or 15, 000 flight hours, whichever occurs first. (1) Before exceeding 24,000 flight cycles or 48,000 flight hours, whichever occurs first since the airplane’s first flight. (2) Within 3,000 flight cycles or 6,000 flight hours, whichever occurs first after the effective date of this AD. (h) Corrective Action If any crack is found during any inspection required by paragraph (g) of this AD: Before VerDate Mar<15>2010 15:10 Apr 09, 2014 Jkt 232001 further flight, repair using a method approved by the Manager, International Branch, ANM–116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA; or European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) (or its delegated agent, or the Design Approval Holder (DAH) with EASA design organization approval). For a repair method to be approved, the repair approval must specifically refer to this AD. (i) Modification Before exceeding 48,000 flight cycles or 96,000 flight hours, whichever occurs first since the airplane’s first flight: Modify the fittings on the left- and right-hand sides of the torsion box, including doing all applicable related investigative and corrective actions, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus Service Bulletin A320–53–1251, Revision 01, dated October 18, 2013; except where Airbus Service Bulletin A320–53–1251, Revision 01, dated October 18, 2013, specifies to contact Airbus for repair, before further flight, repair using a method approved by the Manager, International Branch, ANM–116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA; or European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) (or its delegated agent, or the Design Approval Holder (DAH) with EASA design organization approval). For a repair method to be approved, the repair approval must specifically refer to this AD. (j) Terminating Action Modification of the airplane as required by paragraph (i) of this AD constitutes terminating action for the repetitive inspections required by paragraph (g) of this AD. (k) Credit for Previous Actions This paragraph provides credit for actions required by paragraph (i) of this AD, if those actions were performed before the effective date of this AD using Airbus Service Bulletin A320–53–1251, November 16, 2012, which is not incorporated by reference in this AD. (l) Other FAA AD Provisions The following provisions also apply to this AD: (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager, International Branch, ANM–116, FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your principal inspector or local Flight Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending information directly to the International Branch, send it to ATTN: Sanjay Ralhan, Aerospace Engineer, International Branch, ANM 116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057–3356; telephone (425) 227 1405; fax (425) 227– 1149. Information may be emailed to: 9ANM-116-AMOC-REQUESTS@faa.gov. Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager of the local flight standards district office/ certificate holding district office. The AMOC approval letter must specifically reference this AD. PO 00000 Frm 00011 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 (2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain corrective actions from a manufacturer, use these actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered FAA-approved if they were approved by the State of Design Authority (or its delegated agent, or the DAH with a State of Design Authority’s design organization approval, as applicable). For a repair method to be approved, the repair approval must specifically refer to this AD. You are required to ensure the product is airworthy before it is returned to service. (m) Related Information (1) Refer to Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information (MCAI) EASA Airworthiness Directive 2013–0261, dated October 28, 2013, for related information. This MCAI may be found in the AD docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating it in Docket No. FAA–2014–0193. (2) For service information identified in this AD, contact Airbus, Airworthiness Office—EAS, 1 Rond Point Maurice Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex, France; telephone +33 5 61 93 36 96; fax +33 5 61 93 44 51; email account.airworth-eas@airbus.com; Internet https://www.airbus.com. You may view this service information at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call 425–227–1221. Issued in Renton, Washington, on April 1, 2014. Michael Kaszycki, Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service. [FR Doc. 2014–08071 Filed 4–9–14; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910–13–P DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES 42 CFR Part 85a [Docket No. CDC–2014–0001; NIOSH–271] RIN 0920–AA51 Occupational Safety and Health Investigations of Places of Employment Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, HHS. ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking; withdrawal. AGENCY: The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) in the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) within the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) is withdrawing a previously published notice of proposed rulemaking that solicited public comment on minor technical amendments to regulatory text. DATES: The notice of proposed rulemaking published at 79 FR 2809, SUMMARY: E:\FR\FM\10APP1.SGM 10APP1 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 69 / Thursday, April 10, 2014 / Proposed Rules January 16, 2014, is withdrawn, effective immediately. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Teresa Schnorr Ph.D., Director NIOSH Division of Surveillance, Hazard Evaluations and Field Studies (DSHEFS); 4676 Columbia Parkway, Cincinnati, OH 45226; 513–841–4428 (this is not a toll-free number). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On January 16, 2014, HHS published a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to make minor technical amendments to the regulatory text in 42 CFR Part 85a (79 FR 2809). On the same date, HHS simultaneously published a companion direct final rule (DFR) that offered identical updates because the agency believed that the revisions were noncontroversial and unlikely to generate significant adverse comment (79 FR 2789). In the NPRM preamble, HHS stated that if no significant adverse comments were received by March 17, 2014, the NPRM would be withdrawn and the effective date of the final rule would be confirmed within 30 days of the conclusion of the comment period. HHS received one public comment that was not a significant adverse comment, but rather was in support of the companion NPRM. Because HHS did not receive any significant adverse comments to the NPRM within the specified comment period, we hereby withdraw this NPRM from rulemaking. Dated: April 3, 2014. Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary. [FR Doc. 2014–07987 Filed 4–9–14; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4163–18–P FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION 47 CFR Part 76 [MB Docket No. 10–71; FCC 14–29] Network Non-Duplication and Syndicated Exclusivity Rules Federal Communications Commission. ACTION: Proposed rule. AGENCY: In this document, the Commission seeks comment on whether to eliminate or modify the network nonduplication and syndicated exclusivity rules in light of changes in the video marketplace in the more than 40 years since these rules were adopted. The Commission seeks comment on whether the exclusivity rules are still needed to protect broadcasters’ ability to compete in the video marketplace and to ensure that program suppliers have sufficient ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS-1 SUMMARY: VerDate Mar<15>2010 15:10 Apr 09, 2014 Jkt 232001 incentives to develop new and diverse programming and on the impact of eliminating of the exclusivity rules. DATES: Comments for this proceeding are due on or before May 12, 2014; reply comments are due on or before June 9, 2014. ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by MB Docket No. 10–71, by any of the following methods: • Federal Communications Commission’s Web site: https:// fjallfoss.fcc.gov/ecfs2/. Follow the instructions for submitting comments. • Mail: Filings can be sent by hand or messenger delivery, by commercial overnight courier, or by first-class or overnight U.S. Postal Service mail (although the Commission continues to experience delays in receiving U.S. Postal Service mail). All filings must be addressed to the Commission’s Secretary, Office of the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission. • People With Disabilities: Contact the FCC to request reasonable accommodations (accessible format documents, sign language interpreters, CART, etc.) by email: FCC504@fcc.gov or phone: (202) 418–0530 or TTY: (202) 418–0432. For detailed instructions for submitting comments and additional information on the rulemaking process, see the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of this document. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For additional information, contact Kathy Berthot, Kathy.Berthot@fcc.gov, of the Media Bureau, Policy Division, (202) 418–7454. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a summary of the Commission’s Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, FCC 14–29, adopted on March 31, 2014 and released on March 31, 2014. The full text is available for public inspection and copying during regular business hours in the FCC Reference Center, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street SW., CY–A257, Washington, DC 20554. This document will also be available via ECFS (https:// www.fcc.gov/cgb/ecfs/). Documents will be available electronically in ASCII, Word 97, and/or Adobe Acrobat. The complete text may be purchased from the Commission’s copy contractor, 445 12th Street SW., Room CY–B402, Washington, DC 20554. To request this document in accessible formats (computer diskettes, large print, audio recording, and Braille), send an email to fcc504@fcc.gov or call the Commission’s Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau at (202) 418–0530 (voice), (202) 418–0432 (TTY). PO 00000 Frm 00012 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 19849 This document contains no proposed information collection requirements. SUMMARY: I. Introduction 1. We are issuing this FNPRM to solicit additional comment on whether we should eliminate or modify our network non-duplication and syndicated exclusivity rules. We received numerous comments on this issue in response to the NPRM. However, the record developed in this proceeding to date is not sufficient for us to yet make a determination whether the exclusivity rules are still needed in today’s competitive video marketplace or to assess the potential impact on affected parties of eliminating these rules. Given the complex issues involved, we believe it is necessary and appropriate to undertake a more comprehensive review of the exclusivity rules and to compile a more complete record. II. Background 2. A broadcaster may carry network and syndicated programming on its local television station(s) only with the permission of the networks or syndicators that own or hold the rights to that programming, as reflected in network/affiliate agreements or syndication agreements. In addition, the ability of broadcasters to grant retransmission consent for MVPD carriage may be constrained by the network/affiliate agreement or by the syndication agreement because such agreements generally limit the geographical area in which the station holds exclusive rights to network or syndicated programming. The Commission’s network non-duplication and syndicated exclusivity rules are designed to serve as a means of enforcing contractual exclusivity agreements entered into between broadcasters, which purchase the distribution rights to programming, and networks and syndicators, which supply the programming. Thus, the network non-duplication and syndicated exclusivity rules require that the broadcaster have contractual exclusivity rights and provide proper notice to the relevant MVPD, requesting that an MVPD delete duplicative network or syndicated programming. The rules may be invoked by stations that elect retransmission consent in their local markets, even if they are not actually carried by the MVPD, to prevent an MVPD from carrying programming of a distant station that duplicates local broadcast station programming. By requiring MVPDs to delete duplicative network or syndicated programming E:\FR\FM\10APP1.SGM 10APP1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 69 (Thursday, April 10, 2014)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 19848-19849]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-07987]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

42 CFR Part 85a

[Docket No. CDC-2014-0001; NIOSH-271]
RIN 0920-AA51


Occupational Safety and Health Investigations of Places of 
Employment

AGENCY: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, HHS.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking; withdrawal.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health 
(NIOSH) in the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) within 
the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) is withdrawing a 
previously published notice of proposed rulemaking that solicited 
public comment on minor technical amendments to regulatory text.

DATES: The notice of proposed rulemaking published at 79 FR 2809,

[[Page 19849]]

January 16, 2014, is withdrawn, effective immediately.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Teresa Schnorr Ph.D., Director NIOSH 
Division of Surveillance, Hazard Evaluations and Field Studies 
(DSHEFS); 4676 Columbia Parkway, Cincinnati, OH 45226; 513-841-4428 
(this is not a toll-free number).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On January 16, 2014, HHS published a notice 
of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to make minor technical amendments to the 
regulatory text in 42 CFR Part 85a (79 FR 2809). On the same date, HHS 
simultaneously published a companion direct final rule (DFR) that 
offered identical updates because the agency believed that the 
revisions were non-controversial and unlikely to generate significant 
adverse comment (79 FR 2789). In the NPRM preamble, HHS stated that if 
no significant adverse comments were received by March 17, 2014, the 
NPRM would be withdrawn and the effective date of the final rule would 
be confirmed within 30 days of the conclusion of the comment period. 
HHS received one public comment that was not a significant adverse 
comment, but rather was in support of the companion NPRM. Because HHS 
did not receive any significant adverse comments to the NPRM within the 
specified comment period, we hereby withdraw this NPRM from rulemaking.

    Dated: April 3, 2014.
Kathleen Sebelius,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-07987 Filed 4-9-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.