Monomoy National Wildlife Refuge, Chatham, MA; Draft Comprehensive Conservation Plan and Environmental Impact Statement, 19920-19921 [2014-07531]
Download as PDF
19920
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 69 / Thursday, April 10, 2014 / Notices
Place: National Institutes of Health,
Building 31, Conference Room 10, 31 Center
Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892.
Open: 10:15 a.m. to 4:00 p.m.
Agenda: A report from the Institute
Director and other staff.
Place: National Institutes of Health,
Building 31, Conference Room 10, 31 Center
Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892.
Contact Person: Martin H. Goldrosen,
Ph.D., Director, Division of Extramural
Activities, National Center for
Complementary and Alternative Medicine,
NIH, 6707 Democracy Blvd., Ste. 401,
Bethesda, MD 20892–5475, (301) 594–2014,
goldrosm@mail.nih.gov.
Any interested person may file written
comments with the committee by forwarding
the statement to the Contact Person listed on
this notice. The statement should include the
name, address, telephone number and when
applicable, the business or professional
affiliation of the interested person.
In the interest of security, NIH has
instituted stringent procedures for entrance
onto the NIH campus. All visitor vehicles,
including taxicabs, hotel, and airport shuttles
will be inspected before being allowed on
campus. Visitors will be asked to show one
form of identification (for example, a
government-issued photo ID, driver’s license,
or passport) and to state the purpose of their
visit.
Information is also available on the
Institute’s/Center’s home page:
nccam.nih.gov/about/naccam/, where an
agenda and any additional information for
the meeting will be posted when available.
(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance
Program Nos. 93.213, Research and Training
in Complementary and Alternative Medicine,
National Institutes of Health, HHS).
Dated: April 4, 2014.
Michelle Trout,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory
Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2014–07970 Filed 4–9–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS–R5–R–2013–N265; BAC–4311–K9]
Monomoy National Wildlife Refuge,
Chatham, MA; Draft Comprehensive
Conservation Plan and Environmental
Impact Statement
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability; request
for comments.
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
AGENCY:
We, the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (Service), announce the
availability of a draft comprehensive
conservation plan (CCP) and
environmental impact statement (EIS)
for Monomoy National Wildlife Refuge
(NWR, refuge) for public review and
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:14 Apr 09, 2014
Jkt 232001
comment. In this draft CCP/EIS, we
describe how we propose to manage the
refuge for the next 15 years.
DATES: To ensure consideration, we
must receive your written comments by
June 9, 2014. We will hold public
meetings during a 60-day public
comment period. In addition, we will
use special mailings, newspaper
articles, internet postings, and other
media announcements to inform people
of opportunities for input, including
details on when and where public
meetings will occur.
ADDRESSES: Send your comments or
requests for more information by any
one of the following methods:
• Email: northeastplanning@fws.gov.
Include ‘‘Monomoy NWR Draft CCP/
EIS’’ in the subject line of the message.
• Fax: Attention: Libby Herland,
Project Leader, 978–443–2898.
• U.S. Mail: Attention: Libby
Herland, Project Leader, Eastern
Massachusetts National Wildlife Refuge
Complex, 73 Weir Hill Road, Sudbury,
MA 01776.
• In-Person Drop Off: You may drop
off comments during regular business
hours at the above address.
You will find the draft CCP/EIS, as
well as information about the planning
process and a summary of the CCP, on
the planning Web site: https://
www.fws.gov/refuge/monomoy/what_
we_do/conservation.html.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Libby Herland, 978–443–4661, x 11.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Introduction
With this notice, we continue the CCP
process for Monomoy NWR, which
officially began on February 24, 1999,
when we published a Federal Register
notice (64 FR 9166) announcing our
intent to prepare a CCP. The notice
indicated that one draft CCP/EIS would
be written for all eight refuges in the
Eastern Massachusetts NWR Complex
(refuge complex), of which Monomoy
NWR is a part. As our work got under
way to develop one CCP/EIS for eight
refuges, we recognized that each had
distinct issues and management
concerns, and it became apparent that
combining them all into one plan would
prove too challenging. Thus, in two
separate Federal Register notices—one
published on February 15, 2001 (66 FR
10506), and a second one published on
December 13, 2004 (69 FR 72210)—we
explained our intent to reorganize our
CCP planning effort for the eight
refuges, including Monomoy NWR. For
more information about the initial steps
of the planning process and the history
PO 00000
Frm 00056
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
of this refuge, see the December 13,
2004, notice.
Background
The CCP Process
The National Wildlife Refuge System
Administration Act of 1966, as amended
by the National Wildlife Refuge System
Improvement Act of 1997 (16 U.S.C.
668dd–668ee) (Administration Act),
requires us to develop a CCP for each
national wildlife refuge. The purpose in
developing a CCP is to provide refuge
managers with a 15-year strategy for
achieving refuge purposes and
contributing toward the mission of the
National Wildlife Refuge System
(NWRS), consistent with sound
principles of fish and wildlife
management, conservation, legal
mandates, and Service policies. In
addition to outlining broad management
direction on conserving wildlife and
their habitats, CCPs identify wildlifedependent recreational opportunities
available to the public, including
opportunities for hunting, fishing,
wildlife observation and photography,
and environmental education and
interpretation. We will review and
update the CCP at least every 15 years
in accordance with the Administration
Act.
Each unit of the NWRS was
established for specific purposes. We
use these purposes as the foundation for
developing and prioritizing the
management goals and objectives for
each refuge consistent with the NWRS
mission, and to determine how the
public can use each refuge. The
planning process is a way for us and the
public to evaluate management goals
and objectives that will ensure the best
possible approach to wildlife, plant, and
habitat conservation, while providing
for wildlife-dependent recreational
opportunities that are compatible with
each refuge’s establishing purposes and
the mission of the NWRS.
CCP Alternatives, Including Selected
Alternative
The draft CCP/EIS, which includes
detailed information about the planning
process, refuge resources, management
issues, and management alternatives
considered and proposed, may be found
on our Web site at https://www.fws.gov/
refuge/monomoy/what_we_do/
conservation.html. There are three
refuge management alternatives
considered in the draft CCP/EIS; the
Service’s preferred alternative is
detailed in the draft plan as alternative
B. The alternatives analyzed in detail
include:
E:\FR\FM\10APN1.SGM
10APN1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 69 / Thursday, April 10, 2014 / Notices
19921
Alternative A: Current Management (No
Action)
quality educational and interpretive
programs.
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
This alternative reflects current
management, including activities
previously undertaken, or already
planned or approved, and is the
baseline for comparing the other two
alternatives. In addition to actions
identified as common to all, under
alternative A, there would be little or no
change in our current refuge programs at
Monomoy NWR. We would initiate few,
if any, new wildlife population, habitat,
or ecosystem management activities. No
new public recreational opportunities
would be undertaken, and there would
be no enhancements to existing
programs and opportunities. The
Monomoy Wilderness would continue
to be managed to protect wilderness
character. The refuge would continue its
current operations and maintenance
activities within its current staffing and
funding levels.
Alternative C: Natural Processes
[Investigation No. 731–TA–991 (Second
Review)]
sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Alternative B: Enhanced Management of
Habitat and Public Uses (ServicePreferred Alternative)
Alternative B, in comparison to
alternative A, represents an extension
and progression of all areas of refuge
management. Under alternative B, new
biological program activities would be
initiated. Special emphasis would be
placed on obtaining baseline data to
increase our knowledge of wildlife
populations and habitats in this
dynamic coastal environment, enhance
our ability to evaluate those resources in
a regional context, and anticipate the
effects of climate change. The new
information would be used to develop
the detailed step-down plans proposed
under this alternative. Wildlife and
habitat surveys and inventories would
be prioritized to provide the data
needed to evaluate the effectiveness of
refuge management, and to adapt
management as warranted, in order to
achieve long-range refuge goals and
objectives.
Under alternative B, new and existing
compatible wildlife-dependent
recreational opportunities would be
provided consistent with refuge
purposes for protecting migratory birds
and wilderness character. Special
emphasis would be placed on providing
enhanced, sustainable, and compatible
opportunities for all six priority
wildlife-dependent recreational uses
defined in the Administration Act.
Staffing would be modestly increased to
accommodate new programs and
activities, and proposed new visitor
contact facilities would provide better
access to information and support
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:14 Apr 09, 2014
Jkt 232001
Alternative C proposes less intensive
management on all refuge lands. It
would be guided by a philosophy of
allowing natural processes and
succession of habitats to progress,
consistent with preserving wilderness
character, and to the extent that it does
not compromise refuge purposes and
goals. Generally, wildlife and habitat
management, and inventories and
monitoring efforts, would be reduced
from those planned under alternative A.
We would manage the refuge visitor
services program with an emphasis on
providing wildlife-dependent recreation
that uses hand tools and non-motorized
equipment, protects naturalness, and
provides solitude or primitive,
unconfined recreation.
Under all alternatives, the boundary
of the refuge would be modified to
include an area on Nauset/South Beach,
approximately 717 acres, that is within
the Cape Cod National Seashore
boundary, but which accreted and
joined the refuge’s South Monomoy
Island. With this addition, the refuge
comprises 8,321 acres. We would
incorporate the Nauset/South Beach
addition into, and manage it consistent
with, the refuge’s existing designated
wilderness area.
Public Involvement
We will give the public an
opportunity to provide input at public
meetings. You can obtain the schedule
from the address or Web site listed in
this notice (see ADDRESSES). You may
also submit comments anytime during
the public comment period.
Public Availability of Comments
Before including your address, phone
number, email address, or other
personal identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
your entire comment—including your
personal identifying information—may
be made publicly available at any time.
While you can ask us in your comment
to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
Dated: March 5, 2014.
Deborah Rocque,
Acting Regional Director, Northeast Region.
[FR Doc. 2014–07531 Filed 4–9–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–55–P
PO 00000
Frm 00057
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Silicon Metal From Russia; Revised
Schedule for the Subject Review
United States International
Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
DATES:
Effective: April 7, 2014.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Elizabeth Haines (202–205–3200), Office
of Investigations, U.S. International
Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20436. Hearingimpaired persons can obtain
information on this matter by contacting
the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202–
205–1810. Persons with mobility
impairments who will need special
assistance in gaining access to the
Commission should contact the Office
of the Secretary at 202–205–2000.
General information concerning the
Commission may also be obtained by
accessing its Internet server (https://
www.usitc.gov). The public record for
this review may be viewed on the
Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS)
at https://edis.usitc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background. On December 11, 2013, the
Commission established a schedule for
the conduct of this review (78 FR 76856,
December 19, 2013). Subsequently,
counsel for the domestic interested
party filed a request to appear at the
hearing or, in the alternative, for
consideration of cancellation of the
hearing. Counsel indicated a willingness
to submit responses to any Commission
questions in lieu of an actual hearing.
No other party filed a timely request to
appear at the hearing. Consequently, the
public hearing in connection with the
review, scheduled to begin at 9:30 a.m.
on April 10, 2014, at the U.S.
International Trade Commission
Building, is cancelled. Parties to the
investigation should respond to any
written questions posed by the
Commission in their post-hearing briefs,
which are due to be filed on April 21,
2014.
For further information concerning
this investigation see the Commission’s
notice cited above and the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure, part 201, subparts A through
E (19 CFR Part 201), and part 207,
subparts A and C (19 CFR Part 207).
Authority: This review is being conducted
under authority of title VII of the Tariff Act
of 1930; this notice is published pursuant to
section 207.62 of the Commission’s rules.
E:\FR\FM\10APN1.SGM
10APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 69 (Thursday, April 10, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 19920-19921]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-07531]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS-R5-R-2013-N265; BAC-4311-K9]
Monomoy National Wildlife Refuge, Chatham, MA; Draft
Comprehensive Conservation Plan and Environmental Impact Statement
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), announce the
availability of a draft comprehensive conservation plan (CCP) and
environmental impact statement (EIS) for Monomoy National Wildlife
Refuge (NWR, refuge) for public review and comment. In this draft CCP/
EIS, we describe how we propose to manage the refuge for the next 15
years.
DATES: To ensure consideration, we must receive your written comments
by June 9, 2014. We will hold public meetings during a 60-day public
comment period. In addition, we will use special mailings, newspaper
articles, internet postings, and other media announcements to inform
people of opportunities for input, including details on when and where
public meetings will occur.
ADDRESSES: Send your comments or requests for more information by any
one of the following methods:
Email: northeastplanning@fws.gov. Include ``Monomoy NWR
Draft CCP/EIS'' in the subject line of the message.
Fax: Attention: Libby Herland, Project Leader, 978-443-
2898.
U.S. Mail: Attention: Libby Herland, Project Leader,
Eastern Massachusetts National Wildlife Refuge Complex, 73 Weir Hill
Road, Sudbury, MA 01776.
In-Person Drop Off: You may drop off comments during
regular business hours at the above address.
You will find the draft CCP/EIS, as well as information about the
planning process and a summary of the CCP, on the planning Web site:
https://www.fws.gov/refuge/monomoy/what_we_do/conservation.html.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Libby Herland, 978-443-4661, x 11.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Introduction
With this notice, we continue the CCP process for Monomoy NWR,
which officially began on February 24, 1999, when we published a
Federal Register notice (64 FR 9166) announcing our intent to prepare a
CCP. The notice indicated that one draft CCP/EIS would be written for
all eight refuges in the Eastern Massachusetts NWR Complex (refuge
complex), of which Monomoy NWR is a part. As our work got under way to
develop one CCP/EIS for eight refuges, we recognized that each had
distinct issues and management concerns, and it became apparent that
combining them all into one plan would prove too challenging. Thus, in
two separate Federal Register notices--one published on February 15,
2001 (66 FR 10506), and a second one published on December 13, 2004 (69
FR 72210)--we explained our intent to reorganize our CCP planning
effort for the eight refuges, including Monomoy NWR. For more
information about the initial steps of the planning process and the
history of this refuge, see the December 13, 2004, notice.
Background
The CCP Process
The National Wildlife Refuge System Administration Act of 1966, as
amended by the National Wildlife Refuge System Improvement Act of 1997
(16 U.S.C. 668dd-668ee) (Administration Act), requires us to develop a
CCP for each national wildlife refuge. The purpose in developing a CCP
is to provide refuge managers with a 15-year strategy for achieving
refuge purposes and contributing toward the mission of the National
Wildlife Refuge System (NWRS), consistent with sound principles of fish
and wildlife management, conservation, legal mandates, and Service
policies. In addition to outlining broad management direction on
conserving wildlife and their habitats, CCPs identify wildlife-
dependent recreational opportunities available to the public, including
opportunities for hunting, fishing, wildlife observation and
photography, and environmental education and interpretation. We will
review and update the CCP at least every 15 years in accordance with
the Administration Act.
Each unit of the NWRS was established for specific purposes. We use
these purposes as the foundation for developing and prioritizing the
management goals and objectives for each refuge consistent with the
NWRS mission, and to determine how the public can use each refuge. The
planning process is a way for us and the public to evaluate management
goals and objectives that will ensure the best possible approach to
wildlife, plant, and habitat conservation, while providing for
wildlife-dependent recreational opportunities that are compatible with
each refuge's establishing purposes and the mission of the NWRS.
CCP Alternatives, Including Selected Alternative
The draft CCP/EIS, which includes detailed information about the
planning process, refuge resources, management issues, and management
alternatives considered and proposed, may be found on our Web site at
https://www.fws.gov/refuge/monomoy/what_we_do/conservation.html. There
are three refuge management alternatives considered in the draft CCP/
EIS; the Service's preferred alternative is detailed in the draft plan
as alternative B. The alternatives analyzed in detail include:
[[Page 19921]]
Alternative A: Current Management (No Action)
This alternative reflects current management, including activities
previously undertaken, or already planned or approved, and is the
baseline for comparing the other two alternatives. In addition to
actions identified as common to all, under alternative A, there would
be little or no change in our current refuge programs at Monomoy NWR.
We would initiate few, if any, new wildlife population, habitat, or
ecosystem management activities. No new public recreational
opportunities would be undertaken, and there would be no enhancements
to existing programs and opportunities. The Monomoy Wilderness would
continue to be managed to protect wilderness character. The refuge
would continue its current operations and maintenance activities within
its current staffing and funding levels.
Alternative B: Enhanced Management of Habitat and Public Uses (Service-
Preferred Alternative)
Alternative B, in comparison to alternative A, represents an
extension and progression of all areas of refuge management. Under
alternative B, new biological program activities would be initiated.
Special emphasis would be placed on obtaining baseline data to increase
our knowledge of wildlife populations and habitats in this dynamic
coastal environment, enhance our ability to evaluate those resources in
a regional context, and anticipate the effects of climate change. The
new information would be used to develop the detailed step-down plans
proposed under this alternative. Wildlife and habitat surveys and
inventories would be prioritized to provide the data needed to evaluate
the effectiveness of refuge management, and to adapt management as
warranted, in order to achieve long-range refuge goals and objectives.
Under alternative B, new and existing compatible wildlife-dependent
recreational opportunities would be provided consistent with refuge
purposes for protecting migratory birds and wilderness character.
Special emphasis would be placed on providing enhanced, sustainable,
and compatible opportunities for all six priority wildlife-dependent
recreational uses defined in the Administration Act. Staffing would be
modestly increased to accommodate new programs and activities, and
proposed new visitor contact facilities would provide better access to
information and support quality educational and interpretive programs.
Alternative C: Natural Processes
Alternative C proposes less intensive management on all refuge
lands. It would be guided by a philosophy of allowing natural processes
and succession of habitats to progress, consistent with preserving
wilderness character, and to the extent that it does not compromise
refuge purposes and goals. Generally, wildlife and habitat management,
and inventories and monitoring efforts, would be reduced from those
planned under alternative A. We would manage the refuge visitor
services program with an emphasis on providing wildlife-dependent
recreation that uses hand tools and non-motorized equipment, protects
naturalness, and provides solitude or primitive, unconfined recreation.
Under all alternatives, the boundary of the refuge would be
modified to include an area on Nauset/South Beach, approximately 717
acres, that is within the Cape Cod National Seashore boundary, but
which accreted and joined the refuge's South Monomoy Island. With this
addition, the refuge comprises 8,321 acres. We would incorporate the
Nauset/South Beach addition into, and manage it consistent with, the
refuge's existing designated wilderness area.
Public Involvement
We will give the public an opportunity to provide input at public
meetings. You can obtain the schedule from the address or Web site
listed in this notice (see ADDRESSES). You may also submit comments
anytime during the public comment period.
Public Availability of Comments
Before including your address, phone number, email address, or
other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be
aware that your entire comment--including your personal identifying
information--may be made publicly available at any time. While you can
ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be
able to do so.
Dated: March 5, 2014.
Deborah Rocque,
Acting Regional Director, Northeast Region.
[FR Doc. 2014-07531 Filed 4-9-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P