Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; Comment Request, 19333-19335 [2014-07795]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 67 / Tuesday, April 8, 2014 / Notices
continuing the success of these
programs. The current Alliant GWACs
for Information Technology services are
among GSA’s most successful
acquisition programs for the federal
government with 50 federal agencies
doing more than $20 billion in business
volume since their inception in 2009.
GSA Alliant and Alliant Small Business
GWACs are used for complex IT
requirements involving data center
consolidation, systems integration,
cloud computing, cyber security, help
desk support, and other IT disciplines.
The Alliant II and Alliant Small
Business II Interact communities will
serve as the one-stop-shop for updates
and information regarding the nextgeneration Alliant GWACs. The scope of
the Alliant GWACs is built on the
foundation of Federal Enterprise
Architecture allowing for in-scope
acquisition of new and emerging
technologies. The GSA GWAC Program
is widely acclaimed for superior
customer service, scope reviews, and
acquisition support.
Dated: April 2, 2014.
Christopher Fornecker,
Director, Center for GWAC Programs, Office
of Strategic Programs, Integrated Technology
Service.
[FR Doc. 2014–07794 Filed 4–7–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820–XX–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Advisory Council on Alzheimer’s
Research, Care, and Services; Meeting
Assistant Secretary for
Planning and Evaluation, HHS.
ACTION: Notice of meeting.
AGENCY:
This notice announces the
public meeting of the Advisory Council
on Alzheimer’s Research, Care, and
Services (Advisory Council). The
Advisory Council on Alzheimer’s
Research, Care, and Services provides
advice on how to prevent or reduce the
burden of Alzheimer’s disease and
related dementias on people with the
disease and their caregivers. During the
April meeting, the Advisory Council
will hear presentations from the three
subcommittees (Research, Clinical Care,
and Long-Term Services and Supports).
The Advisory Council will hear updates
to the 2014 plan. The Advisory Council
will also hear presentations on state and
local plans to address dementia.
DATES: The meeting will be held on
April 29th, 2014 from 9:00 a.m. to 5:00
p.m. EDT.
ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held in
Room 800 in the Hubert H. Humphrey
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:42 Apr 07, 2014
Jkt 232001
Building, 200 Independence Avenue
SW., Washington, DC 20201.
Comments: Time is allocated midmorning on the agenda to hear public
comments. In lieu of oral comments,
formal written comments may be
submitted for the record to Rohini
Khillan, OASPE, 200 Independence
Avenue SW., Room 424E, Washington,
DC 20201. Comments may also be sent
to napa@hhs.gov. Those submitting
written comments should identify
themselves and any relevant
organizational affiliations.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Rohini Khillan (202) 690–5932,
rohini.khillan@hhs.gov. Note: Seating
may be limited. Those wishing to attend
the meeting must send an email to
napa@hhs.gov and put ‘‘April 29
meeting attendance’’ in the Subject line
by Friday, April 18, so that their names
may be put on a list of expected
attendees and forwarded to the security
officers at the Department of Health and
Human Services. Any interested
member of the public who is a non-U.S.
citizen should include this information
at the time of registration to ensure that
the appropriate security procedure to
gain entry to the building is carried out.
Although the meeting is open to the
public, procedures governing security
and the entrance to Federal buildings
may change without notice. If you wish
to make a public comment, you must
note that within your email.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice of
these meetings is given under the
Federal Advisory Committee Act (5
U.S.C. App. 2, section 10(a)(1) and
(a)(2)). Topics of the Meeting: The
Advisory Council will hear
presentations from the three
subcommittees (Research, Clinical Care,
and Long-Term Services and Supports),
which will inform the 2014
recommendations. The Advisory
Council will discuss the G8 Dementia
Summit that was held on December 11,
2013.
Procedure and Agenda: This meeting
is open to the public. Please allow 30
minutes to go through security and walk
to the meeting room. The meeting will
also be webcast at www.hhs.gov/live.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 11225; Section 2(e)(3)
of the National Alzheimer’s Project Act. The
panel is governed by provisions of Public
Law 92–463, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix
2), which sets forth standards for the
formation and use of advisory committees.
Dated: March 24, 2014.
Rima Cohen,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Planning and
Evaluation.
[FR Doc. 2014–07596 Filed 4–7–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
19333
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Agency for Healthcare Research and
Quality
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Proposed Collection;
Comment Request
Agency for Healthcare Research
and Quality, HHS.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
This notice announces the
intention of the Agency for Healthcare
Research and Quality (AHRQ) to request
that the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) approve the proposed
information collection project: ‘‘Taking
Efficiency Interventions in Health
Services Delivery to Scale.’’ In
accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104–
13 (44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)), AHRQ
invites the public to comment on this
proposed information collection.
DATES: Comments on this notice must be
received by June 9, 2014.
ADDRESSES: Written comments should
be submitted to: Doris Lefkowitz,
Reports Clearance Officer, AHRQ, by
email at doris.lefkowitz@ahrq.hhs.gov.
Copies of the proposed collection
plans, data collection instruments, and
specific details on the estimated burden
can be obtained from the AHRQ Reports
Clearance Officer.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Doris Lefkowitz, AHRQ Reports
Clearance Officer, (301) 427–1477, or by
email at doris.lefkowitz@ahrq.hhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
Proposed Project
Taking Efficiency Interventions in
Health Services Delivery to Scale
The primary care workforce is facing
imminent clinician shortages and
increased demand. With the
implementation of the Affordable Care
Act (ACA), Federally Qualified Health
Centers (FQHCs) are expected to play a
major role in addressing the large
numbers of people who become eligible
for health insurance as well as continue
in their role as safety net providers.
Thus, understanding new models of
service delivery and improving
efficiency within FQHCs is of national
policy import. The proposed data
collection supports this goal through
studying outcomes associated with a
‘‘delegate model,’’ which is designed to
improve provider and team efficiency,
and the spread of this model throughout
a large FQHC.
Recent models of practice
transformation have documented the
E:\FR\FM\08APN1.SGM
08APN1
19334
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 67 / Tuesday, April 8, 2014 / Notices
use of an Organized Team Model that
distributes responsibility for patient
care among an interdisciplinary team,
thus allowing physicians to manage a
larger panel size while practicing high
quality care. This delegate model
requires that all team members perform
at the top of their skill level, and that
tasks currently performed by clinicians
are delegated to non-clinician team
members in a safe and effective manner.
Researchers at the University of
California, San Francisco have
estimated that delegation may allow
physicians to increase their panel size
by shifting tasks to non-physician team
members. More specifically, if portions
of preventive and chronic care services
are delegated to non-physicians,
primary care practices can meet
recommended quality and care
guidelines while maintaining panel
sizes with a limited primary care
physician workforce. This study will
examine the real-world implementation
of such a model in order to build
evidence of whether such delegation
can achieve the predicted increases in
panel sizes.
AHRQ is working with John Snow,
Inc. (JSI) and its partner, Penobscot
Community Health Center (PCHC), to
evaluate the effectiveness and spread of
a delegate model in 5 of PCHC’s 15
primary care service sites. The model
will be spread from an initial pilot
physician-medical assistant team to
other clinics, as well as to other teams
within each clinic. PCHC is an FQHC
located in Bangor, Maine that serves
northeastern Maine. Currently, PCHC’s
primary care providers (PCPs, which
include medical doctors, osteopaths,
nurse practitioners, and physician
assistants) each work with a Medical
Assistant (MA). Under the delegate
model, a pair of PCPs will be assigned
an ‘‘administrative’’ MA to enhance
their team. This position will enable
shifting of responsibilities among the
team, with the intent of relieving the
PCPs of administrative tasks and
incorporating new tasks that will
enhance team efficiency. Examples of
tasks that an administrative MA may
take on include standardized
prescription renewals, schedule
management, in-box management,
scribing, pre-visit planning with preappointment laboratory tests, and
identification of patients for ancillary
referrals (e.g., behavioral health and
case management).
This study has the following goals:
(1) To evaluate the spread and
effectiveness of the delegate model in
five of PCHC’s primary care sites;
(2) To evaluate the influence of the
delegate model on provider satisfaction,
team functioning, and patient
satisfaction;
(3) To assess the contextual factors
influencing the above outcomes; and
(4) To disseminate findings.
This study is being conducted by
AHRQ through its contractor, JSI,
pursuant to AHRQ’s statutory authority
to conduct and support research on
healthcare and on systems for the
delivery of such care, including
activities with respect to the quality,
effectiveness, efficiency,
appropriateness and value of healthcare
services and with respect to quality
measurement and improvement. 42
U.S.C. 299a(a)(1) and (2).
Method of Collection
AHRQ seeks approval for the
following data collection activities:
• Team Survey that will be
disseminated to all members of both
delegate and non-delegate primary care
teams to assess job satisfaction and team
functioning in all participating sites at
two points in time.
• Key Informant Interviews (KII)
conducted with staff in each of the
participating sites during two rounds of
site visits, with key informants to
include the Medical Director, Practice
Director, members of primary care teams
implementing the delegate model, and
ancillary staff. A condensed version of
the interview will be used for a
conference call with each participating
site’s Medical Director and Practice
Director as an interim activity between
the two site visits.
The information yielded from this
study is expected to inform a wide cross
section of audiences and stakeholders
about provider efficiency, practice
redesign, team-based care, workforce
strategies, and spread of an innovation.
This study is not intended to make
broad generalizations about the
effectiveness of the delegate model of
care, but rather to build initial evidence
about this promising new model, its
ability to increase panel size in FQHCs,
and provide guidance on how similar
models might be spread and evaluated.
Estimated Annual Respondent Burden
Exhibit 1 shows the estimated
annualized burden for the respondents’
time to participate in this research.
Information will be collected through an
internet-based team survey and inperson and telephone interviews. Note
that some respondents may be doublecounted, so the total number of
respondents may be less than 80. For
example, a respondent may fill out a
survey as well as participate in a phone
interview.
Exhibit 2 shows the estimated
annualized cost burden associated with
the respondents’ time to participate in
this research. The total annual cost
burden is estimated to be $25,151.
EXHIBIT 1—ESTIMATED ANNUALIZED BURDEN HOURS
Team Survey:
—Providers ...............................................................................................
—Other Clinical Staff ................................................................................
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Number of
responses
per
respondent
Number of
respondents
Form name
Total
burden
hours
Hours per
response
21
34
2
2
15/60
15/60
11
17
Total ...................................................................................................
Key Informant Interviews (Site visits):
—Medical Director ....................................................................................
—Practice Director ...................................................................................
—Providers ...............................................................................................
—Other Clinical Staff ................................................................................
55
2
15/60
28
2
2
5
10
2
2
2
2
30/60
30/60
30/60
30/60
2
2
5
10
Total ...................................................................................................
Key Informant Interviews (Phone calls):
—Medical Director ....................................................................................
19
2
30/60
19
3
1
1
3
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:42 Apr 07, 2014
Jkt 232001
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\08APN1.SGM
08APN1
19335
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 67 / Tuesday, April 8, 2014 / Notices
EXHIBIT 1—ESTIMATED ANNUALIZED BURDEN HOURS—Continued
Number of
responses
per
respondent
Number of
respondents
Form name
Total
burden
hours
Hours per
response
—Practice Director ...................................................................................
3
1
1
3
Total ...................................................................................................
6
1
1
6
Total .................................................................................................................
80
na
na
53
EXHIBIT 2—ESTIMATED ANNUALIZED COST BURDEN
Total
burden
hours
Number of
respondents
Form name
Team Survey:
—Providers ...............................................................................................
—Other Clinical Staff ................................................................................
Average
hourly
wage rate*
Total
cost
burden
21
34
11
17
a $62.13
b 14.69
$14,352
8,491
55
28
na
22,843
2
2
5
10
19
2
2
2
2
8
c 92.08
368
189
621
294
1,472
Key Informant Interviews (Phone calls):
—Medical Director ....................................................................................
—Practice Director ...................................................................................
3
3
2
2
d 47.34
552
284
Total ...................................................................................................
6
4
na
836
Total .................................................................................................................
80
na
na
25,151
Total ...................................................................................................
Key Informant Interviews (Site Visit):
—Medical Director ....................................................................................
—Practice Director ...................................................................................
—Providers ...............................................................................................
—Other Clinical Staff ................................................................................
Total ...................................................................................................
d 47.34
a 62.13
b 14.69
na
c 92.08
* National
Compensation Survey: Occupational wages in the United States May 2012, ‘‘U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics.’’
on the average mean wages for three categories of primary care provider ($92.08—MDs; $44.45 PAs; and $43.97—NPs).
on the mean wage of Medical Assistants.
c Based on the mean wages for MDs.
d Based on the mean wages for Medical and Health Services Managers.
e Based on the mean wages for Data Analyst (Computer and Information Analyst).
a Based
b Based
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Request for Comments
In accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act, comments on AHRQ’s
information collection are requested
with regard to any of the following: (a)
Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of AHRQ health care
research and health care information
dissemination functions, including
whether the information will have
practical utility; (b) the accuracy of
AHRQ’s estimate of burden (including
hours and costs) of the proposed
collection(s) of information; (c) ways to
enhance the quality, utility, and clarity
of the information to be collected; and
(d) ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information upon the
respondents, including the use of
automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
Comments submitted in response to
this notice will be summarized and
included in the Agency’s subsequent
request for OMB approval of the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:42 Apr 07, 2014
Jkt 232001
proposed information collection. All
comments will become a matter of
public record.
Dated: March 31, 2014.
Richard Kronick,
AHRQ Director.
[FR Doc. 2014–07795 Filed 4–7–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–90–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Agency for Healthcare Research and
Quality
Meeting for Software Developers on
the Common Formats for Patient
Safety Data Collection and Event
Reporting—Agenda & Registration
Information
In reference to Federal Register, Vol.
79, No. 15, pages 3815–3816, published
on January 23, 2014 (https://
www.federalregister.gov/articles/2014/
01/23/2014-01242/meeting-for-software-
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
developers-on-the-common-formats-forpatient-safety-data-collection-andevent), AHRQ is now providing
additional information on the Software
Developers Meeting—AHRQ Common
Formats meeting agenda and
registration.
As indicated in the previous notice,
the PSO Privacy Protection Center
(PSOPPC) is coordinating the meeting.
On Friday, April 25, 2014, the meeting
will start at 10:00 a.m. with welcome
and updates on data submissions issues.
After a networking lunch, a keynote
presentation will focus on electronic
health record (EHR) technology, patient
safety, and federal regulation. Finally,
the meeting will conclude with
presentations on and discussion of
federal initiatives involving the
Common Formats. Throughout the
meeting there will be interactive
discussion to allow meeting participants
not only to provide input, but also to
respond to the input provided by others.
Meeting information, including the full
E:\FR\FM\08APN1.SGM
08APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 67 (Tuesday, April 8, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 19333-19335]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-07795]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection;
Comment Request
AGENCY: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, HHS.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This notice announces the intention of the Agency for
Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) to request that the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) approve the proposed information collection
project: ``Taking Efficiency Interventions in Health Services Delivery
to Scale.'' In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995,
Public Law 104-13 (44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)), AHRQ invites the public to
comment on this proposed information collection.
DATES: Comments on this notice must be received by June 9, 2014.
ADDRESSES: Written comments should be submitted to: Doris Lefkowitz,
Reports Clearance Officer, AHRQ, by email at
doris.lefkowitz@ahrq.hhs.gov.
Copies of the proposed collection plans, data collection
instruments, and specific details on the estimated burden can be
obtained from the AHRQ Reports Clearance Officer.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Doris Lefkowitz, AHRQ Reports
Clearance Officer, (301) 427-1477, or by email at
doris.lefkowitz@ahrq.hhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Proposed Project
Taking Efficiency Interventions in Health Services Delivery to Scale
The primary care workforce is facing imminent clinician shortages
and increased demand. With the implementation of the Affordable Care
Act (ACA), Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs) are expected to
play a major role in addressing the large numbers of people who become
eligible for health insurance as well as continue in their role as
safety net providers. Thus, understanding new models of service
delivery and improving efficiency within FQHCs is of national policy
import. The proposed data collection supports this goal through
studying outcomes associated with a ``delegate model,'' which is
designed to improve provider and team efficiency, and the spread of
this model throughout a large FQHC.
Recent models of practice transformation have documented the
[[Page 19334]]
use of an Organized Team Model that distributes responsibility for
patient care among an interdisciplinary team, thus allowing physicians
to manage a larger panel size while practicing high quality care. This
delegate model requires that all team members perform at the top of
their skill level, and that tasks currently performed by clinicians are
delegated to non-clinician team members in a safe and effective manner.
Researchers at the University of California, San Francisco have
estimated that delegation may allow physicians to increase their panel
size by shifting tasks to non-physician team members. More
specifically, if portions of preventive and chronic care services are
delegated to non-physicians, primary care practices can meet
recommended quality and care guidelines while maintaining panel sizes
with a limited primary care physician workforce. This study will
examine the real-world implementation of such a model in order to build
evidence of whether such delegation can achieve the predicted increases
in panel sizes.
AHRQ is working with John Snow, Inc. (JSI) and its partner,
Penobscot Community Health Center (PCHC), to evaluate the effectiveness
and spread of a delegate model in 5 of PCHC's 15 primary care service
sites. The model will be spread from an initial pilot physician-medical
assistant team to other clinics, as well as to other teams within each
clinic. PCHC is an FQHC located in Bangor, Maine that serves
northeastern Maine. Currently, PCHC's primary care providers (PCPs,
which include medical doctors, osteopaths, nurse practitioners, and
physician assistants) each work with a Medical Assistant (MA). Under
the delegate model, a pair of PCPs will be assigned an
``administrative'' MA to enhance their team. This position will enable
shifting of responsibilities among the team, with the intent of
relieving the PCPs of administrative tasks and incorporating new tasks
that will enhance team efficiency. Examples of tasks that an
administrative MA may take on include standardized prescription
renewals, schedule management, in-box management, scribing, pre-visit
planning with pre-appointment laboratory tests, and identification of
patients for ancillary referrals (e.g., behavioral health and case
management).
This study has the following goals:
(1) To evaluate the spread and effectiveness of the delegate model
in five of PCHC's primary care sites;
(2) To evaluate the influence of the delegate model on provider
satisfaction, team functioning, and patient satisfaction;
(3) To assess the contextual factors influencing the above
outcomes; and
(4) To disseminate findings.
This study is being conducted by AHRQ through its contractor, JSI,
pursuant to AHRQ's statutory authority to conduct and support research
on healthcare and on systems for the delivery of such care, including
activities with respect to the quality, effectiveness, efficiency,
appropriateness and value of healthcare services and with respect to
quality measurement and improvement. 42 U.S.C. 299a(a)(1) and (2).
Method of Collection
AHRQ seeks approval for the following data collection activities:
Team Survey that will be disseminated to all members of
both delegate and non-delegate primary care teams to assess job
satisfaction and team functioning in all participating sites at two
points in time.
Key Informant Interviews (KII) conducted with staff in
each of the participating sites during two rounds of site visits, with
key informants to include the Medical Director, Practice Director,
members of primary care teams implementing the delegate model, and
ancillary staff. A condensed version of the interview will be used for
a conference call with each participating site's Medical Director and
Practice Director as an interim activity between the two site visits.
The information yielded from this study is expected to inform a
wide cross section of audiences and stakeholders about provider
efficiency, practice redesign, team-based care, workforce strategies,
and spread of an innovation. This study is not intended to make broad
generalizations about the effectiveness of the delegate model of care,
but rather to build initial evidence about this promising new model,
its ability to increase panel size in FQHCs, and provide guidance on
how similar models might be spread and evaluated.
Estimated Annual Respondent Burden
Exhibit 1 shows the estimated annualized burden for the
respondents' time to participate in this research. Information will be
collected through an internet-based team survey and in-person and
telephone interviews. Note that some respondents may be double-counted,
so the total number of respondents may be less than 80. For example, a
respondent may fill out a survey as well as participate in a phone
interview.
Exhibit 2 shows the estimated annualized cost burden associated
with the respondents' time to participate in this research. The total
annual cost burden is estimated to be $25,151.
Exhibit 1--Estimated Annualized Burden Hours
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of
Form name Number of responses per Hours per Total burden
respondents respondent response hours
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Team Survey:
--Providers................................. 21 2 15/60 11
--Other Clinical Staff...................... 34 2 15/60 17
---------------------------------------------------------------
Total................................... 55 2 15/60 28
Key Informant Interviews (Site visits):
--Medical Director.......................... 2 2 30/60 2
--Practice Director......................... 2 2 30/60 2
--Providers................................. 5 2 30/60 5
--Other Clinical Staff...................... 10 2 30/60 10
---------------------------------------------------------------
Total................................... 19 2 30/60 19
Key Informant Interviews (Phone calls):
--Medical Director.......................... 3 1 1 3
[[Page 19335]]
--Practice Director......................... 3 1 1 3
---------------------------------------------------------------
Total................................... 6 1 1 6
===============================================================
Total........................................... 80 na na 53
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Exhibit 2--Estimated Annualized Cost Burden
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Average
Form name Number of Total burden hourly wage Total cost
respondents hours rate* burden
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Team Survey:
--Providers................................. 21 11 \a\ $62.13 $14,352
--Other Clinical Staff...................... 34 17 \b\ 14.69 8,491
---------------------------------------------------------------
Total................................... 55 28 na 22,843
Key Informant Interviews (Site Visit):
--Medical Director.......................... 2 2 \c\ 92.08 368
--Practice Director......................... 2 2 \d\ 47.34 189
--Providers................................. 5 2 \a\ 62.13 621
--Other Clinical Staff...................... 10 2 \b\ 14.69 294
Total................................... 19 8 na 1,472
---------------------------------------------------------------
Key Informant Interviews (Phone calls):
--Medical Director.......................... 3 2 \c\ 92.08 552
--Practice Director......................... 3 2 \d\ 47.34 284
---------------------------------------------------------------
Total................................... 6 4 na 836
===============================================================
Total........................................... 80 na na 25,151
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\*\ National Compensation Survey: Occupational wages in the United States May 2012, ``U.S. Department of Labor,
Bureau of Labor Statistics.''
\a\ Based on the average mean wages for three categories of primary care provider ($92.08--MDs; $44.45 PAs; and
$43.97--NPs).
\b\ Based on the mean wage of Medical Assistants.
\c\ Based on the mean wages for MDs.
\d\ Based on the mean wages for Medical and Health Services Managers.
\e\ Based on the mean wages for Data Analyst (Computer and Information Analyst).
Request for Comments
In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act, comments on AHRQ's
information collection are requested with regard to any of the
following: (a) Whether the proposed collection of information is
necessary for the proper performance of AHRQ health care research and
health care information dissemination functions, including whether the
information will have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of AHRQ's
estimate of burden (including hours and costs) of the proposed
collection(s) of information; (c) ways to enhance the quality, utility,
and clarity of the information to be collected; and (d) ways to
minimize the burden of the collection of information upon the
respondents, including the use of automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
Comments submitted in response to this notice will be summarized
and included in the Agency's subsequent request for OMB approval of the
proposed information collection. All comments will become a matter of
public record.
Dated: March 31, 2014.
Richard Kronick,
AHRQ Director.
[FR Doc. 2014-07795 Filed 4-7-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-90-P