Determination of Regulatory Review Period for Purposes of Patent Extension; MELAFIND SYSTEM, 19101-19102 [2014-07657]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 66 / Monday, April 7, 2014 / Notices
ONC’s Web site, www.healthit.gov/
FDASIA.
Silver Spring, MD 20993–0002, 301–
796–3602.
II. Request for Comments
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Interested persons may submit either
electronic comments regarding this
document to https://www.regulations.gov
or written comments to the Division of
Dockets Management (see ADDRESSES). It
is only necessary to send one set of
comments. Identify comments with the
docket number found in brackets in the
heading of this document. Received
comments may be seen in the Division
of Dockets Management between 9 a.m.
and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, and
will be posted to the docket at https://
www.regulations.gov.
Dated: April 1, 2014.
Leslie Kux,
Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2014–07658 Filed 4–4–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
Docket No. FDA–2012–E–0490]
Determination of Regulatory Review
Period for Purposes of Patent
Extension; MELAFIND SYSTEM
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Notice.
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) has determined
the regulatory review period for
MELAFIND SYSTEM and is publishing
this notice of that determination as
required by law. FDA has made the
determination because of the
submission of an application to the
Director of Patents and Trademarks,
Department of Commerce, for the
extension of a patent which claims that
medical device.
ADDRESSES: Submit electronic
comments to https://
www.regulations.gov. Submit written
petitions (two copies are required) and
written comments to the Division of
Dockets Management (HFA–305), Food
and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers
Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
Submit petitions electronically to
https://www.regulations.gov at Docket
No. FDA–2013–S–0610.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Beverly Friedman, Office of
Management, Center for Drug
Evaluation and Research, Food and
Drug Administration, 10903 New
Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 51, Rm. 6257,
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:49 Apr 04, 2014
Jkt 232001
The Drug
Price Competition and Patent Term
Restoration Act of 1984 (Pub. L. 98–417)
and the Generic Animal Drug and Patent
Term Restoration Act (Pub. L. 100–670)
generally provide that a patent may be
extended for a period of up to 5 years
so long as the patented item (human
drug product, animal drug product,
medical device, food additive, or color
additive) was subject to regulatory
review by FDA before the item was
marketed. Under these acts, a product’s
regulatory review period forms the basis
for determining the amount of extension
an applicant may receive.
A regulatory review period consists of
two periods of time: A testing phase and
an approval phase. For medical devices,
the testing phase begins with a clinical
investigation of the device and runs
until the approval phase begins. The
approval phase starts with the initial
submission of an application to market
the device and continues until
permission to market the device is
granted. Although only a portion of a
regulatory review period may count
toward the actual amount of extension
that the Director of Patents and
Trademarks may award (half the testing
phase must be subtracted as well as any
time that may have occurred before the
patent was issued), FDA’s determination
of the length of a regulatory review
period for a medical device will include
all of the testing phase and approval
phase as specified in 35 U.S.C.
156(g)(3)(B).
FDA has approved for marketing the
medical device MELAFIND SYSTEM.
MELAFIND SYSTEM is indicated for
use on clinically atypical cutaneous
pigmented lesions with one or more
clinical or historical characteristics of
melanoma, excluding those with a
clinical diagnosis of melanoma or likely
melanoma. Subsequent to this approval,
the Patent and Trademark Office
received a patent term restoration
application for MELAFIND SYSTEM
(U.S. Patent No. 6,208,749) from MELA
Sciences Inc., and the Patent and
Trademark Office requested FDA’s
assistance in determining this patent’s
eligibility for patent term restoration. In
a letter dated August 10, 2012, FDA
advised the Patent and Trademark
Office that this medical device had
undergone a regulatory review period
and that the approval of MELAFIND
SYSTEM represented the first permitted
commercial marketing or use of the
product. Thereafter, the Patent and
Trademark Office requested that the
PO 00000
Frm 00057
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
19101
FDA determine the product’s regulatory
review period.
FDA has determined that the
applicable regulatory review period for
MELAFIND SYSTEM is 3,837 days. Of
this time, 2,961 days occurred during
the testing phase of the regulatory
review period, while 876 days occurred
during the approval phase. These
periods of time were derived from the
following dates:
1. The date an exemption under
section 520(g) of the Federal Food, Drug,
and Cosmetic Act (the FD&C Act) (21
U.S.C. 360j(g)) involving this device
became effective, or, if an
investigational device exemption (IDE)
was not required, but institutional
review board (IRB) approval is required,
under section 520(g)(3) of the FD&C Act,
the IRB approval date: May 2, 2001. The
applicant claims there was no IDE
submitted under section 520(g) of the
FD&C Act and claims the date that IRBrequired approval was effective was
May 2, 2001. FDA concurs that no IDE
was submitted and that the IRB
approval action was enacted May 2,
2001, according to the certificate of
approval substantiating IRB approval
date provided in the application for
patent term extension.
2. The date an application was
initially submitted with respect to the
device under section 515 of the the
FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 360e): June 9,
2009. FDA has verified the applicant’s
claim that the premarket approval
application (PMA) for MELAFIND
SYSTEM (PMA P090012) was initially
submitted June 9, 2009.
3. The date the application was
approved: November 1, 2011. FDA has
verified the applicant’s claim that PMA
P090012 was approved on November 1,
2011.
This determination of the regulatory
review period establishes the maximum
potential length of a patent extension.
However, the U.S. Patent and
Trademark Office applies several
statutory limitations in its calculations
of the actual period for patent extension.
In its application for patent extension,
this applicant seeks 2,355 days of patent
term extension.
Anyone with knowledge that any of
the dates as published are incorrect may
submit to the Division of Dockets
Management (see ADDRESSES) either
electronic or written comments and ask
for a redetermination by June 6, 2014.
Furthermore, any interested person may
petition FDA for a determination
regarding whether the applicant for
extension acted with due diligence
during the regulatory review period by
October 6, 2014. To meet its burden, the
petition must contain sufficient facts to
E:\FR\FM\07APN1.SGM
07APN1
19102
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 66 / Monday, April 7, 2014 / Notices
merit an FDA investigation. (See H.
Rept. 857, part 1, 98th Cong., 2d sess.,
pp. 41–42, 1984.) Petitions should be in
the format specified in 21 CFR 10.30.
Interested persons may submit to the
Division of Dockets Management (see
ADDRESSES) electronic or written
comments and written or electronic
petitions. It is only necessary to send
one set of comments. Identify comments
with the docket number found in
brackets in the heading of this
document. If you submit a written
petition, two copies are required. A
petition submitted electronically must
be submitted to https://
www.regulations.gov, Docket No. FDA–
2013–S–0610. Comments and petitions
that have not been made publicly
available on https://www.regulations.gov
may be viewed in the Division of
Dockets Management between 9 a.m.
and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.
Dated: March 27, 2014.
Leslie Kux,
Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2014–07657 Filed 4–4–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA–2013–P–1199]
Determination That SKELAXIN
(Metaxalone) Tablets, 400 Milligrams,
Was Not Withdrawn From Sale for
Reasons of Safety or Effectiveness
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Notice.
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA or the Agency) has
determined that SKELAXIN
(metaxalone) Tablets, 400 milligrams
(mg), was not withdrawn from sale for
reasons of safety or effectiveness. This
determination will allow FDA to
approve abbreviated new drug
applications (ANDAs) for SKELAXIN
(metaxalone) Tablets, 400 mg, if all
other legal and regulatory requirements
are met.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Na’Im R. Moses, Center for Drug
Evaluation and Research, Food and
Drug Administration, 10903 New
Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 51, Rm. 6226,
Silver Spring, MD 20993–0002, 240–
402–3990.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In 1984,
Congress enacted the Drug Price
Competition and Patent Term
Restoration Act of 1984 (Pub. L. 98–417)
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:49 Apr 04, 2014
Jkt 232001
(the 1984 amendments), which
authorized the approval of duplicate
versions of drug products under an
ANDA procedure. ANDA applicants
must, with certain exceptions, show that
the drug for which they are seeking
approval contains the same active
ingredient in the same strength and
dosage form as the ‘‘listed drug,’’ which
is a version of the drug that was
previously approved. ANDA applicants
do not have to repeat the extensive
clinical testing otherwise necessary to
gain approval of a new drug application
(NDA).
The 1984 amendments include what
is now section 505(j)(7) of the Federal
Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C.
355(j)(7)), which requires FDA to
publish a list of all approved drugs.
FDA publishes this list as part of the
‘‘Approved Drug Products With
Therapeutic Equivalence Evaluations,’’
which is known generally as the
‘‘Orange Book.’’ Under FDA regulations,
drugs are removed from the list if the
Agency withdraws or suspends
approval of the drug’s NDA or ANDA
for reasons of safety or effectiveness or
if FDA determines that the listed drug
was withdrawn from sale for reasons of
safety or effectiveness (21 CFR 314.162).
A person may petition the Agency to
determine, or the Agency may
determine on its own initiative, whether
a listed drug was withdrawn from sale
for reasons of safety or effectiveness.
This determination may be made at any
time after the drug has been withdrawn
from sale, but must be made prior to
approving an ANDA that refers to the
listed drug (§ 314.161 (21 CFR 314.161)).
FDA may not approve an ANDA that
does not refer to a listed drug.
SKELAXIN (metaxalone) Tablets, 400
mg, is the subject of NDA 13–217, held
by King Pharmaceuticals, Inc., and
initially approved on August 13, 1962.
SKELAXIN (metaxalone) is indicated as
an adjunct to rest, physical therapy, and
other measures for the relief of
discomforts associated with acute,
painful musculoskeletal conditions.
The 400-mg dosage strength is
currently listed in the ‘‘Discontinued
Drug Product List’’ section of the Orange
Book. The applicant continues to
manufacture and distribute an 800-mg
strength tablet of this drug product.
CorePharma, LLC, submitted a citizen
petition dated September 19, 2013
(Docket No. FDA–2013–P–1199), under
21 CFR 10.30, requesting that the
Agency determine whether SKELAXIN
(metaxalone) Tablets, 400 mg, was
withdrawn from sale for reasons of
safety or effectiveness.
After considering the citizen petition
and reviewing Agency records, and
PO 00000
Frm 00058
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
based on the information we have at this
time, FDA has determined under
§ 314.161 that SKELAXIN (metaxalone)
Tablets, 400 mg, was not withdrawn for
reasons of safety or effectiveness. The
petitioner has identified no data or other
information suggesting that SKELAXIN
(metaxalone) Tablets, 400 mg, was
withdrawn for reasons of safety or
effectiveness. We have carefully
reviewed our files for records
concerning the withdrawal of
SKELAXIN (metaxalone) Tablets, 400
mg, from sale. We have also
independently evaluated relevant
literature and data for possible
postmarketing adverse events. We have
reviewed the available evidence and
determined that the product was not
withdrawn from sale for reasons of
safety or effectiveness.
Accordingly, the Agency will
continue to list SKELAXIN (metaxalone)
Tablets, 400 mg, in the ‘‘Discontinued
Drug Product List’’ section of the Orange
Book. The ‘‘Discontinued Drug Product
List’’ delineates, among other items,
drug products that have been
discontinued from marketing for reasons
other than safety or effectiveness.
ANDAs that refer to SKELAXIN
(metaxalone) Tablets, 400 mg, may be
approved by the Agency as long as they
meet all other legal and regulatory
requirements for the approval of
ANDAs. If FDA determines that labeling
for this drug product should be revised
to meet current standards, the Agency
will advise ANDA applicants to submit
such labeling.
Dated: April 1, 2014.
Leslie Kux,
Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2014–07659 Filed 4–4–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
National Institutes of Health
National Institute on Aging; Notice of
Closed Meeting
Pursuant to section 10(d) of the
Federal Advisory Committee Act, as
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is
hereby given of the following meeting.
The meeting will be closed to the
public in accordance with the
provisions set forth in sections
552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C.,
as amended. The grant applications and
the discussions could disclose
confidential trade secrets or commercial
property such as patentable material,
and personal information concerning
individuals associated with the grant
E:\FR\FM\07APN1.SGM
07APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 66 (Monday, April 7, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 19101-19102]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-07657]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
Docket No. FDA-2012-E-0490]
Determination of Regulatory Review Period for Purposes of Patent
Extension; MELAFIND SYSTEM
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has determined the
regulatory review period for MELAFIND SYSTEM and is publishing this
notice of that determination as required by law. FDA has made the
determination because of the submission of an application to the
Director of Patents and Trademarks, Department of Commerce, for the
extension of a patent which claims that medical device.
ADDRESSES: Submit electronic comments to https://www.regulations.gov.
Submit written petitions (two copies are required) and written comments
to the Division of Dockets Management (HFA-305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
Submit petitions electronically to https://www.regulations.gov at Docket
No. FDA-2013-S-0610.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Beverly Friedman, Office of
Management, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug
Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 51, Rm. 6257, Silver
Spring, MD 20993-0002, 301-796-3602.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Drug Price Competition and Patent Term
Restoration Act of 1984 (Pub. L. 98-417) and the Generic Animal Drug
and Patent Term Restoration Act (Pub. L. 100-670) generally provide
that a patent may be extended for a period of up to 5 years so long as
the patented item (human drug product, animal drug product, medical
device, food additive, or color additive) was subject to regulatory
review by FDA before the item was marketed. Under these acts, a
product's regulatory review period forms the basis for determining the
amount of extension an applicant may receive.
A regulatory review period consists of two periods of time: A
testing phase and an approval phase. For medical devices, the testing
phase begins with a clinical investigation of the device and runs until
the approval phase begins. The approval phase starts with the initial
submission of an application to market the device and continues until
permission to market the device is granted. Although only a portion of
a regulatory review period may count toward the actual amount of
extension that the Director of Patents and Trademarks may award (half
the testing phase must be subtracted as well as any time that may have
occurred before the patent was issued), FDA's determination of the
length of a regulatory review period for a medical device will include
all of the testing phase and approval phase as specified in 35 U.S.C.
156(g)(3)(B).
FDA has approved for marketing the medical device MELAFIND SYSTEM.
MELAFIND SYSTEM is indicated for use on clinically atypical cutaneous
pigmented lesions with one or more clinical or historical
characteristics of melanoma, excluding those with a clinical diagnosis
of melanoma or likely melanoma. Subsequent to this approval, the Patent
and Trademark Office received a patent term restoration application for
MELAFIND SYSTEM (U.S. Patent No. 6,208,749) from MELA Sciences Inc.,
and the Patent and Trademark Office requested FDA's assistance in
determining this patent's eligibility for patent term restoration. In a
letter dated August 10, 2012, FDA advised the Patent and Trademark
Office that this medical device had undergone a regulatory review
period and that the approval of MELAFIND SYSTEM represented the first
permitted commercial marketing or use of the product. Thereafter, the
Patent and Trademark Office requested that the FDA determine the
product's regulatory review period.
FDA has determined that the applicable regulatory review period for
MELAFIND SYSTEM is 3,837 days. Of this time, 2,961 days occurred during
the testing phase of the regulatory review period, while 876 days
occurred during the approval phase. These periods of time were derived
from the following dates:
1. The date an exemption under section 520(g) of the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the FD&C Act) (21 U.S.C. 360j(g)) involving
this device became effective, or, if an investigational device
exemption (IDE) was not required, but institutional review board (IRB)
approval is required, under section 520(g)(3) of the FD&C Act, the IRB
approval date: May 2, 2001. The applicant claims there was no IDE
submitted under section 520(g) of the FD&C Act and claims the date that
IRB-required approval was effective was May 2, 2001. FDA concurs that
no IDE was submitted and that the IRB approval action was enacted May
2, 2001, according to the certificate of approval substantiating IRB
approval date provided in the application for patent term extension.
2. The date an application was initially submitted with respect to
the device under section 515 of the the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 360e): June
9, 2009. FDA has verified the applicant's claim that the premarket
approval application (PMA) for MELAFIND SYSTEM (PMA P090012) was
initially submitted June 9, 2009.
3. The date the application was approved: November 1, 2011. FDA has
verified the applicant's claim that PMA P090012 was approved on
November 1, 2011.
This determination of the regulatory review period establishes the
maximum potential length of a patent extension. However, the U.S.
Patent and Trademark Office applies several statutory limitations in
its calculations of the actual period for patent extension. In its
application for patent extension, this applicant seeks 2,355 days of
patent term extension.
Anyone with knowledge that any of the dates as published are
incorrect may submit to the Division of Dockets Management (see
ADDRESSES) either electronic or written comments and ask for a
redetermination by June 6, 2014. Furthermore, any interested person may
petition FDA for a determination regarding whether the applicant for
extension acted with due diligence during the regulatory review period
by October 6, 2014. To meet its burden, the petition must contain
sufficient facts to
[[Page 19102]]
merit an FDA investigation. (See H. Rept. 857, part 1, 98th Cong., 2d
sess., pp. 41-42, 1984.) Petitions should be in the format specified in
21 CFR 10.30.
Interested persons may submit to the Division of Dockets Management
(see ADDRESSES) electronic or written comments and written or
electronic petitions. It is only necessary to send one set of comments.
Identify comments with the docket number found in brackets in the
heading of this document. If you submit a written petition, two copies
are required. A petition submitted electronically must be submitted to
https://www.regulations.gov, Docket No. FDA-2013-S-0610. Comments and
petitions that have not been made publicly available on https://www.regulations.gov may be viewed in the Division of Dockets Management
between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.
Dated: March 27, 2014.
Leslie Kux,
Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2014-07657 Filed 4-4-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-P