Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs): Manufacturing (Import) Exemption for the Defense Logistics Agency (DLA), 18497-18498 [2014-07390]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 63 / Wednesday, April 2, 2014 / Proposed Rules
Order 13132 does not apply to this
action.
In the spirit of Executive Order 13132,
and consistent with EPA policy to
promote communications between EPA
and state and local governments, EPA
specifically solicits comment on this
proposed action from state and local
officials.
F. Executive Order 13175 (Consultation
and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments)
This action does not have tribal
implications, as specified in Executive
Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9,
2000). This rule imposes no regulatory
requirements or costs on any tribal
government. It does not have substantial
direct effects on tribal governments, the
relationship between the Federal
government and Indian tribes, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
government and Indian tribes. Thus,
Executive Order 13175 does not apply
to this action.
G. Executive Order 13045 (Protection of
Children From Environmental Health
and Safety Risks)
This rule is not subject to Executive
Order 13045, entitled ‘‘Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks’’ (62 FR 19885,
April 23, 1997), because it is not
economically significant as defined in
Executive Order 12866 and because the
environmental health or safety risks
addressed by this action do not present
a disproportionate risk to children.
The public is invited to submit
comments or identify peer-reviewed
studies and data that assess effects of
early life exposure.
ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
H. Executive Order 13211 (Actions That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use)
This action is not subject to Executive
Order 13211 (66 FR 28355 (May 22,
2001)), because it is not a significant
regulatory action under Executive Order
12866.
I. National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act of 1995
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (‘‘NTTAA’’), Public Law
104–113, 12(d) (15 U.S.C. 272 note)
directs EPA to use voluntary consensus
standards in its regulatory activities,
unless to do so would be inconsistent
with applicable law or otherwise
impractical. Voluntary consensus
standards are technical standards (e.g.,
materials specifications, test methods,
sampling procedures, and business
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:37 Apr 01, 2014
Jkt 232001
18497
practices) that are developed or adopted
by voluntary consensus standards
bodies. The NTTAA directs EPA to
provide Congress, through OMB,
explanations when the Agency decides
not to use available and applicable
voluntary consensus standards.
This proposed rulemaking does not
involve technical standards. Therefore,
EPA is not considering the use of any
voluntary consensus standards.
Subpart D—Federally Promulgated
Water Quality Standards
J. Executive Order 12898—Federal
Actions To Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and
Low-Income Populations
40 CFR Part 761
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629,
February 16, 1994) establishes federal
executive policy on environmental
justice. Its main provision directs
federal agencies, to the greatest extent
practicable and permitted by law, to
make environmental justice part of their
mission by identifying and addressing,
as appropriate, disproportionately high
and adverse human health or
environmental effects of their programs,
policies, and activities on minority
populations and low-income
populations in the United States.
EPA has determined that this
proposed rule will not have
disproportionately high and adverse
human health or environmental effects
on minority or low-income populations
because: (1) Florida’s WQS apply to
waters across the state, and thus this
action will not disproportionately affect
any one group over another, and (2) EPA
has previously determined, based on the
most current science, that Florida’s
adopted and EPA-approved criteria are
protective of human health and aquatic
life.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 131
Environmental protection, Florida,
Nitrogen and phosphorus pollution,
Nutrients, Water quality standards.
Dated: March 26, 2014.
Gina McCarthy,
Administrator.
For the reasons set out in the
preamble, EPA proposes to amend 40
CFR part 131 as follows:
PART 131—WATER QUALITY
STANDARDS
1. The authority citation for part 131
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
§ 131.43
■
[Removed]
2. Section 131.43 is removed.
[FR Doc. 2014–07387 Filed 4–1–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[EPA–HQ–RCRA–2013–0396; FRL–9909–00–
OSWER]
RIN 2050–AG79
Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs):
Manufacturing (Import) Exemption for
the Defense Logistics Agency (DLA)
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
The U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA or the Agency)
is proposing to take action on a petition
from the United States Defense Logistics
Agency (DLA) to import foreignmanufactured polychlorinated
biphenyls (PCBs). For purposes of the
Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA),
‘‘manufacture’’ is defined to include the
import of chemical substances into the
customs territory of the United States.
With certain exceptions, section 6(e)(3)
of TSCA bans the manufacture,
processing, and distribution in
commerce of PCBs. One of these
exceptions is TSCA section 6(e)(3)(B),
which gives EPA authority to grant
petitions to import PCBs into the
customs territory of the United States
for a period of up to 12 months,
provided EPA can make certain findings
by rule. On April 23, 2013, EPA
received a petition from DLA, a
component of the United States
Department of Defense (DOD), to import
foreign-manufactured PCBs that DOD
currently owns in Japan for disposal in
the United States. EPA is proposing to
grant DLA’s petition as of July 1, 2014.
This proposal to grant the petition, if
finalized, would allow DLA to
manufacture (i.e., import) certain PCBs
for disposal. EPA has granted two
previous exemptions in 2003 and 2007
to DLA for similar petitions to import
PCBs for disposal. Without an
exemption granted by EPA, DLA would
not be allowed to import the PCB waste
to the U.S. for proper disposal. In fact,
if the exemption is not granted, it is very
likely that DLA will not be able to find
any country willing to accept and
properly dispose of the PCB waste.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\02APP1.SGM
02APP1
18498
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 63 / Wednesday, April 2, 2014 / Proposed Rules
Written comments or a request
for an informal hearing (per 40 CFR part
750, subpart B) must be received by May
2, 2014.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–
RCRA–2013–0396, by mail to RCRA
Docket, Mail Code 28221T, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington,
DC 20460. Attention Docket ID No.
EPA–HQ–RCRA–2013–0396. Please
include a total of two copies. Comments
may also be submitted electronically or
through hand delivery/courier by
following the detailed instructions in
the ADDRESSES section of the direct final
rule located in the Rules section of this
Federal Register.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kelly Greene, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Office of Resource
Conservation and Recovery, (MC:
5304P), 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue
NW., Washington, DC 20460, Phone:
703–347–0363; or by email:
greene.kelly@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS-1
DATES:
I. Why is EPA proposing this rule?
EPA is proposing to grant DLA’s
petition to revise 40 CFR 761.80, which
will allow DLA to import its PCB waste
from Japan back to the customs territory
of the United States for proper disposal.
In addition, in the Rules section of this
Federal Register, EPA is promulgating a
direct final rule to make the same
revision as is being proposed here, for
the reasons outlined in detail in the
preamble to that direct final rule. The
reason EPA is issuing a direct final rule
elsewhere in this Federal Register is
because we view this revision as a
noncontroversial action and anticipate
no adverse comment. However, if we
receive adverse comment or a request
for an informal hearing, we will
withdraw the direct final rule (and
therefore it will not take effect based on
the direct final rule), and address all
public comments in any subsequent
final rule based on this proposed rule.
Alternatively, if we receive no adverse
comment (or request for an informal
hearing) on the change we are
promulgating today in the direct final
rule, we will not take further action on
this proposed rule. We do not intend to
institute a second comment period on
this action, unless an informal hearing
is requested, in which case comments
will be accepted until one week after the
close of the informal hearing. Any
parties interested in commenting should
do so at this time, since there may not
be an informal hearing. For further
information, please see the information
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:37 Apr 01, 2014
Jkt 232001
provided in the ADDRESSES section of
this document.
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
II. Does this action apply to me?
47 CFR Part 36
The discussion of the potentially
affected entities by this proposed rule
can be found in the preamble to the
direct final rule located in the Rules
section of this Federal Register.
[CC Docket No. 80–286; FCC 14–27]
III. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
For a complete discussion of all the
administrative requirements applicable
to this action, see the direct final rule in
the Rules section of this Federal
Register.
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
generally requires an agency to prepare
a regulatory flexibility analysis of any
rule subject to notice and comment
rulemaking requirements under the
Administrative Procedure Act or any
other statute unless the agency certifies
that the rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. Small entities
include small businesses, small
organizations, and small governmental
jurisdictions.
For purposes of assessing the impacts
of today’s rule on small entities, small
entity is defined as: (1) A small business
that is primarily engaged in hazardous
waste treatment and disposal as defined
by NAICS code 562211, with annual
receipts of less than 12.5 million dollars
(based on Small Business
Administration size standards); (2) a
small governmental jurisdiction that is a
government of a city, county, town,
school district or special district with a
population of less than 50,000; and (3)
a small organization that is any not-forprofit enterprise which is independently
owned and operated and is not
dominant in its field.
After considering the economic
impacts of today’s proposed rule on
small entities, I certify that this action
will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities. This rule merely allows DOD to
bring its PCB waste back to the U.S. for
proper disposal.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 761
Environmental protection, Hazardous
substances, and Polychlorinated
biphenyls.
Dated: March 25, 2014.
Mathy Stanislaus,
Assistant Administrator, Office of Solid Waste
and Emergency Response.
[FR Doc. 2014–07390 Filed 4–1–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Jurisdictional Separations and Referral
to the Federal-State Joint Board
Federal Communications
Commission.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
In this document, the Federal
Communications Commission
(Commission) seeks public comment on
a proposal to extend the freeze of
jurisdictional separations category
relationships and cost allocation factors
in the Commission’s rules for three
years, through June 30, 2017. This
document also proposes to direct the
Wireline Competition Bureau to open a
filing ‘‘window’’ to encourage (but not
require) rate-of-return incumbent LECs
that desire waivers of the category
relationships freeze to file during the
window.
SUMMARY:
Comments are due on or before
April 16, 2014. Reply comments are due
on or before April 23, 2014.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by CC Docket No. 80–286 by
any of the following methods:
D Federal Communications
Commission’s Web site: https://
fjallfoss.fcc.gov/ecfs2/. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
D People with Disabilities: Contact the
FCC to request reasonable
accommodations (accessible format
documents, sign language interpreters,
CART, etc.) by email: FCC504@fcc.gov
or phone: 202–418–0530 or TTY: 202–
418–0432.
For detailed instructions for
submitting comments and additional
information on the rulemaking process,
see the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
section of this document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Greg
Haledjian, Wireline Competition
Bureau, Pricing Policy Division, (202)
418–1520 or gregory.haledjian@fcc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a
summary of the Commission’s Further
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
(FNPRM) in CC Docket No. 80–286,
dated on March 26, 2014 and released
on March 27, 2014. The full text of this
document is available for public
inspection during regular business
hours in the Commission’s Reference
Center, 445 12th Street SW., Room CY–
A257, Washington, DC, 20554. The full
text of this document may be
downloaded at the following Internet
address: https://www.fcc.gov/documents/
DATES:
E:\FR\FM\02APP1.SGM
02APP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 63 (Wednesday, April 2, 2014)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 18497-18498]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-07390]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 761
[EPA-HQ-RCRA-2013-0396; FRL-9909-00-OSWER]
RIN 2050-AG79
Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs): Manufacturing (Import)
Exemption for the Defense Logistics Agency (DLA)
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA or the Agency)
is proposing to take action on a petition from the United States
Defense Logistics Agency (DLA) to import foreign-manufactured
polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs). For purposes of the Toxic Substances
Control Act (TSCA), ``manufacture'' is defined to include the import of
chemical substances into the customs territory of the United States.
With certain exceptions, section 6(e)(3) of TSCA bans the manufacture,
processing, and distribution in commerce of PCBs. One of these
exceptions is TSCA section 6(e)(3)(B), which gives EPA authority to
grant petitions to import PCBs into the customs territory of the United
States for a period of up to 12 months, provided EPA can make certain
findings by rule. On April 23, 2013, EPA received a petition from DLA,
a component of the United States Department of Defense (DOD), to import
foreign-manufactured PCBs that DOD currently owns in Japan for disposal
in the United States. EPA is proposing to grant DLA's petition as of
July 1, 2014. This proposal to grant the petition, if finalized, would
allow DLA to manufacture (i.e., import) certain PCBs for disposal. EPA
has granted two previous exemptions in 2003 and 2007 to DLA for similar
petitions to import PCBs for disposal. Without an exemption granted by
EPA, DLA would not be allowed to import the PCB waste to the U.S. for
proper disposal. In fact, if the exemption is not granted, it is very
likely that DLA will not be able to find any country willing to accept
and properly dispose of the PCB waste.
[[Page 18498]]
DATES: Written comments or a request for an informal hearing (per 40
CFR part 750, subpart B) must be received by May 2, 2014.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-
RCRA-2013-0396, by mail to RCRA Docket, Mail Code 28221T, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20460. Attention Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-RCRA-2013-0396.
Please include a total of two copies. Comments may also be submitted
electronically or through hand delivery/courier by following the
detailed instructions in the ADDRESSES section of the direct final rule
located in the Rules section of this Federal Register.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kelly Greene, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Office of Resource Conservation and Recovery, (MC:
5304P), 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20460, Phone: 703-
347-0363; or by email: greene.kelly@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Why is EPA proposing this rule?
EPA is proposing to grant DLA's petition to revise 40 CFR 761.80,
which will allow DLA to import its PCB waste from Japan back to the
customs territory of the United States for proper disposal. In
addition, in the Rules section of this Federal Register, EPA is
promulgating a direct final rule to make the same revision as is being
proposed here, for the reasons outlined in detail in the preamble to
that direct final rule. The reason EPA is issuing a direct final rule
elsewhere in this Federal Register is because we view this revision as
a noncontroversial action and anticipate no adverse comment. However,
if we receive adverse comment or a request for an informal hearing, we
will withdraw the direct final rule (and therefore it will not take
effect based on the direct final rule), and address all public comments
in any subsequent final rule based on this proposed rule.
Alternatively, if we receive no adverse comment (or request for an
informal hearing) on the change we are promulgating today in the direct
final rule, we will not take further action on this proposed rule. We
do not intend to institute a second comment period on this action,
unless an informal hearing is requested, in which case comments will be
accepted until one week after the close of the informal hearing. Any
parties interested in commenting should do so at this time, since there
may not be an informal hearing. For further information, please see the
information provided in the ADDRESSES section of this document.
II. Does this action apply to me?
The discussion of the potentially affected entities by this
proposed rule can be found in the preamble to the direct final rule
located in the Rules section of this Federal Register.
III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
For a complete discussion of all the administrative requirements
applicable to this action, see the direct final rule in the Rules
section of this Federal Register.
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) generally requires an agency
to prepare a regulatory flexibility analysis of any rule subject to
notice and comment rulemaking requirements under the Administrative
Procedure Act or any other statute unless the agency certifies that the
rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. Small entities include small businesses,
small organizations, and small governmental jurisdictions.
For purposes of assessing the impacts of today's rule on small
entities, small entity is defined as: (1) A small business that is
primarily engaged in hazardous waste treatment and disposal as defined
by NAICS code 562211, with annual receipts of less than 12.5 million
dollars (based on Small Business Administration size standards); (2) a
small governmental jurisdiction that is a government of a city, county,
town, school district or special district with a population of less
than 50,000; and (3) a small organization that is any not-for-profit
enterprise which is independently owned and operated and is not
dominant in its field.
After considering the economic impacts of today's proposed rule on
small entities, I certify that this action will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. This rule
merely allows DOD to bring its PCB waste back to the U.S. for proper
disposal.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 761
Environmental protection, Hazardous substances, and Polychlorinated
biphenyls.
Dated: March 25, 2014.
Mathy Stanislaus,
Assistant Administrator, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response.
[FR Doc. 2014-07390 Filed 4-1-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P