Revisions To Test Methods and Testing Regulations; Technical Amendment, 18452-18453 [2014-07238]
Download as PDF
18452
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 63 / Wednesday, April 2, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
Latitude
Point A ..................
Point L ..................
Longitude
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
33°10′10″
33°13′50″
119°24′20″
119°21′50″
40 CFR Part 51
(b) The regulations. (1) Except during
closure periods or as otherwise
provided in this section, the restricted
area will be open to all vessels.
(2) Boats must remain at least 300
yards from the shoreline of San Nicolas
Island at all times. Nothing in this
provision shall be construed as
authorization to anchor within 300
yards or to land on San Nicolas Island,
except in an emergency.
(3) No person, vessel or other craft
shall enter the restricted area or
designated section(s) during closure
periods unless authorized to do so by
the Commanding Officer, Naval Base
Ventura County or the Officer in Charge,
San Nicolas Island.
(4) Submarine cables within the
restricted area post a risk to the
equipment of vessels engaged in
dredging, dragging, seining, anchoring
and other bottom contact operations.
Appropriate care must be taken to avoid
damage.
(5) Closure Periods. Notice that the
restricted area or section(s) ALPHA,
BRAVO, or CHARLIE are closed to entry
shall be given by radio broadcast
Monday through Friday at 0900 and
1200 on 2638 kHz and 2738 kHz or by
contacting ‘‘PLEAD CONTROL’’ on
VHF–FM radio channel 11 or 16.
Closure information may also be
requested by telephone between 0600
and 1800 Monday through Friday at
(805) 989–8841 or via recorded message
at (805) 989–1470.
(6) The regulations in this section
shall be enforced by personnel attached
to Naval Base Ventura County, Point
Mugu, Calif., and by such agencies as
may be designated by the Commandant,
11th Naval District, San Diego, Calif.
Dated: March 27, 2014.
James R. Hannon,
Chief, Operations and Regulatory, Directorate
of Civil Works.
[FR Doc. 2014–07359 Filed 4–1–14; 8:45 am]
ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES
BILLING CODE 3720–58–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:28 Apr 01, 2014
Jkt 232001
[EPA–HQ–OAR–2010–0114; FRL–9908–99–
OAR]
RIN 2060–AQ01
Revisions To Test Methods and
Testing Regulations; Technical
Amendment
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule; technical
amendment.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) published a final rule in
the Federal Register on February 27,
2014, that made technical and editorial
corrections for source testing of
emissions and operations. The revisions
will improve data quality and provide
additional flexibility by allowing the
use of newly approved alternative
procedures. The purpose of this action
is to correct an omission to Method 202.
DATES: This technical amendment is
effective on April 2, 2014.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Lula H. Melton, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Office of Air Quality
Planning and Standards, Air Quality
Assessment Division, Measurement
Technology Group (E143–02), Research
Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711;
telephone number: (919) 541–2910; fax
number: (919) 541–0516; email address:
melton.lula@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
I. Summary of Amendment
This action corrects a publication
error for Method 202. Two paragraphs,
namely 11.2.1.1 and 11.2.1.2, were
inadvertently omitted from Method 202
in the promulgated rule. This action
inserts paragraphs 11.2.1.1 and 11.2.1.2
and adds a transition statement in
paragraph 11.2.1 that indicates if the
sample was collected by Method 202,
extract the CPM filter as indicated in
paragraphs 11.2.1.1 and 11.2.1.2.
Section 553 of the Administrative
Procedure Act (APA), 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(3)(B), provides that, when an
agency for good cause finds that notice
and public procedure are impracticable,
unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest, the agency may issue a rule
without providing notice and an
opportunity for public comment. We
have determined that there is good
cause for making this technical
amendment final without prior proposal
and opportunity for public comment
because only simple publication errors
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
are being corrected that do not
substantially change the agency actions
taken in the final rule. Thus, notice and
public procedure are unnecessary. We
find that this constitutes good cause
under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(3)(B). (See also
the final sentence of section 307(d)(1) of
the Clean Air Act (CAA), 42 U.S.C.
307(d)(1), indicating that the good cause
provisions in subsection 553(b) of the
APA continue to apply to this type of
rulemaking under section 307(d) of the
CAA.)
II. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under Executive Order 12866,
Regulatory Planning and Review, and
Executive Order 13563, Improving
Regulation and Regulatory Review (58
FR 51735, October 4, 1993), this action
is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
and is, therefore, not subject to review
by the Office of Management and
Budget. This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’
as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). The
technical amendment does not impose
an information collection burden under
the provisions of the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501
et seq.).
Because the EPA has made a ‘‘good
cause’’ finding that this action is not
subject to notice and comment
requirements under the APA or any
other statute (see Section I), it is not
subject to the regulatory flexibility
provisions of the Regulatory Flexibility
Act [5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.], or to sections
202 and 205 of the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA) [Pub. L.
104–4]. In addition, this action does not
significantly or uniquely affect small
governments or impose a significant
intergovernmental mandate, as
described in sections 203 and 204 of the
UMRA.
This action also does not significantly
or uniquely affect the communities of
tribal governments, as specified by
Executive Order 13175, Consultation
and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments (65 FR 67249, November
9, 2000). This amendment also is not
subject to Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children From
Environmental Health and Safety Risks
(62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997) because
it is not economically significant.
This technical amendment does not
involve changes to the technical
standards related to test methods or
monitoring requirements; thus, the
requirements of section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C.
272) do not apply.
This technical amendment does not
involve special consideration of
E:\FR\FM\02APR1.SGM
02APR1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 63 / Wednesday, April 2, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
environmental justice-related issues as
required by Executive Order 12898,
Federal Actions To Address
Environmental Justice in Minority
Populations and Low-Income
Populations (59 FR 7629, February 16,
1994).
The Congressional Review Act (CRA),
5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (SBREFA),
generally provides that before a rule
may take effect, the agency
determination promulgating the rule
must submit a rule report, which
includes a copy of the rule, to each
House of the Congress and to the
Comptroller General of the United
States. Section 808 allows the issuing
agency to make a rule effective sooner
than otherwise provided by the CRA if
the agency makes a good cause finding
that notice and public procedure is
impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary
to the public interest. This
determination must be supported by a
brief statement, 5 U.S.C. 808(2). As
stated previously, the EPA has made
such a good cause finding, including the
reasons, and therefore established an
effective date of April 2, 2014. The EPA
will submit a report containing this final
action and other required information to
the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller
General of the United States prior to
publication of this action in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ‘‘major’’
rule as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). This
action will be effective April 2, 2014.
This technical amendment does not
have substantial direct effects on the
states, or on the relationship between
the national government and the states,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government, as specified in
Executive Order 13132, Federalism (64
FR 43255, August 10, 1999).
This technical amendment is not
subject to Executive Order 13211,
Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use (66 FR 28355, May
22, 2001) because this action is not a
significant regulatory action under
Executive Order 12866.
ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Parts 51
Air pollution control, Environmental
protection, Performance specifications,
and Test methods and procedures.
Dated: March 24, 2014.
Janet G. McCabe,
Acting Assistant Administrator.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:28 Apr 01, 2014
of Federal Regulations is amended as
follows:
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
PART 51—REQUIREMENTS FOR
PREPARATION, ADOPTION, AND
SUBMITTAL OF IMPLEMENTATION
PLANS
40 CFR Part 52
1. The authority citation for part 51
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401, et seq.
2. Amend appendix M to part 51
under 11.0 Analytical Procedures by
revising paragraph 11.2.1 and adding
paragraphs 11.2.1.1 and 11.2.1.2 to read
as follows:
■
Appendix M to Part 51—Recommended
Test Methods for State Implementation
Plans
*
*
*
*
*
11.2.1 Container #3, CPM Filter Sample.
If the sample was collected by Method 17 or
Method 201A with a stack temperature below
30 °C (85 °F), transfer the filter and any loose
PM from the sample container to a tared glass
weighing dish. (See Section 3.0 for a
definition of constant weight.) Desiccate the
sample for 24 hours in a desiccator
containing anhydrous calcium sulfate. Weigh
to a constant weight and report the results to
the nearest 0.1 mg. [Note: In-stack filter
samples collected at 30 °C (85 °F) may
include both filterable insoluble particulate
and condensable particulate. The nozzle and
front half wash and filter collected at or
below 30 °C (85 °F) may not be heated and
must be maintained at or below 30 °C
(85 °F).] If the sample was collected by
Method 202, extract the CPM filter as
follows:
11.2.1.1 Extract the water soluble
(aqueous or inorganic) CPM from the CPM
filter by folding the filter in quarters and
placing it into a 50-ml extraction tube. Add
sufficient deionized, ultra-filtered water to
cover the filter (e.g., 10 ml of water). Place
the extractor tube into a sonication bath and
extract the water-soluble material for a
minimum of two minutes. Combine the
aqueous extract with the contents of
Container #1. Repeat this extraction step
twice for a total of three extractions.
11.2.1.2 Extract the organic soluble CPM
from the CPM filter by adding sufficient
hexane to cover the filter (e.g., 10 ml of
hexane). Place the extractor tube into a
sonication bath and extract the organic
soluble material for a minimum of two
minutes. Combine the organic extract with
the contents of Container #2. Repeat this
extraction step twice for a total of three
extractions.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2014–07238 Filed 4–1–14; 8:45 am]
For the reasons stated in the
preamble, title 40, chapter I of the Code
Jkt 232001
18453
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
[EPA–R04–OAR–2012–0285; FRL–9909–01–
Region–4]
Approval and Promulgation of
Implementation Plans; Tennessee;
Conflict of Interest
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is finalizing two actions
pertaining to the Clean Air Act (CAA or
Act) State Implementation Plan (SIP)
requirements for the State of Tennessee.
First, EPA is approving the SIP revision
submitted by Tennessee, through the
Tennessee Department of Environment
and Conservation (TDEC) on October 9,
2013, as meeting the applicable
requirements of the Act. This SIP
revision addresses Tennessee’s
outstanding obligations related to the
CAA State board and conflict of interest
requirements. Second, EPA is fully
approving the infrastructure SIP subelement related to the State board and
conflict of interest requirements for the
2008 Lead National Ambient Air
Quality Standards (NAAQS), 1997
Annual Fine Particulate Matter (PM2.5)
NAAQS, 2006 24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS
and 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS. EPA
notes that all other applicable
Tennessee infrastructure SIP elements
for the 2008 Lead, 1997 annual PM2.5,
2006 24-hour PM2.5, and 1997 8-hour
ozone NAAQS have been addressed in
separate rulemakings.
DATES: This rule is effective on May 2,
2014.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket
Identification No. EPA–R04–OAR–
2012–0285. All documents in the docket
are listed on the www.regulations.gov
Web site. Although listed in the index,
some information is not publicly
available, i.e., Confidential Business
Information or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the Internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available either electronically through
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at
the Regulatory Development Section,
Air Planning Branch, Air, Pesticides and
Toxics Management Division, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW.,
Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. EPA
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\02APR1.SGM
02APR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 63 (Wednesday, April 2, 2014)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 18452-18453]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-07238]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 51
[EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0114; FRL-9908-99-OAR]
RIN 2060-AQ01
Revisions To Test Methods and Testing Regulations; Technical
Amendment
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule; technical amendment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) published a final
rule in the Federal Register on February 27, 2014, that made technical
and editorial corrections for source testing of emissions and
operations. The revisions will improve data quality and provide
additional flexibility by allowing the use of newly approved
alternative procedures. The purpose of this action is to correct an
omission to Method 202.
DATES: This technical amendment is effective on April 2, 2014.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Lula H. Melton, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, Air
Quality Assessment Division, Measurement Technology Group (E143-02),
Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711; telephone number: (919)
541-2910; fax number: (919) 541-0516; email address:
melton.lula@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Summary of Amendment
This action corrects a publication error for Method 202. Two
paragraphs, namely 11.2.1.1 and 11.2.1.2, were inadvertently omitted
from Method 202 in the promulgated rule. This action inserts paragraphs
11.2.1.1 and 11.2.1.2 and adds a transition statement in paragraph
11.2.1 that indicates if the sample was collected by Method 202,
extract the CPM filter as indicated in paragraphs 11.2.1.1 and
11.2.1.2.
Section 553 of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA), 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(3)(B), provides that, when an agency for good cause finds that
notice and public procedure are impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary
to the public interest, the agency may issue a rule without providing
notice and an opportunity for public comment. We have determined that
there is good cause for making this technical amendment final without
prior proposal and opportunity for public comment because only simple
publication errors are being corrected that do not substantially change
the agency actions taken in the final rule. Thus, notice and public
procedure are unnecessary. We find that this constitutes good cause
under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(3)(B). (See also the final sentence of section
307(d)(1) of the Clean Air Act (CAA), 42 U.S.C. 307(d)(1), indicating
that the good cause provisions in subsection 553(b) of the APA continue
to apply to this type of rulemaking under section 307(d) of the CAA.)
II. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, and
Executive Order 13563, Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review (58
FR 51735, October 4, 1993), this action is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' and is, therefore, not subject to review by the
Office of Management and Budget. This action is not a ``major rule'' as
defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). The technical amendment does not impose an
information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
Because the EPA has made a ``good cause'' finding that this action
is not subject to notice and comment requirements under the APA or any
other statute (see Section I), it is not subject to the regulatory
flexibility provisions of the Regulatory Flexibility Act [5 U.S.C. 601
et seq.], or to sections 202 and 205 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform
Act of 1995 (UMRA) [Pub. L. 104-4]. In addition, this action does not
significantly or uniquely affect small governments or impose a
significant intergovernmental mandate, as described in sections 203 and
204 of the UMRA.
This action also does not significantly or uniquely affect the
communities of tribal governments, as specified by Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination With Indian Tribal Governments (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000). This amendment also is not subject to
Executive Order 13045, Protection of Children From Environmental Health
and Safety Risks (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997) because it is not
economically significant.
This technical amendment does not involve changes to the technical
standards related to test methods or monitoring requirements; thus, the
requirements of section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272) do not apply.
This technical amendment does not involve special consideration of
[[Page 18453]]
environmental justice-related issues as required by Executive Order
12898, Federal Actions To Address Environmental Justice in Minority
Populations and Low-Income Populations (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
The Congressional Review Act (CRA), 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added
by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996
(SBREFA), generally provides that before a rule may take effect, the
agency determination promulgating the rule must submit a rule report,
which includes a copy of the rule, to each House of the Congress and to
the Comptroller General of the United States. Section 808 allows the
issuing agency to make a rule effective sooner than otherwise provided
by the CRA if the agency makes a good cause finding that notice and
public procedure is impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the
public interest. This determination must be supported by a brief
statement, 5 U.S.C. 808(2). As stated previously, the EPA has made such
a good cause finding, including the reasons, and therefore established
an effective date of April 2, 2014. The EPA will submit a report
containing this final action and other required information to the U.S.
Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and the Comptroller General
of the United States prior to publication of this action in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major'' rule as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2). This action will be effective April 2, 2014.
This technical amendment does not have substantial direct effects
on the states, or on the relationship between the national government
and the states, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
among the various levels of government, as specified in Executive Order
13132, Federalism (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999).
This technical amendment is not subject to Executive Order 13211,
Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001) because this action is
not a significant regulatory action under Executive Order 12866.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Parts 51
Air pollution control, Environmental protection, Performance
specifications, and Test methods and procedures.
Dated: March 24, 2014.
Janet G. McCabe,
Acting Assistant Administrator.
For the reasons stated in the preamble, title 40, chapter I of the
Code of Federal Regulations is amended as follows:
PART 51--REQUIREMENTS FOR PREPARATION, ADOPTION, AND SUBMITTAL OF
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
0
1. The authority citation for part 51 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401, et seq.
0
2. Amend appendix M to part 51 under 11.0 Analytical Procedures by
revising paragraph 11.2.1 and adding paragraphs 11.2.1.1 and 11.2.1.2
to read as follows:
Appendix M to Part 51--Recommended Test Methods for State
Implementation Plans
* * * * *
11.2.1 Container 3, CPM Filter Sample. If the sample
was collected by Method 17 or Method 201A with a stack temperature
below 30 [deg]C (85[emsp14][deg]F), transfer the filter and any
loose PM from the sample container to a tared glass weighing dish.
(See Section 3.0 for a definition of constant weight.) Desiccate the
sample for 24 hours in a desiccator containing anhydrous calcium
sulfate. Weigh to a constant weight and report the results to the
nearest 0.1 mg. [Note: In-stack filter samples collected at 30
[deg]C (85[emsp14][deg]F) may include both filterable insoluble
particulate and condensable particulate. The nozzle and front half
wash and filter collected at or below 30 [deg]C (85[emsp14][deg]F)
may not be heated and must be maintained at or below 30 [deg]C
(85[emsp14][deg]F).] If the sample was collected by Method 202,
extract the CPM filter as follows:
11.2.1.1 Extract the water soluble (aqueous or inorganic) CPM
from the CPM filter by folding the filter in quarters and placing it
into a 50-ml extraction tube. Add sufficient deionized, ultra-
filtered water to cover the filter (e.g., 10 ml of water). Place the
extractor tube into a sonication bath and extract the water-soluble
material for a minimum of two minutes. Combine the aqueous extract
with the contents of Container 1. Repeat this extraction
step twice for a total of three extractions.
11.2.1.2 Extract the organic soluble CPM from the CPM filter by
adding sufficient hexane to cover the filter (e.g., 10 ml of
hexane). Place the extractor tube into a sonication bath and extract
the organic soluble material for a minimum of two minutes. Combine
the organic extract with the contents of Container 2.
Repeat this extraction step twice for a total of three extractions.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2014-07238 Filed 4-1-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P