Notice of Lodging of Three Proposed Consent Decrees Under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, 18315-18316 [2014-07168]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 62 / Tuesday, April 1, 2014 / Notices
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
suggestions from the public and affected
agencies concerning the proposed
collection of information are
encouraged. Your comments should
address one or more of the following
four points:
—Evaluate whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility;
—Evaluate the accuracy of the agencies
estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
—Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and
—Minimize the burden of the collection
of information on those who are to
respond, including through the use of
appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other technological
collection techniques or other forms
of information technology, e.g.,
permitting electronic submission of
responses.
Overview of This Information
Collection
(1) Type of Information Collection:
Extension of a currently approved
collection.
(2) Title of the Form/Collection:
Victims of Crime Act, Victim
Compensation Grant Program, State
Performance Report.
(3) Agency form number, if any, and
the applicable component of the
Department sponsoring the collection:
Form Number: 1121–0114. Office for
Victims of Crime, Office of Justice
Programs, Department of Justice.
(4) Affected public who will be asked
or required to respond, as well as a brief
abstract: Primary: State Government.
The form is used by State Government
to submit Annual Performance Report
data about claims for victim
compensation.
(5) An estimate of the total number of
respondents and the amount of time
estimated for an average respondent to
respond: It is estimated that 53
respondents will complete the form
within 2 hours.
(6) An estimate of the total public
burden (in hours) associated with the
collection: There are an estimated 106
total annual burden hours associated
with this collection.
If additional information is required
contact: Jerri Murray, Department
Clearance Officer, United States
Department of Justice, Justice
Management Division, Policy and
Planning Staff, Two Constitution
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:02 Mar 31, 2014
Jkt 232001
Square, 145 N Street NE., Room 3W–
1407B, Washington, DC 20530.
Dated: March 27, 2014.
Jerri Murray,
Department Clearance Officer for PRA, U.S.
Department of Justice.
[FR Doc. 2014–07202 Filed 3–31–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–18–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Notice of Lodging of Three Proposed
Consent Decrees Under the
Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation, and Liability
Act
On March 26, 2014, the Department of
Justice lodged three proposed Consent
Decrees with the United States District
Court for the Eastern District of
Wisconsin in the lawsuit entitled
United States and the State of
Wisconsin v. NCR Corp., et al., Civil
Action No. 10–cv–910 (E.D. Wis.).
In 2010, the United States and the
State of Wisconsin filed a lawsuit
against multiple defendants that had
contributed to polychlorinated biphenyl
(‘‘PCB’’) contamination in sediment at
the Lower Fox River and Green Bay
Superfund Site in northeastern
Wisconsin (the ‘‘Fox River Site’’ or the
‘‘Site’’). That lawsuit—brought under
the Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation, and Liability
Act (‘‘CERCLA’’), 42 U.S.C. 9601–75—
sought enforcement of a U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency order
requiring cleanup work at the Site,
reimbursement of response costs that
the United States and the State have
incurred in addressing the PCB
contamination at the Site, and recovery
of damages for injuries to natural
resources resulting from the PCBs at the
Site. The three proposed Consent
Decrees contain the terms of proposed
CERCLA settlements with nine parties
for the Fox River Site.
The first proposed Consent Decree is
with the City of Appleton, CBC Coating
Inc., Menasha Corporation, the NeenahMenasha Sewerage Commission, U.S.
Paper Mills Corporation, and WTM I
Company. Those six Settling Defendants
would pay a total of $54 million toward
the response costs and natural resource
damages associated with the Site. The
State would pay an additional $100,000
to resolve its own potential CERCLA
liability, as alleged in certain
counterclaims asserted by some of the
defendants in the lawsuit.
The second proposed Consent Decree
is with Settling Defendant KimberlyClark Corporation. Kimberly-Clark
would pay the United States and the
PO 00000
Frm 00059
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
18315
State a total of $1,350,000 under this de
minimis settlement pursuant to CERCLA
Section 122(g), 42 U.S.C. 9622(g).
The third proposed Consent Decree is
with Settling Defendant NewPage
Wisconsin System Inc. (‘‘NewPage’’).
NewPage filed a petition for relief under
Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code in
2011. The proposed Consent Decree
with NewPage would grant the United
States and the State allowed general
unsecured claims for a total of
$1,157,254 that would be paid as
allowed claims under NewPage’s courtapproved Reorganization Plan. Because
such claims are paid on a discounted
basis under the Reorganization Plan, the
actual distributions that the United
States and the State will receive on
those allowed claims may be as little as
$50,000.
Taken together, the three Consent
Decrees would yield a total of
approximately $55.5 million, which
would be allocated as follows: (1)
Slightly more than $45.9 million would
be applied toward natural resource
damages; (2) slightly more than $8
million would be paid into a segregated
fund managed by the State to defray
future costs that the State will continue
to incur in overseeing ongoing cleanup
work by non-settlers; and (3) slightly
less than $1.6 million would be paid
into a Site-specific Superfund Special
Account as partial reimbursement of
past and future costs incurred by the
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
The publication of this notice opens
a period for public comment on each of
the three Consent Decrees. Comments
should be addressed to the Assistant
Attorney General, Environment and
Natural Resources Division, and should
refer to United States and the State of
Wisconsin v. NCR Corp., et al., D.J. Ref.
No. 90–11–2–1045/3. All comments
must be submitted no later than thirty
(30) days after the publication date of
this notice. Comments may be
submitted either by email or by mail:
To submit
comments:
Send them to:
By email .......
pubcomment-ees.enrd@
usdoj.gov.
Assistant Attorney General,
U.S. DOJ—ENRD, P.O.
Box 7611, Washington, DC
20044–7611.
By mail .........
During the public comment period,
the Consent Decrees may be examined
and downloaded at this Justice
Department Web site: https://
www.usdoj.gov/enrd/Consent_
Decrees.html. We will provide a paper
copy of any of the Consent Decrees
upon written request and payment of
E:\FR\FM\01APN1.SGM
01APN1
18316
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 62 / Tuesday, April 1, 2014 / Notices
reproduction costs (at 25 cents per
page). Please mail your request and a
check or money order payable to the
United States Treasury to: Consent
Decree Library, U.S. DOJ—ENRD, P.O.
Box 7611, Washington, DC 20044–7611.
The cost for paper copies is $14.75 for
the Consent Decree with the six Settling
Defendants and the State, $8.00 for the
Consent Decree with Kimberly Clark,
and $7.50 for the Consent Decree with
NewPage.
Maureen M. Katz,
Assistant Section Chief,Environmental
Enforcement Section, Environment and
Natural Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 2014–07168 Filed 3–31–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–15–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Drug Enforcement Administration
[Docket No. DEA–391]
Controlled Substances: 2014 Proposed
Aggregate Production Quota for 10
Temporarily Controlled Synthetic
Cathinones
Drug Enforcement
Administration (DEA), Department of
Justice.
ACTION: Notice of a proposed 2014
aggregate production quota for ten
synthetic cathinones.
AGENCY:
Ten synthetic cathinones: 4methyl-N-ethylcathinone (4–MEC); 4methyl-a-pyrrolidinopropiophenone (4MePPP); alphapyrrolidinopentiophenone (a-PVP); 1(1,3-benzodioxol-5-yl)-2(methylamino)butan-1-one (butylone);
2-(methylamino)-1-phenylpentan-1-one
(pentedrone); 1-(1,3-benzodioxol-5-yl)2-(methylamino)pentan-1-one
(pentylone); 4-fluoro-Nmethylcathinone (4–FMC); 3-fluoro-Nmethylcathinone (3–FMC);
naphthylpyrovalerone (naphyrone); and
alpha-pyrrolidinobutiophenone (a-PBP)
were temporarily placed in schedule I of
the Controlled Substances Act (CSA) by
a final order published by the Drug
Enforcement Administration (DEA) on
March 7, 2014 (79 FR 12938). This
means that any manufacturer that
wishes to manufacture 4–MEC, 4MePPP, a-PVP, butylone, pentedrone,
pentylone, 4–FMC, 3–FMC, naphyrone,
or a-PBP after March 7, 2014, must be
registered with the DEA and have
obtained a manufacturing quota for 4–
MEC, 4-MePPP, a-PVP, butylone,
pentedrone, pentylone, 4–FMC, 3–FMC,
naphyrone, or a-PBP pursuant to 21
CFR part 1303.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:02 Mar 31, 2014
Jkt 232001
The DEA cannot issue individual
manufacturing quotas for 4–MEC, 4MePPP, a-PVP, butylone, pentedrone,
pentylone, 4–FMC, 3–FMC, naphyrone,
or a-PBP unless and until it establishes
an aggregate production quota.
Therefore, this notice proposes a 2014
aggregate production quota for 4–MEC,
4-MePPP, a-PVP, butylone, pentedrone,
pentylone, 4–FMC, 3–FMC, naphyrone,
and a-PBP.
DATES: Comments or objections should
be received on or before May 1, 2014.
ADDRESSES: To ensure proper handling
of comments, please reference ‘‘Docket
No. DEA–391’’ on all electronic and
written correspondence. The DEA
encourages that all comments be
submitted electronically through
www.regulations.gov using the
electronic comment form provided on
that site. An electronic copy of this
document is also available at
www.regulations.gov for easy reference.
Paper comments that duplicate the
electronic submission are not necessary
as all comments submitted to
www.regulations.gov will be posted for
public review and are part of the official
docket record. Written comments
submitted via regular or express mail
should be sent to the Drug Enforcement
Administration, Attention: DEA Federal
Register Representative/ODW, 8701
Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia
22152.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Ruth A. Carter, Office of Diversion
Control, Drug Enforcement
Administration; Mailing Address: 8701
Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia
22152, Telephone: (202) 598–6812.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Posting of Public Comments
The Freedom of Information Act
applies to all comments received. All
comments received are considered part
of the public record and made available
for public inspection online at
www.regulations.gov and in the DEA’s
public docket. Such information
includes personal identifying
information (such as your name,
address, etc.) voluntarily submitted by
the commenter.
If you want to submit personal
identifying information (such as your
name, address, etc.) as part of your
comment, but do not want it to be
posted online or made available in the
public docket, you must include the
phrase ‘‘PERSONAL IDENTIFYING
INFORMATION’’ in the first paragraph
of your comment. You must also place
all the personal identifying information
you do not want posted online or made
available in the public docket in the first
PO 00000
Frm 00060
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
paragraph of your comment and identify
what information you want redacted.
If you want to submit confidential
business information as part of your
comment, but do not want it to be
posted online or made available in the
public docket, you must include the
phrase ‘‘CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS
INFORMATION’’ in the first paragraph
of your comment. You must also
prominently identify confidential
business information to be redacted
within the comment. If a comment has
so much confidential business
information that it cannot be effectively
redacted, all or part of that comment
may not be posted online or made
available in the public docket.
Personal identifying information and
confidential business information
identified and located as set forth above
will be redacted, and the comment, in
redacted form, will be posted online and
placed in the DEA’s public docket file.
If you wish to inspect the DEA’s
public docket file in person by
appointment, please see the For Further
Information Contact paragraph.
Background
Section 306 of the CSA (21 U.S.C.
826) requires that the Attorney General
establish aggregate production quotas
for each basic class of controlled
substance listed in schedules I and II
each year. This responsibility has been
delegated to the Administrator of the
Drug Enforcement Administration
(DEA) by 28 CFR 0.100. The
Administrator, in turn, has redelegated
this function to the Deputy
Administrator, pursuant to 28 CFR
0.104.
The DEA established the 2014
aggregate production quotas for
substances in schedules I and II on
September 9, 2013 (78 FR 55099).
Subsequently, on January 28, 2014, the
DEA published in the Federal Register
a notice of intent to temporarily place
ten synthetic cathinones: 4-methyl-Nethylcathinone (4–MEC), 4-methyl-apyrrolidinopropiophenone (4-MePPP),
alpha-pyrrolidinopentiophenone (aPVP), 1-(1,3-benzodioxol-5-yl)-2(methylamino)butan-1-one (butylone),
2-(methylamino)-1-phenylpentan-1-one
(pentedrone), 1-(1,3-benzodioxol-5-yl)2-(methylamino)pentan-1-one
(pentylone), 4-fluoro-Nmethylcathinone (4–FMC), 3-fluoro-Nmethylcathinone (3–FMC),
naphthylpyrovalerone (naphyrone), and
alpha-pyrrolidinobutiophenone (a-PBP)
in schedule I of the CSA (79 FR 4429).
On March 7, 2014, the DEA published
in the Federal Register a final order to
temporarily place these ten synthetic
cathinones in schedule I of the CSA (79
E:\FR\FM\01APN1.SGM
01APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 62 (Tuesday, April 1, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 18315-18316]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-07168]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Notice of Lodging of Three Proposed Consent Decrees Under the
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act
On March 26, 2014, the Department of Justice lodged three proposed
Consent Decrees with the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Wisconsin in the lawsuit entitled United States and the
State of Wisconsin v. NCR Corp., et al., Civil Action No. 10-cv-910
(E.D. Wis.).
In 2010, the United States and the State of Wisconsin filed a
lawsuit against multiple defendants that had contributed to
polychlorinated biphenyl (``PCB'') contamination in sediment at the
Lower Fox River and Green Bay Superfund Site in northeastern Wisconsin
(the ``Fox River Site'' or the ``Site''). That lawsuit--brought under
the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability
Act (``CERCLA''), 42 U.S.C. 9601-75--sought enforcement of a U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency order requiring cleanup work at the
Site, reimbursement of response costs that the United States and the
State have incurred in addressing the PCB contamination at the Site,
and recovery of damages for injuries to natural resources resulting
from the PCBs at the Site. The three proposed Consent Decrees contain
the terms of proposed CERCLA settlements with nine parties for the Fox
River Site.
The first proposed Consent Decree is with the City of Appleton, CBC
Coating Inc., Menasha Corporation, the Neenah-Menasha Sewerage
Commission, U.S. Paper Mills Corporation, and WTM I Company. Those six
Settling Defendants would pay a total of $54 million toward the
response costs and natural resource damages associated with the Site.
The State would pay an additional $100,000 to resolve its own potential
CERCLA liability, as alleged in certain counterclaims asserted by some
of the defendants in the lawsuit.
The second proposed Consent Decree is with Settling Defendant
Kimberly-Clark Corporation. Kimberly-Clark would pay the United States
and the State a total of $1,350,000 under this de minimis settlement
pursuant to CERCLA Section 122(g), 42 U.S.C. 9622(g).
The third proposed Consent Decree is with Settling Defendant
NewPage Wisconsin System Inc. (``NewPage''). NewPage filed a petition
for relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code in 2011. The
proposed Consent Decree with NewPage would grant the United States and
the State allowed general unsecured claims for a total of $1,157,254
that would be paid as allowed claims under NewPage's court-approved
Reorganization Plan. Because such claims are paid on a discounted basis
under the Reorganization Plan, the actual distributions that the United
States and the State will receive on those allowed claims may be as
little as $50,000.
Taken together, the three Consent Decrees would yield a total of
approximately $55.5 million, which would be allocated as follows: (1)
Slightly more than $45.9 million would be applied toward natural
resource damages; (2) slightly more than $8 million would be paid into
a segregated fund managed by the State to defray future costs that the
State will continue to incur in overseeing ongoing cleanup work by non-
settlers; and (3) slightly less than $1.6 million would be paid into a
Site-specific Superfund Special Account as partial reimbursement of
past and future costs incurred by the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency.
The publication of this notice opens a period for public comment on
each of the three Consent Decrees. Comments should be addressed to the
Assistant Attorney General, Environment and Natural Resources Division,
and should refer to United States and the State of Wisconsin v. NCR
Corp., et al., D.J. Ref. No. 90-11-2-1045/3. All comments must be
submitted no later than thirty (30) days after the publication date of
this notice. Comments may be submitted either by email or by mail:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
To submit comments: Send them to:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
By email............................ pubcomment-ees.enrd@usdoj.gov.
By mail............................. Assistant Attorney General, U.S.
DOJ--ENRD, P.O. Box 7611,
Washington, DC 20044-7611.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
During the public comment period, the Consent Decrees may be
examined and downloaded at this Justice Department Web site: https://www.usdoj.gov/enrd/Consent_Decrees.html. We will provide a paper copy
of any of the Consent Decrees upon written request and payment of
[[Page 18316]]
reproduction costs (at 25 cents per page). Please mail your request and
a check or money order payable to the United States Treasury to:
Consent Decree Library, U.S. DOJ--ENRD, P.O. Box 7611, Washington, DC
20044-7611.
The cost for paper copies is $14.75 for the Consent Decree with the
six Settling Defendants and the State, $8.00 for the Consent Decree
with Kimberly Clark, and $7.50 for the Consent Decree with NewPage.
Maureen M. Katz,
Assistant Section Chief,Environmental Enforcement Section, Environment
and Natural Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 2014-07168 Filed 3-31-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-15-P