Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Texas; Revisions to the Minor New Source Review (NSR) State Implementation Plan (SIP); Types of Standard Permits, State Pollution Control Project Standard Permit and Control Methods for the Permitting of Grandfathered and Electing Electric Generating Facilities, 18183-18190 [2014-07127]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 62 / Tuesday, April 1, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R06–OAR–2014–0191; FRL–9908–27–
Region 6]
12. Technical Standards
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
13. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023–01 and
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guides the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have concluded that this action is one
of a category of actions which do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This rule involves the
removal of regulations for bridges that
are now fixed bridges. This rule is
categorically excluded, under figure 2–
1, paragraph (32)(e), of the Instruction.
Under figure 2–1, paragraph (32)(e), of
the Instruction, an environmental
analysis checklist and a categorical
exclusion determination are not
required for this rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 117
Bridges.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR Part 117 as follows:
PART 117—DRAWBRIDGE
OPERATION REGULATIONS
1. The authority citation for part 117
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 499; 33 CFR 1.05–1;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.
§ 117.733
[Amended]
2. In § 117.733, remove paragraph (h)
and redesignate paragraphs (i) through
(m) as paragraphs (h) through (l).
■
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
§ 117.753
■
[Removed]
3. Remove § 117.753.
Dated: March 19, 2014.
Steven H. Ratti,
Rear Admiral, United States Coast Guard,
Commander, Fifth Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 2014–07083 Filed 3–31–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:19 Mar 31, 2014
Jkt 232001
Approval and Promulgation of
Implementation Plans; Texas;
Revisions to the Minor New Source
Review (NSR) State Implementation
Plan (SIP); Types of Standard Permits,
State Pollution Control Project
Standard Permit and Control Methods
for the Permitting of Grandfathered
and Electing Electric Generating
Facilities
Environmental Protection
Agency.
ACTION: Direct final rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is approving several
revisions to the Texas State
Implementation Plan (SIP) related to the
Texas Minor New Source Review (NSR)
Standard Permits (SP) Program. First,
EPA is approving revisions submitted
by the Texas Commission on
Environmental Quality (TCEQ, or
Commission) on January 3, 2000, and
March 11, 2011, expanding the Texas SP
Program to include the Rule Standard
Permit (Rule SP). The EPA is also
approving a revision to the Texas SIP
submitted by the TCEQ on February 1,
2006, for a specific Rule SP, the Rule
Standard Permit for Pollution Control
Projects (Rule SP for PCP) as meeting
the requirements for a Minor NSR SIP
revision. Finally, because EPA is
approving the Rule SP for PCP, EPA is
also approving a severable portion of the
January 3, 2000, submittal concerning
the Texas Senate Bill 7 (SB7) permitting
program for grandfathered and electing
electric generating facilities (EGFs). All
of the Texas SB7 EGFs permitting
program provisions have been approved
as part of the Texas NSR SIP except for
this severable portion. This severable
portion allowing for the use of the Rule
SP for PCP for permitting of collateral
emission increases is being approved as
meeting the requirements for a Minor
NSR SIP revision. EPA is approving
these actions under section 110 of the
Federal Clean Air Act (the Act or CAA)
through a direct final rulemaking.
DATES: This rule is effective on June 2,
2014 without further notice, unless EPA
receives relevant adverse comment by
May 1, 2014. If EPA receives such
comment, EPA will publish a timely
withdrawal in the Federal Register
informing the public that this rule will
not take effect.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
18183
Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R06–
OAR–2014–0191, by one of the
following methods:
• www.regulations.gov. Follow the
on-line instructions.
• Email: Ms. Adina Wiley at
wiley.adina@epa.gov. Please also send a
copy by email to the person listed in the
ADDRESSES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section below.
• Mail or delivery: Ms. Adina Wiley,
Air Permits Section (6PD–R),
Environmental Protection Agency, 1445
Ross Avenue, Suite 1200, Dallas, Texas
75202–2733.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
Docket ID No. EPA–R06–OAR–2014–
0191. EPA’s policy is that all comments
received will be included in the public
docket without change and may be
made available online at https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided, unless
the comment includes information
claimed to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
the disclosure of which is restricted by
statute. Do not submit information
through https://www.regulations.gov or
email, if you believe that it is CBI or
otherwise protected from disclosure.
The https://www.regulations.gov Web
site is an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system,
which means that EPA will not know
your identity or contact information
unless you provide it in the body of
your comment. If you send an email
comment directly to EPA without going
through https://www.regulations.gov,
your email address will be
automatically captured and included as
part of the comment that is placed in the
public docket and made available on the
Internet. If you submit an electronic
comment, EPA recommends that you
include your name and other contact
information in the body of your
comment along with any disk or CD–
ROM submitted. If EPA cannot read
your comment due to technical
difficulties and cannot contact you for
clarification, EPA may not be able to
consider your comment. Electronic files
should avoid the use of special
characters and any form of encryption
and should be free of any defects or
viruses. For additional information
about EPA’s public docket, visit the EPA
Docket Center homepage at https://
www.epa.gov/epahome/dockets.htm.
Docket: The index to the docket for
this action is available electronically at
www.regulations.gov and in hard copy
at EPA Region 6, 1445 Ross Avenue,
Suite 700, Dallas, Texas. While all
documents in the docket are listed in
the index, some information may be
publicly available only at the hard copy
E:\FR\FM\01APR1.SGM
01APR1
18184
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 62 / Tuesday, April 1, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
location (e.g., copyrighted material), and
some may not be publicly available at
either location (e.g., CBI). To inspect the
hard copy materials, please schedule an
appointment with the person listed in
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
paragraph below or Mr. Bill Deese at
214–665–7253.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Rick Barrett (6PD–R), Air Permits
Section, telephone (214) 665–7227;
email: barrett.richard@epa.gov. Ms.
Adina Wiley (6PD–R), Air Permits
Section, telephone (214) 665–2115;
email: wiley.adina@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘our,’’
and ‘‘us’’ refers to EPA.
Table of Contents
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
I. Overview of State Submittals
A. 30 TAC Section 116.601(a)(1): Types of
Standard Permits
B. 30 TAC Section 116.617: State Pollution
Control Project Standard Permit
C. 30 TAC Section 116.911(a)(2): Control
Method for Grandfathered and Electing
Electric Generating Facilities
II. Evaluation of State Submittals
A. 30 TAC Section 116.601(a)(1): Types of
Standard Permits
B. 30 TAC Section 116.617: State Pollution
Control Project Standard Permit
C. 30 TAC Section 116.911(a)(2): Control
Method for Grandfathered and Electing
Electric Generating Facilities
D. CAA Section 110(l) Analysis
III. Final Action
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Overview of State Submittals
EPA is approving through direct final
action revisions to the Texas Minor NSR
Program, related to the Texas SP
Program, which were submitted on
January 3, 2000; February 1, 2006; and
March 11, 2011, and are summarized
below. The effect of this direct final
action will be to approve into the Texas
Minor NSR SIP the provisions for the
adoption and development of the Rule
SP, the specific Rule SP for PCP, and a
provision allowing for the use of the
Rule SP for PCP for grandfathered and
electing electric generating facilities.
The approval of the provisions for the
adoption and development of Rule SP
brings this category of SP under the
umbrella provisions of the Texas Minor
NSR SIP SP Program, ensuring that Rule
SP meet all the requirements of the Act
for Minor NSR permits. As discussed
more fully in Sections I.B and II.B of
this notice, we recognize that the TCEQ
has recently promulgated a Non-Rule SP
for PCP to replace the Rule SP for PCP.
Despite the replacement of the Rule SP
for PCP with the Non-Rule SP for PCP,
the TCEQ has not withdrawn the Rule
SP for PCP from our consideration.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:19 Mar 31, 2014
Jkt 232001
Therefore, we are acting on it today.
Additionally, our action today is
responsive to the March 26, 2012, Fifth
Circuit Court of Appeals decision to
vacate and remand our September 15,
2010 disapproval of the Rule SP for
PCP, as amended by the Court’s order of
February 21, 2014, directing EPA to take
final action on this submittal by May 19,
2014.1 2
A. 30 TAC Section 116.601(a)(1): Types
of Standard Permits
Under state law, the Texas Standard
Permits (SP) Program at 30 TAC Chapter
116, Subchapter F, is a component of
the Texas Minor NSR Program. A SP
under the Texas Minor NSR Program is
not a case-by-case Minor NSR permit,
but rather is a streamlined mechanism
with all permitting requirements for
construction and operation of a certain
source category. Within the Texas SP
Program, the TCEQ has the ability to
develop and implement two types of
Standard Permits—Rule Standard
Permits (Rule SP) and Non-Rule
Standard Permits (Non-Rule SP). These
two categories of SP are identified at 30
TAC Section 116.601(a). The Non-Rule
SP and the general provisions
applicable to all SP are already
approved as part of the Texas Minor
NSR SIP. We are approving into the
Texas Minor NSR SIP portions of two
revisions to the Texas SIP submitted on
January 3, 2000, and March 11, 2011,
pertaining to the Rule SP. Specifically,
we are approving 30 TAC Section
116.601(a)(1) as initially adopted on
December 16, 1999, and submitted as a
revision to the Texas SIP on January 3,
2000, which addresses the development
of Rule SP. Additionally, we are
approving a non-substantive revision to
30 TAC Section 116.601(a)(1) adopted
on February 9, 2011, and submitted as
a revision to the Texas SIP on March 11,
2011. EPA has taken no action to date
on the development of Rule SP at 30
TAC Section 116.601(a)(1).3 Therefore,
our action approves the initial adoption
and submittal on January 3, 2000, and
the revisions submitted on March 11,
2011, addressing the development and
implementation of Rule SP. Further, our
action today approves the general
provisions at 30 TAC Sections 601, 604,
605, 606, 610, 611, 614 and 615
1 Luminant Generation Co., LLC v. EPA, 675 F 3d
917 at 922 (5th Cir. 2012) (hereinafter Luminant).
2 Order on Motion to Amend and Enforce
Judgment, Luminant Generation Co. v. EPA, No.
10–60891 (Fifth Cir. Feb. 21, 2014), amending
Luminant.
3 EPA approved the provision at 30 TAC Section
116.601(a)(2) regarding the development of NonRule SP in a separate rulemaking. See 68 FR 64543,
November 14, 2003.
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
pertaining to all SP as applicable to the
Rule SP as well as the Non-Rule SP.
With today’s action, the category of Rule
SP will now become part of the Texas
Minor NSR SIP.
B. 30 TAC Section 116.617: State
Pollution Control Project Standard
Permit
The Texas State Pollution Control
Project Standard Permit (referred to as
the SP for PCP) before us for SIP action
is a Rule SP that must meet the
requirements of 30 TAC Section
116.601(a)(1), which we are also
approving today as described above.
The Rule SP for PCP at 30 TAC Section
116.617 is a component of Texas’s
broader SP Program, which originated
in 1994.
The Rule SP for PCP authorizes
projects undertaken voluntarily, or as
required by any federal or state statute
or rule, that reduce or maintain
currently authorized air emission rates
for facilities authorized by a NSR
permit, Standard Permit, or Permits by
Rule, and that may have associated
Minor NSR collateral emission increases
in other regulated pollutants.4 5 On
April 22, 1994, Texas adopted a
regulation at 30 TAC Section 116.617
that was a Rule SP applicable to
pollution control projects for any
regulated pollutant. On January 27,
2006, Texas repealed the previously
submitted Rule SP for PCP and adopted
a new Rule SP for PCP that is limited
to Minor NSR only. Texas adopted the
new Rule SP for PCP to be consistent
with federal law after the D.C. Circuit
limited the use of pollution control
projects to Minor NSR. New York v.
EPA, 413 F.3d 3, 40–42 (D.C. Cir. 2005).
On February 1, 2006, Texas submitted
the newly adopted Rule SP for PCP
found at 30 TAC Section 116.617,
among other provisions, to the EPA for
approval into the Texas SIP.6 On
4 See 30 TAC Section 116.617(a)(1) describing the
scope and applicability of the Rule SP for PCP as
adopted on January 27, 2006 by the State of Texas
and submitted as a revision to the Texas SIP on
February 1, 2006. See also the TCEQ Response to
Comments provided in the preamble to the rule
adoption at 31 TexReg 529, January 27, 2006.
5 See Luminant, 675 F.3d at 922 n. 3 (‘‘although
the projects by definition reduce or maintain
emissions of the primary pollutant, they have the
potential to cause incidental increases in the
emissions of other regulated pollutants.’’
6 The February 1, 2006, SIP submittal also
included amendments to 30 TAC Sections
116.610(a) and 116.610(b). EPA disapproved 30
TAC Sections 116.610(a) and (b) in our September
15, 2010 disapproval of the Rule SP for PCP. See
75 FR 56424. EPA consented to vacatur of our
disapproval of 30 TAC Sections 116.610(a) and (b),
and on March 26, 2012, the Fifth Circuit Court of
Appeals vacated our disapproval of those two
provisions, In response to the Court’s vacatur and
remand, EPA separately finalized approval of 30
E:\FR\FM\01APR1.SGM
01APR1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 62 / Tuesday, April 1, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
September 23, 2009, EPA proposed to
disapprove revisions to the Texas SIP,
including the Rule SP for PCP at 30 TAC
Section 116.617, on the basis that the
Rule SP for PCP did not meet the
requirements for a Minor NSR SIP
revision. 74 FR 48467, 48471. EPA
finalized our disapproval of the Rule SP
for PCP on September 15, 2010. See 75
FR 56424.
Upon finalization of our disapproval,
several parties (Luminant Generation
Company, L.L.C.; Oak Grove
Management Company, L.L.C.; Big
Brown Power Company, L.L.C.;
Luminant Mining Company, L.L.C.;
Sandow Power Company, L.L.C.; Texas
Association of Business; Texas
Association of Manufacturers; Texas Oil
& Gas Association; Chamber of
Commerce of the United States of
America; and the State of Texas)
appealed our disapproval to the Fifth
Circuit Court of Appeals.
Prior to a ruling by the Fifth Circuit
Court of Appeals, the TCEQ conducted
rulemaking to revise the Rule SP for
PCP at 30 TAC Section 116.617 and
issued pursuant to the Texas Minor NSR
SIP, a new Non-Rule SP for PCP to
replace the Rule SP for PCP at 30 TAC
Section 116.617. On February 9, 2011,
TCEQ adopted, without submitting for
SIP approval, revisions to the Rule SP
for PCP at 30 TAC Section 116.617.
Those new non-SIP provisions are
codified at 30 TAC Section 116.617(a)(4)
and (a)(5), and provide that ‘‘no new or
modified registrations will be accepted
and no existing registrations will be
renewed’’ under the Rule SP for PCP
‘‘on or after March 3, 2011.’’ See 36
TexReg 1323, February 25, 2011.
Additionally, the Non-Rule SP for PCP
issued on February 9, 2011, that became
part of the Texas Minor NSR SIP
immediately upon its effective date of
March 3, 2011, requires at sections
(1)(D)(i)–(iii) that all Rule SP for PCP
authorized as of March 3, 2011, must be
converted to a Non-Rule SP for PCP no
later than the ten-year renewal
anniversary of the authorization.7
Therefore, from March 3, 2011, forward,
under the Texas SIP, no source can
register for a new Rule SP for PCP at 30
TAC Section 116.617, and registrants for
the existing Rule SP for PCP must use
TAC Sections 116.610(a) and (b) on February 14,
2014. See 79 FR 8861.
7 The State’s summary document explains that
‘‘This new non-rule standard permit replaces the
existing 30 TAC § 116.617 for authorization of new
pollution control projects (PCP).’’ Air Quality
Standard Permit For Pollution Control Projects
Summary Document, Section II—Explanation and
Background of Air Quality Standard Permit (March
10, 2011), available at https://www.tceq.state.tx.us/
permitting/air/announcements/nsr-announce-3-1011.html.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:19 Mar 31, 2014
Jkt 232001
for revision and renewal purposes, the
Non-Rule SP for PCP which the TCEQ
developed pursuant to the Texas SIP at
30 TAC Sections 116.601(a)(2) and
116.603. 36 TexReg 2305, February 25,
2011. Because a SP must be renewed
every 10 years pursuant to the SIPapproved provisions at 30 TAC Section
116.604, all PCPs currently authorized
under a Rule SP for PCP are required by
the Texas Minor NSR SIP to be renewed
and comply with the Non-Rule SP for
PCP no later than March 3, 2021.
Effectively, the SIP Non-Rule SP for PCP
creates a sunset date beyond which the
Rule SP for PCP will be unavailable.
On March 26, 2012, the Fifth Circuit
Court of Appeals granted the petition for
review, vacated our disapproval of the
Rule SP for PCP, and remanded the
matter back to EPA for further review.
Luminant, 675 F 3d 917. The ruling did
not address the changes Texas had made
to the Rule SP for PCP but not submitted
for SIP approval, including the date
limitations Texas added to the Rule SP
for PCP. Nor did the decision address
the availability of the SIP-approved
Non-Rule SP for PCP as a replacement
for the Rule SP for PCP and the
mechanism to obtain federal
authorization for PCP in Texas.8 The
effect of the ruling was to put back in
front of EPA for review and
consideration as a revision to the Texas
SIP the Rule SP for PCP as submitted on
February 1, 2006. The Fifth Circuit
issued an Order on February 21, 2014,
instructing EPA to issue a final rule
regarding the Rule SP for PCP by May
19, 2014.
Our action today is confined to the
approval of the Rule SP for PCP
submitted on February 1, 2006, at 30
TAC Section 116.617, combined with
the approval of the Rule SP as an
available type of SP, as meeting the
Minor NSR SIP requirements consistent
with the Fifth Circuit decision regarding
the Rule SP for PCP as a Minor NSR
program.9 Today’s action reflects EPA’s
evaluation of the Texas regulations and
its conclusion that the Texas rules are
consistent with the requirements of the
CAA. EPA’s approval of the Rule SP for
8 On remanding the case to EPA, the court noted
as follows ‘‘It is difficult to conceive, and the EPA
has not suggested, how it could disapprove the PCP
Standard Permit under the appropriate statutory
factors . . . when pressed at oral argument, the EPA
was unable to identify any legal deficiencies with
the PCP Standard Permit other than its supposed
failure to meet . . . requirements that today we
hold unlawful—despite the half decade the EPA has
had to evaluate it. Nevertheless, we defer to the
Agency to evaluate Texas’s regulations in light of
the proper CAA standards.’’ Id. At 932 n. 12.
9 The Fifth Circuit has recognized that the Rule
SP for PCP ‘‘applies only to minor NSR.’’ 675 F.3d
at 922.
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
18185
PCP into the Texas SIP will not provide
federal authorization for projects
registered under the Rule SP for PCP
before it was SIP-approved. CAA
Section 110(i); 40 CFR 51.105; see also,
Train v. Natural Res. Def. Council, Inc.,
421 U.S. 60 (1975); Bethlehem Steel
Corp. v. Gorsuch, 742 F.2d 1028, 1034
(7th Cir. 1984); United States v. Ford
Motor Co., 814 F.2d 1099, 1102–03 (6th
Cir. 1987); Sierra Club v. TVA, 430 F.3d
1337, 1347 (11th Cir. 2005).10
C. 30 TAC Section 116.911(a)(2):
Control Method for Grandfathered and
Electing Electric Generating Facilities
We are approving a portion of
revisions to the Texas SIP submitted on
January 3, 2000, regarding the
application and permitting procedures
for grandfathered and electing electric
generating facilities (EGFs). Specifically,
we are approving 30 TAC Section
116.911(a)(2)—Control method.
Background information about the
permitting of grandfathered and electing
EGFs in Texas subject to Texas Senate
Bill 7 (SB 7) is available in EPA’s partial
approval and partial disapproval of the
Texas provisions for permitting
grandfathered and electing EGFs on
January 11, 2011. See 76 FR 1525.
As explained more fully in EPA’s
January 11, 2011 notice, EPA partially
approved and partially disapproved the
Texas provisions for permitting
grandfathered and electing EGFs,
referred to as the Texas SB 7 permitting
program. 76 FR 1525. Specifically, EPA
partially disapproved the provisions for
control methods for grandfathered
electric generating units at 30 TAC
Section 116.911(a)(2) because they
provided that a source could obtain
coverage under the Rule SP for PCP at
30 TAC Section 116.617, which we had
disapproved on September 15, 2010.
Upon finalization of our partial
approval and partial disapproval,
several parties (Luminant Generation
Company, L.L.C.; Big Brown Power
Company, L.L.C.; and the State of Texas)
filed a petition for review of EPA action
to the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals. On
September 12, 2012, EPA requested the
Fifth Circuit vacate our disapproval and
remand the provision back to EPA for
further proceedings. On October 4,
2012, the Fifth Circuit granted our
request by vacating our disapproval of
10 We state this to clarify any potential confusion
created by statements made in the Fifth Circuit
February 21, 2014 Order on Motion to Amend and
Enforce Judgment that seem to imply that
authorizations under the Rule SP for PCP obtained
prior to EPA’s SIP approval ‘‘may in fact be valid
under the Clean Air Act’’ upon approval by EPA.
Luminant et al., v. EPA, Order on Motion to Amend
and Enforce Judgement, Case No. 10–60891, at 9
(5th Cir. Feb. 21, 2014).
E:\FR\FM\01APR1.SGM
01APR1
18186
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 62 / Tuesday, April 1, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
30 TAC Section 116.911(a)(2) and
remanded the matter back to EPA.
Our approval today of 30 TAC Section
116.601(a)(1), into the Texas SIP, results
in the application of the SIP’s general
provisions for SP applying now to Rule
SP as well as Non-Rule SP.
Additionally, our evaluation today is
that the specific Rule SP for PCP at 30
TAC Section 116.617, as submitted on
February 1, 2006, when combined with
the general provisions for SP, satisfies
the requirements for Minor NSR and our
prior basis for disapproval of 30 TAC
Section 116.911(a)(2) is no longer
supportable. Accordingly, today’s direct
final action approving 30 TAC Sections
116.601(a)(1) and 116.617 as part of the
Texas Minor NSR SIP also approves 30
TAC Section 116.911(a)(2) as part of the
Texas SB7 permitting program and the
Minor NSR SIP consistent with the Fifth
Circuit remand and vacatur of the Rule
SP for PCP.
The following table identifies the
sections addressed in today’s direct
final action.11
TABLE 1—SUMMARY OF THE INDIVIDUAL REVISIONS TO EACH SECTION EVALUATED
Section
Date submitted to
EPA
Title
Adopted by state
Comments
January 3, 2000 ......
December 16, 1999
March 11, 2011 .......
February 9, 2011 ....
February 1, 2006 ....
January 11, 2006 ....
New provision at 30 TAC Section
116.601(a)(1) establishes the Rule SP
as one of two types of SP available in
the Texas Minor NSR Program.
Revisions
to
30
TAC
Section
116.601(a)(1) to remove cross-references from the definition of the Rule
SP.
Repeal and replacement of the Rule SP
for PCP at 30 TAC Section 116.617.
Chapter 116
Subchapter F
30 TAC Section 116.601 .........
30 TAC Section 116.617 .........
Types of Standard
Permits.
State Pollution Control Project Standard Permit.
Subchapter I
30 TAC Section 116.911(a)(2)
Control method .......
II. Evaluation of State Submittals
January 3, 2000 ......
December 16, 1999
Requires the use of the Rule SP for PCP
at 30 TAC 116.617.
EPA approved Texas’ regulations for
Non-Rule SP in 30 TAC Chapter 116,
Subchapter F on November 14, 2003 (68
FR 64543) as meeting the federal
requirements for Minor NSR.12 When
the Texas Minor NSR SP Program began
in 1994, all SPs were developed using
the State’s rulemaking process under the
Texas Government Code, Chapter 2001,
Subchapter B. To streamline the process
for development and issuance of SPs
within the Texas Minor NSR Program,
Texas Senate Bill 766 of the 76th
Legislature directed the Texas Natural
Resource Conservation Commission to
develop an alternate process whereby
the SPs could be developed and
implemented without going through the
formal rule-making process.13 On
January 3, 2000, the TCEQ submitted a
SIP revision that created the two types
of SP that exist today in the Texas
Minor NSR Program—the Rule SP and
the Non-Rule SP. Specifically, this
revision to the Texas SIP included:
• New 30 TAC Section 116.601(a)(1)
which identified those SP that were
adopted through rulemaking in
accordance with Texas Government
Code, Chapter 2001, Subchapter B.
(Rule Standard Permits or Rule SP).
• New 30 TAC Section 116.601(a)(2)
which identified those SP that were
issued after a public notice and
comment period in accordance with 30
TAC Section 116.603 (relating to the
Public Participation in Issuance of
Standard Permits) (Non-Rule Standard
Permits or Non-Rule SP) rather than
through rulemaking.14
Since the initial adoption of 30 TAC
Section 116.601(a)(1), the TCEQ has
adopted one revision to the
identification of Rule SPs and submitted
this amendment to the Texas SIP on
March 11, 2011. This non-substantive
revision removes unnecessary crossreferences in the Rule SP regulation in
the Texas SP program for the Rule SP
for PCP and the Rule SP for Oil and Gas
Facilities. This non-substantive revision
also removes the cross-reference to the
repealed Rule SP for Municipal Solid
Waste Landfills. Our direct final
approval addresses the initial adoption
of 30 TAC 116.601(a)(1), as revised
through the March 11, 2011, SIP
submittal.
EPA finds that the 30 TAC Section
116.601(a)(1) as revised through the
March 11, 2011, SIP submittal is an
integral part of the Texas Minor NSR
program and approves it as part of the
Texas Minor NSR SIP. This provision
enables the Texas SIP to meet the
requirements of 40 CFR 51.160 by
clearly identifying the scope of the
Texas SP Program and identifying the
11 Note that the TCEQ also submitted other, nonrelated revisions to the Texas SIP in the
rulemakings identified in the Table. The
accompanying Technical Support Document (TSD)
for this direct final action identifies each submitted
provision and the date of EPA’s action on the
provision. The TSD is available in the rulemaking
docket.
12 EPA did not approve the Rule SP at 30 TAC
Section 116.601(a)(1) or the specific Rule SP for
PCP at 30 TAC Section 116.617, the Rule SP for Oil
and Gas Facilities at 30 TAC 116.620, or the Rule
SP for Municipal Solid Waste Landfills at 30 TAC
Section 116.621 in the November 14, 2003 action.
See 68 FR 64543, at 64547. Since that time, EPA
has approved the Rule SP for Oil and Gas Facilities
at 30 TAC Section 116.620 on February 14, 2014 at
79 FR 8861. The TCEQ repealed the Rule SP for
Municipal Solid Waste Landfills at 30 TAC Section
116.621 on March 1, 2006.
13 The Texas Natural Resource Conservation
Commission is the predecessor agency to the TCEQ,
hereafter referred to as the TCEQ.
14 On November 14, 2003, EPA fully approved the
Non-Rule Standard Permit provisions, including the
identification of the Non-Rule Standard Permits at
30 TAC Sections 116.601(a)(2). See 68 FR 64543.
Thereafter, upon TCEQ issuance of a Non-Rule SP,
the specific Non-Rule SP automatically becomes
part of the Texas Minor NSR SIP.
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
A. 30 TAC Section 116.601(a)(1): Types
of Standard Permits
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:19 Mar 31, 2014
Jkt 232001
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\01APR1.SGM
01APR1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 62 / Tuesday, April 1, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
legally enforceable procedures the
TCEQ will use in developing Rule SPs.
As previously noted, our approval also
means that the general provisions at 30
TAC Sections 601, 604, 605, 606, 610,
611, 614, and 615 approved into the
Texas Minor NSR SIP in our November
14, 2003 action, now apply to the Rule
SP in addition to Non-Rule SP.
Additionally, 30 TAC Section
116.601(a)(1) satisfies the Minor NSR
public notice requirements at 40 CFR
51.161 by specifying that a Rule SP is
developed in accordance with Texas
Government Code, Chapter 2001,
Subchapter B. This is the rulemaking
process that TCEQ uses in developing
any revision to the Texas SIP; under this
Code, when developing a Rule SP the
TCEQ is required to publish notice of
the proposed Rule SP in the Texas
Register. TCEQ is also required to
provide for 30 days notice on the
proposed Rule SP.15
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
B. 30 TAC Section 116.617: State
Pollution Control Project Standard
Permit
Federal regulations at 40 CFR 51.160
require a Minor NSR program to include
legally enforceable procedures that
enable the permitting authority to
ensure that no construction of a facility
or modification will cause a violation of
applicable portions of the control
strategy or interfere with attainment or
maintenance of a NAAQS. The Rule SP
for PCP at 30 TAC Section 116.617
submitted on February 1, 2006, is a
component of the Texas Minor NSR
program. 30 TAC Section 116.610(b)
limits the Texas SP Program to Minor
NSR and provides that a SP cannot be
used to authorize a project that
constitutes a new major stationary
source or major modification. Therefore,
the Rule SP for PCP can be used at
minor sources, or at major sources
taking a Minor NSR action. But in all
cases, the Rule SP for PCP will not
authorize emission increases that would
have triggered Major NSR review under
either the SIP-approved Texas
Prevention of Significant Deterioration
or Nonattainment NSR programs. As
discussed above and in Section I.B. and
as recognized by the Fifth Circuit,
Luminant, 675 F.3d at 922, the
applicability of the Rule SP for PCP is
clearly limited to Minor NSR and EPA
finds that the provisions at 30 TAC
Section 116.617, in conjunction with
the already-SIP approved general
15 As discussed previously, a SP is not a case-bycase permit. Therefore, the Rule SP goes through
public comment during the development process,
but does not have separate notice and comment
requirements for each authorization of the Rule SP.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:19 Mar 31, 2014
Jkt 232001
provisions for SP, satisfy the federal
requirements for a Minor NSR program.
The Rule SP for PCP that we are
acting on now is a Rule SP as identified
in 30 TAC Section 116.601(a)(1). The
TCEQ used the public notice procedures
found in Texas Government Code,
Chapter 2001, Subchapter B to develop
and accept comments on the program.
Consequently, the development of the
Rule SP for PCP provided public notice
that satisfies the requirements for Minor
NSR public notice at 40 CFR 51.161.
Furthermore, because we are approving
into the Texas Minor NSR SIP, 30 TAC
Section 116.601(a)(1), all of the SP
general requirements previously
approved into the Texas SIP in 2003 as
applicable for the Non-Rule SP now
apply to the Rule SP for PCP. The
registrant is required at 30 TAC Section
116.615(1) to protect public health and
welfare. Additionally, sources seeking
authorization via the Rule SP for PCP
are required to submit a SP registration
to TCEQ under 30 TAC Section 116.611,
which must include information
regarding the proposed project to be
authorized (e.g., emission estimates,
description of project and related
process, description of equipment being
installed). 30 TAC Section 116.615
includes general conditions that must be
met by sources authorized by a Rule SP,
including the Rule SP for PCP; these
general conditions specifically require
that the sources authorized under a SP
comply with ‘‘all rules, regulations, and
orders of the commission issued in
conformity with the [Texas Clean Air
Act].’’ See 30 TAC Section 116.615(10).
In the case where more than one state
or federal rule, regulation, or permit
condition is applicable, the source must
comply with the most stringent
requirement or limit. See 30 TAC
Section 116.615(10). Therefore, the
conditions of the Rule SP for PCP in no
way supersede or relax other applicable
state or federal requirements. In
addition, 30 TAC Sections 116.610(a),
116.615, and 116.617(b) require that
sources authorized under the Rule SP
for PCP submit appropriate
documentation to demonstrate
compliance with state and federal
provisions, including New Source
Performance Standards and National
Emission Standards for Hazardous Air
Pollutants. Regarding testing,
recordkeeping, reporting and
monitoring provisions, 30 TAC Section
116.615 requires recordkeeping and
monitoring sufficient to demonstrate
compliance with the Rule SP for PCP
and all other requirements for SP. This
means the sources authorized under a
Rule SP for PCP must maintain records/
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
18187
testing/monitoring/etc sufficient to
demonstrate status as Minor NSR and
compliance with all federal and state
provisions, as discussed above. The
Rule SP for PCP only authorizes
collateral emission increases of
regulated pollutants from permitted
projects that otherwise ‘‘reduce or
maintain currently authorized emission
rates.’’ Additionally, 30 TAC Section
116.617(a)(3)(B) provides that the Rule
SP for PCP cannot be used to authorize
the installation of emission control
equipment or the implementation of a
control technique that the TCEQ
Executive Director has determined has
the potential to exceed a NAAQS until
the potential exceedances are addressed.
Based on all of these provisions, EPA
concludes that the Rule SP for PCP
contains legally enforceable procedures
to prevent interference with a NAAQS.
As previously discussed, EPA
disapproved the Rule SP for PCP on
September 15, 2010. Prior to the ruling
by the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals,
the TCEQ conducted rulemaking to
revise the Rule SP for PCP at 30 TAC
Section 116.617 and to also issue a new
Non-Rule SP for PCP that automatically
became part of the Texas Minor NSR SIP
upon its effective date, to replace the
Rule SP for PCP at 30 TAC Section
116.617. Therefore, from March 3, 2011,
forward, pursuant to the Texas SIP,
sources seeking authorization for a PCP
must register under the Non-Rule SP for
PCP and all renewals and revisions to
currently authorized Rule SP for PCP
must be done under the Non-Rule SP for
PCP. The Non-Rule SP for PCP became
effective on March 3, 2011, and was
developed by TCEQ according to the
requirements of 30 TAC Sections
116.601(a)(2) and 116.603. 36 TexReg
2305, February 25, 2011. Because the
method for issuing the Non-Rule SP for
PCP was approved by EPA into the
Texas SIP in 2003, the Non-Rule SP for
PCP issued by TCEQ is now part of the
Texas Minor NSR SIP.
The TCEQ has not submitted the
revisions to 30 TAC Section 116.617,
the Rule SP for PCP, adopted on
February 9, 2011, as revisions to the
Texas SIP. Therefore, EPA is only
approving as a revision to the Texas
Minor NSR SIP the Rule SP for PCP at
30 TAC Section 116.617 as initially
adopted and submitted February 1,
2006. The February 9, 2011, revisions to
30 TAC Section 116.617(a)(4) and (a)(5)
establishing date and other limitations
are not federally enforceable as SIP
requirements. However, as previously
noted, the issuance of the Non-Rule SP
for PCP created the SIP-approved
mechanism for obtaining initial, revised
and renewal authorizations for PCP.
E:\FR\FM\01APR1.SGM
01APR1
18188
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 62 / Tuesday, April 1, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
C. 30 TAC Section 116.911(a)(2):
Control Method for Grandfathered and
Electing Electric Generating Facilities
EPA previously disapproved 30 TAC
Section 116.911(a)(2) because it allowed
a source to obtain authorization through
30 TAC Section 116.617. However, we
requested the Court to vacate that
disapproval and remand to EPA for
further consideration based on the Fifth
Circuit ruling on EPA’s disapproval of
30 TAC Section 116.617. As discussed
previously in Section II.B of this direct
final action, EPA now approves it as a
SIP revision, based on today’s finding
that 30 TAC Section 116.617 is an
approvable component of the Texas
Minor NSR program. By extension, the
provision in 30 TAC Section
116.911(a)(1) allowing sources to obtain
authorization through 30 TAC Section
116.617 is also an approvable provision
of the Texas Minor NSR program, and
therefore approvable as submitted on
January 3, 2000.
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
D. CAA Section 110(l) Analysis
Under Section 110(l) of the CAA, the
regulations submitted as a SIP revision
adopting and implementing the Texas
SP Program, and specifically the Rule
SP for PCP, must meet the procedural
requirements of Section 110(l) by
demonstrating that the State followed
all necessary procedural requirements
such as providing reasonable notice and
public hearing of the SIP revision.
Additionally, the SIP revision must
demonstrate that the adopted rules will
not interfere with any applicable
requirement concerning attainment and
reasonable further progress, or any other
applicable requirement of the CAA. We
find that the TCEQ satisfied all
requirements pursuant to Section 110(l).
The regulation of minor sources is a
requirement of Section 110(a)(2)(C) of
the CAA and EPA’s regulations at 40
CFR 51.160–51.164. As discussed in this
direct final action and the
accompanying TSD, EPA finds that the
revisions to the Texas SP Program
establishing the type of SP termed the
Rule SP submitted on January 3, 2000
and revised on March 11, 2011; the Rule
SP for PCP submitted on February 1,
2006; and the provision allowing for the
use of the Rule SP for PCP as a control
method for Texas SB7 grandfathered
and electing EGFs as submitted on
January 3, 2000; satisfy the requirements
for Minor NSR. The Rule SP for PCP
when combined with the already SIPapproved general provisions that apply
to all SP, includes adequate provisions
to provide legally enforceable
procedures to ensure protection of the
control strategy and any applicable
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:19 Mar 31, 2014
Jkt 232001
NAAQS. The Texas Minor NSR SIP SP
general provisions, and specifically the
Rule SP for PCP, also contain sufficient
safeguards to prevent circumvention of
Major NSR permitting requirements.
The Rule SP for PCP only authorizes
collateral emission increases of
regulated pollutants from permitted
projects that would otherwise ‘‘reduce
or maintain currently authorized
emissions rates.’’ Additionally, 30 TAC
Section 116.617(a)(3)(B) provides that
the Rule SP for PCP cannot be used to
authorize the installation of emission
control equipment or the
implementation of a control technique
that the TCEQ Executive Director has
determined has the potential to exceed
a NAAQS until the potential
exceedances are addressed. In sum, we
find that the revisions to the Texas SIP
adopting and implementing revisions to
the Texas Minor NSR Program for
Standard Permits, specifically
provisions for the development of Rule
SP and establishment and use of the
Rule SP for PCP, satisfy the
requirements of Section 110(l) of the
Act.
III. Final Action
EPA has made the determination that
the revisions to the Texas SIP submitted
on January 3, 2000, February 1, 2006,
and March 11, 2011, which are part of
this direct final rulemaking, are
approvable because they were adopted
and submitted in accordance with the
CAA and EPA regulations regarding
Minor NSR. Therefore, under section
110 of the Act, and for the reasons
stated above, EPA is taking direct final
action to approve the following
revisions to the Texas SIP:
• The initial submittal of 30 TAC
Section 116.601(a)(1) as a revision to the
Texas SIP on January 3, 2000, and the
subsequent amendments to 30 TAC
Section 116.601(a)(1) submitted on
March 11, 2011.
• The repeal and replacement of 30
TAC Section 116.617 submitted as a
revision to the Texas SIP on February 1,
2006.
• The adoption of 30 TAC Section
116.911(a)(2) submitted as a revision to
the Texas SIP on January 3, 2000.
EPA is publishing this rule without
prior proposal because we view this as
a non-controversial amendment and
anticipate no adverse comments.
However, in the proposed rules section
of this Federal Register publication, we
are publishing a separate document that
will serve as the proposal to approve the
SIP revision if relevant adverse
comments are received. This rule will
be effective on June 2, 2014 without
further notice unless we receive adverse
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
comment by May 1, 2014. If we receive
adverse comments, we will publish a
timely withdrawal in the Federal
Register informing the public that the
rule will not take effect. In that case, we
will address all public comments on
today’s notice in a subsequent final rule
based on the proposed rule. We will not
institute a second comment period on
this action. Any parties interested in
commenting must do so now. Please
note that if we receive adverse comment
on an amendment, paragraph, or section
of this rule and if that provision may be
severed from the remainder of the rule,
we may adopt as final those provisions
of the rule that are not the subject of an
adverse comment.
IV. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is
required to approve a SIP submission
that complies with the provisions of the
Act and applicable Federal regulations.
42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions,
EPA’s role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the CAA. Accordingly, this action
merely approves state law as meeting
Federal requirements and does not
impose additional requirements beyond
those imposed by state law. For that
reason, this action:
• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ subject to review by the Office
of Management and Budget under
Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993);
• does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• is not subject to requirements of
section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
E:\FR\FM\01APR1.SGM
01APR1
18189
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 62 / Tuesday, April 1, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the CAA; and
• does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this rule does not have
tribal implications as specified by
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249,
November 9, 2000), because the SIP is
not approved to apply in Indian country
located in the state, and EPA notes that
it will not impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt
tribal law.
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. section 801 et seq., as added by
the Small Business Regulatory
Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996,
generally provides that before a rule
may take effect, the agency
promulgating the rule must submit a
rule report, which includes a copy of
the rule, to each House of the Congress
and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report
containing this rule and other required
information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S.
House of Representatives, and the
Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of the rule in
the Federal Register. A major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it
is published in the Federal Register.
This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as
defined by 5 U.S.C. section 804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA,
petitions for judicial review of this
action must be filed in the United States
Court of Appeals for the appropriate
circuit by June 2, 2014. Filing a petition
for reconsideration by the Administrator
of this final rule does not affect the
finality of this rule for the purposes of
judicial review nor does it extend the
time within which a petition for judicial
review may be filed, and shall not
postpone the effectiveness of such rule
or action. This action may not be
challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section
307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Hydrocarbons, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations,
Lead, Nitrogen oxides, Ozone,
Particulate matter, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur
oxides, Volatile organic compounds.
Dated: March 21, 2014.
Ron Curry,
Regional Administrator, Region 6.
40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:
PART 52—APPROVAL AND
PROMULGATION OF
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart SS—Texas
2. In § 52.2270 (c), the table titled
‘‘EPA APPROVED REGULATIONS IN
THE TEXAS SIP’’ is amended by:
■ a. Revising the entries for Sections
116.601 and 116.911.
■ b. Adding a new entry for Section
116.617 immediately after the entry for
Section 116.615.
The amendments read as follows:
■
§ 52.2270
*
Identification of plan.
*
*
(c) * * *
*
*
EPA APPROVED REGULATIONS IN THE TEXAS SIP
State citation
*
State
approval/
submittal date
Title/subject
*
*
EPA approval date
*
*
Explanation
*
*
*
*
*
*
Subchapter F—Standard Permits
Section 116.601 ......................
Types of Standard Permits ....
2/9/2011
4/1/2014 [Insert FR page
number where document
begins].
*
*
*
Section 116.617 ...................... State Pollution Control Project
Standard Permit.
*
1/11/2006
*
4/1/2014 [Insert FR page
number where document
begins].
*
*
*
*
*
Subchapter I—Electric Generating Facility Permits
Section 116.911 ......................
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
*
Electric Generating Facility
Permit.
*
5/22/2002
*
*
4/1/2014 [Insert FR page
number where document
begins].
*
*
[FR Doc. 2014–07127 Filed 3–31–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:48 Mar 31, 2014
Jkt 232001
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\01APR1.SGM
Section 116.911(a)(2) is authorized for Minor NSR
only.
01APR1
*
18190
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 62 / Tuesday, April 1, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
50 CFR Part 17
[Docket No. FWS–R8–ES–2013–0099;
FXES11130900000–145–FF09E42000]
RIN 1018–AY44
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife
and Plants; Removing the Island Night
Lizard From the Federal List of
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
Under the authority of the
Endangered Species Act of 1973, as
amended (Act), we, the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (Service), remove the
island night lizard (Xantusia riversiana)
from the Federal List of Endangered and
Threatened Wildlife. This determination
is based on a thorough review of the
best available scientific and commercial
information, which indicates that the
threats to this species have been
eliminated or reduced to the point that
the species has recovered and no longer
meets the definition of an endangered
species or threatened species under the
Act.
DATES: This rule becomes effective on
May 1, 2014.
ADDRESSES: This final rule and postdelisting monitoring plan are available
on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov at Docket Number
[FWS–R8–ES–2013–0099]. Comments
and materials received, as well as
supporting documentation used in the
preparation of this rule, will be
available for public inspection, by
appointment, during normal business
hours at: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service,
Carlsbad Fish and Wildlife Office, 2177
Salk Avenue Suite 250, Carlsbad, CA
92008.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Scott Sobiech, Deputy Field Supervisor,
Carlsbad Fish and Wildlife Office, (see
ADDRESSES); by telephone 760–431–
9440; or by facsimile (fax) 760–431–
5901. If you use a telecommunications
device for the deaf (TDD), please call the
Federal Information Relay Service
(FIRS) at 800–877–8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
Executive Summary
This document contains: (1) A final
rule to remove the island night lizard
from the Federal List of Endangered and
Threatened Wildlife; and (2) a notice of
availability of a final post-delisting
monitoring plan.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
16:48 Mar 31, 2014
Jkt 232001
Species addressed. The island night
lizard (Xantusia riversiana) is endemic
to three federally owned Channel
Islands (San Clemente, San Nicolas, and
Santa Barbara) located off the southern
California coast and a small islet (Sutil
Island) located just southwest of Santa
Barbara Island. San Clemente and San
Nicolas islands are both owned and
managed by the U.S. Navy (Navy) and
Santa Barbara Island is owned and
managed by the National Park Service
(NPS). Habitat restoration and reduced
adverse human-related impacts since
listing have resulted in significant
improvements to habitat quality and
quantity. As a result, threats to the
island night lizard have been largely
ameliorated. Though population
densities were not known at the time of
listing, the island night lizard
populations are currently estimated at
21.3 million lizards on San Clemente
Island, 15,300 lizards on San Nicolas
Island, and 17,600 lizards on Santa
Barbara Island (including Sutil Island).
Purpose of the Regulatory Action.
Under the Endangered Species Act of
1973, we may be petitioned to list,
delist, or reclassify a species. In 2004,
we received a petition from the Navy
asserting that each of the three
occurrences of island night lizard
qualify for recognition as a distinct
population segment (DPS) under the
DPS Policy (61 FR 4722; February 7,
1996) and requesting that we delist the
San Clemente and San Nicolas Island
DPSs (Navy 2004, p. 12). In 2006, we
published a 90-day finding (71 FR
48900, August 22, 2006) concluding that
the Navy’s petition provided substantial
information supporting that delisting
may be warranted and we thus
announced the initiation of a status
review for this species. On February 4,
2013, we published a 12-month finding
in response to the Navy’s petition and
proposed removing the island night
lizard from the Federal List of
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife
(78 FR 7908). Threats to this species
have been largely ameliorated and all
remaining potential threats are currently
managed by the Navy and NPS, with the
exception of climate change, which is
difficult to predict. Therefore, we have
determined in this final rule that the
island night lizard no longer meets the
definitions of threatened or endangered
under the Act. This final rule removes
the island night lizard from the Federal
List of Endangered and Threatened
Wildlife.
Basis for the Regulatory Action.
Under the Act, a species may be
determined to be an endangered species
or threatened species because of any of
five factors: (A) The present or
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
threatened destruction, modification, or
curtailment of its habitat or range; (B)
overutilization for commercial,
recreational, scientific, or educational
purposes; (C) disease or predation; (D)
the inadequacy of existing regulatory
mechanisms; or (E) other natural or
manmade factors affecting its continued
existence. We must consider the same
factors in delisting a species. We may
delist a species if the best scientific and
commercial data indicate the species is
neither threatened nor endangered for
one or more of the following reasons: (1)
The species is extinct; (2) the species
has recovered and is no longer
threatened or endangered; or (3) the
original scientific data used at the time
the species was classified were in error.
Threats to the island night lizard at
the time of listing included destruction
of habitat by feral goats and pigs,
predation, and the introduction of
nonnatives throughout the species’
range. We reviewed all available
scientific and commercial information
pertaining to the five threat factors in
our status review of the island night
lizard. The results of our status review
are summarized below.
• We consider the island night lizard
to be ‘‘recovered’’ because all
substantial threats to the lizard have
been ameliorated.
• All remaining potential threats to
the species and its habitat, with the
exception of climate change, are
currently managed through
implementation of management plans.
• While we recognize that results
from climate change such as rising air
temperatures, lower rainfall amounts,
and rising sea level are important issues
with potential effects to the island night
lizard and its habitat, the best available
information does not indicate that
potential changes in temperature,
precipitation patterns, and rising sea
levels would significantly impact the
island night lizard or its habitat nor rise
to the magnitude or severity such that
the species would be likely to become
an endangered species within the
foreseeable future. We expect that the
lizard’s susceptibility to climate change
is somewhat reduced by its ability to
use varying habitat types and by its
broad generalist diet; therefore, we do
not consider climate change to be a
substantial threat to the species at this
time.
• We find that delisting the island
night lizard is warranted and are
removing this taxon from the Federal
E:\FR\FM\01APR1.SGM
01APR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 62 (Tuesday, April 1, 2014)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 18183-18190]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-07127]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R06-OAR-2014-0191; FRL-9908-27-Region 6]
Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Texas;
Revisions to the Minor New Source Review (NSR) State Implementation
Plan (SIP); Types of Standard Permits, State Pollution Control Project
Standard Permit and Control Methods for the Permitting of Grandfathered
and Electing Electric Generating Facilities
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency.
ACTION: Direct final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is approving several
revisions to the Texas State Implementation Plan (SIP) related to the
Texas Minor New Source Review (NSR) Standard Permits (SP) Program.
First, EPA is approving revisions submitted by the Texas Commission on
Environmental Quality (TCEQ, or Commission) on January 3, 2000, and
March 11, 2011, expanding the Texas SP Program to include the Rule
Standard Permit (Rule SP). The EPA is also approving a revision to the
Texas SIP submitted by the TCEQ on February 1, 2006, for a specific
Rule SP, the Rule Standard Permit for Pollution Control Projects (Rule
SP for PCP) as meeting the requirements for a Minor NSR SIP revision.
Finally, because EPA is approving the Rule SP for PCP, EPA is also
approving a severable portion of the January 3, 2000, submittal
concerning the Texas Senate Bill 7 (SB7) permitting program for
grandfathered and electing electric generating facilities (EGFs). All
of the Texas SB7 EGFs permitting program provisions have been approved
as part of the Texas NSR SIP except for this severable portion. This
severable portion allowing for the use of the Rule SP for PCP for
permitting of collateral emission increases is being approved as
meeting the requirements for a Minor NSR SIP revision. EPA is approving
these actions under section 110 of the Federal Clean Air Act (the Act
or CAA) through a direct final rulemaking.
DATES: This rule is effective on June 2, 2014 without further notice,
unless EPA receives relevant adverse comment by May 1, 2014. If EPA
receives such comment, EPA will publish a timely withdrawal in the
Federal Register informing the public that this rule will not take
effect.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R06-
OAR-2014-0191, by one of the following methods:
www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line instructions.
Email: Ms. Adina Wiley at wiley.adina@epa.gov. Please also
send a copy by email to the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section below.
Mail or delivery: Ms. Adina Wiley, Air Permits Section
(6PD-R), Environmental Protection Agency, 1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 1200,
Dallas, Texas 75202-2733.
Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID No. EPA-R06-OAR-
2014-0191. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included
in the public docket without change and may be made available online at
https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes information claimed to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information the
disclosure of which is restricted by statute. Do not submit information
through https://www.regulations.gov or email, if you believe that it is
CBI or otherwise protected from disclosure. The https://www.regulations.gov Web site is an ``anonymous access'' system, which
means that EPA will not know your identity or contact information
unless you provide it in the body of your comment. If you send an email
comment directly to EPA without going through https://www.regulations.gov, your email address will be automatically captured
and included as part of the comment that is placed in the public docket
and made available on the Internet. If you submit an electronic
comment, EPA recommends that you include your name and other contact
information in the body of your comment along with any disk or CD-ROM
submitted. If EPA cannot read your comment due to technical
difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA may not be
able to consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid the use of
special characters and any form of encryption and should be free of any
defects or viruses. For additional information about EPA's public
docket, visit the EPA Docket Center homepage at https://www.epa.gov/epahome/dockets.htm.
Docket: The index to the docket for this action is available
electronically at www.regulations.gov and in hard copy at EPA Region 6,
1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 700, Dallas, Texas. While all documents in the
docket are listed in the index, some information may be publicly
available only at the hard copy
[[Page 18184]]
location (e.g., copyrighted material), and some may not be publicly
available at either location (e.g., CBI). To inspect the hard copy
materials, please schedule an appointment with the person listed in the
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT paragraph below or Mr. Bill Deese at
214-665-7253.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Rick Barrett (6PD-R), Air Permits
Section, telephone (214) 665-7227; email: barrett.richard@epa.gov. Ms.
Adina Wiley (6PD-R), Air Permits Section, telephone (214) 665-2115;
email: wiley.adina@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document ``we,'' ``our,''
and ``us'' refers to EPA.
Table of Contents
I. Overview of State Submittals
A. 30 TAC Section 116.601(a)(1): Types of Standard Permits
B. 30 TAC Section 116.617: State Pollution Control Project
Standard Permit
C. 30 TAC Section 116.911(a)(2): Control Method for
Grandfathered and Electing Electric Generating Facilities
II. Evaluation of State Submittals
A. 30 TAC Section 116.601(a)(1): Types of Standard Permits
B. 30 TAC Section 116.617: State Pollution Control Project
Standard Permit
C. 30 TAC Section 116.911(a)(2): Control Method for
Grandfathered and Electing Electric Generating Facilities
D. CAA Section 110(l) Analysis
III. Final Action
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Overview of State Submittals
EPA is approving through direct final action revisions to the Texas
Minor NSR Program, related to the Texas SP Program, which were
submitted on January 3, 2000; February 1, 2006; and March 11, 2011, and
are summarized below. The effect of this direct final action will be to
approve into the Texas Minor NSR SIP the provisions for the adoption
and development of the Rule SP, the specific Rule SP for PCP, and a
provision allowing for the use of the Rule SP for PCP for grandfathered
and electing electric generating facilities. The approval of the
provisions for the adoption and development of Rule SP brings this
category of SP under the umbrella provisions of the Texas Minor NSR SIP
SP Program, ensuring that Rule SP meet all the requirements of the Act
for Minor NSR permits. As discussed more fully in Sections I.B and II.B
of this notice, we recognize that the TCEQ has recently promulgated a
Non-Rule SP for PCP to replace the Rule SP for PCP. Despite the
replacement of the Rule SP for PCP with the Non-Rule SP for PCP, the
TCEQ has not withdrawn the Rule SP for PCP from our consideration.
Therefore, we are acting on it today. Additionally, our action today is
responsive to the March 26, 2012, Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals
decision to vacate and remand our September 15, 2010 disapproval of the
Rule SP for PCP, as amended by the Court's order of February 21, 2014,
directing EPA to take final action on this submittal by May 19,
2014.1 2
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Luminant Generation Co., LLC v. EPA, 675 F 3d 917 at 922
(5th Cir. 2012) (hereinafter Luminant).
\2\ Order on Motion to Amend and Enforce Judgment, Luminant
Generation Co. v. EPA, No. 10-60891 (Fifth Cir. Feb. 21, 2014),
amending Luminant.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
A. 30 TAC Section 116.601(a)(1): Types of Standard Permits
Under state law, the Texas Standard Permits (SP) Program at 30 TAC
Chapter 116, Subchapter F, is a component of the Texas Minor NSR
Program. A SP under the Texas Minor NSR Program is not a case-by-case
Minor NSR permit, but rather is a streamlined mechanism with all
permitting requirements for construction and operation of a certain
source category. Within the Texas SP Program, the TCEQ has the ability
to develop and implement two types of Standard Permits--Rule Standard
Permits (Rule SP) and Non-Rule Standard Permits (Non-Rule SP). These
two categories of SP are identified at 30 TAC Section 116.601(a). The
Non-Rule SP and the general provisions applicable to all SP are already
approved as part of the Texas Minor NSR SIP. We are approving into the
Texas Minor NSR SIP portions of two revisions to the Texas SIP
submitted on January 3, 2000, and March 11, 2011, pertaining to the
Rule SP. Specifically, we are approving 30 TAC Section 116.601(a)(1) as
initially adopted on December 16, 1999, and submitted as a revision to
the Texas SIP on January 3, 2000, which addresses the development of
Rule SP. Additionally, we are approving a non-substantive revision to
30 TAC Section 116.601(a)(1) adopted on February 9, 2011, and submitted
as a revision to the Texas SIP on March 11, 2011. EPA has taken no
action to date on the development of Rule SP at 30 TAC Section
116.601(a)(1).\3\ Therefore, our action approves the initial adoption
and submittal on January 3, 2000, and the revisions submitted on March
11, 2011, addressing the development and implementation of Rule SP.
Further, our action today approves the general provisions at 30 TAC
Sections 601, 604, 605, 606, 610, 611, 614 and 615 pertaining to all SP
as applicable to the Rule SP as well as the Non-Rule SP. With today's
action, the category of Rule SP will now become part of the Texas Minor
NSR SIP.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ EPA approved the provision at 30 TAC Section 116.601(a)(2)
regarding the development of Non-Rule SP in a separate rulemaking.
See 68 FR 64543, November 14, 2003.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. 30 TAC Section 116.617: State Pollution Control Project Standard
Permit
The Texas State Pollution Control Project Standard Permit (referred
to as the SP for PCP) before us for SIP action is a Rule SP that must
meet the requirements of 30 TAC Section 116.601(a)(1), which we are
also approving today as described above. The Rule SP for PCP at 30 TAC
Section 116.617 is a component of Texas's broader SP Program, which
originated in 1994.
The Rule SP for PCP authorizes projects undertaken voluntarily, or
as required by any federal or state statute or rule, that reduce or
maintain currently authorized air emission rates for facilities
authorized by a NSR permit, Standard Permit, or Permits by Rule, and
that may have associated Minor NSR collateral emission increases in
other regulated pollutants.4 5 On April 22, 1994, Texas
adopted a regulation at 30 TAC Section 116.617 that was a Rule SP
applicable to pollution control projects for any regulated pollutant.
On January 27, 2006, Texas repealed the previously submitted Rule SP
for PCP and adopted a new Rule SP for PCP that is limited to Minor NSR
only. Texas adopted the new Rule SP for PCP to be consistent with
federal law after the D.C. Circuit limited the use of pollution control
projects to Minor NSR. New York v. EPA, 413 F.3d 3, 40-42 (D.C. Cir.
2005). On February 1, 2006, Texas submitted the newly adopted Rule SP
for PCP found at 30 TAC Section 116.617, among other provisions, to the
EPA for approval into the Texas SIP.\6\ On
[[Page 18185]]
September 23, 2009, EPA proposed to disapprove revisions to the Texas
SIP, including the Rule SP for PCP at 30 TAC Section 116.617, on the
basis that the Rule SP for PCP did not meet the requirements for a
Minor NSR SIP revision. 74 FR 48467, 48471. EPA finalized our
disapproval of the Rule SP for PCP on September 15, 2010. See 75 FR
56424.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See 30 TAC Section 116.617(a)(1) describing the scope and
applicability of the Rule SP for PCP as adopted on January 27, 2006
by the State of Texas and submitted as a revision to the Texas SIP
on February 1, 2006. See also the TCEQ Response to Comments provided
in the preamble to the rule adoption at 31 TexReg 529, January 27,
2006.
\5\ See Luminant, 675 F.3d at 922 n. 3 (``although the projects
by definition reduce or maintain emissions of the primary pollutant,
they have the potential to cause incidental increases in the
emissions of other regulated pollutants.''
\6\ The February 1, 2006, SIP submittal also included amendments
to 30 TAC Sections 116.610(a) and 116.610(b). EPA disapproved 30 TAC
Sections 116.610(a) and (b) in our September 15, 2010 disapproval of
the Rule SP for PCP. See 75 FR 56424. EPA consented to vacatur of
our disapproval of 30 TAC Sections 116.610(a) and (b), and on March
26, 2012, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals vacated our disapproval
of those two provisions, In response to the Court's vacatur and
remand, EPA separately finalized approval of 30 TAC Sections
116.610(a) and (b) on February 14, 2014. See 79 FR 8861.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Upon finalization of our disapproval, several parties (Luminant
Generation Company, L.L.C.; Oak Grove Management Company, L.L.C.; Big
Brown Power Company, L.L.C.; Luminant Mining Company, L.L.C.; Sandow
Power Company, L.L.C.; Texas Association of Business; Texas Association
of Manufacturers; Texas Oil & Gas Association; Chamber of Commerce of
the United States of America; and the State of Texas) appealed our
disapproval to the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals.
Prior to a ruling by the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, the TCEQ
conducted rulemaking to revise the Rule SP for PCP at 30 TAC Section
116.617 and issued pursuant to the Texas Minor NSR SIP, a new Non-Rule
SP for PCP to replace the Rule SP for PCP at 30 TAC Section 116.617. On
February 9, 2011, TCEQ adopted, without submitting for SIP approval,
revisions to the Rule SP for PCP at 30 TAC Section 116.617. Those new
non-SIP provisions are codified at 30 TAC Section 116.617(a)(4) and
(a)(5), and provide that ``no new or modified registrations will be
accepted and no existing registrations will be renewed'' under the Rule
SP for PCP ``on or after March 3, 2011.'' See 36 TexReg 1323, February
25, 2011. Additionally, the Non-Rule SP for PCP issued on February 9,
2011, that became part of the Texas Minor NSR SIP immediately upon its
effective date of March 3, 2011, requires at sections (1)(D)(i)-(iii)
that all Rule SP for PCP authorized as of March 3, 2011, must be
converted to a Non-Rule SP for PCP no later than the ten-year renewal
anniversary of the authorization.\7\ Therefore, from March 3, 2011,
forward, under the Texas SIP, no source can register for a new Rule SP
for PCP at 30 TAC Section 116.617, and registrants for the existing
Rule SP for PCP must use for revision and renewal purposes, the Non-
Rule SP for PCP which the TCEQ developed pursuant to the Texas SIP at
30 TAC Sections 116.601(a)(2) and 116.603. 36 TexReg 2305, February 25,
2011. Because a SP must be renewed every 10 years pursuant to the SIP-
approved provisions at 30 TAC Section 116.604, all PCPs currently
authorized under a Rule SP for PCP are required by the Texas Minor NSR
SIP to be renewed and comply with the Non-Rule SP for PCP no later than
March 3, 2021. Effectively, the SIP Non-Rule SP for PCP creates a
sunset date beyond which the Rule SP for PCP will be unavailable.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ The State's summary document explains that ``This new non-
rule standard permit replaces the existing 30 TAC Sec. 116.617 for
authorization of new pollution control projects (PCP).'' Air Quality
Standard Permit For Pollution Control Projects Summary Document,
Section II--Explanation and Background of Air Quality Standard
Permit (March 10, 2011), available at https://www.tceq.state.tx.us/permitting/air/announcements/nsr-announce-3-10-11.html.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On March 26, 2012, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals granted the
petition for review, vacated our disapproval of the Rule SP for PCP,
and remanded the matter back to EPA for further review. Luminant, 675 F
3d 917. The ruling did not address the changes Texas had made to the
Rule SP for PCP but not submitted for SIP approval, including the date
limitations Texas added to the Rule SP for PCP. Nor did the decision
address the availability of the SIP-approved Non-Rule SP for PCP as a
replacement for the Rule SP for PCP and the mechanism to obtain federal
authorization for PCP in Texas.\8\ The effect of the ruling was to put
back in front of EPA for review and consideration as a revision to the
Texas SIP the Rule SP for PCP as submitted on February 1, 2006. The
Fifth Circuit issued an Order on February 21, 2014, instructing EPA to
issue a final rule regarding the Rule SP for PCP by May 19, 2014.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ On remanding the case to EPA, the court noted as follows
``It is difficult to conceive, and the EPA has not suggested, how it
could disapprove the PCP Standard Permit under the appropriate
statutory factors . . . when pressed at oral argument, the EPA was
unable to identify any legal deficiencies with the PCP Standard
Permit other than its supposed failure to meet . . . requirements
that today we hold unlawful--despite the half decade the EPA has had
to evaluate it. Nevertheless, we defer to the Agency to evaluate
Texas's regulations in light of the proper CAA standards.'' Id. At
932 n. 12.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Our action today is confined to the approval of the Rule SP for PCP
submitted on February 1, 2006, at 30 TAC Section 116.617, combined with
the approval of the Rule SP as an available type of SP, as meeting the
Minor NSR SIP requirements consistent with the Fifth Circuit decision
regarding the Rule SP for PCP as a Minor NSR program.\9\ Today's action
reflects EPA's evaluation of the Texas regulations and its conclusion
that the Texas rules are consistent with the requirements of the CAA.
EPA's approval of the Rule SP for PCP into the Texas SIP will not
provide federal authorization for projects registered under the Rule SP
for PCP before it was SIP-approved. CAA Section 110(i); 40 CFR 51.105;
see also, Train v. Natural Res. Def. Council, Inc., 421 U.S. 60 (1975);
Bethlehem Steel Corp. v. Gorsuch, 742 F.2d 1028, 1034 (7th Cir. 1984);
United States v. Ford Motor Co., 814 F.2d 1099, 1102-03 (6th Cir.
1987); Sierra Club v. TVA, 430 F.3d 1337, 1347 (11th Cir. 2005).\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ The Fifth Circuit has recognized that the Rule SP for PCP
``applies only to minor NSR.'' 675 F.3d at 922.
\10\ We state this to clarify any potential confusion created by
statements made in the Fifth Circuit February 21, 2014 Order on
Motion to Amend and Enforce Judgment that seem to imply that
authorizations under the Rule SP for PCP obtained prior to EPA's SIP
approval ``may in fact be valid under the Clean Air Act'' upon
approval by EPA. Luminant et al., v. EPA, Order on Motion to Amend
and Enforce Judgement, Case No. 10-60891, at 9 (5th Cir. Feb. 21,
2014).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
C. 30 TAC Section 116.911(a)(2): Control Method for Grandfathered and
Electing Electric Generating Facilities
We are approving a portion of revisions to the Texas SIP submitted
on January 3, 2000, regarding the application and permitting procedures
for grandfathered and electing electric generating facilities (EGFs).
Specifically, we are approving 30 TAC Section 116.911(a)(2)--Control
method. Background information about the permitting of grandfathered
and electing EGFs in Texas subject to Texas Senate Bill 7 (SB 7) is
available in EPA's partial approval and partial disapproval of the
Texas provisions for permitting grandfathered and electing EGFs on
January 11, 2011. See 76 FR 1525.
As explained more fully in EPA's January 11, 2011 notice, EPA
partially approved and partially disapproved the Texas provisions for
permitting grandfathered and electing EGFs, referred to as the Texas SB
7 permitting program. 76 FR 1525. Specifically, EPA partially
disapproved the provisions for control methods for grandfathered
electric generating units at 30 TAC Section 116.911(a)(2) because they
provided that a source could obtain coverage under the Rule SP for PCP
at 30 TAC Section 116.617, which we had disapproved on September 15,
2010. Upon finalization of our partial approval and partial
disapproval, several parties (Luminant Generation Company, L.L.C.; Big
Brown Power Company, L.L.C.; and the State of Texas) filed a petition
for review of EPA action to the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals. On
September 12, 2012, EPA requested the Fifth Circuit vacate our
disapproval and remand the provision back to EPA for further
proceedings. On October 4, 2012, the Fifth Circuit granted our request
by vacating our disapproval of
[[Page 18186]]
30 TAC Section 116.911(a)(2) and remanded the matter back to EPA.
Our approval today of 30 TAC Section 116.601(a)(1), into the Texas
SIP, results in the application of the SIP's general provisions for SP
applying now to Rule SP as well as Non-Rule SP. Additionally, our
evaluation today is that the specific Rule SP for PCP at 30 TAC Section
116.617, as submitted on February 1, 2006, when combined with the
general provisions for SP, satisfies the requirements for Minor NSR and
our prior basis for disapproval of 30 TAC Section 116.911(a)(2) is no
longer supportable. Accordingly, today's direct final action approving
30 TAC Sections 116.601(a)(1) and 116.617 as part of the Texas Minor
NSR SIP also approves 30 TAC Section 116.911(a)(2) as part of the Texas
SB7 permitting program and the Minor NSR SIP consistent with the Fifth
Circuit remand and vacatur of the Rule SP for PCP.
The following table identifies the sections addressed in today's
direct final action.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ Note that the TCEQ also submitted other, non-related
revisions to the Texas SIP in the rulemakings identified in the
Table. The accompanying Technical Support Document (TSD) for this
direct final action identifies each submitted provision and the date
of EPA's action on the provision. The TSD is available in the
rulemaking docket.
Table 1--Summary of the Individual Revisions to Each Section Evaluated
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date submitted to
Section Title EPA Adopted by state Comments
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Chapter 116
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subchapter F
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
30 TAC Section 116.601......... Types of Standard January 3, 2000.. December 16, 1999 New provision at 30
Permits. TAC Section
116.601(a)(1)
establishes the Rule
SP as one of two
types of SP available
in the Texas Minor
NSR Program.
March 11, 2011... February 9, 2011. Revisions to 30 TAC
Section 116.601(a)(1)
to remove cross-
references from the
definition of the
Rule SP.
30 TAC Section 116.617......... State Pollution February 1, 2006. January 11, 2006. Repeal and replacement
Control Project of the Rule SP for
Standard Permit. PCP at 30 TAC Section
116.617.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subchapter I
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
30 TAC Section 116.911(a)(2)... Control method... January 3, 2000.. December 16, 1999 Requires the use of
the Rule SP for PCP
at 30 TAC 116.617.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
II. Evaluation of State Submittals
A. 30 TAC Section 116.601(a)(1): Types of Standard Permits
EPA approved Texas' regulations for Non-Rule SP in 30 TAC Chapter
116, Subchapter F on November 14, 2003 (68 FR 64543) as meeting the
federal requirements for Minor NSR.\12\ When the Texas Minor NSR SP
Program began in 1994, all SPs were developed using the State's
rulemaking process under the Texas Government Code, Chapter 2001,
Subchapter B. To streamline the process for development and issuance of
SPs within the Texas Minor NSR Program, Texas Senate Bill 766 of the
76th Legislature directed the Texas Natural Resource Conservation
Commission to develop an alternate process whereby the SPs could be
developed and implemented without going through the formal rule-making
process.\13\ On January 3, 2000, the TCEQ submitted a SIP revision that
created the two types of SP that exist today in the Texas Minor NSR
Program--the Rule SP and the Non-Rule SP. Specifically, this revision
to the Texas SIP included:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ EPA did not approve the Rule SP at 30 TAC Section
116.601(a)(1) or the specific Rule SP for PCP at 30 TAC Section
116.617, the Rule SP for Oil and Gas Facilities at 30 TAC 116.620,
or the Rule SP for Municipal Solid Waste Landfills at 30 TAC Section
116.621 in the November 14, 2003 action. See 68 FR 64543, at 64547.
Since that time, EPA has approved the Rule SP for Oil and Gas
Facilities at 30 TAC Section 116.620 on February 14, 2014 at 79 FR
8861. The TCEQ repealed the Rule SP for Municipal Solid Waste
Landfills at 30 TAC Section 116.621 on March 1, 2006.
\13\ The Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission is the
predecessor agency to the TCEQ, hereafter referred to as the TCEQ.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
New 30 TAC Section 116.601(a)(1) which identified those SP
that were adopted through rulemaking in accordance with Texas
Government Code, Chapter 2001, Subchapter B. (Rule Standard Permits or
Rule SP).
New 30 TAC Section 116.601(a)(2) which identified those SP
that were issued after a public notice and comment period in accordance
with 30 TAC Section 116.603 (relating to the Public Participation in
Issuance of Standard Permits) (Non-Rule Standard Permits or Non-Rule
SP) rather than through rulemaking.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ On November 14, 2003, EPA fully approved the Non-Rule
Standard Permit provisions, including the identification of the Non-
Rule Standard Permits at 30 TAC Sections 116.601(a)(2). See 68 FR
64543. Thereafter, upon TCEQ issuance of a Non-Rule SP, the specific
Non-Rule SP automatically becomes part of the Texas Minor NSR SIP.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Since the initial adoption of 30 TAC Section 116.601(a)(1), the
TCEQ has adopted one revision to the identification of Rule SPs and
submitted this amendment to the Texas SIP on March 11, 2011. This non-
substantive revision removes unnecessary cross-references in the Rule
SP regulation in the Texas SP program for the Rule SP for PCP and the
Rule SP for Oil and Gas Facilities. This non-substantive revision also
removes the cross-reference to the repealed Rule SP for Municipal Solid
Waste Landfills. Our direct final approval addresses the initial
adoption of 30 TAC 116.601(a)(1), as revised through the March 11,
2011, SIP submittal.
EPA finds that the 30 TAC Section 116.601(a)(1) as revised through
the March 11, 2011, SIP submittal is an integral part of the Texas
Minor NSR program and approves it as part of the Texas Minor NSR SIP.
This provision enables the Texas SIP to meet the requirements of 40 CFR
51.160 by clearly identifying the scope of the Texas SP Program and
identifying the
[[Page 18187]]
legally enforceable procedures the TCEQ will use in developing Rule
SPs. As previously noted, our approval also means that the general
provisions at 30 TAC Sections 601, 604, 605, 606, 610, 611, 614, and
615 approved into the Texas Minor NSR SIP in our November 14, 2003
action, now apply to the Rule SP in addition to Non-Rule SP.
Additionally, 30 TAC Section 116.601(a)(1) satisfies the Minor NSR
public notice requirements at 40 CFR 51.161 by specifying that a Rule
SP is developed in accordance with Texas Government Code, Chapter 2001,
Subchapter B. This is the rulemaking process that TCEQ uses in
developing any revision to the Texas SIP; under this Code, when
developing a Rule SP the TCEQ is required to publish notice of the
proposed Rule SP in the Texas Register. TCEQ is also required to
provide for 30 days notice on the proposed Rule SP.\15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ As discussed previously, a SP is not a case-by-case permit.
Therefore, the Rule SP goes through public comment during the
development process, but does not have separate notice and comment
requirements for each authorization of the Rule SP.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. 30 TAC Section 116.617: State Pollution Control Project Standard
Permit
Federal regulations at 40 CFR 51.160 require a Minor NSR program to
include legally enforceable procedures that enable the permitting
authority to ensure that no construction of a facility or modification
will cause a violation of applicable portions of the control strategy
or interfere with attainment or maintenance of a NAAQS. The Rule SP for
PCP at 30 TAC Section 116.617 submitted on February 1, 2006, is a
component of the Texas Minor NSR program. 30 TAC Section 116.610(b)
limits the Texas SP Program to Minor NSR and provides that a SP cannot
be used to authorize a project that constitutes a new major stationary
source or major modification. Therefore, the Rule SP for PCP can be
used at minor sources, or at major sources taking a Minor NSR action.
But in all cases, the Rule SP for PCP will not authorize emission
increases that would have triggered Major NSR review under either the
SIP-approved Texas Prevention of Significant Deterioration or
Nonattainment NSR programs. As discussed above and in Section I.B. and
as recognized by the Fifth Circuit, Luminant, 675 F.3d at 922, the
applicability of the Rule SP for PCP is clearly limited to Minor NSR
and EPA finds that the provisions at 30 TAC Section 116.617, in
conjunction with the already-SIP approved general provisions for SP,
satisfy the federal requirements for a Minor NSR program.
The Rule SP for PCP that we are acting on now is a Rule SP as
identified in 30 TAC Section 116.601(a)(1). The TCEQ used the public
notice procedures found in Texas Government Code, Chapter 2001,
Subchapter B to develop and accept comments on the program.
Consequently, the development of the Rule SP for PCP provided public
notice that satisfies the requirements for Minor NSR public notice at
40 CFR 51.161. Furthermore, because we are approving into the Texas
Minor NSR SIP, 30 TAC Section 116.601(a)(1), all of the SP general
requirements previously approved into the Texas SIP in 2003 as
applicable for the Non-Rule SP now apply to the Rule SP for PCP. The
registrant is required at 30 TAC Section 116.615(1) to protect public
health and welfare. Additionally, sources seeking authorization via the
Rule SP for PCP are required to submit a SP registration to TCEQ under
30 TAC Section 116.611, which must include information regarding the
proposed project to be authorized (e.g., emission estimates,
description of project and related process, description of equipment
being installed). 30 TAC Section 116.615 includes general conditions
that must be met by sources authorized by a Rule SP, including the Rule
SP for PCP; these general conditions specifically require that the
sources authorized under a SP comply with ``all rules, regulations, and
orders of the commission issued in conformity with the [Texas Clean Air
Act].'' See 30 TAC Section 116.615(10). In the case where more than one
state or federal rule, regulation, or permit condition is applicable,
the source must comply with the most stringent requirement or limit.
See 30 TAC Section 116.615(10). Therefore, the conditions of the Rule
SP for PCP in no way supersede or relax other applicable state or
federal requirements. In addition, 30 TAC Sections 116.610(a), 116.615,
and 116.617(b) require that sources authorized under the Rule SP for
PCP submit appropriate documentation to demonstrate compliance with
state and federal provisions, including New Source Performance
Standards and National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants.
Regarding testing, recordkeeping, reporting and monitoring provisions,
30 TAC Section 116.615 requires recordkeeping and monitoring sufficient
to demonstrate compliance with the Rule SP for PCP and all other
requirements for SP. This means the sources authorized under a Rule SP
for PCP must maintain records/testing/monitoring/etc sufficient to
demonstrate status as Minor NSR and compliance with all federal and
state provisions, as discussed above. The Rule SP for PCP only
authorizes collateral emission increases of regulated pollutants from
permitted projects that otherwise ``reduce or maintain currently
authorized emission rates.'' Additionally, 30 TAC Section
116.617(a)(3)(B) provides that the Rule SP for PCP cannot be used to
authorize the installation of emission control equipment or the
implementation of a control technique that the TCEQ Executive Director
has determined has the potential to exceed a NAAQS until the potential
exceedances are addressed. Based on all of these provisions, EPA
concludes that the Rule SP for PCP contains legally enforceable
procedures to prevent interference with a NAAQS.
As previously discussed, EPA disapproved the Rule SP for PCP on
September 15, 2010. Prior to the ruling by the Fifth Circuit Court of
Appeals, the TCEQ conducted rulemaking to revise the Rule SP for PCP at
30 TAC Section 116.617 and to also issue a new Non-Rule SP for PCP that
automatically became part of the Texas Minor NSR SIP upon its effective
date, to replace the Rule SP for PCP at 30 TAC Section 116.617.
Therefore, from March 3, 2011, forward, pursuant to the Texas SIP,
sources seeking authorization for a PCP must register under the Non-
Rule SP for PCP and all renewals and revisions to currently authorized
Rule SP for PCP must be done under the Non-Rule SP for PCP. The Non-
Rule SP for PCP became effective on March 3, 2011, and was developed by
TCEQ according to the requirements of 30 TAC Sections 116.601(a)(2) and
116.603. 36 TexReg 2305, February 25, 2011. Because the method for
issuing the Non-Rule SP for PCP was approved by EPA into the Texas SIP
in 2003, the Non-Rule SP for PCP issued by TCEQ is now part of the
Texas Minor NSR SIP.
The TCEQ has not submitted the revisions to 30 TAC Section 116.617,
the Rule SP for PCP, adopted on February 9, 2011, as revisions to the
Texas SIP. Therefore, EPA is only approving as a revision to the Texas
Minor NSR SIP the Rule SP for PCP at 30 TAC Section 116.617 as
initially adopted and submitted February 1, 2006. The February 9, 2011,
revisions to 30 TAC Section 116.617(a)(4) and (a)(5) establishing date
and other limitations are not federally enforceable as SIP
requirements. However, as previously noted, the issuance of the Non-
Rule SP for PCP created the SIP-approved mechanism for obtaining
initial, revised and renewal authorizations for PCP.
[[Page 18188]]
C. 30 TAC Section 116.911(a)(2): Control Method for Grandfathered and
Electing Electric Generating Facilities
EPA previously disapproved 30 TAC Section 116.911(a)(2) because it
allowed a source to obtain authorization through 30 TAC Section
116.617. However, we requested the Court to vacate that disapproval and
remand to EPA for further consideration based on the Fifth Circuit
ruling on EPA's disapproval of 30 TAC Section 116.617. As discussed
previously in Section II.B of this direct final action, EPA now
approves it as a SIP revision, based on today's finding that 30 TAC
Section 116.617 is an approvable component of the Texas Minor NSR
program. By extension, the provision in 30 TAC Section 116.911(a)(1)
allowing sources to obtain authorization through 30 TAC Section 116.617
is also an approvable provision of the Texas Minor NSR program, and
therefore approvable as submitted on January 3, 2000.
D. CAA Section 110(l) Analysis
Under Section 110(l) of the CAA, the regulations submitted as a SIP
revision adopting and implementing the Texas SP Program, and
specifically the Rule SP for PCP, must meet the procedural requirements
of Section 110(l) by demonstrating that the State followed all
necessary procedural requirements such as providing reasonable notice
and public hearing of the SIP revision. Additionally, the SIP revision
must demonstrate that the adopted rules will not interfere with any
applicable requirement concerning attainment and reasonable further
progress, or any other applicable requirement of the CAA. We find that
the TCEQ satisfied all requirements pursuant to Section 110(l).
The regulation of minor sources is a requirement of Section
110(a)(2)(C) of the CAA and EPA's regulations at 40 CFR 51.160-51.164.
As discussed in this direct final action and the accompanying TSD, EPA
finds that the revisions to the Texas SP Program establishing the type
of SP termed the Rule SP submitted on January 3, 2000 and revised on
March 11, 2011; the Rule SP for PCP submitted on February 1, 2006; and
the provision allowing for the use of the Rule SP for PCP as a control
method for Texas SB7 grandfathered and electing EGFs as submitted on
January 3, 2000; satisfy the requirements for Minor NSR. The Rule SP
for PCP when combined with the already SIP-approved general provisions
that apply to all SP, includes adequate provisions to provide legally
enforceable procedures to ensure protection of the control strategy and
any applicable NAAQS. The Texas Minor NSR SIP SP general provisions,
and specifically the Rule SP for PCP, also contain sufficient
safeguards to prevent circumvention of Major NSR permitting
requirements. The Rule SP for PCP only authorizes collateral emission
increases of regulated pollutants from permitted projects that would
otherwise ``reduce or maintain currently authorized emissions rates.''
Additionally, 30 TAC Section 116.617(a)(3)(B) provides that the Rule SP
for PCP cannot be used to authorize the installation of emission
control equipment or the implementation of a control technique that the
TCEQ Executive Director has determined has the potential to exceed a
NAAQS until the potential exceedances are addressed. In sum, we find
that the revisions to the Texas SIP adopting and implementing revisions
to the Texas Minor NSR Program for Standard Permits, specifically
provisions for the development of Rule SP and establishment and use of
the Rule SP for PCP, satisfy the requirements of Section 110(l) of the
Act.
III. Final Action
EPA has made the determination that the revisions to the Texas SIP
submitted on January 3, 2000, February 1, 2006, and March 11, 2011,
which are part of this direct final rulemaking, are approvable because
they were adopted and submitted in accordance with the CAA and EPA
regulations regarding Minor NSR. Therefore, under section 110 of the
Act, and for the reasons stated above, EPA is taking direct final
action to approve the following revisions to the Texas SIP:
The initial submittal of 30 TAC Section 116.601(a)(1) as a
revision to the Texas SIP on January 3, 2000, and the subsequent
amendments to 30 TAC Section 116.601(a)(1) submitted on March 11, 2011.
The repeal and replacement of 30 TAC Section 116.617
submitted as a revision to the Texas SIP on February 1, 2006.
The adoption of 30 TAC Section 116.911(a)(2) submitted as
a revision to the Texas SIP on January 3, 2000.
EPA is publishing this rule without prior proposal because we view
this as a non-controversial amendment and anticipate no adverse
comments. However, in the proposed rules section of this Federal
Register publication, we are publishing a separate document that will
serve as the proposal to approve the SIP revision if relevant adverse
comments are received. This rule will be effective on June 2, 2014
without further notice unless we receive adverse comment by May 1,
2014. If we receive adverse comments, we will publish a timely
withdrawal in the Federal Register informing the public that the rule
will not take effect. In that case, we will address all public comments
on today's notice in a subsequent final rule based on the proposed
rule. We will not institute a second comment period on this action. Any
parties interested in commenting must do so now. Please note that if we
receive adverse comment on an amendment, paragraph, or section of this
rule and if that provision may be severed from the remainder of the
rule, we may adopt as final those provisions of the rule that are not
the subject of an adverse comment.
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this
action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and
does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state
law. For that reason, this action:
Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993);
does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
is not subject to requirements of section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because
[[Page 18189]]
application of those requirements would be inconsistent with the CAA;
and
does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this rule does not have tribal implications as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000),
because the SIP is not approved to apply in Indian country located in
the state, and EPA notes that it will not impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law.
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. section 801 et seq., as
added by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of
1996, generally provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency
promulgating the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy
of the rule, to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller
General of the United States. EPA will submit a report containing this
rule and other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House
of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States
prior to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
section 804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for
the appropriate circuit by June 2, 2014. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect
the finality of this rule for the purposes of judicial review nor does
it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may be
filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or action.
This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to enforce its
requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Hydrocarbons, Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations,
Lead, Nitrogen oxides, Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile organic compounds.
Dated: March 21, 2014.
Ron Curry,
Regional Administrator, Region 6.
40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:
PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart SS--Texas
0
2. In Sec. 52.2270 (c), the table titled ``EPA APPROVED REGULATIONS IN
THE TEXAS SIP'' is amended by:
0
a. Revising the entries for Sections 116.601 and 116.911.
0
b. Adding a new entry for Section 116.617 immediately after the entry
for Section 116.615.
The amendments read as follows:
Sec. 52.2270 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
EPA Approved Regulations in the Texas SIP
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State approval/
State citation Title/subject submittal EPA approval date Explanation
date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subchapter F--Standard Permits
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Section 116.601.................. Types of Standard 2/9/2011 4/1/2014 [Insert FR
Permits. page number where
document begins].
* * * * * * *
Section 116.617.................. State Pollution 1/11/2006 4/1/2014 [Insert FR
Control Project page number where
Standard Permit. document begins].
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subchapter I--Electric Generating Facility Permits
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Section 116.911.................. Electric Generating 5/22/2002 4/1/2014 [Insert FR Section
Facility Permit. page number where 116.911(a)(2) is
document begins]. authorized for
Minor NSR only.
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[FR Doc. 2014-07127 Filed 3-31-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P