Notice of Intent To Repatriate Cultural Items: U.S. Department of Defense, Department of the Navy, Washington, DC, 18062-18063 [2014-07137]
Download as PDF
18062
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 61 / Monday, March 31, 2014 / Notices
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
3005, of the intent to repatriate a
cultural item under the control of TVA
that meets the definition of unassociated
funerary objects under 25 U.S.C. 3001.
This notice is published as part of the
National Park Service’s administrative
responsibilities under NAGPRA, 25
U.S.C. 3003(d)(3). The determinations in
this notice are the sole responsibility of
the museum, institution, or Federal
agency that has control of the Native
American cultural items. The National
Park Service is not responsible for the
determinations in this notice.
History and Description of the Cultural
Item
From April 27, 1938, to November 10,
1939, 1 cultural item was removed from
the Cox site (1JA176), in Jackson
County, AL. The Cox site was excavated
as part of TVA’s Guntersville reservoir
project by the Alabama Museum of
Natural History (AMNH) at the
University of Alabama, using labor and
funds provided by the Works Progress
Administration. Excavation of the land
commenced after TVA had acquired this
land for the Guntersville project. The
excavation site was composed of a
conical mound believed to have
originally been a truncated pyramid,
with multiple stratigraphic zones and
also a village site containing most of the
burial units. This site was occupied
during the Crow Creek phase (ca. A.D.
1400–1600). Details regarding this site
may be found in An Archaeological
Survey of Guntersville Basin on the
Tennessee River in Northern Alabama
by William S. Webb and Charles G.
Wilder. The unassociated funerary
object excavated from the Cox site is 1
shell-tempered ceramic pot, and it has
always been in the physical custody of
the AMNH at the University of
Alabama.
This unassociated funerary object was
recovered from one burial feature. The
human remains from this burial feature
were either not collected during
excavation or have been misplaced in
the last 74 years. This ceramic pot is
shell-tempered and the exterior has
multiple nodes. This unassociated
funerary object is similar to others in
use at the end of the Mississippian
period.
Although there is no scientific
certainty that Native Americans of the
Crow Creek phase are directly related to
modern Federally recognized tribes,
Spanish explorers of the 16th centuries
do indicate the presence of chiefdom
level tribal entities in the southeastern
United States. The Coosa paramount
chiefdom noted in historical chronicles
is the most likely entity related to Crow
Creek sites in this part of the
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:10 Mar 28, 2014
Jkt 232001
Guntersville Reservoir. Tribal groups or
towns now part of The Muscogee
(Creek) Nation claim descent from the
Coosa chiefdom. The preponderance of
the evidence indicates that in this part
of the Guntersville Reservoir area, Crow
Creek phase sites are most likely
culturally associated with groups now
part of the Muscogee (Creek) Nation.
Determinations Made by the Tennessee
Valley Authority
Officials of TVA have determined
that:
• Pursuant to 25 U.S.C. 3001(3)(B),
the 1 cultural item described in this
notice is reasonably believed to have
been placed with or near individual
human remains at the time of death or
later as part of the death rite or
ceremony and is believed, by a
preponderance of the evidence, to have
been removed from a specific burial site
of a Native American individual.
• Pursuant to 25 U.S.C. 3001(2), there
is a relationship of shared group
identity that can be reasonably traced
between the unassociated funerary
object and The Muscogee (Creek)
Nation.
Additional Requestors and Disposition
Lineal descendants or representatives
of any Federally recognized Indian tribe
not identified in this notice that wish to
claim these cultural items should
submit a written request with
information in support of the claim to
Dr. Thomas O. Maher, TVA, 400 West
Summit Hill Drive, WT11D, Knoxville,
TN 37902–1401, telephone (865) 632–
7458, email tomaher@tva.gov, by April
30, 2014. After that date, if no
additional claimants have come
forward, transfer of control of the
unassociated funerary object to The
Muscogee (Creek) Nation may proceed.
TVA is responsible for notifying the
University of Alabama and the
Absentee-Shawnee Tribe of Oklahoma;
Alabama-Coushatta Tribe of Texas
(previously listed as the AlabamaCoushatta Tribes of Texas); AlabamaQuassarte Tribal Town; Cherokee
Nation; Eastern Band of Cherokee
Indians; Eastern Shawnee Tribe of
Oklahoma; Kialegee Tribal Town;
Poarch Band of Creeks (previously listed
as the Poarch Band of Creek Indians of
Alabama); Seminole Tribe of Florida
(previously listed as the Seminole Tribe
of Florida (Dania, Big Cypress, Brighton,
Hollywood & Tampa Reservations));
Shawnee Tribe; The Chickasaw Nation;
The Muscogee (Creek) Nation; The
Seminole Nation of Oklahoma;
Thlopthlocco Tribal Town; and the
United Keetoowah Band of Cherokee
PO 00000
Frm 00059
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Indians in Oklahoma, that this notice
has been published.
Dated: March 11, 2014.
Sherry Hutt,
Manager, National NAGPRA Program.
[FR Doc. 2014–07150 Filed 3–28–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4312–50–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Park Service
[NPS–WASO–NAGPRA–15213;
PPWOCRADN0–PCU00RP14.R50000]
Notice of Intent To Repatriate Cultural
Items: U.S. Department of Defense,
Department of the Navy, Washington,
DC
National Park Service, Interior.
Notice.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The U.S. Department of
Defense, Department of the Navy (DoN),
in consultation with the Native Village
of Barrow Inupiat Traditional
Government, has determined that the
cultural items listed in this notice meet
the definition of unassociated funerary
objects and objects of cultural
patrimony. Representatives of any
Indian tribe not identified in this notice
that wish to claim these cultural items
should submit a written request to the
DoN. If no additional claimants come
forward, transfer of control of the
cultural items to the Indian tribe stated
in this notice may proceed.
DATES: Representatives of any Indian
tribe not identified in this notice that
wish to claim these cultural items
should submit a written request with
information in support of the claim to
the DoN at the address in this notice by
April 30, 2014.
ADDRESSES: Dave M. Grant, Department
of the Navy, NAVFAC NW., 1101
Tautog Circle, Suite 102, Silverdale, WA
98315–1101, telephone (360) 396–0919,
email dave.m.grant@navy.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is
here given in accordance with the
Native American Graves Protection and
Repatriation Act (NAGPRA), 25 U.S.C.
3005, of the intent to repatriate cultural
items under the control of the U.S.
Department of Defense, Department of
the Navy, Washington, DC, that meet the
definition of unassociated funerary
objects or objects of cultural patrimony
under 25 U.S.C. 3001.
This notice is published as part of the
National Park Service’s administrative
responsibilities under NAGPRA, 25
U.S.C. 3003(d)(3). The determinations in
this notice are the sole responsibility of
the museum, institution, or Federal
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\31MRN1.SGM
31MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 61 / Monday, March 31, 2014 / Notices
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
agency that has control of the Native
American cultural items. The National
Park Service is not responsible for the
determinations in this notice.
History and Description of the Cultural
Item(s)
In 1951 to 1953, unassociated
funerary objects and objects of cultural
patrimony were removed from the sites
of Birnirk, Nuvuk, and the Brower Grave
site near Point Barrow in North Slope
Borough, AK. The objects were
recovered during archeological
excavations authorized under an
Antiquities Act permit and directed by
Wilbert Carter of the Peabody Museum,
Harvard University. The collections
were returned to the Peabody Museum,
were transferred for a time to Tufts
University, and were returned to the
Peabody Museum by Mr. Carter in 1984.
The archeological collections were
transferred to a Department of the Navy
contract facility in Conshohocken, PA in
2006, and in 2011, the objects were
transferred to the Museum of the North,
University of Alaska at Fairbanks.
The four unassociated funerary
objects were retrieved from the ‘‘Brower
Grave Site, Barrow,’’ and include three
pottery sherds and one antler arrow
point. The four objects from the Brower
Grave Site were evidently recovered
from the surface, as there is no
indication that the grave was excavated.
Two objects of cultural patrimony (a
wooden mask from Mound 5 and an
ivory drum handle with an effigy end
from Midden H) were removed in July
1952 from the Nuvuk site on Point
Barrow. One object of cultural
patrimony (a small wooden mask from
Mound Q) was removed in 1951 at the
Birnirk site near Point Barrow. All three
objects were evaluated during the
NAGPRA consultation process and
determined to be objects of cultural
patrimony.
The wooden mask from Nuvuk
Mound 5 was considered during the
consultation to have reflected dance
ceremonies probably within a karigi, a
nexus of whale hunting activity and
broader social interaction. Robert
Spencer (The North Alaskan Eskimo,
Bureau of American Ethnology Bulletin
171 (1959), pages 293–294) discussed
masks as follows: ‘‘These were never too
important in the North Alaskan Eskimo
areas . . . . The masks which were used
were principally dance masks. There
may have been a concept of
supernatural impersonation but
certainly, it is not well developed. A
suggestion of this appears in the dances
associated with the whaling feasts . . . .
The mask was a simple wooden face
mask with slits for eyes and mouth.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:10 Mar 28, 2014
Jkt 232001
. . .’’ The mask from Nuvuk Mound 5
conforms very closely to this
description. Spencer noted that John
Murdoch (Ethnological Results of the
Point Barrow Expedition, Ninth Annual
Report of the Bureau for Ethnology
(1892), pages 366–369) had observed
and illustrated such masks in use in the
Point Barrow area.
The ivory drum handle with an effigy
end from Nuvuk Midden H was
considered to be associated with dance
celebrations that continue to be
practiced on various occasions by
modern inhabitants of the region. This
continuity was emphasized by Wilbert
Carter (Masterpieces of the Peabody
Museum (1978), page 19): ‘‘Eskimos
were also known to carve a lifelike
human face on one end of a drum
handle, the end obscured from view
under the tambourine-type drumhead.
Even modern Eskimos immediately
interpret this and see no contradiction
in the amount of artistic effort exerted
to produce a visage that is hidden from
view. The hidden head is the ‘‘voice’’ of
the drum!’’
The small wooden mask from Birnirk
Mound Q was recovered from an
archeological context that suggested
association with the early Birnirk
period, dating to between A.D. 500 and
700. Such small masks may have served
in shamanistic practices or amulet uses;
they may also have been masks of ‘‘little
people.’’
Determinations Made by the U.S.
Department of Defense, Department of
Navy
Officials of the U.S. Department of
Defense, Department of Navy have
determined that:
• Pursuant to 25 U.S.C. 3001(3)(B),
the four objects from the Brower Grave
Site are reasonably believed to have
been placed with or near individual
human remains at the time of death or
later as part of the death rite or
ceremony and are believed, by a
preponderance of the evidence, to have
been removed from a specific burial site
of a Native American individual.
• Pursuant to 25 U.S.C. 3001(3)(D),
the three objects discussed above that
were excavated from the Birnirk and
Nuvuk sites have ongoing historical,
traditional, or cultural importance
central to the Native Village of Barrow
Inupiat Traditional Government.
• Pursuant to 25 U.S.C. 3001(2), there
is a relationship of shared group
identity that can be reasonably traced
between the unassociated funerary
objects and objects of cultural
patrimony and Native Village of Barrow
Inupiat Traditional Government.
PO 00000
Frm 00060
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
18063
Additional Requestors and Disposition
Representatives of any Indian tribe
not identified in this notice that wish to
claim these cultural items should
submit a written request with
information in support of the claim to
Dave M. Grant, Department of the Navy,
NAVFAC NW., 1101 Tautog Circle,
Suite 102, Silverdale, WA 98315–1101,
telephone (360) 396–0919, email
dave.m.grant@navy.mil, by April 30,
2014. After that date, if no additional
claimants have come forward, transfer
of control of the unassociated funerary
objects and objects of cultural
patrimony to the Native Village of
Barrow Inupiat Traditional Government
may proceed.
The U.S. Department of Defense,
Department of the Navy is responsible
for notifying the Native Village of
Barrow Inupiat Traditional Government
that this notice has been published.
Dated: March 10, 2014.
Sherry Hutt,
Manager, National NAGPRA Program.
[FR Doc. 2014–07137 Filed 3–28–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4312–50–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Park Service
[NPS–WASO–NAGPRA–15181;
PPWOCRADN0–PCU00RP14.R50000]
Notice of Intent to Repatriate Cultural
Items: Oakland Museum of California
National Park Service, Interior.
Notice.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Oakland Museum of
California, in consultation with the
appropriate Indian tribes or Native
Hawaiian organizations, has determined
that the cultural item listed in this
notice meets the definition of a sacred
object and an object of cultural
patrimony. Lineal descendants or
representatives of any Indian tribe or
Native Hawaiian organization not
identified in this notice that wish to
claim this cultural item should submit
a written request to the Oakland
Museum of California. If no additional
claimants come forward, transfer of
control of the cultural item to the lineal
descendants, Indian tribes, or Native
Hawaiian organizations stated in this
notice may proceed.
DATES: Lineal descendants or
representatives of any Indian tribe or
Native Hawaiian organization not
identified in this notice that wish to
claim this cultural item should submit
a written request with information in
support of the claim to the Oakland
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\31MRN1.SGM
31MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 61 (Monday, March 31, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 18062-18063]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-07137]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Park Service
[NPS-WASO-NAGPRA-15213; PPWOCRADN0-PCU00RP14.R50000]
Notice of Intent To Repatriate Cultural Items: U.S. Department of
Defense, Department of the Navy, Washington, DC
AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Defense, Department of the Navy (DoN),
in consultation with the Native Village of Barrow Inupiat Traditional
Government, has determined that the cultural items listed in this
notice meet the definition of unassociated funerary objects and objects
of cultural patrimony. Representatives of any Indian tribe not
identified in this notice that wish to claim these cultural items
should submit a written request to the DoN. If no additional claimants
come forward, transfer of control of the cultural items to the Indian
tribe stated in this notice may proceed.
DATES: Representatives of any Indian tribe not identified in this
notice that wish to claim these cultural items should submit a written
request with information in support of the claim to the DoN at the
address in this notice by April 30, 2014.
ADDRESSES: Dave M. Grant, Department of the Navy, NAVFAC NW., 1101
Tautog Circle, Suite 102, Silverdale, WA 98315-1101, telephone (360)
396-0919, email dave.m.grant@navy.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is here given in accordance with the
Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA), 25
U.S.C. 3005, of the intent to repatriate cultural items under the
control of the U.S. Department of Defense, Department of the Navy,
Washington, DC, that meet the definition of unassociated funerary
objects or objects of cultural patrimony under 25 U.S.C. 3001.
This notice is published as part of the National Park Service's
administrative responsibilities under NAGPRA, 25 U.S.C. 3003(d)(3). The
determinations in this notice are the sole responsibility of the
museum, institution, or Federal
[[Page 18063]]
agency that has control of the Native American cultural items. The
National Park Service is not responsible for the determinations in this
notice.
History and Description of the Cultural Item(s)
In 1951 to 1953, unassociated funerary objects and objects of
cultural patrimony were removed from the sites of Birnirk, Nuvuk, and
the Brower Grave site near Point Barrow in North Slope Borough, AK. The
objects were recovered during archeological excavations authorized
under an Antiquities Act permit and directed by Wilbert Carter of the
Peabody Museum, Harvard University. The collections were returned to
the Peabody Museum, were transferred for a time to Tufts University,
and were returned to the Peabody Museum by Mr. Carter in 1984. The
archeological collections were transferred to a Department of the Navy
contract facility in Conshohocken, PA in 2006, and in 2011, the objects
were transferred to the Museum of the North, University of Alaska at
Fairbanks.
The four unassociated funerary objects were retrieved from the
``Brower Grave Site, Barrow,'' and include three pottery sherds and one
antler arrow point. The four objects from the Brower Grave Site were
evidently recovered from the surface, as there is no indication that
the grave was excavated.
Two objects of cultural patrimony (a wooden mask from Mound 5 and
an ivory drum handle with an effigy end from Midden H) were removed in
July 1952 from the Nuvuk site on Point Barrow. One object of cultural
patrimony (a small wooden mask from Mound Q) was removed in 1951 at the
Birnirk site near Point Barrow. All three objects were evaluated during
the NAGPRA consultation process and determined to be objects of
cultural patrimony.
The wooden mask from Nuvuk Mound 5 was considered during the
consultation to have reflected dance ceremonies probably within a
karigi, a nexus of whale hunting activity and broader social
interaction. Robert Spencer (The North Alaskan Eskimo, Bureau of
American Ethnology Bulletin 171 (1959), pages 293-294) discussed masks
as follows: ``These were never too important in the North Alaskan
Eskimo areas . . . . The masks which were used were principally dance
masks. There may have been a concept of supernatural impersonation but
certainly, it is not well developed. A suggestion of this appears in
the dances associated with the whaling feasts . . . . The mask was a
simple wooden face mask with slits for eyes and mouth. . . .'' The mask
from Nuvuk Mound 5 conforms very closely to this description. Spencer
noted that John Murdoch (Ethnological Results of the Point Barrow
Expedition, Ninth Annual Report of the Bureau for Ethnology (1892),
pages 366-369) had observed and illustrated such masks in use in the
Point Barrow area.
The ivory drum handle with an effigy end from Nuvuk Midden H was
considered to be associated with dance celebrations that continue to be
practiced on various occasions by modern inhabitants of the region.
This continuity was emphasized by Wilbert Carter (Masterpieces of the
Peabody Museum (1978), page 19): ``Eskimos were also known to carve a
lifelike human face on one end of a drum handle, the end obscured from
view under the tambourine-type drumhead. Even modern Eskimos
immediately interpret this and see no contradiction in the amount of
artistic effort exerted to produce a visage that is hidden from view.
The hidden head is the ``voice'' of the drum!''
The small wooden mask from Birnirk Mound Q was recovered from an
archeological context that suggested association with the early Birnirk
period, dating to between A.D. 500 and 700. Such small masks may have
served in shamanistic practices or amulet uses; they may also have been
masks of ``little people.''
Determinations Made by the U.S. Department of Defense, Department of
Navy
Officials of the U.S. Department of Defense, Department of Navy
have determined that:
Pursuant to 25 U.S.C. 3001(3)(B), the four objects from
the Brower Grave Site are reasonably believed to have been placed with
or near individual human remains at the time of death or later as part
of the death rite or ceremony and are believed, by a preponderance of
the evidence, to have been removed from a specific burial site of a
Native American individual.
Pursuant to 25 U.S.C. 3001(3)(D), the three objects
discussed above that were excavated from the Birnirk and Nuvuk sites
have ongoing historical, traditional, or cultural importance central to
the Native Village of Barrow Inupiat Traditional Government.
Pursuant to 25 U.S.C. 3001(2), there is a relationship of
shared group identity that can be reasonably traced between the
unassociated funerary objects and objects of cultural patrimony and
Native Village of Barrow Inupiat Traditional Government.
Additional Requestors and Disposition
Representatives of any Indian tribe not identified in this notice
that wish to claim these cultural items should submit a written request
with information in support of the claim to Dave M. Grant, Department
of the Navy, NAVFAC NW., 1101 Tautog Circle, Suite 102, Silverdale, WA
98315-1101, telephone (360) 396-0919, email dave.m.grant@navy.mil, by
April 30, 2014. After that date, if no additional claimants have come
forward, transfer of control of the unassociated funerary objects and
objects of cultural patrimony to the Native Village of Barrow Inupiat
Traditional Government may proceed.
The U.S. Department of Defense, Department of the Navy is
responsible for notifying the Native Village of Barrow Inupiat
Traditional Government that this notice has been published.
Dated: March 10, 2014.
Sherry Hutt,
Manager, National NAGPRA Program.
[FR Doc. 2014-07137 Filed 3-28-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4312-50-P