Applications for New Awards; Turnaround School Leaders Program, 17512-17520 [2014-06695]
Download as PDF
17512
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 60 / Friday, March 28, 2014 / Notices
Background
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
This NCCC Team Leader application
was developed to provide information
pertinent to the selection of Team
Leaders for AmeriCorps NCCC.
Specifically, NCCC engages
approximately 2,800 corps members
each year in community service. In
order to achieve this goal, NCCC utilizes
Team Leaders as project leaders and
project developers, as well as on site
team supervision and reporting. There is
at least one Team Leader for each team
of approximately ten corps members.
The application is available
electronically for all Team Leader
applicants.
Office of the Secretary
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Current Action
CNCS seeks to renew the current
information collection. The information
collection will otherwise be used in the
same manner as the existing
application. CNCS also seeks to
continue using the current application
until the revised application is
approved by OMB. The current
application is due to expire on 6/30/
2014.
Type of Review: Renewal.
Agency: Corporation for National and
Community Service.
Title: NCCC Team Leader
Application.
OMB Number: 3045–0005.
Agency Number: None.
Affected Public: AmeriCorps NCCC
Team Leader applicants.
Total Respondents: 800.
Frequency: Bi-annual application.
Average Time per Response: Averages
2 hours.
Estimated Total Burden Hours: 1,600
hours.
Total Burden Cost (capital/startup):
None.
Total Burden Cost (operating/
maintenance): None.
Comments submitted in response to
this notice will be summarized and/or
included in the request for Office of
Management and Budget approval of the
information collection request; they will
also become a matter of public record.
Dated: March 24, 2014.
Kate Raftery,
Director, AmeriCorps National Civilian
Community Corps.
[FR Doc. 2014–06982 Filed 3–27–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6050–28–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:57 Mar 27, 2014
Jkt 232001
[Docket ID: DoD–2014–HA–0001]
Submission for OMB Review;
Comment Request
ACTION:
Notice.
The Department of Defense
has submitted to OMB for clearance, the
following proposal for collection of
information under the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35).
DATES: Consideration will be given to all
comments received by April 28, 2014.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Fred
Licari, 571–372–0493.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Title, Associated Form and OMB
Number: Prospective Department of
Defense Studies of U.S. Military Forces:
The Millennium Cohort Study; OMB
Control Number 0720–0029.
Type of Request: Revision.
Millennium Cohort Follow-Up Study:
Number of Respondents: 46,747.
Responses per Respondent: 1.
Annual Responses: 46,747.
Average Burden per Response: 45
minutes.
Annual Burden Hours: 35,060.
Millennium Cohort Family Follow-Up
Study:
Number of Respondents: 3,576.
Responses per Respondent: 1.
Annual Responses: 3,576.
Average Burden per Response: 45
minutes.
Annual Burden Hours: 2,682.
Combined Burden for Millennium
Cohort Studies:
Number of Respondents: 50,323.
Responses per Respondent: 1.
Annual Responses: 50,323.
Average Burden per Response: 45
minutes.
Annual Burden Hours: 37,742.
Needs and Uses: The Millennium
Cohort Study responds to recent
recommendations by Congress and by
the Institute of Medicine to perform
investigations that systematically collect
population-based demographic and
health data so as to track and evaluate
the health of military personnel
throughout the course of their careers
and after leaving military service. The
Millennium Cohort Study will also
evaluate family impact by adding a
spouse assessment component to the
Cohort, called the Millennium Cohort
Family Study.
Affected Public: Individuals and
Households.
Frequency: On Occasion.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Respondent’s Obligation: Voluntary.
OMB Desk Officer: Mr. John Kraemer.
Written comments and
recommendations on the proposed
information collection should be sent to
Mr. John Kraemer at the Office of
Management and Budget, Desk Officer
for DoD, Room 10236, New Executive
Office Building, Washington, DC 20503.
You may also submit comments,
identified by docket number and title,
by the following method:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the agency name, docket
number and title for this Federal
Register document. The general policy
for comments and other submissions
from members of the public is to make
these submissions available for public
viewing on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov as they are
received without change, including any
personal identifiers or contact
information.
DoD Clearance Officer: Ms. Patricia
Toppings.
Written requests for copies of the
information collection proposal should
be sent to Ms. Toppings at WHS/ESD
Information Management Division, 4800
Mark Center Drive, East Tower, Suite
02G09, Alexandria, VA 22350–3100.
Dated: March 25, 2014.
Aaron Siegel,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison
Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 2014–06910 Filed 3–27–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001–06–P
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Applications for New Awards;
Turnaround School Leaders Program
Office of Elementary and
Secondary Education, Department of
Education.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
Overview Information
Turnaround School Leaders Program
Notice inviting applications for new
awards for fiscal year (FY) 2013 funds.
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
(CFDA) Number: 84.377B.
Applications Available: March
28, 2014.
Date of Pre-Application Webinar:
April 9, 2014.
Further information will be available
at https://www2.ed.gov/programs/sif/
index.html.
Deadline for Notice of Intent to Apply
(optional): April 25, 2014.
DATES:
E:\FR\FM\28MRN1.SGM
28MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 60 / Friday, March 28, 2014 / Notices
Deadline for Transmittal of
Applications: May 23, 2014.
Deadline for Intergovernmental
Review: July 22, 2014.
Full Text of Announcement
I. Funding Opportunity Description
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Purpose of Program: The Turnaround
School Leaders Program supports
projects to develop and implement or
enhance and implement a leadership
pipeline that selects, prepares, places,
supports, and retains school leaders
(which may include leadership teams)
for School Improvement Grant (SIG)
schools (as defined in this notice) and/
or SIG-eligible schools (as defined in
this notice) in a local educational
agency (LEA) or consortium of LEAs.
Background: Effective leaders trained
to lead turnaround efforts in the
Nation’s lowest-performing schools are
essential to improving student outcomes
in these schools. In particular, after
teacher effectiveness, leadership is
found to be the most important schoolbased factor in explaining variation in
student learning.1 Yet, interviews with
external partners engaged in leadership
pipeline development, as well as
monitoring of performance of State
educational agencies (SEAs) and LEAs
under the SIG program, as authorized
under the Elementary and Secondary
Education Act of 1965 (ESEA), as
amended, Title I, Part A, Section
1003(g), 20 U.S.C. 6303(g), indicate that
many LEAs do not have the capacity or
resources to recruit or develop school
leaders able to undertake successful
turnaround efforts. In addition, it has
become clear that State-approved
certification programs are not preparing
school leaders with the specialized
skills needed to turn around schools
identified as low-performing 2 and that
LEAs, in turn, struggle to identify the
right competencies in leader candidates
for turnaround schools and lack a
comprehensive system that uses data to
support the ongoing development of
effective turnaround school leaders.3
Further, rural LEAs face unique
challenges in recruiting strong leaders to
guide school turnaround efforts due to
1 Mendels, Pamela. (June 2012, Vol. 33, No. 3).
Principals in the Pipeline. Oxford, Ohio: Learning
Forward. Retrieved from https://learningforward.org/
docs/jsd-june-2012/mendels333.pdf.
2 Young, M. et al. (2013). Change Agents: How
States Can Develop Effective School Leaders.
Dallas, TX: George W. Bush Institute. Retrieved
from www.bushcenter.org/bush-institute/educationreform.
3 Rhim, Lauren Morando. (2012). No time to lose:
Turnaround leader performance assessment.
Charlottesville: University of Virginia’s Darden
School Foundation. Retrieved from
www.centerii.org.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:57 Mar 27, 2014
Jkt 232001
the social and economic isolation of
their communities.
As of November 1, 2013, the U.S.
Department of Education (Department)
has approved 42 States, Puerto Rico and
the District of Columbia for ‘‘ESEA
Flexibility.’’ As a condition of this
flexibility, States have committed,
among other things, to turning around
their lowest–performing schools over a
three-year period. Similarly, under SIG,
LEAs with low-performing schools
implement models designed to turn
around the State’s lowest-performing
schools. To address the need for leaders
who are prepared to lead effectively in
these turnaround schools, and
consistent with the authority provided
by Congress to use up to five percent of
SIG funds for activities to build SEA
and LEA capacity to implement the SIG
program, the Department is using a
portion of the fiscal year (FY) 2013 SIG
funds to initiate the Turnaround School
Leaders Program.
The Turnaround School Leaders
Program supports efforts to develop and
implement or enhance and implement a
leadership pipeline (as defined in this
notice) for SIG schools and/or SIGeligible schools in an LEA or
consortium of LEAs. Grantees under this
program will—
• Recruit and select promising
current and prospective school leaders,
using locally adopted competencies (as
defined in this notice) identified by the
applicant as necessary to turn around a
SIG school or SIG-eligible school;
• Provide high-quality training to
selected school leaders to prepare them
to successfully lead turnaround efforts
in SIG schools and/or SIG-eligible
schools;
• Place school leaders in SIG schools
and/or SIG-eligible schools and provide
them with ongoing professional
development and other support that
focuses on instructional leadership and
school management and is based on
individual needs consistent with the
LEA’s plan for turning around its SIG
schools and/or SIG-eligible schools; and
• Retain effective school leaders,
using financial or other incentives, and
replace ineffective school leaders.
Priorities: This notice establishes two
absolute priorities and two competitive
preference priorities. We are
establishing these priorities for the FY
2014 grant competition and any
subsequent year in which we make
awards from the list of unfunded
applicants from this competition, in
accordance with section 437(d)(1) of the
General Education Provisions Act
(GEPA), 20 U.S.C. 1232(d)(1).
Absolute Priorities: These priorities
are absolute priorities. Under 34 CFR
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
17513
75.105(c)(3), we consider only
applications that meet one of these
priorities. An applicant may apply
under only one absolute priority and
must indicate in its application the
priority under which it is applying.
The Department seeks to encourage
high-quality applications from
applicants serving LEAs that are diverse
in size and location. For this reason, the
Department establishes two priorities—
Absolute Priorities 1 and 2—through
which the Department intends to
support leadership pipelines in both
rural and non-rural communities with
no fewer than five schools in each
community that are SIG schools and/or
SIG-eligible schools.
If an otherwise eligible applicant
applying under Absolute Priority 2 is
determined not to have met the priority
because it has misidentified the
designation of one or more schools as
rural, the Department reserves the
authority to review the applicant’s
submission with all other applications
submitted for funding that meet
Absolute Priority 1.
These priorities are:
Absolute Priority 1: Non-Rural
Turnaround School Leader Selection,
Preparation, Placement, Support, and
Retention Program
To meet this priority, the applicant
must submit a plan to develop and
implement or enhance and implement a
leadership pipeline for at least one LEA
with no fewer than five SIG schools
and/or SIG-eligible schools.
Absolute Priority 2: Rural Turnaround
School Leader Selection, Preparation,
Placement, Support, and Retention
Program
To meet this priority, the applicant
must submit a plan to develop and
implement or enhance and implement a
leadership pipeline for at least one LEA
with no fewer than five SIG schools
and/or SIG-eligible schools designated
as rural. A school is designated as rural
if it is assigned a locale code of 41
(located in a census-defined rural
territory less than 5 miles from an urban
cluster), a locale code of 42 (located in
a census-defined rural territory more
than 5 miles but less than or equal to 25
miles from an urban cluster), or a locale
code of 43 (located in a census-defined
rural territory that is more than 25 miles
from an urban cluster) by the National
Center for Education Statistics (NCES).
Note 1: To identify the locale code of any
school to be served by the proposed project,
access the NCES public school database here:
https://nces.ed.gov/ccd/schoolsearch/.
E:\FR\FM\28MRN1.SGM
28MRN1
17514
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 60 / Friday, March 28, 2014 / Notices
Note 2: An applicant may apply under only
one absolute priority and must indicate in its
abstract the priority under which it is
applying as well as the schools, and NCES
identification numbers of those schools, the
applicant intends to serve.
Note 3: Applicants that fail to clearly
identify in the abstract section the absolute
priority for which it is seeking to apply will
have its application reviewed with all other
applications submitted for funding that
under Absolute Priority 1.
Competitive Preference Priorities:
These priorities are competitive
preference priorities. Under 34 CFR
75.105(c)(2)(i), we award three
additional points to an application that
meets Competitive Preference Priority 1
and five additional points to an
application that meets Competitive
Preference Priority 2. A total of eight
points may be awarded.
These priorities are:
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Competitive Preference Priority 1:
Existing Policy Conditions That Can Be
Leveraged To Ensure Success and
Sustainability of a Turnaround
Leadership Pipeline
To meet this priority, the applicant
must provide documentation that the
LEA or consortium of LEAs already has
in place policies that provide school
leaders (as defined in this notice) with
decision-making autonomy (with regard
to staffing, school schedules, and
budgeting) and provide the LEA or
consortium of LEAs with flexibility in
the selection, preparation, placement,
support, and retention of school leaders
to successfully turn around SIG schools
and/or SIG-eligible schools. This may
include, for example, School Board
meeting minutes recording the adoption
of policies, guidance documents, or
trainings provided to school leaders.
Competitive Preference Priority 2:
Record of Preparing and Supporting
Turnaround School Leaders Who Have
Demonstrated Success in Increased
Graduation Rates and Academic Growth
To meet this priority, the applicant
must provide documentation of
previous success in preparing and
supporting school leaders or leadership
teams in SIG schools and/or SIG-eligible
schools as demonstrated by increased
graduation rates and academic growth
on State assessments in reading/
language arts and in mathematics for the
‘‘all students’’ group and for each
subgroup, as specified in section
1111(b)(3)(C)(xiii), 20 U.S.C.
6311(b)(3)(C)(xiii).
Note 1: Applicants may address either of
the competitive preference priorities, both, or
neither. In order to be eligible for earning
competitive preference priority points, an
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:57 Mar 27, 2014
Jkt 232001
applicant must identify in the abstract
section of its application the competitive
preference priority or priorities for which it
is seeking points.
Note 2: Applicants that fail to clearly
identify in the abstract section the
competitive preference priority or priorities
for which it is seeking to earn points will not
have its application reviewed against the
competitive preference priority and will not
be awarded competitive preference priority
points.
Application Requirements: The
applicant must provide the following.
Requirement 1—Demonstrating
Capacity To Develop and Implement a
Leadership Pipeline System
In its application, an applicant must
demonstrate its capacity to develop and
implement or enhance and implement a
leadership pipeline for SIG schools and/
or SIG-eligible schools. The applicant
must demonstrate such capacity by
providing evidence of each of the
following:
a. An existing evaluation system that
measures teacher and leader
effectiveness.
b. Commitment to implement and
sustain the proposed plan by the
applicant. To demonstrate this
commitment, an applicant must include
with its application a Memorandum of
Understanding (MOU), or, if the
applicant is an LEA, a letter of
commitment, signed by the
superintendent and (if applicable)
school board president of each LEA to
be served by the project and by an
appropriate representative of the
applicant (if not an LEA) and any other
partner entity, outlining the terms and
conditions of the partnership.
c. A reasonable opportunity for the
public, including teachers and school
leaders, to provide feedback on the
applicant’s proposed leadership
pipeline plan as demonstrated by
evidence, for instance, that forums
designed to inform and engage school
staff and community stakeholders have
been held.
Requirement 2—Sustaining the
Leadership Pipeline
The applicant must describe its plan
for sustaining the leadership pipeline it
will implement as a result of this grant.
The sustainability plan must include
each of the following:
a. A description of the data that the
applicant will use, and how the
applicant will use the data, to inform its
continuous improvement of the
leadership pipeline after the grant
award period ends.
b. A description of the actions that the
applicant will undertake to continue to
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
select, prepare, place, support, and
retain school leaders in SIG schools
and/or SIG-eligible schools after the
grant award period ends.
c. A budget narrative that identifies
and aligns resources to sustain the
system after the grant award period
ends.
Program Requirements: The following
are program requirements. In its
application, the applicant must describe
its plan to carry out the following
program requirements:
Requirement 3—Describing the
Leadership Pipeline
The grantee must use grant funds to
develop and implement or enhance and
implement a leadership pipeline that:
a. Selects school leaders using locally
adopted competencies identified by the
applicant as necessary to turn around a
SIG school or SIG-eligible school;
b. Provides comprehensive and
differentiated professional development
to selected school leaders to prepare
them to successfully lead turnaround
efforts in SIG schools and/or SIGeligible schools;
c. Places school leaders in SIG schools
and/or SIG-eligible schools, and
provides them with ongoing
individualized support based on the
LEA’s plan for turning around its SIG
schools and/or SIG-eligible schools; and
d. Retains effective school leaders,
using financial or other incentives, and
replaces ineffective school leaders.
Requirement 4—Determining
Leadership Effectiveness
The grantee must use data (which
may include data from the evaluation
system that measures teacher and leader
effectiveness) to inform selection,
placement, retention and incentive
decisions.
Requirement 5—Continuous Project
Improvement
The grantee must identify and use
data to inform continuous improvement
of its leadership pipeline during the
award period.
Requirement 6—Extension of Autonomy
to School Leaders
The grantee must ensure that school
leaders placed in SIG schools and/or
SIG-eligible schools have decisionmaking autonomy (with regard to
staffing, school schedules, and
budgeting).
Definitions
The following definitions apply to the
competition announced in this notice.
Leadership pipeline means a system
through which an LEA or consortium of
E:\FR\FM\28MRN1.SGM
28MRN1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 60 / Friday, March 28, 2014 / Notices
LEAs is able to select, prepare, place,
support, and retain school leaders,
including leadership teams, for SIG
schools and/or SIG-eligible schools.
Locally adopted competencies means
the knowledge, skills and abilities,
developed by an LEA or school, which
are associated with effective
performance as a turnaround leader and
supported by research-based evidence.
Logic model (also referred to as theory
of action) means a well-specified
conceptual framework that identifies
key components of the proposed
process, product, strategy, or practice
(i.e., the active ‘‘ingredients’’ that are
hypothesized to be critical to achieving
the relevant outcomes) and describes
the relationships among the key
components and outcomes, theoretically
and operationally.
Relevant outcome means the student
outcome(s) (or the ultimate outcome if
not related to students) the proposed
process, product, strategy, or practice is
designed to improve; consistent with
the specific goals of a program.
School leader means a school’s
principal and may also include other
members of a school’s leadership team.
SIG school means either:
(1) A Tier I or Tier II school as defined
in the SIG final requirements published
in the Federal Register on October 28,
2010 (75 FR 66363) (https://www.gpo.
gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2010-10-28/pdf/201027313.pdf) that is, as of the date of the
application, implementing a SIG model,
or
(2) For a State that has received
approval of its ESEA Flexibility request,
a priority school that is, as of the date
of the application, implementing a SIG
model.
SIG-eligible school means either:
(1) A school that meets the definition
of a Tier I or Tier II school as defined
in the SIG final requirements published
in the Federal Register on October 28,
2010 (75 FR 66363) (https://
www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2010-10-28/
pdf/2010-27313.pdf), or
(2) For States that have received
approval of their ESEA Flexibility
request, a priority school identified by
an SEA in the list of schools in the
SEA’s approved FY 2013 SIG
application.
Strong theory means a rationale for
the proposed process, product, strategy,
or practice that includes a logic model.
Waiver of Proposed Rulemaking:
Under the Administrative Procedure Act
(5 U.S.C. 553) the Department generally
offers interested parties the opportunity
to comment on proposed priorities,
selection criteria, definitions, and other
requirements. Section 437(d)(1) of
GEPA, however, allows the Secretary to
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:57 Mar 27, 2014
Jkt 232001
exempt from rulemaking requirements,
regulations governing the first grant
competition under a new or
substantially revised program authority.
This is the first grant competition for
this program under the Consolidated
and Further Continuing Appropriations
Act, 2013 (Pub. L. 113–6) and the
Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2012
(Pub. L. 112–74) and therefore qualifies
for this exemption. In order to ensure
timely grant awards, the Secretary has
decided to forego public comment on
the priorities, selection criteria,
definitions, and other requirements
under section 437(d)(1) of GEPA. These
priorities, selection criteria, definitions,
and other requirements will apply to the
FY 2013 grant competition and any
subsequent year in which we make
awards from the list of unfunded
applicants from this competition.
Program Authority: 20 U.S.C. 6303(g); the
Consolidated and Further Continuing
Appropriations Act, 2013 (Pub. L. 113–6);
and the Consolidated Appropriations Act,
2012 (Pub. L. 112–74).
Applicable Regulations: (a) The
Education Department General
Administrative Regulations (EDGAR) in
34 CFR parts 74, 75, 77, 79, 80, 81, 82,
84, 86, 97, 98, and 99. (b) The Education
Department suspension and debarment
regulations in 2 CFR part 3485.
Note: The regulations in 34 CFR part 79
apply to all applicants except federally
recognized Indian tribes.
Note: The regulations in 34 CFR part 86
apply to institutions of higher education
only.
II. Award Information
Type of Award: Discretionary grants.
Estimated Available Funds:
$14,000,000.
Contingent upon the availability of
funds and the quality of applications,
the Department may make additional
awards in future years from the list of
unfunded applicants from this
competition.
Estimated Range of Awards:
$1,000,000 to $2,000,000.
Estimated Average Size of Awards:
$1,500,000.
Estimated Number of Awards: 8–12.
Note: The Department is not bound by any
estimates in this notice.
Project Period: Up to 36 months.
III. Eligibility Information
1. Eligible Applicants: (1) An LEA or
consortium of LEAs with at least five
SIG schools and/or SIG-eligible schools;
(2) A State educational agency (SEA) in
partnership with an LEA or consortium
of LEAs with at least five SIG schools
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
17515
and/or SIG-eligible schools; (3) An
institution of higher education (IHE) in
partnership with an LEA or consortium
of LEAs with at least five SIG schools
and/or SIG-eligible schools; (4) Another
public or private nonprofit or for-profit
organization in partnership with an LEA
and/or consortium of LEAs with at least
five SIG schools and/or SIG-eligible
schools; and, (5) A combination of the
above eligible applicants in partnership.
Eligible applicants seeking to apply as a
consortium or partnership must comply
with the regulations in 34 CFR 75.127–
75.129, which address group
applications.
2. Cost Sharing or Matching: This
program does not require cost sharing or
matching.
IV. Application and Submission
Information
1. Address to Request Application
Package: ED Pubs, U.S. Department of
Education, P.O. Box 22207, Alexandria,
VA 22304. Telephone, toll free: 1–877–
433–7827. FAX: (703) 605–6794. If you
use a telecommunications device for the
deaf (TDD) or a text telephone (TTY),
call, toll free: 1–877–576–7734.
You can contact ED Pubs at its Web
site, also: www.EDPubs.gov or at its
email address: edpubs@inet.ed.gov.
If you request an application package
from ED Pubs, be sure to identify this
program or competition as follows:
CFDA number 84.377B.
Individuals with disabilities can
obtain a copy of the application package
in an accessible format (e.g., braille,
large print, audiotape, or compact disc)
by contacting the person listed under
Accessible Format in section VIII of this
notice.
2.a. Content and Form of Application
Submission: Requirements concerning
the content of an application, together
with the forms you must submit, are in
the application package for this
program.
Notice of Intent to Apply: The
Department will be able to develop a
more efficient process for reviewing
grant applications if it has a better
understanding of the number of entities
that intend to apply for funding under
this program. Therefore, the Secretary
strongly encourages each potential
applicant to notify the Department by
sending a short email message
indicating the applicant’s intent to
submit an application for funding. The
email need not include information
regarding the content of the proposed
application, only the applicant’s intent
to submit it. This email notification
should be sent to the Office of School
Turnaround at: leadership.pipeline@
ed.gov.
E:\FR\FM\28MRN1.SGM
28MRN1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
17516
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 60 / Friday, March 28, 2014 / Notices
Page Limit: The application narrative
is where you, the applicant, address the
selection criteria that reviewers use to
evaluate your application. Panel readers
will award points only for an
applicant’s response to a given selection
criterion that is contained within the
section of the application designated to
address that particular selection
criterion. Readers will not review, or
award points for responses to a given
selection criterion that is located in any
other section of the application or the
appendices. You must limit the
application narrative to no more than 40
pages, using the following standards:
• A ‘‘page’’ is 8.5’’ x 11’’, on one side
only, with 1’’ margins at the top,
bottom, and both sides.
• Double space (no more than three
lines per vertical inch) all text in the
application narrative, including titles,
headings, footnotes, quotations,
references, and captions, as well as all
text in charts, tables, figures, and
graphs.
• Use a font that is either 12 point or
larger or no smaller than 10 pitch
(characters per inch).
• Use one of the following fonts:
Times New Roman, Courier, Courier
New, or Arial. An application submitted
in any other font (including Times
Roman or Arial Narrow) will not be
accepted.
The page limit does not apply to the
cover sheet; the budget section,
including the narrative budget
justification; the assurances and
certifications; or the one-page abstract,
the resumes, the bibliography, or the
letters of support. However, the page
limit does apply to all of the application
narrative section.
We will reject your application if you
exceed the page limit.
2.b. Submission of Proprietary
Information: Given the types of projects
that may be proposed in applications for
the Turnaround School Leaders Program
an application may include business
information that the applicant considers
proprietary. The Department’s
regulations define ‘‘business
information’’ in 34 CFR 5.11.
Because we plan to make successful
applications available to the public, you
may wish to request confidentiality of
business information.
Consistent with Executive Order
12600, please designate in your
application any information that you
feel is exempt from disclosure under
Exemption 4 of the Freedom of
Information Act. In the appropriate
Appendix section of your application,
under ‘‘Other Attachments Form,’’
please list the page number or numbers
on which we can find this information.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:57 Mar 27, 2014
Jkt 232001
For additional information please see 34
CFR 5.11(c).
3. Submission Dates and Times:
Applications Available: March 28,
2014.
Date of Pre-Application Webinar:
April 9, 2014. Further information will
be available at https://www2.ed.gov/
programs/sif/.
Deadline for Notice of Intent to Apply:
April 25, 2014.
Deadline for Transmittal of
Applications: May 23, 2014.
Applications for grants under this
program must be submitted
electronically using the Grants.gov
Apply site (Grants.gov). For information
(including dates and times) about how
to submit your application
electronically, or in a paper format by
mail or hand delivery if you qualify for
an exception to the electronic
submission requirement, please refer to
section IV.7. Other Submission
Requirements of this notice.
We do not consider an application
that does not comply with the deadline
requirements.
Individuals with disabilities who
need an accommodation or auxiliary aid
in connection with the application
process should contact the person listed
under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT in section VII of this notice. If
the Department provides an
accommodation or auxiliary aid to an
individual with a disability in
connection with the application
process, the individual’s application
remains subject to all other
requirements and limitations in this
notice.
Deadline for Intergovernmental
Review: July 22, 2014.
4. Intergovernmental Review: This
program is subject to Executive Order
12372 and the regulations in 34 CFR
part 79. Information about
Intergovernmental Review of Federal
Programs under Executive Order 12372
is in the application package for this
program.
5. Funding Restrictions: We reference
regulations outlining funding
restrictions in the Applicable
Regulations section of this notice.
6. Data Universal Numbering System
Number, Taxpayer Identification
Number, and System for Award
Management: To do business with the
Department of Education, you must—
a. Have a Data Universal Numbering
System (DUNS) number and a Taxpayer
Identification Number (TIN);
b. Register both your DUNS number
and TIN with the System for Award
Management (SAM) (formerly the
Central Contractor Registry (CCR)), the
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Government’s primary registrant
database;
c. Provide your DUNS number and
TIN on your application; and
d. Maintain an active SAM
registration with current information
while your application is under review
by the Department and, if you are
awarded a grant, during the project
period.
You can obtain a DUNS number from
Dun and Bradstreet. A DUNS number
can be created within one-to-two
business days.
If you are a corporate entity, agency,
institution, or organization, you can
obtain a TIN from the Internal Revenue
Service. If you are an individual, you
can obtain a TIN from the Internal
Revenue Service or the Social Security
Administration. If you need a new TIN,
please allow 2–5 weeks for your TIN to
become active.
The SAM registration process can take
approximately seven business days, but
may take upwards of several weeks,
depending on the completeness and
accuracy of the data entered into the
SAM database by an entity. Thus, if you
think you might want to apply for
Federal financial assistance under a
program administered by the
Department, please allow sufficient time
to obtain and register your DUNS
number and TIN. We strongly
recommend that you register early.
Note: Once your SAM registration is active,
you will need to allow 24 to 48 hours for the
information to be available in Grants.gov. and
before you can submit an application through
Grants.gov.
If you are currently registered with
SAM, you may not need to make any
changes. However, please make certain
that the TIN associated with your DUNS
number is correct. Also note that you
will need to update your registration
annually. This may take three or more
business days.
Information about SAM is available at
www.SAM.gov. To further assist you
with obtaining and registering your
DUNS number and TIN in SAM or
updating your existing SAM account,
we have prepared a SAM.gov Tip Sheet,
which you can find at: https://
www2.ed.gov/fund/grant/apply/samfaqs.html.
In addition, if you are submitting your
application via Grants.gov, you must (1)
be designated by your organization as an
Authorized Organization Representative
(AOR); and (2) register yourself with
Grants.gov as an AOR. Details on these
steps are outlined at the following
Grants.gov Web page: www.grants.gov/
applicants/get_registered.jsp.
7. Other Submission Requirements:
Applications for grants under this
E:\FR\FM\28MRN1.SGM
28MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 60 / Friday, March 28, 2014 / Notices
stamped by the Grants.gov system after
4:30:00 p.m., Washington, DC time, on
the application deadline date.
• The amount of time it can take to
upload an application will vary
depending on a variety of factors,
a. Electronic Submission of
including the size of the application and
Applications
the speed of your Internet connection.
Applications for grants under the
Therefore, we strongly recommend that
Turnaround School Leaders Program,
you do not wait until the application
CFDA number 84.377B, must be
deadline date to begin the submission
submitted electronically using the
process through Grants.gov.
Governmentwide Grants.gov Apply site
• You should review and follow the
at www.Grants.gov. Through this site,
Education Submission Procedures for
you will be able to download a copy of
submitting an application through
the application package, complete it
Grants.gov that are included in the
offline, and then upload and submit
application package for this program to
your application. You may not email an ensure that you submit your application
electronic copy of a grant application to in a timely manner to the Grants.gov
us.
system. You can also find the Education
We will reject your application if you
Submission Procedures pertaining to
submit it in paper format unless, as
Grants.gov under News and Events on
described elsewhere in this section, you
the Department’s G5 system home page
qualify for one of the exceptions to the
at https://www.G5.gov.
electronic submission requirement and
• You will not receive additional
submit, no later than two weeks before
point value because you submit your
the application deadline date, a written
application in electronic format, nor
statement to the Department that you
will we penalize you if you qualify for
qualify for one of these exceptions.
an exception to the electronic
Further information regarding
calculation of the date that is two weeks submission requirement, as described
elsewhere in this section, and submit
before the application deadline date is
your application in paper format.
provided later in this section under
• You must submit all documents
Exception to Electronic Submission
electronically, including all information
Requirement.
you typically provide on the following
You may access the electronic grant
forms: The Application for Federal
application for the Turnaround School
Assistance (SF 424), the Department of
Leaders Program at www.Grants.gov.
Education Supplemental Information for
You must search for the downloadable
application package for this program by SF 424, Budget Information—NonConstruction Programs (ED 524), and all
the CFDA number. Do not include the
necessary assurances and certifications.
CFDA number’s alpha suffix in your
• You must upload any narrative
search (e.g., search for 84.326, not
sections and all other attachments to
84.326A).
your application as files in a PDF
Please note the following:
• When you enter the Grants.gov site, (Portable Document) read-only, nonmodifiable format. Do not upload an
you will find information about
submitting an application electronically interactive or fillable PDF file. If you
upload a file type other than a readthrough the site, as well as the hours of
only, non-modifiable PDF or submit a
operation.
• Applications received by Grants.gov password-protected file, we will not
review that material.
are date and time stamped. Your
• Your electronic application must
application must be fully uploaded and
comply with any page-limit
submitted and must be date and time
requirements described in this notice.
stamped by the Grants.gov system no
• After you electronically submit
later than 4:30:00 p.m., Washington, DC
your application, you will receive from
time, on the application deadline date.
Grants.gov an automatic notification of
Except as otherwise noted in this
receipt that contains a Grants.gov
section, we will not accept your
application if it is received—that is, date tracking number. (This notification
indicates receipt by Grants.gov only, not
and time stamped by the Grants.gov
system—after 4:30:00 p.m., Washington, receipt by the Department.) The
Department then will retrieve your
DC time, on the application deadline
date. We do not consider an application application from Grants.gov and send a
second notification to you by email.
that does not comply with the deadline
This second notification indicates that
requirements. When we retrieve your
the Department has received your
application from Grants.gov, we will
application and has assigned your
notify you if we are rejecting your
application because it was date and time application a PR/Award number (an ED-
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
program must be submitted
electronically unless you qualify for an
exception to this requirement in
accordance with the instructions in this
section.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:57 Mar 27, 2014
Jkt 232001
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
17517
specified identifying number unique to
your application).
• We may request that you provide us
original signatures on forms at a later
date.
Application Deadline Date Extension
in Case of Technical Issues with the
Grants.gov System: If you are
experiencing problems submitting your
application through Grants.gov, please
contact the Grants.gov Support Desk,
toll free, at 1–800–518–4726. You must
obtain a Grants.gov Support Desk Case
Number and must keep a record of it.
If you are prevented from
electronically submitting your
application on the application deadline
date because of technical problems with
the Grants.gov system, we will grant you
an extension until 4:30:00 p.m.,
Washington, DC time, the following
business day to enable you to transmit
your application electronically or by
hand delivery. You also may mail your
application by following the mailing
instructions described elsewhere in this
notice.
If you submit an application after
4:30:00 p.m., Washington, DC time, on
the application deadline date, please
contact the person listed under FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT in
section VII of this notice and provide an
explanation of the technical problem
you experienced with Grants.gov, along
with the Grants.gov Support Desk Case
Number. We will accept your
application if we can confirm that a
technical problem occurred with the
Grants.gov system and that that problem
affected your ability to submit your
application by 4:30:00 p.m.,
Washington, DC time, on the
application deadline date. The
Department will contact you after a
determination is made on whether your
application will be accepted.
Note: The extensions to which we refer in
this section apply only to the unavailability
of, or technical problems with, the Grants.gov
system. We will not grant you an extension
if you failed to fully register to submit your
application to Grants.gov before the
application deadline date and time or if the
technical problem you experienced is
unrelated to the Grants.gov system.
Exception to Electronic Submission
Requirement: You qualify for an
exception to the electronic submission
requirement, and may submit your
application in paper format, if you are
unable to submit an application through
the Grants.gov system because—
• You do not have access to the
Internet; or
• You do not have the capacity to
upload large documents to the
Grants.gov system; and
E:\FR\FM\28MRN1.SGM
28MRN1
17518
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 60 / Friday, March 28, 2014 / Notices
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
• No later than two weeks before the
application deadline date (14 calendar
days or, if the fourteenth calendar day
before the application deadline date
falls on a Federal holiday, the next
business day following the Federal
holiday), you mail or fax a written
statement to the Department, explaining
which of the two grounds for an
exception prevent you from using the
Internet to submit your application.
If you mail your written statement to
the Department, it must be postmarked
no later than two weeks before the
application deadline date. If you fax
your written statement to the
Department, we must receive the faxed
statement no later than two weeks
before the application deadline date.
Address and mail or fax your
statement to: Janine Rudder, U.S.
Department of Education, 400 Maryland
Avenue SW., Room 3W252,
Washington, DC 20202.
FAX: (202) 205–5870.
Alternatively, you may email a PDF of
your statement to the Office of School
Turnaround. Email:
leadership.pipeline@ed.gov.
Your paper application must be
submitted in accordance with the mail
or hand delivery instructions described
in this notice.
b. Submission of Paper Applications by
Mail
If you qualify for an exception to the
electronic submission requirement, you
may mail (through the U.S. Postal
Service or a commercial carrier) your
application to the Department. You
must mail the original and two copies
of your application, on or before the
application deadline date, to the
Department at the following address:
U.S. Department of Education,
Application Control Center, Attention:
(CFDA Number 84.377B), LBJ Basement
Level 1, 400 Maryland Avenue SW.,
Washington, DC 20202–4260.
You must show proof of mailing
consisting of one of the following:
(1) A legibly dated U.S. Postal Service
postmark.
(2) A legible mail receipt with the
date of mailing stamped by the U.S.
Postal Service.
(3) A dated shipping label, invoice, or
receipt from a commercial carrier.
(4) Any other proof of mailing
acceptable to the Secretary of the U.S.
Department of Education.
If you mail your application through
the U.S. Postal Service, we do not
accept either of the following as proof
of mailing:
(1) A private metered postmark.
(2) A mail receipt that is not dated by
the U.S. Postal Service.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:57 Mar 27, 2014
Jkt 232001
If your application is postmarked after
the application deadline date, we will
not consider your application.
Note: The U.S. Postal Service does not
uniformly provide a dated postmark. Before
relying on this method, you should check
with your local post office.
c. Submission of Paper Applications by
Hand Delivery
If you qualify for an exception to the
electronic submission requirement, you
(or a courier service) may deliver your
paper application to the Department by
hand. You must deliver the original and
two copies of your application by hand,
on or before the application deadline
date, to the Department at the following
address: U.S. Department of Education,
Application Control Center, Attention:
(CFDA Number 84.377B), 550 12th
Street SW., Room 7041, Potomac Center
Plaza, Washington, DC 20202–4260.
The Application Control Center
accepts hand deliveries daily between
8:00 a.m. and 4:30:00 p.m., Washington,
DC time, except Saturdays, Sundays,
and Federal holidays.
Note for Mail or Hand Delivery of Paper
Applications: If you mail or hand deliver
your application to the Department—
(1) You must indicate on the envelope
and—if not provided by the Department—in
Item 11 of the SF 424 the CFDA number,
including suffix letter, if any, of the
competition under which you are submitting
your application; and
(2) The Application Control Center will
mail to you a notification of receipt of your
grant application. If you do not receive this
notification within 15 business days from the
application deadline date, you should call
the U.S. Department of Education
Application Control Center at (202) 245–
6288.
V. Application Review Information
1. Selection Criteria: The selection
criteria for this program are as follows:
a. Quality of the project design (up to
40 points). In determining the quality of
the design of the proposed project, we
consider the following factors:
1. The extent to which the applicant
proposes to select and place school
leaders using locally adopted
competencies identified by the
applicant as being necessary to turn
around SIG schools and/or SIG-eligible
schools (up to 7 points).
2. The extent to which the applicant
will provide comprehensive and
differentiated professional development
to prepare and support school leaders
who are placed in SIG schools and/or
SIG-eligible schools (up to 9 points).
3. The extent to which the proposed
project is supported by a strong theory
(as defined in 34 CFR 77.1(c)) (up to 5
points).
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
4. The extent to which the design of
the applicant’s proposed project will
address the needs of traditionally
underserved populations (including
students with disabilities and English
learners), such as by recruiting,
incentivizing, and selecting special
education teachers and those in
language instruction educational
programs to be school leaders (up to 5
points).
5. The extent to which the applicant
will use data to inform professional
development, retention and incentive
decisions (up to 7 points).
6. The extent to which the applicant
plans to identify and use data to inform
continuous improvement of its
proposed leadership pipeline during the
award period (up to 7 points).
b. Significance of the project (up to 5
points). In determining the significance
of the proposed project, we consider the
extent to which the applicant’s
proposed leadership pipeline is likely to
produce best practices and lessons
learned that promote and support
reforms in the turnaround field (up to 5
points).
c. Capacity to implement the
proposed project (up to 20 points). We
consider the following factors in
determining the applicant’s capacity in
implementing the proposed project:
1. The extent to which the applicant
has a system in place that determines
teacher and leader effectiveness (up to
5 points).
2. The extent to which the applicant
demonstrates that decision-making
autonomy (with regard to staffing,
school schedules, and budgeting) will
be extended to school leaders placed in
SIG schools and/or SIG-eligible schools
(up to 5 points).
3. The extent to which the proposed
project will be coordinated with
committed partners as evidenced by
Memoranda of Understanding, signed
by the superintendent and (if
applicable) school board president of
each LEA to be served by the project
and by an appropriate representative of
the applicant (if not an LEA) and any
other partner entity, which outline the
terms and contributions each partner
will make to support full and effective
implementation of the leadership
pipeline for SIG schools and/or SIGeligible schools (up to 5 points).
4. The extent to which the applicant
offers a reasonable opportunity for the
public, including teachers and school
leaders, to provide feedback on the
applicant’s proposed leadership
pipeline plan as demonstrated by
evidence, for instance, that forums
designed to inform and engage
E:\FR\FM\28MRN1.SGM
28MRN1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 60 / Friday, March 28, 2014 / Notices
stakeholders have been held (up to 5
points).
d. Sustainability of the proposed
project after the award period ends (up
to 25 points). We consider the following
factors in determining the sustainability
of the leadership pipeline:
1. The adequacy of the applicant’s
plan to sustain the leadership pipeline
it develops and implements or enhances
as a result of the grant (up to 10 points).
2. The adequacy of the proposed
budget that indicates how the applicant
will identify and align resources to
sustain the leadership pipeline after the
grant award period ends (up to 10
points).
3. The adequacy of the applicant’s
plan to sustain stakeholder support of
the project after Federal funding ends,
including, as appropriate, the
demonstrated commitment of the LEA’s
superintendent, local school board
president, and any other partner entities
(up to 5 points).
e. Quality of the management plan
(up to 10 points). In determining the
quality of the management plan for the
proposed project, we consider the
following factors:
1. The extent to which the applicant’s
plan is likely to achieve the objectives
of the proposed project on time and
within budget, including how likely the
plan is to result in the applicant
carrying out clearly defined
responsibilities, meeting articulated
timelines, and achieving specified and
measurable milestones for developing
and implementing the leadership
pipeline for SIG schools and/or SIGeligible schools (up to 5 points).
2. The adequacy of the time
commitment and qualifications of the
project director and key personnel,
including relevant training and
experience, to continuously implement
the proposed project and to support
project participants (up to 5 points).
2. Review and Selection Process: To
ensure that grantees under this program
serve both rural and non-rural
communities, the Department may
separately consider for funding
applications meeting Absolute Priority 1
and those meeting Absolute Priority 2.
We remind potential applicants that
in reviewing applications in any
discretionary grant competition, the
Secretary may consider, under 34 CFR
75.217(d)(3), the past performance of the
applicant in carrying out a previous
award, such as the applicant’s use of
funds, achievement of project
objectives, and compliance with grant
conditions. The Secretary may also
consider whether the applicant failed to
submit a timely performance report or
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:57 Mar 27, 2014
Jkt 232001
submitted a report of unacceptable
quality.
In addition, in making a competitive
grant award, the Secretary also requires
various assurances including those
applicable to Federal civil rights laws
that prohibit discrimination in programs
or activities receiving Federal financial
assistance from the Department of
Education (34 CFR 100.4, 104.5, 106.4,
108.8, and 110.23).
3. Special Conditions: Under 34 CFR
74.14 and 80.12, the Secretary may
impose special conditions on a grant if
the applicant or grantee is not
financially stable; has a history of
unsatisfactory performance; has a
financial or other management system
that does not meet the standards in 34
CFR parts 74 or 80, as applicable; has
not fulfilled the conditions of a prior
grant; or is otherwise not responsible.
VI. Award Administration Information
1. Award Notices: If your application
is successful, we notify your U.S.
Representative and U.S. Senators and
send you a Grant Award Notification
(GAN); or we may send you an email
containing a link to access an electronic
version of your GAN. We may notify
you informally, also.
If your application is not evaluated or
not selected for funding, we notify you.
2. Administrative and National Policy
Requirements: We identify
administrative and national policy
requirements in the application package
and reference these and other
requirements in the Applicable
Regulations section of this notice.
We reference the regulations outlining
the terms and conditions of an award in
the Applicable Regulations section of
this notice and include these and other
specific conditions in the GAN. The
GAN also incorporates your approved
application as part of your binding
commitments under the grant.
3. Reporting: (a) If you apply for a
grant under this competition, you must
ensure that you have in place the
necessary processes and systems to
comply with the reporting requirements
in 2 CFR part 170 should you receive
funding under the competition. This
does not apply if you have an exception
under 2 CFR 170.110(b).
(b) At the end of your project period,
you must submit a final performance
report, including financial information,
as directed by the Secretary. If you
receive a multi-year award, you must
submit an annual performance report
that provides the most current
performance and financial expenditure
information as directed by the Secretary
under 34 CFR 75.118. The Secretary
may also require more frequent
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
17519
performance reports under 34 CFR
75.720(c). For specific requirements on
reporting, please go to www.ed.gov/
fund/grant/apply/appforms/
appforms.html.
4. Performance Measures: The
Secretary has established measures for
assessing the effectiveness of the
Turnaround School Leaders Program.
Unless otherwise noted, we intend to
collect from grantees data responsive to
these measures for each project year.
The measures are:
a. The number and percent of school
leaders placed in SIG schools and/or
SIG-eligible schools who have increased
graduation rates and academic growth
on State assessments in reading/
language arts and in mathematics for the
‘‘all students’’ group.
b. The teacher attendance rate for
each school for every year through the
2018–2019 school year for the SIG
schools and/or SIG-eligible schools in
which school leaders are placed and
retained by the LEA or consortium of
LEAs.
c. The student attendance rate for
each school for every year through the
2018–2019 school year for the SIG
schools and/or SIG-eligible schools in
which school leaders are placed and
retained by the LEA or consortium of
LEAs.
d. The graduation rate, as applicable,
for each school for every year through
the 2018–2019 school year for the SIG
schools and/or SIG-eligible schools in
which school leaders are placed and
retained by the LEA or consortium of
LEAs.
e. The number and percent of school
leaders selected, from all applicants for
the project, to begin professional
development to prepare for placement
in SIG schools and/or SIG-eligible
schools.
f. The number and percent of school
leaders that complete the preparation
component of the pipeline for every
year through the 2017–2018 school year.
g. The number and percent of school
leaders placed in SIG schools and/or
SIG-eligible schools for every year
through the 2017–2018 school year.
h. The leadership pipeline cost per
school leader who increased graduation
rates and academic growth on State
assessments in reading/language arts
and in mathematics, by grade, for the
‘‘all students’’ group and for each
subgroup served by the project.
5. Continuation Awards: The
Department may provide full funding
for the entire project period to
successful applicants from the FY 2013
funds currently available or may
provide funding for an initial budget
period from the FY 2013 funds.
E:\FR\FM\28MRN1.SGM
28MRN1
17520
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 60 / Friday, March 28, 2014 / Notices
Depending upon the amount of funding
provided in the initial awards and the
availability of funds, the Department
may make continuation awards for
subsequent fiscal years in accordance
with 34 CFR 75.253. In making such
continuation awards, the Secretary may
consider, under 34 CFR 75.253, the
extent to which a grantee has made
‘‘substantial progress toward meeting
the objectives in its approved
application.’’ This consideration
includes the review of a grantee’s
progress in meeting the targets and
projected outcomes in its approved
application, and whether the grantee
has expended funds in a manner that is
consistent with its approved application
and budget. In making a continuation
grant, the Secretary also considers
whether the grantee is operating in
compliance with the assurances in its
approved application, including those
applicable to Federal civil rights laws
that prohibit discrimination in programs
or activities receiving Federal financial
assistance from the Department (34 CFR
100.4, 104.5, 106.4, 108.8, and 110.23).
VII. Agency Contact
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Janine Rudder, U.S. Department of
Education, 400 Maryland Avenue SW.,
Room 3W252, Washington, DC 20202.
Telephone: (202) 205–3785, or by email:
leadership.pipeline@ed.gov. or
Christopher Tate, U.S. Department of
Education, 400 Maryland Avenue SW.,
Room 3W231, Washington, DC 20202.
Telephone: (202) 260–8103, or by email:
leadership.pipeline@ed.gov.
VIII. Other Information
Accessible Format: Individuals with
disabilities can obtain this document
and a copy of the application package in
an accessible format (e.g., braille, large
print, audiotape, or compact disc) on
request to the program contact person
persons listed under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT in section VII of
this notice.
Electronic Access to This Document:
The official version of this document is
the document published in the Federal
Register. Free Internet access to the
official edition of the Federal Register
and the Code of Federal Regulations is
available via the Federal Digital System
at: www.gpo.gov/fdsys. At this site you
can view this document, as well as all
other documents of this Department
published in the Federal Register, in
text or Adobe Portable Document
Format (PDF). To use PDF you must
have Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is
available free at the site.
You may also access documents of the
Department published in the Federal
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:57 Mar 27, 2014
Jkt 232001
Register by using the article search
feature at: www.federalregister.gov.
Specifically, through the advanced
search feature at this site, you can limit
your search to documents published by
the Department.
Dated: March 21, 2014.
Deborah S. Delisle,
Assistant Secretary for Elementary and
Secondary Education.
[FR Doc. 2014–06695 Filed 3–27–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Quadrennial Energy Review: Notice of
Public Meeting
Office of Energy Policy and
Systems Analysis, Secretariat,
Quadrennial Energy Review Task Force,
Department of Energy.
ACTION: Notice of public meeting.
AGENCY:
At the direction of the
President, the U.S. Department of
Energy (DOE or Department), as the
Secretariat for the Quadrennial Energy
Review Task Force (QER Task Force),
will convene a series of public meetings
to discuss and receive comments on
issues related to the Quadrennial Energy
Review.
DATES: The Department, as the
Secretariat for the QER Task Force, will
convene a series of meetings relating to
the Quadrennial Energy Review. The
first public meeting will be held on
Friday April 11, 2014, from 10 a.m. to
5 p.m. Written comments are welcome,
especially following the public meeting,
and should be submitted within 60 days
of the meeting.
The precise, time, date and address of
subsequent meetings will be announced
in later Federal Register notices.
ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at
United States Capitol Visitors Center,
Congressional Auditorium, located at
East Capitol Street NE., and First Street
NE., Washington, DC 20001.
You may submit written comments,
to: QERComments@hq.doe.gov or by
U.S. mail to the Office of Energy Policy
and Systems Analysis, EPSA–60, QER
Meeting Comments, U.S. Department of
Energy, 1000 Independence Avenue
SW., Washington, DC 20585–0121.
For the April 11th, 2014, Public
Meeting, please title your comment
‘‘Quadrennial Energy Review: Comment
on the Public Meeting ‘‘Enhancing
Infrastructure Resiliency,’’ held April
11, 2014, Washington, DC’’.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Adonica Renee Pickett, EPSA–90, U.S.
Department of Energy, Office of Energy
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Policy and Systems Analysis, 1000
Independence Avenue SW.,
Washington, DC 20585–0121.
Telephone: (202) 586–916. Email:
Adonica.Pickett@hq.doe.gov.
On
January 9, 2014, President Obama
issued a Presidential Memorandum—
Establishing a Quadrennial Energy
Review. To accomplish this review, the
Presidential Memorandum establishes a
Quadrennial Energy Review Task Force
to be co-chaired by the Director of the
Office of Science and Technology
Policy, and the Director of the Domestic
Policy Council. Under the Presidential
Memorandum, the Secretary of Energy
shall provide support to the Task Force,
including support for coordination
activities related to the preparation of
the Quadrennial Energy Review Report,
policy analysis and modeling, and
stakeholder engagement.
The DOE, as the Secretariat for the
Quadrennial Energy Review Task Force,
will hold a series of public meetings to
discuss and receive comments on issues
related to the Quadrennial Energy
Review. The general location and topic
for each of these meetings are listed
below.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Topic
Location
Infrastructure Resilience
and Vulnerabilities
(Cyber, Physical, Climate, Interdependencies).
Infrastructure Constraints—New England.
Infrastructure Constraints—Bakken.
Electricity Transmission
Storage & Distribution—
West.
Petroleum Product Transmission & Distribution
(including CO2/EOR).
Rail, Barge, Truck Transportation.
Washington, DC.
New England
TBD.
North Dakota.
Portland, OR.
Louisiana.
Chicago, IL.
The initial focus for the Quadrennial
Energy Review will be our Nation’s
infrastructure for transporting,
transmitting, storing and delivering
energy. Our current infrastructure is
increasingly challenged by
transformations in energy supply,
markets, and patterns of end use; issues
of aging and capacity; impacts of
climate change; and cyber and physical
threats. Any vulnerability in this
infrastructure may be exacerbated by the
increasing interdependencies of energy
systems with water,
telecommunications, transportation, and
emergency response systems. The first
Quadrennial Energy Review Report will
E:\FR\FM\28MRN1.SGM
28MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 60 (Friday, March 28, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 17512-17520]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-06695]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Applications for New Awards; Turnaround School Leaders Program
AGENCY: Office of Elementary and Secondary Education, Department of
Education.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Overview Information
Turnaround School Leaders Program
Notice inviting applications for new awards for fiscal year (FY)
2013 funds.
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA) Number: 84.377B.
DATES: Applications Available: March 28, 2014.
Date of Pre-Application Webinar: April 9, 2014.
Further information will be available at https://www2.ed.gov/programs/sif/.
Deadline for Notice of Intent to Apply (optional): April 25, 2014.
[[Page 17513]]
Deadline for Transmittal of Applications: May 23, 2014.
Deadline for Intergovernmental Review: July 22, 2014.
Full Text of Announcement
I. Funding Opportunity Description
Purpose of Program: The Turnaround School Leaders Program supports
projects to develop and implement or enhance and implement a leadership
pipeline that selects, prepares, places, supports, and retains school
leaders (which may include leadership teams) for School Improvement
Grant (SIG) schools (as defined in this notice) and/or SIG-eligible
schools (as defined in this notice) in a local educational agency (LEA)
or consortium of LEAs.
Background: Effective leaders trained to lead turnaround efforts in
the Nation's lowest-performing schools are essential to improving
student outcomes in these schools. In particular, after teacher
effectiveness, leadership is found to be the most important school-
based factor in explaining variation in student learning.\1\ Yet,
interviews with external partners engaged in leadership pipeline
development, as well as monitoring of performance of State educational
agencies (SEAs) and LEAs under the SIG program, as authorized under the
Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (ESEA), as amended,
Title I, Part A, Section 1003(g), 20 U.S.C. 6303(g), indicate that many
LEAs do not have the capacity or resources to recruit or develop school
leaders able to undertake successful turnaround efforts. In addition,
it has become clear that State-approved certification programs are not
preparing school leaders with the specialized skills needed to turn
around schools identified as low-performing \2\ and that LEAs, in turn,
struggle to identify the right competencies in leader candidates for
turnaround schools and lack a comprehensive system that uses data to
support the ongoing development of effective turnaround school
leaders.\3\ Further, rural LEAs face unique challenges in recruiting
strong leaders to guide school turnaround efforts due to the social and
economic isolation of their communities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Mendels, Pamela. (June 2012, Vol. 33, No. 3). Principals in
the Pipeline. Oxford, Ohio: Learning Forward. Retrieved from https://learningforward.org/docs/jsd-june-2012/mendels333.pdf.
\2\ Young, M. et al. (2013). Change Agents: How States Can
Develop Effective School Leaders. Dallas, TX: George W. Bush
Institute. Retrieved from www.bushcenter.org/bush-institute/education-reform.
\3\ Rhim, Lauren Morando. (2012). No time to lose: Turnaround
leader performance assessment. Charlottesville: University of
Virginia's Darden School Foundation. Retrieved from
www.centerii.org.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
As of November 1, 2013, the U.S. Department of Education
(Department) has approved 42 States, Puerto Rico and the District of
Columbia for ``ESEA Flexibility.'' As a condition of this flexibility,
States have committed, among other things, to turning around their
lowest-performing schools over a three-year period. Similarly, under
SIG, LEAs with low-performing schools implement models designed to turn
around the State's lowest-performing schools. To address the need for
leaders who are prepared to lead effectively in these turnaround
schools, and consistent with the authority provided by Congress to use
up to five percent of SIG funds for activities to build SEA and LEA
capacity to implement the SIG program, the Department is using a
portion of the fiscal year (FY) 2013 SIG funds to initiate the
Turnaround School Leaders Program.
The Turnaround School Leaders Program supports efforts to develop
and implement or enhance and implement a leadership pipeline (as
defined in this notice) for SIG schools and/or SIG-eligible schools in
an LEA or consortium of LEAs. Grantees under this program will--
Recruit and select promising current and prospective
school leaders, using locally adopted competencies (as defined in this
notice) identified by the applicant as necessary to turn around a SIG
school or SIG-eligible school;
Provide high-quality training to selected school leaders
to prepare them to successfully lead turnaround efforts in SIG schools
and/or SIG-eligible schools;
Place school leaders in SIG schools and/or SIG-eligible
schools and provide them with ongoing professional development and
other support that focuses on instructional leadership and school
management and is based on individual needs consistent with the LEA's
plan for turning around its SIG schools and/or SIG-eligible schools;
and
Retain effective school leaders, using financial or other
incentives, and replace ineffective school leaders.
Priorities: This notice establishes two absolute priorities and two
competitive preference priorities. We are establishing these priorities
for the FY 2014 grant competition and any subsequent year in which we
make awards from the list of unfunded applicants from this competition,
in accordance with section 437(d)(1) of the General Education
Provisions Act (GEPA), 20 U.S.C. 1232(d)(1).
Absolute Priorities: These priorities are absolute priorities.
Under 34 CFR 75.105(c)(3), we consider only applications that meet one
of these priorities. An applicant may apply under only one absolute
priority and must indicate in its application the priority under which
it is applying.
The Department seeks to encourage high-quality applications from
applicants serving LEAs that are diverse in size and location. For this
reason, the Department establishes two priorities--Absolute Priorities
1 and 2--through which the Department intends to support leadership
pipelines in both rural and non-rural communities with no fewer than
five schools in each community that are SIG schools and/or SIG-eligible
schools.
If an otherwise eligible applicant applying under Absolute Priority
2 is determined not to have met the priority because it has
misidentified the designation of one or more schools as rural, the
Department reserves the authority to review the applicant's submission
with all other applications submitted for funding that meet Absolute
Priority 1.
These priorities are:
Absolute Priority 1: Non-Rural Turnaround School Leader Selection,
Preparation, Placement, Support, and Retention Program
To meet this priority, the applicant must submit a plan to develop
and implement or enhance and implement a leadership pipeline for at
least one LEA with no fewer than five SIG schools and/or SIG-eligible
schools.
Absolute Priority 2: Rural Turnaround School Leader Selection,
Preparation, Placement, Support, and Retention Program
To meet this priority, the applicant must submit a plan to develop
and implement or enhance and implement a leadership pipeline for at
least one LEA with no fewer than five SIG schools and/or SIG-eligible
schools designated as rural. A school is designated as rural if it is
assigned a locale code of 41 (located in a census-defined rural
territory less than 5 miles from an urban cluster), a locale code of 42
(located in a census-defined rural territory more than 5 miles but less
than or equal to 25 miles from an urban cluster), or a locale code of
43 (located in a census-defined rural territory that is more than 25
miles from an urban cluster) by the National Center for Education
Statistics (NCES).
Note 1: To identify the locale code of any school to be served
by the proposed project, access the NCES public school database
here: https://nces.ed.gov/ccd/schoolsearch/.
[[Page 17514]]
Note 2: An applicant may apply under only one absolute priority
and must indicate in its abstract the priority under which it is
applying as well as the schools, and NCES identification numbers of
those schools, the applicant intends to serve.
Note 3: Applicants that fail to clearly identify in the abstract
section the absolute priority for which it is seeking to apply will
have its application reviewed with all other applications submitted
for funding that under Absolute Priority 1.
Competitive Preference Priorities: These priorities are competitive
preference priorities. Under 34 CFR 75.105(c)(2)(i), we award three
additional points to an application that meets Competitive Preference
Priority 1 and five additional points to an application that meets
Competitive Preference Priority 2. A total of eight points may be
awarded.
These priorities are:
Competitive Preference Priority 1: Existing Policy Conditions That Can
Be Leveraged To Ensure Success and Sustainability of a Turnaround
Leadership Pipeline
To meet this priority, the applicant must provide documentation
that the LEA or consortium of LEAs already has in place policies that
provide school leaders (as defined in this notice) with decision-making
autonomy (with regard to staffing, school schedules, and budgeting) and
provide the LEA or consortium of LEAs with flexibility in the
selection, preparation, placement, support, and retention of school
leaders to successfully turn around SIG schools and/or SIG-eligible
schools. This may include, for example, School Board meeting minutes
recording the adoption of policies, guidance documents, or trainings
provided to school leaders.
Competitive Preference Priority 2: Record of Preparing and Supporting
Turnaround School Leaders Who Have Demonstrated Success in Increased
Graduation Rates and Academic Growth
To meet this priority, the applicant must provide documentation of
previous success in preparing and supporting school leaders or
leadership teams in SIG schools and/or SIG-eligible schools as
demonstrated by increased graduation rates and academic growth on State
assessments in reading/language arts and in mathematics for the ``all
students'' group and for each subgroup, as specified in section
1111(b)(3)(C)(xiii), 20 U.S.C. 6311(b)(3)(C)(xiii).
Note 1: Applicants may address either of the competitive
preference priorities, both, or neither. In order to be eligible for
earning competitive preference priority points, an applicant must
identify in the abstract section of its application the competitive
preference priority or priorities for which it is seeking points.
Note 2: Applicants that fail to clearly identify in the
abstract section the competitive preference priority or priorities
for which it is seeking to earn points will not have its application
reviewed against the competitive preference priority and will not be
awarded competitive preference priority points.
Application Requirements: The applicant must provide the following.
Requirement 1--Demonstrating Capacity To Develop and Implement a
Leadership Pipeline System
In its application, an applicant must demonstrate its capacity to
develop and implement or enhance and implement a leadership pipeline
for SIG schools and/or SIG-eligible schools. The applicant must
demonstrate such capacity by providing evidence of each of the
following:
a. An existing evaluation system that measures teacher and leader
effectiveness.
b. Commitment to implement and sustain the proposed plan by the
applicant. To demonstrate this commitment, an applicant must include
with its application a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU), or, if the
applicant is an LEA, a letter of commitment, signed by the
superintendent and (if applicable) school board president of each LEA
to be served by the project and by an appropriate representative of the
applicant (if not an LEA) and any other partner entity, outlining the
terms and conditions of the partnership.
c. A reasonable opportunity for the public, including teachers and
school leaders, to provide feedback on the applicant's proposed
leadership pipeline plan as demonstrated by evidence, for instance,
that forums designed to inform and engage school staff and community
stakeholders have been held.
Requirement 2--Sustaining the Leadership Pipeline
The applicant must describe its plan for sustaining the leadership
pipeline it will implement as a result of this grant. The
sustainability plan must include each of the following:
a. A description of the data that the applicant will use, and how
the applicant will use the data, to inform its continuous improvement
of the leadership pipeline after the grant award period ends.
b. A description of the actions that the applicant will undertake
to continue to select, prepare, place, support, and retain school
leaders in SIG schools and/or SIG-eligible schools after the grant
award period ends.
c. A budget narrative that identifies and aligns resources to
sustain the system after the grant award period ends.
Program Requirements: The following are program requirements. In
its application, the applicant must describe its plan to carry out the
following program requirements:
Requirement 3--Describing the Leadership Pipeline
The grantee must use grant funds to develop and implement or
enhance and implement a leadership pipeline that:
a. Selects school leaders using locally adopted competencies
identified by the applicant as necessary to turn around a SIG school or
SIG-eligible school;
b. Provides comprehensive and differentiated professional
development to selected school leaders to prepare them to successfully
lead turnaround efforts in SIG schools and/or SIG-eligible schools;
c. Places school leaders in SIG schools and/or SIG-eligible
schools, and provides them with ongoing individualized support based on
the LEA's plan for turning around its SIG schools and/or SIG-eligible
schools; and
d. Retains effective school leaders, using financial or other
incentives, and replaces ineffective school leaders.
Requirement 4--Determining Leadership Effectiveness
The grantee must use data (which may include data from the
evaluation system that measures teacher and leader effectiveness) to
inform selection, placement, retention and incentive decisions.
Requirement 5--Continuous Project Improvement
The grantee must identify and use data to inform continuous
improvement of its leadership pipeline during the award period.
Requirement 6--Extension of Autonomy to School Leaders
The grantee must ensure that school leaders placed in SIG schools
and/or SIG-eligible schools have decision-making autonomy (with regard
to staffing, school schedules, and budgeting).
Definitions
The following definitions apply to the competition announced in
this notice.
Leadership pipeline means a system through which an LEA or
consortium of
[[Page 17515]]
LEAs is able to select, prepare, place, support, and retain school
leaders, including leadership teams, for SIG schools and/or SIG-
eligible schools.
Locally adopted competencies means the knowledge, skills and
abilities, developed by an LEA or school, which are associated with
effective performance as a turnaround leader and supported by research-
based evidence.
Logic model (also referred to as theory of action) means a well-
specified conceptual framework that identifies key components of the
proposed process, product, strategy, or practice (i.e., the active
``ingredients'' that are hypothesized to be critical to achieving the
relevant outcomes) and describes the relationships among the key
components and outcomes, theoretically and operationally.
Relevant outcome means the student outcome(s) (or the ultimate
outcome if not related to students) the proposed process, product,
strategy, or practice is designed to improve; consistent with the
specific goals of a program.
School leader means a school's principal and may also include other
members of a school's leadership team.
SIG school means either:
(1) A Tier I or Tier II school as defined in the SIG final
requirements published in the Federal Register on October 28, 2010 (75
FR 66363) (https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2010-10-28/pdf/2010-27313.pdf) that is, as of the date of the application, implementing a
SIG model, or
(2) For a State that has received approval of its ESEA Flexibility
request, a priority school that is, as of the date of the application,
implementing a SIG model.
SIG-eligible school means either:
(1) A school that meets the definition of a Tier I or Tier II
school as defined in the SIG final requirements published in the
Federal Register on October 28, 2010 (75 FR 66363) (https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2010-10-28/pdf/2010-27313.pdf), or
(2) For States that have received approval of their ESEA
Flexibility request, a priority school identified by an SEA in the list
of schools in the SEA's approved FY 2013 SIG application.
Strong theory means a rationale for the proposed process, product,
strategy, or practice that includes a logic model.
Waiver of Proposed Rulemaking: Under the Administrative Procedure
Act (5 U.S.C. 553) the Department generally offers interested parties
the opportunity to comment on proposed priorities, selection criteria,
definitions, and other requirements. Section 437(d)(1) of GEPA,
however, allows the Secretary to exempt from rulemaking requirements,
regulations governing the first grant competition under a new or
substantially revised program authority. This is the first grant
competition for this program under the Consolidated and Further
Continuing Appropriations Act, 2013 (Pub. L. 113-6) and the
Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2012 (Pub. L. 112-74) and therefore
qualifies for this exemption. In order to ensure timely grant awards,
the Secretary has decided to forego public comment on the priorities,
selection criteria, definitions, and other requirements under section
437(d)(1) of GEPA. These priorities, selection criteria, definitions,
and other requirements will apply to the FY 2013 grant competition and
any subsequent year in which we make awards from the list of unfunded
applicants from this competition.
Program Authority: 20 U.S.C. 6303(g); the Consolidated and
Further Continuing Appropriations Act, 2013 (Pub. L. 113-6); and the
Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2012 (Pub. L. 112-74).
Applicable Regulations: (a) The Education Department General
Administrative Regulations (EDGAR) in 34 CFR parts 74, 75, 77, 79, 80,
81, 82, 84, 86, 97, 98, and 99. (b) The Education Department suspension
and debarment regulations in 2 CFR part 3485.
Note: The regulations in 34 CFR part 79 apply to all applicants
except federally recognized Indian tribes.
Note: The regulations in 34 CFR part 86 apply to institutions of
higher education only.
II. Award Information
Type of Award: Discretionary grants.
Estimated Available Funds: $14,000,000.
Contingent upon the availability of funds and the quality of
applications, the Department may make additional awards in future years
from the list of unfunded applicants from this competition.
Estimated Range of Awards: $1,000,000 to $2,000,000.
Estimated Average Size of Awards: $1,500,000.
Estimated Number of Awards: 8-12.
Note: The Department is not bound by any estimates in this
notice.
Project Period: Up to 36 months.
III. Eligibility Information
1. Eligible Applicants: (1) An LEA or consortium of LEAs with at
least five SIG schools and/or SIG-eligible schools; (2) A State
educational agency (SEA) in partnership with an LEA or consortium of
LEAs with at least five SIG schools and/or SIG-eligible schools; (3) An
institution of higher education (IHE) in partnership with an LEA or
consortium of LEAs with at least five SIG schools and/or SIG-eligible
schools; (4) Another public or private nonprofit or for-profit
organization in partnership with an LEA and/or consortium of LEAs with
at least five SIG schools and/or SIG-eligible schools; and, (5) A
combination of the above eligible applicants in partnership. Eligible
applicants seeking to apply as a consortium or partnership must comply
with the regulations in 34 CFR 75.127-75.129, which address group
applications.
2. Cost Sharing or Matching: This program does not require cost
sharing or matching.
IV. Application and Submission Information
1. Address to Request Application Package: ED Pubs, U.S. Department
of Education, P.O. Box 22207, Alexandria, VA 22304. Telephone, toll
free: 1-877-433-7827. FAX: (703) 605-6794. If you use a
telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD) or a text telephone (TTY),
call, toll free: 1-877-576-7734.
You can contact ED Pubs at its Web site, also: www.EDPubs.gov or at
its email address: edpubs@inet.ed.gov.
If you request an application package from ED Pubs, be sure to
identify this program or competition as follows: CFDA number 84.377B.
Individuals with disabilities can obtain a copy of the application
package in an accessible format (e.g., braille, large print, audiotape,
or compact disc) by contacting the person listed under Accessible
Format in section VIII of this notice.
2.a. Content and Form of Application Submission: Requirements
concerning the content of an application, together with the forms you
must submit, are in the application package for this program.
Notice of Intent to Apply: The Department will be able to develop a
more efficient process for reviewing grant applications if it has a
better understanding of the number of entities that intend to apply for
funding under this program. Therefore, the Secretary strongly
encourages each potential applicant to notify the Department by sending
a short email message indicating the applicant's intent to submit an
application for funding. The email need not include information
regarding the content of the proposed application, only the applicant's
intent to submit it. This email notification should be sent to the
Office of School Turnaround at: leadership.pipeline@ed.gov.
[[Page 17516]]
Page Limit: The application narrative is where you, the applicant,
address the selection criteria that reviewers use to evaluate your
application. Panel readers will award points only for an applicant's
response to a given selection criterion that is contained within the
section of the application designated to address that particular
selection criterion. Readers will not review, or award points for
responses to a given selection criterion that is located in any other
section of the application or the appendices. You must limit the
application narrative to no more than 40 pages, using the following
standards:
A ``page'' is 8.5'' x 11'', on one side only, with 1''
margins at the top, bottom, and both sides.
Double space (no more than three lines per vertical inch)
all text in the application narrative, including titles, headings,
footnotes, quotations, references, and captions, as well as all text in
charts, tables, figures, and graphs.
Use a font that is either 12 point or larger or no smaller
than 10 pitch (characters per inch).
Use one of the following fonts: Times New Roman, Courier,
Courier New, or Arial. An application submitted in any other font
(including Times Roman or Arial Narrow) will not be accepted.
The page limit does not apply to the cover sheet; the budget
section, including the narrative budget justification; the assurances
and certifications; or the one-page abstract, the resumes, the
bibliography, or the letters of support. However, the page limit does
apply to all of the application narrative section.
We will reject your application if you exceed the page limit.
2.b. Submission of Proprietary Information: Given the types of
projects that may be proposed in applications for the Turnaround School
Leaders Program an application may include business information that
the applicant considers proprietary. The Department's regulations
define ``business information'' in 34 CFR 5.11.
Because we plan to make successful applications available to the
public, you may wish to request confidentiality of business
information.
Consistent with Executive Order 12600, please designate in your
application any information that you feel is exempt from disclosure
under Exemption 4 of the Freedom of Information Act. In the appropriate
Appendix section of your application, under ``Other Attachments Form,''
please list the page number or numbers on which we can find this
information. For additional information please see 34 CFR 5.11(c).
3. Submission Dates and Times:
Applications Available: March 28, 2014.
Date of Pre-Application Webinar: April 9, 2014. Further information
will be available at https://www2.ed.gov/programs/sif/.
Deadline for Notice of Intent to Apply: April 25, 2014.
Deadline for Transmittal of Applications: May 23, 2014.
Applications for grants under this program must be submitted
electronically using the Grants.gov Apply site (Grants.gov). For
information (including dates and times) about how to submit your
application electronically, or in a paper format by mail or hand
delivery if you qualify for an exception to the electronic submission
requirement, please refer to section IV.7. Other Submission
Requirements of this notice.
We do not consider an application that does not comply with the
deadline requirements.
Individuals with disabilities who need an accommodation or
auxiliary aid in connection with the application process should contact
the person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT in section VII
of this notice. If the Department provides an accommodation or
auxiliary aid to an individual with a disability in connection with the
application process, the individual's application remains subject to
all other requirements and limitations in this notice.
Deadline for Intergovernmental Review: July 22, 2014.
4. Intergovernmental Review: This program is subject to Executive
Order 12372 and the regulations in 34 CFR part 79. Information about
Intergovernmental Review of Federal Programs under Executive Order
12372 is in the application package for this program.
5. Funding Restrictions: We reference regulations outlining funding
restrictions in the Applicable Regulations section of this notice.
6. Data Universal Numbering System Number, Taxpayer Identification
Number, and System for Award Management: To do business with the
Department of Education, you must--
a. Have a Data Universal Numbering System (DUNS) number and a
Taxpayer Identification Number (TIN);
b. Register both your DUNS number and TIN with the System for Award
Management (SAM) (formerly the Central Contractor Registry (CCR)), the
Government's primary registrant database;
c. Provide your DUNS number and TIN on your application; and
d. Maintain an active SAM registration with current information
while your application is under review by the Department and, if you
are awarded a grant, during the project period.
You can obtain a DUNS number from Dun and Bradstreet. A DUNS number
can be created within one-to-two business days.
If you are a corporate entity, agency, institution, or
organization, you can obtain a TIN from the Internal Revenue Service.
If you are an individual, you can obtain a TIN from the Internal
Revenue Service or the Social Security Administration. If you need a
new TIN, please allow 2-5 weeks for your TIN to become active.
The SAM registration process can take approximately seven business
days, but may take upwards of several weeks, depending on the
completeness and accuracy of the data entered into the SAM database by
an entity. Thus, if you think you might want to apply for Federal
financial assistance under a program administered by the Department,
please allow sufficient time to obtain and register your DUNS number
and TIN. We strongly recommend that you register early.
Note: Once your SAM registration is active, you will need to
allow 24 to 48 hours for the information to be available in
Grants.gov. and before you can submit an application through
Grants.gov.
If you are currently registered with SAM, you may not need to make
any changes. However, please make certain that the TIN associated with
your DUNS number is correct. Also note that you will need to update
your registration annually. This may take three or more business days.
Information about SAM is available at www.SAM.gov. To further
assist you with obtaining and registering your DUNS number and TIN in
SAM or updating your existing SAM account, we have prepared a SAM.gov
Tip Sheet, which you can find at: https://www2.ed.gov/fund/grant/apply/sam-faqs.html.
In addition, if you are submitting your application via Grants.gov,
you must (1) be designated by your organization as an Authorized
Organization Representative (AOR); and (2) register yourself with
Grants.gov as an AOR. Details on these steps are outlined at the
following Grants.gov Web page: www.grants.gov/applicants/get_registered.jsp.
7. Other Submission Requirements: Applications for grants under
this
[[Page 17517]]
program must be submitted electronically unless you qualify for an
exception to this requirement in accordance with the instructions in
this section.
a. Electronic Submission of Applications
Applications for grants under the Turnaround School Leaders
Program, CFDA number 84.377B, must be submitted electronically using
the Governmentwide Grants.gov Apply site at www.Grants.gov. Through
this site, you will be able to download a copy of the application
package, complete it offline, and then upload and submit your
application. You may not email an electronic copy of a grant
application to us.
We will reject your application if you submit it in paper format
unless, as described elsewhere in this section, you qualify for one of
the exceptions to the electronic submission requirement and submit, no
later than two weeks before the application deadline date, a written
statement to the Department that you qualify for one of these
exceptions. Further information regarding calculation of the date that
is two weeks before the application deadline date is provided later in
this section under Exception to Electronic Submission Requirement.
You may access the electronic grant application for the Turnaround
School Leaders Program at www.Grants.gov. You must search for the
downloadable application package for this program by the CFDA number.
Do not include the CFDA number's alpha suffix in your search (e.g.,
search for 84.326, not 84.326A).
Please note the following:
When you enter the Grants.gov site, you will find
information about submitting an application electronically through the
site, as well as the hours of operation.
Applications received by Grants.gov are date and time
stamped. Your application must be fully uploaded and submitted and must
be date and time stamped by the Grants.gov system no later than 4:30:00
p.m., Washington, DC time, on the application deadline date. Except as
otherwise noted in this section, we will not accept your application if
it is received--that is, date and time stamped by the Grants.gov
system--after 4:30:00 p.m., Washington, DC time, on the application
deadline date. We do not consider an application that does not comply
with the deadline requirements. When we retrieve your application from
Grants.gov, we will notify you if we are rejecting your application
because it was date and time stamped by the Grants.gov system after
4:30:00 p.m., Washington, DC time, on the application deadline date.
The amount of time it can take to upload an application
will vary depending on a variety of factors, including the size of the
application and the speed of your Internet connection. Therefore, we
strongly recommend that you do not wait until the application deadline
date to begin the submission process through Grants.gov.
You should review and follow the Education Submission
Procedures for submitting an application through Grants.gov that are
included in the application package for this program to ensure that you
submit your application in a timely manner to the Grants.gov system.
You can also find the Education Submission Procedures pertaining to
Grants.gov under News and Events on the Department's G5 system home
page at https://www.G5.gov.
You will not receive additional point value because you
submit your application in electronic format, nor will we penalize you
if you qualify for an exception to the electronic submission
requirement, as described elsewhere in this section, and submit your
application in paper format.
You must submit all documents electronically, including
all information you typically provide on the following forms: The
Application for Federal Assistance (SF 424), the Department of
Education Supplemental Information for SF 424, Budget Information--Non-
Construction Programs (ED 524), and all necessary assurances and
certifications.
You must upload any narrative sections and all other
attachments to your application as files in a PDF (Portable Document)
read-only, non-modifiable format. Do not upload an interactive or
fillable PDF file. If you upload a file type other than a read-only,
non-modifiable PDF or submit a password-protected file, we will not
review that material.
Your electronic application must comply with any page-
limit requirements described in this notice.
After you electronically submit your application, you will
receive from Grants.gov an automatic notification of receipt that
contains a Grants.gov tracking number. (This notification indicates
receipt by Grants.gov only, not receipt by the Department.) The
Department then will retrieve your application from Grants.gov and send
a second notification to you by email. This second notification
indicates that the Department has received your application and has
assigned your application a PR/Award number (an ED-specified
identifying number unique to your application).
We may request that you provide us original signatures on
forms at a later date.
Application Deadline Date Extension in Case of Technical Issues
with the Grants.gov System: If you are experiencing problems submitting
your application through Grants.gov, please contact the Grants.gov
Support Desk, toll free, at 1-800-518-4726. You must obtain a
Grants.gov Support Desk Case Number and must keep a record of it.
If you are prevented from electronically submitting your
application on the application deadline date because of technical
problems with the Grants.gov system, we will grant you an extension
until 4:30:00 p.m., Washington, DC time, the following business day to
enable you to transmit your application electronically or by hand
delivery. You also may mail your application by following the mailing
instructions described elsewhere in this notice.
If you submit an application after 4:30:00 p.m., Washington, DC
time, on the application deadline date, please contact the person
listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT in section VII of this
notice and provide an explanation of the technical problem you
experienced with Grants.gov, along with the Grants.gov Support Desk
Case Number. We will accept your application if we can confirm that a
technical problem occurred with the Grants.gov system and that that
problem affected your ability to submit your application by 4:30:00
p.m., Washington, DC time, on the application deadline date. The
Department will contact you after a determination is made on whether
your application will be accepted.
Note: The extensions to which we refer in this section apply
only to the unavailability of, or technical problems with, the
Grants.gov system. We will not grant you an extension if you failed
to fully register to submit your application to Grants.gov before
the application deadline date and time or if the technical problem
you experienced is unrelated to the Grants.gov system.
Exception to Electronic Submission Requirement: You qualify for an
exception to the electronic submission requirement, and may submit your
application in paper format, if you are unable to submit an application
through the Grants.gov system because--
You do not have access to the Internet; or
You do not have the capacity to upload large documents to
the Grants.gov system; and
[[Page 17518]]
No later than two weeks before the application deadline
date (14 calendar days or, if the fourteenth calendar day before the
application deadline date falls on a Federal holiday, the next business
day following the Federal holiday), you mail or fax a written statement
to the Department, explaining which of the two grounds for an exception
prevent you from using the Internet to submit your application.
If you mail your written statement to the Department, it must be
postmarked no later than two weeks before the application deadline
date. If you fax your written statement to the Department, we must
receive the faxed statement no later than two weeks before the
application deadline date.
Address and mail or fax your statement to: Janine Rudder, U.S.
Department of Education, 400 Maryland Avenue SW., Room 3W252,
Washington, DC 20202.
FAX: (202) 205-5870.
Alternatively, you may email a PDF of your statement to the Office
of School Turnaround. Email: leadership.pipeline@ed.gov.
Your paper application must be submitted in accordance with the
mail or hand delivery instructions described in this notice.
b. Submission of Paper Applications by Mail
If you qualify for an exception to the electronic submission
requirement, you may mail (through the U.S. Postal Service or a
commercial carrier) your application to the Department. You must mail
the original and two copies of your application, on or before the
application deadline date, to the Department at the following address:
U.S. Department of Education, Application Control Center, Attention:
(CFDA Number 84.377B), LBJ Basement Level 1, 400 Maryland Avenue SW.,
Washington, DC 20202-4260.
You must show proof of mailing consisting of one of the following:
(1) A legibly dated U.S. Postal Service postmark.
(2) A legible mail receipt with the date of mailing stamped by the
U.S. Postal Service.
(3) A dated shipping label, invoice, or receipt from a commercial
carrier.
(4) Any other proof of mailing acceptable to the Secretary of the
U.S. Department of Education.
If you mail your application through the U.S. Postal Service, we do
not accept either of the following as proof of mailing:
(1) A private metered postmark.
(2) A mail receipt that is not dated by the U.S. Postal Service.
If your application is postmarked after the application deadline
date, we will not consider your application.
Note: The U.S. Postal Service does not uniformly provide a dated
postmark. Before relying on this method, you should check with your
local post office.
c. Submission of Paper Applications by Hand Delivery
If you qualify for an exception to the electronic submission
requirement, you (or a courier service) may deliver your paper
application to the Department by hand. You must deliver the original
and two copies of your application by hand, on or before the
application deadline date, to the Department at the following address:
U.S. Department of Education, Application Control Center, Attention:
(CFDA Number 84.377B), 550 12th Street SW., Room 7041, Potomac Center
Plaza, Washington, DC 20202-4260.
The Application Control Center accepts hand deliveries daily
between 8:00 a.m. and 4:30:00 p.m., Washington, DC time, except
Saturdays, Sundays, and Federal holidays.
Note for Mail or Hand Delivery of Paper Applications: If you
mail or hand deliver your application to the Department--
(1) You must indicate on the envelope and--if not provided by
the Department--in Item 11 of the SF 424 the CFDA number, including
suffix letter, if any, of the competition under which you are
submitting your application; and
(2) The Application Control Center will mail to you a
notification of receipt of your grant application. If you do not
receive this notification within 15 business days from the
application deadline date, you should call the U.S. Department of
Education Application Control Center at (202) 245-6288.
V. Application Review Information
1. Selection Criteria: The selection criteria for this program are
as follows:
a. Quality of the project design (up to 40 points). In determining
the quality of the design of the proposed project, we consider the
following factors:
1. The extent to which the applicant proposes to select and place
school leaders using locally adopted competencies identified by the
applicant as being necessary to turn around SIG schools and/or SIG-
eligible schools (up to 7 points).
2. The extent to which the applicant will provide comprehensive and
differentiated professional development to prepare and support school
leaders who are placed in SIG schools and/or SIG-eligible schools (up
to 9 points).
3. The extent to which the proposed project is supported by a
strong theory (as defined in 34 CFR 77.1(c)) (up to 5 points).
4. The extent to which the design of the applicant's proposed
project will address the needs of traditionally underserved populations
(including students with disabilities and English learners), such as by
recruiting, incentivizing, and selecting special education teachers and
those in language instruction educational programs to be school leaders
(up to 5 points).
5. The extent to which the applicant will use data to inform
professional development, retention and incentive decisions (up to 7
points).
6. The extent to which the applicant plans to identify and use data
to inform continuous improvement of its proposed leadership pipeline
during the award period (up to 7 points).
b. Significance of the project (up to 5 points). In determining the
significance of the proposed project, we consider the extent to which
the applicant's proposed leadership pipeline is likely to produce best
practices and lessons learned that promote and support reforms in the
turnaround field (up to 5 points).
c. Capacity to implement the proposed project (up to 20 points). We
consider the following factors in determining the applicant's capacity
in implementing the proposed project:
1. The extent to which the applicant has a system in place that
determines teacher and leader effectiveness (up to 5 points).
2. The extent to which the applicant demonstrates that decision-
making autonomy (with regard to staffing, school schedules, and
budgeting) will be extended to school leaders placed in SIG schools
and/or SIG-eligible schools (up to 5 points).
3. The extent to which the proposed project will be coordinated
with committed partners as evidenced by Memoranda of Understanding,
signed by the superintendent and (if applicable) school board president
of each LEA to be served by the project and by an appropriate
representative of the applicant (if not an LEA) and any other partner
entity, which outline the terms and contributions each partner will
make to support full and effective implementation of the leadership
pipeline for SIG schools and/or SIG-eligible schools (up to 5 points).
4. The extent to which the applicant offers a reasonable
opportunity for the public, including teachers and school leaders, to
provide feedback on the applicant's proposed leadership pipeline plan
as demonstrated by evidence, for instance, that forums designed to
inform and engage
[[Page 17519]]
stakeholders have been held (up to 5 points).
d. Sustainability of the proposed project after the award period
ends (up to 25 points). We consider the following factors in
determining the sustainability of the leadership pipeline:
1. The adequacy of the applicant's plan to sustain the leadership
pipeline it develops and implements or enhances as a result of the
grant (up to 10 points).
2. The adequacy of the proposed budget that indicates how the
applicant will identify and align resources to sustain the leadership
pipeline after the grant award period ends (up to 10 points).
3. The adequacy of the applicant's plan to sustain stakeholder
support of the project after Federal funding ends, including, as
appropriate, the demonstrated commitment of the LEA's superintendent,
local school board president, and any other partner entities (up to 5
points).
e. Quality of the management plan (up to 10 points). In determining
the quality of the management plan for the proposed project, we
consider the following factors:
1. The extent to which the applicant's plan is likely to achieve
the objectives of the proposed project on time and within budget,
including how likely the plan is to result in the applicant carrying
out clearly defined responsibilities, meeting articulated timelines,
and achieving specified and measurable milestones for developing and
implementing the leadership pipeline for SIG schools and/or SIG-
eligible schools (up to 5 points).
2. The adequacy of the time commitment and qualifications of the
project director and key personnel, including relevant training and
experience, to continuously implement the proposed project and to
support project participants (up to 5 points).
2. Review and Selection Process: To ensure that grantees under this
program serve both rural and non-rural communities, the Department may
separately consider for funding applications meeting Absolute Priority
1 and those meeting Absolute Priority 2.
We remind potential applicants that in reviewing applications in
any discretionary grant competition, the Secretary may consider, under
34 CFR 75.217(d)(3), the past performance of the applicant in carrying
out a previous award, such as the applicant's use of funds, achievement
of project objectives, and compliance with grant conditions. The
Secretary may also consider whether the applicant failed to submit a
timely performance report or submitted a report of unacceptable
quality.
In addition, in making a competitive grant award, the Secretary
also requires various assurances including those applicable to Federal
civil rights laws that prohibit discrimination in programs or
activities receiving Federal financial assistance from the Department
of Education (34 CFR 100.4, 104.5, 106.4, 108.8, and 110.23).
3. Special Conditions: Under 34 CFR 74.14 and 80.12, the Secretary
may impose special conditions on a grant if the applicant or grantee is
not financially stable; has a history of unsatisfactory performance;
has a financial or other management system that does not meet the
standards in 34 CFR parts 74 or 80, as applicable; has not fulfilled
the conditions of a prior grant; or is otherwise not responsible.
VI. Award Administration Information
1. Award Notices: If your application is successful, we notify your
U.S. Representative and U.S. Senators and send you a Grant Award
Notification (GAN); or we may send you an email containing a link to
access an electronic version of your GAN. We may notify you informally,
also.
If your application is not evaluated or not selected for funding,
we notify you.
2. Administrative and National Policy Requirements: We identify
administrative and national policy requirements in the application
package and reference these and other requirements in the Applicable
Regulations section of this notice.
We reference the regulations outlining the terms and conditions of
an award in the Applicable Regulations section of this notice and
include these and other specific conditions in the GAN. The GAN also
incorporates your approved application as part of your binding
commitments under the grant.
3. Reporting: (a) If you apply for a grant under this competition,
you must ensure that you have in place the necessary processes and
systems to comply with the reporting requirements in 2 CFR part 170
should you receive funding under the competition. This does not apply
if you have an exception under 2 CFR 170.110(b).
(b) At the end of your project period, you must submit a final
performance report, including financial information, as directed by the
Secretary. If you receive a multi-year award, you must submit an annual
performance report that provides the most current performance and
financial expenditure information as directed by the Secretary under 34
CFR 75.118. The Secretary may also require more frequent performance
reports under 34 CFR 75.720(c). For specific requirements on reporting,
please go to www.ed.gov/fund/grant/apply/appforms/appforms.html.
4. Performance Measures: The Secretary has established measures for
assessing the effectiveness of the Turnaround School Leaders Program.
Unless otherwise noted, we intend to collect from grantees data
responsive to these measures for each project year. The measures are:
a. The number and percent of school leaders placed in SIG schools
and/or SIG-eligible schools who have increased graduation rates and
academic growth on State assessments in reading/language arts and in
mathematics for the ``all students'' group.
b. The teacher attendance rate for each school for every year
through the 2018-2019 school year for the SIG schools and/or SIG-
eligible schools in which school leaders are placed and retained by the
LEA or consortium of LEAs.
c. The student attendance rate for each school for every year
through the 2018-2019 school year for the SIG schools and/or SIG-
eligible schools in which school leaders are placed and retained by the
LEA or consortium of LEAs.
d. The graduation rate, as applicable, for each school for every
year through the 2018-2019 school year for the SIG schools and/or SIG-
eligible schools in which school leaders are placed and retained by the
LEA or consortium of LEAs.
e. The number and percent of school leaders selected, from all
applicants for the project, to begin professional development to
prepare for placement in SIG schools and/or SIG-eligible schools.
f. The number and percent of school leaders that complete the
preparation component of the pipeline for every year through the 2017-
2018 school year.
g. The number and percent of school leaders placed in SIG schools
and/or SIG-eligible schools for every year through the 2017-2018 school
year.
h. The leadership pipeline cost per school leader who increased
graduation rates and academic growth on State assessments in reading/
language arts and in mathematics, by grade, for the ``all students''
group and for each subgroup served by the project.
5. Continuation Awards: The Department may provide full funding for
the entire project period to successful applicants from the FY 2013
funds currently available or may provide funding for an initial budget
period from the FY 2013 funds.
[[Page 17520]]
Depending upon the amount of funding provided in the initial awards and
the availability of funds, the Department may make continuation awards
for subsequent fiscal years in accordance with 34 CFR 75.253. In making
such continuation awards, the Secretary may consider, under 34 CFR
75.253, the extent to which a grantee has made ``substantial progress
toward meeting the objectives in its approved application.'' This
consideration includes the review of a grantee's progress in meeting
the targets and projected outcomes in its approved application, and
whether the grantee has expended funds in a manner that is consistent
with its approved application and budget. In making a continuation
grant, the Secretary also considers whether the grantee is operating in
compliance with the assurances in its approved application, including
those applicable to Federal civil rights laws that prohibit
discrimination in programs or activities receiving Federal financial
assistance from the Department (34 CFR 100.4, 104.5, 106.4, 108.8, and
110.23).
VII. Agency Contact
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Janine Rudder, U.S. Department of
Education, 400 Maryland Avenue SW., Room 3W252, Washington, DC 20202.
Telephone: (202) 205-3785, or by email: leadership.pipeline@ed.gov. or
Christopher Tate, U.S. Department of Education, 400 Maryland Avenue
SW., Room 3W231, Washington, DC 20202. Telephone: (202) 260-8103, or by
email: leadership.pipeline@ed.gov.
VIII. Other Information
Accessible Format: Individuals with disabilities can obtain this
document and a copy of the application package in an accessible format
(e.g., braille, large print, audiotape, or compact disc) on request to
the program contact person persons listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT in section VII of this notice.
Electronic Access to This Document: The official version of this
document is the document published in the Federal Register. Free
Internet access to the official edition of the Federal Register and the
Code of Federal Regulations is available via the Federal Digital System
at: www.gpo.gov/fdsys. At this site you can view this document, as well
as all other documents of this Department published in the Federal
Register, in text or Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF). To use PDF
you must have Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is available free at the
site.
You may also access documents of the Department published in the
Federal Register by using the article search feature at:
www.federalregister.gov. Specifically, through the advanced search
feature at this site, you can limit your search to documents published
by the Department.
Dated: March 21, 2014.
Deborah S. Delisle,
Assistant Secretary for Elementary and Secondary Education.
[FR Doc. 2014-06695 Filed 3-27-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000-01-P