Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993; Pistoia Alliance, Inc., 17181-17182 [2014-06744]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 59 / Thursday, March 27, 2014 / Notices
established as required by subsection
(a)(2) of section 337.
The complainants request that the
Commission institute an investigation
and, after the investigation, issue a
limited exclusion order and cease and
desist orders.
ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for
any confidential information contained
therein, is available for inspection
during official business hours (8:45 a.m.
to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the
Secretary, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street SW., Room
112, Washington, DC 20436, telephone
(202) 205–2000. Hearing impaired
individuals are advised that information
on this matter can be obtained by
contacting the Commission’s TDD
terminal on (202) 205–1810. Persons
with mobility impairments who will
need special assistance in gaining access
to the Commission should contact the
Office of the Secretary at (202) 205–
2000. General information concerning
the Commission may also be obtained
by accessing its internet server at
https://www.usitc.gov. The public record
for this investigation may be viewed on
the Commission’s electronic docket
(EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov.
The
Office of Unfair Import Investigations,
U.S. International Trade Commission,
telephone (202) 205–2560.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Authority: The authority for institution of
this investigation is contained in section 337
of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and
in section 210.10 of the Commission’s Rules
of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10
(2013).
Scope of Investigation: Having
considered the complaint, the U.S.
International Trade Commission, on
March 21, 2014, ordered that—
(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended, an investigation be instituted
to determine whether there is a
violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of
section 337 in the importation into the
United States, the sale for importation,
or the sale within the United States after
importation of certain lithium silicate
materials and products containing the
same by reason of infringement of one
or more of claims 1, 2, 5–7, 11–14, and
16–18 of the ’021 patent and claims 1,
2, 5–7, 9–11, and 15 of the ’756 patent,
and whether an industry in the United
States exists or is in the process of being
established as required by subsection
(a)(2) of section 337;
(2) For the purpose of the
investigation so instituted, the following
are hereby named as parties upon which
this notice of investigation shall be
served:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:40 Mar 26, 2014
Jkt 232001
(a) The complainants are:
Ivoclar Vivadent AG, Bendererstrasse 2,
9494 Schaan, Liechtenstein.
Ivoclar Vivadent, Inc., 175 Pineview
Drive, Amherst, NY 14228.
Ivoclar Vivadent Manufacturing Inc.,
500 Memorial Drive, Somerset, NJ
08873.
(b) The respondents are the following
entities alleged to be in violation of
section 337, and are the parties upon
which the complaint is to be served:
Dentsply International Inc., 221 West
Philadelphia Street, York, PA 17405.
Dentsply Prosthetics U.S. LLC, a/k/a
Dentsply Ceramco, 570 West College
Avenue, York, PA 17401.
DeguDent GmbH, Rodenbacher
Chaussee 4, 63457 Hanau-Wolfgang,
Germany.
(c) The Office of Unfair Import
Investigations, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street SW., Suite
401, Washington, DC 20436; and
(3) For the investigation so instituted,
the Chief Administrative Law Judge,
U.S. International Trade Commission,
shall designate the presiding
Administrative Law Judge.
Responses to the complaint and the
notice of investigation must be
submitted by the named respondents in
accordance with section 210.13 of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to
19 CFR 201.16(e) and 210.13(a), such
responses will be considered by the
Commission if received not later than 20
days after the date of service by the
Commission of the complaint and the
notice of investigation. Extensions of
time for submitting responses to the
complaint and the notice of
investigation will not be granted unless
good cause therefor is shown.
Failure of a respondent to file a timely
response to each allegation in the
complaint and in this notice may be
deemed to constitute a waiver of the
right to appear and contest the
allegations of the complaint and this
notice, and to authorize the
administrative law judge and the
Commission, without further notice to
the respondent, to find the facts to be as
alleged in the complaint and this notice
and to enter an initial determination
and a final determination containing
such findings, and may result in the
issuance of an exclusion order or a cease
and desist order or both directed against
the respondents.
By order of the Commission.
PO 00000
Frm 00056
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
17181
Issued: March 21, 2014.
Lisa R. Barton,
Acting Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2014–06715 Filed 3–26–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Antitrust Division
Notice Pursuant to the National
Cooperative Research And Production
Act of 1993—ASTM International
Standards
Notice is hereby given that, on
February 27, 2013, pursuant to Section
6(a) of the National Cooperative
Research and Production Act of 1993,
15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (‘‘the Act’’),
ASTM International (‘‘ASTM’’) has filed
written notifications simultaneously
with the Attorney General and the
Federal Trade Commission disclosing
additions or changes to its standards
development activities. The
notifications were filed for the purpose
of extending the Act’s provisions
limiting the recovery of antitrust
plaintiffs to actual damages under
specified circumstances. Specifically,
ASTM has provided an updated list of
current, ongoing ASTM standards
activities originating between December
2013 and February 2014 designated as
Work Items. A complete listing of
ASTM Work Items, along with a brief
description of each, is available at
https://www.astm.org.
On September 15, 2004, ASTM filed
its original notification pursuant to
Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department
of Justice published a notice in the
Federal Register pursuant to Section
6(b) of the Act on November 10, 2004
(69 FR 65226).
The last notification was filed with
the Department on December 9, 2013. A
notice was published in the Federal
Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the
Act on January 28, 2014 (79 FR 4493).
Patricia A. Brink,
Director of Civil Enforcement, Antitrust
Division.
[FR Doc. 2014–06738 Filed 3–26–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–11–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Antitrust Division
Notice Pursuant to the National
Cooperative Research and Production
Act of 1993; Pistoia Alliance, Inc.
Notice is hereby given that, on
January 16, 2014, pursuant to Section
E:\FR\FM\27MRN1.SGM
27MRN1
17182
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 59 / Thursday, March 27, 2014 / Notices
6(a) of the National Cooperative
Research and Production Act of 1993,
15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (‘‘the Act’’),
Pistoia Alliance, Inc. has filed written
notifications simultaneously with the
Attorney General and the Federal Trade
Commission disclosing changes in its
membership. The notifications were
filed for the purpose of extending the
Act’s provisions limiting the recovery of
antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages
under specified circumstances.
Specifically, Biochemfusion ApS,
Charlottenlund, DENMARK;
BioVariance GmbH, Munich,
GERMANY; and The Jackson
Laboratory, Bar Harbor, ME, have been
added as parties to this venture.
Also, Cognizant Technology
Solutions, Docklands, London, UNITED
KINGDOM; and Collaborative Drug
Discovery, Burlingame, CA, have
withdrawn as parties to this venture.
No other changes have been made in
either the membership or planned
activity of the group research project.
Membership in this group research
project remains open, and Pistoia
Alliance, Inc. intends to file additional
written notifications disclosing all
changes in membership.
On May 28, 2009, Pistoia Alliance,
Inc. filed its original notification
pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The
Department of Justice published a notice
in the Federal Register pursuant to
Section 6(b) of the Act on July 15, 2009
(74 FR 34364).
The last notification was filed with
the Department on October 25, 2013. A
notice was published in the Federal
Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the
Act on December 3, 2013 (78 FR 72713).
Patricia A. Brink,
Director of Civil Enforcement, Antitrust
Division.
[FR Doc. 2014–06744 Filed 3–26–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–11–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Antitrust Division
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Notice Pursuant to the National
Cooperative Research and Production
Act of 1993—Petroleum Environmental
Research Forum
Notice is hereby given that, on
February 6, 2014, pursuant to Section
6(a) of the National Cooperative
Research and Production Act of 1993,
15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (‘‘the Act’’),
Petroleum Environmental Research
Forum (‘‘PERF’’) has filed written
notifications simultaneously with the
Attorney General and the Federal Trade
Commission disclosing changes in its
VerDate Mar<15>2010
18:40 Mar 26, 2014
Jkt 232001
membership. The notifications were
filed for the purpose of extending the
Act’s provisions limiting the recovery of
antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages
under specified circumstances.
Specifically, Tullow Oil plc, London,
UNITED KINGDOM, has been added as
a party to this venture.
No other changes have been made in
either the membership or planned
activity of the group research project.
Membership in this group research
project remains open, and PERF intends
to file additional written notifications
disclosing all changes in membership.
On February 10, 1986, PERF filed its
original notification pursuant to Section
6(a) of the Act. The Department of
Justice published a notice in the Federal
Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the
Act on March 14, 1986 (51 FR 8903).
The last notification was filed with
the Department on January 2, 2014. A
notice was published in the Federal
Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the
Act on February 20, 2014 (79 FR 9767).
Patricia A. Brink,
Director of Civil Enforcement, Antitrust
Division.
[FR Doc. 2014–06733 Filed 3–26–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Antitrust Division
Notice Pursuant to the National
Cooperative Research and Production
Act of 1993; High Density Packaging
User Group International, Inc.
Notice is hereby given that, on
February 27, 2014, pursuant to Section
6(a) of the National Cooperative
Research and Production Act of 1993,
15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (‘‘the Act’’), High
Density Packaging User Group
International, Inc. (‘‘HDPUG’’) has filed
written notifications simultaneously
with the Attorney General and the
Federal Trade Commission disclosing
changes in its membership. The
notifications were filed for the purpose
of extending the Act’s provisions
limiting the recovery of antitrust
plaintiffs to actual damages under
specified circumstances. Specifically,
IBM, Armonk, NY; Oracle, Redwood
City, CA; Indium, Clinton, NY; ITEQ,
Taoyuan, TAIWAN; Plexus, Neenah,
WI; Philips Medical, Eindhoven,
NETHERLANDS; Conpart, Dallas, TX;
Alcatel-Lucent, Paris, FRANCE;
Clariant, Muttenz, SWITZERLAND;
Celestica, Toronto, CANADA; NIST
(National Institute of Standards and
Technology), Gaithersburg, MD; Arlon,
Santa Anna, CA; Isola, Chandler, AZ;
PO 00000
Frm 00057
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 9990
Dell, Round Rock, TX; Juniper
Networks, Sunnyvale, CA; Shengyi
Technologies, Guangdong, PEOPLE’S
REPUBLIC OF CHINA; PWB
Interconnect, Ottawa, CANADA;
Sekisui, Tokyo, JAPAN; Enthone, West
Haven, CT; IST, Hsinchu, TAIWAN;
Kyzen, Nashville, TN; Ericsson, Kista,
SWEDEN; Huawei, Shenzhen,
PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA; Senju
Metal, Tokyo, JAPAN; Akrometrix,
Atlanta, GA; Hitachi Chemical, Tokyo,
JAPAN; VIA System/Guangzhou, St.
Louis, MO; Nabaltec, Schwandorf,
GERMANY; Ciena, Hanover, MD;
Meadville, Costa Mesa, CA; Curtis
Wright, Charlotte, NC; Elite, Guanyin
Township, TAIWAN; Engent, Norcross,
GA; Nihon, Osaka, JAPAN; Boeing,
Chicago, IL; Rogers, Toronto, CANADA;
Flextronics, Singapore, SINGAPORE;
Park Electrochemical, Melville, NY;
Cisco, San Jose, CA; FCI, Singapore,
SINGAPORE; Panasonic, Osaka, JAPAN;
Fujitsu, Minato, JAPAN; Polar
Instruments, Beaverton, OR; NVIDIA,
Santa Clara, CA; Sanmina, San Jose, CA;
and Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, have been
added as parties to this venture.
Also, Intel Corporation, Santa Clara,
CA; ASE Group, Kaoshiung, TAIWAN;
and Ventec, Suzhou Jiangsu P.R.C.,
PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA, have
withdrawn as parties to this venture.
No other changes have been made in
either the membership or planned
activity of the group research project.
Membership in this group research
project remains open, and HDPUG
intends to file additional written
notifications disclosing all changes in
membership.
On September 14, 1994, HDPUG filed
its original notification pursuant to
Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department
of Justice published a notice in the
Federal Register pursuant to Section
6(b) of the Act on March 23, 1995 (60
FR 15306).
The last notification was filed with
the Department on July 3, 2002. A
notice was published in the Federal
Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the
Act on September 4, 2002 (67 FR
56588).
Patricia A. Brink,
Director of Civil Enforcement, Antitrust
Division.
[FR Doc. 2014–06734 Filed 3–26–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–11–P
E:\FR\FM\27MRN1.SGM
27MRN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 59 (Thursday, March 27, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 17181-17182]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-06744]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Antitrust Division
Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and
Production Act of 1993; Pistoia Alliance, Inc.
Notice is hereby given that, on January 16, 2014, pursuant to
Section
[[Page 17182]]
6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993,
15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Pistoia Alliance, Inc. has filed
written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the
Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The
notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's
provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual
damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, Biochemfusion ApS,
Charlottenlund, DENMARK; BioVariance GmbH, Munich, GERMANY; and The
Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, ME, have been added as parties to this
venture.
Also, Cognizant Technology Solutions, Docklands, London, UNITED
KINGDOM; and Collaborative Drug Discovery, Burlingame, CA, have
withdrawn as parties to this venture.
No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group
research project remains open, and Pistoia Alliance, Inc. intends to
file additional written notifications disclosing all changes in
membership.
On May 28, 2009, Pistoia Alliance, Inc. filed its original
notification pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of
Justice published a notice in the Federal Register pursuant to Section
6(b) of the Act on July 15, 2009 (74 FR 34364).
The last notification was filed with the Department on October 25,
2013. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to
Section 6(b) of the Act on December 3, 2013 (78 FR 72713).
Patricia A. Brink,
Director of Civil Enforcement, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 2014-06744 Filed 3-26-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-P
