Heat-killed Burkholderia spp. Strain A396 Cells and Spent Fermentation Media; Exemption From the Requirement of a Tolerance, 15702-15704 [2014-06228]
Download as PDF
15702
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 55 / Friday, March 21, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
Lead, Pb, Particulate matter, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: February 28, 2014.
Jared Blumenfeld,
Regional Administrator, Region 9.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart DD—Nevada
2. In § 52.1470, in paragraph (e), the
table is amended by adding entries for:
■ a. ‘‘Nevada’s Clean Air Act § 110(a)(1)
and (2) State Implementation Plan for
the 2008 Lead NAAQS, excluding
appendices A–G for NDEP; and
excluding the Washoe County District
Board of Health Agenda, Minutes,
Certificate of Adoption, Cover Letter to
NDEP, and Proof of Publication’’; and
■
Therefore, 40 CFR Chapter I is
amended as follows:
PART 52—APPROVAL AND
PROMULGATION OF
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
b. ‘‘Clark County Portion of Nevada’s
Clean Air Act § 110(a)(1) and (2) State
Implementation Plan for the 2008 Lead
NAAQS, excluding Cover Letter to
NDEP and Clark County Air Quality
Regulations’’ after the entry for ‘‘Section
12—Resources’’.
The additions as follows:
■
§ 52.1470
*
Identification of plan.
*
*
(e) * * *
*
*
EPA-APPROVED NEVADA NONREGULATORY PROVISIONS AND QUASI-REGULATORY MEASURES
Applicable geographic or nonattainment area
Name of SIP provision
State submittal
date
EPA approval date
Explanation
Air Quality Implementation Plan for the State of Nevada
*
*
*
Nevada’s Clean Air Act
State-wide, within NDEP juris§ 110(a)(1) and (2) State
diction and Washoe County.
Implementation Plan for the
2008 Lead NAAQS, excluding appendices A–G for
NDEP; and excluding the
Washoe County District
Board of Health Agenda,
Minutes, Certificate of Adoption, Cover Letter to NDEP,
and Proof of Publication.
Clark County Portion of NeClark County ..........................
vada’s Clean Air Act
§ 110(a)(1) and (2) State
Implementation Plan for the
2008 Lead NAAQS, excluding Cover Letter to NDEP
and Clark County Air Quality Regulations.
*
*
*
10/12/2011
*
[Insert Federal Register
page number where the
document begins] 03/21/
2014.
7/23/2012
[Insert Federal Register
page number where the
document begins] 03/21/
2014.
*
*
*
3. Section 52.1472 is amended by
adding paragraph (g) to read as follows:
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
§ 52.1472
40 CFR Part 180
■
Approval status.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
*
*
*
*
*
(g) 2008 Pb NAAQS: The SIPs
submitted on October 12, 2011, July 23,
2012, and August 30, 2012 are partially
disapproved for Clean Air Act (CAA)
elements 110(a)(2)(C), (D)(i)(II), and (J)
for the Nevada Division of
Environmental Quality (NDEP), Clark
County, and Washoe County portions of
the Nevada SIP; for CAA element (D)(ii)
for the NDEP and Washoe County
portions of the Nevada SIP; and for CAA
element 110(a)(2)(F)(iii) for the Clark
County portion of the Nevada SIP.
[FR Doc. 2014–06053 Filed 3–20–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:59 Mar 20, 2014
Jkt 232001
[EPA–HQ–OPP–2011–0012; FRL–9907–41]
Heat-killed Burkholderia spp. Strain
A396 Cells and Spent Fermentation
Media; Exemption From the
Requirement of a Tolerance
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
This regulation establishes an
exemption from the requirement of a
tolerance for residues of heat-killed
Burkholderia spp. strain A396 cells and
spent fermentation media in or on all
food commodities when applied as a
biological insecticide to agricultural
crops and used in accordance with label
directions and good agricultural
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00070
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
*
*
‘‘Infrastructure’’ SIP for NDEP
and Washoe County for the
2008 Pb standard.
‘‘Infrastructure’’ SIP for Clark
County for the 2008 Pb
standard.
*
*
practices. Marrone Bio Innovations, Inc.,
submitted a petition to the EPA under
the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic
Act (FFDCA) requesting an exemption
from the requirement of a tolerance.
This regulation eliminates the need to
establish a maximum permissible level
for residues of heat-killed Burkholderia
spp. strain A396 cells and spent
fermentation media under FFDCA.
This regulation is effective
March 21, 2014. Objections and requests
for hearings must be received on or
before May 20, 2014, and must be filed
in accordance with the instructions
provided in 40 CFR part 178 (see also
Unit I.C. of the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION).
DATES:
The docket for this action,
identified by docket identification (ID)
number EPA–HQ–OPP–2011–0012, is
available at https://www.regulations.gov
or at the Office of Pesticide Programs
ADDRESSES:
E:\FR\FM\21MRR1.SGM
21MRR1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 55 / Friday, March 21, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
Regulatory Public Docket (OPP Docket)
in the Environmental Protection Agency
Docket Center (EPA/DC), EPA West
Bldg., Rm. 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave.
NW., Washington, DC 20460–0001. The
Public Reading Room is open from 8:30
a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through
Friday, excluding legal holidays. The
telephone number for the Public
Reading Room is (202) 566–1744, and
the telephone number for the OPP
Docket is (703) 305–5805. Please review
the visitor instructions and additional
information about the docket available
at https://www.epa.gov/dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Michael Glikes, Biopesticides and
Pollution Prevention Division (7511P),
Office of Pesticide Programs,
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington,
DC 20460–0001; telephone number:
(703) 305–6231; email address:
glikes.michael@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
A. Does this action apply to me?
You may be potentially affected by
this action if you are an agricultural
producer, food manufacturer, or
pesticide manufacturer. The following
list of North American Industrial
Classification System (NAICS) codes is
not intended to be exhaustive, but rather
provides a guide to help readers
determine whether this document
applies to them. Potentially affected
entities may include:
• Crop production (NAICS code 111).
• Animal production (NAICS code
112).
• Food manufacturing (NAICS code
311).
• Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS
code 32532).
B. How can I get electronic access to
other related information?
You may access a frequently updated
electronic version of 40 CFR part 180
through the Government Printing
Office’s e-CFR site at https://
www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/textidx?&c=ecfr&tpl=/ecfrbrowse/Title40/
40tab_02.tpl.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
C. How can I file an objection or hearing
request?
Under FFDCA section 408(g), 21
U.S.C. 346a(g), any person may file an
objection to any aspect of this regulation
and may also request a hearing on those
objections. You must file your objection
or request a hearing on this regulation
in accordance with the instructions
provided in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure
proper receipt by the EPA, you must
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:59 Mar 20, 2014
Jkt 232001
identify docket ID number EPA–HQ–
OPP–2011–0012 in the subject line on
the first page of your submission. All
objections and requests for a hearing
must be in writing, and must be
received by the Hearing Clerk on or
before May 20, 2014. Addresses for mail
and hand delivery of objections and
hearing requests are provided in 40 CFR
178.25(b).
In addition to filing an objection or
hearing request with the Hearing Clerk
as described in 40 CFR part 178, please
submit a copy of the filing (excluding
any Confidential Business Information
(CBI)) for inclusion in the public docket.
Information not marked confidential
pursuant to 40 CFR part 2 may be
disclosed publicly by EPA without prior
notice. Submit the non-CBI copy of your
objection or hearing request, identified
by docket ID number EPA–HQ–OPP–
2011–0012, by one of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
Do not submit electronically any
information you consider to be CBI or
other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute.
• Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental
Protection Agency Docket Center (EPA/
DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave.
NW., Washington, DC 20460–0001.
• Hand Delivery: To make special
arrangements for hand delivery or
delivery of boxed information, please
follow the instructions at https://
www.epa.gov/dockets/contacts.htm.
Additional instructions on commenting
or visiting the docket, along with more
information about dockets generally, is
available at https://www.epa.gov/
dockets.
II. Background
In the Federal Register of February
25, 2011 (76 FR 10587) (FRL–8863–4),
EPA issued a notice pursuant to FFDCA
section 408(d)(3), 21 U.S.C. 346a(d)(3),
announcing the filing of a pesticide
tolerance petition (PP 0F7778) by
Marrone Bio Innovations, Inc. 2121
Second Street, Suite B–107, Davis, CA
95618. The petition requested that 40
CFR part 180 be amended by
establishing an exemption from the
requirement of a tolerance for residues
of Burkholderia spp. strain A396.
Subsequently, the applicant modified its
manufacturing process and changed the
active ingredient from a live microbe to
one that is inactivated by applying high
temperatures during the production of
the manufacturing product. Hence, the
active ingredient in the end-use product
applied to crops is ‘‘heat-killed.’’ The
notice referenced a summary of the
PO 00000
Frm 00071
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
15703
petition prepared by the petitioner,
Marrone Bio Innovations Inc., which is
available in the docket via https://
www.regulations.gov. There were no
comments received in response to the
notice of filing.
III. Final Rule
A The EPA’s Safety Determination
Section 408(c)(2)(A)(i) of FFDCA
allows EPA to establish an exemption
from the requirement for a tolerance (the
legal limit for a pesticide chemical
residue in or on a food) only if EPA
determines that the exemption is ‘‘safe.’’
Section 408(c)(2)(A)(ii) of FFDCA
defines ‘‘safe’’ to mean that ‘‘there is a
reasonable certainty that no harm will
result from aggregate exposure to the
pesticide chemical residue, including
all anticipated dietary exposures and all
other exposures for which there is
reliable information.’’ Pursuant to
FFDCA section 408(c)(2)(B), in
establishing or maintaining in effect an
exemption from the requirement of a
tolerance, EPA must take into account
the factors set forth in FFDCA section
408(b)(2)(C), which require EPA to give
special consideration to exposure of
infants and children to the pesticide
chemical residue in establishing a
tolerance exemption and to ‘‘ensure that
there is a reasonable certainty that no
harm will result to infants and children
from aggregate exposure to the pesticide
chemical residue. . . .’’ Additionally,
FFDCA section 408(b)(2)(D) requires
that EPA consider ‘‘available
information concerning the cumulative
effects of [a particular pesticide’s] . . .
residues and other substances that have
a common mechanism of toxicity.’’
EPA evaluated the available toxicity
and exposure data on heat-killed
Burkholderia spp. strain A396 cells and
spent fermentation media and
considered its validity, completeness,
and reliability, as well as the
relationship of this information to
human risk. Based upon that evaluation,
EPA concludes that there is a reasonable
certainty that no harm will result to the
U.S. population, including infants and
children, from aggregate exposure to
residues of heat-killed Burkholderia
spp. strain A396 cells and spent
fermentation media. Therefore, an
exemption from the requirement of a
tolerance is established for residues of
heat-killed Burkholderia spp. strain
A396 cells and spent fermentation
media in or on all food commodities
when applied to elicit induced systemic
resistance in plants and used in
accordance with label directions and
good agricultural practices. A full
explanation of the data upon which EPA
E:\FR\FM\21MRR1.SGM
21MRR1
15704
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 55 / Friday, March 21, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
relied and its risk assessment based on
that data can be found within the
February 28, 2014 document entitled
‘‘Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act
(FFDCA) Considerations for Heat-killed
Burkholderia spp. strain A396 cells and
spent fermentation media.’’ This
document, as well as other relevant
information, is available in the docket
for this action as described under
ADDRESSES.
B. Analytical Enforcement Methodology
An analytical method is not required
for enforcement purposes for the
reasons stated above and in the
aforementioned February 28, 2014
document, and because EPA is
establishing an exemption from the
requirement of a tolerance without any
numerical limitation.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
C. International Residue Limits
In making its tolerance decisions, EPA
seeks to harmonize U.S. tolerances with
international standards whenever
possible, consistent with U.S. food
safety standards and agricultural
practices. In this context, EPA considers
the international maximum residue
limits (MRLs) established by the Codex
Alimentarius Commission (Codex), as
required by FFDCA section 408(b)(4).
The Codex Alimentarius is a joint
United Nations Food and Agriculture
Organization/World Health
Organization food standards program,
and it is recognized as an international
food safety standards-setting
organization in trade agreements to
which the United States is a party. EPA
may establish a tolerance that is
different from a Codex MRL; however,
FFDCA section 408(b)(4) requires that
EPA explain the reasons for departing
from the Codex level.
The Codex has not established a MRL
for heat-killed Burkholderia spp. strain
A396 cells and spent fermentation
media.
IV. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
This final rule establishes a tolerance
exemption under FFDCA section 408(d)
in response to a petition submitted to
EPA. The Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) has exempted these types
of actions from review under Executive
Order 12866, entitled ‘‘Regulatory
Planning and Review’’ (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993). Because this final rule
has been exempted from review under
Executive Order 12866, this final rule is
not subject to Executive Order 13211,
entitled ‘‘Actions Concerning
Regulations That Significantly Affect
Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use’’ (66
FR 28355, May 22, 2001), or Executive
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:59 Mar 20, 2014
Jkt 232001
Order 13045, entitled ‘‘Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks’’ (62 FR 19885,
April 23, 1997). This final rule does not
contain any information collections
subject to OMB approval under the
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), nor does it require
any special considerations under
Executive Order 12898, entitled
‘‘Federal Actions to Address
Environmental Justice in Minority
Populations and Low-Income
Populations’’ (59 FR 7629, February 16,
1994).
Since tolerances and exemptions that
are established on the basis of a petition
under FFDCA section 408(d), such as
the tolerance exemption in this final
rule, do not require the issuance of a
proposed rule, the requirements of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.) do not apply.
This final rule directly regulates
growers, food processors, food handlers,
and food retailers, not States or tribes.
As a result, this action does not alter the
relationships or distribution of power
and responsibilities established by
Congress in the preemption provisions
of FFDCA section 408(n)(4). As such,
EPA determined that this action will not
have a substantial direct effect on States
or tribal governments, on the
relationship between the national
government and the States or tribal
governments, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government or between
the Federal Government and Indian
tribes. Thus, EPA determined that
Executive Order 13132, entitled
‘‘Federalism’’ (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999), and Executive Order 13175,
entitled ‘‘Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments’’ (65 FR
67249, November 9, 2000), do not apply
to this final rule. In addition, this final
rule does not impose any enforceable
duty or contain any unfunded mandate
as described under Title II of the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
(UMRA) (2 U.S.C. 1501 et seq.).
This action does not involve any
technical standards that would require
EPA consideration of voluntary
consensus standards pursuant to section
12(d) of the National Technology
Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995
(NTTAA) (15 U.S.C. 272 note).
V. Congressional Review Act
Pursuant to the Congressional Review
Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.), EPA will
submit a report containing this rule and
other required information to the U.S.
Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller
General of the United States prior to
PO 00000
Frm 00072
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
publication of the rule in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ‘‘major
rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180
Environmental protection,
Administrative practice and procedure,
Agricultural commodities, Pesticides
and pests, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Dated: February 28, 2014.
Steve Bradbury,
Director, Office of Pesticide Programs.
Therefore, 40 CFR chapter I is
amended as follows:
PART 180—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 180
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371.
2. Add § 180.1325 to subpart D to read
as follows:
■
§ 180.1325 Heat-killed Burkholderia spp.
strain A396 cells and spent fermentation
media exemption from the requirement of a
tolerance.
An exemption from the requirement
of a tolerance is established for residues
of heat-killed Burkholderia spp. strain
A396 cells and spent fermentation
media in or on all food commodities
when applied as a biological insecticide
to agricultural crops and used in
accordance with label directions and
good agricultural practices.
[FR Doc. 2014–06228 Filed 3–20–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Office of the Secretary
49 CFR Part 1
[Docket No. DOT–OST–2012–0123]
RIN 2105–AE28
Organization and Delegation of Powers
and Duties
Office of the Secretary of
Transportation (OST), U.S. Department
of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The Secretary of
Transportation is authorized to delegate
functions, powers, and duties as the
Secretary deems appropriate. This rule
amends the existing delegations of
authority by relocating the delegations
to the Inspector General currently found
in the Department’s regulations on the
Freedom of Information Act and
updates the delegation of authority to
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\21MRR1.SGM
21MRR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 55 (Friday, March 21, 2014)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 15702-15704]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-06228]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 180
[EPA-HQ-OPP-2011-0012; FRL-9907-41]
Heat-killed Burkholderia spp. Strain A396 Cells and Spent
Fermentation Media; Exemption From the Requirement of a Tolerance
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This regulation establishes an exemption from the requirement
of a tolerance for residues of heat-killed Burkholderia spp. strain
A396 cells and spent fermentation media in or on all food commodities
when applied as a biological insecticide to agricultural crops and used
in accordance with label directions and good agricultural practices.
Marrone Bio Innovations, Inc., submitted a petition to the EPA under
the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA) requesting an
exemption from the requirement of a tolerance. This regulation
eliminates the need to establish a maximum permissible level for
residues of heat-killed Burkholderia spp. strain A396 cells and spent
fermentation media under FFDCA.
DATES: This regulation is effective March 21, 2014. Objections and
requests for hearings must be received on or before May 20, 2014, and
must be filed in accordance with the instructions provided in 40 CFR
part 178 (see also Unit I.C. of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION).
ADDRESSES: The docket for this action, identified by docket
identification (ID) number EPA-HQ-OPP-2011-0012, is available at https://www.regulations.gov or at the Office of Pesticide Programs
[[Page 15703]]
Regulatory Public Docket (OPP Docket) in the Environmental Protection
Agency Docket Center (EPA/DC), EPA West Bldg., Rm. 3334, 1301
Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001. The Public Reading
Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday,
excluding legal holidays. The telephone number for the Public Reading
Room is (202) 566-1744, and the telephone number for the OPP Docket is
(703) 305-5805. Please review the visitor instructions and additional
information about the docket available at https://www.epa.gov/dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael Glikes, Biopesticides and
Pollution Prevention Division (7511P), Office of Pesticide Programs,
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW.,
Washington, DC 20460-0001; telephone number: (703) 305-6231; email
address: glikes.michael@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
A. Does this action apply to me?
You may be potentially affected by this action if you are an
agricultural producer, food manufacturer, or pesticide manufacturer.
The following list of North American Industrial Classification System
(NAICS) codes is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides a
guide to help readers determine whether this document applies to them.
Potentially affected entities may include:
Crop production (NAICS code 111).
Animal production (NAICS code 112).
Food manufacturing (NAICS code 311).
Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS code 32532).
B. How can I get electronic access to other related information?
You may access a frequently updated electronic version of 40 CFR
part 180 through the Government Printing Office's e-CFR site at https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?&c=ecfr&tpl=/ecfrbrowse/Title40/40tab_02.tpl.
C. How can I file an objection or hearing request?
Under FFDCA section 408(g), 21 U.S.C. 346a(g), any person may file
an objection to any aspect of this regulation and may also request a
hearing on those objections. You must file your objection or request a
hearing on this regulation in accordance with the instructions provided
in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure proper receipt by the EPA, you must
identify docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-2011-0012 in the subject line on
the first page of your submission. All objections and requests for a
hearing must be in writing, and must be received by the Hearing Clerk
on or before May 20, 2014. Addresses for mail and hand delivery of
objections and hearing requests are provided in 40 CFR 178.25(b).
In addition to filing an objection or hearing request with the
Hearing Clerk as described in 40 CFR part 178, please submit a copy of
the filing (excluding any Confidential Business Information (CBI)) for
inclusion in the public docket. Information not marked confidential
pursuant to 40 CFR part 2 may be disclosed publicly by EPA without
prior notice. Submit the non-CBI copy of your objection or hearing
request, identified by docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-2011-0012, by one of
the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Do not submit
electronically any information you consider to be CBI or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental Protection Agency Docket
Center (EPA/DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC
20460-0001.
Hand Delivery: To make special arrangements for hand
delivery or delivery of boxed information, please follow the
instructions at https://www.epa.gov/dockets/contacts.htm.
Additional instructions on commenting or visiting the docket, along
with more information about dockets generally, is available at https://www.epa.gov/dockets.
II. Background
In the Federal Register of February 25, 2011 (76 FR 10587) (FRL-
8863-4), EPA issued a notice pursuant to FFDCA section 408(d)(3), 21
U.S.C. 346a(d)(3), announcing the filing of a pesticide tolerance
petition (PP 0F7778) by Marrone Bio Innovations, Inc. 2121 Second
Street, Suite B-107, Davis, CA 95618. The petition requested that 40
CFR part 180 be amended by establishing an exemption from the
requirement of a tolerance for residues of Burkholderia spp. strain
A396. Subsequently, the applicant modified its manufacturing process
and changed the active ingredient from a live microbe to one that is
inactivated by applying high temperatures during the production of the
manufacturing product. Hence, the active ingredient in the end-use
product applied to crops is ``heat-killed.'' The notice referenced a
summary of the petition prepared by the petitioner, Marrone Bio
Innovations Inc., which is available in the docket via https://www.regulations.gov. There were no comments received in response to the
notice of filing.
III. Final Rule
A The EPA's Safety Determination
Section 408(c)(2)(A)(i) of FFDCA allows EPA to establish an
exemption from the requirement for a tolerance (the legal limit for a
pesticide chemical residue in or on a food) only if EPA determines that
the exemption is ``safe.'' Section 408(c)(2)(A)(ii) of FFDCA defines
``safe'' to mean that ``there is a reasonable certainty that no harm
will result from aggregate exposure to the pesticide chemical residue,
including all anticipated dietary exposures and all other exposures for
which there is reliable information.'' Pursuant to FFDCA section
408(c)(2)(B), in establishing or maintaining in effect an exemption
from the requirement of a tolerance, EPA must take into account the
factors set forth in FFDCA section 408(b)(2)(C), which require EPA to
give special consideration to exposure of infants and children to the
pesticide chemical residue in establishing a tolerance exemption and to
``ensure that there is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result
to infants and children from aggregate exposure to the pesticide
chemical residue. . . .'' Additionally, FFDCA section 408(b)(2)(D)
requires that EPA consider ``available information concerning the
cumulative effects of [a particular pesticide's] . . . residues and
other substances that have a common mechanism of toxicity.''
EPA evaluated the available toxicity and exposure data on heat-
killed Burkholderia spp. strain A396 cells and spent fermentation media
and considered its validity, completeness, and reliability, as well as
the relationship of this information to human risk. Based upon that
evaluation, EPA concludes that there is a reasonable certainty that no
harm will result to the U.S. population, including infants and
children, from aggregate exposure to residues of heat-killed
Burkholderia spp. strain A396 cells and spent fermentation media.
Therefore, an exemption from the requirement of a tolerance is
established for residues of heat-killed Burkholderia spp. strain A396
cells and spent fermentation media in or on all food commodities when
applied to elicit induced systemic resistance in plants and used in
accordance with label directions and good agricultural practices. A
full explanation of the data upon which EPA
[[Page 15704]]
relied and its risk assessment based on that data can be found within
the February 28, 2014 document entitled ``Federal Food, Drug, and
Cosmetic Act (FFDCA) Considerations for Heat-killed Burkholderia spp.
strain A396 cells and spent fermentation media.'' This document, as
well as other relevant information, is available in the docket for this
action as described under ADDRESSES.
B. Analytical Enforcement Methodology
An analytical method is not required for enforcement purposes for
the reasons stated above and in the aforementioned February 28, 2014
document, and because EPA is establishing an exemption from the
requirement of a tolerance without any numerical limitation.
C. International Residue Limits
In making its tolerance decisions, EPA seeks to harmonize U.S.
tolerances with international standards whenever possible, consistent
with U.S. food safety standards and agricultural practices. In this
context, EPA considers the international maximum residue limits (MRLs)
established by the Codex Alimentarius Commission (Codex), as required
by FFDCA section 408(b)(4). The Codex Alimentarius is a joint United
Nations Food and Agriculture Organization/World Health Organization
food standards program, and it is recognized as an international food
safety standards-setting organization in trade agreements to which the
United States is a party. EPA may establish a tolerance that is
different from a Codex MRL; however, FFDCA section 408(b)(4) requires
that EPA explain the reasons for departing from the Codex level.
The Codex has not established a MRL for heat-killed Burkholderia
spp. strain A396 cells and spent fermentation media.
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
This final rule establishes a tolerance exemption under FFDCA
section 408(d) in response to a petition submitted to EPA. The Office
of Management and Budget (OMB) has exempted these types of actions from
review under Executive Order 12866, entitled ``Regulatory Planning and
Review'' (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993). Because this final rule has
been exempted from review under Executive Order 12866, this final rule
is not subject to Executive Order 13211, entitled ``Actions Concerning
Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or
Use'' (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001), or Executive Order 13045, entitled
``Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks'' (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997). This final rule does not contain
any information collections subject to OMB approval under the Paperwork
Reduction Act (PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), nor does it require any
special considerations under Executive Order 12898, entitled ``Federal
Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and
Low-Income Populations'' (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
Since tolerances and exemptions that are established on the basis
of a petition under FFDCA section 408(d), such as the tolerance
exemption in this final rule, do not require the issuance of a proposed
rule, the requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.) do not apply.
This final rule directly regulates growers, food processors, food
handlers, and food retailers, not States or tribes. As a result, this
action does not alter the relationships or distribution of power and
responsibilities established by Congress in the preemption provisions
of FFDCA section 408(n)(4). As such, EPA determined that this action
will not have a substantial direct effect on States or tribal
governments, on the relationship between the national government and
the States or tribal governments, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government or between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes. Thus, EPA determined that
Executive Order 13132, entitled ``Federalism'' (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999), and Executive Order 13175, entitled ``Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments'' (65 FR 67249, November 9,
2000), do not apply to this final rule. In addition, this final rule
does not impose any enforceable duty or contain any unfunded mandate as
described under Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
(UMRA) (2 U.S.C. 1501 et seq.).
This action does not involve any technical standards that would
require EPA consideration of voluntary consensus standards pursuant to
section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act
of 1995 (NTTAA) (15 U.S.C. 272 note).
V. Congressional Review Act
Pursuant to the Congressional Review Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.),
EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other required
information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of
the rule in the Federal Register. This action is not a ``major rule''
as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180
Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure,
Agricultural commodities, Pesticides and pests, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: February 28, 2014.
Steve Bradbury,
Director, Office of Pesticide Programs.
Therefore, 40 CFR chapter I is amended as follows:
PART 180--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for part 180 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371.
0
2. Add Sec. 180.1325 to subpart D to read as follows:
Sec. 180.1325 Heat-killed Burkholderia spp. strain A396 cells and
spent fermentation media exemption from the requirement of a tolerance.
An exemption from the requirement of a tolerance is established for
residues of heat-killed Burkholderia spp. strain A396 cells and spent
fermentation media in or on all food commodities when applied as a
biological insecticide to agricultural crops and used in accordance
with label directions and good agricultural practices.
[FR Doc. 2014-06228 Filed 3-20-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P