Extension of Dairy Forward Pricing Program, 15633-15636 [2014-06189]
Download as PDF
15633
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
Vol. 79, No. 55
Friday, March 21, 2014
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains regulatory documents having general
applicability and legal effect, most of which
are keyed to and codified in the Code of
Federal Regulations, which is published under
50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by
the Superintendent of Documents. Prices of
new books are listed in the first FEDERAL
REGISTER issue of each week.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 1145
[Doc. No. AMS–DA–14–0018]
Extension of Dairy Forward Pricing
Program
Agricultural Marketing Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
This final rule extends the
Dairy Forward Pricing Program in
accordance with the Agricultural Act of
2014 (2014 Farm Bill). The Dairy
Forward Pricing Program was first
authorized in section 1502 of the Food,
Conservation and Energy Act of 2008.
The program allows handlers regulated
under the Federal milk marketing order
program to pay producers and
cooperative associations in accordance
with the terms of a forward contract and
not have to pay the minimum Federal
order uniform price for milk.
Establishing new contracts under the
Dairy Forward Pricing Program has been
prohibited since the expiration of the
program on September 30, 2013. The
2014 Farm Bill (H.R. 2642) was signed
into law on February 7, 2014, and
extends the program to allow new
contracts to be entered into until
September 30, 2018. Any forward
contract entered into up and until the
September 30, 2018, deadline is subject
to a September 30, 2021, expiration date
to meet the terms of the contract.
DATES: Effective March 24, 2014.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Roger Cryan, Director, Economics
Division, USDA/AMS/Dairy Programs,
Stop 0229—Room 2753–S, 1400
Independence Avenue SW.,
Washington, DC 20250–0231, (202) 720–
7091, email address: roger.cryan@
ams.usda.gov.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:59 Mar 20, 2014
Jkt 232001
This final
rule extends the Dairy Forward Pricing
Program (DFPP) in accordance with the
2014 Farm Bill. The 2008 Food,
Conservation and Energy Act (2008
Farm Bill) (Pub. L. 110–246) initially
established the DFPP, which prohibited
new forward contracts from being
entered into after September 30, 2012,
and no forward contracts entered into
under the program extending beyond
September 30, 2015 (7 U.S.C. 8772(e)).
Passage of the ‘‘American Taxpayer
Relief Act of 2012,’’ (ATRA) (Pub. L.
112–240), signed into law on January 2,
2013, revised the program to allow new
contracts to be entered into until
September 30, 2013. New contracts have
been prohibited since then.
The DFPP (7 U.S.C. 8772, 7 CFR 1145)
allows handlers, under the Agricultural
Marketing Agreement Act of 1937,
(AMAA) (7 U.S.C. 601–612), to pay
producers or cooperative associations of
producers a negotiated price, rather than
the Federal order minimum blend price
for producer milk if subject to
conditions and terms of a forward
contract, provided the volume of such
milk does not exceed the handler’s Class
II, III, and IV utilization for the month
on the order that regulates the milk. The
program applies to producer milk
regulated under Federal milk marketing
orders that is not classified as Class I
milk or milk otherwise intended for
fluid use and that is in the current of
interstate or foreign commerce or
directly burdens, obstructs, or affects
interstate or foreign commerce of
Federally regulated milk. The Federal
milk marketing order program consists
of 10 Federal milk marketing orders (7
CFR parts 1001–1135).
This document provides notice that
producers and cooperative associations
of producers may now enter into
forward price contracts under the DFPP
through September 30, 2018, and that
all terms of the forward contract must
expire prior to September 30, 2021. All
other provisions and requirements of
the program as provided for in the final
rule published October 31, 2008 (73 FR
64868) are still in effect.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion of Rules Applicable to
Program
Section 1502 of the 2008 Farm Bill
required the Secretary of Agriculture to
establish a Dairy Forward Pricing
Program. Authorization for this program
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
expired on September 30, 2013, under
the provisions of the ATRA. The DFPP
allows a handler to forward contract for
an amount of milk up to the volume of
Class II, III, and IV milk pooled on the
order by the handler under the AMAA,
as amended, during a month and be
exempt from the minimum Federal
order blend price provisions for that
milk. USDA, including Market
Administrator personnel, does not
determine the terms of forward
contracts or enforce negotiated prices.
For producers who consider forward
contracting as a risk-management tool,
the ‘‘benchmark’’ price for milk is the
minimum Federal order blend price that
they would receive in the absence of a
forward contract. It is reasonable to
expect a producer to negotiate a forward
contract that would approximate the
minimum blend price plus applicable
premiums averaged over the forward
contract period. Over time, it is
reasonable to expect to see forward
contract prices paid to producers below
the applicable minimum order blend
price in some months and above the
minimum order blend price in others.
Participation in the dairy forward
pricing program is voluntary for dairy
farmers, dairy farmer cooperatives, and
handlers. Handlers may not require
producer participation in a forward
pricing program as a condition for
accepting milk. A producer or
cooperative association may continue to
have its milk priced under the
minimum payment provisions of the
applicable milk order.
Any ‘‘handler’’ defined in 7 CFR
§ 1000.9 is eligible to enter into a
forward contract(s) with producers or
cooperatives of producers. As defined in
that section, ‘‘handler’’ includes not
only the operator of a pool plant or
nonpool plant, but also a broker serving
as a handler as provided in § 1000.9(b),
a proprietary handler, and a cooperative
association acting as a handler with
respect to non-member milk delivered
to a pool plant or diverted to a nonpool
plant. Nothing in this regulation affects
any contractual arrangements between a
cooperative association and its
members.
A handler’s combined Class II, III, and
IV producer milk utilization is defined
in 7 CFR part 1145 as the handler’s
‘‘eligible milk.’’ In the case of a multiplant handler, the handler’s Class II, III,
and IV producer milk utilization will be
E:\FR\FM\21MRR1.SGM
21MRR1
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
15634
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 55 / Friday, March 21, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
combined together for all of the
handler’s milk regulated under one milk
marketing order. A handler will only be
exempt from paying the milk marketing
order’s minimum blend price on its
volume of ‘‘eligible milk.’’ If a handler
enters into forward contracts for more
than the eligible milk volume (‘‘overcontract’’ milk), the handler must notify
the Market Administrator. If the handler
fails to notify the Market Administrator
of payment adjustments, the Market
Administrator will prorate the overcontract milk to each producer and
cooperative association having a
contract with the handler.
Although handlers participating in
the program will not be required to pay
producers and cooperative associations
the minimum uniform blend or
component prices for contract milk,
they must continue to account to the
pool for all milk they receive at the
respective milk marketing order’s
minimum class prices. In the case of
milk received by a transfer from a
cooperative association’s pool plant, a
handler may forward contract for all
such transferred milk that is not used in
Class I.
In many milk markets, nonpool plants
regularly receive pooled milk from milk
producers who are not members of a
cooperative association. This milk is
actually pooled by a pool plant operator
or by a cooperative association through
its deliveries to a pool plant. The nonmember milk delivered to a nonpool
plant is reported under the milk
marketing order program as producer
milk diverted to a nonpool plant by the
cooperative association on its monthly
report of receipts and utilization to the
Market Administrator. Alternatively, if a
cooperative association is not involved
in the transaction, such milk could be
reported by a pool plant operator on its
monthly report of receipts and
utilization.
Many nonpool plant operators who
receive non-member milk that is pooled
through another handler issue checks to
the nonpool plant’s non-member
producers. They submit their payrolls
showing these payments to the Market
Administrator. Nevertheless, these
nonpool plant operators are not
responsible under the milk marketing
order program for paying their nonmember producers the minimum
Federal milk marketing order price; it is
the handler (either the cooperative
association or pool plant operator) that
pools the milk for such nonpool plants
that is responsible for an underpayment
under the milk marketing order
program.
Accordingly, only producer milk that
is subject to forward contracting with a
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:59 Mar 20, 2014
Jkt 232001
handler in compliance with the DFPP
will be exempt from the order’s
minimum blend price provisions. In the
case of non-member milk that is
reported as producer milk by a
cooperative association handler or pool
plant operator, but pay rolled by a
nonpool plant operator, the cooperative
association or pool plant operator,
respectively, will be responsible for any
underpayment to a non-member
producer in the event that milk under
contract becomes subject to minimum
milk marketing order pricing (as in the
case of over-contract milk). In this way,
cooperative association handlers, pool
plant operators, and nonpool plant
operators may continue the
arrangements that have evolved to pool
milk under the Federal milk marketing
order program and all will be permitted
to participate in the forward contracting
program.
Any handler participating in the
program will continue to file all of the
reports that are required under the
applicable Federal milk marketing
order. This includes reports of receipts
and utilization of milk and monthly
payroll reports that show all
information required by the orders. The
notable difference, however, for
handlers participating in the DFPP are
that they must also provide more
detailed accounting in their monthly
payroll reports to the Market
Administrator and remittance
information provided to participating
producers (7 CFR 1ll.31, 1001.73(e),
1005.73(e), 1006.73(e), 1007.73(e),
1030.73(f), 1032.73(f), 1033.73(e),
1124.73(f), 1126.73(e), 1131.73(e)). In
accordance with these provisions, the
monthly payroll report of participating
handlers is required to contain detailed
accounting that distinguishes gross
values paid for applicable volumes of
contract versus non-contract milk for
each producer. Remittance information
from participating handlers to
participating producers must clearly
distinguish gross values and volumes
for contract versus non-contract milk.
These distinctions avoid any questions
concerning compliance with Federal
order minimum price requirements for
participant milk not under contract.
As with the DFPP, handlers
participating in the Federal order
program must submit to the Market
Administrator a copy of each contract
for which it claims exemption from the
order’s minimum blend pricing
provisions. The contract must denote
the pricing terms for contract milk. The
contract must be signed prior to the first
day of the first month for which the
contract applies and must be received
by the Market Administrator by the 15th
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
day of that month. For the first month
that the program is effective, contracts
must be signed on or after the day on
which the program becomes effective.
For example, if the program becomes
effective on February 15, contracts for
March milk must be signed between
February 15 and February 28, and
copies must be received by the Market
Administrator by March 15.
Each handler must give each
contracting dairy farmer or cooperative
association a disclosure statement
informing them of the nature of the
program and providing certain
information that should be considered
before entering into a forward contract.
It is important that producers clearly
understand on what basis they are being
paid for contract milk. The disclosure
statement must be signed on the same
date as the contract by the dairy farmer
or cooperative association
representative and will have to be
returned by the handler to the Market
Administrator together with the
contract. The disclosure is less than one
page long and can easily be
incorporated into the body of the
forward contract itself or can be handled
as a supplement that may be attached to
the forward contract. Any contract that
is submitted to the Market
Administrator without the disclosure
statement will be considered to be
invalid for the purpose of being exempt
from the order’s minimum pricing and
will be returned to the handler.
Producers who are not members of a
cooperative association should be aware
that their milk weights and tests will
continue to be handled in the same way
by the Market Administrator even if
they choose to enter into a forward
contract which prices their milk on a
different basis than the milk marketing
order in which their milk is pooled. For
example, if a producer in the
Appalachian Order, which prices the
milk of dairy farmers on the basis of
skim milk and butterfat, enters into a
contract that prices milk on the basis of
protein, butterfat, other solids, and
somatic cell count, the producer will
only receive data from the Market
Administrator on the skim and butterfat
components to compare against the
buying handler’s test data. If the
producer wants to verify other
component tests, they must do so at
their own expense.
Handlers with forward contracts
remain subject to all other milk
marketing order provisions. Payments
specified under a forward contract must
be made on or before the same dates as
order payments which they replace. If
handlers paid producers under contract
at different times than producers not
E:\FR\FM\21MRR1.SGM
21MRR1
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 55 / Friday, March 21, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
under contract, disorderly conditions
might occur. Payments for milk covered
under forward contract are required to
be made by the dates specified in
§ 1145.2(e) of the regulations.
Executive Order 12866 and Executive
Order 13563
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess all costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health, and safety
effects, distributive impacts, and
equity). Executive Order 13563
emphasizes the importance of
quantifying both costs and benefits,
reducing costs, harmonizing rules, and
promoting flexibility. This action has
been designated as a ‘‘non-significant
regulatory action’’ under § 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866 and therefore
has not been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB).
Executive Order 12988
This rule has been reviewed under
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform. It is not intended to have a
retroactive effect. There are no
administrative procedures which must
be exhausted prior to judicial challenge
to the provisions of this rule.
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Executive Order 13175
This rule has been reviewed for
compliance with Executive Order
13175, ‘‘Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments.’’ The
review reveals that this rule will not
have substantial and direct effects on
Tribal Governments and will not have
significant Tribal implications. AMS
consulted with the USDA Office of
Tribal Relations in development of this
proposed rule and believes that it will
not impact or have direct effects on
Tribal governments and will not have
significant Tribal implications. AMS
continues to consult with the USDA
Office of Tribal Relations to collaborate
meaningfully to develop and strengthen
departmental regulations.
Regulatory Flexibility Act and
Paperwork Reduction Act
The legal basis for this rule was first
set forth in the 2008 Farm Bill, which
prohibited new forward contracts from
being entered into after September 30,
2012, and no forward contracts entered
into under the program extending
beyond September 30, 2015 (7 U.S.C.
8772(e)). Passage of the ATRA revised
the program to allow new contracts to
be entered into until September 30,
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:59 Mar 20, 2014
Jkt 232001
2013. The 2014 Farm Bill has again
extended the program so that producers
and cooperative associations of
producers may now enter into forward
price contracts under the DFPP through
September 30, 2018, and that all terms
of the forward contract must expire
prior to September 30, 2021. All other
provisions and requirements of the
program as provided for in the final rule
published October 31, 2008 (73 FR
64868) are still in effect.
In accordance with the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601–612), the
Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS)
has considered the economic impact of
this action on small entities and has
certified that this rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities for
the reasons stated herein. For the
purpose of the Regulatory Flexibility
Act, a dairy farm is considered a small
business if it has an annual gross
revenue of less than $750,000, and a
dairy products manufacturer is a small
business if it has fewer than 500
employees.
For the purposes of determining
which dairy farms are small businesses,
the $750,000 per year criterion was used
to establish a production guideline of
500,000 pounds per month. Although
this guideline does not factor in
additional monies that may be received
by dairy producers, it should be an
inclusive standard for most small dairy
farmers. For purposes of determining a
handler’s size, if the plant is part of a
larger company operating multiple
plants that collectively exceed the 500employee limit, the plant will be
considered a large business even if the
local plant has fewer than 500
employees.
During an average month in 2012, the
milk of 40,750 dairy farmers was pooled
throughout the Federal milk marketing
order system. Of the total, an estimated
38,305 dairy farmers, or 94 percent,
were considered small businesses.
During the same time period, there was
an average of 237 pool handlers per
month with milk priced and pooled on
a Federal milk marketing order. Of this
total, approximately 126, or 53 percent,
were considered small businesses.
AMS is committed to complying with
the E-Government Act, to promote the
use of the Internet and other
information technologies to provide
increased opportunities for citizen
access to Government information and
services, and for other purposes.
The reporting and recordkeeping
requirements for this rule are minimal.
Section 1601 of the 2014 Farm Bill
provides that the extension of the Dairy
Forward Pricing Program shall be made
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
15635
without regard to the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35). Although exempted, the
requirements of the Paperwork
Reduction Act were considered in
developing the provisions of this rule.
The provisions extending the Dairy
Forward Pricing Program have been
carefully reviewed and every effort has
been made to minimize recordkeeping
costs or requirements.
Any handler that enters into a forward
contract with a producer or cooperative
association of producers must have
written proof of such an arrangement.
To meet other requirements for
participation in this program, a handler
must submit a copy of each forward
contract with a producer or cooperative
association of producers to the market
administrator of the order which
regulates the milk. Submitting this
information to the milk market
administrator is estimated to take 5
minutes or less. The handler must
attach a disclosure statement to each
forward contract, or otherwise make
such statement part of the contract. The
disclosure statement must be signed by
each producer or cooperative
representative entering into a forward
contract. The disclosure statement
explains that producers or cooperative
associations of producers entering into
forward contracts forfeit their rights to
receive the minimum order price(s) for
that portion of their milk that is subject
to the contract for the duration of the
contract period. Preparing the contract
and attaching or including the
disclosure statement is estimated to take
20 minutes or less per contract.
Any handler participating in the
program will continue to file all of the
reports that are required under the
applicable Federal milk marketing
order, as authorized under the AMAA.
The information collection requirements
contained in the Federal milk marketing
order program have been previously
approved by the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 and have been
assigned OMB Control Number 0581–
0032. This includes reports of
utilization of milk and monthly payroll
reports that show information required
by the orders. Taking into account the
Dairy Forward Pricing Program, the
monthly payroll report of each
participating handler and the support
statement sent from each participating
handler to each participating producer
must contain detailed accounting that
distinguishes total rates used in making
payment and volumes for milk under
forward contract. While the resulting
changes in burden are exempt from the
Paperwork Reduction Act, slight
E:\FR\FM\21MRR1.SGM
21MRR1
15636
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 55 / Friday, March 21, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
modifications to the currently approved
‘‘Handler’s Report for Producer Payroll’’
form have been submitted to the OMB.
If a handler’s contract milk exceeds
the handler’s eligible milk for any
month in which the specified contract
price(s) are below the order’s minimum
prices, the handler must designate
which producer milk shall not be
contract milk. Preparing this
notification is estimated to take 5
minutes or less. If the handler does not
designate the suppliers of the overcontracted milk, the market
administrator shall prorate the overcontracted milk to each producer and
cooperative association having a
forward contract with the handler.
The primary sources of data used to
complete these reports are routinely
used in most business transactions. The
additional reporting requirements
required by this rule typically only
require a minimal amount of data
processing time, and the information
collection and reporting burden is
relatively small. Requiring the same
reports for all handlers does not
significantly disadvantage any handler
that is smaller than the industry
average.
USDA does not expect the forward
contracting program to unduly burden
small entities or impair their ability to
compete in the marketplace. In its
simplest form, a forward contract
between a milk buyer and a milk
producer (or cooperative) is an
agreement to sell a stated quantity of
milk for a specified period at a stated
price. Producers and handlers are able
to ‘‘lock-in’’ prices, thereby minimizing
risks associated with price and income
volatility and enhancing their ability to
obtain new or continued financing. By
providing another tool to possibly
reduce price risk, the program may aid
small businesses in competing with
larger entities that currently utilize
futures and options markets, among
other means, to reduce price volatility.
Final Action
In accordance with the 2014 Farm
Bill, this final rule extends the Dairy
Forward Pricing Program applicable
under all Federal milk marketing orders.
New contracts under the Program may
be entered into until September 30,
2018. Any forward contract entered into
up to and until the September 30, 2018,
deadline is subject to a September 30,
2021, expiration date.
Subtitle F of Title I of the 2014 Farm
Bill provides that the promulgation of
these regulations shall be made without
regard to the Paperwork Reduction Act
(44 U.S.C. Chapter 35), the Statement of
Policy of the Secretary of Agriculture,
VerDate Mar<15>2010
15:59 Mar 20, 2014
Jkt 232001
effective July 24, 1971 (36 FR 13804),1
and the notice and comment provisions
of section 553 of Title 5, United States
Code.
These provisions are made final in
this action, and for the same reasons
good cause exists for making this rule
effective one day after publication in the
Federal Register. To do otherwise
would be impracticable, unnecessary,
and contrary to the public interest. (5
U.S.C. 553; 5 U.S.C. 808)
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 1145
Contract, Forward contract, Forward
pricing, Milk.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, Title 7, chapter X, Part 1145
is amended as follows:
PART 1145—DAIRY FORWARD
PRICING PROGRAM
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR
part 1145 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 8772.
2. Amend § 1145.2 by revising
paragraph (b) to read as follows:
■
§ 1145.2
Program.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) No forward price contract may be
entered into under the program after
September 30, 2018, and no forward
contract entered into under the program
may extend beyond September 30, 2021.
*
*
*
*
*
Dated: February 19, 2014.
Rex A. Barnes,
Associate Administrator, Agricultural
Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. 2014–06189 Filed 3–20–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 1216
[Document Number AMS–FV–13–0042]
Peanut Promotion, Research, and
Information Order; Amendment to
Primary Peanut-Producing States and
Adjustment of Membership
Agricultural Marketing Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
This rule adds the State of
Arkansas as a primary peanut-producing
State under the Peanut Promotion,
Research, and Information Order
SUMMARY:
1 A Revocation of the Statement of Policy was
published in the Federal Register on October 28,
2013 (78 FR 64194).
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
(Order). The Order is administered by
the National Peanut Board (Board) with
oversight by the U.S. Department of
Agriculture (USDA). This rule also adds
a seat on the Board for the State of
Arkansas. Under the Order, primary
peanut-producing States must maintain
a 3-year average production of at least
10,000 tons of peanuts. Arkansas’s
peanut production meets this
requirement. Primary peanut-producing
States also have a seat on the Board.
This action was recommended by the
Board and ensures that the Board’s
representation reflects changes in the
geographical distribution of the
production of peanuts.
DATES:
Effective: March 24, 2014.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jeanette Palmer, Marketing Specialist,
Promotion and Economics Division,
Fruit and Vegetable Program, AMS,
USDA, Stop 0244, 1400 Independence
Avenue SW., Room 1406–S,
Washington, DC 20250–0244; telephone:
(202) 720–9915; facsimile: (202) 205–
2800; or electronic mail:
Jeanette.Palmer@ams.usda.gov.
This rule
is issued under the Order (7 CFR part
1216). The Order is authorized under
the Commodity Promotion, Research,
and Information Act of 1996 (1996 Act)
(7 U.S.C. 7411–7425).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Executive Order 12866 and Executive
Order 13563
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess all costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, distributive impacts and equity).
Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the
importance of quantifying both costs
and benefits, reducing costs,
harmonizing rules and promoting
flexibility. This action has been
designated as a ‘‘non-significant
regulatory action’’ under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866. Accordingly,
the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) has waived the review process.
Executive Order 13175
This action has been reviewed in
accordance with the requirements of
Executive Order 13175, Consultation
and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments. The review reveals that
this regulation will not have substantial
and direct effects on Tribal governments
and will not have significant Tribal
implications.
E:\FR\FM\21MRR1.SGM
21MRR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 55 (Friday, March 21, 2014)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 15633-15636]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-06189]
========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents.
Prices of new books are listed in the first FEDERAL REGISTER issue of each
week.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 55 / Friday, March 21, 2014 / Rules
and Regulations
[[Page 15633]]
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 1145
[Doc. No. AMS-DA-14-0018]
Extension of Dairy Forward Pricing Program
AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This final rule extends the Dairy Forward Pricing Program in
accordance with the Agricultural Act of 2014 (2014 Farm Bill). The
Dairy Forward Pricing Program was first authorized in section 1502 of
the Food, Conservation and Energy Act of 2008. The program allows
handlers regulated under the Federal milk marketing order program to
pay producers and cooperative associations in accordance with the terms
of a forward contract and not have to pay the minimum Federal order
uniform price for milk. Establishing new contracts under the Dairy
Forward Pricing Program has been prohibited since the expiration of the
program on September 30, 2013. The 2014 Farm Bill (H.R. 2642) was
signed into law on February 7, 2014, and extends the program to allow
new contracts to be entered into until September 30, 2018. Any forward
contract entered into up and until the September 30, 2018, deadline is
subject to a September 30, 2021, expiration date to meet the terms of
the contract.
DATES: Effective March 24, 2014.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Roger Cryan, Director, Economics
Division, USDA/AMS/Dairy Programs, Stop 0229--Room 2753-S, 1400
Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20250-0231, (202) 720-7091,
email address: roger.cryan@ams.usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This final rule extends the Dairy Forward
Pricing Program (DFPP) in accordance with the 2014 Farm Bill. The 2008
Food, Conservation and Energy Act (2008 Farm Bill) (Pub. L. 110-246)
initially established the DFPP, which prohibited new forward contracts
from being entered into after September 30, 2012, and no forward
contracts entered into under the program extending beyond September 30,
2015 (7 U.S.C. 8772(e)). Passage of the ``American Taxpayer Relief Act
of 2012,'' (ATRA) (Pub. L. 112-240), signed into law on January 2,
2013, revised the program to allow new contracts to be entered into
until September 30, 2013. New contracts have been prohibited since
then.
The DFPP (7 U.S.C. 8772, 7 CFR 1145) allows handlers, under the
Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, (AMAA) (7 U.S.C. 601-
612), to pay producers or cooperative associations of producers a
negotiated price, rather than the Federal order minimum blend price for
producer milk if subject to conditions and terms of a forward contract,
provided the volume of such milk does not exceed the handler's Class
II, III, and IV utilization for the month on the order that regulates
the milk. The program applies to producer milk regulated under Federal
milk marketing orders that is not classified as Class I milk or milk
otherwise intended for fluid use and that is in the current of
interstate or foreign commerce or directly burdens, obstructs, or
affects interstate or foreign commerce of Federally regulated milk. The
Federal milk marketing order program consists of 10 Federal milk
marketing orders (7 CFR parts 1001-1135).
This document provides notice that producers and cooperative
associations of producers may now enter into forward price contracts
under the DFPP through September 30, 2018, and that all terms of the
forward contract must expire prior to September 30, 2021. All other
provisions and requirements of the program as provided for in the final
rule published October 31, 2008 (73 FR 64868) are still in effect.
Discussion of Rules Applicable to Program
Section 1502 of the 2008 Farm Bill required the Secretary of
Agriculture to establish a Dairy Forward Pricing Program. Authorization
for this program expired on September 30, 2013, under the provisions of
the ATRA. The DFPP allows a handler to forward contract for an amount
of milk up to the volume of Class II, III, and IV milk pooled on the
order by the handler under the AMAA, as amended, during a month and be
exempt from the minimum Federal order blend price provisions for that
milk. USDA, including Market Administrator personnel, does not
determine the terms of forward contracts or enforce negotiated prices.
For producers who consider forward contracting as a risk-management
tool, the ``benchmark'' price for milk is the minimum Federal order
blend price that they would receive in the absence of a forward
contract. It is reasonable to expect a producer to negotiate a forward
contract that would approximate the minimum blend price plus applicable
premiums averaged over the forward contract period. Over time, it is
reasonable to expect to see forward contract prices paid to producers
below the applicable minimum order blend price in some months and above
the minimum order blend price in others.
Participation in the dairy forward pricing program is voluntary for
dairy farmers, dairy farmer cooperatives, and handlers. Handlers may
not require producer participation in a forward pricing program as a
condition for accepting milk. A producer or cooperative association may
continue to have its milk priced under the minimum payment provisions
of the applicable milk order.
Any ``handler'' defined in 7 CFR Sec. 1000.9 is eligible to enter
into a forward contract(s) with producers or cooperatives of producers.
As defined in that section, ``handler'' includes not only the operator
of a pool plant or nonpool plant, but also a broker serving as a
handler as provided in Sec. 1000.9(b), a proprietary handler, and a
cooperative association acting as a handler with respect to non-member
milk delivered to a pool plant or diverted to a nonpool plant. Nothing
in this regulation affects any contractual arrangements between a
cooperative association and its members.
A handler's combined Class II, III, and IV producer milk
utilization is defined in 7 CFR part 1145 as the handler's ``eligible
milk.'' In the case of a multi-plant handler, the handler's Class II,
III, and IV producer milk utilization will be
[[Page 15634]]
combined together for all of the handler's milk regulated under one
milk marketing order. A handler will only be exempt from paying the
milk marketing order's minimum blend price on its volume of ``eligible
milk.'' If a handler enters into forward contracts for more than the
eligible milk volume (``over-contract'' milk), the handler must notify
the Market Administrator. If the handler fails to notify the Market
Administrator of payment adjustments, the Market Administrator will
prorate the over-contract milk to each producer and cooperative
association having a contract with the handler.
Although handlers participating in the program will not be required
to pay producers and cooperative associations the minimum uniform blend
or component prices for contract milk, they must continue to account to
the pool for all milk they receive at the respective milk marketing
order's minimum class prices. In the case of milk received by a
transfer from a cooperative association's pool plant, a handler may
forward contract for all such transferred milk that is not used in
Class I.
In many milk markets, nonpool plants regularly receive pooled milk
from milk producers who are not members of a cooperative association.
This milk is actually pooled by a pool plant operator or by a
cooperative association through its deliveries to a pool plant. The
non-member milk delivered to a nonpool plant is reported under the milk
marketing order program as producer milk diverted to a nonpool plant by
the cooperative association on its monthly report of receipts and
utilization to the Market Administrator. Alternatively, if a
cooperative association is not involved in the transaction, such milk
could be reported by a pool plant operator on its monthly report of
receipts and utilization.
Many nonpool plant operators who receive non-member milk that is
pooled through another handler issue checks to the nonpool plant's non-
member producers. They submit their payrolls showing these payments to
the Market Administrator. Nevertheless, these nonpool plant operators
are not responsible under the milk marketing order program for paying
their non-member producers the minimum Federal milk marketing order
price; it is the handler (either the cooperative association or pool
plant operator) that pools the milk for such nonpool plants that is
responsible for an underpayment under the milk marketing order program.
Accordingly, only producer milk that is subject to forward
contracting with a handler in compliance with the DFPP will be exempt
from the order's minimum blend price provisions. In the case of non-
member milk that is reported as producer milk by a cooperative
association handler or pool plant operator, but pay rolled by a nonpool
plant operator, the cooperative association or pool plant operator,
respectively, will be responsible for any underpayment to a non-member
producer in the event that milk under contract becomes subject to
minimum milk marketing order pricing (as in the case of over-contract
milk). In this way, cooperative association handlers, pool plant
operators, and nonpool plant operators may continue the arrangements
that have evolved to pool milk under the Federal milk marketing order
program and all will be permitted to participate in the forward
contracting program.
Any handler participating in the program will continue to file all
of the reports that are required under the applicable Federal milk
marketing order. This includes reports of receipts and utilization of
milk and monthly payroll reports that show all information required by
the orders. The notable difference, however, for handlers participating
in the DFPP are that they must also provide more detailed accounting in
their monthly payroll reports to the Market Administrator and
remittance information provided to participating producers (7 CFR 1--
--.31, 1001.73(e), 1005.73(e), 1006.73(e), 1007.73(e), 1030.73(f),
1032.73(f), 1033.73(e), 1124.73(f), 1126.73(e), 1131.73(e)). In
accordance with these provisions, the monthly payroll report of
participating handlers is required to contain detailed accounting that
distinguishes gross values paid for applicable volumes of contract
versus non-contract milk for each producer. Remittance information from
participating handlers to participating producers must clearly
distinguish gross values and volumes for contract versus non-contract
milk. These distinctions avoid any questions concerning compliance with
Federal order minimum price requirements for participant milk not under
contract.
As with the DFPP, handlers participating in the Federal order
program must submit to the Market Administrator a copy of each contract
for which it claims exemption from the order's minimum blend pricing
provisions. The contract must denote the pricing terms for contract
milk. The contract must be signed prior to the first day of the first
month for which the contract applies and must be received by the Market
Administrator by the 15th day of that month. For the first month that
the program is effective, contracts must be signed on or after the day
on which the program becomes effective. For example, if the program
becomes effective on February 15, contracts for March milk must be
signed between February 15 and February 28, and copies must be received
by the Market Administrator by March 15.
Each handler must give each contracting dairy farmer or cooperative
association a disclosure statement informing them of the nature of the
program and providing certain information that should be considered
before entering into a forward contract. It is important that producers
clearly understand on what basis they are being paid for contract milk.
The disclosure statement must be signed on the same date as the
contract by the dairy farmer or cooperative association representative
and will have to be returned by the handler to the Market Administrator
together with the contract. The disclosure is less than one page long
and can easily be incorporated into the body of the forward contract
itself or can be handled as a supplement that may be attached to the
forward contract. Any contract that is submitted to the Market
Administrator without the disclosure statement will be considered to be
invalid for the purpose of being exempt from the order's minimum
pricing and will be returned to the handler.
Producers who are not members of a cooperative association should
be aware that their milk weights and tests will continue to be handled
in the same way by the Market Administrator even if they choose to
enter into a forward contract which prices their milk on a different
basis than the milk marketing order in which their milk is pooled. For
example, if a producer in the Appalachian Order, which prices the milk
of dairy farmers on the basis of skim milk and butterfat, enters into a
contract that prices milk on the basis of protein, butterfat, other
solids, and somatic cell count, the producer will only receive data
from the Market Administrator on the skim and butterfat components to
compare against the buying handler's test data. If the producer wants
to verify other component tests, they must do so at their own expense.
Handlers with forward contracts remain subject to all other milk
marketing order provisions. Payments specified under a forward contract
must be made on or before the same dates as order payments which they
replace. If handlers paid producers under contract at different times
than producers not
[[Page 15635]]
under contract, disorderly conditions might occur. Payments for milk
covered under forward contract are required to be made by the dates
specified in Sec. 1145.2(e) of the regulations.
Executive Order 12866 and Executive Order 13563
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess all
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public
health, and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity).
Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both
costs and benefits, reducing costs, harmonizing rules, and promoting
flexibility. This action has been designated as a ``non-significant
regulatory action'' under Sec. 3(f) of Executive Order 12866 and
therefore has not been reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB).
Executive Order 12988
This rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988, Civil
Justice Reform. It is not intended to have a retroactive effect. There
are no administrative procedures which must be exhausted prior to
judicial challenge to the provisions of this rule.
Executive Order 13175
This rule has been reviewed for compliance with Executive Order
13175, ``Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments.'' The review reveals that this rule will not have
substantial and direct effects on Tribal Governments and will not have
significant Tribal implications. AMS consulted with the USDA Office of
Tribal Relations in development of this proposed rule and believes that
it will not impact or have direct effects on Tribal governments and
will not have significant Tribal implications. AMS continues to consult
with the USDA Office of Tribal Relations to collaborate meaningfully to
develop and strengthen departmental regulations.
Regulatory Flexibility Act and Paperwork Reduction Act
The legal basis for this rule was first set forth in the 2008 Farm
Bill, which prohibited new forward contracts from being entered into
after September 30, 2012, and no forward contracts entered into under
the program extending beyond September 30, 2015 (7 U.S.C. 8772(e)).
Passage of the ATRA revised the program to allow new contracts to be
entered into until September 30, 2013. The 2014 Farm Bill has again
extended the program so that producers and cooperative associations of
producers may now enter into forward price contracts under the DFPP
through September 30, 2018, and that all terms of the forward contract
must expire prior to September 30, 2021. All other provisions and
requirements of the program as provided for in the final rule published
October 31, 2008 (73 FR 64868) are still in effect.
In accordance with the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-
612), the Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) has considered the
economic impact of this action on small entities and has certified that
this rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities for the reasons stated herein. For the purpose
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, a dairy farm is considered a small
business if it has an annual gross revenue of less than $750,000, and a
dairy products manufacturer is a small business if it has fewer than
500 employees.
For the purposes of determining which dairy farms are small
businesses, the $750,000 per year criterion was used to establish a
production guideline of 500,000 pounds per month. Although this
guideline does not factor in additional monies that may be received by
dairy producers, it should be an inclusive standard for most small
dairy farmers. For purposes of determining a handler's size, if the
plant is part of a larger company operating multiple plants that
collectively exceed the 500-employee limit, the plant will be
considered a large business even if the local plant has fewer than 500
employees.
During an average month in 2012, the milk of 40,750 dairy farmers
was pooled throughout the Federal milk marketing order system. Of the
total, an estimated 38,305 dairy farmers, or 94 percent, were
considered small businesses. During the same time period, there was an
average of 237 pool handlers per month with milk priced and pooled on a
Federal milk marketing order. Of this total, approximately 126, or 53
percent, were considered small businesses.
AMS is committed to complying with the E-Government Act, to promote
the use of the Internet and other information technologies to provide
increased opportunities for citizen access to Government information
and services, and for other purposes.
The reporting and recordkeeping requirements for this rule are
minimal. Section 1601 of the 2014 Farm Bill provides that the extension
of the Dairy Forward Pricing Program shall be made without regard to
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35). Although
exempted, the requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act were
considered in developing the provisions of this rule. The provisions
extending the Dairy Forward Pricing Program have been carefully
reviewed and every effort has been made to minimize recordkeeping costs
or requirements.
Any handler that enters into a forward contract with a producer or
cooperative association of producers must have written proof of such an
arrangement. To meet other requirements for participation in this
program, a handler must submit a copy of each forward contract with a
producer or cooperative association of producers to the market
administrator of the order which regulates the milk. Submitting this
information to the milk market administrator is estimated to take 5
minutes or less. The handler must attach a disclosure statement to each
forward contract, or otherwise make such statement part of the
contract. The disclosure statement must be signed by each producer or
cooperative representative entering into a forward contract. The
disclosure statement explains that producers or cooperative
associations of producers entering into forward contracts forfeit their
rights to receive the minimum order price(s) for that portion of their
milk that is subject to the contract for the duration of the contract
period. Preparing the contract and attaching or including the
disclosure statement is estimated to take 20 minutes or less per
contract.
Any handler participating in the program will continue to file all
of the reports that are required under the applicable Federal milk
marketing order, as authorized under the AMAA. The information
collection requirements contained in the Federal milk marketing order
program have been previously approved by the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 and have been
assigned OMB Control Number 0581-0032. This includes reports of
utilization of milk and monthly payroll reports that show information
required by the orders. Taking into account the Dairy Forward Pricing
Program, the monthly payroll report of each participating handler and
the support statement sent from each participating handler to each
participating producer must contain detailed accounting that
distinguishes total rates used in making payment and volumes for milk
under forward contract. While the resulting changes in burden are
exempt from the Paperwork Reduction Act, slight
[[Page 15636]]
modifications to the currently approved ``Handler's Report for Producer
Payroll'' form have been submitted to the OMB.
If a handler's contract milk exceeds the handler's eligible milk
for any month in which the specified contract price(s) are below the
order's minimum prices, the handler must designate which producer milk
shall not be contract milk. Preparing this notification is estimated to
take 5 minutes or less. If the handler does not designate the suppliers
of the over-contracted milk, the market administrator shall prorate the
over-contracted milk to each producer and cooperative association
having a forward contract with the handler.
The primary sources of data used to complete these reports are
routinely used in most business transactions. The additional reporting
requirements required by this rule typically only require a minimal
amount of data processing time, and the information collection and
reporting burden is relatively small. Requiring the same reports for
all handlers does not significantly disadvantage any handler that is
smaller than the industry average.
USDA does not expect the forward contracting program to unduly
burden small entities or impair their ability to compete in the
marketplace. In its simplest form, a forward contract between a milk
buyer and a milk producer (or cooperative) is an agreement to sell a
stated quantity of milk for a specified period at a stated price.
Producers and handlers are able to ``lock-in'' prices, thereby
minimizing risks associated with price and income volatility and
enhancing their ability to obtain new or continued financing. By
providing another tool to possibly reduce price risk, the program may
aid small businesses in competing with larger entities that currently
utilize futures and options markets, among other means, to reduce price
volatility.
Final Action
In accordance with the 2014 Farm Bill, this final rule extends the
Dairy Forward Pricing Program applicable under all Federal milk
marketing orders. New contracts under the Program may be entered into
until September 30, 2018. Any forward contract entered into up to and
until the September 30, 2018, deadline is subject to a September 30,
2021, expiration date.
Subtitle F of Title I of the 2014 Farm Bill provides that the
promulgation of these regulations shall be made without regard to the
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35), the Statement of Policy
of the Secretary of Agriculture, effective July 24, 1971 (36 FR
13804),\1\ and the notice and comment provisions of section 553 of
Title 5, United States Code.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ A Revocation of the Statement of Policy was published in the
Federal Register on October 28, 2013 (78 FR 64194).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
These provisions are made final in this action, and for the same
reasons good cause exists for making this rule effective one day after
publication in the Federal Register. To do otherwise would be
impracticable, unnecessary, and contrary to the public interest. (5
U.S.C. 553; 5 U.S.C. 808)
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 1145
Contract, Forward contract, Forward pricing, Milk.
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, Title 7, chapter X, Part
1145 is amended as follows:
PART 1145--DAIRY FORWARD PRICING PROGRAM
0
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR part 1145 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 8772.
0
2. Amend Sec. 1145.2 by revising paragraph (b) to read as follows:
Sec. 1145.2 Program.
* * * * *
(b) No forward price contract may be entered into under the program
after September 30, 2018, and no forward contract entered into under
the program may extend beyond September 30, 2021.
* * * * *
Dated: February 19, 2014.
Rex A. Barnes,
Associate Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. 2014-06189 Filed 3-20-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-02-P