Department of the Treasury Acquisition Regulations; Contract Clause on Minority and Women Inclusion in Contractor Workforce, 15551-15554 [2014-05846]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 54 / Thursday, March 20, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
Flooding source(s)
Location of referenced elevation
* Elevation in feet
(NGVD)
+ Elevation in feet
(NAVD)
# Depth in feet
above ground
∧ Elevation in
meters (MSL)
Modified
15551
Communities
affected
Township of Sugar Grove
Maps are available for inspection at the Sugar Grove Township Building, 359 Groover Road, Greenville, PA 16125.
Township of West Salem
Maps are available for inspection at the West Salem Township Building, 610 Vernan Road, Greenville, PA 16125.
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance No.
97.022, ‘‘Flood Insurance.’’)
Dated: January 31, 2014.
Roy E. Wright,
Deputy Associate Administrator for
Mitigation, Department of Homeland
Security, Federal Emergency Management
Agency.
[FR Doc. 2014–06092 Filed 3–19–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–12–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
48 CFR Parts 1022 and 1052
RIN 1505–AC40
Department of the Treasury
Acquisition Regulations; Contract
Clause on Minority and Women
Inclusion in Contractor Workforce
Departmental Offices, Treasury.
Final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Department of the
Treasury (the Department) is amending
the Department of the Treasury
Acquisition Regulation (DTAR) to
include a contract clause on minority
and women inclusion, as required by
the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and
Consumer Protection Act of 2010 (the
Dodd-Frank Act).
DATES: Effective Date: April 21, 2014.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Lorraine Cole, Director, Office of
Minority and Women Inclusion, 202–
927–8181 (this is not a toll-free number)
or lorraine.cole@treasury.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES
I. Background and Proposed Rule
Section 342 of the Dodd-Frank Act, 12
U.S.C. 5452, established an Office of
Minority and Women Inclusion (OMWI)
within certain agencies, including the
Departmental Offices of the Department
of the Treasury. Section 342(c)(2)
provides that covered agencies shall
require contractors to provide a written
statement that the ‘‘contractor shall
ensure, to the maximum extent possible,
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:19 Mar 19, 2014
Jkt 232001
the fair inclusion of women and
minorities in the workforce of the
contractor, and as applicable,
subcontractors.’’ This rule will
implement the statement required by
the Dodd-Frank Act through a contract
clause.
The contract clause, which is similar
to those adopted by other OMWI
agencies, requires that a contractor make
good faith efforts to include minorities
and women in its workforce. This
standard is derived from section
342(c)(3) of the Dodd-Frank Act, which
provides for remedies, including
termination, against a contractor that
fails to make good faith efforts to
include minorities and women in its
workforce. Treasury interprets ‘‘good
faith efforts’’ to mean efforts consistent
with the Equal Protection Clause of the
Constitution, Title VII of the Civil Rights
Act of 1964, and Executive Order 11246,
as amended, such as the identification
and elimination of employment barriers,
the widespread publication of
employment opportunities, and other
forms of outreach to minorities and
women.
Section 342 applies to ‘‘all contracts
. . . for services of any kind,’’ but the
section does not define the term
‘‘contract.’’ Treasury applies the clause
to all service contracts above the
simplified acquisition threshold.
Further, as noted above, section 342
applies to Treasury Departmental
Offices (DO). DO does not currently
include an office responsible for
operational procurement; acquisitions
in support of DO are performed
primarily by the Internal Revenue
Service Office of Treasury Procurement
Services. The clause will be included in
all service contracts in support of
requirements originating from DO,
regardless of the Treasury component
performing the acquisition.
II. This Final Rule
In its August 21, 2012, proposed rule,
the Department solicited public
comments on all aspects of the proposal.
This comment period closed on October
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
22, 2012, and eight comment letters
were received. Comments were received
from interest groups, private citizens,
and law students. This section sets out
significant comments raised by the
commenters and the Department’s
response to these comments. As set
forth below, the Department has
considered the comments and is
adopting the proposed rule with two
minor changes in response to comments
received, which are noted below.
Public Comments and Department
Responses
One commenter suggested that the
clause should apply only to
subcontracts subject to reporting under
FAR clause 52.204–10. The Department
declines to adopt this suggestion. It is,
however, the Department’s intent that
the clause should be required only in
subcontracts that are awarded to
support a covered contract. To clarify
this point, Treasury has modified the
language of the clause to require flowdown only to ‘‘subcontracts awarded
under’’ the contract.
One commenter suggested inserting
the language ‘‘including Title VII of the
1964 Civil Rights Act’’ after ’’To
implement this commitment, the
Contractor shall ensure, to the
maximum extent possible consistent
with applicable law, the fair inclusion
of minorities and women in its
workforce.’’ The commenter contends
that, without the insertion, there is a
danger of discrimination against men
and non-minorities.
The Department does not believe that
a specific reference to Title VII is
necessary. The Department believes that
its contractors are aware of their
obligations under that statute. Further,
our contracts contain a separate clause,
FAR 52.222–26, Equal Opportunity, that
expressly prohibits discrimination.
Several commenters suggested that
the Department require specified
documentation to demonstrate a ‘‘good
faith effort.’’ These suggestions are not
adopted. The clause provides Treasury
with the authority to obtain
E:\FR\FM\20MRR1.SGM
20MRR1
ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES
15552
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 54 / Thursday, March 20, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
employment data and other information
regarding good faith efforts to the extent
necessary for its review of a contractor’s
inclusion of minorities and women in
its workforce. Treasury does not believe
that requiring contractors to submit
specific information absent a request or
predetermining what must be included
in a request would serve any useful
purpose. Moreover, the focus of the
clause, and of the relevant provisions of
section 342, is on a contractor’s overall
efforts to reduce barriers to employment
of minorities and women. Specific
information on individual employees
will rarely, if ever, be required for that
purpose.
Two commenters suggested that the
clause be modified to provide 60 days
for contractors to provide information
requested by the contracting officer. The
suggestion is not adopted. Section 342
and the clause require contractors to
engage in good faith efforts at all times
during contract performance, not merely
in the 60 days preceding a contracting
officer’s review. Because a good faith
efforts plan should be in place at all
times during contract performance, 10
days will normally be sufficient to
forward a copy to the contracting
officer. The other data contemplated by
the clause are factual in nature, and it
is reasonable for contractors to be
prepared to provide them. Moreover, the
clause requires that information be
provided within 10 business days of a
written request ‘‘or such longer time as
the contracting officer determines.’’
Contracting officers have a duty to act
in good faith in administering contracts.
Thus, if unusual circumstances existed
or if there was a need for information
not listed in the clause and not
immediately available, the contracting
officer would be required to provide the
contractor a reasonable period of time in
which to respond to the request.
One commenter suggested that the
rule be modified to expressly provide
that completion of the EEO–1 form and
compliance with applicable Office of
Federal Contract Compliance Programs
(OFCCP) rules are sufficient to establish
compliance with the requirements of the
clause. The Department declines to
adopt this suggestion. With respect to
the EEO–1 form, item (1) of the clause
provides that one type of information
the contracting officer may request is
the total number of the contractor’s
employees and the number of women
and minority employees by race,
ethnicity, and gender. The EEO–1 form
contains this information; there is no
need for an explicit statement that
providing the form will provide the
information contemplated by this
element of the clause. With respect to a
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:19 Mar 19, 2014
Jkt 232001
contractor’s plan to make good faith
efforts, addressed by item (4) of the
clause, the clause is drafted to provide
the contractor wide discretion to
determine what efforts should be made
to remove barriers to the employment
and of women and minorities. In most
instances, a contractor that establishes
an affirmative action program compliant
with the OFCCP regulations will not
need to take any additional steps to
comply with the good faith requirement.
However, expressly incorporating
compliance with the OFCCP regulations
as a standard for meeting the good faith
effort requirement would place Treasury
in the position of evaluating compliance
with the OFCCP regulations, something
it has neither the expertise nor the
authority to do. Accordingly, the
Department does not adopt the
suggested change. To clarify the
relationship between compliance with
OFCCP regulations and the good faith
requirement contained in the clause,
however, the Department does add
language to the clause to the effect that
compliance with the clause neither
satisfies contractors’ obligations under
Executive Order 11246, as amended, nor
precludes OFCCP evaluations or
enforcement actions undertaken
pursuant to that Order.
One commenter suggested that the
clause should be modified to expressly
state that it applies only to contracts
with the Department of the Treasury. As
the commenter acknowledges, the
prescription at 48 CFR 1022.7000
requires that the clause be inserted only
in contracts in support of Treasury
Departmental Offices. As with all FAR
clauses, the clause will apply only to
the contracts in which it is inserted.
Language expressly providing that the
clause does not form part of contracts in
which it does not appear (and in which
its insertion is not required by
regulation) is unnecessary and would be
potentially confusing.
Two commenters suggested that the
proposed rule only require information
from subcontractors to the extent that it
is available. The Department declines to
adopt this suggestion. Treasury cannot
fulfill its statutory responsibilities
without information concerning
subcontractors. Moreover, the flow
down provision of the clause establishes
a required mechanism for ensuring that
subcontractors are contractually bound
to provide necessary information to the
prime contractor.
One commenter suggested that the
clause should not be limited to contracts
above $150,000, and asserted that
interpreting the statutory language to
apply only to such contracts ‘‘could
place treasury in noncompliance with
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
the Dodd-Frank Act.’’ Section 342 does
not define the term ‘‘contract.’’ While
we are aware that the term is defined in
some contexts to include any legally
binding procurement instrument, we do
not believe that Congress intended the
good faith efforts requirement to apply
regardless of contract dollar value. The
burden imposed by the clause is
proportionate to the size of the
contractor’s workforce, not to the value
of the contract in which the clause is
inserted. Thus, absent a contract value
threshold, the clause could impose a
burden that is large in relation to the
contract price and make it difficult or
impossible to retain contractors to
perform smaller requirements.
Requiring the clause only in contracts
above the Simplified Acquisition
Threshold, currently $150,000 in the
FAR, represents an appropriate balance
between making the clause broadly
applicable and not including it where
doing so would create a
disproportionate burden. Treasury has
determined that it is appropriate to
interpret the statutory language to apply
only to contracts above that threshold.
One commenter suggested that there
should be remedies for non-compliance
with the clause other than termination
for default. Because the clause will be
a requirement of the contract in which
it is included, standard contractual
remedies will be available in the event
of non-compliance. The specific
remedies available will depend on the
nature of the underlying contract, but
may include such options as downward
equitable adjustments, lowered or
negative contractor performance ratings,
discontinuance or curtailment of new
task order awards, or non-exercise of
options, withholding of progress
payments, termination of contracts, and
debarment from receiving future
contracts. Termination for default
remains the ultimate contractual
sanction in the event of an uncured
failure to comply with the requirements
of the clause.
One commenter suggested that the
definition of ‘‘minorities’’ in the clause
should be expanded. The clause
incorporates the definition set forth in
section 342, from which Treasury
declines to depart.
Two commenters noted that the term
‘‘fair inclusion’’ is not defined in the
statute or proposed contract language.
One commenter also noted that there
appears to be no consequences ‘‘for not
reporting or for poor numbers in a
report.’’ Treasury has considered
providing a more specific definition of
good faith efforts, but determined that
doing so would not be feasible. The
actions that might be appropriate to
E:\FR\FM\20MRR1.SGM
20MRR1
ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 54 / Thursday, March 20, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
eliminate barriers to the employment of
minorities and women will vary
significantly depending on a particular
contractor’s organization and workforce.
The commenter is incorrect that there
are no consequences for failing to report
required information. The clause will
form part of a contract, and Treasury
will have available standard contract
remedies, up to and including
termination of the contract for default in
case of an uncured failure. Under no
circumstances, however, will there be
consequences for reporting ‘‘poor’’
numbers. While the composition of a
contractor’s workforce may help inform
a determination of what barrierreduction efforts are appropriate, the
clause does not require—and Treasury
does not seek—any specific set of
numbers, or any specific changes in
numbers over time. A contractor that
makes good faith efforts to identify and
eliminate barriers to the employment of
minorities and women (and that
complies with applicable reporting
requirements) will fully comply with
the clause, regardless of the ultimate
effect of those efforts on its workforce.
One commenter suggested that the
clause should be revised so as to list
examples of information a contractor
could choose to submit in order to
establish that it has engaged in good
faith efforts. This suggestion is not
adopted. Treasury has an obligation
under section 342 to determine whether
a contractor is in compliance with the
applicable good faith efforts
requirements. While the information
necessary to demonstrate such
compliance will vary significantly
depending on a contractor’s
organization and its approach to the
requirement, Treasury must have the
ability to obtain the information it
determines necessary under the
circumstances. Permitting a contractor
to unilaterally determine what
information is necessary for Treasury’s
determination would not accomplish
the purpose of the clause.
One commenter suggested that there
should be a cutoff beyond the $150,000
threshold to limit the number of
subcontractors to which the clause
applies. The commenter asserts that
there may be many tiers of
subcontractors, ‘‘hundreds (and possibly
thousands) of subcontracts’’ under a
contract that exceed the threshold. We
do not accept the suggestion. First, the
commenter’s concern as to the number
of possibly affected subcontracts
appears to be overstated. In Fiscal Year
2012, only two contracts supporting
Treasury Departmental Offices exceeded
$10 million. Given the relatively modest
value of Departmental Offices contracts,
VerDate Mar<15>2010
14:19 Mar 19, 2014
Jkt 232001
few if any will involve ‘‘hundreds’’ of
subcontracts. More importantly, we
consider it appropriate that a firm
accepting $150,000 in funds to perform
a subcontract be subject to the good
faith effort requirement, regardless of
the tier of its subcontract. While this
will result in prime contractors with
larger contracts and more subcontractors
bearing a larger compliance burden,
such a burden will be roughly
proportionate to the contract value.
One commenter suggested that the
regulation should include provisions
concerning the protection of sensitive
data provided to the government. As
with all other sensitive data received in
contract administration, sensitive data
provided under the clause is protected
by the Trade Secrets Act, 18 U.S.C.
1905. Proprietary information received
from a contractor is protected from
disclosure under Exemption 4 of the
FOIA. We do not see a need to
promulgate special procedures for
contract administration data provided
under this specific clause. Further,
Treasury lacks authority to issue a
regulation that would restrict the
availability of information under the
FOIA.
One commenter asserted that the
clause would expand OFCCP’s
jurisdiction. The regulation does no
more than echo the provision of section
342 setting forth referral to OFCCP as
one option in the event a contractor fails
to comply with the good faith effort
requirement. Any effect section 342 may
have on OFCCP’s jurisdiction is beyond
the scope of Treasury’s authority and
this regulation.
One commenter asserted that the
Department’s Regulatory Flexibility Act
analysis does not provide an adequate
factual basis to support the certification
in this proposal. Treasury believes that
the Regulatory Flexibility Act
certification is fully supported. While
application of the clause to small
business subcontractors will extend its
reach somewhat, the total number will
remain small. Of those small businesses
affected, most will already be subject to
OFCCP requirements. Finally, the clause
only applies to contracts above
$150,000, ensuring that compliance
costs will not be disproportionate to the
contract value and will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The commenter expressed concern
that the proposed rule does not increase
contract spending by the agency with
diverse owned businesses. Increasing
Departmental Offices’ spend with
specific businesses is beyond the scope
of the rulemaking, which concerns only
the requirement of section 342 that
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
15553
firms awarded contracts make good faith
efforts to include minorities and women
in their workforces.
A commenter supported the $150,000
threshold as applied to contracts with
small businesses, but suggested that the
clause should apply to all contracts with
large firms, regardless of dollar value.
To minimize the burden on all
contractors, Treasury will apply this
requirement to service contracts over
the simplified acquisition threshold,
$150,000.
III. Other Matters
Regulatory Flexibility Act Analysis
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.) generally requires
agencies to prepare a regulatory
flexibility analysis of any rule subject to
notice and comment rulemaking
requirements under the Administrative
Procedure Act or any other statute,
unless the agency certifies that the rule
will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities. It is hereby certified that this
rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities and thus no
initial regulatory flexibility analysis is
required.
First, this rule will not affect a
substantial number of small entities.
While this rule will affect all contracts
for services above the simplified
acquisition threshold ($150,000), it will
not affect a substantial number of small
entities because it will only apply to
those entities that actually contract with
Departmental Offices. In Fiscal Year
2011, DO contracted with 370 small
businesses.
Additionally, the rule’s economic
impact is not expected to be significant.
The rule satisfies the statutory
requirement that contractors affirm a
commitment to the fair inclusion of
minorities and women in the workforce,
but does so in a way that minimizes
burden on contractors. The rule
provides maximum flexibility for
contractors in implementing the
statutory requirement because it does
not impose any specific requirements on
contractor hiring. Further, most
contractors are already subject to and
have implemented other FAR
requirements that will satisfy this rule’s
requirements. Essentially all contracts
for services to which this requirement
applies are subject to FAR Clause
52.222–26, Equal Opportunity, which
requires, among other things, that
contractors complete the EEO Form 1
containing workforce demographic data.
Thus, contractors are already required to
compile and retain much of the data
E:\FR\FM\20MRR1.SGM
20MRR1
15554
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 54 / Thursday, March 20, 2014 / Rules and Regulations
required by this clause. Further,
contractors with supply and service
contracts of $50,000 or more and over
50 employees are required by
Department of Labor regulations to
develop affirmative action programs; a
contractor that develops and
implements such a program should be
able to provide documentation to
demonstrate compliance with the
clause.
Executive Order 12866
This rule is not a ‘‘significant
regulatory action’’ for the purposes of
Executive Order 12866.
Lists of Subjects in 48 CFR Part 1022
and 48 CFR Part 1052
Government procurement.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, the Department amends 48
CFR Chapter 10 to read as follows:
■ 1. Add Subchapter D consisting of
part 1022 to read as follows:
Subchapter D. Socioeconomic Programs
PART 1022—MINORITY AND WOMEN
INCLUSION
Subpart 1022.7. Fair inclusion of minorities
and women in contractor’s workforce
Sec.
1022.7000 Contract clause.
ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES
14:19 Mar 19, 2014
Jkt 232001
Contract clause.
Insert the clause at 1052.222–70,
Minority and Women Inclusion, in all
solicitations and contracts in support of
Departmental Offices for services that
exceed the simplified acquisition
threshold.
■ 2. Add subpart 1052.2 to Subchapter
H to read as follows:
PART 1052—SOLICITATION
PROVISIONS AND CONTRACT
CLAUSES
Subpart 1052.2—Texts of Provisions and
Clauses
Sec.
1052.222–70 Minority and Women
Inclusion
Authority: 12 U.S.C. 5452(c)(2).
Subpart 1052.2—Texts of Provisions
and Clauses
1052.222–70
Inclusion.
Minority and Women
As prescribed in 1022.7000, insert the
following clause:
Dated: February 28, 2014.
Iris B. Cooper,
Senior Procurement Executive, Department
of the Treasury.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
1022.7000
Subchapter H. Clauses and Forms
Paperwork Reduction Act
The information collections contained
in the notice of proposed rulemaking
have been previously approved by the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) and assigned control number
1505–0080. Under the Paperwork
Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. chapter 35), an
agency may not conduct or sponsor and
a person is not required to respond to
a collection of information unless it
displays a valid OMB control number.
Authority: 12 U.S.C. 5452.
Subpart 1022.7. Fair inclusion of
minorities and women
MINORITY AND WOMEN INCLUSION
(APR 2014)
‘‘Contractor confirms its commitment to
equal opportunity in employment and
contracting. To implement this commitment,
the Contractor shall ensure, to the maximum
extent possible consistent with applicable
law, the fair inclusion of minorities and
women in its workforce. The Contractor shall
insert the substance of this clause in all
subcontracts awarded under this Contract
whose dollar value exceeds $150,000. Within
ten business days of a written request from
the contracting officer, or such longer time as
the contracting officer determines, and
without any additional consideration
required from the Agency, the Contractor
shall provide documentation, satisfactory to
the Agency, of the actions it (and as
applicable, its subcontractors) has
undertaken to demonstrate its good faith
effort to comply with the aforementioned
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 9990
provisions. For purposes of this contract,
‘‘good faith effort’’ may include actions by
the contractor intended to identify and, if
present, remove barriers to minority and
women employment or expansion of
employment opportunities for minorities and
women within its workforce. Efforts to
remove such barriers may include, but are
not limited to, recruiting minorities and
women, providing job-related training, or
other activity that could lead to those results.
‘‘The documentation requested by the
contracting officer to demonstrate ‘‘good faith
effort’’ may include, but is not limited to, one
or more of the following:
1. The total number of Contractor’s
employees, and the number of minority and
women employees, by race, ethnicity, and
gender (e.g., an EEO–1);
2. A list of subcontract awards under the
Contract that includes: dollar amount, date of
award, and subcontractor’s race, ethnicity,
and/or gender ownership status;
3. Information similar to that required in
item 1, above, with respect to each
subcontractor; and/or
4. The Contractor’s plan to ensure that
minorities and women have appropriate
opportunities to enter and advance within its
workforce, including outreach efforts.
‘‘Consistent with Section 342(c)(3) of the
Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and
Consumer Protection Act (Pub. L. 111–203)
(Dodd-Frank Act), a failure to demonstrate to
the Director of the Agency’s Office of
Minority and Women Inclusion such good
faith efforts to include minorities and women
in the Contractor’s workforce (and as
applicable, the workforce of its
subcontractors), may result in termination of
the Contract for default, other contractual
remedies, or referral to the Office of Federal
Contract Compliance Programs. Compliance
with this clause does not, however,
necessarily satisfy the requirements of
Executive Order 11246, as amended, nor does
it preclude OFCCP compliance evaluations
and/or enforcement actions undertaken
pursuant to that Order.
‘‘For purposes of this clause, the terms
‘‘minority,’’ ‘‘minority-owned business’’ and
‘‘women-owned business’’ shall have the
meanings set forth in Section 342(g) of the
Dodd-Frank Act.’’
[FR Doc. 2014–05846 Filed 3–19–14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810–25–P
E:\FR\FM\20MRR1.SGM
20MRR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 54 (Thursday, March 20, 2014)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 15551-15554]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-05846]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
48 CFR Parts 1022 and 1052
RIN 1505-AC40
Department of the Treasury Acquisition Regulations; Contract
Clause on Minority and Women Inclusion in Contractor Workforce
AGENCY: Departmental Offices, Treasury.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of the Treasury (the Department) is amending
the Department of the Treasury Acquisition Regulation (DTAR) to include
a contract clause on minority and women inclusion, as required by the
Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 (the
Dodd-Frank Act).
DATES: Effective Date: April 21, 2014.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lorraine Cole, Director, Office of
Minority and Women Inclusion, 202-927-8181 (this is not a toll-free
number) or lorraine.cole@treasury.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background and Proposed Rule
Section 342 of the Dodd-Frank Act, 12 U.S.C. 5452, established an
Office of Minority and Women Inclusion (OMWI) within certain agencies,
including the Departmental Offices of the Department of the Treasury.
Section 342(c)(2) provides that covered agencies shall require
contractors to provide a written statement that the ``contractor shall
ensure, to the maximum extent possible, the fair inclusion of women and
minorities in the workforce of the contractor, and as applicable,
subcontractors.'' This rule will implement the statement required by
the Dodd-Frank Act through a contract clause.
The contract clause, which is similar to those adopted by other
OMWI agencies, requires that a contractor make good faith efforts to
include minorities and women in its workforce. This standard is derived
from section 342(c)(3) of the Dodd-Frank Act, which provides for
remedies, including termination, against a contractor that fails to
make good faith efforts to include minorities and women in its
workforce. Treasury interprets ``good faith efforts'' to mean efforts
consistent with the Equal Protection Clause of the Constitution, Title
VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and Executive Order 11246, as
amended, such as the identification and elimination of employment
barriers, the widespread publication of employment opportunities, and
other forms of outreach to minorities and women.
Section 342 applies to ``all contracts . . . for services of any
kind,'' but the section does not define the term ``contract.'' Treasury
applies the clause to all service contracts above the simplified
acquisition threshold. Further, as noted above, section 342 applies to
Treasury Departmental Offices (DO). DO does not currently include an
office responsible for operational procurement; acquisitions in support
of DO are performed primarily by the Internal Revenue Service Office of
Treasury Procurement Services. The clause will be included in all
service contracts in support of requirements originating from DO,
regardless of the Treasury component performing the acquisition.
II. This Final Rule
In its August 21, 2012, proposed rule, the Department solicited
public comments on all aspects of the proposal. This comment period
closed on October 22, 2012, and eight comment letters were received.
Comments were received from interest groups, private citizens, and law
students. This section sets out significant comments raised by the
commenters and the Department's response to these comments. As set
forth below, the Department has considered the comments and is adopting
the proposed rule with two minor changes in response to comments
received, which are noted below.
Public Comments and Department Responses
One commenter suggested that the clause should apply only to
subcontracts subject to reporting under FAR clause 52.204-10. The
Department declines to adopt this suggestion. It is, however, the
Department's intent that the clause should be required only in
subcontracts that are awarded to support a covered contract. To clarify
this point, Treasury has modified the language of the clause to require
flow-down only to ``subcontracts awarded under'' the contract.
One commenter suggested inserting the language ``including Title
VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act'' after ''To implement this
commitment, the Contractor shall ensure, to the maximum extent possible
consistent with applicable law, the fair inclusion of minorities and
women in its workforce.'' The commenter contends that, without the
insertion, there is a danger of discrimination against men and non-
minorities.
The Department does not believe that a specific reference to Title
VII is necessary. The Department believes that its contractors are
aware of their obligations under that statute. Further, our contracts
contain a separate clause, FAR 52.222-26, Equal Opportunity, that
expressly prohibits discrimination.
Several commenters suggested that the Department require specified
documentation to demonstrate a ``good faith effort.'' These suggestions
are not adopted. The clause provides Treasury with the authority to
obtain
[[Page 15552]]
employment data and other information regarding good faith efforts to
the extent necessary for its review of a contractor's inclusion of
minorities and women in its workforce. Treasury does not believe that
requiring contractors to submit specific information absent a request
or predetermining what must be included in a request would serve any
useful purpose. Moreover, the focus of the clause, and of the relevant
provisions of section 342, is on a contractor's overall efforts to
reduce barriers to employment of minorities and women. Specific
information on individual employees will rarely, if ever, be required
for that purpose.
Two commenters suggested that the clause be modified to provide 60
days for contractors to provide information requested by the
contracting officer. The suggestion is not adopted. Section 342 and the
clause require contractors to engage in good faith efforts at all times
during contract performance, not merely in the 60 days preceding a
contracting officer's review. Because a good faith efforts plan should
be in place at all times during contract performance, 10 days will
normally be sufficient to forward a copy to the contracting officer.
The other data contemplated by the clause are factual in nature, and it
is reasonable for contractors to be prepared to provide them. Moreover,
the clause requires that information be provided within 10 business
days of a written request ``or such longer time as the contracting
officer determines.'' Contracting officers have a duty to act in good
faith in administering contracts. Thus, if unusual circumstances
existed or if there was a need for information not listed in the clause
and not immediately available, the contracting officer would be
required to provide the contractor a reasonable period of time in which
to respond to the request.
One commenter suggested that the rule be modified to expressly
provide that completion of the EEO-1 form and compliance with
applicable Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs (OFCCP) rules
are sufficient to establish compliance with the requirements of the
clause. The Department declines to adopt this suggestion. With respect
to the EEO-1 form, item (1) of the clause provides that one type of
information the contracting officer may request is the total number of
the contractor's employees and the number of women and minority
employees by race, ethnicity, and gender. The EEO-1 form contains this
information; there is no need for an explicit statement that providing
the form will provide the information contemplated by this element of
the clause. With respect to a contractor's plan to make good faith
efforts, addressed by item (4) of the clause, the clause is drafted to
provide the contractor wide discretion to determine what efforts should
be made to remove barriers to the employment and of women and
minorities. In most instances, a contractor that establishes an
affirmative action program compliant with the OFCCP regulations will
not need to take any additional steps to comply with the good faith
requirement. However, expressly incorporating compliance with the OFCCP
regulations as a standard for meeting the good faith effort requirement
would place Treasury in the position of evaluating compliance with the
OFCCP regulations, something it has neither the expertise nor the
authority to do. Accordingly, the Department does not adopt the
suggested change. To clarify the relationship between compliance with
OFCCP regulations and the good faith requirement contained in the
clause, however, the Department does add language to the clause to the
effect that compliance with the clause neither satisfies contractors'
obligations under Executive Order 11246, as amended, nor precludes
OFCCP evaluations or enforcement actions undertaken pursuant to that
Order.
One commenter suggested that the clause should be modified to
expressly state that it applies only to contracts with the Department
of the Treasury. As the commenter acknowledges, the prescription at 48
CFR 1022.7000 requires that the clause be inserted only in contracts in
support of Treasury Departmental Offices. As with all FAR clauses, the
clause will apply only to the contracts in which it is inserted.
Language expressly providing that the clause does not form part of
contracts in which it does not appear (and in which its insertion is
not required by regulation) is unnecessary and would be potentially
confusing.
Two commenters suggested that the proposed rule only require
information from subcontractors to the extent that it is available. The
Department declines to adopt this suggestion. Treasury cannot fulfill
its statutory responsibilities without information concerning
subcontractors. Moreover, the flow down provision of the clause
establishes a required mechanism for ensuring that subcontractors are
contractually bound to provide necessary information to the prime
contractor.
One commenter suggested that the clause should not be limited to
contracts above $150,000, and asserted that interpreting the statutory
language to apply only to such contracts ``could place treasury in
noncompliance with the Dodd-Frank Act.'' Section 342 does not define
the term ``contract.'' While we are aware that the term is defined in
some contexts to include any legally binding procurement instrument, we
do not believe that Congress intended the good faith efforts
requirement to apply regardless of contract dollar value. The burden
imposed by the clause is proportionate to the size of the contractor's
workforce, not to the value of the contract in which the clause is
inserted. Thus, absent a contract value threshold, the clause could
impose a burden that is large in relation to the contract price and
make it difficult or impossible to retain contractors to perform
smaller requirements. Requiring the clause only in contracts above the
Simplified Acquisition Threshold, currently $150,000 in the FAR,
represents an appropriate balance between making the clause broadly
applicable and not including it where doing so would create a
disproportionate burden. Treasury has determined that it is appropriate
to interpret the statutory language to apply only to contracts above
that threshold.
One commenter suggested that there should be remedies for non-
compliance with the clause other than termination for default. Because
the clause will be a requirement of the contract in which it is
included, standard contractual remedies will be available in the event
of non-compliance. The specific remedies available will depend on the
nature of the underlying contract, but may include such options as
downward equitable adjustments, lowered or negative contractor
performance ratings, discontinuance or curtailment of new task order
awards, or non-exercise of options, withholding of progress payments,
termination of contracts, and debarment from receiving future
contracts. Termination for default remains the ultimate contractual
sanction in the event of an uncured failure to comply with the
requirements of the clause.
One commenter suggested that the definition of ``minorities'' in
the clause should be expanded. The clause incorporates the definition
set forth in section 342, from which Treasury declines to depart.
Two commenters noted that the term ``fair inclusion'' is not
defined in the statute or proposed contract language. One commenter
also noted that there appears to be no consequences ``for not reporting
or for poor numbers in a report.'' Treasury has considered providing a
more specific definition of good faith efforts, but determined that
doing so would not be feasible. The actions that might be appropriate
to
[[Page 15553]]
eliminate barriers to the employment of minorities and women will vary
significantly depending on a particular contractor's organization and
workforce. The commenter is incorrect that there are no consequences
for failing to report required information. The clause will form part
of a contract, and Treasury will have available standard contract
remedies, up to and including termination of the contract for default
in case of an uncured failure. Under no circumstances, however, will
there be consequences for reporting ``poor'' numbers. While the
composition of a contractor's workforce may help inform a determination
of what barrier-reduction efforts are appropriate, the clause does not
require--and Treasury does not seek--any specific set of numbers, or
any specific changes in numbers over time. A contractor that makes good
faith efforts to identify and eliminate barriers to the employment of
minorities and women (and that complies with applicable reporting
requirements) will fully comply with the clause, regardless of the
ultimate effect of those efforts on its workforce.
One commenter suggested that the clause should be revised so as to
list examples of information a contractor could choose to submit in
order to establish that it has engaged in good faith efforts. This
suggestion is not adopted. Treasury has an obligation under section 342
to determine whether a contractor is in compliance with the applicable
good faith efforts requirements. While the information necessary to
demonstrate such compliance will vary significantly depending on a
contractor's organization and its approach to the requirement, Treasury
must have the ability to obtain the information it determines necessary
under the circumstances. Permitting a contractor to unilaterally
determine what information is necessary for Treasury's determination
would not accomplish the purpose of the clause.
One commenter suggested that there should be a cutoff beyond the
$150,000 threshold to limit the number of subcontractors to which the
clause applies. The commenter asserts that there may be many tiers of
subcontractors, ``hundreds (and possibly thousands) of subcontracts''
under a contract that exceed the threshold. We do not accept the
suggestion. First, the commenter's concern as to the number of possibly
affected subcontracts appears to be overstated. In Fiscal Year 2012,
only two contracts supporting Treasury Departmental Offices exceeded
$10 million. Given the relatively modest value of Departmental Offices
contracts, few if any will involve ``hundreds'' of subcontracts. More
importantly, we consider it appropriate that a firm accepting $150,000
in funds to perform a subcontract be subject to the good faith effort
requirement, regardless of the tier of its subcontract. While this will
result in prime contractors with larger contracts and more
subcontractors bearing a larger compliance burden, such a burden will
be roughly proportionate to the contract value.
One commenter suggested that the regulation should include
provisions concerning the protection of sensitive data provided to the
government. As with all other sensitive data received in contract
administration, sensitive data provided under the clause is protected
by the Trade Secrets Act, 18 U.S.C. 1905. Proprietary information
received from a contractor is protected from disclosure under Exemption
4 of the FOIA. We do not see a need to promulgate special procedures
for contract administration data provided under this specific clause.
Further, Treasury lacks authority to issue a regulation that would
restrict the availability of information under the FOIA.
One commenter asserted that the clause would expand OFCCP's
jurisdiction. The regulation does no more than echo the provision of
section 342 setting forth referral to OFCCP as one option in the event
a contractor fails to comply with the good faith effort requirement.
Any effect section 342 may have on OFCCP's jurisdiction is beyond the
scope of Treasury's authority and this regulation.
One commenter asserted that the Department's Regulatory Flexibility
Act analysis does not provide an adequate factual basis to support the
certification in this proposal. Treasury believes that the Regulatory
Flexibility Act certification is fully supported. While application of
the clause to small business subcontractors will extend its reach
somewhat, the total number will remain small. Of those small businesses
affected, most will already be subject to OFCCP requirements. Finally,
the clause only applies to contracts above $150,000, ensuring that
compliance costs will not be disproportionate to the contract value and
will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities.
The commenter expressed concern that the proposed rule does not
increase contract spending by the agency with diverse owned businesses.
Increasing Departmental Offices' spend with specific businesses is
beyond the scope of the rulemaking, which concerns only the requirement
of section 342 that firms awarded contracts make good faith efforts to
include minorities and women in their workforces.
A commenter supported the $150,000 threshold as applied to
contracts with small businesses, but suggested that the clause should
apply to all contracts with large firms, regardless of dollar value. To
minimize the burden on all contractors, Treasury will apply this
requirement to service contracts over the simplified acquisition
threshold, $150,000.
III. Other Matters
Regulatory Flexibility Act Analysis
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) generally
requires agencies to prepare a regulatory flexibility analysis of any
rule subject to notice and comment rulemaking requirements under the
Administrative Procedure Act or any other statute, unless the agency
certifies that the rule will not have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities. It is hereby certified that
this rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities and thus no initial regulatory flexibility
analysis is required.
First, this rule will not affect a substantial number of small
entities. While this rule will affect all contracts for services above
the simplified acquisition threshold ($150,000), it will not affect a
substantial number of small entities because it will only apply to
those entities that actually contract with Departmental Offices. In
Fiscal Year 2011, DO contracted with 370 small businesses.
Additionally, the rule's economic impact is not expected to be
significant. The rule satisfies the statutory requirement that
contractors affirm a commitment to the fair inclusion of minorities and
women in the workforce, but does so in a way that minimizes burden on
contractors. The rule provides maximum flexibility for contractors in
implementing the statutory requirement because it does not impose any
specific requirements on contractor hiring. Further, most contractors
are already subject to and have implemented other FAR requirements that
will satisfy this rule's requirements. Essentially all contracts for
services to which this requirement applies are subject to FAR Clause
52.222-26, Equal Opportunity, which requires, among other things, that
contractors complete the EEO Form 1 containing workforce demographic
data. Thus, contractors are already required to compile and retain much
of the data
[[Page 15554]]
required by this clause. Further, contractors with supply and service
contracts of $50,000 or more and over 50 employees are required by
Department of Labor regulations to develop affirmative action programs;
a contractor that develops and implements such a program should be able
to provide documentation to demonstrate compliance with the clause.
Executive Order 12866
This rule is not a ``significant regulatory action'' for the
purposes of Executive Order 12866.
Paperwork Reduction Act
The information collections contained in the notice of proposed
rulemaking have been previously approved by the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) and assigned control number 1505-0080. Under the
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. chapter 35), an agency may not
conduct or sponsor and a person is not required to respond to a
collection of information unless it displays a valid OMB control
number.
Lists of Subjects in 48 CFR Part 1022 and 48 CFR Part 1052
Government procurement.
Dated: February 28, 2014.
Iris B. Cooper,
Senior Procurement Executive, Department of the Treasury.
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, the Department amends 48
CFR Chapter 10 to read as follows:
0
1. Add Subchapter D consisting of part 1022 to read as follows:
Subchapter D. Socioeconomic Programs
PART 1022--MINORITY AND WOMEN INCLUSION
Subpart 1022.7. Fair inclusion of minorities and women in contractor's
workforce
Sec.
1022.7000 Contract clause.
Authority: 12 U.S.C. 5452.
Subpart 1022.7. Fair inclusion of minorities and women
1022.7000 Contract clause.
Insert the clause at 1052.222-70, Minority and Women Inclusion, in
all solicitations and contracts in support of Departmental Offices for
services that exceed the simplified acquisition threshold.
0
2. Add subpart 1052.2 to Subchapter H to read as follows:
Subchapter H. Clauses and Forms
PART 1052--SOLICITATION PROVISIONS AND CONTRACT CLAUSES
Subpart 1052.2--Texts of Provisions and Clauses
Sec.
1052.222-70 Minority and Women Inclusion
Authority: 12 U.S.C. 5452(c)(2).
Subpart 1052.2--Texts of Provisions and Clauses
1052.222-70 Minority and Women Inclusion.
As prescribed in 1022.7000, insert the following clause:
MINORITY AND WOMEN INCLUSION (APR 2014)
``Contractor confirms its commitment to equal opportunity in
employment and contracting. To implement this commitment, the
Contractor shall ensure, to the maximum extent possible consistent
with applicable law, the fair inclusion of minorities and women in
its workforce. The Contractor shall insert the substance of this
clause in all subcontracts awarded under this Contract whose dollar
value exceeds $150,000. Within ten business days of a written
request from the contracting officer, or such longer time as the
contracting officer determines, and without any additional
consideration required from the Agency, the Contractor shall provide
documentation, satisfactory to the Agency, of the actions it (and as
applicable, its subcontractors) has undertaken to demonstrate its
good faith effort to comply with the aforementioned provisions. For
purposes of this contract, ``good faith effort'' may include actions
by the contractor intended to identify and, if present, remove
barriers to minority and women employment or expansion of employment
opportunities for minorities and women within its workforce. Efforts
to remove such barriers may include, but are not limited to,
recruiting minorities and women, providing job-related training, or
other activity that could lead to those results.
``The documentation requested by the contracting officer to
demonstrate ``good faith effort'' may include, but is not limited
to, one or more of the following:
1. The total number of Contractor's employees, and the number of
minority and women employees, by race, ethnicity, and gender (e.g.,
an EEO-1);
2. A list of subcontract awards under the Contract that
includes: dollar amount, date of award, and subcontractor's race,
ethnicity, and/or gender ownership status;
3. Information similar to that required in item 1, above, with
respect to each subcontractor; and/or
4. The Contractor's plan to ensure that minorities and women
have appropriate opportunities to enter and advance within its
workforce, including outreach efforts.
``Consistent with Section 342(c)(3) of the Dodd-Frank Wall
Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (Pub. L. 111-203) (Dodd-
Frank Act), a failure to demonstrate to the Director of the Agency's
Office of Minority and Women Inclusion such good faith efforts to
include minorities and women in the Contractor's workforce (and as
applicable, the workforce of its subcontractors), may result in
termination of the Contract for default, other contractual remedies,
or referral to the Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs.
Compliance with this clause does not, however, necessarily satisfy
the requirements of Executive Order 11246, as amended, nor does it
preclude OFCCP compliance evaluations and/or enforcement actions
undertaken pursuant to that Order.
``For purposes of this clause, the terms ``minority,''
``minority-owned business'' and ``women-owned business'' shall have
the meanings set forth in Section 342(g) of the Dodd-Frank Act.''
[FR Doc. 2014-05846 Filed 3-19-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-25-P